Home Blog Page 687

How many times has President Putin met with the US president?

0

play

President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin will meet in Alaska on Friday, August 15th in a highly anticipated one-on-one meeting in Alaska, a rare bilateral meeting in American soil during a period of tensions.

According to the National Archives, Putin will be Alaska as the first elected leader of Russia.

If everything goes according to the plan, this trip marks President Putin’s eight visits to the United States during his presidency. Trump is holding a meeting to drive Moscow into a peace agreement with Ukraine. The war caused by a full-scale Russian invasion in 2022 approaches the 31/2 year mark and stands as the largest conflict in Europe since World War II.

The US and Russian leaders have met many times over the decades since the Soviet Union was dissolved, creating ups and downs in the complex relationships between the two countries that have swayed from an era of deep tension and distrust to an era of Detente and cooperation.

Conference with Putin: Dozens of Discussions with Bush, Clinton

After a brief four years of interlude when Ally Dmitry Medvedev worked since taking office in 1999, Putin met with all the US presidents once again in 2012 after another four-year interlude. In total, Putin has held dozens of official and informal meetings with the US president over the years.

Some presidents had more frequent interactions with Russian leaders than others.

Former President Bill Clinton’s second term only briefly overlapped with Putin’s first tenure, but in 2000 the pair met several times when President Putin was the vice president of Russian President Boris Yeltsin.

Clinton gave a speech on Russian territory in June 2000, recounting more than half a dozen of his visits to the country twice before he became president and five times during his tenure. Clinton has developed particularly close ties with Yeltsin, the country’s first democratically elected leader, after the collapse of the Soviet Union.

President George W. Bush met with Putin at least 12 times in his two terms, including a 2007 trip to his family in Maine.

As tensions escalated, meetings with President Putin fell

Since Russia illegally annexed Crimea from Ukraine in 2014, President Putin’s relationship with Western countries has become increasingly tense, and longtime Russian leaders have since met with the US president less frequently.

The US president has not travelled to Russia for official state visits for more than a decade.

Former President Barack Obama’s trip to St. Petersburg in September 2013 was his last visit, initially including a stop in Moscow to meet with Putin. Obama cancelled 1-1 about a month ago, citing the lack of progress in consultations surrounding arms control, trade, security and human rights, and the decision to grant the then-Russian decision to temporarily exile American whistleblower Edward Snowden.

President Putin attended the UN General Assembly in September 2015, discussing with Obama, and sharply criticised Putin for the conflict between eastern Ukraine and Syria.

Former President Joe Biden met with the Russian president once during his term in June 2021 in Geneva.

During Trump’s first term, he held one bilateral meeting with Putin in Finland in July 2018. At a press conference after the closing speech, Trump publicly rejected the results of the US intelligence news study on Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, appearing to accept Putin’s denial of interference. The pair have met several times, several times, and several times, including bystanders at the Global Leader Summit, and have held several disclosed telephone conversations.

The August 15th meeting is the first in-person session between the two world leaders since Trump returned to the White House in January.

Contribution: Reuters.

Kathryn Palmer is a national trending news reporter for USA Today. You can contact her kapalmer@usatoday.com And with x @Kathrynplmr.

More than 130 passengers fall ill on Royal Caribbean cruise

0

(CNN) – More than 130 cruise ship passengers reported suffering from a gastrointestinal disease after setting sail from Los Angeles on July 4. The cause of the outbreak has not been determined.

The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says 134 passengers on Royal Caribbean’s Navigator of the Seas — or 3.4 percent of the cruise’s total passenger list of 3,900 people — reported feeling ill. Seven members of the crew were also affected, out of a total of 1,266 staff members.

The outbreak was reported to the CDC’s Vessel Sanitation Program (VSP) on July 11 when the weeklong Royal Caribbean cruise returned to Los Angeles to dock after the trip was over.

According to records compiled by the VSP, there have been 18 outbreaks of gastrointestinal illness on cruise ships under the program’s jurisdiction so far this year, mainly related to Norovirus.

That’s the same number of outbreaks reported all of last year, according to incidents logged by the CDC.

While it’s unclear what caused the outbreak on the Royal Caribbean ship, passengers experienced diarrhea, vomiting and abdominal cramps, the CDC said in a post this week about the Navigator of the Seas outbreak.

In April, about 250 passengers on the Queen Mary 2 reported coming down with the highly contagious norovirus.

That disease has a reputation as “the cruise ship virus,” infectious disease expert Dr. William Schaffner, of Vanderbilt University Medical Center, told CNN Travel earlier this year.

That’s because it spreads easily, and anyone in close quarters — like cruise ships — is extra susceptible. Such outbreaks also frequently occur in schools and jails — wherever large groups of people gather in tight spaces.

But the CDC hasn’t determined yet if the culprit on the Navigator of the Seas was norovirus.

“The health and safety of our guests, crew, and the communities we visit are our top priority,” a Royal Caribbean Group spokesperson told CNN Travel. “To maintain an environment that supports the highest levels of health and safety onboard our ships, we implement rigorous cleaning procedures, many of which far exceed public health guidelines.”

The CDC says Royal Caribbean reported boosting its cleaning and disinfection procedures and also collected specimens from infected passengers, after isolating anyone who was ill.

CNN wellness expert Dr. Leana Wen said that while infectious diseases can be “very unpleasant,” they typically “pass within 1 to 2 days.”

While the cause remains unknown in this case, Dr. Wen reiterated that precautions such as thorough hand washing are critical. She also noted that norovirus is not killed by alcohol-based hand sanitizers that are commonly used.

Mexico says the 26 cartel figures sent to us were requested by the Trump administration, but they are not part of the tariff talks.

0


Mexico City
AP
–

Mexico has sent 26 cartel figures to face justice in the United States as the Trump administration demanded of them and doesn’t want Mexico to continue its illegal business from Mexican prisons, officials said Wednesday.

But mass relocations were not part of wider negotiations as Mexico tries to avoid higher tariffs threatened by US President Donald Trump, officials said.

“These relocations are not only a strategic tool to ensure public safety, but also reflect a firm determination to prevent these criminals from continuing to operate from within prisons and splitting their network of influence,” Mexican security minister Omar Garcia Halfucci said at a press conference Wednesday.

The 26 prisoners handed over to US authorities on Tuesday included figures such as the new generation of Jalisco cartel and the Sinaloa cartel. They were sought by American authorities for their role in drug trafficking and other crimes. It comes months after 29 other cartel leaders were sent to the US in February.

In exchange, the U.S. Department of Justice has pledged to seek the death penalty for any of the 55 people included in the two transfers. Authorities said the operation involved around 1,000 law enforcement officers, 90 vehicles and a dozen military aircraft.

Mexican President Claudia Sinbaum said early Wednesday that the transfer was a “sovereignty decision,” but the move comes as Mexican leaders began to pressure them to crack down on cartels and fentanyl production.

Garcia Hauchu also confirmed Wednesday that U.S. government drones – non-military – are flying through Central Mexico but are flying at Mexican authorities’ request as part of an ongoing investigation.

So far, Shanebaum has sought to increase the willingness to pursue cartels over his predecessors (changes recognized by US officials) to avoid the threat of Trump’s tariffs. Two weeks ago, the two leaders spoke to and agreed to give the team another 90 days to negotiate to avoid threatened 30% tariffs on imports from Mexico.

“Little by bit, Mexico is chasing this demand by Americans to deliver drug capo,” said Mexican security analyst David Saucedo. “It’s buying (the Mexican government).”

Saucedo said the Mexican government was able to avoid a burst of cartel violence — a common reaction when Capos is captured — some have shown that Obigio Guzman, the son of the infamous Capo Joaquin El Chapo “Guzman” Guzman, can negotiate with US prosecutors. Ovidio Guzmán pleaded guilty last month to drug trafficking and other charges, and wanted a light sentence in exchange for his cooperation.

However, Saucedo warned that if such a large-scale prisoner relocation continues, the Latin American country is expected to see another blast of violence in the future.

Wendy’s adds chicken bids to the menu. See when it arrives.

0

play

It will be a fall season filled with chicken strips at Wendy’s.

The fast food chain is “expanding its (ITS) chicken lineup” in the fourth quarter by introducing several new menu products, including chicken tenders.

In addition to the chicken bid, Wendy’s is releasing a lineup of “modernized and improved” sauces. Wendy’s announcement comes months after MacCrispy Strip (and creamy chili dip) debuted at McDonald’s.

According to Cook, the chicken bid is “made using the finest quality ingredients, including 100% white meat coated with light, crispy and flavorful panding.”

“Through testing, it was clear that consumers could taste the difference,” Cook said in a revenue call. “I think we are delivering exactly what our customers want. It’s a craving, juicy, hollowing, holistic and delicious product in a rapidly growing part of the protein market.”

What we know about Wendy’s new chicken bids includes when they will be available.

Chicken Tenders and Sauce Lineup arrives in October 2025

Wendy’s lineup of chicken tenders and sauces consists of six different sauce varieties, making its debut in the fourth quarter. According to the fast food chain, the fourth quarter will be from October 1st to December 28th.

“We are rolling out a lineup of modernized and improved sauces by launching a chicken bid with six new sauces, including my personal favorite sweet chili, and six new sauces, including the tangy Kick’s new Wendy signature sauce,” Cook said. “Our bids and sources are great and I’m sure our customers will love them too.”

In addition to offering a new menu, Wendy’s is also focusing on “drink innovation.”

A new lineup of caffeinated drinks, including cold brews (and cold foam), energy drinks and hot coffee blends, will also be on the menu.

Question The Kelse brothers should ask Taylor Swift in “New Heights”

0

play

  • Taylor Swift has joined New Heights, a “favorite podcast” hosted by romantic partner Travis Kels and his brother Jason Kelsse.
  • It remains to be seen how much it is revealed about her upcoming studio album, The Life of a Showgirl.
  • There are 12 questions that the Kelse brothers would like Swift to ask.

Taylor Swift has joined “Favorite Podcast” “New Heights,” hosted by his romantic partner and Kansas City Chiefs tight end Travis Kells and his brother, the retired offensive lineman Jason Kells, who played the Philadelphia Eagles.

The show isn’t a blueprint for journalism or heavy hit programs, but Swift is still on the hot seat. A conversation will take place. Questions will be asked. You may be given an answer.

It remains to be seen how much it is revealed about her upcoming studio album, The Life of a Showgirl. However, she chose the brothers’ show to announce it. The number of eyeballs and downloads offered by the show could be a record setting.

In honor of Swift’s 12th album, there are 12 questions Kelce Brothers asks Swift.

Are there any parts of you that still have roots for the Eagles?

As Jason Kels pointed out in an introduction clip that took place on a social media round on Wednesday, Swift is originally from Pennsylvania. Her previous Eagles fandom is well documented. It’s worth asking as the Eagles and Chief play each other in two of the last three Super Bowls.

What was her reaction to being booed at the Super Bowl?

In New Orleans in February, Caesars Superdome Jumbotron showed Swift in the first half. The booing came furiously – with the brand of Eagles conditioning. Sometimes it’s your own people who face you the most.

Who is her favorite player in the Chiefs?

The qualifications for this question are important. Clearly, No. 1 is “Trav.” Mahomes is too easy to copy out. Have her down the roster and reveal some of the knowledge she has picked up.

What songs are there on the new album about Travis?

“So High School” hinted at the Chiefs tight end on her latest album. But after years of whirlwind romance around the world, there needs to be more, right?

How many lyrics are there about the Chief? Or a typical soccer?

And with that, there will certainly be some references to the “Chiefs Kingdom” or grid iron.

Who was the best hang at the Super Bowl 58 After Party?

Swift and Kelse were part of the Chiefs crew that partyed in Vegas after last year’s Super Bowl victory. Has anyone impressed her with their dance and party abilities?

Are you engaged?

Jason Kelse is not afraid to thrust the bear. At least one question is needed as to whether the Travis Kelce-Swift relationship takes the next step.

Will she do the Kylie Kelce podcast next?

She did one Kelce podcast, so what is another podcast? Jason’s wife, Kylie, is the host of “No Lies.”

Who is the ideal crew to fill her suite in the game?

Sophie Turner. Sabrina Carpenter. Ryan Reynolds. Ice spices. Kate Linklark. Donakelse (mother of the Kels brothers). Brittany Mahomes. Swift has joined us with many friends and family in the game.

Is she a good charm for the Chiefs?

The chief is 19-4 and Swift is in the game. However, they were 1-1 in the Super Bowl.

How did you come to know the Kelse family?

From the aforementioned Kylie and Jason to Travis’ parents Donna and Ed, it will be insightful to understand the vibe of her (potential) future in-laws.

Have you not yet collaborated with artists you don’t want to do yet? Will there be any future albums available?

Start your “Easter Egg” hunt.

Ukrainian and European leaders urge Trump not to launch peace deals in Alaska without them

0

European leaders urged President Donald Trump on Wednesday not to attack Ukraine unilaterally A peace agreement with Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin at a one-on-one meeting in Alaska later this week.

German Prime Minister Friedrich Merz has convened a virtual summit with Trump, Ukrainian President Voorazia’s Voldimi Zelensky and European leaders as former KGB spy threatens to try and get back the round to see the war on his terms.

After the meeting, French President Emmanuel Macron said Trump wanted Washington to obtain a ceasefire and that Ukraine’s territorial issues could not be negotiated without Zelensky.

Called “very good,” Trump told reporters that if the summit with Putin works out, a follow-up meeting with the Russian president and Zelensky could happen “almost immediately” afterwards.

“It’s very likely that we’ll have a second meeting that’s more productive than the first one, because we’re going to know where we’re and what we’re doing,” Trump said when he appeared at the Kennedy Center.

Two European diplomats familiar with virtual meetings appeared to tell CNN that Trump would push for an unconditional ceasefire in his meeting with Putin.

Trump believes the ceasefire is a show of goodwill from Russia and said Ukrainian territory wasn’t for him to negotiate, sources said.

Leaders of Ukraine, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Finland, NATO and the European Union took part in a virtual meeting with Trump. It was followed by another large meeting of the “Wishing Union” attended by US Vice President J.D. Vance.

Following the meeting, Zelensky said the leader agreed to “five common principles” and to lay out the “form of negotiations” to be held in Alaska, including focusing on ceasefires and “truly trustworthy” security assurances.

“Everything about Ukraine should be discussed only with Ukraine. We need to prepare a trilateral format for the lecture. We need a ceasefire. In other words, it’s number one.”

He added: “We need security guarantees. It’s truly reliable. Today, President Trump spoke about his support for this and how he prepares for America to participate.”

“Russia cannot have a veto power over Ukraine’s Europe and NATO outlook,” he said. “Peace negotiations must be combined with appropriate pressure on Russia.”

Zelensky also called for Russia to tighten sanctions if the ceasefire agreement is not reached on Friday.

Mertz said Europe has revealed to Trump that Ukraine must attend the next high-level Maite.

“It has made it clear that Ukraine must be at the table at the next meeting,” Mertz said at a press conference following the virtual meeting. He added: “We want things to go into the correct sequence. We want a ceasefire at first, then we need to create a framework agreement.”

Zelensky said he expressed his support for Europe’s demands for the first ceasefire before Trump reached a full settlement, saying that if Putin leaves Alaska without agreeing to the ceasefire, he should slap Russia with new sanctions.

Trump was frankly saying “a land exchange will take place” on Monday, but Mertz emphasized that legal perception of Ukrainian territory is “uncontroversial.”

At a Moscow meeting with Witkov last week, Putin proposed a plan to demand Ukraine to give in to the eastern Donbas region in exchange for a ceasefire, according to US officials. The exact details of the plan have been covered in confusion since it was first reported.

Last week, Trump gave Putin either agreeing to a ceasefire at the August 8 deadline or facing new sanctions punishment on the “Shadow Fleet.” After the deadline ended, Trump announced the summit with Putin this Friday.

Putin has been trying to mess with the effects of sanctions for a long time. However, Zelensky said on Wednesday that Russian leaders were bluffing. “Sansions are stricken at Russia’s war economy,” he said after a call with Trump. “Putin can’t fool anyone.”

European officials familiar with the call said they were given the impression that if the upcoming Alaska stories proved fruitless, they were the “threat” of secondary sanctions against Russia.

“It is clear that Indian sanctions were effective,” the official said, referring to Trump’s pledge to issue an additional 25% tariff on India to buy Russian oil. The tariffs are expected to come into effect in the coming weeks.

Ukrainian President Voldy Mirzelensky will be attending a press conference with German Prime Minister Friedrich Merz (not in the photo).

“President Putin can’t fool anyone”: Zelensky says Putin is bluffing about the effects of sanctions

Ukrainian President Voldy Mirzelensky will be attending a press conference with German Prime Minister Friedrich Merz (not in the photo).

0:49

Alexander Gabwev, director of the Carnegie Russia and Eurasia Centre, told CNN that Zelensky is urging Trump to use a “stick” that wields Russia.

“The key issue is the sticks that President Trump is said to have. This could be either more economic sanctions (Russia) or more military support for Ukraine,” Gabwev said. “Therefore, President Zelensky wants to be optimistic that the Russian economy is falling apart.”

But Ukraine is facing its own pressure, he said. This week, a small group of Russian military forces drilled a hole in the alerts of Ukrainian officials and military bloggers, some of Ukraine’s increasingly porous frontlines in the Donetsk region of Ukraine. If Russia’s economy creaks, then so does Ukraine’s front line, Gabwev said.

“The timeline here is really important,” he added. “Putin is sure there will be another 12-18 months and Ukraine doesn’t have it.”

Wegmans recall cheese sold in 10 US states surrounding listeria risks

0

play

Grocery store chain Wegmans recalls medium Camembert soft-aged cheese and products containing it due to the potential contamination of Listeria, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said in a notice.

In an FDA alert posted Wednesday, August 13, Wegmans said items affected by the recall were sold at stores in Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, Pennsylvania, Virginia, Virginia and Washington, Washington between July 1 and August 12.

The company said the cheese was supplied to the store by Estancia Holdings in Cumming, Georgia. So far, no illnesses have been reported in connection with cheese recalls, according to the alert.

The FDA said Wegmans automatically called customers who used Shoppers Club cards to purchase cheese. Customers who purchase the affected cheese can return it to the store’s service desk for a full refund as per the notice.

Which products have been recalled?

The FDA provided a list of products affected by the recall.

  • Wegmans Medium Camembert Soft Ripened Cheese, 8.8 oz, UPC: 77890-53515 Best dates on 7/26/25, 8/12/25, and 8/19/25
  • Wegmans Cheese Flight, 1 pound, upc: 2-77100-00000-0
  • Wegman’s Grill Camembert with Tapenade and Roasted Tomato, 10 oz, UPC: 2-77297-00000-0
  • Wegmans Caramel Apple Pecan Topped Brie Cheese, 13 oz, UPC: 2-77645-00000-3

Listeria poisoning symptoms

Listeriosis, or listeria poisoning, is a food-borne bacterial infection most commonly caused by listeria monocytogen, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). It is considered a serious condition and can be dangerous or life-threatening, especially for the elderly, those with weak immune systems, and pregnant women.

According to the CDC, Listeria is the third leading cause of death from foodborne diseases in the United States. The agency estimates that the disease affects 1,600 Americans each year, with around 260 people dying from those infections.

For each CDC, symptoms include:

  • heat
  • Muscle pain
  • headache
  • Stiff shoulders
  • confusion
  • Loss of balance
  • convulsions
  • diarrhea
  • Other gastrointestinal symptoms
  • Miscarriage, stillbirth, premature birth, and/or life-threatening infections of newborn babies
  • death

Saman Shafiq and Natalie Neysa Alund of USA Today contributed to this report.

Fernando Cervantes Jr. is a trending news reporter for USA Today. Contact him at fernando.cervantes @gannett.com and follow him at x @fern_cerv_.

Homeless camp removed on the Kennedy Center route in Trump

0


The number of homeless people in DC has fallen from pandemic levels. The White House said those remaining in the camp would be jailed if they refuse to move.

play

WASHINGTON – Blocked away from where President Donald Trump announced the latest slate of Kennedy Center recipients, workers have begun to wipe out homeless camps along the route to the White House as part of his wider crackdown in the capital.

The August 13 move comes days after Trump seized control of Washington’s local law enforcement agencies, deployed National Guard troops, and ordered people living outside to move “quickly.”

Amber Harding, executive director of the homeless Washington Legal Clinic, said Trump cleared at least two tents on a patch of green space near the Kennedy Center as he spoke at the Center for Performing Arts.

Members of the city’s Human Services Department have fixed the notification to at least nine other tents in the area, notifying residents that the camp will break and close if not removed by the next morning.

George Morgan, a lifelong DC resident, said he had lived in the camp for two months but didn’t know where he was going. He won’t allow him to bring in the American pit bull terrier, so he won’t go to shelter.

“I’m very worried,” Trump supporter Morgan said of the city’s police president’s acquisition and national security mobilization. “I try not to attack.”

He doesn’t know where he is going, but he says, “The God who wants will make the way.”

Where are they being taken?

Advocates for the city’s homeless population say it’s still unclear where the Trump administration expects people living outside to move.

At a press conference on August 12, White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt told reporters that homeless people will “reject fines or imprisonment times if they leave the camp and are taken to homeless shelters and are provided with addiction or mental health services.”

She said U.S. Parks Police will remove 70 homeless encampments from federal parks from March, and will clear the remaining two encampments in the city later this week.

Andrew Wasenig, director of policy at Miriams Kitchen, a local nonprofit supporting the homeless, said Trump rhetoric and notifications placed in tents appear to be aimed at scaring homeless people away.

“The more people do it themselves, the easier it will be for them,” he said.

So far, Wassenich said the liquidation of the camp reflects past efforts by city officials and efforts to keep people away from the city’s hypertensive areas. In 2023, authorities removed a large tent location in a park near the White House despite a boost from local officials and homeless advocacy groups.

“They haven’t solved the homelessness problem. It’s not gone,” added Wassenic. “They’re just moving it.”

“Minimize confusion”

Over the weekend, the city’s human services department added about 70 beds to the homeless shelter to create space for the expected influx of residents, said Rachel Pierre, the agency’s agent. She said when the order came into effect, the city shelter was capable but could create additional rooms.

Wayne Tanage, deputy mayor of the DC Department of Health and Human Services, said the number of homeless camps in the city has dropped far below their pandemic levels.

According to Turnage, around 100 people live in today’s camp, down from about 300 amid the Covid-19 pandemic. However, supporters said these figures do not include all people living in D.C., which counted the 900 people living in the city during their one-night survey in January.

When the city cleans up or closes camps, they usually provide residents with a weekly notification, Turnage said. But with new federal orders in place, they tell residents they should pack their bags now.

“Our aim is to ensure that the camps are closed in an orderly manner and to extend homeless services to those affected,” said Tarnage. “These people are humans, not chess fragments. Their lives are confused, so they need to make sure they do everything they can to minimize the confusion.”

Have you got a stimulus check? Trump suggested there is no unlikely to be a rebate on tariffs

0

play

Last month, President Donald Trump teased that the global tariffs announced earlier this year could be accompanied by potential rebates.

“We’ve got a lot of money coming in and we’re thinking about a little rebate,” Trump said, planning on resolving details of the UK trade agreement ahead of his trip to Scotland on July 25th.

The White House announced that some of the tariffs disclosed on April 2 generated revenue of $100 billion.

Trump did not provide details of potential rebates that are unlikely to pass in Congress, except that it is available only to people at certain income levels. The president will need Congressional approval to approve the rebate.

Although the details are missing, here’s what you need to know about potential tariff rebates:

Senator Josh Hawley introduces the rebate bill

Shortly after Trump’s July comments, Missouri Republican Sen. Josh Hawley introduced the 2025 American Workers Rebate Act.

A family of four can receive up to $2,400. Under this law, credits could increase if tariff revenue exceeds the 2025 forecast.

“My law allows hardworking Americans to benefit from the wealth that Trump’s tariffs are back in this country,” Holy said in a news release announcing the bill.

U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bescent said tariff revenue is expected to reach $300 billion a year. But economists say the policy could increase inflation and cost taxpayers thousands of dollars a year, especially if Trump fails to reach trade deals with key partners like Canada and Mexico.

For joint filers with adjusted gross income of more than $150,000 and those applying for singles earning more than $75,000, their profits will be reduced by 5%.

The law has been introduced to the Senate Finance Committee. It must pass both the Senate and House of Representatives to become law.

What are some of the hurdles facing rebates?

Republican lawmakers are unlikely to be excited about the rise in federal spending. The stimulus check issued during the Covid-19 pandemic cost the government around $164 billion. If the check is issued, that means a significant percentage of the tariff revenue will return to taxpayers when Trump himself says his priorities are paying off $37 trillion in debt.

“What we want to do is pay off our debts,” Trump said in July. “But we’re thinking about rebates.”

In an interview with Semafor, one conservative lawmaker shot down the idea.

“People love spending money to allow new tax cuts,” Sen. Ron Johnson, a Republican from Wisconsin, told the outlet. “We’re in debt of $37 trillion and run a $2 trillion deficit a year. After a while, this madness just has to end.”

How is tax rebates different from stimulus checks?

A tax refund is a refund to the taxpayer of excess amounts paid in taxes during the year, and a stimulus check is a direct payment from the federal government to the household.

Tax rebates can be issued at any time of the year. A Hawley news release states that the tax rebate parameters are similar to the stimulus checks issued in 2020 during the economic slowdown caused by the pandemic.

When can I receive tax refunds?

The Holy bill must pass through both chambers of lawmakers until the end of the current Congress calendar. Or it should be reintroduced if it is considered dead and lawmakers want to proceed with it.

Michelle Del Rey is a trending news reporter for USA Today. Contact her at mdelrey@usatoday.com

Shooters may have a common mental health problem, but that’s not the thing behind violent attacks, experts say

0

Editor’s Note: Help is available if you or someone you know is struggling with suicide thoughts or mental health issues.
In the US, Call or Text 988, The Suicide & Crisis Lifeline.
Globally: International Suicide Prevention Associations and beFrienders for Befrienders worldwide have contact information for crisis centres around the world.

After a random shooting in Austin, Texas, Austin Police Chief Lisa Davis said the suspect had past criminal offences and “serious issues.” The 32-year-old suspect was arrested after police found him naked and claimed he was yes with the Bible.

“There have been some serious mistakes here,” Davis said.

A few days ago, a 30-year-old man fired hundreds of shots at a U.S. center to prevent disease in Atlanta, killing a police officer. The gunman who took his own life reportedly spoke of suicide and reached out to mental health assistance before the attack.

And a few days ago, another gunman with a history of mental health issues shot and killed four people in a Manhattan skyscraper before pointing his gun at him.

While suspects in several recent well-known attacks have been described as having mental health issues, experts say it doesn’t mean their mental health issues are due to the murders.

Experts say there is no mental health system built to catch such rare and explosive crimes. But the potential solution is that many politicians don’t have a stomach to deal with. That is, it limits access to the gun.

“We often tell stories of mental illness. If we focus on it, or focus on it, it lacks all these other factors that much more predictive of mass shooting,” says Vanderbilt University’s medical dean, “We can die in the countryside.”

“Having mental health issues doesn’t predict mass shooting,” Metzle said. “Many people have symptoms of mental illness, and that’s definitely true, but that’s a different argument from saying that mental illness caused mass shootings.”

Violence is not a listed condition of mental health issues, such as major depression or schizophrenia, Metzle noted. “In fact, there is no mental illness in which symptoms cause violence against others or shooting others.”

Many people in the United States suffer from mental illness. According to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, one in five adults experience mental illness in a given year.

People with mental illness are far more likely to be victims rather than perpetrators of violence, research shows. And if someone with mental health problems hurts someone with guns, it’s probably in itself, Dr. Jeffrey W. Swanson, professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at Duke University School of Medicine, also wrote extensively about gun violence and mental health.

Studies have shown that mental illness is a strong causal factor in suicide, but only about 3% to 4% of violent behaviors are attributed to serious mental illness, Swanson’s study showed. Even during gun violence, mass shooting is rare: Of the 150,000 people filmed in the US each year, only about 1-2% were victims of mass shootings.

“If you think about it, we certainly have problems with gun violence in the US. We have problems with mental illness. These are two really big public health issues that intersect with their edges, but mental illness is not the place where many people start just trying to stop dying from mass shooting,” Swanson said.

Flowers can be seen outside the CDC on Saturday under handwritten signs.

Mass shootings do not generally come from one problem, but several factors can increase the risk. History of violence, access to guns, violent social networks, misogyny and substance abuse all create a list.

“Most perpetrators of mass shootings had a history of domestic violence, or a targeted family or intimate partner,” said Lisa Geller, senior advisor to implementing the Center for Gun Violence Solutions at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.

“Dome violence has played a key role in mass shootings with more issues than any other,” Geller said.

And while some may argue that mass shootings will be prevented if attackers are better able to access their mental health system, J. Thomas Sullivan, professor emeritus at Little Rock William H. Bowen Law School at the University of Arkansas, also said he doesn’t think it’s right.

“Trading the mental health system to provide the help needed to stop these shootings is an inappropriate way to change responsibility,” said Sullivan, who wrote extensively about the topic.

Sullivan said some of the mental health experts he taught said their patients were constantly pose threats. “But not everyone can accurately predict who is actually threatening to chase it,” Sullivan said.

Sullivan and other experts CNN said focusing on the tools used to hurt others is a more effective solution.

“I don’t think a lot of people want to hear this, but the real problem is access to the gun,” Sullivan said.

Sullivan said many responsible gun owners were included, but said “it’s very difficult to stop someone from firing a gun when they have a gun.”

Gun restrictions are what countries like Australia and New Zealand looked at after mass shootings. Swanson said the strongest risk factors for common violent behavior are young and male. “But you know you can’t cut them up, right?” Swanson said. In some countries, “we decided that the idea that everyone has easy access to firearms is extremely dangerous. Therefore, they broadly restrict legal access to guns,” he said.

Police will block entrances to targets after a shooting in Austin, Texas on Monday.

“It’s important that neuroscientists come up with magical molecules and eliminate harmful behaviors, while still focusing on the issue of lethal measures,” Swanson said.

One way to do that is through An extreme protection order also known as the “Red Flag” Act. Depending on the law, if a family member or family member or law enforcement believes that a person is at risk of harming himself or others, the court may restrict access to a firearm as long as the order is in effect.

Red Flag laws are important, Geller said, “it’s because it focuses on people’s actions rather than diagnosis.”

“Just because someone is experiencing mental health issues doesn’t mean they have a mental illness that can be diagnosed,” Geller said.

21 states in the Washington, DC and the US Virgin Islands have some form of red flag law in their books, according to Everytown, a nonprofit for gun safety.

After Connecticut increased its Red Flag Act enforcement, the survey found it was linked to a 14% decline in the state’s firearm suicide rate. In California, the gun violence control order is believed to have blocked at least 58 potential mass shootings and other types of gun violence in that state, including suicide.

Polls show that the majority of Americans support this type of restriction, but political reality doesn’t always reflect that.

In Texas, three people (store employee, 4-year-old grandfather) were killed in a targeted parking lot in Austin on Monday, and Congress recently passed a law that would make such gun law restrictions illegal.

Barrier stopped flooding of “glacial explosion” in Alaska’s capital

0

The danger is over for residents of Juneau, the Alaska capital. He was urged to evacuate on August 13th as the nearby Mendenhall River.

The emergency barriers built to protect Mendenhall Valley and Juneau, a city of Alaskan Panhandle of about 32,000, have been successful, USA Today reported. Most of the Juneau residents live in the valley.

A two-mile Hesco barrier was installed along the river in June to mitigate summer flooding from the Mendenhall Glacier. According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, glacial flooding is driven by climate change.

The threat of flooding did not affect the planned summit between President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin. This was scheduled for August 15th at a military base near Anchorage, more than 500 miles away.

What happens when a melted glacier causes flooding?

This is how the explosion of glaciales sent water towards Mendenhall Valley, where Juneau’s threatened.

Mendenhall Glacier is an ice river 12 miles long and 1.5 miles wide. It travels from Juneau Ice Field in the Mendenhall Valley Coast Mountains to Lake Mendenhall, about 12 miles from Juneau.

The glacier serves as a dam in a nearby suicide basin. A lake-sized bowl that holds rainwater and annual snowmelt. When a glacier melts, it releases a large amount of water from the basin, known as a glacier explosion. That water reached Lake Mendenhall after a day or two, then entered the river and could have flooded Juneau.

Large flooding was prevented

According to the Alaska Climate Adaptation Science Center, the amount of flooding in Mendenhall Valley was determined by:

The amount of water in the suicide basin.

The speed at which water flows beneath the Mendenhall Glacier and through Lake Mendenhall.

How to increase your Mendenhall Lake level.

The barrier prevented flooding, but city officials asked evacuated residents to stay outside the area until they were notified that they were safe to return. USA Today reported that water levels are projected to drop rapidly following the summit.

Where in Alaska will Trump meet Putin?

Trump and the Russian President will meet together at Elmendorf Richardson, a 13,000-square-acre US military base in Anchorage.

The two leaders are expected to discuss the three-year war in Russia’s Ukraine.

Contributions from Trevor Hughes, Jeanine Santucci, and Swapna Venogopal Ramaswamy

Source USA Today Network Report and Research. Reuters; NASA Earth Observatory; juneau.org, juneauflood.com, NOAA, National Weather Service

This story has been updated to add new graphic profiling to Hesco barriers.

What Fed Goolsbee said about interest rate cuts in September

0

play

Federal Reserve officials said on August 13 that they were worried about the rising underlying inflation last month, as many economists would expect, suggesting that they may not be inclined to support interest rate cuts in September.

“It’s going to be even more concerning when you start receiving reports like the latest report on overall inflation,” Austan Goolsbee, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago and a voting member of the Fed’s interest rate setting committee, said in a forum by the Greater Springfield Chamber of Commerce in Illinois.

Goolsbee’s remarks are worth noting as they are considered one of the more “silly” members of the Fed’s pricing committee. This means he can either move away from the recession and raise rates and raise rates or lower the rates to keep longer to reduce inflation.

His views appear to contradict many economists and investors who saw the July employment report as disastrous and relatively mild inflation readings. Earlier on Wednesday, the FED futures market saw a nearly 100% chance of interest rate cuts in September.

Like many Fed officials, Goolsbee has supported refraining from cutting interest rates until the Fed can assess the impact of President Donald Trump’s tariffs on consumer prices.

At a press conference following the Chamber event, Goolsbee said, “The most concerning thing about the (inflation) report was the service.”

The prices of underlying services rose sharply as categories such as airfares and dental services rose. Goolsbee said she is worried about reading because it reflects a potentially persistent trend, rather than a one-off clash from tariffs.

He also said he is worried about Trump’s plan to impose 100% tariffs on semiconductors.

Overall inflation was stable at 2.7% in July, but the core major, which removes volatile food and energy items, rose from 2.9% to 3.1%, reflecting an increase in service prices, according to the consumer price index released on August 12th.

At the same time, Goolsbee said it was not worried about the unfortunate 73,000 jobs added by US employers in July, as well as the downward revision of 258,000 jobs over the past two months. This number has left an average anemia growth of 35,000 over the past three months.

But Goolsbee said Trump’s immigration crackdown likely affected population growth and employment numbers, but that doesn’t mean the labour market has weakened significantly. He noted that job initiation and employment rates are comparable to preschool levels. The unemployment rate of 4.2% has remained historically low.

“I think it’s a bad idea to (overinterpret) one variable,” Goolsbee told reporters. “I don’t know what the immigration flow is.”

Ghoolsby also said at the Chamber of Commerce event that “the labor market is in a pretty strong and quite solid state.”

He said he has not ruled out interest rate cuts in September, and that Fed officials will consider the August inflation and employment report before making a decision at a mid-September meeting.

“It depends on what the numbers show,” he said, adding that he has not made a decision. “We’re thinking about all the meetings the Fed has to be a live meeting.”

(This story has been updated with new information.))

Trump’s approval rating is the highest in Wyoming. Vermont is the worst

0

President Donald Trump’s national recognition rating is red, but in about half of the state, more people are approving his work performance.

The state legislature can determine Trump’s political future. Pushing to add more Republican seats to redraw the map of Texas’ legislature is rising up a bit as they threaten to do the same thing Texas advances. That’s because Democrats are trying to regain control of the US home in the midterm elections, and doing so would overturn Trump’s efforts to take office for the past two years.

Trump’s approval ratings remain historically low nationwide, but looking at state-by-state surveys show a more complicated picture. Here’s what we know:

Trump has positive approval ratings in 27 states

Trump’s approval rates surpass water in 27 states. This comes from an August 12 update from Morning Consult, which has attracted three months of votes to look at state-level data among registered voters. The number of states has not changed since the July update.

Trump is the most popular in Wyoming morning consultations, with 66% of voters approving his job performance, and the least popular in Vermont.

However, his approval is net negative in two states that have a governor race this fall: New Jersey and Virginia, according to Morning Consulting.

In Texas, 53% of voters approve Trump’s performance, while 44% disapprove. In California, where Gov. Gavin Newsom threatened to counter the changes in Texas district change, 41% have approved Trump’s job performance, and 56% have disapproved. California is Trump’s seventh worst rating in the state, according to Morning Consulting.

What is Trump’s overall approval?

The RealClearpolitics poll average shows Trump’s approval ratings have become more negative throughout the first few weeks of July. Aggregated polls by the New York Times show similar trends.

As of January 27th, Trump received a +6.2 percentage points approval rating, but as of March 13th, it reversed slightly negatively, and there is no show for RealClearpolitics graphics. Approval rating reached the most negative on April 29th, at -7.2% points. This fell around Trump’s 100 Day mark. The controversy over Epstein was published in week three, which again approached that low on July 22nd and 23rd at -7.1 percentage points.

His average approval margin as of August 12th is -5.4 percentage points, according to RealClearPolitics. According to a New York Times aggregator on August 12th, the approval margin is -8% points.

How does Trump’s approval rating compare to his previous president?

Historical analysis by Gallup shows that Trump’s first few years of office approval ratings in July – both the 45th and 47th presidents are lower than any other modern president at the same time in power.

In a Gallup poll conducted July 7-21, 37% approved Trump’s job performance. According to Gallup, here is how it is compared to other presidents in July of the first year of his term:

  • Joe Biden (July 2021) – 50% approval
  • Trump (July 2017) – 38% approved
  • Barack Obama (July 2009) – 57% approval
  • George W. Bush (July 2001) – 55% approval
  • Bill Clinton (July 1993) – 43% approval
  • George HW Bush (July 1989) – 66% approval
  • Ronald Reagan (July 1981) – 59% approval

Kinsey Crowley is a Trump Connect reporter for the USA Today Network. Contact her at kcrowley@gannett.com. Follow her on X and Tiktok @kinseycrowley or Bluesky @kinseycrowley.bsky.social.

Live updates and how to watch

0

play

Here is one of 2025’s most predicted podcast episodes, and perhaps one of the best podcast episodes of all time.

The “New Heights” podcast featuring brothers Jason and Travis Kelse features Grammy-winning artist Taylor Swift, one of the most profiled guests in today’s history.

Swift and Travis Kelce have been a couple since September 2023. He went to one of Swift’s shows at Geha Field in Arrowhead Stadium, home to the Kansas City Chiefs.

Kelce Brothers launched the “New Heights” podcast in September 2022, growing into one of the most popular podcasts on the streaming platform. Amazon’s streaming platform Windery purchased distribution and advertising rights to the show for $100 million in August 2024.

The podcast teased her appearance with multiple clips earlier this week. One in particular is an important concern for Swift. She has announced the release of her new album, “The Life of a Showgirl.”

The podcast will be released tonight on YouTube and other streaming platforms. Follow us here for all the live updates of Swift’s first appearance in “New Heights.”

Podcasts are available on all streaming platforms. It is currently the top show on Apple Music and can also be streamed on Spotify. The premiere will also be on the show’s YouTube channel at 7pm ET.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mj2s5blt9wm

Where to watch the New Heights podcast

You can only catch “New Heights” in video format on YouTube.

Will Taylor Swift unveil her new album on the podcast?

yes. Clips from the episode show that Swift is revealing her new album. “The Life of a Showgirl” is the award-winning artist’s 12th studio album following “The Tortured Poets Department,” released last year.

Has Taylor Swift been on the Travis Kelse podcast before?

This is the first time Swift has appeared on the “New Heights” podcast, but she has been mentioned by name previously.

Travis first talked about going to one of her concerts on a July 2023 episode.

“I was disappointed that I didn’t talk before or after the show. “If you were attending a Taylor Swift concert, there was a bracelet of friendship and I received a bundle of them, but I wanted to give it my number and give it a Taylor Swift.”

Two months later, the two were on an official date.

What is the New Heights podcast?

The show premiered on September 7, 2022 when both brothers were active players in the NFL. Jason has entered his 12th and penultimate seasons with the Philadelphia Eagles as a starting center. He retired following the 2023 NFL season after earning first-team All-Pro honors in his sixth career.

Jason’s career with the Eagles and Travis meant that prominent people from both franchises appeared on the show. Eagles quarterback Jalen Hurts, general manager Howie Roseman, coach Nick Sirianni and running backs all appeared on the podcast at least once. So are chief quarterback Patrick Mahomes, defensive tackle Chris Jones and coach Andy Reid.

The podcasts grew in popularity over the next two years as Amazon’s podcast platform Wondery paid more than $100 million for advertising sales and distribution rights to the show.

New Heights Guest History

Swift is one of the best profile guests the brothers had on the show, but she’s not alone. Some of the more notable non-football guests appearing in “New Heights” include:

National justice continues to challenge itself

0

Three years ago, the U.S. Supreme Court expanded gun rights and reduced abortion rights by invoking originality, a way of interpreting the constitution that requires judges to look to “history and tradition” or “the original meaning” to assess constitutional rights. Since then, originalism has been a controversial topic in the state Supreme Court and has sparked debate among justice around the country. These lively arguments have generated harsh criticisms of this method, but some state courts, including those who write and participate in the majority opinion, adhere to originalist analysis. The following is built on a sample of recent critiques drawn from opinions published between March 2024 and June 2025, as well as a previous summary of similar critiques.

Originism’s back focus will not be suitable for modern problems

A popular modestness among state Supreme Court justice is that new facts disrupt old understandings of the law, or that those understandings have become obsolete due to changes in social values, and that originality is not equipped to deal with modern issues.

This critique is particularly relevant when technology plays a key role. In these cases, justice questioned the ability of Originalism to resolve legal controversies involving technology that did not exist in the past.

For example, consider the objections of Iowa Susan Christensen, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Statev. White. There, the majority of the Iowa Supreme Court ruled that the criminal defendant’s right to conflict was violated when two child witnesses testified on a case of child abuse via a one-way television system while physically located outside the courtroom. The court previously had granted this exception to the standard practice of requiring two-way visibility between the defendant and the witness to protect the child’s well-being and minimise additional trauma. However, a majority of the High Court rejected the arrangement based on an analysis of the history and traditions of Iowa’s conflict clauses, which was understood to require a face-to-face conflict between the accused and the witnesses of the trial.

Christensen criticized the majority originalist approach because he discounted technological advances that should have influenced the reasonable interpretation of constitutional rights. “Originality is limited,” Christensen wrote. “We cannot explain the technology that did not exist in 1857 when the Iowa Constitution was ratified, and the type of cases that were not brought in in 1857.”

Furthermore, she stated that the majority of claims that 19th century legal understanding should be controlled seems to have no stopping point and could lead courts to refuse to change the number of modern laws. “The majority arrive at this decision based on a false view of originality,” she continued. “There have been a lot of developments regarding the law boy since 1857. Are we now back in 1857 in all respects?”

Similar critiques appear when the originalist answers contradict modern values and norms. This is especially true when the rights of historically marginalized groups are included. Critics argue that originality is inappropriate, even when the legal issue itself isn’t entirely new. Because whether it is law or fundamental reason or human decency, they unite judges to apply historical values that would otherwise be rejected.

North Carolina Supreme Court Judge Anita Earls captured the criticism by agreeing to a decision to reaffirm the statutory constitutionality of limiting tort claims by victims of child sexual abuse.

case, McKinneyv. Goinsthe majority applied the original analysis to determine that state constitutional provisions that guarantee legitimate proceedings did not prohibit the law that revived expired child sexual abuse claims. Earls warned that the application of the majority’s originality would “freeze the meaning of Amber’s constitution according to the narrow circumstances of several centuries,” and that “contrary to what is taught in law schools and what common sense strengthens, it gives a great deal of weight to case law law older than new.” The meaning of this approach is radical, she explained, threatening to “return legal and constitutional protections to that point in the history of this state, when slavery was legal and women were unable to own or vote for property.”

Justice generally expresses this version of concern in reproductive rights lawsuits, pointing out that originality would ask for women’s rights to constitutional provisions that women are not working on shaping. Moreover, many of these provisions have been used historically to perpetuate women rather than protect them.

Several judges on the Iowa Supreme Court criticized this feature of the majority of decisions. Heartlandv. Planned Parenthood by Reynoldsapplied an originalist analysis to conclude that the Iowa Constitution does not include the underlying right to abortion. There, the majority ruled that the right to abortion was “not rooted in the history and traditions of the nation (Iowa) state,” and stated that the state banned abortion from 1857 until the US Supreme Court declared it in 1973. Roev. Wade that the federal constitution protected access to procedures. (egg It was rejected in 2022 Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Agency. )

“Do Originalists really believe that women have the same constitutional autonomy over their bodies today, just like they did in 1857? Really?” Judge Edward Mansfield asked in dissent. And in another objection, Christensen raised additional concerns about originality in this case as well, saying that the majority ruling “perpetuates gender hierarchy when women are second-class citizens.” It’s no surprise that Iowa lacks a tradition of abortion support, she wrote, taking into account the “complete absence in the decision-making role” of women in Iowa.

Originality is inappropriate in state courts

The judge also specifically raised concerns about the use of originality in state courts. At the heart of this criticism is the observation that methodology was developed primarily to interpret the federal constitution. This is a document that is different from the national constitution in many important ways.

For example, judges point out that state constitutions are amended more frequently than federal counterparts, making it difficult to determine whether constitutional provisions should be authoritative when determining their original meaning. In North Carolina, Earls investigated the issue in a case relating to whether a juvenile defendant’s life sentence without opportunity for parole violated the A-state clause prohibiting cruel and unusual punishment. in Statev. Tirade, The majority fixed the analysis to the original intent of the clause when it was drafted in 1776.

In her consent, Earls denounced the majority of “correcting that gaze” in the 1776 version without “needing to control the moment without explaining it.” She provided a set of considerations that challenged the majority conclusions, such as “the 1776 Constitution () is the only version that has never been voted directly by voters and approved.” The majority of decisions “are having a perverse influence on the “appearance” of our “appearance” as the star of guidance to the most exclusive and least democratic version of our constitution.

At the time, Supreme Court Justice of South Carolina, Donald Beatty, disputed these concerns in part. Owensv. Stirlingfound that executions by the Electric Squadron and executions by the Dismissal Squad do not constitute “cruel or unusual” punishment under the state constitution. Beatty pointed out the difficulty of determining the original meaning of multiple amended constitutional clauses. “Even using the concept of originalism, the courts must decide whether the prohibition of “cruel” punishment should be based on collective judgments of the meaning of 1790, 1865, 1868, 1895, and possibly 1971. ”

Other critics have called attention to the often available evidence to decipher the original meaning of the state’s constitutional provisions. For example, in Rutgers Method ReviewMaryland Court of Appeals Judge Dan Friedman explains the “sudden and inadequate” treaty records in his hometown, and gives a broader point about variation in the quality and quantity of state treaty records in 50 states. The originality applied to the federal constitution simply “is not perfectly compatible with the national constitution,” Friedman wrote.

Scholars reflect these views. For example, Professor Maureen Brady of Harvard University called out courts to habitually use the state’s constitutional treaty records in a “reckless waiver.” in Wisconsin Legal Reviewshe detailed many issues related to the records of state constitutional treaties, including poor documentation, delays and secret procedures, inaccuracies introduced in records released decades later in the facts, and politicized records of treaties.

The review is a purposeful and subjective effort.

Proponents of originalism argue that it excludes subjectivity from the examination. The claim that critics are challenged points to selective, outcome-oriented methods in which judges often apply the method. Critics emphasize that originality is not different from other approaches to judicial decision-making, as all reviews require some degree of subjective judgment, even when applied in good faith.

Beatty emphasized this point with his partial opposition. OwensReference above: “From a practical point of view,” he wrote, “the use of fundamentalism does not exclude the elements of judicial interpretation (or as a fear, potential bias of the majority) that exist in answering questions.”

Furthermore, state justice points out that subjectivity is a necessary and important part of judgment that should be recognized and accepted, rather than hidden or rejected. South Carolina Supreme Court Judge D. Garrison Hill argued subjectively in another opinion Owensnote that judicial analysis relies on sound judgments of judges. Hill opposed originalism as an “unconscious methodology,” and urged the judiciary to actively “consider the principles underlying constitutional rights, determine the contours of rights, and use common sense to apply them to facts.”

He continued to explain his vision for a pluralistic approach to jury. He gave a better explanation of the intentional freedom of constitutional provisions. Citing former US Supreme Court Judge Oliver Wendell Holmes and former President Thomas Jefferson, he concluded: “The law isn’t. “The gloomy omnipresent in the sky” always provides a clear answer.

••••

As these recent state Supreme Court opinions have shown, state judges continue to provide critiques of originality and continue to promote alternative interpretive methodologies. These critiques often reflect those raised by federal judges, but also introduce national-specific considerations. By promoting this lively discussion, judges affirm their commitment to the state as an independent constitutional thinking laboratory, helping to clarify a positive and non-original vision of the role of review.

Chihiro Aizaki is an advisor to the Brennan Judicial Center’s Democracy Program.

Maryjane Johnson is a program associate for the Brennan Center for Justice’s Democracy Program.

Suggested Quotes: Chihiro Isoki & Mary Jane Johnson, National justice continues to challenge itselfsᴛᴛᴇcᴏᴜʀᴛrᴇᴘᴏʀᴛ (August 12, 2025), https://statecourtreport.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/state-justices-continue-challenge-originalism

We say that human rights have been “deteriorating” in the UK over the past year.

0


London
–

The Trump administration has issued a report claiming that the UK’s human rights have been “deteriorating” over the past year.

The annual report, part of the US State Department’s Global Survey on Human Rights, covers the 2024 calendar year and criticizes it for stating it as a “serious limit” on the threat of violence motivated by free speech and anti-Semitism.

Other reports in the series claimed that human rights have returned to countries like France and Germany, but the UK’s list of complaints is much longer, highlighting the backslides assumed in the age of social media.

Specifically, regarding the UK’s freedom of speech, the US report said “the government generally respected this right,” but “there was a particular area of concern, including restrictions on political speeches that were deemed “hate” or “offensive.”

A spokesman for the UK government said that freedom of speech is “essential to democracy” and that he “is proud to protect freedom while keeping our citizens safe.”

Speaking at the Munich Security Conference in February, Vice President JD Vance, who is currently on vacation in the Cotswolds in the countryside of England – claimed that free speech across Europe was “retreating” and that citizens’ “basic freedoms” have chosen the UK as a country where citizens were caught up in “intersections.”

The report picked out the response of then-Prime Minister Kiel’s young government to the murder of three female students last year by Axel Ludakbana, the son of a Rwandan immigrant in the British town of Southport.

Misinformation about the murder and the identity of the perpetrators has sparked anti-immigrant riots across the country, urging people to set fire to hotels used to house asylum seekers while they are inside.

US Vice President JD Vance accused the UK of being a reversal of civil liberties.

The Southport murder led government officials to “repeatly intervene in speeches about the attacker’s identity and motivation,” the report said.

The report implied negativity on the part of the UK government, but prosecutors applied existing laws such as the Public Order Act of 1986 and the Communications Act of 2003, punishing speeches deemed “vulgar or grossly offensive.”

To riot, former prosecutor superintendent Sturme has pledged that officials will face “the full power of the law.” About 2,000 people were arrested that summer and more than 1,000 people were charged.

The riots died quickly after the initial convulsion of rage, but many on British rights criticized the government’s response, designed to conservative views, as forceful.

“While many media observers considered the enforcement of “two layers” of these laws following the Southport attacks, they attacked particularly bad examples of government censorship, the censorship of ordinary British people has become increasingly routine and often targeted political speeches,” the report said.

Lee Joseph Dunn’s July sentence was quoted in the prison for eight weeks for “postling memes suggesting links between immigration and knife crime.” Dan pleaded guilty to sending a message that was “severely offensive,” and prosecutors said “escalating community tensions” would be at risk.

Dan’s case wasn’t uncommon. In another prominent case, mother and former nanny Lucy Connolly was sentenced to 31 months in prison after sought a massive deportation and urged the hotel to burn immigrants. “If that makes me racist,” she posted an X at the time.

Vance and British Foreign Secretary David Lammy fished at a British politician's country retreat in Kent outside London on August 8th.

The UK claims to balance speech protection with keeping citizens safe, while Vance claims that the UK is incorrect. At a meeting with British Foreign Minister David Lamy last week, the vice president told other countries that by censoring conservative views, he “don’t want to chase after us what I think is a very dark path under the Biden administration.”

Following Vance’s Munich speech and his recent intervention, many in the UK have denounced him for hypocrisy and cited the Trump administration’s detention of a student who took legal action against the broadcaster for what they viewed as hostile news reports.

Should you trade with your car now or wait? One car journalist lesson

0

play

At the Paris Auto Show many years ago, I met a fellow car scribe from Quebec. We became quick friends when I spoke to him using the little French I remembered in high school and he observed. Blue flowers. ”

I smiled and said politely.”Merci“I looked into it later. It’s a French idiom to translate into “blue flowers,” meaning someone who is sentimental and overly romantic. It’s also a variety of potatoes, but I think he means that as the former.

Last week, me Blue flowers Nature was overdrive as I considered buying a new car.

There were all practical reasons why I didn’t buy it. I recently wrote an article about cars where consumers can get trades at pre-duty prices, and the vehicles I was paying attention to were not on the list. I also own a 2020 Mini Cooper Clubman without paying, with just 33,897 miles. My cousin had explained it in detail just five months ago. It was beautiful and drove wonderfully.

Finally, as we were wobbling at the edge of chaos, I was worried about the economy. Do you really need to pay for the car?

Then there was mine Blue flowers Personality that resisted the idea of letting go of my car: all memories tied it together. I felt an excruciating sense of betrayal for this little car that was safely transported home from St. Joseph, Michigan last fall. A few years ago I was hugging my dog Jesse in the back seat of my last car ride to the vet and took me to the hospital to hold my mother when I passed away last summer. There were times when I was happy. I brought my beloved German shepherd dog, Scarlett, home from a friend for the animal in the Metro Detroit Shelter in this car a year ago.

But when I sat inside the new 2025 mini-countryman and the seats started massaging my back – well, hell Blue flowers! Spoiler alert: A white compatriot of sparkling new pearls with retro tan interiors (and their massage sheets) is sitting in my garage as I write this.

Do I like that? I don’t really know yet. See the above paragraph. What remains the regret of the buyer during the excitement of driving something new. But I had a reason to buy it (beyond the massage sheet). If you are considering a new vehicle, here is how I made the decision:

Phone calls cause curiosity

It all started with a call from a mini dealer and said I needed a used car and wanted to make an offer to me at Clubman in 2020. Curiosity got my best. I drove the car value with Kelly Blue’s books, Carmax and Calvana. I managed to get at least $17,000 or more for the Clubman.

I remember the day I got that Clubman: July 23, 2020. It was a demo model sold on the dealer’s website that was tested. It was a cream colour called pepper white. It had a black interior and hundreds of miles inside. I liked it the moment I hit the throttle. It was my favorite of the seven cars I owned as an adult.

But my clubman is small and the Mini is no longer making that model. I would like to have a larger vehicle with more space to carry both the thing and my two big dogs. Still, I wanted a car that was still driving like a mini. Countrymen fit the bill.

I own other brands, including domestic (my father led the union organization at Burrows in the 1960s and served as the local Vice President of the UAW), and I thought of them. I’ve seen electric cars too, but I’m not ready for it due to lack of charging infrastructure. So after all my research, the mini-countryman was my favorite ride.

Pros and Cons

But first I contacted a colleague from the Free Press in Detroit (part of the USA Today Network). We contacted automotive review columnist Mark Phelan and personal finance columnist Susan Tompor. I wanted to take on the vehicle (he gave it with a thumbs up), and take Tomru if it would be better to buy or lease it. Neither of them recommends not keeping your car payments.

So I called my financial advisor. He assured me that he could afford a new car, even if it was in a recession, given that there were few other bills. If I lease, he said he would never beat over $3,000 because he would not collect the money even if he added the car. He said he proposed to sell Clubman for $17,000 and leasing a new vehicle that had been reduced by $3,000, then investing a $14,000 balance in a measure protected from market volatility. He said it could grow to $20,000 over the next few years. I liked that idea.

I conclude: Get a new car now or hold my car at least 4-5 years after the chaos around the tariffs settle down, we will overcome the possibility of a recession. The advantage of keeping it is that you don’t pay for the car. The downside is that new brakes, all new run-flat tires, and more, ultimately expensive work. Given that it is my only car, having it in the store would be a huge inconvenience beyond financial costs. It is also expected that the cost of repairs for automobiles will rise as imported parts are expected to be subject to customs duties. Finally, since I often drive solos, reliable transport is a safe necessity.

The advantage of buying a new vehicle is reliable transport with all the maintenance and mechanical issues paid at the factory, including more rooms, new amenities my car didn’t have, free roadside assistance and towing if necessary. Disadvantages: Car payments.

I called the dealer to schedule a look. After all, I justified, it’s a useful study for my work.

I just say no

The real art of trading is simple: being able to walk away. There were many benefits to keeping my car so I could say “no” to my new car and didn’t feel any regrets. That’s what I did. My first offer to buy my car was $16,000, a mediocre discount on my purchase or lease plan.

Plus, after my first test drive I got a Carsick. I don’t know if the vehicles I tested were not lined up properly or if I was worried about the whole experience, so it was from my nerves, perhaps it was something I ate earlier in the day, or the fact that I was on the edge of the cold tail on my head. Whatever the cause, I got out of the car, washed away and vomited.

The next day, the salesman called. He said they could make a better offer to me. I was firmly restrained: I still like my car and got a higher offer from Kelly Blue’s books, Carbana, Carmax, so if they don’t offer any more in my deal, I said. He asked me to come back. Promising to try and get more me for my car, we drove other cars to see if they made me feel bad or if it was a one-off.

So I went back. At this point, you’re probably thinking: OK, Jamie, you may not need a new car, but you obviously want it or you won’t be coming back. That’s exactly Ivan Drury, director of insights at car buying site edmunds.com when I consulted him.

I interview a lot. He is an expert when it comes to car buying. So his advice was: If you’re going to get a new car, now is the time to find it at pre-Turfy price. However, take your time to check:

  • Choose the car you absolutely want so that you will be happy with it for many years.
  • Get a detailed pricing spreadsheet that includes manufacturers’ recommended retail prices, rates and taxes, discounts or incentives, financial fees and other terms.
  • For leases, you must have all of the above and all of the vehicle’s residual values when the lease is finished.
  • The dealer’s maths are confusing, so take your spreadsheet home to study.

My dealer formed the transaction from MSRP after taxes and fees, deducting the incentives and down payment. So, math is to look at the total that you are actually paying to the car at the end of your lease or loan.

By using car shopping sites such as Edmunds.com, Kelley Blue Book, and Cargurus, you can make the vehicle transparent about its average transaction price, lease fees and financing agreements and assess whether it has received a good offer. Also, different states have different lease rules, so if you see an ad saying your vehicle is leasing “a $1,000 down for just $299 per month,” the transaction may not apply to the state you live in.

Final decision

The salesman was patient and transparent. He responded to detailed spreadsheet requests and was able to spend some time driving several different countrymen’s cars. I also thought of a mini 4-door hardtop car.

I didn’t get a Carsick this time. I found it fun to drive both models. They each contain most of the same features, and the two I saw were close in price. Countryman costs $42,000 and $39,000 for a four-door hardtop.

A 4-door hardtop car is fun to drive. It’s sporty and fast. It’s a traditional mini in its best condition. The countryman is big and solid with a smooth, luxurious ride, but retains the speed and agility of the mini. I liked being a country worker and being a little more expensive. It also has all-wheel drive and front-wheel drive, so I wish I had an AWD in the past.

The Mini also uses regular tires on both vehicles, rather than the expensive Replace run-flat tires found in Clubman. However, the Countryman includes spare tires, and the four-door hardtop only offers a kit that patches flat.

So when I decided what to do: I chose to trade with a Clubman, but instead of waiting a few years, I was able to get a trade with a new vehicle, risking the repairs to the car, then a lower trade-in and more expensive new one.

I chose what I would get because of the larger space to travel with my dog, a higher stance and a spare tire vs patch kit.

However, I wasn’t doing anything to cost the price, but I still believed it was too expensive. This time the general manager called me. I emphasized that the dealer will make money from me in the service lane as the dealer is paid by the manufacturer under warranty and maintenance plans. I told him what I wanted to pay and I was ready to leave. But we signed a contract.

I decided to lease a $14,000 balance from the sale of the car and invest it.

Start a new chapter

When I returned to the dealership to do countryman delivery a few days later, I quickly found out I had to pay for the car, which made me feel a little sick. My parents grew up in Great Repression and took over me the habits of practicality and frugality that I felt betrayed.

I was easily overwhelmed Blue flowers When I was forced to hand over the keys to my loyal Pepper white pepper of five years. However, when I entered the showroom, Nanuq White had a new friend and was tagged with “Jamie’s New Mini.”

I signed the paperwork and headed home knowing whether I would start worrying about paying for my car or overly nostalgic memories of my previous car. I always take a deep breath, touch the button and get a massage.

Jamie L. Larrow is a senior Autos writer covering Ford Motor Company for the Detroit Free Press. Please contact Jamie at jlareau@freepress.com. Follow her on Twitter @Jarouan. Sign up for our car newsletter. Become a subscriber.

The Trump Putin Summit highlights the incredible beauty and vulnerability of Alaska

0


Joint base Elmendorf Richardson is a midway rest stop for senior officials on the route from Washington to East Asia.

play

WASHINGTON – The summit meeting between President Donald Trump and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin will focus on ending Putin’s war in Ukraine, with the incredible beauty and vulnerability of Alaska.

The two world leaders meet at Elmendorf Richardson’s joint base. It was a facility where I was with the airline and soldiers – a lot of moose and bears are also worthy of the location on the edge of Alaska’s vast black spruce-washed wilderness.

It’s cold, dark in winter, and snowy, brings you closer to the 24-hour sun during peak summer.

For senior officials like the president and cabinet secretaries on the route from Washington to East Asia, this is a major mid-stop stop. A flight from the East Coast to the South Coast of Alaska takes about eight hours, with mandatory pre-rest air crew limits and convenient and safe places to refuel.

Long before the air travel and the superpower summit, US and Russian leaders raided Alaska. In 1867, Secretary of State William Seward negotiated secretly with Russian officials to purchase Alaska’s territory for $7.2 million. At the time, it was ridden as Seward’s stupidity, but this deal worked for the Americans. Alaska – its people, its stunning scenery and huge natural resources – joined the union in 1959.

Before the state, the Army established a base that would become Elmendorf Richardson in 1940 during the WWII phase. Since then, along with soldiers, airmen and small units of the Navy and Marines, they have called the base home. Overall, the joint base hosts around 30,000 service members, their families and civilian employees.

Its important location is close to the Arctic resources seen by China near Russia – Elmendorf Richardson and other Alaskan military facilities have become increasingly valuable to the Pentagon. In recent years, more personnel and money have been flowing to Alaska to strengthen the North’s defenses. This base participates in some of the military’s most complex annual war games, featuring sophisticated weapons like the F-22 fighter planes.

Alaska is the finest land. The state is more than twice that of Texas. Its 46,000-mile coastline is more than the combination of the 48 lower condition. Denali’s snowy Peak Tower is located above the interior of more than 20,000 feet.

Walking around the forest of brown and black bears, moose and wolves, tundra and black spruce. Temperatures routinely drop below the interior zero where Fort Wainwright sits on the edge of Fairbanks. The dim sunlight glides in the sky for just a few hours at the depths of winter.

Cabin fever can be very real.

In summer, it is the land of the midnight sun. Permanent daylighting has its drawbacks, disrupting, irritating, and worse. Alaska is routinely ranked among national leaders in alcohol abuse and suicide.

In recent years, Alaska’s strategic remote locations have revealed its vulnerability. Suicide among soldiers who have risen to alert levels. A report by USA Today revealed that there is a lack of mental personnel to help them. The Army and Congress intervened, dispatching dozens of counselors, spending millions of millions to improve the living conditions of the military there. Suicide rates have declined.

Efforts by Chinese spies to access Alaska bases have not been reported by USA Today. The base includes military top-end weapons, sophisticated radar, which tracks and intercepts potential attacks from home and missiles.

Russia also regularly inspects the northern side of the United States. On July 22, North American Aerospace Defense Command detected a Russian fighter jet operating in the Alaska Air Defense Identification Zone.

When aircraft enter the zone, they must be identified for national security purposes. Russian planes remained in international airspace, a tactic they regularly employ. Mildly provocative, the flight is recognized by Norad, but is not considered a threat.

Meanwhile, global warming thaws permafrost under the runway, rising water levels damage coastal facilities, requiring tens of millions of dollars of corrective cost accounting. A climate skeptic, Trump has been able to see its effects on himself, including cemeteries eroded by rising sea levels that absorb the casualties of flu co-op and natural PO victims for over a century. The potential release of ancient pathogens from permafrost thawing is also attracting attention from the Pentagon.

Alaska may have been Putin’s last best choice for the summit. His brutal and unprovoked invasion of adjacent Ukraine made him an international pariah. Refusing to enter Europe, he and Trump were unable to repeat their summit in Helsinki, the Finnish capital of Helsinki, a member of NATO, primarily invading.

Luckily for Putin and Trump, Anchorage is a fun city, cool in the middle of summer, far from Putin of death and destruction he created in Ukraine.

Drivers will be fined up to $110,000 for speeding on Swiss Street. But he can afford it

0


Geneva
AP
–

The driver appeared at 27 km/h (17 mph) at the speed limit on the streets of Lausanne, Switzerland, and now he is facing up to 90,000 Swiss francs (over $110,000). But he can afford it.

Why is it an eye-opening penalty? A recurring criminal, the Speedster is one of the wealthiest people in Switzerland, and Vaud Canton or the region has fined him based on factors such as income, fate, or general family financial situation.

There is not one Swiss. Germany, France, Austria and the Scandinavian countries all punish the punishment based on the wealth of a person. The recent fines are not even Swiss records. In 2010, the billionaire Ferrari driver obtained a ticket worth around $290,000 for speeding in St. Gallen’s East Canton.

At the time, Roadcross of the Swiss Safety Group said the rich drivers were lightly punished until voters approved an overhaul of criminal law three years ago.

Under today’s rules, poor people may spend the night in prison in place of fines, but the wealthiest people in a wealthy alpine country may be in hook for tens of thousands.

A Swiss Canton court recently determined that Tycoon had to pay 10,000 Swiss francs ($12,300) in advance and could be forced to pay the remaining 80,000 if caught in a similar road breach over the next three years.

The Swiss “24 Heures” newspaper first reported the incident, saying the unidentified man is a French citizen listed by the weekly Billan of the Swiss economy among 300 wealthy people in Switzerland, and has a fortune in hundreds of millions of dollars.

Daily reported that automated police radar filmed criminals driving at 77 km/h (48 mph) in the 50 kph (31 mph) zone on Lausanne Street. A rapid calculation prosecutor tallyed the biggest fines drivers faced under the law, the report said.

Vincent Derouand, a spokesman for the Vaud Public Thesecutors Office, said the defendant did not object to a decision that was reported in June almost a year ago for the violation.

The Vaud Criminal Code sets the maximum financial penalty based on “the personal and financial situation of the offender at the time of the sentence.”

The newspaper reported that he had already been caught eight years ago for a similar speeding violation, paying 10,000 Swiss francs with a penalty and facing an additional 60,000 if another violation occurred within the next two years.

In Switzerland, the penalty for speeding can even catch up with police. One officer chased after a thief who was fined for the race in 2016 at nearly twice the speed limit through Geneva Street and blown up a bank counter machine.

Watch ABC’s “High Potential” Season 2 with Kaitlin Olson first

0

play

LOS ANGELES – Caitlyn Olson had to make some important changes when her quirky “potential” character Morgan Guillowry finally created her own police lawsuit for season 2 of HIT ABC Crime Dramedy. The visual map detailing the suspects, victims and essential photographs was too organized for Morgan’s caucasian, 160-IQ mind.

“I remember filming the day because everything on Morgan’s Crime Commission was so uniform. I said, ‘No, no, no!”,” Olson says. “It’s all hanging, there’s a lot going on with photos everywhere, and there’s a lot going on with that board. But Morgan knows where it all is.”

Morgan’s partner at the Los Angeles Police Department in the first teaser trailer for Season 2 (september 16, 10 ET/PT, and streaming on Hulu). Adam Kaladek (Daniel Sunjata) asks, “What does this look like on the inside of your head?”

“Yeah, Buddy, I’m not even close,” replies Morgan.

However, this infectious look of the stunning brains of a single mother and former police station cleaner who won a job as a LAPD crime consultant has propelled the freshman series into one of the few bright spots on broadcast television. Focusing on the 49-year-old charmingly observable Olson, longtime “Always Sunny in Philadelphia” star, “High Potential,” is the most acclaimed new show in ABC’s adult in seven years.

What will happen to Morgan in Season 2 of “High Possibility”?

Unorthodox Morgan, dressed roughly with his Easter egg-colored jeweled claws, has earned respect from the LAPD’s main crime forces. This led Detective Karadek, Revuz’ Osman (Denniz Akdeniz), Daphne Forester (Javicia Leslie), Mentor Boss and Serena Soto (Judy Rays). “Morgan even got his desk,” says Reyes. “It’s a small thing. But it’s a desk.”

Morgan is full of her hands as a single mother raising three children, Baby Chloe and her son Elliott (Matthew Ram), the orntime partner of her son Elliott (Matthew Ram), and as a single mother raising three children, including her mysteriously missing ex-husband, Rome’s eldest son Ava (Amira J).

The first season finale last February featured stacked double cliff hangers that had an impact on Morgan.

The first Shocker crashes into the Hot Reed, suggesting that the Romans may still be alive. Morgan disposes this with an intrusive bomb. The cute guy (David Juntori) who cheated in the grocery store parking lot is actually a crazy puzzle maker who has been messing with clues of LAPD with glaring at his brain to solve his unconventional crime.

“Season 1 was a fun, two-part ending surprise,” says Olson. “And everything will be addressed in a new season.”

“The car park meeting was so creepy and he got very close to Morgan’s kids,” Olson said. “It’s a nightmare for every mother.”

Things become personal between game makers and code cracking Morgan. It will prompt parents to want to quit police work to keep their children safe, but it will soon be clear that Morgan has no choice,” Olson says. There is only one pass. Stop game maker. Dangerous mind battles affect already unorthodox police consultants.

How does Steve Howey and Meki Fifer affect “high potential” casting?

Olson refuses to debate who will play in Season 2 by “er” star Meki Fifer. But Roman, the former hat, could be. “Shambled” alumni Steve Howey joined the cast as Nick Wagner, captain of a politically sharp new precinct. Smooth talk, Wagner wears an expensive suit, but not only is it a mess in the office, but also a potential concern for Morgan’s love.

The relationship of budding Karadek Morgan will be pruned into a new season.

“Karadek is still Morgan’s partner and has built friendship and trust,” Olson says. “But others are coming into the picture. Let’s play it and see what happens.”

“High Possibility” for More Wild Morgan’s Costumes

Morgan’s eye-opening ensemble, signature knee high boots and stunning claws won’t be able to calm down in Season 2. “That means they’re perfect.”

The success of the show marks an extension run of Olson who filmed episodes of 13 Season 1, filmed episodes of 13 Season 1, married to co-star Rob Mac Mac, raising two sons while starring as DJ Vance Jr. on HBO’s “Hack” (season 5 will start production this fall) and filmed episodes of 13 Season 1, filmed episodes of FX, and filmed “Always Sunny,” and filmed co-star Rob Mac Mac and raised two sons.

“I do it like every mom does it,” says Olson of her packed schedule. “You show up, you get it done, then you go home and make dinner for your kids. I do it all year round.”

How to watch season 2 of “High Potential”

“High Potential” Season 2 kicked off on ABC on September 16th with 10 ET/PT, and the next day. Stream with \.