Home Blog Page 170

How long has Melania been married? Explaining President Trump’s jokes to the King

0

play

  • President Trump said his parents have been married for 63 years, but he and Melania Trump won’t last that long.
  • Trump married Melania when he was 58 years old.
  • Jimmy Kimmel joked that President Trump should be fired for this comment.

President Donald Trump has joked that his marriage to First Lady Melania Trump won’t last as long as his parents’ marriage.

The president addressed a crowd at the White House during a daylong visit by King Charles III and Queen Camilla. He remembered his mother’s admiration for King Charles, and later came to admire his parents’ long marriage.

“They were married for 63 years. If you don’t mind, excuse me,” Trump said, then turned to the first lady, who was sitting directly behind him. “That’s a record we’re not going to get, darling. I’m sorry, it’s not going to work out that way. We’re going to be good, but we’re not going to be that good.”

The apparent joke about his age comes just days after Trump called for Jimmy Kimmel to be fired for telling a joke about the age difference between Donald Trump and Melania Trump. If the president and first lady don’t live to be 63, how long will they be married? Here’s what you need to know:

How long have Melania and Donald Trump been married?

Donald Trump and Melania Trump have been married for 21 years. The two married on January 22, 2005, when Melania Knauss was 34 and Trump 58.

President Trump is currently 79 years old and first lady Melania Trump is 56 years old. The couple would have to live to be 121 and 98 years old, respectively, to celebrate 63 years of marriage.

Trump was married twice before Melania. His marriage to Ivana Trump lasted about 15 years, and his marriage to Marla Maples lasted about six years.

What did Jimmy Kimmel say about Melania Trump?

Kimmel joked during his April 23 “Alternative White House Correspondents Dinner” segment, two days before the actual event in Washington, D.C., that it was about Melania Trump that spurred the backlash from the White House, but the event ended prematurely in chaos with gunfire outside the dining room.

Kimmel said: “So beautiful. Mrs. Trump, you have the glow of a pregnant widow.”

In an April 27 Truth social post, President Trump called Kimmel’s comments a “despicable call to violence” and called for Kimmel to be fired.

“[It was]obviously a joke about their age difference and the look of joy I see on her face every time we’re together,” Kimmel countered on April 27. “It was a very light joke about the fact that he’s almost 80 and she’s younger than me.”

Kimmel compared his joke to the president’s comments during the king’s April 28 monologue.

“Wait a minute, was he just joking about his own death?” Kimmel asked after playing a clip about President Trump’s comments. “He should be fired for that! Only Donald Trump would fire me for making a joke about his own retirement and then go out the next day and make a joke about his own retirement!”

USA TODAY previously contacted the White House about Kimmel’s comments and was directed to the X post by White House communications director Stephen Chan, who called Kimmel a “(expletive) person” and called on ABC to fire him.

Kimmel’s show was briefly taken off the air in September following his comments about the Republican response to the murder of Charlie Kirk. President Trump had previously called for the firing of late-night TV hosts, including Kimmel. On April 28, the Federal Communications Commission issued an order saying it was investigating Disney, ABC’s parent company, for “possible violations of the Communications Act of 1934 and FCC rules, including the FCC’s prohibition on unlawful discrimination.”

Contributors: Zach Anderson, James Powell, Brendan Morrow, Taijuan Moorman, Breanna J. Frank, america today

Kinsey Crowley is a Trump Connect reporter for the USA TODAY Network. Please contact KCrowley@usatodayco.com. follow her X (Twitter), thread, blue sky and TikTok.

How do you greet King Charles? Be polite, respectful, and don’t touch him.

0

It is unlikely that Britain’s King Charles III, his wife Queen Camilla, or any other members of the royal family will meet during their four-day state visit to the United States. But in case you do How should you greet them if you meet them?

The Royal Family’s website says there is “no mandatory code of conduct” when meeting the King, Queen or members of the Royal Family.

However, it is best to follow the traditional format. This means keeping a respectful distance, bowing or curtsying, being polite, and addressing people first as “Your Majesty” and then as “Sir” or “Ma’am” depending on the situation.

Above all, don’t touch it. Please do not attempt any physical contact, including shaking hands, unless initiated by the Royal Family.

King Charles and his entourage will be in the United States from April 27th to 30th. Here’s a quick visual guide on what to do and what not to do if you come across them.

How did President Trump greet King Charles?

If you can’t see the graphic, click here to reload the page.

President Donald Trump greeted King Charles at the White House on April 27 with a Trump handshake, in which he held the king’s hand and performed several signature tug-of-war moves. The handshake lasted about 10 seconds.

King Charles delivered an unusual speech to a joint session of Parliament on April 28, marking the second day of a four-day state visit and spotlighting the nation’s strained but enduring relationship with the United States.

The King and Queen are scheduled to visit New York City on April 29th and visit the 9/11 Memorial at One World Trade Center. The two monarchs are scheduled to meet with the families of the victims and first responders involved in the attack.

The King will visit Virginia on April 30th, where he will tour national parks and attend local events and cultural performances.

This is what you should do when you meet royalty…

…but please don’t do this

Can I take photos?

No, you probably can’t do that. Please do not ask royals for selfies or take close-up photos unless explicitly permitted.

Photography may be allowed at royal events, but it is considered a breach of etiquette to request a photo in person.

Contributed by Kathryn Palmer, Francesca Chambers, Zach Anderson, Carissa Wadick, Bart James, Thao Nguyen, Nicole Fallato, USA TODAY

SOURCE USA TODAY NETWORK REPORTS AND INVESTIGATIONS. Reuters;Royal.UK/Encyclopedia;Harper’s Bazaar

Sporkle, District Trivia, and the Deals That Ruined My Weekly Ritual

0

play

death. tax. trivia.

These three inevitabilities rattled and bounced around my skull every Tuesday morning for the better part of two years. The threat of death always remains. Listen to the wooden stairs. The tax threat is not just a threat, it’s a promise. Just ask my shaved paycheck. However, the trivia was something I was looking forward to.

I met up with my friends and fiancé at a local dive bar in Washington, D.C., and answered increasingly difficult questions about geography, science, history, politics, and, my favorite, pop culture. What didn’t you like?

The friendly host showed us around. His soothing voice echoed through the beer hall over and over again. Total of 5 rounds including music round. Although often perplexed, he never flinched. We answered questions using an app on our phones, and there was an honor system in place (although the D.C. area is not immune to trivia cheating scandals).

The stools, which somehow always broke, tilted back and forth as we sat on them, which actually made us feel uneasy, but reassuring in that it was predictable. We were able to win or be in the top three teams on a regular basis.

No, I didn’t know all the answers, and neither did many of us. But guessing and thinking about things was part of the fun. And sometimes we surprise ourselves. I somehow remembered that “Keeping Up with the Kardashians” premiered on E! In 2007.

Sometimes we didn’t surprise ourselves. I still can’t tell you where Idaho is on a map (I was and still am not the geography expert on the team).

And then it happened.

Quiz company Sporcle has acquired our trivia company, District Trivia, and as a result our weekly ritual as we know it has been ruined. This replaced the district trivia format with one that favors random easy questions and out-of-this-world difficult questions. A round usually contained at least 10 questions and one bonus question to bet on, but there were approximately two rounds of eight questions with extra time in between. It baffled us. Fed up with us. Hell, it traumatized us.

We tried to find an alternative location to no avail. Other bar trivia started too late. The human ear has no way of distinguishing the names of lesser-known songs within a single bar of music. Nowhere else did they nail the betting procedure so familiar to us in our first trivia hangout. Were we being boring? of course. But we had something. Something good will happen. And then it disappeared.

Since then, our bar has replaced Sporcle with another company and hosts us on Tuesday nights. We tried that trivia night and although we’re not completely satisfied, we’re comfortable with it. It lacks the magic, the joie de vivre, the je ne sai quoi that our old trivia lives had. But that’s enough for now.

When we reached out to Sporcle for comment for this article, we received a call from Mark Adams, the company’s senior vice president of brand.

He explained that Sporcle trivia still takes place in bars on Monday nights (Music Quiz), and the company offers multiple game formats to satisfy different trivia desires. Was there any thought of using a format similar to District Trivia once the acquisition was complete?

“After speaking with[the previous owner]all of us, including him, felt pretty reassured that this should work for most places. But we also know that not all bars in America are the same,” Adams told me. Changing things always involves risk. But they took some of the feedback they received about adding more questions and debuted them this week in Trivia across the country, including in Washington, D.C.

He also dangled carrots, which were appetizing. “Without giving too much away, we are working hard on longer format works in the future,” he teased.

For now, perhaps, once the former trivia host returns to the bar, a sense of normalcy may be able to align our spirits again. Or maybe it’s a moment where you appreciate not the format or difficulty of the questions, but the camaraderie built at the table.

no. Everyone at that table would agree with me. Questions and format are important.

I don’t ask for much from this life. Well, some people may disagree. But in a world that is teetering on its axis, choosing between politics, climate and media, was it too much to indulge in this wonderful thing? Won’t the winds of change change my joy once and for all?

Oh, I forgot the fourth inescapable axiom. death. tax. trivia. change.

For now, I’m going to go with it and welcome that exciting new Sporcle format when it comes along. “It will be so”, “to the violation”, etc. If you know where these quotes come from, you can join our team.

This story has been updated with new information.

Justice Department releases new photos seeking to keep Cole Thomas Allen in prison

0

play

Acts that are “premeditated, violent, and calculated to cause death.” The “most serious” crime under U.S. law. “There is a possibility of a life sentence.”

The Justice Department has no hesitation in keeping the man accused of attempting to assassinate President Donald Trump locked up.

In an April 29 court filing asking a federal judge in Washington, D.C., to keep Cole Thomas Allen in custody ahead of his trial, government lawyers essentially said there were no bail conditions that would keep others safe if Allen were released.

“As long as the president and his cabinet continue to appear in public, as they undoubtedly will, the defendant’s motivation for violence remains,” they said.

The Justice Department also released a new photo of Allen that it said was taken shortly before the attack. The enhanced image shows a man wearing a sheathed knife, pliers and wire cutters, which match items later recovered by law enforcement during his arrest, the Justice Department said.

In addition to attempting to assassinate the president, Allen is charged with transporting a firearm and ammunition to commit a felony and discharging a firearm during a violent crime. U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro, whose D.C. staff is prosecuting the case, has vowed to file additional charges as the investigation progresses.

If Allen is convicted, he could spend the rest of his life in prison.

The incident occurred after Allen was arrested on April 25 for an incident at the White House Correspondents’ Association dinner at the Hilton Hotel in Washington, D.C. Several senior government officials attended the dinner, including Trump, Vice President J.D. Vance, and House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana).

According to the indictment, Allen planned to attack the dinner party on foot with multiple guns and knives, starting with the highest-ranking officials. Prosecutors said the suspect emailed family, friends and a former employer about his plans minutes before the attack.

Tejira Abe, one of two lawyers appointed to represent Allen, gave a preview of what the defense may make in seeking conditions for Allen’s release at the April 27 proceeding. Prime Minister Abe told the judge that Allen had no previous arrests or convictions and was presumed innocent under the law.

In a new filing, government lawyers agreed that Mr. Allen had a clean criminal record, but said he was still a danger to the public.

“Although the defendant apparently has no prior contact with the criminal justice system, his personal history and circumstances indicate that conditions less restrictive than incarceration cannot reasonably guarantee the safety of the community while this case proceeds,” the attorney said.

Silver fell 5.68% in trading on Wednesday, April 29, 2026.

0

How much is silver worth per ounce today?

As of 12:05 PM ET on April 29, 2026, the spot price of silver is $71.78 per oz., according to the latest market data. The stock fell 5.68%, or $4.32 from its previous closing price of $76.11.

One year ago, silver was trading at $33.11 an ounce. This means that the price has increased by 116.82% in the last 12 months.

Key levels to look out for this week:

52 week low: $32.01

52 week high: $117.39

Silver is trading 38.85% below its 52-week high. The stock is 124.25% above its 52-week low.

What is the historical price of silver?

today 1 week ago 1 month ago 1 year ago
$71.78 $77.48 $67.99 $33.11

A week ago, silver was trading at $77.48 per ounce. Since then, the price has fallen by 7.35%.

A month ago, silver was trading at $67.99 per ounce. Since then, the price has increased by 5.59%.

USA TODAY is an independent publisher and not an investment advisor. The information provided is for educational purposes only and should not be construed as financial, investment, or trading advice. We recommend that you seek independent advice from a qualified professional regarding any specific financial decisions you may make. Trading commodities, futures, and options involves significant risk of loss. Individual investment results may vary. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Prices can change rapidly and unpredictably due to factors such as supply/demand, weather, and geopolitical events. Our company assumes no responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of the information.

What is driving the price of silver today?

The price of silver is driven by inflation expectations, central bank policy, global economic conditions, and investor demand. The strength of currencies, especially the US dollar, can influence daily prices, as well as physical and industrial demand. For more on the market, read the latest investment news on USA TODAY Money.

What does XAG/USD mean?

XAG/USD is the ticker symbol used to track the spot price of silver in US dollars.

XAG stands for 1 troy ounce of silver and USD stands for US dollar. The estimated price tells you how many dollars it costs to purchase one ounce.

Prices are usually quoted per troy ounce, which is slightly heavier than a standard ounce.

Spot prices reflect real-time market transactions and serve as a benchmark for futures contracts, ETFs, and retail bullion prices.

how to invest in silver

Investing in silver can be done by buying physical coins or bars, buying ETFs that track its price, or investing in mining stocks. Be sure to weigh costs, storage needs, and risk tolerance before making a decision. The retail price of a coin or bar typically includes a premium over the spot price.

Disclaimer: This USA TODAY Money article was automatically generated using live market data from Alpha Vantage. If you think we made a mistake or have feedback, please use this form.

I always wanted to be a mother. After this weekend, I’m not sure

0

play

As a reporter in my late 20s who covers caregiving and motherhood, sources often assume that I am a parent myself.

They’ll stop and look at me pointedly in the middle of a big talk about the struggles of raising a child, including the tantrums, endless doctor’s visits, and emotional strain. “Well, okay,” they add. Some people stop in the middle of interviews and ask me questions. “Do you have any children?”

No, I tell them. However, I would like to become a mother someday.

I always knew that was the role I wanted. When I played with Barbie dolls as a child, my dolls would always put the baby in the stroller or announce that she was pregnant midway through the game. By middle school, I was well-known in my neighborhood as a babysitter, happily hopping from house to house, entertaining giggling toddlers and helping kids with their math homework. I’ve been curating a list of potential baby names since I was in high school.

So when I walked into a ballroom full of moms at Mom 2.0, an annual summit for moms and parenting experts in Austin, Texas, in April, I felt less like a con artist and more like someone who had just earned a membership card in the mothers’ club a little early. This is like a sneak peek, I told myself. This is how I feel when I write and research many articles for USA TODAY. I am not a parent or caregiver right now, but I will be one day. This is like training.

But as I chatted with mothers between brand booths at the Summit and over tea, a troubling idea that had been brewing over the past year took root. I realized that it’s not enough to just feel deep down that you’re capable of motherhood. Living in a world with so many obstacles to modern motherhood, and deciding whether and when to have a child, is so complex that it made me think about things I had never asked myself or thought about. The question is, “Is it really worth it?” And do I have the ability?

What I learned from a year of research on motherhood

It is often said that it is impossible to fully prepare for parenthood. But this work certainly informed me. Even if the information is sometimes overwhelming.

My sources shared their blissful moments of parenting with me. The connections I build while taking care of my daughter’s hair. The loving gaze of a newborn baby puts everything into perspective. They feel proud when they see their children grow and become confident in their abilities.

But what sticks with me most are the stories of mothers who had to let go of things they never thought they would let go of when they became mothers. A job that does not meet the needs of the family. Friends I can no longer relate to. Despite the promise that young girls like me can “have it all” as mothers and career women, despite the fact that young girls like me have been fed all our lives, passions and hobbies that have fallen by the wayside as dirty diapers pile up.

I wrote about a mother who was required to come to work several days later after an emergency C-section resulted in pre-term labor and her baby was taken to the NICU. I spoke with women who faced cancer during their early years as mothers. I’ve written about the debt some parents can’t afford, and how that debt will be even greater for the sandwich generation. I’ve been analyzing the trad wife vs. female boss paradigm.

And I have a long series of articles outlining the ripple effects of the gender pay gap that widen the moment a woman becomes a mother.

I’m not saying that all the women I interviewed quit their jobs and became stay-at-home moms, but that’s far from the case. But what I’ve found is that many mothers are dissatisfied with a corporate world built to exclude them, a home life that looks better online than it does in real life, and a consumer industry that forever makes them feel inadequate.

Frankly, it scares me.

As I was packing my suitcase at the end of Mom 2.0 weekend, I realized I had collected countless baby items from freebies and bargain bags. The hotel bed was littered with diaper rash cream, chocolate brown baby boots, and thirst-quenching lollipops. Little did I know that these items literally wouldn’t fit in a bag filled with a report notepad, work laptop, library books, and running shoes. I wondered what I would have to sacrifice in the future to make room for those boots. Do you still want it?

i will do it. I know that deep down. And now, thanks to the women and mothers I met at the conference and beyond, I know what I’m up against when I join their ranks. someday.

Madeline Mitchell’s role covering women and the care economy for USA TODAY is supported by a partnership with Pivotal and Journalism Funding Partners. Funders do not provide editorial input.

Contact Madeline at: memitchell@usatoday.com and @maddiemitch_ With X.

Gold fell 2.90% in trading on Wednesday, April 29, 2026

0

How much is gold per ounce today?

As of 8:05 AM ET on April 29, 2026, the spot price of gold is $4,563.22 per oz., according to the latest market data. This is a decline of 2.90% and $136.30 from the previous closing price of $4,699.52.

One year ago, Gold was trading at $3,335.58 per ounce, which represents a 36.80% increase in price over the past 12 months.

Key levels to look out for this week:

52 week low: $3,182.44

52 week high: $5,477.79

Gold is trading 16.70% below its 52-week high. The stock is still 43.39% above its 52-week low.

What is the historical price of gold?

today 1 week ago 1 month ago 1 year ago
$4,563.22 $4,745.16 $4,425.96 $3,335.58

A week ago, gold was trading at $4,745.16 per ounce. Since then, the price has fallen by 3.83%.

A month ago, gold was trading at $4,425.96 per ounce. Since then, the price has increased by 3.10%.

USA TODAY is an independent publisher and not an investment advisor. The information provided is for educational purposes only and should not be construed as financial, investment, or trading advice. We recommend that you seek independent advice from a qualified professional regarding any specific financial decisions you may make. Trading commodities, futures, and options involves significant risk of loss. Individual investment results may vary. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Prices can change rapidly and unpredictably due to factors such as supply/demand, weather, and geopolitical events. Our company assumes no responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of the information.

What is driving the price of gold today?

The price of gold is driven by inflation expectations, central bank policies, global economic conditions, and investor demand. The strength of currencies, especially the US dollar, can influence daily prices, as well as physical and industrial demand. For more on the market, read the latest investment news on USA TODAY Money.

What is XAU/USD?

XAU/USD is the ticker symbol used to track the spot price of gold in US dollars.

XAU stands for 1 troy ounce of gold and USD stands for US dollar. The estimated price tells you how many dollars it costs to purchase one ounce.

Prices are usually quoted per troy ounce, which is slightly heavier than a standard ounce.

Spot prices reflect real-time market transactions and serve as a benchmark for futures contracts, ETFs, and retail bullion prices.

how to invest in gold

Investing in gold can be done by buying physical coins and bars, buying ETFs that track the price of gold, or investing in mining stocks. Be sure to weigh costs, storage needs, and risk tolerance before making a decision. The retail price of a coin or bar typically includes a premium over the spot price.

Disclaimer: This USA TODAY Money article was automatically generated using live market data from Alpha Vantage. If you think we made a mistake or have feedback, please use this form.

Supreme Court reins in landmark voting rights law that would hurt Black voters

0


The high court effectively invalidated Louisiana’s black-majority congressional district, restricting a landmark civil rights law passed to protect the voting rights of racial minorities.

play

WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court on April 29 threw out Louisiana’s congressional map designed to protect Black residents’ voting rights, in a ruling that undermined a landmark civil rights law.

The ideologically divided court sided 6-3 with the Trump administration and non-Black voters who challenged the map as relying too much on race to classify voters. And the court did so just three years after upholding the 1965 Voting Rights Act’s vote dilution protections for racial minorities.

Justice Samuel Alito, writing for the conservative majority, said the map was an “unconstitutional gerrymander” that violated the constitutional rights of non-Black voters who challenged it.

The court’s three liberal justices dissented. Justice Elena Kagan said the impact of the majority’s decision is “likely to be far-reaching and significant” and that the protections of civil rights law are “obsolete”.

The decision could ultimately reduce the number of Black and Hispanic members of Congress, making it more likely that Republicans, who currently have a thin majority, will win more seats in the U.S. House of Representatives. States are now free to change voting district boundaries at all levels of government.

But the ruling, one of the most anticipated rulings this term, may not have arrived in time to make a big difference in this year’s midterm elections. It is possible that some states may attempt to redraw their congressional maps, but they will likely face both practical and legal challenges.

The Voting Rights Act had already been weakened.

Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act seeks to prevent Congressional mapmakers from reducing the voting power of racial minorities by crowding them into one district or spreading them across so many districts that they have no influence.

These protections became even more important after the court struck down another part of the law in 2013, one that was used to police states with a history of discrimination.

It will be easier for Republicans to draw maps that favor their party, especially in the South, where voters’ races closely align with party preferences.

Alito wrote that the Voting Rights Act “requires evidence that strongly infers intentional discrimination.”

In her dissent, Ms. Kagan wrote that proving intentional discrimination is extremely difficult.

That means, under the majority’s “new view” of law, states can systematically weaken the voting rights of minority citizens “without legal repercussions,” she said.

Year-long battle over Louisiana map

The racially and politically charged case grew out of a years-long battle over Louisiana’s congressional map.

After the 2020 census, the state Legislature created a map that included only one of the six majority-black districts, even though black people make up about one-third of the state’s population.

When a group of black voters filed a lawsuit, a lower court said the map likely violated the Voting Rights Act. The law was a landmark bill of the civil rights movement, passed after Alabama state troopers attacked peaceful marchers on what became known as “Bloody Sunday.”

But when the Republican-controlled Legislature creates a second majority black district in 2024, a group calling itself non-black voters went to court in a separate lawsuit, arguing that “racial quotas” would deprive the state of Republican seats in the narrowly contested Congress.

The Supreme Court will consider the issue in early 2025. However, rather than handing down a ruling, the justices took the unusual step of requesting a second oral argument that more directly jeopardizes the future of protected area reorganization. They asked whether states could create congressional districts consistent with the Voting Rights Act without violating the anti-discrimination clauses of the 14th and 15th Amendments, amendments passed to protect the rights of former slaves after the Civil War.

Louisiana initially defended the map, but in October instead argued that the Voting Rights Act’s redistricting protections were “unenforceable and unconstitutional.”

The Justice Department under President Donald Trump similarly argued that it had become too easy for courts to strike down maps as discriminatory against Black Americans without fully considering whether race-neutral factors, such as incumbency protections or partisan advantage, played a role.

“The way Article 2 is interpreted…is far from being perhaps intentionally discriminatory and, in fact, is a coercive gerrymandering that would declare it unconstitutional,” Justice Department attorney Hashim Muppan said during oral argument.

NAACP calls Voting Rights Act important

Lawyers representing black voters in Louisiana countered that civil rights laws have played an important role in diversifying the state’s leadership and giving minority voters an equal opportunity to participate in the process.

The fact that Louisiana has never elected a statewide black candidate shows that racism continues to play a large role in the state’s elections, said Janai Nelson, president of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, during oral argument.

Democratic voting rights groups warned that Republicans could pick up 19 additional seats if the courts strike down vote dilution protections.

But Louisiana Attorney General J. Benjamin Aguinaga said that without creating majority-minority districts, Republicans risk turning safe districts for incumbents into competitive ones, suggesting there are reasons beyond the Voting Rights Act that could prompt Congress to avoid spreading racial minorities across multiple districts.

Jimmy Kimmel doubles down on calling for President Trump’s removal from office

0

play

Jimmy Kimmel isn’t backing down.

On April 28, a late-night TV host mocked President Donald Trump’s calls to fire him for jokingly calling First Lady Melania Trump a “pregnant widow” on his show last week. He also suggested that President Trump had made a very similar joke about himself and accused the president of hypocrisy.

In his latest monologue, Kimmel showed footage of President Trump welcoming Charles III, noting that his parents had been married for 63 years, and telling the first lady that he didn’t think he would live much longer than that. “This is a record we will never be able to match,” Trump said. The president and first lady have been married for 21 years.

“Wait a minute. Was he just joking about his own death?” Kimmel asked. “He should be fired for that! Only Donald Trump would fire me for making a joke about his own retirement and then go out the next day and make a joke about his own retirement!”

Continuing his monologue, Kimmel dismissed the “ridiculous” people who were making what he called “a big deal out of this joke.”

When asked for comment, the White House pointed to communications director Stephen Chan’s x post, criticizing Kimmel for “making an offensive joke about the president’s assassination” and “doubling down on that joke without a proper apology.”

Kimmel gave a fake White House Correspondents Association dinner speech on his April 23 show in advance of events scheduled for that weekend. In a sketch made to look like Kimmel was performing at an upcoming dinner party, the comedian joked, “Mrs. Trump, you have the glow of a pregnant widow.”

The comment initially garnered little attention, but days later, after a gunman opened fire at the White House Correspondents’ Association dinner, Kimmel’s critics resurfaced the joke, accusing him of advocating violence against the president.

First lady Melania Trump, in a post from the Government President Donald Trump was more direct, posting on Truth Social that “Jimmy Kimmel should be fired by Disney and ABC immediately.”

This was just the latest example of the Trump administration calling on ABC to fire Kimmel, who has been a vocal critic of the president. In September, ABC controversially suspended the comedian for several days after facing pressure from Federal Communications Commission Chairman Brendan Carr over his comments after Charlie Kirk’s murder.

The decision drew heavy criticism of ABC and Carr, with critics arguing that the Trump administration was trying to censor free expression and that the Disney-owned network had unfairly caved in. Even many Republicans, including Sen. Ted Cruz, shared free speech concerns.

“It’s incredibly dangerous for the government to take the position of saying we get to decide what speech we like and what we don’t like, and if we don’t like what’s being said, we’re going to threaten to take it off the air,” Cruz said at the time.

Disney eventually brought Kimmel back on the air, and he has continued his scathing criticism of Trump on his show ever since.

Kimmel defends ‘pregnant widow’ joke after Trump demands firing

In a sharp contrast to previous controversies, Disney, which has been under new CEO Josh D’Amaro for just over a month, appears to be backing Kimmel from the get-go.

The comedian was able to return to the airwaves as scheduled on April 27 as he defended his jokes and argued that critics had intentionally misinterpreted them. Kimmel said the “pregnant widow” quip referred to the age difference between the 79-year-old president and the 56-year-old first lady.

“It was a very light joke about the fact that he’s almost 80 years old and she’s younger than me,” he said. “It’s not a call for assassination by any stretch of the imagination, and they know that.”

He went on to tell the first lady, “I agree, I agree, that hateful and violent rhetoric should be rejected. And I think the best way to reverse it is to talk to your husband about it.”

Kimmel’s April 28 monologue did not mention the fact that his joke may be sparking a fight between Disney and the FCC.

Earlier, the agency issued an order saying it was “investigating” Disney and its subsidiaries for “possible violations of the Communications Act of 1934 and FCC rules, including the agency’s prohibition on unlawful discrimination.”

Contributors: BrieAnna J. Frank and Joey Garrison

Pennsylvania court finds reproductive autonomy a fundamental right

0

A Pennsylvania state court ruled this week that access to abortion is a fundamental right protected by the state constitution.

In case of a lawsuit, Allegheny Reproductive Health Center v. Pennsylvania Department of Human Servicesbegan in 2019 when a group of reproductive health providers challenged the constitutionality of state restrictions on Medicaid reimbursement for abortions under the state constitution. Providers first argued that the state’s Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) prohibits exemptions because Medicaid covers all reproductive health care for men but does not do the same for women. Second, the plaintiffs argued that the ban violates the Equal Protection Clause of the state constitution by penalizing one method (abortion) and subsidizing another method by which Pennsylvanians can exercise their fundamental right of choice (procreation).

In 2020, a lower court dismissed the case, citing a 1985 case. Fisher v. Department of Health and Human Services. Based on federal constitutional precedent, fisher They unanimously rejected arguments that Pennsylvania’s Medicaid ban violates the state constitution. in Allegheny Reproductive Health Center; the nation was leaning fishersimultaneously challenging the provider’s position in litigation.

In January 2024, the state high court concluded in a 3-2 decision that the provider was eligible. Then the majority reversed. fisherargued that the state’s ERA applies specifically to classifications that burden one gender. The court reasoned that laws regulating pregnancy and abortion were a prime example of such sex discrimination in the past. And because public funds covered men’s reproductive health care but not abortion, the court concluded that the Medicaid ban amounted to sex discrimination under the state’s ERA.

The court then provided guidance to lower courts on how to conduct this sex discrimination investigation. States had to prove that they had a “compelling state interest” in refusing to grant Medicaid coverage for abortion and that there were “no more intrusive methods” available to advance that interest. The court left the question of the law’s ultimate constitutionality to be resolved by lower courts on remand.

The state Supreme Court’s 2024 decision provided even less guidance on equal protection claims. The court split 2-1-2 on how to resolve this issue. Justices Christine Donahue and David Vecht would have ruled that the state constitution protects the fundamental right to abortion, saying the law unconstitutionally discriminates based on how patients exercise their fundamental right to choose. Donahue wrote that this fundamental right reflects important constitutional norms surrounding equality. Donahue writes, “The decision whether to have children is perhaps the most personal and consequential decision in human experience.”

But Justice Kevin Doherty, who joined Donahue and Vecht in their ERA analysis, concluded that there was no need to reach an equal protection claim or address the existence of an abortion right, given that the court had already reversed it. fisher The court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs on the ERA claim. Chief Justice Debra Todd and Justice Sally Mundy dissented, concluding there was no good reason to overturn it. Fisher.

Last week, in a 4-3 decision, the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court, the middle appellate court, granted the plaintiffs’ request for summary relief, holding that the coverage exclusion violates both the state’s ERA and the Equal Protection Clause. The Commonwealth Court, which deals with civil cases, has seven members and sometimes acts as the court of first instance where cases begin. This is also the case in cases like Allegheny Reproductive Health Center Plaintiff files a civil suit against the State of Pennsylvania.

After the state Supreme Court’s ruling, the federal Department of Health and Human Services notified a federal court that it would no longer defend the constitutionality of the coverage exclusion. The plaintiffs again sought summary relief, and the Commonwealth Court held oral arguments in February 2025. The Pennsylvania Attorney General then sought permission to intervene in the lawsuit. The court granted the request and held supplementary oral argument on the issue.

The Attorney General acknowledged that the exemption constituted gender classification under the state ERA, as held by the state Supreme Court. But the attorney general argued that the exemption was in the compelling interests of protecting the life of the fetus, protecting women from post-abortion regret, and preventing public funds from being funneled into medical procedures that some citizens morally object to. Additionally, the Attorney General stated that the state used the least restrictive means to achieve these benefits.

The court did not find these proposed benefits to be persuasive. The court first addressed Pennsylvania’s interest in protecting the life of the unborn child. The majority was unsympathetic to this argument, questioning why “the state must ensure that all pregnancies reach term.” Citing the state’s interest in protecting women from post-abortion regret, the court asked whether there is an interest in “protecting competent adults from regretting their free choices.” The state’s interest in protecting citizens’ conscience-based objections to Medicaid coverage could not be better served. The court reasoned that while the Attorney General had shown that Congress had regard for this interest, the state had done nothing to show why it was persuasive.

And even if the state could demonstrate a compelling interest, the majority concluded that the state had less intrusive ways to pursue it. The court said that if Pennsylvania wanted women to carry their pregnancies to term, it could subsidize childcare or invest more in maternal and child health care. By directly licensing, regulating and educating doctors, governments could protect women from unscrupulous providers and post-abortion regret. And Pennsylvania had less intrusive ways to protect taxpayers’ consciences, such as a tax credit program. Therefore, the court ruled that the exemption violated the state’s ERA.

With respect to equal protection, plaintiffs reiterated their argument that this exclusion discriminates against one way of exercising a fundamental right of choice. The Attorney General responded that there is no fundamental right to state support for abortion services. In any case, the attorney general said that even if fundamental rights were involved in this case, the law could satisfy rigorous scrutiny for the same reasons outlined above.

The majority rejected the state’s equal protection claim. The issue is whether the state constitution recognizes “reproductive autonomy” or “reproductive decision-making rights,” not whether there is a right to use state funds to access reproductive services. The court agreed with health care providers that the law discriminates against and subjects those who choose abortion to strict scrutiny. The Attorney General’s justification for the exclusion failed in the equal protection context for the same reasons as the court’s arguments regarding the state ERA. Justice Michael Wojcik wrote a separate concurrence that emphasized the importance of individual autonomy in Pennsylvania’s constitutional tradition.

Justice Patricia McCullough, joined by two of her colleagues, dissented, arguing that the provider’s ERA claim should fail because the state’s interest in protecting the life of the unborn child is “compelling on its face.” McCullough also complained that the majority reached its conclusion without giving the state a hearing or sufficient opportunity to make its case. States should have the opportunity to provide evidence of abortion-related harm experienced by women to demonstrate a genuine interest in protecting women from regret, he said. She ultimately concluded that there is also a compelling interest in protecting the conscience of taxpayers, something she said Congress and the state constitution already recognize. Opponents were similarly persuaded by the state’s argument that exclusion is the least restrictive option.

Opponents were even more wary of the plaintiffs’ equal protection claims, arguing that the court should never have reached the claim in the first place. The dissenting justices also rejected the majority’s fundamental right, which McCollough wrote “does not arise from the text of the Pennsylvania Constitution or from any social policy purpose.”

Pennsylvania has not yet announced whether it will appeal, but if the attorney general does decide to appeal, the state Supreme Court would likely affirm at least part of the lower court’s ruling. In 2025, Pennsylvania voters retained all three justices in 2024 with a majority vote. Allegheny Reproductive Health Centermaintained a 5-2 Democratic majority (two of the current justices did not participate in the earlier decision).

But it remains unclear exactly how far the argument will go in court. As it turned out, only two justices chose to address equal protection claims in the courts below. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court could award the plaintiffs a victory without ever resolving whether the Constitution recognizes a fundamental right to reproductive autonomy.

In any case, it seems likely that Pennsylvania will join the list of states that recognize reproductive rights. lawsuit in Allegheny Reproductive Health Center It emphasizes the importance of judicial elections. The state constitution’s text has remained unchanged since the Pennsylvania Supreme Court rejected a challenge to the exemption. fisherthe judge who interpreted it made all the difference.

Mary Ziegler is the Martin Luther King Jr. Professor of Law at the University of California, Davis School of Law.

Medicaid work requirement debuts in Nebraska, much to dismay

0

play

Shumeeka Simpson, an Omaha resident, works as a patient navigator for the American Civil Liberties Union, an administrative assistant for Nebraskans for Peace, and shifts at a Dunkin store.

Still, even those with three jobs worry they will lose their health insurance when Nebraska becomes the first state on May 1 to require certain Medicaid enrollees to work, train and attend school under rules mandated by Congressional Republicans’ One Big Beautiful Bill Act.

Simpson, 46, has relied on Medicaid since her divorce in 2014. None of her employers offer health insurance. She said technical issues prevented her from updating in time, causing her to lose federal food aid, and she doesn’t trust the state to implement the new work rules without a hitch.

“Adding more barriers doesn’t make the program work better,” she says.

Nebraska Medicaid officials said they are working to make compliance as easy as possible for enrollees so that people don’t lose coverage for administrative reasons such as failing to submit proper documentation.

Enrollees with any of the thousands of health conditions detailed by the state will be exempt.

“Our top priority is to provide members with a clear understanding of the changes to the program and how to maintain coverage,” Drew Gonshorowski, the state’s Medicaid director, said in a news release in early April.

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Administrator Mehmet Oz said in a brief interview with KFF Health News on April 28 outside the National Press Club in Washington, D.C., that he applauds Nebraska for being the first state to begin implementing work requirements. He acknowledged that the state is still “working through the issues,” adding that he hopes “by the end of this year, we’ll be in a more sophisticated situation.”

But health policy analysts, advocates for the poor and health care industry groups remain skeptical, fearing that thousands of Nebraskans on Medicaid will lose coverage and, with it, access to medical services and protection from medical debt.

Jeremy Nordquist, president and CEO of the Nebraska Hospital Association, said hospitals are also concerned that an increase in uninsured patients will hurt their bottom line.

“There’s a lot of concern at different levels,” he said. Many enrollees may not be aware of the change and may not realize they must take action to continue their coverage, he said.

The law signed by President Donald Trump last July requires the 42 states and the District of Columbia that fully or partially expanded Medicaid under the 2010 Affordable Care Act to implement work requirements starting in 2027. The full expansion would allow adults with incomes up to 138% of the federal poverty level, equivalent to $22,025 for a single person this year, to qualify for Medicaid, a government program for low-income people. income or disability.

More than 20 million people gained Medicaid coverage through the expansion, according to KFF, a health information nonprofit that includes KFF Health News. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that 4.8 million people will become uninsured over the next 10 years due to work requirements.

Under the law, enrollees must work or volunteer at least 80 hours a month, attend school at least part time or participate in job training. Or you must prove that you qualify for certain exemptions, such as caring for a child under 13, a disabled parent, or having a medical condition that prevents employment.

Some states were considering implementing labor regulations several years before the law was passed. This gave states the option to start the program early.

nebraska state plan

About 70,000 Medicaid enrollees must meet the requirement, which Nebraska implemented eight months before the law requires, said Colin Spirinek, a spokesman for the Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services.

About 72% of them probably won’t need to do anything to stay insured, Spirinek said. That’s because states already track their employment and exemption status through state or national databases.

To check whether enrollees meet the requirements, Nebraska and other states plan to tap a variety of databases, including Medicaid claims information and data maintained by credit rating agencies. Registrants without data in Nebraska will receive a notification and can complete an online form to confirm they meet the new rules.

While many states have said they plan to hire additional administrative staff, the Nebraska Medicaid Agency has not added employees to meet operational requirements.

“The fact that they’re saying they don’t need additional resources begs the question of whether they can get this done without future headaches,” Nordquist said.

Although documentation is required to prove employment status, Nebraska officials will allow enrollees to self-certify that they volunteer, attend school or qualify for an exemption, such as caring for a parent with poor health or a disability. “Supporting documentation such as medical records is not required,” Spirinek said.

This could make registrants more likely to receive exemptions under the law’s “medical frailty” exception. A long list of medical conditions eligible for exemption was released by the state last week, including many types of cancer, mental health, heart disease and more.

Kelsey Allens, senior staff attorney at the advocacy group Nebraska Appleseed, said the state’s long list of medical billing codes for exempt conditions is still insufficient. He said different levels of disease severity were not included.

The waiver is critical for Crystal Schroer, 30, who will receive Medicaid starting in 2022 and be unemployed since 2024. She said it was difficult to find a job near her home in Kearny, Nebraska, that would allow her to take Tarot, a psychiatric service dog who helps with anxiety, with her.

“I’m really worried,” said Schroer, who lives with a friend. “It made my depression even worse.”

Whether self-certification will be widely accepted in other states will depend on CMS work requirements rules expected to be enacted this summer. “We don’t like self-certification,” Oz told KFF Health News. “Documentation is important.”

Several advocacy groups, including the American Diabetes Association, the HIV+Hepatitis Policy Institute, and the National Bleeding Disorders Foundation, had asked states to exempt registrants under certain conditions. The group said losing insurance coverage means losing access to medicines that keep people healthy and avoid hospital visits.

Adding work requirements to Medicaid has been a priority of Trump since his first term. In 2018, his administration allowed states to adopt the policy for the first time, but only Arkansas did so. More than 18,000 people lost their insurance in the nine months after the policy was introduced until a federal judge ruled it illegal. This equates to almost one in four people covered by the obligation.

In most cases, you lose coverage not because you didn’t meet the requirements, but because you didn’t submit your documents correctly by the deadline.

In Georgia, work will be required starting in 2023 under a partial expansion of Medicaid. Only about 8,000 people signed up for coverage in the first two years, far fewer than the 25,000 that state officials expected in the first year alone, and many were denied benefits due to red tape.

national mission

During Congressional debate over the law last year, Republicans pushed Medicaid work requirements as a way to recruit “able-bodied” adults into the workforce who would benefit from government assistance. House Speaker Mike Johnson said it will help keep Medicaid “for the people who deserve it,” not young people “sitting on the couch playing video games.”

Republicans argue that the employment mandate would encourage people to find work and leave Medicaid to help children and people who are pregnant or disabled.

They were unfazed by the study’s finding that most adults receiving Medicaid are already working, attending school, or have health conditions that prevent them from doing so.

A recent study published in the Annals of Internal Medicine found that about one-third of adults at risk of losing insurance coverage under new work requirements report having a physical or mental illness or disability.

“This doesn’t mean that most healthy adults are choosing not to work,” said study co-author Darshari Vyas, a health policy researcher at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston. “This is a vulnerable group and we don’t know if there will be clear protections when we start introducing work requirements.”

In Nebraska, about two-thirds of Medicaid expansion enrollees are working or attending school, according to KFF. Nebraska’s unemployment rate is 3%, one of the lowest in the nation.

Andrea Skolkin, CEO of Omaha-based One World Community Health Center, said this is an anxious time for the clinic and its patients. “We remain concerned that people eligible for expanded Medicaid will lose coverage,” she said.

About 4,000 of the 52,000 patients are eligible for Medicaid expansion, Skolkin said. He said many admitted students have received letters from the state regarding work requirements, but he is concerned that many do not understand them.

Losing 10% of those patients would mean a $500,000 decrease in revenue for the nonprofit center, she said. To assist patients, the company plans to hire more staff to help fill out forms to obtain and maintain insurance.

Allens, of Appleseed, Nebraska, said he is skeptical of the state’s promise to use automation to ensure enrollees meet work requirements. “We remain very concerned about early implementation,” she said.

The federal law also reduces retroactive eligibility for expansion enrollees from three months to one month, which could make it harder for people who lose insurance to get coverage for their medical bills when they re-enroll in the Medicaid program.

Nordquist said hospitals are concerned that the change could leave health care providers paying more if they lose health coverage, since many people enroll in Medicaid when seeking emergency care, and enrollment can take weeks or months to complete.

Only two other states have plans to implement this work requirement early. Montana is scheduled to start in July and Iowa is scheduled to start in December.

Andrea Maresca, senior principal at consulting firm Health Management Associates, said many states will be watching Nebraska’s implementation closely to see what lessons can be learned before implementing their own in January.

States are better prepared to enact work requirements than they were when Arkansas went to court in 2018, she said. After re-verifying the eligibility of millions of registrants post-COVID-19, they have more experience using public and private databases to automate processes and have more practice communicating with registrants, Maresca said.

Still, “it’s not perfect,” and states will have to adapt accordingly, he said.

KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism on health issues and is one of our core operating programs. KFF — An independent source for health policy research, polling, and journalism.

(This story has been updated to add new information)

David Scott, 80, lies in court at the Georgia State Capitol. What you need to know

0

play

The late Georgia congressman David Scott will be back under the Gold Dome for the final time on Friday.

Just a day after the House vote, U.S. Representative Scott died on April 22 at the age of 80.

The longtime politician represented Georgia’s 13th Congressional District, which includes parts of Clayton, Henry, Rockdale, Newton, Gwinnett, and DeKalb counties in the Atlanta metropolitan area.

Scott’s office announced that a memorial service for the Atlanta-area representative will be held on May 1st at the Georgia State Capitol.

“Congressman Scott’s family would like to thank Governor Kemp for extending this honor and the incredible outpouring of grief, love, and support from countless friends, constituents, and elected officials who have known Congressman throughout his life or who have been helped by him,” the Congressman’s team said in a statement.

When is David Scott’s memorial service?

A celebration of life, open to the public, begins at 11 a.m. Friday, May 1, at the State Capitol.

After the ceremony, Scott will lie in state at the Capitol until 5 p.m., when Georgians can pay their respects.

“Please be advised to arrive early to attend the commemoration as there is only one entrance to the Georgia State Capitol and security screening is required,” Scott’s office said. “The Georgia Department of Buildings will open its South Deck and parking will be free. The closest MARTA stop to the Capitol is Georgia.”

Scott’s funeral will be held at 11 a.m. Saturday, May 2nd at Elizabeth Baptist Church, 4245 Cascade Road SW, Atlanta.

“In lieu of flowers, please consider making a donation to the David Scott Foundation, which provides financial assistance to high school graduates who are residents of Georgia’s 13th Congressional District and plan to attend an HBCU,” Scott’s office said in a statement.

Scott’s public service celebrated

Concerns about Scott’s health have circulated on Capitol Hill in recent years, as he seeks re-election to the House in the 2026 midterm elections. The cause of death was not initially released, and Scott’s office said his death was “unexpected.” His office later confirmed that he died of natural causes.

Mr. Scott has served in the Georgia State Legislature since 1974 and for more than 20 years.

After completing his education, Scott moved to Atlanta and started an advertising business, Dayn-Mark Advertising. He married Alfredia Aaron and became the brother-in-law of Atlanta Braves legend Hank Aaron.

He first became active in politics in 1972, when he participated in Andrew Young’s parliamentary campaign and was instrumental in Young’s success. He ran solo in 1974 and was elected to the Georgia House of Representatives, where he served until 1982.

During his 24 years as a Congressman, Mr. Scott served on the Financial Services Committee, the Agriculture Committee, and the NATO Congress.

During his tenure, Scott focused on climate change, criminal justice and law enforcement reform, education, health care, housing, immigration, labor and employment, transportation and infrastructure, and veterans affairs, according to his office.

Georgia Sen. Raphael Warnock said in a statement on April 22: “David Scott was a Georgian’s Georgian. For decades, Congressman Scott epitomized public service for our state. Throughout his years in the Georgia State Legislature and then the U.S. Congress, he made uplifting and supporting the people of Georgia his top priority.”

Democratic Sen. Jon Ossoff said in a statement that Scott “dedicated his life to public service and the state of Georgia.” He said Georgia is “a better place because of Congressman Scott’s efforts.”

Eileen Wright covers Georgia politics as an Atlanta Connect reporter for USA Today’s Deep South Connect team. X Find her at @IreneEWright or email her at ismith@usatodayco.com.

Despite snow drought, snowstorms hit Colorado well into May

0


After months of a snow drought, up to two feet of snow is forecast to fall in the highest elevations of the Colorado Rockies as May begins.

play

Forecasts are predicting snow in parts of Colorado, Montana and Wyoming from late April to early May, but the severe snow shortage plaguing the Colorado Rockies continues.

Snowfall could reach up to 2 feet in the highest areas of Colorado’s Rocky Mountains over the next few days, according to forecasts from NOAA’s Weather Prediction Center. Lower amounts are predicted for mountains in Wyoming and Montana. “This is a classic setup for mountain snow…an area that could take great advantage of any significant precipitation,” WPC said in its forecast.

How bad could it have been? “Colorado’s 2025-2026 (season) snowpack was near or record-low for most of the winter in most parts of the state,” said Joel Gratz, a meteorologist at OpenSnow, a website specializing in Colorado snowfall. “This snow will help a little bit (every single flake or grain of snow helps), but it won’t break the drought,” he told USA TODAY in an email.

Brian Fuchs, a drought expert with the National Drought Mitigation Center, agreed: “Depending on where you are in Colorado, this is one of the worst snow seasons on record, and some places are actually seeing their lowest snowfall of the season.”

“Snow droughts and droughts in general are very serious,” AccuWeather meteorologist Tom Kines told USA TODAY via email. “Northwestern Colorado is experiencing one of the most severe and exceptional drought conditions. Parts of Colorado have not experienced consecutive months of above-average precipitation since 2024.”

Is it unusual for this snow to fall at the end of the season?

An additional 6 to 24 inches of snow could fall between April 28 and May 7, Glatz said. “Snow late in the season is not uncommon. Colorado’s mountains often see significant snowfall by at least mid-May.”

But Fuchs said, “At this time of year (warmer temperatures) it’s difficult for snow to continue to fall or accumulate, so we don’t expect much snow to be added to (Colorado’s) peak season totals.”

“It’s going to help a little bit, but the snow and precipitation over the next few weeks isn’t going to help much. It’s going to help some people in the short term, but it’s not going to end the long-term drought,” Caines said.

Are most ski resorts closed already?

“Yes, most ski areas are closed,” Gratz said. “Arapahoe Basin and Copper Mountain are still open and are scheduled to close on Sunday, May 3rd. Often Arapahoe Basin remains open until June, but that is not the case this season.”

Lack of snow means “decreasing stored water”

Glatz said snow is another form of water storage, and much of the western United States has a generally dry climate, so every drop and flake helps. “Water scarcity affects many aspects of life,” he says.

Fuchs explained, “Snowpack is ‘deposited’ moisture that is utilized later in the summer. As we are seeing now, much of the snow has already melted and there will not be a surge of water in rivers/streams/lakes/reservoirs in the summer.”

This means less water will be available for plants, animals, humans and agriculture later this summer, he said. Fuchs noted that irrigation water providers have already warned customers about reduced deliveries. “This also means that water storage will be reduced in the future, which could lead to further water restrictions.”

Is there any chance of precipitation this summer?

Gratz added a hopeful comment: “The atmosphere may be able to save us from the El Niño-induced drought, as the El Niño event could lead to wetter-than-normal conditions in some regions this spring, summer, and fall.”

Caines agreed, saying, “We’re seeing some light at the end of the tunnel. The weather pattern for late June into July could bring us a few thunderstorms, which could be very beneficial.”

Mother’s Day this year is going to be expensive. The reason is as follows

0

play

Celebrating mom on Mother’s Day this year will be even more expensive thanks to inflation.

According to a recent analysis from the Wells Fargo Agriculture and Food Research Institute, treating your mother to a meal out can be expected to cost 4% more.

And according to CouponFollow, going nine yards on a Mother’s Day gift package that includes flowers, jewelry, chocolates, spa treatments, perfume and a card will cost you 6% more than last year, or $543 compared to $514.

It costs money to take your mom out to eat.

The Wells Fargo Agri-Food Institute predicts the total cost of a restaurant meal on Mother’s Day will be $67, an increase of about 4% from last year’s $64. Wells Fargo credit card data was used for spending at non-quick-service restaurants on Mother’s Day last year.

The biggest factor in the increase is labor costs in the restaurant industry.

“Restaurants have to compete to retain these workers,” Michael Swanson, chief agricultural economist at Wells Fargo Research Institute, told USA TODAY.

The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported in March that wages in the leisure and hospitality sector increased 3.8% over the past 12 months.

When it comes to food, two popular Mother’s Day foods, eggs and beef, have seen dramatic price changes over the past year.

Fortunately, egg prices have come down from last year’s highs due to bird flu, Swanson said.

“This might be the year to have a Mother’s Day brunch because egg prices are much lower than they were a year ago,” Swanson said. “A year ago in March, the price of 12 eggs was $6.23; this March it was $2.35.”

However, if your Mother’s Day menu includes beef, the cost of the meal may increase. Beef prices are soaring as the market struggles to rebuild supply despite record demand.

According to a Wells Fargo report, the latest USDA retail meat prices show a 17% increase in the retail price of beef. By comparison, the retail price of pork rose by 1.3% over the same period, while the overall price of broiler chickens fell by 1.9%.

What parts of your Mother’s Day gift package have you increased?

If the gift to the mother is more important, its cost will also increase.

According to CouponFollow, flowers, jewelry and chocolates saw the fastest increases, each rising more than 7% year over year. The organization examined BLS Consumer Price Index data and analysis of retail prices.

“The key takeaway from our research is how quickly costs are adding up across different categories,” Clay Carey, senior trends analyst at CouponFollow, told USA TODAY. “Inflation is always expected, but these hidden costs can catch consumers by surprise. Planning ahead and taking advantage of discounts where possible can have a big impact on your budget this year.”

Here’s how costs rose:

Bouquets rose 7.3% from $54.53 in 2025 to $58.50 in 2026.

Jewelry under $500 also rose 7.3%, from $213.82 to $229.34.

Chocolate and candy rose 7.2% from $37.97 to $40.71.

The most inflation-resistant categories were perfumes and greeting cards.

Perfume rose only 1.1% from $66.87 to $67.57, while greeting cards also rose 1.1% from $6.83 to $6.90.

But the most expensive Mother’s Day gift packages are still jewelry, which costs $229, and spa services, which cost an average of $140. According to CouponFollow, these two make up 68% of the total price of a gift package.

Procrastination also harms you

If you wait too long to buy a Mother’s Day gift, you’ll end up spending more.

According to CouponFollow, last-minute shoppers are paying $5 to $20 more per gift for expedited shipping. Additional charges can be up to $5 for same-day flower delivery and $20 for overnight chocolates.

Betty Lin-Fisher is a consumer reporter for USA TODAY. Contact her at blinfisher@USATODAY.com or follow her at @blinfisher on X, Facebook and Instagram and @blinfisher.bsky.social on Bluesky.. Sign up for our free The Daily Money newsletter, breaking down complex consumer and financial news. Subscribe here.

Cuban Royal Visit, James Comey on Daily Briefing

0

Welcome to the daily briefing. Start with the following story.

nicole farato here. “Do you really want to know where I was on April 29th?” Wednesday’s news includes a full military meal, a chat with the New York Royals, Michigan football’s new coach, and more.

Military meals raise concerns

A heartbreaking photo of meals served to military personnel on two major US warships fighting the Iran war was shared with USA TODAY by the families of those involved, sparking outrage. Families and friends of sailors and Marines continue to worry that the meals provided to their loved ones deployed at sea are not nutritious or adequately nourishing.

A photo shared with USA TODAY shows a half-empty cafeteria tray held by two service members. One contains just a small scoop of moist shredded meat and a tortilla, the other a handful of boiled carrots, a dry burger, and slices of mysterious gray spam-like meat.

The Pentagon denies there is a food shortage on board the ship. But the family photos and claims remain unexplained, prompting at least one U.S. lawmaker to call for a congressional investigation.

More news you need to know right now

  • A royal moment in the Big Apple. King Charles III and Queen Camilla are continuing their successful tour of the United States, including a visit to New York today.
  • James Comey was indicted. A federal grand jury in North Carolina indicted Comey on charges of threatening to harm or kill President Donald Trump in an Instagram post.
  • How President Trump’s Department of Homeland Security deports people to prisons in countries they don’t know. A growing number of immigrants are caught up in sweeping changes to U.S. deportation policy. Last year, the Trump administration dramatically expanded the little-known tactic of sending migrants to countries with which they have no ties.

politics

Crowded California ballot

In a more than hour-long debate Tuesday at Pomona College’s Bridges Auditorium, eight candidates running for California governor sparred and threw jabs over health care, days before Californians could begin early voting in the state’s primary election. ☀️Want more California news? Sign up for USA TODAY’s Today California newsletter.

USA TODAY Sports Limited

He’s no Michigan man, but Kyle Whittingham is exactly what the Wolverines needed

New University of Michigan coach Kyle Whittingham keeps his workday private. So when a man who had lived and thrived on less in Utah State first stepped into the shining city on a hill that is Schembechler Hall, the football facility on this historic campus, he was just like anyone else viewing the palace at the time. Silent. Read Whittingham’s extensive interview with USA TODAY Sports.

before you go

Have feedback about the daily briefing? Email Nicole at NFallert@usatoday.com.

President Trump’s lawsuit seeking deportation of Haitian immigrants goes to Supreme Court

0

play

Murderers, leeches, rights junkies. Scientists, engineers, nurses.

Behind the legal battle unfolding in the Supreme Court over deportation protections for Haitians is a long-running battle over defining the contributions, or security risks, of one of the nation’s oldest immigrant groups.

On April 29, the Trump administration plans to argue grounds for terminating the Haitians’ temporary protected status in a lawsuit that could affect about 1.3 million TPS holders in more than a dozen countries. For the Haitian diaspora, the fight is the latest chapter in a long story dating back to the 18th century in which the U.S. government has targeted them in immigration crackdowns, often using racist terms.

There were fewer than 1 million Haitian immigrants living in the United States in 2022, according to the think tank Migration Policy Institute. But for half a century, they have been a frequent target of immigration crackdowns by both Republican and Democratic administrations.

Immigration advocates say President Donald Trump’s focus on Haitian immigrants stands out for the dramatic way he has sought to define Haitians in the United States to justify deporting them.

President Trump has repeatedly singled out Haiti and Haitians on the campaign trail and in the White House, calling African countries and Haiti “shithole countries” and repeating debunked claims that Haitian immigrants “probably have AIDS” and were eating family pets in Ohio.

“As I’ve always said, if you import Third World, you become Third World,” President Trump said in an April 9 Truth social post in which he shared a video of a Haitian immigrant who allegedly killed a convenience store clerk. The Department of Homeland Security publicized his arrest by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

Haiti’s defenders argue that its diaspora did not bring its insular problems to the United States any more than the Irish brought famine, Italians brought poverty, and Jews became persecutors through waves of immigration in the 19th and early 20th centuries.

“We are honest. We are hard-working people. We believe in education,” said Renold Julien, director of Combit Negrakai, a Haitian community center in Rockland County, New York. “That’s why our children become important members of society. Our children become doctors, lawyers, judges, teachers and nurses.”

When TPS ends, approximately 350,000 Haitian immigrants will be stripped of their right to legally live and work in the United States.

White House press secretary Abigail Jackson told USA TODAY that TPS was “never intended to be a path to permanent residency or legal residency, no matter how much left-wing organizations wanted it to be.”

Tense relations, history of immigration

Five Haitian immigrants eligible for TPS, including an aspiring neuroscientist, a software engineer, and a registered nurse, allege in their lawsuit that the Trump administration terminated their protected status in order to advance a policy agenda that favors white immigrants over people of color and failed to take into account that Haiti remains plagued by instability, rampant violence, and hunger, as required by law, according to a review of the conditions by Human Rights Watch and the U.S. State Department.

According to a July Federal Register report ending TPS, the Trump administration said the situation in Haiti represented a national security risk to the United States. At the time, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem cited ICE’s arrests of Haitian gang members as evidence of the “pervasive risks posed by increased Haitian immigration.”

Separately, in a social media post in December, Noem recommended a complete travel ban “against all countries that are flooding our country with murderers, leeches, and rights junkies.” The ban went into effect in January and targeted more than a dozen black-majority countries, including Haiti.

But they say Haitians remember words and actions that targeted them going back two centuries.

“If you look specifically at the relationship with Haiti and immigration, you can go back 200 years,” said Gealine Joseph, executive director of the Haitian Bridge Alliance, a nonprofit organization that advocates for Haitian immigrants.

She and others recall how their nationals fleeing U.S.-backed authoritarian governments in the 1980s were intercepted at sea and sent home or detained at immigration prisons in Florida and the Guantanamo Bay military base in Cuba. The modern immigration detention system was essentially created by President Ronald Reagan to detain Haitians, she said.

Or, she said, going back even further to the beginnings of both countries, how the U.S. government in the 1800s refused for decades to recognize both countries, which were founded by former slaves who overthrew French slavery. Some Haitians, including free black men and women, fled to the emerging nation of America, from New Orleans to Philadelphia, in what was said to be America’s first refugee crisis.

In modern times, the Obama administration first instituted “metering” at the U.S.-Mexico border to prevent Haitian asylum seekers from entering the country. The Biden administration left Haitian asylum seekers in squalid encampments on the Texas border.

Joseph said what stands out is President Trump’s efforts to define Haitians in negative terms. She and the Haiti Bridge Alliance formally asked Ohio prosecutors to file criminal charges against Trump and then-Vice Presidential candidate J.D. Vance for their derogatory comments about Haitian immigrants in Springfield. Prosecutors refused.

“They created a narrative that dehumanized the Haitian people in a vile way that was not true,” she said.

“Haitians want a better life”

Tessa Petit, director of the Florida Immigration Coalition and a Haitian political asylum seeker, said the arguments the administration is using to end TPS “are about who we are.”

“Yes, we are from poor countries,” she said. “Yes, we are a black nation. One thing we all have in common is that Haitians want a better life.”

Evan Auguste, an assistant professor of psychology at the City University of New York, runs a support group for Haitians grappling with the “yo-yo of policymaking” and the looming threat of deportation. This is a place where people in the diaspora can share memories of their homeland.

“People express that they miss the food, the land, the air, the sea, and each other,” he says. “People would want to go and build a beautiful Haiti if they could. These policies have a huge impact on people’s ability to do that.”

In mid-April, Jeremiah Johnson, a former U.S. immigration judge fired by the Trump administration, visited Mexico’s southern border. There, thousands of Haitian immigrants had gathered in hopes of reaching Mexico City and thus Canada.

At 6 p.m., about 2,000 Haitians gathered in a park in Tapachula, a colonial city near the border between Mexico and Guatemala. The two began walking through a downpour toward Mexico City, some 1,100 miles away. A video he shared with USA TODAY shows him walking in the rain wearing a plastic poncho and wrapping his belongings in garbage bags. He walked with them to the edge of town.

“They’re down-to-earth people,” he said. “I heard there are more opportunities in Mexico City.”

The U.S. State Department warns Americans in no uncertain terms: “Do not travel to Haiti for any reason.” As of April 16, the ministry maintained a Level 4 travel advisory, warning of “risks of crime, terrorism, kidnapping, insecurity, and limited medical care.”

According to the State Department, U.S. commercial flights to Haiti’s capital Port-au-Prince are currently suspended. Deportation flights will continue once a month.

Lauren Villagran covers immigration for USA TODAY. Contact him at lvillagran@usatoday.com or Signal (laurenvillagran.57).

Americans feel bad about the economy. Here are four reasons why.

0

play

As the Iran war spills over into daily life, more Americans say they are worse off now than at any time in the past 25 years. According to the latest Gallup poll, more than half (55%) say their financial situation is worsening. The numbers are similar to the downturn in sentiment that Gallup recorded last year, but the number of dissatisfied people is increasing. Only 47% of Americans are disappointed about the economy in 2024.

The poll also marks the fifth year in a row that Americans are dissatisfied with the situation, saying it’s getting worse, not better. Only during the Great Recession was the national mood so depressed. In the midst of the Iran war, financial instability has surfaced ahead of November’s midterm elections, putting pressure on President Donald Trump and the Republican Party.

Since the beginning of the year, President Trump has urged Congress to pass legislation capping credit card interest rates at 10% and directed the Justice Department to investigate meatpacking companies to lower beef prices.

President Trump inherited an economy in tatters from former President Joe Biden, but he has often said it is “stronger than ever” under his leadership. But Americans remain skeptical, with a recent Reuters/Ipsos poll showing Trump’s approval ratings have fallen to their lowest level in his second term, with only 34% of Americans viewing him as a good steward of the economy and country.

Inflation is lower than its 2022 peak. So what’s keeping Americans up at night? They’re struggling with economic headaches, including years of high prices, a recent spike in gas prices, and rising housing and health care costs. Four in 10 Americans are worried about how they’ll pay their monthly bills, and the number of people worried about minimum credit card payments has increased by 11 percentage points, Gallup said.

Kerrigan Rosado, 29, commutes an hour each way to work as an administrative assistant at Central Michigan University. Her husband drives 30 minutes to work helping people with disabilities.

Rosado said the couple in Saginaw, Michigan, was hit hard by the huge price hikes. In the past few days, a gallon of gas has jumped from $3.99 to $4.29. With the current refinery disruption in the Midwest, it could soon reach $4.70.

“I drive a Chevrolet Equinox, so I probably have a 13-gallon tank, so when it costs $50 to fill up the car, it hurts, it definitely hurts,” she said. “That means we’ve stopped spending in a lot of other areas. We don’t go out anymore. We actually don’t have money to buy most things.”

Rosado said as insecurity increases, preserving essential goods has become a matter of economic survival.

“The economy has really taken a hit over the past year or so, but since COVID-19, since 2020, we’ve seen things skyrocket. As I watch the prices at the grocery store go up and up, I feel like there’s not much I can do,” she said. “The things you have to buy, like food in your fridge, gas to get to work, electricity for your home, are going up in price. It’s not a new flat screen or a game console. It’s these essentials that you have to buy.”

“The fight against affordability”

Nearly one-third of Americans cite the high cost of living as their most pressing financial problem. This number is below the 2024 peak of 41% and similar to a year ago, but still the highest level Gallup has recorded in decades. College costs, transportation costs, childcare costs, and more all add up, making it even more difficult for Americans to make ends meet. “My whole life, it’s been a struggle with affordability,” said Ray Gomez Jr., 67, of Covina. California told USA TODAY. “I feel like everything happened at once,” Gomez said. “I don’t feel any hope.” He has struggled with rising prices for years and feels like everything from food to rent is rising. “It’s becoming more and more frequent,” he said. Prices are rising. The consumer price index, an indicator of inflation, rose 3.3% in March compared to the same month last year. In particular, food prices are soaring. Prices of 11 of the 25 common food items analyzed in a recent Coupon Follower study have declined over the past two years, but the savings have been more than offset by rising prices. The study looked at average food price data from the monthly Consumer Price Index from the Bureau of Labor Statistics over the past two years. “Inflation rose steadily in 2021, reaching 7% by December from 1.4% in January, and peaking at 9.1% in June 2022. Inflation has since receded, recording below 3% in most months since early 2025,” Gallup said. “Yet it has not consistently returned to the sub-3% range typical of the decade ending in 2021, which may be what consumers are expecting.”

What is your second biggest concern?Housing

Housing is a necessity, but it is becoming out of reach for many Americans. The poll ranked it as the second-biggest concern.

No wonder. Of the millions of Americans who live in rental housing, 50% are considered “cost burdened,” meaning they spend more than 30% of their income on housing and utilities. This includes 27% who spend more than half of their income on these expenses.

But in an era when home prices are soaring and mortgage rates remain high, becoming a homeowner is becoming increasingly difficult.

The median home price is five times the median household income in 2024, which is much higher than the long-held rule of thumb for affordability of three times. Going back to 1990, the only time this ratio was this high was in 2005, at the height of the subprime bubble.

Home sales have fallen sharply as many Americans who locked in ultra-low interest rate mortgages during the pandemic have little incentive to let go. As a result, many prospective buyers remain on the sidelines.

Even those lucky enough to become homeowners face cost issues. Property taxes will increase by 15% from 2019 to 2024, and real estate insurance will increase by a mind-boggling 70% between 2019 and 2025 for those who can still get insurance.

In a recent interview, one housing counselor told USA TODAY that this month alone, she referred three homeowners a week to food pantries.

Gasoline prices rise, bringing more pain

Coupled with housing, rising energy costs are keeping Americans up at night. According to Gallup, 13% of Americans say prices are rising, up 10 points from last year and the highest since 2008. Energy costs are now Americans’ second-biggest concern, along with housing costs.

From truck drivers to commuters, gas prices are straining budgets across the country. And the pain at the pump won’t ease any time soon, analysts warned this week.

As peace negotiations between the United States and Iran appear to be at a dead end, the average price of a gallon of regular gasoline has risen to $4.18, the highest level in four years, according to AAA.

Before the war began in February, gasoline was less than $3 a gallon. The last time Americans paid this much to fill a tank was in the summer of 2022 after Russia invaded Ukraine.

Gasbuddy oil analyst Patrick de Haan had a grim prediction for Americans. The national average could soon reach $4.30 a gallon, he told USA TODAY.

Additionally, JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon said he is concerned about stagflation, the combination of high inflation, slowing economic growth, and rising unemployment.

In early April, he warned that rising oil and commodity prices due to the Iran war could cause interest rates to rise more than the market expected while inflation remains high.

From routine procedures to serious illnesses, worries increase

According to a Gallup poll, 6 in 10 Americans worry they won’t be able to cover their medical bills if they have a serious accident or become ill. Almost half are concerned about day-to-day costs. What’s the cause? Health care costs are rising faster than wages and inflation.

According to the sound policy nonprofit KFF, the average cost of a family health insurance plan offered through the workplace in 2025 will be about $27,000, an increase of 6% from the previous year.

David Soika, 62, said he plans to retire after nearly 40 years in the import/export industry, but not just to maintain his medical care.

“I’ll be 63 in August and I’m scared of losing my health insurance,” Soika said.

He has a number of serious health issues, including non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, type 2 diabetes, and high blood pressure. When he broke his ribs two years ago, the hospital bill was $90,000.

“If I didn’t have health insurance, it probably wouldn’t have killed me completely, but it’s a lot of money,” he says.

Soika worries that if her company goes bankrupt or she loses her job, she will have to leave the U.S. and go to a country where she can access low-cost or free insurance.

“Right now I’m fine, but I’m worried about the millions of Americans who aren’t,” he said. “I’m worried about a lot of people, not just friends and family, but people I don’t even know. How are they coping with this? They’re on the verge of going bankrupt with one accident or illness.”

Most working-age Americans have health insurance through their jobs, but millions of people who buy insurance through the Affordable Care Act’s marketplace are paying significantly higher costs because Congress has failed to expand the tax credit.

Without the enhanced tax credit, which is set to expire at the end of 2025, the average cost for the 22 million Americans with subsidized ACA insurance would have more than doubled as of January, according to KFF.

Rising costs likely led many consumers to drop their ACA coverage or seek cheaper minimum coverage that may not provide much coverage. Preliminary numbers released in February showed ACA enrollment decreased by 1.2 million people, but that number is likely to increase when additional numbers are released later this year.

When medical costs increase, health insurance companies raise premiums. Employers cite chronic conditions, prescription drug costs, increased use of medical care and hospital costs as reasons why health insurance costs will rise this year, according to KFF.

Low-income Americans on Medicaid could also expect cuts under the Trump Tax Cuts and Spending Act passed by Congress in 2025. Over the next 10 years, 7.5 million people will lose Medicaid coverage due to changes in the law, the Congressional Budget Office said in an August report. Nondisabled adults receiving Medicaid must work, volunteer, or enroll in school to maintain Medicaid coverage. Additionally, states must reverify Medicaid eligibility up to twice a year.

When will my May SSI check be mailed? See 2026 Payment Schedule

0

play

The May Supplemental Securities Income Check is scheduled to be issued on May 1st.

Supplemental Security Income (SSI) payments are typically issued on the first day of the month, but payments may be issued earlier if the first calendar day of the month is a weekend or holiday. According to the Social Security Administration’s calendar, the first day of the month in May is a Friday, and payments are made on May 1st.

This continues for 4 consecutive months and the SSI check is done on the 1st of the month. Then, in July, August 1st is a Saturday, so August’s check will be paid early, on Friday, July 31st.

When will my SSI payment be sent? See the full 2026 payment schedule.

Here are the SSI payment dates for 2026 according to the SSA calendar:

  • Friday, May 1, 2026 (Please check May 2026)
  • Monday, June 1, 2026 (confirmed in June 2026)
  • Wednesday, July 1, 2026 (confirmed in July 2026)
  • Friday, July 31, 2026 (Please check for August 2026)
  • Tuesday, September 1, 2026 (confirmed in September 2026)
  • Thursday, October 1, 2026 (confirmed in October 2026)
  • Friday, October 30, 2026 (Please check for November 2026)
  • Tuesday, December 1, 2026 (confirmed in December 2026)
  • Thursday, December 31, 2026 (confirmed for January 2027)

What is Supplemental Security Income (SSI)?

The Supplemental Security Income program, administered by the Social Security Administration, provides benefits to people with limited or no income or assets, people age 65 or older, and people who are blind or have a qualifying disability. According to the SSA website, children with eligible disabilities are also eligible for SSI.

Adults who earn more than $2,073 per month from work are generally not eligible for benefits. About 7.4 million Americans currently receive monthly SSI payments, and about one-third of SSI recipients also receive Social Security benefits, the agency said.

To see if you qualify for SSI, visit the Social Security website. You can also visit your local Social Security office in person or call 1-800-772-1213 (TTY 1-800-325-0778) between 8 a.m. and 7 p.m. local time on weekdays.

Mike Snyder is a national trends news reporter for USA TODAY. You can follow him on Threads, Bluesky, and X, and email him at: mike snyder & @mikegsnider.bsky.social & @mikesnider & msnider@usatoday.com.

White House, Democrats condemn political rhetoric after shootings

0


The White House said the shooting at a news conference attended by President Trump was a “predicted outcome” of Democratic rhetoric, prompting backlash from Democrats.

play

On the night an alleged assassination attempt against President Donald Trump was thwarted by gunfire at a news conference, the president later took to the stage in the White House briefing room to speak about unity.

“This was supposed to be an event dedicated to free speech, bringing together members of Congress and members of the press from both parties,” President Trump said on April 25. “And in a sense it did, because I saw a completely unified venue, given the fact that the two parties had just unified.”

The next day, President Trump told “60 Minutes” that Democrats’ “hate speech” was creating a dangerous situation. Shortly thereafter, the White House began slamming Democrats and the media over the shooting.

White House press secretary Caroline Levitt blamed the political violence on the president’s “demonization” by Democrats and the media, and said at a press conference on April 27 that a “left-wing hate cult” against Trump “has injured and killed multiple people and nearly did so again this weekend.”

In response, Democrats pointed to President Trump’s long history of inflammatory rhetoric, including calling political opponents “vermin” and “the enemy within.” House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said Mr. Levitt should “clean his own house.”

Debate over political rhetoric that contributes to violence has intensified in recent years, with President Trump facing two assassination attempts in the past. A series of other attacks on politicians have also drawn condemnation from both sides.

After an assassin’s bullet grazed his ear during a 2024 campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, President Trump also nodded toward unity before using the shooting to smear his opponents, even though investigators have never revealed the shooter’s motive. This time, a post written by the alleged gunman is attracting attention.

Suspected gunman’s comments spark debate

Prosecutors on April 27 charged Cole Thomas Allen, 31, of Torrance, California, with attempting to assassinate President Trump at the White House Correspondents’ Association dinner on April 25 at a Washington, D.C., hotel.

Allen allegedly ran through a security checkpoint and opened fire. One Secret Service agent was shot, but his bulletproof vest prevented him from serious harm, authorities said. Officials said investigators fired five shots at the suspect, but they missed the target. No one was killed in the incident, and Allen was quickly arrested.

Allen, an adjunct instructor with a degree in mechanical engineering from Caltech, said he registered to vote in California “regardless of political party preference.” He donated $25 to then-Vice President Kamala Harris in 2024.

Prosecutors included in charging documents some of the emails Allen allegedly sent to his family and former employer before and after the shooting. The email is signed “Allen, Friendly Federal Assassin.”

The email said that as a U.S. citizen, “the actions of my agents reflect on me” and that he did not want to allow “traitors to paint crimes on my hands.” According to the affidavit, Allen said he targeted Trump administration officials “from high to low rank” with priority.

“I read the manifesto, and it’s — he’s radicalized,” Trump said on “60 Minutes” on April 26 about the alleged gunman.

Asked about people who encourage political violence, Trump said: “I think it’s far more far left than far right doing that.”

Trump later added, “I think it’s very dangerous, especially the hate speech from Democrats.”

Democratic leaders condemned political violence following the shooting at the WHCA dinner.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said on April 27 that “political violence, regardless of the perpetrator or motive, endangers our democracy,” adding, “I have and will continue to condemn all forms of political violence.”

The violence has spread to the political sphere in recent years, with conservatives such as activist Charlie Kirk and Republican House Majority Leader Steve Scalise being targeted, along with Democratic lawmakers in Minnesota and the Democratic governor of Pennsylvania. On January 6, 2021, a mob of Trump supporters stormed the U.S. Capitol in an attempt to overturn President Joe Biden’s victory.

rhetoric of blame

Levitt criticized anti-Trump rhetoric at a news conference Monday.

“This political violence stems from the systematic demonization of him and his supporters by commentators, certainly Democratic elected officials, and even some media outlets,” Levitt said, adding that “much of the manifesto is indistinguishable from the words we hear from so many people every day.”

A White House press release on Tuesday continued to push that point.

“This attack was not random, but the expected result of years of reckless, inflammatory and escalating rhetoric by Democrats,” the release states.

“The political violence and rhetoric must stop,” Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche said at a press conference on April 27, slamming the media.

“To be honest, a lot of people in this room have done the same thing,” Blanche told reporters. “They’re just as guilty as a lot of people in X. It’s not surprising that this kind of rhetoric happens when you have reporters, when you have the media, when you have the media being overly critical and calling the president horrible names for no reason, no evidence, no basis.”

Democrats are pushing back. Jeffries ridiculed Levitt’s comments, calling her a “disgrace” and a “cold liar” and accusing her of taking Democrats’ words out of context.

Jeffries cited President Trump’s pardons for participants in the January 6 riot, as well as the case in which a man pleaded guilty to arson, terrorism and attempted murder at the home of Democratic Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro. He told Mr. Levitt, “Get lost. Before you say anything about the language we use, clean your own house.”

Others point out that Trump has lashed out at film director and actor Rob Reiner and former special counsel Robert Mueller after their deaths, and has made similar incendiary statements over the years.

“If you can’t unequivocally condemn President Trump’s daily use of violent rhetoric, no one is going to take your rhetoric against Democrats seriously right now,” Sarah Longwell, a longtime Republican strategist who has become a prominent Trump critic, wrote on social media.

Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez told reporters that she felt an obligation to speak out about some of President Trump’s actions, but that there was a “clear” line between raising concerns about the president’s policies and actions and calling for violence, and that she was not aware of “the people who were involved in it.”

“I don’t think it’s responsible behavior to try to use an opportunity to escape responsibility for any actions,” she added.

Contributor: Katherine Palmer

I ran my first ever Dollywood race weekend. The situation is as follows.

0


Runners took on hills, cinnamon bread stops, and beautiful scenery during Dollywood’s first-ever race weekend.

play

  • Dollywood held its first-ever Run Dollywood Race Weekend in late April, featuring a 5K, 10K, and half marathon.
  • More than 5,900 people from around the world participated in the inaugural race event.
  • Along the race route, staff took runners through the theme park, past dormant rides and shops, while providing encouragement and refreshments.

Early on a weekend morning, I was trudging up a 5km hill in the dim early morning light, listening to The Chicks’ “Ready to Run.” As I turned the corner, a woman standing by the road said exactly what I wanted to hear.

“It’s all downhill from here, guys!” I wasn’t used to encouragement while jogging, but this wasn’t your standard morning run. Dollywood staff members were stationed there as part of the first-ever Run Dollywood Race Weekend.

It could be her words of encouragement, adrenaline, or an unexpectedly excited competitive instinct. After all, it was a race. But I picked up the pace and made my way to the finish line, overcoming dormant roller coasters and still-closed stores.

For two days in late April, the Pigeon Forge, Tennessee, theme park became a 5k, 10k, and half marathon course (along with a Kids Fun Run).

Eugene Norton, president of Dollywood Parks & Resorts, said he met participants from all over the world, from California in the United States to the Netherlands. “It’s been a dream of mine to host a race here because of the beauty of the Smoky Mountains and how much people love coming here,” he told USA TODAY.

More than 5,900 people attended over the weekend. The situation is as follows.

What happened at the first Run Dollywood Race Weekend?

I signed up for a 5K that started early on April 25th. I was staying at Heartsong Lodge & Resort, one of Dollywood’s two resorts adjacent to the park, where participants received a packet the day before, including a race bib with a timing device and a free T-shirt. The facility’s Runner Expo also featured limited edition merchandise and accessibility information.

On race day, a trolley picked us up from the resort around 5:10am. Even though it was well before business hours, someone started singing Dolly Parton’s hit “9 to 5” while we were waiting to leave. It might have seemed strange elsewhere.

After about 4 minutes of riding, the trolley dropped us outside the park, and from there we walked another 10 minutes to the starting line. It hadn’t even been nearly an hour since the race started, but many people were already warming up, stretching, and sitting on the pavement in various sections organized based on estimated pace (I did the same at one point to conserve energy).

I saw at least two women wearing cloaks shaped like butterfly wings (a motif seen throughout the park), a woman wearing a butterfly-print T-shirt, and several people wearing blonde wigs. Before I knew it, the wait was over and I was on my way.

The route started near the Dolly Parton Experience, which opened in 2024, and moved clockwise through the park. I wanted to maintain a steady pace, but it was difficult to avoid pausing at various points along the way. By the park’s main entrance, staff handed out bite-sized bites of Dollywood’s famous cinnamon bread, while the Corey Zink and Co. bluegrass band performed near the Dollywood Express depot.

There were a few narrow spots where I had to reposition myself to avoid bumping into other runners, but other than that I felt the trail was easy to follow. Staff were always on hand to guide the runners, hand out water, and cheer them on.

Later in the race, we left the park and continued to the end of the route, where we finished in the parking lot. We tackled the last small hill and soon crossed the finish line to receive a snack box containing bananas, granola bars, etc. and a medal in the shape of a butterfly.

As I sat on the ground to catch my breath, I heard the announcer reassure the crowd, “Don’t worry, it’s not sweat. It’s rhinestones.”

Is the Run Dollywood Race Weekend available?

Participants were allowed to use competition wheelchairs, walkers, and other equipment. According to Runner’s Guide, the theme park strongly encourages guests to “contact Dollywood Accessibility at least one week prior to race day to discuss accommodations, device approval, and participation needs.”

Was Dolly Parton in the race?

Parton herself wasn’t at the race, but she recently appeared at the park to celebrate the start of the 41st season in March. Dollywood’s Dreamer-in-Chief typically appears in person multiple times a year, but there is no set schedule.

“When Dolly is here, you never know where she’s going to show up, which makes it all the more exciting when you experience a ‘Dolly sighting,'” Public Relations Director Wes Ramey told Knox News, part of the USA TODAY Network, in 2024.

When is the next Run Dollywood race weekend?

The next Run Dollywood Race Weekend will be held on September 26th and 27th. Prospective runners can sign up to renew their registration on the park’s website.

Pricing information for fall races is not yet available, but registration and processing fees for April races ranged from $27.50 to $289.75 depending on guest selection when I registered in November. We paid a total of $144.10 for the 5K and 2 days of park admission.

Norton also said the first few weeks of the Smoky Mountain Christmas event will be “focused on Christmas,” and that he hopes to add a full marathon next year.

Contributor: Eve Chen

Nathan Diller is a consumer travel reporter for USA TODAY based in Nashville. Please contact us at ndiller@usatoday.com.