Home Blog Page 391

Nick Reiner’s attorney Alan Jackson withdraws from murder case

0

play

LOS ANGELES — Nick Reiner’s attorney, Alan Jackson, has stepped down from a high-profile murder case in which he charged the 32-year-old with killing his parents, Rob Reiner and Michelle Reiner.

The sudden withdrawal delayed Reiner’s case just as it was about to begin. Mr. Reiner’s arraignment, which was scheduled for Wednesday, January 7, after an initial delay in December, is a formal court process in which defendants are informed of the allegations against them and, in many cases, enter a plea.

“I have no choice but to resign as a lawyer and seek dismissal,” Jackson told Judge Theresa McGonigle in court, after reminding him of his private discussions.

Mr. Jackson did not explain the nature of the discussion or the reason for his withdrawal. USA TODAY has reached out to Jackson for comment.

The judge allowed Jackson to recuse himself. Public defender Kimberly Green asked the court to postpone Reiner’s arraignment until February 23.

Judge McGonigle then asked Reiner if he agreed to the change. “Yes, I agree with that,” Reiner said, his only words in the fast-moving proceedings. He quickly stood up and was led out of the courtroom.

Green said later outside the courtroom that he spoke briefly with Reiner, who said he “understands there will be a change of attorneys,” but that there was no “deep conversation.”

Alan Jackson says Nick Reiner is ‘not guilty’ of murdering his parents

Even though Jackson withdrew from the screenwriter’s case, he remained supportive of Reiner outside the courtroom.

The lawyer did not provide details about what led to his resignation, citing legal restrictions, but acknowledged there were “circumstances beyond our control” and “more importantly, circumstances beyond Nick’s control.”

“I want to be clear on this: My team and I remain deeply committed to Nick Reiner and his best interests,” Jackson said. “We know that the legal process will reveal the true facts of the circumstances surrounding this incident.”

Alan Jackson criticizes media investigation into wife Rob Reiner’s murder

Jackson also took aim at the media scrutiny surrounding Reiner and his famous family following the deaths of Rob and Michelle Reiner, stressing that he and his team “examined this matter from top to bottom.”

“What we learned is that you can take this to the bank, but according to the laws of this state, Nick Reiner is not guilty of murder,” Jackson said. “Please print it out and we wish him luck.”

Meanwhile, Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan Hochman told reporters that his office will work with public defenders on Reiner’s case. He declined to answer questions about whether his office would seek the death penalty.

“We are completely confident that the jury will convict Nick Reiner beyond a reasonable doubt of the brutal murders of his parents, Rob Reiner and Michelle Singer Reiner,” Hochman said.

What crime has Rob Reiner’s son Nick Reiner been charged with?

Reiner is charged with two counts of first-degree murder with the special circumstance of multiple murders, allowing prosecutors to seek the death penalty. Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan Hochman said on Dec. 16 that his office has not yet decided whether to do so.

Speaking outside a Los Angeles courthouse in December, Jackson called the deaths of Rob and Michelle Reiner a “devastating tragedy.”

“This case involves very complex and serious issues,” Jackson said. “Things need to be handled, investigated, observed and analyzed thoroughly but very carefully.”

This story has been updated to add new information.

When does the 2026 tax season start? Immigrants at risk

0

play

Tax season is approaching like clockwork in the United States. Once again, documents, receipts and statements occupy kitchen tables and community offices as millions of families prepare their tax returns. But this year, for immigrant households — blended families, Dreamers, ITIN taxpayers — the ritual is fraught with questions.

President Donald Trump’s administration has launched a proposal that could fundamentally change access to key tax credits. The U.S. Treasury’s announcement has raised alarm among taxpayers and community groups, saying benefits that previously helped families balance their budgets may no longer arrive starting in fiscal year 2026.

What is the Treasury proposing and why would it change the rules of the game?

The Treasury Department said it plans to reclassify some refundable tax credits as “federal public benefits” under the 1996 law known as PRWORA. These include the Earned Income Credit (EITC), Child Credit, Education Credit, and Saver Matching Credit.

This twist is no small thing. By considering them a public benefit rather than just a tax instrument, the government could limit their access to U.S. citizens and certain eligible immigrants. In reality, people who currently work, pay taxes, and abide by the law could be excluded, even if they continue to contribute to the national treasury every year.

Who stands to lose the most from tax credit changes?

Groups most at risk include DACA holders, Temporary Protected Status (TPS) holders, temporary permit workers, international students, and family members who file taxes with ITIN numbers. For many people, these loans represent the difference between covering basic expenses and taking on more debt.

“That ITIN number is given by the IRS to people who don’t qualify for Social Security. Last year they were eligible for a credit of up to $2,000, but this year they’re no longer eligible,” return preparer Jeffrey Peña explained to Spectrum Noticias. According to the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, immigrants without legal status contribute nearly $100 billion in federal, state, and local taxes, even though they lack access to benefits such as Social Security and Medicare.

Is this change legal? What do experts currently recommend?

Experts warn that changes of this magnitude would normally require action by Congress. Indeed, the U.S. Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel has issued an opinion supporting the reinterpretation, and the Treasury Department is expected to issue formal regulations that will go into effect in 2026.

In the meantime, the advice is clear. That means filing your taxes is still important. “While it may seem unfair and confusing, filling out a tax return protects your tax history, which can change in court or through other legislation,” Peña stressed. Seeking trusted advice, preserving documentation and avoiding misinformation can make a difference for affected families.

Boris Q’va is a national Spanish language trends news reporter for Connect/USA TODAY Network. You can follow him on X as @ByBorisQva or write to him at BBalsindesUrquiola@gannett.com.

Video showing Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey’s fierce demands on ICE

0

play

In an impassioned speech Wednesday afternoon, Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey told U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents patrolling the area, telling them to “get the f*** out of Minneapolis.”

The message was released at a press conference following the shooting death of a 37-year-old woman by ICE agents in the city on January 7th. Authorities have offered conflicting accounts of the shooting, which occurred in a residential neighborhood outside downtown Minneapolis, less than a mile from where George Floyd was killed in 2020.

The presence of personnel in the city has been increased, with the federal government describing it as the “largest immigration operation in history.”

‘We don’t want you here’: Minneapolis mayor addresses ICE

In his speech, Frey told the community there was little they could say to improve the situation, but they could speak directly to federal authorities.

“To ICE: Get them out of Minneapolis,” Frey said. “We don’t want you here. You say the reason you’re in this city is to create some kind of security, but you’re doing the opposite.”

Frey added that it was the responsibility of authorities to leave the city to prevent further damage, loss and injury.

“People are being hurt. Families are being torn apart, long-time residents of Minneapolis who have contributed so much to the city, culture and economy of Minneapolis are being terrorized, and now someone is dead,” Frey told ICE. “That’s your responsibility.”

Early morning shooting sparks conflicting claims

Some details about the shooting, including the woman’s identity, have not been released. Both the FBI and the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Investigation are investigating the shooting.

The Department of Homeland Security said Wednesday that its agents “fired defensively” after a woman allegedly tried to ram officers with her car. President Donald Trump echoed that sentiment in a post on Truth Social after the press conference, in which he called the woman a “professional agitator” who “violently ran over an ICE officer.”

Frey disputed those claims at a news conference, saying the video shows the woman running away from federal agents, not toward them.

“They’re already trying to interpret this as an act of self-defense,” Frey said. “I saw the video myself, and I want to say it directly to you: That’s a bull.”

Frey urges people to be their ‘best selves’

In response to his comments on ICE, Frey urged residents not to “take the bait that ICE agents are trying to create.” He added that it was acceptable for residents to feel angry about the situation, but warned them to come to the scene and respond peacefully.

“Respond now with the best version of yourself. This is a moment where all of us in Minneapolis and beyond can rise to the occasion,” Frey said. “We can show them who we are. We can show them the kind of courage, bravery, love and compassion that makes Minneapolis what makes Minneapolis and what makes America America.”

ICE has a growing presence in major cities across the United States, including Portland, Charlotte, and Chicago. In September 2025, a man died after being shot by ICE in Chicago.

“We are better than sending a bunch of ICE agents to cities across the country and tearing families and communities apart,” Frey said. “We’re better than that, so we’re going to meet that hatred with love. We’re going to meet that despair with hope. We’re going to meet that injustice with constitutional justice.”

Contributor: Christopher Cann, USA TODAY

Kate Perez covers national trends and breaking news for USA TODAY. You can reach her at kperez@usatodayco.com or on Twitter @katecperez_.

President Trump to ban Wall Street home purchases

0

play

President Donald Trump says he will ban Wall Street investors from buying single-family homes in an effort to ease the affordability crisis plaguing the housing market.

“For a very long time, buying and owning a home was considered the pinnacle of the American Dream,” President Trump said in a Jan. 7 post on the social media site Truth Social. “I am immediately taking steps to ban large institutional investors from purchasing more single-family homes, and I will ask Congress to legislate. People live in homes, not businesses.”

Since the 2008 financial crisis shut many Americans out of the mortgage market, institutional investors like Blackstone have been reliably buying and renting out single-family homes.

Although many housing experts are skeptical that banning institutional investors from buying homes will result in significant changes to the overall housing market, Wall Street investors could become a popular scapegoat. As USA TODAY reported in 2024, limiting market participation was a rare point of agreement between the two presidential candidates.

Sharon Cornelissen, director of housing for the nonpartisan Consumer Federation of America, said big investors have uneven influence in rural areas across the country.

“While institutional investors make up a small portion of the nation’s homebuyers, they have turned some areas (such as the Atlanta suburbs) into ‘mortgage deserts’, limiting homeownership opportunities,” he said in an email. “Restricting private equity access to housing is a long way off.”

But such a ban would likely be difficult, if not completely impossible, to enforce, advocates say.

First-time home buyers are suffering because housing remains in short supply and prices are getting higher. Industry analysis shows that in the past year, the share of all buyers has fallen to an all-time low, and the average age of first-time buyers has jumped to 40.

This story has been updated with additional information.

RFK Jr. releases new dietary guidelines for 2026

0

play

New U.S. dietary guidelines announced by Secretary of Health Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on January 7 include recommendations for more protein, less sugar, and ultra-processed foods. The guidelines also ease restrictions on alcoholic beverages.

Speaking at a White House press briefing, press secretary Caroline Leavitt said the announcement was in line with President Trump’s domestic pledge to “make America healthy again.”

“My message as Secretary of Health and Human Services is clear: Eat real food,” President Kennedy said, calling the food pyramid “the most significant reset in federal nutrition policy history.”

Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins said the new guidelines encourage families and schools to prioritize nutritious, whole foods.

“That means more protein, more dairy, more healthy fats, more whole grains, and more fruits and vegetables. Whether fresh, frozen, canned, or dried, we’re finally putting real food back at the center of the American diet,” she said.

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the U.S. Department of Agriculture jointly issue guidelines every five years. Updates to the U.S. Dietary Guidelines for Americans, which affect school lunches, medical advice and nutritional standards, were expected after the summer.

Ultra-processed foods, focus on sugar

The updated guidelines do not change long-standing advice on saturated fats, as some had previously expected. Instead, they focus on sugar and ultra-processed foods.

“We are ending the war on saturated fat,” Kennedy added. “Today, our government declares war on added sugar.”

Ultra-processed foods are primarily factory-made preparations made with little or no refined ingredients, additives (including colorings and preservatives), and whole foods.

These foods, which use artificial flavors and sweeteners, are designed to be more addictive, taste better, and have a longer shelf life. They are usually high in sugar, salt, and unhealthy fats, and lack nutrients and fiber.

President Kennedy said federal policy is “turning a blind eye to the dire consequences” of promoting and subsidizing highly processed foods and refined carbohydrates.

“The new guidelines recognize that whole, nutritious foods are the most effective way to improve health and reduce health care costs,” Kennedy said.

More than half of the calories consumed at home by adults and children in the United States come from ultra-processed foods (UPF), according to a 2025 analysis from the National Center for Health Statistics.

UPF intake has been linked to more than 30 health conditions, including type 2 diabetes, heart disease, mental health disorders, and obesity. A diet high in UPF is also associated with an increased risk of arthritis and increased fat within the thigh muscles.

Although UPF is unhealthy, it tends to be cheaper and more accessible to many people than whole foods.

Rollins said their estimates suggest that eating healthy could become cheaper for Americans.

“The challenge is access to healthy food, especially in areas of America where there are food deserts,” she says.

President Kennedy said the idea that processed foods are cheap is “an illusion.”

“You’re paying or you’re paying on the back end,” he said. “We’re paying the price for diabetes, obesity and disease.”

More meat menus

President Kennedy called on Americans to eat more meat, and protein was also a hot topic during the presentation.

“Protein and healthy fats are essential, but were wrongly discouraged in previous dietary guidelines,” he says.

The problem with wanting more meat is that they aren’t all equally healthy. For example, consuming large amounts of red meat comes with health risks, including its association with type 2 diabetes and heart disease.

Revised alcohol recommendations

The new recommendations also remove limits on alcoholic beverages, which previously recommended limiting consumption to one to two drinks a day.

“I don’t think people should drink alcohol, but it gives people an excuse to bond and socialize,” said Dr. Mehmet Oz, administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. “There’s nothing healthier than having fun with friends in a safe way.”

Response from health authorities

In a press release Tuesday, the American Medical Association praised the new guidelines, which “focus on highly processed foods, sugary drinks, and excess sodium that contribute to heart disease, diabetes, obesity, and other chronic diseases.”

AMA President Dr. Bobby Mukamala added that the guidelines “affirm that food is medicine and provide clear direction that patients and physicians can use to improve their health.”

The American Heart Association praised several aspects of the new guidelines, including an emphasis on increasing intake of vegetables, fruits, and whole grains while limiting added sugars, refined grains, highly processed foods, and sugary drinks.

However, the organization also shared some concerns when it comes to red meat, saying in a press release that “consumers may inadvertently exceed recommended limits for sodium and saturated fat, which are key contributors to cardiovascular disease.”

“Although the guidelines emphasize full-fat dairy products, the Heart Association encourages consumption of low-fat and non-fat dairy products that are beneficial to heart health,” the AHA added.

Contributor: Adriana Rodriguez, Stephen J. Beard and Carly Procell, america today

Here’s why stock prices are breaking records

0

good morning! I’m Daniel de Visé from Daily Money.

The stock market seems to have made a New Year’s resolution to aim high.

According to a report by Medora Lee, stock indexes are setting new records at the beginning of 2026. But how long will the upward momentum continue?

Where will Americans move?

Andrea Riquier checks out a report on the top states where Americans move. Hint: They haven’t moved north.

January is a great month for home shopping

Finally, Medora reports on why January is the best month to buy a home.

📰 Other stories you can’t miss 📰

Daniel de Visse covers personal finance for USA TODAY. Daily Money analyzes complex consumer and financial news. Subscribe here.

Did President Trump say “cancel the election”? No, he said he wouldn’t say that.

0

play

  • President Trump has directed House Republicans to campaign on priorities to maintain control of Congress in the 2026 midterm elections.
  • President Trump mentioned canceling the election, but quickly dismissed the idea, anticipating criticism from the media.
  • He urged Republicans to win the midterm elections or suggested Democrats would find a reason to impeach him.

President Donald Trump mentioned canceling the election in a wide-ranging speech on January 6, but denied the possibility.

Speaking at the newly named Trump Kennedy Center, he encouraged House Republicans to base their campaigns on priorities to maintain control of Congress in the 2026 midterm elections. He said the Republican Party had “the right policies” and expressed confusion at the negative public opinion about his job performance.

He mentioned tariffs during his speech, saying, “If you get the wrong president, nothing good will happen.”

“We’ve known it for four years…We even have to confront these people because they have the worst policies,” he said. “I don’t say, ‘Cancel the election, we should cancel the election,’ because the fake news says, ‘He wants to cancel the election, he’s a dictator.'” They always call me a dictator. ”

Trump says Republicans need to win to avoid impeachment

Republicans currently hold majorities in both chambers of Congress, but their majority in the House is shrinking due to Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene’s departure from the party and other Republicans’ unforeseen emergencies.

The president’s party often loses in midterm elections, but President Trump used his speech to try to break that trend. His political future depends on it, he said.

President Trump said, “We have to win the midterm elections.” “If we don’t win the midterm elections, they’ll find a reason to impeach me.”

Trump was impeached twice by House Democrats during his first term, and the Senate acquitted him both times.

Who will vote in the midterm elections?

On November 3, 2026, all members of the House of Representatives and one-third of the Senate will be up for re-election, as well as various local and state elections. That means any eligible American citizen can vote in the midterm elections.

Midterm elections typically have lower turnout than presidential election years. However, according to Census Bureau data, turnout jumped to 53.4% ​​in 2018, the midterm election of President Trump’s first term. Voter turnout in 2022 was 52.2%. Compare these to the 2020 presidential election, which was a record year with 66.8% turnout.

Older voters are more likely to vote in non-presidential years and more likely to vote Republican, according to Reuters. In the 2018 and 2022 midterm elections, white voters and voters with college degrees made up a larger share of voters than non-voters, according to the Pew Research Center.

Contributions: Bart Jansen, Zachary Schermele, america today

Kinsey Crowley is a Trump Connect reporter for the USA TODAY Network. Please contact KCrowley@usatodayco.com. follow her X (Twitter), blue sky and TikTok.

Ford reports highest quarterly and annual U.S. sales since 2019

0

play

  • Ford reported annual sales rose 6% to 2.2 million vehicles, its highest annual sales since 2019.
  • Strong truck sales and a variety of powertrain options, primarily hybrids, contributed to the company’s success.
  • Hybrid vehicle sales increased significantly, while electric vehicle sales declined due to the end of federal tax incentives.

Ford Motor Co. reported strong fourth-quarter and full-year U.S. sales results, which it attributed to its broad product lineup, which offers a variety of trim levels and powertrains to meet customers’ different needs and pocketbooks.

Ford on January 6 reported its best annual sales and fourth-quarter results since 2019. Sales in the fourth quarter were 545,216 units, an increase of 2.7% compared to the fourth quarter of 2024. For all of 2025, Ford reported sales rose 6% to 2.2 million vehicles. Ford’s U.S. market share increased gradually from 0.6% to 13% during the year.

As a breakdown, annual sales of the Ford brand were 2.1 million units, an increase of 6.2% compared to 2024, and sales of the company’s luxury brand Lincoln also increased by 2% to 106,868 units, driven by sales of the new Navigator SUV. The Navigator ended 2025 with sales up 42.8%, bringing total SUV sales to 22,185 units, the highest since 2007.

“What made 2025 such a successful year for Ford? One of them was our share growth and industry-wide wins by delivering a complete product offering, from accessible entry-level models to high-performance off-roaders and luxury trim lines,” Andrew Frick, president of Ford Blue and Ford Model E, told the media. “Our growth has led to record hybrid sales, demonstrating the power of our selection approach by offering gas hybrid and electric powertrains, which delivered significant results for us throughout the year.”

Ford reported annual EV sales of 84,113 units, down 14% from 2024. After federal tax breaks ended on September 30, EV sales plummeted 52% to 14,513 units in the quarter. However, annual sales of hybrid powertrain vehicles increased by 22% to 228,072 units, and by 2024, sales increased by 18% to 55,374 units. quarter.

Across the city, rival General Motors Co. saw sales decline in the quarter as sales of electric vehicles fell as federal tax incentives expired. GM US sales in the fourth quarter were 703,001 units, down 7% from the same period last year. GM reported that its sales in 2025 will increase by 5.5% to 2.8 million units.

Stellantis sold 1,260,344 vehicles in 2025, which was 3% less than in 2024. However, the brand said fourth-quarter sales growth and powertrain diversification were positive signs for the automaker and its new leadership. Sales for the quarter increased 4% to 332,321 units.

Toyota North America announced that year-end U.S. sales rose 8% to 2,518,071 vehicles. Toyota reported sales of 652,195 vehicles in the fourth quarter, an increase of 8.1% year-on-year.

track strength

Ford’s sales were largely supported by strong growth from the Maverick compact pickup and the popular F-Series full-size pickup lineup. Frick called the Maverick “America’s most affordable pickup truck,” and said Ford set a sales record for the Maverick last year. Pricing for the 2025 Maverick starts at $28,145.

Maverick sales in the fourth quarter increased 54.2% to 34,147 units, compared with a full-year increase of 18.2% to 155,051 units. Frick said Ford’s success with the Maverick and several other vehicles was due to offering an expanded range of trim levels, a recipe for addressing affordability constraints.

“This has had a huge impact on our commitment to affordability in the market. We’ve seen significant line expansion, not just in the Maverick, but with our entry-level Maverick XL up 105%, which is a trend we’re seeing across many of these vehicle lines,” Frick said.

He added that Ford also saw a significant increase in sales of off-road performance trim levels for various vehicles, including the Raptor, Tremor, Timberline and FX4 trims.

Ford saw annual sales of its popular three-row Explorer SUV increase 14.7% to 222,706 units, and more than 30.6% in the same quarter to 61,777 units. That year, Ford sold 146,007 Bronco SUVs, an increase of 33.7%, and Frick said Ford had record sales of the Bronco and Bronco Sport, with total sales exceeding 280,000 units, an increase of 19.9% ​​over the previous year.

Making a pickup

Ford suffered some damage to its F-Series sales in the fourth quarter after two fires at aluminum supplier Novelis’ plant in Oswego, New York, shut down some production late last year. Ford is its biggest customer and uses aluminum in its truck bodies. Ford announced in October that it would increase F-Series production by more than 50,000 units in 2026, up from the first quarter, to compensate for downtime caused by unavailability of aluminum. It will do this by adding a third shift of employees at the Dearborn Truck Plant, where Ford manufactures F-150s with gasoline and hybrid engines.

F-Series unit sales in the fourth quarter decreased 3.1% from the same period last year to 208,252 units. For the full year, sales increased by 8% to 828,832 units. Frick said Ford will begin backfilling lost pickup truck production on schedule starting in 2025.

“We’re moving a third staff member this quarter, and we’re taking steps to do that, and we’re putting a lot of emphasis on the recovery from Novelis after losing some of our production in the fourth quarter,” Frick told reporters. “That seems to be on track at this point.”

Separately from this issue, Frick said Ford had a “really big truck year.”

“Ford sold approximately 1.3 million total trucks and vans in 2025, making it the top U.S. truck manufacturer,” Frick said. “No other company offers the powertrain choices that Ford offers in our trucks. Our F-Series sold more than 828,000 units, an increase of 8.3 percent, and has been America’s best-selling truck for the 49th consecutive year.”

Ford’s commercial van sales continued to grow, with Transit van sales increasing 5.9% to 161,797 units.

The road ahead

Part of the F-Series’ success is due to demand for the F-150 hybrid powertrain, with total sales of about 85,000 units in 2025, 15% more than in 2024, Frick said.

Annual sales of the Ranger midsize pickup increased 53.6% to 70,960 units, led by the entry-level XL trim.

Regarding the Escape SUV, which ends production in 2025, Frick said Ford has enough Escape inventory to bring it into the first quarter, but no more. Escape sales ended the year with 139,387 units, down 5% from 2024, as Ford sold its inventory.

Frick declined to provide an economic or sales outlook for 2026, saying Ford leaders will address the topic when the company reports fourth-quarter and full-year results in February. But he said the company will continue to monitor its overall mix to make sure it’s “taking advantage of some of the market trends that we’re seeing and really meeting the demand that customers want to buy right now.”

He noted that Ford is seeing growth in its lower trim lines of Explorer, Ranger and Maverick, as well as interest in more hybrids, and expects that to continue this year.

As for EVs, Ford said it will continue to produce the Mustang Mach-E, an all-electric vehicle produced in Mexico, to meet market demand.

“We have a very strong offering with the Maverick and the F-150 hybrid,” Frick said, and he expects that to continue through 2026. “For the F-150, we’ll see how the market continues. We plan to align production with what the market is asking for. So for the F-150, we’ll see what happens with natural demand (this year).”

Jamie L. Lareau is senior auto writer for USA Today and covers Ford Motor Company for the Detroit Free Press. Contact Jamie at jlareau@freepress.com. Follow her on Twitter @Jalalean. To sign up for our automotive newsletter. become a subscriber.

Lindsay Harrigan to be held accountable for use of US attorney’s title by judge’s order

0

play

A federal judge has ordered Lindsay Harrigan to explain why she continues to call herself a U.S. attorney despite a previous judge’s ruling that she was illegally appointed to the position.

Harrigan is President Donald Trump’s former personal attorney, who was appointed by his administration to the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Eastern District of Virginia, and is the prosecutor who last year indicted former FBI Director James Comey and former New York Attorney General Letitia James.

However, the lawsuit against Comey and James was dismissed in November 2025 after a U.S. district judge ruled that Harrigan was not legally elected to head the Eastern District of Virginia. The Department of Justice appealed this decision.

In a separate lawsuit, on January 6, U.S. District Judge David Novak of the Eastern District of Virginia, building on an earlier ruling, ordered Harrigan to submit a brief explaining why he identified himself as a U.S. attorney.

Novak’s order says Harrigan has seven days to respond and also explain why her use of her title is not a false or misleading statement.

USA TODAY reached out to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for comment on January 7, but has not yet received a response.

Who is Lindsey Harrigan? About her challenge as a U.S. attorney

In September 2025, Attorney General Pam Bondi reportedly appointed Harrigan as U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, following the resignation of former Attorney General Eric Siebert.

Mr. Siebert reportedly expressed skepticism about bringing charges against Mr. Comey and Mr. James and told colleagues in an email that he was resigning. However, President Trump later said in a social media post that he had fired him.

“I fired[Siebert]. There’s a great case going on and a lot of lawyers and legal experts are saying that. Lindsey Harrigan is a really good lawyer and I really like you,” Trump said in a Truth Social post addressed to Pam.

Hours after that post, Bondi issued an order appointing Harrigan as interim chief. Harrigan had never been a prosecutor before.

Within weeks of his appointment, Mr. Harrigan’s office secured indictments against both Mr. Comey and Mr. James.

And on Nov. 24, Senior U.S. District Judge Cameron McGowan Curry wrote an opinion stating that only the district court has the authority to appoint a new chief justice for the Eastern District of Virginia. Curry said Harrigan was the prosecutor in both cases, and her illegal appointment led to the charges being dismissed.

Contributions: Aisha Bagchi, Bert Jansen, Josh Mayer, USA TODAY

Melina Khan is USA TODAY’s national trends reporter. Contact her at melina.khan@usatoday.com.

Examining the impact of the Sherone Moore scandal on racism in Michigan

0

play

  • Unlike many white coaches, black coaches are rarely given a second chance after being fired.
  • Experts suggest that black coaches are often evaluated collectively, while white coaches are evaluated as individuals.
  • The number of Black FBS head coaches has decreased from 17 in 2011 to 14 today.

College football’s two most powerful leagues began the 2025 season with a combined four Black head coaches out of 34 schools nationwide.

∎ There were no black head coaches in the Southeastern Conference.

∎ Four were selected to the Big Ten, including Sherrone Moore, the first Black head coach in Michigan history.

Four months later, only Maryland’s Mike Locksley remains. Experts contacted by USA TODAY Sports said other players, particularly Moore, were fired over scandals that don’t affect white coaches but can disproportionately impact perceptions of other black coaches.

“Black coaches are often evaluated collectively, but our fellow white coaches are evaluated individually,” said former San Jose State University head coach Fitz Hill, who is Black. “That’s the difference. And that’s because when you look at minorities, you group minorities together. It’s just a rational cognitive process.”

But Hill says that’s not fair.

With another round of firings and hirings in college football, USA TODAY Sports has updated its historical data on Black head coaches and gathered additional information to look at the fallout from Moore’s firing from a racial perspective. The picture drawn is never a bright one.

What it means and why it can get worse

Black coaches still rarely get a second chance if they fail, according to data compiled by USA TODAY Sports. The main reason is that first chances are rare. Of the 136 schools in the Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS), there are only 14 black head coaches and nearly half of the players are black. This is down from 17 out of 120 major college teams in 2011.

Meanwhile, the SEC hasn’t had a non-interim Black head coach since 2020. Of the 34 coaches in the Big Ten and SEC, 33 are white and one is black.

In the bigger picture, all of this comes against the backdrop of universities reeling from the Trump administration’s crackdown on efforts to improve diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI).

“In the current climate, where DEI and initiatives that align with it have been largely sidelined, I fear that things will get worse, not better,” said Richard Lapchik, founder of the Sports and Social Justice Institute.

A short list of black coaches vs. white coaches with second chances.

According to a USA TODAY Sports investigation, only five Black coaches in college football history have been given a second chance as a non-interim head coach in a Power Four conference after previously being fired from another head coaching position in the Football Bowl Division (FBS). It’s a short list: Tyron Willingham, Mike Locksley, Kevin Sumlin, Karl Dorrell and James Franklin, who was recently hired by Virginia Tech after being fired by Penn State in the Big Ten.

Outside of the Power Four League, only three black head coaches in FBS history have gotten a second chance after being fired as an FBS coach: Charlie Strong, Willie Taggart and Derek Mason.

By contrast, 17 current white FBS head coaches are on their second or third chances after previously being fired as FBS head coaches, three in the Big Ten and two in the SEC. LSU’s new coach, Lane Kiffin, is white and was even considered the hottest candidate on the market after previously being fired as head coach of Southern California and the NFL’s Oakland Raiders.

White coaches also overcome scandals

Some white head coaches have survived to get a second chance as a head coach despite being arrested or hiding their affairs with staff members. But some believe Moore won’t get the same opportunity despite leading the University of Michigan to a 9-3 record in 2025. Mr. Moore was arrested on suspicion of violating school rules by concealing an affair with a teacher and breaking into her home after he was fired.

“Will Moore get the same second chance as his white counterpart?” asked Sandy Young, CEO of J. Walcher Communications, which specializes in crisis communications. “In today’s society, where race is treated as ‘other’ and simplified as ‘colored people are bad’ and ‘white people are good,’ Moore may have squandered a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity.”

Why aren’t black coaches given second chances?

Several factors help explain this, including that people who hire head coaches are often white and tend to hire people who look like themselves. Of the 131 athletic directors who oversaw FBS football programs in 2022, 100 were white, according to the University of Central Florida’s latest coaching report card.

Another reason relates to Hill’s comments about how minorities are unfairly “grouped together” despite their individual differences. For example, after Charlie Strong was fired as head coach at the University of Texas in 2016, he seemed to acknowledge this impact in comments he made to Fox Sports. He was later hired as the head coach at South Florida out of a power conference. But he worried that the failure in Texas would be symbolic.

“When you’re the first minority coach at a major university like that, you feel like so many people are counting on you,” Strong said at the time. “I was mad at myself for not being successful and I was mad at myself because I feel like you let a lot of people down. There’s a limited number of African-American coaches, so when you get on a stage like that…”

Similarly, former NFL safety Ryan Clark said the same applies to the impact of Moore’s shooting at Michigan State.

“He failed not only himself, but the coaching community as well,” Clark said on Instagram. “Had he been successful, the next ‘Sherone Moore’ would have received a favorable evaluation in the interview process. If you were the AD at the University of Michigan, would you feel comfortable hiring someone who reminded you of your former coach who was fired?”

Few schools have ever hired more than two Black coaches

The “grouping” of minority coaches after failure is also supported by evidence that only four major college teams in history have hired at least three Black coaches: Colorado, Stanford, Kent State, and Bowling Green.

After Mr. Hill was expelled from San Jose State University in 2004, Mr. Hill told school administrators that he hoped that Mr. Hill’s lack of success would prevent the school from considering a person of color as a candidate to replace him.

“Do you really think anyone should consider it?” the administrator asked, Hill said.

“From what you’ve said, I can see that you don’t understand the issue,” Hill reportedly responded.

San Jose State never hired a black non-interim head coach after that. The current coach, Ken Niutalolo, is Samoan.

Deion Sanders made a similar point.

Colorado is the only team in the FBS to hire four Black non-interim head coaches, two of whom were fired.

Current Colorado coach Deion Sanders addressed the same issue when he was hired by Colorado athletic director Rick George in December 2022. Sanders, who is Black, replaced Karl Dorrell, who was fired after an 0-5 start in 2022. Dorrell replaced Mel Tucker, who is Black, who left Colorado State after one season in 2019 to become head coach at Michigan State.

“Thank you again, Rick, because there are a number of African-American head coaches across the country who were fired and they were not replaced by an African-American coach,” Sanders said. “But you had the audacity to do something like that. Not just this time, you’ve done something like that several times. So I thank you for your courage. Thank you for your courage. Thank you for looking beyond skin color and ethnicity.”

Mel Tucker and Sherone Moore’s “Grouping”

Another undercurrent to Moore’s firing was that Michigan State University fired Tucker in 2023 after rape victim Brenda Tracy said he made sexual comments to her on the phone in 2022 and masturbated on the phone.

The similarities between their scandals and their firings from two rival Big Ten schools led to racist jokes on social media and grouping them together.

“The fact that we’re so quick to put[Tucker and Moore]on the same page shows how stereotypes about black men and sexual promiscuity work,” said Lou Moore, a sports history professor at Michigan State University who is not related to Sherone Moore.

Tucker and Sherone Moore, like other white coaches, had separate scandals in separate jobs, but were not grouped negatively based on race.

“I think the way we should look at this is that while it’s bad, it certainly doesn’t paint a picture of other people in college sports,” Lapchick said of the Sherrone Moore scandal.

So what’s the answer?

After 110 years of college football, which began in 1869, the first black head coach at the major college level was Willie Jeffries of Wichita State University in 1979.

Since then, USA TODAY Sports has counted only 70 total non-interim Black head coaches in major college football history. In 2005, there were only three. There are 14 people today.

So what’s the fairest way to go in the meantime? It always helps to cast a wider net on your candidates. Hill said it’s important that Black coaches have more “access” to these jobs. Unfortunately, unfair perceptions often override reality.

He wrote a book in 2012 titled “Cracked Back! How College Football Blinds Black Coaches’ Hopes.”

“Awareness always impacts access in the hiring process,” Hill says. He said this, in turn, creates unrealized potential for Black coaches who weren’t given a first or second chance. Many schools, including the University of Alabama, have never hired a black non-interim head coach.

“What would have happened if Nick Saban (former Alabama coach) had been born black?” Hill asked. “He would have been a great coach that never happened at the University of Alabama.”

Other considerations may also help black coaches, as the successful rehabilitation of white coaches like Lane Kiffin has proven.

Failure can sometimes make a coach better, not worse.

Follow reporter Brent Schrotenboer @Schrotenboer. Email: bschrotenb@usatoday.com

Optimism for AI-powered productivity: Deloitte

0

Deloitte’s latest UK CFO survey shows that the outlook for large UK companies is improving, with technology investment, particularly in AI, emerging as a key strategy. The research shows that while macroeconomic and geopolitical risks remain high, boards are increasingly focusing on digital capabilities as a key route to productivity and medium-term growth.

The strongest finding concerns investment in technology. 96% of CFOs expect UK companies to increase investment in technology over the next five years, with 77% expecting productivity and performance to improve. This number is unique for a CFO paper and shows that digital spending is not seen as discretionary or cyclical, but as structural (similar to capital spending in the earlier industrial phase). This paper shows that continued funding is available for IT leaders, but also points to increased expectations for technology delivery, integration, and measurable benefits.

Artificial intelligence is at the heart of newspapers and CFO sentiment in general. The percentage of CFOs who are “more optimistic” about AI’s ability to improve their organization’s performance increased from 39% in Q3 2024 to 59%. This shift is not gradual, suggesting that AI has moved from experimentation to mainstream financial confidence. Importantly, the study does not show that newfound optimism is accompanied by an overall increase in risk-taking. Risk appetite has improved but remains subdued at 15%, below the long-term average of 25%. This combination – trust in AI and continued vigilance on balance sheets – will influence how AI efforts are managed and controlled. Finance departments may require tightly focused usage and productivity metrics rather than open-ended experimentation and trials.

For finance professionals, this environment strengthens the CFO’s role as a steward of technology rather than a passive consumer of IT budgets. The study positions finance executives as having a role in shaping digital strategy around AI. The paper’s emphasis on productivity improvements indicates a preference not just for customer-facing innovations, but also for applications that automate processes and help with financial forecasting. IT teams should expect closer scrutiny of the business cases presented, more complex work from financial experts, and translation of technical capabilities into financial outcomes.

Despite improvements in affective metrics, this study also highlights some notable limitations. Despite a rebound in optimism from the lowest levels recorded in previous iterations of Deloitte’s CFO survey, business confidence remains below its long-term average at -13%. Capital spending is a priority, but only 17% of CFOs consider it a “strong priority,” slightly above the long-term average. This suggests that although investments are protected, they are not immune. Programs that are considered speculative, poorly managed, or poorly aligned with productivity remain less likely to survive.

Although external uncertainty has declined, it remains significant. 38% of CFOs still rate future uncertainty as high or very high, and geopolitics continues to dominate the risk landscape, cited by 65% ​​of respondents. The UK’s competitiveness and productivity followed, with a historically high risk rating of 62. System resiliency, data security, energy efficiency, and supply chain visibility are likely to gain attention, as will the overall goal of efficiency created by the use of AI in operations.

The focus of this study is on the human side of technology adoption. Deloitte leadership recognizes that the value of AI relies on the combination of technology and human skills, and the need to upskill employees. Although this is not quantified in the survey data, it is consistent with a broader pattern of cautious optimism. CFOs are willing to invest, but they don’t assume the technology itself will deliver results. This strengthens the argument among IT leaders that change management, training, governance, and monitoring should be built into new digital programs.

The Deloitte CFO survey shows a real and decisive shift towards technology-led productivity in UK businesses. The evidence is strongest regarding sustained digital investment and a remarkable rise in confidence in AI. We continue to be cautious about risks and recognize the harsh external environment. The priority for finance professionals is to allocate capital to initiatives that can clearly improve performance. Opportunities are expanding for IT staff, but so are their responsibilities. Digital ambitions will almost certainly be funded, but only if they can be translated into reliable and auditable business value.

(Image source: “Deloitte Exposure” by zilverbat. Licensed under CC BY-NC 2.0.)

Want to learn more about AI and big data from industry leaders? Check out the AI ​​& Big Data Expo in Amsterdam, California, and London. This comprehensive event is part of TechEx and co-located with other major technology events. Click here for more information.

AI News is brought to you by TechForge Media. Learn about other upcoming enterprise technology events and webinars.

Waymo Nashville launch comes amid questions about safety after outage

0

play

Ahead of Waymo’s plans to roll out its self-driving ride-hailing service in Nashville in 2026, a large-scale power outage occurred in San Francisco late last month, leaving many vehicles out of action.

A traffic jam occurred.

The outage, caused by a fire at a Pacific Gas & Electric substation on December 20, caused a blackout that plunged one-third of the city into darkness.

The incident raises concerns about self-driving cars amid a state of emergency in flood-prone Nashville and Middle Tennessee. Waymo’s self-driving cars are expected to hit the streets of Nashville in 2026.

“Saturday’s outage was a widespread event that caused traffic congestion across San Francisco, including outages and disrupted traffic,” a Waymo spokesperson told The Tennessean, part of the USA Today Network, last week.

Social media posts showed a stuck self-driving car with its hazard lights flashing. Waymo’s software normally treats disabled traffic lights as four-way stops, but traffic was overwhelming the system.

“While the disruption to public infrastructure was significant, we work to ensure that our technology adapts to traffic flow when such an event occurs,” the spokesperson added.

Waymo suspended operations for the rest of the day after the power went out.

Waymo emergency plan

The partnership with Lyft will see Waymo responsible for the self-driving car software, while the ride-hailing company will manage the fleet and its maintenance.

In Nashville, Waymo must navigate a city susceptible to environmental disasters such as floods and tornadoes.

Waymo representatives did not respond to questions about Nashville-specific contingency plans, but company officials said they worked with San Francisco government during the outages.

“During the power outage, we worked closely with San Francisco city officials,” a spokesperson said. “We are focused on rapidly integrating the lessons learned from this event and are committed to earning and maintaining the trust of the communities we serve every day.”

Waymo said its self-driving drivers have an 85% lower crash rate than human-driven vehicles, and that humans crash 6.7 times more frequently than Waymo vehicles.

The company said it is constantly improving its technical and operational safety systems to better identify hazards and employ fail-safe operations in unexpected situations. The company began offering software training on the streets of Nashville in March.

The company said if an incident occurs, you can call 9-1-1 and have a team dispatched to the scene. In the event of a collision, the vehicle can automatically turn off its propulsion system. The vehicle is also equipped with speakers for in-vehicle communication with company officials.

Waymo said it is working to improve vehicle behavior in difficult situations, including:

  • snow and ice accumulated on the road
  • flooded road
  • mountain path
  • off road truck

It’s unclear where Waymo will operate in Nashville, but company officials say it will include neighborhoods such as Germantown, Berry Hill, Sylvan Park and Old Hickory.

Waymo said its vehicles are trained to operate in the following areas and conditions:

  • Roadways: Highways, highways, urban roads, and rural roads with speed limits up to 100 miles per hour.
  • parking
  • day and night
  • fog
  • rain

‘ICE-related shooting’ reported in Minneapolis, Minnesota, Walz says

0

One person is dead after a shooting by federal immigration agents in Minneapolis, Minnesota, authorities said.

Department of Homeland Security Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers opened fire after someone allegedly tried to ram someone with a vehicle.

“The ICE officer fired defensively in fear for his life, the lives of his fellow law enforcement colleagues, and the safety of the public,” McLaughlin said in a statement. “He used his training to save his life and that of his coworkers. The alleged assailant was struck and died. The injured ICE officers are expected to make a full recovery.”

Minneapolis Gov. Tim Walz said ICE was involved in the shooting and that agents were flooding into the Minneapolis area amid a broader federal crackdown on fraud in the state.

“My public safety team is working this morning to gather information regarding an ICE-related shooting incident,” Walz said. “We will share more information as it becomes available. In the meantime, we ask everyone to remain calm.”

Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey said he was “aware of the shootings committed by ICE agents” and called on federal authorities to leave the city.

“The presence of federal immigration enforcement agents is causing chaos in our city,” he wrote to X. “We demand that ICE immediately remove them from our city. We stand firm with our immigrant and refugee communities.”

Sen. Amy Klobuchar also shared on X, “My team is gathering information on an ICE-related shooting in Minneapolis this morning.”

The shooting occurred as the Department of Homeland Security launched its “largest-ever operation” in Minnesota, sending 2,000 federal agents to the state in addition to an earlier deployment of police officers in December.

This is a developing story and will be updated.

Will “The Face of Mar-a-Lago” be obsolete in 2026?

0

play

Think MAGA is just a political movement? Think again. Lately, MAGA aesthetics have been a hot topic online, especially when it comes to beauty enhancements, with viral terms like “MAGA makeover” and “Mar-a-Lago face” popping up.

The cheeky term “Mar-a-Lago face” is used online to refer to “an aesthetic characterized by full lips, high cheekbones, sparkling white teeth, a strong jawline, and defined eyebrows with minimal facial movement,” explains Dr. Summer Jabbar, a dermatologist at Washington Square Dermatology in New York City.

Online users posted videos pointing out several prominent Republicans who they claim embody this look. And the Guardian recently reported that cosmetic surgeons are increasingly fielding requests from patients inspired by the likes of Kristi Noem, Kimberly Guilfoyle, Laura Loomer and Matt Gaetz.

But “this is a bipartisan issue,” joked Dr. Anthony Rossi, a dermatologic surgeon. He added that men and women alike have been increasingly going for over-the-top looks for some time now.

This not-so-subtle look is also known as the “Instagram face,” “iPhone face,” or “Real Housewives face,” Rossi explained. Rossi and Jaber think this look may be fading away as beauty trends gain traction.

Explaining “The Face of Mar-a-Lago” or “MAGA Makeover”

How do you achieve this look? It typically involves a combination of Botox and “some kind of filler that smoothes wrinkles and adds volume,” but Rossi says she’s not sure how intentional some of the end result is.

“I don’t think they go there for this type of look,” he says. “I feel like some male politicians are extremely aggressive.”

Rossi emphasizes that this style has spread to many people, not just political circles. “It’s pervasive throughout pop culture,” he says. “This echo chamber exists not only in politics but also in the aesthetic world.”

Geographic factors may also be a factor, Jaber added. For example, he says, what patients are looking for in New York – more natural and subtle results are common – may be different than their aesthetic goals in Miami or Los Angeles.

Mar-a-Lago’s face collapse?

Despite their popularity, there seems to be some negative publicity regarding their appearance these days.

Last month, in a New York Times article, President Trump’s ally-turned-foe, former Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, criticized what she called “the sexualization of the MAGA Mar-A-Logo.”

“I have two daughters and I was always uncomfortable with the way they puffed out their lips and enlarged their breasts,” she told the Times. “I believe how women in leadership express themselves sends a message to young women.”

Jaber says he’s seen the tide change before, citing Kylie Jenner’s once-revered lips as an example. “While big, full, ‘Kylie’ lips used to be popular, young women are now generally opting for less full lips,” she says. Recently, some influencers and celebrities have announced that they are ditching Botox and moving away from fillers. Ariana Grande, Courteney Cox, Lisa Rinna, Olivia Culpo and more have recently talked about returning to a more natural look.

However, as Rossi points out, it’s hard to know if they’re actually going filler-free or if they’re just choosing a more subtle amount.

Key treatment trends in 2026

So, what does the new year have in store? What Rossi predicts is a shift toward what he calls a “quiet aesthetic.”

It involves many of the same treatments, but in a different, milder way.

One method on the rise? Lasers, which can improve the skin itself, are “growing in popularity tremendously,” Rossi says.

“This is one of the great things about skin, it has the tendency and ability to actually rejuvenate, and we can use it in conjunction with laser resurfacing and collagen-mimicking lasers to help with that,” he explains.

At Jaber, we’re also seeing the rise of more natural “tweaks.”

“In 2026, the field of aesthetics will move away from ‘looking done’ and focus more on invisible work,” he says.

Megan Thee Stallion collaborates with Dunkin’ on new protein refresher

0

play

Megan Thee Stallion rewards sexy girls.

The “Bigger In Texas” rapper is teaming up with Dunkin’ to launch a new protein milk option at the fast food chain, the company announced Wednesday, Jan. 7.

Dunkin’ Protein Refresher is described as a “bold, refreshing sip made with protein milk,” and Megan’s drink in particular has a “juicy mango flavor,” the company said.

The multiple Grammy Award winner, as “Pro Tina,” introduced the product in Dunkin’s 80s-inspired workout “Dunk and Pump” campaign.

“Teaming up with Dunkin’ to bring my new Mango Protein Refresher to life has been an exciting experience and I can’t wait for Hotties to try it,” Megan said in a press release. “Whether you drink it to enhance your fitness routine or power through a busy day, it’s the perfect drink for any occasion.”

Dunkin’ lovers can customize their drinks with protein milk, the company says.

According to a press release, Dunkin’ fans can add protein milk to any drink, from lattes to refreshments, including milk and dairy-free bases.

Drink ideas include Strawberry Protein Refresher, Almond Iced Protein Matcha Latte, Iced Protein Latte with Unsweetened Vanilla, and Caramel Chocolate Iced Protein Latte.

“We saw protein milk as a natural way to give our guests more flexibility in enjoying Dunkin’ menu items throughout the day,” Jill Nelson, the company’s chief marketing officer, said in a statement.

Beverages made with protein milk contain 15 grams of protein per medium, the company said.

Dunkin’s other new menu items

Dunkin’ is also releasing more winter menu items, including the return of sweet black pepper bacon and a $5 meal deal that comes with a wake-up wrap, hash browns and a hot or iced medium coffee.

According to the press release, other options include:

  • Berry Moonlight Daydream Refresher
  • cocoa cloud latte
  • caramel chocolate shaken espresso
  • golden chocolate donut

Taylor Eardley is a news reporter for USA TODAY. Contact us at tardrey@usatodayco.com.

US seizes Venezuela-related oil tanker Marinera

0

play

After more than two weeks of manhunt, U.S. forces seized a Venezuelan-linked oil tanker in the Atlantic Ocean on January 7, U.S. officials said.

“The vessel was captured in the North Atlantic Ocean pursuant to a warrant issued by a U.S. federal court after being pursued by USCGC Munro,” U.S. European Command announced on social media.

Reuters reported that the ship, named Marinella, had escaped a U.S. blockade of sanctioned ships near Venezuela and was being escorted by a Russian submarine as U.S. forces attempted to board it.

No U.S. troops were injured, the newspaper reported.

Earlier in the day, U.S. forces seized another tanker named Sophia, which officials said was operating in international waters and “conducting illegal activities in the Caribbean.”

“The blockade of sanctioned and illegal Venezuelan oil remains in full effect everywhere in the world,” Pentagon Secretary Pete Hegseth wrote in a post on X.

However, tightening that blockade could prove to be a difficult task and lead to further seizures. The New York Times reported that in recent days, a number of ships have simultaneously and seemingly coordinated efforts to evade U.S. ships in attempts to break through the blockade, and that at least three tankers operating in the area (in addition to Marinella) have adopted Russian flags.

The capture of Marinella, which involved the U.S. Coast Guard and Navy, followed a pursuit that lasted more than two weeks across the ocean, with the Russian warship being monitored “in close proximity,” two U.S. officials told the program.

In December, the Coast Guard attempted to seize the vessel, initially named Vera-1, after it evaded a U.S. naval blockade against the sanctioned tanker and refused a request to board. It has since been registered under the Russian flag, Reuters reported.

Later in the day, Russia called the seizure a “violation of maritime law,” and a senior lawmaker described it as “outright piracy,” according to Reuters.

Russia’s Transport Ministry said it had lost contact with the Marinella after the U.S. Navy boarded it near Iceland as part of an effort to block oil exports from Venezuela.

“In accordance with the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, freedom of navigation applies on the high seas and no state has the right to use force against a vessel duly registered within the jurisdiction of another state,” the ministry said in a statement seen by Reuters.

On January 3, the United States detained Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife in a surprise attack on the oil-rich country. The couple is currently in federal custody in the United States on federal drug trafficking charges.

The seizure also came less than a day after President Donald Trump announced that the Venezuelan regime would hand over up to 50 million barrels of “sanctioned oil” to the United States after it detained President Maduro.

“This oil will be sold at market price and managed by me, the President of the United States, to ensure that the funds are used for the benefit of the people of Venezuela and the United States,” Trump wrote in a Jan. 6 social media post.

The White House is scheduled to hold a press conference at 11 a.m. ET.

This is a developing story.

Contributor: Davis Winkie, USA TODAY and Reuters

Natalie Neisa Alland is a senior reporter at USA TODAY. Contact her at nalund@usatoday.com and follow her at X @nataliealund.

Grab brings robots in-house to control delivery costs

0

Rising labor costs and shrinking delivery margins are prompting large platform operators like Grab to turn to automation. The acquisition of Infermove brings robotic capabilities in-house.

Grab operates at a scale where small efficiency gains can have a huge impact. The company’s platform supports millions of deliveries in Southeast Asia, many of which are made by passengers on scooters and bicycles in dense urban areas, creating complexities that limit the extent to which automation can replace human labor. By acquiring companies focused on robots designed for unstructured environments, Grab sees AI in the physical world becoming mature enough to be used in cases beyond pilot programs.

Delivery automation close to core operations

Grab has chosen to internalize its development loop rather than relying on off-the-shelf systems. Infermove’s technology is designed to learn from real-world movement data, including information generated by non-motorized delivery vehicles. In practical terms, this means the robots were trained on how people would actually move around sidewalks, intersections, and busy drop-off points, rather than how those spaces would appear on a simulation.

For delivery operators like Grab, that distinction is important. While simulated environments can support early development, they often struggle with the edge cases that define real cities. By bringing that learning process in-house, Grab can shape how automation works under its own operational constraints, rather than adapting its delivery network to third-party systems.

From a company’s perspective, the strategic value lies in control. Owning this technology gives Grab greater leverage over deployment pace, operational scope, and cost trade-offs. It also reduces long-term dependence on vendors whose priorities may not align with Grab’s regional reach or economic realities.

However, automation is not positioned to replace human riders. While robots may take over some of the workflow, humans remain at the center of service delivery. Grab’s interest appears to be focused on selective usage, such as structured first-mile or last-mile segments where tasks are repetitive and distances are short. In these sectors, robots could help smooth out spikes in demand, reduce delays during peak periods, and ease the pressure of labor shortages.

Address cost pressures without service interruption

At an internal meeting in December, Grab’s chief technology officer Suesen Thomas called Infermove’s progress “impressive,” highlighting both the technology and its early commercial use. He also said the company will continue to operate independently and its founders will report directly to him. This structure suggests that Grab prioritizes execution and continuity over rapid organizational integration.

This approach reflects a broader shift between large digital platforms. Rather than treating AI as an added layer on top of existing systems, companies are embedding it deep into their core operations. In the shipping and logistics sector, this often means moving beyond optimization software to physical automation, with higher risks and costs, but with more structural potential benefits.

The timing is also telling. On-demand delivery volumes continue to grow, but margins remain under pressure. Customers expect faster service and lower rates, but operators face rising wages, fuel costs and tighter regulations. In such an environment, automation is less about novelty and more about maintaining service levels without compromising profitability.

Bringing robot development closer to operations could also help align incentives around data use. Training physical AI systems requires large amounts of real-world data, which is already being generated at scale by delivery platforms. Keeping feedback loops internal speeds up iteration and reduces the need to share sensitive operational data externally.

There are still limits. Robots designed for sidewalks and short routes are unlikely to replace human couriers across networks in the near future. Weather, local rules, and customer acceptance will continue to shape where automation realistically works. Deploying across multiple countries adds further complexity, as infrastructure and regulations vary widely.

Industry forecasts suggest rapid growth for last-mile delivery robots, but these numbers provide limited guidance for operators. The more pressing question is whether automation can reduce cost per delivery without introducing new points of failure. It depends on performance in a real environment rather than market size.

From a company perspective, the Infermove acquisition is not a bet on robots as a product category. This is a move to strengthen the collaboration between AI, data, and physical operations. For logistics and mobility-based platform companies, that integration can be a key element in managing growth under sustained cost pressures.

(Photo provided by Afif Ramdasma)

See also: Legal profession: Current law is fit for the AI ​​era

Want to learn more about AI and big data from industry leaders? Check out the AI ​​& Big Data Expo in Amsterdam, California, and London. This comprehensive event is part of TechEx and co-located with other major technology events. Click here for more information.

AI News is brought to you by TechForge Media. Learn about other upcoming enterprise technology events and webinars.

President Trump meets with US oil executives amid pressure on Venezuelan oil

0


President Trump wants U.S. companies to invest in Venezuela, but political instability and a history of state control of the oil industry could complicate matters.

play

President Donald Trump is scheduled to meet with oil company executives as his administration looks to American companies to rebuild Venezuela’s oil infrastructure under new leadership after a U.S. military operation.

The meeting will take place at the White House on January 9, according to a White House official.

In an unusual move, the United States arrested Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro early on January 3 and brought him to New York City on drug trafficking charges. Maduro pleaded not guilty in federal court on January 5. Delcy Rodriguez, who served as Maduro’s vice president, became interim president.

President Trump has focused on Venezuela’s oil resources following the U.S. military operation. In a speech after Maduro’s arrest, Trump said Venezuela had “stolen” U.S. oil, a claim disputed by some international energy law experts.

“We built Venezuela’s oil industry with American talent, ambition, and skill,” President Trump said. “And the socialist regimes stole it from us during those previous regimes, and they stole it by force. This constituted one of the greatest thefts of American property in our country’s history.”

Venezuela boasts the world’s largest oil reserves and was once home to several U.S. oil companies, but Chevron is the only major U.S. oil company left after former leader Hugo Chávez pushed to nationalize the country’s oil industry.

The administration is now trying to entice U.S. oil companies to reinvest in Venezuela, but the country’s political instability and history of state control of the oil industry could complicate matters.

President Trump told NBC on January 5 that Venezuelan oil production could take less than 18 months to recover and that the United States could repay its investments in American oil companies.

“We’re going to have to spend a lot of money, and the oil companies are going to spend it, and then it’s going to be reimbursed by us and through revenue,” Trump said.

Energy Secretary Chris Wright will meet with oil company executives in Miami on January 7th. Mr. Wright is also coordinating efforts announced by President Trump on January 6 to transfer sanctioned Venezuelan oil to the United States. President Trump said the United States would sell 30 million to 50 million barrels of Venezuelan oil.

“This oil will be sold at market price and managed by me, the President of the United States, to ensure that the funds are used for the benefit of the people of Venezuela and the United States,” Trump said in a Jan. 6 social media post.

Mr. Wright appeared in Miami and laid out plans for the United States to sell Venezuelan crude oil in the future. He said the first crude to be sold will be “crude in floating storage at sea, backed up by onshore storage.”

“We’re going to put the crude oil coming out of Venezuela on the market. First this will back up the oil we have in storage, and then we’re going to sell the crude oil coming out of Venezuela on the market indefinitely,” Wright said.

The crude oil will be sold to U.S. refineries and “around the world,” Wright said, and sales will be conducted by the U.S. government and “funded into accounts controlled by the U.S. government.”

“And from there, those funds can be flowed back to Venezuela to benefit the Venezuelan people,” Wright added. “But it needs its influence and control of oil sales to drive the changes that absolutely must happen in Venezuela.”

Wright said the deal would “create the conditions for U.S. oil companies to invest in Venezuela in the long term” as the Trump administration makes “progress with the government.”

“The resources are huge,” he says. “This is supposed to be a wealthy, prosperous, peaceful energy powerhouse. That’s the plan.”

This story has been updated to add new information.

Contributor: Erin Mansfield

Focus on state court oral arguments in January

0

monthly, state court report Preview upcoming oral arguments in prominent or interesting state court cases. The state Supreme Court is scheduled to take up issues in January regarding search and seizure laws, access to courts and funding for private schools.

Can the Missouri Attorney General appeal a preliminary injunction when litigants in other states cannot? — January 7

Nicholson vs. StateMissouri Supreme Court

The Missouri Supreme Court will consider whether a 2025 state law that allows the state attorney general to immediately appeal preliminary injunctions that prevent the state from enforcing the law violates Missouri’s Equal Protection Clause. Other Missouri litigants do not enjoy the same instant appeal rights. The lower court said it applied a strict standard of review in its decision because it found the law violated the fundamental right to access the courts. On appeal, the state argued that the state constitution’s “open court” clause only protects plaintiffs’ right to sue, and because the law does not prohibit plaintiffs from bringing their claims in trial court, it does not interfere with that right.

Lawmakers passed a preliminary injunction in response to a trial court’s order temporarily blocking abortion restrictions after voters approved the 2024 Amendment, which protects abortion rights, according to news reports. The provision in question allowed the Attorney General to immediately appeal the case.

The high court is also hearing a counter-appeal by the plaintiffs. nicholsonMissouri taxpayers working on voting campaigns cited another part of the lower court’s ruling related to the 2025 law’s voting measure provisions. These sections shorten deadlines, add steps for contesting ballot language, and extend the length of the ballot summary. News reports reflect that these provisions are a legislative response to a successful challenge brought by abortion rights supporters to the ballot language of the 2024 Amendment. The lower court rejected the plaintiffs’ argument that the Legislature’s combination of preliminary injunction provisions and ballot measure provisions violated the state Constitution’s prohibition on changing the purpose of a bill during the enactment process or addressing multiple subjects of the law.

See the discussion here.

Can a police officer ask an Alabamian to show identification during a traffic stop? — January 7th

Jennings vs. SmithAlabama Supreme Court

The Alabama Supreme Court will consider whether a statute that allows a police officer to request a stopped person’s name, address and description of his or her actions would also allow an officer to require a person to produce physical identification if they determine that the person’s verbal response is insufficient. The incident occurred after law enforcement responding to a 911 call about a suspicious “black male” approached a pastor who was out watering flowers for neighbors and arrested him after he refused to show identification. The pastor initially filed a lawsuit in federal court seeking damages, alleging that the police officers had unlawfully arrested him without a valid reason. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that the claim could proceed because the law did not make denial of identification illegal, but the remand court said subsequent circuit court decisions created uncertainty about the meaning of the law and referred the question to the Alabama High Court.

The pastor and various legal groups, including the Southern Poverty Law Center, the Cato Institute, and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), argue that their interpretation of the law to create an implied obligation to provide identification whenever a police officer deems an incomplete response makes it unconstitutional. They argue that vagueness in the content of unsatisfactory responses violates due process. Additionally, Amici argues that given state and federal protections against unreasonable searches and seizures and forced self-incrimination, allowing police officers to request identification is problematic, mislabels the scope and name of the law, and violates the state constitution.

See the discussion here.

Does the Ohio Constitution provide stronger protections for administrative investigations than the Fourth Amendment? — January 8th

City of North Canton Development Services Authority v. CF HomesSupreme Court of Ohio

The Ohio Supreme Court will consider for the first time whether the Ohio Constitution, which prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures, requires city authorities seeking to search homes for regulatory, rather than criminal, violations to show more evidence than federal law requires.

in Camara v. District Courtthe U.S. Supreme Court said that while the Fourth Amendment requires a warrant for such a search, a warrant can be based on “reasonable legislative or administrative criteria,” such as time elapsed since the inspection or general area conditions, even if there is no probable cause to believe that an individual residence is in violation of the regulations. Landlords challenging rental inspections by local authorities argue that this lack of personal cause is insufficient for purposes of the Ohio Constitution. The state’s constitutional history reflects a longstanding rejection of general writs and an emphasis on the sanctity of the home, the firm, the Institute for Justice and the Pacific Law Foundation argue. The Pennsylvania Court of Appeals recently departed Kamala He was charged under Pennsylvania’s search and seizure provisions for similar reasons.

But in the Ohio case, legal aid groups in the state countered that Ohio tenants, especially low-income residents, “rely on the ability of local governments to conduct home safety inspections to ensure safe rental conditions in their homes.”

See the discussion here.

Is Idaho’s school choice program constitutional? — January 23

Idaho Constitutional Protection and Preservation Commission v. StateIdaho Supreme Court

The Idaho Supreme Court will hear a challenge to the state’s first school choice program brought by teachers unions, school districts and other advocacy groups. The program, enacted in 2025 and scheduled to open this month, will provide students enrolled in non-public schools with tax credits of up to $5,000 ($7,500 if they have special needs) to pay for tuition and other educational expenses. In a complaint filed directly in state Superior Court, the plaintiffs argue that this use of taxpayer funds benefits private schools that exist outside of the “general, uniform, and thorough system of public, free, regular schools” that the state constitution requires the Legislature to maintain and lack public oversight. They also argue that the program violates the state doctrine that requires government programs to have a “public purpose.” They argue that the main beneficiaries are a limited number of private organizations, which may exclude students, rather than the community as a whole, and that the lack of accountability for private schools means that “educational services that are contrary to the public interest” may be funded.

State officials and lawmakers have defended the program, with support from parents, faith-based school groups and others seeking to apply for tax credits. They argue that there is nothing in the Idaho Constitution to prevent the Legislature from supporting additional education initiatives outside the state’s public school system, that tax credits do not undermine lawmakers’ duty to properly maintain public schools, and that prohibiting public purposes because the means are private would jeopardize many government programs, such as Medicaid and food assistance.

The debate in Idaho comes against a backdrop of similar school choice issues occurring across the country.

See the discussion here.

Can Utah’s Execution Method Be Challenged Under the State Constitution? — January 28th

Menzies v Department of CorrectionsUtah Supreme Court

The Utah Supreme Court will hear a challenge to the state’s protocol regarding lethal injection and firing squad. The five people sentenced to death argued that these methods violated provisions in the state constitution that prohibit cruel and unusual punishment and treating incarcerated people with “unnecessary harshness.” The lower court dismissed the claim, finding that the U.S. Supreme Court’s Eighth Amendment requirement that plaintiffs challenging enforcement methods identify available alternatives with less risk of suffering also applied to state constitutional provisions.

The ACLU filed amicus briefs in support of each individual’s appeal with the state high court. The group argues that interpreting the states clause in line with the Eighth Amendment ignores that only the former includes a prohibition on “unnecessary rigor.” The ACLU argues that “Utah’s broad commitment to the humane treatment of people in the slaughter system,” reflected in the clause’s language and history, is undermined by requiring plaintiffs “to devise better methods of punishment before they can be challenged.”

One of the men who filed the lawsuit, Ralph Menzies, died of natural causes in November. The state Supreme Court had halted the execution in August to allow its competency to carry out the death penalty to be evaluated in light of his ongoing dementia.

Listen to the discussion here.

Sarah Kessler is an advisor and contributing editor. state court report.

Erin Geiger-Smith is a writer and editor at the Brennan Center for Justice.

Recommended Citation: Sarah Kessler & Erin Geiger Smith, Focus on state court oral arguments in JanuarySᴛᴀᴛᴇ Cᴏᴜʀᴛ Rᴇᴘᴏʀᴛ (January 6, 2026), https://statecourtreport.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/state-court-oral-arguments-watch-january-0

U-Haul says Texas and Florida are the most popular states for Americans to move to.

0

play

Anyway, don’t mess with Texas when it comes to moving.

The Lone Star State has returned to the top of the list of states where the most Americans moved in 2025, according to rental truck company U-Haul’s annual roundup. U-Haul calculates its “growth index” based on the net number of customers who rent trucks, trailers and other equipment in one state and abandon them in another state.

In 2025, Texas ranks as the No. 1 growth state for the seventh time this decade. Last year, it placed second behind South Carolina. Florida, North Carolina and Tennessee are also in the top five. The company said these five states also occupied the top five in 2024 and 2023, although in a different order.

Uhaul said Americans are choosing sunshine and warmer climates when deciding where to move. Eight of the top 10 are in the South. In contrast, eight of the bottom 10 states (those with the highest number of out-migrants) are northern states.

The biggest loser is California, ranked 50th, followed by Illinois, New Jersey, New York and Massachusetts. The Golden State ranked last for the sixth year in a row, but its net loss of residents in 2025 was lower than the previous year, the release said.

Do politics influence where Americans move?

“Blue-state to red-state migration is a hotly debated political theme that became more prominent following the 2020 pandemic, and continues to be a prominent trend,” U-Haul said in a release accompanying the report.

“Seven of the top 10 growth states currently have Republican governors, and nine of those states went red in the last presidential election,” the release added. “Conversely, nine of the bottom 10 growth states have Democratic governors, and seven of those states voted blue in the last presidential election.”

Weather patterns and political decisions aside, “we know that life circumstances such as marriage, children, death in the family, college, work, and other events drive most moving needs,” John “JT” Taylor, president of U-Haul International, said in a statement.