Home Blog Page 538

Kim Kardashian announces diagnosis of brain aneurysm. What is it?

0

play

Fans of Keeping Up With the Kardashians got a shocking health update on Thursday, Oct. 23, as Kim Kardashian revealed she has been diagnosed with a small brain aneurysm.

Kardashian announced her medical update in a preview video that aired on Hulu’s Season 7 premiere of “The Kardashians” on Oct. 23. Most brain aneurysms are small and asymptomatic, but if they rupture they can be fatal.

Here’s a closer look at the health condition and what it means for the star from the Detroit Free Press, part of the USA TODAY Network.

What happened to Kim Kardashian?

Kim Kardashian has been diagnosed with a small brain aneurysm, she said in a sneak preview of the Season 7 premiere of Hulu’s reality show “The Kardashians” on Oct. 23.

What is a cerebral aneurysm?

According to the Cleveland Clinic, a brain aneurysm is a bulge or weak spot in a blood vessel, usually in or around the brain. Although most brain aneurysms are small, a ruptured brain aneurysm can be life-threatening.

Who does a brain aneurysm affect most?

According to the Mayo Clinic, brain aneurysms are more common in women than men and are more common in adults between the ages of 30 and 60.

What are the common symptoms?

According to the Mayo Clinic, small brain aneurysms that don’t rupture usually don’t cause symptoms. However, the Cleveland Clinic advises that minor symptoms, such as a headache, may occur before a major rupture.

A ruptured brain aneurysm is a serious condition that can cause internal bleeding and requires immediate treatment.

According to the Cleveland Clinic and Mayo Clinic, common symptoms include:

  • severe headache
  • nausea and vomiting
  • stiff shoulders
  • Weakness and/or numbness
  • Blurred or double vision
  • seizure
  • light sensitivity
  • confusion
  • pain above and behind the eyes
  • loss of consciousness
  • Eyelids droop and pupils dilate

How is a brain aneurysm treated?

A ruptured brain aneurysm must be treated immediately, usually requiring emergency surgery. The Cleveland Clinic urges people to call 911 or go to the nearest emergency room if they develop symptoms. The need for treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysms is evaluated on a case-by-case basis and may include long-term monitoring.

Does stress cause brain aneurysms?

According to the Mayo Clinic and Cleveland Clinic, brain aneurysms occur when the walls of arteries in the brain become thinner and weaker. Various risk factors may be involved in the occurrence of this problem, including:

  • Family history of cerebral aneurysms
  • smoking
  • certain health conditions
  • drug use, especially cocaine
  • high blood pressure
  • heavy use of alcohol

How is a brain aneurysm diagnosed?

A CT scan of the brain is usually the first step in diagnosing an aneurysm or hemorrhage, according to the University of Michigan Health.

“When an aneurysm is diagnosed, cerebral angiography is performed to better understand the aneurysm,” UM said. “During this procedure, dye is injected into your bloodstream and X-rays are taken. This gives our team information about how to best treat your condition.”

American workers are worried that their Social Security benefits will disappear when they retire.

0

play

Three-quarters of American workers are worried they won’t receive the Social Security benefits they were promised when they retire, a new survey finds.

Generations of workers have worried about the future of Social Security and retirement trust funds. However, recently, my anxiety seems to be increasing.

A new Bankrate survey released on October 22nd found that 76% of workers and 80% of retirees are concerned about their benefits not being paid. A year ago, 73% of workers and 71% of retirees expressed similar concerns.

There are many reasons to be concerned. According to predictions, Social Security will face a shortage by 2034. At that point, the federal program’s cash reserves will be depleted and the agency will have enough funds to pay about 81% of all severance payments, according to an AARP analysis.

Approaching deadlines can create dramatic tension for workers and retirees, and mark their approach on their calendars.

“Funding issues have become a quantitative threat in recent years,” said Mark Hamrick, Bankrate’s senior economic analyst and Washington bureau chief.

Are people losing faith in social security?

The Trump administration may be stirring up anxiety. The Social Security Administration has been in turmoil through most of 2025, enduring highly publicized layoffs, policy shifts, and leadership changes.

In a March speech to Congress, President Trump called into question the integrity of government agencies, alleging “shocking levels of incompetence and possible fraud.” Some critics of Congress say the president is plotting to privatize Social Security.

The combination of bankruptcy countdown and confusion in government agencies has shaken public confidence. In an AARP survey released in July, only 36% of Americans expressed confidence in the future of Social Security, down from 43% in 2020.

Fear causes some people to claim Social Security early, on the theory that they will receive benefits forever.

In another recent AARP survey, nearly a quarter of Americans ages 62 to 66 said they had decided to claim Social Security early within the past year or planned to do so.

Americans are claiming Social Security early.

At a recent internal meeting, Social Security administrators noted that new benefit claims increased by more than 15% in March compared to the same month in 2024.

The total number of Social Security retirement claimants increased by 1.7 million people in the first eight months of 2025, according to Financial Advisor Magazine. This is a larger increase than in all of 2024.

This rise is partly due to concerns about social security deficiencies and partly as a result of new laws that increase benefits for civil servants.

For many retirees, claiming Social Security early is a mistake. You can claim as early as age 62, but the longer you wait, the bigger your monthly check will be, up to age 70.

Based on average human lifespans, economists say most people would be better off waiting.

Americans rely on Social Security to fund their retirement. The Bankrate survey of 2,466 adults found that 52% of workers said they would rely on the benefits after retirement, and 78% of retirees said they still relied on the benefits.

Reliance on social security appears to be increasing. According to AARP research, 65% of retirees now rely “substantially” on Social Security, up from 51% in 2005.

Will Congress step in to fix Social Security?

To “fix” Social Security, Congress would have to find a way to make the program more flexible. Policymakers could collect even more Social Security taxes. It would raise the “full” retirement age for Social Security, potentially extending the period before retirees receive larger checks. They could also borrow funds.

Will Congress really allow Social Security to fail? Experts, like the general public, are divided on this question.

“I think Congress will definitely do something to avoid cutting benefits,” Emily Ekins, vice president and director of polling at the liberal Cato Institute, told USA TODAY in August. “I don’t think we’re going to just accept a quarter cut in benefits.”

Bankrate’s Hamrick is more skeptical.

“There was certainly nothing to support confidence that they would pay attention to solving this low-hanging fruit,” he said.

In any case, Hamrick said, “The current path is unstable.”

Donald Trump’s approval rating, poll on shutdown, DC dismantling

0

President Donald Trump will head to Asia this weekend as the U.S. government remains shut down for more than three weeks. While Congressional Democrats and Republicans repeatedly tried and failed to pass funding legislation, President Trump began demolishing the White House to make way for a $300 million ballroom, shocking preservationists as construction expanded to include the entire East Tower. Some Democratic lawmakers have called for President Trump to cancel his visit to North Korea in response to the government shutdown, but as of October 23, Trump’s visit remains on the schedule. According to Reuters, President Trump will head first to Malaysia, then to Japan and South Korea. What do people here stateside think about Trump and how he’s doing as president? Check out his latest approval ratings.

Shutdown week 3: More Americans criticize Republicans

A Reuters/Ipsos poll showed President Trump’s approval rating rose slightly to 42%, but within the poll’s margin of error. According to Reuters, it has hovered between 40% and 44% since the beginning of April. The poll was conducted between October 15th and 20th among 4,835 American adults. It has a margin of error of plus or minus 2 percentage points.

Fifty percent of respondents believe Republican Congressional leadership is to blame for the government shutdown, while 43% believe Democrats are to blame.

The closure has been in place since October 1, so far the second longest closure in history.

YouGov: 53% disapprove of decision to demolish east building

A weekly poll by The Economist and YouGov found 39% approve of Trump’s job performance, while 56% disapprove. The poll was conducted among 1,621 people from October 17 to 20, and had a margin of error of about 3.5 percentage points. His approval rating fell slightly from the previous week.

A separate YouGov poll of 2,326 U.S. adults conducted on October 23 found that 53% disapproved of President Trump’s move to demolish the east wing of the White House, compared to 28% who disapproved.

What is President Trump’s overall average approval rating?

President Trump’s approval rating is a net negative, but has remained relatively stable over the past few months, according to an average based on RealClearPolitics and the New York Times aggregators.

According to graphics from RealClearPolitics, President Trump’s approval rating was 50.5% as of January 27th, making him net positive, but by March 13th, his approval rating was 47.8%, and his disapproval rating was 48.5%, making him net negative. The approval rating hit its lowest of 45.1% on April 29, but it declined near the 100th day of the Trump administration. On September 30, the day before the government shutdown began, the approval rating hit an all-time low of 44.8%.

According to a tally by the New York Times, President Trump’s approval rating fell from 52% in January to 44% in April, and has remained roughly flat since then. According to the Times, Trump’s lowest approval rating during his term was 43%, which he first reached on August 21, about 10 days after Trump took over Washington, D.C.

As of October 23, President Trump’s average approval rating is 45.3%, according to Real Clear Politics, and 43% according to the New York Times.

President Trump’s approval rating is lower than other presidents

A Gallup poll conducted from October 1 to 16 found that 41% of people approve of President Trump’s job performance, a slight increase from the previous month.

Trump’s approval ratings in his first October as the 45th and 47th president of the United States were lower than any other modern president during the same period, according to a historical analysis by Gallup. According to Gallup, his October approval compares to other presidents’ first year in office.

  • Joe Biden (October 2021) – 42% support
  • President Trump (October 2017) – 37% approve
  • Barack Obama (October 2009) – 53% approve
  • George W. Bush (October 2001) – 88% approved
  • Bill Clinton (October 1993) – 48% support
  • George H.W. Bush (September 1989) – 68% approve
  • Ronald Reagan (September 1981) – 55% approved

Kinsey Crowley is a Trump Connect reporter for the USA TODAY Network. Please contact kcrowley@gannett.com. Follow her on X and TikTok @kinseycrowley or Bluesky (@kinseycrowley.bsky.social).

2,000 gold and silver coins stolen from French museum in Louvre museum robbery

0

play

Hours after robbers launched a brazen heist at the Louvre in Paris, another French museum has been looted.

Authorities said a group of robbers stole 2,000 silver and gold coins worth more than $100,000 from the House of Enlightenment Maison des Lumières on Sunday night, October 19th.

When the facility opened the next morning, security guards encountered a broken display case and realized the coins had been stolen, French media reported.

Local officials said the attackers broke into the Hotel du Breuil de Saint-Germain, which houses a small museum, and made off with historic coins after breaking into the building.

The Langres department said in an official statement that the robbery was carried out with “great expertise and precision”, suggesting it was a targeted operation. No arrests have been made and authorities have not named the suspect.

The heist was largely overshadowed by a brazen theft hours earlier in which $102 million worth of jewelry was stolen from the Louvre. It is unclear whether the two robberies are related.

Masked thief attacks Louvre Museum in broad daylight

Shortly after the Louvre opened on October 19, robbers disguised as construction workers climbed a ladder and entered the Apollo Museum through a window. Once inside, they destroyed display cases and stole eight of France’s crown jewels as alarms sounded and panicked tourists fled the building.

Officials said the four suspects fled on motorcycles and are still on the run. All in all, the robbery took place within 10 minutes.

Items stolen included an emerald necklace belonging to Napoleon Bonaparte’s family and a sapphire tiara that once belonged to 19th-century French queens Marie Amélie and Hortense.

The attack shocked the nation and raised questions about how one of the world’s most famous museums could be robbed in broad daylight.

This also follows a series of thefts targeting other cultural institutions in France.

In August, six gold bars worth $1.75 million were stolen from the Paris Museum of Natural History. French prosecutors say they have arrested a Chinese-born woman who was trying to dispose of melted gold in Barcelona.

Contributed by: N’dea Yancey-Bragg And Thao Nguyen

Lightricks’ open source AI video delivers 4K, sound, and fast rendering

0

Lightricks uses the latest artificial intelligence models to raise the bar for rapid video creation and iteration. The company claims that the newly released LTX-2 underlying model can generate new content faster than playback speeds, further raising the bar for resolution and quality.

The open source LTX-2 can generate stylized, high-resolution 6-second videos in just 5 seconds without compromising quality, allowing creators to produce professional content much faster than before.

While this is an impressive accomplishment, it’s not the only parameter that sets the LTX-2 apart. It combines native audio and video synthesis with open-source transparency, and the company says it can scale output to 4K resolution at up to 48 frames per second if users are willing to wait a few seconds. Even better, creators can run their software on consumer-grade GPUs, significantly reducing computing costs.

Maturation of the diffusion model

LTX-2 is a so-called diffusion model, which works by incrementally adding “noise” to the generated content and reducing that noise until the output resembles the video assets on which the model was trained.

With LTX-2, Lightricks has accelerated the adoption process, allowing creators to output live previews and iterate on ideas almost instantly. This model can also simultaneously generate accompanying audio, such as soundtracks, dialogue, and ambient sound effects, dramatically accelerating creative workflows.

This is a big problem. Previously, creators had to create audio separately from video and spend time splicing it together to make sure it was perfectly in sync. Google’s Veo models are known for their strong integration of synchronous sound production, so these new features in LTX help reinforce the idea that Lightricks’ technology is on par with the cutting edge.

When it comes to access options, Lightricks continues to use LTX-2 to give creators plenty of flexibility. The company’s flagship LTX Studio platform is aimed at professionals who want to create the highest quality videos, sometimes at the expense of some speed. Lightricks claims that the subsequent slight reduction in processing speed will allow it to output video at native 4K resolution at up to 48fps, allowing it to be produced to the same standards you’d expect from a cinematic production.

The platform provides extensive creative control to influence the customizable parameters of your model. These details will be announced soon, but will include pose and depth controls, video-to-video generation, and rendering alternatives. Stay tuned for a release date later this fall.

Lightricks co-founder and CEO Zeev Farbman believes LTX-2’s enhanced capabilities are indicative of the extent to which the adoption model is finally maturing. He said in a statement that LTX-2 is “the most complete and comprehensive creative AI engine we’ve ever built, combining synchronized audio and video, 4K fidelity, flexible workflows, and radical efficiency.”

“This is not vaporware or a research demo,” he said. “This is a real advancement in video generation.”

big milestone

With LTX-2, Lightricks has proven itself at the cutting edge of AI video generation, and the platform builds on numerous industry firsts with previous LTXV models.

In July, the company’s LTXV model family, including the LTXV-2B and LTXV-13B, supported long-duration video generation for the first time, with subsequent updates extending output to up to 60 seconds. This makes AI video production “truly directed,” allowing users to start with an initial prompt and add more prompts in real-time as the video is streamed live.

Even before its one-minute update, the LTXV-13B already had a reputation for being one of the most powerful video creation models out there. Launched in May, the platform is the industry’s first to support multi-scale rendering, allowing users to incrementally enhance their videos by incrementally adding color and detail to their models, in the same way that professional animators “layer” details on top of their work in traditional production processes.

The 13B model was trained on data licensed from Getty and Shutterstock. The company’s partnerships with these content giants are important not only for the quality of the training data, but also for ethical reasons. The model output has far fewer copyright issues that plague the creation of many other AI models.

Lightricks has also released a distilled version of LTXV-13B that simplifies and speeds up the diffusion process. This means you can generate content in just 4 to 8 steps. The distilled version also supports LoRA. This means users can tweak it to create content that fits the aesthetic style of their project.

Innovative billing model

Like these previous models, the LTX-2 is released under an open source license and is a viable alternative to Alibaba’s Wan2 series models. Lightricks emphasized that it’s not just “open access” but truly open source. This means that the pre-trained weights, dataset, and all tools will be available on GitHub along with the model itself.

LTX-2 is currently available to users through LTX Studio and its API, with an open source version expected to be released in November.

For those who prefer to use the paid version via the API, Lightricks offers flexible pricing, starting at just $0.04 per second for a version that generates HD video in just 5 seconds. The Pro version offers a good balance between speed and performance, starting at $0.07 per second. The Ultra version costs $0.12 per second for 4K resolution, video generation at 48 fps, and full fidelity audio. Prices also vary by resolution, with users able to choose from 720p, 1080p, 2K, and 4K.

Lightricks claims that thanks to the model’s processing efficiency, the LTX-2 is priced up to 50% lower than competing models, making expansion projects more economically viable while delivering faster iterations and higher quality than previous generations. Alternatively, after it’s published on GitHub next month, users will be able to use the model by downloading the open-source version and running it on a consumer-grade GPU.

Image source: Unsplash

In the United States, states conduct elections, not the president.

0

The president has no constitutional authority over the administration of federal elections. Rather, state and local officials are responsible for administering elections, serving voters, and counting ballots to determine who the people choose to represent them. Still, the Trump administration is attempting to illegally assert control over certain aspects of election administration. For example, President Donald Trump issued an executive order aimed at mandating new rules governing voter registration and voting systems and other changes.

The U.S. Constitution and state constitutions guarantee the regularity of elections and protect the right of all eligible citizens to participate. While the president has limited authority to influence the level of support the federal government provides for election administration, state and local governments primarily set the rules for how elections are conducted, such as making cybersecurity expertise and resources available to states as they wish, and state and local officials are responsible for registering voters, managing polling places, and counting votes. And despite recent challenges such as the pandemic, threats of violence, and extraordinary political pressure, state and local election officials have worked together across party lines to conduct secure elections with accurate vote counts.

Courts have already blocked several provisions of the executive order. President Trump nevertheless threatened to issue further orders that would disrupt mail-in voting, ban voting machines, and introduce new voter ID requirements.

In November, Americans will elect 180 state representatives and many more local officials. In just over a year, all 435 U.S. House seats, 33 U.S. Senate seats and thousands of state legislative seats will be on the ballot. As the 2026 midterm elections approach, there may be further attempts to undermine or interfere with elections. Here’s what you need to know about who runs elections and what that means for democracy.

What does the Constitution say about who conducts elections?

The U.S. Constitution gives both the states and Congress the responsibility to regulate federal elections. Article I, Section 4 of the Constitution, known as the Election Clause, gives the states the power to determine the “times, places, and manner” of holding federal elections, and Congress has the power to “make or alter” such regulations. Congress exercised its constitutional authority to pass laws affecting elections in every state, from establishing a nationwide Election Day to setting minimum standards for electronic systems for counting votes and establishing ground rules for maintaining voter lists. But beyond these limited instances, election administration is largely left to states and local governments.

States’ powers are of course not unlimited, since state laws cannot infringe on constitutional rights. For example, the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees that all voters be treated fairly and equally, and states cannot enact laws that discriminate against certain voters.

What is the role of state and local governments in elections?

Within constitutional protections and national standards established by Congress, state law establishes election processes and tasks state and local officials with administering these processes.

At the state level, an official (usually the secretary of state) or a bipartisan commission acts as election administrator. Election administration varies by state, but its responsibilities include enforcing election policies, training and directing local election officials, maintaining a statewide voter registration system, setting detailed standards for voting equipment, and certifying final election results. State constitutions and statutes also set rules for voting, such as registration deadlines and voter ID requirements.

At the local level, an estimated 10,000 or more local bodies administer elections. In most states, county officials oversee the administration of elections, but some states delegate this task to city officials or allow special districts or agencies (such as school boards) to administer their own elections. While conducting elections in accordance with state law, these officials must also manage responsibilities to keep elections running, including registering voters, maintaining voter rolls, preparing polling places, training poll workers, designing ballots, overseeing mail-in and absentee voting, and tabulating and certifying election results. These tasks rely on the work of hundreds of thousands of full-time and temporary employees.

This decentralization is a key feature of American democracy. Officials at the local level are empowered to handle much of the election work, allowing them to adjust procedures based on community needs and capabilities. This flexibility ensures fair elections even in difficult circumstances, such as in the event of a natural disaster. Additionally, election officials working in their own communities creates responsiveness and transparency for voters. The people we serve at election offices and polling places are our neighbors who have a genuine stake in ensuring our communities have an opportunity to be heard.

What is the federal government’s role in elections?

As mentioned above, the U.S. Constitution gives Congress the role of “enacting or altering” election laws and enforcing the voter protections set forth in the voting-related amendments: the 14th Amendment (equal protection), the 15th Amendment (nondiscrimination on the basis of race), the 19th Amendment (women’s suffrage), the 24th Amendment (prohibition of poll taxes), and the 26th Amendment (lowering the voting age to 18). Historically, the federal government, through Congress and at its direction, has acted to protect voters’ rights to access and vote at the polls, to set basic national standards to ensure fairness, and to provide funding and services to election officials to help them conduct elections more effectively.

Congress passed laws such as the Voting Rights Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the Uniform and Overseas Citizens Act to ensure access to voting for groups of citizens who had previously been denied the right to vote or had significant disabilities, and the Department of Justice has worked to enforce these laws and eliminate discriminatory practices in voting.

Through the National Voter Registration Act and the Help America Vote Act, Congress established national standards for voter registration and voting systems to simplify the process and reduce election administration errors that can disenfranchise voters.

Recently, Congress and federal agencies, such as the Election Assistance Commission and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, have helped states secure their election infrastructure through increased funding, guidance and voluntary standards, and access to federal services and expertise.

Can the president intervene in election administration??

The Constitution does not delegate any election-related authority to the president beyond his general role of signing or vetoing federal laws establishing election rules. The president can issue executive orders that affect federal agencies and officials who enforce federal election laws, but he cannot unilaterally rewrite those laws or change state laws about how elections are conducted. The president does not have the power to overturn election results or cancel elections.

What can Americans do to ensure free, fair, and secure elections in 2026 and beyond?

Our democracy is based on checks and balances and relies on broad participation to ensure fairness. Americans should try to get involved in every way they can, including joining civic groups, calling or emailing their elected officials, registering to be a poll worker, and supporting voter registration efforts led by existing groups that understand the rules. And most importantly, vote!

Jess Brouard is special assistant for elections and government programs at the Brennan Center for Justice.

Derek Tisler is a consultant and manager of elections and government programs at the Brennan Center for Justice.

Recommended citation: Jess Brouard & Derek Tisler, In the United States, states conduct elections, not the president.Sᴛᴀᴛᴇ Cᴏᴜʀᴛ Rᴇᴘᴏʀᴛ (October 21, 2025), https://statecourtreport.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/states-not-president-run-elections-america

New car prices exceed $50,000 on average for the first time in history

0

play

  • Kelley Blue Book reports that the average selling price of a new car has reached an all-time high of more than $50,000.
  • Rising new car prices are causing consumers to look more closely at the used car market

According to Kelley Blue Book, the average selling price of a new car exceeded $50,000 for the first time in history.

The price of almost everything is going up, and new cars are no exception. But many car buyers definitely encountered sticker shock when the average transaction price of a new car hit $50,080 in September. This year’s ATP (average transaction price) for new cars rose 3.6% year-on-year, marking the largest increase since spring 2023. There are several factors driving up new car prices, including tariffs, the end of the federal EV tax credit, and strong sales in the luxury car segment.

But cars continue to sell even as prices reach all-time highs.

EVs hit record sales this quarter

This year, an influx of shoppers looking to snap up new EVs before the federal tax credit ends has had a big impact on price trends. A record 437,487 EVs were sold in Q3 2025, with an average selling price of $58,124.

Tariffs are also contributing to these price increases. Automakers tried to resist price hikes as they waited to see how things played out. Since the tariffs officially took effect earlier this year, brands have been forced to pass on rising manufacturing costs to consumers. As a result, even the most affordable makes and models are now being sold at such prices that potential buyers consider the second-hand market.

Luxury cars are still on sale

In the luxury car market, car sales don’t seem to be slowing down. In a news release, Cox Automotive Executive Analyst Erin Keating said of her expectations for the future:

“Today’s auto market is driven by wealthy households with access to capital and favorable loan rates, supporting the luxury market,” Keating said. “While there are many affordable options out there, many price-conscious buyers choose to stay on the sidelines or cruise the used car market.”

Senate adjourned in second-longest shutdown: Live updates

0


Lawmakers have begun exploring options to extend temporary funding to the government after the Senate failed to approve a short-term funding patch through Nov. 21.

play

WASHINGTON – The second-longest government shutdown in history will likely last at least through the weekend, as the Senate is in recess until next week.

The senators left the party on Thursday after failing to advance a bill aimed at paying essential workers such as the military and immigration enforcement officers despite budget shortfalls. Workers do not expect to receive their first full paycheck within a few days, depending on where they work.

This vote was different from 11 previous votes that failed to advance a House-passed bill funding the government by Nov. 21. The final vote on the temporary relief package came Wednesday as advocates warned of a lack of food benefits, flight delays and other service losses during the government shutdown.

As the government shutdown enters its 24th day and drags on, lawmakers are exploring options for a longer-term temporary funding bill to complete negotiations on year-round funding for government agencies.

Health care policy continues to be a dividing point for Democrats, 24 days into the federal government shutdown.

Senate Democrats have blocked Republican-backed continuing resolutions to fund the government at existing spending levels 12 times. Democrats say their reopening bill should also extend expiring Affordable Care Act subsidies and reverse Republican Medicaid cuts passed in the summer.

Republicans have refused to negotiate on health care policy, insisting that health care subsidies should be debated in Congress after the shutdown ends.

Democrats have circled November 1 as a key date for their push. At that time, universal enrollment in the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare, will begin and millions of Americans will begin purchasing health insurance plans in 2026.

If the subsidies aren’t extended by November, consumers on healthcare.gov could experience sticker shock when they start looking for health plans. If subsidies are not renewed, insurance premiums for millions of Americans are expected to double, according to research organization KFF.

Inflation picked up again in September, the job market showed signs of cooling and prices continued to rise as consumers headed into the holiday season.

According to the Labor Department’s Consumer Price Index, which measures the cost of goods and services across the country, consumer prices rose 3% from a year ago, up slightly from 2.9% in August.

The economic impact of the ongoing government shutdown has not yet been fully felt, said Stephen Cates, a financial analyst at Bankrate. The Bureau of Labor Statistics has suspended data collection for October due to a lack of funding.

“Federal job cuts and lack of back pay will constrain spending and worsen working conditions, especially in the most affected rural areas,” Cates said in an Oct. 21 memo. “The longer the shutdown lasts, the bigger our blind spots will be regarding the current economic situation.”

– Rachel Barber

The Labor Department’s employment report was delayed due to the ongoing shutdown, but today’s consumer price index received special attention because it was needed to calculate the Social Security cost of living adjustment (COLA).

The Social Security Administration announced a 2.8% adjustment in 2026, which is larger than the 2.5% increase that beneficiaries will receive in 2025.

– Rachel Barber

Pilots at major airlines are jumping into the fight over the federal government shutdown. Three pilot unions are asking Congress to end the stalemate by passing a continuing resolution supported by Republicans.

The United Airline Pilots Association, the NetJets Jitney Aircraft Pilots Association, and the United Pilots Association released separate statements Thursday calling on Congress to pass a “clean” continuing resolution to reopen the government.

Their statement came after a fourth union, the Southwest Airlines Pilots Association, endorsed a Republican-backed continuing resolution a day earlier.

About 13,000 air traffic controllers, considered “essential” workers, are working without pay during the shutdown. Transportation Security Administration employees are also being forced to work without pay.

“A shortage of air traffic controllers has created stress and strain on the national airspace system this year,” the Federation of Airline Pilot Associations said in a statement. “They report that they are now working without pay, so this closure will only exacerbate the pressures they face.”

The Airline Pilots Association, the largest pilots union with about 80,000 members, called on lawmakers in an Oct. 15 statement to find a solution to restarting government, but did not say what legislation Congress should pass.

The White House warned that Americans should expect delays and disruptions at airports if the closure extends over the Thanksgiving holiday, which historically sees a surge in travel.

“We are concerned that we will experience significant flight delays, disruptions and cancellations across the United States this holiday season,” White House Press Secretary Caroline Leavitt said in a briefing with reporters on Thursday. “If Democrats continue to shut down the government, they will also shut down U.S. air travel.” read more.

Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) proposed a bill to pay “essential” workers, such as air traffic controllers, military personnel and immigration enforcement officers, who continue to work despite short pay.

“We’re not paying them,” Johnson said. “That’s unreasonable.”

The 54-45 vote fell short of the 60 votes needed to pass the bill. In addition to Republicans, three Democrats also supported the bill: Sens. Raphael Warnock and Jon Ossoff of Georgia and Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania.

President Trump told reporters he did not know whether the shutdown would be lifted by the time he returns from his trip to Asia on October 30.

“I don’t know,” he told reporters at the White House.

President Trump departed on Friday for a tour of Malaysia, Japan and South Korea. But he said the Democratic Party is “absolutely insane” and that its unpredictability makes resolving the conflict uncertain.

“I don’t think they know what they’re doing right now,” Trump said.

The House passed a bill to continue funding the government through Nov. 21 because lawmakers believed seven weeks would be enough time to approve a full-year spending bill.

But half that period has already passed without even one-time funding being approved, and lawmakers are beginning to explore options to both reopen the government and provide funding for a full year.

Another bill may be needed just to reopen the government until December or next year. But the House remains out while waiting for the Senate to reopen the government. House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana) opposes reinstating the House until the Senate takes action.

Rep. Jason Smith (R-Missouri), chairman of the Taxation and Revenue Committee, told Bloomberg TV on Wednesday that some Republicans are talking about extending funding beyond the next election until Dec. 1, 2026.

“Every day that passes, we have less time to fund the government,” Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-South Dakota) told reporters Monday.

Transport Secretary Sean Duffy has warned that a shortage of air traffic controllers could lead to more flight delays and cancellations as the holidays approach.

Duffy told reporters on Oct. 23 that air traffic controllers will not receive their first full paycheck on Oct. 28. As Duffy became more worried about how she would pay her mortgage, car loan or put food on the table, she worried she would look for a second job.

Regarding the stressful job that requires concentration, Duffy said, “I don’t want someone to be an air traffic controller.”

Mr Duffy said a shortage of air traffic controllers would result in fewer flights.

“Safety is our top priority,” Duffy said. “You’ll see us slowing down traffic. You’ll see us canceling flights.”

Sharon Parrott, director of the nonpartisan Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, said the Trump administration is likely to continue providing food assistance to low-income households through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program despite the shutdown.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture has warned that if the shutdown continues, full benefits will no longer be available by November 1st. But Parrott, a former Office of Management and Budget official, said the government could shift billions of dollars in emergency funds to continue benefits to the 42 million people in the program.

“It is unconscionable to go out of your way to threaten millions of children, seniors, veterans, people with disabilities, parents, and workers with hunger without taking all legal steps to provide food assistance to those in need,” Trump said.

Trick-or-treating and community in the Halloween capital of the world

0

play

You can never catch me by going to a haunted house or watching a horror movie with my eyes open.

Anyway, Halloween is my favorite holiday. Why, you may ask?

I spent the first few years of my life living in Anoka, a suburb of Minneapolis known as the “Halloween Capital of the World.” I went to parades, carved pumpkins, and packed up and went door-to-door in the Minnesota cold.

My parents are famous for their neighborhood decorations. We were the last family to close up shop for trick-or-treating, and with four kids in the house, our wardrobe was always bursting at the seams.

So when I was asked if I wanted to go to the Halloween capital of the world to write a story after Halloween has been gone for over 20 years, it was more than a mission. It was a homecoming.

I came back to Anoka because I wanted to write about the local haunted spots and the dozens of themed events happening throughout this month. But I soon realized it was much more than that.

Not just ghosts and ghouls

My greatest wish as an adult was that this celebration would remind me of the magic of my childhood. My biggest fear was that it would become a tourist trap with its eccentric decorations and indifferent residents.

The red brick town is filled with quaint, sparse Halloween motifs, themed murals, two giant pumpkins, and a ghost tour I took during which I heard a voice or two from behind my shoulder. The Halloween Committee also plans numerous parades and community activities throughout the year in October. But I was surprised at how little there was a more epic Halloween vibe.

From the wonderful Midwestern interactions I had with the locals, it was clear that Anokians take no pride in pretending behind masks or attracting tourists. Their spirit was born out of their willingness to be with each other as they truly are.

Although we didn’t see any richly decorated homes, we did see costumed children perched on their parents’ shoulders, laughing and opening the door with friends. In lieu of voodoo stores and witch potions, a free family event was held, with proceeds from sales going to local scholarships.

Instead of watching strangers jump and scare each other, I watched community members wave to their loved ones as they marched down Main Street. Just like many years ago when my mom took a picture of my dad and me at the big parade.

After 20-odd years of loving Halloween and returning to where it all began, I can confidently say that the magic of Halloween is built on community, not candy. And I don’t think there is any other way.

Supporting the role of Sam Woodward are: Partnership with Pivotal and Journalism Funding Partners. Funder does not provide editorial opinion. Want to send her a note? Email swoodward@gannett.com.

Inflation rises again. Rates, Social Security, and What They Mean for You

0

play

Inflation rose again in September, the job market showed signs of cooling and prices continued to rise as consumers headed into the holiday season.

According to the Labor Department’s Consumer Price Index, which measures the cost of goods and services across the country, consumer prices rose 3% from a year ago, up slightly from 2.9% in August.

Cost increased by 0.3 on a monthly basis% After rising 0.4% in August.

Price increases were driven by increases in gasoline and energy prices, which rose 4.1% and 1.5%, respectively, over the month. Prices for shelter, airfare, recreation, home furnishings and operating costs, and clothing all rose. Prices for auto insurance, used cars and trucks, and telecommunications products and services fell in September.

“Tariffs continue to push up commodity prices, with clothing, furniture and personal goods prices all registering significant increases, and pass-throughs are widening,” Michael Pearce, deputy chief U.S. economist at Oxford Economics, said in an Oct. 24 note.

“Assuming tariffs do not rise significantly going forward, the temporary boost in commodity prices from tariffs and a weaker dollar will start to fade next year,” he added.

Some economists said the figure was not enough to prevent the U.S. Federal Reserve from cutting interest rates next month.

What is the core inflation rate in the United States?

Core prices, which exclude volatile food and energy costs, rose 0.2%, following a 0.3% rise in the previous month. This increased the annual core inflation rate to 3%.

Airfares rose 2.7%, following a 5.9% rise in August. Apparel costs rose 0.7%, and personal care, recreation, home equipment and business indexes all rose 0.4%.

The economic impact of the ongoing government shutdown has not yet been fully felt, said Stephen Cates, a financial analyst at Bankrate. The Bureau of Labor Statistics has suspended data collection for October due to a lack of funding.

“Federal job cuts and lack of back pay will constrain spending and worsen working conditions, especially in the most affected rural areas,” Cates said in an Oct. 21 memo. “The longer the shutdown lasts, the bigger our blind spots will be regarding the current economic situation.”

What is the 2026 Social Security COLA Adjustment?

The Labor Department’s employment report was delayed due to the ongoing shutdown, but the consumer price index received special attention because it was needed to calculate the Social Security cost of living adjustment (COLA).

The Social Security Administration announced a 2.8% adjustment in 2026, which is larger than the 2.5% increase that beneficiaries will receive in 2025.

Will the Fed cut rates in October?

Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell said earlier this month that there is no “risk-free” path to monetary policy as the labor market cools and inflation remains above the Fed’s 2% target.

Although the situation is unlikely to change, a rise in prices in September could complicate the central bank’s interest rate decisions at the end of the month.

Fed policymakers are weighing the dual mandate of keeping prices stable and maximizing employment after months of weaker-than-expected jobs data. Uncertainty is further heightened by delays in the release of the September jobs report, leaving officials with less data than usual to guide their decisions.

Futures markets are predicting further quarter-point rate cuts in October and December, following the Fed’s quarter-point rate cut in September.

“Despite the lack of labor market data due to the government shutdown, this weaker-than-expected CPI report should give confidence to the Fed, which already appears leaning toward further rate cuts in October and December,” Cates said in a separate note on Oct. 24. “The latest inflation numbers strengthen the case that continued easing is appropriate given known conditions in the labor market.”

Is gasoline getting cheaper?

Gasoline prices rose 4.1% in September, but have fallen 0.5% over the past year. The average price of regular unleaded was $3.07 per gallon as of Oct. 23, down from $3.17 last month and $3.16 a year ago, according to AAA.

Retail gas prices in the U.S. have fallen this year as oil-producing group OPEC+ ramps up production and U.S. crude oil production surges to record levels.

Are rents going up or down?

Rent increased by 0.2% in September, following a 0.3% increase in the previous month. As a result, the annual growth rate has been reduced from 3.6% to 3.4%.

The annual rent increase for single-family homes rose 1.4% in August, the slowest increase in more than 15 years, according to real estate information, analytics and data company Kotality.

Are food prices still going up?

The eating-at-home index, or grocery costs, rose 0.3%, following a 0.6% rise in August.

The index for meat, poultry, fish and eggs rose 0.3%, following a 1% rise in the previous month. In particular, beef prices rose again after rising in August. Earlier this month, President Donald Trump announced plans to import more beef from Argentina as domestic prices hit record highs, a proposal that drew criticism from some Republicans in Congress and that cattle producer groups said would ease the burden on U.S. ranchers..

Other essential goods also rose in price, with prices for cereals, bakery products and non-alcoholic drinks all rising 0.7% in September.

Prices of some products fell, with dairy products prices down 0.5% and cheese products prices down 0.7%.

Household food prices rose 0.1%.

This story has been updated to add more information.

Contact Rachel Barber rbarber@usatoday.com X Follow her at @rachelbarber_

President Trump target Letitia James scheduled to appear in court on bank fraud charges

0

play

New York Attorney General Letitia James is scheduled to appear in court on October 24th after a federal grand jury in Virginia indicted her on charges of bank fraud and making false statements to a financial institution. She is the next in a growing number of President Donald Trump’s opponents to face federal charges during his second term.

Her expected court appearance will be her first in court. The suit was filed less than three weeks after President Trump publicly called for her accusations and replaced the longtime prosecutor with his former personal attorney Lindsey Harrigan, who reportedly believed there was not enough evidence to bring a case.

“This is nothing but the continuation of the president’s desperate weaponization of the justice system, as he forces federal law enforcement to do his bidding, all while performing my duties as New York’s attorney general,” James said in a statement after the indictment.

Harrigan, who has never been a prosecutor before, was officially appointed by Attorney General Pam Bondi, an ally of President Trump, to head the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia. Mr. Harrigan was the only federal prosecutor to sign Mr. James’ indictment. James said in an Oct. 23 court filing that he plans to file a motion on Oct. 24 challenging the legality of Harrigan’s appointment.

The allegations may be similar to those filed on October 20 by James Comey, a former FBI director and prominent Trump critic who was also indicted by a grand jury after Harrigan took office. Mr. Comey argued that Bondi did not have the authority to establish Halligan under the following laws: distribute the power among the membersThe Attorney General, the Senate, and the court system. His motion on this issue is still pending.

Mr. Comey has pleaded not guilty and has pleaded not guilty.

The Virginia charge alleges that James attempted to defraud two financial institutions by falsely claiming that a three-bedroom, one-bathroom property he purchased in Norfolk, Virginia, in 2020 was a secondary residence. According to the indictment, the property was actually an investment property in which she had no plans to live. She allegedly rented the space to a family member and misused it to get better terms on a mortgage.

James’s office, then New York’s attorney general, filed a civil complaint against Trump in 2022, accusing him of fraudulently inflating the value of assets over a period of years to obtain better loan terms. New York state judge Arthur Engoron agreed with Trump’s liability and ordered him to pay a fine of about $454 million after a months-long trial. The New York Court of Appeals struck down that financial penalty this summer, but left in place some business restrictions Engoron had imposed. James’ office appealed the decision.

James and her attorney, Abby Rowell, have suggested that President Trump may have pushed for the charges against James in retaliation for that lawsuit.

“Attorney General James categorically and forcefully denies these charges. We are deeply concerned that this incident is driven by President Trump’s desire for revenge,” Lowell said in a statement after James’ indictment.

Ms Halligan defended the charges.

“The charges alleged in this case are intentional criminal acts and serious violations of the public trust,” he said in a statement.

I’m Chelsea Clinton. President Trump demolishes homes that don’t belong to him

0


What was demolished today was more than just marble and plaster. It reflects how easily history can be erased when power forgets purpose.

play

Although I spent many of my formative years in the White House, I always knew it was not my home. It was definitely my home, but it wasn’t my home. The White House belongs to the American people, which is why we call it the People’s House. I never forgot it.

Well, while I played hide-and-seek in the White House residence and danced behind closed doors at many state dinners, I never thought, “This is my home,” as my friends thought of theirs.

I was 12 years old when I first walked through the doors of the White House, not as a visitor but as a soon-to-be resident. First Lady Barbara Bush showed my mother and me around, telling us where her grandchildren would stay when they came to visit, and what her family’s favorite foods were.

Eight years later, my family would welcome the Bush family back, and I remember telling Jenna and Barbara Bush about my favorite places, my friends who worked in the White House, and, yes, my favorite food.

Like me, I always felt that the Bush family understood that even while our parents were shaping American history, we were all simply passing through. It was the same feeling I had when I met Presidents Jimmy Carter, Gerald Ford, Richard Nixon, first ladies Jacqueline Kennedy and First Lady Lady Bird Johnson, and other presidents who at one time called the White House home.

Every president brings change to the White House, including those in my family.

Although this is only a temporary residence, every president and their family has undergone changes. President Theodore Roosevelt built what is now the West Wing, and a few years later, President William Howard Taft built the Oval Office. President Franklin Roosevelt developed the East Wing and installed a swimming pool, and President Nixon later converted it into the White House briefing room.

Mrs. Kennedy famously renovated the Great Hall. My mother was Georgia O’Keeffe, the first first lady to bring contemporary art to the White House. First Lady Michelle Obama added a vegetable garden (my mother only had a planter full of tomatoes on the roof). And first lady Melania Trump renovated the rose garden during her husband’s first term, adding a limestone path and preserving the surrounding flowers.

The White House Historical Society believes there has been a garden at this site since the mid-1800s, when President Ulysses S. Grant was in office, or for more than half the country’s lifetime. Presidents and first ladies add elements of efficiency, comfort, and beauty, all of which are taken care of by a talented staff of electricians, plumbers, painters, arborists, gardeners, butlers, housekeepers, chefs, ushers, historians, and more.

Many of these experts have been working in the White House for substantially longer than the president’s family has lived there.

President Trump’s destruction of the East Tower is what happens when power forgets its purpose.

President Donald Trump has the right to pave over the Rose Garden (and strip the roses bare), turn the East Wing into a ballroom, and apparently raise private funds.

Still, with less than a year left until we celebrate our nation’s 250th anniversary, it is disturbing that such major renovations to the 225-year-old People’s Hall are being undertaken without consideration for historic preservation and seemingly without the involvement of historians, and I hope to be proven wrong here.

When Mrs. Kennedy restored and renovated the White House and Rose Garden, she worked with historians, landscape architects, and preservation experts to make the restoration, which led to the creation of the White House Historical Society, to ensure that it reflected Mrs. Kennedy’s influence but remained consistent with the original design.

In the decades that followed, the Garden became the setting for history itself, with presidents announcing peace agreements, welcoming visiting heads of state, and signing historic landmark legislation, including the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Given the widespread public condemnation of the Rose Garden’s persistence and its apparent reproduction as the “White House Rose Garden Club,” and the outrage over the complete demolition of the East Wing, I’m clearly not alone in my concerns.

Renovations are not inherently unpleasant because of who orders them or who pays for them. Every generation has an obligation to care for and update the White House as its needs evolve, from staffing levels within the administration to technology to more fully represent America to national security and other obvious reasons. But how we do it, and who we include and exclude from the process, says a lot about history and our respect for the House of Peoples.

Opinion warning: Get columns from your favorite columnists and expert analysis on key issues delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. If you don’t have the app, download it for free from the app store.

Yes, the president has authority over the White House grounds, but institutions such as the National Trust for Historic Preservation have outlined both review priorities and required procedures. But authority is not the same as control. Stewardship requires transparency, consultation, and accounting for history.

A disregard for history is a hallmark of President Trump’s second administration. He reportedly directed the Smithsonian Institution and the National Park Service to censor exhibits and remove references to slavery and the treatment of Native Americans. References to women’s rights and LGBTQ+ history have been removed from federal government websites. In a particularly embarrassing episode, President Trump’s Department of the Army (officially known as the Department of Defense) even removed all mention of the Enola Gay, the plane that dropped the atomic bomb on Hiroshima, from its site. This is because an automated effort to remove the word “gay” caught it in the process.

This is what happens when we bring a wrecking ball into our heritage. Ignoring our democratic institutions and the rule of law, and withholding funds already authorized by Congress, stems from the same disregard for our founding ideals and the norms and laws that over time have helped us move closer to the more perfect union that is the ironclad law of our Constitution.

Our greatness does not come from our disregard for history. That happens because we acknowledge our history, learn from it, and build a better future, including the People’s Hall building and gardens.

The White House will always be the home I was lucky enough to live in for a while. More importantly, it is a mirror of our democracy, resilient when we respect its foundations, but fragile when we take it for granted. What was demolished today was more than just marble and plaster. It reflects how easily history can be erased when power forgets purpose.

Chelsea Clinton is an author, investor, advocate, and Vice Chair of the Clinton Foundation.

Anthropic’s $1 billion TPU expansion signals strategic change for enterprise AI infrastructure

0

Anthropic’s announcement this week that it will deploy up to 1 million Google Cloud TPUs in a deal worth tens of billions of dollars represents a major recalibration of its enterprise AI infrastructure strategy.

With online capacity expected to exceed gigawatts in 2026, this expansion represents one of the largest single efforts by an underlying model provider for a specialized AI accelerator, providing enterprise leaders with critical insight into the evolving economics and architectural decisions shaping production AI deployments.

This move is particularly notable for its timing and scale. Anthropic currently serves more than 300,000 enterprise customers, and its large accounts (defined as accounts with annual run-rate revenue of more than $100,000) have grown nearly seven times over the past year.

This customer growth trajectory, concentrated among Fortune 500 companies and AI-native startups, suggests that adoption of Claude in enterprise environments is accelerating beyond the early experimental stage to production-grade implementations where infrastructure reliability, cost control, and consistent performance are non-negotiable.

Multi-cloud computing

What makes this announcement different from typical vendor partnerships is that Anthropic clearly articulates a diversified computing strategy. The company operates on three different chip platforms: Google’s TPU, Amazon’s Trainium, and NVIDIA’s GPU.

CFO Krishna Rao emphasized that Amazon remains a key training partner and cloud provider and continues to work on Project Rainier, a large-scale computing cluster spanning hundreds of thousands of AI chips across multiple data centers in the United States.

For enterprise technology leaders evaluating their own AI infrastructure roadmaps, this multi-platform approach is worth noting. This reflects a practical recognition that no single accelerator architecture or cloud ecosystem can optimally serve all workloads.

Training large-scale language models, fine-tuning domain-specific applications, delivering inference at scale, and conducting tuning studies each involve different computational profiles, cost structures, and latency requirements.

The strategic implications for CTOs and CIOs are clear. Vendor lock-in at the infrastructure layer becomes an increasing risk as AI workloads mature. Organizations building long-term AI capabilities must evaluate how a model provider’s own architectural choices and ability to port workloads across platforms translate into flexibility, pricing leverage, and continuity guarantees for enterprise customers.

Price performance and economies of scale

Google Cloud CEO Thomas Kurian said Anthropic’s expansion into TPUs is due to “strong price performance and efficiency” proven over several years. While specific benchmark comparisons remain unique, the economics underlying this choice are critical to enterprise AI budgeting.

TPUs are purpose-built for tensor operations, which are central to neural network computations, and typically offer advantages in throughput and energy efficiency for certain model architectures compared to general-purpose GPUs. It is instructive that the announcement refers to “capacity in excess of gigawatts.” Power consumption and cooling infrastructure are increasingly constraining large-scale AI deployments.

For companies operating on-premises AI infrastructure or negotiating colocation agreements, understanding the total cost of ownership, including equipment, power, and operational overhead, can be as important as the raw pricing of the compute.

Codenamed Ironwood and mentioned in the announcement, the 7th generation TPU represents the latest iteration in Google’s AI accelerator design. Although technical specifications in public documents remain limited, the maturity of Google’s AI accelerator portfolio, developed over nearly a decade, provides a counterpoint for companies evaluating new entrants to the AI ​​chip market.

Proven production history, extensive tool integration, and supply chain stability play a key role in sourcing decisions for companies where continuity risks can derail multi-year AI efforts.

Implications for enterprise AI strategy

Several strategic considerations emerge from Anthropic’s infrastructure expansion for enterprise leaders planning their own AI investments.

Capacity planning and vendor relationships: The size of this commitment (tens of billions of dollars) demonstrates the capital intensity required to meet enterprise AI demands at production scale. Organizations relying on underlying model APIs should evaluate their provider’s capacity roadmap and diversification strategy to reduce service availability risks during demand spikes or geopolitical supply chain disruptions.

Extensive adjustments and safety testing: Anthropic explicitly ties this expanded infrastructure to “more thorough testing, coordinated research, and responsible deployment.” For companies in regulated industries such as financial services, healthcare, and government contracting, compute resources dedicated to safety and coordination directly impact model reliability and compliance posture. Procurement conversations should not only cover model performance metrics, but also the testing and validation infrastructure that supports responsible deployment.

Integration with the enterprise AI ecosystem: Although this announcement focuses on Google Cloud infrastructure, enterprise AI implementations increasingly span multiple platforms. Organizations using AWS Bedrock, Azure AI Foundry, or other model orchestration layers need to understand how the underlying model provider’s infrastructure choices affect API performance, regional availability, and compliance certifications across different cloud environments.

Competitive environment: Anthropic’s aggressive infrastructure expansion is in response to increased competition from OpenAI, Meta, and other well-capitalized model providers. For enterprise buyers, this competition for capital leads to continued model capability improvements, but also comes with potential pricing pressures, vendor consolidation, and changes in partnership dynamics that require proactive vendor management strategies.

The broader context for this announcement includes increased corporate scrutiny of the cost of AI infrastructure. As organizations move from pilot projects to production deployments, infrastructure efficiency directly impacts AI ROI.

Anthropic’s choice to diversify across TPU, Trainium, and GPU rather than standardize on a single platform suggests that no dominant architecture has emerged for all enterprise AI workloads. Technology leaders must resist premature standardization and maintain architectural optionality as the market continues to rapidly evolve.

See also: Anthropic details its AI safety strategy

Banner for AI & Big Data Expo by TechEx event.

Want to learn more about AI and big data from industry leaders? Check out the AI ​​& Big Data Expo in Amsterdam, California, and London. This comprehensive event is part of TechEx and co-located with other major technology events such as Cyber ​​Security Expo. Click here for more information.

AI News is brought to you by TechForge Media. Learn about other upcoming enterprise technology events and webinars.

Trump’s pardon is controversial

0


President Trump has previously pardoned political allies, personal friends and other aides.

play

President Donald Trump’s decision to pardon Qiao Changpeng, a cryptocurrency exchange founder convicted of money laundering, is the latest in a series of controversial pardon moves.

President Trump pardoned or commuted the sentences of more than 1,600 people in his second term, after pardoning an additional 237 people in his first term.

White House press secretary Caroline Levitt said President Trump “exercised his constitutional authority by pardoning Mr. Zhao, who was prosecuted by the Biden administration over the cryptocurrency war.”

Binance is a major backer of the Trump family’s lucrative crypto venture, World Liberty Financial, and earlier this year accepted a $2 billion investment in the Trump family’s cryptocurrency called USD1. “The Biden administration’s crypto war is over,” Levitt said.

Presidents have long used their constitutional authority to erase people’s criminal records or allow them to be released after serving part of their sentence.

While some presidents have chosen to pardon people they believe have been wronged, many have been criticized for pardoning close friends or political allies. Former President Joe Biden granted full pardons to his son Hunter Biden and his brother James Biden before leaving office.

Here are eight other times President Trump’s pardons sparked controversy.

George Santos

President Trump commuted the sentence of former New York Republican Rep. George Santos, who pleaded guilty to federal wire fraud and identity theft charges primarily related to raising money for his 2022 congressional campaign. He was sentenced to seven years in prison and ordered to pay $370,000 in restitution.

Santos became a celebrity after the news media scrutinized his resume after the 2022 election and uncovered a series of lies about his education, work history and fictitious career as a college volleyball star. Bowen Yang played him on “Saturday Night Live.”

In announcing Santos’ pardon, President Trump wrote on social media: “George Santos was a ‘thug’ in some ways, but there are many thugs in this country who should not be sentenced to seven years in prison.”

rod blagojevich

A former Democratic governor of Illinois was sentenced to eight years in prison for soliciting campaign contributions and other favors in exchange for former President Barack Obama’s Senate seat. When Mr. Obama resigned in 2008 to become president, it was Mr. Blagojevich’s job to appoint his successor.

Blagojevich was sentenced to 14 years in prison in 2012. He was released in 2020 after President Trump commuted his sentence. President Trump granted him a full pardon in 2025.

Joe Arpaio

In 2017, President Trump pardoned a former Arizona sheriff who was notorious for his heavy-handed enforcement of immigration laws in the Phoenix area. A federal judge ordered Arpaio to stop racial profiling of Latinos, but another federal judge found Arpaio in contempt for failing to stop the activity. He was expected to receive up to six months in prison for criminal contempt, but was granted clemency before sentencing.

President Trump said Arpaio is 85 years old and deserves a pardon because he has rendered “commendable service to our country” for more than 50 years.

paul manafort

In December 2020, President Trump pardoned Paul Manafort, his 2016 presidential campaign chairman. Mr. Manafort was convicted in a separate trial on charges including financial fraud and tax evasion, conspiracy and witness tampering, and was sentenced to more than seven years in prison.

The charges stem from special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election. “This is a very sad situation,” President Trump told reporters after Manafort’s sentencing.

roger stone

President Trump pardoned his friend and political operative Roger Stone just before Stone was due to serve a 3 1/2-year federal prison sentence for lying to Congress in Mueller’s Russia investigation. Then-White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany described Stone as a “victim of the Russia hoax.”

michael flynn

President Trump’s former national security adviser Michael Flynn has been indicted in connection with the special counsel’s Russia investigation. Flynn pleaded guilty in 2017 to lying to the FBI about his interactions with Russian diplomats. President Trump pardoned Flynn in 2020.

anti-abortion activist

On January 23, President Trump pardoned 23 people convicted of blocking people from entering reproductive health clinics. Not all were sentenced; some were given suspended sentences.

“Many of them are elderly. They should not have been prosecuted,” Trump said as he signed the documents.

January 6 Prisoner

On the day his second term began, President Trump pardoned approximately 1,600 people charged with acts during or related to the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol that sought to stop Congress from certifying Joe Biden’s victory in the 2020 election.

Trump called the rioters who stormed the Capitol “political prisoners” and promised to pardon them if he becomes president again during the 2024 campaign. Among those released was Oath Keepers founder Stewart Rhodes, who was convicted of seditious conspiracy and sentenced to 18 years in prison in 2023.

How Halloween, trick-or-treating, and pranks changed the holiday

0


In the early 1920s, American Halloween celebrations were marked by pranks. But they became increasingly destructive. In Anoka, city leaders decided something had to be done.

play

  • In Anoka, Minnesota, Halloween celebrations began in 1920 to curb destructive pranks by local youths.
  • The town’s civic festival, which included a parade, became a model for other cities to deter vandalism.
  • Anoka bills itself as the Halloween capital of the world, hosting a month-long celebration that draws thousands of people.
  • The town’s history shows that Halloween in the United States has evolved from a night of pranks to a community-centered holiday.

ANOKA, Minn. – Anoka’s Halloween tradition began more as an intervention than a celebration.

The year is 1919, and the former logging town on the Rum River, about 20 miles north of Minneapolis, is in trouble. All Hallows Eve was more of a trick than a treat.

For a while, Anokian woke up the next day to find his windows covered in soap. Barns were set on fire and turned over. A carriage that was disassembled and reassembled on the rooftop. But this time, a cow was spotted roaming downtown. Other livestock were eating math books inside the school.

At the time, American Halloween celebrations were characterized by pranks. But they became increasingly destructive. Other towns were even considering banning the holiday altogether.

In Anoka, city leaders decided something had to be done.

But instead of banning it, they took a different tack. In 1920, they organized a night parade as part of the civic Halloween celebration to keep young troublemakers busy.

More than a century later, the Minnesota town of just 18,000 people has come to call itself the “Halloween Capital of the World,” drawing tens of thousands of die-hard Halloween enthusiasts and spirited locals alike for the month-long celebration.

Anoka’s quaint red-brick downtown hosts parades including a formal orange tie ball, a giant pumpkin expo, ghost tours, zombie bar hopping, an elaborate decorating contest and the Little People’s Big Parade.

While the designation of Halloween as a capital may be controversial when combined with heavy hitters with even more macabre backstories, Anoka’s roots and history help explain the unusual path the holiday has taken in the United States, away from pranks and vandalism, to what it is today.

“People live in this town during the month of October,” Rebecca Ebnett Desens, president of the Anoka County Historical Society, told USA TODAY. “There’s a lot of fuss around here.”

But 105 years ago, unrest in the town was more feared than celebrated.

The history of Halloween, from tricks to treats

Halloween has its roots in the ancient Celtic ritual of Samhain, which heralds the harvest and the coming of winter. Few people know the downside of the cold like Minnesotans. It was a time when the wall between the worlds of the living and the dead was thought to be at its thinnest.

Lisa Morton, author of “Trick-or-Treat: A History of Halloween,” said people honored their deceased relatives and told terrifying stories of malevolent spirits wandering over to kidnap people and set their homes on fire.

Eventually, Celtic traditions merged with All Hallows’ Day (Aholomesse in Middle English), and the night before, All Hallows’ Eve, became known as Halloween.

Morton said Halloween became popular in the U.S. in the 1840s with the arrival of large numbers of Scottish and Irish immigrants fleeing the potato famine. They also have a penchant for mischief, once tying strings to cabbages and pulling them through fields at night to scare people, and carving gourds with glowing faces.

In the late 1800s and early 1900s, Halloween pranks evolved into knocking over outhouses, leaving manure on doorsteps, and using a spool-and-stick “tick-tock” to make frightening noises in your unassuming neighbor’s window.

In some places, people woke up to find roads blocked with bathtubs and strollers, vegetable gardens uprooted and livestock on the loose, earning the nickname “gate night.” In one case, teenage boys left a stuffed body on the tracks, causing the conductor to stop the train in fear.

As America has become more urbanized, sometimes mayhem options have become more dangerous, such as arson and pedestrian tripwires.

In 1918, nine boys were arrested in Kansas City for waxing streetcar tracks, causing a crash, the Topeka Capital Journal reported.

“The pranks started getting really destructive,” Morton said. “Many cities were considering banning the holiday entirely.”

After the cattle invasion, Anoka town leaders had had enough, said John Jost, 47, a longtime resident and Halloween enthusiast who helped commemorate the city’s holiday history.

“They were taking farmers’ cattle and putting them inside buildings, and they were not only flipping barns over, but also setting things on fire. Over the years, the situation got progressively worse,” he said. “In 1919 they said, ‘This has to stop.’

Local businessman George Green is credited with proposing the idea of ​​a grand celebration of feasting and entertainment in 1920 to curb vandalism.

“Why don’t we keep them busy with a big parade?” he asked, according to Jost. “That was the beginning.”

Anoka secures a spot on the US Halloween map

When Halloween arrived in Anoka in 1920, businesses decorated their stores. A parade was planned for the evening with bands, confetti and 500 costumed participants, who received popcorn, candy and peanuts. Afterwards, a large bonfire was lit.

Other events included crowds competing to catch chickens, with the winners taking home the chickens, according to one report on the town’s history.

A 1920 Anoka County Union article declared, “We don’t know if the chickens enjoyed the sport, but the crowds did.”

As the next day dawned, newspapers reported that “Halloween looting was less than usual.”

Although Halloween parades have been held in other places, such as Scranton, Pennsylvania, and large holiday celebrations have been held in places such as Newark, New Jersey, Anoka is credited with being one of the early adopters of large celebrations, especially those instituted to discourage destructive pranks, Morton said.

“And it was a model that really caught on, spread, and was successful,” Morton said.

Another was Independence, Kansas, which founded a celebration in 1919 to combat pranks and named it “Neewalla”, spelling Halloween backwards.

As Anoka’s celebrations continued and grew over the next decade, they included weddings, wrestling and boxing matches, and organized pillow fights.

During the Great Depression, people in some U.S. cities pooled their funds to hold house-to-house parties with various treats and homemade attractions, such as gifting costume sheets for children, setting up haunted house basements, and handing out treats and games.

In conjunction with the civic celebration, it helped promote the tradition of children dressing up and going trick-or-treating from house to house, Morton said. After World War II, companies began making packaged Halloween candy and costumes, further promoting the participatory tradition we know today.

The weddings and games soon turned into stories of local haunted houses on the town’s famous Third Avenue, home decorations, football games held at the high school stadium affectionately known as the “Pumpkin Bowl,” and minor celebrities such as the winner of the 1970 television show “The Dating Game” participating in the parade.

Some of the legend surrounding Anoka’s nickname “Halloween Capital of the World” dates back to the 1930s, but it was proclaimed by Minnesota legislators in 2003, declaring Anoka the pinnacle of coveted spooky destinations.

Anoka attracts Halloween fans and families from all over the world.

It was still August when Jost put up neon jack-o-lanterns, plaster gargoyles, spooky flamingos and Halloween banners in Anoka’s garden.

Jost was a bank employee who, like most people, grew up marching in Little People parades and trick-or-treating with his classmates, and when there were too many other activities, he created a haunted garden.

In 2020, he chaired the 100th anniversary celebration and helped write a book about its history.

“When you grow up in Anoka, it’s ingrained in you,” he says.

“It’s in your blood,” Jost said later as she walked toward the city’s iconic pumpkin carving, which resembles a fixture in the 1998 Disney Channel original movie “Halloween Town.”

Except here, his name is “Iron Jack,” a gift from city workers who assembled him from recycled iron parts to commemorate the 100th anniversary of the Halloween festival.

“As an Anokian, I consider Halloween almost separate from other holidays,” Jost said. “Halloween only teeth. ”

Today, this celebration continues for a month. He said the main parade alone draws 60,000 people, with people coming from Minneapolis as well as other states and countries, from Germany to Brazil.

“There are some hardcore people doing the circuit,” Ebnet Desens said, citing tours to famous Halloween towns and haunted destination towns such as Salem, Mass., Savannah, Ga., and Hell Town, Michigan.

In Anoka, visitors can stay in a Victorian bed and breakfast, dine at Serum’s Good Time Emporium, and enjoy a drink at Billy’s Bar & Grill, located in an 1800s building known for its mob connections and rumors of ghostly visitations.

They also go on ghost tours, including an antique shop in a former doctor’s mansion with rocking chairs that rock even when no one is there, and a Masonic Hall where the lights turn off and on automatically. Paranormal fans are also drawn to the history of the former psychiatric hospital, which once performed lobotomies. It has since been repurposed as housing for veterans experiencing homelessness.

Perhaps Anoka’s embrace of Halloween made ghosts feel welcome here, Ebnet Desens said.

“It’s important to always give back.”

Today, the Halloween capital of the world is known for good old-fashioned family fun. In true “Minnesota nice” fashion, locals won’t say they’re better than other creepy cities, but they’ll say their pride is built on good citizens.

Linda Evavold, a lifelong Anokian and member of the Halloween committee, said the dozens of events they coordinate and plan throughout the year are aimed at bringing the community together and supporting each other rather than commercializing the holiday.

For Evavold, Halloween in Anoka “wasn’t necessarily all about ghosts and skeletons and the spooky. Rather, it was a celebration in our town and something that made Anoka proud.”

In an age of digital scrolling doom scrolling, Americans face an epidemic of loneliness and increasing social division, but Halloween in Anoka is a time to see each other, Evervold said.

Whether it’s bingo night, sitting around a bonfire, or watching little kids parading down the street in costume. Evervold said Halloween, now more than ever, is about bringing families and young people together rather than brushing off potential trouble.

“It’s great to be able to slow down people’s lives,” she says.

Most events are free to attendees, local or not, and proceeds from Anoka’s Halloween merchandise go toward scholarships throughout the community. The spirit of Halloween here isn’t about evil tricks: “It’s always about giving back,” Evervold said.

Serious pranks have disappeared in Anoka and across the country, but it took longer in some places, Morton said.

“In some areas, kids didn’t want to stop doing pranks, so they changed it to the night before they changed it to October 30th. And that became known as Devil’s Night,” she said.

In Detroit, as people first dumped their trash in trash cans and abandoned buildings, the city instituted a curfew and increased neighborhood patrols that helped quell the problem in the 1990s.

What about Anoka? Evnet Desens said she believes petty pranks are still happening.

But for now at least, the city’s math books remain safe.

Supporting the role of Sam Woodward are: Partnership with Pivotal and Journalism Funding Partners. Funder does not provide editorial opinion.

How the White House changed from Washington to JFK to Trump

0


The personal preferences of presidents and their families, as well as the demands of the growing federal government, have helped drive changes to the White House over time. Below are some highlights.

WASHINGTON – President Harry Truman knew it was time to destroy the White House when the legs of Baldwin’s black grand piano crashed through his daughter Margaret’s living room floor.

In a letter to his daughter, the president joked that if he had crashed through the ceiling with a marble bathtub, he would have startled his wife’s gathering of Daughters of the American Revolution.

“Don’t you think it would have grabbed headlines, to say the least?” Truman wrote.

Truman moved across Pennsylvania Avenue to Blair House, now reserved for visiting dignitaries, from 1948 to 1952 while construction crews demolished and renovated the dilapidated presidential mansion. Modern materials such as steel and concrete have strengthened the original wood and brick building.

The Truman-era renovations caused more changes to the historic building than the fires during the War of 1812 and the destruction of the east wing by President Donald Trump. Over the two-plus centuries since the original building was completed in 1800, each major and even minor renovation has sparked controversy. President Thomas Jefferson’s portico, President Truman’s namesake balcony, and even Jackie Kennedy’s Rose Garden were each criticized for being too expensive or falsifying history.

The personal preferences of presidents and their families, as well as the demands of the growing federal government, have helped drive changes to the White House over time. Below are some highlights.

The original White House, built between 1792 and 1800

President George Washington lived and worked in Philadelphia for most of his two terms as the new nation’s first leader. Washington, a native of Virginia, chose the site of the proposed “Presidential Palace,” but never occupied it.

According to the White House Historical Society, Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson organized an architectural competition to design the mansion in 1792, and Irish-born James Hoban won the $500 prize.

When President John Adams moved in in November 1800, many of the rooms had not yet been plastered and there were holes where the grand staircase was to be installed. First Lady Abigail Adams used the unfinished East Room as a laundry room.

Jefferson Colonnade 1801

According to the White House Historical Society, Mr. Jefferson worked with architect Benjamin Henry Latrobe to add the Colonnade, a covered walkway supported by classical Ionic columns.

The east and west colonnades led to service buildings such as icehouses and storage rooms for coal and wood.

Federalist critics in Congress argued that the colonnade looked aristocratic. national intelligence officer Newspaper editorials questioned the need for such decorations in government buildings.

Currently, the west colonnade runs along the modern-day Rose Garden and connects to the Oval Office, while the east colonnade is being demolished as part of President Trump’s ballroom project.

President Barack Obama called the walk along the west portico a “45-second commute” from the main building to the west wing, where his family lives.

Burning of Britain 1814

On August 24, 1814, during the War of 1812, British troops set fire to the presidential palace. Much of the building’s interior and furnishings were destroyed, but the exterior walls remained intact, according to the White House Historical Association.

After the fire, some lawmakers considered moving the house to another part of Washington, D.C., or even to another city. However, President James Madison rehired Hoban and rebuilt it based on the original design.

Hoban is credited with completing the rebuild in three years. But his shortcuts included reusing some of the damaged stone walls and using wood instead of brick for some of the interior walls, weakening the building in ways Truman later discovered.

Despite the popular belief that the house was painted white to hide the fire scars, the building had been covered in lime-based plaster since 1798 to protect the porous sandstone from freezing, according to the historical society. The renovated building was painted white in 1818.

“White House” was a nickname, but it was officially adopted by President Teddy Roosevelt in 1901.

Andrew Jackson North Portico 1829-1830

President Andrew Jackson oversaw the addition of the North Portico, the covered porch that became the face of the White House, in 1829 and 1830.

Hoban oversaw the construction of the porticos on the north and south sides of the building, which Latrobe first designed in 1807. Hoban added the south portico under President James Monroe after British troops set the building on fire.

The Legislature appropriated $24,729 for the north portico during the economic downturn. American Telegraph Company Newspapers criticized Mr. Jackson for his extravagant spending, according to the historical society. Whig critics said the money could have been better spent above Should I build a new building or reduce my debt?

Theodore Roosevelt West Building 1902

President Theodore Roosevelt oversaw the removal of the Victorian-era greenhouses (glass structures used to grow plants) west of the main building in 1902.

Instead, architect Charles McKim designed a separate west wing with office space for the president and key staff, according to the historical society.

Lawmakers scrutinized the $65,000 cost. of washington post Removal of the greenhouse “destroyed its historic value and appears to have made it less desirable as a residence.”

President Taft’s Office 1909

According to the Historical Society, President William Howard Taft held a competition and selected architect Nathan Wyeth to design the iconic Oval Office. Taft began working there in October 1909.

Wyeth modeled his office after the oval Blue Room in the main building. Today, it overlooks the Washington Monument and the Jefferson Memorial to the south. Washington’s original design called for the Blue Room’s round walls to function as a state dining room, based on a traditional gathering of guests called a “levee” in a semicircle.

Franklin Delano Roosevelt East Building 1942

President Franklin D. Roosevelt added the east wing in 1942 to house additional staff and offices during World War II, as well as a wartime safety haven.

Congressional Republicans argued the spending was wasteful, and the secret project further raised doubts about its necessity, according to the historical society.

Later in the war, the East Wing eventually became the base for the First Lady’s staff and social events.

Truman Overhaul 1948-1952

The Truman renovation represented the most extensive overhaul of the building since its original construction. The floor shook when he arrived in 1945 as People walked on it, causing joints to crack and rats to run through holes in the walls, according to the historical society.

The $5.7 million overhaul gutted the interior and replaced weakened wooden beams and outdated plumbing and electrical systems, but kept the exterior walls intact. Truman gave his cabinet members paperweights made from his own pine. People can pay $1 to order “one brick, preferably whole” for demolition.

Congressional Republicans questioned the costs of the postwar economy. The Executive Residence Renovation Committee faced pressure to balance modernization and preservation.

Sculptor Felix de Weldon, known for the Marine Corps Memorial at Arlington National Cemetery and who provided advice during the reconstruction, said in an oral history that the goal was to return the exterior to its Federal-era appearance, with no Victorian-era changes to the building except for Abraham Lincoln’s bedroom. The moldings, paneling and fireplace were carefully removed and preserved.

“This building is one of the most beautiful buildings, so we tried to restore it to its original beauty from the early Federal period,” de Weldon said.

The most controversial change was the addition of a balcony on the second floor of the south portico, which became known as the Truman Balcony. Some architects said it clashed with the original Palladian style. According to the Congressional Historical Society at the time, Pennsylvania Republican Frederick Muhlenberg, who himself worked in architecture, accused President Truman of diverting $16,000 as a personal indulgence.

(William Hassett, Truman’s Secretary from 1945 to 1952, said in an oral history that he discussed the south portico being out of proportion with the rest of the building.

“The president was laughing out loud when he talked about how messing with the portico would cause a commotion, but I could tell by the look in his eyes that he really wanted the portico to be moved.”,” Hassett said. “But of course, as far as the public is concerned, that’s out of the question. So nothing happened but a big laugh from us at that suggestion.”

Kennedy Rose Garden 1962

In 1962, President John Kennedy’s wife Jackie redesigned the foliage along the West Colonnade, according to the Historical Society. This is where First Lady Edith Roosevelt created the Colonial Garden in 1902, and where First Lady Ellen Wilson updated the Rose Garden in 1913.

Jackie Kennedy commissioned horticulturist Rachel Lambert Mellon to create an authentic garden inspired by French and British design. President Richard Nixon’s daughter Tricia Nixon Cox was married in the garden in 1971. President Trump toured First Lady Melania Trump on Oct. 21 to show her what she’s up to, which included paving the lawn area.

“It was in really bad shape, but we got it back to health,” Trump told Senate Republicans at a luncheon on Oct. 21. “Everything was new, everything was beautiful. The only thing we did was we had to have a hard surface here, because no one could use it because of the grass.”

nixon press room 1970

In 1970, President Nixon converted the indoor pool, which was built in 1933 for physical therapy for President Franklin Roosevelt, who had contracted polio ten years earlier, into a press room for reporters.

Congressional Democrats argued that President Nixon undermined White House tradition to suit his media strategy with the $574,000 project, according to the historical society. new york times He criticized the loss of ties to President Roosevelt’s legacy as a “sacrifice of history for convenience.”

The briefing room, located on the other side of the west portico wall, currently has 49 chairs for press secretaries to hold regular television briefings. In 2000, the room was named after President Ronald Reagan’s press secretary, James Brady, who was wounded in an assassination attempt in 1981.

Trump Ballroom 2025

President Trump announced in July that he would build a 90,000-square-meter ballroom that could accommodate up to 1,000 people. He said the $300 million cost would be covered by private donations.

President Trump has long argued that a permanent banquet hall has been needed because there isn’t enough space inside the White House and the tents set up on the South Lawn often leave guests’ feet wet.

“When it rains, it’s a disaster. It’s not a pretty sight,” President Trump told reporters on July 31.

The destruction of the east wing contradicted President Trump’s July assurance that the new structure could be “close to, but not touching, the east wing.” The project sparked a public backlash, with former first lady Hillary Clinton saying on social media on October 21, “He is destroying the project.”

But House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana), who describes himself as an “amateur historian,” defended the project as the latest improvement to the White House.

“President Trump is going to make the biggest improvements in the history of the White House since it was built in 1800,” Johnson told reporters on Oct. 22. “The ballroom is going to be glorious. It’s going to be available to everyone. By the way, Democrats, when we take back the White House, you’re going to be able to use it. This is for the American people, and he’s using private money to do it. How on earth can he do that?” Are they against it? ”

SOURCE USA TODAY NETWORK REPORTS AND INVESTIGATIONS. Reuters; whitehouse.org; architectmagazine.com; commonedge.org

Autonomy in the real world? Druid AI releases AI agent “Factory”

0

At the London Symbiosis 4 event on October 22, Druid AI introduced what it calls Virtual Authoring Teams, a new generation of AI agents that can design, test, and deploy other AI agents. The announcement marks a shift to what the company calls a “factory model” of AI automation.

According to Druid, the system enables organizations to build enterprise-grade AI agents up to 10 times faster, and in addition to orchestration capabilities, the platform provides compliance safeguards and measurable ROI tracking. The orchestration engine, Druid Conductor, serves as a control layer that integrates data, tools, and human oversight into a single framework.

In addition to Druid Conductor, we have the Druid Agentic Marketplace, a repository of pre-built industry-specific agents for banking, healthcare, education, and insurance. With its solution, Druid wants to make agent AI accessible to non-technical users while also providing scalability features suitable for enterprise use.

CEO Joe Kim described it as “actual AI,” a bold claim in a market flooded with experimentation and unproven automation frameworks.

A new agent battlefield

Druids aren’t the only ones pursuing this. Similar platforms such as Cognigy, Kore.ai, and Amelia have each invested heavily in multi-agent orchestration environments. OpenAI’s GPT and Anthropic’s Claude Projects enable users to design semi-autonomous digital workers without any coding expertise.

Google’s Vertex AI Agents and Microsoft’s Copilot Studio are moving in the same direction, positioning agent AI as an extension of the enterprise ecosystem rather than a standalone product.

The difference between competing platforms is in execution. Some platforms focus on workflow automation, while others focus on conversation depth and ease of integration with other parts of the IT stack.

For technology buyers, this diversity is both an opportunity and a risk. As vendors race to define what agent AI actually means, there is no doubt that agent AI has the elements to become a buzzword in 2025, meaning a distinction between a pure LLM model and a practical tool useful in a business setting. Some vendors view agents as modular, distributed, and explainable architectures, while others frame agent AI as layers of automation that build on themselves. That is, we believe that we can discover what privileges are given to agents and use them as directed by natural language. The truth of agent AI’s capabilities lies somewhere between engineering promise and operational reality.

Business case and points to note

Agent AI systems promise extraordinary benefits. Accelerate daily development, coordinate multiple business functions, and use data repositories that were once siled. For companies under pressure to achieve digital transformation with a limited number of employees, the idea of ​​self-building an AI team is appealing.

However, the use of conditional tense in many vendors’ marketing materials and descriptions is telling: Agent AI can achieve savings, It was done This will speed up operations, etc.

Business leaders need to approach such systems with a clear head. There are few proven case studies outside of pilot programs within large enterprises (those with mature data governance and deep budgets), and even within those organizations the benefits are uneven. After all, failure is rarely shouted from the rooftops.

The biggest risks are not technical, but organizational. Delegating complex decision-making to automated agents without sufficient oversight can lead to bias, non-compliance, and reputational damage. The system may also create automation debt. This increases the complexity of interconnected bots that become difficult to monitor and update as business processes evolve.

Furthermore, the issue of necessary organizational changes is troubling in two ways. Most business processes have evolved in a certain way for good reason, so why change them and implement a new, largely unproven technology?Second, what is often suggested is change caused by technology implementation. Shouldn’t processes be changed for strategic reasons and technology should support that change? Is this a case of IT letting the tail wag the business dog?

Security remains an additional concern. Each agent increases the surface area for potential breaches and data misuse, especially when designed to communicate and collaborate autonomously. As more workflows become autonomous, ensuring traceability and accountability becomes essential, and as complexity increases, de-extraction becomes more difficult. The required number of people to monitor results and ensure strict oversight can negate the ROI provided by agent AI.

Why agent AI is appealing to businesses

Although there are challenges, the appeal is easy to understand. Successful agent systems change the rate at which companies experiment and scale. By delegating repeatable cognitive tasks, from compliance checks to customer service triage, organizations can redirect human activity elsewhere.

Druid’s virtual authoring team encapsulates logic and automates automation. A marketplace of domain-specific agents provides businesses with a head start, promising faster deployment and measurable ROI. That’s an attractive prospect for an industry struggling with talent shortages and regulatory pressures.

Additionally, Druid’s emphasis on explainable AI and its orchestration layer suggests enterprise wariness. Its stated pillars of control, precision and results are designed to reassure boards that transparency and speed can coexist. If the system truly delivers on the company’s claims, it could close the gap between AI experimentation and scalable transformation.

Balance autonomy and accountability

Still, some organizations that have adopted agentic AI are still not convinced. Many companies are wary of over-promising vendors and pilot fatigue. Any technology that allows you to design and deploy your own successor technology poses operational challenges. What happens when agents act beyond the intentions of their creators? How do governance frameworks respond?

Business leaders need to treat autonomy as a scope, not a goal. The near future of enterprise AI is likely to be a blend of automation with human oversight and limited agent autonomy. A system like Druid may act as an orchestration hub rather than a completely independent actor.

From hype to practicality

Agentic AI represents the natural evolution of automation on an unexplored frontier. While the potential is clear, the market still lacks extensive evidence-based validation of sustainable business outcomes. It may be just the beginning, or it may be an exaggeration that drowns out the voices of reason.

Currently, the agent system do work Controlled context – contact center operations, document processing, IT service management. Scaling agent AI across an organization requires maturity not only in technology but also in culture, process design, and monitoring methods.

As Druid and its peers expand their services, companies must weigh the costs of control against the benefits promised by increased automation. The next two years will determine whether AI factories become part of business operations or become another abstraction layer with its own overhead.

(Image source: “Black and gray wolf (female of the Druid pack, ‘half-black’) walking on the road near the Lamar River Bridge” by YellowstoneNPS is marked with a public domain mark of 1.0.)

Want to learn more about AI and big data from industry leaders? Check out the AI ​​& Big Data Expo in Amsterdam, California, and London. This comprehensive event is part of TechEx and co-located with other major technology events. Click here for more information.

AI News is brought to you by TechForge Media. Learn about other upcoming enterprise technology events and webinars.

IRS delays could benefit this tax season, economists say. Here’s how to do it

0

play

Thanks to the tax and spending package President Donald Trump passed in July, Americans, especially the wealthy, will either get more tax refunds or be charged less when they file their taxes in 2026, according to one economist.

Nancy Vanden Houten, chief economist at the University of Oxford, said in a report this week that total tax savings for taxpayers could reach an additional $50 billion because the IRS has not retroactively updated its withholding schedules to account for the new provisions until early 2025.

He said the only way for taxpayers to benefit from the 2025 retroactive provisions, such as the additional senior citizen deduction, tax exemptions on tips and overtime pay, and expanded child tax credit, is to reduce their tax liability through withholding and estimated tax payments. But even with the law passed in July, employers still use the higher tax rate to calculate employee withholding, or the amount of federal income tax to withhold from an employee’s paycheck. The IRS updates the tables annually to account for inflation and changes in tax law.

With so many Americans struggling under the weight of high prices for everything from beef to insurance premiums, the tax savings may be welcome news, but Vanden Houten warns that most of the benefits will go to the wealthy.

“The benefits of the new retroactive tax cuts disproportionately benefit taxpayers in the top income quintile,” he said. A previous analysis of the new tax law by the Tax Policy Center, a nonpartisan think tank, found that on average all income groups benefited from the tax cuts, but higher-income households benefited the most.

What would an additional $50 billion in tax savings mean for Americans?

The $50 billion increase in tax refunds would be about a 17% increase over last year’s total of about $275 billion, according to IRS data. This is especially important given that the increase in refunds from 2024 to 2025 was only 2%.

The average refund in 2025 was $2,939. A 17% increase is nearly $500 more, but it’s important to note that not all $50 billion in additional tax savings will be refunded.

“Taxpayers may simply choose to pay even less tax as they approach the final payment deadline in April next year,” Vanden Houten said.

And, of course, “taxpayers can reduce withholding on their own, and some taxpayers may do so,” she said. But “there is no evidence that this is happening on a large scale.”

Why do tax cuts primarily help wealthy Americans?

Analysts say an increase in state and local tax (SALT) deductions will be the biggest boost for wealthy Americans.

President Trump’s plan would temporarily raise the SALT deduction cap to $40,000 for some households that itemize their taxes. The law also allows some business owners, such as partnerships and sole proprietors, to take advantage of state loopholes to avoid the SALT deduction cap entirely, the Tax Policy Center said. Wealthy people tend to exceed the upper limit when it comes to itemized state and local taxes.

Will bigger tax cuts boost the economy?

People usually spend at least some if not all of their refund. In May 2005, a survey commissioned by TaxSlayer and conducted by Talker Research found that 64% of 2,000 taxpayers had already used up their tax refund or were planning to do so soon.

Vanden Houten predicted that the economic boost would arrive in the first half of 2026, but cautioned that “there is not much evidence that the delay in 2025 tax adjustments is having a negative impact on consumer spending at this point, so the impact may be minor.”

“Consumers may be (now) spending in anticipation of a larger refund or lower tax bill next year,” he said.

Additionally, high-income households have disproportionately benefited from the new retroactive tax cuts, likely through reduced tax burdens rather than refunds, he said. She says she’s unlikely to spend more because she’ll save money on lower bills.

Overall, Vanden Houten expects higher-income households to spend about 20% of their tax savings, while the rest of Americans will spend 25% to 40% of their increased tax refunds.

Medora Lee is USA TODAY’s money, markets and personal finance reporter. Please contact us at mjlee@usatoday.com. Subscribe to our free Daily Money newsletter for personal finance tips and business news every Monday through Friday morning.

Klomo launches ‘racist’ and ‘Islamophobic’ attack against Zoran Mamdanni

0


Zoran Mamdani, a Democrat and front-runner in New York’s mayoral race, said “disgusting” attacks on his Islamic faith come from both parties.

play

NEW YORK – In the final stages of New York’s mayoral race, with polls showing Mamdani in the lead, Zoran Mamdani called recent attacks on him by former Gov. Andrew Cuomo “disgusting” and “racist.”

Governor Cuomo said on October 23 that Mamdani, 34, was unable to handle crises like the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks in the city nearly 25 years ago. Cuomo, who is running as an independent, appeared on the conservative radio program “Sid and Friends in the Morning” the morning after the final debate between Democratic candidate and state representative Mamdani and Republican Curtis Sliwa.

“Can you imagine another 9/11 happening with Mamdani sitting there?” asked Mr. Cuomo, 67.

“You can do it,” host Sid Rosenberg said. “I’m sure he’ll be supportive.”

Cuomo laughed and said, “That’s a different question.”

Mamdani, a Democratic Socialist state legislator, will become New York City’s first Muslim mayor if polls continue until the Nov. 4 general election. Nearly one in 10 New Yorkers is Muslim, and many faced profiling and surveillance in the aftermath of the 2001 attacks. The data also shows a rise in Islamophobia.

“This is terrible,” Mamdani told PIX 11 News. “This is Andrew Cuomo’s final moment in public life, and he is choosing to spend it making racist attacks.”

Cuomo campaign spokesman Rich Azzopardi said the former Democratic governor disagrees with Rosenberg’s assertion that Mamdani would support a terrorist attack. Azzopardi said in an email that Cuomo had mentioned Mamdani’s appearance on popular left-wing commentator Hasan Piker’s show in April. In 2019, Piker said, “America deserved 9/11, dude.”

A week ago, in response to a question from Cuomo during a debate, Mamdani called Piker’s comments “disgusting and reprehensible.” Mr. Cuomo did not mention Mr. Piker until 10 minutes into the interview.

“The general theme of the conversation was that Mandani is completely unqualified and unprepared to be mayor of the greatest city on earth. That’s what every New Yorker thought last night,” Azzopardi wrote.

Earlier in the same broadcast, Rosenberg called Mamdani a “terrorist.”

Cuomo removes AI-generated ads

The incident was not the only controversy for Mr. Cuomo as he tries to bounce back in the polls.

On October 22, Cuomo’s campaign ran an ad showing AI-generated “Zoran criminals,” but it has since been removed.

The video showed Mamdani eating rice with her hands, a custom that is traditional for many people in India, where Mamdani’s mother is from, and is popular among right-wingers. They also included a black shoplifter wearing a keffiyeh, a symbol of Palestinian resistance, and a black man acting as a pimp with a van full of white women.

Muslim political advocacy group CAIR Action accused Mr. Cuomo of a series of “Islamophobic and racist attacks” against Mamdani.

“Andrew Cuomo’s comments are despicable, dangerous and disqualifying,” CAIR Action Executive Director Basim Elcala said in a statement, adding, “Mr. Cuomo has crossed a moral line.”

“This rhetoric is not only deeply Islamophobic, it is reckless and life-threatening to Muslim, Arab, and South Asian New Yorkers who are still living with the trauma of the post-9/11 backlash,” Elkala said.

Republicans and Democrats are under fire

Both Republicans and Democrats have fiercely attacked Mamdani’s identity since his primary victory over Cuomo in June.

On the Republican side, New York Rep. Elise Stefanik, an ally of President Donald Trump who is running for governor, repeatedly and inaccurately called Mamdani a “jihadist.” There is no evidence that Mamdani, who has condemned terrorist attacks including Hamas’ attack on Israel on October 7, 2023, supports “jihad,” meaning the struggle against the enemies of Islam.

Laura Loomer, an ally of President Trump and a self-described “proud Islamophobe,” said New York will soon have sharia law. Rep. Brandon Gill (R-Texas) told Mamdani, a Ugandan-born naturalized citizen, to “go back to the Third World” in response to a video of him eating rice with his hands.

In September, Queens prosecutors charged a 44-year-old Texas man with making terroristic threats against Mamdani.

On PIX 11, Mamdani said bigotry and racism are not just a Republican problem. After the primary, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) falsely told WNYC that Mamdani had “referenced global jihad.” Gillibrand later apologized.

New York City Mayor Eric Adams also cited the specter of Islamism in endorsing Cuomo on October 23.

“Guys, New York can’t be Europe,” Adams said. “I don’t know what’s wrong with people. You see what’s happening in other countries because of Islamic extremism.”

Mamdani has criticized Israel’s existence as a Jewish state and its treatment of Palestinians. Mamdani called Israel’s devastating siege of Gaza after the Hamas-led offensive in southern Israel in 2023 a “genocide” (a term used by the United Nations Special Committee and some human rights groups). Many New Yorkers agree with Mamdani, and polls show a plurality on the side of the Palestinians.

His opponents have attacked him for appearing on Piker’s show and for dodging Fox News’ foreign policy questions about the future of Hamas. (He later said the group had committed atrocities and should be disarmed.) He has also been hesitant to condemn the popular pro-Palestinian rallying cry, “Globalize the Intifada,” which some interpret as an attack on Jews. Mamdani later said he no longer uses that word.

Recently, Mamdani caused controversy by posing with Imam Siraj Wahadj, who has expressed his opposition to homosexuality. Mr. Wahaj attended along with past mayors and became the first Muslim to make a vow in the House of Commons.

The conservative-leaning New York Post also reported that Wahadj was listed as an unindicted co-conspirator in the 1993 World Trade Center bombings. Mr. Wahaj was not indicted, and former prosecutors said the list was too broad, The New York Times reported.

In the final debate, Mr. Cuomo and Mr. Sliwa both attacked Mr. Mamdani for his stance on Israel and sought to portray him as incapable of dealing with rising anti-Semitism to protect Jews, who make up about one-tenth of New York City. Sliwa, citing her two Jewish sons, called Mamdani an “arsonist who is fanning the flames of anti-Semitism.”

Mamdani has repeatedly committed to increasing resources to combat hate crimes and condemned all forms of bigotry, but rejected any comments that promoted anti-Semitism.

“Frankly, I think a lot of it has to do with the fact that I’m the first Muslim candidate on the verge of winning this election,” he responded.

Representative Jerry Nadler of New York, who is Jewish and supports Mamdani, defended Mamdani on social media.

“Imagine if this type of bigotry was used against New Yorkers of other faiths, Jews and Christians,” Nadler said. “Shall I turn over and accept it?”

Eduardo Cuevas is based in New York City. Contact us via email (emcuevas1@usatoday.com) or Signal (emcuevas.01).

Man faces lawsuit over arrest for playing ‘Star Wars’ songs in National Guard

0

play

COLUMBUS, Ohio — A Washington, D.C., man filed a lawsuit against the Ohio National Guard and several police officers on Oct. 23 after he was detained during a September protest in the nation’s capital while playing the theme song of a famous “Star Wars” movie villain.

The American Civil Liberties Union filed a lawsuit on behalf of Sam O’Hara, 35, naming Sgt. Defendants include Devon Beck of the Ohio National Guard and four Washington, D.C., police officers. The lawsuit stems from his Sept. 11 arrest, which he claims violated his First Amendment rights.

According to the complaint, O’Hara frequently protested the National Guard presence in Washington, D.C., in August. On August 16, Ohio Governor Mike DeWine ordered 250 Guard troops to be sent to Washington at the request of the Secretary of War.

“Mr. O’Hara was deeply concerned about the constant presence of military patrolling the Washington, D.C., area, so whenever he saw Guard members in the area, he began to protest their presence by walking several feet behind them,” the lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia states.

Using her cell phone and sometimes a small speaker, O’Hara recorded the encounter and posted it on TikTok, playing “Imperial March,” the memorable John Williams composition synonymous with the “Star Wars” character Darth Vader.

“Sergeant Devon Beck of the Ohio National Guard did not find this satire funny,” the complaint states.

The lawsuit accuses security guards and local law enforcement officers of suppressing speech, retaliation, unlawful seizure, excessive force, and false imprisonment. O’Hara is seeking unspecified compensatory and punitive damages in addition to legal costs.

Man arrested for protesting with Darth Vader song, lawsuit says

On Sept. 11, O’Hara was walking home from work when he saw Beck and several other uniformed security guards patrolling the Logan Circle area near downtown Washington, D.C., and O’Hara played the march’s theme song on his cell phone and began recording it, according to the complaint.

The complaint alleges that O’Hara threatened to call the Metropolitan Police Department if Beck continued to cause trouble.

“Hey, if you’re going to keep following us, we can contact Metro PD and they can deal with you if that’s what you want to do. Is that what you want to do?” Beck said, according to the complaint.

O’Hara continued to record and perform music. “Is that what you want to do? I understand,” Beck said, according to the complaint.

Beck called the Metropolitan Police Department, and O’Hara was handcuffed, according to the complaint.

The lawsuit cites the logic behind Governor DeWine’s decision to send the Ohio National Guard to Washington, D.C., noting that “Governor DeWine retains command of the Ohio National Guard operating in the District.” According to the newspaper, Beck’s decision to contact local police was “(a) in accordance with Governor DeWine’s directive that MPD, not troopers, make the arrest; Sergeant Beck stepped aside and briefly called MPD.”

Four police officers eventually arrived and questioned O’Hara about whether his actions constituted a protest, according to the complaint. They handcuffed O’Hara for 15 to 20 minutes before eventually releasing him without charge, according to the complaint.

“Long ago, in a galaxy far, far away, this type of government action may have been legal,” the complaint states. “Right now, however, the First Amendment prohibits government officials from shutting down peaceful protests, and the Fourth Amendment (along with the district’s prohibition on false arrests) prohibits baseless seizures.”

The Columbus Dispatch, part of the USA TODAY Network, has reached out to DeWine’s office and the Ohio National Guard for comment.

Man arrested during protests in Washington, D.C., releases statement

In a statement released by the ACLU, O’Hara condemned the continued military presence in Washington, D.C.

“For me, it was important not to normalize this dystopian occupation,” he said. “Instead of respecting my right to protest, the police officers handcuffed me so tightly that my wrists were still marked and sore the next day. This shows the danger of sending military forces to America’s streets. It puts all of our fundamental rights at risk.”

ACLU senior staff attorney Michael Perloff was also outraged by O’Hara’s detention and issued a statement defending his client’s right to perform the “Imperial March.”

“The government can’t decide whether your protest is funny or not, and government officials can’t punish you for using it as a punchline,” Perloff said. “That’s really the whole point of the First Amendment.”