Home Blog Page 316

Can President Trump’s emissions regulations lower car prices? Here’s what experts say

0

play

  • The Trump administration is lowering federal fuel economy standards to lower new car prices.
  • Despite the last policy reduction in 2017, the average price of a new car rose significantly.
  • Environmental and consumer groups say the measure would increase pollution and that the federal standards would have minimal impact on car prices.

President Donald Trump lowered federal fuel economy standards for the second time in five years to lower sticker prices for car buyers.

The White House announced Thursday that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has finalized a new rule reversing Obama-era scientific findings that greenhouse gas emissions from vehicles and other sources pose a threat to public health.

The 2009 findings, known as the Endangerment Findings, provided the legal basis for some of the federal government’s most ambitious efforts to reduce global-warming vehicle emissions, including rules requiring automakers to average at least 50 miles per gallon for all their vehicles.

President Trump has promised to roll back strict fuel economy regulations that will allow automakers to make cheaper cars.

“This action will reduce regulatory costs by more than $1.3 trillion and lead to significant declines in auto prices,” President Trump said at a White House event on February 12 announcing the measure. “You can get a better car, you can get a car that starts easier, you can get a car that works better for less money.”

With that in mind, the USA TODAY Cars team looked at what happened to car prices the last time President Trump lowered federal fuel efficiency standards, and what car buyers can expect this time.

What happened the last time President Trump rolled back federal fuel rules?

In March 2017, President Trump first announced plans to roll back strict fuel economy rules enacted under former President Barack Obama that required automakers to average 54.5 miles per gallon across their vehicles by 2025. According to Kelley Blue Book, the average price of a new car at the time Trump made his announcement was $34,342.

President Trump’s first rollback froze federal fuel economy standards to about 39 miles per gallon from 2021 through 2026 model years. The average price of a new car in January was $49,191, according to Kelley Blue Book.

When former President Joe Biden took office in January 2021, he almost immediately moved to reinstate strict Obama-era fuel economy standards. Biden ultimately settled on the plan he announced in August 2021. The plan would require automakers to achieve an average vehicle mileage of about 50 miles per gallon by 2031. The average price of a new car at the time was $43,355.

President Trump said his new proposal would eliminate all federal regulations on vehicle emissions.

People’s opinions on President Trump’s reduction in fuel economy

Environmentalists have criticized President Trump’s move to eliminate federal regulations on air pollution from cars, saying it would make cars dirtier and slow the country’s transition to electric vehicles.

“It is irresponsible and deadly for this administration to ignore the evidence of climate change and the persistent policies aimed at curbing climate emissions,” Katherine Garcia, director of the Sierra Club Clean Transportation for All, said in a statement.

“The science shows that an urgent transition to electric vehicles is essential if we are to protect our health and our climate at the pace we need,” Garcia continued.

Daniel Green, senior director of consumer protection and product safety at the Consumer Federation of America, which bills itself as the nation’s oldest consumer advocacy group, said American families should not have to “choose between safety, fuel efficiency and car affordability.”

“Federal safety and fuel economy standards have a small impact on car prices, but they save families thousands of dollars over the life of a car,” Green said.

Mr. Green said the real culprit for sticker shock at car dealerships is not federal emissions regulations but “the production of more upscale models, more expensive vehicle configurations, and higher showroom prices.”

Stephanie Valdez Streety, director of industry insights at Cox Automotive, agreed, saying in a statement provided to USA TODAY, “Historically, changes in fuel economy and emissions regulations have not translated into substantial sticker price relief for consumers.”

“Historically, new car prices have increased by an average of about 3% per year, and regulatory changes have not significantly changed that long-term trend,” he said. “The truth is, politics can move much faster than the auto industry. Policy and regulatory changes tend to affect auto production gradually over multiple model years, rather than a sudden price reset.”

“Largest known outbreak” of sexually transmitted ringworm in Minnesota

0

play

The “largest known outbreak” of the sexually transmitted disease ringworm in the United States is occurring in Minnesota, according to local health officials.

In an advisory posted Feb. 11, the Minnesota Department of Health said more than 30 confirmed or suspected cases have been reported in the state’s metropolitan areas since the first case was confirmed in July 2025 in a patient who sought treatment for a genital rash.

Sexually transmitted ringworm, known as Trichophyton mentagrophytes genotype VII (TMVII), is not a worm, but a sexually transmitted fungus that infects the skin, according to the Department of Health and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

“TMVII infections can be confused with noncommunicable diseases (such as psoriasis) and other sexually transmitted diseases, and if treatment is delayed, they can cause scarring and secondary bacterial infections, which can continue to spread,” the CDC added.

To prevent TMVII infection, the health department advises people to avoid sexual contact and skin-to-skin contact while having symptoms or signs of a rash, avoid sharing clothing and personal items, and wash and dry clothing at high temperatures to kill fungal spores.

“Sexual partners of patients with TMVII should be informed and evaluated if they are symptomatic,” the department’s recommendations added.

Medical experts first warned about this rare and highly contagious fungal strain in the United States after it was first reported in New York in June 2024.

The first case was a man in his 30s from New York City who developed ringworm on his genitals, buttocks, and hands and feet after having sex with a man during a trip to California and abroad, including England and Greece, according to a JAMA Dermatology report released at the time.

According to the case study, the man returned home with an itchy, red rash on areas such as his groin, genitals, and buttocks, and tests confirmed he was infected with the rare fungus.

Contributor: Natalie Neysa Alund, USA TODAY

Canadian school shooter was ‘addicted’ to bloody and violent websites

0


The boy responsible for one of Canada’s deadliest mass shootings had an online lifestyle similar to that of American mass shooters, including watching videos of people being killed online.

play

A Canadian teenager who killed eight people in the country’s deadliest mass shooting frequently visited the same gruesome websites that American mass shooters are known to visit in the lead up to their attacks in the United States, investigators have found.

Jesse Van Luzeler opened fire on homes and schools in northeastern British Columbia on February 10th. The 18-year-old girl, who was born male but identified as female, killed eight people and injured dozens before taking her own life. The attack in Tumbler Ridge, about 1,100 miles north of Vancouver, was one of the deadliest in America’s northern neighbor, where gun laws are strict and mass shootings are relatively rare.

An Anti-Defamation League report shared on February 12 said the teen’s online activity “indicates an interest in violence and weapons.” Anti-hate organizations have specialized teams that investigate online histories of online hate speech and mass shootings. Van Rootseller claimed admiration for other shooters online and was active on WatchPeopleDie, a forum where users share images of torture, rape, beheadings, and other violence.

The website is a known destination for school shooters in the United States, including in Wisconsin, Tennessee, and Colorado.

“It’s time for people to understand the connective tissue between child murders around the world, and that connective tissue is websites like WatchPeopleDie and other Gore platforms,” ​​Oren Segal, ADL’s senior vice president of counterextremism and intelligence, told USA TODAY in a statement.

“These sites not only desensitize young people to violence, but create a toxic environment where extremist ideologies, including anti-Semitism, blend with graphic content, leading users to seek out more violent content and, in some cases, to commit violence themselves. This is a vicious cycle that puts impressionable young people at serious risk.”

The ADL report provides the most detailed look yet at Van Roetzelaar’s online life in the lead up to the shooting.

What did she post online?

ADL investigators found that the boy had an “extensive digital footprint” on platforms including YouTube, Reddit and the WatchPeopleDie (WPD) site.

Regardless of platform, she displayed “an interest in violence and weapons, along with an interest in past mass shooters,” the researchers said.

Van Rootselaar’s own posts on the WPD Gore site included photos of multiple firearms and a video of her firing the gun.

Her first comment on the forum was in response to a thread dedicated to footage of mass shootings. “Thank you for this post,” she wrote.

In a similar thread, she wrote: “I love these first-person type videos. It’s always exciting when a shooter records his actions.”

Who else was active on this site?

The boy’s activity on the violence-focused website included visiting the profile of another mass shooter who was previously active on the website, the ADL said. Natalie Rapnow killed two students and injured six others at Abundant Life Christian School in Madison, Wisconsin in December 2024. The 15-year-old boy died from a self-inflicted gunshot wound.

Mr. Van Rootseller and Mr. Lupnow are not the only mass shooters known to be active on the website.

Solomon Henderson, a 17-year-old who killed a student and injured another at Antioch High School in Tennessee in January 2025 before committing suicide, was a known user.

Henderson and Rapnow followed each other on the forum and each began their attacks about a year and a half after joining the website. It is unknown how long Van Rootseller has been active.

One known user is Desmond Holley, the 16-year-old who seriously injured two students at Evergreen High School in suburban Denver in September 2025. Holly also died from a self-inflicted gunshot wound.

“I don’t think it’s a big deal,” the gunman said of the website.

According to online comments, Van Loetzeler said she had thought about stopping access to violent websites and expected it to have some effect on her, but there were times when she found it difficult to leave.

“I used to try to stay away from watching these kinds of shows because they were so addicting and a huge waste of time,” she wrote. Elsewhere, she called the content “addictive,” according to the ADL.

“It’s probably naive to say ‘it doesn’t affect me,'” she said in another post. But “I feel like it’s not a big deal.”

Mega Millions winning numbers for February 13th drawing: $385 million jackpot

0

play

The Mega Millions jackpot continues to grow ahead of the Friday, February 13th drawing, and now stands at $385 million, with a cash value of $174.2 million.

If someone is lucky enough to win the jackpot tonight, they have two options. Take home one-time cash or get paid instantly and then receive an annual check that’s 5% larger than the previous year.

Mega Millions has been on a bit of a slump lately, as no one has won the jackpot since December, when a New Jersey ticket holder won a $90 million jackpot.

With just a few hours left until Friday’s drawing, here’s what you need to know.

What are the winning Mega Millions numbers for February 13, 2026?

Here are the winning numbers for the Friday, February 13th Mega Millions lottery drawing. 34, 40, 49, 59, 68 and the mega ball 1.

When is the next Mega Millions drawing?

The next Mega Millions drawing is scheduled for Tuesday, February 17th at 11:00 PM ET.

Top 10 Mega Millions Jackpots

  • $1.602 billion in Florida on August 8, 2023
  • $1.537 billion in South Carolina on October 23, 2018
  • $1.348 billion on January 1, 2023 in Maine
  • July 29, 2022, $1.337 billion in Illinois
  • December 27, 2024, $1.269 billion in California
  • $1.128 billion in New Jersey on March 26, 2024
  • $1.05 billion in Michigan on January 22, 2021
  • $983 million in Georgia on November 14, 2025
  • $810 million in Texas on September 10, 2024
  • March 30, 2012, $656 million in Illinois, Kansas, and Maryland

What is Mega Millions?

Mega Millions is a lottery that is played in 45 states, the District of Columbia, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.

Each ticket costs $5, and players can choose six numbers from two different number pools: five different numbers from 1 to 70 (white balls) and one number from 1 to 24 (gold mega ball), or choose Easy Pick/Quick Pick.

If you match all six winning numbers in the drawing, you win the jackpot. If there are multiple jackpot winners, the jackpot prize will be shared.

How to play Mega Millions

To play Mega Millions, you must purchase a ticket. This can be done at several locations, including local convenience stores, gas stations, and grocery stores. In some states, you can purchase Mega Millions tickets online.

Once you have your ticket, you have to choose six numbers. Five of them are white balls numbered 1-70. The golden mega ball ranges from 1 to 24.

If you’re feeling particularly unlucky or don’t want to go through the hassle of picking, you can request a “quick pick” or “easy pick.” When you use these options, your computer randomly generates numbers.

Mega Millions tickets have built-in multipliers that increase your non-jackpot prize by 2, 3, 4, 5, or 10 times. Previously, players had to pay an extra dollar to add a “Megaplier”.

Where can I buy lottery tickets?

Mega Millions tickets can be purchased directly at gas stations, convenience stores, and grocery stores. Some airport terminals may also sell lottery tickets.

You can also order tickets online through Jackpocket, the USA TODAY Network’s official digital lottery courier, in the following U.S. states and territories: Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Idaho, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Puerto Rico, Washington, DC, and West Virginia.

The Jackpocket app allows you to choose your lottery games and numbers, place your order, check your tickets, and claim your winnings, all using your phone or home computer.

The lottery winning numbers sponsors are: Jackpocket, USA TODAY Network’s official digital lottery delivery company.

Jackpocket is the official digital lottery carrier of USA TODAY Network. Gannett may earn revenue from viewer referrals to the Jackpocket Service. Must be 18 years or older, 21 years or older in Arizona, 19 years or older in Nebraska. Not affiliated with any state lottery. Gambling problem? Call 1-877-8-HOPE-NY or text HOPENY (467369) (NY). 1-800-327-5050 (MA); 1-877-MYLIMIT (OR); 1-800-981-0023 (PR); 1-800-GAMBLER (ALL OTHERS). visit jackpocket.com/tos Over the entire period.

Fernando Cervantes Jr. is a trending news reporter for USA TODAY. Contact us at fernando.cervantes@usatodayco.com and follow us at X @fern_cerv_.

ICE agents investigating Minnesota shooting

0


The two officers involved were involved in the January 14 shooting death of a Venezuelan man in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Authorities are investigating whether the two men lied.

play

Federal authorities are investigating two ICE agents for allegedly lying about how a Venezuelan man was shot and killed in Minnesota in January.

On January 14, a U.S. Customs and Immigration Enforcement officer shot and killed Venezuelan immigrant Julio Cesar Sosascelis in Minneapolis. The Department of Homeland Security said when immigration officers tried to arrest Sosascelis during a traffic stop, he fled and officers shot and killed him.

The shooting received widespread attention at the time, with the Department of Homeland Security saying Sosascelis and another man used “shovels or broomsticks” to hit the officers.

“Today, I am pleased to see that ICE and the Department of Justice are publicly acknowledging and investigating false statements made by two ICE agents. These false statements had serious consequences for my client and his family,” Sosascelis’ attorney Robin M. Wolpert told USA TODAY. “The actions taken by ICE and the Department of Justice against these two ICE officers are welcome and will help begin to restore trust and confidence in federal law enforcement.”

ICE Director Todd Lyons said on Feb. 13 that the agency and the Justice Department had opened an investigation into whether the two officers involved in the shooting lied under oath about what happened because video evidence appeared to contradict their statements, according to a statement shared by the Department of Homeland Security.

“A joint review of video evidence by ICE and the Department of Justice (DOJ) revealed that sworn statements provided by two separate officers appear to have made false statements,” Lyons said in a statement. “Both officers were immediately placed on administrative leave pending the completion of a thorough internal investigation. … The United States Attorney’s Office is actively investigating these false statements.”

The Justice Department declined to comment.

DHS reliability is called into question

This case is the latest example of an immigration enforcement officer’s claims being proven unfounded.

Following the January 24 shooting death of Alex Preti, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem retracted her comments about the 37-year-old who was killed. She blamed Border Patrol for labeling Preeti a “domestic terrorist” and saying he brandished a gun.

Meanwhile, new body camera footage of a Border Patrol agent fatally shooting a U.S. citizen in Chicago has been released, contradicting the government’s story that she ambushed him and rammed him with her car. Charles Exum, the Border Patrol agent who shot the woman five times, has been placed on leave.

ICE made the decision to investigate its officers after the Department of Homeland Security announced it would reduce deployments to Minnesota. The department sent thousands of military personnel to Democratic-led states in response to misconduct by welfare program workers related to Somali immigrants.

Minnesotans complained that sending immigration authorities into the city amounted to an “invasion.” In January, federal agents shot and killed Minneapolis residents Alex Preti and Renee Good, sparking protests across the United States against the Trump administration’s immigration enforcement efforts.

Justice Department ends investigation into injured Venezuelan national

The agency’s move to open an investigation into the ICE officers involved in the shooting came after a federal judge on February 13 dismissed the case against Sosascelis and another man involved in the incident, Alfredo Alejando Ajorna.

U.S. District Judge Paul A. Magnuson dismissed the case at the request of prosecutors, according to a federal court filing. Magnuson dismissed the case with prejudice, meaning prosecutors cannot try to bring the same case against the two men.

Prosecutors with the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Minnesota had sought to indict Mr. Sosascelis and Mr. Algiorna for assaulting a federal officer. According to a criminal complaint filed days after the shooting, Sosa-Celiz and Algiorna twirled their broomsticks back and forth, taking turns hitting one of the ICE agents before shooting Sosa-Celiz to death.

USA TODAY has asked prosecutors for comment on the move to dismiss the case.

Why did the prosecutor drop the case?

Federal court filings reveal some of the reasons why the U.S. attorney’s office moved to drop the case. USA TODAY has requested comment.

Daniel N. Rosen, the U.S. attorney for Minnesota, explained his reasons for seeking dismissal of the case in a Feb. 12 court filing.

“Newly discovered evidence in this case materially contradicts the allegations in the complaint affidavit,” Rosen wrote, referring to the findings of the FBI investigation that initiated the case. “Therefore, the dismissal with prejudice is just.”

FBI agents said they based their findings on interviews and documents from “other law enforcement officers,” according to the affidavit.

FBI officials in Minnesota did not respond to requests for comment on the unreliable affidavit.

Venezuelan man ‘delighted’ lawsuit dropped

Algiorna’s attorney, Frederick J. Goetz, told USA TODAY that his client is “delighted.”

“He’s happy to leave this behind him,” Goetz said of Agiorna. “But he is shocked that he has been branded a criminal, a violent criminal…He is a good man who is trying to take care of his family.

Goetz, a defense attorney with 40 years of experience, called the move to dismiss with prejudice “unusual.” He praised the U.S. Attorney’s Office for doing the “right thing.”

“There’s been a lot of turmoil in that office lately,” he said. “But their respect for the rule of law remains intact.”

Who is an ICE officer?

Federal officials did not respond to questions about the names of the officers under investigation.

According to court filings detailing the Sosascelis shooting, the two men were part of ICE’s removal operations, a division of the agency focused on capturing immigrants for deportation.

The FBI said in a court filing that the two were among thousands of Homeland Security personnel sent to Minnesota from out of state. They were driving an unmarked vehicle the night of the incident, according to the affidavit. One officer was wearing a belt with a badge on it. The other person was wearing a bulletproof vest with the word “POLICE” written on it.

Ilia Marin’s fall made Olympic nightmares with terrible performance

0

play

MILAN — Ilia Marin ended her long program not in victory but in tears. In one of the most shocking and destructive performances by a potential champion in Olympic figure skating history, the runner who was expected to win the gold medal in the men’s figure skating event finished in eighth place.

Yes, it’s number 8.

Quad God was 8th.

Marinin’s meltdown was so bad that near the end of the program, when he made a mistake, his father, who was also his coach, turned away from the board near the ice and buried his head in his hands.

If you’ve ever wondered how intense the pressure of the Olympics is, you now know it. Marin, 21, entered the men’s final with a solid five-point lead. He looked invincible. Then the other skaters closest to him started making all kinds of mistakes and could not skate well. This was a great gift to Marin. All he had to do was land a few patented quadruple jumps and the Olympic gold medal was his.

But he couldn’t do it. Early in his long program, he did a quad axel in the air, followed by two quad loops, and fell not once but twice on his other jumps.

“The pressure of the Olympics really bothers me,” Marinin said afterwards, calmly and perfectly answering all the questions. “The pressure is unreal. It was like I didn’t realize where I was in the program. Usually I have more time and I get a better feel for what it’s like, but this time everything happened so quickly that I really didn’t have time to make changes or change that process.”

The skater who most controlled the sport over the past four years was lost on the ice.

“Going into the free program, I was really confident. I just felt really good, and it was like it was right there and then it just slipped out of my hands,” he said.

Marinin was so relaxed as she entered the final group of skaters for the long program that she teasingly pretended to do a backflip and wagged her finger at the audience as if to say, “Not yet!” as she walked out to warm up. Who would do that when marching towards the most stressful moment of their life? There is no one but Marinin.

But then he encountered a long wait between five other skaters who were right behind him in the standings, taking a total of 40 minutes. Something happened when he came out for a long program. His face looked nervous. His bravado disappeared. He seemed worried and nervous.

When mistakes started happening, he couldn’t stop them.

“My life has been through a lot of ups and downs, and right before I entered the starting pose, I felt all of those experiences, memories, and thoughts really come flooding back. And it felt really overwhelming. In that moment, I didn’t really know what to do with it,” he said.

Mullin, who is fun and cheeky but always has a mischievous grin on his face, has been preparing for this moment for years, winning the last four U.S. titles and the last two world championships. He hadn’t lost a competition since 2023. I welcomed and even accepted the increasing pressure along the way. It was all part of his dream.

Until that dream turned into a nightmare.

Get the Chasing Gold Olympic Newsletter in your inbox Interview your favorite Team USA athletes

More than 22,000 pounds of ground beef recalled due to E. coli risk

0

play

Consumers are being warned to check their refrigerators after more than 22,000 pounds of ground beef was recalled due to possible E. coli contamination.

The recall affects approximately 22,912 pounds of ground beef sold by CS Beef Packers, LLC of Kuna, Idaho, according to a notice posted by the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) on Wednesday, February 11.

Officials said the beef was produced on January 14, 2026 and shipped to distributors in California, Idaho and Oregon. According to the Department of Agriculture, there are no confirmed reports of illness associated with the recalled beef.

“FSIS is concerned that some products may be in food service freezers. Food service establishments are asked not to serve these products. These products must be discarded or returned to the point of purchase,” the notice reads.

Here’s what you need to know:

What ground meat products have been recalled?

According to the USDA, the following ground beef products have been recalled due to possible E. coli contamination.

  • A cardboard case containing eight 10-pound pieces. “Beef, coarsely ground, 73 L” chunks, case code 18601, “use/freeze by: 02/04/26”.
  • A cardboard case containing four 10-lb. “Fire River Farms Classic Beef Fine Ground 73L” beans, case code 19583, “use/freeze by: 02/04/26”.
  • A cardboard case containing four 10-lb. “Fire River Farms Classic Beef Fine Ground 81L” beans, case code 19563, “use/freeze by: 02/04/26”.

What is E. coli? What are the symptoms?

Most Escherichia coli (E. coli) bacteria exist harmlessly in the intestines of humans and animals. But some can cause mild to life-threatening gastrointestinal illness if ingested, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says.

The type of E. coli that can cause diarrhea is usually spread through food or water contaminated with feces. For example, infections can spread if food handlers do not wash their hands properly after using the restroom. Animals such as cows can also spread E. coli to food and food crops.

Symptoms of E. coli infection include severe stomach cramps, diarrhea (often bloody), and vomiting, according to the CDC.

USA TODAY’s James Powell contributed to this report.

Fernando Cervantes Jr. is a trending news reporter for USA TODAY. Contact us at fernando.cervantes@usatodayco.com and follow us at X @fern_cerv_.

No matter how expensive it is, it’s not Valentine’s Day without chocolate.

0

play

“Life is like a box of chocolates,” Forrest Gump memorably said. “You never know what you’re going to get.”

But Valentine’s Day is simply a day to ask for a box of sweets. According to the National Confectioners Association (NCA), 92% of Americans hope to receive chocolate for Christmas, and about half plan to treat themselves if they don’t think they can get it, even though the price of chocolate continues to rise due to continued inflation throughout the candy supply chain.

Unprecedented price increases in 2025 pushed the price of U.S. branded chocolate up 12%, according to data from the Wells Fargo Agriculture and Food Research Institute. That’s because West Africa, which produces about 70% of the world’s cocoa, continues to suffer from climate problems, disease and aging trees.

Producer prices have fallen since then, but it will take some time for those declines to trickle down the supply chain to the inventories that consumers shop. David Branch, sector manager at Wells Fargo Research Institute, doesn’t expect these lower prices to hit shelves until mid-2026.

“Despite rising prices, consumers are still indulging in luxury this Valentine’s Day,” Branch told USA TODAY in an email. “Chocolate remains popular, even if it means omitting the heart shape to save money.”

Valentine’s Day’s ‘most iconic’ type of chocolate

In fact, the heart-shaped box is the “most symbolic” of all Valentine’s Day options, says the NCA, and 55% of Americans think receiving a box of chocolates at Christmas is the warmest gesture, ahead of the 7% who think the honor should be bestowed on the heart in a personal conversation.

Meanwhile, despite Forrest Gump’s insight into the unknown elements inside each box of chocolates, about 43% of Americans refer to the guide that comes with most boxes before choosing a treat. Almost a quarter of us confess to nibbling on the corner of chocolate, and 10% say they bite the bottom.

Valentine’s Day is one of the “big four” seasons in the candy industry, which also includes Easter, Halloween and winter holidays, according to the NCA. Together, these holidays account for 62% of the $54 billion confectionery industry in 2024, with Valentine’s Day accounting for 12.4% of that total.

An NCA spokesperson told USA TODAY in an email that regardless of price, consumers still rely on candy and chocolate to celebrate important days like Valentine’s Day.

“Importantly, most consumers consider chocolate and candy to be an affordable treat and appreciate their special role in sweetening memories and bringing friends and family closer together. On Valentine’s Day, sharing chocolate and candy is really about love, connection and joy,” the spokesperson said.

TSA and travelers brace for Trump ICE standoff as DHS shuts down

0


It’s not yet clear when Democrats and the White House will be able to finalize a deal to fully fund the agency, which has come under fire since the murders of Alex Preti and Renee Nicole Good.

play

WASHINGTON – The Department of Homeland Security is about to be shut down following a political deadlock in Congress over immigration enforcement.

This situation could indefinitely impact many Americans, including travelers, boaters, storm victims, and tens of thousands of Homeland Security employees. With negotiations between Democrats and the White House tenuous and slow, it is unclear how long the shutdown, which involves only a small but critical part of the federal government, will last.

Importantly, DHS includes the Transportation Security Administration, the federal government department most responsible for airport security. During last year’s record shutdown, many TSA agents slept in their cars, received eviction notices, lost childcare services and sold blood and plasma as their paychecks were delayed.

Although they were expected to continue working, TSA officer absenteeism increased and aircraft operations were disrupted. Delays and cancellations of air travel are also caused by air traffic control issues, but this will not happen this time as the shutdown is not under the jurisdiction of the Department of Transportation.

Acting TSA Administrator Ha Nguyen McNeil told lawmakers on February 11 that the approximately 61,000 employees at more than 430 commercial airports affected by the new funding blunder cannot afford another funding blunder.

“Some businesses are still recovering from the economic impact of the 43-day closure,” she said. “We can’t let them go through that again. It’s outrageous.”

Despite this plea, Congress left town the next day without an agreement to fund DHS. DHS has come under increased scrutiny since federal agents killed two Minnesotans in separate incidents last month. The agency’s funding was scheduled to expire after Friday, February 13th.

Since 37-year-old Alex Preti was shot and killed by a Border Patrol agent, Democrats have rallied around demands for reform of DHS, which oversees Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP). They are calling for a ban on masks and stricter standards for the use of force, as well as mandatory body cameras and judicial warrants when searching people entering the country. Republicans say some of these demands are rudimentary, especially banning masks, which could lead to staff detention.

The government shutdown will force DHS to scale back operations and postpone paychecks to many employees. For example, the head of the Federal Emergency Management Agency warned that the crisis would “significantly disrupt” states’ ability to reimburse states for disaster relief costs.

However, many of DHS’ law enforcement activities, including immigration enforcement, will continue. Lawmakers have noted in recent days that ICE, which typically continues to operate during shutdowns, already has surplus funds that could be tapped in connection with President Donald Trump’s “big, beautiful bill.”

Because the partial shutdown only applies to DHS, other services and programs affected during last year’s longest shutdown in history will be safe from political fallout. Food stamps, air traffic controllers, and the military (with the exception of the Coast Guard, which is under DHS) are not affected.

But as was the case with the government shutdown in 2025, the longer it lasts, the more Americans will suffer. Many members of Congress planned to spend the next week outside Washington, with some going to Germany for security conferences. Congress is not scheduled to take another vote until February 23.

Zachary Schermele is a Congressional reporter for USA TODAY. You can email us at zschermele@usatoday.com. Follow him on X at @ZachSchermele and on Bluesky at @zachschermele.bsky.social..

Where is Surya Bonaly now? Ilia Marin talks about her Olympic backflip

0

play

  • Ilya Marinin landed a one-legged backflip at the 2026 Winter Olympics, helping Team USA win the gold medal.
  • Backflips were banned in 1977, but Surya Bonaly performed them at the 1998 Olympics and was given a penalty.
  • The International Skating Union lifted its ban on backflips in 2024, allowing them to be performed in choreographed sequences.
  • Bonaly, a black skater in a predominantly white sport, feels his accomplishments are now being recognized.

Editor’s note: Follow live Olympic figure skating results and updates from the 2026 Winter Olympics.

milan — When American figure skater Ilia Marin performed a one-legged backflip in the men’s team free skate on Sunday, the crowd at the Milan Ice Skating Arena cheered, then gasped.

Marinin’s gravity-defying move capped an enthralling program that propelled Team USA to its second consecutive team gold medal. He became the first skater to perform a one-blade backflip on Olympic ice since France’s Surya Bonaly performed the technique at the 1998 Nagano Winter Olympics.

Backflips have been openly embraced since her return to figure skating in 2024, but the reception was very different 30 years ago, when Bonaly voluntarily chose to end her Olympic career. The move was deemed too dangerous and was banned by the International Skating Union (ISU) in 1977.

But Bonaly did it anyway.

“I had nothing left to lose,” Bonaly told USA TODAY Sports on Thursday. “I did it because I was an athlete and I wanted to show that I could do it…I left my trademark behind.”

Watch Olympic figure skating at Peacock

American figure skater Terry Kubicka was the first figure skater to land a backflip on two skates at the 1976 Winter Olympics in Innsbruck, leading the ISU to list the move as an illegal element the following year. An American may have debuted the backflip and a young American phenom may have revived it, but it was Bonaly who challenged the rules and pushed the limits as a black woman in a predominantly white sport that was never fully accepted.

Bonaly was often labeled a rebel rather than a pioneer, as racism affected her career. But Bonaly’s enduring legacy is finally receiving the recognition it has long been denied following Malinin’s Olympic performance.

“People are now more open-minded and more accepting of others who do things differently,” Bonaly says. “Now it’s even better because I feel like it’s well-represented by everyone. Whether it’s black, white, Chinese, Asian, if it’s good, it’s good and that’s it.”

Bonaly’s iconic backflip at the 1998 Nagano Olympics was completely spontaneous.

She was recovering from a torn right Achilles tendon suffered two years ago, but suffered a muscle strain before the women’s singles free skate that left her unable to complete complex jumps. Bonaly knew she wouldn’t be on the podium in her third and final competition, but she still wanted to make her mark on the ice.

“I wasn’t playing to my full potential…I just wasn’t feeling well,” Bonaly told USA TODAY Sports. “If I can’t do any more triple (jump) combinations or anything like that, this last competition will be my last. And I thought, I don’t have much time to think about it, I won’t have another chance, so I have to do it now.”

Bonaly knew she would be punished for her actions, but after years of seeking approval from judges and overcoming moving goalposts that seemed to apply only to her, she decided to fully embrace her identity. She wanted to make a statement and prove herself. Bonaly wanted to entertain the audience.

“I didn’t know what kind of penalty I was going to get,” Bonaly said, remembering thinking, “Maybe I’ll get a full suspension and the judge will give me zero points.” This backflip made her very popular among her fellow athletes in the Olympic Village, but the judges were not satisfied with her. Although he fell from 6th place after the short program to 10th place after the free skate, he said, “I have no regrets.”

“She thumbed her nose at the (jury) panel a little bit, but at the same time gave the audience something very memorable,” U.S. Olympic gold medalist Scott Hamilton said in a 2019 episode of the Netflix documentary series “Losers.” “There were many people above her, but I don’t remember much of them.”

Bonaly has never met Marinin, but first learned about him 10 years ago after a chance encounter with his parents at the 2016 U.S. Figure Skating Championships in Minnesota. Bonaly currently lives there as a skating teacher. Marinin comes from a long lineage of figure skaters. His parents, Tatyana Marinina and Roman Skolniakov, were both former Olympic skaters from Uzbekistan.

Marinina finished eighth at the 1998 Nagano Winter Olympics, two places ahead of Bonaly.

“I remember his mother saying, ‘Oh, I have a son who actually skates a little bit. And I was like, ‘Wow, that’s amazing,'” Bonaly recalls. “I never thought that one day that little kid would actually become a wolf engine.”

Clips of Bonaly’s 1998 Olympic backflip have been introduced to a new audience since Marinin completed the backflip at the Olympics for the first time since the ISU lifted the ban in 2024.

Backflips are sometimes added to skaters’ choreography sequences to showcase their artistic side, and are evaluated with component scores, but the elements themselves are not assigned a value, said USA TODAY correspondent Christine Brennan and Olympic champion Brian Boitano, hosts of the podcast “Milan Magic.” (Malinin’s signature “Raspberry Twist,” an acrobatic jump used to link the movement, also does not earn bonus points.)

“I decided to include it in the free skate because it fits the music very well,” Malinin said in October 2024, after the ban was lifted. “The audience applauds and it feels very suspenseful and I really like doing it.”

Bonaly praised Marinin’s efforts to entertain the audience, which she says is essential to the growth of the sport. She called him a “warrior” on the ice and “the best skater in the whole world.”

“This Olympics is so interesting…I’m sitting on the couch watching it and my heart is pounding, boom, boom,” Bonaly said. “In skating, you can’t limit an athlete’s ability to move forward. I think it’s important for people to have fun watching our sport.”

While all eyes are on Mullin’s backflips in Friday’s men’s single free skate, Bonaly is most excited about the seven quadruple jumps that earned Mullin the nickname “God of the Quads.”

“Sometimes backflips aren’t the most difficult thing to do,” Bonaly says. “I want him to do a perfect quad, so I’m tired of people trying to add little negativity so no one can say, ‘Oh, yeah, but that’s (underrated)…’ It’s even worse, especially for people who can’t do it.”

Looking back on his career spanning more than a decade, Bonaly believes he was simply born ahead of his time. As skaters continue to expand what’s possible on the ice, she said the current generation of skating “would have been a better fit for my personality.” She wants to be remembered not as a one-trick pony, but as an athlete who “worked hard to push the limits of her sport.”

“I have something else besides backflips, so I hope people remember me for the rest of the skates,” said Bonaly, a nine-time French national champion, five-time European champion and three-time world silver medalist. “Even if I didn’t win the gold medal, I built myself up from nothing and achieved my goal.”

Get to the heart of the news quickly with the USA TODAY app. Download award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, e-newspapers, and more.

Optima Tax Relief review including service, price, and important facts

0

When tax obligations escalate to IRS notices, penalties, and collection actions, many taxpayers seek professional tax relief assistance to help them navigate the system. Companies like Optima Tax Relief promise to guide customers through complex IRS programs, but before signing up, it’s important to understand how their services work, how much they cost, and when you might actually need them.

In this Optima tax relief review, we’ll explain how the company operates, what services it offers, how its pricing is structured, and when professional tax relief assistance may or may not make sense.

Overview of Optima tax reduction

Optima Tax Relief was founded in 2011 and is one of several companies that provide tax resolution services and administrative assistance with IRS tax relief programs.

The company works with individuals and small businesses across the country, typically serving customers who owe at least $10,000 in unpaid taxes. Many of those cases involve more complex situations, such as wage garnishments, bank collections, and tax liens.

Like any authorized tax relief service provider, Optima Tax Relief cannot control IRS decisions or guarantee a particular outcome.

Contents of Optima tax reduction

Optima Tax Relief offers a wide range of tax resolution services designed to help taxpayers understand their situations, comply with IRS requirements, and pursue available relief options. The company offers free consultations and publishes educational resources that address common questions about tax debt. However, like other tax relief providers, Optima Tax Relief can only help taxpayers navigate the IRS system and cannot directly control IRS decisions.

We also offer Optima Tax Shield, a subscription-style service focused on tax-related identity theft monitoring and protection.

Common services include:

  • Tax consultation
  • Offer in compromise (OIC) support
  • Responsibility investigation
  • IRS proposed resolution
  • Tax preparation and filing support
  • Compliance support
  • Tax payment/negotiation support
  • Tax lien exemption support
  • Bank levy and wage garnishment relief
  • Protection against tax identity theft

How Optima Tax Relief Pricing Works

Optima Tax Relief does not publish standard pricing for its tax resolution services. Instead, Optima employs a phase-based pricing model, which typically begins with an investigation fee, followed by separate resolution fees based on the complexity of the case, the amount of tax debt involved, and the services required.

This approach is common in the tax relief industry and can vary widely in price depending on factors such as unfiled returns, enforcement actions, or the need to negotiate directly with the IRS. According to LendEDU, a typical cost for a tax relief company is between $250 and $7,500.

Optima lists prices for its Optima Tax Shield plan, which focuses on taxpayer identity theft monitoring and related support. According to the company’s website, these plans range from $0 to $49.99 per month.

Advantages and potential disadvantages of Optima tax relief

Although working with a tax relief company like Optima Tax Relief may be helpful for taxpayers dealing with complex IRS issues, this service may not be necessary or cost-effective in every situation.

Strong Points

  • We offer a free initial consultation.
  • Certified by the BBB with a 4-star rating and an A rating
  • We handle complex tax debt cases such as liens, levies, and foreclosures.

Cons

  • Prices for services are not disclosed
  • Based on customer reviews, fees may outweigh benefits in simpler tax situations
  • results are not guaranteed

Optima Tax Relief reviews and reputation

Optima Tax Relief typically receives high ratings from customers across major review platforms, but like most tax relief companies, there is also mixed feedback.

The company is accredited by the Better Business Bureau (BBB) ​​with an A rating that reflects a company’s responsiveness to customer complaints. Optima Tax Relief also maintains an average customer rating of around 4 stars on the BBB site.

On Trustpilot, the company has an overall rating of around 4.5 stars, with many reviewers calling their experience professional, helpful, and easy to understand.

Some negative reviews have focused on communication delays, confusion about the scope of service, and dissatisfaction with the price of results. In BBB complaint records, companies typically respond to customer concerns and attempt to resolve disputes.

How Optima Tax Relief compares to its competitors

Tax relief companies generally offer many of the same core services, including support with OICs, installment agreements, penalty and hardship relief, preparation and filing, and general taxpayer representation.

However, pricing, case evaluation processes, and the types of qualified professionals involved may vary from firm to firm. Before choosing a company, taxpayers should compare multiple providers, carefully consider rates, and understand what services are needed to achieve the best results.

When it makes sense to work with a tax relief company

Working with a tax relief company may be helpful for taxpayers dealing with larger or more complex tax liability situations. Optima Tax Relief typically serves customers who owe $10,000 or more in unpaid taxes or who are facing aggressive collection efforts by the IRS.

It may be worth considering professional tax relief assistance if:

  • paying a large amount of unpaid taxes
  • I have multiple years of unfiled tax returns.
  • Facing a wage garnishment, bank levy, or tax lien
  • I need help understanding IRS relief programs or preparing financial statements
  • Overwhelmed by dealing directly with the IRS

These services may not be as necessary for taxpayers with small balances or in simple situations. For example, many people can set up an IRS payment plan directly through an agent. The IRS also provides free assistance through its Taxpayer Advocacy Service for those who need additional help resolving tax issues.

conclusion

Optima Tax Relief may be a legitimate option for taxpayers with complex or large IRS debts who need professional assistance in navigating tax relief programs. However, professional services can be expensive and results vary depending on IRS eligibility requirements.

For more straightforward tax situations, working directly with the IRS or a local CPA or tax professional may be a more cost-effective approach.

Optima Tax Reduction Frequently Asked Questions

Is it worth using tax saving services?

For taxpayers who owe a large amount of taxes, face a complex tax situation, are being collected by the IRS, or have multiple unfiled returns, it may be worth taking advantage of a tax relief service like Optima Tax Relief. For simpler situations, such as setting up a basic payment plan, it may be less costly to work directly with the IRS or local tax professional.

Can Optima Tax Relief services reduce my tax debt?

In some cases, Optima Tax Relief can help reduce your tax liability. However, there are limits to the support provided by any tax reduction company. Optima Tax Relief focuses on helping eligible taxpayers apply for IRS programs that can reduce penalties or resolve tax debts, such as OIC. However, tax liability reduction is not guaranteed and approval depends on IRS regulations, financial hardship, and the taxpayer’s ability to pay.

Do I need a tax relief company to work with the IRS?

Although often helpful, you don’t have to use a tax relief company to work with the IRS or manage your tax debt. Legally, taxpayers can set up a payment plan or request relief directly through the IRS. Tax relief companies can help people with complex cases, but they cannot provide access to special programs that are not available to individuals.

Toyota’s electric SUV plan is a shocking big bet

0

play

  • Toyota is planning to release a new electric SUV, even though it has taken a cautious stance toward the EV market.
  • Sales of the company’s first mainstream EV, the bZ4X, are declining, and its specs are lackluster compared to its rivals.

Japanese automaker Toyota Motor Corporation (NYSE:TM) has taken a cautious and hesitant approach to producing electric vehicles in the United States, but it is looking to disrupt the emerging automotive segment with a new SUV.

It’s no secret that Toyota is cautious about producing electric vehicles in the U.S., but the brand has fallen behind the likes of Tesla, Hyundai, Kia and Ford as more automakers enter the popular small electric SUV segment, led by the Tesla Model Y.

Currently, Toyota offers small electric SUV options, but they are not as dominant in that segment as the Toyota RAV4. Surprisingly, Toyota is making a big push into EV production, targeting a segment that’s been getting a lot of attention in recent years. This is why this development is shocking to say the least.

Toyota to electrify mid-sized SUV Highlander in 2026

According to a press release from Toyota, the all-electric 2027 Highlander EV is scheduled to go on sale in late 2026 in Georgetown, Kentucky. Pricing hasn’t been announced yet, but Toyota is boasting up to 338 horsepower and 320 miles of range, which is competitive even by today’s standards.

Toyota’s Highlander EV aims to compete with the Kia EV9, Hyundai Ioniq 9, and other midsize electric SUVs that are designed with families and long-distance travel in mind.

Toyota’s EV track record in the US is not overwhelming

The first mainstream mass-produced battery electric vehicle produced by Toyota was the bZ4X. It was a small electric SUV whose specs seemed lackluster compared to its key rivals.

Toyota later rebadged the bZ4X to Toyota bZ and completely redesigned it. Prices for the 2026 bZ start at $34,900. It produces 165 horsepower and has a range of 336 miles. The upper trim has even more impressive specs. According to a recent sales report, Toyota will sell only 15,609 bZ models in 2025, down from 18,570 in 2024.

Electric cars are losing popularity in the US

According to Cox Automotive, U.S. EV sales will decline from the previous year from 2024 to 2025. Federal electric vehicle tax incentives are also set to end in 2025, so sales soared as drivers in the U.S. took advantage of the tax credits before they went away. Many major automakers, including Ford, are taking a different approach to EVs after their sales and profits took a huge hit. Ford is considering producing an EREV (extended range electric vehicle) version of the F-150 and has ended production of the all-electric F-150 Lightning.

Rival brands are trying to unseat Tesla, but few challengers come close to Tesla’s dominance in the U.S. market. Additionally, the Trump administration is aggressively cutting back on EV charging infrastructure spending, according to Politico.

EVs may have a place in the auto industry, but given the current sales environment, it’s unlikely that electric cars will outsell gasoline or hybrid cars in the U.S. anytime soon. Toyota’s move into producing a midsize electric SUV is an acceptable risk as the company is backed by strong sales numbers for its most popular models. Other automakers that have been going all-in on EVs are starting to back off.

Toyota’s best seller is now a hybrid

The best-selling vehicles in Toyota’s portfolio include models such as the Toyota RAV4 small SUV and Toyota Camry midsize car, both of which are now standard hybrids. According to its fourth quarter sales report, the brand sold more than 316,000 Camry models and 479,000 RAV4 models in 2025. Most Toyota gasoline models also offer a hybrid configuration for drivers willing to pay more for improved fuel economy.

Hybrids are Toyota’s backbone. The brand gradually began favoring hybrid powertrains over other powertrains, making models like the Sienna minivan and Sequoia SUV standard hybrids. Today, even the most successful nameplates benefit from electric motors. Are Toyota’s hybrid sales strong enough for the company to invest further in the EV space?

President Trump says voter ID will be required in midterm elections

0

play

In a Feb. 13 post on Truth Social, President Donald Trump asserted that voter ID will be required in the upcoming midterm elections, even if Congress does not approve it.

“Democrats are denying voter ID, voting citizenship. The reason is very simple: They want to continue to rig elections. This is not what our founders wanted,” he wrote. “Voter IDs will be issued for the midterm elections, with or without Congressional approval. And our people have insisted on their citizenship and will not vote by mail, with exceptions such as military, disability, illness, and travel.”

House Republicans passed a bill on February 11th that would require voters to prove their U.S. citizenship ahead of the midterm elections. However, the bill is expected to face significant opposition in the Senate.

An earlier version of the bill failed to gain support in both chambers last year. This latest iteration builds on the 2024 version by adding voter ID provisions and would need 60 votes to pass.

The law, the SAVE America Act, requires proof of citizenship to be submitted “in person” when registering to vote in federal elections and adds an additional requirement for voters to present an approved form of photo identification in order to vote. It also creates new rules for voting by mail, requiring Americans to send a copy of their ID when requesting and submitting a ballot.

Republicans say voter ID requirements protect election integrity, while Democrats say they would disenfranchise millions of Americans.

According to the Brennan Center for Justice, more than 21 million Americans do not have easy access to a passport or birth certificate.

“Nearly half of Americans do not even have a passport, and millions of people do not have access to a paper copy of their birth certificate. The SAVE Act would disenfranchise Americans of all ages and races, but young voters and voters of color would disproportionately suffer,” the law states.

Similarly, the Brennan Center warns that millions of women whose married names do not match the names on their birth certificates or passports will have to take additional steps to make their voices heard.

Still, a recent poll by the Pew Research Center found that bipartisan majorities support photo ID requirements. About 83% of Americans support requiring all voters to show a government-issued photo ID to vote, including 95% of Republicans and 71% of Democrats.

Contributor: Katherine Palmer

President Trump tells Fort Bragg troops to support Republicans to preserve base’s name

0


President Trump visited the base in January to pay respects to the soldiers who captured Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro.

play

President Donald Trump told troops at Fort Bragg that he would change the base’s name if Democrats returned to power and joked about retiring to the North Carolina base because he likes it so much.

The Biden administration had changed the base’s name to Fort Liberty in 2023 to remove any association with Confederate General Braxton Bragg. However, Pentagon Secretary Pete Hegseth changed the name in February 2025 in honor of World War II paratrooper Pfc. Roland Bragg.

“When I heard they were removing the name Fort Bragg, I said no, no, no,” Trump said during a visit to the base on Feb. 13. “They did. They took the name off. We quickly took it back. If we don’t win the midterm elections, they’ll take the name off again.”

President Trump said he liked the area so much that he might retire there.

President Trump drew cheers by saying, “It’s a great area. In fact, I’d like to move here someday.” “We’re moving to Fort Bragg with our first lady. How about that darling?” he asked his wife, Melania. “She likes it. It’s possible.”

President Trump visited Fort Bragg to congratulate the military for capturing and eliminating Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro. President Trump said three helicopter pilots suffered “very serious leg injuries” from machine gunners on the ground, but a sniper shot the gunners and the pilots returned safely. He planned to meet up with the “very brave” pilots “soon.”

“With your help, America is winning again,” President Trump said. “America is respected again. And perhaps most importantly, we are feared by our enemies around the world.”

After his arrest, Maduro was taken to New York to face federal charges of narcoterrorism and cocaine trafficking. He pleaded not guilty.

Fort Bragg is home to the Army Special Operations Command and the elite special forces unit Delta Force, which is believed to have carried out the attack.

“No one thought something like that would happen,” Trump said.

President Trump said the soldiers who entered Maduro’s compound during the raid broke through a steel door like “mache”.

According to media reports, seven U.S. soldiers were injured and dozens of Cuban security personnel protecting Mr. Maduro were killed.

“They were removed very quickly,” Trump said.

President Trump: US has ‘very good’ relationship with Venezuela’s Rodriguez

Before leaving the White House for a visit to Fort Bragg, President Trump told reporters that he had a “very good relationship” with former Venezuelan vice president Delcy Rodriguez, who succeeded Maduro as interim president.

President Trump said the U.S. government would extract oil from Venezuela, refine it and sell it overseas. However, some U.S. oil companies have expressed reluctance to do business with Venezuela, citing the risks of investing in a country with such chaotic politics.

“We have a very good relationship with the president of Venezuela,” Trump said. “The relationship we have with Venezuela right now is a 10 in my opinion.”

Rodriguez, a member of Maduro’s government, became interim president after his ouster on January 3, but opposition leader María Colina Machado has insisted on a transition to leadership. Trump was asked if he would recognize Rodriguez as the official head of government.

“Now we’ve done it. We’re dealing with them. They’ve really done a great job so far,” Trump said. “Delsie has done a very, very good job. The relationship is strong.”

Asked when he would visit Venezuela, President Trump said he had not decided yet.

Joe Rogan says he refused to meet with Jeffrey Epstein in 2017

0

play

After Joe Rogan’s name was discovered in one of the latest releases of the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) Epstein files, the podcaster came on his show to explain why his name appeared.

On the Tuesday, February 10 episode featuring Cheryl Hines, wife of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Logan said her name was in the “didn’t go” file.

“Jeffrey Epstein was trying to meet me,” Logan said. “And I was like, what? There was no way I was even going to go, especially after I Googled him.”

Logan said the incident happened about nine years ago in 2017.

“I was like, ‘What[expletive]are you saying?'” he continued. “It was like 2017. One of the guests was trying to get me to meet him. I was like, ‘Are you (expletive) high? Or what are you talking about (expletive)?’

What happened to Logan’s name in the Epstein files?

The Hill reported that Logan’s name appeared in an email Epstein sent to theoretical physicist Lawrence Krauss after Krauss appeared on Logan’s podcast in September 2017.

In it, Mr. Epstein asked Mr. Krauss to set up a meeting with Mr. Logan, but in a subsequent email, the theoretical physicist told Mr. Epstein that he had not heard back from the podcaster. Logan said on a Feb. 10 podcast that he would not have met Epstein because he is not “the kind of guy who preys on the rich and powerful.”

“Some people get intoxicated by being part of a circle of rich and powerful people, even if they have no ambition to be one of those people. They just want to be around them,” Rogan said on a Feb. 10 podcast.

Logan blasts Epstein file edits

In the final stages of the 2024 election, Logan interviewed then-presidential candidate Donald Trump and vice presidential candidate J.D. Vance. After the interview and hours before Election Day, Logan continued to support Trump, saying Elon Musk provided a “compelling rationale” for voting for Trump.

But in recent months, Mr. Rogan has criticized Mr. Trump numerous times, and on February 10, the podcaster went so far as to criticize the Justice Department’s editing of the Epstein file.

“It seems awful that President Trump was saying none of this is true, this is all a hoax. This is not a hoax. Like, didn’t he know? If he wants to be charitable, he may not have known, but this is definitely not a hoax,” Rogan said. “And if you redact people’s names and they’re not victims, you’re not protecting victims. So what are you doing?”

Fernando Cervantes Jr. is a trending news reporter for USA TODAY. Contact us at fernando.cervantes@usatodayco.com and follow us at X @fern_cerv_.

Stephen A. Smith has indicated he will run for president in 2028. Democrat or Republican?

0


The outspoken media personality told CBS News he has not ruled out running for president in 2028.

play

  • ESPN personality Stephen A. Smith is considering running for president again.
  • Smith said he is strongly considering taking the Democratic debate stage in 2027.
  • He had previously expressed mixed feelings, saying he had no intention of becoming a politician but was “sick of this mess.”
  • Smith has criticized the Democratic Party for appearing to be “leaderless” and lacking a decisive public voice.

Will he or won’t he?

ESPN personality Stephen A. Smith is flirting with the possibility of running for president again.

Smith, the 58-year-old “First Take” and SiriusXM radio host, said in a Feb. 15 interview with correspondent Robert Costa on CBS Sunday Morning that he has “no intention” of becoming a politician or running for office, but Smith, who is known for his verbose rants about sports (including NBA great LeBron James) and politics (including President Donald Trump) in general, can’t rule out that possibility.

According to Costa’s Feb. 13 post on X, Smith teased the interview by saying he would run for the Democratic nomination, saying, “I confess I am strongly considering taking the debate stage in 2027.”

“This year we are approaching 2026 and we need to think about it, study it and know the issues,” Smith told Costa.

Smith’s latest comments come nearly a year after he publicly announced his intention to run for president.

“It’s time to stop fooling around. Life is beautiful, especially on ESPN/Disney,” Smith said in an April 7, 2025, post to the X Show. “I hate the idea of ​​being a politician, but I’m tired of this mess. So I’m officially leaving all doors open.”

A month ago, Smith told USA TODAY that he “doesn’t care about the office” and said he preferred sparring with political leaders rather than being them.

But since then, Smith has gone back and forth about his possible presidential bid on various platforms and to people who have approached him with the question. During an appearance on ABC’s “This Week” on July 27, 2025, Smith told ABC News’ Jonathan Karl that the Democratic Party is “in a really bad place right now because it looks like we don’t have a leader.”

“Donald Trump is leading with one party or the other. You can argue with him. Yes, no one can argue with him. He is the leader of the Republican Party and the Republican Party. Don’t get me wrong, the Democrats don’t have a leader,” Smith said. :We — I see — who — who is your leader? Who is it? Is it AOC? Are you Bernie Sanders? Are you Jasmine Crockett? Who is it? We respect many people on Capitol Hill.

“I’m not here to disagree with individuals by any means, but as an organization, the Democratic Party looks very bad right now because it looks like it’s leaderless,” Smith said. “They don’t have a definitive voice that everyone can trust.

“For example, if we look to 2028, we have people like Governor Wes Moore, who I really like and who I think is very capable, and Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro, who I like and think is very capable.

“But when it comes to the public voice for the Democratic Party, it literally doesn’t exist. There’s no one right now,” Smith continued.

Smith previously said he was “officially leaving all doors open” after rejecting the idea of ​​running for president. But past polls have shown that media personalities known for their harsh opinions have a long way to go to win over voters.

As for Trump, the president said last year that he would “love to see” Smith run.

“I love watching him. He has great entertainment skills, which is very important. People are paying attention to him,” Trump said at NewsNation’s Town Hall on April 30, 2025. “I’m good at picking people and picking candidates. Let me tell you, I’d love to see him run.”

Contributed by USA TODAY’s Philip M. Bailey.

President Trump’s new exhaust gas regulations will reduce the idle stop function of cars

0

play

  • The Trump administration is trying to eliminate credit for automakers with start-stop engine technology.
  • Government officials called the feature “universally despised” and a “ridiculous requirement.”
  • Start-stop systems, which temporarily stop the engine from idling, were first used in the 1970s and have become more common since 2012.

President Donald Trump said he is doing away with the start-stop button that has plagued drivers for years, a big boon for car buyers.

As part of a broader rollback of U.S. fuel economy regulations, the Trump administration announced it would eliminate credit for automakers that fail to comply with fuel efficiency regulations if they install start-stop buttons on their vehicles that shut off the engine when the vehicle is idling.

“You’re going to have better cars. You’re going to have cars that start easier, you’re going to have cars that work better for less money,” Trump said at a White House event announcing the changes.

EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin said in a statement that eliminating the start-stop system credit is an “added bonus” to President Trump’s broader rollback of emissions regulations, adding that “off-cycle credits for the almost universally despised vehicle start-stop feature have been removed.”

There’s nothing in the new rules that would force automakers to stop using start-stop features if they want to, but the Trump administration is trying to eliminate the fuel efficiency rating that has driven start-stop adoption for the past decade.

With this in mind, USA TODAY Cars looked at the tradition of start-stop and the fuel economy of some automakers that have popularized the feature in recent years.

What was the first car to use a start/stop system?

According to a Popular Science article published at the time, one of the first cars to use an automatic on/off switch was the 1974 Toyota Crown.

The technology was later adopted by automakers such as Fiat and Volkswagen in the 1980s. It was then used by companies such as BMW, Ford, Honda, Hyundai, and Kia in the 2010s after the EPA began granting automakers additional emissions credits for use under the Obama administration in 2012.

The Trump administration has hung on to the technology as a symbol of the previous administration’s environmental overreach, which introduced features that car buyers disliked.

play

Congress holds hearings on self-driving cars

The future of self-driving cars was a hot topic on February 4, as the Senate Commerce Committee held a hearing on the future of the technology and how to keep people safe on Capitol Hill.

Fox – 10 Phoenix

“As I traveled to all 50 states last year, I heard from countless Americans who not only dislike start-stop features, but also passionately advocate for making them a thing of the past,” Zeldin said in a Feb. 12 statement. “Many find start-stop systems to be a nuisance and only drain car batteries without providing any significant environmental benefits.”

“Car manufacturers should not be forced to adopt or be rewarded for technology that is simply a trophy for climate participation without measurable pollution reductions.”

In his own statement, Transport Secretary Sean Duffy added: “This administration is taking a whole-of-government approach to making cars affordable again.”

“Whether it’s resetting mileage standards or eliminating the ridiculous start-stop requirements that every driver hates, President Trump’s Automotive Dream Team is working overtime to lower costs and revitalize American manufacturing,” Duffy said.

How has the idling stop system been used to reduce emissions?

Here’s how some automakers that have popularized start-stop systems are tackling vehicle emissions in recent years, according to the latest data publicly available from the EPA.

toyota

  • Average fuel consumption in 2023: 27.5mpg
  • Rate of change from 2018:7.8%
  • best selling car in usa: Toyota RAV4

honda

  • Average fuel consumption in 2023: 30mpg
  • Rate of change from 2018:1%
  • best selling car in usa:Honda CR-V

BMW

  • Average fuel consumption in 2023: 27.6mpg
  • Rate of change from 2018:6%
  • best selling car in usa:BMW X5

ford

  • Average fuel consumption in 2023: 23.2mpg
  • Rate of change from 2018:6%
  • best selling car in usa:Ford F-150

hyundai

  • Average fuel consumption in 2023: 29.8mpg
  • Rate of change from 2018:4.1%
  • best selling car:Hyundai Tucson

mercedes benz

  • Average fuel consumption in 2023: 27.5mpg
  • Rate of change from 2018:17%
  • best selling car in usa: Mercedes-Benz GLC Class

general motors

  • Average fuel consumption in 2023: 23mpg
  • Rate of change from 2018:2.6%
  • best selling car in usa: Charbolet Silverado

volkswagen

  • Average fuel consumption in 2023: 27mpg
  • Rate of change from 2018:9.7%
  • best selling car in usa: Volkswagen Tiguan

Is Lifetouch in the Epstein files? School photo brands answer.

0

play

Concerns that school photography company LifeTouch may be included in the Justice Department’s file on Jeffrey Epstein sparked widespread social media posts and school districts across the country responded to the voices of upset parents. However, the company refutes this claim.

“LifeTouch’s name does not appear in the Epstein files. The documents do not contain any allegations that LifeTouch itself engaged in any illegal activity or that any student photos were used in any illegal activity,” LifeTouch said in a Feb. 10 statement on its website and posted on social media.

Still, concerns are rife on social media that LifeTouch may be named in Epstein’s file.

One content creator posted an Instagram Reel on February 12th warning parents about schools using the company and advising them to opt out of photos of their children. To date, it has been viewed 39,000 times.

At X, in a post that had been viewed more than 100,000 times as of February 13, one user reiterated the company’s claim that it was on file, writing, “They keep a database of all digital photos of children and their personal information.”

The controversy appears to stem from the ownership of Lifetouch’s parent company, Shutterfly, which is owned by private equity firm Apollo Global Management. Leon Black, former CEO of Apollo Global Management, is named in the Epstein file.

Here’s what you need to know about the relationship between LifeTouch, Apollo Global Management, Black Co., and Epstein Co.

Is Lifetouch in the Epstein files? Explaining the connection to billionaire Leon Black

LifeTouch said his name is not listed in the Epstein files. The company has taken student privacy seriously amid rumors of a relationship with a convicted sex offender.

“When a LifeTouch photographer takes a photo of a student, that image is protected only by the family and the school, without exception,” LifeTouch said in a statement from current CEO Ken Murphy.

LifeTouch’s ties to the Epstein files date back to Black, a billionaire and former CEO of Apollo Global Management, which owns LifeTouch’s parent company, Shutterfly.

Emails show that associates of Mr. Epstein arranged meetings between Mr. Epstein and Mr. Black between 2010 and 2017. Black was also mentioned in an email thread between FBI employees. The email states, “Someone stated that Epstein instructed her to give Black a massage while he was naked, and someone stated that another woman gave Black a massage and had him perform oral sex on her.” The names of the accusers have been redacted.

Black’s attorney, Susan Estrich, previously denied wrongdoing in a statement to USA TODAY.

“Mr. Black called for an independent investigation into his relationship with Mr. Epstein. After examining and reviewing more than 60,000 documents and interviewing more than 20 people, the Dechert Law Firm concluded that Mr. Black paid Mr. Epstein for estate planning and tax advice and had no knowledge of Mr. Epstein’s criminal conduct,” the statement said.

Black left Apollo Global Management in March 2021 amid increased scrutiny over his relationship with Epstein, The New York Times reported.

USA TODAY has reached out to Apollo Global Management for comment.

School district responds to LifeTouch, Epstein report

Several school districts across the country responded to the rumors as parents raised concerns about LifeTouch’s possible connection to Epstein.

Arizona’s Prescott Valley Charter School announced on February 10 that it would cancel future photo days “out of an abundance of caution” due to “recent media coverage and online discussion related to the photo company LifeTouch.”

“While there is no information indicating a direct impact on the school or students, our greatest responsibility has always been the safety, security and trust of our families,” the school said in a statement.

In Salinas, California, Alisal Union School District Superintendent Monica Anzo addressed unsubstantiated rumors that LifeTouch “shares photos with unauthorized third parties for illicit purposes” in a Feb. 11 letter to parents.

“We want you to be assured that the safety and security of our children is the district’s top concern and we are ensuring that our third-party vendors adhere to the same safety standards,” Anzo said, also sharing a copy of LifeTouch’s statement.

Anna M. Cutaia, superintendent of Milford Public Schools in Milford, Conn., also issued a letter sharing LifeTouch’s statement.

“We are writing to address recent media reports regarding the release of Epstein investigative files and other allegations regarding the leadership of LifeTouch, a photo company often used for school photos,” Cutaia said. “We understand these headlines are alarming and want to provide clarity to our family.”

What is Life Touch? Please read the rest of the statement.

LifeTouch is an 80-year-old photography company headquartered in Eden Prairie, Minnesota, according to its website. The company is well known for its work nationwide in K-12 school photography and other school-related activities.

Shutterfly acquired Lifetouch in 2018, according to the company’s timeline history.

In its student privacy statement, LifeTouch writes:

  • Lifetouch images are shared only for school records and to be available for purchase by parents. Additionally, as part of our decades-long relationship with the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, LifeTouch prints a free Smile Safe Card for every student we photograph for families to use with law enforcement if their child goes missing.
  • Lifetouch complies with all applicable federal, state, and local data privacy laws, including the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). In fact, Lifetouch is the first school photography company to sign a voluntary and enforceable privacy pledge, reaffirming our deep commitment to protecting our school community.
  • Lifetouch does not share, sell, or license student images to train AI models, including large-scale language models and facial recognition technology. Lifetouch has never provided images to other third parties for such purposes.
  • The fund, managed by a subsidiary of Apollo Global Management, invests in Shutterfly, LifeTouch’s parent company. Neither Apollo nor its funds are involved in Lifetouch’s day-to-day operations, so no one employed by Apollo has ever had access to the students’ images.
  • Lifetouch is not named in the Epstein files. The document does not contain any allegations that LifeTouch itself engaged in any illegal activity or that the students’ photos were used.

Read the full statement on the Lifetouch website.

Contributors: Erin Mansfield, Kathryn Palmer, Jayme Fraser, USA TODAY

Melina Khan is USA TODAY’s national trends reporter. Contact her at melina.khan@usatoday.com.

American Girl introduces a new modern era doll collection. Fans react.

0

play

American Girl is introducing a new collection of classic dolls, and the release is garnering reactions from fans online.

American Girl announced on Wednesday, February 11th. According to a news release posted on Mattel’s website, the company is celebrating its 40th anniversary with the Modern Era Collection, a new line of dolls that reimagine historical characters as modern versions. I own American Girl.

The doll retails for $90 and is “reimagined for today,” according to the American Girl website.

The doll is smaller than standard dolls modeled after historical figures, measuring 14.5 inches tall. Although it is different from regular costumes, it is characterized by costumes made from fabrics with similar patterns and designs.

Here’s what you need to know about the doll.

When can I buy new American Girl dolls?

The doll is currently available for pre-order on the American Girl website and is scheduled to ship on Friday, May 1st.

Which characters will be featured in the new collection?

Each doll in the new collection is a historical character from the brand, representing the lives of young American girls in different eras. Each has a series of books, and some even have movies based on current events of the time.

For example, the character in this line, Felicity Merriman, and her story take place in 1774, before the American Revolution, while the character, Addie Walker, whose story takes place in 1864, at the height of the Civil War, is a young girl born into slavery.

The stories deal with themes such as war, death, and poverty in ways that even young children can understand.

The brand’s new line features the following characters:

  • Samantha Parkington (Originally from 1904) – Doll comes with a pink top with black ribbon and buttons, plaid skirt and matching handbag, pink socks, and white and black shoes with pink ribbon.
  • Addie Walker (Originally from 1864) – Doll comes with a pink striped and blue patterned dress inspired by her original look, earrings, necklace, bag, socks, and pink shoes with straps and buckles.
  • Molly McIntyre (Original from 1944) – Doll comes with a red knit top, blue skirt, blue beret with red ribbon, red glasses, bracelet, red wristlet with blue ribbon, white socks, and red shoes.
  • Josefina Montoya (Originally from 1824) – Doll comes with a white top, red shorts, gold belt, earrings, gold necklace, brown purse, and white cowgirl boots.
  • felicity merriman (Originally from 1774) – Doll comes with satin top, pants, beaded necklace, pink purse, and pink boots.
  • Kirsten Larson (Originally from 1854) – Blue dress dotted with red flowers and with floral ruffles, two barrettes, a red bracelet, a red heart-shaped purse, white socks, and red boots.

All dolls come in display boxes.

‘Samantha is not an iPad kid’: Fans react to new American Girl doll

American Girl posted a photo of the new doll on Instagram, and fans commented and shared their thoughts.

One user commented: “Well we like the classics so we want the old outfits back.” “Hear from our Millennial followers who are buying for their daughters right now.”

Another user said the little doll looked like she was on weight loss pills, while others accused the brand of ignoring customer preferences.

Another user said: “Please stop.” “The reason we like historical dolls is because they are not from our time! Samantha is not an iPad kid, Molly is not Taylor Swift!!!”

Julia Gomez is USA TODAY’s trends reporter, covering popular toys, scientific research, natural disasters, holidays, and trending news. Connect with her on LinkedIn ×Instagram, TikTok: @juliamariegz or email jgomez@gannett.com..

Georgia senator tries to block construction of ICE facility in Congress

0

play

The fight against the construction of two ICE detention facilities in Georgia has reached Congress with an amendment to the federal funding bill sent by Sen. Raphael Warnock.

HR 7147, the fiscal year 2026 Department of Homeland Security appropriations bill, is being debated on Capitol Hill, with lawmakers calling for additional limits on ICE’s operations before funding DHS.

Warnock, who is serving his first six-year term in the Senate, proposed amendments to the bill that propelled the Georgia debate onto the national stage.

Where are Georgia’s ICE facilities located?

A large warehouse outside Social Circle, Georgia, was purchased by DHS in early February and converted into an ICE detention center that can hold 5,000 to 10,000 people.

The purchase was made over the objections of local leaders who were concerned about the strain on infrastructure and the safety of residents in the small community of 5,000 people.

Rumors that DHS is considering a second location were confirmed when Oakwood leaders told the media that property in town is being considered for a 1,500-bed detention center that would serve as a processing facility for detainees before they are taken to social circles. (This site’s address is Flowery Branch, but it is within Oakwood city limits.)

Oakwood is approximately 80 miles northeast of downtown Atlanta and Social Circle is approximately 70 miles west of Atlanta.

Officials from both cities said they received no advance notice that DHS would be entering the town before the land purchases were made, and that environmental and facility impacts were being discussed without their input.

“We’re already pre-paying for the sewer capacity they’re going to use, but if they go over that, we don’t have the funds for what’s going to be used from that property,” Oakwood City Manager BR White told 11Alive. White also said that once the federal government begins operations on the land, they won’t have to pay property taxes, meaning the revenue to support the new facility will have to come from local residents’ pockets.

The Oakwood Mayor and City Council also said in a statement Wednesday that the facility could cause “economic disruption to Hall County’s large Hispanic community, which is an important part of the workforce that supports local industry, small businesses, and the broader consumer community.”

The detainees are expected to be held at the Social Circle as early as April, and department officials told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution that the building was sold for $129 million.

ICE already operates a field office in Atlanta and has confirmed plans to add another field office in College Park.

Warnock takes the fight to Washington.

“Georgians want secure borders and they don’t want massive immigrant detention centers in their backyard,” Warnock said in a statement Friday. “If the Trump administration focused on deporting violent criminals, we wouldn’t need new detention centers that burden Georgia’s rural communities.”

The proposed amendments to the federal funding bill would prohibit DHS from “acquiring, constructing, renovating, or expanding ICE detention facilities in Georgia without express legal authorization” and would “require such actions to comply with relevant environmental laws.”

This amendment does not extend the restriction to other states.

If the funding bill is not passed by midnight on February 13, the department will enter a government shutdown. But ICE and Customs and Border Protection’s operations are both funded through the One Big Beautiful Bill Act passed last year, so the closure likely won’t have a major impact.

According to The Hill, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Coast Guard, Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Agency, and Secret Service will be the most affected.

Eileen Wright is an Atlanta Connect reporter on USA Today’s Deep South Connect team. X Find her at @IreneEWright or email her at ismith@usatodayco.com.