Home Blog Page 392

Can U.S. oil companies operate in Venezuela? chris wright push

0

play

Energy Secretary Chris Wright said Wednesday, Jan. 7, that the U.S. government wants to restart shipments of Venezuelan oil, deposit funds into U.S.-controlled accounts and create conditions for U.S. oil companies to operate in Venezuela.

Wright said he is in talks with U.S. oil companies to find out on what terms they can enter the South American country, adding that he would like to sell Venezuelan oil to U.S. refineries.

He spoke at the Goldman Sachs Energy, Cleantech and Utilities Conference in Miami.

President Donald Trump said over the weekend that the United States would “take control” of Venezuela after the U.S. military ousted Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro.

Reuters reported on January 7 that US oil executives are scheduled to visit the White House later this week to discuss ways to revive Venezuela’s battered oil sector.

Jordan Shipley hospitalized, what we know about former Texans star

0

play

Former Texas football star Jordan Shipley was hospitalized Tuesday afternoon after suffering “severe burns” in a ranch accident.

Shipley’s family released the following statement through Texas Senior Associate Athletic Director and Public Relations Officer John Bianco:

“Jordan was involved in an accident this afternoon near his hometown of Burnett, Texas. A machine he was operating on his ranch caught fire and although he managed to escape, he suffered severe burns to his body in the process.

“He was able to contact one of the ranch’s employees, who drove him to a local hospital. He was then taken by CareFlight to Austin, where he remains in critical but stable condition.”

Shipley, 40, played at Texas from 2006 to 2009. He teamed with QB Colt McCoy and became one of the top receivers in college football during his junior and senior years.

A third-round pick in the 2010 NFL Draft, Shipley played in 24 NFL games between the Cincinnati Bengals, Jacksonville Jaguars and Tampa Bay Buccaneers.

Will PBS and NPR be shut down? What you need to know after news of CPB closure

0

play

The nonprofit organization, which has operated for more than half a century and has been responsible for funding public media giants NPR and PBS, will be dissolved in the wake of multimillion-dollar budget cuts pushed by the Trump administration.

The Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB)’s board of directors voted to dissolve the organization on January 5 after Congress voted in July to withdraw $1.1 billion appropriated for its use. Since taking office, President Donald Trump has rallied against CPB, NPR, and PBS, accusing them of not providing a “fair, accurate, or unbiased portrayal of current events to taxpayers.” President Trump has repeatedly targeted news organizations he perceives to be broadcasting content unfavorable to his administration.

As USA TODAY previously reported, CPB blamed the closure on a lack of funding and “sustained political attacks” and said it no longer functions as intended when it was founded in 1967.

CPB was a major financier of NPR, PBS, and related stations and real estate. Both organizations have previously warned that they would struggle to continue operating without federal funding.

What is Public Broadcasting Corporation?

The Corporation for Public Broadcasting is a nonprofit, nongovernmental organization established by Congress under the Public Broadcasting Act of 1967. Its purpose was to provide funding and support to public media across the United States to enable broader and more equitable access to information and education.

CPB provides millions of dollars in grants to local public access television and radio stations, according to its website.

The company is best known for funding National Public Radio (NPR), which includes hundreds of local news sources and a network of community radio programs across the country, and Public Broadcasting Service (PBS), which broadcasts educational television such as “Sesame Street,” concerts, cooking shows, documentaries, news and weather alerts. It was once home to other popular shows such as “Mister Rogers’ Neighborhood” and Bob Ross’ “The Joy of Painting.”

What happened to CPB?

The Corporation for Public Broadcasting’s board of directors voted on Monday, January 5, to dissolve the corporation following funding cuts.

CPB had previously announced it would close on August 1, 2025, following cuts of more than $1 billion in federal funding to the organization, USA TODAY previously reported.

“For more than half a century, CPB has existed to ensure that all Americans, regardless of geography, income or background, have access to trusted news, educational programming and local stories,” President and CEO Patricia Harrison said in a press release. “With the Administration and Congress revoking federal funding, our board faced a significant responsibility. CPB’s ultimate action will be to protect the integrity of our public media system and our democratic values ​​by dissolving the organization rather than leaving it defunded and vulnerable to further attacks.”

The corporation said it would keep some employees on board for an “orderly closure,” which would include distributing remaining funds and assisting the Archives of American Public Broadcasting in its efforts to preserve “historic content.” The company has partnered with the University of Maryland to preserve its own archives, which the corporation announced it would make available to the public.

Will NPR and PBS be shut down?

Although NPR and PBS as a whole will not be “shut down,” at least for now, many related facilities, especially those in rural and low-income areas, may be hit. CPB accounted for a significant portion, but not all, of NPR and PBS’s funding. That means both organizations will need to find other ways to fill the multimillion-dollar gap.

CPB said 70% of federal funds went to locally owned public media stations, reaching about 99% of Americans. PBS supporters previously told USA TODAY that budget cuts could disproportionately impact local areas and worsen existing news and information deserts. It is unclear at this time how many programs may be affected.

Some trademark shows at risk are seeking other solutions, such as “Sesame Street”‘s recent deal with Netflix.

USA TODAY has reached out to NPR and PBS for comment.

Contributor: Jenna Prestininzi, Detroit Free Press. BreeAnna J. Frank, USA TODAY

Venezuela, oil, Los Angeles fires, Republican Party, Greenland, ICE, NFL: Daily Briefing

0

morning! Welcome to the daily briefing. This morning’s breaking news is:

nicole farato here! I know it’s late, but it’s time to take down the Christmas tree. From the future of the Republican-held House to Venezuelan oil, we’ve got Wednesday’s news for you. Plus, the latest turn in the NFL’s coaching carousel.

Oil executives meet about investments

Energy Secretary Chris Wright is scheduled to meet oil executives at a conference in Miami on Wednesday, days after the United States captured the head of Venezuela, home to the world’s largest oil reserves.

Background: President Donald Trump said earlier this week that U.S. companies may invest in Venezuela to help rebuild low output. Chevron is currently the only major U.S. oil company operating in Venezuela. Many U.S. oil companies withdrew in 2007 when then-leader Hugo Chávez tried to seize assets as part of a nationalization drive. The country’s crude oil production has been in sharp decline since 2012.

The talks came a day after President Donald Trump said Venezuela would “deliver” between 30 million and 50 million barrels of oil to the United States, as the Venezuelan regime detained the country’s president and began to pressure new leadership.

More news you need to know right now

  • LA residents can’t go home. A year after deadly wildfires ravaged this once-bustling road lined with colorful houses, the scars on the landscape and the struggles of its residents remain. Few people have rebuilt their homes. There are ongoing battles with insurance companies and bureaucratic hurdles to rebuilding. More than 70% of Eaton and Palisades residents remain displaced by the fires, and many told USA TODAY they are worried about how they will fare financially next year.
  • Balanced home: President Donald Trump’s slim Republican majority in the House has become even smaller, making the path to passing a Republican-centered agenda in 2026 even more complicated. “It’s not a majority, but it’s a united majority,” President Trump said during a recess with House Republicans on Tuesday, acknowledging the difficult political calculation.
  • Will the US use force against Greenland? “Using the U.S. military is always an option,” White House press secretary Caroline Levitt said in a statement on January 6, after President Donald Trump and administration officials renewed interest in annexing Greenland.

Let’s take a look

ICE in Minnesota

Federal immigration agents are “swarming” into Minnesota, officials said, as a fraud scandal engulfing state and national politics deepens. The move comes after Hilton announced it had severed ties with the Minneapolis hotel franchise. The hotel franchise reportedly canceled reservations for ICE agents working in the area.

I want to talk to you about something.

Where will John Harbaugh land?

John Harbaugh’s 18-year run with the Baltimore Ravens has come to an end. The Ravens announced Tuesday that they have fired Harbaugh, ending the winningest coach in franchise history and the second-longest tenure of any active NFL coach. That means there are currently seven head coaching vacancies in the NFL. USA TODAY Sports is following a game of musical chairs in a league that doesn’t know where everyone will end up when the music stops.

before you go

Have feedback about the daily briefing? Email Nicole at NFallert@usatoday.com.

Altadena was destroyed by fire. How one family found hope in their new life.

0

play

Altadena, Calif. – Newlyweds Ryan and Jasmine LaBelle were on their honeymoon in Fiji, enjoying a romantic seafood dinner and a chef-decorated signature dessert to celebrate their newlyweds, when their cell phones started dying.

Frenzied text messages, neighborhood alerts, sad and devastating voicemails from family members. Something really terrible was happening back home, and the situation seemed to be getting worse by the minute.

It was January 7, 2025.

The fire tore through the dry hillsides of Eaton, at the base of the Pacific Palisades and San Gabriel Mountains. The Santa Ana winds were relentless, pushing the hungry embers back.

Ryan Lovell’s oldest sister was in California watching the flames move closer and closer to their Altadena home. The house where her remarried brother and sister-in-law lived with her and planned to raise their family. The same house that Ryan was brought home to when he was little.

Of course, another generation was to live there. That’s what their mother, Gloria Lovell, always intended. Gloria is a nurse who manages racism in the workplace, is one of the few black people, and manages to buy a house with her ex-husband. She scraped together her nurse’s salary to raise her children here.

Therefore, for the patriarch, intergenerational wealth can only exist in the form of the family. four walls. A home in which her children and their descendants might thrive. Something tangible that she can leave behind as a legacy of love. She believed it might help level the playing field for black families.

The playing field will be leveled. And that’s not quite how Gloria LaBelle once envisioned this future promise.

Achim Airitam, Ryan Lovell’s sister, knew she needed to evacuate the 1912 Craftsman at 2172 Maiden Lane. The lights flickered and I couldn’t find my flashlight. she panicked. What important documents does she need to obtain?Will she be able to escape safely? where is she going go?

“She was unable to collect her mother’s remains, her parents’ wedding album, or her childhood memorabilia. She had little time to escape,” Lovell told me. “It broke her.”

Burnt houses. Burnt memories.

Even though it’s been almost two weeks since wildfires ravaged parts of Southern California, I knew exactly what I was witnessing. Simply put, it was the worst natural disaster I have experienced in my 32 years as a professional journalist.

Blocks of brick chimneys stood unwaveringly and defiantly among the rubble of charred homes. Burnt memories. A burnt dream.

leveled.

Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department deputies and cadaver dogs continued to search for human remains. Missing person. Their families and friends desperately tried to contact them, but they received no response.

The hillsides, once green, or at least brown, appeared black. You can trace the path of the flames simply by examining the once lush vegetation that served as the gateway to the Altadena area.

Towering palm trees had been destroyed from trunk to leaf, but remained upright. Citrus trees such as orange, lemon and grapefruit have abandoned their bounty to the ground. A burnt sweetness and flavor that remains even when there is moisture inside.

When I visited Altadena after the fire, I was struck by the sight of tearful residents rummaging through their property, looking for anything they could salvage. They were not allowed to return home for two weeks because of the toxic burn.

I wanted to comfort them. Please hug me. But I saw their stony faces, their sorrow, their unbelief. What can I do as a stranger? I think at first glance it would have looked like I was there just to do my job, to report on this tragedy.

I was. But I wasn’t. Los Angeles was also my home until a few months before the wildfires.

I prayed for them. I prayed that God’s mercy would guide and comfort them through this most devastating reality. Because those were definitely some of the most awful images I’ll take with me to my grave.

While in the field, meeting these people and experiencing their palpable grief and loss, I constantly fought off waves of vomit, but only because I was wearing a full-face respirator mask to protect my lungs from toxins.

I can’t go back completely. So I can’t imagine the eternal mental and physical suffering of the people who actually lived in Altadena and survived this nightmare.

“Mayberry for African Americans”

The Eaton Canyon fire progressed rapidly, destroying approximately 9,500 buildings and damaging over 1,000 more, burning more than 14,000 acres and killing 19 people.

But it was so much more than that.

It was a community filled with black and brown people who created what one survivor described as “Mayberry for African Americans.”

It was a place of refuge for black people fleeing the Jim Crow South in the early 20th century in search of a better life and respite from systemic racism. This was where home ownership was passed on to the next generation and was often the herald of family wealth. This was the place where families settled, grew, loved, and ultimately lost.

This quaint community, 13 miles north of mainland Los Angeles, has long been a haven for the approximately 44,000 people who live here.

The Great Migration played a central role in California cities such as Los Angeles, Oakland, and San Francisco, where blacks moved primarily from the South to establish a better life free of overt racism.

Altadena became “that place.”

Until it isn’t. Until a fire broke out.

Since the civil rights movement, small business entrepreneurs, artists, and activists have flourished. Although the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Fair Housing Act of 1968 officially abolished “redlining,” the practice of denying blacks and other communities of color access to housing, many people of color continued to move to Altadena during the 1960s and early 1970s.

But like many disasters that disproportionately affect Black and brown people, warnings and evacuation orders were delayed, particularly in western Altadena, resulting in more wildfire deaths than other parts of Southern California.

“I have no intention of returning to Altadena,” former resident Joel Moiseau-Phillips told me. “I’m heartbroken, but there’s no clear, affordable, acceptable path forward. And on top of that, I’m worried about the health of those who stay or come back. And it will never be the same. It was a lovely little oasis of diversity, with a wonderful black community inside, and it’s not coming back.”

establish firm roots

As a final farewell dinner to their Fiji honeymoon, the resort’s chef once again gifted Ryan and Jasmine Lovell with original sweet treats. It’s completely personal. And surprisingly sweet.

One container contained vanilla pastry with a swirl of strawberry icing. The chef carefully scribbled a heartbreaking message from the heart.

That was one word.

sorry.

As the couple prepared to leave Fiji and packed their suitcases, their hearts were heavy as they thought about what they would see and experience when they returned to Southern California, but they vowed to love each other through the hardships and traumas ahead.

They returned home with a typical baggage and a baggage of fear of the unknown. But they also returned home with an amazing blessing. Unbeknownst to her parents, Kayla was also on board when they said goodbye to Fiji.

When Ryan returned to Los Angeles, he visited his childhood home. A house that no longer exists. All that remained was the garage. And a chimney. He began collecting everything he could, including his mother’s medical books, his sister’s food supplies, and a few family photos.

After decades of family gatherings for the holidays in Altadena, the Lovell family has settled into a new reality. Ryan and Jasmine have a newborn. Kaila is her name. She was born on September 16, 2025.

“About two days after we found out we lost our home in the Eaton fire, we found out that my wife Jasmine was pregnant with Kayla, so she has been a blessing to us throughout this whole tragedy,” Ryan Lovell said.

they didn’t know what to do. where are you going? They had a plan. However, it caught fire. FEMA provided little aid in the short term. Therefore, they lived with their families until they had the mental and physical strength to meet their fiancées.

The Lovells eventually purchased a home in Upland, realizing that they could not bring a new child into the world without proper housing. They had to do the right thing for the next generation. Just like Gloria did.

“We moved here at the end of June of 2025,” Lovell said. “Obviously due to the circumstances surrounding the Eaton Fire, we had to really get serious about finding a place to live. So we spent the first half of 2025 just looking for a place to call home. We wanted something to buy, something that would give us solid roots since we were uprooted a little earlier this year. So this was a very important search for us.”

The land in Altadena continues to be owned by the family. But there’s nothing there except the garage. And a sign that says “ALTADENA. Not for sale.” They, like many people, are underinsured and the cost of rebuilding is unimaginable. After all, owning real estate in Los Angeles is ridiculously expensive. Even if it’s just dirt and burnt memories.

Suzette Hackney is a national columnist. Contact her at:@suzyscribe

Target wants its stores to be wellness destinations. What you need to know.

0


Health is a concern for consumers of all ages. To this end, Target is expanding the variety of wellness products it offers, from skin care to food, by adding thousands of new products.

play

Target is launching an energetic year-round wellness initiative just in time to help you keep your New Year’s resolutions alive.

The Minneapolis-based retailer is expanding its wellness product selection by 30% and adding thousands of new items, many priced under $10, in skin care, beauty, nutrition, food and beverage, weight management, baby care and more, the company said.

The expansion of Target’s wellness rollout has already begun and will continue in the coming months. “We are embarking on a new era of wellness,” Lisa Roos, executive vice president of food, essentials and beauty and chief merchandising officer, told USA TODAY. “We want to be a destination for trend-forward wellness products, not just in January, but year-round.”

Roos said the wellness enhancement is the largest category expansion in Target’s history, but it’s timely as the retailer’s internal data suggests 7 out of 10 Target customers have already purchased wellness products. “It’s important to consumers, and consumers say it’s confusing, so we feel like it’s an area we can lean into,” she added.

What is the purpose of the target? It will make it “easier for[customers]to find the solution they’re looking for” and make it more affordable, Roos said.

“We want to champion accessible wellness. Wellness shouldn’t be just for those with disposable income,” she added. “That should be the case for everyone.”

Target’s Wellness Initiatives in Stores and Online

Target has enhanced Target.com and its in-app wellness hub. Wellness also hosts in-store wellness events. Two events are scheduled for the next two Saturdays, with product sampling and giveaways featuring Good & Gather food on January 10th and All in Motion lifestyle and Embark outdoor and activity products on January 17th.

Some of the new wellness products coming to Target include well-known brands and exclusive products.

Wellness is already big business

A focus on wellness products could strengthen Target’s retail business. The company’s revenue has plateaued in recent years, declining slightly from its peak during the COVID-19 pandemic.

To drive sales growth, the company is investing in store upgrades and opening new stores. Target also addressed consumer confidence by cutting prices on 3,000 items for the 2025 holiday season, including food, beverages and many essential items, and began emphasizing new staff policies to make customers feel welcome.

Wellness can be a benefit to Target. According to consulting firm McKinsey & Company, U.S. spending on wellness exceeds $500 million a year, and consumer spending is growing at a rate of 4% to 5% annually.

Emphasizing wellness has the potential to attract and retain younger shoppers. Nearly 30% of Gen Z (born between 1997 and 2012) and Millennials (born between 1981 and 1996) say they prioritize health “a lot more” than they did a year ago, according to a McKinsey & Company survey of more than 9,000 consumers worldwide. Wellness is also a concern for older shoppers, with 23% of survey respondents saying they prioritize healthier lifestyle choices.

While some people are obsessed with New Year’s resolutions, for most people health is a constant lifestyle consideration, Roos said. “We’re here for those who want to keep their New Year’s resolutions, and we’re also here for those who are just starting wellness as a lifestyle,” she added.

Mike Snyder is a national trends news reporter for USA TODAY. You can follow him on Threads, Bluesky, and X, and email him at: mike snyder & @mikegsnider.bsky.social & @mikesnider & msnider@usatoday.com.

Will President Trump’s focus on Venezuela hurt the economy?

0


By focusing on Venezuela and pushing for greater US reach, President Trump is moving away from America’s biggest concern: the economy.

play

WASHINGTON – Even before the United States took control of Venezuela and ousted its leaders, some of President Donald Trump’s allies worried that he was focusing too much on foreign countries, while Americans made clear their biggest concerns were the economy and cost of living at home.

President Trump has already begun talking about other foreign goals following the arrest of Nicolas Maduro.

President Trump has said the United States intends to “run” Venezuela and take advantage of the country’s vast oil supplies, while next he has warned that Cuba is on the brink of collapse, threatened military intervention in Colombia and renewed his call for the United States to occupy Greenland, which is part of Denmark. He even gave his foreign policy a name: the Donroe Doctrine, a renaming of the early 19th century Monroe Doctrine.

Add all this up and it risks undermining President Trump’s efforts to restore American faith in the economy by presenting Democrats with a new line for the midterm elections, one in which Trump and the Republican Party are more obsessed with oil and American imperialism than with the checking accounts of ordinary Americans.

House Majority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said on January 5, “The American people are rejecting the prospect of another unjust foreign war that appears to be on the horizon because of President Trump’s desire to reward big American oil companies while doing nothing to improve the lives of the American people.”

The White House claimed the military’s January 3 operation demonstrated American power overseas. Trump administration officials have also sought to defend Democrats, stressing that Maduro’s leadership has been widely condemned by both parties. Former President Joe Biden has offered a $25 million reward for information leading to Maduro’s arrest.

President Trump has routinely denounced the concept of nation-building and criticized previous presidents for dragging the United States into foreign affairs. But the president rejected any suggestion that his actions in Venezuela contradicted his “America first” beliefs, insisting that the seizure of Venezuelan oil was vital to U.S. national interests.

“We want to be surrounded by energy,” President Trump said at his first press conference about the Venezuela operation. “There’s a huge amount of energy in that country, and it’s very important to protect it. We need it for ourselves, and we need it for the world.”

However, a new Reuters/Ipsos poll found that only one in three Americans supports a military attack on Venezuela, and 72% are concerned about the United States getting too involved in the country. Only 23% of independent voters, a key voting group for the outcome of the midterm elections, said they supported action in Venezuela.

Democrats aim to force Maduro out of office to strengthen affordability case

Meanwhile, according to a Gallup poll, President Trump’s approval rating was 36% in December, and only 24% of Americans said they were satisfied with the current state of the economy. A PBS News/NPR/Marist poll conducted last month found that 57 Americans disapproved of President Trump’s handling of the economy.

“The American people don’t want boys and girls in Florida, Nebraska and Arizona fighting for Big Oil,” Arizona Democratic Sen. Ruben Gallego said on MS NOW’s Morning Joe on January 5. “That’s not what the last election was about,” the senator added, referring to President Trump’s 2024 pledge to cut costs from day one.

“How does it make the cost of living lower? How does it help people buy a house? How does it help a kid who just graduated from college get a job?” Gallego said.

Former Ohio Democratic Sen. Sherrod Brown was quick to seize on Trump’s attack on Venezuela during his campaign to return to the Senate after losing re-election in 2024.

“Hundreds of thousands of Ohioans are struggling to make ends meet, and Washington is making their lives even harder by prioritizing a foreign country over their own,” Brown said in a post on X. “Ohioans face higher costs across the board and desperately need leadership to provide relief. We should be focusing more on improving the lives of Ohioans, not Caracas.”

Democrats used affordability as an underlying campaign message, performing well in special 2025 House elections across the country and winning off-year gubernatorial races in New Jersey and Virginia by double digits. This is expected to be a central message for Democrats in the 2026 midterm elections as they seek control of the House and Senate.

“The economy, particularly inflation and economic growth, is likely to remain the primary issue,” said Whit Ayers, a longtime Republican strategist and president of North Star Opinion Research. “But whether that really happens depends on how other foreign interventions work. If we were to get into a shootout with another country, the situation would be very different.”

Ayers said Democrats will try to argue that he is preoccupied with the administration’s business in Venezuela and other countries, but “that’s not going to work once inflation goes down and the economy gets back on track.”

President Trump says Republicans have ‘plenty of ammunition’

President Trump began his speaking tour in December with rallies in Pennsylvania and North Carolina, in response to Americans’ bleak outlook for the economy, even as inflation rates have fallen from post-pandemic peaks under the Biden administration. President Trump has called affordability a “hoax” promoted by Democrats and blamed them for soaring inflation during Biden’s presidency.

In an 84-minute speech to House Republicans at a convention in Washington on January 6, President Trump touted the stock market at an all-time high, strengthened 401(k) retirement plans, and efforts to lower drug prices through a new “most-favored-nation” policy. President Trump also urged Republicans to implement tax cuts and other measures in the “One Big Beautiful Bill” bill passed last year.

“We have a lot of ammunition. Just sell ammunition,” Trump told his Republican allies. “We have to win the midterms, because if we don’t win the midterms, they’re going to find a reason to impeach me. I’m going to be impeached.”

If Trump’s efforts to take control of Venezuelan oil by U.S. companies are successful and U.S. energy prices fall, Trump could claim that his intervention directly improved the lives of Americans.

But in his remarks to House Republicans, Trump also pointed to the long history of the incumbent president’s party often losing midterm elections, calling it an “amazing phenomenon.” He also acknowledged that the poll numbers have been weak.

“I want you to explain what’s going on in the minds of the people, because we have the right policies,” Trump told the Kennedy Center crowd. “They’re not like that,” he added of Democrats. “They have terrible policies.”

But it remains to be seen whether most Americans agree with him on Venezuela. Marjorie Taylor Greene, who unofficially resigned from Congress on January 5, was among those who last year urged Trump to spend less time with foreign leaders and focus on domestic policy, ahead of a dramatic falling out with the president.

“This is what many in MAGA believe they voted to end,” Greene said in a post for the X after Maduro’s arrest, criticizing President Trump for focusing on regime change in other countries “while Americans continue to face rising costs of living, housing and health care, and learn about fraud and tax fraud.”

John Anzalone, a veteran Democratic pollster, said not a single person in the United States woke up on January 3 and said, “We’re very concerned about Venezuela. We really hope President Trump does something about it.” Anzalone said that in several focus groups he conducted through the end of 2025, Americans told him exactly the opposite: “They want him to focus solely on the economy.”

“I think it’s even more emphasized today because he’s playing military instead of focusing on the fight, and that’s where he ends up losing people,” Anzalone said.

Anzalone, the 2020 Biden campaign’s chief pollster, compared Trump’s situation to the disconnect Biden suffered during his first term in office, as Trump’s Democratic predecessors touted economic gains while Americans expressed economic dissatisfaction.

“President Trump is moving into Joe Biden territory here, and that’s a problem for him,” Anzalone said.

X Contact Joey Garrison at @joeygarrison.

Current laws are fit for the AI ​​era

0

As ministers push to ease rules to speed up the adoption of AI, the Law Society says lawyers simply need to know how the current law applies.

The Department of Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) recently launched a call for evidence on a proposed ‘AI Growth Lab’. This cross-economy sandbox is designed to accelerate the deployment of autonomous technologies by giving companies “limited-time regulatory exemptions.” The government’s position is that many regulations were designed before autonomous software existed and are often outdated, assuming that decisions would be made by humans rather than machines.

Ministers believe that if the UK can move faster than its global competitors, it could secure a decisive economic advantage, potentially increasing the country’s output by £140bn by 2030. Their preliminary analysis specifically focuses on legal services as an area where removing “unnecessary legal barriers” could generate billions of dollars in value over the next decade.

However, the legal community, which is supposed to be the beneficiary of this deregulation, is not seeking exemption. In its formal response, the Law Society made clear that the existing framework is sufficiently robust. The friction lies not in the rules themselves, but in the lack of certainty surrounding them. Two-thirds of lawyers are already using AI tools, but confusion remains the main brake on deeper integration.

Headshot of Ian Jeffrey, CEO of The Law Society.

Ian Jeffrey, CEO of The Law Society, said: “AI innovation is essential to the legal sector and is already gaining significant momentum. The existing legal and regulatory framework supports progress. The main challenges do not come from regulatory burden, but rather from the uncertainty, costs, data and skills associated with AI implementation.”

Experts want a practical roadmap, not a regulatory overhaul. Businesses are now navigating gray areas when it comes to liability and data protection. Lawyers need definitive answers on whether client data needs to be anonymized before entering it into AI platforms, and they need standardized protocols for data security and storage.

When errors occur, the questions become even more difficult. If an AI tool generates harmful legal advice, it is currently unclear who is responsible (i.e., lawyers, companies, developers, insurance companies, etc.). There is also ambiguity regarding oversight requirements, specifically whether all instances of AI deployment must be supervised by human lawyers.

Such concerns are particularly acute in “reserved legal activities” such as legal representation, conveyancing, and probate, where practitioners need to know whether the use of automated assistance violates their professional obligations.

AI law needs to maintain safeguards

The government has sought to reassure the public that there will be “red lines” in the sandbox to protect fundamental rights and safety. However, the Law Society remains wary of any moves that could weaken consumer protection in the name of speed.

“Technological advances in the legal field should not expose clients and consumers to unregulated risks,” Jeffrey said. “The current regulations for the profession reflect the safeguards that Parliament has deemed essential to protect clients and the public. This ensures confidence in the English and Welsh legal system around the world.”

The agency intends to cooperate with the “legal services sandbox”, but only if it upholds professional standards rather than flouting them. A priority for the Law Society is to maintain the integrity of the justice system in the age of AI.

“The Law Society strongly supports innovation as long as it maintains professional integrity and operates within a strong regulatory environment,” Jeffrey explained. “Government needs to work with legal regulators and institutions to ensure compliance with professional standards in this area. Changes to legal regulations must include parliamentary oversight.”

See also: Inside China’s push to apply AI across its energy system

Want to learn more about AI and big data from industry leaders? Check out the AI ​​& Big Data Expo in Amsterdam, California, and London. This comprehensive event is part of TechEx and co-located with other major technology events. Click here for more information.

AI News is brought to you by TechForge Media. Learn about other upcoming enterprise technology events and webinars.

Girl Scout cookie season is here! Check out the 2026 lineup.

0

play

Girl Scout cookie season is finally here!

Girl Scouts of America, a girl-led entrepreneurship program, is preparing to sell some of its most famous cookies, including Thin Mints, through spring.

As if that wasn’t exciting enough news for cookie lovers around the world, GSUSA is also adding a new cookie to its lineup: Exploremores. Exploremores are rocky road ice cream-inspired sandwich cookies that “reflect the spirit of exploration at the heart of every Girl Scout.”

Proceeds from the sale of each box of Girl Scout cookies, including Exploremore, go to local troops and councils to fund “life-changing programs, experiences and learning” throughout the year, according to GSUSA.

Girl Scouts also develop the leadership and entrepreneurial skills needed for a “bright future” while working to earn the coveted My First Cookie Business, My Cookie Customer, and My Cookie Team badges. GSUSA also works closely with Adobe, the national sponsor of the 2026 Girl Scout Cookie Program.

“Girl Scout cookie season is always a moment of joy and tradition, but this year promises to be incredibly exciting,” Wendy Lu, who oversees the cookie program, said in a statement.

“We’re excited to introduce new and delicious Exploremores™ cookies to our lineup of iconic cookies that people know and love,” added Lu. “With every purchase, consumers directly support the ability of local Girl Scouts to explore more opportunities in STEM, the outdoors, and more.”

Here’s what you need to know about the 2026 Girl Scout cookie season, including the flavors that will make up the lineup.

Are Girl Scout cookies available yet?

Nationally, cookie season is recognized to start from January to April, but the timing varies by region. There are several ways to find out when cookies go on sale in your area or where you can get them near you.

girl scout cookie flavor

This season, 11 different cookie flavors are available, including a new flavor called “Exploremores.” Consumers looking to get their hands on Toast-Yay! The S’mores fix is ​​out of luck, as these two cookie flavors were discontinued at the end of the 2025 season.

According to the Girl Scouts, available varieties vary by region, so check with your local Girl Scout council to see what’s available near you, or enter your zip code on the “Meet the Cookie” page.

Here’s the complete list of this year’s flavors:

  • adventurous person: A luxurious brownie-inspired cookie topped with caramel-flavored cream flavored with sea salt.
  • caramel chocolate chip: A chewy cookie with rich caramel, semi-sweet chocolate chips, and a hint of sea salt.
  • caramel delitz | Samoa: Crispy cookie with caramel, coconut, and chocolate stripes
  • Peanut butter sandwich | Dosidos: Crispy oatmeal sandwich cookie with peanut butter filling
  • See more details: Cookie sandwiched with chocolate, marshmallow, and almond-flavored cream.
  • lemonade: Flavorful and refreshing shortbread cookie topped with tangy lemon-flavored icing
  • lemon ups: Crispy lemon cookies baked with a touching message
  • Peanut butter patty | Tagalong people: Crispy cookies layered with peanut butter and covered with chocolate coating.
  • thin mint: Crispy chocolate cookies coated with delicious mint chocolate coating.
  • toffee flavor: Rich and buttery cookies and sweet and crunchy toffee bits
  • mitsuba: Shortbread cookies inspired by the original Girl Scout cookie recipe

How to purchase Girl Scout Cookies

Purchasing Girl Scout cookies is easy.

  • If you know a Girl Scout, please contact her.
  • Check with your local government or use the Girl Scout Cookie Finder by entering your zip code. (These resources can help you find a troop selling at a booth near you. You can also purchase cookies shipped directly from troops across the country.)
  • For Girl Scout Cookies news, text COOKIES to 59618.

Contributor: Melina Khan, USA Today

Former CIA employee who spied for Russia dies

0

play

Aldrich Ames, a former CIA counterintelligence officer who gained notoriety as a double agent for the Soviet Union and later Russia, has died. He was 84 years old.

Ames, who was serving a life sentence without parole at the Federal Correctional Facility in Cumberland, Maryland, died on January 5, the Federal Bureau of Prisons confirmed to USA TODAY. The agency’s inmate database did not list the cause of death or place of death.

Ames is said to be one of the most harmful spies in the history of American counterintelligence. The FBI said Ames acted as a double agent and compromised intelligence by leaking classified documents and the identities of CIA and FBI sources. Soviet authorities eventually executed some of the sources.

In February 1994, Ames was arrested by the Federal Bureau of Investigation on suspicion of espionage. He later pleaded guilty to spying for Moscow and was sentenced to life in prison without parole.

At the time of Ames’ arrest, the FBI said he was a 31-year veteran of the Central Intelligence Agency and was believed to have been spying for the Soviet Union and Russia since 1985. Federal authorities also accused Ames’ wife, Rosario Ames, of aiding and abetting espionage.

Ames’ espionage efforts made him one of the highest-paid spies in history, according to the Center for Security Excellence Development. He received a total of $4.6 million for espionage.

His case sparked widespread scrutiny of vulnerabilities within the CIA and shook confidence in the federal agency.

Ames information led to ‘at least 100’ US intelligence operations being compromised

Ames was born in River Falls, Wisconsin, in 1941, the son of an alcoholic CIA officer. He later became a CIA case officer specializing in Russian intelligence, according to the FBI.

Throughout his career, Ames worked in New York City and other countries including Türkiye, Mexico, and Italy. He was assigned to the CIA’s Soviet/Eastern European Division in 1985, where he “secretly volunteered to join the KGB staff at the Soviet Embassy in Washington, D.C.,” the FBI said.

The Center for Security Excellence Development said Mr. Ames was deeply in debt when he began selling classified information to the Soviet government.

“Information he provided led to the compromise of at least 100 U.S. intelligence operations and the execution of at least 10 U.S. intelligence sources,” the center said. “He eventually revealed to the Soviet government the names of all American agents operating in the country.”

Federal authorities tipped off after employees disappeared at an ‘alarming rate’

The Center for the Development of Security Excellence said the CIA and FBI were tipped off to learn that agents were “disappearing at an alarming rate,” and the FBI learned that Russian officials recruited by the United States were being arrested and executed.

“These human sources provided important intelligence information about the Soviet Union that was used by U.S. policymakers in determining U.S. foreign policy,” the FBI said.

The FBI began its investigation in May 1993 after reviewing information about “Ames’ unexplained wealth,” according to the bureau. After a 10-month investigation and raid of Ames’ residence, the FBI discovered documents and other information linking Ames to Russian foreign intelligence.

Ames was arrested by the FBI in February 1994 in Arlington, Virginia. Later, in April 1994, he confessed and pleaded guilty to charges of espionage and conspiracy to commit tax evasion.

Mega Millions winning numbers for January 6th drawing: $180 million jackpot

0

After the first drawing of the year was held on January 2nd, the Mega Millions jackpot rose to $180 million ahead of the drawing on Tuesday, January 6th, as no one took home the big prize.

If someone is lucky enough to win the jackpot tonight, they have two options. You will receive a one-time cash payment of $81.9 million or an immediate payment, followed by an annual check that is 5% higher than the previous year.

Last year was an active year for Mega Millions, with 2025 producing six different winners. The latest incident occurred on December 2nd in New Jersey, where a player won a $90 million jackpot.

Check below to see if you won the Mega Millions jackpot on Tuesday, January 6th.

What are the winning Mega Millions numbers for January 6, 2026?

The winning numbers for the January 6, 2026 Mega Millions drawing are 9, 39, 47, 58, 68 and the Mega Ball is 24.

Top 10 Mega Millions Jackpots

  • August 8, 2023, $1.602 billion in Florida.
  • $1.537 billion in South Carolina on October 23, 2018
  • January 1, 2023, $1.348 billion in Maine
  • July 29, 2022, $1.337 billion in Illinois
  • December 27, 2024, $1.269 billion in California
  • $1.128 billion in New Jersey on March 26, 2024
  • January 22, 2021, $1.05 billion in Michigan
  • $983 million in Georgia on November 14, 2025
  • $810 million in Texas on September 10, 2024
  • March 30, 2012, $656 million in Illinois, Kansas, and Maryland

What is Mega Millions?

Mega Millions is a lottery that is played in 45 states, the District of Columbia, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.

Each ticket costs $5, and players can choose six numbers from two different number pools: five different numbers from 1 to 70 (white balls) and one number from 1 to 24 (gold mega ball), or choose Easy Pick/Quick Pick.

If you match all six winning numbers in the drawing, you win the jackpot. If there are multiple jackpot winners, the jackpot prize will be shared.

How to play Mega Millions

To play Mega Millions, you must purchase a ticket. This can be done at several locations, including local convenience stores, gas stations, and grocery stores. In some states, you can purchase Mega Millions tickets online.

Once you have your ticket, you have to choose six numbers. Five of them are white balls numbered 1-70. The golden mega ball ranges from 1 to 24.

If you’re feeling particularly unlucky or don’t want to go through the hassle of picking, you can request a “quick pick” or “easy pick.” These options let your computer randomly generate numbers.

Mega Millions tickets have built-in multipliers that increase your non-jackpot prize by 2, 3, 4, 5, or 10 times. Previously, players had to pay an extra dollar to add a “Megaplier”.

Where can I buy lottery tickets?

Mega Millions tickets can be purchased directly at gas stations, convenience stores, and grocery stores. Some airport terminals may also sell lottery tickets.

You can also order tickets online through Jackpocket, the USA TODAY Network’s official digital lottery courier, in the following U.S. states and territories: Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Idaho, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Puerto Rico, Washington, DC, and West Virginia.

The Jackpocket app allows you to choose your lottery games and numbers, place your order, check your tickets, and claim your winnings, all using your phone or home computer.

The lottery winning numbers sponsors are: Jackpocket, USA TODAY Network’s official digital lottery delivery company.

Jackpocket is the official digital lottery carrier of USA TODAY Network. Gannett may earn revenue from viewer referrals to the Jackpocket Service. Must be 18 years or older, 21 years or older in Arizona, 19 years or older in Nebraska. Not affiliated with any state lottery. Gambling problem? Call 1-877-8-HOPE-NY or text HOPENY (467369) (NY). 1-800-327-5050 (MA); 1-877-MYLIMIT (OR); 1-800-981-0023 (PR); 1-800-GAMBLER (ALL OTHERS). visit jackpocket.com/tos Over the entire period.

Fernando Cervantes Jr. is a trending news reporter for USA TODAY. Contact us at fernando.cervantes@gannett.com and follow us at X @fern_cerv_.

Grok “undresses” women in a series of posts. It’s not the first time.

0

play

On December 31st, xAI’s Grok was prompted by a user on X to write a “heartfelt apology” after the chatbot generated and shared an image of two young girls in sexual attire based on a user’s prompt. In his apology, Grok said this was due to “inadequate safety measures”. But since then, the number of women and girls being digitally “undressed” by bots has increased.

Conservative influencer Ashley St. Clair, who has a child with Elon Musk, was the target of a digital attack, she wrote. People X, formerly Twitter, used Grok to generate sexualized images of her. One of them featured a photo of 14-year-old St. Clair. Other users reported that Grok had edited their photos to “make them in bikinis.”

One such woman is British-based content creator Bella Wallersteiner, who posted a selfie on X on December 31st wishing her approximately 100,000 followers a Happy New Year. She scrolled through the replies and liked the positive tweets. Then she saw a photo of herself wearing a “Hello Kitty micro bikini.” The photo was edited and published without her consent, Wallersteiner told USA TODAY on January 6.

This trend is part of a growing problem that experts call image-based sexual abuse, where deepfake non-consensual intimate images (NCII) are used to degrade or exploit others. Although anyone can be a victim, 90% of victims of image-based sexual abuse are women.

Wallersteiner’s first reaction was “embarrassment and embarrassment.” It wasn’t the first time she’d been harassed online, but it felt different. This was my first experience with deepfake sexual images. She started blaming herself, wondering if she should have been more careful about posting selfies and personal content on the internet. But then I saw another creator in the UK post that the same thing had happened to him.

“I thought this was ‘me’ problem. I didn’t know that hundreds of other women were affected,” she says. Seeing how widespread this issue was, she felt confident speaking out. Now she hopes her story will help prevent this from happening to other women.

“This is not just about sexual images of girls and women. It’s broader than that,” Leora Tannenbaum, author of “Sexy Selfie Nation,” told USA TODAY after a number of women had their photos allegedly altered by Grok in July. “This is all about taking control and power away from girls and women.”

xAI did not respond to USA TODAY’s request for comment.

This can reduce the AI’s ability to flag inappropriate prompts. Grok’s “spicy mode” lets you do just that.

This is not the first time Grok has been subjected to this type of surveillance. A similar incident was reported in July. However, Grok’s “spicy mode” was released in August as part of xAI’s image and video generation feature, Grok Imagine.

USA TODAY asked Grok on January 6th whether “spicy mode” could be used to alter the image of a real person in a conversation with a bot on X. “Yes, Grok Imagine’s spicy mode can be used to alter or edit images of real people in provocative or NSFW ways, such as removing clothing, adding suggestive elements, or creating sexualized versions,” the bot replied, acknowledging that the feature is “controversial.”

When asked how the bot obtains consent from the individuals whose photos have been altered, the bot replied, “I don’t get consent from anyone, because I’m an AI tool and not a human being who can ask or obtain permission on your behalf.”

You can block or disable Grok, but you can’t always prevent it from changing its content. Another user could tag Grok in a reply and request an edit to your photo, but you wouldn’t know it because Grok is blocked.

A more effective solution is to make your profile private, but not all users want to take that step.

The “Take It Down” law aims to combat non-consensual sexual images. Is it working?

In May 2025, the Take It Down Act was signed into law to combat non-consensual intimate images, including deepfakes and revenge porn.

Although most states have laws protecting people from non-consensual intimate images and sexual deepfakes, victims struggle to remove images from websites, increasing the likelihood that they will continue to circulate and re-traumatize victims. The law requires websites and online platforms to remove non-consensual intimate images upon notification from the victim and within 48 hours of a confirmed request.

But if you scroll through Grok’s replies on X, the bot’s page is littered with rapidly generated, explicit, doctored photos of women.

AI-powered programs that digitally undress women (also known as “nudification” apps) have been around for years, but until now they have been largely confined to the dark corners of the internet, such as niche websites and Telegram channels, and typically require a certain level of effort or payment.

X’s innovation has lowered the barrier to entry. And even if the photo is deleted, the damage done to the victim will not be completely erased.

“Those who use Grok to create illegal content will suffer the same consequences as those who upload illegal content,” Musk said on January 3. In another post, he reshared an image of a toaster with a bikini on it, captioning it, “Glok can put a bikini on anything,” along with a laughing emoji.

Affected users want to hold X accountable and see real changes

In June, 21-year-old Twitch streamer and photographer Evie was among a group of women who had their images sexualized on X. After posting a selfie on her page, an anonymous user asked Grok to edit the image in a highly sexualized manner, using language to circumvent the filters set by the bot. Grok then replied to the post with the generated image attached.

“I was just shocked to see that a bot built into a platform like X could do something like that,” she told USA TODAY in a video chat in July, a month after the first incident.

In response to Grok’s recent controversy, Evie wrote on January 5th, “There are over 100 instances where Grok has created sexually explicit images of me, including me naked… We cannot allow anyone to recover from this within a week. Hold everyone involved accountable.”

Wallersteiner shared her story on LinkedIn and was pleasantly surprised by the support she received from her colleagues and others in her professional network.

“I hope that in the future more women will be able to talk about this type of activity when they are victims of it,” she says.

Many of Wallersteiner’s photos have been removed, but she says new demands keep coming, especially as she continues to speak out. Although she has no intention of taking legal action against X or xAI, she wants the UK to enact legislation on deepfake NCII that protects victims from this type of abuse and holds tech companies accountable.

For now, she’s still using X, but is questioning her choice. “X has become an increasingly hateful platform and not a shining place for women,” she says.

Evie also wants to see visible change and is staying with X. Although she would like to believe that she “didn’t really feel it,” she found herself becoming more cautious about the photos she posted, worried about whether she was showing too much skin that an AI bot could easily remove her clothes. “I always think, ‘Is there a way someone could do something with these photos?'”

Contribution: AJ Vicens and Raphael Satter, Reuters

S&P 500, Dow rise to record highs amid economic and technology optimism

0

play

U.S. markets got off to a strong start in 2026, with the S&P 500 and the blue-chip Dow index closing at new records as investors avoided the Venezuela incident and other potential geopolitical risks and focused on economic and corporate news.

“It’s early in the year, but so far the market doesn’t seem to be too concerned about developments in South America,” said Brett Kenwell, a U.S. investment analyst at online brokerage eToro.

The S&P 500 rose 0.62% (42.77 points) to close at a record high of 6,944.82. The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 0.99% (484.90 points) to close at $49,462.08, marking the first time in history it had closed above $49,000. The tech-heavy Nasdaq rose 0.65% (151.351 points) to close at 23,547.173.

“The calendar says 2026, but the theme for 2025 is still in progress,” said Chris Larkin, managing director of E*TRADE trading and investments at Morgan Stanley. “The market is on track with geopolitics so far, and the first trading week of the new year could revolve around whether the tech industry gains a foothold from its year-end stumbles.”

Technology gets stronger at CES

Memory and storage technology stocks rose after Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang gave details about upcoming artificial intelligence processors, including a new storage technology layer, at the annual Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas.

SanDisk rose 27.56%, Western Digital rose 16.77%, Seagate Technology rose 14%, and Micron Technology rose 10.04%, with all four stocks hitting new all-time highs.

“I think it’s going to be a very strong earnings season for Big Tech,” said Jed Ellerbrook, portfolio manager at Argent Capital in St. Louis. Ellerbrook expects companies to announce plans to invest more money in upcoming earnings calls.

The next earnings season begins next week, when activity for the last three months of 2025 will be reported.

Oil prices fall, but energy stocks rise

Crude oil prices fell, dropping 2.38% to close at $56.93 per barrel. Venezuela’s share of global oil production is less than 1%, limiting downside risks to the energy market.

But Adrian Herfeldt, chief investment officer of multi-asset strategies at Westwood, said oil refiners and energy services companies on Mexico’s Gulf Coast will have a meaningful opportunity to rebuild their infrastructure once the political situation stabilizes.

Companies like Chevron and Exxon Mobil soared on these expectations, but gave back some of their gains on January 6th.

No recession expected

Economists say there are many expectations for the U.S. economy.

“We expect the economy to benefit in early 2026 from a surge in government refunds from the personal tax cuts included in the One Big Beautiful Bill,” said Stephen Ricciuto, chief U.S. economist at Mizuho Securities. He also said the economy should begin to feel the full benefits of last year’s Federal Reserve interest rate cuts.

(Reuters contributed to this article.)

Medora Lee is USA TODAY’s money, markets and personal finance reporter. Please contact us at mjlee@usatoday.com. Subscribe to our free Daily Money newsletter for personal finance tips and business news every Monday through Friday morning.

White House says military deployment to Greenland is ‘always an option’

0

play

As President Donald Trump and administration officials renew their interest in annexing Greenland, White House press secretary Caroline Levitt said in a statement on January 6 that “the use of the U.S. military is always an option.”

President Trump has repeatedly suggested buying the ice-covered Arctic island from Denmark and has refused to rule out seizing the resource-rich land by military force.

“President Trump has made it clear that acquiring Greenland is a national security priority for the United States and essential to deterring adversaries in the Arctic,” Levitt said in a statement obtained by USA TODAY. “The President and his team are discussing various options for pursuing this important foreign policy objective, and of course the use of the U.S. military is always an option at the discretion of the Commander-in-Chief.”

The leaders of France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain, the United Kingdom and Denmark pushed back against the U.S. threat that emerged after the Trump administration’s detention of Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro.

“Greenland belongs to the people. Denmark and Greenland, and they alone, decide matters concerning Denmark and Greenland,” the leaders said in a January 6 statement.

Greenland is an autonomous territory of Denmark, a NATO member state, with a population of approximately 57,000 people. President Trump has argued that annexing Greenland is necessary for national security, pointing to Greenland’s large amounts of important minerals and strategic location.

“We absolutely need Greenland. We need it for our defense,” President Trump said in an interview published on January 4, noting that the island is reportedly “surrounded by Russian and Chinese ships.”

White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller echoed similar sentiments in a Jan. 5 CNN interview, dodging a question about whether the U.S. would use military force in Greenland. “No one will fight the United States militarily over the future of Greenland,” Miller said.

The public belligerence comes after the Wall Street Journal reported on January 6, citing unnamed sources, that Secretary of State Marco Rubio told lawmakers at a press conference on January 5 that the threat was “not an indication of an imminent invasion” and that the goal was to acquire territory.

Greenland’s Prime Minister Jens Frederik Nielsen has repeatedly criticized President Trump’s interest in colonizing Greenland, saying in December that “the United States must not occupy Greenland.”

Greenland threat sparks domestic backlash

In response to the Trump administration’s threats, Sens. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.) and Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), co-chairs of the Senate NATO Oversight Group under the Congressional Foreign Relations Committee, issued a bipartisan statement.

“Once Denmark and Greenland make clear that Greenland is not for sale, the United States must honor its treaty obligations and respect the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Kingdom of Denmark,” the senators said.

Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska added in a statement on X that she remains “hopeful” that the administration’s threats are “nothing more than a sham.” “As we chart Greenland’s future, we must view Greenland as an ally rather than an asset, and focus on continued partnership rather than ownership,” Murkowski said.

Democratic Sen. Ruben Gallego has introduced an amendment to the Senate defense appropriations bill that would halt funding for military forces in Greenland.

“What’s happening in Venezuela shows we can’t just ignore President Trump’s reckless threats. His dangerous actions are putting American lives and global credibility at risk,” Gallego said in a statement.

In the House, Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee called Trump’s comments “destabilizing and dangerous” and said they would “undermine” the NATO alliance.

“Americans voted for affordability at home, not threats to invade our closest friends abroad,” the committee’s minority said in a statement on X.

“The way we’re treating them is truly humiliating and there’s no good in it. It only angers our NATO allies and creates mistrust,” Nebraska Republican Rep. Don Bacon said in a Jan. 6 CNN interview.

Contributors: Joey Garrison, Carissa Wadick, Kinsey Crowley – america today

ZOA Energy agrees to a $3 million settlement. Here’s how to get the pieces.

0

play

The popular energy drink brand co-owned by Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson has agreed to a $3 million class action lawsuit settlement after being accused of using deceptive marketing tactics.

ZOA Energy was sued in the Northern District of California on October 23, 2023, alleging that its beverages contained chemical preservatives, even though the company originally advertised that its beverages were preservative-free.

“ZOA’s claims that its products have ‘zero preservatives’ are false because each product contains significant amounts of the preservative citric acid,” the federal complaint obtained by USA TODAY states.

ZOA Energy agreed to the settlement without admitting any wrongdoing, according to court records.

“ZOA denies these allegations and maintains that its labeling and marketing are truthful, accurate, and in compliance with applicable law,” the document states.

The class action lawsuit also claimed that the energy drink contained another chemical preservative in the form of ascorbic acid. Following the settlement announcement, plaintiffs’ attorneys established a registration period for their clients to receive compensation.

USA TODAY reached out to ZOA Energy for comment on Tuesday, January 6th.

Here’s what affected consumers need to know about the $3 million settlement fund.

Who is eligible for ZOA Energy’s settlement payments?

According to the settlement’s website, customers who purchased ZOA energy drinks labeled with “zero preservatives” between March 1, 2021 and November 21, 2025 will be eligible for cash payments.

To qualify, customers must have proof of purchase.

Those without certification are entitled to $1 for every energy drink purchase, or up to $10 per household. Those with proof of purchase can also receive $1 per energy drink, but the threshold is higher at $150 per household.

The settlement registration period runs until February 20, and customers are asked to submit their claims online.

When will the ZOA Energy settlement be paid?

A final approval hearing for the $3 million settlement is scheduled for March 26 at 10 a.m. Pacific Time, according to the settlement’s website.

“The proposed relief to class participants will be provided only upon final court approval of the settlement and after the appeal, if any, is resolved in favor of the settlement,” the website states.

What happens if I do nothing or opt out?

According to the website, consumers who do not sign up “waive their right to sue (ZOA Energy) for claims released by settlement” and will not receive funds.

Consumers who wish to remove themselves from the process must opt ​​out by February 13, 2026. By opting out, individuals retain the right to sue ZOA Energy, LLC in a class action lawsuit. However, they will not receive any money from the settlement.

Fernando Cervantes Jr. is a trending news reporter for USA TODAY. Contact us at fernando.cervantes@gannett.com and follow us at X @fern_cerv_.

President Trump freezes $10 billion in child care and family support funds to five states

0

play

WASHINGTON, Jan 6 (Reuters) – President Donald Trump’s administration is freezing more than $10 billion in federal child care and family assistance funds to California, Colorado, Illinois, Minnesota and New York, citing concerns about fraud and abuse, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) said.

Since taking office, the Trump administration has threatened to cut federal funding to organizations and states over a number of issues, from allegations of fraud in programs in Democratic-run states to diversity efforts and pro-Palestinian college protests over attacks on Gaza by U.S. ally Israel.

On January 6, HHS announced that it had notified five states with Democratic governors that they would be freezing $2.4 billion in Child Care Development Funds, $7.35 billion in Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, and $869 million in Social Services Block Grants.

The province’s access to these funds will be restricted pending further review, the department said in a statement.

Democrats denounced the freeze. “Our state should not be a political pawn in the battle that Donald Trump seems to be waging with blue state governors,” New York Governor Kathy Hochul said, adding the move was “vindictive” and “cruel.”

The Trump administration has singled out Minnesota in recent weeks, alleging rampant immigration fraud in its welfare and social services programs.

Trump administration officials have frequently and sharply attacked the state’s largest Somali community, as well as Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, a 2024 Democratic vice presidential candidate, and Ilhan Omar, a Somali-American Democratic congresswoman who represents a Minneapolis-based congressional district.

Human rights activists say the Trump administration is using the fraudulent investigation as a pretext to target immigrants and political opponents more broadly.

(Reporting by Kanishka Singh and Kostas Pitas; Editing by Christian Schmollinger and Thomas Derpinhaus)

Where top candidates land

0

play

When you start the music, the merry-go-round will start moving.

The NFL regular season has ended, and the offseason has begun for 18 of the league’s 32 teams. After all, every minute is precious to those who missed the playoffs. The moment Tyler Roop’s field goal went wide right on “Sunday Night Football” ended the Baltimore Ravens’ season, it was time for several coaches to walk off the stage in conjunction with the NFL’s “Black Monday.”

It was a mostly uneventful day across the league, but four head coaches were given pink slips, leaving a total of six vacancies before offseason activities get into full swing.

Then the Baltimore Ravens decided to start the merry-go-round by parting ways with John Harbaugh after 18 seasons. This is a move that will completely change the entire coaching world this offseason.

There are currently seven head coaching vacancies this season. The Tennessee Titans and New York Giants avoided “Black Monday” by waiving Brian Callahan and Brian Daboll midway through the season. At season’s end, the Las Vegas Raiders, Atlanta Falcons, Cleveland Browns, Arizona Cardinals, and Baltimore Ravens followed suit.

Now, it’s a big game of musical chairs where you never know where everyone will end up when the music stops.

Which coaching candidates will ultimately land potential jobs across the NFL? Here are USA TODAY Sports’ predictions for the NFL’s 2026 recruiting cycle.

NFL Coach Landing Prediction 2026

Arizona Cardinals: Clint Kubiak, Seattle Seahawks offensive coordinator

The Cardinals have felt like a forgotten franchise at times and may have the worst head coach at the moment. Arizona’s quarterback situation remains uncertain, with big questions surrounding Kyler Murray hanging over the organization.

To make matters worse, the Cardinals will enter the 2026 NFL Draft with the No. 3 pick in a two-quarterback class at best. Barring a trade or some interesting business, the Cardinals won’t find a solution during the draft. It seems like the bad outweighs the good at this point. Arizona currently plays in a loaded NFC West with no real way to compete.

It’s natural to wonder if the Cardinals could find a better talent than Jonathan Gannon. In a world where there are only 32 openings, someone is bound to get the job, but will that be the best candidate? That’s hard to imagine. The Cardinals feel like a team ready to follow the Kellen Moore path the Saints did last offseason. It worked well for them.

Perhaps poaching an offensive coordinator from a division rival will pay off in more ways than one. Kubiak led Seattle’s offense this season, averaging 28.4 points per game and ranking third in the league in scoring. For a Cardinals team in need of direction, Kubiak is perfect for the job.

Atlanta Falcons: Kevin Stefanski, former Cleveland Browns head coach

The Falcons have perhaps the league’s most attractive head coach opening. At least that was the case until the Ravens fired John Harbaugh. Either way, Atlanta has skill position players in a division they can win every year. Stefanski will have to contend with the Philadelphia Eagles, Dallas Cowboys and Washington Commanders in the NFC East, but he doesn’t have the same threat anywhere in the NFC South.

Between that and Atlanta’s general manager absence, the former Browns coach could step into the situation with a clean slate and win right away.

The quarterback situation is far from resolved, but if Stefanski believes in Michael Penix Jr., this is a home run. Despite countless issues this season, the Falcons finished tied for first place in the NFC South with an 8-9 record. With better coaching and another year of development for some of the team’s younger players, a quick turnaround could be possible.

They don’t have a first-round pick in 2026, so that’s a negative. But Stefanski would likely welcome the idea of ​​calling plays for Bejan Robinson and Drake Rondon, two players who weren’t with the Browns during their time in Cleveland.

Baltimore Ravens: Jesse Minter, Los Angeles Chargers defensive coordinator

Baltimore fired John Harbaugh on Jan. 6, leaving a huge void for a potential Super Bowl contender and sending shockwaves through the NFL coaching merry-go-round. Despite these high expectations, the Ravens fell far short of winning a championship in 2025, but this roster remains talented, led by two-time league MVP Lamar Jackson.

It makes sense to think the Ravens would choose an offensive-minded coach to pair with Jackson, but why not dip into the old coaching staff that once patrolled the sidelines in Baltimore? Minter is not Harbaugh, but he was part of the Ravens’ coaching line under the former manager.

A close relationship with Harbaugh could be enough to eliminate him. But if Mike McDonald was in charge of the Ravens right now, no one in Baltimore would be upset. The Seahawks coach led Seattle to the No. 1 seed in the NFC and is currently one of the best coaches in the sport.

Perhaps the Ravens can find their next great coach in Minter, who profiles as a solid leader who can also fix the team’s poor defense. In that world, keeping Todd Monken as offensive coordinator wouldn’t be out of the realm of possibility. As it turned out, offense wasn’t the problem for Baltimore.

Cleveland Browns: John Harbaugh, former Baltimore Ravens head coach

Harbaugh is currently at the top of the top storyline on the coaching merry-go-round. The Browns may not have the most glamorous job, but they offer some things that other teams don’t. Harbaugh is an Ohio State native who also played college football at Miami (Ohio).

Perhaps there is a desire to return to your roots without going far. After all, his younger brother Jim did it at the University of Michigan and coached his alma mater. Harbaugh would immediately add credibility to a Browns organization that has lacked credibility in recent years.

Jimmy Haslam could back up the Brinks truck and increase the franchise’s profile by giving Harbaugh everything he wants and more.

The Browns are still rebuilding and it’s anyone’s guess whether Harbaugh will accept that. But after his sudden departure, he will have the opportunity to play against the Ravens twice a year. For a player like Harbaugh, who already has a Super Bowl ring on his back, building the Browns into a championship contender could be appealing.

Las Vegas Raiders: Brian Flores, Minnesota Vikings defensive coordinator

Tom Brady seems determined to rebuild the behemoth he was in mid-2010. He tried unsuccessfully to sign Pete Carroll in 2025. I took the Seahawks off that list. Now he could set his sights on his former team, the Patriots, and bring Flores to the team.

Without a doubt, Flores is an attractive candidate. He has regularly coached some of the league’s better, more offensive defenses. Things didn’t end well in Miami. Flores is also suing the league and several teams. These lawsuits were filed in 2022 alleging racial discrimination in the hiring process.

But none of that would prevent the Raiders from hiring Flores. In fact, he may be one of those coaches who improves after being given a second chance. Will Daboll also be the one to join Flores in the desert? Given the dysfunction the past few seasons, the Raiders need a steadying force like Flores.

New York Giants: Jeff Hafley, Green Bay Packers defensive coordinator

If there’s one thing I like about the Giants, it’s the connection they have with the coaches they ultimately hire. Daboll was a disciple of Bill Belichick, as was Joe Judge. Pat Shermer previously worked for Steve Spagnuolo, who had a relationship with Tom Coughlin in the good old days, as well as Ben McAdoo.

Hafley doesn’t have those connections, but he does have ties to the area. The Packers defensive coordinator from Montvale, New Jersey, has a long coaching history dating back to 2001. He coached one season at Rutgers and also served as head coach at Boston College from 2020-2023.

It may not be the flashy hire fans want, but you can’t steal headlines and win games. Hafley’s defense took a step back in Green Bay last month after losing Micah Parsons and Devonte Wyatt to season-ending injuries.

The injury isn’t Hafley’s fault, and he could be a good fit for the Giants if they can bring in a solid offensive coordinator.

Tennessee Titans: Mike McCarthy, former Dallas Cowboys head coach

McCarthy appears determined to take the head coaching job this offseason. The former Cowboys coach was on the sideline after parting ways with Dallas after the 2024 season.

Now, he seems ready to get back into coaching and feels Tennessee is the perfect fit. The 62-year-old likely doesn’t want a long-term rebuild, but that’s not guaranteed with the Titans. But if he’s a fan of Cam Ward, McCarthy could afford to help shape the roster he envisions.

Offense has never been an issue for McCarthy’s teams, and he is one of the most established coaches available this offseason.

The Titans will also want to take steps in the right direction before moving to a new stadium in 2027. Like it or not, football is a business too, and selling a coach like McCarthy to fans is much easier than acquiring any coordinator in a lackluster cycle.

Do self-driving cars need to pass a driver’s test? Experts give their opinions

0

play

  • The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration collects crash data on self-driving cars, but has only issued voluntary guidelines about expectations for self-driving cars.
  • These guidelines were relaxed in April after industry groups successfully lobbied President Donald Trump’s administration to grant further waivers for safety testing.

If a 16-year-old needs to take a test to determine if they’re roadworthy, why shouldn’t they be given a self-driving car?

After all, we’ve all driven behind someone who stopped at a flashing yellow light or got confused by four cars entering a four-way stop at the same time. How do we know self-driving cars can handle these situations?

The idea had been circulating within the University of Michigan for years, even before the university’s mobility lab Mcity published its own tests on highly automated vehicles in 2019.

Four years later, on Oct. 2, the question remained when the university hosted a panel discussion with industry experts in Ann Arbor, Michigan, titled “How Secure Is Enough?”

That’s because there are still no federal standards to determine whether these vehicles on our roads meet the skills and abilities we expect from teenagers, and the industry is still pushing for self-driving cars.

So, how safe is safe enough?

“It’s a corporate decision that every AV company is making on their own right now,” said Greg Stevens, who is currently leading research at the Mcity test facility. Stevens, the former head of Ford Motor Co.’s advanced driver-assistance system called BlueCruise, added: ”

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration collects crash data on self-driving cars, but has only issued voluntary guidelines about expectations for self-driving cars.

These guidelines were relaxed in April after industry groups successfully lobbied President Donald Trump’s administration to grant further waivers for safety testing. Currently, automakers don’t have to share many details about why or how vehicles equipped with certain advanced driver-assistance or autonomous driving systems are involved in accidents, nor are there any tests these vehicles must pass before offering self-driving (such as yielding without stopping on a flashing yellow light) or even how to pull over when an ambulance passes by.

To make matters worse, the number of investigators investigating AV safety is decreasing. NHTSA will lose 4% of its workforce in 2025 amid efforts to reduce probationary employees across federal agencies.

The Washington Post reported that a group within NHTSA dedicated to investigating safety concerns about so-called self-driving technology had just seven people. Three of those seven were lost in the cut.

“The ability of AV developers, investors, automakers, and consumers to realize their full potential is hampered by government inaction,” John Bozella, president and CEO of the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, said this spring. “The time has come for America to move to the next phase of self-driving, and to do so we urgently need a regulatory framework and a pathway to the final and complete adoption of self-driving vehicles in the country.”

Who decides what is safe?

In the absence of federal standards, states that allow autonomous vehicles (AVs) to circulate must develop their own rules. Currently, 16 states in the United States have no laws regarding this technology.

The Department of Transportation’s new self-driving vehicle policy aims to accelerate the national rollout of autonomous vehicles, but it does not address what UM researchers believe is the most important barrier for AVs: the lack of national safety performance testing standards.

Ensuring that cars can merge onto the freeway without incident or always stop before hitting a pedestrian are just some of the areas that Mcity researchers determined self-driving cars must cross.

Greg McGuire, managing director at Mcity, said that if a test like the one devised at the university were adopted at the federal level, it would likely allay consumer concerns before getting into a self-driving car. Standardized tests that are viewed by the public, criticized and improved over time can only improve the functionality of these systems and make their actual capabilities more transparent.

“The public has no way of looking at a particular company, Company A or Company B, and knowing that this company has done good engineering and is actually trustworthy, but this company is cutting corners,” McGuire told the Free Press, part of the USA TODAY Network. “The systems on the road look the same, but the risk profiles are very different.”

While other safety agencies in the U.S. and around the world are working to develop similar tests, McGuire said no one has come up with a way to calculate the probability of an AV accident that the public would accept. Even robotaxi company Waymo, which shares its safety data publicly, can’t articulate how much better its Waymo driver system is than a human, he said.

However, according to the latest safety data, Waymo has calculated several key areas where human drivers fall short of Waymo’s track record. Waymo vehicles have reduced crashes with serious injuries by 91% and pedestrian crashes with injuries by 92% compared to the same distance traveled by an average human driver in the cities where we operate.

In addition to involving the public, local governments want to be more involved in the process of determining the safety of self-driving cars before opening their doors to them.

Ryan Russo, executive director of the National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO), said in a letter to NHTSA that when city representatives are responsible for road safety, it is not enough to leave the entire verification process to automakers and tech companies.

The letter was submitted to regulators in response to a request for comment on proposed voluntary rules for self-driving systems, weighing the pros and cons of deploying the technology on a large scale. The proposed rule is the ADS-Equipped Vehicle Safety, Transparency, and Evaluation Program, known as AV STEP.

“As proposed, AV STEP would provide the industry with near-complete oversight over the design, deployment, operation, and safety definition of vehicles, all while remaining unknown to consumers, passengers, and the traveling public,” Russo’s letter said. “NACTO, on behalf of local government officials who are most often responsible for road safety, requests that city officials be deeply involved in the investigation and reporting of participating vehicles.”

Done properly, autonomous vehicles offer an opportunity to make our roads safer, increase access to transportation for communities without reliable public transportation, and increase America’s competitiveness in international markets, Russo wrote. But if done haphazardly, introducing AVs to American streets will make cities less safe and more crowded.

How does that test work?

McGuire said that designing tests will not prevent companies from self-certifying the safety of their products, “but companies will need to publicly demonstrate that they have tested these AI-based systems and passed them through some level of rigor before deployment.”

Mcity researchers first published details of an AV safety test they developed in 2019 following several high-profile incidents involving self-driving vehicle technology. This is called the Mcity ABC test, where “A” stands for “Accelerated Assessment,” “B” stands for “Behavioral Capability Scenario,” and “C” stands for “Corner Case Test” (also known as a fringe case), where AVs are asked to deal with unexpected training situations.

University researchers compiled a total of 50 capability scenarios, but focused on seven to highlight the areas most needed for AVs to safely achieve before being considered roadworthy.

  • merge onto the highway
  • join the rotary
  • A vehicle cuts in front of another vehicle on the highway
  • A vehicle door opens in the path of another vehicle
  • Deer in the path of a vehicle turning a blind curve
  • Pedestrians crossing an intersection at a crosswalk without obeying traffic lights
  • The final test, an unprotected left turn, is when an AV needs to turn left while crossing a divided lane with no stop signs or streetlights to stop oncoming traffic.

The ABC test later evolved into the current Mcity Safety Evaluation Program and was first used in 2023 to evaluate May Mobility vehicles ahead of the Detroit Pilot Program. The vehicle was tested in two ways. One is the “driving license test,” which measures basic ability in normal traffic scenarios, and the other is the “driving intelligence test,” which is designed to challenge AV software with more dangerous simulations that are statistically more common in causing vehicle crashes, injuries, and fatalities.

“We believe the Mcity Safety Assessment Program will serve as a blueprint for a publicly visible safety framework that will help bring self-driving vehicle technology to market in a way that truly benefits society,” Mcity Director Henry Liu said in a statement.

While this test is a good start, some on the committee on October 2 added that it may also be necessary to test the “vehicle’s senses”, particularly the technology used to “see” and “hear” on the road.

Jean-Paul Velez, autonomous vehicle policy leader for the San Francisco County Department of Transportation, said there is a need to test vehicles in ways that are natural to humans.

“What we saw in San Francisco is that once fully driverless driving began, many of these vehicles started failing at things that human drivers wouldn’t necessarily fail at, such as driving as if there were emergency response vehicles on the road,” he said. Driverless cars “have a bit of a hard time pulling to the side or improvising a stop in situations where you need to do something a little more extraordinary than normal traffic rules.”

Cooper Lohr, senior policy analyst for transportation and safety at Consumer Reports, cited a nationally representative survey on fully self-driving technology conducted in late 2024 that found nearly 70% of consumers reported wanting stronger safety standards for self-driving cars than for regular passenger cars, and nearly 60% said they supported things like vision tests. Yes, even humans have to go through one of them.

“The broad takeaway from this is that consumers want adoption of this technology based on some binding and measurable criteria,” he said. “I think a lot of that comfort lies in the scenario of them taking over the driving duties, because the safety promises and potential safety benefits are not just assumed, they have to be proven.”

Jackie Charniga covers General Motors for the Free Press. Contact me at jcharniga@freepress.com.

The last words of the Brown shooter, who also killed an MIT professor, were ‘unlucky’.

0


Neves Valente does not provide a clear motive for the attack in the video, which is rambling and doesn’t necessarily make sense. But he made one thing clear: “I’m not going to apologize.”

Claudio Manuel Neves Valente said he had no remorse for last month’s mass shooting that killed two Brown University students and injured nine others, and for killing a Massachusetts Institute of Technology professor two days later, according to new records released by the Justice Department.

“Good luck…I didn’t like any of you,” Neves Valente, 48, says in the recording, in part, as her last words, according to a recording made public on Tuesday, January 6.

“I can say I was very happy, but I don’t regret what I did,” said Neves Valente, a Portuguese national and former Brown University student. “I’m not going to apologize, because no one in my lifetime has ever sincerely apologized to me.”

Neves Valente, who was recording videos in a New Hampshire storage facility, was found dead by authorities from a self-inflicted gunshot wound on Dec. 18, just five days after authorities said his killing spree began at Brown University. On December 13, Neves Valente opened fire on students preparing for their final exams, killing students Ella Cook and Muhammad Aziz Umurzokov and wounding nine others.

Two days later, on December 15, authorities announced that Neves Valente shot and killed MIT professor Nuno F.G. Loureiro at his home in the Boston suburb of Brookline, Massachusetts, about 80 miles north of Brown University. Neves Valente Loureiro attended the same academic program at a Portuguese university from 1995 to 2000.

Neves Valente does not provide a clear motive for the attack in the video, which is rambling and doesn’t necessarily make sense.

Here’s what else Neves Valente had to say:

Neves Valente ‘needed a catalyst’ for crime

Neves Valente did not say what his motive was, but according to the transcript, he said, “I needed a catalyst.”

“But in the first case, it’s the fact that I was faced, and in the second case, I was also faced, I guess you could say there was a little bit. So…” he said before the video ended.

Previously, he mentioned the possibility of fame.

“I don’t care what you judge me or what you think about me,” he said. “I don’t care at all about fame, accomplishments, manifestos and all that (expletive) stuff. I have zero patience for that.”

He said he probably had a lot more to say and write, but “I don’t care.”

“I’m not going to give you that right,” he said.

Neves Valente appears to be making fun of his student victims

At one point in the video, Neves Valente apparently mocked the students who fired the shots, saying they could have easily escaped through a nearby exit.

“I thought people had left, because they were kind of stupid,” he said with a laugh, according to the transcript. “There’s an emergency exit…the people who were hiding under the table, or whatever, could have totally gotten out of there.”

Neves Valente says she likes it when President Trump calls her an animal.

Among Neves Valente’s ramblings was a comment that he particularly liked when President Donald Trump said, “He said I was an animal, and that’s true. I’m an animal, and he’s an animal.”

Neves Valente appeared to be referring to President Trump’s remarks in May 2018, when he once again called for stricter immigration laws and called immigrants “animals.”

Neves Valente went on to say, “I have no hatred towards America.” Later he added: “I have no love for that either.”

He continued to say that coming to the United States was a mistake.

Neves Valente was preparing to commit suicide in the vault.

Neves Valente spent much of his time talking about his impending death and complaining about the injuries he sustained when he shot Loureiro.

“Honestly, my only regret is that this hit me,” he said with a laugh, according to the transcript.

He went on to say that it was time for him to leave “at his own discretion.”

“Now let’s see if I have the courage to do this myself, because it was very difficult to do it to all these people…I envy people who do it without difficulty, and these people really exist. That’s what I really envy. The rest means nothing to me. Let’s see if I have the courage.”

Who is Neves Valente?

Brown University President Christina Paxson told USA TODAY last month that Neves Valente was a student in Brown’s doctoral program from 2000 to 2001, but had since taken a leave of absence. He dropped out of school in 2003.

Paxson said Neves-Valente only took physics classes as a student and would have spent time at the Barth and Holly building where the shooting occurred.

Authorities said Neves Valente entered the United States legally from Portugal on a Diversity Visa Lottery Program (DV1) visa. He entered the program in 2017 and received a green card, according to Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem.

“This heinous individual should never have been tolerated in our country,” she said.

Contributor: Jeanine Santucci, USA TODAY

How to see the stars in the constellation Regulus, where the moon is located, on January 6th.

0

play

For stargazers and space enthusiasts who may have observed the first full moon of the year last week, another celestial event is just around the corner.

Tonight, bright stars will accompany and shine above the nearly full moon. The star, known as Regulus, is the brightest in the constellation Leo, one of the 12 constellations in the galaxy that share names with zodiac signs.

This star’s ascent is expected to occur in North America on the night of Tuesday, January 6, and here’s what you need to know to catch a glimpse of the constellation’s brightest star.

Where in the sky is Regulus?

Viewers will be able to catch a bright star just above the moon tonight as it rises. According to Space.com, the star should be easy to spot and shine brighter than the moon, but over time the moon may appear to be moving away from Regulus.

Stargazers in other parts of the world, including Eastern Europe, Asia and Russia, may also catch a glimpse of the moon passing in front of the star in a celestial event known as an occultation.

When will Regulus appear?

The star should shine brightly to observers around 8:50 p.m. local time, which is the best time for visibility, according to Space.com.

In addition to catching a glimpse of Regulus on Tuesday night, 2026 is shaping up to be a year full of big lunar events. A total lunar eclipse will occur in March and a partial lunar eclipse in parts of the world in August.

Kate Perez covers national trends and breaking news for USA TODAY. You can reach her at kperez@usatodayco.com or on Twitter @katecperez_.