Home Blog Page 302

Car air suspension provides a smooth ride, but it also has drawbacks

0

play

A car’s suspension affects the ride comfort of the car. Some suspensions are made for smooth comfort, while others are made a little stiffer to prioritize handling.

Most cars use traditional leaf spring or coil spring suspension, but some automakers choose air suspension for some vehicles. Air suspension is a great option for daily driving as it focuses on ride comfort and provides a more comfortable driving experience.

How does air suspension work?

Air suspension replaces the basic steel spring with an air spring, which is an air-filled rubber bellows. Similar to how traditional shocks work, they use compressed air to adjust the vehicle’s ride height and absorb shock from the road.

What is adaptive air suspension?

Adaptive air suspension takes things to another level. This type of suspension uses sensors to automatically adjust to the terrain and conditions you’re driving on, giving you the smoothest ride possible.

What type of car does it come with?

Air suspension is typically available on luxury cars and large SUVs and trucks that need to raise or lower the vehicle.

Are there any disadvantages to air suspension?

The air suspension can be easily adjusted at the push of a button while providing maximum comfort. A good ride quality is what makes it great, but it will fail at some point. Once your air suspension breaks, it can be expensive to repair if it’s not under warranty.

More basic leaf spring or coil spring suspensions may not offer as much ride comfort, but they are much more durable and last longer. Even if it breaks down, it will last longer than air suspension and will be cheaper to repair.

Kenan Thompson is a car culture reporter for the Detroit Free Press. Contact Keenan at kthompson@freepress.com. Follow him on Instagram @keenanaautos. To sign up automotive newsletter. become a subscriber.

Companies celebrate tariff victory against President Trump in Supreme Court

0

NEW YORK/LONDON, Feb 20 (Reuters) – Thousands of businesses have won a hard-fought victory after the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled to overturn the White House’s emergency tariffs, but the process of getting refunds has only just begun.

In a decision that could reverberate throughout the global economy for years, a court ruled that US President Donald Trump cannot use the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 to impose broad tariffs on imported goods.

The business world has spent months adapting to President Trump’s frequently evolving trade policies and the use of tariffs, which are central to his policy agenda, not only to address trade issues but also as a cudgel against other government policies and actions.

The two countries are likely to face further challenges, as President Trump vowed in a furious press conference after the ruling to use additional powers to impose additional tariffs, including a temporary 10% tariff on all imports. On Saturday, February 21st, President Trump raised that number to 15%.

Nevertheless, many businesses and industry groups responded with hopes for more predictable trade policy. Economists at Penn Wharton Budget Models said Friday that thousands of companies, not just those that sued the administration, will now decide whether to seek refunds for more than $175 billion in tariffs collected in the United States.

“If the country needs revenue, it should be discussed in Congress,” said Rick Woldenberg, CEO of toy maker Learning Resources, one of the first companies to file suit against the tariffs last April. “I’m excited. I hope this makes everyone feel like they won. It’s a win for everyone.”

uncertainty remains

Shares of affected companies initially rose on the news, but the gains were pulled back due to uncertainty over trade policy. Shares of Target TGT.N and Coach’s parent company Tapestry TPR.N rose slightly in afternoon trading.

John Denton, executive director of the International Chamber of Commerce, said any refund proceedings would likely be referred to the U.S. Court of International Trade, meaning claims would likely be administratively complex, adding that the ruling was “disturbingly silent” on the issue.

Since April, more than 1,800 tariff-related lawsuits have been filed with the U.S. Court of International Trade, which has jurisdiction over tariffs and customs matters, compared with fewer than 20 such lawsuits in all of 2024.

President Trump’s vow Friday to impose additional tariffs was anticipated by a number of lawyers and business groups interviewed before the news conference. Several said the decision and President Trump’s subsequent moves will create further uncertainty in the coming months.

“The potential for tariffs to be re-imposed in a modified form remains significant,” said Ol Sonora, head of U.S. economics at Fitch Ratings. “The potential for tariffs to be re-imposed in a modified form remains significant. The accumulation of potential tariff refunds would create onerous operational and legal overloads and increase economic uncertainty.”

Many sectors affected

Consumer goods, automotive, manufacturing, and apparel companies have been particularly hard hit because they rely on low-cost production in China, Vietnam, India, and other sourcing locations. President Trump’s tariffs are raising the cost of importing finished goods and parts, squeezing profit margins and disrupting finely tuned global supply chains.

The main plaintiffs include a subsidiary of Japan’s Toyota Group, US retailer Costco COST.O , tire maker Goodyear Tire & Rubber GT.O , aluminum company Alcoa AA.N , Japanese motorcycle maker Kawasaki Motors, and Paris-listed eyewear giant Essilor Luxottica ESLX.PA .

The tariffs are pushing up prices for consumers exhausted by years of post-COVID-19 inflation, and the New York Fed estimated last week that 90% of President Trump’s tariffs are being borne by U.S. consumers and businesses. The White House insists there is little evidence that the levy is being paid by foreign nationals.

As of November, the effective U.S. tariff rate was 11.7%, compared with an average of 2.7% from 2022 to 2024, according to the Yale Institute for Budget Studies.

Additionally, the automotive sector will continue to face significant tariffs that were not imposed under IEEPA. For example, a 25% import tariff was imposed on vehicles shipped across the border from Mexico and Canada last year for national security reasons.

Still, lawyers say the levy is impacting potentially thousands of auto parts shipped to the U.S. from countries covered by President Trump’s reciprocal tariffs, inflating costs for both parts suppliers and automakers.

Lawyers said more companies around the world are likely to join the lawsuit and are awaiting a ruling to avoid drawing unnecessary attention from the White House. They join a growing number of companies that could wait months or even years to collect billions of dollars in import duties.

Wade Kawasaki, CEO of California-based automotive wheel maker The Wheel Group, said his company faces about 20% additional costs under the IEEPA tariffs. He plans to ask for a refund, which he said will involve his team sorting through thousands of transactions to “figure out how much they owe us.”

Some U.S. companies have chosen to sell the right to collect these refunds to outside investors. This involves agreeing to make a small payment upfront (about 25 to 30 cents on the dollar) and forfeit the remainder to investors if tariffs are lifted, Reuters reported in December.

German logistics company DHL said it would use its technology to ensure customers receive refunds “accurately and efficiently” if approved.

Bruce Smith, owner, chairman and CEO of Voltava, a Michigan-based auto parts company, said he supports President Trump’s efforts to balance trade with other countries, but now expects the president and other elected officials to protect national interests and work on trade policies that benefit both the United States and its trading partners.

“We can be tough and act strategically without being unpredictable,” he said.

(Reporting by Nicholas Braun and Arianna McLimore in New York; Additional reporting by Tom Hulse in Delaware, Nora Eckert and Kalea Hall in Detroit, Alexander Murrow in London and Christoph Steitz in Frankfurt; Writing by David Gaffen; Editing by Lisa Jukka and Nick Zieminski)

Virginia State Police search for suspect in Richmond shooting

0


Richmond Police Chief Rick Edwards told reporters there are multiple suspected shooters as the investigation is ongoing.

Virginia State Police are searching for multiple suspects after nine people were shot, two of them fatally, in a mass shooting early on February 21st.

Richmond police responded to a shooting in progress in the Shockoe Bottom neighborhood just east of the city’s downtown just after 2:45 a.m., according to dispatch records. Police Chief Rick Edwards told reporters that officers nearby saw a large fight in the street and cars speeding. He added that the firearm appeared to have escalated the brawl, which started as an altercation and then worsened.

“My message is to leave your guns at home,” Edwards said at a news conference, adding that the shooting shows that “nothing will end in tragedy like what we saw this morning.”

Police found Genesis Jones, 23, of Petersburg, and Dominique Jackson, 42, of Henrico County, suffering from multiple gunshot wounds and were pronounced dead at the scene, Edwards said.

Four other people with non-life-threatening gunshot wounds were taken by ambulance to local hospitals. Three more people drove themselves to local hospitals, Edwards said. The seven injured include three men and four women.

Police recovered more than 50 shell casings and two firearms at the scene, Edwards said. Police believe more weapons were used in the shooting.

Edwards said police asked for the public’s assistance in the ongoing investigation. Police Department spokesman James Mercante said no arrests have been made at this time.

Shockoe Bottom is a historic Richmond neighborhood known for its bars and restaurants. Local bars closed by 2 a.m., Edwards said.

Prior to the shooting, Richmond had three homicides in 2026. The two deaths from the shooting are pending a coroner’s determination of the cause and manner of death, according to a police advisory. Edwards said homicides and nonfatal shootings are down in Richmond.

Who voted against tariffs? Supreme Court rejects President Trump’s tariffs

0

play

The Supreme Court ruled on February 20 that President Donald Trump does not have the authority to impose blanket tariffs in one go.

The decision, a major blow to President Trump’s economic policies, was handed down 6-3. So how did each of the nine judges vote?

The conservative court’s ruling is the first major ruling against President Trump’s expansive view of presidential power.

Which justices voted against tariffs?

  • Chief Justice John Roberts (Conservative)
  • Neil Gorsuch (conservative)
  • Amy Coney Barrett (Conservative)
  • Sonia Sotomayor (Liberal)
  • Elena Kagan (Liberal)
  • Ketanji Brown Jackson (Liberal)

In a 6-3 ruling by conservative Chief Justice John Roberts, the justices upheld a lower court’s ruling that Trump’s use of a 1977 law intended for use in a national emergency exceeded the president’s authority, Reuters reported. The justices ruled that the law in question, the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), does not give Trump the authority to impose the tariffs he claimed.

Citing previous Supreme Court decisions, Roberts wrote that “a president must ‘demonstrate clear Congressional authorization’ to justify an extraordinary claim of tariff-imposing authority,” adding, “The president cannot do that.”

Which judges voted in favor of tariffs?

The following Supreme Court justices dissented:

  • Brett Kavanaugh (Conservative)
  • Clarence Thomas (Conservative)
  • Samuel Alito (conservative)

Justice Brett Kavanaugh, writing a dissenting opinion joined by fellow conservatives Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, said the ruling does not necessarily bar President Trump from “most, if not all, similar tariffs under other statutory authorities,” adding that “the court’s decision is unlikely to significantly limit the president’s tariff powers in the future.”

Gorsuch wrote another opinion highlighting the role of Congress.

Justice Neil Gorsuch, the first of three conservatives appointed to the court by President Trump, wrote a separate opinion emphasizing the importance of getting major policies like taxes and tariffs through Congress.

“Through that process, a nation can harness the collective wisdom of its people’s elected representatives, not just the wisdom of one faction or individual,” he wrote. “And because laws need to have broad support to survive the legislative process, they tend to stick around, and when the rules change daily, they allow you to plan your life in a way that ordinary people can’t.”

Reuters and USA TODAY contributed to this report.

A $2,000 customs rebate check? Here are the latest updates:

0


Democrats are demanding the money back after the Supreme Court ruled against President Donald Trump’s sweeping tariffs. This is the latest hypothetical plan to redistribute tariff revenue to Americans.

After the Supreme Court ruled against President Donald Trump’s sweeping tariffs on imports, some Democrats are pushing for rebates to Americans, the latest hypothetical plan to redistribute tariff revenue to ordinary Americans.

The country’s highest court ruled on February 20 that it does not have the authority to unilaterally impose tariffs enacted under the emergency powers law, which President Trump has used as part of a diplomatic strategy to constantly change tax rates on target countries.

Democrats, including California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker, are demanding rebates of at least $1,700 per household, and Pritzker has sent the Trump administration a bill for that amount per household in the state.

play

President Trump reacts to SCOTUS tariff decision to lower tariffs

After expressing disappointment with the SCOTUS tariff decision, President Donald Trump announced that he had signed an order imposing 10% tariffs worldwide.

“For more than a year, Donald Trump has been illegally taxing groceries, furniture, and cars. It’s time for a refund,” Newsom said.

Their idea follows months of speculation that has long surfaced about President Trump’s plan to send $2,000 duty refund checks to some Americans. The fate of that plan remains unclear.

Meanwhile, President Trump announced plans to enact tariffs using a different legal mechanism.

Tariff rebate checks have long emerged amid skepticism

Americans have felt the effects of tariffs, from higher prices on products they regularly purchase to receiving unexpected tariff bills in the mail. The average American household paid more than $1,700 in tariffs as of January, according to a report by Democrats on the Congressional Joint Economic Committee. The nonpartisan Tax Foundation said in a report in early February that the tariffs would cost households an average of $1,000 in 2025.

When President Trump first started mentioning the idea of ​​rebate checks for Americans, it seemed like a welcome relief to some. Some people believed it when they saw it.

Experts say the checks never had a specific path. Tax analysts have said the revenue generated by the tariffs will not be enough to send $2,000 to Americans, and details such as how and when the checks will be sent are up in the air.

“It’s not clear to me that they will actually happen,” said Stephen Derlauf, an economist and director of the Stone Center for Research on Wealth Inequality and Mobility at the University of Chicago’s Harris School of Public Policy.

President Trump initially suggested that the tariff revenue could be used to send checks to Americans in 2025. Since then, the amount of the proposed checks and their schedule have changed. In a Jan. 7 interview with the New York Times, President Trump seemed to forget that he had promised that the checks would be for $2,000 and could be sent to Americans with “moderate” incomes toward the end of 2026.

But checks related to customs revenue are never likely to be made, Dulauf said. There is no precedent or clear legal basis for a president to distribute tariff revenue to Americans in the form of checks, so if any stimulus checks were to be implemented, they would likely come from other sources under Trump’s control, he said.

Durauf noted that the stimulus checks sent at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic were approved by Congress under exceptional circumstances. On the contrary, rebate checks for individuals have already been proposed in Congress but have not moved forward. In July 2025, Republican Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri introduced the American Worker Rebate Act, which would provide qualifying individuals with at least $600 in revenue from tariffs, but the legislation received no further consideration in committee.

And President Trump suggested that the $1,776 checks sent to military personnel while on leave came from customs revenue, when they actually came from the military housing fund that Congress appropriated for the Pentagon.

Businesses win battle for refunds

The Supreme Court’s decision was a victory for thousands of companies that have sued to recover billions of dollars in duties already collected, including importers such as Costco, Revlon and Goodyear Tire.

The Trump administration has said in court that companies would receive refunds if the Supreme Court overturns the tariffs. But those refunds may still be a long way off. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told Reuters in January that repayments could take weeks or even a year.

President Trump previously said on social media about the prospect of refunds: “It would be complete chaos and it would be almost impossible for our country to pay.” On February 20, he said at a press conference that the Supreme Court had not addressed the mechanics of refunds.

For Americans wondering whether the need to pay back tariff revenue will dash hopes for economic stimulus, Durauf said cause and effect aren’t that simple. Drauf said it was unlikely that the tariff revenue would lead to check payments in the first place, and that Trump probably simply tied it to the tariff revenue to regain support after the tariffs proved unpopular.

“The bottom line is, it wasn’t very likely before, and it’s not very likely now,” Drauf said of refund checks to taxpayers.

Contributors: Bart Jansen, Maureen Groppe, Kinsey Crowley, Daniel de Visé, America today. Reuters

(This story has been updated to include new information and video.)

Savannah Chrisley’s ‘The View’ co-host performance backlash, Joy Behar praises

0

play

Former Trump press secretary Alyssa Farrah Griffin went on maternity leave this week from her current job as host of “The View,” and her seat was replaced by Republican reality TV star Savannah Chrisley.

Chrisley, 28, first appeared on the national stage in 2014 with her parents Todd and Julie Chrisley on the USA Network reality show Chrisley Knows Best.

Chrisley rose from a teenage reality TV heiress to one of the most prominent conservative voices of her generation after her parents were jailed on fraud and tax evasion charges in 2023.

“The View,” now America’s No. 1 daytime talk show, shed its dogfight reputation over the past decade as its co-hosts, the brainchild of Barbara Walters, became more collegial and its producers leaned more into its political past. The show’s “Hot Topics” segment feels more like a coffee clutch between close friends than a talk show feud.

Chrisley seemed comfortable during the four-day stint. She weighed in on the backlash surrounding the new Netflix documentary Reality Check, about Tyra Banks’ alleged behavior on the 2000s reality show America’s Next Top Model, and revealed that parts of her family’s own TV experience were fabricated by producers.

The only notable spat was when Chrisley claimed that New York progressive congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez was “also the Democratic nominee in the next election” following the congresswoman’s foreign policy blunder at last weekend’s Munich summit. She was also reprimanded by legal hawk Sunny Hostin for saying President Trump is not a racist.

Deadline’s exclusive Feb. 4 announcement that Chrisley was among the invitees for the fill-in guest hosting gig drew boos from left-leaning View fans and boos from the MAGA world. Her four-day appearance on “The View” drew similar reactions, including a surprising praise from Joy Behar, a frequent Trump critic who held court on Friday.

“But I think today is the last day, right?” Behar said on Friday, February 20, before declaring, “Right now, at this point, you never know.” Chrisley in turn thanked Behar and co-hosts Sunny Hostin, Sarah Haines and Ana Navarro for “giving me a seat at the table.” Whoopi Goldberg is always absent from Friday episodes.

How Savannah Chrisley found a seat at ‘The View’ table

In 2014, the complex family relationship of Todd and Julie Chrisley was first chronicled in “Knows Best” along with their five children (Grayson, Chase, Savannah, Lindsay, and Kyle) and their paternal grandmother, “Nanny Faye.”

The show followed the family’s lavish lifestyle in Atlanta and then Nashville, peppered with the one-liners from patriarch Todd Chrisley that made the Southern series a favorite of cable fans.

In 2017, during the first term of the Trump administration, Arizona Sen. John McCain’s eldest daughter Meghan McCain joined “The View” as a conservative co-host. After Trump lost to Joe Biden in 2020, McCain completely left the committee the following year.

After an extensive hosting search, executive producer Brian Teta and The View staff were led to frequent guest host Alyssa Farrar Griffin in August 2022. Once President Trump’s first-term communications director, she left the White House after the events at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6.

Navarro, a former View contributor, was also named an official co-host. Two months earlier, in June 2022, Chrisley’s parents and reality TV stars were found guilty of conspiracy to defraud community banks, defraud the IRS, and commit tax evasion. The Chrisleys reported to their respective federal prisons on January 17, 2023.

Chrisley advocated for his release at the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee in July 2024, and the couple was later granted a full pardon by President Trump last May.

After Trump’s re-election in November 2024, Chrisley hinted at the possibility of a U.S. Senate race in Tennessee in the summer of 2025. After her parents were released from federal prison on May 28, she returned to television on “The Chrisleys: Back to Reality,” which aired in September.

Joy Behar to Savannah Chrisley: “We all love you so much”

Chrisley’s hosting sparked a backlash from fans in the comments on The View’s social media pages, with some boycotting the show until the following week. “Next week I’m off until Savannah is no longer on the table!” one Chrisley critic said on Instagram.

The Unlocked podcast host responded on Instagram, telling “those who sent me hate” that she listened and chose love instead, “because true tolerance is not just for the opinions you agree with, but for the opinions you don’t agree with.”

On the Friday, February 20th episode, Chrisley revealed that he told his father that Behar was his favorite. Behar then told Chrisley: “You were such a kind and gentle person. We all love you. We’re happy to have you here.” Chrisley will be followed by fellow conservatives Amanda Carpenter, The View host Elisabeth Hasselbeck and Abby Huntsman. Sheryl Underwood, former co-host of “The Talk” on CBS, will also be on the panel.

If the show adds a new co-host later this year, will Chrisley be seen on a more permanent basis soon?

Contributor: Saman Shafiq, USA TODAY; Jennifer Sangalang, USA TODAY Network

A blizzard warning has been issued as a blizzard approaches in the Tohoku region.

0


A blizzard warning is in effect for New York City, southern Connecticut and parts of Delaware.

play

Millions of people have been warned of a possible blizzard as forecasts strengthen for the Northeast to threaten the East Coast over the weekend.

The winter storm that forecasters have been concerned about for days is expected to have “significant impacts” across the Mid-Atlantic and Northeast from Sunday into Monday, the National Weather Service announced Saturday, Feb. 21.

A blizzard warning was issued for New York City, southern Connecticut, and parts of Delaware from Sunday morning into Monday afternoon. A winter storm warning is in effect for southern Westchester, New York State’s lower Hudson Valley, and southern interior Connecticut.

According to the NWS, blizzard conditions with heavy snow and strong winds are expected along the East Coast from Delaware to southeastern New England. The NWS said travel in these areas would be “extremely dangerous” due to reduced visibility.

Snowfall rates are expected to exceed 1 inch per hour, with some areas expected to receive 1 to 2 feet of snow, levels that are expected to cause hazardous travel conditions, the weather service said.

AccuWeather said the nor’easter was caused by a storm that moved in from the Gulf Coast over the weekend and “rapidly strengthened along the Atlantic Coast, spreading snow from West Virginia through the Mid-Atlantic into southern New England from Saturday night into Monday.”

In a post on X, New York City Mayor Zoran Mamdani urged New Yorkers to “stay off the streets unless absolutely necessary. Stay home if you can.” in response to the blizzard warning.

Snowstorm forecast map: How much snow will fall?

Are you wondering how much snow is in the forecast? Use USA TODAY’s detailed winter weather forecast map below to find out where snow is expected in the coming hours and days.

Where will winter storms hit?

The storm is expected to bring 6 to 12 inches of heavy, wet snow to coastal areas from Philadelphia and New York City to Boston, according to AccuWeather. Forecasters say snow is expected to fall between 1 and 2 inches per hour Sunday into Sunday night.

“Winter storm watches and warnings are in effect along portions of the East Coast and also in the highlands of the northern Appalachians,” Weather.com meteorologist Jonathan Erdman said in an online forecast Saturday morning, Feb. 21. “I would not be surprised to see more winter storm watches convert to blizzard warnings in the coming hours.”

A low pressure system that formed Sunday off the East Coast between the Delmarva Peninsula and the Carolinas could gain enough strength to be called a “bomb cyclone” by early Monday morning, Erdman said. A “bomb cyclone” is a term used when a low pressure system develops rapidly, creating a storm similar to a winter hurricane.

The storm is expected to intensify so quickly that Brian Hurley, a senior forecaster at the National Weather Prediction Center, even called it a “superbomb” in an interview with Bloomberg.

“Today is a real nor’easter,” Hurley told Bloomberg. “This will continue for some time. It will be stagnant for most of Monday. The highest amounts are expected to be in central and eastern Long Island and coastal New Jersey, where 20 inches of rain is forecast.”

Strong winds can cause blowing and blizzard conditions, sharply reduced visibility, travel difficulties, and potential power outages. In eastern Massachusetts, minor coastal flooding may occur during high tides along with coastal erosion.

Wind gusts of 40 to 70 mph are expected from coastal New Jersey to southern New England, the NWS said. Combined with the heavy snowfall, these areas are likely to experience “numerous sporadic power outages”, the Bureau of Meteorology said.

‘Years have passed’ since a blizzard warning was issued in New York City

AMS Certified Broadcast Meteorologist James Spann wrote in a post on

According to the New York Times, this is the first blizzard warning for New York City since 2017.

“It’s been years since we’ve had a blizzard warning like this in the Northeast. To say it’s long overdue is an understatement,” Jim Cantore of the Weather Channel posted on X.

How to prepare for power outages

Heavy snow combined with strong and gusty winds can cause tree limbs to fall and subsequent power outages.

The American Red Cross recommends preparing for potential power outages by gathering supplies, including coolers, ice, water, flashlights, batteries, first aid kits, and seven days worth of medication.

If the power is out for less than two hours, most fresh foods are safe to consume. However, if the power goes out for more than 4 hours, you should discard the food in your refrigerator.

To stay warm, keep your family and pets in the same room. Do not use stoves or ovens to heat your home, as they can release carbon monoxide, which can lead to poisoning and death.

Contributor: Carissa Wadick

Mike Snyder is a national trends news reporter for USA TODAY. You can follow him on Threads, Bluesky, and X, and email him at: mike snyder & @mikegsnider.bsky.social & @mikesnider & msnider@usatoday.com.

(This story has been updated to include new information and meet standards.)

Alisa Liu’s father shares regrets about her path to Olympic gold medal

0

play

MILAN — Alisa Liu’s father sifted through conflicting thoughts and emotions.

Thursday, February 19, less than 24 hours after his daughter won gold in the women’s individual figure skating competition at the 2026 Winter Olympics.

Arthur Liu was smiling and looking happy during an exclusive interview with USA TODAY Sports. He also became restrained while sharing his regrets. He said they stemmed from decisions his daughter made years ago that surprised the crowd inside the Milan Ice Skating Arena and the millions watching on television.

He recalled that Alisa changed coaches shortly before she left ice skating at age 16.

Arthur Liu said, “Looking back, I think I made a mistake,” and Alisa added, “I started hating things like skating until I quit.”

He also said he regrets taking her from her parents’ home in Northern California to train in Colorado Springs, home of USA Ice Skating, months before the 2022 Winter Olympics. She finished 6th at the Beijing Games.

“I took her to Colorado Springs and left her there,” said Alissa, 20, who was overwhelmed at the time with the burden of running a law firm and being a single parent of five children.

“She was upset and she missed home. But I thought, I went to boarding school when I was 14. I survived. I felt like[Alyssa]could get through this too. But I didn’t know she hated it. I didn’t know until she came home.”

“Do it your way.”

When Alisa Liu returned to ice skating at age 18, Arthur Liu said it was clear what was to come.

“She said, ‘I’ll be back. I’m going to keep my word,'” Arthur recalled. “I thought, ‘Yeah, I’ll do it my way,’ because as a father I love her and I want to support her, but there’s only so much I can do. I’m just one person. I’m so tired by the end of the day.

“Just work and the kids and everything else. I just want to relax a little bit. I don’t have to worry about her too much1771697546which is great. You want me to stay out of it? That’s great, even if it hurts a little to hear that.”

At age 13, Arisa became the youngest U.S. champion in history. And as his skating career progresses, Arthur Liu said he hopes to find someone to take over.

“Because it’s too difficult for me. It’s really difficult for me to raise Champion and take care of her and also take care of other children,” he said.

“So, I’ve always wanted someone to take over and that’s what happened. So, okay, you’re not on the team anymore. In a way, that’s a little heartbreaking to hear. But the truth is, that’s exactly where I wanted it to be, and I want her to be independent.”

Arthur Liu gave up his role as Alisa’s manager.

“She has a good team around her, so I don’t have to worry about how to protect her or what to do,” Arthur Liu said.

“I’m not fully involved in her work. I’ve done my work for her and now I have to focus on the other four (children).”

“Hugs and photos”

Section 28, 2 rows, seats 1-5.

That’s where Arthur and his four children sat inside the Milan Ice Skating Arena, at the edge of the rink. He said Alisa discovered them during a six-minute practice session before the final stage of the competition began.

Arthur said he learned later that she had made her fingers into the shape of a heart.

Arthur Liu said, “That’s the type of person she is. Even early on at (U.S.) nationals and nationals, she knew where I was sitting.”

The family waited at the arena until 2:30 p.m. so they could meet with Alisa for 10 minutes.

Arthur Liu said about 20 friends and family members greeted Alisa.

“Lots of hugs and pictures,” he said of the visit.

“I really trust her.”

On the night of the free skate, Arthur Liu said he was a little nervous.

“I really trust her. I believe she’s going to go out there and do what she always does,” he said. And my philosophy is a little similar to hers. I’m not too attached to rankings or medals. So it’s actually about two great programs: the short program and the free skate.

“It’s something she’s happy with, something she’s happy with. So when she does that, it usually works out pretty well for her.”

However, as Arisa surged to the top, Japan’s Ami Naka and Kaori Sakamoto were within striking distance before the final ski.

Arthur Liu said, “I was very happy after (Alyssa) performed. But there will be two very strong competitors, so you never know.”

Arthur Liu noticed right away. Everyone knew.

Alisa is an Olympic champion and the first American figure skating champion since 2002.

“They had a lot of fun.”

Arthur Liu recalled when his eldest son, Alisa, just started skating. Two of her brothers joined her.

“They had a lot of fun chasing the people playing hide and seek on the rink, and they made friends with the adults and hockey players and chased them around,” Arthur Liu said. “It’s just having fun. That’s what parents want to see.”

And there she was at the ice skating arena in Milan, oozing joy and clearly having fun, just as she did before her hiatus during dark times.

Arthur Liu said, “She’s really happy to see the crowd,” adding, “She just wants to perform well.”

President Trump raises global tariffs to 15%, slams Supreme Court

0

play

President Donald Trump on February 21 stepped up his efforts to raise tariffs without support from the Supreme Court, announcing that he would increase tariffs from 10% worldwide to 15%, which he had announced after the nation’s highest court ruled against him.

In a post on Truth Social, President Trump wrote, “Following a thorough, detailed, and complete review of the ridiculous, poorly written, and extremely un-American tariff decision handed down yesterday by the United States Supreme Court after months of deliberation, global tariffs will be increased to 15%, effective immediately.”

The move comes after President Trump slammed the Supreme Court on February 20 over his “deeply disappointing” decision to overturn emergency tariffs imposed on countries around the world.

At a press conference after the ruling, President Trump said he was “ashamed” that some Supreme Court justices “didn’t have the courage to do what was right for our country.”

“I think their decision was a terrible one,” he said. “If you want to know the truth, I think it’s a shame for their families.”

The court struck down the tariffs by a 6-3 majority that included two Trump-appointed judges, Justices Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett. It was the first time in Trump’s second term that a conservative-dominated court ruled against the president’s full use of power.

The case came to the Supreme Court after a small business association representing more than a dozen states with Democratic attorneys general filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, accusing the president of unfairly expanding its “regulatory” powers and imposing taxes illegally.

Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in his opinion that while “the President asserts extraordinary power to unilaterally impose tariffs without limits on amount, duration, or scope,” he was “unable to identify a clear Congressional authority to do so.”

Contributed by Swapna Venugopal Ramaswami

Will there be an Iranian attack? President Trump says he is considering limited strikes

0

play

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump could make good on his threat to attack Iran within days as the number of U.S. warships surrounding Iran grows and the administration presses Iran to quickly conclude a nuclear deal.

For weeks, President Trump has warned of a possible military attack on the Middle Eastern country as negotiators hold brokered talks with Iran to reach a deal. The White House has said a deal would avoid military action, and the administration is awaiting a proposal from Tehran ahead of the weekend.

The president acknowledged on February 20 that a limited strike against Iran is currently being considered. “I think that’s something we’re considering,” he said in response to a question.

After a discussion on Iran during a Feb. 18 status conference, senior administration officials told USA TODAY that President Trump could decide to attack Iran as early as this weekend. The official said the president’s options could be to attack Iran next weekend or not. The person spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the sensitive topic.

The next day, at a meeting of the Gaza Peace Commission on February 19, President Trump told attendees that they would know whether an agreement was possible within the next 10 days.

“We may or may not need to go a step further,” Trump said.

He said later in the day that the 15th was the longest.

A senior official told USA TODAY on February 19 that the US is waiting for a proposal from Iran and should receive one within the next two weeks.

White House says Trump has ‘all options’ for freedom

The Trump administration is currently engaged in negotiations with Iran to curb its nuclear program, and the White House has repeatedly emphasized that Trump prefers a diplomatic path. However, mediated negotiations have not yet resulted in an agreement. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is pushing for the deal to include funding for Iran’s ballistic missile program and regional proxy forces, but experts say it is highly unlikely that Iran will accept the terms.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio is scheduled to meet with Prime Minister Netanyahu in Israel on the evening of February 28th. President Trump typically consults close ally Israel on actions in the region and worked closely with Israel during the bombing of Iran’s nuclear facilities last June. Prime Minister Netanyahu also visited President Trump in Washington this month.

“There is no military solution to Iran’s nuclear program,” Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said in an interview on MSNOW’s “Morning Joe” on February 20.

“The only solution is diplomacy, which is why the United States is returning to the negotiating table and seeking an agreement,” he said.

But an Iranian diplomat said the country was ready for negotiations “as much as it is ready for war” if no deal is reached.

Multiple media outlets have reported in recent days that President Trump is considering a limited initial strike, but that an operation to decapitate Iran’s government or remove its leadership is also being considered.

The Department of Defense and U.S. Central Command referred USA TODAY’s requests for comment to the White House.

“President Trump’s first instinct has always been diplomacy and he has made clear that the Iranian regime should reach a deal. Of course, ultimately the president has all options at his disposal,” a White House official told USA TODAY in a statement.

President Trump has renewed his threats in recent months as the largest protests in decades erupted in the country and the Iranian regime launched a brutal crackdown that reportedly left thousands of people dead. President Trump had previously sent a message to protesters in a Truth Social post that “help is on the way,” but he has since shifted the focus of negotiations and possible military operations to Iran’s nuclear program.

Experts said Trump could launch an initial attack and expand depending on the situation.

“I think the idea of ​​limited and expanded[attacks]is definitely on the table,” said Brian Carter, a research manager specializing in Iran for the American Enterprise Institute’s Critical Threats Project.

But Jennifer Kavanaugh, director of military analysis at Defense Priorities, said even a limited attack could set the two countries on a path to escalation.

A limited strike “may be attempted by the military, but I find it hard to imagine that Iran would not retaliate.”

Iran has threatened to launch attacks on U.S. forces in the region under Trump. There are between 30,000 and 40,000 troops stationed in the area at any given time, said Col. Tim Hawkins, a spokesman for U.S. Central Command.

“They have made it clear that they will retaliate, and once they do, the United States will have to retaliate,” Kavanaugh said. “Then you go into a cycle of strikes.”

President Trump’s threat looms over State of the Union

President Trump is scheduled to deliver the State of the Union address to Congress on February 24th.

After coming under fire from MAGA Republicans for his frequent meetings with foreign leaders at the White House and his overall focus on fighting wars and forging peace deals, the president is increasing his domestic travel and hosting more economic events ahead of the midterm elections. He has held most of his meetings with visiting leaders privately since his first year in office, when many of them were publicly broadcast.

The prospect of a second attack on Iran would not be ideal just as President Trump plans to wreak havoc on Iran after speaking as part of an affordability tour in battleground states where his party needs wins to maintain its House majority.

President Trump first attacked Iran in June 2025, when U.S. military aircraft, directed by Trump, dropped more than a dozen penetrating bombs on Iran’s nuclear facilities. Now he is sending more and more military assets to the region to strengthen the threat.

There is currently one aircraft carrier and 10 warships in the region, and dozens of fighter jets, including F-22s and F-16s, were headed to U.S. military bases in the Middle East last week, according to open source accounts and news reports. They were accompanied by an air tanker used to refuel the plane during the flight. Another aircraft carrier is heading to the region with more naval destroyers.

The entire Gerald Ford Carrier Strike Group and all U.S. military assets are not expected to arrive in the region until mid-March, a senior administration official said.

Allies have reportedly indicated they will not support the United States if President Trump launches an attack. The London Times reported on February 19 that Britain would not allow Trump to use its military bases for attacks, following similar statements from Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.

Given the vast amount of U.S. firepower in the region, anything is possible, Carter said.

“The U.S. military has a wide enough range of assets to do basically everything from relatively limited strikes aimed at steering Iran in the right direction in negotiations, to strikes aimed at actually overthrowing the regime itself,” he said.

Kavanaugh said the more pressing issue is “next day strategy.”

“We don’t have short-term, limited campaigns here,” she said.

Heartbreaking video shows a monkey being dragged and punched. See zoo response.

0


Ichikawa City Zoo said, “When you see this kind of disciplinary action against Punch by other members, please do not sympathize with him, but support Punch’s efforts.”

play

Punch the Monkey can’t catch a break.

Punch, a baby monkey at the Ichikawa City Zoo, made headlines earlier this week for allegedly dragging a stuffed orangutan around his enclosure. According to the zoo’s website, the baby monkey was abandoned by its mother at birth and raised by zoo staff. This stuffed animal was given to Punch to help him overcome his loneliness. Social media users have been showering Punch with love in recent days, but a new video posted on Thursday, February 19, is leaving animal lovers in the lurch.

In the video, Punch is approached by a larger monkey and dragged several times around on the ground before he flees to a corner of his habitat to seek refuge with a stuffed orangutan. As the two monkeys scream, a collective gasp can be heard from the onlookers.

Watch the heartbreaking video of the punch being dragged

Zoo says in video Punch ‘shows resilience’

On Friday, February 20th, Ichikawa City Zoo released a statement on social media regarding the viral video. The zoo said that before the video was taken, Punch tried to communicate with another baby monkey in the habitat, but he was rejected. Punch was then confronted by an adult monkey. It was probably the mother of the baby monkey that Punch tried to contact. The zoo said in a statement that the mother believed the baby was irritated by the punch and became upset.

“Punch shows resilience and mental strength despite being scolded,” the zoo said in a statement. “When you observe this disciplinary behavior towards Punch from other members of the zoo as he attempts to communicate with them, we ask that you support Punch’s efforts rather than feel sorry for him.”

IKEA Japan donates more stuffed animals to zoos

Punch’s favorite stuffed orangutan appears to be IKEA’s Djungelskog, which sells for $20 in stores and on IKEA’s website. On Tuesday, February 17, IKEA Japan President Petra Ferre visited the zoo and donated a bunch of stuffed animals, including Punch and other animals.

Various IKEA accounts around the world are capitalizing on Punch’s love for orangutans. On Monday, February 16, the official account of IKEA Spain

Punch Update: Despite new video, Abandoned Monkeys are making progress

Punch was born at the Ichikawa City Zoo on July 26, 2025, and was abandoned by his mother “soon after birth,” according to a translation on the zoo’s website. While the baby monkey’s relationship with the stuffed orangutan has been the talk of the internet, the zoo announced in a recent social media update that Punch is successfully communicating with other monkeys in his habitat.

The zoo said in a statement on February 6, “The monkeys are grooming themselves, playfully pecking others, being scolded, and experiencing a variety of other things every day, and are steadily learning how to live as monkeys in a group.”

In response to the spread of Punch, the Ichikawa City Zoo posted a notice on its website on February 20, asking visitors to be mindful of the facility’s small size and rules in the monkey observation house.

Greta Cross is USA TODAY’s national trends reporter. Story ideas? Email her at gcross@usatoday.com.

Team USA wins Olympic gold medal in mixed aerials, earning record 11th medal

0

play

  • The U.S. mixed aerial team won the gold medal at the 2026 Milan-Cortina Winter Olympics.
  • The victory gave Team USA its 11th gold medal, a new record for a single Winter Olympics.
  • The team consisted of Chris Lillis, Connor Curran, and Kaila Kuhn.

LIVIGNO, Italy – Team USA won a record-setting 11th gold medal at the 2026 Milan-Cortina Winter Olympics.

The U.S. mixed aerial team won the gold medal with Chris Lillis, Connor Curran and Kyla Kuhn flying and contorting their way to the top of the podium.

The 11 gold medals won in Italy are the most for any team at a Winter Olympics, surpassing the 10 they won at the 2002 Salt Lake City Games. With the gold medal dangling at chest height, the trio reacted with a mixture of pleasant surprise and glee when they were informed of the news in the mixed zone.

The United States won the mixed aerial event for the first time four years ago at the 2022 Beijing Games. As the only member of both teams, Lillis has pondered why the Americans succeeded in team competitions but stumbled in individual competitions. Many of the athletes grew up playing team sports. They can use each other for motivation.

“I think it really helps, especially in aerial skiing,” Lillis said. “In aerial skiing, it can feel very lonely up in the air.”

They were in a bad mood with each other. He asserted his dominance from the beginning and started the first round of the final in pole position. However, the score was reset and there were four teams left in the field, so it didn’t matter.

Mr. Kuhn set the tone. Karan was nervous. Lilith successfully built a haymaker. This was a jump he had been landing for 10 years, so it wasn’t a problem.

Switzerland won the silver medal and China won the bronze medal. According to Lillis, the average aerial skier crashes on 60% of their jumps. With at least one skier from the other six countries competing, the Americans’ 6-for-6 finish was more than clutch.

The team heading into the Olympics was thought to be comprised of Kuhn, Lillis and Quinn Dillinger, the event’s defending world champions. However, Derringer re-aggravated his knee injury during training, forcing him to participate in both individual and team competitions. Last week’s snow, wind and fog in the region also drastically altered training schedules, leaving jumpers unprepared.

Curran learned from the rest of the team that he would be part of the trio around 6:30 p.m.

“I want to perform for the team,” he said. “It’s bigger than me. I’m glad I was able to give it my all.”

Kuhn won the gold medal at the 2025 World Championships and also won the mixed aerials with Lilith. She reached the six-a-side final in the individual event with teammate Winter Binecki, but both missed the final jump and missed out on the podium.

On the men’s side, Karan and Lilith made it to the 12-person final, but did not make it to the six-person final.

Kuhn said the team was “pretty devastated” by not winning a medal in the individual competition.

“None of us really performed to the best that we could,” she said.

But there was a chance to bounce back. They used that as motivation, she said.

“It worked in our favor,” Kuhn said.

However, it was not appropriate for Lilith to call it salvation. Anything that happened within the last 24 hours will not be erased.

Lillis, who has 15 World Cup podiums, said: “I’ve fallen short two more times, which hurt, but I know I can do more.” “And maybe in the future I can get that monkey off my back and get on the individual podium.”

He also said the joy of another gold medal was not denied.

“It’s so amazing to win a gold medal at the Olympics with my teammates and to do it for them and for them to do it for me,” Lillis said. “Words cannot express how special it is to bring home a gold medal to the United States.”

Supreme Court considers ‘stock theft’ in foreclosure sales

0


AARP, one of the influential groups involved in the Supreme Court case, said older Americans could be particularly at risk of losing the equity they have spent a lifetime building.

play

WASHINGTON – A Michigan family lost their ranch-style home to cover $2,242 in disputed unpaid taxes.

the government sold the place for the song − It went for $76,008 at public auction, but the buyer sold it for $195,000.

A 2023 Supreme Court ruling required Isabella County to give the remaining property to Michael Pun’s family after selling the home and settling taxes, but his lawyers argue in a lawsuit to be heard in court on Feb. 25 that that’s not enough. They point to the appraised value of the foreclosed home at nearly $200,000 and argue that compensation should be based on its fair market value.

Lawyers for the family say the government has no reason to sell the property for more than the unpaid taxes unless the high court intervenes.

“They don’t care because they’re not allowed to keep anything else anymore,” attorney Philip L. Ellison said at a press conference about the lawsuit by the Pacific Law Foundation, which is representing the families.

A libertarian public interest law firm last challenged the so-called “stock theft” case before the Supreme Court after a 94-year-old Minnesota grandmother lost her property to foreclosure.

“Taxpayers must give back to Caesar what is Caesar’s, but no more,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote, siding with the grandmother in the court’s unanimous decision.

But the ruling does not address whether the state can sell the property for far less than its actual value.

AARP: “Amazingly Low” Sale Prices

AARP called the county’s purchase price for the Puns’ home “stunningly low.”

The advocacy group filed a brief in support of the challenge, citing concerns that older Americans are particularly vulnerable to tax liens and also cited a 2011 tax lien auction in Poughkeepsie, New York.

According to AARP, a company paid $4,825 for the home of a widow who was unable to pay $4,242 in taxes due to dementia. Even though she had the money. The home was appraised at $132,000 and the buyer later sold it for $115,000.

Starting in 2023, some states, including Oregon, Massachusetts and Maine, will require foreclosed homes to first be sold at fair market value by real estate agents.

AARP argued this shows there are alternatives to fire sale auctions that allow the government to collect unpaid money and homeowners to keep most of their home’s value.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, another powerful interest group, is involved as well.

“Governments are incentivized to sell quickly and cheaply, often resulting in devastating losses for property owners,” the industry group said in a filing.

The main legal issue in the case is the Fifth Amendment’s Expropriation Clause, which prohibits the government from taking private property “without just compensation.” The Puns also argue that selling the property for a fraction of its value to cover taxes is an excessive penalty under the Eighth Amendment.

What is the “fair market value” of a foreclosed home?

Isabella County attorneys said the government’s requirement that compensation be based on the property’s fair market value ignores the fundamental difference between a market sale with a willing seller and buyer and a forced sale through foreclosure.

The county said in its filing that properties in foreclosure simply have a lower value.

“The Constitution does not give delinquent taxpayers the right to seek a hypothetical pre-foreclosure appraisal rather than the actual sale proceeds,” Michigan and 10 other states said in a brief supporting Isabella County.

Hennepin County, the municipality at the center of Minnesota’s 2023 lawsuit, said properties it recently sold through an online public auction sold for about 40% of their estimated market value.

The Wisconsin Association of Counties told the court that the state has already taken steps to comply with the court’s decision in 2023 and that further changes “will likely require a complete re-evaluation of Wisconsin’s tax lien laws.”

The nation was doing “a lot of bad things”

According to the Pacific Legal Foundation, nearly all states changed their laws after the 2023 Supreme Court ruling.

“A lot of states did bad things,” said Christina Martin, a lawyer for the foundation who defended the case. “In most states, people are better off than they were before.”

However, a liberal public interest law firm recently announced that it has identified ways in which the states of Alabama, Arizona, Michigan, New Jersey, and New York are engaging in “shadow stock theft.” These include requiring property owners to submit claims to the government for excess proceeds from tax sales. Homeowners may be required to make that request even before the property is sold, which may shorten the deadline for filing a claim.

In recent months, the Pacific Law Foundation has asked the Supreme Court to intervene in several Michigan cases involving such “bureaucratic trappings.”

Courts have so far declined to hear such appeals.

In the Isabella County case over fair market value, which the court will hear on Feb. 25, the Department of Justice argues that property owners can challenge whether they received insufficient notice of sale or were not given an opportunity to bid. But the department said that’s all the Constitution requires if the sale was conducted fairly and the homeowner received any surplus money.

“The best measure of a property’s value is the price it receives at the foreclosure sale itself, as long as the sale is conducted fairly,” the Justice Department said in a filing previewing arguments it plans to make during oral arguments. “Like other debtors, taxpayers who wish to avoid foreclosure proceedings can also pay their outstanding debts.”

2026 National Margarita Day Sale at Chili’s, Chuy’s and More

0

play

The margarita is a cocktail mainstay, and this drink with an elusive origin story will be celebrated on National Margarita Day on Sunday, February 22nd.

Tequila-based cocktails appeared after Prohibition, and by 1939 similar drinks like picadors and tequila sours were appearing in cocktail books. By the 1940s, margaritas were being served in many places, including California and Texas. The basic ingredients include tequila, lime juice (freshly squeezed is ideal), an orange liqueur like triple sec, and usually salt on the rim.

While there may be some uncertainty about the margarita’s origins, you’re sure to find a great deal on the drink this National Margarita Day.

Chili’s National Margarita Day Special and Margarita of the Month Club

Chili’s launched its Margarita of the Month Club earlier this month, coinciding with the monthly release of a new $6 seasonal and culturally inspired margarita (this month it’s the Straw Eddy Margarita). The restaurant chain is giving away free cocktail passport books to keep track of your cocktails and has started selling this month’s margarita merchandise, including polo shirts ($45) and hats ($30).

Chili’s also has several specials for National Margarita Day on Sunday, February 22nd, including this month’s strawberry-themed margarita.

  • $5 Tequila Classic Margarita: This new twist on a classic cocktail is made with Cuervo Traditional Blanco, triple sec, and a house-made chili sour and garnished with a lime wedge.
  • This month’s $6 StrawEddy Margarita: Made with Lunazul Blanco Tequila, Deep Eddy Lemon Vodka, Strawberry Puree, and House-Made Sour (available at participating locations throughout February).
  • $7 Frozen Daisy Pattern: Made with Patron Silver Tequila, triple sec, lime juice, and agave.

More National Margarita Day sales and specials

  • study: The Japanese restaurant chain will be offering $9 margaritas all day from Sunday, February 22nd through Wednesday, February 25th. These include the classic Rocky’s Margarita, made with Altos Plata tequila, Combier d’Orange, organic agave, yuzu, and Grand Marnier (also mango, passion fruit, and strawberry varieties).
  • Buffalo Wild Wings: The new Spicy Margarita (made with spicy Ghost Tequila) is available for $10.50.

  • Mr. Chewie: The Austin, Texas-founded Tex-Mex chain will be hosting a National Margarita Day drink special on Sunday, February 22nd. This includes an extra $2 on any House Rita a Grande (with special cup, while supplies last) and a $1 floater. This is a great plan for dine-in only.

  • Taco County: Get a $27 Margarita Pitcher from Friday through Sunday and try the new Mystery Margarita ($5) through March 2nd. Guess the flavor and win free tacos for a year. Children 10 and under get free with the purchase of an adult entree of $12 or more. Thursday through Saturday, you can purchase a flight of two margaritas for $20.
  • Duffy’s Sports Grill: National Margarita Day is Sunday, February 22nd, so the Florida-based chain will be serving $2.22 El Jimador Margaritas all day long (dine-in only; not included in the 2-for-1 drink special).
  • Fuzzy’s Taco Shop: Specials include $4 house margaritas, $4 sangria Rita swirls, and $4 Coors Light drafts. There are also two limited edition margaritas made with Pantalones Organic Tequila. Two flavors are available in limited-edition pants-shaped cups: the Party Pants Margarita, and the Pants on Fire Margarita, made with strawberries and jalapeños.
  • Kona grill: Celebrate National Margarita Day with $6 margaritas from Sunday, February 22nd through Wednesday, February 25th.

  • Lime fresh Mexican grill: The Florida-based fast-casual chain will be serving $5 frozen margaritas all day on Sunday, February 22nd. We also have a giveaway where three lucky winners will receive free margaritas for a year. The competition can be entered online and closes on February 22nd, with winners announced on Sunday March 1st.
  • Little Saints: The non-alcoholic canned cocktail maker launches new non-alcoholic margaritas online and in retail stores in time for National Margarita Day. With no sugar and just 5 calories, the canned margarita is described by the company as “salty, with the tang of fresh lime, and the brightness of bitter orange, just like the classic Cointreau-style margarita you’d order at your favorite bar.”

  • Margarita Mexican Restaurant: This Mexican restaurant chain has some special menu items for National Margarita Day. These include Original and Classic Flavor Margaritas available for just $6, Patrón Margaritas ($9.99) served in a souvenir cup, and the Patrón Tree ($39), your choice of four classic flavor margaritas served in individual-sized Patrón bottles.

  • Margaritaville: Members of the Paradise Points loyalty program can purchase up to 20 ounces of “Margarita in Paradise” for $2 when they bring in a cup, glass or blender on February 22nd. You can participate in the Dining Rewards Program online.
  • Native Grill & Wings: On National Margarita Day, you can get a $6.50 Native Margarita (dine-in only at participating locations).
  • Crazy Eyes Sports Cantina: On Saturday, Feb. 21 and Sunday, Feb. 22, $3 Short House Margaritas or $5 Regular House Margaritas will be available frozen or on the rocks. Other drink options include the Cerveza Rita with Corona, or the Dos Equis Laga Es Special blended with Ojos Locos’ signature frozen margarita, and the new $5 Spicy Strawberry Margarita with La Lo Blanco, strawberry puree and fresh jalapeños.
  • STK Steakhouse: The steakhouse chain will be serving $9 Perfect Margaritas all day on Sunday, February 22nd (not available at Chicago, Oak Brook, Charlotte, or Boston locations).
  • Talkie Taco: The Austin, Texas-based chain is offering two National Margarita Day specials throughout the day. $10 House Margaritas with collectible Torchy cups (while supplies last) and $1 Patron Blanco Floaters.

  • Twin Peaks: Celebrate National Margarita Day with the new Cuervo Traditional Margarita, made with Jose Cuervo Traditional Blanco, triple sec, agave, and lime juice.
  • Velvet taco: The Texas-founded franchise will be offering special $5 margaritas on Friday, Feb. 21 and Saturday, Feb. 22, in observance of National Margarita Day.

Mike Snyder is a national trends news reporter for USA TODAY. You can follow him on Threads, Bluesky, and X, and email him at: mike snyder & @mikegsnider.bsky.social & @mikesnider & msnider@usatoday.com.

Trump vs. Trump. Which president will attend the State of the Union address?

0


Will it be Trump who says “the economy is fixed” who will address Congress, or will it be Trump who “feels your pain”? America First Trump or Nobel Pacifist Trump?

play

The state of President Donald Trump’s unions is in trouble.

When he delivers his annual State of the Union address on February 24, his audience in the House is likely to include members of the Supreme Court who just outlawed draconian tariffs, his main economic and national security cudgel. A bitter showdown over his aggressive immigration policies has partially shut down key parts of his administration.

And Congressional Republicans will now be watching to see how Donald Trump fares as they prepare for what is likely to be a difficult midterm election.

Call this the battle for Trump’s brain.

Some see his efforts to refocus his message on kitchen issues and even acknowledge their reality as an existential challenge to his country’s political future and to Republicans’ continued control of Congress in November.

That has never been a priority for the president.

Since signing the so-called “Big Beautiful Act” on July 4 of last year, which extended the major tax cuts from his first term, President Trump has been less concerned with the bill and more concerned with his legacy. He has been less involved in the immediate issues that were key to his re-election in 2024 and more engaged in the global war and peace causes he hopes will cement his place in history.

Not to mention his gold leaf brand stamped on everything from the Rose Garden to the Kennedy Center. It is now designated the Trump Kennedy Center in letters above its marble entrance. Some of it remains.

Indeed, the president’s eagerness to circumvent Congress landed him squarely at the Supreme Court, which ruled on February 20 that the president does not have the authority to impose steep tariffs without Congressional approval. The court’s 6-3 decision threatens the very foundations of his economic policy.

During the State of the Union address, not only senators and representatives, but also Cabinet members, military commanders, high court judges and ambassadors from around the world will line up in front of Trump on the House floor. The night offers the grandest venue, largest television audience, and most presidents give the most high-profile speeches of the year.

Will President Trump use this opportunity to offer a positive agenda to encourage Republicans who are reeling from Democratic victories in a series of special elections over the past year? Or does it celebrate the accomplishments he claims to have already achieved?

Let’s see on Tuesday.

When it comes to the economy, victory and empathy

Let’s consider the economy.

Nowhere else is there such a wide gap between what President Trump says and what Republicans in Congress want to hear.

“I think we actually have the greatest economy in history,” Trump told Fox Business. Mainstream economists don’t think that far, but Mr. Trump has cited a strong stock market, stronger-than-expected job growth and cooling inflation as evidence that his policies are working.

He assessed the economic situation as “plus-plus-plus-plus-plus,” dismissing economic worries that can be summed up by the word “affordability.” He calls this “Democrat quackery” and “the work of con artists.”

But affordability is a concern that lawmakers from both parties are hearing from constituents. Economic uncertainty is rising as consumers begin to pay higher costs due to the Trump administration’s tough tariffs and the loss of enhanced insurance subsidies from the Affordable Care Act. So is the sense that positive economic development is returning primarily to the benefit of the rich rather than workers.

A Pew Research Center poll released this month found that a majority of Americans are “very concerned” about a range of tangible costs, including health care, food, housing and electricity. According to a Gallup poll, the percentage of adults who expect to have a good quality of life in five years has fallen to an all-time low, and the decline continued into 2025, when Trump returns to office.

Republican lawmakers voting this fall are hoping for a sympathetic message from President Trump. More “I feel your pain.” Less thinking that “the economy is fixed,” regardless of how you feel.

“People aren’t stupid,” Sen. Josh Hawley, a MAGA Republican and Trump supporter, told NBC News. “They know what it costs to go to the grocery store and what doesn’t cost. They know how much their rent costs. They know how much prescription drugs cost. And all of that is too expensive. And they can’t afford it. And they know it.”

During the 2024 campaign, President Trump harshly criticized his predecessor, Joe Biden, for not doing more to fight inflation. He argued that the economy was rosier than most voters realized and accused the then-president of being out of line.

Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, said Trump and his advisers now appear to be out of touch.

“Trump doesn’t sit down Thursday night and pay his bills and see how his health care is going and see how much gas receipts show up on his credit card,” she said. “You can’t call this a hoax and make people believe it.”

On foreign policy, America First vs. the Nobel Prize

When it comes to foreign policy, President Trump’s actions during his time in office also differ from his campaign messages.

Trump praised his “America First” message during his presidential campaign. This means that countries should focus on domestic issues rather than their role in the world. He promised there would be no more “endless wars” like the one in Afghanistan, the country’s longest, which ended in 2021 after nearly 20 years.

But since becoming president, Trump has engaged extensively in conflicts around the world, and now boasts that he has resolved eight wars and is worthy of the Nobel Peace Prize. He recently convened a “peace commission” with an agenda starting with rebuilding devastated Gaza. Last week, he sent senior aides and his son-in-law to a series of negotiations in Geneva over the Ukraine war and tensions with Iran.

He moved his second carrier group to the Middle East to prepare for a possible attack on Iran, despite warnings from allies in the region that it risked triggering a major war.

The problem for some of his supporters is not just the broad global role he advocated for the United States, but also the time and attention he devoted to it. Voters’ priorities tend to be close to home, such as whether they can afford a home or whether the roads in their area are safe.

When Trump flew to Switzerland last month to attend the World Economic Forum in Davos, White House chief of staff Susie Wiles told reporters that the president would scale back his international travel this year and increase domestic travel, starting with a focused visit to Iowa to visit farmers hit by tariffs.

On Thursday, he was in Rome, Georgia, and in interspersed remarks he declared that he had already “earned leeway,” a message quite different from the one he was asked to convey.

He was in a congressional district holding a special election in March to replace MAGA supporter-turned-critic Marjorie Taylor Greene, who resigned in January.

“If we had put America first from the beginning, not our wealthy donor class or our foreign policy, we wouldn’t have had to strategize how to gaslight the American people,” Greene said in a post by X, heckling the White House’s plans for a State of the Union address. “Sending messages won’t solve the problem.”

You can write scripts. can’t make him stick to it

Trump rarely follows a script, even in big speeches.

Consider last year’s speech to a joint session of Congress.

“To my fellow citizens: America is back,” Trump began, reading from a teleprompter.

But for the next 1 hour and 39 minutes, he continued to soar, making it the longest such speech in decades. He praised firefighters (“incredible people” who “voted for me in record numbers”) but decried “wokeness” (“wokeness is the problem”). He paid tribute to Secretary of State Marco Rubio, but also added a warning. “Now you know who to blame if something goes wrong,” he ad-libbed.

He also repeatedly blamed Biden for the country’s economic and other woes, something that will be harder to do after more than a year as president.

“You know, we inherited an economic disaster and an inflationary nightmare from the last administration,” President Trump said last year, pointing specifically to egg prices as a sign of Biden’s failures. “As President, I will fight every day to repair this damage and make America affordable again.”

There is that word. Will he say it again this time?

President Trump’s State of the Union address will be delivered under ‘very difficult circumstances’

0


“They’re in a very tough spot,” said Tim Malloy, a Quinnipiac University polling analyst whose recent poll showed Trump’s approval rating at 37%.

play

President Donald Trump’s aggressive second-term policies were already coming to a standstill when the Supreme Court handed down the hammer.

The court’s 6-3 decision, announced on February 20, invalidated President Trump’s use of emergency powers to impose sweeping tariffs, shattering a pillar of his economic policy. It’s also the latest in a series of other setbacks, from the withdrawal of immigration officials in Minneapolis to the withdrawal in the occupation of Greenland.

The setback and defeat came amid declining poll numbers, large anti-Trump protests, strong Democratic performance in the elections, and other signs that the political mood was shifting sharply against the Republican president, in the run-up to a high-stakes State of the Union address on Feb. 24, the first of his second administration.

The prime-time speech at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., comes at a crucial time for President Trump, as he seeks to counter increasingly negative perceptions of his performance and deliver a message that reverses the dire outlook for the 2026 midterm elections for the Republicans who have historically driven him from power.

Presidential historian Douglas Brinkley said the speech, broadcast live on all television networks and cable news channels, was a dream opportunity for the president to “strengthen his strategy” and shore up support.

“You own the floor,” he said.

President Trump’s “rough patch”

Mr. Trump’s standing among the public is crumbling beneath his feet, with polls showing him at or near the lowest point in his second term amid concerns about the cost of living, intense opposition to immigration and skepticism about other administration policies.

After an astonishing first year of disruptive policy moves, the president is now on the defensive, as evidenced by recent defeats and reversals.

In addition to the Greenland and Minneapolis U-turns, Trump also deleted a video he posted depicting President Barack Obama and Michelle Obama as monkeys after receiving bipartisan condemnation, but he refused to apologize and blamed his aides. And he continues to fight the fallout from the Congress-mandated release of the Epstein files.

“They’re in a very tough spot,” said Tim Malloy, a polling analyst at Quinnipiac University, whose polls showed President Trump’s approval rating at just 37% as of early February. A year ago, a poll showed President Trump’s approval rating at 45%.

Loss in customs litigation is particularly significant. Although polls show tariffs are unpopular, they are a central part of President Trump’s economic policy and will face a referendum in the midterm elections.

“This is a huge setback,” said Matthew Bartlett, a Republican consultant who worked at the State Department during Trump’s first administration, noting that tariffs were the president’s “poster economic policy.”

Barrett added that the tariff ruling “will definitely raise the stakes” for the president’s State of the Union address, predicting “heightened drama” when Trump speaks before the Supreme Court justices, who gave him a surprising rebuke and predicted who the president would bash in his post-decision press conference. President Trump singled out Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett, two judges he appointed in his first term who ruled against him on tariffs, calling them “a disgrace to the family.”

“This SOTU can vary from a circus environment to a coliseum atmosphere,” Bartlett said.

President Trump has factored tariffs into his economic pitch, highlighting positives such as a booming stock market, relatively low inflation and higher-than-expected job numbers. His defeat at the Supreme Court could further darken their view of his economic management, but allies believe he has a legitimate case.

“If his numbers are low and he doesn’t accomplish anything, people might be worried,” former Republican House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, a Trump ally who led House Republicans for part of the president’s first term, told USA TODAY before the Supreme Court’s tariff decision. “He has so many accomplishments. All he has to do is narrow it down and tell the American people what he’s done…and his numbers will explode.”

‘Air leak’ on economy and immigration

The White House has been keen to tout signs of economic recovery, issuing a sweeping press release earlier this month announcing that employers added 130,000 jobs in January, with the unemployment rate falling to 4.3% and beating expectations.

“This is the Trump economy,” the release declared.

The strength of the stock market has also been a major selling point for Mr. Trump, who is celebrating new records in major indexes. The president cited the recent peak in financial markets during a Feb. 20 press conference following the court’s tariff decision, and Attorney General Pam Bondi also noted that stock prices had soared during Congressional hearings in reaction to the department’s handling of the Epstein file. More importantly for many Americans, many of whom don’t own stocks, inflation fell to 2.4% in January, close to the Federal Reserve’s 2% target interest rate.

But the prices of many essential goods remain high, and polls show that a majority of Americans have serious concerns about the cost of living. The White House, in its recent executive order granting expanded tariff-free access to Argentine beef, cited ground beef prices at $6.69 per pound, the highest since record-keeping began in the 1980s.

A Quinnipiac poll released earlier this month found that only 39% of Americans approved of President Trump’s handling of the economy. The president also received poor reviews for his handling of immigration issues, with an approval rating of just 38%.

“Where he’s really leaking air is the economy and immigration. The numbers there are bad and they’re getting worse,” Malloy said.

A January poll by the Pew Research Center found that 60% of Americans disapprove of President Trump’s tariffs, which economists widely see as leading to higher consumer costs. The survey found that a majority of Americans are “very” concerned about health care, food, housing and electricity costs.

President Trump appeared in Georgia on February 19 while campaigning for a special congressional election to fill former Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene’s seat, telling supporters that affordability was no longer an issue: “We solved it, and we’ll go further down the line, but we solved it.”

President Trump sticks to tariffs

The dissonance between President Trump’s economic stimulus plan and widespread cost-of-living concerns among Americans poses a challenge as the president tries to sell his vision in the State of the Union. Some Republicans say he is so preoccupied overseas with Venezuela and Greenland that he struggles to stay focused and strike the right tone on economic issues.

Former Michigan Republican Rep. Fred Upton told USA TODAY that “President Trump doesn’t seem to feel the pain that many Americans are experiencing regarding the economy and the sanctity of work. He doesn’t seem to be aware of it.”

Bartlett said that in the “irrational euphoria” surrounding Trump’s return to power, the president and his allies “overlooked” the important issue of affordability.

He added: “The idea that the Republican Party and the president have done almost everything but the things that matter most to voters will continue to haunt voters.”

The State of the Union address could be an opportunity for President Trump to “reset” and rally support for bipartisan economic policy, but Bartlett said that is unlikely. He noted that there are concerns that tariffs would drive up prices, and said a tariff ruling could even be beneficial.

But President Trump vowed to continue pursuing the tariffs in other ways, saying at a news conference after the court’s ruling that the country is “better off because of tariffs” and “we’re going to continue to do what we were doing.” He even announced a new 10% tariff worldwide.

“The Supreme Court gave Trump’s economy a lifeline, but the president continues to demand an anchor,” Bartlett said.

The ongoing tariff debate could overshadow other moves President Trump has made on the economy. McCarthy pointed to President Trump’s efforts to lower prescription drug prices and lower taxes as tangible economic benefits to Americans. He said the president is doing a lot of things that “people don’t see” and the State of the Union is an opportunity to change that, calling the address Trump’s “report card” to the nation.

President Trump’s decline in approval ratings is also due to his poor ratings on immigration, with the president reeling from the uproar over his aggressive tactics in Minnesota, where two people were shot and killed by federal immigration agents. Democrats have warned that the administration is pursuing an authoritarian approach that violates constitutional rights, and polls show a majority disapprove of Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

Bartlett said it was “amazing” that immigration had gone from a political force to an “incredible political liability” for President Trump.

With this change, President Trump is trying to get back on track.

President Trump is withdrawing

In the wake of outrage over the deaths of Renee Good and Alex Preti in Minneapolis, President Trump, in a rare admission, acknowledged that his administration had gone too far and said a “softer response” was needed.

In response to the deaths, President Trump also withdrew immigration officials from the city and ended the operation. The dramatic course correction comes on the heels of other reversals and paints a picture of Mr. Trump’s retreat 13 months into his second term.

Trump’s first year in office was marked by massive disruption, including billionaire Elon Musk’s campaign to cut federal agencies and a massive deportation effort that included the deployment of the National Guard to major cities. The president bombed Iran and captured Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro.

But after months of saying he wanted to occupy Greenland, President Trump withdrew in the face of overwhelming opposition from U.S. allies and Congressional Republicans. And the president had already adjusted his approach to tariffs before the Supreme Court struck them down, waiving or deferring taxes on goods ranging from coffee to beef to furniture in the face of price concerns.

“That’s the sign of a strong leader that he can adapt,” McCarthy added. “He’s always on the lookout for solutions to problems. If one path doesn’t work out, he adapts to it.”

It remains to be seen whether there will be any realignment when President Trump takes the floor on February 24th. Upton noted that the president often chooses a combative approach, even criticizing Democrats at this year’s bipartisan prayer breakfast.

The economy is expected to be the top concern for voters in the midterm elections. White House Deputy Chief of Staff James Blair watered down the administration’s message in a Feb. 17 interview with Fox Business, saying voters would have to “choose between going back to the economic pain that we’re feeling, or moving forward as things continue to improve.”

The White House tries to regularly communicate its economic message to the public, with press secretary Caroline Leavitt opening a Feb. 18 briefing with a list of “encouraging signs” about the economy and declaring that “the best is yet to come.” According to Politico, White House officials met with Trump administration ministers at a recent meeting in Washington to discuss the administration’s economic message heading into the midterm elections.

“We’re the hottest country in a year. We’re the hottest country anywhere in the world,” President Trump declared in Georgia.

But President Trump has struggled to maintain his message on the economy, veering into baseless claims about election fraud and other topics in a speech in Georgia.

Nebraska Republican Rep. Don Bacon, who opposed President Trump on tariffs and other issues and is not running for re-election, told USA TODAY that Democrats’ strong performance in last year’s elections was a “red flag” for Republicans heading into the midterm elections.

Bacon, who celebrated the Supreme Court’s decision on tariffs, said it was a chance for Trump to “reframe the agenda” in his speech and refocus affordability after getting “sidetracked” on other issues, adding that he hopes Trump’s “staff and lawyers will talk some sense into him” as the president vows to continue pursuing tariffs.

“If you’re driving and your light is flashing red, you need to have your engine checked or you need to pull over,” Bacon says.

Jesse Jackson’s achievements as an international hostage negotiator

0


Vice President George H.W. Bush accused Jackson of being “swayed” in foreign policy, but the civil rights leader’s “citizen diplomacy” led to the release of hundreds of prisoners held overseas.

play

Jesse Jackson held many titles. Pastor. A leader of the civil rights movement. Democratic presidential candidate. Shadow senator of Congress in Washington, DC.

Jackson, who passed away on February 17 after a long illness, was also a versatile negotiator responsible for securing the release of hundreds of hostages, “human shields” and prisoners of war around the world. Thanks to Jackson, more than 100 Americans escaped from foreign captivity or captivity.

The civil rights icon’s efforts earned him praise from Presidents Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton and sniping from the State Department and other officials. Several of those freed were American soldiers and airmen who had been captured. Some were accused of wrongdoing by a hostile government. They were held in countries such as Cuba, Iraq, Syria, Kosovo, Gambia, and Liberia.

In awarding Jackson the Presidential Medal of Freedom in 2000, Clinton cited his “legendary ability to persuade people to do things they would not otherwise do to free innocent people imprisoned around the world, including American military personnel from the Middle East to the Balkans.”

Saddam Hussein’s human shield

A group of Americans were among hundreds of civilians held as human shields by Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein ahead of the 1990-1990 Gulf War.

A former U.S. diplomat working at the U.S. embassy in Baghdad at the time recounted Jackson’s arrival on the eve of the conflict.

“He came to the embassy and said, ‘What can I do for you?'” Stephen Thibeau said in an oral history interview with the Institute for Diplomatic Research and Training. “So Jackson met with the Iraqis, and the Iraqis actually offered to take a certain number of hostages.”

In a letter to Hussein published by the George Bush Presidential Library and Museum, Jackson implored the leader not to “close the door to dialogue and humanitarianism.”

It was the plea to sit down and talk that underpinned much of his activism and so-called “citizen diplomacy.”

Jackson ‘opened the door’ to American POWs

Alvin B. Tillery, a Northwestern University political scientist who has written about black political leadership and foreign policy, said Jackson’s unique position helps explain why he was so successful in freeing Americans held overseas.

Mr. Tillery said Mr. Jackson’s position as one of Martin Luther King Jr.’s “principal successors” allowed him to overcome barriers that have eluded many others. Tillery said he was someone who “opened doors and got people to pick up the phone,” a success that current government officials and members of Congress sometimes failed to achieve.

Jackson rose to fame early in life, participating in sit-ins as a teenager and participating in the deadly Bloody Sunday march in Selma, Alabama, at age 23. Jackson first entered politics in the early 1980s in Washington, D.C., and launched his first presidential campaign in 1984. That same year, he would also begin what would become a decades-long career in “Track 2” diplomacy, sometimes referred to as “humanitarian” or “humanitarian” or “humanitarian.” “People” diplomacy.

In January 1984, Jackson successfully secured the release of Lt. Robert Goodman, a U.S. Navy pilot who had been held for 30 days in Syria after being shot down over Lebanon.

President Ronald Reagan, who opposed Jackson’s efforts, said at a ceremony in the Rose Garden that “Pastor Jackson’s mission was a personal mission of mercy.” “And he has earned our gratitude and admiration.”

Jackson then traveled to Cuba in June 1984 to negotiate the release of 22 American prisoners of war held by Fidel Castro’s regime.

A 1990 conversation with Saddam Hussein led to the release of hundreds of foreigners and about 100 Americans who had been prevented from leaving the country.

In 1999, Jackson helped negotiate the release of American soldiers held by Serb forces in Kosovo, and the following year he helped negotiate the release of four journalists held in Liberia.

The effort was met with celebration and criticism.

Despite his success in negotiating his release in the mid-1980s, Mr. Jackson’s relentless lobbying sometimes worried the Reagan administration, especially as he became even more well-known during his second successful run for the White House in 1988.

When Mr. Jackson announced in July 1988 that he was interested in contacting the Iranian government through a third party to seek the release of American hostages in Lebanon, the U.S. State Department was reluctant.

State Department spokesman Charles E. Redman dismissed Mr. Jackson’s efforts, saying the government believes “the official route offers the best chance of success.”

Vice President George Bush was less diplomatic, calling Jackson a “loose cannon” who was “rolling around” on foreign policy.

Mr. Jackson’s bid for the Oval Office effectively ended in June 1988, after Massachusetts Governor Michael Dukakis won key primaries in California and New York. Even after failing to win the Democratic nomination, his political star power was at its peak.

Mr. Dukakis himself has not publicly supported the efforts of his fellow Democrats, telling Seattle news outlets that private citizens should not try to conduct foreign policy.

But Jackson stood his ground, straddling the line between his role as a rising Democratic Party and his role as an independent interlocutor who thrived on his ability to move beyond the rigid confines of government.

an enduring humanitarian legacy

At the time, Tillery called Jackson’s efforts to free Robert Goodman from Syria “a huge positive story for this country.” His success in rescuing three American servicemen from Kosovo 15 years later was also widely praised.

“He was a great American patriot. If he had a line with Saddam Hussein or Castro or the Syrian regime, he would try to use that line to bring Americans home, and that’s exactly what he did,” Tillery said.

For Jonathan Franks, a consultant who works on lawsuits on behalf of Americans brought abroad, Jackson’s influence and influence are unparalleled.

What makes third-party negotiators like Jackson successful are “people with a Rolodex,” he said.

“If you called me today and said, ‘I have a loved one in prison somewhere and the government won’t help me,’ my instinct would be to go find someone with a name,” Franks said.

While outcomes are not guaranteed, especially in the case of kidnapping for ransom, a high-profile name can make a big difference in drawing attention to a case, he said.

“I would have done anything to have had someone of Jesse Jackson’s moral credibility and prominence,” Franks said, recalling a recent complex case in which several Americans were released.

Kathryn Palmer is USA TODAY’s political reporter. She can be reached at the following address: kapalmer@usatoday.com And to X@Kathryn Purml. Sign up for her daily politics newsletter here.

Lessons learned from USA TODAY’s research on solar and wind opposition

0

America’s renewable energy expansion is facing resistance not only in Washington but also at county commission meetings across the country. A new USA TODAY survey finds an increasing number of local governments are restricting or completely blocking large-scale wind and solar projects.

These restrictions come in the form of prohibitions, allowing requirements that make the project economically unviable and moratoriums that may or may not ultimately expire. All the while, changing economic conditions and improving technology have made wind and solar much cheaper than natural gas and much cheaper than coal.

An exclusive USA TODAY investigation identified at least 755 counties with regulatory mechanisms that make it difficult or impossible to develop large-scale wind and solar projects. The study is based on data collected by USA TODAY reporters in 3,142 counties across all 50 states through public announcements, county board meetings, news reports, emails and phone calls to government offices. Read our methodology here.

Here are key takeaways from USA TODAY’s survey

About a quarter of U.S. counties have restrictive ordinances against the construction of solar and wind farms. This type of blocking of wind and sunlight has been rapidly expanding in recent years. Most of the ordinances target wind energy projects. However, solar energy development is now facing increasing resistance as many counties in the United States have adopted measures that limit or discourage new installations.

Overall, at least 645 counties have prohibitions, impediments, or moratoriums on wind energy development, and 261 counties have these ordinances on solar energy development. Some people have both. Most of these ordinances are enacted in counties that do not have solar or wind projects within their jurisdictions.

Trump administration’s federal land restrictions loom large

Due to restrictions, approximately 38% of the country’s land is no longer viable or economically viable for wind power development. When it comes to solar power, developers will no longer be able to develop on 33% of the country’s area. USA TODAY calculated that number by taking into account the impact of local ordinances and the Trump administration’s federal land restrictions.

Take Nevada, for example. USA TODAY identified four of the 17 counties where local restrictions on solar and wind would make development difficult. There would still be plenty of flat land for developers to build solar projects. But because the federal government owns so many acres in Nevada, that restriction would leave less than 15% of the state open for renewable energy development, according to USA TODAY calculations.

Anti-solar sentiment grows

More counties have bans on wind energy than have adopted utility-scale projects. A total of 645 counties have windbreaks in place, while a USA TODAY analysis of generator inventory data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration shows about 470 counties have wind farms with more than 5 megawatts of capacity, a measure of business size used in these analyses. Partly due to opposition, wind power development grew from the 2000s to 2012, but has leveled off since then. By 2020, fewer generators were in operation each year, and inventories began to decline, according to federal inventory statistics.

The anti-wind sentiment that has dominated local debate appears to be spreading to solar energy as well. Solar power projects, which once faced only mild opposition, are now increasingly caught up in the same policy battles that have long stalled wind power development across the country. But while solar ordinances are rapidly gaining popularity, new counties are still allowing solar construction. As of December 2025, more than 1 in 4 U.S. counties have solar power plants operating at least 5 MW.

Solar and wind power continue to expand

President Donald Trump is one of the most vocal critics of renewable energy. But since he first won the White House in 2016, solar and wind power has recorded significant growth, rising from about 6.5% of the country’s electricity generation to 18% by 2025, despite his attacks on the industry and deregulation. The U.S. Energy Information Administration predicts that share will reach 21% by 2027.

Growth is widespread. Between 2016 and 2025, the share of wind and solar grew faster than all other energy sources in at least 23 states.

Gas still makes up the majority of the national mix, but its share is declining as wind and solar expand. Utility-scale solar power is now the fastest growing source of electricity in the United States, indicating that the ongoing transition may be difficult to reverse.

Solar power and wind energy are now cheaper to build

Experts say market dynamics for renewable energy have changed dramatically over the past decade. In a 2025 report, financial advisory firm Lazard estimates that the cost of building, operating, fueling and maintaining power plants has fallen by 55% for wind and 84% for solar since 2009. A USA TODAY report shows that bringing in solar and wind development could cause political tensions and strain community ties. Still, such construction has boosted local economies, especially rural ones.

Industry experts say wind and solar also make economic sense on the supply side. Considering the increase in energy usage, solar and wind power can help meet that demand. Both can be built faster than gas plants, which face years of delays due to backlogs of turbines.

How many people live near solar or wind farms?

There is a lot of misinformation being spread about renewable energy, especially wind energy. Common complaints include that turbines are ugly, destroy the countryside, damage property values, endanger birds, and make noise.

USA TODAY covered each of these in this article.

Despite these complaints, most people do not live near turbines and therefore cannot experience such complaints.

A USA TODAY analysis assessed the population’s proximity to these wind and solar projects and concluded that approximately 0.7% of the U.S. population lives within eight miles of a wind project with 10 or more turbines. Since the solar project is not visible from a distance, we used different radii for solar radiation. This indicates that approximately 0.6% of the population lives within a 1-mile radius of a solar project with a capacity of 5 megawatts or more.

USA TODAY’s Ignacio Calderon contributed data analysis.

Ramon Padilla Karina Seitz Stephen J. Beard, Carlie Procell, Veronica Bravo, Josh Susong, Suhail Bhat, Javier Zarracina, and Shawn J. Sullivan contributed graphics and data visualization.

Click here for a state-by-state analysis of wind and solar regulations across the United States.

Impact of President Trump’s tariff ruling on new car prices

0


Will auto brands and new car buyers finally get some relief? The answer is as complex as the current trade war.

play

  • The Supreme Court’s ruling invalidates some of President Donald Trump’s tariffs and could lower consumer prices in the long run.
  • The decision could reduce car manufacturing costs and provide relief to car brands and buyers.

The Supreme Court’s decision canceling several of President Donald Trump’s tariffs has given pause to the administration’s current economic agenda. Tariffs on auto parts and imports remain in place, but the suspension could mean savings for consumers in certain product categories.

Automotive parts have been greatly affected by the soaring prices of new cars due to import tariffs and the subsequent rise in used car prices due to increased demand. According to Kelley Blue Book, the average price of a new car hit an all-time high of $50,326 in December 2025.

The Supreme Court’s ruling could provide much-needed relief to car buyers if manufacturing costs for car brands are reduced.

Impact of Supreme Court ruling on new car prices

The Supreme Court’s decision invalidated most tariffs imposed on trading partners such as China. The majority of auto parts used to manufacture cars in the United States come from Mexico, China, Canada, and Japan, respectively. Additionally, the U.S. imports the majority of its cars from Canada, Mexico, and other countries, according to the Visual Capitalist data application Voronoi.

The Supreme Court’s decision “will provide some relief to automakers, especially those with supply chains in Asian countries,” Edmunds reports. The per-vehicle cost of car production may drop slightly, as tariffs on many raw materials, parts, and machinery are considered illegal. With high tariffs still in place on cars and auto parts, the savings are unlikely to be passed on to consumers immediately.

Is it a good time to buy a new car?

New car prices may have skyrocketed in recent months, but that doesn’t mean there aren’t plenty of great new cars available for well below the average new car price (about $50,000). In fact, there are several new cars and SUVs available for less than $25,000.

2026 models with starting prices under $25,000.

  • 2026 Kia K4: $22,290
  • 2026 Nissan Sentra: $22,600
  • 2026 Toyota Corolla: $22,925
  • 2026 Hyundai Elantra: $23,750

Some 2026 SUVs have starting prices under $25,000 before taxes and fees, including the 2026 Hyundai Venue ($20,550), 2026 Chevrolet Trax ($21,700), and 2026 Nissan Kicks ($22,430).

Tariffs may have had a devastating impact on automakers, but many popular car brands are careful not to pass on increased production costs to consumers by raising prices across the board. If consumers do the right amount of research, there are enough choices of low-cost cars, trucks, and SUVs to secure a solid new car deal.

Which car brands are least affected by tariffs?

Automakers least affected by steep tariffs on imports and auto parts have strong manufacturing bases in the U.S., creating a win-win situation for U.S. workers, auto companies and consumers in the trade war. According to a 2025 article in Forbes magazine, Tesla is the number one car brand in the United States.

Tesla’s Model 3 electric sedan and Model Y electric SUV are the most American-made vehicles on the market. These also happened to be the best-selling models in their respective segments last year. Tesla sold 192,440 Model 3s and 357,528 Model Ys in 2025, according to sales data compiled by Cox Automotive.

Other vehicles uniquely positioned to withstand the impact of tariffs include the Ford Mustang, Honda Passport, Jeep Wrangler, Volkswagen ID.4, Chevrolet Colorado, and GMC Canyon. All of these models have at least 75% of their parts made in the USA.

Vinegar sold on Amazon has been recalled. See affected products.

0

play

Vinegar sold on Amazon is being recalled due to the risk of fatal poisoning if ingested, according to a notice posted on the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission’s website.

According to the notice, Jolie’s 80% Vinegar was sold through Amazon from May 2025 to November 2025 for about $23. The product comes in a clear bottle with a white cap and an orange and red label with the “Joly’s” branding and white text reading “80% Vinegar” and “Diluted to 5 Gallons.”

The CPSC says there are no additional markings on the containers.

The CPSC warns that “this product violates the precautionary labeling requirements under the Federal Toxic Substances Act because the vinegar lacks required labeling and first aid instructions.”

According to the notice, there is a risk of poisoning if the contents are swallowed, and if mishandled can cause serious injuries including chemical burns to the skin and eyes.

The notice states that approximately 450 units of the product are part of the recall. As of February 20th, no accidents or injuries related to this product have been reported.

What should I do with the recalled vinegar? How do I get a refund?

According to the notice, consumers should immediately move the recalled vinegar out of sight and reach of children and contact Jolly’s for a full refund and disposal instructions.

Affected consumers are asked to email jolysllc@gmail.com with a photo of the product in its original packaging and “RECALLLED” printed on the container.

Joly’s can be reached at 240-412-8720, Monday through Friday, 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. ET.

Michelle Del Rey is a trending news reporter for USA TODAY. Please contact mdelrey@usatoday.com.