Home Blog Page 108

Hantavirus tops the polymarket with $1 million in stakes. How did we get here?

0

play

Polymarket has steadily grown in popularity in recent years, but it skyrocketed in 2024 when it became a hotbed for betting on election results.

Like other platforms like Calsi, this prediction market allows you to place odds on just about anything, including the guest list for Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce’s wedding, the number of tweets Elon Musk will send this week, and whether Jesus Christ will return by 2027.

But a new bet approaches the line between casual brutality and simple indifference: Will hantavirus reach pandemic status in 2026? As of 2pm ET on May 7th, this is the most trending bet on the platform, with nearly $1 million worth of shares purchased.

This is not the first time profiteers have used polymarkets to cash in on disasters. In 2023, interest in the speculative gambling market skyrocketed after the disappearance of the Titan submarine, which killed all five people on board.

So how did we get here? Is our empathy meter broken, or is this the result of economic desperation in an increasingly divided economy? While the wealthy continue to get richer, some Americans are struggling to cover the rising cost of living.

Fiscal concerns are mounting amid the Iran war, soaring gasoline prices, and the upcoming midterm elections in November. More Americans say economic conditions are worse now than at any point in the past 25 years. More than half (55%) of Americans say their financial situation is worsening, according to a new Gallup poll.

On social media platform X, users called the bet “dystopian and crazy.” “This is like betting on war, incredibly dark and morally bankrupt,” one user wrote. Some called for prediction market platforms to be “eradicated.”

Ethicists and psychologists argue that using prediction markets like Polymarket to bet on hantavirus falls into a moral gray area. It comes down to broader cultural changes, including the gamification of daily life and the desensitization of emotions through repeated exposure to stress and crisis.

“There is no one-size-fits-all explanation for better people. Rather, different people make such bets for different reasons,” explains Christian B. Miller, professor of philosophy, ethics, and religion at Wake Forest University. And betting on a terrible outcome does not mean that something better will actually happen.

“They may think there’s going to be an epidemic, and they may even want to make money, but they don’t want people to suffer,” Miller says.

Brad Fulton, an associate professor of business and social policy at Indiana University Bloomington, said betting is less like gambling and more like posting an opinion by “literally putting your money where your mouth is.”

But Fulton warns that turning world events into a gamble can undermine empathy.

“We now live in an information environment where disease outbreaks are recorded as data points before they are recorded as stories about human suffering,” he says.

What is hantavirus?

According to the World Health Organization, hantaviruses are a group of viruses that naturally infect rodents, sometimes for long periods of time without showing obvious disease, and in some cases can be transmitted to humans.

The World Health Organization says five people have been confirmed to be infected with this typical rodent-borne virus, and three others are suspected of being involved in the outbreak. Three people died. Residents of several countries, including the United States, are currently being monitored for the virus after disembarking from or coming into contact with fellow passengers on a cruise ship where multiple cases of the virus have occurred.

But Dr Maria van Kerkhove, WHO’s director of disease and pandemic management, said that while this was a “major incident”, it was “not the beginning of a pandemic”.

Emotional distancing blurs moral boundaries

Stephanie Serkis, a psychotherapist who specializes in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and anxiety, says prolonged exposure to stress can lead to emotional desensitization.

“Many people are still dealing with unresolved trauma and anxiety from COVID-19, while also navigating political conflicts, wars, financial strains, climate insecurity, and a constant stream of distressing news,” she explains. “At some point, the mind can create emotional distance as a form of self-preservation.”

This can cause “emotional numbness.” However, some people use dark humor to cope with the tragedy and fear surrounding the health crisis, while also demonstrating emotional intelligence and empathy in interpersonal relationships and other areas of their lives.

But Serkis warns that the more emotionally distant people become, the more insensitive they become to human pain.

It’s cyclical, and although prediction markets rely on emotional detachment, they also contribute to the same environment of empathy depletion, or “compassion fatigue.”

“Rather than experiencing empathy, compassion, and anxiety, these gambling sites function to make everything a gamble,” said Ellen Feder, a philosophy professor at American University.

Despite debate about the ethics of betting on tragic events, Miller says it’s important to distinguish that pandemic predictions don’t carry any weight on the outcome. Fulton added that most winners don’t even care about the event they’re betting on, but are “fascinated by the bet itself,” which adjusts the odds and the reward for winning. Whether it’s a baseball game or a disease outbreak, the underlying psychology is the same.

“Empathy is being crushed by platforms designed to reward detachment,” he says. “Human interests are secondary to analytical interests.”

Calais Aftermath | State Court Report

0

you are reading state court report Biweekly newsletter. Subscribe to get it in your inbox.

The Supreme Court’s decision is louisiana vs curry It represents a seismic shift in civil rights and election law. The court rewrote and watered down key protections in the Voting Rights Act, ruling that goals such as partisan gerrymandering and incumbent protection can justify the creation of electoral maps that weaken the political power of minority voters. As is the case with many recent Supreme Court decisions that limit federal civil rights protections, one of the byproducts is that chalice It will engulf state courts in a new wave of legal and political battles.

Until then chalicethe Voting Rights Act’s anti-discrimination protections functioned in part as a constraint on states that were free to pursue partisan advantage in drawing electoral maps. no longer. Although we are already well into the midterm election cycle, several Republican-controlled states in the South, including Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi and Tennessee, are reacting quickly to the decision and seeking to assemble more extreme gerrymanders. There will likely be more such efforts at both the state and local level after the midterm elections, including quick-fix efforts to pass gerrymandering that favors Democrats.

Going forward, legal constraints on these attempts to create new maps will be set by state law (unless new action is taken by Congress). These may include state constitutional limits on partisan gerrymandering and other state requirements, such as the obligation for districts to maintain communities of interest. State law would also regulate the mapping process, including whether states use independent redistricting commissions and when and how mid-decade redistricting changes are allowed.

The first post-post wave is unlikely to see many judicial restrictions.chalice gerrymander. In Florida, the state constitution prohibits drawing districts that favor incumbents or political parties, and the Florida Supreme Court has previously enforced that provision to block gerrymandered maps. Plaintiffs are now citing this case law to challenge Florida’s new congressional map. However, the composition of state high courts has shifted sharply to the right since the earlier ruling, and the court has repeatedly overturned past precedent, leaving it unclear what impact these restrictions will have today.

Additionally, eight state supreme courts have upheld state constitutional limits on partisan gerrymandering, but only two are in the South: Florida and Kentucky. In North Carolina, the state Supreme Court struck down a Republican gerrymander, but reversed when Republicans gained a majority on the court, ultimately ruling that partisan gerrymandering claims were unjustified.

In the medium to long term, the story is even more complex and uncertain. North Carolina Supreme Court elections in 2026 and 2028 could once again change the composition of the court, raising the possibility of reconsidering precedent. Georgia, a purple state that has largely avoided major judicial elections, could become a new battleground. (Georgia has a state supreme court election on May 19th, which will be an early test).

States or voters may also pursue amendments to their state constitutions to make gerrymandering easier (or harder) through ballot initiatives. State courts not only interpret the scope of passed amendments, but also evaluate the legality of measures placed on the ballot. In Virginia, the state’s high court is considering whether to block the state’s recent redistricting reforms, which challengers argue do not meet the required legal process.

It also remains to be seen how state supreme courts across the country, including courts that have previously set limits on partisan gerrymandering, will respond to an increasingly glove-less approach in the wake of the case. chalice. Judges are likely to face significant political pressure to greenlight the new map. In recent years, state legislatures have repeatedly targeted courts in response to partisan gerrymandering. This year, the Utah Legislature added two seats to the state Supreme Court after giving the green light to redraw maps to undo gerrymandering.

A final question is what state laws can do to fill the rights gap left by the Supreme Court. chalice. For example, state constitutions themselves can protect against discrimination, and 10 states have already adopted their own voting rights laws. As a legal issue, chalice The constitutionality of such a law was not reached. However, the court’s analysis was based on equal protection theory, and it is highly questionable that race was intentionally used in determining electoral districts.

While the use of race-neutral remedies may be on stronger footing, it is also possible that the Supreme Court may take a backseat to national policies aimed at addressing racial disparities in elections. It is also unclear how well such remedies would address concerns of underrepresentation due to racially polarized voting, a key element of the Voting Rights Act’s anti-discrimination analysis. chalice With undercut. To date, constitutional challenges to the state’s voting rights law have been unsuccessful. However, new challenges are almost certain to arise in the aftermath of the crisis. chalice.

Stepping back and ensuring fair representation for all voters is a daunting but urgent task.chalice. There is a clear need for uniform national rules to protect voting rights and limit partisan gerrymandering. But until that happens, the battle for fair representation will be waged state by state.

Alicia Bannon is the editor-in-chief State Court Report. She is also the director of justice programs at the Brennan Center for Justice.

Recommended quote: Alicia Bannon the aftermath of chalice, Sᴛᴀᴛᴇ Cᴏᴜʀᴛ Rᴇᴘᴏʀᴛ (May 7, 2026), https://statecourtreport.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/aftermath-callais

Gold rose 2.95% on May 7, 2026

0

How much is gold per ounce today?

As of 12:05 PM ET on May 7, 2026, the spot price of gold is $4,725.46 per oz., according to the latest market data. This was an increase of 2.95% or $135.39 from the previous close of $4,590.07.

One year ago, Gold was trading at $3,397.21 per ounce, which represents a 39.10% increase in price over the past 12 months.

Key levels to look out for this week:

52 week low: $3,182.44

52 week high: $5,477.79

Gold is trading 13.73% below its 52-week high. The stock is still 48.49% above its 52-week low.

What is the historical price of gold?

today 1 week ago 1 month ago 1 year ago
$4,725.46 $4,560.71 $4,659.87 $3,397.21

A week ago, gold was trading at $4,560.71 per ounce. Since then, the price has increased by 3.61%.

A month ago, gold was trading at $4,659.87 per ounce. Since then, the price has increased by 1.41%.

USA TODAY is an independent publisher and not an investment advisor. The information provided is for educational purposes only and should not be construed as financial, investment, or trading advice. We recommend that you seek independent advice from a qualified professional regarding any specific financial decisions you may make. Trading commodities, futures, and options involves significant risk of loss. Individual investment results may vary. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Prices change rapidly and unpredictably due to factors such as supply/demand, weather, and geopolitical events. Our company assumes no responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of the information.

What is driving the price of gold today?

The price of gold is driven by inflation expectations, central bank policies, global economic conditions, and investor demand. The strength of currencies, especially the US dollar, can influence daily prices, as well as physical and industrial demand. For more on the market, read the latest investment news on USA TODAY Money.

What is XAU/USD?

XAU/USD is the ticker symbol used to track the spot price of gold in US dollars.

XAU stands for 1 troy ounce of gold and USD stands for US dollar. The estimated price tells you how many dollars it costs to purchase one ounce.

Prices are usually quoted per troy ounce, which is slightly heavier than a standard ounce.

Spot prices reflect real-time market transactions and serve as a benchmark for futures contracts, ETFs, and retail bullion prices.

how to invest in gold

To invest in gold, you can buy physical coins and bars, buy ETFs that track the price of gold, or invest in mining stocks. Be sure to weigh costs, storage needs, and risk tolerance before making a decision. The retail price of a coin or bar typically includes a premium over the spot price.

Disclaimer: This USA TODAY Money article was automatically generated using live market data from Alpha Vantage. If you think we made a mistake or have feedback, please use this form.

Rubio ramps up pressure on Cuba’s military with new sanctions

0

play

  • Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced new sanctions against Cuba’s military junta and elite.
  • The sanctions targeted the military-run economic group GAESA and its leaders.
  • Rubio indicated that additional sanctions against Cuba are expected in the near future.

WASHINGTON — Secretary of State Marco Rubio slammed Cuba’s military junta and elite with sanctions, hours after a meeting with Pope Leo XIV that focused on the humanitarian crisis on the communist-ruled island.

Rubio said he is using the authority granted by President Donald Trump in a recently issued executive order to sanction the military-run economic group known as GAESA and its leader, Ania Guillermina Lastres Morera. He also sanctioned More Nickel SA, a joint venture that mines and sells nickel in Cuba.

Rubio said in a statement that the sanctions are “part of the Trump administration’s comprehensive campaign to address the urgent national security threat posed by Cuba’s communist regime and to hold accountable the regime and those who provide it with material and financial support.”

He said he believes this punitive action is just the beginning, with additional sanctions designations expected in the coming days and weeks.

The sanctions are the latest attempt by the Trump administration to weaken the Cuban regime and force economic and political changes that will increase Havana’s dependence on the United States.

Since the attack on Venezuela earlier this year, the United States has maintained a near-total oil blockade on Cuba, exacerbating Cuba’s energy crisis. President Trump has instead hammered out an economic-focused deal that his administration hopes will lead to more freedoms and military action and make Cuba’s government more flexible.

On May 1, President Trump signed an executive order imposing new sanctions on individuals and entities that support the Cuban government and security services and are complicit in “government corruption and gross human rights violations.”

The order accused the Cuban government of maintaining close ties with state sponsors of terrorism, providing safe haven to Iranian proxies such as Hezbollah, denying its citizens free speech, and torturing and persecuting political opponents.

Cuba is already considered a state sponsor of terrorism by the United States and is subject to harsh sanctions and a restrictive trade embargo.

This story has been updated to add new information.

Contributor: Joey Garrison

Snack mix recalled due to salmonella risk. See list

0

play

Several snack mixes sold at Target and other retailers are being recalled due to possible salmonella contamination.

According to a recall announcement issued by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration on May 6, John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. announced a voluntary recall of snack mix products flavored with seasonings made by third-party suppliers, including the recalled milk powder.

The notice states that the affected condiment batches tested negative for salmonella before use, but the company said it was taking this action “as a precautionary measure as these products may contain salmonella.”

According to the FDA, to date, John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. has not received any reports of illness associated with the affected products.

Consumers who have recently purchased a product should not consume the product and should return it to the store of purchase for a full refund or exchange.

Which snack mix products are affected?

According to the FDA, the following products are sold through retail stores, e-commerce, and QVC under the Fisher, Squirrel Brand, and Southern Style Nuts brands.

JBSS part number UPC number brand Product Description Unit weight expiration date
P27594 070690275941 fisher tex mex trail mix 30 oz Best before date 08/06/27
07331 085839073319 southern style nuts gourmet hunter mix 23 oz Best Buy 01/28/27 Best Buy 02/05/27 Best Buy 02/12/27 Best Buy 02/17/27 Best Buy 03/03/27 Best Buy 03/14/27
07148 085839071483 southern style nuts gourmet hunter mix 36 oz Best Buy 12/February/2027Best Buy 26/February/2027Best Buy 13/March/2027Best Buy 02/April/2027
07332 085839916302 southern style nuts hunter mix 30 oz Best Buy 01/29/27Best Buy 02/03/27Best Buy 02/10/27Best Buy 02/19/27Best Buy 02/24/27Best Buy 03/10/27Best Buy 03/10/27Best Buy 03/16/27
05120 07223899166 squirrel brand traveler’s mix 16 oz Best Buy 04/30/27 Best Buy 05/28/27 Best Buy 06/24/27
05251 07223805251 squirrel brand Town & Country Mix 16 oz Best Buy 05/01/27Best Buy 05/25/27Best Buy 05/28/27
05450 07223805450 squirrel brand Town & Country Mix 7.5 oz Best before date 02/10/27

The following items were sold at Target retail stores under the Good & Gather brand.

JBSS part number UPC number brand Product Description unit weight lot number expiration date
03572 085239270240 Good & Gather™ mexican street corn trail mix 8 oz 6082GY5D Best before date March 23, 2027 GY

Consumers with questions about the recall may contact John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. Customer Service toll-free at (800) 874-8734, Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. (Connecticut).

Other products affected by baby formula

Snack mixes join the list of products subject to recalls or public health warnings related to potentially contaminated milk powder.

Others include Zapp’s and Dirty brand potato chips, frozen pizza varieties sold at Walmart, and two types of Mama Cozzi breakfast pizzas.

Additionally, Pork King Good Company has recalled certain Sour Cream & Onion pork rind and seasoning products in connection with milk powder.

Symptoms of salmonella infection

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, most people with Salmonella infection experience watery diarrhea with blood or mucus and severe stomach cramps.

Some people have headaches, nausea, vomiting, and loss of appetite. Symptoms usually begin within 6 hours to 6 days after infection and usually last 4 to 7 days.

The CDC recommends calling your doctor if you have the following symptoms:

  • Diarrhea or vomiting lasting more than 2 days
  • Bloody poop (including diarrhea) or pee
  • Fever over 102 degrees
  • dehydrated sigh
  • long-term complications

Gabe Hauari is USA TODAY’s national trends news reporter. You can follow him at X @gabehauari Or email Gdhauari@gannett.com.

Mother’s Day will be different for a mother estranged from her son

0

Kendall Williams, 53, won’t see her youngest son on Mother’s Day this year. But it’s nothing new.

Ms Williams has been estranged from her 30-year-old son since September 2023, when she decided to cut off contact because she felt the relationship had become unhealthy and emotionally abusive. USA TODAY reached out to his son, who declined to comment on his relationship with his mother.

“It wasn’t an easy decision,” Williams said. “I really love my two sons.”

Although she remains close with her 35-year-old eldest son, she is not sure she will be in a position to resume a relationship with her youngest son. She has written two books on the subject and frequently posts about her estrangement on social media platforms. She says that people often criticize her, but they don’t understand the whole story.

“I was diagnosed with cervical cancer that same year, so I had to distance myself from our relationship for my own well-being,” Williams told USA TODAY. “I had to really focus on my health instead of putting all my focus on him. I’ve been doing that for years.”

In recent years, more and more people have come forward about setting boundaries with their families, or even cutting ties with their families completely. A 2025 YouGov poll found that 38% of Americans are estranged from at least one family member, and 10% are estranged from their children. But while adult children are often praised for “keeping the peace” by distancing themselves from their parents and siblings, Williams said, mothers are demonized for doing the same.

British psychologist and family separation researcher Lucy Blake said accusations of emotional abuse were a common reason for family separation. People often describe feeling yelled at, manipulated, or called names. Such behavior can be just as harmful to someone’s life and well-being as physical abuse, she says.

“And emotional abuse often occurs when other types of abuse are occurring,” she says.

“Don’t take fear for your safety lightly,” Williams said, adding that she had a friend, Rosemary Slaughter Pate, who was killed by a child in Florida despite her attempts to contact authorities and get help for the child. “Don’t say, ‘That’s my child, they would never hurt me.’ Think about it seriously.”

“Our expectations for mothers are very high.”

Mother’s Day can be a difficult day for “so many people and for so many different reasons,” Blake said. Tina Gilbertson is a family estrangement therapist who works primarily with parents who have estranged themselves from their children. Gilbertson says this is more common than people think and can cause a lot of grief, especially around the holidays.

“There is a very strong and unrealistic expectation that mothers will always be there for their children, no matter what,” Gilbertson said. “And I think that’s an ideal that no human being can achieve.”

Blake said mothers often bear the brunt of maintaining families and homes, but sometimes they don’t have much support. “Our expectations of mothers are so high,” she says.

She said it was “bold and brave” for mothers like Ms Williams to share their experiences of exclusion, and she hoped it “might be of real comfort” to other mothers going through similar experiences.

“I think there’s an expectation that parents will literally do anything for their children and endure any kind of emotional pain,” Blake said.

Mothers are often viewed as “servants of everyone around them,” so the moment a mother decides to put herself above others, “that’s always frowned upon,” Williams said.

Williams said things got easier over time when it came to her son. She has gotten used to him not being a part of her life.

“I’m at peace with this. Sometimes I miss my son, and so do I. But I’m at peace now,” she said, adding that her health and mental well-being are her priorities right now, especially as someone whose cancer is in remission.

“I just want mothers to have a voice,” she said. “Mothers no longer have to suffer in silence, no longer have to live in shame without an idealistic image of what their relationship with their children should be.”

Setting Healthy Expectations for Mother’s Day

Blake said Mother’s Day posts on social media can be difficult for estranged mothers, whether they or their children have lost contact or not.

“What we’re seeing that day doesn’t fully reflect what everyone went through as a human being,” Blake said. “People rarely share experiences of tension, disappointment, heartache, betrayal, and loss.”

While these are things everyone experiences in relationships, Blake said people are far more likely to post moments together and well-chosen images of bliss on social media. But she says it’s important to recognize that alienation is not uncommon.

Gilbertson suggests planning your day, whether it’s running errands, meeting friends, or cooking a delicious meal.

“It’s okay to have that sadness,” Gilbertson said. “These are sad times. It’s a reminder of the disconnect.”

Madeline Mitchell’s role covering women and the care economy for USA TODAY is supported by a partnership with Pivotal and Journalism Funding Partners. Funders do not provide editorial input.

Contact Madeline at: memitchell@usatoday.com and @maddiemitch_ With X.

Missouri High Court decision offers lessons for advancing voting rights

0

In March, the Missouri Supreme Court struck down part of a 2022 state law that would have made it harder for groups like the League of Women Voters and the NAACP to conduct voter registration efforts.

court of Missouri v. League of Women Voters of the States The court held that the provisions at issue restricted core political speech and triggered the standard rigorous tests courts use to analyze laws that threaten the most fundamental rights. In doing so, it became the latest state high court to refuse to apply a “relatively weak” federal test for evaluating laws that burden voting rights. anderson burdick. Other state courts have also held that voting restrictions must undergo strict scrutiny, but have done so by holding that the right to vote is fundamental. Taken together, these decisions provide an illustrative path to vindicating the right to vote in state court.

In the final week of the 2022 legislative session, the Missouri General Assembly passed HB 1878, which includes major changes to state election law. The bill prohibited compensation from being paid to individuals who “solicise” to apply to register to vote. Requires individuals who “solicit” more than 10 people to register to vote to register with the state. Required such individuals to register as Missouri voters over the age of 18. It prohibited anyone from “soliciting anyone to obtain an absentee ballot application,” without defining the word “soliciting.” These prohibitions were backed by severe criminal penalties. (Another lawsuit challenged the law’s strict voter ID provisions, and the state Supreme Court ruled that groups challenging that part of the law had no standing to sue.)

The Missouri League of Women Voters and the Missouri NAACP filed suit over registration rules and a prohibition on “soliciting” voters to fill out voting applications. A state court found the provision violated state constitutional speech protections, saying it “contradicts the core tenets of free speech.” The state appealed to the Supreme Court. (In Missouri, appeals in cases regarding whether a state law is valid go directly to the state high court.)

The state argued on appeal that the provision at issue applied to conduct, not speech, “the solicitation of voter registration or absentee ballot requests,” and there were no restrictions on “the ability to induce voters to register or vote absentee.” Laws restricting speech must withstand intense scrutiny. Under this test, a state would need to show by the least restrictive means possible that the provision furthers a compelling interest. Instead, the state argued that the court should apply the law. anderson burdick Standards developed in two 1983 U.S. Supreme Court cases Anderson vs. Celebrese and in 1992 Burdick v. Takushi — regularly used by federal courts to evaluate voting restrictions. The federal test balances the burden on voters and the regulatory interests of states. Because voters often face significant empirical hurdles to demonstrate a law’s negative impact, regulations are analyzed from the following perspectives: anderson burdick Stand frequently.

Even though the law regulated speech, the state argued that it nonetheless targeted aspects of the state’s election process, warranting a review under the law. anderson burdick test. The states argued that the provisions at issue meet that test because they advance the compelling interests of combating fraud and maintaining election integrity and impose a “minimal burden” on the right to vote. The state’s brief makes no argument as to whether the provision would withstand scrutiny.

The court rejected the state’s argument, adopting a broad definition of “solicitation” that includes encouraging potential voters to register. Accordingly, the court held that the provision in question was not intended to regulate the electoral process, but rather to regulate political expression, which is subject to free speech protections. Writing for the majority, Justice Mary R. Russell explained that the speech in question urging people to register to vote “is not given on the ballot, at the polling place, or even within the voting process, because the purpose of the speech is to get people to register to vote, and that must occur long before the election.”

Opinions cited Meyer vs. Granta U.S. Supreme Court case striking down a Colorado law banning payments to people distributing ballot initiative petitions. There, the court applied strict scrutiny and held that the circulation of initiative petitions amounted to core political speech. “Encouraging others to vote is pure speech and, as a core First Amendment activity, is entitled to the same protections as circulating an initiative petition,” Russell wrote. “The debate about whether to register to vote and participate in the democratic process is a matter of public concern.”

Regarding the regulation of speech, the court stated as follows: anderson burdick It did not apply to the impugned provisions. In return, they must endure intense scrutiny. Although the court did not go so far as to raise the issue, anderson burdick In the analysis itself, it reflexively refused to align itself with the federal court, choosing instead to critically examine the terms of the case.

Under rigorous scrutiny, the court held that even if the state’s compelling interest in “protecting election integrity and preventing voter fraud” was legitimate, the state had not been able to show that the challenged provisions strictly conformed to the supposed legitimate reasons for preventing voter fraud. For example, the law required anyone soliciting voter registration to be a registered Missouri voter and to be at least 18 years old. But the state was unable to show why it required the person to: voters — more than just resident — referred to the alleged goal of “credibility” for lawyers.

A dissenting opinion written by Judge Ginger K. Gooch agreed with the state that the law’s use of the word “solicitation” applied only to the act of collecting voter registration applications and that the affected activity was conduct, not speech.

Missouri Supreme Court is not the first state high court to deny application Anderson Burdick. For example, the Washington Supreme Court last year explicitly refused to uphold a signature verification process for mail-in ballots. anderson burdick It means “ambiguous and unclear.” Instead, in court, Vet Voice Foundation vs. Hobbslaws that “impose heavy burdens” on the right to vote “are subject to appropriately intense scrutiny.” (The Brennan Center has filed an amicus brief asking the court to apply strict scrutiny to address the burden on fundamental voting rights.)

At a time when multiple federal courts have backed away from protecting voting rights, the Missouri Supreme Court’s decision suggests a different approach. Whether it’s because of the burden these laws place on speech or because voting itself is a fundamental right, applying strict oversight to voting laws allows state courts to advance people’s right to vote even when federal courts won’t.

Justin Lamb is a consultant in the Brennan Center’s Voting Rights and Elections Program.

Recommended quote: Justin Lam Missouri High Court decision offers lessons for advancing voting rightsSᴛᴀᴛᴇ Cᴏᴜʀᴛ Rᴇᴘᴏʀᴛ (May 5, 2026), https://statecourtreport.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/missouri-high-court-decision-offers-lessons-about-advancing-voting-rights

Silver rose 8.98% on May 7, 2026

0

How much is silver worth per ounce today?

As of 12:05 PM ET on May 7, 2026, the spot price of silver is $80.32 per oz., according to the latest market data. The stock is up 8.98%, or $6.62 from its previous closing price of $73.69.

One year ago, silver was trading at $33.14 per ounce. This means that the price has increased by 142.36% in the last 12 months.

Key levels to look out for this week:

52 week low: $32.17

52 week high: $117.39

Silver is trading 31.58% below its 52-week high. It is 149.66% higher than its 52-week low.

What is the historical price of silver?

today 1 week ago 1 month ago 1 year ago
$80.32 $71.99 $72.95 $33.14

A week ago, silver was trading at $71.99 per ounce. Since then, the price has increased by 11.56%.

A month ago, silver was trading at $72.95 per ounce. Since then, the price has increased by 10.09%.

USA TODAY is an independent publisher and not an investment advisor. The information provided is for educational purposes only and should not be construed as financial, investment, or trading advice. We recommend that you seek independent advice from a qualified professional regarding any specific financial decisions you may make. Trading commodities, futures, and options involves significant risk of loss. Individual investment results may vary. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Prices change rapidly and unpredictably due to factors such as supply/demand, weather, and geopolitical events. Our company assumes no responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of the information.

What is driving the price of silver today?

The price of silver is driven by inflation expectations, central bank policy, global economic conditions, and investor demand. The strength of currencies, especially the US dollar, can influence daily prices, as well as physical and industrial demand. For more on the market, read the latest investment news on USA TODAY Money.

What does XAG/USD mean?

XAG/USD is the ticker symbol used to track the spot price of silver in US dollars.

XAG stands for 1 troy ounce of silver and USD stands for US dollar. The estimated price tells you how many dollars it costs to purchase one ounce.

Prices are usually quoted per troy ounce, which is slightly heavier than a standard ounce.

Spot prices reflect real-time market transactions and serve as a benchmark for futures contracts, ETFs, and retail bullion prices.

how to invest in silver

Investing in silver can be done by buying physical coins and bars, buying ETFs that track its price, or investing in mining stocks. Be sure to weigh costs, storage needs, and risk tolerance before making a decision. The retail price of a coin or bar typically includes a premium over the spot price.

Disclaimer: This USA TODAY Money article was automatically generated using live market data from Alpha Vantage. If you think we made a mistake or have feedback, please use this form.

Chief Justice John Roberts laments Supreme Court’s ‘political’ views

0

play

HERSHEY, Pa., May 6 – Chief Justice John Roberts on Wednesday expressed concern about the public’s perception of the Supreme Court as an institution driven primarily by political results rather than law, as some prominent voices question the legitimacy of the highest judicial body.

Roberts, who has led the court since 2005, appears to acknowledge the tepid public support for the court shown in public opinion polls over the past few years, as the conservative majority continues to move U.S. law dramatically to the right.

“At a very basic level, people think we are making policy decisions,” Roberts told an audience of judges, lawyers and law students.

“I think they see us as a purely political actor, and I don’t think that’s an accurate understanding of what we do,” Roberts said.

Roberts, who was appointed chief justice by former Republican President George W. Bush, is seen as deeply conservative, but he also has concerns about the court’s institutional credibility and public perception.

The current 6-3 conservative majority was established in 2020, when Republican President Donald Trump appointed his third justice to a lifetime position on the high court. Since then, it has handed down landmark decisions rolling back abortion rights and racially conscious affirmative action, expanding gun rights, expanding religious rights, restricting transgender rights, and limiting federal regulatory power.

Another landmark ruling last week watered down key provisions of the Voting Rights Act, making it harder for minorities to challenge racially discriminatory electoral maps based on historic civil rights laws. The ruling was a victory for the Louisiana Republican Party and the Trump administration.

Roberts’ 2024 ruling granted Trump broad immunity from criminal prosecution in his efforts to reverse his 2020 presidential election loss to Democrat Joe Biden, strengthening his efforts to regain the presidency by effectively delaying a trial that ultimately never took place.

Since Mr. Trump returned to office last year, courts have repeatedly taken emergency measures to allow his wide-ranging executive actions to take effect even while legal challenges are pending. In one setback for Mr. Trump, the court in February struck down Mr. Trump’s signature global tariffs issued under a law intended for use in national emergencies in a separate ruling authored by Mr. Roberts.

On Wednesday, Roberts was interviewed on stage by a federal judge and asked how the court was being misled. Judges are “simply not part of the political process,” Roberts said, adding, “I don’t know if the public understands that to the right degree.”

Justice Kagan’s concerns

In 2022, Justice Elena Kagan, one of the court’s three liberal members, said the court’s legitimacy could be at risk if Americans began to see the justices as trying to impose their personal preferences on society. Kagan said that “a court is legitimate when it functions like a court” by respecting past precedent and not claiming authority to make political or policy decisions.

“The problem arises when courts become an extension of the political process, when people see them as just trying to impose their personal preferences on society without regard to the law,” Kagan said.

The Biden administration has lost ground on several key Supreme Court decisions and has proposed sweeping changes to the court in 2024, including an 18-year term limit for judges and a binding code of conduct.

“We need these reforms to restore trust in our courts,” Biden said. He added at the time that it had been “weaponized by those seeking to implement extreme policies for decades to come.”

Amid Republican opposition, Biden’s proposal went nowhere in Congress.

Other Democrats and some legal scholars have expressed similar concerns. Sen. Edward Markey (D-Mass.) criticized the “unjust majority of extremist U.S. Supreme Court justices,” referring to conservative judges in 2024.

personal attack

Roberts on Wednesday reiterated concerns about personal attacks and hostility toward the justices. Roberts said criticism of the ruling is legitimate, but criticizing the judge himself is not.

“As soon as that happens, it’s not appropriate and can lead to very serious problems,” Roberts said.

Roberts did not mention Trump by name. The president launched a verbal attack on the judiciary in response to a ruling that impeded his policies.

The Supreme Court has repeatedly been asked to rule on cases involving President Trump’s expansive views on executive powers. Decisions are expected by late June on additional major cases involving President Trump, including the firing of Federal Reserve President Lisa Cook and restrictions on birthright citizenship.

President Trump has criticized Roberts and the five other justices who ruled against him on the tariff issue, making baseless claims that the court is influenced by foreign interests. President Trump criticized two of the three conservative judges he appointed during his first term, Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett, calling the decision a “disgrace to our family.”

Stephen Colbert reacts to Byron Allen replacing him on CBS’ ‘The Late Show’

0

play

Stephen Colbert has revealed that he sent a letter of congratulations to Byron Allen after CBS announced that The Late Show would be replaced by the producer’s show Comics Unleashed.

In an interview with The Hollywood Reporter published on May 6, the late-night show host reacted to the news that Allen-created comedy talk show “Comics Unleashed” will take over CBS’ 11:35 p.m. slot immediately after “The Late Show with Stephen Colbert” ends later this month.

“God bless him. I know Byron. We met last year, actually. He’s a fascinating guy. Do you know his past with Carson?” Colbert told the magazine, referring to the fact that Allen became the youngest comedian to appear on The Tonight Show Starring Johnny Carson when he was 18 years old.

“Anyway, when I found out, I wrote him a letter the next morning and said, ‘Hey, congratulations. I heard you had some time. That’s great. Wouldn’t it be nice if Mr. Carson wrote you a letter?'” Colbert joked. Carson was the host of The Tonight Show from 1962 to 1992 and died in 2005.

But when The Hollywood Reporter asked Colbert what he thought about “The Late Show” not being replaced by a traditional late-night show, Colbert simply said, “That doesn’t concern me.”

CBS canceled “The Late Show with Stephen Colbert” in July 2025, describing the move as “a financial decision against a difficult background in late night.” In April, the network confirmed that Colbert’s time slot would be filled with “Byron Allen and Unleashed Comics.” The show, which began in 2006, is a series in which comedians take turns presenting their stories in a panel format. “Comics Unleashed” is already airing on CBS after “The Late Show.”

CBS is leasing the slot to Mr. Allen, who told the Los Angeles Times last year that the economics of “Comics Unleashed,” which covers production costs, were attractive to the network. “It’s not cheap,” he told the Los Angeles Times. “Zero.” In April, Paramount TV Media Chairman George Cheeks told reporters that while CBS was still developing other late-night programming ideas, Allen’s one-year deal would allow the network to “quickly get into the black with that slot.”

Colbert reveals ‘White Whale’ guest, addresses unhappy ‘Lord of the Rings’ fans

Other topics brought up in Colbert’s Hollywood Reporter interview included the guest he wanted to have on “The Late Show” more than anyone else: Pope Leo XIV. “The Pope is my Moby Dick,” he said, adding that he had even written a letter to the pope asking him: “Will you be on my show? We don’t have to talk about politics.”

Colbert also mentioned a project he has planned after The Late Show ends: writing a new installment of the Lord of the Rings series. He is working on the screenplay with his screenwriter son and Philippa Bowen, who co-wrote the Lord of the Rings and The Hobbit trilogies.

The Hollywood Reporter asked Colbert to respond to Lord of the Rings fans who are unhappy with his hiring and think he only got the job because he is a known fan of the series.

“It’s not worth bringing up for me, because all you can do as an artist is follow your heart and the techniques you’ve learned to turn this into a drama and not a fandom,” Colbert said. “And luckily I don’t have to do this alone. I have an amazing Sherpa in Philippa Boyen who cares about this issue as much as I do. And let me just say that every moment so far has been a joy.”

Colbert is currently in the final stages of his “Late Show” episodes, with the final episode scheduled to air on May 21st. “Comics Unleashed” will take over the CBS slot starting the next day. Colbert hasn’t revealed details about his last show, but he’s been going all out in recent weeks with guests like Oprah Winfrey and former President Barack Obama.

Americans are driving less and changing plans as gas prices rise, poll finds

0

play

  • A recent poll found that 44% of Americans are driving less because of rising gas prices.
  • The same poll found that 34% of Americans are changing their vacation plans because of rising fuel costs.
  • As a result of rising gas prices, 42% of those surveyed are also cutting back on other household expenses.

Rising gas prices are changing the driving behavior of many Americans, according to a new poll released by ABC News, The Washington Post and Ipsos. A survey of 2,560 U.S. adults conducted between April 24 and April 28 found that 44% of respondents said they were cutting back on driving due to high gas prices.

The findings come as gas prices rose to an average of $4.55 per gallon on May 7, from $4.30 the previous week on April 30, according to AAA.

“May 6 US Gas Price Scorecard ($3.99 per gallon is no longer the most common price in the US. The top 10% of gas stations are now averaging over $6 per gallon,” Patrick de Haan, GasBuddy’s head of petroleum analysis, said in an X post.)

De Haan said in a May 4 blog post that gasoline prices are expected to continue rising in the coming weeks due to the war between the United States and Iran.

“The market is also digesting a wave of new developments, including OPEC+’s production increase in June and President Trump’s outline of a plan to free stranded ships, which could lead to some recovery in supply,” he said. “However, with so many variables at play, the outlook remains very fluid and while localized easing may emerge, broader price movements are likely to continue in the short term.”

The USA TODAY Cars team analyzed how U.S. drivers are adjusting their behavior to cope with rising gas prices.

Americans are driving less

When asked whether they thought gasoline prices would get better or worse next year, the majority (50%) of poll respondents said they thought they would get worse. When asked an additional question about the impact of gas prices, 44% said they had driven less.

According to the U.S. Department of Energy, there has historically been an inverse relationship between the number of miles Americans are willing to drive, gas prices and overall economic uncertainty. “The long-term rise[in vehicle miles traveled]has included three periods of flatness or decline in 1974, 1979, and 2008, triggered by high oil prices,” the agency said in a post on its website.

“The flatline in VMT that began in 2008 persisted long after oil prices recovered, primarily due to the economic downturn,” the agency continued. “VMT started rising again in 2012, largely because oil prices remained relatively low while the U.S. economy recovered.”

The agency said another long-term period of recent U.S. driving declines was the beginning of the 2020 coronavirus pandemic.

“The growth rate slowed from 2017 to 2020. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, VMT in 2021, reflecting February 2020 to January 2021, was the lowest since 2002,” the Energy Department said. “VMT reached its highest level since 2021, primarily due to the trend of hybrid work schedules.”

Americans are changing their vacation plans

The survey also found that 34% of respondents said they were changing their travel or vacation plans in light of the current rise in gas prices.

The findings come after the U.S. Travel Association found the following price increases for travelers:

  • Gasoline prices rose 9.2% year-on-year and 21.5% since February, putting the biggest upward pressure on the index.
  • Airfares increased by 14.9% compared to March last year, continuing the increase observed since the second half of 2025.
  • Out-of-home dining increased 3.8% year-over-year, consistent with multi-year trends in restaurant and hospitality pricing.
  • Hotel prices rose 2.1% year-on-year, reversing the decline recorded in January and February.
  • Recreation spending increased 2.0% year-over-year, a slower increase than the sharp monthly increases observed in the second half of 2025.

Americans are cutting back on household spending

According to the survey, 42% of adults said they were cutting back on household spending in light of the current rise in gas prices.

According to the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, personal consumption spending increased by $195.4 billion in March 2026. But officials said $81.3 billion of the increased spending went to gas and other energy costs.

The next category with the largest increase in spending was health care, which increased by $21.3 billion.

Here’s how much U.S. spending increased in each category in March, according to the agency:

  • Gasoline and other energy products: $81.3 billion
  • Healthcare: $21.3 billion
  • Automobiles and parts: $17.6 billion
  • Financial services and insurance: $14.6 billion
  • Other non-durable goods: $9.9 billion
  • Food and Beverage: $6.9 billion
  • Transportation services: $6.7 billion
  • Other services: $6.6 billion
  • Recreational equipment and vehicles: $5.5 billion
  • Furniture and durable home equipment: $5 billion
  • Final expenditure for nonprofits: $4.2 billion
  • Food services and lodging: $3.5 billion
  • Clothing and footwear: $2.9 billion
  • Other durable goods: $2.7 billion
  • Housing and utilities: $500 million

Americans are considering electric cars and renting them to reduce gas costs.

Almost half of the poll respondents said they were trying to cut back on spending, while 15% said they were currently considering buying an electric car.

And even if Americans aren’t ready to buy a new or used EV, they’re choosing to rent one more often. Car Rental Gateway, an online car rental platform headquartered in London with operations in the United States, reported a 16% increase in electric and hybrid vehicle rentals in March.

Additionally, Hertz spokeswoman Lauren Luster told USA TODAY that the company saw a nearly 25% increase in requests for EV reservations from rideshare drivers from February to March.

The survey results were announced at a time when sales of new electric vehicles are declining, while sales of used EVs are recovering. According to Cox Automotive, automakers sold 82,629 new electric vehicles and 42,924 used EVs in March 2026.

According to the group, new car EV sales in March decreased by 24.7% compared to March 2025, but increased by 20.2% compared to February 2026. Used EV sales increased by 27.7% compared to March 2025, and by 53.9% compared to February 2025.

Cox said Tesla sold the most EVs in March, both new and used, with the Austin, Texas-based company selling 41,055 new EVs and 15,385 used plug-in models.

Cox said the average price for a new EV in March was $54,508, while the typical used EV price was $34,653.

Watch the crowd react to laughter when Melania Trump mentions empathy

0

At a Military Mother’s Day event, the audience laughed lightly when first lady Melania Trump mentioned her husband’s empathy.

President Donald Trump and the first lady welcomed mothers of military personnel to the White House on May 6. Melania Trump, Barron Trump’s mother, said a mother’s love and strength are at the heart of America’s strength. She then introduced President Trump, who spoke of a “skirmish” in Iran.

“Most everyone knows my husband is a powerful commander-in-chief, but his empathy goes beyond the role,” she said as the crowd erupted in laughter and paused to look back at the president. “…and shape compassionate leaders who always remember that each American soldier is someone’s child.”

The laughter grew louder as President Trump shrugged and the first lady smiled back at him. Watch the video below.

Video shows Melania laughing with the audience at a Mother’s Day event.

play

First Lady Melania Praises President Trump’s ‘Empathy’

First Lady Melania Trump spoke at a Military Mother’s Day event and praised President Donald Trump’s empathy.

The first lady posted an excerpt on social media from her memoir “Melania,” which tells the story of how she met her husband.

She said she met Donald Trump at the Kit Kat Club on a Saturday night in September 1998 while attending a party with friends.

“‘Hello, this is Donald Trump,’ the man said as he sat down at my table. ‘Nice to meet you.’ I recognized the name and knew he was a businessman or celebrity, but I didn’t know much else. He held out his hand to shake mine,” she wrote in the book. “His eyes were full of curiosity and interest, and he took the opportunity to sit down next to me and strike up a conversation.”

She also wrote that although she didn’t think much of him at the time because he was a beautiful date, she was “drawn to him by his magnetism.”

The two married in 2005 and had a child, Barron Trump, the following year.

Is Melania Trump a US citizen?

Yes, she is the only naturalized First Lady.

What is Melania Trump’s nationality?

Melania Trump was born in Slovenia.

How old is Melania Trump?

Melania Trump turned 56 on April 26th, and Donald Trump turned 79. His birthday is June 14th.

How tall is Melania Trump?

First Lady Melania Trump is 5 feet 11 inches tall.

Contributors: Joey Garrison, Jay Stahl, Christopher Cann, Rebecca Moerin, USA TODAY

Kinsey Crowley is a Trump Connect reporter for the USA TODAY Network. Please contact KCrowley@usatodayco.com. follow her X (Twitter), thread, blue sky and TikTok.

Paxton, Texas begins investigation into ties between drone company and China

0

play

Attorney General Ken Paxton has launched an investigation into a drone company over its alleged ties to China.

Paxton is investigating drone geeks over its relationship with Anzu Robotics, which Paxton said in a May 5 news release is known to be an affiliate of the Chinese Communist Party. An’s Robotics sold drones in the U.S. “with false security and privacy measures and concealed ties to the Chinese Communist Party,” the news release said.

“These products raise serious concerns, including unauthorized data collection, surveillance capabilities, and potential access by the Chinese government,” Paxton said in a news release.

Paxton originally sued An’s Robotics in February 2026. The lawsuit alleges that the drones are taking detailed photos and videos of Texas homes and infrastructure.

“To consumers in Texas, this drone appears to be a safe, American-made alternative to Chinese-made drones with known security vulnerabilities. However, unbeknownst to consumers, Anzu Robotics’ products are wolves in sheep’s clothing,” the complaint states.

As part of the investigation, Paxton issued a civil investigative request to Drone Geek to determine the scope of the company’s role in “misleading Texas consumers in violation of the Texas False Trade Act.”

“On my watch, the Chinese Communist Party will have no influence in Texas,” Paxton said. “I will thoroughly investigate all potential threats to the privacy and safety of Texans and hold accountable any companies that enable Chinese Communist Party surveillance.”

According to its website, Drone Nerds specializes in supplying high-end drones for a variety of commercial, personal, and recreational needs. The company’s mission statement reads, “To be the most trusted retailer and wholesaler brand for drones, serving domestic and international customers alike and meeting their specific drone technology needs.”

Natassia Paloma can be reached at npaloma@gannett.com, @NatassiaPaloma at x. natassia_paloma on Instagram and Natassia Paloma Thompson on Facebook.

Steven Garcia reveals stage 4 colorectal cancer diagnosis

0

Former South Carolina quarterback Steven Garcia has announced that he has been diagnosed with stage 4 colorectal cancer. Garcia, 38, is using the announcement to raise awareness about the importance of early detection and encourage others to seek medical attention if they feel unwell.

“I wasn’t too excited to share this news, but it is what it is,” Garcia wrote in a social media post. “We have a great team of doctors and staff who are confident we can overcome this problem, and that is our only option.

“If there’s one lesson to be learned, it’s to get tested and don’t be afraid to go to the clinic when you’re not feeling 100%,” Garcia continued. “What we consume has changed significantly over the years and we are hearing that more and more people in this age group are being diagnosed with these diseases. We understand this and thank you all!”

Garcia is one of only six quarterbacks in South Carolina history to throw for at least 3,000 yards in a season. He was the Gamecocks’ starting quarterback from 2008 to 2011, finishing his college career with 7,597 passing yards and 47 touchdowns in 40 games.

One of Garcia’s most notable performances with the Gamecocks came in 2010, when he threw for 210 yards and led South Carolina to a historic victory over then-No. 1 Garcia. In first place is the Alabama Crimson Tide. That season, under Garcia’s leadership, the Shumcocks went 9-3 and made their first and only appearance in the SEC Championship Game, a performance that remains a highlight in program history.

PSA has confirmed an “alarming” spike in counterfeit Pokemon cards. These are at the top of the list

0

play

For many longtime Pokemon card collectors, Charizard and Pikachu lived in binders, traded among friends, and even carried to school in backpacks. Once a childhood pastime, card collecting has evolved into a high-stakes global market, lucrative for hobbyists and attractive for counterfeiters.

A new fraud report from Pro Sports Authenticator (PSA) estimates that there will be an estimated $200 million worth of counterfeit and altered trading cards across all categories in 2025, with Pokemon at the forefront of the surge. This number reflects the material detected and intercepted, not the total amount of fraud circulating in the market.

“It’s an eye-opener,” said Ryan Hoge, president of PSA & Collectors.

Hoge said the trend reflects a collision of nostalgia, cultural relevance and growing economic interest in collectibles. That nostalgia coincides with a milestone year for this series. First released in the late 1990s, Pokémon will celebrate its 30th anniversary in 2026, with a series of product releases ranging from apparel, collectibles, and other branded gear scheduled to reignite interest across generations of fans.

That overlap has propelled Pokémon into the center of the modern trading card economy.

“In some months, it’s well over 60% of what we’re observing,” Hoge said of the PSA submission. “It dwarfs everything else.”

Fraud patterns also dominate. According to the PSA report, six of the top 10 most counterfeited trading cards are Pokemon cards, highlighting how deeply the franchise lies at the center of demand and deception in the hobby sector. Characters like Charizard, Pikachu, and Gengar are still the most frequently forged and reflect the same ones that card collectors most actively pursue.

“Charizard is like Michael Jordan,” Hoge says. “Everyone knows and wants that character.”

Widespread fraud problem across markets

Overall, counterfeit and altered cards increased by 45.3% in 2025, and the proportion of counterfeit cards in total submissions increased by 250%.

PSA estimates that it stole more than $200 million in potentially fraudulent trading cards last year, based on modeled market values. The company said this figure reflects fraud prevented, not total circulation.

Counterfeiters are also changing tactics. Rather than focusing solely on rare, high-value cards, many companies target lower-value items that are easier to duplicate and more likely to slip past simple inspection. As tactics evolve, PSA says it is adapting its review process across both technology and human grading expertise.

“We’re trying to stay ahead of the bad guys,” Hoge said.

PSA currently processes approximately 20 million cards per year, reflecting the rapid growth in collections and the strain placed on authentication systems.

PSA response

To combat the rise in fraud, PSA relies on a combination of artificial intelligence and human expertise.

The company has built a large reference library of real, altered, and counterfeit cards to train its machine learning system to detect fraud during grading. These tools provide real-time alerts to guide human graders during assessment.

But Hoge said technology alone is not enough.

“Some things can only be physically sensed, such as the feel or smell of a card,” he added.

That expertise is enhanced through structured training within PSA’s internal scoring program, known as Grader University. According to the report, all graders complete months of formal training before grading cards independently, followed by more than 13,000 supervised assessments. The program also includes ongoing guidance on emerging counterfeit trends to keep graders updated on new fraud techniques emerging on the market.

Each submission goes through multiple layers of review, combining AI-assisted screening and experienced scorers trained to identify increasingly sophisticated counterfeits and falsifications.

Why PSA released the report

This is the first year that PSA has released a fraud report, a move that reflects increased transparency as the market expands, Hoge said.

“We want people to go into their collecting journey with their eyes wide open when they buy or sell,” he said.

The company had previously avoided releasing detailed fraud data due to concerns that counterfeiters could use the data, but this year it finally decided that providing the information to collectors outweighed the risks.

The report will be published annually from now on.

For Hoge, the stakes are as personal as they are financial. “When you get scammed, it takes the fun out of it,” he says. “And that’s what collecting should be about.”

Reporter Anthony Thompson can be reached at ajthompson@usatodayco.com or on Twitter @athompsonABJ.

5 teams that should play fewer prime-time games

0

play

  • The Dolphins and Cardinals are rebuilding and are no longer appealing to a national audience.
  • Despite the market the Jets play in, prime-time opportunities could be further reduced.

The NFL’s regular season schedule may be a complex puzzle, but when it comes to optimizing broadcast schedules, the concept of fairness can quickly fall to the wayside.

Despite the league widely touting its parity, that dynamic rarely extends to the balance, or lack thereof, in how prime-time games are distributed. Franchises with major markets and large audiences will remain on a single pedestal, while remaining franchises will fight for scraps.

However, assignments can vary widely from season to season as each organization’s expectations change. Ahead of this year’s schedule announcement, here are five teams that deserve fewer prime-time games in 2026.

atlanta falcons

The Falcons, who have five prime-time games and an independent slot for a game against Germany in 2025, received a huge vote of confidence from the league. Atlanta quarterback Michael Penix Jr.’s breakthrough didn’t materialize, and Arthur Blank cleaned house in response to the disappointment.

Even with new coach Kevin Stefanski in place, the Falcons aren’t exactly a must-watch team on TV. The quarterback competition between Penix and Tua Tagovailoa isn’t going to impress viewers or produce much better results through the air. Atlanta’s struggling squad has been overtaken by their NFC South rivals, with the Carolina Panthers and New Orleans Saints showing serious signs of improvement. It’s time to diversify the wealth within the sector. That can easily be accomplished by reducing the Falcons to a clean slate worthy of a neutral team.

miami dolphins

The NFL benefited the rudderless Dolphins and Cincinnati Bengals last year by making it all the way to Week 16 before changing their prime-time matchups. That was perhaps a harbinger of how the league will handle the former this spring, after securing five such spots on teams in 2025.

First-year general manager Jon-Eric Sullivan has left no doubt that Miami is serious about dismantling Tagovailoa, wide receivers Tyreek Hill and Jaylen Waddle, and edge rusher Bradley Chubb, among others. All that’s left in the rubble are a variety of low-cost holdovers, cheap free agent contracts, and rookies trying to find their way. And while quarterback Malik Willis has shown promise with his big-play ability as a runner and downfield thrower, he will certainly be hampered by a receiving corps that lacks established options. It looks like the Dolphins will spend this season struggling and tweaking before becoming truly competitive. Perhaps it’s best for the group to do it out of the spotlight.

commander of washington

In 2025, the league’s schedule creators welcomed Washington’s team into the NFC Championship Game on a surprising note, giving the franchise five prime-time games in addition to a Christmas slot and a standalone international slot. The managers went on to lose all seven games, three of which were decided on the final play.

Is this a sign of a rapid recovery? There’s reason to believe Washington should be even more formidable in 2026 after Jaden Daniels’ fresh start after a spate of injuries ruined his sophomore season. Still, the manager will likely hire two first-time coordinators and implement a more methodical offense with David Breaux focusing on work under center. This isn’t exactly a bright setup for a team that hasn’t done much from a personnel standpoint to support Daniels, who still lacks a viable No. 2 target alongside Terry McLaurin.

Managers need to find a more stable resting point between the highs of 2024 and the lows of last season. But Washington is still clearly out of the running as a major contender in the NFC, and its schedule needs to reflect that reality.

arizona cardinals

Since eliminating the requirement for every team to schedule at least one prime-time game, the NFL has not hesitated to push some of its boring and uncompetitive operations out of the spotlight. This could mean trouble for Arizona State, which has two prime-time appointment slots in 2025 that could go blank this fall.

First-year coach Mike LaFleur may have some luck health-wise – the Cardinals finished last season with 24 players on injured reserve – and may have better luck in close games than his predecessor Jonathan Gannon. But the team, which finished with the worst point differential in the NFC (-133) as they went 0-6 against their NFC West foes last year, is still a long way from challenging other teams in the division. Whether Jacoby Brissett retains his starting QB spot or cedes it to third-rounder Carson Beck, the offense seems bound to be limited by its limitations behind center. Jeremiah Love’s arrival may spark some mild intrigue, but as with any game time other than Sunday afternoon, running room will likely be difficult to find.

new york jets

Perhaps this may seem harsh for a team that was already pushed into the corner, with its prime-time record dropping significantly from six games in 2024 to two last year. But even matching that amount this fall would be generous for an administration that has yet to remember why other countries are following suit.

Gang Green could become a more capable operation after absorbing the necessary lessons from Aaron Glenn’s tumultuous first year in office. But are the Jets more attractive than before? The defense still appears to be in a state of transition after releasing Sauce Gardner and Quinnen Williams in midseason, and the new pairing of quarterback Geno Smith and coordinator Frank Reich doesn’t inspire much confidence in the offense’s rapid growth.

Of course, the Jets are too big a brand to be completely sidelined. But while a “Thursday Night Football” game against an AFC East rival may be reasonable, anything beyond that may be a stretch.

Donald Trump approval rating survey reveals views on his personal characteristics

0

President Donald Trump’s professional approval ratings have been stagnant for more than a year, and a Pew Research Center poll shows that views of the president’s personal characteristics have declined as well.

The Pew poll, conducted April 20-26 among 5,103 U.S. adults, found that opinions of Trump on five personal traits have declined since November 2024, shortly after Trump was elected for a second term. The biggest decline was in the percentage of Americans who think President Trump “keeps his promises,” dropping from 51% in November 2024 to 38% now. The survey also found similar trends for qualities such as “mentally astute,” “honest,” and “setting a good role model.”

A majority of respondents still think President Trump stands up for their beliefs, but that number has fallen from 68% to 64% since August 2025. The poll has a margin of error of plus or minus 1.6 percentage points for the entire sample.

What is President Trump’s overall approval rating? Here’s what we know.

What is Donald Trump’s approval rating?

President Trump’s approval rating has been in net negative territory for the past year or so, and although it has fluctuated, it has been trending further down in recent months. According to the aggregation agency, President Trump’s average approval rating as of May 6 is as follows.

Some polls show Trump’s disapproval rating is at an all-time high

According to the Pew poll, President Trump’s approval rating for taking office was 34%, the lowest point in the polling organization’s second term. President Trump’s job approval ratings are at some of their lowest points since the poll was released on May 1, according to other polling organizations.

In a Washington Post, ABC News, and Ipsos poll conducted April 24-28, President Trump’s disapproval rating reached 62%, the highest in poll history for both terms. According to a public opinion poll, his approval rating was 37%. The poll was conducted among 2,560 American adults and had a margin of error of plus or minus 2.2 percentage points.

The NPR/PBS News/Marist poll released on May 6 also showed President Trump’s disapproval rating at 59%, and his approval rating at 37%, a record high. Among those who disapprove, 51% strongly support him, the lowest ever for President Trump, according to the poll. The poll was conducted April 27-30 among 1,322 respondents and had a margin of error of plus or minus 3.1 percentage points.

Contributor: Katherine Palmer, USA TODAY

Kinsey Crowley is a Trump Connect reporter for the USA TODAY Network. Please contact KCrowley@usatodayco.com. follow her X (Twitter), thread, blue sky and TikTok.

Jennie Garth opens up about being a new mom on “90210” set in her 20s

0

play

AUSTIN — Actress Jennie Garth’s life as a young mother wasn’t typical.

At a recent speaking event in Austin, Garth revealed to a room full of mothers that she was running to take care of her daughter in between filming “Beverly Hills, 90210.” While Garth was navigating parenthood, her character, Kelly Taylor, was navigating a love triangle, family trauma, and drug addiction.

“One moment, I was this young woman playing this young woman, and we were all young and having so much fun and hanging out, and then I got pregnant, and my world changed,” she said.

Garth said she gave birth to her first child when she was 25 and eight years into filming the TV show. She returned to work and appeared on camera four weeks after giving birth.

“As you can imagine, it was really tough,” Garth said, adding that most mothers take much longer than four weeks to recover after giving birth. “You’re in a fog. There’s a situation going on around breastfeeding that no one understands.”

When she heard the word “cut” on set, she ran back to her trailer to be with her baby.

“I packed her up at 5 a.m. every morning, got her on set by 6 a.m., and then I did makeup for an hour or two and she stayed with the nanny,” Garth said.

Garth said her daughters’ nanny contributed to her ability to be a “hands-on mother.”

“I didn’t want to have to raise my daughters. I wanted to be there for them,” she said.

Jennie Garth says she found her purpose by slowing down and looking outside.

Twenty years after the “Beverly Hills, 90210” finale, and after his daughters were grown, Garth said he hit a wall. “What am I doing?” she asked herself at age 50. As the height of the COVID-19 pandemic winds down, we can’t help but wonder, “What is life all about?”

In exploring herself, she realized that her purpose was to inspire others to look within themselves as well. She’s written it all down in her new book, “I Choose: Chasing Joy, Finding Purpose, and Embracing Reinvention,” which she describes as “a self-help book disguised as a memoir.”

“It’s so important to take a slow look at yourself every once in a while and ask, ‘How am I choosing to be myself right now? How am I putting my own dreams, my own aspirations, my own needs on the table and not just meeting the needs of others?'” she said.

She says saying “I choose me” may sound selfish. But what’s really important is to do your best and develop the ability to be considerate of others. The mothers in the crowd understood her point and nodded in understanding.

“Because we all know what it’s like when you’re running empty. It’s a disaster,” Garth said. “And everyone in your circle is affected by that.”

Madeline Mitchell’s role covering women and the care economy for USA TODAY is supported by a partnership with Pivotal and Journalism Funding Partners. Funders do not provide editorial input.

Contact Madeline at: memitchell@usatoday.com and @maddiemitch_ With X.

Hantavirus, Pope and Ted Turner speak at Daily Briefing

0

Welcome to the daily briefing. Please read the following first.

nicole farato here. From America’s hantavirus to Alabama’s redistricting push, we bring you the news you need to know on Thursday.

U.S. monitors passengers returning from ship due to hantavirus outbreak

Residents of Georgia, Arizona and California are being monitored for possible hantavirus infection after boarding a luxury cruise liner hit by a deadly outbreak, according to reports.

Health experts at the World Health Organization say the outbreak may have started with passengers who boarded the ship after becoming infected with the virus.

This virus has been identified as Andesvirus, the only species of hantavirus that can be transmitted from person to person. Hantaviruses are usually spread through contact with the urine, feces, or saliva of infected rodents, but human-to-human transmission is rare. Track the virus here.

More news you need to know right now

  • President Trump reignites feud with Pope: Tensions between the two leaders have increased as Secretary of State Marco Rubio is scheduled to make a high-stakes visit to the Vatican on Thursday.
  • Destroying 420,000 Clinton peach trees: California growers plan to destroy thousands of peach trees after a decades-long partnership with Del Monte Foods collapsed, leaving farmers without buyers for tens of thousands of tons of fruit.
  • Meet the hockey CEOs who are profiting from their kids’ teams. A nine-month investigation by USA TODAY found that Marie Ganty, founder of Blackstreet Capital Holdings, used her private investment firm’s youth sports arm, Black Bear Sports Group, to rapidly acquire ice rinks and teams in the Northeast and Midwest, using that control to steer families into an ecosystem of unique leagues, tournaments and high membership fees.

2026 Midterm Elections

Alabama accelerates toward redistricting

A special legislative session in Alabama this week sparked widespread protests as the state Legislature considered redrawing congressional maps to favor Republicans, according to USA TODAY Network’s Montgomery Advertiser. Alabama’s primary election will be held on May 19th, with voting for the gubernatorial and U.S. Senate races scheduled.

memory

Atlanta media icon leaves behind huge legacy

Ted Turner, former owner of the Atlanta Braves, founder of CNN, philanthropist, and media mogul who changed the American news landscape, has died at the age of 87. Mr. Turner became known as the “Mouth of the South” as he built a broadcasting empire and developed the nation’s first 24-hour news cycle. He died after battling progressive Lewy body dementia. Jane Fonda, his spouse of 10 years, recalled that Turner was “not a normal person.”

before you go

Have feedback about the daily briefing? Email Nicole at NFallert@usatoday.com.

Estrogen patch shortage worsens, sending women straight to FDA

0

play

Physicians have been working for years to improve the care of menopausal and perimenopausal women, from training to setting standards for hormone replacement therapy.

Now they fear the effort will be undermined by the lack of access to the most commonly prescribed drugs for menopause. And they’re asking the Food and Drug Administration to do more.

A women’s group led by the founders of Midi Health, the largest provider of menopause care in the United States, is meeting with FDA officials on Wednesday, May 6, to discuss solutions to the estrogen patch shortage.

Estrogen patches have been in short supply since the beginning of the year.

The FDA told USA TODAY in April that it was in talks with the five largest patch manufacturers to ensure all companies were up to speed. Officials said they have not yet classified the difficulty in finding patches as a shortage, but some health care providers and patients disagree.

USA TODAY has reached out to the FDA for updated information.

How did we get here?

According to a recent Midi survey, nearly half of women on hormone replacement therapy say they have trouble filling prescriptions for estrogen patches. More than 8,000 women from 49 states responded to the survey.

One in 10 women surveyed said they had stopped treatment due to shortages. Additionally, 9 out of 10 women said they were unsure whether they would be able to fill their next prescription.

“Women are no longer confused about menopause. They’re informed patients. They’ve found a provider, they’ve had a conversation, and now they have a prescription,” says Tamsen Fadal, Midi’s chief women’s health ambassador and author of How to Menopause. “We bring them here and say, ‘Congratulations for being here, but right now we don’t have what you need.'” Women are rationing patches and stopping treatment. ”

One-third of women surveyed said lack of estrogen patches was affecting their health.

According to the Menopause Society, hormone replacement therapy (often a combination of estrogen and progestin) is the preferred treatment for menopause.

“The shortage is only going to get worse,” says Kathleen Jordan, Midi co-founder and chief medical officer. “We need the FDA to recognize this shortage and that manufacturing is not keeping up with demand.”

Patches do more than just relieve symptoms like night sweats and irritability. Estrogen helps protect against osteoporosis and can also help improve blood pressure, mood, memory, and sex drive. Recent studies have also shown that this patch is an effective part of treatment for some men with prostate cancer.

Some women are forced to use different brands of estrogen every month, resulting in inconsistent care. Other transdermal methods that avoid blood flow, such as gels and creams, are often not covered by insurance and cost three times as much as patches.

Some drug companies blame the shortage on increased use of patches since the FDA removed black box warning labels last fall.

This warning has kept many women away from hormone replacement therapy for more than two decades, ever since a 2002 Women’s Health Initiative study linked it to an increased risk of breast cancer, heart attack, and stroke in postmenopausal women. This later-recognized risk was primarily seen in women who were older when they started hormone therapy.

The impact of this study has affected millions of women, and over the past two decades, the use of hormone replacement therapy has fallen from 40% to 5%, as many doctors stopped prescribing it, and even if they did, women were reluctant to take it.

Solution for estrogen patch deficiency

Still, use of hormone replacement therapy has remained stable over the past six years, with about 5% of menopausal or perimenopausal women using hormone replacement therapy, Jordan said. So while the label change has increased patch usage since November, it hasn’t been large enough to cause a shortage.

“The problem isn’t the increased demand for patches; it’s the manufacturers,” Jordan said. “As access to care improves, demand will only increase.”

Some companies, including Bayer, have stopped producing patches in 2023. Sandoz, one of the leading manufacturers of estrogen patches, is working to expand its global production capacity.

A company spokesperson told USA TODAY that the patch is more complicated and time-consuming to manufacture than other medicines. In the meantime, the company is allocating additional quantities to patients in the U.S. to meet demand.

Many women still struggle to find menopausal care, but things are improving. In recent years, more health care providers have become certified in menopause care. The nonprofit Menopause Association’s membership has quadrupled to 4,000 in the past decade. And telemedicine companies are growing, with some taking insurance, like Midi, and others offering their own medicines and supplements.

Women are also receiving hormone replacement therapy for longer periods of time. Jordan says women begin the treatment several years before perimenopause, the last menstrual period when women may experience fluctuations in estrogen. Nowadays, women often continue taking medication as long as they have symptoms, and in some cases continue to take medication until they are in their 80s.

Jennifer Weiswolf, an attorney who has advocated for improved health care for women, said insurance companies still dominate the drug access market.

“Rather, this story is an indictment of a broken insurance industry, the result of market concentration, perverse incentives, and the admission that insurance companies own the pharmacy benefit managers who effectively control drug access for the vast majority of users,” she wrote in a recent editorial in the Los Angeles Times.

Weiswolf, executive director of the Birnbaum Center for Women’s Leadership at New York University School of Law, will publish a book in October called “Menopause: A User’s Manual and Citizen’s Guide.”

She’s hopeful about the growing demand for better menopause coverage, with more than 60 bills introduced in state legislatures last year aimed at menopause education and workplace protections.

“The FDA is part of this wave of movement,” she told USA TODAY. “They can make a huge difference in ensuring all women have access to the medicines they need.”

Laura Trujillo is a national columnist focused on health and wellness. She is the author of “Stepping Back from the Ledge: A Daughter’s Search for Truth and Renewal” and can be reached at ltrujillo@usatoday.com.