Home Blog Page 28

“Disclosure Day” Ending – Steven Spielberg Breaks the Cliffhanger

0


“Disclosure Day” alleges that the U.S. government is hiding evidence of aliens. Here’s what Steven Spielberg had to say about that mysterious ending:

play

Spoiler alert! We’re discussing important details about the ending of “Disclosure Day” (currently in theaters). If you haven’t seen the movie or don’t want to know, stop reading.

NEW YORK – When Steven Spielberg was a kid, he hated “Hansel and Gretel.”

The Brothers Grimm fairy tale tells the story of a pair of hungry brothers who get lost in the forest, stumble upon a hut made of sweets, and then become trapped by a child-eating witch.

“It was very scary,” Spielberg recalls. “It was the scariest fairy tale I ever heard from my father and mother. They were always happy to tell it to me in the most graphic way possible. Being lured into a space by false promises? It’s a story of betrayal, after all.”

“Hansel and Gretel” plays a surprisingly important role in Spielberg’s new film “Disclosure Day.” The film follows Daniel (Josh O’Connor), a whistleblower who threatens to release decades of government documents proving that aliens exist.

This sci-fi adventure stars Emily Blunt as TV meteorologist Margaret. Margaret one day unlocks extraterrestrial abilities that allow her to deeply communicate with strangers and tap into their most intimate thoughts and fears.

How will “Disclosure Day” end?

Margaret experiences a series of strange dreams, including one from “Hansel and Gretel.” Her mysterious visions eventually lead her to Daniel and Hugo (Colman Domingo), an advocate of alien disclosure.

Here’s where things get really trippy. Through storybook-like flashbacks, we learn that Daniel and Margaret met as children. One night, the two are invited into the forest by an alien disguised as an animal. After arriving at the snow-covered hut, the young children were endowed with cosmic skills. He gave Daniel a sophisticated language and Margaret a deep sense of empathy and connection.

The extraterrestrials erased Daniel and Margaret’s memories of that night, knowing that one day the aliens would return and they would be able to carry an otherworldly message to the citizens of Earth.

At Hugo’s urging, Margaret and Daniel play a prank on a local TV station. Decades of secret information supporting a top-level alien cover-up is released, and it is quickly picked up by national news channels.

Footage dating back to the 1940s reveals that UAPs have landed on Earth many times before, with the purpose of government officials torturing and killing extraterrestrials. The film references famous alien conspiracies such as Roswell and Nixon-Gleason, suggesting that perhaps there is some truth to them.

Spielberg and screenwriter David Koepp (Jurassic Park) immersed themselves in numerous transcripts of Congressional testimony, documentaries and books on the subject, including Daniel Kehoe’s Flying Saucers Are Real.

“He was the first whistleblower to say, ‘Hey, all these things I’ve been seeing are real. I know they’re trying to discredit everyone, but this is what’s happening,'” Cope said.

Cope has long believed there is life beyond this planet, and thinks we are “probably” being visited by aliens.

But after reading Kehoe’s book, Cope says, “it became undeniable that there was 80 years of government oppression. There’s no question about it.” “If you read their own documents, you can see that they have a plan on how to hide this. So in my head, it went from a ‘maybe’ to a certainty.”

Who are the aliens in “Disclosure Day”?

The film’s striking visuals inspired Spielberg to embrace “our cultural memory” of aliens, Cope said. For example, the film’s portrayal of extraterrestrials closely fits pop culture stereotypes of small, pale creatures with large eyes, bulbous heads, and rail-thin bodies.

The alien’s ability to take on the forms of a stag, fox, and cardinal is also consistent with what people have reported about their visits.

“We wanted to incorporate as much of the existing lore as possible, but we didn’t want to say, ‘Everything you thought was wrong,'” Cope says. Instead, “we wanted to say, ‘Here’s the evidence.'” We wanted to take everything that seemed mostly reliable and present it as a unified theory of everything we know about UAPs. A big part of that was having the aliens appear as animals. ”

What is the last line of “Disclosure Day”?

The movie ends with people all over the world glued to their televisions and smartphones as news confirms that aliens are real. At the last moment, extraterrestrials arrive at Margaret’s news station. The creature quietly says something to Daniel, who whispers it to Margaret.

“Listen,” Margaret says on air, and the screen goes black and the credits roll.

Director Spielberg has said that this was the first scene he came up with for Disclosure Day, and that there was no version of the script in which he heard what Margaret would say next. We’ll never know what Daniel whispered in her ear either.

“I’m never going to give that away,” Spielberg says. “No one (other than the actors) knows that and is not allowed to say it.”

Director Koop says he always wanted the film to end with the words, “Listen.”

“It said everything I wanted to say,” Cope says. “‘Listen, because this space boy has told me many interesting things. Listen, because empathy means listening to each other.’ These are also the first words of most Hebrew prayers.

“When I found one word that said it all, I realized I should stop talking.”

The ending of “Disclosure Day” leaves a lot of room for speculation as to how people will react. While Spielberg believes such an event would unite the world, Cope believes there could be a mass uprising against the scientists, government officials, and even religious leaders who were hiding this information.

“Personally, I think it would be in the interest of humanity, but it would be a painful process with a lot of suffering and death to get there,” Cope said. “But I know Stephen will disagree with me. So that’s for future discussion!”

Will the Spurs or Knicks win?

0

play

The 2026 NBA Finals will return to San Antonio for Game 5 between the New York Knicks and San Antonio Spurs.

Jalen Brunson and the Knicks will have a chance to close out the series on the road, having already won the first two games at Frostbank Center. The Spurs and Knicks split the two games played in New York, with the Knicks leading 3-1.

Victor Wembaneyama and the Spurs will have to crawl back into the series after the team gave up a 29-point lead and lost Game 4 on Wednesday, June 10th.

The Knicks are seeking their first NBA Championship since winning only twice in 1970 and 1973, but they’ve already given their fan base something to look forward to by reaching the NBA Finals for the first time since 1999.

What NBA experts expect to happen in Game 5 of the series:

Knicks vs. Spurs Game 5 predictions

USA TODAY Staff: Spurs are strong at home too

The USA TODAY Sports staff agrees the Spurs will force a Game 6 at Madison Square Garden on Tuesday. We recommend:

Lorenzo Reyes: Spurs 109, Knicks 106

James H. Williams: Spurs 105, Knicks 104

Scooby Axon: Spurs 121, Knicks 103

Mark Jannot: Spurs 112, Knicks 105

Victoria Hernandez: Spurs 108, Knicks 105

John Hoefling: Spurs 104, Knicks 98

Dimers: Spurs will stop Knicks

The website predicts the final score of Saturday’s Game 5 will be a 112-106 win for the Spurs. This prediction is based on each team’s average result after 10,000 simulated games.

ESPN: Spurs expected to beat Knicks

The website gives the Knicks a 43.2% chance of defeating San Antonio in Game 5 of the series.

How to watch Game 5 of the NBA Finals

  • time: 8:30pm ET
  • where: Frost Bank Center (San Antonio, Texas)
  • tv set: ABC
  • stream: ESPN, Fubo, YouTube TV

Princess Kate pays tribute to Princess Diana with Trooping the Color

0

play

LONDON – Princess Kate paid tribute to her late mother-in-law, Princess Diana, on Saturday by wearing a pale blue and white outfit at Trooping the Color, King Charles III’s official birthday parade.

Kate’s powder blue coat, which features white trim and button detailing, was designed by French-born designer Catherine Walker, who was frequently worn by Princess Diana in the ’90s.

In fact, it was a nearly exact replica of the design Princess Diana wore in 1987.

Saturday’s celebrations marked the 45th anniversary of the first Trooping the Color ceremony in 1981, a month before Princess Diana married Prince Charles. Dame Diana Spencer, who was just 19 at the time, chose a blue floral print outfit by British designer Bill Pashley for her debut.

In 1981’s Trooping the Color, Princess Diana rode in a carriage with Prince Andrew as her husband, Prince Charles, rode horses as part of a procession. The event was memorable not only for Princess Diana’s debut, but also for the shocking incident in which a pistol-wielding teenager opened fire on the Queen as she rode by on horseback.

The shot startled the queen’s horse, but she was soon able to bring it back under control.

According to British media, he fired six blank rounds before being subdued by guards and police.

The Duchess of Cambridge, who has been married to Princess Diana’s son William for 15 years, often pays tribute to her late mother-in-law through her clothing and jewelery choices, from double-breasted coat dresses to pearl drop earrings. And just like the deceased princess, she frequently re-wears her fashions.

Princess Diana first wore Catherine Walker’s powder blue coat when she escorted Prince William and his nephew Peter Phillips to the Easter service in 1987. When she opted for the look again, she wore it without a cream-colored blouse underneath and paired it with a pearl necklace.

Last weekend, Kate attended a family wedding wearing a pearl bracelet that previously belonged to Princess Diana, and of course her sapphire engagement ring is the same ring she received from Prince Charles when he proposed.

On the Border closes all of its restaurants

0

play

On the Border Mexican Grill & Cantina, a Tex-Mex restaurant chain, has closed all of its restaurants across the United States.

When On the Border filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in March 2025, it operated 60 On the Border restaurants. Many reopened after Houston-based Papa’s Restaurants acquired the chain in May 2025 through an auction process.

“On the Border has already undergone a radical menu overhaul rooted in the same culinary standards that have defined the Pappas name across Texas for decades,” the company said in a May 1 news release, adding, “The team has improved the quality of our food, strengthened our operations and improved the overall guest experience.” Pappas Restaurants Group’s portfolio includes Pappadeaux Seafood Kitchen, Pappasito’s Cantina, Pappas Bros. Steakhouse, Pappas Bar-BQ, Pappas Burger and Yiayia’s Greek Kitchen, with more than 100 locations across the United States.

But on Friday, June 12, On the Border announced it was closing all of its stores and evaluating the future of the brand, according to a statement to The Oklahoman, part of the USA TODAY Network. The restaurant chain had one location in Oklahoma City and another in Tulsa.

“On the Border Mexican Grill & Cantina has made the difficult decision to proceed with a significant transition in restaurant operations, which includes closing our company locations by the end of the day on Friday, June 12, 2026,” OTB Hospitality said in a statement emailed to The Oklahoman and later shared with USA TODAY.

In addition to the Oklahoma closures, restaurants in cities including Grand Rapids, Michigan, Bucks County, Pennsylvania, and Wichita Falls, Texas have also closed, USA TODAY Network reported.

Franchise locations in South Dakota, Florida, Nevada, California and South Korea will operate independently and remain open, the statement said.

On the Border also announced the closure of its stores on its website, writing, “After many years of serving our community, On the Border Mexican Grill & Cantina has decided to close our restaurant locations. This was an incredibly difficult decision to make. We are deeply grateful to our guests and team members who have supported On the Border over the years. Thank you to everyone who has been a part of this journey.”

On the Border’s bankruptcy in 2025 led to closure.

The company was founded in 1982 as On the Border South Texas Café and was “purposed to share bold border-style cuisine with our customers,” Jonathan Tibbs, OTB Holdings’ chief restructuring officer, said in a 2025 bankruptcy court filing.

The chain is one of several large casual dining chains to file for bankruptcy in the past two years, including Hooters, Red Lobster and TGI Fridays.

On the Border closed more than 70 stores after filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in March 2025. “On the Border has been weighed down by macroeconomic factors that have adversely affected the company in recent years. Casual dining restaurants have been severely impacted by consumer sensitivity to eating out versus staying indoors,” Tibus said in court records.

However, many were reopened after Papas Restaurants acquired the chain. The company said in a statement that the June 12 closure was “the result of a thorough evaluation of our business and was not made lightly.”

“We are currently evaluating the future of the On the Border brand and considering various strategic options,” the company said in a statement. “Our immediate focus is to support our team members through this transition and ensure an orderly and respectful closure.”

Contributors: Anna Barboza, Dan Basso, Fernando Cervantes, Jenna Prestininzi, Ben ShapiroMike Snyder is a national trends news reporter for USA TODAY. You can follow him on Threads, Bluesky, and X, and email him at: mike snyder & @mikegsnider.bsky.social & @mikesnider & msnider@usatoday.com.

Deep-sea goblin shark is found alive at sea for the first time

0

play

A creepy deep-sea creature has been spotted alive in its natural habitat for the first time.

Researchers at the University of Hawaii at Manoa have recorded the first two live sightings of the rare deep-sea goblin shark, Mitsculina austoni, in the South Pacific, according to a University of Hawaii at Manoa news release. One of the sharks was discovered near Jervis Island (about halfway between Hawaii and the Cook Islands) in 2019, and the other was discovered in the Tonga Trench in 2024.

Until these findings were published in the Journal of Fish Biology, goblin sharks were only photographed or reported after they were hooked onto a fishing line and brought to the surface, where they died shortly after, the news release said. Additionally, the location where the shark was found appears to be an extension of the previously understood range of shark habitat.

Goblin sharks are known to inhabit a narrow region of the Pacific Ocean off the coast of the western United States, Australia, Japan, and other parts of the Atlantic and Indian Oceans, according to a news release. The new discovery expands the shark’s geographic range into the central Pacific Ocean.

“It’s extremely important that we still do natural history research,” Aaron Judah, the study’s lead author and a doctoral candidate at the University of Hawai’i at Manoa, said in a news release. “New discoveries like this show that there is still much to explore in our deep ocean home. Given the newly expanded geographic range of the goblin shark, this species can be included in regional management and national biodiversity lists, where we previously didn’t even know it was there.”

What is a deep sea goblin shark?

Deep-sea goblin sharks are a member of the order Salmonidae, which includes well-known species such as great whites, basking sharks, and shortfin mako sharks. According to the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, the goblin shark’s long, protruding snout is covered with sensing organs that help it detect electrical fields in the deep ocean. Sharks can extend their jaws all the way to the tip of their snouts to catch fish, squid, and crustaceans.

According to the Australian Museum, the goblin shark can grow up to 12.8 feet and is often referred to as a “living fossil” because it comes from the family Goblin shark, which dates back 125 million years.

How were sharks discovered?

During a 2019 Marine Exploration Trust expedition aboard the EV Nautilus, the research vessel known for discovering the wreckage of the Titanic, the crew used a remote camera system to capture footage of what they believed to be a goblin shark, according to a news release. In 2025, Judah combed through the footage and confirmed that the team had indeed found this rare shark.

The second discovery was made in 2024 during an expedition by the research vessel RV Dagon to the Tonga Trench, the world’s second largest trench after the Mariana Trench. Scientists on board the Dagon used baited cameras to capture footage of the shark.

Greta Cross is USA TODAY’s national trends reporter. Story ideas? Email her at gcross@usatoday.com.

Princess Kate attends Trooping the Color 2026

0

play

LONDON – Princess Kate looks happy at Trooping the Color 2026.

On June 13, at King Charles’ annual royal birthday celebrations, the 44-year-old Princess of Wales appeared in good spirits as she took part in a traditional London parade with her family.

For the annual occasion, the princess opted for a powder blue and white ensemble and matching hat. It’s a sweet tribute to her late mother-in-law, Princess Diana, who wore a nearly identical outfit in 1987.

She was seen leaving Buckingham Palace in a horse-drawn carriage with her three children early Saturday morning. A smiling Princess Charlotte wore a white ribbon in her hair, while Prince George and Louis waved to the crowd.

Kate is a colonel in the Irish Guards Regiment and wears an Irish Guards brooch.

Duchess Kate’s light blue jacket was designed by Catherine Walker, and was also worn by Princess Diana, paying homage to her late mother-in-law. Walker was a French-born designer based in London who passed away in 2010. Lady Diana Spencer first attended Trooping 45 years ago, just before her wedding to Charles.

This year’s costumes are reminiscent of last year’s blue color palette. In 2025, twins Kate and Charlotte wear aqua-colored outfits.

The long-sleeved coat dress, featuring a structured contrasting white, was reminiscent of the look Princess Diana wore during her 1992 visit to Delhi, India.

The Trooping of the Color is an annual ceremonial and military parade commemorating the birthday of the current British monarch, whose actual birthday is November 14th. This year’s Trooping the Color will be King Charles’ fourth.

This royal affair also marks an anniversary of sorts for Duchess Kate. Last year’s annual event was the first Trooping of the Color since the princess announced she was in remission from cancer. This year, the royal family returned to its regularly scheduled program of official engagements and family events, including the recent royal wedding of Princess Anne’s son Peter Phillips and Harriet Sperling.

For the blissful event, Kate chose a cream-colored tweed midi dress by Roland Mouret, which featured a belted bodice and a pointed collar with a pleated skirt. The royal accessorized her look with a wide-brimmed straw hat adorned with a neutral-colored ribbon and classic nude pumps.

Duchess Kate attended this year’s Trooping of the Color with her daughter Charlotte, her husband Prince William, second in line to the British throne, and their sons Prince George, 12, and Prince Louis, eight.

Contributors: Jay Stahl and Taijuan Moorman, USA TODAY

El Niño has a major negative impact on the economy. The reason is as follows

0


El Niño, the natural warming of Pacific waters, can have a major impact on the global economy, causing trillions of dollars in damages around the world.

play

The beginning of an El Niño weather pattern has been officially declared by federal forecasters, and there are signs it could become “very strong” and very costly.

In fact, El Niño, the natural warming of Pacific waters, could have devastating effects on the global economy, reaching trillions of dollars worldwide, and the current pattern is likely to continue as well.

For example, a 2023 study suggests that the 1982-1983 El Niño caused a global income loss of $4.1 trillion, and the 1997-1998 El Niño cost about $5.7 trillion.

“Current projections suggest this could be the most damaging El Niño on record,” said Justin Mankin, an associate professor of geography at Dartmouth who studies El Niño’s economic impact.

What impact will El Niño have on the global economy?

El Niño tends to slow global economic growth and cause trillions of dollars in losses, mainly due to the fact that it causes destructive weather patterns that affect agriculture, infrastructure, and supply chains.

Experts say El Niño causes widespread changes in weather and climate patterns in the years it occurs, resulting in a range of global disasters, including devastating floods, crop-killing droughts, decimated fish populations and an increase in tropical diseases around the world.

“El Niño significantly influences the world’s weather and climate patterns,” World Meteorological Organization Director-General Celeste Sauro said in a recent statement. “El Niño’s footprint extends far beyond its source in the Pacific Ocean, impacting agriculture, energy supplies, trade, water resources, supply chains and livelihoods across the region.”

How does El Niño damage stack up?

It is important to recognize that the trillions of dollars in losses are not primarily due to direct disaster damage. In his research, Mankin found that these events permanently inhibit economic growth long after they occur.

While El Niño-induced disasters such as droughts, floods, heat waves, and wildfires cause immediate damage, the following lasting costs arise from El Niño’s impact on the foundations of growth:

  • Agricultural losses are carried into later seasons
  • interruption of labor
  • Schooling and early childhood development interrupted, emerging into the workforce years later
  • Disruption to commodity markets and the transport sector
  • Investments that never materialize due to shocks

How much damage will this El Niño cause?

“We know from observation that El Niño can cause trillions of dollars in damage and productivity losses to the global economy,” Mankin told USA TODAY. “These costs occur over many years and disproportionately impact countries whose weather and climate are most associated with El Niño.”

“We know that past El Niño events like 1997-1998 cost the economy more than $7 trillion by 2003.”

Mankin said the current cost of El Niño is estimated to be in the trillions of dollars worldwide, with more than $1.8 trillion in the United States alone by 2032.

Because we don’t know exactly how strong this El Niño phenomenon will become, we don’t know how much damage it will cause, he said.

Could this El Niño be the most damaging in history?

“Certainly in absolute dollar terms, current projections suggest this could be the most damaging El Niño on record,” Mankin said. “The current forecast is for El Niño to intensify above 2 degrees Celsius, so if El Niño goes well, it will be a very strong phenomenon.”

At the same time, he said, this phenomenon is having a bigger impact on the global economy than the previous El Niño event, and the damage will be even greater. Both of these factors make the 1997-1998 event more expensive than the 1982-1983 event. But the true total will not be known for many years, as losses increase over time while the probability and impact of more powerful events increases.

“In terms of its relative impact (for example, as a percentage of the current global economy), it really depends on how powerful this event ends up being.”

Specific impacts to be aware of

  • Low rainfall is bad news for some crops. “El Niño is likely to have a negative impact on crop yields in Southeast Asia and India,” said Kyle Tapley, director of enterprise sales at Vaisala ExWeather’s Weather Desk. “El Niño is typically associated with below-normal rainfall.” Meanwhile, Indonesian rice farmers are racing to bring forward their annual planting schedule while battling the threat of this year’s prolonged drought. Malaysia’s economy minister has warned that El Nino could reduce crop yields by an average of 8% to 10% this year.
  • I’m worried about the lack of fertilizer. “Super El Niño, coupled with the current Middle East conflict and associated fertilizer shortages, could have a synergistic effect on wheat, rice and corn, which are already at risk due to reduced availability of fertilizer during the planting season,” said Saskia van Ghent, chief sustainability officer at supply chain management company Blue Yonder, USA. said in an email to TODAY. “This will lead to short-term shortages and price increases, with long-term effects as these crops are used for animal feed and processed food.”
  • Flooding is also a concern in some areas. “Flooding is predicted to increase during El Niño periods due to increased rainfall, which could reduce transport speeds and lead to increased travel costs,” Van Gent said. “In other regions, El Niño could exacerbate droughts and restrict waterways. In 2023-2024, El Niño reduced water levels and restricted traffic through the Panama Canal.”

I have good news. In some regions, El Niño has actually boosted agriculture, Van Ghent said, and “in some agricultural regions (eastern Brazil, Uruguay, Italy, Romania, and the Caspian Sea region), higher temperatures and increased precipitation could lead to higher crop yields.” “Historically, soybean yields have increased during El Niño events.”

And experts say the negative effects of El Niño won’t be felt right away. “While it typically takes months for crop disruptions to translate into higher retail food prices, consumers may experience early and compounded cost increases due to fertilizer shortages,” Van Ghent said. “The World Economic Forum predicts that the current fertilizer shortage will take six months to a year to impact food supplies.”

What is El Niño?

El Niño is a natural climate pattern in which ocean waters in the central and eastern tropical Pacific Ocean are warmer than average. El Niño and its counterpart La Niña can influence storms and weather patterns around the world, including hurricanes.

According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, El Niños occur on average about every three to five years and can vary in intensity.

Here in the United States, El Niño causes wetter, warmer winters on the West Coast and milder hurricane season on the Atlantic Coast.

Contributed by: Reuters

Doyle Rice is a national correspondent for USA TODAY, focusing on weather and climate.

Dangerously hot weather forecast for the Southeast over the weekend

0

play

While the Northeast and Midwest will get some respite from the heat and humidity over the weekend of June 13th, that won’t be the case in the scorching Southeast, where “dangerous” heat is forecast through Sunday, June 14th.

How hot is it? Temperatures will be in the 90s to near 100 degrees, accompanied by severe humidity. The National Weather Service in Tallahassee, Florida, said that due to the heat, “people who are unable to adequately cool or hydrate should take steps such as staying indoors with air conditioning or shade, staying hydrated, and taking frequent breaks.”

Elsewhere, high temperatures will remain in the 80s to low 90s, although cold, dry air behind a cold front will spread across the eastern United States on Saturday, NOAA’s Weather Prediction Center said in an online forecast.

The Southeast will experience its first really hot days this year. “Early season heat is often more dangerous and the risk of heat-related illness can be greater,” WPC said.

Arctic air in the Midwest?

Cooler weather will be a hot topic in the upper Midwest and around the Great Lakes. “The flow from the northwest comes directly out of the Arctic. It’s cold and dry,” Weather Trader meteorologist Ryan Maue said in an email to USA TODAY. “This is a very severe trough for mid-June,” he added.

Nighttime temperatures are expected to drop into the 40s across much of the upper Midwest Saturday night, the National Weather Service said.

Doyle Rice is a national correspondent for USA TODAY, focusing on weather and climate.

Americans have dream World Cup start

0

play

Editor’s note: Follow the 2026 World Cup live opening match and star-studded opening formula!

The U.S. Men’s National Team opened the 2026 World Cup with a 4-1 victory over Paraguay on Friday, June 12, at SoFi Stadium in Inglewood, California.

Manager Mauricio Pochettino has fully replenished the players at his disposal with Chris Richards returning to the lineup. His addition in place of Miles Robinson was the only change from the team that started against Germany.

The Americans got off to a dream start, with Weston McKennie forcing an own goal from Paraguay’s Damien Bobadilla after just seven minutes. From then on, the Americans dominated the first half, dominated the ball and took the lead for nearly 30 minutes.

Folarin Balogun clinically finished a pass from Christian Pulisic to double the lead. The Monaco striker capped off a perfect opening 45 minutes with two goals and the score went into the second half 3-0.

The only concern for the United States in this game was when Pulisic was substituted at halftime after being kicked in the calf. The level of play in the second half was not as high as the first, and Paraguay got a goal back with 20 minutes remaining. Gio Reyna restored the three-goal lead with the final kick of the game, giving his team a big win.

The USMNT’s next game will be against Australia in Seattle on Friday, June 19th.

Let’s take a look at how the USMNT players performed in their first World Cup win.

Buy your USMNT World Cup tickets!

GK: Matt Frees – 6

He had nothing to do but pick the ball out of the goal net as Paraguay were outplayed for most of the match.

RWB: Serginho Dest – 7

With the Americans dominating play, Dest was able to play as a de facto winger. He was still a dangerous presence, getting into great positions in the attack and causing problems. If he’s going to continue to get clear scoring opportunities, he needs to be more efficient in those situations.

RCB: Alex Freeman – 7.5

Is he a right back? Is he a center back? Does it matter? He seems to be everywhere on the field fighting to get the ball back. His energy and tenacity helped set the tone.

CCB: Chris Richards – 6.5

It is clear that he will be greatly missed from a leadership and structure standpoint. Oh yeah, he’s really good too. He established himself as one of the most valuable players on this team.

LCB: Tim Ream – 6

There were some nerve-wracking moments, but none of them turned into a threat. The rest of the performance was anonymous.

LWB: Anthony Robinson – 7

The Jedi are at their best when they can move up and down the sides freely, as they did in this match. He was in huge spaces all night and came close to tangible reward in the form of a goal or an assist several times.

CM: Tyler Adams – 6.5

Other than a silly yellow card and some questionable moments in possession, it was a great performance for the midfield leader. He will have to be smarter if he is to avoid risking a yellow card for the rest of the tournament.

CM: Weston McKennie – 7.5

Weston McKennie has always been an influence in midfield and his best season of his career spilled over into the World Cup. His nomadic role takes him all over the field and fits perfectly into this style of play.

RW: Malik Tillman – 8

It was questionable whether Tillman would start in the opening game. He answered that question with a brilliant performance that included everything but his goal contribution. He was active throughout the attack, appearing in a variety of places and creating chances.

Forward: Folarin Balogun – 9

The United States has been waiting for a long time for a proper striker to rely on in big games. Balogun proved that he is the man for the job in this game as he successfully achieved two clinical goals that sent SoFi Stadium into a frenzy. If this is the tone he exudes all summer, it could be a very long time for the American.

LW: Christian Pulisic – 8.5

It was an exciting 45 minutes for Pulisic before he was sent off at half-time. It was impossible for Paraguay to handle him on the left side, because whenever he touched the ball, something good happened for America. It was his brilliant dribbling that led to his own goal at the start of the match. He then set up Balogun’s second goal of the match.

Pulisic is in top form and makes this team very dangerous. He said, “I’m taking a little bit of precaution today, but I hope it’s okay.”

Sub: Sebastian Berhalter – 6

There was no sense of discomfort even though he came on as a substitute. He briefly had a chance to make a name for himself in right field, but missed a long-distance chip attempt. It’s clear Pochettino rates him highly, as he was the first name off the bench.

Sub: Ricardo Pepi – 5.5

He missed a great chance and missed one more. If we want to have a chance at the World Cup, we have to take advantage of it.

Sub: Tim Ware – 6

After playing, there was nothing to do except run up and down the sides.

Sub: Gio Reyna – 8

After coming on, he did little until he scored an absolute banger with the outside of his foot on the final touch of the match.

Half of Millennials and one-third of Gen Xers still ask their parents for money

0

play

Half of Millennials and one-third of Gen Xers are still financially dependent on their parents, according to a new study.

The findings suggest that the economic relationship between aging parents and aging children may be changing.

There is a long tradition of young people relying on their parents for some of their expenses as they start their careers and start families.

But American millennials aren’t that young anymore. The youngest generation is turning 30, and the age group of Generation X now ranges from 45 to 61 years old.

Newly released data from Northwestern Mutual’s 2026 Planning and Progress Survey shows that 42% of adults surveyed said they felt financially dependent on their parents. The breakdown by generation is as follows:

  • Generation Z (under 29 years old): 72% are dependent on their parents
  • Millennials: 53% depend on parents
  • Generation X: 33% depend on their parents

Older adult children wait longer for inheritance

Americans are having children later and living longer. That means adult children will wait longer for inheritance, the traditional gateway to financial independence.

Researchers at the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania found that people between the ages of 56 and 65 are most likely to receive an inheritance. And, according to an analysis by The Washington Post, fewer than two-fifths of Americans inherit their children.

“While large wealth transfers are a reality, inheritance is not something most Americans can count on,” said Jeff Sippel, chief strategy officer at Northwestern Mutual.

The survey data, released June 1, is based on interviews conducted with 4,375 adults in January.

Large wealth transfers are expected to amount to $124 trillion by 2048, primarily from older generations to younger generations.

Elderly parents have many assets to inherit.

Baby boomers born between 1946 and 1964 own 51% of America’s wealth, with their mountains of real estate, stocks, pension benefits, personal businesses, and other assets valued at $90 trillion by the second half of 2025.

“Parents are in a pretty good position. They want to help,” said Ryan Nelson, president of emerging wealth management at US Bancorp Advisors. “They want their children to have a higher quality of life.”

But sometimes the money arrives late, or sometimes it doesn’t arrive at all. Not only are Americans living longer, but they are also spending more on assisted living, nursing homes, and other long-term care.

“Longevity is great, but it also comes with the added stress of needing more money to retire,” says Douglas Benson Jr., a private wealth advisor and founder of Northwestern Mutual’s Benson Wealth Management.

Economic independence was easy for previous generations

Most Americans find it harder to achieve financial independence now than in previous generations, according to research from Northwestern Mutual. About 20% of adults surveyed said they did not expect to achieve independence.

One reason is rising housing prices. Today’s young people carry more mortgage debt than previous generations, even after adjusting for inflation.

For example, adults ages 29 to 34 had $190,000 in mortgage debt in 2022, compared to $120,174 for the same age group in 1992, after inflation, according to a Pew Research Center analysis.

Adults under 35 are now far more likely to have student loans and have higher balances, according to a Pew Research study.

In 1992, the typical young person owed between $6,000 and $7,000 in student loans. In 2022, young people had between $16,000 and $20,000 in debt in inflation-adjusted dollars.

“Young people are more likely to have student loans and large mortgage debt,” said Rachel Minkin, a senior researcher at Pew Research.

In a 2024 Pew Research survey, 44% of young adults said they had received financial help from their parents in the previous year.

What expenses do parents pay for their adult children?

Here’s a breakdown of the areas in which young people received the most help from their parents:

  • Household expenses such as groceries and utilities, 28%
  • Mobile phone bill or streaming subscription, 25%
  • Rent or mortgage, 17%
  • Medical expenses 15%
  • Education, 11%

Among parents who provided financial aid to their children, 36% said the aid hurt them financially.

“Low-income parents were much more likely to say their personal finances had been negatively impacted,” Minkin said.

Pew’s report is based on research conducted in October and November 2023.

Many middle-aged adults rely on their parents for financial support, but they aren’t always ready to discuss money with their moms and dads.

According to a 2024 US Bank survey, just over half of Americans are comfortable discussing money with their parents. 49% of Gen Xers, 55% of Millennials, and 58% of Gen Zers.

The U.S. Bank study also found that 37% of parents across generations worry that their children will remain financially dependent upon them into adulthood.

The US housing market has reversed, but not in favor of sellers.

0

play

They say what comes around comes around. But when it comes to the housing market, normal cycles took time to arrive.

But now a new analysis calls “the U.S. seller’s market over.”

A report released June 11 by Realtor.com declares, “The days of bidding wars are over.” The authors write that for too long, sellers have had a “free pass” when it comes to pricing their homes. But no more.

“Right now, overpriced homes aren’t just sitting around; they’re aging, they’re becoming less leveraged, and they’re selling for less than they would have if they had been priced in the first place,” Joel Berner, the firm’s senior economist, said in a report comparing home sales data and Realtor.com listing history.

“If you price it right, buyers will come to you,” Varner added. “If you price it wrong, you’re going to come after them. It’s been four weeks and the market has already made its verdict. Either you have a competing offer or you lower the price.”

In fact, home sales that close after four weeks fetch 1.8% more than asking price than most homes in the same time period. After 18 weeks, those still on the market end up selling for 1.3% less.

Although housing remains unaffordable for too many Americans, the situation is changing, Berner wrote. “Buyers have more influence than they have in years, and it’s clearly visible in the data.”

After crazy bidding wars during the pandemic, it’s a “real paradigm shift” now, said Steve Reese, a real estate agent and owner of Soled on Shawnee in the Oklahoma City metropolitan area.

Reese told USA TODAY that homes that are presented well and priced well will sell. Even though buyers now have more options and are taking the time to make good decisions, “there are still agents out there who do a very average job,” he said.

In particular, the real estate agent’s analysis found that buyers in the $750,000 to $2 million range may have the most influence. The final number of homes sold in these price ranges is the lowest below asking price, as 2022, at the height of the pandemic rush, saw more bidding wars than average.

Another segment of the market that is lagging behind is condominiums. The average single-family home sells for 99.2% of asking price, while condos sell for an average of 97.9%. Meanwhile, list prices for condos are down 6% compared to March 2022, even though list prices for single-family homes have increased 7.5% since then.

Condominiums have been hit hard by rising costs associated with ownership, such as HOA dues and homeowners insurance. In the wake of the Surfside, Florida, condominium collapse, many buildings are increasing their financial reserves and taking steps to prepare for increased risk due to increased assessed common area fees.

With all this in mind, “real estate is very local,” Reese says.

Trump’s name removed from Kennedy Center after judge orders

0


A federal judge ruled on May 29 that adding Trump’s name to the center was illegal, and ordered the center to be stripped from official materials and removed from billboards.

play

WASHINGTON – Workers stripped President Donald Trump’s name from the Kennedy Center on June 13, less than six months after the building was erected, following a judge’s ruling that a performing arts landmark cannot be renamed without an act of Congress, Reuters reports.

The work began around 1:20 a.m., hours after the Justice Department announced the government would miss a court-ordered deadline of 11:59 p.m. on June 12 to remove Trump’s name from the Washington venue set up to commemorate the assassinated president half a century ago.

Construction workers first showed up at the iconic arts facility on the afternoon of June 12, erected scaffolding, and hours later began preparing to remove the president’s name from the building’s façade sign, letter by letter.

Hundreds of onlookers cheered and sang “God Bless America” ​​as the workers wore fluorescent yellow vests, bungee straps and helmets prepared to exclude Trump’s name. Many in the crowd were dressed to look like they were performing at the stately Washington, D.C., venue. Onlookers chatted festively amid thunderstorms that threatened to delay work. Passersby honked their car horns in approval.

Local resident Carolina Clarence came to watch the game with her dog Rufino. A former kindergarten teacher said it was “ridiculous” that Trump’s name was included.

“We can see this situation unraveling,” Clarence said, adding that artists canceling shows and donations dwindle, damaging the institution that famously bears Trump’s name on the building. “They’re going to destroy the Kennedy Center.”

Workers arrived at the site shortly after a three-judge appeals court rejected the Trump administration’s request for a moratorium on Friday night, which is appealing a judge’s decision to remove Trump’s name from the Kennedy Center’s name.

The crew began receiving letters after midnight. On a crisp Washington, D.C. night, hundreds of protesters looked on, chanting “Get rid of it!” The effort to remove the letters began around 3 a.m., The Washington Post reported.

In a May 29 ruling, U.S. District Judge Christopher Cooper ruled that adding Trump’s name to the center was illegal and ordered the center to be stripped from official documents and removed from signage within 14 days, ending June 12.

Cooper denied the Justice Department’s request for a stay, saying the defendants had failed to prove that their appeal would be successful and that complying with the order would cause “irreparable harm” to the Kennedy Center.

The Trump administration then filed an emergency motion with the U.S. Court of Appeals to intervene to suspend the order just before 7 p.m. ET as the year-end deadline approaches, but the panel denied the request. But the request was quickly rejected by a judge, paving the way for the president’s name to be removed from the building as a crowd of onlookers watched workers go about their work. Even after midnight on June 13, workers were still erecting the scaffolding needed to remove the letters.

Despite intermittent thunder and lightning, crowds gathered around the building to watch the spectacle, some wearing flashy clothes in a festive mood.

Earlier this week, Kennedy Center lawyers advised staff to comply with the judge’s order. Trump’s name was quickly removed from the center’s website and from staff email signatures. But the center waited until a judge granted a last-minute request to stay the order before removing the most visible display of President Trump’s attempted takeover of the center: a large, all-caps sign outside the building’s marble facade that reads “Donald J. Trump and John F. Kennedy Memorial Performing Arts Center.”

The building has returned to its title, “John F. Kennedy Memorial Center for the Performing Arts,” which has been featured on the building since the center opened in 1971.

The removal of the president’s name from the center is a striking blow to President Trump’s efforts to remake the center in his favor.

The Kennedy Center voted in December 2025 to rename the venue after Trump, in recognition of his role in securing federal funding critical to the center’s transformation. His name was added to the building’s exterior sign less than 24 hours later.

Cooper, who was appointed by former President Barack Obama, ruled that the Kennedy Center’s board of directors, made up mostly of Trump supporters, violated a 1964 federal law that established the center to honor the late President John F. Kennedy when it voted to rename the center after Trump. The justices said the statute makes clear that “the Kennedy Center must be named after and honor only President Kennedy.”

The judge’s order came in a lawsuit filed by Rep. Joyce Beatty (D-Ohio), ex-officio director of the Kennedy Center, who sued to block President Trump’s rebranding and to shut it down for two years for renovations.

In his ruling, Cooper also overturned President Trump’s plan to close the Kennedy Center for two years starting in July in preparation for major renovations to the building.

The closure was approved by the Kennedy Center’s Board of Trustees in a March vote. In a 94-page opinion, Cooper questioned the reliability of the center’s executive director, Matt Floca,’s conclusion that renovations cannot be made without shutting down public facilities.

The judge also said the center’s board had “no meaningful say” on the issue when it voted to close on March 16. President Trump had already announced his closure plans on Truth Social on February 1st.

X Contact Joey Garrison at @joeygarrison.

Study suggests smartphone use is linked to 33-52% fewer births in the US

0

play

The introduction of the iPhone nearly 20 years ago may have had a direct impact on declining birth rates, a new study claims.

This pragmatic study, recently published by the National Bureau of Economic Research, has not been peer-reviewed, but claims that iPhone penetration, which began in 2007, explains a 33% to 52% drop in birth rates among women ages 15 to 44 in the United States.

The study was conducted by Katelyn Myers, an economics professor at Middlebury College, and her stepson, Ezekiel Hooper, a 2025 Middlebury College graduate. This article focuses on where the iPhone was available at launch from 2007 to 2011, when AT&T was the exclusive smartphone carrier. We then analyzed the birth rates in those areas by county.

Myers and Hooper wrote that the birth rate among women in their 20s living in counties with “widespread” AT&T coverage, meaning they had easier access to iPhones, decreased by 14.6 percent between 2007 and 2011. Birth rates for women in their 20s living in counties not served by AT&T decreased by just 10%.

Similarly, the birth rate for teens living in counties with “nearly universal” AT&T coverage fell by 26 percent between 2007 and 2011, while the birth rate for teens living in counties without AT&T coverage fell by 13.8 percent, the authors wrote.

Myers and Hooper understand that iPhone use was not the only reason birth rates declined from 2007 to 2011, but Hooper told USA TODAY that they were surprised by the sheer drastic nature of the study’s findings.

Sarah Hayford, director of the Ohio State University Population Research Institute, said she is open to studying the impact of smartphones on national and international fertility rates, but is skeptical about how the research is narrowly focused and how it will affect the broader conversation about declining global birth rates.

“This is part of how sociologists see the world and part of how economists see the world, but as a sociologist, I’m not particularly interested in explaining this small change in trends over five years,” Hayford told USA TODAY. “I’m more interested in thinking about what the major factors are that drive long-term changes in family formation and childbearing.”

Two additional studies suggest similar results

Myers and Hooper’s publication follows two other studies published by the Social Science Research Network in April and June that suggest smartphones and the “digital revolution” are influencing the way people spend their time, and that smartphones and the “digital revolution” are contributing to a decline in births worldwide. Both studies were authored by University of Cincinnati economics professor Hernan Moscoso Boedo and doctoral candidate Nathan Hudson.

The latter of the two studies found that 43% of the decline in the U.S. birth rate since 2007 can be attributed to digital technologies becoming cheaper (and more accessible) and of higher quality, Hudson told USA TODAY.

“The digital revolution has fundamentally changed the way humans interact with each other, favoring broad, shallow connections at the expense of deep connections that require continued face-to-face investment,” Moscoso-Boedo and Hudson wrote in a recently published study. “As digital technologies redistribute family time, deep relationships are lost, partnerships form less frequently, those that do form become weaker, and conditional fertility declines.”

Through line? Smartphones and other digital technologies also make people want children. They simply replace face-to-face time in building relationships that can lead to children, Hudson explained.

Focused on teen birth rates

All three studies examine declining teen birth rates and argue that technology is changing the way young people interact. A joint study by Hudson and Moscoso-Boedo, published in April, specifically analyzed how smartphones have affected teen birth rates since 2007.

Hudson told USA TODAY that as more teens spend their time online, there is less “unstructured in-person time.” Hudson and Moscoso-Boed’s Teen Birth Rate Study specifically cites the American Time Use Survey, documenting a 44% decline in face-to-face interactions among teens ages 15 to 19 from 2003 to 2019.

Myers and Hooper’s study found the largest decline among teenage girls ages 15 to 19 between 2007 and 2011, ranging from 4.5% to 8%, the research summary states.

“As for why smartphones are causing this decline in teen births, we can’t necessarily explain what they’re doing with their smartphones or what’s causing that change in behavior. All we know is that smartphones are playing a role in it,” Hooper told USA TODAY.

But Myers and Hooper point to several factors taken into account in the study, including a broader increase in search interest in spending time with friends, sexual behavior, psychological distress, and watching pornography and adult films.

But in general, the U.S. teen birth rate has been declining for decades, Hayford said.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the teen birth rate decreased by 78% from 1991 to 2021.

“There is pretty good evidence that, at least in the United States, the teen birth rate has been declining over the five to 10 years since about 2007, and the evidence we have suggests that the decline in the teen birth rate is due to… increased use of contraceptives, not decreased sex,” said Hayford of Ohio. “That seems to contradict the mechanism these studies propose, where online socializing is replaced by offline socializing, including sex.”

Is it really possible that smartphones are causing people to have less sex?

These three studies are not the only analyzes of the impact that smartphones and other digital technologies have had on relationships, sex, and fertility around the world. And so does consensus, which seems to have a fundamental impact.

Going back even further, Hayford said advances in communications technology have long had an impact on declining birth rates, citing research done in the 1960s and 1970s that suggested the widespread use of radio and television depicting families with only two children spread the idea that smaller families were desirable. Today, this could translate into parenting content on social media platforms like TikTok, she said.

“The decline in fertility is something that’s happening around the world, in all age groups, and in very different contexts. When we think about explanations for it, we want to think about the big picture and the long term, but we’re not sure that these micro, very focused studies are the most useful way to think about changes and trends,” Hayford said.

Greta Cross is USA TODAY’s national trends reporter. Story ideas? Email her at gcross@usatoday.com.

Today TV critic Jean Shalit dies at 100

0

Legendary film critic Gene Shalit, known for his long appearances on NBC’s “Today” show, passed away on Friday, June 12, NBC reported. He was 100 years old.

Sharit “passed away peacefully today after 100 years of a remarkable life,” her family told NBC News in a statement.

Shalit became a beloved figure in American media thanks to his unique, pun-filled take on American movies and on-air persona that included a handlebar mustache, glasses, and a bow tie.

His career began in print journalism, including Ladies’ Home Journal and The New York Times. He joined the “Today” show as a contributor in 1970 and became a full-time book and film critic three years later, a role he held for another 37 years.

When he turned 100 on March 25, “Today” commemorated the occasion with a photo of him on a Smucker’s jam jar, a longtime network tradition, and Al Roker sent birthday wishes to his former colleague.

Jean Shalit, eternal movie buff

As Today’s go-to film critic, Shalit took a much different approach than competitors like Roger Ebert and Gene Siskel. Although the criticism can be harsh, Sharit often smokes a cigar and performs the fun, pun-filled songs from “Critics Corner.” Viewers liked his generous approach, but some said he lacked a critical eye.

Sharit approached the task with wit and humor, and although he was also a true movie buff, he did not hold back from negative reviews. “Two words, Ishtar.” ish It’s terrible,” he said of the 1987 flop starring Dustin Hoffman.

In addition, a review of “Brokeback Mountain” caused controversy by describing Jack Twist, played by Jake Gyllenhaal, as a “sexual predator” of Ennis, played by Heath Ledger. GLAAD spoke out against the review, calling it “ignorant and irresponsible,” and Sharit apologized, adding that he regretted the “emotional distress” he had caused.

In addition to critical opinions, Shalit interviewed Hollywood greats, from the then-little-known Star Wars star (he called Harrison Ford, “the only actor named after two presidents”) to Oprah Winfrey, who was nominated for an Oscar for The Color Purple.

His persona inspired parodies such as “Saturday Night Live” and “SpongeBob SquarePants” fish food critic “Gene Scallops.”

“He was a naturally funny guy,” fellow critic Leonard Maltin told NorthJersey.com, part of the USA TODAY Network. “I think at times he was more interested in smart cracks than cold judgment in movies. Maybe that’s what his producers wanted.”

Jean Shalit’s early days

Shalit was born in New York, but grew up in Newark and Morristown, New Jersey, where his father owned a drug store. But as a young man, he was bitten by the journalism bug. While in high school, he created the first school newspaper, Spotlight. and the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, where he wrote for the Daily Illini.

Early in his career, Shalit worked behind the scenes in the media industry, working as Dick Clark’s press agent. But when Mr. Clark became embroiled in the “Payola” scandal, which led to a parliamentary investigation into the illegal practice of record companies playing songs to DJs, Mr. Shalit quit representing Mr. Clark, and the two never spoke again. (“Jean Shalit was a jellyfish,” Clark told The New York Times in 2011.)

He returned to writing in 1967, working for the NBC radio network before joining the “Today” show.

“He was someone who was known around the office as a funny guy,” Martin said. “And someone said you’re too funny to work in public relations. I’m going to put you on the air.”

Martin credits Shalit with launching his career. “Specifically, when I was a writer and I was young, I ended up on the Today show,” he said. “They always do a pre-interview with you, and he came into the dressing room with me and said, ‘Do I have to follow the list?’ And I said, ‘No, ask me anything.’ And we had a very nice conversation. ”

Shalit didn’t just save his humor for the screen. He was just as funny in real life. “How do I know this? My wife and I were at a screening of ‘Texas’ Best Little Whore,’ ” Martin said. “And my wife leaned over and gave me a smart argument about how bad this movie was. And sitting behind us was Jean Shalit, and he said, ‘Would you please sit up straight again and block my view?’

Sharit was married to Nancy Lewis for 28 years until her death from cancer in 1978. They had six children, including Willa Shalit.

in his book great hollywood witIn a collection of “zingers” from industry insiders, he writes, “Hollywood is famous for betrayals, front-stabbing, revenge, envy, promises, scoundrels, deceptions, soundtracks, geniuses, half-geniuses, quasi-geniuses, former geniuses, deciduous loyalties, flagrant dreams, brains, bodies, breasts, butts, clowns, vagrants, intellectuals, and many intellectually good people.” Souls. ”Many remember him as one of them.

Why the stars left during the World Cup match between USA and Paraguay

0

play

INGLEWOOD, Calif. — U.S. star Christian Pulisic was kicked in the left calf in the USMNT’s World Cup opener against Paraguay and was ejected at halftime of the 4-1 win.

“There was a bit of a shock in the first half, so I really hope nothing happened,” Pulisic told reporters in a post-match interview. “I’m a little cautious today, but I think I’ll be fine.

“It was just on the sole of my foot, around my calf, but I’ve had something similar before, so I’m trying to stay positive. I don’t think it’s anything.”

In the opening match of the 2026 World Cup against Paraguay, the USMNT had a great first half performance, but Pulisic came on as a substitute to start the second half and was replaced by Sebastian Berhalter.

Get your tickets to the USA World Cup!

Pulisic will have a week to recover before the USMNT’s next game against Australia on June 19th.

Initially, there was no explanation as to why Pulisic was sent off the pitch, and there were no signs of injury. According to the FOX broadcast, he signaled to his family that he was OK and sat on the bench during the second half.

“I hope it won’t be a big problem,” USMNT coach Mauricio Pichettino said at the post-match press conference, adding that the decision was made at the last minute and that they are urgently considering substitutions.

Pulisic’s departure came after he played well in the first 45 minutes for the Stars and Stripes. He always beat defenders with his first touch and played a key role in getting his team on the scoreboard with a seventh-minute own goal. He then made a sensational pass to Folarin Balogun in the 31st minute to give him a 2-0 lead, earning him the 21st assist of his international career.

2026 USA World Cup Schedule

The U.S. national team started the World Cup in Group D and is ranked 16th in the FIFA world rankings.

  • June 12: USA vs. Paraguay, 9 p.m. ET, SoFi Stadium, Inglewood, Calif., broadcast on FOX.
  • June 19: USA vs. Australia, 3pm ET, Lumen Field, Seattle, broadcast on FOX
  • June 25: USA vs. Turkier, 10 p.m. ET, SoFi Stadium, Inglewood, Calif., broadcast on FOX.

Ariana Grande joins list of artists objecting to White House use of music

0

play

Ariana Grande doesn’t want President Donald Trump’s White House to use her music to promote its policies.

“Please never use my music in connection with this barbaric, inhumane, heinous nonsense,” Grande said in a video posted to TikTok by the White House on June 9 highlighting immigration enforcement policies. The video, which shows federal agents arresting and handcuffing people, features the Grammy-winning singer’s 2024 song “Bye,” Reuters and the Guardian report.

The audio and Grande’s comments have since been deleted.

Grande’s representatives have not provided any information on the matter, but Reuters reports, citing sources close to Grande, that her team is considering ways to remove the music from the video as soon as possible.

Meanwhile, White House Press Secretary Abigail Jackson said in a June 12 statement to USA TODAY: “Let me say one last time: What is actually barbaric, inhumane and heinous are criminal illegal aliens who have harmed and killed innocent American citizens.”

Grande has criticized Trump.

This isn’t the first time Grande, 32, who recently launched her Eternal Sunshine Tour, has criticized Trump and his administration. Last year, the Oscar-nominated actress took to her Instagram Story to ask people who voted for Trump if their lives had gotten better since the president returned.

Trump, now in his second non-consecutive term, has an active social media presence, with his communications team frequently posting short videos featuring popular songs highlighting the president’s efforts to fulfill campaign promises.

When asked by Variety about the November 2025 video’s use of music by Taylor Swift, the White House responded, “We created this video because we knew fake news media brands like Variety would gasp and amplify it. Congratulations, it got played.” Swift declined to allow her music to be used.

Other artists object to White House’s use of their songs

Grande is just the latest musician or band to speak out against the use of their music by the Trump administration and campaign.

Other artists who have sent cease-and-desist letters or threatened lawsuits include Aerosmith, Beyoncé, Sabrina Carpenter, Phil Collins, Celine Dion, Olivia Rodrigo, John Fogerty (Creedence Clearwater Revival), Foo Fighters, Guns N’ Roses, Elton John, Linkin Park, Panic! At the Disco, REM, Leanna, Semisonic, The Rolling Stones, The Smiths, The White Stripes, Pharrell Williams, Neil Young, and the estates of Prince, Sinead O’Connor, and Tom Petty.

Contributor: Reuters/Mike Snider, USA TODAY

Saman Shafiq is a trending news reporter for USA TODAY. Contact her at sshafiq@usatodayco.com and follow X and Instagram @saman_shafiq7.

Emily Ratajkowski says she rejects the label ‘divorced single mother’

0

Emily Ratajkowski has opened up about how she resents being labeled a “divorced single mother” following her divorce from ex-husband Sebastian Bear-McClard.

In a vulnerable essay published in the June 12 issue of The Cut, the 35-year-old model and actress chronicled her experience grappling with single motherhood, re-entering the dating world, and the emotional turmoil that comes with it.

She briefly touched on how her marriage to Bear-McClard “disintegrated” in “a period that felt both quick and excruciatingly slow” six months after giving birth to son Sly, five. She described the transition to motherhood as “a violent transition to a new reality of a baby screaming over an aching breast and a ring on a swollen finger.”

Ratajkowski and her husband married in 2018 and separated in 2022. The divorce was finalized in 2025. After the separation, she said she was forced to confront her long-held fear of becoming a single mother.

She said she noticed that when she met new men, many were excited about the fact that she was a mother. “They were particularly drawn to the idea that being a parent meant self-sacrifice in my life. Did they want me as a mother? Maybe,” she wrote.

Emily Ratajkowski says she’s entered the era of being the ‘villain’ in the dating scene

Ratajkowski said that she intentionally embodies the role of a villain when she puts herself out there on a date, explaining that she considers herself “a woman who doesn’t need anything from a man” and that she draws inspiration from comic book characters such as Poison Ivy and Catwoman.

“I’ve watched too much and discovered that many women only act when they’re in their mid-40s and divorced. I had a failed unit and was still barely in my 30s. Here’s my villainous origin story,” she wrote. “I was a city person. Being a New Yorker made being a single mom feel sexier. Bohemian. At least that’s what I told myself.”

She then spoke about her relationship with a man she described as “the elder statesman of the millennial generation.” When he first told her he loved her, just three weeks into their relationship, she said she felt “the usual anxiety in my chest.”

After politely asking if she could remain non-exclusive, she said she watched him begin to realize that he was “the dead-eyed supervillain I’ve been playing all along.”

“Despite playing a supervillain, even though the character believed I was invulnerable, I was just as misguided and vulnerable as I had been in my 20s when I was playing the good girl,” she wrote. “I never connected with my own desires. It was all nonsense, a stupid game of empty performances.”

Ratajkowski has long essayed as an outspoken defender of women’s rights. My Body is a 2021 collection of essays that explores themes such as female empowerment, ownership of one’s sexuality, and the exploitative tendencies of the entertainment and fashion industries.

Contributor: Anna Kaufman, USA TODAY

Mega Millions jackpot reaches $413 million on Friday, June 12th

0

play

The Mega Millions jackpot continues to grow ahead of the Friday, June 12th drawing, and now stands at $413 million, with a cash value of $182.6 million.

The game has been on a bit of a slump lately, as it’s been almost three months since we last hit the jackpot. The most recent jackpot winner dates back to St. Patrick’s Day, when an Ohio player took home a $60 million jackpot.

If someone gets lucky and wins the jackpot on Friday, they have two options. Take home one-time cash or get paid instantly, then receive an annual check each 5% larger than the previous year.

Here’s what you need to know about Friday’s Mega Millions drawing.

What are the winning Mega Millions numbers for June 12, 2026?

Here are the winning numbers for Friday’s Mega Millions lottery drawing. 9, 17, 24, 39 and 51. Mega ball is 3.

When is the next Mega Millions drawing?

The next Mega Millions drawing is scheduled for Tuesday, June 16th at 11:00 PM ET.

Top 10 Mega Millions Jackpots

  • August 8, 2023, $1.602 billion in Florida.
  • $1.537 billion in South Carolina on October 23, 2018
  • January 1, 2023, $1.348 billion in Maine
  • July 29, 2022, $1.337 billion in Illinois
  • December 27, 2024, $1.269 billion in California
  • $1.128 billion in New Jersey on March 26, 2024
  • January 22, 2021, $1.05 billion in Michigan
  • $983 million in Georgia on November 14, 2025
  • $810 million in Texas on September 10, 2024
  • March 30, 2012, $656 million in Illinois, Kansas, and Maryland

What is Mega Millions?

Mega Millions is a lottery that is played in 45 states, the District of Columbia, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.

Each ticket costs $5, and players can choose six numbers from two different number pools: five different numbers from 1 to 70 (white balls) and one number from 1 to 24 (gold mega ball), or choose Easy Pick/Quick Pick.

If you match all six winning numbers in the drawing, you win the jackpot. If there are multiple jackpot winners, the jackpot prize will be shared.

How to play Mega Millions

To play Mega Millions, you must purchase a ticket. This can be done at several locations, including local convenience stores, gas stations, and grocery stores. In some states, you can purchase Mega Millions tickets online.

Once you have your ticket, you have to choose six numbers. Five of them are white balls with numbers from 1 to 70. The golden mega ball ranges from 1 to 24.

If you’re feeling particularly unlucky or don’t want to go through the hassle of picking, you can request a “quick pick” or “easy pick.” When you use these options, your computer randomly generates numbers.

Mega Millions tickets have built-in multipliers that increase your non-jackpot prize by 2, 3, 4, 5, or 10 times. Previously, players had to pay an extra dollar to add a “Megaplier”.

Fernando Cervantes Jr. is a trending news reporter for USA TODAY. Contact us at fernando.cervantes@usatodayco.com and follow us at X @fern_cerv_.

How President Trump settled his own lawsuit and avoided a $100 million audit

0

Donald Trump may have landed the biggest deal of his life.

A controversial settlement that avoids politically unpalatable transfers of Treasury funds to Trump exempts the president and his family from a tax audit that could cost $100 million, according to The New York Times.

The tax relief document, written by acting attorney Todd Blanche, who has served as Mr. Trump’s personal lawyer, was released a day after the Justice Department agreed to create a $1.8 billion fund to benefit Mr. Trump’s allies.

After political backlash from Republicans and others, Blanche declared he would not proceed with establishing the fund, but continues to pursue lawsuits questioning its legality. Today, a judge in one of the cases extended an indefinite stay on the funds. But President Trump’s tax deal stands.

Let’s take a closer look at how he accomplished it.

Don’t see the graphic above this line? Click here to reload the page.

Here is the timeline of events:

1929: U.S. Supreme Court says department heads are “presidential alter egos” in Myers v. United States

January 29, 2026: President Trump has sued the IRS and Treasury Department for $10 billion over the leak of tax returns by a former contractor who worked for Booz Allen.

January 31st: Asked by a reporter what it’s like to be on both sides of a lawsuit, Trump replied, “…I have to think about reconciliation with myself…”

April 24th: The judge in the case questioned the legality of the lawsuit, given that President Trump was on both sides, and ordered both parties to submit briefs setting out their positions on the issue by May 20.

May 18th: The Department of Justice announced a $1.8 billion fund settlement with President Trump for “victims of illegal conduct and weapons use.”

May 19th: According to the New York Times and ProPublica, Trump’s personal lawyer, Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, released the tax liability for Trump and his family, which could have cost him $100 million if he lost.

May 20th: Two police officers who defended the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6 filed a lawsuit against the fund, calling it “the most brazen act of presidential corruption in this century.”

May 22nd: A separate lawsuit has been filed in Virginia, alleging that the fund was created without Congressional approval under a collusive agreement between President Trump and his administration.

May 27th: Thirty-five former federal judges are asking the Miami federal judge who closed Trump’s lawsuit against the IRS to reopen the case in a court filing.

June 3rd: Following pushback from Republican senators, AG Blanche told reporters that the fund would not move forward, but President Trump’s tax agreement remains in place.

June 12th: The judge in the Virginia case blocked the fund indefinitely and gave Mr. Blanche and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent one week to sign an affidavit saying they would not proceed with establishing the fund or the lawsuit would continue.

This is a developing story and may be updated.

US military attack kills leader of Venezuelan gang Torren de Aragua

0

President Donald Trump announced on June 12 that the U.S. military had carried out an airstrike that killed Hector Rustenford Guerrero Flores, also known as Niño Guerrero, the leader of the Venezuelan prison organization Torren de Aragua.

“At my direction, U.S. Southern Command conducted a swift and deadly kinetic attack that successfully executed Nino Guerrero, the infamous leader of Torren de Aragua, one of the most bloodthirsty terrorist organizations on Earth,” President Trump said in a post on Truth Social Friday night.

“This action is closely coordinated with our friends in Venezuela, and we are very cooperative.”

President Trump did not say when the attack took place.

Venezuela’s Ministry of Information did not respond to requests for comment.

The Trump administration has repeatedly sanctioned Guerrero and other leaders of the Torren de Aragua organization for their alleged involvement in criminal activities such as drug smuggling, human trafficking and money laundering.

The State Department has designated Torren de Aragua as a foreign terrorist organization.

President Trump claimed that Torren de Aragua was coordinating U.S. activities with President Nicolás Maduro’s Venezuelan government. The Trump administration cited this connection to justify deporting some U.S. immigrants to high-security prisons in El Salvador.

The White House, Pentagon and US Southern Command did not respond to requests for comment.

Reporting by Christian Martinez and Jasper Ward. Editing: Sergio Non, Kim Cogill