Home Blog Page 929

GM announces 2026 All-Electric Cadillac Optiq v

0


play

  • GM will disclose pricing details, specifications and production plans for the Optiq V later this summer.
  • GM revealed in January that the Lyriq, the Cadillac’s first electric vehicle, the five-seater medium-sized SUV, will receive the V-badge.

General Motors is rolling out the 2026 Cadillac Optiq V, part of the 5th generation V series and the second all-electric vehicle, to be equipped with the V-series badge.

Compact Crossover’s new options continue the company’s ambitious plan to offer all-electric powertrain options throughout its Cadillac portfolio.

The company said in a statement that it will be added to its performance offering on April 23rd, “it has a unique package that prioritizes dynamic suspension for an exhilarating driving experience, tight steering.”

GM will disclose Optiq V pricing details, specifications and production plans later this summer. The vehicle competes with Egenesis’s electrified GV70, Mercedes-Benz EQB, and Audi Q4 E-Tron.

In the under-year market, Optiq is GM’s second-lowest sales Cadillac, beating only the Cadillac XT4, which sold 1,214 during the same period with 1,716 sales in the first quarter of 2025.

GM revealed in January that the Lyriq, the Cadillac’s first electric vehicle, the five-seater medium-sized SUV, will receive the V-badge. The Lyriq V priced at $79,990, which is an amount that qualifies for the EV tax credit.

Jackie Charniga covers General Motors for the Free Press. Contact her at jcharniga@freepress.com.



Source link

Can US monopoly laws rein in Silicon Valley? | Meta

0


The European Union fined Apple and Meta hundreds of millions of dollars last week.

My colleague Jennifer Rankin reports:

The European Commission has fined Apple €500m (£429m) and Meta €200m for breaking rules on fair competition and user choice, in the first penalties issued under one of the EU’s landmark internet laws.

The fines under the EU Digital Markets Act (DMA), which is intended to ensure fair business practices by tech companies, are likely to provide another flashpoint with Donald Trump’s administration, which has fiercely attacked Europe’s internet regulation.

The Trump administration was indeed quick to rebuke the fines: a national security council spokesperson told Politico that the EU’s moves were a “novel form of economic extortion” that “will not be tolerated by the United States”.

Interesting, too, is that while the penalties are no small amount of money, their impact likely pales in comparison to the scrutiny the tech companies are facing in the US. Though the EU boasts more robust consumer protections when it comes to tech, the cases against these companies on their home turf, where they have enjoyed great latitude in the past, threaten their core corporate structure, which has been key to integrating their products with one another and creating the walled gardens that have earned them hundreds of billions of dollars.

Before Donald Trump ascended to the US presidency a second time, I would have predicted that little regulation of tech giants would emerge from his administration and that if there were any authority that would provide a check on Silicon Valley’s humongous and still growing influence, it would be Europe. That is not the regulatory landscape we find ourselves in, though. The US Department of Justice is engaged in serious pursuit of nearly every major American tech company for alleged monopolistic conduct. The bureau has filed suits against Apple, Amazon, Meta and Google within the past two years. Meta’s trial began two weeks ago and threatens to unwind its acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp.

Most severe – Google faces the consequences of losing two major antitrust cases in quick succession. The US has petitioned a judge to force the nearly $2tn company to divest one of its crown jewels, Chrome, the most popular web browser in the world.

The US wields the sharper sword here since the tech giants are headquartered there. Unlike the EU’s fines, the antitrust cases in the US threaten the corporate organization of the tech giants, which, if altered, would redirect the profits and change consumers’ experiences with their products. These massively profitable businesses have rolled over far larger fines like speed bumps – recall when the US Federal Trade Commission fined Facebook $5bn for privacy violations, which Mark Zuckerberg mentioned during a few subsequent earnings calls and then never again. Facebook continued operating largely as it did before. The EU fined Google fined €4.3bn in 2018 over Android’s preference for Google search. Apple was fined €1.8 just last year over music streaming payments.

A Chrome-less Google, on the other hand, would make for a less personalized experience of using the internet, I think, perhaps even for my fellow Safari users. YouTube and Google search could draw on less of your history. No other company serves ads in so many corners of the web, so the ads that follow you around would become quite different.

Read more here.

Two good essays on tech

The UK’s communications regulator attempts to protect children online

Tesla reports abysmal earnings at a pivotal moment for Musk

Donald Trump and Elon Musk at a SpaceX test flight launch in November. Photograph: Brandon Bell/Reuters

Elon Musk’s electric vehicle company reported its earnings for the first quarter of 2025 last week. The numbers were among the worst in its history. Via my colleague Johana Bhuiyan, here are the figures:

skip past newsletter promotion

Tesla saw a 9% drop in revenue year over year in the first quarter of 2025. The company brought in $19.3bn in revenue, well below Wall Street expectations of $21.45bn. The company reported an earnings per share of 27 cents, also well under investor expectations of 43 cents in earnings per share.

Tesla profits also slid 71% to $409m compared with $1.39bn in net income the previous year.

The company suffered a 13% drop in vehicle deliveries, making it the company’s worst quarter since 2022. Tesla closed the quarter with 336,681 vehicles delivered.

The majority of Musk’s enormous net worth – he remains the world’s richest person despite a nearly $100bn decline in his fortune since the year began – consists of his partial ownership of Tesla. His shares in the company are worth quite a lot less than they were when Trump was inaugurated.

During a call with disappointed Wall Street investors after Thursday’s earnings figures, Musk said his work to get the US government’s “financial house in order is mostly done”. “Starting probably next month, May, my time allocation to Doge will drop significantly,” he added. He is scheduled to leave Doge on 30 May, amid a strict 130-day cap on his service as a special government employee.

The statement reminds me of the premature “Mission Accomplished” banner flown by former US president George W Bush soon after the disastrous Iraq war began: a declaration of victory that papers over a tumultuous reality very much still in flux. The success of Musk’s cost-cutting has yet to be determined. Four days before the earnings call, a federal judge in the US blocked his team’s efforts to shutter a top consumer financial protection agency. We do not yet know how much of his scything of the US federal government will remain in place.

Read more about Elon Musk

The wider TechScape



Source link

Mike Lindell’s lawyers push to move trial after using AI for filing

0


play

Lawyers representing MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell have asked a judge to postpone the defamation trial against him after mistakenly filing a document made with artificial intelligence.

In an April 28 filing with the U.S. District Court for Colorado, Christopher Kachouroff and Jennifer DeMaster, the attorneys for MyPillow and Lindell, requested to push the proceedings to “ensure a fair trial and adequate preparation.”

Last week, federal Judge Nina Wang questioned the attorneys’ use of generative AI in a February filing. Kachouroff said he uses generative AI to analyze documents, but said the filing was a draft that was mistakenly submitted to the court due to “human error.”

In Monday’s motion, the lawyers said they have experienced “reputational harm, emotional distress, and significant distractions from trial preparation” because of last week’s hearing about the mistaken filing.

Former Dominion Voting Systems executive Eric Coomer is suing Lindell for defamation tying back to claims the MyPillow founder made about fraud in the 2020 presidential election. Coomer alleges that Lindell played a role in spreading a conspiracy theory that he admitted to rigging voting systems for Dominion. The trial is currently set to begin June 2.

USA TODAY has reached out to Kachouroff, DeMaster and Lindell for comment.

Lindell’s lawyers admitted to using generative AI for documents

Wang filed an order on April 23 that said the lawyers submitted a document in February with nearly 30 errors, including citation of cases that do not exist.

Kachouroff admitted to using generative AI at an April 21 hearing, according to the order.

The judge in the order threatened to penalize the lawyers and refer them to disciplinary hearings if they did not provide further explanation about the use of generative AI by May 5.

In a response filed two days later, Kachouroff said he was “wholly unprepared” for the hearing about whether generative AI was used, adding that he had “never heard of that phrase before and refer to artificial intelligence as simply ‘AI.'”

He said he often uses platforms like Microsoft Copilot “to analyze my own and my opposition’s arguments.”

“There is nothing wrong with using AI when used properly,” Kachouroff said in the response.

The response also said the document in question was an “inadvertent, an erroneous filing that was not done intentionally, and was filed mistakenly through human error.”

Lawyers push to move start date in defamation trial against Lindell

On Monday, Lindell’s lawyers filed a motion to postpone the start of the defamation trial, which is currently slated to begin June 2.

The motion said the issues surrounding the erroneous filing made using generative AI “has imposedsignificant burdens” on the lawyers and interfered with their trial preparation.

“It has triggered national media coverage, subjecting defense counsel to reputational harm, emotional distress, and significant distractions from trial preparation,” the motion said.

The lawyers also raised concerns about “potential jury prejudice” in the case if it moves forward with the June 2 start date.

They requested the trial be pushed back by 45 days to begin in mid-July. The motion said Coomer’s lawyer opposed the request.

What is MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell being sued for?

Coomer’s case against the MyPillow CEO stems from claims Lindell made that the 2020 presidential election was rigged in former President Joe Biden’s favor.

The MyPillow founder has faced a slew of legal actions in recent years, including an ongoing defamation case brought by Dominion Voting Systems.

Coomer, a former Dominion executive, alleges Lindell made defamatory remarks against him by spreading a conspiracy theory that Coomer had admitted to rigging voting machines.

Melina Khan is a trending reporter covering national news for USA TODAY. She can be reached at MKhan@gannett.com. 



Source link

Police ID victims of deadly crash at youth program in Illinois

0


play

The three children and one young adult who were killed when a car plowed into a building hosting an after-school program in Illinois have been identified.

The fatal victims of the crash include Kathryn Corley, 7; Alma Buhnerkempe, 7; Ainsley Johnson, 8; and Rylee Britton, 18, according to Sangamon County Coroner Jim Allmon. All four were pronounced deceased at the scene as a result of blunt force injuries sustained in the crash, Allmon said.

Authorities also identified the driver as 44-year-old Marianne Akers, of Chatham. Illinois State Police said she was not in custody “as the cause of the crash remains under investigation.” Officials added that the crash does “not appear to be a targeted attack.”

The crash occurred on April 28 around 3:20 p.m. when a vehicle traveled through a field and smashed into the east side of the YNOT After School Camp in Chatham, a village just south of Springfield. The car rammed into the building and struck multiple people before exiting on the other side.

The crash killed four people and injured six children, who were taken to area hospitals. As of April 29, one remains in critical condition.

After the crash, the driver was taken to a hospital for an evaluation. Toxicology reports are pending, according to state police.

What is the YNOT After School Camp

The nonprofit YNOT Outdoors was formed in 2002 as “a way for parents to place their kids into a safe, fun, active and stimulating summer environment,” according to its website.

YNOT, acronym for Youth Need Other Things, holds summer camps that plan organized field trips and offer a range of outdoor activities, including fishing, hiking as well as organized field sports.

Staff counselors are generally college students or high school seniors, the camp’s website says. Each candidate is interviewed by both the local day director and the executive director, then go through a background check.

The nonprofit hosts events and programs at several locations in Chatham, including the Pawnee Assembly of God Church and Sugar Creek United Methodist Church. The building that was struck on April 29 is where YNOT hosts its after-school programs and summer camps.



Source link

Adam Johnson: No criminal charges over death of ice hockey player

0




CNN
 — 

No criminal charges will be brought over the 2023 death of ice hockey player Adam Johnson, the UK’s Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) announced on Tuesday.

Johnson died after sustaining a cut to the neck in a collision with another player during the second period of the Nottingham Panthers’ game against the Sheffield Steelers in England on October 28, 2023.

A Sheffield coroner’s report found that the 29-year-old “sustained an incised wound to the neck caused by the skate of another player” and later died in hospital as a result of the injury.

The CPS said it worked with South Yorkshire Police to determine whether criminal charges would be brought against an unnamed professional hockey player. Matthew Petgrave previously said he was the other hockey player involved in the incident when he appealed for donations to help fund his legal fees.

According to deputy chief crown prosecutor Michael Quinn, the CPS concluded that “there is not a realistic prospect of conviction for any criminal offence and so there will not be a prosecution.”

“Our thoughts remain with the family and friends of Adam Johnson,” Quinn said in a statement, adding that it was a “shocking and deeply upsetting incident.”

CNN has contacted Burton Copeland, the law firm listed on the crowdfunding page as Petgrave’s representatives, for comment.

Johnson's death led to an outpouring of tributes.

Born in Hibbing, Minnesota, Johnson started his professional career in the American Hockey League before progressing to the National Hockey League (NHL).

He featured in 13 games over two years for the Pittsburgh Penguins and also played in Sweden and Germany before joining the Panthers for the 2023-24 season.

Johnson’s death sparked an outpouring of tributes to the American from across the hockey world, with Johnson’s family remembering him as a “thoughtful, patient and genuinely authentic” person who “took pleasure in the small, everyday things.”

Following Johnson’s death, the International Ice Hockey Federation (IIHF) made the wearing of protective neck guards mandatory at all levels, including the Winter Olympics and World Championships.



Source link

Restaurant fire kills 22 in northeast China’s Liaoning

0




Reuters
 — 

A restaurant fire in northeastern China killed 22 people on Tuesday, the official news agency Xinhua said, in the latest in a series of similar deadly incidents around the country.

Xinhua did not identify the cause of the fire but said President Xi Jinping called it “a deeply sobering lesson” and urged local officials to quickly treat the injured, determine what triggered the blaze and hold those responsible to account.

The fire broke out at 12:25 p.m. (0425 GMT) in a restaurant in a residential area of Liaoning Province’s Liaoyang City, state broadcaster CCTV said. Three people were injured.

Footage circulating on social media including X and Chinese platform Douyin, unverified by Reuters, showed bright orange flames engulfing a storefront on street level alongside scores of parked vehicles. Smoke was seen billowing out as paramedics tended to people on stretchers.

Hao Peng, secretary of Liaoning’s provincial ruling party committee, said 22 fire trucks and 85 firefighters were deployed to the scene. Hao said the on-site rescue work had been completed and people had been evacuated.

It was the latest in a spate of similar incidents across the country in recent years. In April, 20 people were killed in a fire that broke out in an apartment for the elderly at a nursing home in the northern province of Hebei.

Gas leaks caused at least two high-profile explosions in residential areas last year, with a blast at a restaurant in Hebei province killing two people and injuring 26 in March, and an explosion in a highrise building in southern Shenzhen province in September killing one person.



Source link

Kroger’s leadership upheaval marks most turbulent year since COVID-19

0


play

Between the abrupt March resignation of CEO Rodney McMullen, two changes of its chief financial officer and the departure of its top marketing officer in December, Kroger is seeing the biggest changes among its senior executives ranks since the COVID-19 pandemic, company disclosures show.

Further change was revealed April 15 when Kroger disclosed Joe Kelley, its head of the King Soopers & City Market division in Colorado, was being promoted to senior vice president of retail divisions, one of Kroger’s top roles overseeing store operations. He is replacing Kenny Kimball, who has been listed as one of Kroger’s top dozen executives for the last three years, who will lead its Smith’s Food and Drug division in Utah as president.

The latest switch marks the fifth exit among Kroger’s top executive ranks in just over a year. When Kroger files its annual proxy statement next month, it will likely list two or three of its five highest-paid executives who no longer work for the company. The last time Kroger saw so much change was in 2021 when five top executives left amid the COVID-19 pandemic.

No timeline yet on finding next Kroger CEO

Interim CEO Ron Sargent, a Kroger board member and former Staples CEO, took over at the retailer after the sudden exit of McMullen. CEO for more than 11 years, McMullen resigned amid an investigation into his “personal conduct” that “was inconsistent” with the grocer’s policy of business ethics, the grocer announced March 3.

Sargent, 69, said on a conference call a few days later Kroger would conduct a national search for a successor and consider both internal and external candidates for the CEO position. The company hasn’t given a timeline for naming McMullen’s permanent successor.

Kroger disclosures show McMullen’s departure was hasty: The company said it came about after the board “was made aware” of the undisclosed conduct and “immediately” hired an outside lawyer to investigate 10 days before the resignation. The company hasn’t offered additional detail about the conduct, other than to say it was “not related to the company’s financial performance, operations or reporting, and it did not involve any Kroger associates.”

Recent departures began with top accountant leaving for Costco

At Kroger the recent spate of resignations, retirements and other changes began 13 months before McMullen left:

  • On Feb. 5, 2024, Kroger’s chief financial officer Gary Millerchip left the grocer to take another job. Days later, Costco Wholesale revealed the company hired him for the same job. A review of the company’s respective proxies suggest a good reason: Millerchip’s total compensation package has more than doubled from $5.7 million in 2023 to $14.3 million in 2024 at the membership warehouse retailer.
  • That same day, Kroger named its corporate controller, Todd Foley, as the interim CFO, but made it clear it was looking elsewhere for a “permanent” replacement.

  • The retailer said Mary Ellen Adcock, Kroger’s senior vice president of operations, was replacing Aitken.
  • On Feb. 12, Kroger announced it had tapped a Pepsico executive for the top accounting job: David Kennerley, who was the beverage company’s CFO for Europe, would take over in April. It added interim CFO Foley would retire at the end of the first quarter.
  • On March 11, Kroger named Yael Cosset, previously its chief information officer, its new executive vice president and chief digital officer, with oversight of the grocer’s newly-formed eCommerce business unit.
  • On April 15, Kroger announced Kelley’s promotion along with other divisional changes in the wake of his move.

Based in downtown Cincinnati, Kroger employs 409,000 workers nationwide, including roughly 20,000 in Greater Cincinnati. Kroger operates 76 stores in Greater Cincinnati and Northern Kentucky, employing 14,500 associates.



Source link

White House calls Amazon ‘hostile’ for reportedly planning to list tariff costs | Amazon

0


The White House accused Amazon of committing a “hostile and political act” after a report said the e-commerce company was planning to inform customers how much Donald Trump’s tariffs would cost them as they shopped.

The press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, was responding to a report in Punchbowl News, which, citing a person familiar with the matter, reported that Amazon would begin displaying on its site how much the tariffs had increased the prices of individual products, breaking out the figure from the total listed price.

“Why didn’t Amazon do this when the Biden administration hiked inflation to the highest level in 40 years?” Leavitt asked during a press briefing.

Amazon’s online marketplace has seen prices rise across the board since Trump announced sweeping tariffs at the start of April, particularly on China, where many products listed on Amazon.com ship from. In response, the company has pressured its third-party sellers to shoulder the burden of the extra import costs rather than pass them on to customers. Amazon did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

“This is another reason why Americans should buy American,” Leavitt continued, though Amazon is headquartered in Seattle.

Amazon moved to distance itself from the report, saying the idea had been considered by Amazon Haul, the company’s recently launched low-cost shopping hub, but had been rejected.

“The team that runs our ultra-low-cost Amazon Haul store considered the idea of listing import charges on certain products. This was never approved and is not going to happen,” said Tim Doyle, Amazon spokesperson.

Online shopping has been upended by Trump’s trade policies. The day before the White House took aim at Amazon, discount retailers Temu and Shein, which ship from China, began displaying 145% “import charges” in customers’ totals to reflect the surcharge on Chinese goods.

Asked if the strident statement from the White House signaled a rift between Trump and Amazon’s billionaire founder, who stepped down as CEO in 2021 and donated $1m to Trump’s inauguration fund earlier this year, Leavitt said: “I will not speak to the president’s relationships with Jeff Bezos.”

Bezos and Trump endured a strained relationship during the president’s initial run for the White House. During the 2016 campaign, the Amazon founder publicly argued that some of Trump’s rhetoric, including threats to lock up his political opponents, damaged democracy, while Trump accused the tech giant of failing to pay enough taxes.

Scrutiny of Trump’s first term by the Washington Post, which is owned by Bezos, angered the US president. He was further infuriated by Bezos’s apparent refusal to intervene. In a bid to pile pressure on Amazon, Trump threatened to block federal aid for the US Postal Service unless it hiked shipping rates for online firms.

Since Trump’s return to power, however, Bezos has taken a noticeably different approach to the president. He attended Trump’s inauguration, alongside a string of other big tech founders, and Amazon donated $1m to Trump’s inauguration fund.

Days before last November’s presidential election, the Washington Post announced its editorial board would not endorse a candidate for the first time in more than three decades – prompting an exodus of subscribers. Bezos insisted the move was a “principled decision” and claimed that “inadequate planning” had led to the last-minute call.

The Post went a step further in February, announcing an overhaul of the newspaper’s opinion section to focus its output “in support and defense of two pillars: personal liberties and free markets”, Bezos said. The decision angered readers and staff and prompted the resignation of the opinions editor, David Shipley.

His actions drew a sharp rebuke from Marty Baron, the highly regarded former editor of the Washington Post, who told the Guardian that Bezos’s plan for the newspaper’s opinion section amounted to a “betrayal of the very idea of free expression” that had left him “appalled”.

Amazon, meanwhile, is reportedly paying some $40m to license a documentary on the life of the first lady, Melania Trump.



Source link

Supreme Court sounds willing to allow family’s lawsuit against FBI

0



Trina Martin, her son Gabe and her partner Toi Cliatt awoke one morning in October 2017 to what she called the “monstrous noise” of a half-dozen FBI agents barging into their home with guns drawn.

play

WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court sounded willing to allow an Atlanta family to sue the FBI for compensation over the mistaken search of their home, but reluctant to define how much protection law enforcement officers deserve in carrying out their jobs.

Trina Martin, her son Gabe and her partner Toi Cliatt awoke one morning in October 2017 to what she called the “monstrous noise” of a half-dozen FBI agents barging into their home with guns drawn.

But the FBI agents were at the wrong home, 436 feet from a similar beige, split-level house where a suspected gang member lived. The justices sounded willing to allow a lawsuit for compensation for the mistake, after lower courts dismissed the case.

“You are begging the question, which is, how far does this discretionary exception goes?” Justice Sonia Sotomayor told the government lawyer.

The FBI agents described their meticulous planning to search the house by locating it with GPS during daylight, taking pictures and drawing up a tactical plan. Frederick Liu, an assistant to the solicitor general, said officers were weighing public safety concerns and executing the search swiftly through steps such as not checking the address on the mailbox at the house before entering.

‘Don’t break down the wrong door’

Justice Gorsuch asked whether U.S. policy says, “don’t break down the wrong door of a house” or “don’t traumatize its occupants.”

“How about make sure you’re on the right street?” Gorsuch asked.

“Of course, it’s the United States policy to execute the warrants at the right house,” Liu replied. “What I would say is exactly what the courts below found, which is that the officers here made a reasonable mistake as to where they were.”

Liu said a 1974 change in federal law at the heart of the case removed one protection for police against lawsuits but left another in place to block the family’s case. But Sotomayor was skeptical.

“That is so ridiculous,” Sotomayor said.

What is the Federal Tort Claims Act?

The family sued under the Federal Tort Claims Act, which Congress amended in 1974 to allow lawsuits against law enforcement after two wrong-house raids the year before. But the government argued that judges shouldn’t second-guess agents doing their jobs. A District Court and the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed the case by finding the agents were immune.

Gorsuch asked whether the high court could send the case back to the 11th Circuit to determine whether the FBI in this case deserved discretion to make the mistake they did.

“Wouldn’t that be a sensible course?” Gorsuch asked.

Patrick Jaicomo, a lawyer at the Institute for Justice representing the family, said federal appeals courts have disagreed about how much discretion police deserve with messy discussions of the faces of specific cases. But the 11th Circuit’s decision would rule out any lawsuits against law enforcement – despite Congress changing the law, Jaicomo argued.

“The line is being drawn right now by all the circuits. They’re just confused about where to draw it,” Jaicomo said. “There needs to be some guidance on this, so that this statutory provision actually has effect.”

Roberts suggests lawsuit ‘plausible’ under statute

The statute removed sovereign immunity from lawsuits for “assault, battery, false imprisonment, false arrest, abuse of process or malicious prosecution” based on “acts or omissions of investigative or law enforcement officers of the United States Government.”

Liu, the government lawyer, said Congress hadn’t intended to remove all protections for law enforcement based on where changes were made in the statute.

But Chief Justice John Roberts said lawmakers are busy and “it’s certainly plausible” the family’s lawsuit should be allowed.

“I don’t really think that’s plausible,” Liu replied.

Justice Brett Kavanaugh said the justices could simply return the case to the 11th Circuit by saying a provision in the Constitution doesn’t prevent a lawsuit and let the lower-court judges sort out how much discretion police deserve in making mistakes.

Justices sound reluctant to define how much protection police get from lawsuits

Justices sounded reluctant to map out how much discretion law enforcement officers deserve.

Sotomayor said a Secret Service agent who mistakenly arrested someone while protecting the president deserved protection from a claim of false arrest. She disagreed that legal claims for intentional actions could never be discretionary.

“I’m not quite sure that’s true,” Sotomayor said.

Justice Samuel Alito told the family’s lawyer the high court could simply send the case back to the 11th Circuit to discuss how much discretion to grant the FBI agents for their mistake.

“I know you would like us to go quite far,” Alito said. “Why should we go further than that and get into this enormously complicated question about the scope of the discretionary function exception?”



Source link

The Guardian view on teachers’ pay: ministers must fund an increase | Editorial

0


Teachers deserve a pay rise. So it was good to learn that the independent pay review body is expected to recommend an increase of around 4% in England for 2025-26, along with 3% for NHS workers. There are staff shortages across many parts of the public sector. Schools are not unique in having trouble with recruitment and retention. But the importance of education means that the government must do all in its power to prevent children from missing out, and fund the increase in full.

By refusing to do so, ministers would send the wrong signal to a beleaguered profession and the country at large. There are strong arguments for investing in public services across the board – and not only in England. But the case for ensuring that there are enough teachers should be unarguable for a government that is hopeful about the future and wants voters to feel the same.

The gap between public and private sector pay has grown over the past decade. Dismayingly, the former is now lower in real terms than in 2010, with experienced teachers facing some of the steepest drops. Labour’s acceptance last year of an above-inflation 5.5% rise for teachers, and similar deals for other public sector workers, was an overdue boost to morale as well as incomes.

The government now risks undoing that progress. Teaching has always been a challenging job, and one respected by the public. But for complicated reasons it is particularly difficult at the moment. Cuts to other services and benefits are one factor, with schools filling in gaps and meeting needs – such as hunger – that ought to sit outside their purview, and that were exacerbated by the pandemic. Chronic problems in the special educational needs system add significantly to workloads, as pupils who need extra support struggle to cope.

Behaviour is another concern. If Sir Keir Starmer learned anything from Netflix’s Adolescence, and the debate it stirred up around teenage boys, this must surely include a greater understanding of the challenges faced by teachers. Rudeness and aggression linked to internet use are not the only reason why secondary-school classrooms can be hostile places. But a recent survey found that most teachers see social media as the “number one cause” of poor conduct, with female staff bearing the brunt, and some parents refusing to support schools in upholding standards.

Other kinds of changes connected with technology and the pandemic have also had an impact. Many graduate professions now enjoy more flexibility than five years ago, with “WFH” an ordinary part of the employment lexicon and accepted practice. Teaching, along with other public-facing roles, is excluded from this trend. It remains a physically demanding role involving high levels of personal interaction and strict timetabling.

The government has budgeted for a 2.8% rise. These figures must now be revisited. Telling schools to find the money by cutting other budgets would undermine the point of the pay rise, which is to make teaching more attractive. To allow arbitrary fiscal rules to prevent teachers from being properly remunerated would be unjust folly. The pay review recommendations are a good opportunity to let go of damaging constraints – and to tell the public why.

The last Labour government used the slogan “those who can, teach” to recruit teachers. Teachers could now turn this back on ministers and demand that those who can, pay.

  • Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.



Source link

Beyoncé shares sweet moments onstage with daughters Blue Ivy, Rumi

0


LOS ANGELES — Blue Ivy Carter is back onstage alongside her mom, Beyoncé, at her Cowboy Carter and the Rodeo Chitlin Circuit Tour. And her little sister, Rumi Carter, made an appearance, as well.

Blue took center stage for “America Has a Problem” early in the set list as the tour kicked off April 28 at SoFi Stadium in Los Angeles.

The crowd went wild as the 13-year-old danced front and center while the other dancers stayed back. Beyoncé grinned as the audience screamed.

Later, Beyoncé’s daughter Rumi, 7, appeared alongside her mom onstage for the first time ever during “Protector.”

The song features sentimental lyrics like, “Even though I know someday you’re gonna shine on your own/ I will be your projector.”

Blue, Rumi and Beyoncé ended the song standing together as they shared smiles with one another. Following the performance, a montage of Beyoncé and her children appeared on the screen, leaving fans in tears.

This is the second tour where Blue has appeared as a backup dancer. She made her debut on the 2023 Renaissance World Tour in Paris. She also danced with her mom during the Beyoncé Bowl NFL halftime show on Christmas Day 2024.

The Los Angeles concert kicked off a total of 32 stadium shows on her Cowboy Carter and the Rodeo Chitlin’ Circuit Tour. The nine-city tour will span the U.S. and Europe with the grand finale taking place in Las Vegas on July 26. She’s set to make history with her scheduled tour dates, including by playing the most dates at SoFi Stadium of any artist.

Find Beyoncé concert tickets

Beyoncé first announced the tour the night before the 2025 Grammy Awards, where she took home the award for best country album and the night’s top prize album of the year for “Cowboy Carter.”

Of course, she first released the 27-track project in March 2024. It has since made history and broken multiple records. As Beyoncé’s first country album, she deliberately featured country legends and emerging Black country artists alike.

Beyoncé last toured in 2023 for her record-breaking Renaissance World Tour. It began May 10 in Stockholm, Sweden, and concluded Oct. 1 in Kansas City, Missouri, with Beyoncé performing a total of 56 shows.

The tour followed the release of her seventh studio album, “Renaissance.” The 2022 project earned her four Grammys including best dance/electronic music album, making her the most decorated artist in the awards’ history. She later announced the album was the first part of a three-act project, making “Cowboy Carter” the second.

We cover all your favorite stars: Sign up for USA TODAY’s Entertainment newsletter.



Source link

AI strategies for cybersecurity press releases that get coverage

0


If you’ve ever tried to get your cybersecurity news picked up by media outlets, you’ll know just how much of a challenge (and how disheartening) it can be. You pour hours into what you think is an excellent announcement about your new security tool, threat research, or vulnerability discovery, only to watch it disappear into journalists’ overflowing inboxes without a trace.

The cyber PR space is brutally competitive. Reporters at top publications receive tens, if not hundreds, of pitches each day, and they have no choice but to be highly selective about which releases they choose to cover and which to discard. Your challenge then isn’t just creating a good press release, it’s making one that grabs attention and stands out in an industry drowning in technical jargon and “revolutionary” solutions.

Why most cybersecurity press releases fall flat

Let’s first look at some of the main reasons why many cyber press releases fail:

  • They’re too complex from the start, losing non-technical reporters
  • They bury the actual news under corporate marketing speak.
  • They focus on product features rather than the real-world impact or problems they solve.
  • They lack credible data or specific research findings that journalists can cite as support.

Most of these problems have one main theme: Journalists aren’t interested in promoting your product or your business. They are looking after their interests and seeking newsworthy stories their audiences care about. Keep this in mind and make their job easier by showing them exactly why your announcement matters.

Learning how to write a cybersecurity press release

What does a well-written press release look like? Alongside the reasons listed above, many companies make the mistake of submitting poorly formatted releases that journalists will be unlikely to spend time reading.

It’s worth learning how to write a cybersecurity press release properly, including the preferred structure (headline, subheader, opening paragraph, boilerplate, etc). And, be sure to review some examples of high-quality press releases as well.

AI strategies that transform your press release process

Let’s examine how AI tools can significantly enhance your cyber PR at every stage.

1. Research Enhancement

Use AI tools to track media coverage patterns and identify emerging trends in cybersecurity news. You can analyse which types of security stories gain traction, and this can help you position your announcement in that context.

Another idea is to use LLMs (like Google’s Gemini or OpenAI’s ChatGPT) to analyse hundreds of successful cybersecurity press releases in a niche similar to yours. Ask it to identify common elements in those that generated significant coverage, and then use these same features in your cyber PR efforts.

To take this a step further, AI-powered sentiment analysis can help you understand how different audience segments receive specific cybersecurity topics. The intelligence can help you tailor your messaging to address current concerns and capitalise on positive industry momentum.

2. Writing assistance

If you struggle to convey complex ideas and terminology in more accessible language, consider asking the LLM to help simplify your messaging. This can help transform technical specifications into clear, accessible language that non-technical journalists can understand.

Since the headline is the most important part of your release, use an LLM to generate a handful of options based on your core announcement, then select the best one based on clarity and impact. Once your press release is complete, run it through an LLM to identify and replace jargon that might be second nature to your security team but may be confusing to general tech reporters.

3. Visual storytelling

If you are struggling to find ways to explain your product or service in accessible language, visuals can help. AI image generation tools, like Midjourney, create custom visuals based on prompts that help illustrate your message. The latest models can handle highly complex tasks.

With a bit of prompt engineering (and by incorporating the press release you want help with), you should be able to create accompanying images and infographics that bring your message to life.

4. Video content

Going one step further than a static image, a brief AI-generated explainer video can sit alongside your press release, providing journalists with ready-to-use content that explains complex security concepts. Some ideas include:

  • Short Explainer Videos: Use text-to-video tools to turn essential sections of your press release into a brief (60 seconds or less) animated or stock-footage-based video. You can usually use narration and text overlays directly on the AI platforms as well.
  • AI Avatar Summaries: Several tools now enable you to create a brief video featuring an AI avatar that presents the core message of the press release. A human-looking avatar reads out the content and delivers an audio and video component for your release.
  • Data Visualisation Videos: Use AI tools to animate key statistics or processes described in the release for enhanced clarity.

Final word

Even as you use the AI tools you have at your disposal, remember that the most effective cybersecurity press releases still require that all-important human insight and expertise. Your goal isn’t to automate the entire process. Instead, use AI to enhance your cyber PR efforts and make your releases stand out from the crowd.

AI should help emphasise, not replace, the human elements that make security stories so engaging and compelling. Be sure to shine a spotlight on the researchers who made the discovery, the real-world implications of any threat vulnerabilities you uncover, and the people security measures ultimately protect.

Combine this human-focused storytelling with the power of AI automation, and you’ll ensure that your press releases and cyber PR campaigns get the maximum mileage.



Source link

ICE’s New Courthouse Arrest Policy Set Them on a Collision Course with State Courts

0


On Friday, federal law enforcement arrested a Wisconsin state judge for allegedly obstructing an immigration arrest at her courthouse. The move is an escalation in the conflict between the Trump administration and local authorities over immigration policies. It also undermines the ability of judiciaries to effectively carry out their duties.

While exactly what happened is still becoming clear, FBI director Kash Patel asserted on social media that Milwaukee County trial judge Hannah Dugan “intentionally misdirected federal agents away from” a man U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) was seeking to arrest in her courthouse.

ICE’s own policy changes — which dramatically increased the frequency of immigration arrests in courthouses — set federal law enforcement on a collision course with state courts. These policy changes were made despite ample evidence and clear calls from judges, prosecutors, and others that immigration enforcement in state courthouses makes communities less safe.

Though federal immigration authorities historically did not bar enforcement from taking place in state courthouses, it was a practice they mostly avoided. But in 2017, the first Trump administration changed course. According to one study by a New York-based coalition, there were 159 and 178 courthouse arrests by ICE in New York State in 2017 and 2018, respectively, compared to just 11 in 2016. Across the country, these arrests included people who were in court to get orders protecting them from domestic violence, contest traffic tickets, and even access a program for victims of human trafficking.

These arrests resulted in chaos in courthouses across the country. Chase scenes played out in courthouse hallways. People who were scheduled to appear before a judge disappeared immediately before their hearing. One incident in New York City was so violent that witnesses thought the person ICE arrested had been kidnapped.

Federal prosecutors even charged a Massachusetts judge in 2019 with obstructing an immigration arrest for allegedly enabling a person targeted by ICE to evade arrest by leaving out a different door than he entered. While these allegations were similar to those leading to the Wisconsin judge’s arrest on Friday, the Massachusetts judge was never arrested, and prosecutors ultimately dropped the charges against her.

With the dramatic increase in immigration enforcement in courthouses came substantial evidence that people who needed courts to keep them or their communities safe were choosing to avoid them. Local prosecutors reported dropping domestic violence cases, as victims saw appearing in court as too risky. Communities from Los Angeles to San Diego to Houston saw double-digit declines in domestic violence reports and applications for protective orders in 2017 and 2018.

As a result, there was broad pushback from all corners of the justice system. A group of 75 retired state and federal judges wrote to ICE in 2018 that “judges simply cannot do their jobs — and our justice system cannot function effectively — if victims, defendants, witnesses, and family members do not feel secure in accessing the courthouse.” One New York district attorney said that ICE’s courthouse operations were “compromising our ability to hold accountable perpetrators who prey upon victims from vulnerable immigration communities.” Several state legislatures and court systems responded by passing laws or adopting policies to limit courthouse immigration arrests.

While the Biden administration responded to these calls by limiting courthouse arrests, the Trump administration made a priority of walking back those limitations, issuing a new directive on “Enforcement Actions in or Near Courthouses” on January 21, its first full day in office. That current policy removed most restrictions on immigration enforcement at courthouses and is what led to ICE operating in that Wisconsin courthouse as well as numerous incidents of ICE arrests in state courthouses over the last several months.

If the government has any interest in keeping communities safe, it can heed the calls of those judges, prosecutors, and court administrators who have said clearly: Keep immigration enforcement out of courts and let judges do their jobs. Otherwise, we should expect more chaos to play out in courthouses across the country.

Douglas Keith is a founding editor of State Court Report and a senior counsel in the Judiciary Program at the Brennan Center for Justice. 

Suggested Citation: Douglas Keith, ICE’s New Courthouse Arrest Policy Set Them on a Collision Course with State Courts, Sᴛᴀᴛᴇ Cᴏᴜʀᴛ Rᴇᴘᴏʀᴛ (Apr. 25, 2025), https://statecourtreport.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/ices-new-courthouse-arrest-policy-set-them-collision-course-state-courts



Source link

A day without power: Spain and Portugal’s 12 hours of darkness

0




CNN
 — 

Luis Ibáñez Jiménez was driving on a highway in east Madrid when Spain lost power.

“Suddenly, there were no traffic lights,” the resident of the capital told CNN. Cars piled up, and nobody had right of way. “I was stopping so that people could pass… I saw a massive bus coming, and I had to accelerate a lot to go past it,” he said. “It was a bit of a jungle.”

Jiménez had just seen his entire country’s electrical supply wiped out in a matter of seconds. The lights went out in cities, villages, airports and train stations; computer screens and payment terminals shut to black in an instant. Confusion and concern coursed through Spain and Portugal. And for officials in the two countries, a race was sparked against the setting sun.

It was a battle the neighboring nations would lose. Several hours would pass until power was meaningfully restored; by nightfall, families gathered in candlelight and exchanged stories from a remarkable Monday.

“It was definitely one of the weirdest days of my life,” said Jiménez, a 29-year-old chief operating officer for a vocational training provider.

People queue to reach a bus stop in downtown Madrid. The subway in the city was shut down by the outage.

The outage was baffling, and a day later, remains unexplained. In the space of five seconds, 15 gigawatts of energy suddenly dropped from Spain’s supply, Spanish government sources told CNN – equivalent to 60% of the electricity being consumed at the time – and the entire Spanish grid collapsed as a result.

Virtually all energy had finally been restored by Tuesday morning, but confusion is still pulsing through Spain. “The investigation into the causes is ongoing,” a government source said. “All hypotheses remain open, and more details will emerge in the coming hours.”

Chaos, confusion and cash payments

Alanna Gladstone, a 40-year-old film editor, had landed in Portugal’s capital, Lisbon, on a flight from New York hours before the outage. She checked into her Airbnb and took a nap; by the time she woke up, the technology that the country takes for granted had gone dark.

“I didn’t know what was going on,” the New Yorker said. She went out looking for supplies, with two euros and 10 US dollars to her name.

“There was a bit of a pandemonium, and a bit of a frenzied energy,” Gladstone told CNN. Supermarkets were closed, so lines snaked through the street into fruit markets, where shopper after shopper was told they couldn’t pay with cards.

People queue to pay in cash at a supermarket in Pamplona, northern Spain.

It took some time before Spanish and Portuguese people understood the scale of what was happening. “People were asking: is this hacking from Russia? Is this an act of terrorism?” Gladstone said.

Ellie Kenny, a holidaymaker inside Lisbon’s Humberto Delgado airport, said hundreds of people were stood in the dark in lines, with no air conditioning or running water. Shops were only accepting cash, she told CNN.

Hours later, with the power still out and the working day ending, people were adjusting to a strange new reality. Police officers directed traffic with hand signals. Major cities were clogged with traffic, and pavements heaved with busy crowds, trying to find a way home.

Jiménez drove home – carefully. “People were surprisingly polite and well coordinated,” he said. “But the whole city was blocked by around 4 p.m.” His journey, which usually takes 30 minutes, lasted two hours.

Street lighting went out in Lisbon, leaving drivers to cautiously inch home.

Gladstone had another problem: She returned to her apartment with shopping, but the electronic keypads that allowed access to the building and to her unit were down. After banging on the main entrance to no avail, a neighbor found a way into their own apartment, and welcomed her in for the night.

Madrid’s firefighters carried out hundreds of “elevator interventions” across the city on Monday, its Emergency Information Office said; members of Spain’s Civil Guard carried an elderly woman in a wheelchair to her apartment on the sixth floor, the agency said.

By early evening, with the sun sinking and power still out for most of Spain and Portugal, misinformation swirled online and in person. “The rumor mill was just going crazy,” she told CNN. A false theory circulated that all of Europe’s power was down, and with phone and internet access intermittent, it was impossible for many to check whether that was true.

People eat under candlelight at a restaurant in Burgos, Spain.

Spain’s Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez urged people to use phones “responsibly,” to make calls only when necessary and to keep them brief to ease strain on the system.

By early evening, with the sun sinking and power still out for most of Spain and Portugal, camaraderie became commonplace. “People took the opportunity to ‘get on it’… You could see people drinking beer everywhere,” buying rounds until the batteries in card payment machines went flat, Jiménez said. “All the terraces were full.”

In Lisbon, the lights came on around 10:30 p.m. By then, Gladstone’s neighbors had became her friends. “We spent the night discussing life, and how strange everything is,” she said. “They made food by Mag-Lite and flashlight, and we drank wine.”

“The kindness of strangers never ceases to amaze.”



Source link

Here’s why you should change your cabin air filter this spring

0



If your car smells like rotten eggs, you aren’t alone. Keep your cabin air fresh by learning this easy maintenance procedure.

play

  • Millions of Americans have experienced foul car odors from dirty air filters.
  • Cabin air filters are affordable and easy to replace with the right guidance.
  • Change your cabin air filter before cranking up your car A.C. to avoid musty car smells.

Does your car reek? If you’ve noticed a foul odor in the interior of your vehicle, don’t fret. You, like millions of other Americans, probably need to change your cabin air filter this spring. It’s a quick, easy, and affordable way to ensure that your car’s air conditioning unit is pushing the cleanest air possible into the passenger cabin.

Spring cleaning doesn’t have to stop at your home. Some basic car maintenance can guarantee you have the safest, most pleasant driving experience possible as we head towards the summer.

What is a cabin air filter?

A cabin air filter is a filter that acts to capture dust, pollen, and pollutants in the air, so your vehicle brings clean air into the cabin. If your cabin air filter is dirty or moldy, you risk serious foul odors as well as inhaling harmful pollutants. Your local mechanic shop will happily offer to change this filter for you during oil changes. On the other hand, if you want to change your cabin air filter sooner, for less money, it’s much more simple than most Americans realize.

Your car’s cabin air filter will need changing at least once a year. Additionally, it’s important to have a clean filter if you plan on cranking up the air conditioning while driving this spring and summer.

How much does a cabin air filter cost?

Basic cabin air filters can cost anywhere between $10 and $20. Filters from original equipment manufacturers (car brands) tend to be more expensive. Auto mechanics will often attempt to upsell the OEM air filters. While there isn’t enough of a difference to justify purchasing the more expensive filters for most drivers, the choice is yours, especially if you’re changing the filter yourself on your own time.

The easiest way to find the appropriate cabin air filter for your vehicle online is simply by searching for the term “cabin air filter” for your specific year/make/model. For example, my 2018 Honda Civic EX is compatible with cabin air filters from several brands including STP ($19.99) and K&N (44.99) according to AutoZone.com. I can get this particular cabin air filter shipped directly to my residence or add it to a cart and pick it up at my local AutoZone. Most auto parts shops carry cabin air filters.

Amazon also offers several affordable options from various brands starting from $9.99. So, you can score a new cabin air filter for under $20 in most cases and skip any installation/labor cost by doing it yourself.

How to change a cabin air filter

The first step is to locate your cabin air filter via a quick web search using your car’s year/make/model. Most cabin air filters are tucked behind glove compartments.

If your filter is behind your glove box, carefully remove the glove box completely by applying mild pressure to the sides of it when it’s fully open. This pressure will help pop the glove box out of place, leaving the filter cover exposed. Place your glove box aside and uncover the filter.

Once you can access the filter, remove it completely. Your new filter will include directions informing you which side should be facing towards the flow of air. Then, just pop the filter cover back on and you’re good to go. The entire process should take no longer than a few minutes and it’ll easily save you a few bucks.



Source link

Mark Carney wins Canada’s election, riding anger at Trump to victory

0



Mark Carney rode an unprecedented surge of Canadian nationalism sparked by President Donald Trump’s aggression and tariffs to victory.

play

  • “America wants our land, our resources, our water, our country,” Carney said. “That will never happen.”
  • With most of the votes counted, Canada’s Liberals had won 168 electoral districts, followed by the Conservatives with 144.
  • Carney will need the support of two small parties on the left to govern.
  • Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre, who just three months ago looked certain to sweep the polls, lost his seat in Parliament.

TORONTO – Mark Carney won the Canadian election to continue his term as prime minister, Canada’s election authority reported, closing his victory after President Donald Trump’s aggressive rhetoric and tariffs lifted the ruling Liberal Party to a remarkable political comeback.

Carney’s win was a repudiation of Trump’s threats to annex Canada and make it the “51st state.” That rhetoric – along with punishing tariffs on Canadian goods – has sparked an unprecedented wave of nationalism and overturned years of stability between the two neighbors.

“As I have been warning for months, America wants our land, our resources, our water, our country,” Carney said. “But these are not idle threats. President Trump is trying to break us so that America can own us.”

“That will never ever happen.”

“Our old relationship with the United States, a relationship based on steadily increasing integration, is over,” Carney said in a victory speech in Ottawa.

“The system of open global trade anchored by the United States, a system that Canada has relied on since the Second World War, a system that, while not perfect, has helped deliver prosperity for our country for decades, is over,” he said.

“These are tragedies, but it’s also our new reality.”

Carney, a central banker with little formal government experience, called a snap election late last month as the liberal party surged in polls to close a more-than-20-point deficit since the beginning of 2025.

play

President Trump’s feud with Canada key issue in Canadian election

Canadians have taken exception with President Trump’s talk of tariffs and annexation as the “Elbows Up” movement forms to fight back.

Conservative leader loses his seat in parliament

With almost all votes counted on April 29, results from Elections Canada showed the Liberals had won 168 electoral districts, followed by the Conservatives with 144.

Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre, who just three months ago had looked certain to sweep the polls, lost his seat in the Ontario district of Carleton to Liberal Bruce Fanjoy.

The Liberals, who have been in power for more than nine years, were 20 percentage points behind in surveys in January before the unpopular Justin Trudeau announced he was quitting as prime minister and Trump started threatening tariffs and annexation.

“It was the ‘anybody-but-Conservative’ factor, it was the Trump tariff factor, and then it was the Trudeau departure … which enabled a lot of left-of-center voters and traditional Liberal voters to come back to the party,” said Shachi Kurl, president of the Angus Reid Institute polling firm.

Carney’s Liberals win, but lack a majority

Despite the gains, the Liberals will not gain the outright majority that Carney had sought, to help him negotiate with Trump on the tariffs threatening Canada’s economy.

They needed 172 of the House of Commons’ 343 seats to be able to rule without the support of a smaller party.

Carney said the coming months would be challenging and require sacrifices.

Poilievre conceded defeat and said his party would continue to hold the government to account.

Kudos from Europe

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer congratulated Carney.

“The bond between Europe and Canada is strong — and growing stronger,” von der Leyen said. “I look forward to working closely together, both bilaterally and within the G7. We’ll defend our shared democratic values, promote multilateralism, and champion free and fair trade.”

Starmer said he looked forward to Carney’s leadership on international issues, and to continuing to work closely “on defence, security, trade and investment.”

Support from the left?

Carney had promised a tough approach to Washington’s import tariffs and said Canada would need to spend billions to reduce its reliance on the U.S. But the right-of-center Conservatives showed unexpected strength.

Minority governments in Canada rarely last longer than 2-1/2 years. If Carney strikes a deal with the left-leaning New Democrats and the Greens, he will be able to scrape together a slim majority.

“That’s … very fragile,” said Philippe Lagasse, a professor and constitutional expert at Ottawa’s Carleton University. “Every confidence vote will be stressful. Every by-election will be quite consequential.”

The Trump factor

Trump’s threats spurred a wave of patriotism that boosted support for Carney, a political newcomer who had previously led the Canadian and British central banks.

Trump re-emerged as a campaign factor last week, declaring that he might raise a 25% tariff on Canadian-made cars because the U.S. did not want them. He said earlier he might use “economic force” to make Canada the 51st state.

Carney has argued that his experience handling economic issues makes him the best leader to deal with Trump, while Poilievre tapped into concerns about the cost of living, crime and a housing crisis. Poilievre was endorsed by billionaire Trump advisor Elon Musk.

Trump, in a social media post on Monday, reiterated his call for Canada to become the 51st state.

“Good luck to the Great people of Canada,” he said. “Elect the man who has the strength and wisdom to cut your taxes in half, increase your military power, for free, to the highest level in the World, have your Car, Steel, Aluminum, Lumber, Energy, and all other businesses, QUADRUPLE in size, WITH ZERO TARIFFS OR TAXES, if Canada becomes the cherished 51st. State of the United States of America. No more artificially drawn line from many years ago.”

Tensions with the U.S. caused supporters of two smaller parties, the left-leaning New Democratic Party and the separatist Bloc Quebecois, to shift to the Liberals. NDP leader Jagmeet Singh conceded defeat in his own district and said he planned to quit as party leader.

The Liberals have now won four consecutive elections twice, the last time being in 2004.

Contributing: Reuters



Source link

Jalen Hurts misses Eagles’ White House celebrations while Trump throws shade at Taylor Swift and backs ‘tush push’

0




CNN
 — 

Unlike seven years ago, the Philadelphia Eagles celebrated their Super Bowl victory at the White House with President Donald Trump on Monday.

The Eagles traveled to Washington for the traditional championship victory lap, taking photos with the president, presenting him with an Eagles jersey emblazoned with “Trump 47” and soaking up the plaudits on the South Lawn having won Super Bowl LIX against the Kansas City Chiefs in February.

But absent from the traveling party was star quarterback and Super Bowl MVP Jalen Hurts who had a “scheduling conflict,” according to a White House spokesperson.

Last week, Hurts had dodged a question about whether he will personally celebrate the team’s Super Bowl victory at the White House, instead not answering when while he was on the red carpet for the 2025 TIME 100 gala in New York City, saying “Um” and looking around before the interviewer thanked him for his time.

Trump praised Hurts at the White House on Monday, calling him a “terrific guy and terrific player” while calling the Eagles an “incredible team, an incredible group.”

Hurts missed the celebrations at the White House because of a

According to reports, several other key members of the Eagles team were also not present at the White House, including wide receivers AJ Brown and DeVonta Smith, linebacker Zack Baun, defensive ends Brandon Graham and Josh Sweat and defensive tackle Jalen Carter.

In 2018, during Trump’s first term as president, the Eagles decided not celebrate their first ever Super Bowl win at the White House, a decision which sparked a storm of criticism from Trump, who falsely accused the Eagles of taking a knee during “The Star-Spangled Banner” that year and disrespecting the National Anthem in other ways before uninviting the whole team.

During their time in Washington, the Eagles also visited Arlington National Cemetery where they paid their “respects to those who made the ultimate sacrifice for our country by laying a wreath at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier,” team owner Jeffrey Lurie said in a statement.

“Our time in our nation’s capital served as a great reminder of the core values that have brought our team so close together – sacrifice, selflessness, and discipline.”

One player who was in attendance was Eagles running back Saquon Barkley who on Sunday had been seen spending time with Trump.

Barkley and Trump were seen getting off Marine One in New Jersey before playing golf at Trump National Golf Club in Bedminster. Barkley later took to social media to reply to those questioning his decision to meet and play golf with Trump.

“Lol some people are really upset cause I played golfed and flew to the White House with the PRESIDENT,” he said on X. “Maybe I just respect the office, not a hard concept to understand. Just golfed with Obama not too long ago…and look forward to finishing my round with Trump!

“Now ya get out my mentions with all this politics and have amazing day.”

During Monday’s festivities at the White House, Trump vocalized his support for the “Tush Push” play which the Eagles have popularized but could potentially be banned later this year by NFL owners.

Trump called the Eagles an

The infamous play has become polarizing across the NFL, but teams will vote on whether it will remain a permitted play in the future after a motion was tabled to ban it. And Trump said he’s in support of the league keeping it around.

“I hope they keep that play, Coach (Nick Sirianni). They’re talking about getting rid of that play, I understand. They should keep it,” Trump said on Monday. “I like it. It’s sort of exciting and different.”

After Trump spoke, Eagles head coach Sirianni said, “Thank you, Mr. President, for having us here. And we also appreciate the endorsement for the tush push.”





Source link

History has a lesson for Trump on overturning the global rules-based order. And it’s not a good one

0




CNN
 — 

Mankind’s achievements over the millennia have been bountiful. Their evolutionary fruits – from the harnessing of fire, to vaccines, to the art of diplomacy – were never low hanging; they were imagined before they were ever grasped.

But once held, they became indispensable. Until now that is, as 100 days into his presidency US President Donald Trump seems determined to throw this painful learning to the wind, risking a world forced into reverse.

A torrent of tariffs, unleashed against the better judgement of experts, yet exalted by Trump’s acolytes as the work of a deal-making genius are a case in point. So too is his willingness to throw allies to the wind, by threatening to grab Greenland, Canada even Panama by force if necessary.

Whatever one’s view of the policies themselves, Trump’s total upending of the global status quo has sewn fear and uncertainty among America’s friends, exacerbated market volatility and normalized economic aggression. It’s a formula that over the centuries has rarely served the world well.

The president’s apparent over-arching ethos – might is right, and mine is greatest – is now demolishing geopolitical norms at speed. It is Ukraine that should give in to Russia, which “has all the cards,” Trump says. Russian President Vladimir Putin’s “pretty big concession,” his US counterpart adds, is not “taking the whole country.”

Rescuers work at the site of a Russian airstrike, amid Russia's attack on Ukraine, in the town of Sloviansk, Donetsk region of Ukraine on April 23.

Yet despite three years of “meat-grinding” war, Putin’s aim remains as contrary to international law as it was when he launched his unprovoked, full-scale invasion.

It is clear then why Trump struggles to do what all his allies find easy: to blame Putin for defying the rules-based world order in a brutal campaign to swallow his smaller neighbor. The US president often even blames Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky for the war in which at least 42,000 Ukrainian civilians have been killed or injured, according to the United Nations, saying “he should never have started it.”

The implication – that the weak should capitulate to the strong – is an upending of millennia of evolution, culminating in the post-World War II, US-inspired rules-based international order that led to an unprecedented eight decades of relative global peace, prosperity and unimaginable scientific innovation.

Trump, as British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has commented, has broken the mold. “Old assumptions can no longer be taken for granted, the world as we knew it is gone,” he said.

The president’s world view was nurtured by his property-developing, landlord father Fred Trump. Poor tenants unable to pay their rent claimed they were evicted; not an uncommon practice at the time, or since, but one that advantages the powerful over the weak.

The parallels are not hard to spot: the world’s most powerful man still relies on bravado and bullying to get what he wants. Today everyone is in his firing line. America has been “taken advantage of by virtually every country in the world,” Trump inaccurately claims, “we’re no longer going to be the country that’s ripped off by every country in the world.”

But here’s the rub. Such is Trump’s braggadocio, no one he trusts appears brave enough to challenge him. Only when global markets soured, and his Petri dish economic experiment turned putrid, did he backslide on the threat to impose immediate tariffs on both friends and foes of the US, and even then, it may not be enough to avoid economic pain.

Trump’s acolyte have exalted a torrent of tariffs, unleashed against the better judgement of experts, as the work of a deal-making genius.

China seems ready to wait out his trade-defying tariffs, having been preparing for this moment since Trump’s first term.

Now, it seems, he must learn a costly lesson for himself that economic evolution had already taught the experts.

And while Trump’s defiant pose after the July 2024 assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania, was enough to convince Putin that he was “a courageous man,” the US president is already backing down on some of his tariff bravado, chastened by his loyalists who found their voices as bond markets tanked.

In the view of both Putin and Trump, it is the tough who set the rules, and the man in both their crosshairs, Ukraine’s President Zelensky, got this message Wednesday, “the man with ‘no cards to play’ should now, finally, GET IT DONE,” as Trump wrote on his social media platform.  Trump has since criticized Putin, questioning whether the Russian leader is interested in peace and suggesting “he’s just tapping me along.”

The world Trump and Putin seem to crave is one of spheres of influence run from islands of power, where diplomacy is a time-consuming irrelevance replaced by imperial decrees.

It would be a reset harking back to a darker time, essentially overturning the rules-based order. In the aftermath of great empires, regional warlords allied, feuded and fought each other for centuries before nations emerged, and largely did the same.

Presidents Zelensky and Trump held brief talks on the sidelines of the funeral of Pope Francis last Saturday.

By the 19th century diplomats like Klemens von Metternich, the Chancellor of the Austrian Empire, spent entire careers attempting to balance Europe’s feuding powers. He famously said, “when France sneezes, the rest of Europe catches cold.”

Today it is Trump spreading a chill. The Manhattan real estate developer has said he is going to “get” Greenland “for national security reasons.” Greenland and its Danish patron, a NATO ally that is no match militarily for the USA, say no.

Canada’s prime minister says the same about Trump’s plans to make his northern neighbor the USA’s 51st state, insisting “it will never happen.” Mark Carney, a former central banker already battling Trump’s aggressive trade tariffs, knows the threat is real, telling voters ahead of Monday’s election in which his Liberal Party won a stunning fourth consecutive victory “the Americans want our resources, our water, our land, our country.”

Trump’s world view is clear: he speaks as though he can reach out and take these things, and clearly believes he is working from an island of power, isolated from the negative consequences of his assumed conquests.

But no man, nor nation, is an Island.

Trump’s weakness is not just that he might buy Putin’s lie that he can conquer all Ukraine, or be outfoxed by Xi on tariffs, but that the rest of the world increasingly sees through his mantle of self-belief.

The costs of this muscle-power politics will be revealed more slowly than the near-instantaneous economic market pain to his trade tariffs. But it still marks a return to an era of dog eat dog. History has shown how that turns out.



Source link

Elon Musk’s Doge conflicts of interest worth $2.37bn, Senate report says | Elon Musk

0


Elon Musk and his companies face at least $2.37bn in legal exposure from federal investigations, litigation and regulatory oversight, according to a new report from Senate Democrats. The report attempts to put a number to Musk’s many conflicts of interest through his work with his so-called “department of government efficiency” (Doge), warning that he may seek to use his influence to avoid legal liability.

The report, which was published on Monday by Democratic members of the Senate homeland security committee’s permanent subcommittee on investigations, looked at 65 actual or potential actions against Musk across 11 separate agencies. Investigators calculated the financial liabilities Musk and his companies, such as Tesla, SpaceX and Neuralink, may face in 45 of those actions.

Since Donald Trump won re-election last year and Musk took on the role of de facto head of Doge in January, ethics watchdogs and Democratic officials have warned that the Tesla CEO could use his power to oust regulators and quash investigations into his companies. In the role, Musk, the richest man in the world, holds sway over agencies that regulate or contract with his companies. The subcommittee report outlines the extent of Musk’s liabilities, which include potentially facing $1.19bn in fines to Tesla alone over allegations it made false or misleading statements about its autopilot and self-driving features.

Although the report gives a total estimated amount, it also states that the $2bn-plus figure does not include how much Musk could avoid from investigations that the Trump administration declines to launch. It also excludes the potential contracts, such as communications deals with his Starlink satellite internet service, that Musk’s companies could gain because of his role in the administration.

“While the $2.37 billion figure represents a credible, conservative estimate, it drastically understates the true benefit Mr Musk may gain from legal risk avoidance alone as a result of his position in government,” the report states.

The Trump administration has downplayed concerns over Musk’s conflicts of interest in recent months, with the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, stating in early February that he would “excuse himself” if there was any issue. Democrats have pressed the administration for answers on how Musk is addressing these conflicts, while also seeking to put the increasingly unpopular billionaire at the forefront of their attacks against the Trump administration. The Democratic senator Jeanne Shaheen introduced a bill earlier this month targeting Musk that would prohibit awarding government contracts to companies owned by special government employees.

“Despite numerous requests from members of Congress, the Trump Administration has failed to provide any relevant documents or information, the authorities relied upon for these actions, or an explanation of how Mr Musk is navigating the conflicts they inherently pose,” the report states.

Musk’s conflicts span multiple agencies, including the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) which oversees SpaceX rocket launches and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), which has multiple open investigations into Tesla’s operations. In February, Doge fired workers at the NHTSA that were experts in self-driving car technology.

skip past newsletter promotion

The permanent subcommittee on investigations is a bipartisan subcommittee with a Republican majority and Democratic minority, the latter of which is chaired by the Connecticut senator Richard Blumenthal. The subcommittee’s report issues a series of demands to Trump, executive departments and regulatory agencies to take stronger oversight action against Musk, including allowing for independent audits of major contracts given to Musk-affiliated companies.

“No one individual, no matter how prominent or wealthy, is above the law,” the report states in its conclusion. “Anything less than decisive, immediate, and collective action risks America becoming a bystander to the surrender to modern oligarchy.”



Source link

What to know as GOP starts work on sweeping Trump priorities bill

0


play

WASHINGTON – It was tricky enough for Congressional Republicans to get to this point: After weeks of negotiating a blueprint for President Donald Trump’s legislative agenda, lawmakers are returning to Washington from a two-week break with plans to hammer out the details of what Trump calls one “big, beautiful bill.”

Over the next several weeks, lawmakers will craft a sweeping package of Trump’s priorities for taxes, border security and energy they will eventually pass along party lines. It is likely to be the marquee piece of legislation passed during Trump’s second term.

The path forward will be rife intra-party challenges as Republicans work through competing priorities such as cutting spending and extending Trump’s 2017 tax cuts.

Here’s what you need to know.

Two tracks for the House, Senate

The budget blueprint passed earlier this month instructs the House and Senate to craft separate proposals that will eventually need to be reconciled. The Senate’s instructions require lawmakers to find very few spending cuts while implementing the president’s expensive tax proposals.

The two houses agree on the broad strokes: They want to lock in the tax cuts implemented during Trump’s first term, which are set to expire this year; eliminate taxes on tips, overtime and Social Security payments; boost defense and border security spending; and raise the debt ceiling to avoid a looming default.

But the details look different for each chamber. In addition to different spending totals, the House has instructed lawmakers to find at least $1.5 trillion in cuts and the Senate has said that’s a goal – but only instructed their committees to find a tiny $4 billion in cuts.

House Speaker Mike Johnson has instructed committees in the lower chamber to start hashing out the details of legislation between April 28 and May 9 in the hopes of having a final package passed by Memorial Day. The Senate expects the process to take a little longer, expecting a final bill to be passed by the Fourth of July.

Somewhere along the way, the two sides will have to reconcile their differences – a process that is sure to be politically challenging.

Fight over Medicaid

Several Republicans in both chambers – and all Democrats – are concerned that the final bill will include significant cuts to Medicaid, the health insurance program that provides coverage to 72 million low-income Americans.

That’s because the House’s instructions include a directive to cut $880 billion from programs under the House Energy and Commerce Committee, which nonpartisan experts have said is not possible to meet without slashing Medicaid.

House Budget Chairman Rep. Jodey Arrington, R-Texas, said earlier this month that there’s plenty of opportunity to save money without cutting benefits. The federal government loses between $233 billion and $521 billion annually to fraud across all programs, according to the Government Accountability Office, though it’s unclear how Congress will seek to reduce that.

“It’s pervasive,” Arrington said. “You check the Medicaid rolls twice instead of once, like President Biden, and you save $160 billion.”

Several Republicans like Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., have said they will not vote for a package that includes Medicaid cuts. And Trump himself has said he would veto a bill if it cut Medicaid benefits beyond the GOP aims to eliminate “waste, fraud and abuse.”

Spending concerns

Another cohort of the Republican conference is worried that the package will add trillions more to the deficit than it cuts.

These fiscal conservatives in the House almost blocked passage of the budget blueprint over concerns that the package doesn’t go far enough to cut spending.

Their protest pushed House and Senate leaders to commit to at least $1.5 trillion in spending reductions – a priority that will be tough for leaders to reach without cuts to benefit programs like Medicaid. But if hardline conservatives believe leaders have gone back on that promise, they may withhold their vote for the final package.

A policy test

Republicans plan to use a process known as “reconciliation” in order to pass the package without Democratic help in the Senate.

That process, however, is reserved for legislation that is related to government spending. The Senate parliamentarian, a non-partisan advisor in the upper chamber, will review the final bill to ensure each piece of policy is indeed related to spending. That incentivizes lawmakers to limit what they pack into the legislation.

However, GOP senators have already decided not to consult the parliamentarian on a crucial accounting maneuver that allows the chamber to count the extension of Trump’s 2017 tax cuts as “current policy,” making an extension of them appear free rather than costing $3.8 trillion over 10 years.

An adverse ruling from the parliamentarian after lawmakers have written the bill could complicate things for Republicans down the line.



Source link