Home Blog Page 89

Seattle Seahawks star Derrick Hall’s mother shares his survival story

0

play

When Stacey Gooden-Crandle had her son, she never imagined he would grow up to be a Super Bowl champion.

At the time, she said, she didn’t even know if he would make it home from the hospital.

Seattle Seahawks linebacker Derrick Hall was born in Mississippi in 2001 at 23 weeks old. Doctors quickly put him on life support, and his tiny body, weighing just 2 pounds, 9 ounces, fought to survive, his mother said.

“It’s been a trying time for our family,” Gooden Crandle told USA TODAY, adding that doctors have told her son may never walk or talk again.

Hall, now 25 years old, is 6 feet 3 inches tall and weighs over 250 pounds. In Super Bowl 60, he attracted attention with two sacks, one tackle, and a fumble recovery at the end of the third quarter, contributing to the team’s victory.

His mother comes to watch every game.

“I never miss a game. He’s looking for me,” she said. “If he doesn’t find me, my phone rings at halftime, ‘Hey, where are you?’

One mother in the NICU tells another that there is light at the end of the tunnel.

Off the field, Hall and her mother work together to raise awareness and funds for families with infants in neonatal intensive care units. Gooden-Crandle said Derrick Hall’s One Percent Foundation responds to all families who contact them. Hall’s nonprofit recently partnered with Huggies on the Natural Born Fighters campaign, with Huggies donating $1 for every social media share.

“I want people to know that there is light at the end of the tunnel,” Gooden Crandle said.

Hall had been in the NICU for more than five months after birth. During that time, Gooden-Crandle said, her “faith in God, family and village surrounded her with love and support.” Miraculously, and to the surprise of his doctors, Hall made a successful recovery.

“I was mentally messed up. You never talk about what NICU parents go through,” Gooden Crandle said, adding that it’s very different from the typical parent’s birth story. “You have to leave the hospital while the baby is still there and fighting for his life. So it’s a different process. In that moment, my faith was strong, but I can’t say I wasn’t worried and I wasn’t scared because there were so many unknowns. There was so much uncertainty surrounding Derrick’s health.”

Gooden-Crandle said Hall was developmentally delayed until he was 6 years old. The first three years of his life were a revolving door of doctor visits. She was out of work during that time to care for her son, making it difficult financially for the family, but Gooden-Crandle said they managed.

Hall was a mischievous child and needed an outlet as he grew older, she said. Gooden-Crandle’s older brother encouraged him to play football.

“And I’m like, ‘Absolutely not.’ Like, my baby doesn’t play soccer. I’m not going to let anyone hurt him,” she said.

She hesitantly signed him up to play flag football when he was 4 years old. Even then, she said, his coaches knew he was a star. Although initially reluctant to let Hall continue with the sport, he fell in love with the game.

“It helped him get a sense of normalcy,” Gooden Crandle said. “Just running around and playing soccer with the other boys gave him a sense of security.”

Sitting in the stands during the Super Bowl and watching his son win, “there were so many emotions.” After the win, she hugged him and told him how proud she was to be his mother. “You did it,” she told him.

“Then he said, ‘No, we did it,'” she recalls. “I think that moment validated all the hard work and how he got to this point.”

Madeline Mitchell’s role covering women and the care economy for USA TODAY is supported by a partnership with Pivotal and Journalism Funding Partners. Funders do not provide editorial input.

Contact Madeline at: memitchell@usatoday.com and @maddiemitch_ With X.

Different versions of lockstepping according to state constitutions

0

Rather than independently analyzing the text, context, and history of state constitutions, state courts often default to applying the same rules and standards of review that the U.S. Supreme Court uses to interpret and apply similar federal constitutional provisions. Courts and commentators commonly criticize this practice, known as lockstepping. However, by identifying the different ways in which the courts are aligned, a more precise critique is possible (and an occasional recognition of cases in which parallel interpretations are warranted).

In a forthcoming Law Review article, I will point out variations in how courts incorporate federal constitutional principles into state constitutions. State constitutional scholars have already identified several versions of lockstep interpretation. These include “unreflective” lockstep, in which state courts automatically apply federal doctrine without even considering the state constitution, and “methodological” lockstep, in which state courts apply federal methods of interpretation and adjudication (considering scrutiny and a clause-bound hierarchy of interpretation) to inappropriate state constitutional contexts. These types of lockstep interpretations are worthy of independent consideration, but there are others that courts and commentators should consider.

For example, some courts engage in “non-textual lockstep,” interpreting provisions of state constitutions in the same way that federal courts interpret the U.S. Constitution, despite differences in the wording of those provisions. For example, Article 1, Section 13 of the Texas Constitution prohibits “cruel acts.” or However, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, the state’s highest court in criminal matters, has interpreted this provision in line with the U.S. Supreme Court’s treatment of the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on “cruel punishment.” and It’s an unusual punishment. ”

Other state courts have adopted what I call “lazy lockstep.” Courts adopting this method of interpretation recognize that state constitutions may apply to the case at hand, but they interpret state constitutions in alignment with federal doctrine after citing a case or two that endorses this lockstep approach. After all, tracing back to these case law citations often reveals that the original decision to interpret state constitutions in line with federal constitutional law was nothing more than an unsubstantiated assertion. In other cases, a look back at case law reveals that lockstep decisions were made based on statements about completely different state constitutional provisions. Courts tend to lazily rely on one or two citations and call it a day, perpetuating a lockstep doctrine that is unfounded in its origins.

Another form of state constitutional interpretation is “mandatory lockstep.” Some state constitutions themselves require state courts to interpret provisions consistent with federal constitutional principles, even if they are worded differently. For example, Article 1, Section 12 of the Florida Constitution prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures and includes a clear provision prohibiting “unreasonable interception of private communications by any means.” Despite this state-specific language, the provision further requires that the right be “construed in accordance with the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution as interpreted by the Supreme Court of the United States.”

Finally, some courts employ a practice I call “sticky lockstepping.” This refers to a variation in which state courts continue to follow past federal precedent to protect individual rights under state constitutions, even though the U.S. Supreme Court has rolled back or eliminated this protection. For example, state courts have recognized state constitutional due process rights to abortion, mirroring the reasoning of the U.S. Supreme Court. Roe vs. Wade This state-level protection may remain even after that right is repealed at the federal level.

Distinguishing between forms of lockstep interpretation may strengthen the argument against this practice. Rather than attacking lockstep interpretations in the abstract, critics can use their arguments to identify multiple levels of failure that occur when courts use improperly considered lockstep interpretations. For example, a state court that interprets the prohibition on “cruel or unusual punishment” in the same way that the U.S. Supreme Court interprets the Eighth Amendment could be criticized for engaging in a lockstep interpretation that is not faithful to the original text. However, if the same courts apply this interpretation without considering specific state constitutional protections, or if they apply it based on random citations of case law dating back to unfounded declarations decades ago, they may also be susceptible to criticisms of unreflective or lazy lockstepping. Rules can be particularly vulnerable to criticism if they are based on multiple forms of lockstep interpretation.

Furthermore, recognizing the diversity of lockstep interpretations shows that not all uniformity in constitutional interpretation is a negative thing. State courts may engage in “reflexive” lockstepping, carefully considering whether to adopt federal principles when interpreting their own constitutional provisions, and concluding that the U.S. Supreme Court’s approach is well suited to the text, history, and purpose of state constitutions. As courts continue to curtail individual rights, sticky lockstepping could strengthen individual rights protections by aligning with older, more protective federal constitutional principles. Although many instances of lockstep interpretation of state constitutions ignore the unique text, structure, and historical characteristics of state constitutions, not all instances of lockstep interpretation are blameworthy.

Michael Smith is an associate professor at the University of Oklahoma School of Law.

Recommended quote: Michael Smith Different versions of lockstepping according to state constitutionsSᴛᴀᴛᴇ Cᴏᴜʀᴛ Rᴇᴘᴏʀᴛ (June 10, 2026), https://statecourtreport.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/many-versions-state-constitutional-lockstepping

Buc-ee expansion raises concerns for transportation, water and wildlife.

0

play

  • Despite its popularity, Buc-ee’s expansion plans have faced opposition from local communities in several states.
  • Residents have expressed concerns about increased traffic, environmental impacts and potential damage to local businesses.
  • Common complaints about large travel centers include water usage, potential for chemical spills, and light and noise pollution.

Buc-ee’s, the wildly popular gas station, convenience store and tourist destination from Texas, has plans to open new stores across the country through 2031. This large travel center has a cult following that rave about its convenience, gas station lines, cleanliness, fresh food made in-store and Beaver-themed treats.

Buc-ee’s could also bring hundreds of jobs to the community and generate millions of dollars in revenue, as well as draw thousands of visitors a day who might wander around to check out local entertainment and shops.

However, not everyone is happy to see the Buc-ee sign go up.

Ahead of a proposed 74,000-square-foot Buc-ee’s along Interstate 75 in Port Charlotte, Florida, some residents are expressing concerns about the increased traffic it would bring to the area. Local residents told Gulf Coast News that the chosen site is “entirely within a coastal high-risk area and flood plain” and could disrupt endangered fish species in nearby fish farms.

play

Buc-ee’s St. Lucie billboard signal project progress.

Buc-ee’s is announcing progress in St. Lucie County with updated signage near the project site. Details of the site plan have been revealed.

Plans for another site in Florida, a 76,245-square-foot site in St. Lucie County, had to be resubmitted after addressing environmental concerns about potential impacts to wildlife such as migratory birds and hatching sea turtles. County commissioners also had to approve changes to local zoning regulations to allow Buc-ee’s iconic 100-foot sign to tower next to the highway.

Buc-ee protests across the country

In Palmer Lake, Colorado, a former school bus carrying a “Stop Buc-ee’s” banner drove through northern El Paso County following local protests at a December city council meeting to discuss potential sites in the area.

Palmer Lake Mayor Grant Hebner told KRDO in February that the project is still in its early stages while the city awaits the results of multiple transportation and water use studies. Multiple residents and nonprofit groups sued the city to block the plan.

Buc-ee’s withdrew its request in March, citing “technical issues,” according to the Chron.

In Springfield, Missouri, demonstrators marched against city incentives for new Buc-ee construction that include paying the company up to $9.2 million over 20 years in reimbursement for needed infrastructure improvements.

Residents of Oak Creek, Wisconsin, filed a lawsuit in April to block the city from rezoning a proposed Buc-ee’s there. “Heave the Beave” fundraisers said runoff from the new Buc-ee could impact local groundwater and the nearby Root River, putting nearby horse ranches at risk. The lawsuit was dismissed.

Critics of the proposed 74,000-square-foot site in Stafford, Virginia, voiced the estimated increase in more than 20,000 vehicles daily, noise, light pollution and poor air quality. The Stafford County Board of Supervisors approved the plan on May 20.

play

Huge new Daytona Book refueling area

Check out this video of the huge new Buc-ee’s refueling area in Daytona Beach. Along with St. Augustine Buc-ee’s, it is the largest gas station in Florida.

Clayton Park, Daytona Beach News Journal

Why don’t people want Buc-ee’s?

Common complaints about potential travel centers of 70,000 square feet or more, each with more than 100 gas pumps, are increased traffic, environmental impact, and cost.

  • Increased traffic
    • Buc-ee’s attracts thousands of drivers every day, and traffic in the area has increased dramatically. Development often involves widening or adding new roads and traffic lights.
  • Environmental impact
    • “Buc-ee’s will consume more than 10 million gallons of our precious water this year,” most of which will go to nonresident travelers, according to the stopbuceespalmerlake.com website.
    • Each Buc-ee has 100 to 120 gas pumps, storing hundreds of thousands of gallons of oil and other dangerous chemicals underground, increasing the potential for contamination of local soils and water tables.
    • Exhaust emissions from the thousands of vehicles that visit Buc-ee’s each day can impact local residents.
    • Buc-ee development could disrupt local wildlife and endangered species through light pollution, noise, traffic, and chemical spills.
  • local income
    • Buc-ee’s often receive large tax breaks from local governments as an incentive to come there, and they sometimes negotiate “capital incentives” to pay for improvements.
    • Buc-ee’s typically offers gas at a lower price, so not having the same purchasing power could hurt your local gas station. Local shopping districts may also lose out to competition.
    • Buc-ee’s offers very competitive wages and salaries, but our employee satisfaction rating on Indeed.com is only 2.5 out of 5. A review by a Florida employee says, “At first glance, this job may seem desirable in terms of compensation and benefits, but don’t be fooled. Employee paranoia is so high here that it defines the culture.”

Buc-ee’s has also had some recent issues, with dozens of its stores receiving an “F” rating from the Better Business Bureau’s website.

On May 26, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) filed a complaint against the company, accusing the company of forcing a disabled cashier to stand at a store in Bastrop, Texas, and terminating her because she was unable to return to work.

As plans move forward in several states, local officials and residents will continue to weigh the benefits of new jobs and revenue against the potential burden on infrastructure and the environment.

CA Bridges is a journalist on the service journalism Connect team at USA TODAY Network-Florida. Sign up for our free newsletter, Florida TODAY, to get all of Florida’s best content straight to your inbox every weekday.

Man accused in shooting of Minnesota lawmaker expected to plead guilty

0

play

A man accused of assassinating a Minnesota lawmaker and his wife and shooting another is expected to change his plea to guilty on June 11, according to court filings.

On June 14, 2025, Vance Luther Boulter, 58, was arrested following an investigation following the shooting deaths of Minnesota Representative Melissa Hortman, her husband Mark, and their dog, and the shooting deaths of State Senator John Hoffman and his wife Yvette, both of whom were injured but survived.

Boulter was charged with two counts of murder with a firearm, stalking and firearms charges for the shootings of the Hortmans and Hoffmans, and the attempted shooting of the Hoffmans’ adult daughter, Hope. He pleaded not guilty in August 2025. Some of the federal charges carried the possibility of the death penalty.

Prosecutors agreed not to seek the death penalty in a plea agreement with Mr. Boulter, according to a letter from Minnesota District Attorney Daniel Rosen. According to records, the change in the Prosecution Review Board is scheduled for June 11 at 10 a.m. local time.

Mr. Belter’s attorney did not respond to a request for comment.

The shooting nearly a year ago shocked Minnesota and was quickly deemed an assassination and an “act of political extremism” by prosecutors. The MPs shot dead were members of the state’s Democratic, Farmers and Labor parties. Prosecutors said Boulter claimed in a letter to the FBI that he was being blackmailed in an outlandish conspiracy and that he had a list of other officials’ names.

What happened in the Minnesota lawmaker shooting incident?

In the early morning hours of June 14, 2025, Boelter dressed up as a police officer, equipped with a “surrealistic” silicone mask, a vest and an SUV with flashing lights, and drove through suburban Minneapolis to the homes of several members of Congress, authorities previously said.

Police and prosecutors say the man first arrived at Hoffman’s home, knocked on the door, yelled he was police, and told the resident to open the door around 2 a.m. Police and prosecutors say the man shot John and Yvette Hoffman multiple times. He also tried to shoot his daughter, Hope, but she was not injured, according to the indictment.

He then drove to the homes of two other state legislators. One person was not home. He encountered police at another home and fled in a car, officials said.

Officials said the man arrived at the Hortman residence around 3:30 a.m. He again took advantage of police tactics, according to the indictment. While Boulter was talking to Mark Hortman on the porch, police officers who had learned of the previous shooting also arrived for a welfare check. According to the indictment, Boulter fired shots into the residence, and officers engaged in a gunfight with Boulter. Prosecutors said the suspect shot Mark Hortman to death in the front door of the home, then shot Melissa Hortman multiple times, killing her as she tried to run up the stairs. Boulter was also charged with shooting and killing his family’s golden retriever, Gilbert.

Massive investigation begins in shooting incident

After Boulter fled, authorities launched what has been described as the largest manhunt in Minnesota history.

In the SUV he left behind, authorities said they found a note listing the names of other officials and a newspaper that read “No King,” an apparent reference to protests that occurred across the United States that day.

Boulter was arrested on June 15 near Green Isle, Minnesota. Authorities said police searching the Boulters’ home found an abandoned car near the farmhouse with a letter to the FBI inside.

Prosecutors previously said the letter included Boelter’s confession to shooting the lawmakers and allegation that Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz approached him about killing other lawmakers, a claim they called “delusional” or perhaps an attempt to abandon the investigation.

Charles Barkley calls post-collapse Spurs ‘stupidest basketball team’

0

NBA commentator Charles Barkley didn’t hold back in expressing his opinion on the San Antonio Spurs’ disappointing loss in Game 4 of the NBA Finals.

Barkley called the Spurs “the stupidest basketball team in the history of civilization” after they blew a 29-point lead on Wednesday, June 10.

The Spurs had a chance to tie the series at 2-2, but the Knicks stole it late and now hold a commanding lead in the series, 3-1.

“That was the most mismanaged, stupidest basketball game,” Barkley said on the postgame show “Inside the NBA.” “When you blow a 29-point lead, the other team has to help you out. The San Antonio Spurs helped the New York Knicks win this game by doing some of the stupidest things I’ve ever seen on a basketball court.”

The Spurs found success early in the first half, setting an NBA Finals record with 14 made threes (on 26 attempts).

San Antonio didn’t have the same luck in the second half, struggling from long range. The team made 3 of 17 shots from deep in the second half.

The Spurs missed nine of those three shots in the third quarter, allowing the Knicks to capitalize on missed opportunities and claw their way back into the game.

“They played terrible basketball,” Shaquille O’Neal said on the show. “They were happy with the lead and were talking about going back to San Antonio, but they didn’t play smart.”

The Knicks returned to the locker room at halftime trailing 76-49, but outscored the Spurs 58-30 in the second half.

Silver fell 1.56% on June 11, 2026

0

How much is silver worth per ounce today?

As of 8:05 AM ET on June 11, 2026, the spot price of silver is $63.84 per oz., according to the latest market data. The stock fell 1.56%, or $1.01 from the previous closing price of $64.85.

One year ago, silver was trading at $36.57 per ounce. This means that the price has increased by 74.57% in the last 12 months.

Key levels to look out for this week:

52 week low: $35.81

52 week high: $117.39

Silver is trading 45.62% below its 52-week high. It is 78.27% above its 52-week low.

What is the historical price of silver?

today 1 week ago 1 month ago 1 year ago
$63.84 $73.14 $86.77 $36.57

A week ago, silver was trading at $73.14 per ounce. Since then, the price has fallen by 12.72%.

One month ago, silver was trading at $86.77 per ounce. Since then, the price has fallen by 26.43%.

USA TODAY is an independent publisher and not an investment advisor. The information provided is for educational purposes only and should not be construed as financial, investment, or trading advice. We recommend that you seek independent advice from a qualified professional regarding any specific financial decisions you may make. Trading commodities, futures, and options involves significant risk of loss. Individual investment results may vary. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Prices can change rapidly and unpredictably due to factors such as supply/demand, weather, and geopolitical events. Our company assumes no responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of the information.

What is driving the price of silver today?

The price of silver is driven by inflation expectations, central bank policy, global economic conditions, and investor demand. The strength of currencies, especially the US dollar, can influence daily prices, as well as physical and industrial demand. For more on the market, read the latest investment news on USA TODAY Money.

What does XAG/USD mean?

XAG/USD is the ticker symbol used to track the spot price of silver in US dollars.

XAG stands for 1 troy ounce of silver and USD stands for US dollar. The estimated price tells you how many dollars it costs to purchase one ounce.

Prices are usually quoted per troy ounce, which is slightly heavier than a standard ounce.

Spot prices reflect real-time market transactions and serve as a benchmark for futures contracts, ETFs, and retail bullion prices.

how to invest in silver

Investing in silver can be done by buying physical coins and bars, buying ETFs that track its price, or investing in mining stocks. Be sure to weigh costs, storage needs, and risk tolerance before making a decision. The retail price of a coin or bar typically includes a premium over the spot price.

Disclaimer: This USA TODAY Money article was automatically generated using live market data from Alpha Vantage. If you think we made a mistake or have feedback, please use this form.

Did President Trump say “I love inflation”? Watch the video. Trump explains.

0

President Donald Trump said on June 10 that when he said, “I love inflation,” he meant that he was glad it wasn’t rising.

“The numbers were great” and “I like the inflation,” President Trump said in response to a reporter’s question about the May Consumer Price Index report. According to the CPI report, prices rose by more than 4% annually for the first time since 2023.

Shortly after speaking in the Oval Office, he clarified his comments to the New York Post by phone, saying that Democratic criticism of the comments was “taken out of context.”

“I love the inflation numbers because that’s what I’m talking about,” Trump told the Post. “The numbers are going to be staggering, because despite the fact that we’re at war, the numbers are showing to be much lower than expected. And when we come out of the war, the numbers will be lower than they were before we started.”

House Speaker Mike Johnson also said the comment was taken “completely out of context,” according to NBC News.

Did President Trump say “I love inflation”? clock.

play

President Donald Trump tells reporters he loves inflation

Asked if he was concerned about the latest inflation numbers, President Donald Trump told reporters he loves inflation.

President Trump made the remarks at a bill signing in the Oval Office on June 10, and are now widely shared among Democrats who want to make high prices a focus in the midterm elections. President Trump was asked if he was concerned about the Labor Department’s latest CPI, released earlier in the day.

“No, I love it. The numbers were great. You know what I really love? I love inflation. You know why?” Trump responded. “Because as soon as this war is over, you can say now what you didn’t know.”

Trump later said that Iran had brought millions of barrels of oil through the Strait of Hormuz without its knowledge. He later explained on Truth Social that he had carried out a “secret mission” to transport more than 100 million barrels of oil through the strait.

May report showed inflation rate was highest since 2023

Disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz, which acts as a chokepoint for about a fifth of the world’s oil, have sent oil and gas prices soaring since the Iran war began.

According to the May CPI report released by the Ministry of Labor on June 10, prices rose 0.5% from April to May, up 4.2% from the same month last year. This was the largest increase in the last three years.

President Trump has repeatedly said price hikes are worth the effort to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. He also said that although peace talks have stalled, the war is nearing an end, and that Trump will return to attacks because Iran is “taking too long” to reach a deal. “When the war ends, inflation will go down,” Trump said of inflation. “It will fall like a rock.”

According to a June 8 Reuters/Ipsos poll, President Trump’s approval rating is 35%, with most voters citing rising food and gasoline prices as a reason for their disapproval.

Contributors: Joey Garrison, Rachel Barber, Terry Collins, USA TODAY

Kinsey Crowley is a Trump Connect reporter for the USA TODAY Network. Please contact KCrowley@usatodayco.com. follow her X (Twitter), thread, blue sky and TikTok.

Which host city has the greatest weather risk for the World Cup?

0

The weather for the World Cup has been a hot topic.

In May, World Weather Attribution released a report analyzing the potential impact of heat on the World Cup, warning that approximately one in four matches could be played in dangerously hot conditions.

So NPR recently calculated which games are most at risk in hot, humid weather, and the analysis found that as many as one-third of games are at higher risk in hot, humid conditions. Bloomberg also published a visual story tracking which teams will play the more dangerous Heat schedule.

Ahead of the World Cup starting on June 11, USA TODAY conducted further analysis of recent weather trends at World Cup venues.

The analysis specifically counted the number of days each venue exceeded an estimated wet bulb temperature of 78.8 degrees Fahrenheit (26 degrees Celsius) during the 2016-2025 World Cup. Above this temperature, the world athletes’ association FIFPRO says heatstroke becomes a real risk.

USA TODAY found that Houston, Miami and Dallas had the most frequent outdoor heat loads during the World Cup.

At WBGT of 82.4 degrees Fahrenheit (28 degrees Celsius), FIFPRO recommends delaying or postponing play. Current FIFA regulations do not allow for postponements until the WBGT reaches 89.6 degrees Fahrenheit (32 degrees Celsius).

The 2026 tournament will include a three-minute hydration break every 22 minutes between each half of all 104 games.

WBGT is a heat stress index that takes into account temperature, humidity, sun, and wind. For this analysis, USA TODAY used hourly ERA5 land temperature and dew point data from the European Union’s Copernicus program to estimate shaded/sheltered WBGT.

This is not the first World Cup to be affected by adverse conditions. For the 2014 Brazil men’s tournament, FIFA introduced a cooling break if weather conditions reached 89.6 degrees Fahrenheit. And the last World Cup in Qatar was held in winter to avoid the country’s harshest weather.

It’s also worth noting that some matches at the 2026 World Cup will be played indoors, including the match between Houston and Dallas. These are the two cities with the highest outdoor heat loads in this analysis.

However, fans will likely experience the effects of heat on their way to and around the stadium. World Weather Attribution specifically noted in its report that fans “may also be adversely affected by the rise in WBGT.”

Heat loads also generally worsened in July in this analysis. And Miami’s Hard Rock, one of the stadiums that frequently suffers from the heat, will host three games that month, including the quarterfinals and third-place game. With Hard Rock Stadium especially outdoors, Miami recorded a WBGT of 78.8 degrees Fahrenheit on 90% of the analysis days, second only to Houston’s 94.1%.

The semifinals will be held in Dallas, which exceeded the 78.8 degrees Fahrenheit WBGT on 87.9% of analysis days, and Atlanta, which exceeded the 78.8 degrees Fahrenheit WBGT 46.2% of the time. However, both venues have temperature control.

The finals will be held outdoors in East Rutherford, New Jersey, where only a 20% chance of passing the standard. Three host cities, Mexico City, Guadalajara, and Toronto, failed to reach the baseline during the analysis period.

Methodology: USA TODAY analyzed hourly ERA5-ground temperature and dew point data near each 2026 World Cup venue from June 11 to July 19 from 2016 to 2025. The shaded/protected WBGT was estimated from temperature and humidity using the indoor/no solar loading WBGT approximation. The results represent outdoor conditions near each venue, rather than conditions inside the stadium or on the field in direct sunlight.

Gold fell 3.15% on June 11, 2026

0

How much is gold per ounce today?

As of 8:05 AM ET on June 11, 2026, the spot price of gold is $4,085.79 per oz., according to the latest market data. It was down 3.15% and $132.97 from the previous close of $4,218.76.

One year ago, gold was trading at $3,327.49 per ounce, which represents a 22.79% increase in price over the past 12 months.

Key levels to look out for this week:

52 week low: $3,267.56

52 week high: $5,477.79

Gold is trading 25.41% below its 52-week high. The stock is 25.04% above its 52-week low.

What is the historical price of gold?

today 1 week ago 1 month ago 1 year ago
$4,085.79 $4,455.36 $4,767.16 $3,327.49

A week ago, gold was trading at $4,455.36 per ounce. Since then, the price has fallen by 8.29%.

A month ago, gold was trading at $4,767.16 per ounce. Since then, the price has fallen by 14.29%.

USA TODAY is an independent publisher and not an investment advisor. The information provided is for educational purposes only and should not be construed as financial, investment, or trading advice. We recommend that you seek independent advice from a qualified professional regarding any specific financial decisions you may make. Trading commodities, futures, and options involves significant risk of loss. Individual investment results may vary. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Prices can change rapidly and unpredictably due to factors such as supply/demand, weather, and geopolitical events. Our company assumes no responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of the information.

What is driving the price of gold today?

The price of gold is driven by inflation expectations, central bank policies, global economic conditions, and investor demand. The strength of currencies, especially the US dollar, can influence daily prices, as well as physical and industrial demand. For more on the market, read the latest investment news on USA TODAY Money.

What is XAU/USD?

XAU/USD is the ticker symbol used to track the spot price of gold in US dollars.

XAU stands for 1 troy ounce of gold and USD stands for US dollar. The estimated price tells you how many dollars it costs to purchase one ounce.

Prices are usually quoted per troy ounce, which is slightly heavier than a standard ounce.

Spot prices reflect real-time market transactions and serve as a benchmark for futures contracts, ETFs, and retail bullion prices.

how to invest in gold

To invest in gold, you can buy physical coins and bars, buy ETFs that track the price of gold, or invest in mining stocks. Be sure to weigh costs, storage needs, and risk tolerance before making a decision. The retail price of a coin or bar typically includes a premium over the spot price.

Disclaimer: This USA TODAY Money article was automatically generated using live market data from Alpha Vantage. If you think we made a mistake or have feedback, please use this form.

Knicks win Game 4 of NBA Finals in biggest upset in NBA history

0

play

NEW YORK — Sometimes in sports, there are moments that feel impossible. What we all witnessed seemed to be an outrageous fantasy script. Once it’s over, everything feels like a blur.

This was one of those moments.

On Wednesday, June 10th, the New York Knicks completely dominated the San Antonio Spurs in the biggest comeback in NBA Finals history, erasing a 29-point lead.

And with a team just one win away from winning for the first time in 53 seasons, it was without a doubt the best game in the franchise’s storied history.

The Knicks went hot on the Spurs in the second half, but San Antonio missed 28 of their first 34 attempts after the break. This was a game in which New York completely collapsed in the first half, but then corrected itself and played their most calm game of the season.

And with this 3-1 lead, the Knicks inched closer to etching their place in NBA lore with one of the most remarkable performances in postseason history.

As a result, the team overall went from Jalen Brunson’s 36 points to OG Anunoby’s 33 points (including the game-winning tip-in and 7-of-9 3-point shooting).

This is the type of game that puts players in the heart of the city. Years from now, they’ll be talking about this night, about Brunson and Karl-Anthony Towns, about Anunoby. They will become icons. They become verbs.

And participants will be telling the story of this game for the rest of their lives.

“I want to thank our fans,” Towns said after the game. “They stuck with us. It was an ugly, ugly game. We didn’t take it in the first half. But they stuck with us. They stayed in their seats, kept rooting for us, kept finding ways to give us energy.”

“It’s a testament to their grit, their resiliency, the New York way. We found a way to come out of the mud and get through the first half. I think anyone who lives in New York knows that if you want to be successful in this city, you have to be able to get out of the mud safely. And tonight, we did that.”

But this was such an unbelievable victory that fans watching at home may have called off the game at half-time. It was so unbelievable that viewers probably scoured the internet for trivia and statistics about the biggest disaster in NBA Finals history. To that end, the Spurs set multiple NBA records in the first half.

  • Over the past 30 years in the playoffs, NBA teams have gone 4-750 in the playoffs when trailing by 20 points or more in the fourth quarter (according to NBA statistics expert Keerthika Uthayakumar).
  • In the first half, the Spurs set a record for most 3-pointers in a half in Finals history with 14.
  • The Spurs scored 76 points in the first half, the most points in a first half by a road team in NBA Finals history.
  • The Spurs’ 41-22 advantage (19 points) after one game was the largest first-quarter lead by a road team in Finals history.

The second half was a completely different story.

Impossibly, the Spurs missed 31 of 39 field goal attempts and 14 of 17 3-point attempts in the second half. Watching the Knicks first cut the lead to 20 points, then 10, then five, shooting just 20.5 percent before the Knicks finally pulled off an unthinkable comeback.

It is not correct to say that this is a story of two halves. Must read to understand. The points obtained after the first half are as follows.

“Master class in self-destruction”: Knicks fully uncovered in first half

After Mitchell Robinson shot him in the throat with an easy elbow, Victor Wembaneyama, sprawled out on the court, stared at Robinson and repeatedly pointed to his temple. And while doing that, Wenbanyama was smiling. The message was undeniable.

I’m inside your head.

The New York Knicks were completely out of sorts in the first half of Game 4 of the NBA Finals, and frustration with the officiating soured the team’s mindset.

It probably started right after Game 3, when Knicks coach Mike Brown started his postgame press conference complaining about officiating and free throw inconsistencies. That tough mentality didn’t energize the Knicks, and instead spilled over into Game 4. That contributed to New York’s overall undisciplined play.

All-Star center Karl-Anthony Towns, who has become an integral part of New York’s offense, committed two fouls in the first 1:02 of the game. The second time was completely unnecessary, when he stepped on Wembang Yama on his way to the hoop but pinned Wembang Yama’s arm to his body.

After Wembaneyama hit Robinson against the post for a scoop lay-in, Robinson elbowed him and ended up with a flagrant foul. Wembaneyama bit Robinson with his jaw as both players took to the floor, until Robinson’s frustration boiled over.

Late in the second quarter, backup guard Jose Alvarado realized he had to box out Wenbanyama at the expense of his 16-inch height before he stumbled to the court. As he stood up, Alvarado unnecessarily hooked one of Wenbanyama’s thighs. As a result, De’Aaron Fox’s free throw resulted in three points and an and-1 foul.

It was a master class in self-destruction, steeped in New York aggression, execution, and overall nature.

Playing in the NBA Finals is tough enough, especially against an up-and-coming team with unique, generational talent like Wenban Yama. Still, New York has managed to fabricate the narrative that they are playing. against officials. That’s a recipe for destruction.

The Knicks shot 29.4% in the first quarter. By the end of the first half, the Knicks had seven turnovers to San Antonio’s only two, resulting in a -11 turnover differential. Defensively, New York gave it their all, allowing the Spurs to make 14 of 26 attempts (53.8%) from beyond the arc, setting a record for most 3-pointers in a first half in NBA Finals history.

Earlier this week, before the results of Game 3 were known, the city was electric. Fans were absolutely delighted. The only question here was whether it would be a sweep or if the Spurs could find a way to extend the series.

But now, facing a 27-point deficit at halftime, the Knicks relinquished any momentum they had in the NBA Finals, and the series returned to San Antonio for Game 5 on Saturday, June 13th.

Forget about sweeps and parades. The Knicks now need to save the series. And the only way they can do it is by keeping a semblance of calm.

***

As it turns out, New York has discovered just that.

Penn and Teller weigh in on death row appeal to Supreme Court

0


Masters of perception manipulation say they have a duty to expose the type of junk science allegedly used to convict a man of murder.

WASHINGTON – Magicians Penn and Teller say that as masters of manipulating perception, they have an obligation to “reveal flim-flam when they see it.”

And they told the Supreme Court that such deceptive nonsense was on display in the case of a Texas man sentenced to death for murder after a key witness was put under “investigative hypnosis” before trial.

The court is considering whether to hear the appeal of Charles Flores, who was convicted of fatally shooting a suburban Dallas woman in 1998 during an attempted burglary.

Flores’ lawyer said his trial was “irreparably tainted by junk science and official misconduct.”

Prosecutors have argued that Flores had multiple opportunities to challenge his conviction.

The Supreme Court refused to hear the earlier appeal.

His support from Penn & Teller will remain strong this time around, despite the Supreme Court refusing to intervene more than once and submissions from psychology experts making similar points about how memories can be tampered with.

In Flores’ case, a neighbor of the murdered woman initially said she saw two white men with long hair enter the victim’s home. She couldn’t pick Flores, a short, shaved-headed Hispanic man, out of a photo lineup. And the computer-generated drawing she created looked nothing like him.

Flores’ lawyers claim the witness was prompted to change his memory through hypnosis sessions that included questions such as whether the man he witnessed had short, shaven, and clean-cut hair.

A witness said the man had long, dirty hair and was asked, “Is it neatly cut or trimmed?”

Near the end of the session, the officer told the witness, “The more time that passes, the more you will remember these events.”

At a trial 13 months later, after Flores’ photo appeared in the news, a witness testified that he “100%” saw Flores enter the home.

Investigative hypnosis called “flimflam”

In a legal brief supporting Flores, Penn & Teller said police used cognitive techniques similar to those used against witnesses to deceive audiences.

For example, a magician may pretend to shuffle a stacked deck of cards and then ask a member of the audience to shuffle the deck. The magician might then say, “We all shuffled the cards. You cut the cards.” This is a slight blur of the facts just enough for the participants to “remember” that everyone shuffled the cards.

“Penn & Teller acknowledges that they are experts in magic, not law,” lawyers wrote in a brief supporting Flores. “But they believe that something is fundamentally wrong with the justice system if law enforcement can use flimsy methods like investigative hypnosis to reconstruct the missing memories of key witnesses in executions.”

Two weeks before Flores was scheduled to be executed in 2016, he was given an opportunity to raise new concerns about witness identification. After an evidentiary hearing, Flores was denied a new trial.

The Supreme Court also rejected Flores’ appeals in 2021 and 2022.

Texas: Convicted murderer is reusing old claims

Prosecutors argue that Flores’ latest appeal “repackages and reasserts essentially the same allegations.”

Flores’ lawyers countered that he was bringing forward new information, including “a new consensus in scientific research on eyewitness memory.”

But while Texas passed a law in 2013 that allows people to prove that science, which has since been discredited, contributed to their wrongful conviction, the state’s highest criminal court has ruled against all death row inmates who invoked the law.

“A Texas-sized due process problem exists that forces those sentenced to death like Mr. Flores to make credible claims of innocence,” his lawyers wrote to the court.

The justices could decide whether to hear Flores’ appeal as early as June 15.

Here’s how to watch the 2026 World Cup opening ceremony and start time.

0

play

The countdown to the 2026 FIFA World Cup is almost over, and it will be the most ambitious competition yet. For the first time ever, the event will kick off with three spectacular ceremonies, one for each host country, that reflect and celebrate North American culture.

The group stage has officially begun and the festival begins on Thursday, June 11th. The first opening ceremony will take place at Mexico City’s legendary Estadio Azteca. The celebration, set 90 minutes before kick-off, will showcase Mexican culture, music and traditions before hosts Mexico take on South Africa in their first Group A match.

The second opening ceremony will be held on Friday, June 12th at SoFi Stadium in Inglewood, California. The event boasts a star-studded line-up, with global superstars Katy Perry, Future, Anitta, Lisa, Rema and Tyra set to perform. Their performance will set the stage for the United States’ first game against Paraguay.

Watch the World Cup Opening Ceremony with Fubo

Canada will wrap up three opening ceremonies on Friday, June 12 at BMO Field in Toronto, showcasing Canadian talent. Artists including Alanis Morissette, Alessia Cara, Elianna, Jesse Reyes, Michael Bublé, Nora Fatehi, Sanjoy, Vegedream and William Prince will perform ahead of Canada’s opener against Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Here’s how to watch all three opening ceremonies of the 2026 FIFA World Cup.

What time is the World Cup opening ceremony?

The opening ceremony for the 2026 FIFA World Cup will begin at 1:30pm ET on June 11, just before the Group A match between Mexico and South Africa. The United States and Canada will hold opening ceremonies on Friday, June 12, 90 minutes before their respective group kickoffs.

Mexico’s 2026 World Cup Opening Ceremony

Watch the Mexico World Cup Opening Ceremony in Spanish

2026 World Cup Opening Ceremony in the United States

Watching the US World Cup Opening Ceremony

Canada’s 2026 World Cup Opening Ceremony

Watch the Canada World Cup Opening Ceremony

buy world cup tickets

World Cup Group Preview

Group A (Mexico) | Group B | Group C | Group D (USMNT) | Group E | Group F | Group G | Group H | Group I | Group J | Group K | Group L

2026 World Cup Odds

7 surprising numbers from the Knicks’ miraculous Game 4 comeback

0

play

On Wednesday, June 10th, the New York Knicks made history by overcoming a 29-point deficit to defeat the San Antonio Spurs 107-106 in Game 4 of the NBA Finals at Madison Square Garden in New York.

Victor Wembaneyama and the Western Conference champions pummeled the home team in the first half, building a 29-point lead. After that, the team settled down, shooting 6-of-34 (17.6%) to start the second half, but Defensive Player of the Year committed a flagrant foul and the Knicks continued to steadily close the gap. OG Anunoby hit the winning shot with 1.2 seconds left.

Anunoby had 33 points and Jalen Brunson had 36 points, five rebounds and seven assists.

This was the biggest upset in NBA Finals history, with the Knicks falling to 3-1. It was the first home series win for either team. In a playoff series where the first three games are won by the road team, the winner of Game 4 wins the series 13-3.

Here are some other Knicks stats from this epic win:

  • 29 points – Biggest comeback in NBA Finals history
  • NBA teams are 4-750 In the past 30 years, a lead of 20 points or more in the fourth quarter has advanced the playoffs (according to NBA statistician Keerthika Uthayakumar).
  • The Knicks are 5-3 When they trailed by 20 points or more in the past two postseasons. The rest of the NBA 4-71 (By Associated Press Writer Josh Dubow)

The Spurs recorded the following shocking statistics in the first half before allowing a 29-point lead.

  • 14 – Most 3-point shots in the first half in Finals history
    • Devin Vassell – 4
    • De’Aaron Fox – 3
    • Dylan Harper – 3
    • Steffon Castle – 1
    • Julien Champagnie – 1
    • Victor Wenbanyama – 1
    • Carter Bryant – 1
  • 76 point – Third-highest first half scoring in Finals history (according to ESPN)
  • 76 points – Most points in the first half by a road team in Finals history
  • 41-22 (19 point difference) – Largest first quarter lead by a road team in Finals history

According to the NBA, the previous record for most 3-pointers in a half was 13, set by the Cleveland Cavaliers in 2017.

Wenbanyama experienced a historic playoff run, recording a record 12 blocks in Game 1 of the Western Conference Semifinals and becoming the youngest player to score 40 points or more and grab 20 rebounds in Game 1 of the Western Conference Finals.

There’s so much hype surrounding Wenby that even Wendy’s considered changing its name and menu in honor of the rising star.

But maybe it’s time to change the name of TGI Fridays to OG Anunoby’s?

Game 5 of the NBA Finals will be held in San Antonio on Saturday, June 13th at 8:30pm ET.

Michigan shooting suspect had unstable family relationship: police

0

play

Editor’s note: This article discusses domestic violence. If you or a loved one is suffering from domestic violence or an abusive relationship, call the National Domestic Violence Hotline at 1-800-799-SAFE (1-800-799-7233).) Or visit www.thehotline.org. Callers can remain anonymous.

A man opened fire at a family home in suburban Detroit, killing four people, including his parents and brother, before surrendering to police, authorities said.

Livonia Police Chief Tom Goralski said officers were dispatched to a home in Livonia, about 20 miles (32 kilometers) west of Detroit, on a report of multiple shots fired at around 5:35 p.m. local time on June 9. After officers arrived on the scene, Goralski said the suspect came out of the home with “his hands above his head and his fingers clasped.”

“Officers approached him and asked him if he knew where the shots were coming from. The subject responded and stated that he had shot his family in their home,” the police chief said at a June 10 press conference.

Police said the suspect, identified only as a 25-year-old resident of the home, was taken into custody without incident.

Goralski said officers entered the residence and found the suspect’s brother, Tanner Ray Pierce, 22, and Tanner’s girlfriend, Nevaeh Mae Jaslyn Finch, 21, in a bedroom. The suspect’s parents, Sterling Ray Pierce, 58, and Holly Marie Kimball, 53, were found in the backyard.

All victims suffered gunshot wounds. According to police, despite life-saving efforts, all were pronounced dead.

“This incident is confined to a residence and there is no threat to the public,” police said in a news release. “This is a tragic event and our thoughts are with the families and loved ones affected by this incident.”

Police: Suspect had ‘contentious relationship’ with parents

Goralski said police had not visited the residence in previous incidents involving the suspect, but said the suspect had a “contentious relationship” with his parents. The police chief added that investigators are not aware of any documented mental health concerns or criminal history regarding the suspect.

“We’re looking into the motive at this point. All I can say is that there was a controversial relationship between the suspect and his parents. That’s all we can say,” Goralski said. “We don’t know what happened yesterday.”

Goralski said a semi-automatic rifle believed to have been used in the shooting was recovered at the scene. Investigators are still working on a search warrant, but the police chief said they found several other weapons.

Goralski said the investigation is ongoing. Police will forward their findings to the Wayne County Prosecutor’s Office for review and determination of charges.

Latest domestically-related mass shootings in the United States

The incident in Livonia is the latest in a series of domestic-related shootings across the United States in recent months.

Over the weekend, Los Angeles police announced they were investigating a murder-suicide in the Canoga Park neighborhood, the Los Angeles Times reported. When officers responded to a report of a shooting on the night of June 7, they discovered a man had shot and killed his 10-year-old twin sons, then killed himself, the Times reported.

The shooting occurred about two weeks after a family of four was found dead of gunshot wounds at a home in North Hills, another neighborhood in the San Fernando Valley region of Los Angeles County, the Times reported. The newspaper reported that authorities believe the 30-year-old mother shot herself in the head on May 27 after fatally shooting her husband and two children.

On June 1, a 52-year-old man killed six members of his family in what appeared to be a domestic dispute in a small eastern Iowa city, according to local police. Police said the suspect later committed suicide when confronted by officers.

In May, Houston police announced they were investigating a murder-suicide after four relatives were found shot to death in their home. Authorities later reported that evidence showed the 52-year-old man shot his wife and two children before shooting himself.

A community in northwestern Louisiana was rocked in April by a mass shooting that left eight children dead. At the time, the Shreveport Police Department announced that the suspected gunman killed seven of his children and injured his wife and another woman.

According to the Johns Hopkins University Gun Violence Prevention Center, domestic violence “is a public health crisis, and given the availability and accessibility of guns in the United States, this violence is often perpetrated with firearms.”

On its website, the center said researchers found that nearly half of murdered women in the United States were killed by a current or former intimate partner. More than half of these incidents involved firearms, the center said.

The center also noted that approximately 68% of mass shootings from 2014 to 2019 involved perpetrators who had killed a family member or intimate partner or had a history of domestic violence.

Contributor: Susan Bromley and Laura Colvin, USA TODAY Network

Poll finds that majority of Americans are concerned about job losses due to AI

0

play

More than half of Americans (53%) are worried that they or someone in their family will lose their job due to artificial intelligence, a new Reuters/Ipsos poll finds.

The findings come as companies ramp up investment in AI while cutting workforces, fueling concerns across demographics. Concerns about job loss were consistent across age, gender, and education levels, but Democrats were more likely than Republicans to express concern.

The six-day poll of 4,531 adults nationwide was conducted in the wake of a wave of AI-related layoffs by major companies. Software company Intuit told employees last month it would lay off 17% of its global workforce to streamline operations and sharpen focus on core businesses, including its AI efforts.

U.S. employers announced 60,620 layoffs in March, with AI being the primary reason for a quarter of the layoffs, according to the April Challenger, Gray & Christmas report.

Last year, Klarna CEO Sebastian Siemiatkowski told CNBC that the Swedish fintech company had cut its workforce by 40%, and Ford CEO Jim Farley said AI “will literally replace half of all white-collar workers in the United States.”

Jennifer Shalhoub, a 62-year-old freelance writer from Little Ferry, New Jersey, told Reuters that she recently lost a job writing letters to government officials to advocate for specific policies, and that she suspects the rise of AI has something to do with the loss.

“AI is taking over as people care less and less about the quality of the work being produced,” Shalhoub said.

AI faces cultural backlash

Artificial intelligence technology is facing a backlash. Elected leaders and even Pope Leo XIV have issued warnings about it, as it can be used as a tool for political propaganda, entertainment, and even war.

On May 25, the Catholic Church issued Leo’s encyclical, saying that what AI needs is “more active political engagement that can slow things down at a time when everything is accelerating.”

Students at the University of Arizona booed former Google CEO Eric Schmidt when he spoke about the impact of AI at their graduation ceremony last month.

The backlash comes as young job seekers struggle to land entry-level jobs.

According to research from Cengage Group, 76% of employers report hiring fewer or the same number of entry-level positions in 2025, up from 69% in 2024. A study by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York found that 42% of recent college graduates are “underemployed,” the highest level since 2020. This means they usually have jobs that don’t require a college degree.

While AI isn’t the only factor driving stricter hiring, Peter Watkins, senior director of university programs at the CFA Institute, previously told USA TODAY that technology is playing a role.

“If companies are looking to reduce resources, AI will start to become a solution to that, but in a different economic climate you’ll probably be leveraging AI from an innovation and growth perspective,” Watkins said.

Contributed by: Reuters

Wednesday, June 10th Powerball Jackpot $238 Million: Winning Numbers

0

play

The Powerball jackpot has increased to $238 million with a cash value of $106.1 million ahead of the drawing on Wednesday, June 10th.

Since its launch in 1992, the Powerball jackpot has been hit more than 400 times. Indiana, Missouri, Minnesota, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin rank among the states with the most winning jackpot tickets.

It’s been over a month since I last won the Powerball jackpot. The last time the top prize was returned was on May 2, when two players from Texas and Florida split the $20 million prize.

Here’s what you need to know about Wednesday night’s Powerball drawing.

What are the Powerball winning numbers for June 10th?

The winning numbers for Wednesday, June 10th’s Powerball drawing are: 12, 31, 38, 60, 66 and the powerball 14. The multiplier for “power play” is 2x.

Do I have to be a US citizen or resident to play Powerball?

The short answer is no. You do not need to be a US citizen or resident to play Powerball. Anyone visiting any of the 45 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, or the U.S. Virgin Islands may purchase lottery tickets from authorized and licensed retailers, regardless of nationality, as long as they meet the legal age requirements (usually 18 years old) at the time of purchase.

Top 10 Powerball Jackpots

  • $2.04 billion in California on November 7, 2022
  • December 24, 2025, $1.817 billion in Arkansas.
  • $1.787 billion in Missouri and Texas on September 6, 2025
  • $1.765 billion in California on October 11, 2023
  • January 13, 2016, $1.586 billion in California, Florida, and Tennessee
  • April 6, 2024, $1.326 billion in Oregon.
  • $1.08 billion in California on July 19, 2023
  • $842.4 million in Michigan on January 1, 2024
  • March 27, 2019, $768.4 million in Wisconsin
  • August 23, 2017, $758.7 million in Massachusetts

How to play Powerball

Powerball tickets cost $2 per play and are sold in 45 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. This can be done at a variety of locations, including local convenience stores, gas stations, and grocery stores. In some states, you can purchase Powerball tickets online depending on your local jurisdiction.

Once you have your ticket, you have to choose six numbers. Five of them are white balls numbered from 1 to 69. The red Powerball range is 1-26. You can also add a “Power Play” for $1, which increases your winnings on all non-jackpot prizes. “Power Play” multipliers allow you to increase your winnings by 2x, 3x, 4x, 5x, or 10x.

A “Quick Pick” option is also available if you want the computer to select the numbers for you. To win the jackpot, players must match all five white balls with the red Powerball in any order.

Powerball drawings are held on Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday nights. The winnings continue to increase even if no one wins the jackpot.

Fernando Cervantes Jr. is a trending news reporter for USA TODAY. Contact us at fernando.cervantes@usatodayco.com and follow us at X @fern_cerv_.

Taylor Swift sits courtside with Haim Sisters at NBA Finals

0

Taylor Swift, you look like Stevie Nicks.

Fresh off a surprise performance at the Toy Story 5 premiere and hours before being officially inducted into the Songwriters Hall of Fame, the pop star was spotted with some familiar faces at Game 4 of the NBA Finals.

On Wednesday, June 10, Swift arrived at Madison Square Garden with friends and collaborators Alana and Este Haim as the New York Knicks took on the San Antonio Spurs. The trio wore some nifty merchandise: blue and orange T-shirts with Knicks puns on them.

Swift’s shirt read “Stevie Nicks,” a nod to one of her musical inspirations. Alana’s shirt had “Nickelback” written on it in the same style, and Este’s shirt had “Nickel Kidman” embroidered on it.

They greeted a few fans as they made their way to their courtside seats, and were also seen jamming to a remix of Pitbull’s “Hotel Room Service” while sitting next to Ben Stiller with drinks in hand. Sitting next to them was Broadway’s newest star, Mariska Hargitay. She is known to Swifties as the inspiration for Swift’s cat, Olivia Benson.

Kylie Jenner and Timothée Chalamet, Jackie and Adam Sandler, Spike Lee, Jerry Seinfeld and Chris Rock were other stars spotted at the game.

The Madison Square Garden performance marked the singer’s second high-profile NBA appearance in less than a month.

In May, Swift and her fiancé, Travis Kelce, attended Game 3 of the Eastern Conference Finals between the Cleveland Cavaliers and the New York Knicks at Rocket Arena in Cleveland. Kelce, who grew up near Cleveland Heights, was rooting for his hometown team as the Cavaliers tried to fight back in the series.

During the game, Kelce appeared on the arena’s video board and chugged a beer, drawing cheers from fans while Swift applauded from her courtside seat.

Taylor Swift aims to be inducted into the Songwriters Hall of Fame after ‘Toy Story 5’ premiere

The basketball game comes less than 24 hours after Swift surprised fans at the premiere of Pixar’s Toy Story 5 in Los Angeles.

Although Swift does not voice any characters in the film, she plays a prominent role in the film’s soundtrack with her country radio single “I Knew It, I Knew You.” The singer had cast and crew members autograph original VHS copies of “Toy Story.” Tom Hanks spoke about the incident on USA TODAY.

“It means so much to me to be a small part of the world of these movies,” Swift told the audience during the screening. “And Toy Story 5 is my favorite Toy Story movie. I’m so happy to be a part of it.”

Swift is in New York City for the Songwriters Hall of Fame dinner, where she will become the youngest female songwriter ever to be inducted.

The 14-time Grammy Award winner joins a class of 2026 that includes KISS’ Gene Simmons and Paul Stanley, Alanis Morissette, Kenny Loggins, Christopher “Tricky” Stewart, Terry Britten and Graham Lyle, and Walter Afanasyev.

For Swift, the win caps a career that has produced chart-topping albums across multiple genres and a catalog that includes songs such as “Love Story,” “Blank Space,” “Anti-Hero,” “The Last Great American Dynasty” and “All Too Well (10-Minute Version).” These five songs are among the songs she chose to represent her work during the Hall of Fame nomination process.

Don’t miss any Taylor Swift news. Sign up for our free weekly newsletter, This Swift Beat.

Taylor Swift reporter Brian West on Instagram, TikTok, and X as @BryanWestTV.

This affordable EV has our approval

0

play

  • The 2026 Toyota bZ is the automaker’s first fully electric vehicle and features 25% more battery life than its predecessor.
  • Starting at less than $35,000, the bZ is an affordable option in the electric SUV market.
  • This electric SUV offers a smooth ride, a spacious interior, and an EPA-estimated 314 miles of range per charge.

The Toyota bZ is the automaker’s first fully electric vehicle, and after undergoing a mid-cycle refresh in 2025, the 2026 model features 25% more battery range than previous versions.

I spent a week driving the 2026 Toyota bZ The 2025 Toyota bZ also earned the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety’s Top Safety Pick+ award, but the 2026 version underperformed in the organization’s most recent round of testing.

The XLE we tested is the base model of Toyota’s bZ and starts at just under $35,000. Pricing for the upgraded Limited trim starts at $43,300. I recently tested the Chevrolet Blazer EV, bZ’s main competitor in the electric SUV segment.

The 2026 Toyota bZ is notable for its standard features, affordability, and practicality. After a week of hands-on testing behind the wheel of Toyota’s first all-electric vehicle, here’s what we learned.

What makes the 2026 Toyota bZ stand out?

The 2026 Toyota bZ stands out from its segment rivals with its unique new exterior and interior design. It also has a strong value proposition (starting at just under $35,000 for the base model), which propels it to the top of the rankings, as the average price of a new electric vehicle is nearly $54,532, according to Cox Automotive.

During our week of testing, the Toyota bZ’s interior and cargo area felt very spacious for daily driving needs. We also enjoyed the bZ’s large screen for infotainment, Android Auto and Apple CarPlay connectivity.

How does the 2026 Toyota bZ drive?

Performance, usability and efficiency

The 2026 Toyota bZ offers a smooth, quiet and comfortable ride with excellent battery life. It handles well and accelerates quickly, making it fun to drive every day. Daily drivers often forget that they are driving an electric vehicle until it is time to charge the battery.

The Toyota bZ is nimble, and the Japanese automaker has decided to keep the vehicle’s dimensions the same during its 2025 facelift.

The 2026 Toyota bZ is powered by a lithium-ion battery and uses a single electric motor for front-wheel drive models and dual motors for all-wheel drive models. Toyota says total system output can reach up to 338 horsepower. This electric SUV is front-wheel drive and has an EPA-estimated driving range of approximately 314 miles per battery charge. Our base model road test vehicle only lost about 20% of its battery after a week of field driving.

Does the 2026 Toyota bZ fit your lifestyle?

Load capacity, space, practicality

2026 Toyota bZ is 184.6 inches long, 65 inches high, and 73.2 inches wide (without mirrors). The base model we tested had 27.7 cubic feet of cargo space behind the rear seats, which we found to be plenty for hauling luggage and groceries. Folding the rear seats significantly increases interior space to approximately 56 cubic feet.

Is the 2026 Toyota bZ worth it?

price, value, competition

Pricing for the 2026 Toyota bZ starts at $34,650 before taxes and surcharges, which seems like a modest price considering recent new car prices. Two trims are available, ranging from the base model XLE to the top-of-the-line Limited. Top-trim Limited vehicles start at $43,300 but come with all the bells and whistles, including all-wheel drive, a panoramic roof with a power sunshade, and a split-roof rear spoiler.

I really like the Toyota bZ XLE. If you want to save as much money as possible, this is the one to choose. For the most features, I’d choose the Limited trim ($43,300).

The Toyota bZ competes in the electric five-seat SUV segment with models from competitors such as the Tesla Model Y, Kia EV6, Hyundai Ioniq 5, and Chevrolet Blazer EV. According to CarGurus, the bZ was the 6th cheapest electric car in the U.S. in 2025.

Who should buy the 2026 Toyota bZ?

If you want an affordable electric SUV that offers great value at a fair price, you should buy the 2026 Toyota bZ.

The base model trim we tested comes with a 14-inch touchscreen infotainment system and Toyota Safety Sense 3.0, the Japanese manufacturer’s suite of advanced driver-assistance technologies, including a pre-collision system with pedestrian detection, lane departure warning, lane tracing assist, and road sign assist.

Billy Ray Cyrus details battle with sepsis, praises Harley’s support

0


Country music icon Cyrus was diagnosed with vocal cord paralysis in 2024 after a near-fatal bout of sepsis, she revealed in a new interview with People magazine.

play

Billy Ray Cyrus’ return to music isn’t just a return to Hollywood, it’s a second chance at life.

The country music icon, who is gearing up to release his first new album in seven years, opened up about his recent health struggles in an interview with People magazine on Wednesday, June 10th.

The “Achy Breaky Heart” singer, 64, was diagnosed with vocal cord paralysis in 2024 after being hospitalized with near-fatal sepsis.

“I don’t know exactly how it evolved. It was my worst nightmare,” Cyrus told the outlet. “Two years before that, my mother passed away at that hospital, on the floor I was on.”

According to the Cleveland Clinic and Mayo Clinic, sepsis is a life-threatening condition that occurs when a person’s immune system responds inappropriately to an infection, damaging healthy tissues and organs.

If not treated quickly, the disease can lead to organ failure and death, according to the Cleveland Clinic. Dr. James Morrison, chair of the clinic’s Corporate Sepsis Steering Committee, previously told USA TODAY that sepsis is the “leading cause of in-hospital mortality.”

Cyrus said her entire body was “swollen” and at one point her medical team told her to “get her body together.” However, the Grammy-winning singer later said he had made a full recovery, describing his return to health as a “miracle.”

Cyrus, the father of pop singers Miley Cyrus and Noah Cyrus, credits his family with helping him recover.

“At a very overwhelming moment in my life, my little grandson Bear (Brazon Cyrus’ son) looked at me and said, ‘Try again,'” Silas recalled. “And until that moment, he had never spoken to me at all. I didn’t even know if he knew my name.

“At that moment I thought, ‘He’s saying something.’ Is it about love? Music? Somehow I had to try again with both. So I’m learning to try again.”

The singer-songwriter also credited his girlfriend, actress and model Elizabeth Hurley, with facilitating his musical recovery. Cyrus, who was previously married to Tish Cyrus and Firerose, revealed her romance with Harley in April 2025.

“Elizabeth would say to me, ‘Can you hear your voice coming back?'” Silas said. “She even encouraged me to do ‘The Masked Singer,’ and she said, ‘You need to do that to challenge yourself.’ And I thought, ‘God, why is she so smart? ”

Cyrus’ new album, The Hill, is scheduled for release on June 16th.

“I sing. I sing every day. I feel like my voice is great,” Cyrus said. “This might be one of the best moments.”

Contributors: Sara Moniuszko and Daryl Austin, USA TODAY

Capital gains tax explanation on precious metals

0

Precious metals provide an important hedge against portfolio risk, but they don’t come at a cost. Many investors believe that gold and silver are taxed the same as stocks and bonds, but the IRS classifies these assets differently.

When it comes to selling metals, it can have a significant impact on the profits you take home. In fact, the IRS classifies most precious metals as collectibles, so profits earned on these items can be taxed as high as 28%.

Here’s how much you can expect to pay based on your income level, how long you’ve held the investment, and its account type.

Precious metals are not taxed like stocks.

Gold and silver, like stocks, are not taxed. Capital gains on stocks are generally taxed at rates of 0%, 15%, or 20%, depending on your taxable income.

On the other hand, the IRS almost always taxes precious metals as collectibles. This means that profits are taxed at your marginal tax rate, with a top rate of 28%. However, keep in mind that if you sell your stock, you will only pay tax on capital gains.

That said, capital gains on both stocks and precious metals are taxed like ordinary income if held for less than one year.

What the IRS taxes as collectibles

According to IRS tax rules, collectibles include metals, coins, jewelry, and other items of tangible value, such as art and antiques. This means that most types and forms of precious metals are taxed at the same rate, including both silver, gold, platinum and palladium bars and coins.

However, some forms of precious metals are not considered collectibles, such as certain coins, some bullion in IRAs, and non-physically backed ETFs. These holdings have their own tax rules.

Why does the IRS tax precious metals as collectibles?

Generally, the U.S. government taxes precious metals more than it taxes investments such as stocks and bonds. According to Purba Mukherji, an economist at the University of Connecticut, this is by design: “The tax law is designed to encourage people to keep their savings in the form of U.S. dollars instead of holding potential rivals such as precious metals,” she says.

What tax rate do I pay on gold and silver profits?

The 28% collectibles tax rate is the maximum tax rate and not necessarily the tax rate you pay. If your ordinary income tax rate is lower than 28%, your precious metals profits will generally be taxed at that lower rate.

“For example, if a taxpayer’s marginal tax rate is 22%, they will pay taxes at that marginal rate,” says Elliott Bassin, an accountant, financial planner, and partner at Fiondella Milone & LaSaracina LLP.

For example, if you buy gold for $1,000 and then sell it for $2,000, your taxable gain will be $1,000. At a tax rate of 22%, you would pay $220 in federal capital gains taxes. At up to 28% collectibles rate, you’ll pay $280.

The exact amount of tax depends on your income, holding period, and whether additional taxes such as net investment income tax (NIIT) apply.

Who pays the 28% tax rate and when?

You will only pay the 28% tax rate if your ordinary income tax rate is higher than 28%. According to IRS guidelines, this generally applies only to single filers who earn more than $201,775 per year or married couples filing jointly who earn more than $403,555 per year.

Additionally, you only pay taxes on capital gains you realize. This means you only pay taxes on your profits if you actually sell your silver, gold, or other precious metals at a profit.

Who pays net investment income tax?

High-yielding investors may also be liable to pay 3.8% net investment income tax (NIIT) on their precious metal gains. This generally applies if your modified adjusted gross income exceeds $200,000 as an individual or $250,000 for a married couple filing jointly. In such cases, the gain on the sale of precious metals may result in additional tax being imposed on top of the existing 28% collectibles capital gains tax rate.

How does the IRS know if you’re selling gold?

The IRS may track sales of precious metals in several ways. Some precious metals dealers are required to file information returns with the IRS for certain transactions that meet certain reporting criteria. If you sell through a brokerage account, such as a gold or silver ETF, the transaction may also be reported on tax forms sent to both you and the IRS.

However, not all precious metal sales are automatically reported. Regardless of whether a transaction is reported by a dealer or a financial institution, taxpayers are responsible for accurately reporting their taxable gains on their federal income tax returns.

Comparison of short-term and long-term capital gains

The length of time you own precious metals can have a significant impact on your tax liability. The 28% collectibles tax rate only applies to long-term gains, i.e. metal gains held for more than one year.

If you sell gold, silver, or other precious metals after owning them for less than a year, the gain is considered short-term capital gain and is taxed as ordinary income.

For example, if you buy $1,000 worth of gold and sell it 10 years later for $2,000, you will have a long-term capital gain of $1,000. Because physical gold is generally treated as a collectible, profits from it are taxed at marginal tax rates of up to 28%.

If you are subject to the full 28% recovery rate, you may have to pay up to $280 in federal taxes on that $1,000 of gain. Investors in lower tax brackets may pay less.

This example does not take into account state taxes, transaction costs, or net investment income tax (NIIT) that may apply to some high-income investors.

Tax treatment of gold and silver ETFs

Gold and silver ETFs allow investors to trade precious metals on the stock market without physically handling coins or bars. The IRS treats sales of physically backed ETFs the same as sales of the metal itself. This means that the 28% collectibles capital gains interest rate cap still applies.

“Investors who think they’re avoiding payback interest by buying ETFs often don’t,” says Jeffrey Schmidt, a certified public accountant and financial educator who specializes in retirement and tax strategies. “Funds like GLD and SLV hold physical metals, so the IRS treats the sale of stock as a sale of the bullion itself.”

How is a Gold IRA taxed?

Gold IRAs generally follow the same tax rules as other self-directed IRAs. Because the precious metals are held in a tax-advantaged retirement account, investors typically do not pay capital gains taxes when they sell gold or silver within the account.

Instead, depending on the type of account, you will be taxed when you contribute funds to or withdraw money from your IRA. Contributions to a traditional gold IRA are tax-deductible and tax-deferred, but withdrawals in retirement are generally taxed as ordinary income. Roth gold IRAs are funded with after-tax dollars, but qualified withdrawals in retirement are generally tax-free.

As a result, standard IRA contribution limits, distribution rules, and penalties still apply, but investors may be able to avoid the 28% collectibles capital gains tax rate while the assets remain in the IRA.

Tax treatment of precious metal losses

Like other capital assets, losses on investment grade precious metals are generally tax deductible. Investors can use capital losses to offset capital gains from other investments, potentially reducing their overall tax bill.

For example, if you sell gold at a loss and earn profits from stocks, mutual funds, or other investments in the same year, your losses may help offset some or all of those gains. If your capital losses exceed your capital gains, you may be able to deduct a portion of your remaining losses from ordinary income and carry forward any unused losses to future tax years.

However, losses on items purchased primarily for personal use (such as gold jewelry, collectible coins, and other personal property) are generally not tax deductible.

Consumption tax on gold and silver purchases

There is no federal excise tax on precious metals such as gold and silver. Many states also offer full or partial sales tax exemptions for the purchase of precious metals. Rules vary by state, but these exemptions often apply to bullion coins, bars, and rounds that meet certain purity or purchase value requirements.

If your state imposes a sales tax on precious metals, the tax is typically collected at the time of purchase, increasing your upfront costs. This is separate from the capital gains tax you pay later if you sell the metal at a profit.

Before purchasing, please check your state’s current regulations or ask your dealer if sales tax applies to your transaction.

Capital Gains Tax Frequently Asked Questions

Do I always have to pay 28% tax on my gold profits?

no. Precious metal profits are taxed at marginal tax rates up to 28%.

Is gold subject to higher taxes than stocks?

Yes, gold is usually taxed at a higher rate than stocks. Capital gains on gold are taxed at a maximum of 28%, while capital gains on stocks are only subject to a maximum of 20%.

Is silver subject to the same taxes as gold?

Yes, the IRS taxes both silver and gold as collectibles.

Can I avoid capital gains tax on gold?

Holding precious metals in a gold IRA offers several tax benefits. Investors can also work with a financial planner to assist with time sales and optimize strategies such as loss recovery to reduce tax burden.

What is the six-year capital gains tax rule?

There are no general U.S. federal capital gains tax rules that apply after six years of ownership. For precious metals, the primary tax base is one year. Holdings sold for more than one year are subject to long-term capital gain treatment, while holdings sold within one year are taxed as short-term gains. The IRS typically taxes physical gold and silver as collectibles, with long-term gains taxed at marginal tax rates of up to 28%.