What if companies didn’t wait until employees left to ask what went wrong?
That’s the idea behind “stay interviews,” a growing workplace strategy designed to improve retention before problems become serious. Rather than focusing on why someone is leaving, a retention interview shifts the conversation to why employees choose to stay and what could ultimately force them out.
The core of a stay interview is a structured conversation between the manager and the employee about what’s working and what’s not working in their role.
According to a 2026 Gallup poll, 52% of employees who voluntarily left their job said their boss or company could have taken steps to stop them from leaving. Accommodation interviews aim to identify such opportunities early, while there is still time to act.
The goal is to understand what keeps employees engaged, what support they need, and what changes can improve the employee experience.
By having these conversations regularly, employers can identify concerns early, make meaningful adjustments, and create a workplace where employees feel supported and motivated to stick around.
Difference between retention interview and exit interview
Unlike exit interviews, which are conducted after the employee has already decided to leave, retention interviews are conducted early on, when there is still time to make changes.
They are designed to surface concerns in real-time, giving managers an opportunity to improve the day-to-day employee experience before small issues turn into reasons for termination.
According to Erica Rivera, a career coach and former technical recruiter at Google, retention interviews are a “retention strategy that many companies use to try to keep people in their organizations.”
In contrast, exit interviews are retrospective. While it can provide useful insights, it’s too late to retain departing employees.
Reasons why companies introduce accommodation interviews
As the labor force becomes increasingly mobile, companies are paying close attention to open interviews as a way to secure talent. With turnover rates still high in many industries, retention is no longer a secondary concern but a core business priority. Gallup estimates that 42% of employee turnover is preventable, which is often tied to factors such as management, engagement, and workplace experience.
“In 2026, more and more companies will be using overnight interviews because they act as a proactive ‘examination’ rather than a reactive ‘autopsis’,” said Janelle Rush, a human resources leader. She added: “The cost of preventing turnover is a fraction of the cost of managing it.”
The costs can be significant. Considering hiring, onboarding, and lost productivity, Rush says, “replacing an experienced employee can range from 50% to 200% of the employee’s annual salary.”
In reality, however, accommodation interviews are not always as aggressive as intended.
“I’d like to say they’re more proactive than reactive, but I’ve seen more of the latter,” Rivera said. Companies often conduct retention interviews only after they notice an increase in employee turnover, using the interviews to understand why employees are leaving rather than to prevent them from leaving.
Still, the economic incentives cannot be ignored. “It costs more to hire and train people than to focus on internal retention,” Rivera says.
As competition for skilled workers increases, companies can’t afford to overlook what keeps employees engaged every day. Accommodation interviews offer a way to get ahead of these challenges by understanding the needs of employees before they decide when to leave.
Tomos Bright, global talent and culture manager at Mauve Group, explains, “Residency interviews are conversations about why someone stays and what makes them stay longer. Think of it as the human counterpart to an engagement survey.” Unlike surveys, these conversations open up room for honest, nuanced feedback that’s hard to capture through forms alone.
Frequently asked questions for accommodation interviews
Residential interviews are designed to be conversational rather than formal, creating a space for honest and thoughtful feedback.
Erica Rivera said the discussion may feel casual, but that’s by design. Managers often ask open-ended questions such as:
- How is the situation now?
- What part of your role excites you the most on a day-to-day basis?
- Are there any areas where you feel there are challenges or gaps?
- How can we better support your growth and next steps?
These questions will help uncover what’s working, what’s not, and what might influence an employee’s decision to stay.
Questions to avoid in residency interviews
Not all questions will lead to useful feedback. In some cases, the wrong approach can make employees feel uncomfortable or wary.
avoid:
- main question (Example: “You’re happy here, aren’t you?”)
- Performance review-like questions not a conversation
- Anything that puts employees in the field Regarding retirement (e.g. “Are you planning to quit?”)
- Questions without follow-throughespecially if concerns were raised but not addressed.
The goal is to create a safe, low-pressure environment, not to interrogate or elicit a sense of security.
Advantages of accommodation interview
Accommodation interviews benefit both employees and employers by creating a space for open and ongoing conversations about the work experience. Done well, it helps leaders address concerns early, strengthens manager-employee relationships, and improves retention rates.
Bright said residency interviews often act as an extension of regular one-on-one check-ins. “In practice, it’s often an informal extension of one-on-ones or check-ins with line managers, providing clear insight into what people need to feel supported and committed,” he says. “And while informal, retention interviews can be a crucial factor in deciding whether someone stays or leaves.”
These conversations not only retain employees but also strengthen trust between employees and managers. “It’s nice to have these types of touchpoints,” Rivera says. These give managers a clearer picture of how their team is feeling and where they need additional support.
In a workplace shaped by performance improvement plans, layoffs, and exit interviews, retention interviews can also serve a more human purpose: letting employees know their voices matter and are valued before they consider leaving.
Potential disadvantages
Although the residency interview is a valuable tool, it is not without its limitations. Its effectiveness largely depends on how it is implemented and whether employees feel comfortable being honest.
Trust is a key factor. If that isn’t established, employees may refrain from giving meaningful feedback.
“If you haven’t built a trusting relationship with someone, you’re probably not going to get the honest feedback you’re looking for,” Rivera says.
Janelle Rush has similar concerns. “Residency interviews fail when the company culture is already toxic or fearful,” she says. In these environments, employees may default to “safe” or overly polite responses rather than honest feedback, especially if they’re worried about being labeled negatively.
Even in a healthy workplace, tensions can arise during a residency interview if expectations are not clear. Employees may wonder how their feedback will be used or worry about unintended consequences.
Without trust, transparency, and follow-through, residential interviews risk becoming performative rather than productive.
conclusion
Retention interviews are gaining traction because they provide managers with real-time insight into the employee experience and an opportunity to act before issues lead to turnover.
They have become the “gold standard,” as Rush explains, because they provide actionable insights while there is still time to react. Unlike an exit interview, which reflects on what went wrong, a retention interview focuses on improving the employee’s day-to-day experience in the moment.
It doesn’t have to be formal to be effective. Rivera says these conversations should happen on a regular basis, rather than every scheduled check-in. Weekly one-on-ones can include space for employees to talk about not just what they’re doing, but how they’re feeling.
More structured retention interview conversations can occur quarterly, or at least every six months, giving managers a consistent way to understand what employees need to stay engaged.
At the end of the day, stay interviews are most effective when they’re part of an ongoing conversation, rather than a one-time fix.
USA TODAY What are the top workplaces of 2026?
Do you work for a great company? USA TODAY Top Workplaces, a collaboration between Energage and USA TODAY, annually ranks organizations across the United States that excel at creating positive work environments for their employees. Employee feedback determines the winner.
In 2026, more than 1,600 companies were recognized as Top Workplaces. See rankings across the United States. Check out the links below for further insight into workplace trends and advice.
