Home Blog Page 343

Jeffrey Epstein and Steve Tisch discuss women via email

0

play

The millions of files related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, released by the Justice Department on January 30, include multiple emails believed to have been exchanged between Epstein and New York Giants co-owner Steve Tisch.

The release includes 2,000 videos and 180,000 images, as well as various redacted and unredacted emails, letters, and other documents related to Epstein.

As first reported by a reporter for The Athletic, the emails show Epstein provided “scouting reports” about multiple women to Steve Tisch’s account (email addresses redacted), asking whether various women were “professionals,” “working girls,” or “civilians,” in emails reviewed by The Athletic and USA TODAY.

Messages exchanged between the two accounts include Epstein promising to “invite the (redacted) Russian if you like,” to which he responded, “Is she having fun?”

In another exchange, Tish asked, “I’m interested in (redacted). I’ll contact (redacted). Professional or civilian?” Later in the string, the same account says, “I don’t like the recording of these conversations so please send me a number to call.”

During the exchange, Epstein made various lewd references to the women’s bodies. Other email strings show Tisch’s account asking for details about a particular woman he met in New York.

Emails included in the Jan. 30 release also show Epstein contacting women to gauge their interest in meeting with Tisch.

Emails sent in 2013 also included an invitation from Tisch to Epstein to attend a Giants game in his suite. Emails exchanged between the accounts also included various attempts by the two to connect in New York, including an invitation to go for a walk or meet for lunch.

Tisch, 76, has been the Giants’ chairman and co-owner since 2005. The famous film producer has been involved in numerous Hollywood hits, including “Forest Gump” and “Risky Business.”

USA TODAY was unable to reach Tisch or representatives for the New York Giants for comment.

Epstein died by suicide in 2019 while awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges.

USA TODAY’s e-newspaper is here – a continuously updated source of timely and relevant stories.

‘Schitt’s Creek’ cast remembers Catherine O’Hara’s ‘sparkle’

0

play

Hollywood is reeling from the shocking death of Catherine O’Hara, who starred as the eccentric Moira Rose on Schitt’s Creek for six seasons.

“Schitt’s Creek” aired on CBC Television in Canada from 2015 to 2020, but gradually gained a devoted following in the United States when the comedy series began streaming on Netflix. A Fish Out of Water follows a wealthy family who loses their fortune and are forced to move to a motel in a small town.

The show won nine Emmy Awards during its run, including Best Comedy Series. O’Hara, Annie Murphy and Dan and Eugene Levy, who co-created the hit sitcom, also won individual acting awards.

Dan Levy paid tribute to his TV mom and real-life friend on Instagram, sharing a selfie of the two of them.

“What a gift it has been to dance in the warm light of Catherine O’Hara’s brilliance for so many years,” he wrote in the caption of the post. “Having worked with my father for over 50 years, Catherine was part of my extended family even before playing my family. It’s hard to imagine a world without her. I will cherish all the funny memories I was lucky enough to make with her.”

O’Hara, who died on January 30 at the age of 71, was remembered by her co-star Karen Robinson, who played Ronnie Lee in Schitt’s Creek.

In an interview with USA TODAY, Robinson said, “I will forever treasure the immeasurable good fortune of sharing work and laughter with Catherine O’Hara’s genius.” “My heart breaks for her family and her friends and loved ones. Oh, Canada, I am so sorry. Katherine, thank you for everything you gave us before you left us. So much and so timeless that a part of you will always be with us.”

Jennifer Robertson, who played Jocelyn Schitt, recalled O’Hara’s “magical gift.”

“I am so sad to hear of the loss of Catherine. Being in Catherine O’Hara’s orbit was a beautiful and magical gift,” Robertson said in a statement to USA TODAY. “She was an absolute star and I never understood why people made such a fuss about her. Her death is a loss to everyone who knew and loved her. My deepest sympathies go out to Beau, her sons and the O’Hara family.”

Chris Elliott, who played Roland Schitt alongside Eugene Levy and O’Hara, said the world was shocked and saddened by the news of her death.

“Working with her and Eugene was a dream come true for me, made even more special because Katherine was such a warm-hearted, generous and humble human being,” Elliott said in a statement shared with USA TODAY. “I will always remember the laughs we shared on and off screen, and I will never forget the fun shopping experiences we had at Joe Fresh.”

Variety and Deadline reported that O’Hara died at her home in Los Angeles after a “brief illness,” according to her agency CAA.

O’Hara was beloved by many for her comedic performances in “Schitt’s Creek,” as well as Christopher Guest’s films “Waiting for Guffman,” “For Your Convention,” “Best in Show,” and the series “Beetlejuice” and “Home Alone.” Last year, she received Emmy nominations for her work on both the Apple TV+ comedy “The Studio” and the HBO drama “The Last of Us.”

Contributors: Kelly Lawler and Edward Segarra, USA TODAY

Mega Millions winning numbers for January 30th drawing: $303 million jackpot

0

play

The Mega Millions jackpot continues to grow ahead of the Friday, January 30th drawing, reaching $303 million with a cash value of $136.7 million.

If someone is lucky enough to win the jackpot tonight, they have two options. Take home one-time cash or get paid instantly and then receive an annual check that’s 5% larger than the previous year.

Friday is the last Mega Millions drawing of January, but so far there have been no jackpot winners. Meanwhile, Powerball had one jackpot winner, with one lucky player from North Carolina taking home a $209.3 million jackpot.

With Friday’s Mega Millions drawing just hours away, here’s what you need to know.

What are the winning Mega Millions numbers for January 30, 2026?

USA TODAY will publish the winning numbers for Friday’s Mega Millions lottery after the drawing at 11pm ET.

When is the next Mega Millions drawing?

The next Mega Millions drawing is scheduled for Tuesday, February 3rd at 11:00 PM ET.

Top 10 Mega Millions Jackpots

  • $1.602 billion in Florida on August 8, 2023
  • $1.537 billion in South Carolina on October 23, 2018
  • $1.348 billion on January 1, 2023 in Maine
  • As of July, it was $1.337 billion. 29, 2022, Illinois
  • December 27, 2024, $1.269 billion in California
  • $1.128 billion in New Jersey on March 26, 2024
  • $1.05 billion in Michigan on January 22, 2021
  • $983 million in Georgia on November 14, 2025
  • $810 million in Texas on September 10, 2024
  • March 30, 2012, $656 million in Illinois, Kansas, and Maryland

What is Mega Millions?

Mega Millions is a lottery that is played in 45 states, the District of Columbia, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.

Each ticket costs $5, and players can choose six numbers from two different number pools: five different numbers from 1 to 70 (white balls) and one number from 1 to 24 (gold mega ball), or choose Easy Pick/Quick Pick.

If you match all six winning numbers in the drawing, you win the jackpot. If there are multiple jackpot winners, the jackpot prize will be shared.

How to play Mega Millions

To play Mega Millions, you must purchase a ticket. This can be done at several locations, including local convenience stores, gas stations, and grocery stores. In some states, you can purchase Mega Millions tickets online.

Once you have your ticket, you have to choose six numbers. Five of them are white balls numbered 1-70. The golden mega ball ranges from 1 to 24.

If you’re feeling particularly unlucky or don’t want to go through the hassle of picking, you can request a “quick pick” or “easy pick.” When you use these options, your computer randomly generates numbers.

Mega Millions tickets have built-in multipliers that increase your non-jackpot prize by 2, 3, 4, 5, or 10 times. Previously, players had to pay an extra dollar to add a “Megaplier”.

Where can I buy lottery tickets?

Mega Millions tickets can be purchased directly at gas stations, convenience stores, and grocery stores. Some airport terminals may also sell lottery tickets.

You can also order tickets online through Jackpocket, the USA TODAY Network’s official digital lottery courier, in the following U.S. states and territories: Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Idaho, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Puerto Rico, Washington, DC, and West Virginia.

The Jackpocket app allows you to choose your lottery games and numbers, place your order, check your tickets, and claim your winnings, all using your phone or home computer.

The lottery winning numbers sponsors are: Jackpocket, USA TODAY Network’s official digital lottery delivery company.

Jackpocket is the official digital lottery carrier of USA TODAY Network. Gannett may earn revenue from viewer referrals to the Jackpocket Service. Must be 18 years or older, 21 years or older in Arizona, 19 years or older in Nebraska. Not affiliated with any state lottery. Gambling problem? Call 1-877-8-HOPE-NY or text HOPENY (467369) (NY). 1-800-327-5050 (MA); 1-877-MYLIMIT (OR); 1-800-981-0023 (PR); 1-800-GAMBLER (ALL OTHERS). visit jackpocket.com/tos Over the entire period.

Fernando Cervantes Jr. is a trending news reporter for USA TODAY. Contact us at fernando.cervantes@gannett.com and follow us at X @fern_cerv_.

What is a Rotten Tomatoes score?

0

play

Melania Trump’s new documentary started with an 8% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes, below her husband’s approval rating.

“Melania” premieres Thursday night at the newly renamed Trump Kennedy Center with members of the president’s Cabinet, then opens in theaters nationwide on Friday, January 30th. and Several distinguished guests will be present, including: TV host Dr. Phil McGraw, rap superstar Nicki Minaj, and former New York City mayor Eric Adams.

The nearly two-hour film, directed by Brett Ratner, delves into the 20 days leading up to the first lady’s return to the White House on Inauguration Day, focusing on President Trump’s personal and private life. This is the first project created by the former model’s new production company, Muse Films.

The film is also Ratner’s first feature film since 2014’s “Hercules,” following sexual harassment allegations against the creator of “Rush Hour,” but Ratner denied the allegations and no criminal charges were filed against him.

Here’s what our initial review of the film says:

What does the USA TODAY review say?

Initial movie reviews for “Melania” aren’t very positive, with most critics giving it scores between 1 and 1.5 out of 4 or 5 stars.

USA TODAY film critic Brian Truitt said Melania (★ out of 4) doesn’t work well as a documentary because Ratner fails to provide a convincing glimpse into the first lady’s life, instead presenting an extremely unflattering view with little new information. Truitt said there are few moments where Ratner reflects Melania Trump’s personality, such as when she sings Michael Jackson’s “Billie Jean.”

“Melania is suffering a severe disconnect because she doesn’t speak to the camera,” Truitt wrote. “She talks about respecting the military, but Ratner doesn’t show her conversations with the soldiers. It’s an odd filmmaking choice for a documentary, but it might be by design.”

What are other critics saying about Melania Trump’s movies?

Variety magazine’s review echoed this sentiment, claiming that the documentary “never comes close to being real” and is “so crafted, so airbrushed, so stage-managed that it barely rises to the level of a shameless infomercial.” A review from The Hollywood Reporter said that the film “indulges its subject matter so extravagantly that not gushing about it feels downright unpatriotic.”

“‘Melania’ is a level of bland propaganda that almost resists review; it’s so promising it’s completely pointless,” wrote Kevin Fallon of the Daily Review.

Melanie McDonagh of the London Evening Standard played devil’s advocate in her review, giving the film three stars out of five and urging audiences to keep in mind that what they were showing was directed by the First Lady.

“What we see is what she wants us to see,” McDonough wrote. “If you think of this film as Melania’s carefully chosen interpretation of herself, there’s one thing she wants to convey: there’s a human warmth beneath those cheekbones and cat-like eyes.”

Meanwhile, a review in The Atlantic highlighted that the documentary was ultimately lackluster, quipping, “Ratner seems desperate to find action, but there’s none. The pace is sluggish.”

Sen. Alex Padilla calls for more ICE accountability as shutdown looms

0

play

  • California Sen. Alex Padilla is calling for further restrictions on funding for the Department of Homeland Security ahead of a possible government shutdown.
  • Mr. Padilla is seeking accountability measures against ICE and CBP, citing concerns over recent events and actions by ICE and CBP.
  • He is calling on federal employees to wear body cameras, stop using unmarked vehicles and stop profiling.

Sen. Alex Padilla of California wants to impose further restrictions on funding for the Department of Homeland Security ahead of a Jan. 30 deadline to avoid a federal shutdown.

The Democratic congressman said he wants assurances that the departments that oversee Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Customs and Border Protection, which he believes terrorize the country, will be held more accountable.

Padilla cited President Donald Trump’s previously controversial mass deportation plans in Los Angeles and Chicago, as well as ongoing aggressive immigration enforcement and civil unrest in Minneapolis that led to the shooting deaths of two Americans, Renee Nicole Good and Alex Preti, by federal immigration agents this month.

“We want to use this moment to bring real, enforceable accountability measures against ICE and CPB,” Padilla told USA TODAY in a Jan. 30 phone interview. “As long as they continue to act as if they are above the law, we should not approve additional funding for them.”

Padilla’s comments came more than two months after the U.S. endured the longest government shutdown in history, and amid the lingering threat of another federal shutdown.

The Senate passed a bill that would fund most departments except the Department of Homeland Security through the end of September. It was a partial deal, with just two weeks of DHS funding, and Democrats like Padilla had called for reining in immigration officials.

The Senate voted 71-29 to move the bill to the House. This comes after Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) initially opposed closing the deal early.

After stalling in an earlier vote, Graham said he had received consent from Senate Majority Whip John Thune, R-South Dakota, to vote on a bill that would crack down on sanctuary cities and allow widespread litigation stemming from special counsel Jack Smith’s investigation into the 2020 election.

“He told me he supports a vote on my bill that would repeal the sanctuary city policy once and for all by making it a federal crime for state and local officials to knowingly violate federal immigration law,” Graham said in a statement. “Remove the hold and vote yes on the package.”

Padilla thinks there’s still work to be done.

But Padilla said no government funding package should be approved without stronger measures regarding the role of federal agents in enforcement activities. Democrats plan to use the next two weeks to negotiate changes such as ending “patrol patrols” carried out by undercover officers in unmarked vehicles and requiring officers to wear body cameras and have proper identification.

“They have to take off their masks and turn on their body cameras,” Padilla said. “Body cameras in particular, we know from state and local law enforcement experience that not only are they good for general public safety, but they’re also good for officer safety. It’s a proven policy.”

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) agrees with Padilla.

“If Republicans are taking seriously the very reasonable demands that Democrats have made on ICE, there’s no reason they can’t come together quickly to pass a bill, which should take less than two weeks,” Schumer said on the Senate floor. “These are not radical demands; they are basic standards that the American people already expect from law enforcement.”

But Sen. John Kennedy (R-Louisiana) told reporters on January 30 that the next two weeks of negotiations on changes to ICE and CPB would include “the content and efficiency of a Class 8 car wash.”

“I’m not going to vote for a series of so-called reforms designed to cripple ICE, and I don’t think my Republican colleagues will either,” Kennedy said. “And I hope this prediction is wrong, but what I feel is a long, long shutdown of DHS.”

Padilla said he wants to make sure federal agents don’t stop people simply because they look or speak a certain way. He also called for a “credible, independent investigation” if agents are accused of using excessive force.

“We also want to make sure that enforcement actions are taken based on judicial warrants, which have long been the policy of the case,” Padilla added. “In other words, ICE, CBP, and other federal agencies are not simply pulling up people who meet certain profiles that the Supreme Court has allowed them to do.

“So you can’t violate the law when you’re trying to enforce the law,” Padilla added.

Padilla says President Trump is trying to “rigg” midterm elections

Padilla believes the Trump administration pulled the plug after Attorney General Pam Bondi delivered a three-page letter to Minnesota leaders calling it a “common sense solution.” Mr. Bondi called for the state’s voter rolls, Medicaid and Food and Nutrition Services program records, and the repeal of local sanctuary policies.

“This is clearly not about government security. It’s a political power grab. They want Minnesota’s voter rolls, and just days ago the FBI raided an election center in Georgia and took 2020 election materials,” Padilla said. “They are trying to rig the upcoming November election in a desperate attempt to stay in power. This is what it is for them.”

As another government shutdown looms, Padilla has a message for his Republican colleagues:

“Here’s the bottom line: This is for Congressional Republicans,” Padilla said. “Do they want a government shutdown or accountability for a Department of Homeland Security that is out of control? That’s the bottom line.”

Who will President Trump choose to lead the Fed? What you need to know about Kevin Warsh

0

play

President Donald Trump on January 30 nominated Kevin Warsh to lead the Federal Open Market Committee, which is increasingly split from the Federal Reserve after Chairman Jerome Powell’s term ends in May.

Warsh served on the Federal Reserve Board for five years from 2006 to 2011, including during the U.S. financial crisis. During that time, he was seen as a bridge to Wall Street and was pegged as a hawk, meaning he supported keeping interest rates high to control inflation. But Mr. Warsh has taken a more dovish stance lately, siding with the president in calling for further easing of the Fed’s benchmark federal funds rate.

Asked by reporters on January 30 whether Warsh had promised to cut interest rates as Fed chairman, Trump said: “No, but we’re talking about it.” “I don’t want to ask him that question. I think it’s inappropriate. It’s probably forgivable, but I want to keep it nice and pure. But I’m sure he wants a rate cut. I’ve been watching him for a long time.”

In an interview with CNBC last summer, Warsh even called for “systemic change” at the central bank, saying “the lack of credibility lies with the incumbent at the Fed.”

“Warsh has been critical of the Fed’s intervention in the market in terms of quantitative easing and basically the role of the Fed in general over the last few years,” said Liz Thomas, head of investment strategy at SoFi. “There is an expectation that he will push for some reform in terms of the Fed’s role in the markets. … If we were faced with a crisis, or if we were faced with inflation, we don’t know how he would respond to that.”

Warsh’s nomination wasn’t much of a surprise to many Fed watchers. Powell’s name has been part of the conversation since negotiations began last year about replacing him. He defeated other front-runners, including National Economic Council Chairman Kevin Hassett, Federal Reserve President Christopher Waller and BlackRock executive Rick Rieder.

Before Warsh can assume the role, his nomination must be approved by the Senate Banking Committee. It will then go to the Senate for a vote. The confirmation process could be complicated by Sen. Thom Tillis (R-North Carolina), who serves on the Banking Committee and has vowed to oppose any Fed nominations by President Trump until the Justice Department concludes its investigation into Mr. Powell.

Who is Kevin Warsh?

Former President George W. Bush appointed Mr. Warsh to the Federal Reserve Board in 2006 after serving as special assistant to the president for economic policy, executive director of the National Economic Council, and a member of the president’s Financial Markets Task Force.

Prior to that, Mr. Warsh was an executive at Morgan Stanley, where he worked as a financial advisor to companies across multiple industries.

He holds a bachelor’s degree in public policy from Stanford University and a law degree from Harvard Law School.

After leaving the Fed in 2011, Warsh returned to Stanford University, where he currently serves as a visiting scholar at the university’s Hoover Institution and lectures at the Stanford Graduate School of Management.

Does Kevin Warsh support rate cuts?

Mr. Thomas described Mr. Warsh as a “known figure” with experience on Wall Street, the Fed and Washington, but said his approach to interest rates remains somewhat questionable because Mr. Warsh has both hawkish and dovish views.

Wells Fargo economists said in a Jan. 30 note that if he is confirmed as the next Fed chair, they generally expect Warsh to take a “more dovish stance on monetary policy, driven by his optimism about productivity growth and his views on the need to lower interest rates to support ‘Main Street.'”

After President Trump has been pressuring the Fed for months to lower the federal funds rate, Sara Foster, an economist at Bankrate, said in a statement to USA TODAY that the president has made it clear that he wants the next Fed chair to share his desire to lower rates.

“But the chair is just one vote out of 12, and policymakers will need compelling evidence to move them off the sidelines,” Foster said.

What Warsh’s confirmation means for Fed independence

The Justice Department’s investigation into Mr. Powell and the Supreme Court case involving Federal Reserve President Lisa Cook have recently heightened concerns about the central bank’s independence from politics.

If Warsh is confirmed, he will become chairman at a time when maintaining the Fed’s credibility is part of its mission. Although such concerns seem heightened today, they are not new.

“Central bank independence is precious,” Warsh said in a 2010 speech during the administration of former President Barack Obama. “What may seem obvious in good times is tested when times get tough, and we still have tough times ahead. My colleagues and I have to prove that the Fed’s independence is not diminished and that the Fed’s long-term goals are intact.”

Not everyone is completely convinced that Warsh will be up to the task in 2026, including Mike Madowitz, chief economist at the liberal think tank Roosevelt Institute and nonprofit partner of the Franklin D. Roosevelt Presidential Library and Museum.

“Rarely has the Fed’s independence been tested as aggressively as it has been over the past year,” Madowitz said in a statement to USA TODAY. “Mr. Warsh’s nomination to lead the Fed does not reassure Americans that these threats are behind us. The costs of getting it wrong could be dramatic: higher home and car prices, higher barriers to starting a small business, and fewer benefits and higher taxes at the federal, state, and local levels.”

What is the current federal funds rate?

The FOMC left key interest rates unchanged on January 28, with some policymakers suggesting monetary policy was close to neutral after concerns about the U.S. labor market prompted a three-quarter point rate cut late last year.

The decision, which was not unanimous, left the federal funds rate, the benchmark national interest rate, at a range of 3.5% to 3.75%.

At a press conference following the announcement, Chairman Powell expressed further optimism about the U.S. economy, saying consumer spending remains healthy and the unemployment rate is showing signs of stabilizing. But he added that committee members are closely monitoring inflation as some companies appear poised to further pass on tariff-related costs to consumers this year.

Over the past few months, some members have been divided on the direction of interest rates. Rodney Williams, co-founder of Solo Funds, said some remain cautious about inflation while others are concerned about slowing growth.

“Warsh’s ability to negotiate and bridge these views will determine his success in his new role,” Williams told USA TODAY.

Contributor: Joey Garrison, USA TODAY

Contact Rachel Barber at rbarber@usatoday.com and follow her at X @rachelbarber_

Why China’s BYD electric cars threaten automakers

0

play

  • According to the company’s website, BYD vehicles are sold in more than 112 cities in 102 countries on six continents.
  • According to AlixPartners, Chinese car brands are expected to account for 30% of the global new car market by 2030.

Chinese automaker BYD is rapidly growing to become the world’s largest electric vehicle manufacturer, surpassing Tesla on a global scale in 2025.

The company, founded in 1995 as a secondary battery manufacturer and headquartered in Shenzhen, China, has recently attracted attention as an existential threat to automakers in the United States, Europe, and Japan.

BYD vehicles are sold in more than 112 cities in 102 countries on six continents and will soon enter the Canadian market as part of a new deal signed by Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, according to the company’s website.

Canada’s northern neighbor recently opened its doors slightly to Chinese automakers, saying Canada would allow up to 49,000 Chinese-made electric vehicles into its market at a most-favored-nation tariff of 6.1%. This represents less than 3% of Canada’s new car market based on market size in 2023-24.

While other brands are manufacturing EVs in China, the number of BYDs powered around the world is increasing every year. According to data released by the China Passenger Vehicle Association on January 9, overall car exports from China in 2025 increased by 19% to 5.79 million units, while exports of pure battery electric vehicles increased by 49% to 1.52 million units.

According to AlixPartners, Chinese car brands are expected to account for 30% of the global new car market by 2030.

How is BYD able to manufacture EVs so cheaply?

The Chinese government provides subsidies for standard development of standard parts across automakers through the China Automotive Technology Research Center. This is just one step of many to reduce costs and speed up production for Chinese automakers. Competing Western companies rely on proprietary, expensive, or difficult-to-source sources for vehicle manufacturing.

The government-controlled system has given China’s emerging auto industry several strategic advantages over foreign automakers by reducing manufacturing and labor costs.

Additionally, experts say China has a high proportion of trained engineers among its workforce and is introducing artificial intelligence and connected software into vehicle design and execution processes much faster than its competitors.

Another big advantage of the Chinese system is the process by which companies like BYD develop battery technology. They control the entire process from mining lithium to assembling battery packs.

The Chinese system results in a selection of attractive, high-quality, and affordable vehicles that can be sold in large quantities at a fraction of the price the same vehicles would cost if manufactured in the United States or other countries.

For example, BYD models range in price from $20,000 for the Dolphin compact hatchback and Atto 3 compact SUV to $180,000 for the luxury Yanwan U8L, a long-wheelbase version of the off-road SUV.

Some of BYD’s popular models

BYD only produces electric and hybrid models. According to BYDAC, a manufacturer and retailer of aftermarket auto accessories, here are some examples of popular models.

  • Seal, premium electric sedan
  • dolphin compact hatchback
  • Tang, a 7-seater SUV with a luxurious interior
  • Compact SUV “Atto 3”
  • Han EV and Han L, their flagship executive sedan and high-performance versions
  • Song Plus, mid-size electric SUV with hybrid option
  • Plug-in hybrid sedan “Qin Plus”

According to the company’s website, Han’s flagship EV has a range of 375 miles and can run from 0-60 mph in 3.9 seconds. It is equipped with all-wheel drive and the complete BYD Intelligent Driving System.

Despite the affordable price tag, BYD claims that its vehicles exude a premium feel.

According to Han’s product description, “The interior features solid wood panels, high-quality Nappa leather seats, aluminum trim, and rare materials not commonly found in other luxury cars.”

Another model you may have heard of is the Shark 6 pickup that BYD sells in Mexico.

Hybrid models include the Han DM-i and its upgraded version Han L DM-i, BYD Destroyer 05.

In addition to automobiles, BYD’s products also include freight, rail, transportation, battery energy storage systems, and electronics.

Is it possible to bring BYD to the US?

Purchasing a BYD electric vehicle in Canada and crossing the border into the United States is complicated, but not completely precluded by U.S. safety laws required for imported vehicles.

Under the Imported Vehicle Safety Compliance Act of 1988, U.S. citizens can import “nonconforming foreign motor vehicles” for personal use if they can prove that they are not intended for resale.

The process could still be costly enough to deter most would-be buyers of BYD. According to the law, anyone importing a nonconforming foreign vehicle must also pay a bond and comply with other conditions established by the U.S. Secretary of Transportation.

According to the law, why is BYD unsafe?

One of the big hurdles to overcome is the autonomous capabilities of BYD electric vehicles. There is no existing federal framework for determining what is safe in autonomous vehicles (AVs), but perhaps one is in the works.

A more pressing safety concern is the vast amount of data self-driving cars need to collect and utilize to operate effectively: precise location data, driver behavior data, and vehicle data from sensors and cameras. In other words, the U.S. government is wary of sharing this kind of data directly with foreign automakers with strong ties to the Chinese government.

Perceived national security risks are part of the reason President Donald Trump’s administration has imposed 100% tariffs on all Chinese-made cars.

USA Today automotive writer Keith Laing contributed to this report. Jackie Charniga covers General Motors for the Free Press. Contact me at jcharniga@freepress.com.

Musk exchanged emails with Epstein about party on private island

0

play

WASHINGTON — Billionaire technology entrepreneur Elon Musk had multiple conversations with Jeffrey Epstein about visiting the suspected sex trafficker on his private island, according to emails released by the Justice Department.

Among the 3 million pages of documents released by the Justice Department on January 30 are email exchanges between Mr. Musk and Mr. Epstein in 2012 and 2013 about plans for the CEO and founder of SpaceX and Tesla to visit Mr. Epstein’s 70-acre Little St. James Island in the U.S. Virgin Islands.

On November 24, 2012, Mr. Epstein wrote to Mr. Musk, “How many people will be taking the helicopter to the island?”

“Probably just Talulah and I. What day and night will be the wildest party on our island?” Musk responded the next day, November 25, 2012.

In the wake of Congress passing the Epstein File Transparency Act in November, the Justice Department’s latest release of files from the Epstein investigation reveals more extensive communications between Mr. Musk and Mr. Epstein than previously known.

In 2013, the two exchanged emails about Musk visiting Epstein’s island while on vacation and about Musk’s plans to be near the Caribbean island of Saint-Barthelemy.

“I’m planning on staying in the BVI/St. Barts area over the holidays. Is there a good time to visit?” Musk wrote in an email to Epstein on December 13, 2013.

Mr. Epstein responded via email on December 15, 2013: “Anytime between the 1st and the 8th. Listen if you’d like. I always have space for you.”

After exchanging potential dates, Musk wrote in a December 25, 2013 email: “Actually, we can fly back early on the 3rd. We’ll be in St. Barts. When on the 2nd should we head to your island?”

It is unclear whether Mr. Musk traveled. Representatives for Mr. Musk did not respond to requests for comment.

Musk has denied ever visiting Epstein’s island. In a 2019 interview with Vanity Fair after Epstein’s arrest, Musk said, “He tried many times to invite me to visit his island, but I said no.”

Epstein owned two islands in the U.S. Virgin Islands: Little St. James and Great St. James. Much of Epstein’s trafficking of underage girls is said to have taken place at his compound in Little St. James. The two islands were purchased by developers in 2023, years after Epstein died in prison in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges.

X Contact Joey Garrison at @joeygarrison.

Weekend forecast calls for “first snowstorm in decades” in parts of the South

0


Leaders in North Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia issued or extended states of emergency ahead of the winter storm.

play

The frigid temperatures and wintry weather aren’t over yet on the East Coast, as the nation braces for what meteorologists are describing as a bomb cyclone, nor’easter, and blizzard.

The National Weather Service announced on January 30 that the Carolinas were headed for blizzard conditions due to a “rapidly intensifying coastal low.” Heavy snow, strong winds and dangerous travel conditions will hit North and South Carolina, as well as parts of Virginia and Georgia, over the weekend.

The Raleigh Weather Service said 4 to 8 inches of snow was expected to fall in central North Carolina starting the night of Jan. 30, with localized accumulations of more than a foot expected. Wind chills will reach as low as -5 degrees in this region.

The National Weather Service in Columbia, South Carolina, said some areas near the Carolina border could see 6 to 8 inches of rain, while other areas could see 3 to 6 inches of rain.

“For cities like Charlotte, Raleigh and Greensboro, this storm could be the biggest snowstorm in decades,” AccuWeather said.

Up to 6 inches of snow could fall in southern Virginia, according to AccuWeather.

Winter storm forecast for the weekend

The snow that began in Kentucky on the morning of January 30 is expected to spread into the Appalachians, while a coastal low develops off the coast of the southeastern United States. The cyclone is expected to intensify on January 31 and February 1, causing coastal flooding up and down the east coast.

As new weather challenges continue in the East, gusty arctic winds are moving south and will reach as far south as the Gulf Coast by the evening of January 30, the National Weather Service announced. Daily low temperatures could collapse across the Ohio Valley and Mid-Atlantic, bringing “dangerously cold” temperatures to the Southeast and even Floridians with the potential for snowstorms. Subzero weather is expected in South Florida as February begins.

Parts of the same region affected by last weekend’s massive winter storm will once again be experiencing frigid cold and snow.

“This is severe and deadly winter weather that will not let up,” AccuWeather meteorologist Brandon Buckingham said in an advisory.

Leaders in North Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia issued or extended states of emergency ahead of the winter storm.

“High winds and bitter cold will bring snow,” North Carolina Governor Josh Stein said. “Our biggest concern is unsafe travel. Stay home and stay off the streets during the winter.”

Where does it snow?

The snowpack will move into Kentucky on the morning of January 30th and move over the southern Appalachians on January 31st. Snow will also spread into the Carolinas, southern Virginia and northern Georgia, the weather service said.

Moderate to heavy snow could extend into North Carolina’s Outer Banks. Snow is also possible in parts of Maryland and Delaware.

A winter storm warning covered the Carolinas, northeastern Georgia, southern Virginia and eastern Tennessee. As of the afternoon of January 30th, 31 million people were under winter storm warnings.

Although the storm’s exact path through the mid-Atlantic coast and Northeast is not 100% certain, AccuWeather meteorologists say the areas most likely to see snow are 3 to 6 inches in southeastern Massachusetts, and 1 to 3 inches in Rhode Island, eastern Massachusetts and the eastern coast of Maine. Storms are expected from Northern Virginia to New York City.

Track snowfall with this interactive map

Stay tuned to USA TODAY’s tracker for the latest information on this weekend’s snowfall totals.

Contributors: Dinah Voyles Pulver and Doyle Rice

Starbucks previews spring 2026 menu. When new items are dropped.

0

play

Spring is still more than a month away, but Starbucks is already counting the days and unveiling its spring menu as winter weather spreads.

Lavender, coconut, and ube (purple yam) dominate Starbucks’ Spring 2026 menu, with several fan favorites returning, including Iced Lavender Cream Matcha, Iced Lavender Latte, and Lavender Cream Frappuccino.

Starbucks also plans to introduce new chai recipes this spring, according to a Jan. 26 news release. Details were limited, but Starbucks promises that the base will be the same “iconic chai flavor” made with “black tea and warming spices like cinnamon, cloves, cardamom and ginger.”

The new menu items will launch alongside Starbucks’ refreshed rewards program. The new program, which launches on March 10, offers three free membership tiers, including extended benefit expiration dates, new ways to earn points, and one free drink change per month.

Here’s what we know so far about Starbucks’ spring menu drop.

When does Starbucks’ spring menu end?

Starbucks’ Spring 2026 menu will go on sale on Tuesday, March 3rd.

What is Starbucks’ spring menu?

The spring menu is as follows.

  • Toasted coconut cream cold brew (new)
  • Toasted coconut latte (new)
  • Iced ube coconut macchiato (new)
  • Iced lavender cream chai (new)
  • iced lavender cream matcha
  • iced lavender latte
  • lavender cream frappuccino
  • Frog cake pop (new)

Starbucks changes chai recipe

In addition to several new drinks, Starbucks is also updating its chai recipe, which will also be available on March 3rd. Customers will soon be able to customize their chai drinks, “adjusting the level of sweetness, spice and overall flavor,” according to a Jan. 26 news release. As of January 30th, Starbucks had not released any details about the new recipes.

The new Energy Refresher will be available later this spring

Starbucks will also introduce a new Energy Refresher later this spring, Erin Shane Riley, Starbucks brand communications director, told USA TODAY on January 30. Iced drinks offer customizable energy, allowing customers to order decaf or add extra energy. Energy Refresher is naturally made with a blend of B vitamins and caffeine, Riley continued.

New syrups will also be added to the menu.

Two new syrups, raspberry and mango, will also be available later this spring, Riley said.

Contributor: Mike Snider, USA TODAY

Greta Cross is USA TODAY’s national trends reporter. Story ideas? Email her at gcross@usatoday.com.

Ghislaine Maxwell’s citizenship records released in Epstein file drop

0


Maxwell was convicted in 2021 of sex trafficking of minors against Jeffrey Epstein.

play

Ghislaine Maxwell’s U.S. citizenship application was posted on Friday, January 30, among the latest set of files released by the Department of Justice regarding convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

Maxwell, a close associate of Mr. Epstein, was convicted in 2021 of sex trafficking minors to a disgraced financier. She is serving a 20-year sentence.

According to the document, Maxwell became a permanent resident of the United States on February 5, 1995 and received citizenship nearly eight years later on November 27, 2002. Born to a French mother and British father, Maxwell holds dual citizenship in the United States, United Kingdom, and France.

The 2002 document lists two of Epstein’s companies as employers. One is J. Epstein & Company, an investment banking and finance company that Epstein founded after leaving Bear Stearns, and LSJ, LLC.

Mr. Maxwell’s citizenship application is one of 3 million pages of files related to Mr. Epstein released by the Justice Department at the request of Congress. These files represent about 60% of all the files the government has collected on Epstein. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche said the latest batch included 2,000 videos and 180,000 images.

Maxwell is scheduled to testify before Congress in February about an alleged sex trafficking network run by her late bosses.

Epstein, who died in a Manhattan jail in 2019 while awaiting trial, had ties to some of the world’s richest and most powerful people, including Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, formerly known as Prince Andrew, President Donald Trump and former President Bill Clinton. All three have denied wrongdoing.

In late 2025, Maxwell was transferred from a federal prison in Florida to a low-security facility in Texas after a meeting with the Department of Justice.

Sidney Sweeney addresses Republican rumors, ‘MAGA Barbie’ label

0

play

Sydney Sweeney is responding to an online discussion calling her a “MAGA Barbie” in the wake of a controversial denim ad.

In a new interview with Cosmopolitan, the “Housemaid” star, 28, hit back at a commenter who said she made assumptions about her political leanings.

“I’ve never been here to talk about politics. I’ve always been here to make art. So this is not a conversation I want to be at the forefront of,” Sweeney told the outlet. Many are casting her as a conservative, especially after a jeans ad she shot for American Eagle drew harsh criticism from some quarters and was fiercely defended by President Trump, Vice President J.D. Vance, and others. The ad was characterized by some as promoting white supremacist ideology in order to exalt her “good genes” (and play on words “good jeans”) as a blue-eyed, blonde woman.

“People want to take it further and use me as their pawn,” Sweeney told Cosmo. “But it’s someone else assigning something to me, so I can’t control that.”

As for why she doesn’t go on record about what she believes, Sweeney said she simply doesn’t want to be involved in the conversation at all.

“I don’t get it. I’m not an asshole. If I say, ‘That’s not true,’ they’ll come at me like, ‘You’re just saying that to look good.'” There’s no winning. You never win,” she said.

“I have to continue to be who I am, because I know who I am,” Sweeney continued. “I can’t make everyone love me. I know what I stand for.”

Sweeney’s interview took place as she launched her new lingerie brand Syrn, the latest in a string of commercial successes. With 2,025 film appearances under her belt, including both the box office failure Christie and the thriller The Housemaid, she remained booked and busy.

An ad for American Eagle jeans, which critics accused of toying with “good genes,” and a campaign for Dr. Scutch soap, which reportedly contained her real bath water, both frequently sparked debate over the use of her celebrity as a branding opportunity.

Why are gold and silver prices falling today? Here’s what you need to know

0

play

U.S. stocks fell, with gold and silver posting their biggest single-day declines since 1980 after President Donald Trump announced he would choose former Federal Reserve Governor Kevin Warsh to be the next Fed chairman.

Warsh, currently a fellow at the Hoover Institution and a lecturer at the Stanford Graduate School of Management, will need Senate confirmation to succeed Jerome Powell at the top of the Fed when his term expires in May. Warsh is seen as the most hawkish of the group, having won the nomination over BlackRock executive Rick Rieder, current Federal Reserve Director Christopher Waller and current National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett.

Because hawks are wary of inflation, they tend to favor high interest rates to combat inflation, compared to doves, who generally favor low interest rates to promote economic growth.

Mr. Warsh’s nomination eliminates uncertainty about Mr. Trump’s selection as the next Fed chairman, but his confirmation remains uncertain. Sen. Thom Tillis (R-North Carolina) said he would oppose Warsh’s confirmation until the federal criminal investigation into current Fed Chairman Jerome Powell’s handling of renovations at the Fed’s headquarters is resolved.

Stocks, which typically thrive in a low-interest-rate environment, are also weighing the pros and cons of the possibility of a hawk in power who is reluctant to cut interest rates, which President Trump has repeatedly called for.

“[Warsh]has historically been a hawk on monetary policy and will naturally want to stay on Trump’s good side, but this should help temper expectations that the Fed will start cutting rates indiscriminately once he takes office,” Quilter portfolio manager Stuart Clark said in a note to investors.

Ultimately, Warsh’s appointment is seen as a good choice, experts said. “Over the long term, Warsh’s appointment strengthens the prospects for policy continuity and institutional credibility,” Seema Shah, chief global strategist at Principal Asset Management, said in an email. “That stability should be far more important to the market than the kind of sudden reactions we’re seeing today.”

Mark Marek, chief investment officer at Sievert Financial, said Warsh could prevent a market meltdown as Fed chair if investors believe there is an artificial intelligence bubble.

“A monetarist-led Fed will tighten the filters on even the most spend-happy AI players, leaving us with only those who can afford it. Could a bubble have just been avoided?” he said in an email.

The S&P 500 composite index closed 0.43% (29.98 points) lower at 6,939.03, but still managed to gain for the month. The blue-chip Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 0.36%, or 179.09 points, to 48,892.47, while the tech-heavy Nasdaq fell 0.94%, or 223.3 points, to 23,461.82.

The benchmark 10-year US Treasury yield rose to 4.247%.

“Bond markets have always been captured earlier than equities and were quick to price in the lower likelihood of aggressive easing, which is why yields rose,” Malek said.

Is Warsh a Goldstopper?

Gold prices rose to record levels this year amid geopolitical and economic uncertainty. The U.S. economy is showing slowing job growth and inflation remains above the Fed’s 2% target, with some economists expecting it to rise further this year.

But Mr. Warsh and his past reputation as an inflation-fighter sent gold prices plummeting. Gold fell more than 9%, or nearly $500, to $4,871.30 an ounce. Silver also plunged more than 27%, its biggest single-day drop since 1980.

“Gold sold because the hawkish Fed chair candidate signaled less tolerance for inflation and less appetite for financial repression,” Malek said.

Is Mr. Warsh saving the US dollar?

The U.S. dollar reversed some of its decline this year after Warsh’s announcement, with the expectation that he won’t cut interest rates to appease President Trump.

“This seems like it could at least reduce the risk of another big drop in the dollar at this point,” said Francesco Pesole, foreign exchange strategist at Dutch bank ING.

What about the government shutdown?

Mr. Warsh’s nomination as the next Fed chairman has overshadowed government shutdown talks among investors, but the government is expected to enter a temporary partial shutdown this weekend after the Senate failed to pass a funding package on Thursday.

Economists said the negative impact on the economy would be limited if the government were able to reopen next week.

Medora Lee is USA TODAY’s money, markets and personal finance reporter. Please contact us at mjlee@usatoday.com. Subscribe to our free Daily Money newsletter for personal finance tips and business news every Monday through Friday morning.

Don Lemon Arrested – What Happened to His Career After CNN?

0


Life after CNN sees Don Lemon take on the Trump administration and conservatives as an independent journalist. Now that led to his arrest.

Don Lemon’s focus as an independent journalist has changed dramatically.

The 59-year-old former CNN anchor, who was ousted from the network for making sexist and ageist comments, was arrested on Friday, January 30, weeks after covering a protest inside a church in Minnesota on January 18, according to the New York Times and CBS News.

Lemon, whose attorney Abby Lowell called the arrest “an unprecedented attack on the First Amendment,” was one of several journalists who attended the Cities Church protest in St. Paul, Minnesota. The church is reportedly pastored by an Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent.

USA TODAY has reached out to Lemon’s attorney for comment.

Why was Don Lemon fired from CNN?

CNN offered no explanation when Lemon was fired in 2023, with CNN’s then-CEO Chris Licht saying only in a statement that Lemon and the network had “parted ways.” However, Lemon’s resignation from the agency after 17 years was announced weeks earlier amid allegations of misogyny.

He was accused of making offensive remarks about women. Variety reported at the time that Lemon made offensive comments about former colleagues Nancy Grace and Soledad O’Brien on air and in meetings. At the time, a representative for Lemon told USA TODAY that the report contained “obviously false anecdotes” and “anonymous gossip from 15 years ago.”

Lemon has caused controversy many times with his on-air comments. He once said that then-presidential candidate Nikki Haley was “not in her prime” and that “women are considered to be in their prime in their 20s, 30s and maybe 40s,” but after being asked to explain, he added: “I’m not saying I agree with that.” Lemon later I apologized I appreciate his comments before he left the airwaves and returned.

He also faced backlash for comments about women’s soccer and for telling Bill Cosby’s accuser how to avoid assault, telling him, “If you don’t want to give oral sex, there are ways not to do it.” Lemon later apologized.

Don Lemon pivots to YouTube show, independent journalism

The journalist has launched “The Don Lemon Show,” which will be streamed twice a day and shared as a podcast on multiple platforms in 2024. (The show also briefly hosted on X before clashing with Elon Musk.) Lemon’s work now includes an edgy YouTube channel that boasts 1 million followers and social media content that leans heavily toward criticism of President Donald Trump, his administration, and policies.

During his interview at the epicenter of the arrest, he streamed nearly seven hours on his YouTube channel, speaking with members of his congregation, protesters and one of the church’s pastors. At one point during the livestream, Lemon said, “I’m going to be as respectful as possible. I’m not here to intimidate anyone. I’m just here to go on the record and get answers.”

He added: “This is something you get in independent journalism that you don’t get in corporate media.”

Lemon is one of several anchors to pivot to independent journalism, including former anchors Megyn Kelly and Katie Couric.

Don Lemon arrested after saying he wants Nicki Minaj to go to jail

Mr. Lemon’s independent stance has allowed the journalist to speak out more and respond more quickly to criticism. This includes a sharp response to Nicki Minaj’s call for Lemon’s arrest over ICE’s coverage of protests.

In the X post, Minaj called Lemon “disgusting” and used an anti-gay slur. “Is that what it is? I want that thug in jail!” Minaj wrote in all caps on January 19th. She then doubled down on her use of the slur.

In an Instagram video that day, Lemon criticized Minaj’s posts as “wild” and “homophobic.”

“You’re out of line,” Lemon said, before questioning Minaj’s citizenship. The former anchor also elevated Minaj’s husband, Kenneth Petty, to his status as a registered Level 2 sex offender. “You have the nerve to say what you think about me and what I do,” Lemon said. “Nicki Minaj, please live. Please stop choosing me.”

contribution:

LEGO Icon Golden Retriever Puppy Set available for purchase on February 1st

0

play

Lego’s latest Lego Icon set will be available for purchase this weekend, and it’s a set dog lovers won’t want to miss.

The new Lego Icon Golden Retriever Puppy will be available to purchase from Sunday 1st February.

“Our latest LEGO adult set is packed with the big energy of a Golden Retriever,” LEGO said in an Instagram post.

According to Lego’s website, the set features a golden retriever puppy wearing a blue collar with a gold tag that can be posed in various positions. Contains 2,102 pieces and is recommended for adults 18 years and older.

The pup joins other pet sets including the 1,722-piece LEGO Disney 101 Dalmatian Puppy Set and the 1,710-piece LEGO Ideas Tuxedo Cat.

Here’s what you need to know, including how much it costs and where you can buy it.

Where can I buy the Lego Golden Retriever Puppy Set?

Starting Sunday, Feb. 1, the Lego Icon Golden Retriever Puppy will be available for purchase at Lego stores, the Lego website, Target stores and the Target website, a Lego spokesperson told USA TODAY via email.

Lego sets will be available at other major retailers on April 1st, but Lego has not said where.

How much does the Lego Golden Retriever Puppy Set cost?

The LEGO set retails for $139.99 (excluding taxes and fees).

The LEGO set was available for pre-order on the LEGO website, but pre-orders have now ended. Lego says pre-orders are scheduled to ship on Sunday, February 1st.

You can purchase up to 3 sets at a time.

What is the recommended age for the LEGO Golden Retriever puppy set?

The LEGO set, like other sets in the LEGO Icon line, is recommended for adults 18 years and older.

Lego sets that are rated 18+ are more advanced than other sets and may include more pieces or more intricate designs. According to Lego’s website, the set is “specifically designed for adults” so they can “unplug, unbox and relax.”

A Lego spokesperson said the set was designed with adults in mind. However, parents can still build sets together.

How big is the LEGO Golden Retriever puppy set?

The 2,102-piece LEGO set stands approximately 1 foot tall and 11.5 inches tall when assembled.

How can Lego sets be made movable?

Lego says the Golden Retriever puppy’s head, ears and tail can be posed to create canine expressions. The paws can be lifted and the mouth opens, allowing the creator to add a pink tongue made of LEGO “for a wide range of adorable expressions.”

The Lego set also features a row of small teeth.

Julia is USA TODAY’s trends reporter, covering popular toys, scientific research, natural disasters, and trending news. Connect with her on LinkedIn ×Instagram, TikTok: @juliamaigz or email jgomez@hannett.com.

San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan enters crowded California gubernatorial race

0

play

  • San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan has announced his candidacy for California governor.
  • Mahan, a moderate Democrat, joins a crowded field of candidates seeking to succeed Gavin Newsom.
  • He has previously criticized Gov. Gavin Newsom for focusing on national politics rather than state issues such as housing and poverty.
  • Mahan points to San Jose’s achievements in reducing homelessness and crime as a blueprint for the state.

San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan is a political upstart who joins a long list of candidates for California governor when Gavin Newsom’s term ends later this year.

In a Jan. 29 post on X, the Democratic candidate announced his participation in the gubernatorial race “because we can do better.” The mayor said he has proven that by leading San Jose, the most populous city in the San Francisco Bay Area region and a longtime center of Silicon Valley’s technology sector.

“I’m running to bring the focus back to government,” Mahan said in a social media post. “To give cities the tools they need to succeed. To show that the best resistance to division is results. And to prove that California can work again. For everyone.”

Mr. Mahan, 43, was largely unknown on the national stage but quickly rose to prominence in California politics. He was elected to the San Jose City Council in 2020 and ran successfully for mayor in 2022.

When Governor Newsom criticized President Donald Trump on social media, Mahan praised him and loudly criticized him. Last year, Mahan wrote in an op-ed that Newsom was ignoring California’s high unemployment and poverty rates.as well as the state’s housing crisis and energy prices. Taking a “blind leap into memeland” while holding the highest position in the country.

“This may be a winning strategy for his presidential campaign, but it’s a losing strategy for improving the lives of Californians, and now more politicians will try to advance with silly online strategies rather than smart policies,” Mahan wrote in the San Francisco Standard in August. “The way we win the fight for a better California is by solving problems in the real world, not by stooping to Donald Trump’s level online.”

Brian Sobel, a longtime political analyst based in the San Francisco Bay Area, said Mr. Mahan isn’t afraid to be outspoken, even with members of his own party, which could appeal to some voters who want change.

“This was a refreshing perspective for someone who was thinking, ‘Hey, I can’t believe you’re here,'” Sobel said, referring to Mahan’s comments about Newsom. “Mahan would be an interesting candidate who could attract a lot of attention to see if he has the necessary qualities.”

Mahan enters crowded gubernatorial race

Mahan, considered a moderate Democrat, joins an already crowded field of eight Democrats and two Republicans, but no clear front-runner to run the nation’s most populous state, which is also the world’s fourth-largest economy.

Candidates include Democratic Rep. Eric Swalwell, former Rep. Katie Porter, U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, and investor Tom Steyer. Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco and former Fox News host Steve Hilton are also Republicans.

Other notable candidates for California governor include State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Thurmond, former Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, and former Secretary of State Betty Yee, all Democrats.

The party’s primaries are scheduled for June. The top two vote-getters will advance to the November general election.

Mahan: “I want to fix California”

Mahan said last year that he would not run for governor, but has hinted in recent weeks that he would only run as a last resort.

Sobel said that given his limited political experience, Mahan needs to prove to voters that he is serious about running, especially how he plans to tackle key issues, including California’s $18 billion budget deficit.

“He’s going to have to make the case that he has the bandwidth and ability to do the job,” Sobel said.

“We need to fix California,” Mahan told Inside California Politics host Nikki Lorenzo on January 29. He also told Laurenzo that “I have never seen a candidate articulate with specificity what we need to do.”

Mahan said California voters can look to his accomplishments in San Jose as a blueprint, citing his accomplishments as lowering crime and homelessness rates and breaking through bureaucratic red tape to build new housing across the city.

“After 10 years of growth, the number of unsheltered homeless people has fallen by nearly a third, and last year we were rated America’s safest large city for the first time in more than 20 years,” Mahan said in a Jan. 29 X post. “We are the only city that has solved 100% of our homicides for almost four consecutive years. And we have worked with urgency and integrity on affordability, freeing thousands of housing units over the past several years.”

Mahan drew the ire of some progressives and housing advocates in San Jose when he got the City Council to approve a controversial plan that would give the city permission to arrest homeless people if they refuse to visit a shelter three times in an 18-month period. Mahan emphasized case-by-case evaluation and redefined outreach workers to use their discretion to decide when to escalate a refusal to evacuate.

In 2024, Mahan also targeted Newsom and some state Democrats when he supported Proposition 36. Prop. 36 would have allowed prosecutors to charge people convicted of a variety of third-time drug offenses and property crimes with so-called mandatory treatment felonies, giving offenders the option of behavioral health treatment or up to three years in jail or prison.

Voters overwhelmingly approved the measure.

Mahan said in a Jan. 29 social media post that California voters “need to stand up for our rights, our freedoms, and our neighbors.”

“We need to use the tools at hand to protect our democracy,” Mahan continued. “One tool is the law and the other tool is our results. We need to use both.”

Luigi Mangione’s federal murder charges are dropped, making him ineligible for the death penalty

0

play

The death penalty for Luigi Mangione in the murder of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson was removed after the most serious federal charges were dismissed by a judge on January 30.

Mangione still faces other state charges. He has pleaded not guilty to murder, weapons and forgery charges in New York.

The latest update hinges on four counts filed in federal court against Mangione, 27, in connection with a Dec. 4, 2024, shooting outside a Manhattan hotel. He has been charged with two counts of stalking, weapons offenses and murder with a firearm, and could face the death penalty if convicted.

In a Jan. 30 court order, U.S. District Judge Margaret M. Garnett granted a motion to remove the death penalty from the case and dismiss the two most serious charges. Mr. Mangione will continue to stand trial on charges of stalking him in the death of Mr. Thompson, which carries a maximum sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole.

U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi has directed the Justice Department to pursue the death penalty against Mangione in 2025. At the time, defense attorney Karen Friedman Agnifilo said in a statement that the federal charges were brought by a “lawless Justice Department” that made a “political” decision to pursue the death penalty.

In his order dismissing the charges, Garnett wrote that the use of a firearm and the use of a weapon to murder require the elements of “during and in connection with” another federal crime to be considered a “crime of violence.”

Although these charges were based on stalking, Garnett found that they did not meet the legal definition of a “crime of violence,” noting that the legal standard is counterintuitive to the average person.

Mangione is scheduled to appear in court later on Jan. 30, when a representative for his defense team said statements about the new order will be made.

Massive legal battle unfolds after death of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson

In separate state charges, Mr. Mangione has pleaded not guilty to murder, weapons and forgery charges in New York. He has been charged in the state with nine felonies, including second-degree murder, which could result in a sentence of 25 years to life in prison. In September, a judge dismissed state terrorism-related charges against Mangione. A trial date for the New York charges has not been set.

He also faces weapons and related charges in Pennsylvania, where he was arrested at the McDonald’s after a lengthy investigation and has pleaded not guilty.

Mangione is accused of using a 3D-printed “ghost gun” to shoot Thompson in the back in the early morning hours of December 4, 2024. Prosecutors argued that his writings showed “hostility” toward the health insurance industry. The violence drew harsh condemnation from political leaders, but also sparked a surge of support for Mangione. Supporters gathered outside his courtroom and donated to a fund for his legal costs.

(This story has been updated to add new information.)

How much tax relief can I claim? IRS limits explained

0

If you’re behind on taxes or penalties, “How much tax relief can I claim?” This is usually the first question, and the most difficult one to answer. The simple truth is that the IRS calculates relief amounts differently depending on the type of program involved, income, tax liability, and other strict eligibility rules.

Understanding how these amounts are determined can help you set realistic expectations and avoid confusion when reviewing IRS notices or considering professional assistance. Below is a practical breakdown of how tax relief works, what affects a taxpayer’s IRS tax relief amount, and why results can vary widely for different taxpayers.

The true meaning of tax reduction

The “tax reduction amount” does not necessarily mean that the amount of tax paid will be lower overall. Depending on your program, relief may be applied to different parts of your IRS balance, including:

  • unpaid taxes
  • penalty or interest
  • Monthly payment amount
  • overall tax liability

Different forms of relief affect different parts of your balance, so when comparing tax relief options, it’s essential to understand what the programs actually change.

Tax deduction amount that can be claimed from credit

Tax credits are one of the most direct tax deductions, but they are also one of the most misunderstood.

refundable creditprograms like the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) allow you to get a refund even if you pay little or no federal income tax. In some cases, this allows taxpayers to recover more tax than they should have paid.

non-refundable creditThings like residential clean energy credits work differently. These credits can only reduce your bill to zero, but once your tax liability is zero, you can’t get a refund. Some credits are somewhere in between; Partial refund possiblethat is, you can only pay part of the credit.

This difference alone can have a significant impact on your final IRS tax relief amount.

Other limitations may further reduce the benefit of the tax credit, including:

  • gradual reduction in income Credits may be gradually reduced or eliminated as revenue increases
  • Annual limit Limit the amount that can be deducted in a single tax year
  • Filing status and dependency rules May affect eligibility

Because of these limitations, advertised credit amounts are not guaranteed and often reflect the maximum possible return. That’s why it’s important to understand the credit rules and how they differ from deductions when estimating your actual tax relief.

How deductions affect your tax bill

deduction The mechanism is different from the tax credit. Rather than reducing your tax bill by one dollar, a deduction reduces your taxable income, which in turn reduces the portion of your income that is subject to tax.

For example, a “tax-free overtime pay” provision treats eligible overtime pay as a deduction rather than a refundable credit. In other words, the value of your benefits is determined by your marginal tax rate. A $1,000 deduction does not reduce your tax bill by $1,000. The amount of income that is taxed is lower, and the deduction is generally more valuable for higher income earners.

Taxpayers usually have the option of taking the standard deduction or itemized deductions. Itemization tends to benefit people with large amounts of eligible expenses, such as mortgage interest or charitable donations. If the deductible expenses exceed the basic deduction amount, you can expect greater tax savings by breaking them down.

For tax year 2025, the standard deduction will be $15,750 for single filers (or married couples filing separately), $31,500 for married couples filing jointly (or qualifying surviving spouses), and $23,625 for heads of households.

Penalties and interest reduction: How much can you reduce them?

The IRS may reduce certain penalties, but relief is limited and depends on eligibility.

Some taxpayers may be eligible First time penalty reductionpenalties can be lifted for those who have a track record of filing and paying on time. There may be other qualifications Relief based on reasonable grounds The penalty is caused by circumstances beyond your control, such as a serious illness or natural disaster. Neither option is inherently more permissive than the other. If both meet the IRS standards, you can completely remove any eligible penalties.

In practice, even if a taxpayer requests relief for cause, the IRS will apply initial penalty relief if the taxpayer qualifies. Even if the initial reduction does not apply, the IRS may consider reasonable cause relief.

interest reductionHowever, it is much more limited. Interest on released penalties may be automatically reduced, but interest on unpaid taxes typically continues to accrue and is rarely waived. Lawrence Sprung, CFP, CEPA, wealth advisor and founder of Mitlin Financial, explains, “Interest is a different story. Interest will not be removed unless the IRS shows an error or an unreasonably long delay.”

Payment plans and how much they change your payment amount

IRS payment plan Spreading your payments out over time makes it easier to manage your balance. However, the outstanding amount will not be reduced. Interest and penalties typically continue to accrue until the balance is paid in full, and setup fees may apply depending on the type of plan you choose.

Instead of lowering the bill, payment plans change how and for how long taxpayers pay. Depending on the plan, taxpayers may see information such as:

  • lower monthly payments
  • Repayment period becomes longer
  • Ongoing interest and penalties

Short-term payment plans are designed for taxpayers who can pay in full within 180 days and don’t have a set-up fee. Long-term payment plans allow you to extend your repayment period but usually include a set-up fee. In either case, interest and penalties will continue to accrue until the balance is paid in full.

Offer in Compromise: How the Settlement Amount is Determined

Ann offer of compromise (OIC) allows some taxpayers to settle their tax debt for less than the amount owed, but the eligibility is strict and the calculation is based on a formula. Rather than negotiating a discount, the IRS determines whether the offer reflects the amount it believes it can realistically collect.

“The IRS is effectively calculating the risk of being paid or not being paid and whether or not they will actually collect the unpaid tax,” Sprung explains. “It will scrutinize a taxpayer’s income, assets, necessary living expenses, and even future earning capacity.”

This analysis can work against taxpayers who are low on cash but appear to be rich in assets. Even if your current income is low, the IRS may expect people with large assets (including retirement accounts) to use those resources to pay off their debts. As Sprung points out, the IRS is not evaluating what it feels is fair to taxpayers, but rather what it reasonably believes it can collect over time.

This is why OIC settlement amounts vary widely and why advertised reductions are often not universally applicable. Approval depends on the taxpayer’s overall financial situation, not on the promised percentage from the balance.

Why do tax cuts vary so much?

Each IRS program follows its own rules and calculations, so tax relief results will vary.

“This is primarily because no two taxpayers have the same income, filing status, debt, and compliance history,” Sprung explains. “All of these factors will influence (how the IRS evaluates relief) and will result in different outcomes.”

Because of this complexity, there is no standard or guaranteed tax reduction amount. The relief available will depend on the specific program involved and the taxpayer’s complete financial situation. For taxpayers with multiple years of unpaid taxes, penalties, or asset considerations, working with a CPA or qualified tax professional may help clarify which options are realistic.

When expert help is available to estimate relief

Some taxpayers work with a certified public accountant, registered agent, or tax advisor to review IRS notices and evaluate relief options. Some people turn to tax relief companies to help evaluate eligibility and negotiate with the IRS.

Companies such as Optima, Anthem Tax Services, Alleviate Tax, BC Tax, and Priority Tax Relief are examples of companies that help taxpayers understand the tax relief programs available to them.

Although working with a professional does not guarantee a specific outcome, it can help taxpayers better understand their realistic options and take full advantage of appropriate tax relief mechanisms.

How to estimate tax relief potential

Taxpayers can take several practical steps to assess their situation.

  • Review IRS notices to determine the type of balance, penalty, or action involved.
  • Estimate your credits, deductions, or payment options using IRS calculators and online tools
  • If your situation involves unpaid taxes, penalties, or complex income issues, please consult a qualified tax professional.

These steps will help you clarify your expectations before committing to a course of action.

conclusion

When it comes to tax relief, there is no universal amount. The amount depends on the type of relief, income, tax liability, and IRS eligibility rules. Some programs reduce the amount of taxes you owe, while others adjust how or when you pay taxes. Understanding these differences can help taxpayers make informed and realistic decisions.

IRS Tax Credit Frequently Asked Questions

Is there a limit to the amount of tax deductions I can receive?

Yes, many credit, deduction, and payment programs have income and eligibility limits that limit maximum benefits. These limits are set by law or IRS guidelines and vary by program.

Does a tax cut reduce the amount of tax you have to pay, or just the way you pay it?

It depends on the program. Credits and settlements can reduce the amount a taxpayer owes, while payment plans simply change how taxes are paid. Understanding this difference can help you avoid confusing cash flow relief with debt reduction.

Can working with a tax professional affect the tax credits I receive?

Experts can help identify applicable programs and ensure accurate filing, but the final decision is always made by the IRS. Professional guidance can improve clarity and compliance, but does not guarantee results.

What we know about church protests related to Don Lemon’s arrest

0

play

Two journalists covering a demonstration that disrupted Sunday services at a church in St. Paul, Minnesota, and two additional protesters have been arrested in connection with the January 18 incident.

In a Jan. 30 post on X, U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi confirmed that former CNN anchor Don Lemon, who was covering immigration enforcement in the state prior to his arrest, was one of the two reporters being arrested.

Lemon’s attorney said in a social media post the same day that federal agents arrested his client in Southern California on Jan. 29.

“Don Lemon was taken into custody by federal agents in Los Angeles last night while covering the Grammy Awards,” a statement posted on Lemon’s Instagram page on January 30th read. “Don has been a journalist for 30 years, and his constitutionally protected work in Minneapolis was no different than anything he’s ever done.”

At least seven people are now facing criminal charges following the demonstrations on the morning of January 18th.

Here’s what you need to know about the protests, what led to them, and how they relate to lemons.

Where were the church protests held?

The demonstration took place on January 18th at Cities Church in St. Paul, Minnesota.

Located in the city’s Summit Hill neighborhood, the church is about halfway between downtown St. Paul and downtown Minneapolis.

What happened at Cities Church?

On Sunday, January 18, a group of protesters entered Cities Church and claimed to be the Rev. David Easterwood, the acting director of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement St. Paul field office.

Nikki Muhlhausen, a spokeswoman for the St. Paul Police Department, told USA TODAY that officers responded to the church, but by the time they arrived, the group of 30 to 40 protesters had moved outside. Muhlhausen said at the time that the department was investigating the protest for disorderly conduct.

Video of the protest showed demonstrators shouting “ICE out” and the church’s senior pastor, Jonathan Purnell, shouting, “Shame on you. This is God’s house and we worship.”

In a statement posted to X on January 20, the church called the protesters “instigators” who “accused members of our congregation, threatened children, and created a scene of intimidation and intimidation.” The church added that it was considering legal action.

What led to the church protests?

The protests came four days after Renee Good, a 37-year-old American woman, was shot and killed by a federal immigration officer in Minneapolis on January 7, and another person was shot and killed by federal authorities there.

The Justice Department said it was investigating the protests for potential violations of the FACE Act, which protects access to religious services under the First Amendment.

Who was arrested at the church protest?

As of January 30, authorities had arrested seven people in connection with the church protests.

they are:

  • Don Lemon, journalist and former CNN anchor
  • Chauntill Louisa Allen, member of the St. Paul Public School Board
  • William Kelly, anti-ICE activist and military veteran
  • Nekima Levi Armstrong is a civil rights attorney based in Minneapolis and St. Louis. pole area
  • Georgia Fort, Journalist
  • Traherne Gene Crews, political activist
  • Jamael Rydell Lundy, political activist

Some of those arrested face criminal charges related to the demonstrations, including conspiracy to deprive people of their rights, according to federal prosecutors and the Department of Homeland Security.

James Blair, the White House’s deputy chief of staff, told the X-Post on January 30 that Lemon had been indicted by a federal grand jury.

Lemon has been charged with conspiracy and interfering with the First Amendment rights of worshipers, according to news outlets including the Associated Press and NBC News.

What did Don Lemon do?

A nearly seven-hour livestream available on Lemon’s YouTube channel shows Lemon as one of several journalists who attended the protest, where he spoke with members of the congregation, protesters, and one of the church’s pastors.

A federal judge last week rejected the Justice Department’s proposed criminal charges against Lemon in connection with the protests, multiple news outlets reported, citing anonymous sources.

Contributor: James Powell and Greta Cross

Natalie Neisa Alland is a senior reporter at USA TODAY. Contact her at nalund@usatoday.com and follow her at X @nataliealund.

Catherine O’Hara dies – ‘Home Alone’ and ‘Schitt’s Creek’ star dies at 71

0

play

Legendary actress Catherine O’Hara, known for her roles in “Home Alone,” “Best in Show,” and “Schitt’s Creek,” has reportedly passed away. She was 71 years old.

The Canadian actress passed away on Friday, January 30, her manager confirmed to People magazine. TMZ was first to report the news.

Variety and Deadline, citing her agency CAA, reported that O’Hara died at home after a “short illness.”

A veteran of the entertainment industry, O’Hara is one of the most admired and respected actors of his generation, winning two Emmy Awards, one Golden Globe Award, and two Actor’s Awards (formerly Screen Actors Guild Awards) during his career. She was nominated for two Emmy Awards at the 2025 ceremony.

Born in Canada in 1954, O’Hara began her career with the Toronto comedy troupe Second City. The group later formed the Canadian sketch comedy show SCTV, which was also responsible for producing stars such as Martin Short, Rick Moranis, and O’Hara’s “Shits” co-star Eugene Levy. Her performance on “SCTV” made her famous in Canada, and she won an Emmy Award in 1982 for her writing on the sketch show, after moving to American television on NBC, which became known as “SCTV Network.”

Throughout the 1980s and 1990s, she worked steadily in television and movies, mostly in supporting roles. She appeared in Martin Scorsese’s After Hours in 1985 and Mike Nichols’ Heartburn in 1986.

In 1988, she danced “Day-O” as Delia Dietz in Tim Burton’s Beetlejuice, one of her most famous performances. She would later co-star with Burton again as a voice in two of Burton’s animated films, The Nightmare Before Christmas (1993) and Frankenweenie (2012), as well as the 2024 sequel Beetlejuice. Speaking to USA TODAY about her long-awaited return to the horror-comedy world, she embraced the nostalgia of movie fans. She said fans whose parents let them see the film as children were at an age where they “look back at that time in their lives and remember it fondly.”

In 1990, she landed her most iconic role as the poor, forgotten mother of Kevin, played by Macaulay Culkin, in the Christmas classic Home Alone. She reprized the role in the 1992 sequel, Home Alone 2: Lost in New York. O’Hara and Culkin have remained close since the movie, and O’Hara and Culkin attended the 2023 Hollywood Walk of Fame ceremony in O’Hara’s honor.

Culkin paid tribute to O’Hara on Instagram on Friday, writing, “Mom. I thought you had time.” “I wanted more. I wanted to sit in the chair next to you. I could hear your voice. But there was so much I wanted to say. I love you. I’ll see you again.”

The actresses are frequent collaborators on director Christopher Guest’s signature mockumentary films, including Waiting for Guffman (1996), Best in Show (2000), A Mighty Wind (2003), and For Your Consideration (2006). In the 2000s, she was praised for her work as a guest star on HBO’s series such as “Curb Your Enthusiasm” and “Six Feet Under.” In 2010, she received her first acting Emmy nomination for the TV movie Temple Grandin, co-starring Claire Danes.

O’Hara’s fame and career prospects took another leap forward with “Schitt’s Creek,” which premiered on Pop TV in 2015 but exploded in popularity after it was added to Netflix. In 2020, she won an Emmy for her role as Moira Rose, the theatrically demanding matriarch of a family, opposite Dan Levy, Eugene Levy, and Annie Murphy.

She most recently appeared alongside Seth Rogen on Apple TV’s industry satire show “The Studio” and the second season of HBO’s zombie apocalypse hit “The Last of Us.” She received Emmy nominations for both performances.

O’Hara married production designer Bo Welch in 1992 after they met on the set of Beetlejuice. The couple has two sons, Matthew and Luke. The family has lived in Los Angeles’ Brentwood neighborhood for years, and O’Hara was named “honorary mayor” in 2021.

O’Hara spoke to USA TODAY in 2025 about the Michelob Ultra Super Bowl commercial he appeared in alongside Willem Dafoe, and said he owed his successful career to advertising, not film or TV work. “I brag to people that I’m doing a Super Bowl commercial,” O’Hara said at the time. “It’s like, ‘Oh, I made it.’

When talking about the industry and her experience in comedy, she added, “Being able to laugh, especially at yourself, is a great gift.”

Contributor: Ralphie Aversa, USA TODAY