Home Blog Page 939

Feathered family stuck on a rooftop gets fairytale ending

0


Sign up for CNN’s Wonder Theory science newsletter. Explore the universe with news on fascinating discoveries, scientific advancements and more.


Atlanta
CNN
 — 

A family of seven recently overstayed their welcome at a swanky, boutique hotel in Atlanta’s trendy Old Fourth Ward neighborhood.

They didn’t have a reservation — but that wasn’t the problem.

This was a gaggle of Canada geese, nesting on the hotel’s rooftop garden patio. Mom and dad had been on the rooftop for awhile, but their five goslings — who were too young to fly — had no way to follow their parents down to a nearby pond, four stories below.

The goslings lived on the rooftop of Atlanta's FORTH hotel.

Michael Waters, a longtime volunteer with AWARE Wildlife Center, came to the rescue. Even as an experienced wildlife rescuer, Waters said saving the geese was tricky due to their behavior and strong gusts of wind.

“There were five little goslings, and they were all running in a fright,” Waters said. “The mother and father goose were both present and they both were sort of in their guardian mode and were being very protective.”

The goal of the rescue, Waters said, was to collect the entire family to keep them together and relocate them to a pond below.

“The first thing I thought was to collect the little ones because I was just so concerned about them at the precarity of the ledge,” he said.

After Waters collected the goslings in a box, he tried to capture the father goose.

“He fought me off of his wing and flew off the building,” Waters said. “He flew all the way down to the ground and was just honking like a little horror at the base of the building.”

Next, Waters tried to save the mother goose, but he realized she was also trying to escape. To prevent her from leaving, Waters released all the goslings, and she came after him trying to protect her babies.

“I was able to secure her in her enclosure, then I was able to collect all the babies again,” Waters said.

The mother goose once captured by Michael Waters, an AWARE volunteer.

With the goslings and the mother goose captured, Waters took them outside to release them in the pond.

“Who was waiting there at the pond but the father goose!” Waters said. “So, it was just perfect.”

While the rooftop goslings had never been on the ground or in water before, Waters said they adjusted quickly.

“It was so lovely to see their little instincts step forward,” he said. “They immediately became amphibious and just waddled out and went out with mom and dad, and they all went to go live their wild lives.”

The goose family reunited at a nearby pond.

But how did the geese get themselves into this situation? Why would they want to nest on a hotel rooftop?

Kara Nitschke, migratory and game bird biologist with the Georgia Department of Natural Resources, said Canada geese are very adaptable and easily assimilate.

“In urban and suburban areas, we keep our grass short like golf courses, parks, neighborhoods,” Nitschke said. “Geese like that because they can walk through that easily.”

And she said it’s a “bonus” for the geese if these green spaces have a nearby pond.

“They can run to the water and hop in (if they feel threatened), and they feel perfectly safe and comfy,” she said.

The state of Georgia is home to about 250,000 Canada geese, according to Nitschke. Being a migratory species, the birds would make their yearly trip south from Canada. But in the 1970s and ’80s when migration slowed, Nitschke said the state stocked the environment with around 8,000 geese — and since then, the population has boomed.

Canada geese are federally protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918. That means if someone comes across an injured or orphaned goose or wants to relocate a goose, that person would need a permit to handle it, Nitschke said.

If anyone finds a goose or any wildlife that might need help, Nitschke and Waters recommend they call their state wildlife department or a local wildlife rehabilitation center, like Atlanta’s AWARE, before interacting with the animal.

For Waters, who regularly works with and rescues animals, idealism keeps him motivated to continue his work.

“In any way that we can ameliorate or make better the effects that have consequences for these other beings,” Waters said, “I want to be someone who gives at least the effort for things to be made better.”



Source link

Analysis: Trump has learned that getting through to Putin isn’t easy

0




CNN
 — 

US President Donald Trump is finding out that getting through to Russian President Vladimir Putin is not as easy as he might have thought. But he’s only the latest US leader to fail at an attempt to get Russia and its longtime president on board.

The Trump administration’s attempts to reach a ceasefire agreement in Ukraine have largely stalled, despite a flurry of diplomatic activity.

Since returning to the White House, Trump has held at least two lengthy phone calls with Putin and has repeatedly sent his envoy Steve Witkoff to meet the Russian leader in person in Moscow, with the latest trip on Friday.

Unsurprisingly to many Kremlin-watchers, none of these meetings have led to an agreement. Not only did Witkoff come back empty-handed, he also repeated several key Kremlin talking points.

The latest US proposal includes recognizing Russian control of Crimea – a long-standing red line for Ukraine and its European allies, officials familiar with the details have told CNN.

“I would say the negotiations are going very well — from Putin’s point of view,” Angela Stent, a foreign policy expert and former national intelligence officer for Russia and Eurasia at the National Intelligence Council, told CNN.

“He has no intention of stopping the war, but what he wants, and what he’s getting, is a restoration of US-Russian diplomatic relations.”

In this photograph distributed by the Russian state agency Sputnik, Russia's President Vladimir Putin shakes hands with US President Donald Trump's envoy Steve Witkoff during a meeting in Saint Petersburg on April 11.

“Putin is playing a waiting game because he believes that time is on his side and that he can force Ukraine into a more disadvantageous position and persuade Kyiv and its European allies with the help of Washington that there is no alternative to a peace settlement on Russian terms,” John Lough, the head of foreign policy at New Eurasian Strategies Centre, a think tank based in London and Washington, told CNN.

Stalling, haggling over every detail, or saying no without explicitly saying “no” is a classic Russian tactic, employed by Putin and his top negotiators on several occasions in the past, such as during the negotiations for a ceasefire in Syria.

It’s unclear whether the Trump administration didn’t see it coming because it doesn’t have the expertise that would have led it to expect such behavior, or if it has simply decided to play along.

Trump’s words since coming back into office indicate that he sees the world in a similar way to Putin, Stent said – as consisting of a handful of great powers to whom smaller countries should submit.

“Trump talks about great power competition (between China and the US), that he should be able to take over Canada and Greenland, and Panama, and from Putin’s point of view, that’s okay. Remember, he hasn’t criticized Trump for any of these things,” she said.

Ultimately, Trump has made it clear that he has little interest in the future of Ukraine – even suggesting Ukraine “might be Russia someday.”

So, if Putin continues to drag the process along, it may give Trump a way out.

Russian President Vladimir Putin hands US President Donald Trump a World Cup football on July 16, 2018 in Helsinki, Finland.

Lough said that Putin’s KGB training has shaped the way he approaches negotiations.

“Putin famously described his job in the KGB as ‘work with people.’ He was trained in the art of manipulating interlocutors. He is known to prepare meticulously for negotiations and is a master of detail,” Lough told CNN, adding that the Russian leader is known to be “quick on his feet and can charm and intimidate in the same breath.”

Putin has employed this technique on Trump in the past, according to Kalina Zhekova, an associate professor at University College London (UCL) who specializes in Russian foreign policy.

When the two met in Helsinki in 2018, the Russian leader handed Trump a ball from the 2018 World Cup during the news conference, saying “now the ball is in your court,” in reference to efforts to improve the strained US-Russia relationship.

“This was indicative of Putin’s calculated ‘tit-for-tat’ approach that views diplomacy as a game with winners and losers. He was also likely aware that his counterpart is someone with a fragile ego who is easily impressed by theatrical gestures and gifts,” Zhekova said, adding that the summit was widely seen as a win for Putin, because Trump was reluctant to denounce Moscow’s interference in the 2016 US presidential election, contradicting US intelligence reports and effectively siding with the Kremlin.

Putin has many tricks in his diplomatic toolbox. He likes to keep his counterparts waiting by turning up late for meetings – sometimes by several hours. He often creates chaotic situations to get more options and can change his mind when it suits him, which makes it even more difficult to negotiate with him.

Russian President Vladimir Putin looks on as his dog Kuni approaches the Germany Chancellor Angela Merkel in Sochi in January 2007.

He is also known to use other ways to assert his power. In 2007, for example, “Putin allowed his Labrador to approach (German Chancellor) Merkel during a photo opportunity, although her fear of dogs was communicated to Russian officials prior to the meeting,” Zhekova said.

Witkoff, a real estate magnate with zero previous experience in politics or diplomacy, has been trying to strike a deal with a former KGB lieutenant colonel who has outlasted five US presidents, eight UK prime ministers, three Chinese leaders and six NATO chiefs, having personally negotiated with many of them.

Stent pointed to the fact that Gen. Keith Kellogg, officially Trump’s special envoy for Ukraine and Russia, has been largely sidelined in the talks with Russia, despite, she said, having the most relevant experience. “Of course, he’s a general, he’s not a diplomat, but at least he has some experience with Russia and thinking about these things, but of course, he’s only dealing with Ukraine.”

The mismatch in expertise extends beyond Witkoff to the rest of the US negotiating team too.

Instead of Kellogg, Witkoff was accompanied on some of his trips by Secretary of State Marco Rubio and national security adviser Mike Waltz. Both are experienced politicians but have no proven track record when it comes to Russia.

Meanwhile, the Russian delegation included longtime Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, the former ambassador to Washington, Yuri Ushakov, and Kirill Dimitriev, the head of Russia’s sovereign wealth fund who studied at Stanford and Harvard. All three speak fluent English and are experienced diplomats who know how to deal with Americans.

US and Russian delegations met with Saudi representatives in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, February 18, 2025.

Moscow might be dragging its feet in hopes that Trump will lose his patience and abandon his goal of ending the war.

Signs of that are already emerging: Rubio said last week that the US could walk away within “days” if there are no signs of progress. And CNN reported this week that Trump is getting frustrated with the lack of progress and privately told advisers that mediating a deal has been more difficult than he anticipated.

“(The Trump administration) are eager to have a deal, but unwilling to pay a high cost for that deal – so no US security guarantees, no boots on the ground (and) they’re unwilling to surge US aid to Ukraine as a stick to try to get Russia to make concessions,” said Jennifer Kavanagh, the director of military analysis at Defense Priorities, a think tank that advocates for more restrained US foreign policy.

She added that, for Trump, getting the US out of Ukraine and stabilizing relations with Russia are more important than achieving peace.

Putin knows this. Russia’s launch of several major attacks against Ukraine over the past few weeks, including on Kyiv, indicates the Kremlin’s belief that the leverage US has – or is willing to use – is limited.

Trump, of course, is not the first US president to believe he can build a good relationship with Russia.

“Every US administration in my memory has come in with some idea that they’re going to reset – they all use that word – the relationship with Russia, that they have an opportunity to turn the page and start again. And they have always been wrong,” Sam Greene, director for Democratic Resilience at the Center for European Policy Analysis, told CNN.

Greene, who is also a professor of Russian politics at King’s College London, said that this succession of failures has meant that Moscow “has come to see the United States as fundamentally inconsistent.”

Some former presidents tried to build personal relationships with Putin – George W. Bush invited the Russian leader to his ranch in Crawford, Texas, where he drove him around in a Ford pickup truck. Bush famously wrote later that he “looked the man in the eye” and “was able to get a sense of his soul.”

But while Putin was initially agreeable to cooperating with the Bush administration, being the first world leader to call Bush after the 9/11 attacks, their relationship soured fairly quickly.

“I think the real reason for the collapse of that reset was because Putin wanted the United States to treat Russia as an equal and to recognize that it has a right to a sphere of influence in the post-Soviet states. And that’s not what the Bush administration was prepared to do,” Stent said.

US President George W. Bush and Russian President Vladimir Putin tour a canyon and waterfall at the Bush Ranch November 14, 2001 in Crawford, Texas.

Other US administrations have tried a different approach, attempting to get Russia more interested in cooperation by welcoming the country into global institutions – such as the G7 in 1997 during Bill Clinton’s presidency, or the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 2012 under the Obama administration.

“And that hasn’t worked either, largely because both sides, over time, underestimated the depth of the structural disconnect between the West and where Russia was headed,” Greene said.

America’s relationship with Russia did somewhat ease under the Obama administration – but mostly because Putin wasn’t officially in the top seat for some of that time. He stepped down in 2008 to become prime minister because of term limits. He returned as president in 2012 and has since changed the constitution.

The key problem, experts say, is that the US and Russia simply do not understand each other – now or in decades past.

“I don’t think that most US administrations have understood really the depth of Russia’s shift towards not just authoritarianism, but to a brand of authoritarianism that sees the existence of Western power and particularly sort of the unity of the transatlantic relationship as deeply threatening to Russia’s interests,” Greene said.

Thomas Graham, a distinguished fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations who was the senior director for Russia on the National Security Council staff from 2004 to 2007, said that the key mistake American presidents made after the breakup of the Soviet Union was thinking that it was possible to develop a broad strategic partnership with Russia.

“I would argue that given Russian interest, given Russian history and Russian traditions, that was never really on the cards. And so we tended to exaggerate the possibilities for cooperation, and then were deeply disappointed when we didn’t get it,” he told CNN.

Russian President Vladimir Putin delivers a speech during a ceremony to receive diplomatic credentials from newly appointed foreign ambassadors at the Grand Kremlin Palace in Moscow, Russia November 5, 2024.

Graham, who served as a special assistant to Bush, said that the only way forward is to understand that Russia and the US will always have a complex, competitive relationship.

“It’s important to remember that there are different ways of rivalry. We could have the type of very profound adversarial relationship that we have at this point, with, I would say, an unacceptably high risk of military confrontation between Russia and the United States … or we could have something that I like to call competitive coexistence, where the competition is largely in an economic, commercial, cultural, ideological, diplomatic realm, and not so much in the military realm,” he said.

The point, Graham and others say, is that Russia will not disappear. It will continue to exist and have an interest in European security, in Ukraine and in competing with the Western world.

Thomas Graham, a distinguished fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations who was the senior director for Russia on the National Security Council staff from 2004 to 2007, said that the key mistake American presidents made after the breakup of the Soviet Union was thinking that it was possible to develop a broad strategic partnership with Russia.

“I would argue that given Russian interest, given Russian history and Russian traditions, that was never really on the cards. And so we tended to exaggerate the possibilities for cooperation, and then were deeply disappointed when we didn’t get it,” he told CNN.

Graham, who served as a special assistant to Bush, said that the only way forward is to understand that Russia and the US will always have a complex, competitive relationship.

“It’s important to remember that there are different ways of rivalry. We could have the type of very profound adversarial relationship that we have at this point, with, I would say, an unacceptably high risk of military confrontation between Russia and the United States … or we could have something that I like to call competitive coexistence, where the competition is largely in an economic, commercial, cultural, ideological, diplomatic realm, and not so much in the military realm,” he said.

The point, Graham and others say, is that Russia will not disappear. It will continue to exist and have an interest in European security, in Ukraine and in competing with the Western world.



Source link

7-year car loans are here. What will your ride be worth in 2032?

0


play

More new-car shoppers are taking on seven-year loans, a trend that underscores the rising cost of financing a vehicle.  

Seven-year loans made up 19.8% of all new vehicle financing by dealers in the first quarter of 2025, Edmunds reports, an all-time high. 

The average new-car customer borrowed $41,473 in the first three months of 2025, at an annual interest rate of 7.1%, for an average monthly payment of $741. Those financing terms added $9,231 in interest to the cost of the average car. 

Car loans have grown steadily longer in recent years, as buyers labor to keep pace with rising prices. Nowadays, a car buyer seems to have as many financing options as a home buyer. 

Homes tend to go up in value. Cars mostly go down.

But cars and homes are very different assets. Homes tend to appreciate in value. Cars mostly depreciate.  

“It’s not money that you get back. It’s not equity that you have in the car,” said Brian Moody, executive editor of Kelley Blue Book and Autotrader.  

Here’s another worrisome trend: Many cars are losing value at a faster pace than the borrower repays the loan. You wind up owing more than the auto is worth, a predicament known as being “underwater” or upside-down on the loan. The longer your loan, the greater the risk of slipping underwater. 

An old rule of thumb in car-buying, known as 20/4/10, held that you should make a 20% downpayment, cap your loan at four years, and spend no more than 10% of your monthly income on transportation. 

Decades ago, three- and four-year car loans were standard.  

In the early 2000s, a five-year term “was kind of the sweet spot” for car loans, said Joseph Yoon, consumer insights analyst at Edmunds. Yoon’s own family took out a five-year loan in 2004.  

“Now, 20 years on, it seems that sweet spot has become six years,” Yoon said, “with many people opting for seven years or longer.” 

Today, only 10% of new car buyers choose loans of four years or less, Edmunds reports. 

The average new car cost $47,462 in March 2025, compared with $38,162 in March 2020, according to Kelley Blue Book. 

Interest rates have soared in that span. The average rate on a five-year new-car loan rose from 5.2% in February 2020 to 8% in February 2025, according to Federal Reserve data. 

A longer loan means lower monthly payments

Auto buyers typically choose a longer loan term because a longer loan means lower monthly payments. Dealer negotiations often pivot on finding the right monthly payment, rather than the lowest sale price or interest rate, because the monthly sum is easier to digest. 

“The only reason why you would extend out a loan term seven, eight years,” Yoon said, “is because you went to the dealership with a certain budget in mind, you picked out a car, and then the salesperson, the finance person, throws a number at you that you cannot afford.” 

But the length of the loan profoundly affects the interest you pay, potentially jacking up the total cost of the transaction.  

Here’s an example, offered by Consumer Reports, for a $40,000 auto loan at a 7% interest rate. 

With a four-year loan, you face a steep monthly payment of $958, but you cap your total interest at $5,977 over the lifetime of the loan. 

Bump the loan up to five years, and you trim your monthly payment to $792. But now, you pay $7,523 in interest. 

With a six-year loan, your monthly payment falls to $682, but your interest rises to $9,101. 

And with a seven-year loan, your monthly payment slips to $604. And now, you’re paying $10,711 in interest. 

“Yes, your monthly payment is important,” Yoon said. “But with interest rates as high as they are, with a six-year loan, with a seven-year loan, with an eight-year loan, that’s five figures of interest that you’re going to pay.” 

‘Underwater’ loans are on the rise

Longer loans at higher rates are pushing more customers underwater.  

One-quarter of customers who traded in used vehicles for new ones in the last three months of 2024 owed more than the trade-in was worth, according to Edmunds. The trade-in effectively raised the price of the new car.  

“If you’re underwater when you want to trade it in, that’s going to be a problem,” said Chuck Bell, a financial policy advocate at Consumer Reports. 

With a used vehicle, the numbers can look even worse.  

The average used car sold in March 2025 had already been driven 70,487 miles, according to Cox.  

A typical five- or six-year-old car has already lost more than half of its value through depreciation. If you finance an aging vehicle for seven more years, “halfway through the loan, your car’s not going to be worth anything,” Yoon said. 

Here, from the experts, are a few questions to ask before you take out a seven-year car loan: 

Can I make a bigger downpayment? 

The more you put down on an auto purchase, the less you have to finance. With a larger downpayment, a buyer may be able to afford the monthly payments on a shorter-term loan. 

Your downpayment “goes straight to the bottom line,” Bell said. 

Can I afford those payments for seven years? 

Before you commit to a seven-year car loan, consider how the monthly payments will impact your budget over those years, including housing payments, other debt and unexpected expenses. 

Will I still own the vehicle in seven years? 

A big risk, with a seven-year car loan, is owing more than the vehicle is worth. But if you plan to keep the car until the loan is paid off, your negative equity will eventually melt away. 

“If you like to keep your cars for a long time,” Yoon said, “then ultimately it doesn’t matter.” 



Source link

US and China holding talks on trade war, Trump says after Beijing rebuttal | International trade

0


The US and China held talks on Thursday to help resolve the trade war between the world’s two largest economies, Donald Trump said.

“We may reveal it later, but they had meetings this morning, and we’ve been meeting with China,” the US president told reporters at the White House.

China had earlier hit back against Trump’s previous claim to be close to a trade deal with Beijing.

Trump had buoyed markets by suggesting on Wednesday that the US was “actively” negotiating with Beijing, and pointing to hopes of a deal that would “substantially” reduce tariffs, now set at 145%, on goods coming into the US from China.

The Chinese commerce ministry’s spokesperson He Yadong said there were “currently no economic and trade negotiations between China and the United States”.

At a later press briefing by the foreign affairs ministry, spokesman Guo Jiakun said of the reports of talks: “None of that is true”.

“For all I know, China and the US are not having any consultation or negotiation on tariffs, still less reaching a deal,” Guo said.

“Any claims about progress in China-US economic and trade negotiations are baseless rumours without factual evidence,” he said, adding that if the US wanted “de-escalation” – as Trump’s Treasury secretary, Scott Bessent, has argued – it should “completely cancel all unilateral tariff measures against China and find a way to resolve differences through equal dialogue”.

Earlier this month Beijing retaliated against Trump’s tariffs by imposing a 125% tariff in turn, a situation that Bessent described as unsustainable, saying it amounted in effect to a trade embargo.

The director of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), Kristalina Georgieva, used a press conference in Washington on Thursday to call for a truce in the escalating trade conflict, to limit the damage to the global economy.

She declined to criticise the US administration directly but said “major trade policy shifts” had “spiked uncertainty off the charts”.

“A trade policy settlement among the main players is essential and we are urging them to do it swiftly, because uncertainty is very costly,” she said.

“I cannot stress this strongly enough: without certainty, businesses do not invest, households prefer to save rather than to spend, and this further weakens prospects for already weakened growth.”

The IMF director, Kristalina Georgieva, speaks at a press conference in Washington on Thursday. Photograph: Maansi Srivastava/EPA

Trump and his team have repeatedly highlighted the number of countries that are keen to strike trade deals since his “liberation day” tariffs were imposed and then partly paused earlier this month. But no deal has yet been signed.

China, which was left out of Trump’s pause on implementing other high global tariffs, has been courting other countries to strengthen relations away from the US. On Friday, its ambassador to Australia, Xiao Qian, wrote an op-ed in local media that said Trump’s tariffs were taking the world back to the “law of the jungle”.

“Amid the changing international landscape, China stands ready to work with all parties to resolutely oppose all forms of hegemony and bullying,” he said.

The IMF downgraded its forecasts this week for global economic growth and warned of further downside risks if the trade war escalated. “Simply put, the world economy is facing a new and major test,” Georgieva said.

She added that the situation was particularly challenging because many countries had little room for policy manoeuvre after already enduring a series of economic shocks in recent years.

skip past newsletter promotion

Asked what the mood of the delegations from the fund’s member countries in Washington had been this week, Georgieva said: “The membership is anxious.”

“We were just about to step on the road to more stability after multiple shocks. We were projecting 3.3% growth, and actually we were worried that this was not strong enough – and here we are,” she said. The IMF is now forecasting global growth of 2.8% for this year.

Georgieva urged China to carry out economic reforms as a response to the shift in policy in Washington. She suggested Beijing should boost demand at home, to rebalance its economy away from its dependence on exports, and “pull back from too much intervention in the economy”.

With many multilateral institutions under attack from the Trump administration, Georgieva welcomed a speech by Bessent on Wednesday in which he said the Bretton Woods institutions – the IMF and the World Bank – had “enduring value”.

“I very much appreciate Secretary Bessent’s reiteration of the US commitment to the Fund and to its role,” she said.

However, Bessent also fiercely criticised the institutions for what he called “mission creep” and their “sprawling and unfocused agendas”, including issues such as gender and the climate crisis.

Georgieva, responding to a question about these claims, declined to say whether the IMF would continue to work on climate or gender.

But she replied: “I want to say that I actually agree with the secretary on one thing. It’s a very complicated world, a world of massive challenges of all kinds.” Stressing that the Fund was a “very fiscally disciplined institution”, she added: “Yes, we have to focus.”

Discussions on the sidelines of the IMF and World Bank meetings have been dominated by the knock-on effects of Trump’s trade policy, with ministers closely monitoring the stream of pronouncements from the White House.

Most countries are facing 10% tariffs on all exports to the US, and 25% for some key products such as cars. It remains unclear whether the much higher “reciprocal” rates announced by Trump in the White House Rose Garden will be reimposed when his 90-day “pause” is over.



Source link

Judge says ICE deported two-year-old US citizen ‘with no meaningful process’

0


play

A federal judge on Friday said he strongly suspects that the Trump administration deported a 2-year old U.S. citizen to Honduras “with no meaningful process.”

The child was born in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on January 4, 2023, according to court documents. The child was taken into custody by Immigration and Customs Enforcement Tuesday morning with her mother and her 11-year-old sister, while the mother was “attending a routine check-in” with the federal agency, according to the petition.

“In the interest of dispelling our strong suspicion that the government just deported a US citizen with no meaningful process,” U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty ordered a hearing on May 16 in Monroe, Louisiana.

The judge added, “It is illegal and unconstitutional to deport, detain for deportation, or recommend deportation of a U.S. citizen,” citing a 2012 deportation case.

Doughty, chief judge in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana, was appointed by President Donald Trump in 2017.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement did not immediately respond to requests for comment Saturday.

“The parent made the decision to take the child with them to Honduras. It is common that parents want to be removed with their children,” assistant secretary Tricia McLaughlin said in a statement provided by the Department of Homeland Security.

The federal government, Doughty said, “contends this is all okay because the mother wishes that the child be deported with her … But the court doesn’t know that.”

In his April 25 order, Doughty said he tried to reach the 2-year-old’s mother over the phone, to determine whether she wanted her child deported with her, as the government contended, but was told by government attorneys that wouldn’t be possible because the mother had just been released in Honduras.

Father sought custody

After the father of the 2-year old learned Tuesday that his family was detained, his lawyer called immigration officials to inform them that child, a girl identified by the initials V.M.L ,is a U.S. citizen and could not be deported, according to court documents. The father of V.M.L., who lives in the U.S., asked that the girl be placed with a custodian who is “ready and willing” to care for her in the U.S..

According to the court filing, when the father reached out to an Immigration and Customs and Enforcement official, he was told that he could try to pick up V.M.L but that he would also be taken into custody.

On Thursday, an attorney for a family friend, who had been given temporary provisional custody of the child, filed for a temporary restraining order, requesting the immediate release of the 2-year-old, saying she was suffering irreparable harm by being detained.

Before Doughty could consider the petition and restraining order request, V.M.L. was deported along with her mother and sister Friday morning.

Government lawyers said in a court filing that the child’s mother has legal custody of the child and that she indicated in writing that she wanted to take her daughter to Honduras.

The letter, in Spanish and dated at 6:23 p.m. Thursday, reads, “I will take my daughter … with me to Honduras.”

Doughty noted in his order for a May hearing that V.M.L. and her mother were still in the air and in U.S. custody when he asked to speak with the mother. The government responded an hour later that the mother had been released in Honduras, the filing states.

ACLU responds

On Friday, the American Civil Liberties Union issued a statement stating that not only was the 2-year-old U.S. citizen deported, but that the New Orleans Immigration and Customs Enforcement Field Office deported two other children who are U.S. citizens aged 4 and 7 that day.

The ACLU said that the 2-year old and two other U.S. citizen children in a separate case, were deported from the U.S. “under deeply troubling circumstances that raise serious due process concerns.”

The second family, who was detained Thursday and deported Friday, included a child suffering from a rare form of metastatic cancer who “was deported without medication or the ability to consult with their treating physicians–despite ICE being notified in advance of the child’s urgent medical needs,” according to the ACLU.



Source link

Melania Trump wears black veil

0


play

First Lady Melania Trump, whose fashion is often thought to reflect her mood, wore a black lace veil to the funeral of Pope Francis.

The former fashion model, the first practicing Catholic to serve as first lady since Jacqueline Kennedy, attended the April 26 service in a double breasted coat dress paired with a traditional veil, gloves and black stilettos.

President Donald Trump, who attended alongside the Slovenian-born first lady, donned a signature blue suit.

The first lady’s outfit harkens back to the dress and veil she wore to the Vatican during her husband’s first trip abroad as president in 2017, when she described meeting Pope Francis as an experience she would “never forget.” Kennedy also wore a black dress and black lace mantilla when meeting Pope John XXIII in 1962.

Mantillas, also known as chapel veils, are customary among some Catholic women who typically wear the traditional headpieces to Catholic Mass.

“Today’s visit with His Holiness Pope Francis @Pontifex is one I’ll never forget,” she wrote in an X post at the time. “I was humbled by the honor. Blessings to all.”

The president and first lady were among hundreds of thousands of mourners and dozens of world leaders and dignitaries that packed St. Peter’s Square at the Vatican for the funeral. Saturday also was Melania Trump’s 55th birthday.

The Trumps were seated in the front row for the service and the president’s midnight blue suit stood in contrast to the waves of black. Former President Joe Biden and wife Jill Biden were seated a few rows behind their successors.

After the Mass, Francis’ coffin was placed on an open-air popemobile and transported to the burial site outside the Vatican by a motorcade that traversed the streets of Rome, lined by cheering crowds.

Melania Trump has courted controversy, garnered attention for her fashion

Trump’s fashion choices are the subject of fierce controversy and constant attention. Earlier this year, she emerged on Jan. 21 for her husband’s second inauguration ceremony in an outfit that evoked a somber, modest mood.

She often surprises fashion onlookers with both her bargain buys and luxurious looks but her low-key black dress, and a matching wide brim hat, at the swearing-in was a stark departure from the Jacqueline Kennedy-inspired powder blue dress that she wore for her husband’s first inauguration in 2017.

In a move that ignited an outcry from critics in 2018, she sported a short trench coat with “I REALLY DON’T CARE, DO U?” scrawled on the back was worn during a trip to visit a migrant children’s shelter in Texas.

The message, written in white letters on the back of a military-green jacket, was identified as a $39 item sold by Zara.

The fashion moment, considered by some to be a major faux pas, came amid fierce criticism of the first Trump administration’s approach to immigration in America. At the time, then-Trump spokeswoman turned critic Stephanie Grisham slammed media attention of the jacket.

“It’s a jacket. There was no hidden message. After today’s important visit to Texas, I hope the media isn’t going to choose to focus on her wardrobe,” Grisham said. The president took to Twitter, known now as X, with a message of his own: “‘I REALLY DON’T CARE, DO U?’ written on the back of Melania’s jacket, refers to the Fake News Media. Melania has learned how dishonest they are, and she truly no longer cares!”

Contributing: Sam Woodward, Kinsey Crowley, Maria Puente, Susan Miller, Kim Hjelmgaard and Jeanine Santucci, USA TODAY



Source link

Dagestan: Why this region of Russia produces so many MMA champions

0




CNN
 — 

Ibragim Ibragimov’s latest victory over Kenny Mokhonoana kept alive his unbeaten start to professional MMA fighting and his status as one of the most exciting prospects in the sport. But in the hours after the win, the 20-year-old was quick to praise all the help he received in his preparations.

Ibragimov posted a photo on his Instagram of his training staff in Dubai, a group which included two of the greatest MMA fighters ever in Khabib Nurmagomedov and Islam Makhachev.

Perhaps it is no surprise that Ibragimov has had such success – he is 9-0 in his blossoming career with his sights set on the top – when he has such legends in his corner.

Ibragimov is the latest in the production line of mixed martial arts talent to come out of Dagestan, Russia, with Nurmagomedov and Makhachev acting as figureheads and role models for the new generation.

For a region with a population of just over three million – smaller than Los Angeles – it has become renowned for churning out top-level fighting talent, famous for their wrestling abilities and never-say-die attitude.

Ibragimov – who fights in the Professional Fighters League (PFL) – is part of the most recent generation of Dagestani fighters who are taking over the sport, and he says that for he and compatriots, fighting is a way of life, not just a profession.

“In Dagestan, guys really want to be fighters. In the whole of Europe, there’s not many guys who really want to be fighters,” Ibragimov told CNN Sports. “They just pretended like they are fighters. They want to be like fighters. They want to be like someone.

“But in Dagestan, there’s so many guys that really want to be fighters. Not all (European fighters). I’m not speaking for all of them, but I’d say like 30% or 50% of the guys, they don’t really want to be there. They just go in there for a hype and stuff like that, for Instagram.”

Ibragimov (top) is seen as the next exciting MMA prospect to come out of Dagestan.

While fighting might be a walk of life for some, it’s more than that for many Dagestanis.

Michael Lyubimov, a famed MMA coach who has worked with many Dagestani fighters including Nurmagomedov, explained that when he often first encounters athletes from the Russian republic upon their arrival in the US, they are already vastly experienced.

Lyubimov – who is general manager of the Jackson Wink MMA Academy in New Mexico, renowned for its production of MMA talent – says that many young Russians take up fighting out of “despair from a young age.”

“Back where they come from, there’s absolutely nothing. A lot of these guys that come here, I mean, they fought since they’re like six years of age,” Lyubimov – who was born in Moscow before moving to the US as a youngster – told CNN.

“By the time they get to the UFC or obtaining these big promotions or come to America, they have over 200 fights and stuff.”

He added: “There’s no other option. There are cauliflower ears everywhere. It’s just who they are. It’s in the culture, engraved in them.”

Lyubimov also highlights the faith of the fighters from the region as a reason for their success, with many of them practicing Muslims. That means they often don’t drink or party and choose instead to focus on their craft.

The combination of those factors breeds a relentlessness in Dagestani fighters, according to Lyubimov. He recounts an athlete once telling him that he “will die in there before anything happens.”

Many fighters from the region will put their bodies through significant hardship to sign with big-money promotions, often waiting until they’ve inked deals before undergoing the necessary treatment to heal their ailments.

Nurmagomedov (left) and McGregor (right) had a rivalry which came to define an era in the UFC.

Lyubimov highlights to CNN Sports the journey of Ismail Israilov, from neighboring Chechnya, who recently won a fight after dislocating his shoulder in the first round. Before coming to the US, Israilov had been in a truck accident in which he almost lost his hand and, at the age of 24, has over 200 street fights to his name.

When Lyubimov asked Israilov what his upbringing was like back in Russia, the Chechen detailed how he came to have the resilience he now displays in the octagon.

“‘My whole life was like, you have a piece of bread in your backpack, and you drive for like an hour and a half to wrestling practice, and sometimes you can’t make it because it’s so far away or whatever, so we’d just fight on the street and practice on the pavement,’” Lyubimov recounts Israilov saying.

“‘We live in the middle of nowhere in the mountains. You look one way and there’s nothing there, you look the other way and there’s nothing there. All we have left is to fight.’”

During his time as part of Nurmagomedov’s coaching team, Lyubimov spent plenty of hours in the gym with the former UFC great, in both the US and his native Dagestan.

Compared to the current commercial gyms he works in now, the centers in Dagestan are vastly different environments with their hyper-focus on discipline, says Lyubimov.

“In Dagestan, gyms are government funded or recreational where people can come in. A lot of it is somewhat free, to a certain extent, until, of course, they make it to the big level where they start paying coaches and they’re like at a higher level, professional level,” he said.

“But at the beginning level, most of it is free. That’s why if you see Khabib when he walks into the room, or when Abdulmanap (Nurmagomedov’s father) would walk in into the room, all the fighters get up, they line up, they bow down, they’re quiet, they don’t talk, they’re always on time, they don’t talk back to elders, they have absolute major respect.

“If you show disrespect to an elderly person or coach or whoever, your peers will put you in place and you can literally get slapped like by a coach and you will be quiet about it and you stand there and take the criticism and them yelling at you if you’re being a dumbass.”

Makhachev is considered by many to be the best pound-for-pound fighter in the UFC at the moment.

That rugged upbringing builds character and toughness. For Lyubimov, this sets the perfect platform from which to build a career.

When Lyubimov starts working with Dagestani fighters, it is often a case of refining their skills rather than adding more to their repertoire.

“Obviously America is Mecca for making the name for yourself, right?” he explains. “The lights are much brighter when they hit the American promotions. So, it’s just about teaching the composure, keeping emotions under check, and refining the skills.

“It’s teaching them how to adapt and how to just refine their skills in general, just making better fighters, understand the game better, understand the rules better, understand what to expect better, get them to deal with medicals, with fight preparations, with weight cutting. The diet, the weight cuts, everything because they do it one way over there. They come here, then they have to kind of relearn, or learn new things.”

The golden example of having to adjust to the American system was Nurmagomedov, who arrived in the US as a little-known prospect and blossomed into the biggest name in the sport.

His rise to prominence in the UFC was the jumping-off point for Dagestani dominance across the Western MMA scene.

Between his grappling skills, undefeated record and his customary wearing of Dagestan’s traditional papakha headpiece in the ring, Nurmagomedov became the hottest topic in the UFC despite not getting involved in the war of words which often previews fights or helps build rivalries between competitors.

His popularity grew to a previously unseen level through his rivalry with Conor McGregor, and then he retired a few years later. Lyubimov, who helped train Nurmagomedov during his heyday, said that the fighter understood that he needed to engage in sparring matches to continue to build his profile.

Since retiring in 2020, Nurmagomedov has transitioned into a mentor for the next generation of Dagestani fighters. He has had a hands-on effect on the burgeoning career of Makhachev, who is the No. 1 ranked pound-for-pound fighter at the moment and the current UFC lightweight world champion.

Elsewhere in the UFC, another Dagestani – Magomed Ankalaev – became UFC light heavyweight champion in March, while there are other world champions in MMA competitions around the world from the Russian region.

Ankalaev (center) is the latest Dagestani to become a UFC world champion after defeating Alex Pereira at UFC 313 in their light heavyweight title bout in March.

Before his most recent fight in January, Ibragimov trained with Nurmagomedov and Makhachev in Dubai and says the experience in the gym with two of MMA’s luminaries and his Dagestani “brothers” was formative for his burgeoning career.

“When you train in Khabib’s gym, and then, especially when he’s in there controlling you, there’s no limits,” he told CNN Sports. “It’s like sometimes he doesn’t even set the timer for training. And then we just train non-stop. We just roll nonstop, until he says stop.”

Ibragimov explained that a young Dagestani’s MMA journey is made that much easier because the previous generation has already walked that path and is around to give advice where needed. “They already showed us the road that we have to follow,” he said.

Ibragimov – who moved to Manchester, England, as a youngster and has siblings who are part of the Manchester United academy – has a long journey ahead of him in his MMA career. But in Nurmagomedov, Makhachev and other Dagestani fighters, he’s got the perfect role models showing him the way to the top.





Source link

Fossil footprints describe a day in the life of a 50 million-year-old shorebird

0


Sign up for CNN’s Wonder Theory science newsletter. Explore the universe with news on fascinating discoveries, scientific advancements and more.



CNN
 — 

About 50 million years ago, a small bird waded along a lakeshore in what today is central Oregon. A worm wriggled at its feet. The bird appeared to probe the silty earth with its beak, once, twice, three times, looking for food. On the fourth try, the bird may have found something. Or perhaps it missed again and moved on.

This glimpse into prehistory is possible thanks to two tiny fossil footprints and the dogged work of an undergraduate intern at John Day Fossil Beds National Monument with a particular interest in ancient tracks, known as trace fossils.

“Trace fossils definitely do tell stories,” said Conner Bennett, lead author of a study describing the find and three others that was published in February in the journal Palaeontologia Electronica. “We don’t have the body of this bird. It’s more just like we’re left with its actions, its behaviors. It’s like trying to study ghosts.”

Two small bird footprints found within 50 million-year-old lakebed sediments suggest the feeding behavior of a shorebird foraging for worms in shallow water, according to the study.

Trace fossils can fill in gaps in the fossil record, said Dr. Anthony Martin, professor of practice in the department of environmental sciences at Emory University in Atlanta. “This paper has tracks that are definitely from a bird of some sort, and then tracks that are definitely from a lizard,” said Martin, who researches modern and fossil traces and was not involved in the research. “So those are showing that those animals actually were there, even though there’s not a single bone or feather or any other bodily evidence of those two types of animals being there.”

The science of trace fossils isn’t as “sexy” as studying bones, teeth and other physical remains, Bennett said. Fossilized tracks don’t get as much attention. That’s part of the reason he got the chance to undertake this research in the first place. Bennett, now a graduate student in the department of Earth, environmental and planetary sciences at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, applied for a summer internship at John Day in 2022. The national monument holds a rich paleontological record from the Eocene Epoch — part of the age of mammals — which lasted from about 56 million to 34 million years ago.

Bennett combed through the park’s online catalog of finds and came across several animal track impressions that had been found decades ago but never studied. He’d previously worked with 3D modeling software to describe dinosaur tracks and endeavored to give the unidentified animal tracks the same treatment.

The analysis could help researchers form a better understanding of the prehistoric ecosystems of Oregon. Bennett said he hopes his findings will inspire other researchers to look for trace clues they may have previously overlooked. “I’m sure it’s going to happen soon where people are like, ‘Oh, it’s really interesting to learn about fossil tracks. Let’s pull this stuff out of our archives and start looking at it.”

Blue-green claystones add color to the Flood of Fire Trail at the John Day Fossil Beds National Monument.

While interning at John Day, Bennett took hundreds of overlapping photos of four sets of fossilized tracks, each only centimeters in size. He fed the pictures into the modeling software, which created 3D representations that could be blown up, zoomed in on and scrutinized in greater detail than the fossils.

In one, there were tracks that reminded him of a small shorebird, such as a plover. There aren’t bird fossils in John Day, he explained — the bones are fragile and hollow and don’t hold up well. But it would make sense that there would be such birds near the lake that once covered the area where the tracks were excavated.

There were also small, round indentations near the tracks. At first, Bennett and study coauthor Dr. Nicholas A. Famoso — the head paleontologist and museum curator at John Day — thought they could be caused by raindrops, which can leave impressions in the fine grains of shale and clay the tracks were found in. But there are usually many raindrop impressions, and here there were only a few, and only near the footprints. The researchers wondered whether the bird had made them with its beak. Bennett went online and quickly turned up a video of modern plovers pecking into the ground, hunting for food. The connection seemed clear to the research team.

Not only did the trace fossil confirm the previously unproved existence of birds in the area tens of millions of years ago, but it also could paint a picture of how the birds foraged in the shallow water — much the way they do today. And to complete the picture, the fossil contained evidence of what the bird was feeding on or trying to feed on: the squiggly trail of a worm on the move. “We can track a feeding behavior over 50 million years. That’s pretty cool,” Bennett said.

Dr. Danielle Fraser, head of paleobiology at the Canadian Museum of Nature in Ottawa, who was not involved in this study, expressed a similar sentiment. “This is a really cool example of a behavior that would otherwise not be apparent,” she said.

Martin suggested an alternative interpretation: that the divots could have been made by water droplets falling off the bird’s body as it came out of the water. “I’ve seen that a lot on the Georgia coast,” he noted.

A separate specimen showed three footprints made up of five thin, splayed digits and clawlike impressions, suggesting some small lizard once darted along the lakeshore. There were even marks showing where the lizard dragged its feet. The researchers found this exciting because there are few examples of tracks from small lizards in North America in this period, and no body fossils have been unearthed at John Day.

“Too few paleontologists are trained in the recognition and interpretation of trace fossils and so a lot of this information is overlooked,” said study coauthor Dr. Daniel I. Hembree, professor and director of undergraduate geology studies in the University of Tennessee department where Bennett is studying.

The traces are the only evidence of small lizards’ existence at John Day during the Eocene.

“The fossils of the bird and lizard are the first evidence of those groups of animals from that period of time in our fossil record,” Famoso said. They “help to paint a more complete picture of what life was like” during the Eocene.

Bennett also analyzed two other trace fossils — from mammals from a more recent time period. One showed prints of a three-toed ungulate, possibly a rhinoceros or ancient tapir. The other: the 29 million-year-old tracks from what the researchers believe to be some sort of saber-toothed cat.

The absence of claw marks suggested that the animal’s claws were retractable, like those of modern cats. And the gait appears similar, too, Martin said. The way the rear paw print only partially overlaps the front means the animal may have been walking at a normal pace. “This is the kind of understep gait that I see in my cats at home,” he said. “I get kind of excited when I see something that looks so familiar.”

Famoso noted that both sets of prints were found in an ash layer, which means the animals walked across an ash-laden landscape after a volcanic eruption.

“Sometimes fossils are stored in collections until new technologies or methods are developed that can better study them,” he added. “These fossils were collected and added to collections between 1979 and 1987, but it took until 2022 for us to get a good study out to describe the specimens.”

Amanda Schupak is a science and health journalist in New York City.



Source link

Live updates: Funeral of Pope Francis, interred at Santa Maria Maggiore

0


Faithful attend Pope Francis' funeral ceremony at St Peter's Square in the Vatican.

More than 250,000 worshipers, religious and political figures lined St. Peter’s Square, in the Vatican, on Saturday to pay their respects to the late Pope Francis, who died earlier this week at the age of 88.

The service started at St. Peter’s Basilica shortly after 10 a.m. local time (4 a.m. ET), lasting just over two hours.

Cardinal Giovanni Battista Re, one of the most senior figures in the Catholic Church, led the simplified ceremony, in a series of rituals of religious hymns, an emotional homily and a final farewell to the pope, who was the first Latin American pontiff.

Francis’ modest coffin was then transported in the white popemobile over the River Tiber to be entombed in Rome’s Basilica di Santa Maria Maggiore – an illuminated basilica that sits atop the highest point in the Italian capital.

Here’s how the day unfolded:

Mourners and world leaders assemble: The pope’s funeral saw one of the largest gatherings of world leaders in recent years. A total of 130 delegations, including presidents and reigning monarchs, were in attendance. Argentine President Javier Milei, Britain’s Prince William, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, US President Donald Trump and Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky were among the most high-profile guests.

Trump and Zelensky summit: The US and Ukrainian leaders met minutes before the funeral began Saturday, speaking face-to-face on two chairs that had been set up inside the St. Peter’s Basilica. A White House spokesman accompanying Trump said that the two leaders “had a very productive discussion.” A spokesman for Zelensky said the meeting lasted for about 15 minutes, and the leaders agreed to continue talks. The Ukrainian leader also held sideline meetings with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron.

High security: Authorities in Rome ramped up security measures ahead of the service, deploying more than 2,000 police officers, sharpshooters and specialist forces. A further 400 traffic officers were on shift, the city’s police department told CNN.

‘Pope among the people:’ The 91-year-old Re eulogized the late pontiff’s “deeply sensitive” leadership, in a poignant sermon read out on the footsteps of St. Peter’s Basilica. “Faced with the raging wars of recent years, with their inhuman horrors and countless deaths and destruction, Pope Francis incessantly raised his voice imploring peace,” said Re. The late pontiff insistently advocated for communities in war-ravaged regions until his final days, including in Gaza, Ukraine, Sudan and South Sudan.

Young worshipers pay respects: An array of mourners, including streams of young people and pilgrims from Indonesia, the US, the Philippines and France, pitched up at St. Peter’s Square overnight – a testament to Pope Francis’ wide appeal. Some of his most liberal supporters believe he was not reformist enough, but others say he has carved a progressive legacy in his wake, having transformed the Catholic Church for its 1.4 billion followers.



Source link

Apple ‘aims to source all US iPhones from India’, reducing reliance on China | Apple

0


Apple is reportedly planning to switch assembly of all iPhones for the US market to India as the company seeks to reduce its reliance on a Chinese manufacturing base amid Donald Trump’s trade war.

The $3tn (£2.3tn) technology company aims to make the shift as soon as next year, the Financial Times reported.

Apple has been swept up in Trump’s aggressive tariff policies, with the iPhone maker at one point among the biggest stock market casualties because of the prospect of its Chinese-made products being hit with a hefty import tax when they reach the US.

However, the blow was softened by a White House decision to exclude smartphones from the heaviest Chinese tariffs, although Apple is still exposed to a 20% levy on all Chinese goods as part of the US president’s response to China’s role in producing Fentanyl.

The complex manufacturing process behind iPhones involves more than 1,000 components sourced from all over the world – albeit they are largely put together in China. Apple is secretive about details of its production processes but analysts estimate that about 90% of its iPhones are assembled in the country.

According to the FT, Apple plans to source from India the more than 60m iPhones sold in the US annually by the end of 2026 – a commitment that would require more than doubling iPhone assembly in India.

Apple has already been ramping up production in India and diverting iPhones assembled in the country to the US. The company’s main Indian suppliers, Foxconn and Tata, shipped almost $2bn worth of handsets to their largest market in March as Apple sought to offset the impact of looming tariffs.

It also chartered cargo flights to ferry 600 tonnes of iPhones – or as many as 1.5m devices – to the US to ensure sufficient inventory in an important market. Apple has three plants in India and last month temporarily extended operations to Sunday working at the biggest Foxconn India factory in Chennai.

More than 5o% of Apple’s Mac products and 80% of its iPads are assembled in China as well, according to US investment bank Evercore. Apple watches are largely built in Vietnam.

Analysts do not expect Apple to move iPhone production to the US, despite the White House insisting that the manufacturing of an American tech product will ultimately return home. The US president’s press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, told reporters that Apple’s recent announcement of a $500bn investment indicated a US-made iPhone was possible.

“If Apple didn’t think the US could do it, they probably wouldn’t have put up that big chunk of change,” she said.

However, experts have played down the prospect. Wedbush Securities, a US financial firm, said the cost of an American-made iPhone would more than treble if production was shifted to the US.

skip past newsletter promotion

“If consumers want a $3,500 iPhone we should make them in New Jersey or Texas or another state,” the Wedbush analyst Dan Ives said.

Fraser Johnson, a professor at Ivey business school in Canada and an Apple supply chain expert, said last month that the US economy did not have the facilities or the flexible labour to assemble iPhones.

“To train 200,000-300,000 people to come in and assemble iPhones is simply not practical,” he said.

Apple has been approached for comment.



Source link

Norway launches scheme to lure top researchers away from US universities | Academics

0


Norway has launched a new scheme to lure top international researchers amid growing pressure on academic freedom in the US under the Trump administration.

Following in the footsteps of multiple institutions across Europe, the Research Council of Norway on Wednesday launched a 100m kroner (£7.2m) fund to make it easier to recruit researchers from other countries.

The initiative is open to researchers from around the world, but it was expanded and accelerated after the Trump administration announced substantial cuts last month.

Norway’s announcement comes before a visit to the White House by the Norwegian prime minister, Jonas Gahr Støre, and his finance minister, the former Nato secretary-general Jens Stoltenberg. Subjects on the agenda are expected to include security, defence, Ukraine, tariffs and trade.

The Nordic country’s minister for research and higher education, Sigrun Aasland, said: “It is important for Norway to be proactive in a demanding situation for academic freedom. We can make a difference for outstanding researchers and important knowledge, and we want to do that as quickly as possible.”

Aasland added: “Academic freedom is under pressure in the US, and it is an unpredictable position for many researchers in what has been the world’s leading knowledge nation for many decades.”

The research council said it would put out a call for proposals next month including in the areas of climate, health, energy and artificial intelligence.

The scheme is planned to take place over several years, with 100m kroner set aside for 2026.

Mari Sundli Tveit, the chief executive of the research council, told broadcaster NRK: “This is particularly relevant to the situation in the US. Academic freedom is under pressure and funding is being cut.”

Other countries to take similar action include France, where nearly 300 academics have applied to Aix-Marseille University after it offered to take US-based researchers, and the former French president François Hollande called for the creation of a “scientific refugee” status for compromised academics.

The Belgian university Vrije Universiteit Brussel has also opened up new postdoctoral positions targeted at Americans, and the Netherlands has said it plans to launch a fund to attract researchers there.



Source link

Shedeur Sanders’ NFL draft slide seems deeper than pure football

0


play

Editor’s note: Follow 2025 NFL Draft live updates, grades and analysis.

Legendary.

There’s a new twist to that theme with Shedeur Sanders. After his precipitous slide out of the first round on Thursday night, the most polarizing player in the NFL Draft suddenly has another whole package of drama attached to his compelling storyline.

So, nobody thought the Colorado quarterback and high-profiled son of Hall of Famer Deion Sanders, was worth a first-round pick?

As Shedeur himself put it in addressing the partygoers who came to help celebrate his big draft moment at the bash staged at his father’s ranch in Texas, this statement about his draft stock has added some fuel to the fire.

“Under no circumstance, we all know this shouldn’t have happened,” Sanders said at the end of an event that morphed from festive to somber.

Was that the reaction of someone entitled? Or just the truth?

Given all of the negativity heaped on Sanders in the weeks leading up to the draft – including shots from anonymous sources who attacked him as arrogant and entitled — I’m having a hard time shaking the feeling that the snub went beyond football.

Sure, nitpicking is allowed – and expected as part of the due diligence of talent evaluations – when it comes to breaking down prospects. But in Sanders’ case, even if his correctable flaw of holding onto the football too long can be fixed (like flaws that can be found with any given prospect), it strikes me as a culture pick, too. Or non-pick.

Shedeur is flashy, for sure. Like father, like son, in that regard.

If that’s what tipped the scales for some teams – and especially the New York Giants – then shame on them.       

Sanders was one of the most productive quarterbacks on the college landscape last season, passing for more than 4,000 yards with 37 touchdowns and an NCAA-leading 74% completion rate. He plays a premium position. And the NFL, with some teams searching for their franchise anchors for decades, seemingly never can have enough quarterbacks. You’d think that would been enough to at least get him in the first round.

If you wonder how Sanders, as the face of a franchise, would represent himself – and the franchise – in the face of adversity and the intense spotlight, then consider the level-headed maturity he demonstrated on Thursday night as his draft bash fizzled.

He didn’t hide and run for cover. No, Sanders assured his supporters that he would embrace whatever the coming days present. Sure, he had to be embarrassed. Yet it was an undeniable stand-up moment that provided another example of what his father said about his youngest son being built for dealing with adversity.

Still, it’s fascinating that there wasn’t a single team inspired enough to make an aggressive move for him as his stock tumbled during the first round.

The Giants did exactly that, but not for Sanders. The G-Men, who drafted Penn State edge rusher Abdul Carter with the third pick overall, traded back into the first round to select former Ole Miss quarterback Jaxson Dart with the 25th pick.

And the Giants also made a significant offer to the Tennessee Titans, presumably in the days before the draft, to secure the top pick overall, to use on former Miami quarterback Cam Ward.

Remember this. The Giants could have had Sanders, but instead preferred Dart.

Maybe Dart will turn out to be the next Phil Simms or Eli Manning for a franchise that only a few years ago rolled out the red carpet for since-discarded Daniel Jones. It’s also possible that in a league with a 50-50 hit-or-miss rate for first-round quarterbacks, the Giants may have overplayed their hand.

This, of course, is what makes the draft so compelling – especially in the ensuing years as the decisions play out on the field. Re-drafts, 20/20 hindsight and man-to-man comparisons will allow the draft analysis to flow on for years to come.

In Sanders’ case, though, it feels weird. And not only because the Giants passed on him. Other QB-needy teams, like the Cleveland Browns and New Orleans Saints, also were moved enough on Sanders to deal back into the first round to get him.

And the Pittsburgh Steelers, who ended Thursday night without owning a second-round pick, passed on Sanders at the 21st slot and opted for former Oregon defensive lineman Derrick Harmon. If the Steelers stand pat with their lineup of picks, they won’t have another selection until the latter half of the third round, 83rd overall.

Of course, there are all sorts of possibilities for how this unfolds from here. The options surely include teams that wouldn’t project Sanders as an immediate starter, but a viable possibility in time. The Las Vegas Raiders and Los Angeles Rams, with veteran QBs in tow, would be two teams worth watching.

Then again, the most important thing is that Sanders lands with a team that will afford him an opportunity to ultimately prove himself.

There’s no need to fret it now. Sanders can take the first-round setback and use it as a huge chip on his shoulder. Remember, Lamar Jackson, two-time NFL MVP, launched his NFL career as the fifth quarterback drafted – and final pick in the first round. Tom Brady was a sixth-round pick who went on to win seven Super Bowls. Dak Prescott was a fourth-round pick who is now the NFL’s highest-paid player.

In other words, Sanders’ NFL journey is hardly doomed because he didn’t get picked in the first round. As you’ve heard before, it’s not how you start…

And for Sanders, he’s had to pay quite a tax for his mission to become a legend.

All the NFL news on and off the field. Sign up for USA TODAY’s 4th and Monday newsletter.



Source link

He was the first player ever to be drafted in the NFL, but he never played a professional game

0




CNN
 — 

The NFL draft is broadcast live on television every year as millions tune in and hundreds of thousands more attend in person to revel in the hoopla of it all.

It’s a far cry from the event’s humble beginnings, when the player picked first didn’t even know it was happening and soon walked away from the game without ever earning a cent.

There are no tackles or touchdowns, but the draft has become one of the biggest sports events of the year, because the fans know that a three-day event in April could impact the fortunes of their teams for years to come. Two-hundred-fifty-seven players will be drafted this week in Green Bay, Wisconsin, and anyone chosen in the first round – which begins at 8 p.m. ET on Thursday – will be set for life with guaranteed multi-million-dollar contracts. It was all very different in the first year of the draft back in 1936 when just 81 players were selected through nine rounds in the inaugural draft.

There was little doubt that University of Chicago halfback Jay Berwanger would go first that year. At 6-foot tall and 195 pounds, the standout player of his class had just received the first ever Heisman Trophy and been named as the Chicago Tribune’s Big 10 player of the year.

In this 1934 file photo, University of Chicago halfback Jay Berwanger is shown in the stiff-arm pose. The Heisman trophy, while not modeled after Berwanger directly, made the stiff-arm pose famous.

“He played offense, defense and special teams for Chicago,” explained Landon Bundy, the school’s director of sports information and promotions, to CNN. “He pretty much never came off the field and he played every single position there was on defense.”

Bundy said that Berwanger was also the team’s kicker, so he’d often score a touchdown and then kick the extra point himself.

“In his Heisman Trophy campaign, it looks like he passed for 405 yards and ran for 577 yards,” Bundy said. “He was the kickoff returner, and he scored six touchdowns, kicking five of the extra points. Basically, he did it all.”

“You can say anything superlative about him and I’ll double it,” said his coach Clark Shaughnessy to the Chicago Tribune in 1935.

Among his many nicknames, Berwanger was known as “The Man in the Iron Mask,” a reference to the faceguard he wore to protect his twice-broken nose. For more reasons than one, he was hard to forget – the Chicago Tribune polled all the opposing players in Berwanger’s senior season and 104 of the 107 participants concluded that he was the best halfback they’d ever seen.

Even Gerald Ford, a future president who won back-to-back national championships with Michigan, would attest to Berwanger’s brilliance and he carried a permanent scar under his left eye to prove it.

Jay Berwanger high in the air as he returned the opening kickoff to the Chicago 31-yard line at the start of the game between the Maroons and Wisconsin at Chicago.

The New York Times quoted Ford in 2002, “When I tackled Jay one time, his heel hit my cheekbone and opened it up three inches,” he said. Ford has described Berwanger as “one of the greatest athletes I’ve known.”

In November 1935, the Downtown Athletic Club in New York recognized Berwanger’s impact on the college game by making him the inaugural recipient of a new trophy given to the “most valuable player east of the Mississippi.” The following year it was renamed after club’s late athletic director, John Heisman.

On hearing news of his accolade via a telegram, Berwanger didn’t quite know what to make of it. Speaking about the honor a half-century later he said that it wasn’t really a big deal at the time.

“No one at school said anything to me about winning it other than a few congratulations. I was more excited about the trip (to New York) than the trophy because it was my first flight,” he said.

Indeed, Berwanger didn’t have much use for the trophy once it was in his possession, which was described as being too wide for a mantlepiece and too large for a coffee table. According to the UChicago magazine, the stiff arm of the player depicted in the trophy spent many years propping the door open at his Aunt Gussie’s house.

Three months later, the NFL held its first formalized draft and it was much different than the razzmatazz of the modern day. The Hartford Courant described it as “no gala, more like a penny-ante poker game. Nine cigar-puffing, mogul wannabees, some of whom were paying their players with IOUs, stubbornly trying to salvage their dream of professional football.”

Berwanger told the Courant in 1994 that he was oblivious to the draft at the Ritz-Carlton Hotel in Philadelphia.

“I found out I was drafted by reading it in the newspaper,” he said, “I didn’t even know the draft was going on.”

Philadelphia Eagles owner Bert Bell had persuaded his peers to formalize a draft in order to cease the expensive and “self-defeating” bidding wars for college players and he’d proposed that teams should choose players in reverse order from the previous season’s standings. That meant the worst team, Bell’s own 2-9 Eagles, went first and chose Berwanger, quickly dealing his rights to the Chicago Bears. The Eagles didn’t think they’d be able to afford Berwanger’s salary demands, and the Bears owner and coach George Halas soon realized he didn’t have enough money, either.

According to the Courant, the two met in the lobby of a downtown hotel in Chicago.

“He asked what I wanted,” Berwanger recalled, “and I had my tongue in my cheek. I told him, $25,000 for two years. He looked at my date and said, `Nice to have met you; have a nice time tonight.’ And that was the end of it.”

As Brian E Cooper, author of “First Heisman: The Life of Jay Berwanger” described it to UChicago Magazine, the player had made the Bears an offer they simply couldn’t accept.

“Jay basically signaled to Halas, by making an extremely high salary ‘demand,’ that he wasn’t really that interested in pro football,” Cooper said.

In his obituary in 2002, the Los Angeles Times quoted Berwanger, who had said, “There was no money in pro football then, that was during the Great Depression. I thought I’d have a better future by using my education rather than my football skills.”

Having snubbed a career as a professional football player, Berwanger considered competing in the decathlon at the Berlin Olympics that summer, but he chose instead to finish his studies, and he went to work as a foam rubber-salesman. In World War Two, he rose to the rank of lieutenant commander as a Navy flight instructor, and after the war he founded a company that made plastic and sponge-rubber strips for cars and farm machinery. According to the New York Times, Jay Berwanger Inc. was grossing $30 million a year when he sold it in 1992.

Jay Berwanger poses at his office in Chicago on Dec. 13, 1972.

Berwanger isn’t the only player to be drafted first in the NFL and not play a game; tragically, the Heisman Trophy’s first black recipient, Ernie Davis, was picked first in 1962 but died of leukemia at the age of 23 and never played for the Cleveland Browns.

And although Berwanger never played in the NFL, his name still carries a unique distinction within a league that would become the most lucrative in all of sport. He was the very first pick in the very first draft, but his timing was just a little off. Before his death at the age of 88 in 2002, Berwanger noted that if he’d been drafted even just a few years later, then he would surely have turned professional. And nobody can deny that he was an original.

“I still think of myself as the first, kind of like being George Washington,” Berwanger once said.



Source link

Disrupted US vaccine meetings could threaten timelines, access and transparency around shots

0




CNN
 — 

Two long-planned vaccine meetings — one at the US Centers for Disease Control and another at the US Food and Drug Administration — have now been disrupted under the watch of US Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., stirring questions about whether seasonal flu shots or other lifesaving vaccines will be delayed or harder to access.

The February meeting of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, or ACIP, was postponed “to accommodate public comment,” according to a note online. The three-day meeting, which had been scheduled for this week, was to review the safety and effectiveness of vaccines for meningococcal disease, which is seeing a resurgence, as well as RSV, flu, chikungunya and mpox. It also included two votes related to Vaccines for Children, the government program that buys and distributes vaccines to state and local health departments for children whose families wouldn’t otherwise be able to pay for them.

ACIP typically meets three times a year, in February, June and October. There’s no word on whether or when the February meeting will be rescheduled and it’s unclear whether the delay will hinder access to shots.

On Wednesday, the FDA canceled a March 13 meeting of its Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee, which was to discuss the recipe manufacturers must follow to make this fall’s flu shots. No explanation was given for the cancellation.

In a statement to CNN on Thursday, the FDA said it would still weigh in on the makeup of flu shots but didn’t indicate whether it would seek its advisers’ guidance or allow for the public discussion and debate that usually occurs.

“The FDA will make public its recommendations to manufacturers in time for updated vaccines to be available for the 2025-2026 influenza season,” the statement said.

The uncertainty around the government’s process for regulating and recommending vaccines comes as the US is in the grips of a brutal flu season and experiencing a resurgence of measles, a vaccine preventable disease. Experts say these infections are increasing because of growing hesitancy to use vaccines, something they fear the new HHS director will only encourage.

Kennedy maintains that he is not anti-vaccine, but he has repeatedly cast doubt on the safety and effectiveness of immunizations and questioned the research and regulations that allow them to be used.

Kennedy, whose financial disclosures show he has made money from law firms that sue vaccine manufacturers, has also impugned some of the experts who advise federal agencies on vaccines. During his confirmation hearings, Kennedy incorrectly stated that 97% of the members of the CDC’s vaccine advisory committee had conflicts of interest. In fact, the panel has strict policies to guard against conflicts, and a screening process for members to ensure they are impartial when they vote.

Members of FDA’s vaccine committee are also subject to strict conflict of interest rules and are required to disclose potential conflicts during meetings.

This week, former CDC Director Dr. Tom Frieden wrote that false claims that ACIP members vote based on their financial ties is among the “most damaging” falsehoods about vaccines.

Frieden said the 97% figure comes from a 2009 report, issued when he was CDC director. He is now president and CEO of the nonprofit Resolve to Save Lives.

It was an audit of lengthy and detailed conflict of interest forms submitted by all experts who served as CDC advisers in 2007. He said 97% had at least one missing response, which could have meant someone forgot to do something as simple as initial a page. He said it is not the same thing as a conflict of interest.

“I really think that this is classic misinformation,” Frieden told CNN.

Frieden also raised alarm about the postponed ACIP meeting, writing in a recent post on LinkedIn, “It’s certain there will be misleading, inaccurate information claiming ACIP members have conflicts of interest. Here’s the plain truth: ACIP, made up of pediatricians, public health specialists, and parents, is the gold standard for open, transparent recommendations on vaccine safety and effectiveness.”

Without either vaccine committee weighing in on vaccine regulation or recommendations, health-care providers worry there will be delays on vaccines or limits on people’s ability to access them.

“Cancelling this meeting means vaccine makers may not have the vital information and time they need to produce and distribute targeted vaccines before the next flu season,” Dr. Tina Tan, president of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, said after the cancellation of the FDA flu shot meeting. “If the FDA meeting is not immediately rescheduled, many lives that could be saved by vaccination will be lost.”

In a February 20 open letter to Kennedy, Acting CDC Director Dr. Susan Monarez and Sen. Bill Cassidy, a doctor and chairman of the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee, a coalition of groups called the Partnership to Fight Infectious Disease pushed for the “prompt rescheduling” of the ACIP meeting.

“Each ACIP meeting holds tremendous weight and relevance. Infectious diseases are constantly evolving opponents; vaccines are among the best tools for constantly adapting and responding to the latest public health threats,” the letter said.

“Making America healthy requires healthy discussion and timely, evidence-based decisions. This meeting should be no different.”

There are several different ways to make flu vaccines, but the most common is to grow the selected candidate viruses in chicken eggs — a painstaking operation that takes months to finish.

For that reason, selection of the strains that will be included in flu vaccines is carefully orchestrated to be sure that manufacturers can deliver their shots to doctor’s offices and pharmacies in time.

In order for flu vaccines to be sold in the US, they must contain strains that are officially selected by the FDA.

That decision typically comes after a meeting of the World Health Organization’s Global Influenza Surveillance and Response System, a network of seven collaborating centers and four essential regulatory labs, which are based in the US, UK, Japan, China, Russia and Australia. Both the CDC and FDA are members, and representatives from both agencies participated in the deliberations which got underway this week, WHO said.

“The US did participate in this meeting,” Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove, WHO’s technical lead for Covid-19, said at a news briefing on Friday.

“I want to be very clear that the US is still contributing. I know that there’s a lot of attention on the US right now, but we are going to continue to emphasize the importance of this global system that’s in place.”

These experts meet twice a year — in the fall and spring — to choose strains for countries in the Southern and Northern Hemispheres.

On Friday, WHO announced the strains that it thinks will most closely match the viruses that will be making people sick next fall. Those picks would swap out the H3N2 component of this years vaccine, which was only a partial match to the circulating viruses, for a new one.

“I think the match is not perfect, but it is a reasonable match, and is still the best preventative we have against infection with influenza,” said Prof. Ian Barr, deputy director at the Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, and a member of GISRS, in a new briefing after the strain selection

The FDA said it will make public its recommendations to vaccine manufacturers in time for updated shots to be available for the 2025-26 flu season.

What typically happens next is that the 17-member FDA vaccine committee would meet and publicly discuss the recommendation, and then make its own endorsement. The agency ultimately makes the final decision, which can differ from its advisers’, although they generally align.

This year, there won’t be an advisory meeting. The FDA said it would still make recommendations to manufacturers but didn’t specify how it would come to a decision or when.

“If there’s no FDA recommended strains, the US manufacturers are kind of stuck,” said Dr. LJ Tan who is chief policy and partnerships officer for nonprofit vaccine advocacy group Immunize.org.

Flu vaccine manufacturers contacted by CNN on Thursday said the missed VRBPAC meeting wouldn’t break their stride.

“Just as every year, we have already begun production for the 2025-2026 flu season in the Northern Hemisphere and will be ready to support final strain selections in time for the season,” wrote Sanofi in a statement to CNN.

GSK also said it will continue to work with FDA on its flu strain recommendation in the US.

But canceling the VRBPAC meeting will deprive Americans of public discussion and debate that happens when these experts meet. It makes the process less transparent, Immunize.org’s Tan said.

“It’s very dangerous to bypass your expert advisory committee,” Tan said.

In his Senate confirmation hearings, Kennedy promised “radical transparency” at HHS.

“Public health agencies should be transparent and if we want Americans to restore trust in the public health agencies, we need transparency,” Kennedy said.

Vaccine advocates say canceling advisory committee meetings undermines that goal.

“You heard what we thought. We disagreed on some things, and for people who are interested, you can see how we arrived at the conclusion that we did,” said Dr. Stanley Perlman, a member of FDA’s VRBPAC who is also a pediatrician and immunologist at the University of Iowa.

Perlman said he was also worried that skipping committee meetings would deprive the public of a window into the government’s vaccine decisions.

“The country is in so much flux right now about what it thinks about vaccines, what it thinks about medical devices, what it thinks about drugs. The more transparency there is, hopefully, the more people who are undecided about things will see where the committee is coming from,” Perlman told CNN’s Meg Tirrell.

Other experts agreed the committees are an important layer of independent review.

“It’s kind of taking experts out of the conversation,” said Dr. William Moss, a pediatrician who directs of the International Vaccine Access Center at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. “Many of these decisions are tricky and nuanced, and having the opportunity for a group of experts who are familiar with these vaccines and familiar with these diseases. You know, have an open discussion is critically important.”

The FDA has not said how it will choose vaccine strains for the fall, but if it follows WHO’s recommendation, it will mean that the US will be relying on data from the organization despite President Donald Trump’s order that the US withdraw its support from WHO and stop sharing information.

“It’s part of the chaos, whether it’s planned or not, or just incompetence,” Moss said.

CNN’s Meg Tirrell contributed to this report.



Source link

Have Shein, Temu prices gone up? Here’s what we found

0


play

Fast fashion fans who forgot to clear their shopping carts may have a higher total waiting if they return to checkout after Friday, April 25.

E-commerce giants Shein and Temu announced in early April that prices would be rising on both platforms in response to changing trade policy between the U.S. and China. In nearly identical notices shared April 16, the competitors explained that, “Due to recent changes in global trade rules and tariffs,” operating expenses had gone up and so would prices.

“To keep offering the products you love without compromising on quality, we will be making price adjustments starting April 25, 2025,” both notices read.

Known for selling clothing and convenience items at cheap prices, both sellers have attracted American shoppers looking to place large orders for remarkably low costs and often free shipping. Between the 145% import tariff currently imposed on China by President Donald Trump and the impending closure of a trade loophole that allowed packages under $800 in value to come into the country for free, those rock-bottom prices may soon begin to rise.

We tracked 15 items across both platforms in the days before the April 25 deadline and after to get a snapshot of what the price changes may look like. Here’s what we found.

Why are Shein and Temu prices going up?

Shein and Temu are Chinese-founded companies. Though Shein has since moved its base to Singapore and Temu has a headquarters in Boston, both still operate and ship items out of China, meaning they will be subject to the 145% import tariff currently levied against the country.

Additionally, a trade loophole called the “de minimis” exemption that previously allowed low-value goods to be shipped to the U.S. duty-free is set to close at midnight on May 1.

Beginning on May 2, carriers (meaning commercial mail agencies like UPS and FedEx) will either have to pay a 120% rate on packages from China valued at under $800 or a $100 package fee. On June 1, that fee will jump from $100 to $200, the White House announced on April 9.

When are Shein and Temu prices going up?

While the de minimis exemption is not being eliminated until May 2, both Shein and Temu released notices on April 16 saying they would be performing “price adjustments” starting April 25.

Though the two companies are competitors, their announcements were nearly identical.

Are Shein and Temu still shipping to the U.S.?

Yes, Shein and Temu are still shipping to the U.S. and other countries. Because of tariffs and the closing de minimis loophole, however, U.S. customers may see higher prices.

How much will Shein and Temu raise their prices?

Neither Shein nor Temu clarified how much they intend to raise prices. When reviewing dozens of items on both sites, USA TODAY found that some prices were over 100% higher, while some were the same or lower than their pre-April 25 tag. The 15 items below are a sampling of what USA TODAY tracked.

Because Temu and Shein serve as a marketplace for third-party sellers, have partnerships with certain manufacturers and make some of their own branded clothing, a clean, uniform increase across all items, categories and sellers is likely not possible.

See price changes on 10 Temu items

Temu has a “Local Warehouse” shopping tab under which you can shop items that ship through nearby distributors. Temu, like Shein, has fulfillment centers and warehouses in different countries, including the U.S., where Chinese sellers and manufacturers send some items in bulk.

Through this practice, Temu can offer faster, cheaper shipping to U.S. customers and, in the case of the new tariffs and duties, avoid foisting additional costs onto customers. This is reflected in the price changes we observed on April 25, which disproportionately impacted non-local inventory.

We chose popular items from housewares as well as men’s, women’s and children’s clothing categories on the “best-selling” pages on Temu.

Locally shipped

Non-local warehouse

See price changes on 5 Shein items

While Shein also has U.S.-based fulfillment centers, it does not specify when shopping where an item is shipped from. When putting items in a shopping cart on April 25, a new message appeared at the top saying, “Tariffs are included in the price you pay. You’ll never have to pay extra at delivery.”

We chose housewares and clothing items from “most popular items” under the “best sellers” category on Shein. The prices of items we reviewed did not appear to change significantly, though it is unclear if this is because the items selected come from shippers closer to the U.S. or our sample did not capture the most impacted products.

Will Shein and Temu prices keep going up?

Both Shein and Temu said in their online statements that they would be making adjustments “starting” on April 25, indicating that price changes will be an ongoing process. However, neither company responded to USA TODAY’s request for clarification.

Trump said in late April that the 145% tariff on China will “come down substantially” in the future. It is unclear how this could impact prices.

Contributing: Bianca Harris, James Sergent, USA TODAY



Source link

Google broke the law. It’s time to break up the company | Courtney C Radsch

0


In less than a year, US courts have ruled that the world’s most powerful tech company broke the law – twice.

In August, a federal judge in Washington ruled that Google illegally maintained its search monopoly by locking up defaults on browsers and devices. In April, a federal judge in Virginia found that Google illegally monopolized the digital advertising market, manipulating auctions, restricting and stifling competitors. These two rulings, the most significant antitrust wins against a tech giant in decades, should be a turning point in the digital economy.

The rulings against Google’s illegal monopoly in digital advertising offer a once-in-a-generation chance to redesign the infrastructure of surveillance that underpins Google’s ill-gotten dominance. But if regulators settle for symbolic fines or behavioral tweaks, it will do nothing to structurally reform the business model and incentives that underpin Google’s illegal dominance. In a three-week hearing that began this week, the US justice department is urging a judge to break up the company. Whether we seize this moment to break up these concentrations of power will shape the future of markets, media and democratic governance.

Google is emblematic of the platform economy in which we now live. The Silicon Valley corporation and its platform brethren provide core infrastructure – for advertising, for information access, for the economy at large. Google’s control of the search ecosystem, from its Chrome browser and Android operating system to its dominance in digital advertising and search, gives it unrivaled power over who gets heard and who gets paid. That power has stifled competition, undermined journalism and distorted the digital economy.

The courts have now recognized what my fellow critics have argued for years and what regulators around the world have similarly determined: Google illegally leverages its dominance in one market to reinforce its control in another.

As addressed in the ad tech case, Google manipulated auctions and structured its business to advantage its own services at the expense of publishers and rivals, turning its ad exchange into what one employee called an “authoritarian intermediary”. As a result of its illegal monopoly, and by its own estimates, Google pockets on average more than 30% of the advertising dollars that flow through its digital advertising technology products; in some transactions and with certain publishers and advertisers, it takes far more.

As discussed in the search case, Google paid billions annually to be the default search engine on devices and browsers, effectively shutting out competitors and securing its control of 90% of the search market. And Google is now using the data generated throughout these products and its monopoly profits to secure its dominance in AI.

Regulators around the world have converged on similar verdicts and would like to see structural changes, though they seem to have been waiting to see what happened in the US cases. In 2023, the European Commission concluded that only divestiture could remedy Google’s ad tech conflicts of interest. Google offered to sell its AdX exchange, but European publishers and regulators rejected the move as insufficient. In the UK, Google is now facing a £5bn class-action lawsuit for abusing its search dominance along with a competition strategic market status investigation, which could result in structural or behavioral remedies.

These global actions reflect a growing consensus: Google’s power is infrastructural and self-reinforcing. It controls the tools that decide what we know, what we see and who profits. The implications are especially acute for journalism, which has been hollowed out by Google’s ad market manipulation and search favoritism. In an era of generative AI, where foundation models are trained on the open web and commodify news content without compensation, this market power becomes even more perfidious.

Meaningful remedies require structural separation supported by behavioral changes to prevent future anticompetitive behaviors, including in the market for artificial intelligence. First, Google should be required to divest parts of its ad tech stack, spin off Chrome and ensure interoperability. Vertical integration has allowed it to dominate every layer of digital advertising, from the tools publishers use to the auctions that determine ad placement. Breaking up that stack would create space for competition and innovation.

Second, regulators should enforce interoperability and transparency. Let competitors have access to or build on Google’s core infrastructure. Let users choose and switch search engines and browsers easily, enabling them to take their data and easily shift providers. Require Google to disclose how it trains its AI models and how it uses publisher content.

Third, global coordination should be built into enforcement. Antitrust remedies must be aligned across jurisdictions to prevent regulatory arbitrage and make retaliatory American actions more difficult. The US cases should embolden regulators elsewhere to act swiftly.

Finally, we must recognize that these antitrust cases are not just about prices or innovation. They are about power. Who sets the rules for how knowledge circulates? Who profits from public discourse? Who benefits from the infrastructure of the modern economy? If we allow Google to keep its hydra-headed corporation intact, the same dynamics will replicate themselves under the guise of AI innovation.

The courts have shown that Google broke the law. Now, governments must show that the law still has teeth. That means structural remedies, not settlements. Transformation, not tinkering.

If we fail to act now, we may not get another chance.



Source link

Trump signs orders cracking down on diversity and inclusion at US universities | Trump administration

0


Donald Trump signed executive orders on Wednesday targeting universities as his administration seeks to reshape higher-education institutions and continues to crack down on diversity and inclusion efforts.

The actions address foreign gifts to universities, directing the federal government to “enforce laws on the books” related to the disclosure of large donations, and college accreditation, which the president has referred to as his “secret weapon” to upend US universities. While reading the orders to Trump, the White House staff secretary Will Scharf said that the third-party groups that accredit universities have relied on “woke ideology” rather than merit.

Linda McMahon, the education secretary, added during the signing in the Oval Office: “We should be looking at those who have real merit to get in, and we have to look harder at those universities that aren’t enforcing that.”

Trump says US education is getting out of DEI ‘after being in that jungle for a long time’ – video

Trump’s administration has been engaged in an all-out attack on US universities since the president took office in January, seeking to dramatically alter institutions he has claimed have been taken over by “Marxist maniacs and lunatics”. The federal government has sought to cut billions in funding from universities unless they comply with administration demands; banned diversity initiatives; and detained international students in retaliation for their activism.

This week, more than 150 US university presidents signed a statement condemning the Trump administration’s “unprecedented government overreach and political interference” in higher education. Meanwhile, Harvard University – which Scharf mentioned by name when introducing the order related to foreign gifts – has sued the government in response to the threatened funding cuts.

The president has referred to accreditation as a “secret weapon” in his fight against universities.

“I will fire the radical-left accreditors that have allowed our colleges to become dominated by Marxist maniacs and lunatics,” he said last summer. “We will then accept applications for new accreditors who will impose real standards on colleges once again and once for all.”

According to a statement from the White House, the order directs McMahon to hold accreditors accountable with “denial, monitoring, suspension, or termination of accreditation recognition, for accreditors’ poor performance or violations of federal civil rights law”. It also orders administration officials to investigate “unlawful discrimination” in higher education.

The White House alleges accreditors have imposed “discriminatory diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI)-based standards”, which it describes as a violation of federal law and an abuse of their authority.

While signing orders on Wednesday that Scharf said would direct schools out of the “whole sort of diversity, equity and inclusion cult”, the president said that the US was “getting out of that … after being in that jungle for a long time”.

Despite his condemnation of diversity and inclusion efforts, Trump also signed an order establishing a White House initiative on historically black colleges and universities to promote “excellence and innovation”. The order facilitates the creation of a presidential advisory board on HBCUs and seeks to address funding barriers and increase affordability and retention rates.

The president also signed orders related to workforce development and artificial intelligence education to ensure the future workforce is “adequately trained in AI tools”, Scharf said.



Source link

Ahmed Hassanein could be the first Egyptian ever selected in the NFL draft. It’d be the next chapter in an improbable story

0




CNN
 — 

Those who know him best say Ahmed Hassanein isn’t close to reaching his full potential, even as he stands to possibly make history this weekend as the first Egyptian ever chosen in the NFL draft.

Perhaps that’s not surprising for the anchor of Boise State’s defensive line over the last two seasons. After all, the Cairo native didn’t know a single thing about football until he arrived in Southern California almost seven years ago.

Now, with the support of his brother and coaches at Loara High School and Boise State, Hassanein has become a monster on the gridiron. Boise head coach Spencer Danielson says he’s the best edge rusher to come out of the Mountain West Conference powerhouse in a long time. Off the field, he’s even more impressive.

“Knowing his character, knowing his work ethic, knowing his journey, knowing his testimony, I’d be willing to bet everything I have on him,” said his half-brother, Cory Besch.

“And I think any team that’s willing to invest in him is going to not just get a football player, but they’re going to get somebody who’s going to represent their team, their culture better than any other prospect in the draft. I will put that part of his skillset against anybody. The leadership, the passion and the fact that he is an untapped, unrefined diamond that is still being discovered.”

Projected to be a late-round pick on Saturday, Hassanein racked up 24 sacks as a Bronco, most of which came after he took over the starting edge rusher job as a junior. He was a first-team all-conference player in the 2023 and 2024 seasons and was a captain in his senior season. It’s an impressive resumé for any college player, but even more so for the still-raw Hassanein.

In less than a decade, Hassanein has moved across the world, learned English, learned football and the unique language of the sport, adjusted to the culture shocks of Orange County, California, and Boise, Idaho, converted from Islam to Christianity and found himself as a leader in the locker room, on the field and in the community.

But Danielson said teams considering picking up Hassanein in the draft ought to know he’s more than his story: He’s also a hell of a football player.

“I don’t want people to get it twisted. There’s a phenomenal story about Ahmed, right? Everything we talked about, who he is as a person – Egypt to California to Boise,” Danielson told CNN Sports. “I don’t want people to get it twisted: Ahmed’s one of the best football players in the nation.

“There are so many things about his life that are just make it an amazing story. But, oh man, he’s gonna get drafted because he’s gonna have a monster impact on the field in the NFL. I just want that to be known for people – you’re not only just getting a great story, you’re getting a big-time football player.”

<p>CNN World Sport's Don Riddell discusses the NFL Draft with NFL Network analyst and former NFL general manager Scott Pioli.</p>

The Analytics and methodology behind the NFL Draft

06:02

Hassanein moved to the United States from Egypt just before his sophomore year of high school after Besch made a visit to Cairo and realized the half-brother, who he hadn’t seen in 10 years, might have a future on the gridiron. Besch played football in college at Azusa Pacific University and entered coaching after his college days were done, though he still played in Europe. After one of those semi-pro seasons in Austria were finished, Besch went to Egypt and realized his little brother wasn’t so little anymore.

The then-15-year-old Hassanein was about six-feet, one-inch tall and weighed about 215 pounds, a CrossFit enthusiast and looking like he could succeed in football – a sport he’d never played and didn’t know anything about.

“At the time, I had just finished playing a professional season, a semi-pro season, in Austria, so I was still in pretty good shape. And I worked out with him and when I was working out with him and holding my own, and he was holding his own with me, I could tell there was definitely potential,” Besch said. “I knew what the game of football had done for me, giving me a purpose and identity and the life lessons that I had learned and continued to teach the next generation. I just knew that that that would benefit him.”

Hassanein pressures UNLV quarterback Jayden Maiava during the Mountain West Football Championship on December 2.
Maiava fumbles the football after taking a hit from Hassanein.

“I didn’t necessarily know that he was going to be a great prospect, but I knew that he needed to get out of that environment, and I knew that football was an avenue and a tool to help him do that.”

Hassanein’s home life in Egypt wasn’t great at the time and that led to issues in school and his personal life, but he found an outlet in the gym. When Besch pitched him, and the rest of his family, on Hassanein moving to Southern California and trading the CrossFit gym for the football field, the future defensive star jumped at the chance.

From there, it was the start of one of the most intense learning curves imaginable.

“He walked in here, and obviously he’s a good-sized kid, as big as anybody we had,” said Mitch Olson, his coach at Loara. “And he was athletic. He did CrossFit in Egypt.

“When we got him out on the field, he knew nothing. He didn’t know formations, nothing. So what we did is we’re going to put him at defensive tackle. It’s the easiest, and we’ll just tell him a couple things to do. And right away, he was just so strong and just dominating. In fact, we didn’t spend as much time developing him as we should have, because we had to get other kids going.”

Hassanein arrived in the United States not knowing the language, not knowing the game and only just getting reacquainted with his brother who was now his primary guardian in the US.

There was some healing that needed to be done, Besch said.

“I didn’t actually know what I was getting myself into when I take my brother in. I didn’t know how difficult his struggles were. I didn’t know how difficult the language barrier was going to be. I didn’t know what it was right like to raise a 16-year-old boy. I knew what it was like to raise a 10-year-old little girl, right?” he said, referring to his daughter.

“But I didn’t know what that meant. Didn’t know how much he was going to eat. I didn’t know all of the challenges and things, but I did know that God had me there for a reason … and I knew that God’s calling on my life as a coach was purposeful.”

Hassanein worked hard at his game – and at learning English. Olson said within about three months, Hassanein went from knowing very little English to understanding what was being said and being able to communicate effectively.

Learning the rules of football, though, was a bit more of a challenge.

“We start playing games and, in every game, he gets a 15-yard penalty because he didn’t know the rules,” Olson said. “The first game he played in, about the first series, he grabs the quarterback’s face mask and just body slams him, and he gets flagged.

He added: “Next game he’s on the punt return team and he tackles a guy who’s running down trying to make the tackle. … So we taught him a bunch of stuff, but then there was a whole bunch of stuff that he learned. But I’m telling you, halfway through his first year, you’d have thought he’d been playing football for two, three years.”

A lot of that work got done at home with Besch, whose furniture sometimes suffered for it.

“Any detail you can think of about the game, I’m having to explain to him, whether that’s around the kitchen table, in the kitchen,” Besch said. “We’re working on how to get leverage on a blocker. He’s throwing me into cabinets. It was insane. Literally, it was just a whole learning process every second of the day.”

Eventually, the process of learning football evolved from an excuse for a fresh start in the US to a potential career path. As he played more and worked more and learned more, Hassanein decided that football was all he wanted to do.

First, he told Besch. Then he told Olson. The goal wasn’t just to play in high school or college. The goal was the NFL.

“It’s everything for him,” Besch said. “I mean, his identity was 100% (football) once he got here, there was no other motivation. And it’s weird because the goal wasn’t to send him here to become a football player, but we knew that was going to be part of it, because that’s what our lives consist of. But I didn’t ever necessarily expect him to take it on so personally and for it to become his passion.”

Hassanein leads Boise State onto the field against Air Force in Boise, Idaho, on November 24, 2023.

Clarity and confidence

The challenges Hassanein faced were immense. Not only was he brand new to the sport that he wanted to play professionally, but he also went to a school that was not exactly a football powerhouse.

It took a little time for Hassanein to realize exactly what it would mean to lift himself to the lofty heights of Division 1 football, let alone the NFL. It was a conversation with Besch that made it click.

“He’s telling me, ‘This is what I want to do. I want to be a Division I football player.’ And I’m seeing him maybe not being as motivated and really understanding what that looks like, because it’s not just working out, right? It’s everything you do,” Besch said.

“If you’re going to be that type of guy, it’s got to show up in the way you carry yourself around the house, around school, pick up after yourself – just how you handle responsibility. And I was getting frustrated as his brother, because I’m seeing him not doing that.

“So, I remember telling him one day, I said, ‘Bro, I need you to do me a favor. I have homework for you.’ And he goes, ‘What is it?’ I said, ‘It’s football homework. I want you to think about: ‘What does it take? What is the number one player in the country doing every day?’ If you were to imagine a Division I football prospect does every single day, write it down right from the time he wakes up to the time he goes to sleep. What does his day look like?

“And so he did. He wrote out a list: He wakes up early, he eats healthy, he takes his vitamins, he drinks water, he does this, he studies, he watches film and all these things. And then I told him, ‘OK, now that list you just made, compare that to what you do every day.’ How much of this are you doing? Because it’s great to say it, right? It’s a whole other thing to actually do it, because it’s not easy, or everyone would do it.”

Hassanein’s response to that conversation was simple: “OK, I get it.”

Olson said that from that point on, he’d never seen a player work as hard. Hassanein put on 20 or 25 pounds of muscle each year of high school, woke up at 5 a.m. for workouts, watched film constantly and practiced his craft.

“I don’t think I’ve had anybody just put that much work out, but he doesn’t know any other way,” Olson said. “I’ve never seen him do anything half ass. He has one speed. He’s the guy in practice that you hate because he doesn’t go half speed. He is old school, an old school kind of a guy. And he’s an absolute worker.”

After his junior season, with the scholarship offers still not coming in the way that they wanted, Hassanein had to deal with a new obstacle: The Covid-19 pandemic.

<p>Coy Wire looks back on an emotional draft day back in 2002 when he was selected by the Buffalo Bills with the 97th overall pick.</p>

CNN’s Coy Wire reflects on his NFL Draft experience

01:37

The virus closed down high school athletics across California and suddenly it seemed like Hassanein’s best opportunity to make a good impression – the summer camp circuits where high school players regularly get discovered – might go out the window. After months of sending tapes around and trying to get in touch with college coaches, Hassanein and Besch finally found an opportunity to showcase his skills at a camp about 30 minutes away from their home.

Besch told Hassanein that it was his best shot at getting recruited, and he sold his brother to anyone who’d listen, including as they’re filling out the paperwork to register for the camp.

“I’m basically selling him to these guys. I see a scout in the background, and his ears perk up when I say that he’s only been playing football for two years,” Besch said. “He’s from Egypt, and nobody knows who he is. The scout literally audibly says, ‘Well, that’ll change after today,’ like he says that in the background, and that’s when I knew. I was like, OK, he’s passing the eye test.”

A standout performance at that camp against some of the state’s top prospects got the ball rolling. But it was an old connection from college and a video of Hassanein working out in a mask that started his path to Boise.

Danielson was the defensive line coach for Boise at the time and happened to come across a video of Hassanein on social media. When Hassanein told Besch that Danielson had sent him a message, it seemed the pieces were falling into place.

Besch and Danielson played together in college at Azusa Pacific and were friends, though they had grown apart in the years since school. But the connection still existed and Besch reached out to Danielson to try and get his old friend truly interested in his brother.

“He was sending me videos of literally him in a garage, pass rushing, striking,” Danielson said of Besch.

The coach remained skeptical. Besch is a great athlete but he was built more like an undersized slot receiver than a defensive end.

“You hear that he’s 6’3”, 215, but you’re like, is he really?” Danielson said. “You get him next to a door frame, right? You’re like, trying to figure out exactly how big he is.”

Besch tried to sell his half-brother on Boise as other schools came calling, but all it took was a virtual tour – no on-campus visits were allowed due to Covid – for Hassanein to sign up to head to Idaho.

On a virtual call with Danielson, Hassanein decided to commit. He didn’t tell Besch he was doing it, and it seemed out of the blue.

Hassanein tackles Penn State running back Kaytron Allen.
Hassanein sacks Penn State quarterback Drew Allar.

“Just in Ahmed fashion he said, ‘Coach, I trust you. I don’t know anything about Boise, Idaho. I don’t really know even much about football, but I trust you and that you’re going to help me become the best version of myself,’” Danielson said.

Still the nerves over how big Hassanein really was – was he really six-foot-three when his brother was about half a foot shorter? – were present throughout the Boise defensive coaching staff.

“I knew what time he was being dropped off, and me and our entire staff were waiting to see him get dropped off to make sure he was 6’3”,” Danielson said. “We’re like, ‘Please don’t be 5’11,” like, did we just get hoodwinked? And he pops out of the car and looks like a Greek god. And I’m like, ‘Yep, we’re good boys.’”

For Besch, it was a time of mixed emotions – he was thrilled for his brother, but now it was no longer his time to be Hassanein’s personal coach. He had to trust the staff at Boise to keep him growing. But he figured Hassanein was in good hands.

“Knowing that Spencer was the guy helped me immensely, because I knew that if there was one person I could entrust, you know, not just the development of him as a football player, but the development of his character … I knew he was going to be a positive person under Spencer Danielson,” he said.

After getting some time as a true freshman – becoming the first Egyptian player in FBS history – and playing in 12 games as a second-stringer as a sophomore, Hassanein finally got a chance to start as a junior at Boise. He seized that opportunity with gusto.

He turned in a first-team all-Mountain West Conference season, ranking fifth in the FBS with 12.5 sacks, making 53 total tackles including 16.5 for loss and forced two fumbles.

It was the moment those close to him had been waiting for.

“Before his junior year, you saw a lot of talent, but you saw a very robotic person that was a pleaser and trying to do exactly what he was told to do,” said Erik Chinander, who took over as the defensive line coach at Boise late in 2022.

“And somewhere in that next fall camp before his junior year, kind of when he had that breakout year, you saw him stop thinking and playing a little bit more freely, and taking what people were giving him instead of exactly what he was coached to do or exactly what the playbook said.”

The change was noticeable to Olson, who drove more than four hours to catch Boise’s game against Fresno State in the 2023 season. Olson said he waited to greet Hassanein outside the locker room at the stadium after the game, and what he saw from Hassanein’s teammates made clear that something special was going on.

“The way the guys treated him was he was the guy,” Olson said. “And I called his brother, who was back in Boise. I go, Cory, I’m sitting there, and he had had about eight sacks by then, and I think it was about three quarters of the way through the season. I told Cory, ‘I’m standing outside the locker room, and he didn’t see me, and I’m just watching the guys interact with him.’ I go, ‘He’s the guy, Cory.’”

For Besch, that 2023 season was the realization of all the work he and his brother had done in those kitchen technique sessions, the still-not-close-to-finished product starting to look like a star.

It was a year later that he realized his brother was really going to have a solid chance at being a professional because he kept succeeding even though defenses were starting to game plan against Hassanein.

“I knew that, as a football coach, it’s great to have a breakout season but the next year is going to be exponentially more difficult because every single coach on the other side of the ball is game planning for you,” he said. “You’re going to get all the attention, you’re going to get all the double teams, you’re going to get all the chippers, and you’re still going to have to perform if you want to make it, because this is Boise State. You don’t get to have a down year. You need to have, you know, eight, nine sacks and continue to progress, or else you fall off the cliff.

“And when he started doing it, still, (with a) sack in Oregon early in the game. It’s like if you’re doing it against those guys, then you can do it against anybody.”

That production on the field was created by an incredible devotion to his game off of it. Hassanein became known around Boise as one of the hardest working players on the team, someone who was devoted to getting better each and every day and was simply grateful for the opportunity to play.

“He puts in a ton of time, not only in getting to the building early to get his body ready, get his nutrition right, all those kinds of things, but like, he’s always in the film room,” Chinander said.

“And it’s not just busy work for him. He’s in there, and he’ll come grab us and want to ask questions, like real questions. He’s got multiple notebooks that are full of coaching points he’s got from the head coach, from me, from Coach (Jabril) Frazier. You know, it’s one thing you’ve got to be careful (about) with Ahmed – is he is going to write down what you say? So you’ve got to choose your words wisely, because he will write it down.”

Danielson called him “the most grateful young man you’ll ever be around,” a player who would thank coaches after a hard day of practice, get coffee for staff, treat everyone around him with respect.

“He’s got the football skillset, the talent that I think means he’s gonna be a long-time NFL pro,” Danielson said, “but he is going to immediately change the culture of the NFL team he goes to, because of how grateful he is, because of the kind of teammate he is.”

Hassanein participates in a drill during the NFL Scouting Combine in Indianapolis, Indiana, on February 27.

The knock on Hassanein among draft prognosticators is that he’s still a pretty raw prospect, not the kind of guy who’s going to come in on day one and start blowing away NFL offensive linemen.

But those close to him say give him a couple years and he might be one of the best edge rushers in football.

“He’s going to be a guy who’s going to get drafted here in the next few days that you know may not start quite at the level of some other guys,” Chinander said, “but as you draft him and you’re working with him for the next early portion of his career, he’s going to get better and better and better. And where he’s at now – it’s not even close to where he’ll finish his NFL career.”

Besch, who knows him best, believes his half-brother has reached about 70% of his potential.

“That’s the secret of the draft, to be honest. I have a unique perspective as a football coach and as his brother and seeing where he’s at, I would say he’s 70% of his potential,” Besch said. “If you take that ability and that coachability, and relentless effort and motor and desire to grow and develop, and you give it to an NFL coach who actually wants to develop him … the sky’s the limit.”

With the draft having started on Thursday, NFL scouts and executives are now well aware of all the players who they could have at training camp this summer as a part of their team.

But if they needed one final sales pitch from Danielson, he’s happy to give it.

“Ahmed can play in any defense you want,” he said. “He can be a four-down D-end, he can be an outside linebacker in the 3-4. That’s uncommon. I’ve been here for nine years, and we put out a lot of edge guys in the NFL, and we’ve had some of the top defenses in the country, and he’s been the best edge guy that we’ve had, that (is) not only violent in the run game but can absolutely impose his will on tight ends and offensive tackles.

“And I would urge people to watch Oregon and Penn State, watch those games. Watch the top tight end in the country and see how that went against Ahmed. I mean, just watch it.”

If and when Hassanein makes history as the first Egyptian ever drafted into the NFL, it’s something he’ll wear with pride, Chinander said. It will be the culmination of a long, unexpected journey that ultimately Hassanein has made on his own, but one in which so many other people feel incredibly invested.

Olson, his high school football coach who believes Hassanein is as fine a young man he’s ever come across in his 34 years of coaching, said he gets tears in his eyes watching his former player succeed on the field.

“That’s why I get emotional. It’s just, I’m just so happy for him. He’s worked his butt off. And a lot of times you don’t see that,” Olson said. “You don’t see guys reap the fruits of their labor. And hopefully he will – somehow, whether he gets drafted or not – somebody will pick him up and he’ll make it just because of the guy he is.”



Source link

Nearly half of Americans live in an area with a failing grade for air pollution, and the problem is only getting worse

0




CNN
 — 

Air pollution levels keep getting worse for more people in the US, according to a new report, and experts say the Trump administration’s proposed deregulation plans will make it even harder for people to get clean air.

Almost half of everyone who lives in the United States breathes unhealthy levels of air pollution, according to the American Lung Association’s annual State of the Air report, released Wednesday.

According to air quality data from 2021 to 2023, about 156 million people – 25 million more than last year’s report – live in an area that the association gives a failing grade for ozone and two measures of fine particulate matter pollution.

The US Environmental Protection Agency defines particulate matter, also called particle pollution or soot, as a mix of solid and liquid droplets that float in the air. It can come in the form of dirt, dust or smoke. Coal- and natural gas-fired power plants create it, as do cars, agriculture, unpaved roads, construction sites and wildfires.

Particle pollution threatens human health because it is so tiny – a fraction of the width of a human hair – and can travel past the body’s usual defenses. When a person breathes these particles in, they can get stuck in the lungs and move into the bloodstream, causing irritation and inflammation.

Exposure to particle pollution is considered a significant factor in premature death around the world, according to the World Health Organization. Exposure can also raise the risk of conditions including certain cancers, stroke, asthma, preterm births, dementia, depression and anxiety.

The new report says that 85 million people in the US live in an area with a failing grade for year-round particle pollution, the second-highest number of people with such exposure since the report was first published in 2000.

The top 10 areas most polluted by year-round particle pollution are:

  • 1. Bakersfield-Delano, CA

  • 2. Visalia, CA

  • 3. Fresno-Hanford-Cocoran, CA

  • 4. Eugene-Springfield, OR

  • 5. Los Angeles-Long Beach, CA

  • 6. Detroit-Warren-Ann Arbor, MI (tied for 6th)

  • 6. San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA (tied for 6th)

  • 8. Houston-Pasadena, TX

  • 9. Cleveland-Akron-Canton, OH

  • 10. Fairbanks-College, AK

Even in the short term, exposure to particle pollution can cause breathing problems or trigger a heart attack.

During the research period, the report says, short-term particle pollution in the US was the highest level it has been in 16 years, with 77.2 million people living in counties with these unhealthy spikes.

The 10 areas most polluted by short-term particle pollution are:

  • 1. Bakersfield-Delano, CA

  • 2.Fairbanks-College, AK

  • 3. Eugene-Springfield, OR (tied for 3rd)

  • 3. Visalia, CA (tied for 3rd)

  • 5. Fresno-Hanford-Corcoran, CA

  • 6. Reno-Carson City-Gardnerville Ranchos, NV-CA

  • 7. Los Angeles-Long Beach, CA

  • 8. Yakima, WA

  • 9. Seattle-Tacoma, WA

  • 10. Sacramento-Roseville, CA

Ozone pollution, also called smog, is the presence of ground-level ozone that forms when chemicals like nitrogen oxides and volatile organics from electric utilities, car exhaust, gasoline vapors, industrial facilities and chemical solvents react to sunlight.

Exposure to ozone pollution can cause asthma attacks and chest pain in the short term. Long-term exposure can also cause decreased lung function and premature death.

The top 10 areas most polluted by ozone are:

  • 1. Los Angeles-Long Beach, CA

  • 2. Visalia, CA

  • 3. Bakersfield-Delano, CA

  • 4. Phoenix-Mesa, AZ

  • 5. Fresno-Hanford-Corcoran, CA

  • 6. Denver-Aurora-Greeley, CO

  • 7. Houston-Pasadena, TX

  • 8. San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad, CA

  • 9. Salt Lake City-Provo-Orem, UT

  • 10. Dallas-Fort Worth, TX

The American Lung Association report notes that people of color are the group most likely to live in neighborhoods with unhealthy air and are more than twice as likely as White people to live a community with a failing grade for two types of particle pollution or ozone pollution.

People who identify as Hispanic are three times more likely as White people to live in an area with three failing grades for air pollution.

Dr. Juanita Mora, a pulmonologist who works in a predominantly Hispanic neighborhood on Chicago’s South Side, said she sees the toll of high air pollution levels nearly every day.

The demolition of a power plant in the area in 2020 spread soot “for miles and miles,” she said. When that combined with normal pollution levels, street vendors, other outdoor workers and a 7-year-old boy all came in wheezing and coughing.

“He was just outside playing in his yard,” said Mora, who is also a volunteer spokesperson for the American Lung Association. “His parents had to rush him to the ER because he said he was having chest tightness and couldn’t stop coughing.

“As a doctor, I feel like we’re failing millions and millions of kids and adults,” she added.

It doesn’t always take a demolished building for air pollution to cause widespread breathing problems.

Katherine Pruitt, national senior director for policy at the American Lung Association and a co-author of the new report, said that a record number of warm days and wildfires during the research period caused “horrible ozone years.”

People didn’t even have to live close to a wildfire to be affected, Pruitt said. Smoke plumes travel, and when they combine with typical pollution in urban areas, “they bump up the ability to produce ozone-forming compounds,” Pruitt said.

In 2023, Canadian wildfires caused problems for Mora’s patients hundreds of miles away in Chicago. “I saw so many kids and adults with asthma exacerbations around that time,” she said.

Dr. Panagis Gallatsatos, a pulmonary and critical care medicine specialist at Johns Hopkins Medicine, said doctors do what they can to help patients breathe better, “but we can only do so much against the air that they breathe.”

Gallatsatos, who is also a volunteer spokesperson for the Lung Association, said it’s been “rather defeating” to read about how many more Americans have been exposed to pollution.

“As a lung doctor, I don’t have any medication that can really offset that,” he said. “For pollution, we rely on good policies and legislation to protect lung health.”

And protective legislation may become harder to find. As part of the “biggest deregulatory action in US history,” the EPA said last month that it will revisit the Biden-era National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter, which govern how much soot can be released into the air.

The Trump administration is also considering looser regulations on power plants, the oil and gas industry, coal plants and other industries and machines that generate air pollution.

“Obviously, we’re worried about what the future portends for all the hard work that we’ve done to put rules and practices into place to control emissions, both for particle pollution and ozone and for greenhouse gases that are affecting the climate,” Pruitt said. “It’s very worrisome.”

If EPA deregulation efforts are successful, Mora said, it will directly hurt her patients who are already breathing polluted air.

“I believe I’m going to be seeing a lot more kids, more families affected by the lack of limits on particle pollution as well as ozone pollution, especially here in the city of Chicago,” she said. “If you can’t breathe, nothing else matters.”



Source link

Wisconsin Supreme Court Election Spells a Win for Abortion Rights

0


This month’s race for an open seat on the Wisconsin Supreme Court is now officially the most expensive judicial election in history, with total spending topping $100 million. The election attracted the attention of donors from across the political spectrum, including the ACLU Voter Education Fund, George Soros, and Americans for Prosperity. Groups affiliated with Elon Musk, the billionaire ally of President Donald Trump, funneled $21 million into the campaign of Brad Schimel, the conservative former attorney general.

Yet his opponent, trial judge Susan Crawford, who was endorsed by the state Democratic Party, won the race by roughly 10 percentage points, maintaining a 4–3 liberal majority on the court.

The race attracted so much attention partly because the court is set to decide two major abortion cases this year. Abortion thus played a central role in the campaign, with Crawford stressing her experience representing Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin and accusing Schimel of not trusting women to make their own health care decisions. Schimel, who maintains that he is against abortion, argued that the issue should be left to voters.

A Constitutional Abortion Right

One of the two key abortion cases facing the court this year hinges on whether the Wisconsin Constitution recognizes a right to abortion. Last year, the Wisconsin Supreme Court agreed to hear a case about an 1849 law that state Republicans interpret to ban virtually all abortions from the moment of fertilization. The law provides that “any person, other than the mother, who intentionally destroys the life of the unborn child” can be convicted of a felony unless the procedure was necessary to save the life of the pregnant person.

In the case, Planned Parenthood v. Urmanski, Planned Parenthood is asking the court to rule — without waiting on a decision from the lower courts — that interpreting the 1849 law as a ban on abortion would violate the state constitution. “The right to life and liberty, including the right to make one’s own decisions about whether or not to give birth and medical decisions related to pregnancy or abortion care from a chosen health care provider,” the organization asserts, “is fundamental.” Planned Parenthood also argues that if it operated as a ban, the 1849 law would violate the constitutional rights of doctors to practice their chosen profession.

Joel Urmanski, the Republican district attorney for Sheboygan County named as a respondent in the case, has said in briefing that the Wisconsin Supreme Court generally interprets the state constitution in the same way that the U.S. Supreme Court interprets equivalent provisions of the federal Constitution. Because the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization overturned the federal constitutional right to abortion, Urmanski argues that the Wisconsin Constitution similarly lacks abortion protections.

Even if the Wisconsin high court didn’t follow Dobbs, Urmanski argues that the outcome should be the same. He urges the court to discern the “original meaning” of the state constitution and insists that at the time of the state constitution’s ratification, no one thought there was a right to abortion.

Planned Parenthood, by contrast, spotlights decisions from other states recognizing a right to abortion after Dobbs. It further argues that Wisconsin’s tradition regarding abortion is far richer than Urmanski suggests, maintaining that abortion was common and at least somewhat accepted when the state constitution was written.

The parties are also clashing over what bearing the state constitution’s provisions on equal protection have on abortion rights. Planned Parenthood argues that the 1849 law would violate state protections against sex discrimination, while Urmanski stresses that Dobbs rejected an equal protection argument for abortion rights and invites the Wisconsin Supreme Court to do the same.

A Feticide Law?

Ultimately, the Wisconsin Supreme Court may not have to address whether the state constitution protects an abortion right, depending on the outcome of Kaul v. Urmanski, a case argued before the court in November.

Josh Kaul, the state’s Democratic attorney general, concluded that the 1849 law was a feticide law — punishing only those who terminated a pregnancy against a pregnant person’s wishes — not an abortion ban. Fetal homicide statutes aren’t unusual; 38 states currently have some version of such a law. Convinced that the 1849 law fit in the same category, Kaul filed suit to establish that Wisconsin providers can’t be prosecuted for abortions performed with the patient’s consent. Even if the 1849 law did ban abortions, Kaul argued, later Wisconsin restrictions implicitly overrode it, particularly a 2015 law banning abortion at 20 weeks. In 2023, a trial court agreed with Kaul, and Urmanski appealed the decision.

Kaul will turn on what the high court makes of the 1849 law — particularly, how to make sense of it in light of its 1994 ruling in State v. Black. In that case, Glenndale Black violently assaulted his pregnant partner days before her due date and caused her to miscarry. Black was prosecuted under the 1849 law but argued that the law criminalized only “consensual medical abortions,” not feticide. He also claimed that steps taken by the state legislature to comply with Roe v. Wade had implicitly repealed the 1849 law. The court in Black rejected both those arguments, reasoning that the law clearly prohibited feticide and that the court generally didn’t interpret a later statute to repeal an earlier one. Moreover, the court reasoned that it was important to interpret state statutes to effectuate all their goals, when possible. That meant interpreting the 1849 law to prohibit feticide, which would not contradict the intent of later legislation to protect abortion access.

Black will play a central role in the disposition of Kaul. On the one hand, as Urmanski argues, the court has previously rejected the claim that a later law, like the 20-week ban from 2015, implicitly repeals an earlier one. On the other hand, as the assistant attorney general representing Kaul explained during the oral arguments, the court already interpreted the statute as a feticide law in Black. Kaul’s lawyer also argued that there was no way for both laws to stand if the 1849 law was an abortion ban because Wisconsin courts only permit two statutes on the same subject to stand when they address different purposes or have different scopes. If the 1849 law is an abortion ban, then both laws would have the same objective: setting the gestational limit for legal abortion.

At oral argument, the court seemed divided about how to resolve Kaul. But the justices were clearly skeptical of the constitutionality of a ban on abortion at fertilization. It seems probable that one way or another, the court’s four-justice majority will rule in a way that permits legal abortion in Wisconsin. That result seems even likelier in the wake of the recent election solidifying the liberal majority.

The Court’s Reasoning Matters

But how the court reaches this result will matter too. It’s possible that the court will embrace some of Planned Parenthood’s broader constitutional arguments. If the court recognizes the right of physicians to perform abortions, for example, that would make it easier to challenge any new abortion ban in court. Importantly, other state supreme courts are rethinking whether doctors should have standing to sue on their patients’ behalf.

And if the court offers an especially convincing rationale for abortion rights — perhaps one rooted in equality — that might make it harder to undermine or even overturn such a ruling in the future.

Of course, the court could reach a much narrower decision: It might rule that the 1849 law simply isn’t an abortion ban. Such an outcome would obviate the need for the court to consider whether a ban violates the state constitution.

• • •

Whatever happens will not just ensure that abortion remains accessible in Wisconsin. After the demise of federal constitutional abortion rights, state supreme courts have moved to the center of struggles over what their constitutions have to say about abortion. For that reason, we should expect the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s rulings to shape the terms of debate in other states.

Mary Ziegler is the Martin Luther King Jr. Professor of Law at the University of California, Davis School of Law. Her new book, “Personhood: The New Civil War over Reproduction,” comes out this week. 

Suggested Citation: Mary Ziegler, Wisconsin Supreme Court Election Spells a Win for Abortion Rights,  Sᴛᴀᴛᴇ Cᴏᴜʀᴛ Rᴇᴘᴏʀᴛ(Apr. 22, 2025), https://statecourtreport.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/wisconsin-supreme-court-election-spells-win-abortion-rights



Source link