Home Blog Page 291

Weber recalls over 3.2 million wire grill brushes due to broken bristles

0

play

More than 3.2 million metal wire bristle grill brushes are being recalled by Webber Inc. because the bristles can break off and end up in human food, according to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC).

The recall applies to six models, some of which have been sold in the U.S. since 2011.

The CPSC said some of the hairs can get caught on grill grates and end up in people’s food, getting into their throats and digestive tracts and causing internal injuries. The agency added that Weber was aware of at least 38 reports of hair loss, four of which required treatment.

The brushes were sold in stores and online at Lowe’s, Home Depot, Ace Hardware, Target for $10 to $17, and online at Amazon and Weber.com. Recalled products can also be found on third-party resale sites such as eBay.

“Consumers should immediately stop using the recalled grill brushes and contact Weber for a replacement cold cleaning nylon bristle grill brush,” the CPSC said. “Consumers are asked to discard recalled grill brushes.”

Which Weber grill brushes are included in the recall?

The recall issued by the CPSC includes the following model numbers in addition to the year of sale:

  • 6277, 12-inch brush with black plastic handle (2021-2026 sales)
  • 6278, 18-inch brush with black plastic handle (2021-2026 sales)
  • 6463, 12-inch brush with bamboo handle and metal scraper (sold 2011-2021)
  • 6464, 18-inch brush with bamboo handle and metal scraper (sold 2011-2021)
  • 6493, 21-inch brush with black plastic handle and metal binder (sold 2013-2021)
  • 6494, 12-inch brush with black plastic handle (sold 2013-2021)

Fernando Cervantes Jr. is a trending news reporter for USA TODAY. Contact us at fernando.cervantes@usatodayco.com and follow us at X @fern_cerv_.

Texas airspace closed after military shoots down CBP drone, lawmakers say

0

play

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The U.S. military shot down a U.S. government drone with a laser-based anti-drone system, prompting the Federal Aviation Administration to ban flights in the area around Fort Hancock, Texas, on Feb. 26, a congressional aide told Reuters.

The Pentagon had no immediate comment, but the FAA cited “special security reasons” in its notice regarding airspace restrictions near the Mexican border.

Reps. Rick Larsen, Bennie Thompson and Andre Carson, the top Democrats on the committees that oversee aviation and homeland security issues, criticized the lack of coordination, saying in a joint statement that the Pentagon reportedly shot down a Customs and Border Protection drone.

Lawmakers said they had warned months ago that the White House’s decision to sidestep a bipartisan proposal to train counter-drone pilots and address coordination issues was “short-sighted thinking.”

“Now we are witnessing the consequences of incompetence,” the statement said.

Congressional aides told Reuters that the Pentagon appears to have used a high-energy laser system to shoot down a CBP drone near the Mexican border. The area is frequently infiltrated by Mexican drones used by drug cartels. CBP and the White House did not respond to requests for comment.

The FAA announced it would close the airspace at Fort Hancock from February 26 to June 23, the El Paso Times, part of the USA TODAY Network, reported.

The FAA said it was expanding advance flight restrictions in the area to “enhance its reach to ensure safety,” but said commercial aircraft would not be affected because of its location.

Earlier this month, the FAA suspended traffic at an airport near El Paso, Texas, for 10 days, but about eight hours later it reversed course and announced it was lifting the order. Fort Hancock is about 60 miles east of El Paso.

Reuters and other media reported that the closure was due to concerns about the use of laser-based anti-drone systems, and that the FAA had agreed to lift restrictions around El Paso if the Pentagon agreed to hold off further testing pending FAA safety review.

The Pentagon and CBP told Congressional aides earlier this week that they believe they can deploy lasers without prior FAA approval.

Aides said there was a lack of coordination between the FAA and the Pentagon. The government notified Congressional offices about the El Paso closure and the Fort Hancock incident late on February 26.

The FAA’s notice prohibits all flights in the Fort Hancock area, but says air ambulance and search and rescue flights can be cleared by the Southern Border Joint Task Force. Aviation restrictions will remain in place until June 24th.

The agency briefed Congressional staff about the El Paso incident earlier this week and plans to brief lawmakers next week.

CBP reportedly deployed laser technology this month to shoot down four suspected cartel drones, despite warnings from the FAA that it was unsafe to use the technology in the same vicinity as commercial aircraft, an aide told Reuters, adding that the agency had told authorities the laser had never been deployed in the country before.

(Reporting by David Shepherdson; Editing by Clarence Fernandez and Jamie Freed)

North Carolina’s missing mother found 24 years after arrest on old warrant

0

play

The mother at the center of the disappearance of a 24-year-old North Carolina man has been arrested on an outstanding warrant, authorities announced on February 26th.

The Rockingham County Sheriff’s Office announced in a Facebook post that Michelle Hundley-Smith was arrested by the Robeson County Sheriff’s Office for failure to appear in court stemming from a November 2001 DUI charge issued by the Eden Police Department. The last missed court date was in December 2001, according to court records.

Handley Smith, who went missing while out Christmas shopping 24 years ago, has been found “alive and well” in an undisclosed area of ​​North Carolina, Rockingham County Sheriff’s Office investigators announced in a Feb. 20 news release.

The arrest was made on February 25, according to a Facebook post. Mr. Smith posted bail and was released. A hearing is scheduled for March 26, according to court records, but it is unclear whether Smith has hired an attorney.

USA TODAY reached out to Capt. Jonathan Cheek of the Rockingham County Sheriff’s Office, who reiterated what was said in the post.

What happened to Michelle Handley Smith?

Handley Smith was 38 years old when he left his Greensboro-area home to do Christmas shopping at a nearby Kmart on Dec. 9, 2001, two days before he missed a court appearance, the sheriff’s office said.

Her family last saw her around 8:30 p.m. when she left her home in Eden, North Carolina, about 56 miles north of Greensboro, to go shopping in Martinsville, Virginia, about 27 miles away. She was reported missing on December 31, 2001.

According to the Rockingham County Sheriff’s Office, multiple agencies participated in the decades-long manhunt for Hundley-Smith, including the North Carolina Bureau of Investigation, the Drug Enforcement Administration and the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

The sheriff’s office also shared posts asking for information in connection with her disappearance cases in 2020 and 2021, noting there was a cash reward for clues.

Sheriff Sam Page of the Rockingham County Sheriff’s Office previously told USA TODAY. The information came from the National Crime Information Center (NCIC), a computerized index of missing person and criminal information that allows law enforcement agencies to exchange information.

The sheriff said another agency entered information about Hundley-Smith and Rockingham County officials were notified.

When asked, Page said that to his knowledge, the missing woman was not living under a new name. A more likely scenario is that she may have recently enrolled in some service and later alerted authorities.

300 Papa John’s stores will close. The majority will close by the end of 2026

0

play

Louisville, Kentucky-based Papa John’s announced during its earnings call on Thursday, February 26, that it will close approximately 300 stores across the United States by the end of 2027.

Ravi Tanawala, Papa John’s chief financial officer and president of North America, said the company expects to close about 200 stores in 2026. Tanawala said the stores closing are primarily franchised stores that are “not meeting brand expectations or lack a clear path to sustainable financial improvement.”

He added that these locations generate “negative four-wall” income and are more than 10 years old.

“We are taking steps to better align our corporate and field resources with our transformation priorities and optimize spans and layers within our organization,” Papa John’s CEO Todd Penegor said during the call regarding the store closures.

It is currently unclear which stores the pizza chain plans to close or when. USA TODAY has reached out to Papa John’s for comment.

In 2025, Papa John’s embarked on several initiatives to improve the company, including the appointment of new company leaders, fleet and cost restructuring, organizational changes, and innovation.

Papa John’s reported in its earnings call that revenue from North American stores in 2025 will be down 2% from the previous year. Revenue at company-operated restaurants was down 3%, and revenue at franchised restaurants was down 2%.

The pizza chain’s global sales in 2025 increased by 1% from the previous year. This sales growth was supported by international markets, where sales increased by 5%.

Mr Thanawala, who previously managed the company’s international division, said this store closure strategy was similar to the one he implemented in the UK, resulting in a 17% increase in average sales per store.

“Selected strategic closures will allow our North American franchisees to drive operational excellence in their core restaurants and direct resources to accelerate growth in priority markets,” he said, adding that the company also reduced its workforce by 7%.

The company has 3,523 locations in the United States at the end of 2025, according to its financial statements.

Closed in 2026

The series of closures is similar to that of pizza delivery competitor Pizza Hut, which plans to close 250 “unprofitable” stores in the U.S. in the first half of 2026.

At parent company Yum!’s financial results conference on February 4th. Brands Chief Financial Officer Ranjith Roy said the move is part of the company’s “Hat Forward” strategy, which includes “vigorous marketing, technology modernization and franchise agreements.”

Pizza Hut’s U.S. store sales fell 3% in the fourth quarter of 2025.

Multiple fast-food and fast-casual chain restaurants across the country have announced plans to downsize since the beginning of the year, with some saying they intend to focus resources on better-performing locations.

Contributor: Olivia Evans, Louisville Courier-Journal

Backcountry skiing, volcanoes, and submersibles. Disasters can happen even if you have a guide.

0


A recent avalanche that killed nine people in California has raised questions about how safe the rapidly growing adventure tourism sector is and what causes bad decisions in dangerous conditions.

play

Adventure seekers can pay a guide to help them do anything they dream of. Go ice climbing on crevasses-filled glaciers, take excursions to active volcanoes, and ski in the backcountry in avalanche-prone areas.

They pay hundreds, thousands, and even millions of dollars to explore some of the most unexplored places on Earth, all in the safety of well-trained guides with extensive experience. But again and again, disasters happen.

Most recently, an avalanche struck a group of 15 backcountry skiers (11 paying guests and four guides) near Lake Tahoe in California’s Sierra Nevada on February 17th. The avalanche was the deadliest avalanche in the United States since 1981, killing nine people, including three “experienced” guides from the company that organized the trip.

Despite dire warnings about a storm expected to bring up to 8 feet of fresh snow and create “extremely dangerous” avalanche conditions, the group went on a three-day adventure that cost more than $1,100 per person. The disaster raises questions about how safe the rapidly growing adventure tourism sector is and whether there should be any repercussions for professionals and guides who press forward despite the dangers.

“In this industry, when you see a guide that says, ‘Here we go,’ it makes you feel like you’re not in danger because you trust the experts,” said Philippe Duverger, a marketing professor at Towson University in Maryland who has studied adventure tourism for about 20 years.

Karl Cater, a professor of tourism at Swansea University in Wales, said when tourists hire guides, “there is a sense of transferring risk management”.

“You gave it up,” he told USA TODAY. “I guess they’re hoping that they’ll pay the money and come back safely from the other side.”

As investigators work to figure out why a deadly ski trip in California was canceled despite the dangers, USA TODAY examines some of the most notable adventure tourism disasters in recent history, what they have in common, and how death is almost always on the table, no matter your level of experience.

Titan submarine: CEO claims ‘indestructible’

In 2023, three tourists paid between $150,000 and $250,000 for a seat on the Titan submersible. The Titan submersible is a carbon fiber ship whose owner, Oceangate CEO Stockton Rush, has promised to take him to the bottom of the North Atlantic Ocean to see the wreck of the Titanic.

When the submarine imploded two miles below the ocean’s surface on June 18, 2023, all five crew members were killed, including Rush, maritime expert Paul-Henri Narjolet, and three tourists: British billionaire Hamish Harding, Pakistani businessman Shahzada Dawood, and her 19-year-old son Suleman Dawood.

A Coast Guard report released last year concluded that the disaster, caused by inadequate submersible design and failures in maintenance and safety protocols, could have been prevented. The report also said Rush’s boast that Titan’s hull was “indestructible,” giving passengers a false sense of security, also contributed to the disaster, the report said.

Had Rush survived, he could have faced criminal charges for negligence, the report said.

volcanic eruption in new zealand

On December 9, 2019, a diverse group of guides and tourists were visiting New Zealand’s active volcano Whakaari Island when the island erupted, spewing boiling steam, gas, rocks and ash over the visitors. The eruption killed 22 people, including two guides and five Americans, and injured another 25, many seriously.

Tourist brochures lured visitors with promises of getting “closer to the drama” and seeing “amazing lakes with acidic vapors.” Visitors paid between $80 and $140 to reach the island by boat and more than $800 if they arrived by helicopter.

“They made it look exciting, but they didn’t make it sound dangerous,” American tourist Matt Uley, who along with his wife Lauren survived injuries from the eruption, told the makers of the Netflix documentary “Volcano: Rescue from Whakaari” about the disaster.

“I understand that no one can control nature, but you have to at least give me the opportunity to make an informed decision,” Yury said in the documentary. “Knowing what we know now, there’s a zero percent chance we’d set foot on that island. Zero.”

Since then, the island has been closed to all visitors.

After the eruption, the companies that own the islands, travel companies and even government agencies came under intense scrutiny for failing to ensure the safety of visitors and reduce risks. The company, Whakaari Management Limited, was found guilty of health and safety offences, and a judge ordered the company to pay millions of dollars in compensation and fines. A judge overturned the conviction last year.

Everest Blizzard of 1996

The dangers of attempting to climb Mount Everest are well known, but that doesn’t deter adventurers from spending tens of thousands of dollars on mountain guides to conquer the world’s highest peaks.

In Into Thin Air, author Jon Krakauer exposes the unnecessary risks rival travel companies are taking to get their customers to the top. The 1996 Everest season described in this book was the deadliest year on the mountain at the time, with eight climbers, including two guides, dying in one day during a snowstorm on May 10, 1996.

In his book, Krakauer criticizes guide companies that lead inexperienced climbers on climbs despite the extreme danger. Expedition leaders ignored or underestimated warnings that dangerous weather was coming, he wrote.

Professor Cater said many experts in the adventure tourism field believe this snowstorm was a watershed moment when mountains became commercial destinations.

Since then, around 200 people have died attempting to climb or descend from Everest, including 16 in an ice avalanche known as the Khumbu Icefall in 2014 and up to 24 in an earthquake in 2015.

Missouri duck boat accident

A duck boat tour is much safer than a trek to Everest, but when Mother Nature gets involved and humans make bad choices, even something seemingly harmless can turn into a life-or-death battle.

On July 19, 2018, a duck boat sank on Table Rock Lake in Branson, Missouri during a severe storm, killing 17 people ranging in age from 1 to 70, including nine members of a family vacationing from Indiana.

The first notification that severe weather and high winds were heading toward Table Rock Lake that day came more than seven hours before the boat capsized, the Springfield News Leader, part of the USA TODAY Network, reported. Later that day, authorities issued a severe thunderstorm warning that predicted 60 mph winds for the area before the boat departed.

After the accident killed her husband and three young children, Tia Coleman told FOX59 from her hospital bed that the duck boat captain told tourists they didn’t need to wear life vests.

“The captain told us, ‘Don’t worry about bringing a life jacket. You don’t need one,'” she said. “So no one grabbed them because we heard the captain telling us to sit down…but by doing that, by the time it was time to grab them, it was too late. And I believe a lot of people might have been saved.”

Ride the Ducks, which operated the boat, went out of business the following year. The captain was charged last year with 17 counts of manslaughter and 12 counts of endangering the welfare of a child. He maintains his innocence and is asking for the case to be dismissed.

Common themes in adventure disasters: disregard for danger, ego.

When adventure tourism disasters strike, there are some common themes: ignored danger, ego and the forces of Mother Nature, adventure tourism experts told USA TODAY.

Often the leaders of such trips, like Rush on the Titan sub, let their egos rule the day. But they say egos can also come into play with paying customers.

“Most of the time, there’s an underlying red flag or something, a desire to complete the adventure and not want to turn back,” Cater said.

Florian Zack, a professor of hospitality and tourism management at Virginia Tech, says many people are drawn to guided adventures like backcountry skiing or climbing Mount Everest because “there’s something meaningful about doing something that not many people can do.”

While there is a physical component to conquering such adventures, there can also be an economic component, as wealthy people spend money on experiences that are out of reach for most people, such as climbing Mount Everest or traveling to space, he said.

“Some people start overlooking the risks,” Zack said, adding that they can end up feeling invincible. “They think, ‘Yes, I understand it’s dangerous, but I know what I’m doing, I’ve been trained, and it won’t happen to me. It’s arrogant and maybe naive in a way to not judge the situation properly and ignore the warnings.’

When it comes to backcountry skiing in particular, some people can do it for years without any problems, but that confidence doesn’t always help, said Scott Savage, president of the American Avalanche Association and director of the U.S. Forest Service’s Sawtooth Avalanche Center in Ketchum, Idaho.

“Skiing or riding deep powder on steep slopes is exhilarating, and the ‘reward’ causes people to take more risks and find ways to justify that risk,” Savage said in an email. “Next time you find yourself in a similar situation, you might not be so lucky.”

The big question remains: Why wasn’t the Tahoe ski trip canceled?

It’s too early to say why the fateful trip near Lake Tahoe was forced. In such cases, experts say, in some cases guides are able to convince guests that they are safe when they are not, and in other cases, paying customers are encouraged to go ahead with a trip despite making the guide or the company uncomfortable.

In a statement to USA TODAY, the families of the six victims, all married mothers, said there were “many unanswered questions” and that their loved ones were “seasoned backcountry skiers with a deep respect for the mountains.”

“They were trained and prepared for the outback trip and trusted their professional guides for this trip,” the family said.

Zev Blais, founder of Blackbird Mountain Guides, which led the trip and lost three guides, has not explained why he moved the trip forward.

“There’s still much we don’t know about what happened. It’s too early to draw conclusions, but the investigation is ongoing,” he said in a statement on the night of the avalanche. “We ask those who have experienced this tragedy to refrain from speculation. We do not yet have all the answers, and it may be some time before we have them.”

No matter what motivated the decision that led to the disaster on the mountain, by all accounts everyone who took part in this trip had experience, skill and knowledge. But sometimes that doesn’t matter, Savage said.

“Humans are fallible. We usually make logical, good decisions, but not when we don’t,” Savage says. “If you play in the backcountry for years, the law of averages will make you make bad decisions. Chance or luck will determine whether or how much you pay for your bad decisions.”

Contributed by Jeanine Santucci and Thao Nguyen, USA TODAY

Amanda Lee Myers is a senior crime reporter covering cold case investigations, breaking news and the death penalty for USA TODAY. Follow her on X at @amandaleeusin.

Hillary Clinton condemns investigation after Epstein testimony

0


A former secretary of state testified behind closed doors about her relationship with an accused sex trafficker. She blamed Republicans for not making their testimony public.

play

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said on February 26 that Republican lawmakers who called her to testify about sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein were not serious about the investigation and should have made her testimony public.

“They had a chance to do it in public and I wish they had done it in public. I think they made a bad decision by not doing it in public,” Clinton told reporters outside the Chappaqua Performing Arts Center, where she was called to testify in a closed-door hearing near her home in suburban New York.

Ms. Clinton was removed from office by House members after they issued subpoenas seeking information about Mr. Epstein. Mr. Epstein is a disgraced financier suspected of facilitating womanizing and worse against some of the world’s richest and most powerful people. Some of those caught up in the scandal, including former Obama Treasury Secretary Larry Summers, former British prince Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and Microsoft founder Bill Gates, are facing serious consequences.

Mr. Clinton said in his opening statement to the committee that he said he knew nothing about Mr. Epstein’s criminal activities.

“I do not remember meeting Mr. Epstein, nor have I ever been on his plane or visited his island, home or office. I have nothing to add to this,” she said in a statement to the committee, according to a post on X.

Clinton also called on the committee to ask questions “directly under oath about what appears tens of thousands of times in the Epstein file” rather than relying on press conferences with President Donald Trump.

Former President Bill Clinton is one of the elite figures featured in the so-called Epstein Files. The file is a trove of millions of documents that the Justice Department has released under laws passed by Congress, and the signature of Mr. Trump, a former friend of Mr. Epstein, also features prominently in the file.

Bill Clinton is scheduled to testify before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee on February 27th.

What did Hillary Clinton say about being called to testify?

Clinton accused House members of “going on the road” for information instead of questioning Justice Department officials who did not prosecute Epstein.

“If most people were serious, they wouldn’t waste their time on expedition fishing,” she says. “What is being blocked? Who is being protected? And why the cover-up?”

The former Democratic presidential candidate, who lost to Trump in the 2016 election, said the questioning she received “didn’t seem very productive.”

“It was very repetitive,” Clinton told reporters Thursday. “They literally asked the same questions over and over again, which didn’t seem very productive to me.”

Some of the questions were “completely off-topic,” she said.

“If they were literally going to carry out their responsibilities in the investigation, they could have had a more productive day,” Clinton said.

Clinton’s private testimony came after she demanded that she publicly question Rep. James Comer, the Kentucky Republican who is leading the investigation.

“If you want this fight, @RepJamesComer, let’s do it in public,” the former first lady said on social media. “You love to talk about transparency. There’s nothing more transparent than a hearing with the cameras on.”

Clinton said she asked for the video and transcript of testimony to be released as soon as possible.

What could Bill Clinton be asked?

Clinton’s husband, the former president, will testify before the House Oversight Committee on Friday.

The former first lady appeared upset when asked about her husband appearing “many times” in Epstein’s file, including one photo of the 42nd president relaxing in a hot tub. Another photo shows the former president in a pool with Epstein’s convicted accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell.

Asked if she thought her husband was “100% ignorant” of Epstein’s crimes, the former first lady said, “Yes.”

“My relationship with Mr. Epstein ended several years before Mr. Epstein’s criminal activities became known,” Clinton said.

Frida Baby responds to controversy over sexually suggestive ad

0

play

Popular brand Frida Baby, which sells postnatal care and baby care products, has come under fire online for some of its marketing strategies after an Instagram campaign posted five years ago resurfaced. The company says it is currently “decommissioning” some assets.

Customers began a campaign to boycott Frida products on social media in February, citing sexual innuendo in some of the company’s packaging and advertising.

“There’s a time and a place for adult humor. Baby products don’t,” content creator Chrissy Horton said in a video posted to Instagram on February 16. The post received thousands of responses and hundreds of comments.

In response to the recent backlash, Baby Frida said the brand has always used humor to discuss the messy aspects of parenting.

“From the beginning, Frida has used humor to talk about the real, raw and messy parts of parenting that aren’t often talked about,” Frieda said in a statement emailed to USA TODAY on Monday, Feb. 23. “We do this because raising a child can be lonely and overwhelming, and sometimes moments of levity can make a painful experience feel human, shareable, and survivable.”

In a statement posted on Instagram on Tuesday, February 24, Frieda said it would retire “legacy assets” and change its tone in the future to “always be responsive to the moment.” Frieda did not specify which assets would be retired.

Here’s what you need to know about this product and the controversy surrounding it.

Baby Frida advertising, packaging with sexual innuendo

Screenshots of posts from Frida’s official Instagram page from 2020 and 2021 have resurfaced on social media, sparking a debate about the appropriateness of the marketing tactic.

USA TODAY scrolled through Frida’s Instagram page to see such posts. Newer posts don’t seem to contain sexual innuendo, but older posts were found to contain sexual innuendo. Internet sleuths also dig up posts and leave fresh comments.

Instagram users are criticizing the post below.

  • The 2020 post included a photo of a baby with sweat on his forehead and the caption, “I’m hot and sweaty thinking about what’s going to rain tomorrow…”
  • A 2020 post featured an advertising filter for the brand’s nasal aspirator with the caption, “Remember, inhale, don’t swallow. Don’t Google.”
  • In another post from 2021, Frida announced new baby products with the caption, “Mom, what’s suitable for the top drawer of your nightstand, battery-powered, and available in your clutch when it’s hot and muggy?”
  • A video posted in 2021 demonstrates how a nasal aspirator works on an infant, with the caption, “Bringing the game out strong.”

One of the products currently in stores, Frida Baby’s 3-in-1 Ear, Forehead + Touchless Thermometer, teases on the side of the package, “Would you like a little try?”

Internet discussion about Baby Frida’s post

Several screenshots of these past posts have been circulating on social media, sparking discussion.

“I’m really tired of your innuendo comments about BABY products,” one commenter wrote on a video of the baby with the caption “Pull the game hard.”

“This is a disease. @fridababy how did you avoid language like this for so long,” said another.

A petition has also been launched, ‘Hold Frida Baby to account for the sexualization of babies in its marketing’, calling on the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) to investigate Frida Baby’s marketing practices.

“As a first-time mother, I was stunned to read these captions,” wrote petition creator Regan Montanez. “I had to look twice to make sure I was not mistaken.” The petition was created on Change.org in early February and has since garnered more than 27,000 signatures.

Some defend the company.

“It’s kind of funny, isn’t it?” content creator Daniel Anello wrote on Instagram about Frida’s marketing. “If you can snort snot out of a kid’s nose and find a little bit of humor and get a chuckle out of it, then that’s fine. That’s just packaging.”

Other commenters on Facebook also said they would continue using the product.

“I’m not mad. I’m going to keep boogieing out of my[baby’s]nose at Frida,” content creator Daniel Elizabeth said in a post.

Frida responds to backlash

In response to the renewed outcry online, Frida Baby issued the following statement via email to USA TODAY, in which the company noted the humor that has always been present in the campaign.

“While our products are designed for babies, our voice is always written for the adults who care for babies,” the statement continued. “Our consistent intention has been to make an awkward and difficult experience feel lighter and more honest, and to help parents feel less alone.”

Frida also said the humor was “personal” and not intended to “offend, push boundaries for shock value or make anyone uncomfortable.”

“We will continue to act with honesty, empathy, and courage. We will continue to evaluate how we express our voices to ensure that in each decision we make, our commitment to our family is unmistakable and our tone is always in keeping with the moment,” the brand wrote.

The company also responded on Instagram that it was “decommissioning some legacy assets” and “refining future policies.”

Baby Frida’s viral marketing history

Frida has a history of eyebrow-raising marketing that focuses on graphic pregnancy and parenting.

Recently, Frida created a Mardigrafroat to celebrate breastfeeding.

Frida Baby’s Instagram post read: “We live in a world that loves boobs. As long as we do what society wants us to do…” “But the moment your breasts start doing what they’re supposed to do: feed your baby, leak through your shirt, exist unevenly, painfully, honestly, everyone suddenly becomes embarrassed and uncomfortable.”

In October 2025, the brand launched a booger-themed candy that resembles an actual booger, and in August 2025, it partnered with New York-based small-batch ice cream company Oddfellows to introduce breast milk-flavored ice cream.

Contributor: Greta Cross, USA TODAY

Julia Gomez is USA TODAY’s trends reporter, covering popular toys, scientific research, natural disasters, holidays, and trending news. Connect with her on LinkedIn ×Instagram, TikTok: @juliamariegz or email jgomez@gannett.com..

Religion and the State of the Union. Unraveling the content of President Trump’s speech

0

play

  • President Trump invoked religion several times in his State of the Union address, including his assertion that “the destiny of the nation is written by the hand of providence.”
  • The Religious Freedom Foundation criticized the comments, adding to other groups’ criticism of Trump for promoting Christian nationalism.
  • Experts said that while U.S. presidents have long brought up religion and God in speeches, Trump’s rhetoric was unique and more targeted to his base.

President Donald Trump’s State of the Union address included a continued push to increase the presence of religion in American public life.

President Trump is not the first president to invoke God in his annual address.

For example, former President George W. Bush said in 2003, “The freedoms we value were not given to the world by America; they were given to us by God.” Former President Joe Biden said in 2023, “All of us, each and every one of us, are created equal in the image of God.”

Presidents across the political spectrum often end their speeches with a variation of “God bless America.” But for some religious studies experts and supporters of the separation of church and state, the language used in Trump’s Feb. 24 speech and the broader Trump administration is different.

He said there has been a recent “great renewal of religion, of faith, of Christianity, of belief in God” in the United States.

President Trump praised Erica Kirk, who attended the event, saying slain conservative activist Charlie Kirk “played a huge role in that,” adding that Kirk “was a martyr for his beliefs.”

“In memory of Charlie, we must come together to reaffirm that America is one nation under God,” President Trump said.

Later in his speech, he described the United States as a beacon to the rest of the world.

“And God knows exactly who to ask when a nation needs a miracle,” Trump said, going on to say the nation’s “destiny is written by the hand of providence.”

Such sentiments are akin to “an updated version of Manifest Destiny,” the Religious Freedom Foundation wrote in X magazine. The foundation is one of several groups to express concerns about the Trump administration’s behavior related to religion.

White House press secretary Taylor Rogers called President Trump “the greatest president for religious freedom in modern American history” in a statement to USA TODAY.

“Only anti-Trump activists would complain that the president, in his historically successful State of the Union address, touted a renewal of religious beliefs that is spreading across the country,” she said.

President Trump says religion is necessary to “have a great country”

Efforts to increase the presence of religion in public spaces have been a cornerstone of President Trump’s second term.

He created the White House Office of Faith and Neighborhood Partnerships in February 2025, replacing Biden’s White House Office of Faith and Neighborhood Partnerships.

He later established the Commission on Religious Freedom, which was sued in February by groups representing various religious traditions, alleging an illegal lack of diversity in its membership. The group is “composed almost exclusively of Christians, including one Orthodox Jewish rabbi,” according to the complaint.

President Trump also pledged to protect prayer in public schools during a Committee on Religious Freedom hearing in September, and once said in a speech that “we need religion to have a great country.”

Group accuses President Trump of promoting Christian nationalism

Many organizations have criticized such sentiments, characterizing them as inaccurate and threatening the First Amendment, which prohibits the government from establishing religion.

That includes the American Humanist Association, which said it expected “an attempt to pander to Christian nationalists” ahead of the State of the Union address.

The Rev. Paul Rauschenbusch of the Interfaith Alliance, which is involved in the lawsuit against the Religious Freedom Commission, said on the group’s Feb. 24 “State of the Union” that the Trump administration is “the most hostile to religious freedom in a generation.”

In his view, the administration has “weaponized religion for the benefit of a white Christian nationalist movement.”

About three in 10 Americans are adherents or sympathizers of Christian nationalism, the belief that the United States is or should be a Christian nation, according to data released in February by the Public Religion Research Institute.

While there were overt references to religion in Trump’s speech, there were also “smaller, more subtle” nods to Christian nationalist sentiments through some of the people and topics Trump highlighted, said Melissa Deckman, CEO of the Public Religion Research Institute.

For example, President Trump criticized Minnesota’s Somali community, saying that “bribery, corruption, and illegal activity are commonplace in much of the world.”

“Importing these cultures through unrestricted immigration and open borders is bringing these problems to America, and the American people are paying the price,” Trump said.

According to a survey by the Public Religion Research Institute, about two-thirds of Christian nationalist supporters and just over half of sympathizers agree that “immigrants are invading our country and displacing our cultural and ethnic background.”

Common references to religion among American presidents

Experts told USA TODAY that religious language has long existed in American politics.

For example, President Abraham Lincoln’s second inaugural address was “very religious,” said Daniel Konkle, a professor emeritus at Indiana University’s Maurer School of Law.

Barbara Perry, professor and co-director of the Presidential Oral History Program at the University of Virginia’s Miller Center, referred to President John F. Kennedy’s 1961 inaugural address, which concluded with a call to “move forward to lead the land we love, seeking God’s blessing and help, but knowing that God’s work on this earth must be truly our own.”

President Ronald Reagan later described the United States as a “shining city on a hill” in his 1989 farewell speech. The phrase is a reference to a 1630 sermon by English Puritan John Winthrop, which itself was based on Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount.

Perry described such examples as “religious light,” a common reference to a higher power that has been common among American presidents for many years.

But Trump’s State of the Union address was aimed at appealing to a base made up primarily of white evangelical Christians, Perry said.

Konkle said there is a “nuance” among politicians when it comes to bringing up religion. Such references can be used to “bring out the better angels in people’s personalities,” he said, or to “suggest that God is on our side, that we know what’s right, and that we’re going to use this sense of special privilege to accomplish what we want to accomplish.”

Mr. Deckman and Mr. Perry said Mr. Trump’s religious language goes beyond lip service, adding that Mr. Trump has delivered more substantive victories for white evangelicals than past presidents who supported the same base, such as conservative appointments that led to the repeal of the constitutional right to abortion.

“He’s a man of his word, like George W. Bush did, and I would say like Reagan and Jimmy Carter did, but he lives his life,” Perry said.

Breanna Frank is USA TODAY’s First Amendment reporter. please contact her bjfrank@usatoday.com.

USA TODAY’s coverage of First Amendment issues is funded by the Freedom Forum in collaboration with our journalism funding partners. Funders do not provide editorial input.

Lisa Rinna claims she was drugged at ‘Traitors’ premiere at Abbey

0

Lisa Rinna is speaking out after an alleged drug incident at the premiere of her new show.

During an appearance on “Good Day New York” on Thursday, Feb. 26, the soap opera veteran and reality TV personality, who stars in the latest season of “Traitor,” said she took drugs during the season four premiere of the reality competition in West Hollywood on Jan. 8.

TMZ first reported the alleged incident on Monday, which prompted the hosts of “Good Day New York” to ask Rinna about the event held at a convent in West Hollywood.

“Yes, I was taking (drugs). I had fentanyl in my system,” Rinna, 62, said, adding that she later underwent a drug test to check for the substance in her system.

“I’m not kidding. I was on fentanyl, high levels of amphetamines, things like that,” she continued. “But I can’t say much because we’re still dealing with it. It was leaked and my team is currently dealing with it.”

USA TODAY has reached out to Rinna’s representatives for additional comment.

Abbey says ‘no evidence of drink tampering’ after Lisa Rinna accusations

The “Real Housewives” alum was photographed at the premiere of “The Traitors,” and one photo shows Rinna in an all-black outfit and matching hat. Another photo showed Rinna and her Traitor castmates, including Alan Cumming and Colton Underwood, together for a group shot.

In a statement to USA TODAY on Thursday, the Abbey said it immediately conducted a “thorough internal investigation” after receiving reports of Rinna’s alleged drug use, including interviewing staff and examining “all available surveillance footage.”

“When she became unwell, our security team assisted her and safely removed her from the venue,” the statement said. “We found no evidence of drink tampering or suspicious behavior towards her.”

Rinna said her husband Harry Hamlin quickly helped her leave the premiere after the incident, and said many of her friends had similar experiences at the West Hollywood venue.

“This is not the first time this has happened. It’s been happening for years,” Rinna said on “Good Day New York.” “And I think that needs to be talked about. And I’m glad now that it’s clear and we’ll deal with it. I don’t have my time to do it yet.”

The Abbey did not dispute the results of Rinna’s alleged drug test, but the venue said it had “extensive surveillance, trained security personnel and ongoing beverage safety measures in place.”

“We cannot discuss medical findings and do not wish to speculate on toxicology results,” the venue said. “We take reports of guests feeling unwell or unsafe very seriously and follow established investigation procedures.”

Burger King strengthens Whopper after customer complaints

0

play

Burger King is beefing up its Whopper for the first time in 10 years.

The improvements come after the fast-food chain’s president, Tom Curtis, earlier this month encouraged customers to call or text to give feedback about their Burger King experience.

Some of those comments led to changes to Burger King’s flagship sandwich, the first in nearly a decade, the company said in a news release. According to the company, The Whopper is now a “more premium, better-tasting bun” and is “served in a box so it can be delivered straight from the kitchen to guests.”

The sandwich still comes with lettuce, pickles, onions, and tomatoes, and is topped with “more delicious mayonnaise.” According to Burger King, what is the goal? “From the bun to the toppings to the packaging, we deliver an even higher quality experience with perfect taste every time.”

The box resolves a complaint Burger King received regarding crushing the Whopper.

“Are you one of the people who asked me why my Whopper broke?” Curtis asks in a video posted to Instagram. “I think I have a solution.”

The change to the Whopper comes as fast food restaurants continue to offer value meals and larger burgers to satisfy consumers’ budgets and appetites. On March 3rd, McDonald’s will add the Big Arch, the largest hamburger ever, to its menu.

Last month, Burger King launched a double cheeseburger, fries and drink combo for $4.99 to go along with its $5 duo and $7 trio combos, and just brought back the Maple Bourbon BBQ Whopper to its menu.

“Over the past several years, we have focused on strengthening our operations and modernizing our restaurants to create a more consistent foundation across our systems,” Tom Curtis, president of Burger King U.S. and Canada, said in a news release. “That work is well underway, and we are now in a position to carefully improve our core menu. The Whopper is an icon, so we didn’t set out to reinvent it. Instead, we improved it based on direct feedback from our guests.”

AI comes to Burger Kingdom

Burger King also does the cooking. Burger King is rolling out an AI chatbot called BK Assistant to monitor whether employees are treating customers with courtesy.

Contributors: Kate Perez and Michelle Del Rey

Mike Snyder is a national trends news reporter for USA TODAY. You can follow him on Threads, Bluesky, and X, and email him at: mike snyder & @mikegsnider.bsky.social & @mikesnider & msnider@usatoday.com.

Anthropic says it does not agree to Department of Defense requests for AI safeguards

0

play

Anthropic cannot comply with the Department of Defense’s request in an AI safeguards dispute, despite threats to remove the company from the Department of the Army’s systems, the AI ​​company’s CEO Dario Amodei said on February 26.

The dispute between the Pentagon and Anthropic stems from the AI ​​startup’s refusal to lift safeguards that prevent its technology from being used to autonomously target weapons and conduct surveillance in the United States.

Anthropic, which is backed by Google and Amazon, has a contract worth up to $200 million with the division.

Amodei said on February 26 that the ministry announced it would only contract with AI companies that agree to “all lawful uses” and lift protections.

Amodei said AI use cases, such as domestic mass surveillance or fully autonomous weapons, were not previously included in Anthropic’s contract with the department and “we don’t think they should be included right now.”

Amodei added that if Anthropic maintains the safeguards, the department has threatened to remove Anthropic from its systems, designate it as a supply chain risk and invoke the Defense Production Act to force the safeguards to be lifted.

“In any case, these threats do not change our position. We cannot in good conscience comply with their demands,” Amodei said.

Earlier, Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell said on the X show that the department has no interest in using AI to carry out mass surveillance of Americans, nor does it want to use AI to develop autonomous weapons that operate without human involvement.

“What we’re asking is that the Department of Defense be allowed to use Anthropic models for any lawful purpose,” Parnell said.

The Pentagon did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Anthropic’s statement.

“It is the Department of Defense’s prerogative to choose the contractor that best aligns with their vision. However, given the tremendous value that Anthropic’s technology provides to our military, we hope they reconsider,” Amodei said.

“If the Department chooses to offboard Anthropic, we will work to enable a smooth transition to another provider,” he added.

An Anthropic spokesperson said the company remains “ready to continue discussions and is committed to continuing operations for the department and U.S. warfighters.”

(Reporting by Carlos Mendez and Chris Thomas in Mexico City and Mike Stone in Washington; Editing by Matthew Lewis and Sri Navaratnam)

Melissa Claire Egan has coronary heart disease. What is it?

0

play

Melissa Claire Egan, known for her roles on daytime soap operas “The Young and the Restless” and “All My Children,” revealed in late January that she had been diagnosed with coronary heart disease.

The 44-year-old actress shared her diagnosis in an Instagram post on Feb. 26.

“Thanks to early detection and medicine, I’ll be fine!” she wrote. “I’m an individual, but this is too important to share, especially for women.”

Recent projections from the American Heart Association show that 14.4% of women in the United States will experience cardiovascular disease or stroke by 2025, up from 10.7% in 2020. Coronary heart disease, also known as coronary artery disease or CAD, affects the main blood vessels that supply blood to the heart, called coronary arteries, causing reduced blood flow to the heart muscle, according to the Mayo Clinic.

According to the Cleveland Clinic, CAD is the leading cause of death in the United States and around the world. For example, in 2021, coronary artery disease caused 375,500 deaths in the country.

The disease is also very common, with more than 18 million adults in the United States living with CAD.

What causes coronary artery disease?

The Mayo Clinic explains that the buildup of fat, cholesterol, and other substances in and on artery walls typically causes coronary artery disease. “A buildup called plaque narrows the arteries.”

Although genetics can play a role in the risk of CAD, common causes of CAD include diabetes or insulin resistance, high blood pressure, lack of exercise, and smoking or smoking.

Egan said in her post that a calcium scan of her heart revealed plaque in her arteries, which led to her diagnosis.

Symptoms of coronary artery disease

The Cleveland Clinic notes that CAD is often referred to as a “silent killer,” and people can live with the disease for years without symptoms before having a heart attack.

For people with symptoms, the most common is stable angina, or temporary chest pain or discomfort, although some people may experience shortness of breath during light physical activity.

Coronary artery disease treatment

The Cleveland Clinic explains that treatment for CAD typically includes lifestyle changes, risk factor management, and medications, but in some cases, procedures or surgery may be necessary.

“Coronary artery disease cannot be reversed, but you can manage the condition and prevent it from worsening.”

When will my March SSI check be mailed? See the 2026 payment schedule.

0

play

Those who received the Supplemental Security Income check will receive their March payment a little earlier.

Supplemental Security Income (SSI) payments are typically issued on the first day of the month, but if the first calendar day of the month is a weekend or holiday, the payments will be issued earlier. According to the Social Security Administration’s calendar, March 1st is a Sunday, so March payments will be made on February 27th.

This is not an unusual situation. Last month, my February SSI check was issued on Friday, January 30th because February 1st fell on a Sunday.

Approximately 7.4 million Americans currently receive monthly SSI payments, the agency said.

When will my SSI payments be sent? See the full 2026 payment schedule.

Here are the SSI payment dates for 2026 according to the SSA calendar:

  • Friday, February 27, 2026 (check for March 2026)
  • Wednesday, April 1, 2026 (confirmed in April 2026)
  • Friday, May 1, 2026 (Please check May 2026)
  • Monday, June 1, 2026 (confirmed in June 2026)
  • Wednesday, July 1, 2026 (confirmed in July 2026)
  • Friday, July 31, 2026 (Please check for August 2026)
  • Tuesday, September 1, 2026 (confirmed in September 2026)
  • Thursday, October 1, 2026 (confirmed in October 2026)
  • Friday, October 30, 2026 (Please check for November 2026)
  • Tuesday, December 1, 2026 (confirmed in December 2026)
  • Friday, December 31, 2026 (for January 2027)

What is Supplemental Security Income (SSI)?

Supplemental Security Income, a program administered by the Social Security Administration, provides benefits to people with limited or no income or assets, people age 65 and older, and people who are blind or have a qualifying disability. According to the SSA website, children with eligible disabilities are also eligible for SSI.

Adults who earn more than $2,073 per month from work are generally not eligible for benefits. About one-third of SSI recipients also receive Social Security benefits.

To see if you qualify for SSI, visit the Social Security website. You can also visit your local Social Security office in person or call 1-800-772-1213 (TTY 1-800-325-0778) between 8 a.m. and 7 p.m. local time on weekdays.

2026 Social Security Payment Schedule

Mike Snyder is a national trends news reporter for USA TODAY. You can follow him on Threads, Bluesky, and X, and email him at: mike snyder & @mikegsnider.bsky.social & @mikesnider & msnider@usatoday.com.

Video showing the aftermath of Vince McMahon’s car accident in Connecticut

0

play

Newly released police body camera footage shows the aftermath of a July 2025 car crash in which former WWE CEO Vince McMahon was charged with reckless driving.

In a video obtained by USA TODAY through a public records request, a police officer asks McMahon, “Why were you driving over 100 mph?” Then he answered, “It’s my granddaughter’s birthday.”

Asked if he saw the police car with its emergency lights on, McMahon said: “I wasn’t trying to pass him.”

“I haven’t driven this car in a long time,” McMahon said after turning down the ambulance. The officer said, “That’s fast, I’ll tell you,” to which McMahon responded, “Oh, (expletive) too fast.”

According to a police report obtained by USA TODAY, on July 24, 2025, McMahon was driving on the Merritt Parkway in Westport, Conn., when he was involved in a three-vehicle crash that severely damaged his vehicle.

McMahon was driving north on Route 15 when he collided with the rear of another vehicle, which caused him to crash into a wooden beam guardrail in the median. A third vehicle traveling southbound was struck by “debris extending over the median” from McMahon’s vehicle, the report said.

No injuries were reported in the incident, and there were no passengers in the affected vehicle. The crash caused the airbags in all vehicles to deploy.

Vince McMahon’s reckless driving lawsuit dismissed, lawyer says

McMahon was charged with misdemeanor charges of reckless driving and following too closely, causing an accident. At the time, he was released on $500 bail.

In October 2025, a Connecticut Superior Court judge ruled that McMahon could resolve the charges by participating in a pretrial program, the Associated Press reported.

McMahon’s attorney, Mark Sherman, confirmed in a statement to USA TODAY that the court granted the motion to suspend and dismiss the case.

“Mr. Vince’s primary concern in this case was for the other drivers, and we are grateful that the court deemed this an accident rather than an indictable crime,” the statement said.

Vince McMahon’s car crash happened on the same day as Hulk Hogan’s death

The former WWE boss took over the reins of professional wrestling from his father, Vince McMahon Sr., in 1982 and helped grow professional wrestling into a global phenomenon, transforming the world’s stars into larger-than-life characters and celebrities.

McMahon was at the helm of the company for nearly 40 years before stepping down as CEO in 2022 following reports that he paid more than $12 million over 16 years to four women to settle allegations of sexual misconduct.

In 2024, he resigned as executive chairman and director of WWE’s parent company, TKO Group Holdings, one day after a former employee filed a lawsuit alleging sex trafficking and assault. As of February 26, the lawsuit is still pending.

Coincidentally, McMahon’s car accident occurred on the same day that WWE icon Hulk Hogan passed away at the age of 71. In a statement, McMahon called Hogan “the greatest WWE Superstar of all time.”

“His grit and unquenchable thirst for success are unparalleled, which made him the perfect performer,” McMahon added.

Alert issued after reports of ‘severe burns’ caused by pressure cooker

0

play

The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) is warning customers who purchased certain pressure cookers from Best Buy and other retailers to immediately stop using them after several customers suffered severe burns.

In a notice issued on Tuesday, February 24, the CPSC cited three main issues with Gourmia pressure cookers, one of which led to five reports of customers suffering burns after the cooker opened under pressure. Two other issues have to do with the pressure cooker’s flat valve and capacity markings.

The commission added that from 2017 to 2020, approximately 43,500 Grumia six-quart pressure cookers were sold at Best Buy and other retailers and e-commerce sites for between $50 and $80.

“The CPSC has received five reports of incidents in which hot content was released under pressure,” the commission said in a notice. “Severe burns were reported in four cases.”

The agency said pressure cooker lids “may open while under pressure and spill out hot contents, potentially causing serious second-degree burns to consumers.”

The injuries have led to at least two lawsuits, according to CPSC and court documents obtained by USA TODAY.

The importer Steelstone Group, LLC, doing business as Gourmia, and Best Buy, which the agency says sold most of the products, “refused to agree to an acceptable recall to address this hazard,” according to the CPSC.

“Pressure cookers are safe if used according to instructions,” says Gulmia.

In a statement to USA TODAY on Feb. 26, Gourmire said the company was aware of the CPSC’s notice. The company added that it stopped selling the model GPC625 pressure cooker six years ago.

“We are thoroughly considering this matter,” Gurmia said in a statement. “At this time, the CPSC has not provided Gourmia with the underlying data that the CPSC reportedly relies on. Gourmia’s GPC625 pressure cooker is designed and tested to comply with UL standards. It includes a mechanism to prevent the lid from opening when the unit is under pressure. The pressure cooker is safe when used according to instructions.”

The company says it stands behind its products and is “focused on supporting our customers.”

Best Buy said in a statement to USA TODAY on Feb. 26 that the company first learned of the pressure cooker problem six years ago. Best Buy learned of the problem six years ago, and the electronics giant alerted the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission and stopped selling the product, the company said.

“This product is sold by multiple retailers, and approximately half of all products on the market were sold by Best Buy,” Best Buy said in a statement. “Nothing is more important to us than the safety of our customers, so we encourage anyone who has purchased our products to contact the manufacturer, Steelstone, for a solution.”

What are the problems with the Gourmia pressure cooker?

According to the CPSC, affected Gourmia pressure cookers have issues with the following materials:

  • Lid – The lid can open while the cooker is pressurized and the hot contents can cause burns.
  • Float Valve – Float valves are meant to rise when pressure is applied within the product and fall when pressure is removed. However, the valve is located inside the handle, so it can be difficult to find. The customer may not realize that the float valve is still up and the lid may open while the pressure cooker is under pressure.
  • Capacity markings – Pressure cooker inner pots have incorrect capacity markings, which can lead to customers overfilling. Hot food or liquids can spill out when the pot is vented or its contents are pressurized.

The CPSC said customers should stop using the pressure cooker and dispose of it.

“Do not sell or give away these dangerous pressure cookers,” the agency wrote.

According to the CPSC notice, the affected Gourmia pressure cookers were manufactured in China.

The lawsuit alleges the child suffered “scarring and disfigurement”

According to a lawsuit filed against Gourmire in May 2025, a North Carolina mother claims her child was injured when the rice cooker opened under pressure.

The May 2025 lawsuit cites at least 10 lawsuits filed against the company for injuries dating back to 2020, and says that “despite being notified of these similar incidents…Gurmia continued to aggressively market its pressure cookers and promote them as ‘safe.'”

The mother also said her child suffered emotional distress and “scarring and disfigurement” as a result of the pressure cooker malfunction. She sought damages to cover medical, treatment and other expenses.

Customers can report pressure cooker incidents to the CPSC (www.SaferProducts.gov).

Saleen Martin is a reporter for USA TODAY’s NOW team. She is from Norfolk, Virginia (757). Email sdmartin@usatoday.com.

Hillary Clinton’s neighbors condemn her Epstein testimony

0

play

Chappaqua, N.Y. – It’s been more than 26 years since Bill and Hillary Clinton settled in this wealthy, wooded community about 55 miles north of Manhattan.

This community served as the backdrop for the Clinton family’s life after the White House. This is also where Hillary Clinton, a US senator from New York, started her political career. Secretary of State. Twice presidential candidate.

Hillary Clinton delivered her historic 2016 Democratic National Convention nomination acceptance speech via satellite from Crabtree’s Kittle House in Chappaqua, a popular local restaurant and inn.

A photo taken by a supporter who encountered the Clintons in Chappaqua Woods behind their home two days after their crushing defeat to Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential election went viral as a symbol of resilience.

More than a decade later, politics returned to the spotlight on February 26, when Hillary Clinton testified under subpoena to lawmakers behind closed doors at the Chappaqua Performing Arts Center about her relationship with the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and convicted co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell.

The arts center is less than a mile from a vast white clapboard Dutch colonial mansion on Old House Lane and is located on the former Reader’s Digest campus, which is now being redeveloped into a retail, office and residential complex.

On this quiet Thursday, with snow still on the ground, people continued their workday by drinking coffee, reporting to work, and shopping at the Whole Foods on the square.

While national media focused on Clinton’s arrival, there were no curious onlookers waiting to catch a glimpse of the former secretary of state. After all, the Clintons are not lacking in presence in the community. They are often seen walking their dogs, grabbing a Starbucks, or buying groceries at the Village Market. They also make sure to march in the Memorial Day parade.

However, in a town with many Democratic supporters, there were many opinions about the Clintons’ testimony.

“Secretary Clinton is being used as a pawn.”

New Castle Town Councilwoman Jennifer Naperstek Klein said she was pleased the town was willing to accommodate “this forced process at Secretary Clinton’s convenience” so that the depositions could be held at a venue close to home and familiar to the couple.

“But I am frustrated by this deliberately divisive attitude from Congress,” said Klein, an ardent supporter of Hillary Clinton. “This is an insult and an attack on the integrity of our country’s women.”

She said it was “ridiculous” for the attorney general not to go after President Donald Trump. “Instead, once again Secretary Clinton is being used as a pawn to divert focus from Donald Trump’s misdeeds,” she said.

Mr. Trump and Mr. Epstein were friends until they had a falling out in the 1990s and early 2000s, but Mr. Trump has denied any involvement. The president has also repeatedly denied all charges against him, saying he is “innocent.”

Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.), who is leading the investigation, said lawmakers want to know more about how Epstein raised his money and built a social network of the rich and powerful. He said lawmakers would ask why Epstein raised money for the Clinton family foundation and why his colleague Ghislaine Maxwell attended the wedding of the Clinton family’s daughter.

“I think you want the whole truth to come out.”

Bill Clinton, who served as president from 1993 to 2001, said he was unaware of Epstein’s alleged criminal activities while dating him. But Comer said Epstein visited the White House 16 times while Bill Clinton was president.

In her testimony, Hillary Clinton accused the House members who subpoenaed her of going on a “road trip” seeking information rather than questioning Justice Department officials who did not prosecute the late financier.

Stopping by Starbucks, Steven Sabbagh said he was glad Hillary Clinton was forced to testify.

“I think you want all the truth to come out. I’m really sorry to the victims,” ​​he said. “I’m very proud and very happy that they’re relentless in their pursuit and that they’re somehow getting it resolved, because I really believe there are so many powerful individuals who are trying to quell this.”

“I hope everything comes out and people are punished for what they did,” said Saba, who lives near South Salem, New York.

“We are tired of people manipulating justice,” he added.

play

Hillary Clinton testifies that she doesn’t remember meeting Jeffrey Epstein

USA TODAY correspondent Bart Jansen reports on former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s Epstein deposition.

“Everyone must take responsibility.”

The Congressional investigation followed the Justice Department’s release of 3 million pages of documents related to Epstein’s criminal investigation. Millions more pages remain sealed.

Heather Smith, a recent Cornell University graduate applying to veterinary school, said that as a woman who has been sexually assaulted, she didn’t think this should be a politically polarizing topic.

“I think the biggest thing to regain trust from government is transparency, especially after COVID-19 and everything that has happened with miscommunication,” she said. “And the only way that’s going to happen is for Congress and other parts of the government to hold people accountable. Anyone involved or named in the Epstein file, whether it’s Bill Clinton or Donald Trump, I personally think they should be asked really tough questions and held accountable.”

IT expert Tim Gomez said he believes Hillary Clinton when she says she doesn’t know much. But he said he would keep an eye on Bill Clinton, who is scheduled to testify on February 27.

“So tomorrow will be the day,” said a Mount Kisco resident who identified himself as an independent. “I think we need to get to the bottom of it. Everyone should take responsibility for it.”

Betty Cotton, who has known Hillary Clinton for decades and participated in fundraising efforts since the former first lady ran for U.S. Senate from New York, called Clinton a “trooper.”

“If you really want to know, I think it’s a travesty. I just think it’s ridiculous,” she said. “I can’t believe cop she would agree to that. Would Trump do that?”

Contributor: Bert Jansen

Swapna Venugopal Ramaswamy is USA TODAY’s White House correspondent. You can follow her at X @SwapnaVenugopal.

These states have the most expensive car insurance

0

play

  • President Trump said immigrants are contributing to higher auto insurance costs for Americans.
  • The average annual cost of full coverage auto insurance in 2025 was $2,144, down 6% from 2024.
  • Average car insurance is the most expensive in Washington, DC, followed by Maryland and Rhode Island.

President Donald Trump said in his State of the Union address on February 24 that immigrants, like Somalis who have settled in states such as Minnesota, are forcing Americans to pay more for services like auto insurance.

In a nearly two-hour speech, President Trump said Somalis were “pirates who sacked Minnesota” and that “bribery, corruption and illegal activity are the norm, not the exception, in much of the world.”

“Importing these cultures through unrestricted immigration and open borders creates problems right here in the United States,” President Trump said. “And it is the American people who are paying the price for high medical bills, auto insurance, rent, taxes, and perhaps most importantly, crime. We will address this problem.”

The comments came as website Insurify.com reported that U.S. drivers paid an average of $2,144 a year for full car coverage in 2025. This figure was 6% lower than the average full-time premium in 2024, but Insurify said average premiums increased by 46% from 2022 to 2024. The website attributes at least some of this year’s price increases to unsafe driving behavior following the coronavirus pandemic.

Due to rising insurance premiums in recent years, the price of new cars has also increased. The average price of a new car reached $49,191 in January 2026, according to Kelley Blue Book.

With all that in mind, the USA TODAY Cars team researched car insurance prices in Minnesota and other states.

Have car insurance prices increased in Minnesota?

In Minnesota, where the Trump administration sent thousands of military personnel to the Democratic-led state in response to fraud by welfare program workers related to Somali immigrants, the average cost of full auto insurance coverage was $2,088 at the end of 2025. According to Insurify, the expected average cost for a Minnesota driver in 2026 is $2,061, which is actually a -1.3% decrease from the average cost in 2025.

According to Insurify, Minnesota had the seventh largest drop in average auto insurance premiums in 2025, dropping 15% from 2024 levels. Only Wyoming, Iowa, Arkansas, Utah, Idaho, and New Mexico showed steeper declines.

In which state is car insurance the most expensive?

According to Insurify.com, the highest average premiums are in Washington, D.C., where the average annual price for full-time insurance is $4,017. Minnesota, where President Trump raised the flag during his State of the Union address, fell well outside the top 10.

Insurify said the nation’s capital has “several factors working against it. Higher population density means more opportunities for accidents. Similarly, Washington, D.C. has the third highest rate of uninsured motorists, which drives up premiums for policyholders.”

The rest of the top 10 states with the highest annual car insurance premiums are:

  • Maryland: $3,601
  • Rhode Island: $3,394
  • Michigan: $3,073
  • New York: $3,019
  • New Jersey: $2,983
  • Delaware: $2,978
  • South Carolina: $2,956
  • Georgia: $2,939
  • Nevada: $2,897

How can drivers save money on car insurance?

Insurify drivers can try to save money on their auto insurance by following these steps.

  • Don’t be too eager to update.
  • Compare insurance from different insurance companies.
  • Utilize AI for comparison shopping.
  • Practice safe and defensive driving.
  • Install telematics devices in vehicles that track driver behavior.
  • Consider how make and model will affect your insurance claim.
  • Choose discounts on safety features, bundling policies, paperless communication, low total mileage, and more.
  • Call your insurance agent and ask about discounts that may apply.

She is deaf. Why would the airline send her a wheelchair?

0


Advocates argue that audio-only airline announcements can pose a safety risk for millions of deaf and hard of hearing travelers.

play

  • Many hearing-impaired travelers miss important flight information because announcements are often only made verbally.
  • Airlines may provide inappropriate equipment, such as wheelchairs, to deaf passengers due to flaws in their communication systems.
  • Proponents argue that the lack of visual announcements and captioned content is not just an inconvenience, but a safety concern.

Cruising Altitude is a weekly column about air travel. Have you experienced accessibility issues while flying? Fill out the form or email us at the address at the bottom of this page.

Sitting at the airport, you can be overwhelmed by the amount of announcements. Boarding order on your flight to Orlando will not affect your travel to Denver. But imagine how dangerous it would be if there were no announcements.

For many deaf travelers, that’s the reality of flying. Important announcements at airports and onboard flights are often made only verbally or in other audio-based formats, and travelers with hearing loss may miss important information such as last-minute gate changes or important safety instructions in an emergency.

According to the National Institute on Deafness and Other Hearing Disorders, approximately 30 million Americans ages 12 and older have some degree of hearing loss in both ears, so this audio-based information broadcast at airports can impact millions of travelers each year.

One of them recently reached out to me to see if I was paying attention.

“When I book a flight, I always disclose that I am deaf. This is usually not communicated to actual airline employees, such as gate agents or flight attendants,” Corinna Butler DeMeo wrote to me. “When I ask if my name or seat is on the list, I’m always told there’s nothing on it. Usually, when I let someone know, they forget or ignore it, so I miss out on meals, snacks, important announcements, etc.”

Butler-DeMeo, 36, wrote that she often cannot access subtitles for in-flight entertainment, which the Boston native explained is particularly frustrating as she now travels frequently between the United States and Australia.

She also writes that she often receives accommodations she doesn’t need when she flies.

“You know what happens almost every time? When I get off the plane, a wheelchair is waiting for me. This has happened to almost every deaf person I know who has traveled by plane. It’s so disappointing to get off the plane and find accommodations you don’t need,” her email said. “When something like this happens, I feel like I’m wasting resources. It’s also a bit embarrassing having to explain that I don’t need a wheelchair because I’m deaf. It’s clear that my name is just on a list that goes to partners who provide wheelchair assistance services.”

Butler-DeMeo’s experience highlights how far the airline industry still has to go to ensure all travelers have equal access to flying.

Here’s how:

need better communication

“The biggest barrier is access to communications,” Bobby Beth Scoggins, interim CEO of the National Association of the Deaf, wrote me in an email. “If airlines are unable to provide accessible communications, it not only causes inconvenience, but also prevents millions of Americans from participating in air travel completely.”

She added that accessible announcements will help travelers in different regions.

“Accessibility benefits everyone,” Scoggins wrote. “Visual announcements, captions and clear communication improve the travel experience for all passengers, including non-native English speakers and those in noisy environments.”

For Butler-DeMeo, it started with the simple fact that her own accessibility needs were poorly communicated to everyone she interacted with while traveling.

“Normally, when you book your ticket, you can request ‘special assistance’ by checking a box. “There is typically no ‘free text’ field to describe your needs,” she wrote.

As a result, she is often unable to fully communicate with airline staff during her travels.

Butler-DeMeo wrote that her experience could have been smoother if the airline’s internal communication systems had been improved and training had been more extensive.

“Proper training for customer-facing employees is also important: a basic understanding of the experiences of deaf and hard-of-hearing people and how to communicate that generally works for us (i.e., getting attention with gestures and light taps, making sure you’re facing me, writing down important information),” she writes.

Many airlines provide updates on gate changes and other information in a visual format within their apps, but during large-scale disruptions such as inclement weather, the information is often broadcast verbally by gate agents well before the app is updated, so travelers who rely on visual updates may not have the most up-to-date information in real time.

Please be aware that this is a safety concern

Scoggins noted that while it may be frustrating not to be able to watch in-flight movies without subtitles, the bigger, more pressing concern for deaf travelers about the lack of accessibility during flights is safety.

“In an environment where timing and safety are critical, inaccessible communication is not only inconvenient, it can be dangerous,” she writes. “Key countermeasures such as pilot announcement captions and visual emergency updates are often unavailable or inconsistent.”

Tips for hearing-impaired travelers

For advocates like Scoggins, the ideal situation would be for airports to be built and airlines to be built with accessibility as the default, but she acknowledged that across-the-board improvements in this area are unlikely to happen overnight.

“Technology exists to provide real-time captions and visual alerts; the barrier is not feasibility, but prioritization,” she wrote.

In the meantime, deaf travelers can be proactive in ensuring their needs are met while traveling.

Scoggins recommends:

  • Request accommodations in advance and confirm before traveling.
  • Please arrive early to allow time for your communication needs.
  • Use airline apps for visual updates when available.
  • Please let the gate agent know directly that you would like visual notification of the announcement.
  • Understand your rights under the federal Americans with Disabilities Act.

Still, even having to take these steps can be frustrating, she wrote. “The responsibility for ensuring access for themselves should not rest solely on deaf travelers. Equal access is a civil right, not a favor.”

Zach Wichter is a travel reporter and writes the Cruising Altitude column for USA TODAY. He is based in New York and can be reached at zwichter@usatoday.com.

Burger King’s new AI chatbot ‘Patty’ rates employee friendliness

0

play

Burger King has launched an AI chatbot that monitors whether employees are courteous to customers.

The company’s new voice-enabled chatbot, Patty, runs on employees’ cloud-connected headsets. It’s part of a new platform powered by OpenAI called BK Assistant.

Burger King introduced BK Assistant on Thursday, February 26th. The platform brings artificial intelligence technology to restaurant teams by “unifying point of sale, kitchen equipment, inventory and digital ordering into one command center,” the company said in a news release.

Here’s what you need to know:

Burger King uses AI to track civility

Burger King aggregated and tracked keywords such as “welcome,” “please,” and “thank you” in a limited number of pilot locations to help managers understand overall service patterns, the company said.

In a statement emailed to USA TODAY, Burger King said the chatbot was not deployed to grade individuals or enforce scripts.

“The aim is to enhance hospitality excellence and provide useful, real-time insights to help managers recognize their teams more effectively,” the fast food chain said. “We believe hospitality is fundamentally human, and the role of this technology is to help our teams stay with our guests.”

How else is “Patty” used?

In fact, Burger King said the technology is being used to alert managers to automatically remove items from digital menus and the Burger King app when they are no longer available, to support online questions about menu item preparation and product details without service interruption, and to analyze drive-thru audio to improve order accuracy and provide coaching insights.

The chatbot will be piloted in 500 restaurants by the end of 2026, and BK Assistant’s web and app platform will be available in all U.S. locations by the end of the year.

This isn’t the only measure the company has recently taken to ensure customer satisfaction. In early February, the fast food chain announced that customers could share their thoughts on their experience by calling Burger King President Tom Curtis at (305) 874-0520.

Curtis responds to as many calls as possible each day. A news release announcing the move said all messages received will be reviewed and responded to to help the company make decisions across its business.

Michelle Del Rey is a trending news reporter for USA TODAY. Please contact mdelrey@usatoday.com.

Justice Department to investigate reports of missing Epstein files related to Trump

0


Three 2019 FBI interview summaries with women who accused President Donald Trump of sexual assault are missing from the Epstein File.

play

WASHINGTON – The Justice Department will investigate whether it improperly withheld FBI files containing allegations against President Donald Trump when it recently released millions of pages of investigative files related to suspected sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, according to media reports.

Three interviews conducted by the FBI in 2019 with women who accused President Trump of sexual assault appear to be missing from the Epstein Library files released to the public in recent months, according to independent journalist Roger Sollenberger and news outlets including NPR.

California Rep. Robert Garcia, the ranking Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, confirmed media reports and said the Justice Department had withheld more than 50 pages of documents dealing with the women’s claims from among the more than 3 million Epstein-related documents released.

The woman accused President Trump of sexually assaulting her years ago when she was a minor. No evidence has been publicly presented to support her accusations, and Trump has denied any wrongdoing related to Epstein, a longtime friend before the two fell out decades ago.

Media reports said the existence of the summary, known informally as a 302 report, was listed in a Justice Department index included in a document release in response to a law passed by Congress known as the Epstein File Transparency Act. However, while the index shows that federal officials interviewed the women four times and created summaries for each, the release included only one of the four summaries.

The Associated Press first reported on February 26th about the Justice Department’s new move to investigate the matter. The Justice Department did not immediately respond to USA TODAY’s request for comment.