Home Blog Page 217

Beef prices rise as U.S. herd shrinks

0

play

  • Experts say high consumer demand and historically small U.S. cattle herds are driving up beef prices.
  • U.S. cattle herd size is at its lowest in 75 years.
  • Ranchers point to drought, high feed costs and the profit margins of large meat processors as factors contributing to the price hike.
  • Analysts don’t expect beef prices to fall anytime soon, but they think supply and demand may be leveling out.

Retail prices for beef in all categories are higher than they were a year ago, and experts see no signs of them dropping anytime soon.

How did we get here? Dr. Daniel Sumner, distinguished professor of agricultural economics at the University of California, Davis, says it all comes down to high demand and low supply. But Brian Stevenson, president of the Shasta County Cattlemen’s Association, said the profit margins of major international meat packers may have more to do with it than that.

Read below to find out why beef prices are so high.

Why is the price of beef so high?

Mr Sumner said increased demand for protein in recent years was the main factor influencing the rise in beef prices.

“There’s been a lot of news and interest in expanding protein, especially high-quality, balanced protein in people’s diets. Whether you’re old or young, active or inactive, the message is to eat more protein,” Sumner said.

This move has led shoppers to spend more money on high-quality protein when going to the grocery store. But there are plenty of different forms of protein on the market, from chicken and pork to milk and even Greek yogurt. Why is the price of beef in particular soaring?

Sumner said this is due to interaction with the historically small U.S. cattle herd.

As of January 1, 2026, the U.S. cattle herd size was 86.2 million head, the smallest in 75 years, but has been declining since 2021. On the other hand, the selling price of live cattle has been rising since 2020. This poses a dilemma for ranchers. Should you sell your cattle now to take advantage of record high prices, or save your herd and allow your population to recover? up?

“People are bringing more products to market now,” Sumner said.

As a result, the U.S. cattle herd has “stabled at this very low level,” keeping the supply of beef on the market low. Combined with historically high demand for protein, Sumner says this relationship effectively causes beef prices to rise.

Why is the domestic cattle herd so small?

Sumner has several ideas about how the herd became so small.

One is productivity. Advances in technology and science have allowed modern cows to produce more meat than in the past, Sumner said. This reduces the number of cows needed to meet international beef demand, leading to a gradual decline in the number of cows over time.

The other is that cattle sales prices rose sharply in 2023 and remained relatively stable until 2025. This led ranchers to sell “older cows and heifers to take advantage of what they thought would be a temporarily high price,” Sumner said. In reality, cattle prices rose even higher in late 2025 and into 2026, delaying the herd rebuilding period that ranchers had expected was already here.

Sumner also believes the low number of cows may be due to a downward trend in U.S. beef consumption that preceded the recent surge in demand.

What do local ranchers say is driving up beef prices?

Mr Stevenson agreed that demand for beef was “definitely not going down” and said it was stable despite rising beef prices. But he has a different perspective on the supply side of things and the factors that may actually be influencing price increases.

First, he said, the small herd size is not the rancher’s fault.

Asked if ranchers were taking advantage of high cattle prices at the expense of herd size, Stevenson said, “Speaking from a multi-generational rancher standpoint, you’re not going to do something for today’s profit if you’re going to die tomorrow.”

He emphasized that ranchers cannot determine the selling price of their cattle.

“We’re kind of benefiting from the market, and the people above us are benefiting from the meat packers,” Stevenson said.

Instead, Stevenson points to drought and high input costs as reasons for the decline in herd size. He said drought in “major cattle states” has forced ranchers to sell large portions of their herds. Stevenson also said many ranchers reduced herds when feed prices rose in 2019 and 2020.

My impression among local ranchers is that there may be more powerful factors at play when it comes to beef prices than simple supply and demand.

In the past, imports from international beef markets played a large role in regulating the price of U.S. cattle, Stevenson said. However, due to the impact of the new coronavirus infection, travel restrictions began, and the amount imported to the U.S. market decreased. Current foreign tariffs and a ban on imports of cattle from Mexico to prevent the spread of the New World screwworm extended these effects into 2026.

This dependence on domestic beef has increased input costs for the beef industry as a whole, primarily impacting the Big Four meat packers. Tyson, JBS, Cargill, and National Beef control up to 85% of the U.S. beef market.

This increased input cost is passed on to the “grocery guys” by these powerful meat processing companies, pushing prices up to meet profit margins, Stevenson said.

When will beef prices drop?

“Nobody expects prices to go down anytime soon,” Sumner said.

But the good news is that the problem of high demand and low supply may be leveling out.

Sumner said demand for beef “may be at saturation point,” in other words, it can’t get any bigger. If that happens, “it will give the supply side a chance to catch up,” he says.

And Stevenson is hopeful that eventually supply will reach stable levels again.

“Nationally speaking, the American beef herd can be rebuilt. They’ve been through these cycles throughout history, from the 1920s, ’30s, ’40s to the 2000s. Numbers go up and go down,” Stevenson said.

Record Searchlight reporter Jessica Skropanich contributed to this report.

Drew Askeland covers Reading and Shasta County government issues, as well as anything else that needs reporting for Record Searchlight and the USA Today Network. Contact draw.askeland@redding.com or (530) 225-8247. To support and sustain this effort, please subscribe today. thank you.

How many perfect brackets are there yet in March Madness? Tracking brackets

0

play

March Madness is already living up to the hype, even though we’re less than a full day away from the start of the 2026 men’s basketball tournament.

In fact, the vast majority of fans who created brackets without the hope of beating the incredibly long odds of creating a perfect bracket have already seen their hopes dashed.

Who is the most likely culprit? No. 12 High Point, led by Chase Johnston, defeated Greg Gard and No. 5 seed Wisconsin. No. 9 TCU technically pulled off an upset over No. 8 Ohio State, not to mention No. 1 overall Duke suffered a near-disaster with a 71-65 victory over No. 16 seed Siena.

Yet, at least for now, perfection still remains.

Here’s a look at how many perfect March Madness brackets remain. There are many more opportunities for upsets.

How many people have the perfect March Madness bracket?

Last updated March 20, 12:45 a.m. ET

  • ESPN: 10,754 full parentheses left (starting at 26,029,409)
  • NCAA: Over 14,000 complete brackets left

As of March 20th at 12:45 a.m. ET, fewer than 20,000 complete brackets remain on ESPN or NCAA Bracket Challenge. While the NCAA hasn’t released the full number of brackets submitted, ESPN has, providing insight into just how frenetic the NCAA Tournament has been.

Of the 26,029,409 brackets submitted, only 10,754 remain complete. This is only 0.04% of the total bracket.

Man admits to cyberstalking murdered healthcare CEO’s family

0

play

A New York man has admitted to sending a threatening voicemail to the family of slain UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson hours after he was killed in midtown Manhattan in December 2024.

The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of New York announced Thursday that Shane Daly, 40, of Galway, Saratoga County, has pleaded guilty to cyberstalking charges.

The office said Daly admitted as part of his defense that he made multiple calls over several days to a work phone used by Thompson’s family. The call began hours after the 50-year-old CEO was shot and killed by a masked man on December 4, 2024.

Daly also acknowledged using threatening and harassing language expressing satisfaction with Thompson’s death and manner of death, adding that the victim and Thompson’s children deserved a similar outcome, the office said.

“Just hours after the brutal public murder of Brian Thompson, Shane Daly repeatedly terrorized grieving families by glamorizing the loss of a loved one and threatening a similar fate,” said James Barnacle, Jr., deputy director of the FBI’s New York office. “The FBI will not tolerate those who hide behind a screen or keyboard and exploit the suffering of others to inflict senseless suffering.”

Mr. Daly’s sentencing is scheduled for July 17, 2026, and he faces up to five years in prison, a $250,000 fine, and three years of supervised release.

“This reprehensible act demands a speedy trial,” said Jay Clayton, U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York. “Intimidation and other acts of violence, especially when motivated by commercial, social, political, or religious factors, have no place in our free society.”

Mr. Thompson was shot at around 6:45 a.m. near the Hilton Midtown in New York. He was scheduled to speak at an investment conference as the head of one of the country’s largest health care companies.

Thompson’s alleged assailant, Luigi Mangione, is scheduled to stand trial on state murder charges in the summer of 2026, but has maintained his innocence. Separately, Mangione, 27, faces federal stalking charges that could carry a life sentence. Jury selection for that trial is scheduled to begin in September 2026.

Jif offers a ‘simpler’ version of popular peanut butter recipe

0

play

Jihoo says he is giving his fans what they want.

The ‘People’s Peanut Butter’ brand now offers a ‘simpler’ version of the spread that customers know with ‘Unsweetened Creamy’, a product made with three ingredients – peanuts, salt and palm oil.

In addition to a “streamlined ingredient list” featuring U.S.-grown peanuts, the unsweetened creamy is “the perfect guess-free solution for families looking for a delicious and easy snack,” Jessica Fair, JM Smucker’s vice president of marketing, said in a statement.

“Jif strips away the ingredient label without sacrificing the iconic flavors that fans crave,” the JM Smucker Company-owned brand said in a March 10 news release.

Jif’s unsweetened creamy is the latest addition to the brand’s Simply range, with additional varieties coming soon. Each 15-ounce jar contains 8 grams of plant-based protein per serving.

“Whether you enjoy it in oatmeal, yogurt, smoothies, spread on toast or rice cakes, or add it to stir-fry sauces and stews for that extra peanut flavor, it’s pure deliciousness,” Ziff added.

Here’s what you need to know about Jif Simply Unsweetened Creamy and where you can get it.

Where can I get Jif Simply Unsweetened Creamy?

Jif Simply Unsweetened Creamy is sold at Walmart stores nationwide, with “sales to more retailers planned soon.”

All other Jif products will continue to be available at U.S. retailers.

How much does Jif Simply Unsweetened Creamy cost?

Jif Simply Unsweetened Creamy costs about $3 for a 15-ounce jar, according to Walmart’s website.

US drops powerful bunker bomb on Iran

0

According to multiple reports, the United States has dropped its newest and second most powerful bunker bomb, the GBU-72, on Iranian fortified targets, marking the first time the weapon has been used in combat.

Without formally identifying the bomb, U.S. Central Command said in a March 17 post on

Retired Air Force Lt. Gen. Mark Weatherington later told CNN that the ammunition was a Guided Bomb Unit-72 Advanced 5K Penetrator. The bombs were dropped at locations along Iran’s coastline near the Strait of Hormuz.

The GBU-72 replaces older bomb versions designed to penetrate deeply buried and hardened underground targets, such as missile bases, command centers, and nuclear facilities, with minimal damage on the ground.

What is a bunker-busting bomb?

If you can’t see the graphic, click here to reload the page.

According to Stars and Stripes, the GBU-72 was developed as a successor to the GBU-28, a 5,000-pound bunker buster bomb first used in 1991. It is considered far more lethal than the GBU-28 used in Iraq’s Operation Desert Storm and the 2003 US invasion of Iraq.

How does the GBU-72 bomb work?

The GBU-72 and GBU-28 can be carried by fighters and bombers, but they are far less powerful than the massive GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator bunker buster.

Only the U.S.-built B-2 Spirit stealth bomber is programmed to carry the GBU-57, which weighs over 30,000 pounds. Based at Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri, the B-2s can each carry two bombs.

It was reported that the Iranian base targeted by GBU-72 on March 17 was equipped with anti-ship cruise missiles and posed a threat to commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz.

Contributors Ramon Padilla, Sara Chernikov, USA TODAY

SOURCE USA TODAY NETWORK REPORTS AND INVESTIGATIONS. Reuters; US Air Force

The Treasury Department will take over defaulted student loans. What does that mean to you?

0

play

Borrowers who default on their student loans will soon face a new collector: the U.S. Treasury.

The Ministry of Education announced on March 19 that the Ministry of Finance will take over all student loan-related operations in three stages. The first is to collect defaulted federal student loan debt and use private collection agencies to get defaulted borrowers into rehabilitation programs or back into good standing. The transfer of the entire student loan portfolio and financial aid programs will follow.

The move had been widely expected since the Trump administration last year indicated it would transfer responsibility for student loans to either the Treasury Department or the Small Business Administration.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said collections will be more efficient and less costly to taxpayers because the Treasury already has systems in place to deal with troublesome loans.

“Treasury has the unique experience, operational capabilities and financial expertise to bring long-overdue financial discipline to the program and be better stewards of taxpayers,” he said in a statement.

How many borrowers will be affected?

According to Federal Student Aid, there are 42.8 million borrowers with federal student loans totaling $1.7 trillion, an increase of 3.5% in dollar terms from December 2024.

According to the Department of Education, less than half of these borrowers are currently repaying their loans, and nearly a quarter are in default.

About 7.7 million borrowers with $180 billion in federal student loan balances are in default on loans administered by the Department of Education (some older loans are held by private, commercial, or state-backed entities), representing 11% of the total portfolio as of December 2025, according to the FSA.

An additional 4 million people are in late-stage delinquency, meaning nearly 12 million borrowers are in default or close to default.

What can borrowers expect?

Borrowers do not need to take any immediate action, and those in repayment should continue to work with their designated loan servicer, the Education Department said. Default users should visit myeddebt.gov for help getting out of the default.

“What’s new here is that Treasury is moving from being a back-end infrastructure partner to an operational partner, actually managing the collection process, running the default resolution group, and directly overseeing private collection agencies,” College Investor founder Robert Farrington said in a post on his website.

Critics say the measure will confuse people and expose defaulting borrowers to further financial hardship.

“Instead of providing relief to millions of delinquent defaulters, the department is transferring a portfolio of the most vulnerable borrowers to institutions with little expertise in the rights and benefits afforded to them under the Higher Education Act,” Aissa Canchola Báñez, director of the nonprofit advocacy group Borrower Protection Policy, said in a statement.

He added: “Policymakers should be very concerned about this transfer and how it could exacerbate disruption for borrowers and push relief further out of reach.”

Why did the Department of Education partner with the Treasury Department?

The Department of Education said the Treasury Department is already working with the Department on some student loan activities. They include:

  • Disbursing federal student loan funds
  • Provides a federal tax information data system to verify income and repayment plans for financial aid.
  • Collecting involuntary payments using a financial offset program

“Treasury also has far more experience with risk management, fraud detection, and default collection,” Andrew Gillen, a researcher at libertarian think tank Cato, wrote in a blog post. “In fact, the Department of Education (Department) has already delegated default collection to the Treasury Department in the form of the Treasury Offset Program, which forfeits tax refunds and other federal payments (such as Social Security benefits) to defaulting borrowers. Recovery rates will be high due to Treasury’s extensive financial experience.”

However, the results of the Ministry of Finance’s collection efforts are not yet visible.

“Pilot projects in 2014-2015 that tested the Department of the Treasury’s ability to recover defaulted student loans were less successful compared to the existing Department of Education infrastructure,” Farrington said.

Medora Lee is USA TODAY’s money, markets and personal finance reporter. Please contact us at mjlee@usatoday.com. Subscribe to our free Daily Money newsletter for personal finance tips and business news every Monday through Friday.

Most Americans think President Trump will order US ground forces to Iran: poll

0

play

According to the latest Reuters/Ipsos poll released on March 19, 65% of Americans think President Donald Trump will “order a large-scale ground war” in Iran, with just 7% supporting him.

The poll, conducted from March 17 to March 19, found that 55% of respondents opposed the deployment of ground troops and 34% supported deploying a small number of special forces to Iran. 59% of respondents did not support the war.

President Trump has insisted that the United States is not sending troops to the Middle East, even though a US Navy warship carrying more than 2,000 Marines has been seen entering the region. Reuters, citing unnamed sources, reported that the Trump administration is considering sending in thousands of U.S. troops as part of the next phase of the operation against Iran.

Asked by reporters in the Oval Office on March 19 if he intended to keep more U.S. troops in the region, the president said “no.”

President Trump explained, “We have no intention of sending troops anywhere.” “If I had, I would never say so. But I’m not going to send in the troops.”

However, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu suggested in a March 19 press conference that there would be a “ground element” to this war, adding: “This ground element has many possibilities, and I feel free not to share all of those possibilities with you.”

On March 15, satellite images showed the American-class amphibious assault ship USS Tripoli (LHA7) and two destroyers sailing southwest in the South China Sea.

Despite MAGA backlash, Republicans show support for war in polls

So far, 77% of Republicans support war, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll. 14% of Republican respondents supported a large-scale invasion, and 63% supported limited use of special forces.

President Trump faces backlash from MAGA officials who stood by his campaign promise of no “forever wars” and from senior government officials who resigned in protest of the war.

Marjorie Taylor Greene, a former Trump ally and former congresswoman, said in a social media post on March 1 that starting a war was “not what we were campaigning for,” and has continued to criticize it ever since.

“The Iran war is quickly spiraling out of control. This should never have happened,” she said in a March 19 social media post.

Joe Kent, former director of the National Counterterrorism Center, said in his resignation letter on March 17 that he could not support the war “in good conscience” and claimed that the Trump administration “started this war under pressure from Israel.”

In an interview with Tucker Carlson on March 18, Kent reiterated the statement in his resignation letter that there was “no intelligence” that Iran posed an imminent threat to the United States before the war began.

“There was no intelligence community that said, ‘Hey, whatever day March 1st is, the Iranians are going to launch this big raid, they’re going to do 9/11 or Pearl Harbor or something. They’re going to attack one of our bases,'” he said.

Netanyahu rejected accusations that Israel had drawn the United States into the war, asking: “Does anyone really think they can tell President Trump what to do?”

Opinion poll shows President Trump’s approval rating is 40%

President Trump’s broad standing among the public is little changed in the poll, rising one point to 40% from the poll taken hours after the United States and Israel attacked Iran on February 28.

The results are in line with polls compiled by The New York Times and Real Clear Politics, which give Trump an approval rating of 40% and 42.3%, respectively.

The Reuters/Ipsos poll surveyed 1,545 U.S. adults and had a margin of error of about 3 percentage points.

Contributed by: Reuters

Expert explains why Iran and US are at war

0


Decades before the U.S.-Israel war in Iran began, Iran was considered one of America’s most important allies in the Middle East.

play

As the US-Israel war in Iran escalates, it is difficult to imagine that Iran was once a key ally of the US.

“Iran has been the United States’ best ally in the Middle East. Iran has really been the linchpin of American policy in the region,” said Ali Baez, director of the International Crisis Group’s Iran project, but noted that the two countries have a “very complicated history.”

Friendship between the United States and Iran dates back to 1953. At the time, the United States and Britain supported a coup against then Iranian Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh due to Mossadegh’s attempts to nationalize Iran’s oil industry and concerns about drawing Soviet influence. The coup, backed by the United States, would return Iran’s last shah, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, to power.

The United States and Iran remained largely friendly for the next two decades. The United States sold arms and provided military assistance to Iran in its resistance to the Soviet Union, and the two countries embarked on cultural exchanges to improve Iranian higher education.

“There was a lot of interaction with Iranian students who studied in the United States and returned to help their country develop,” Baez said.

iran nuclear deal

A major disagreement between the United States and Iran is over Iran’s efforts to develop nuclear energy, with the United States concerned that Iran could develop nuclear weapons. In 2015, after lengthy negotiations, President Barack Obama declared an agreement between the United States and Iran to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.

But in 2018, President Donald Trump announced that the United States would withdraw from negotiations with Iran.

“It’s clear that the rotten and rotten structure of this deal will not stop Iran from nuclear bombing,” Trump said.

President Joe Biden sought to restore the Iran nuclear deal, and negotiations resumed in 2021, but the two countries were unable to reach an agreement.

Informal talks continued after President Trump returned to power, but they broke down again and the United States and Israel launched attacks on Iran.

President Trump’s rationale for launching an attack on Iran on February 28, 2026 was concern about Iran’s nuclear capabilities. However, the United States played an important role in supporting Iran’s nuclear program.

“One of the great ironies of this situation is that the Iranian nuclear program was a gift to Iran from the United States as part of President Eisenhower’s Atoms for Peace program,” Baez said.

The program aimed to improve relations between nations and quell interest in developing nuclear weapons by providing the necessary elements for establishing a civilian nuclear program for energy production.

strained relationship

However, it was the Iranian revolution of 1979 that seriously strained relations between the two countries. Disdain for the Shah’s autocratic rule reached a climax among the Iranian people, and he was eventually removed from power.

“The Shah has completely lost control and the US-trained Iranian military has decided to declare neutrality in this conflict between state and society,” Baez said. “The revolutionaries were thus able to overthrow Iran’s 2,500-year-old monarchy and establish an Islamic republic.”

Iran’s new supreme leader, who took office in 1979, regarded the United States as an enemy and spread anti-American sentiment in society.

“The Islamic Republic really tried to brainwash the entire population, especially the new generation, against the United States,” Baez said. “I grew up in Iran. Every day before I went to class, I had to chant ‘Death to America’ before I could sit behind the bench. Yet, my brother was studying in the United States, and I couldn’t say ‘Death to America,’ because I was afraid it would hurt him in some way.”

In the latest episode of USA TODAY’s signature podcast “The Excerpt,” Baez spoke about the complicated history between the United States and Iran, including repeated efforts to quell Iran’s nuclear ambitions.

700,000 Wagner power steamers have been recalled due to burn concerns. Check out our products.

0

play

Hundreds of thousands of power steamers have been recalled due to the risk of burns to users, safety officials said in a recall notice.

The recall affects approximately 700,000 Wagner 900 Series power steamers, according to a March 19 notice posted on the Consumer Product Safety Commission’s (CPSC) website. The problem centers on the steamer’s hoses, which officials say can become too hot during and after use, causing boiling water to escape from the nozzles and guns.

Officials say there have been at least 156 incidents where “hose became too hot or hot water spouted from nozzles or guns.” The reports include 50 cases of burns on users’ arms, hands, feet, and faces.

Many of these cases suffered first- or second-degree burns, according to the CPSC.

Here’s what you need to know:

What models of steamers are subject to the recall?

According to the CPSC, the following Wagner 900 Series power steamers are subject to a recall:

  • 905e auto steamer
  • 915e on-demand power steamer
  • 925e Steam Machine Elite Steamer

“All steamer models include the same base steamer but different accessories. The steamer includes a yellow and black pressure boiler base and has ‘Wagner’ written on the side of the product,” according to the notice.

What if I have a steamer?

Consumers who own recalled steamers are asked to immediately stop using them and contact Wagner for a free repair kit, which includes a hose sleeve, nozzle cover, and funnel.

Fernando Cervantes Jr. is a trending news reporter for USA TODAY. Contact us at fernando.cervantes@gannett.com and follow us at X @fern_cerv_.

Rams surprise North Carolina in March Madness upset

0

On Thursday, March 19, No. 11 VCU defeated No. 6 seed North Carolina 82-78 in the first round of the NCAA Tournament.

The Tar Heels led by as many as 19 points during the game, but the Rams fought back for the sixth-best comeback in March Madness history.

VCU cut the Tar Heels’ lead to 70-68 on a 3-pointer by Terrence Hill Jr. VCU went on a 12-0 run.

The score was tied at 75 with 8.7 seconds left in the second half.

UNC’s Henri Wiesard had the ball, but lost control and went out of bounds. VCU received the ball with 2.9 seconds to play, but Seth Trimble stole the ball. His shot was no good. The game goes into overtime.

Neither team scored in the first three minutes of overtime. Nick Lewis’ layup gave VCU its first lead of overtime. Seth Trimble made two free throws to tie the game at 77 points.

Trimble quickly returned to the free throw line, where he made 1/2 to give the Tarheels a one-point lead. In the end, VCU overtook him with a clutch shot.

The Rams responded quickly, with Terrence Hill making another 3-pointer to put the Rams back in the lead at 80-78. Nick Lewis also made two free throws to help seal the victory.

Watch UNC vs. VCU live on Sling TV

The Rams entered Thursday’s game having won 16 of their last 17 games, including the A-10 Conference Championship Game to earn an automatic bid to the Big Dance. The only loss during that streak came against No. 9 seed St. Louis as an at-large team in the NCAA Tournament.

VCU’s win over North Carolina was the largest upset in first-round history and the sixth in tournament history. See the complete list here:

On Thursday, May 19, No. 11 VCU defeated No. 6 North Carolina 82-78 in the first round of the NCAA Tournament.

Terrence Hill made another 3-pointer to put the Rams back within two points, 80-78. Nick Lewis also made two free throws to help seal the victory.

Neither team scored in the first three minutes of overtime. Nick Lewis’ layup gave VCU its first lead of overtime. Seth Trimble made two free throws to tie the game at 77 points.

The game was tied at 75 with 8.7 seconds left in the second half. UNC’s Henri Wiesard had the ball, but lost control and went out of bounds. VCU received the ball with 2.9 seconds to play, but Seth Trimble stole the ball. His shot was no good. The game goes into overtime.

VCU went on a 12-0 run in the final two minutes of the period. Terrence Hill Jr. made a long shot and North Carolina led VCU 70-68 with 3:56 left in the second half.

VCU continues to battle North Carolina throughout the second half. Both teams each scored 28 points during this period. The Tar Heels held a 67-56 lead over the Rams with 7:30 left in regulation time.

With 11:30 left in the second half, North Carolina led VCU 61-47. Henri Vissard led the way with 20 points and seven rebounds (five on defense). Seth Trimble contributed 12 points, five rebounds and four assists. VCU’s Lazar Djokovic had 15 points and four rebounds, and Terrence Hill Jr. had 17 points. Both players played over 23 minutes tonight.

The Tarheels were up 12-9 in the first few minutes of the game to start the second half. The Rams beat the Tar Heels 51-37. Herni Wiesar had 17 points and seven rebounds. He’s still only 1-of-5 from the 3-point line.

North Carolina went into the locker room with a 39-28 lead at halftime.

The Tar Heels led the game by as many as 15 points in the first half. The Rams never held a lead of more than three points.

UNC’s Henri Vissard had 13 points and five rebounds in the first half. Terrence Hill Jr. had 11 points for VCU.

Derek Dixon led North Carolina State with six points on 2-of-2 shooting from the 3-point line. The Tar Heels put together a 7-0 scoring run to lead VCU 24-18 with 7:43 left in the first half.

North Carolina coach Hubert Davis told CBS side reporter Tracy Wolfson that he hopes the Tarheels continue to play at a fast pace against VCU, but he also hopes his team gets more rebounds and second-chance scoring opportunities.

VCU and North Carolina were tied at 13 with 11:33 left in the first half. Both teams are shooting a combined 1-11 from the 3-point line. VCU’s Terrence Hill Jr. hit the first 3-pointer of the game off an assist from Michael Bell.

VCU led North Carolina State 8-5 with 15:36 left in the first half. UNC was unable to score for nearly three minutes.

Seth Trimble, Derek Dixon, Luka Bogavac, Jarrin Stephenson and Henri Viesar will start for North Carolina today against VCU.

Brandon Jennings, Nick Lewis, Yadrian Tracy, Barry Evans and Lazar Djokovic will make up the starting lineup for today’s VCU vs. UNC game.

What TV channel is showing North Carolina vs. VCU basketball today?

North Carolina vs. VCU will be broadcast nationally on TNT and will feature Ian Eagle, Bill Raftery, Grant Hill and Tracy Wolfson. Game streaming options include Sling TV, which broadcasts TNT.

Today’s UNC vs VCU March Madness game start time

  • date: Thursday, March 19th
  • time: 6:50pm ET
  • position: Bon Secours Wellness Arena (Greenville, South Carolina)

The game between the Tar Heels and Rams is scheduled to begin at 6:50 p.m. ET on March 19 at Bon Secours Wellness Arena in Greenville.

Prediction for No. 6 North Carolina vs. No. 11 VCU

  • John Luzzi: VCU
  • Ethan Kasim: north carolina
  • Austin Cartwright: VCU
  • Craig Meyer: VCU

North Carolina vs VCU odds

Odds provided by BetMGM as of Wednesday, March 18th

  • Spread: North Carolina (-2.5)
  • Top/Bottom: 152.5
  • Money line: North Carolina (-150) | VCU (+125)

Salmonella outbreak linked to ‘Super Greens’ spreads to 32 states

0

play

A salmonella outbreak linked to superfood supplements has been declared “over” after sending more people to the hospital, according to the latest information released by federal health officials.

The Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have completed an investigation into a multistate salmonella outbreak linked to Live It Up brand dietary supplements that were sold nationally on Amazon and the brand’s website.

A March 17 FDA notification reported that 97 people in 32 states had contracted salmonella poisoning and 26 were hospitalized. This is an increase from the 65 cases reported in 28 states in the previous notification on January 29. No deaths were reported.

The recall began on January 15, with Live It Up voluntarily recalling its products “out of an abundance of caution.” Why Not Natural, another supplement brand, later added one of its products to the list in a recall on January 28th.

Although the product has been removed from shelves, federal health officials are still encouraging consumers to check their homes for the recalled product because the supplement has a long shelf life.

Exposure to Salmonella is especially dangerous for vulnerable groups, such as children, the elderly, and people with compromised immune systems. Here’s what you need to know about the outbreak.

What are the recalled Super Green supplements?

The recalled Live it Up products include certain Live it Up branded Super Green dietary supplement powders, which include both Original and Wild Berry flavors. The recall also includes all stick-pack products with expiration dates from August 2026 to January 2028, or Live it Up items packaged in tube-like containers.

The supplement was sold nationally, primarily online, on the Live it Up website and Amazon. They may also have been sold by unauthorized third-party sellers, such as Walmart, according to the FDA notice.

According to the FDA, consumers should check the following:

  • live it up super greensnet weight 8.5 oz (240g), UPC 860013190804.
  • live it up super greens30 – 0.28oz (8g) sticks, net weight. 8.47 oz (240g), UPC 850077468063
  • Live it Up Super Green, Wild Berry, Net weight 8.5 oz (240g) with UPC 860013190811
  • Live it Up Super Green, Wild Berry, 30 – 0.32oz (9g) sticks, net weight. 9.52 oz (270g) with UPC 850077468070

The recalled products are packaged in green bags. According to the FDA, lot codes are printed in black on the bottom of the back of the package and begin with the letter “A” or the number “3” for stick-pack products.

Why Not Natural has recalled Why Not Natural Organic Moringa – Green Superfood Supplement as part of the outbreak. These capsules were also sold nationally on Why Not’s website and third-party sellers, including Amazon, from July 2025 to January 2026.

  • Why not choose natural organic moringa – Green Superfood, 120 Capsule Bottle, Lot Number A25G051, Expiration Date July 2028.

Where did people get sick?

As of March 17, Alabama, Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Iowa, Illinois, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, North Dakota, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Vermont, Washington, and Wisconsin.

What to do if you purchased a recalled Live it Up product

If you have the recalled Live it Up brand Super Greens dietary supplement powder in your home, you should throw it away or return it to your place of purchase, the FDA said. The agency advised people to clean and disinfect surfaces that may have come into contact with the product and contact their health care provider if they think they have symptoms of salmonella poisoning. If you would like a refund, please fill out Live it Up’s online form to request a refund.

Consumers who purchased Why Not Natural moringa capsules should also stop consuming them and return the product to the company for a refund. Consumers may request a full refund from Why Not Natural at care@whynotnatural.com.

Symptoms of salmonella poisoning usually begin 6 hours to 6 days after swallowing the bacteria. According to the CDC, the most common symptoms are diarrhea, fever, and abdominal pain.

Most healthy people recover in four to seven days without treatment, but some vulnerable people, such as children under 5, adults over 65, and people with weakened immune systems, can develop more severe illness that requires treatment and hospitalization.

If you experience any of these more serious symptoms, the CDC recommends contacting your health care professional.

  • Diarrhea and fever greater than 102 degrees Fahrenheit
  • Diarrhea does not improve even if it continues for more than 3 days
  • bloody diarrhea
  • Vomiting that is uncontrollable
  • Signs of dehydration such as not producing much urine, dry mouth or throat, and feeling dizzy when standing up

Barron Trump praised by Japan’s prime minister as a ‘handsome gentleman’

0

play

Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi praised Barron Trump, the son of President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump, ahead of his birthday in remarks at a White House dinner on March 19.

“I know he has grown into a very tall, good-looking gentleman,” Takaichi said. “Looking at you, Donald, it’s very clear where he got it. His parents, of course.”

Barron Trump will celebrate his 20th birthday on March 20th. Although he mostly stayed out of the spotlight before he turned 18, he has shown an interest in his father’s politics, especially during the 2024 presidential campaign, USA TODAY Network reported.

In the rest of his remarks, Takaichi said that Japan would gift 250 more cherry blossom trees to Washington, D.C., in celebration of the 250th anniversary of the founding of the United States. He also emphasized the relationship between the two countries, saying, “Japan is back.”

In his remarks, the president called Takaichi a “great friend and partner” and said the two had become “very close.”

The dinner concluded Takaichi’s first visit to the White House since taking office as prime minister in October. The president visited her in Japan last year and endorsed her in February’s snap election.

Pearl Harbor statement confirmed at Presidential Office meeting

During a meeting in the Oval Office, Takaichi said that the world is facing a “very severe security environment” due to the continued war against Iran by the United States and Israel, and that the global economy is “about to take a huge hit,” but that “Takaichi is the only one who can achieve global peace.”

President Trump has insisted that Japan’s aid to Iran is not needed, but it would be “appropriate” given how dependent the country is on oil passing through the Strait of Hormuz.

The president said he did not tell other world leaders about the war-starting attack to maintain the element of surprise. He compared the attack that killed then-Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei to the attack on Pearl Harbor that led to the United States’ entry into World War II.

President Trump drew laughter by saying, “I didn’t tell anyone about this because I wanted it to be a surprise.” “Who knows more about surprises than Japan? Why didn’t you tell me about Pearl Harbor?”

Takaichi remained expressionless throughout Trump’s remarks.

Contributor: Jennifer Sangalang, USA TODAY Network

How to compare Gen X’s net worth by age

0


Median net worth varies widely by age group.

play

The average net worth of U.S. adults is $192,700, according to a new study from the Federal Reserve Board based on data released in 2022-2023. However, the averages for each age group vary widely, with older people unsurprisingly having higher net worth.

Generation X is generally defined as people born between 1965 and 1980, with the youngest members of this generation being in their mid-40s. With you at least a few years away from retirement and at your peak earning potential, now is the ideal time to increase your savings.

Everyone’s situation is different, so even if your net worth is lower than someone else’s age, it doesn’t necessarily mean you’re inferior. That being said, it’s still helpful to see where you stand among your peers.

Median net worth by age

The median is often more representative of the typical person, as the average can be highly skewed by some people with very high net worth.

According to 2022 Federal Reserve data, the median net worth for people ages 45 to 54 is about $247,000. The median net worth for people ages 55 to 64 is about $364,000.

age group Median net worth (2022)
Under 35 years old $39,040
35-44 $135,300
45-54 $246,700
55-64 $364,270
65-74 $410,000
Over 75 years old $334,700

Again, comparisons aren’t always helpful in this situation, as your savings goals are highly dependent on your age, cost of living, and priorities. For example, people who live in cheaper cities may not need to save as much for retirement as those who live in more expensive cities, and people who retire early are likely to need more savings to survive the rest of their lives.

If you’re looking to build your net worth, investing in the stock market is one of the easiest and most accessible ways to do so. Contributing consistently to a 401(k) or IRA can increase your net worth by tens of thousands of dollars or more in just a few years.

The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

The Motley Fool is a USA TODAY content partner providing financial news, analysis and commentary designed to help people take control of their financial lives. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY.

The $23,760 Social Security bonus that most retirees completely overlook

Offers from the Motley Fool: If you’re like most Americans, you’re several years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. However, there are only a few that are not well known. “Secrets of Social Security” It may help ensure that you increase your retirement income.

One Easy Trick Could Pay You Up to $23,760…Every year! By learning how to make the most of your Social Security benefits, we believe you can retire confidently with the peace of mind we all seek. participate stock advisor To learn more about these strategies,

View “Social Security Secrets” »

24k gold playing card coin? Mint goes ahead despite the opposition.

0


This is the design of the commemorative gold coin. Another $1 coin depicting President Donald Trump has drawn even more backlash.

play

The U.S. Treasury Department has taken a major step forward with plans to engrave President Donald Trump’s likeness on 24-karat gold commemorative coins.

The American Board of Fine Arts, an advisory committee whose members were hand-picked by President Trump, on March 19 approved the general design for a 24-karat gold commemorative coin featuring the president’s likeness.

Separately, the Treasury Department announced it plans to issue $1 Trump coins, which were approved by the Fine Arts Commission in January, despite protests from Democrats and coin enthusiasts as breaking with long-standing norms.

The commemorative gold coin features a photo of President Trump leaning on a desk of determination, taken by the White House’s chief photographer, and is on display in the National Portrait Gallery at the Smithsonian Institution. The U.S. Mint did not respond to requests for comment on the coins’ prices, but some coins are listed on its website for sale for thousands of dollars.

“He has a very strong, very tough image,” said Chamberlain Harris, a member of the committee and White House deputy director of Oval Office operations. “It is fitting that a sitting president preside over the 250th anniversary and appear on that year’s commemorative coin.”

Megan Sullivan, acting director of the Office of Design Management, said the Treasury secretary presented a series of designs to Trump before submitting the proposal to the committee. She said President Trump approved the image. The coin will have a face value, but that hasn’t been decided yet, Sullivan said.

Commissioners recommended minor changes, such as adding woodgrain to the Resolute Desk, and suggested that the coin be approximately 3 inches in diameter, the largest coin the agency could produce.

“Don’t sell out. Bigger is better,” said James C. McCreary, the commission’s vice chairman and the original architect of President Trump’s proposed White House ballroom project.

The coin is expected to join a series of special edition coins and medals the Treasury Department will release for the nation’s 500th anniversary, including another $1 Trump coin approved by the Fine Arts Commission in January.

But neither the $1 coin nor the gold coin have received approval from the Citizens’ Coinage Advisory Committee, a bipartisan group created by Congress to advise the Treasury Department on coin design. The commission refused to examine both coins, saying they violated the nation’s founding principles.

CCAC chairman Donald Scarinci said the two proposals were “an abomination to the Declaration of Independence” and said it was a “huge irony” to celebrate the country’s departure from the British monarchy with presidential coins.

“When you issue a coin with the portrait of a sitting president on it, you send a message that the sitting president is king,” Scarinci said.

During his lifetime, George Washington refused to have his likeness printed on currency, believing it to be a “monarchy.” Calvin Coolidge is the only American president to have had his portrait printed on banknotes during his lifetime. He appeared with Washington in the controversial 1926 Centennial Half Dollar. was unpopular and most pieces were melted down by the Mint.

If created, the Trump coin would join a growing list of structures and items bearing the president’s name and image, including national park passes, banners outside government buildings and the recently renamed Trump Kennedy Center for the Arts.

Is the coin legal?

Unlike $1 coins, which circulate as currency, gold coins are designed purely as collectibles. A 1935 law prohibits the commercial use of gold currency in the United States.

Because gold coins are not in circulation, there is less legal resistance than a $1 coin.

Mr. Scarinci, who has served on the CCAC board since 2005, said the creation of a new currency must be approved by Congress, but commemorative coins do not require regulatory approval because they are made of gold.

The Treasury Department claims its authority over the $1 coin stems from a 2020 law authorizing the pressing of the commemorative 250th coin.

But earlier this year, Democratic lawmakers led by Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Ariz.) asked the agency to stop producing $1 Trump coins. They claim it’s illegal.

At issue are past laws, such as an 1886 law that required currency and securities to bear “only the likeness of deceased individuals.”

The Mint did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the status of the $1 coin. Mast’s office said the Treasury Department appears intent on continuing with the project.

“The White House’s decision to remove gold coins featuring President Trump is embarrassing and contrary to our nation’s core values,” the senator said in a statement.

Rita will give away free Italian ice cream on the first day of spring 2026

0

play

The first day of spring on Friday, March 20th means Rita’s Italian Ice & Frozen Custard giveaways.

Customers who visit any of Rita’s more than 600 stores nationwide on March 20th will receive a free 6-ounce Italian ice cream. With a selection of flavors to choose from, the new Mystery Peeps Italian Ice flavor will be available for a limited time on Friday, March 20th.

If you choose the mystery flavor, it will be served as white Italian ice with a secret flavor profile. Guess the flavor for a chance to win a free Rita’s Ice or Rita’s + Peeps Swag Pack for a year (5 winners randomly selected from correct entries will enter online).

Rita’s will also be adding Peeps Marshmallow Chick toppers to top this spring treat.

“For so many, the Rita’s and Peeps brands are associated with the simple joys and sweet memories that symbolize spring,” Carmela Hughley, senior vice president of marketing insights and innovation for Rita’s Italian Ice & Frozen Custard, said in a news release. “This collaboration brings together two iconic brands to create a Mystery Italian Ice that feels playful, nostalgic and mysterious, while encouraging guests to interact with each product like never before.”

How to get free Italian ice cream at Rita’s on March 20th

Visit any Rita’s Italian Ice & Frozen Custard store on Friday, March 20th to claim your freebie. Find your nearest Rita’s store at www.ritasice.com/locations/.

As part of its annual giveaway, Rita’s will give away approximately 1 million cups of Italian ice cream.

Mike Snyder is a national trends news reporter for USA TODAY. You can follow him on Threads, Bluesky, and X, and email him at: mike snyder & @mikegsnider.bsky.social & @mikesnider & msnider@usatoday.com.

California and other states challenge President Trump’s repeal of greenhouse gas protections

0

play

California will co-lead a coalition challenging President Donald Trump’s administration’s recent decision to rescind the Environmental Protection Agency’s landmark climate findings targeting greenhouse gases.

Governor Gavin Newsom and Attorney General Rob Bonta announced on March 19 that the state of California, along with 25 attorneys general, the governor of Pennsylvania, and 10 cities and counties, has filed a federal lawsuit against the Trump administration over the EPA’s recent decision to rescind the EPA’s “hazard finding,” which has been the legal basis for regulations targeting man-made greenhouse gases for nearly two decades.

“We are challenging the Trump administration’s unlawful decision to roll back one of our nation’s most important climate programs,” Bonta said at a news conference. “The federal government is trying to overturn science and eliminate protections that limit harmful pollution from vehicles, the nation’s largest source of greenhouse gases.”

In 2009, the Obama administration’s EPA released its Endangerment Findings, which concluded that six greenhouse gases pose a significant threat to public health and contribute to worsening environmental conditions. These findings served as the basis for passage of the Clean Air Act, which imposed emission standards on cars, trucks, and power plants.

In announcing the decision, President Trump argued that rescinding these environmental protections would ultimately help Americans by starting to “fall” in car costs, and that the study’s findings had no “factual basis.”

On February 12, President Trump said, “We are officially ending so-called ‘risk finding,’ a disastrous Obama-era policy that severely damaged the American auto industry.”

The president described this moment as “the greatest deregulatory move in American history.”

EPA’s action to reverse the 2009 findings would ultimately eliminate the federal government’s ability to enforce environmental protections against greenhouse gas pollution from cars and trucks.

“This is not a small technical change. This is a sweeping decision that will increase pollution, exacerbate climate change, and endanger the health of millions of Americans,” Bonta said at a news conference.

“Greenhouse gas emissions will increase because the federal government is stepping back from its role in properly regulating greenhouse gases.”

Newsom: “President Trump’s decision will hurt America and boost China’s EVs”

When President Trump announced his decision to reverse the EPA’s findings, Newsom vowed to sue. This week, he did not hold back from criticizing the president’s actions.

“Since 2009, we’ve known the obvious: Greenhouse gases, carbon dioxide (and) methane, are negatively impacting our public health and our nation’s economic prosperity,” Newsom said. “The only people who can see it differently are Donald Trump and his big donors.”

Newsom said that before the creation of the EPA and policies to address smog and pollution in the state, greenhouse gases played a significant role in the poor air quality that has affected Californians for decades.

“Los Angeles was almost uninhabitable, and it could happen again,” Newsom said. “They want to make the pollution serious again. That’s the problem.”

He also emphasized that the EPA’s loosening of regulations and greenhouse gas emissions policies could hurt modern Californians as the state faces an increase in natural disasters due to climate change.

“They want to recreate the 19th century. California is about the future. We’re about transformation, not restoration. We’re not about nostalgia. We’re not second-guessing fools,” Newsom said. “We have been here before, and our action is not to be victims or bystanders of this attack on common sense, science, public health, and lived reality, but to seek to shape the future.”

Notably, California Environmental Protection Secretary Yana Garcia said that while President Trump’s decision affected federal policy, it did not affect the state’s ability to regulate greenhouse gas emissions.

In 2006, the California General Assembly passed AB 32 (California Global Warming Mitigation Act of 2006), requiring businesses to participate in significantly reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the state to 1990 levels by 2020.

“AB 32 remains unchanged,” Garcia said. “California Air Resources Board, we are advancing our climate change program. We remain steadfastly committed to protecting public health.”

One of President Trump’s main justifications for rescinding the EPA findings was that the agency would help the U.S. auto industry by eliminating federal regulations.

Newsom argued that the decision could ultimately have a negative impact on the U.S. auto market because the federal government is discouraging U.S. automakers from developing electric vehicles in favor of gasoline-powered vehicles.

By contrast, Newsom said the United States is being “left behind,” pointing to Beijing’s investment in the electric vehicle industry, which has become a major player in the global market.

Earlier this year, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney agreed to a plan with China to begin importing EVs into the North American market, where imports have been blocked for years by a tariff agreement with the United States.

Noe Padilla is a Northern California reporter for USA Today. To contact him, npadilla@usatodayco.comX Follow him at @1NoePadilla or Bluesky @noepadilla.bsky.social..

Some soldiers banned from wearing uniforms off base during Iran war

0

play

Since the U.S. began its war with Iran, military bases on the U.S. mainland have banned service members from wearing their uniforms outside the base, amid growing threats of retaliatory attacks against soldiers.

After the United States and Israel launched their first joint attack on Iran on February 28, U.S. military bases in the Middle East came under heavy fire from Iranian missiles and drones, killing seven U.S. troops stationed in Kuwait and Saudi Arabia. Then an air tanker crash in Iraq killed six soldiers and injured at least 200 others across the Middle East.

Threats to U.S. forces are not limited to combat zones. Bases in the United States are closed in response to reports of active shooters, suspicious packages, and other unidentified threats. Since the war began, many military bases in the continental United States have tightened security, banning visitors and ordering service members to change out of their uniforms when leaving the premises.

Shooting incident at US military base, suspicious package found

March 16th, report A suspicious package was found near the entrance gate to MacDill Air Force Base in Tampa, home to the U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM), causing the gate to be closed. Later FBI Tampa office said It is said that “something that may be an energy substance” was found inside the package. macdill issued Two days later, on March 18, a shelter-in-place order was issued citing an unknown and targeted “threat.” CENTCOM is the military branch leading operations in the Iran war. It’s unclear whether the threats are related.

On March 17, officials at Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst in southern New Jersey announced that a “suspicious package” had been discovered on the base, prompting a lockdown. They later determined that the package posed no threat.

Holloman Air Force Base in New Mexico was placed on lockdown the same day due to reports of an active shooter. According to reports, a veteran was killed and an active duty military member was injured.

It is unclear whether these incidents are related to the Middle East wars. Local authorities said an investigation is ongoing. However, several separate U.S. attacks since the beginning of the war have been investigated as terrorism, including the shooting of a Virginia Reserve Officers Training Corps (ROTC) class. On March 12, a man serving time for conspiring with the Islamic State group opened fire on an ROTC class at Old Dominion University in Norfolk, killing the class instructor, Lt. Col. Brandon Shah.

Uniforms prohibited for soldiers off base

Military installations have tightened security, and some areas have banned service members from wearing uniforms outside bases. On March 13, Fort Huachuca Army Base in Arizona, which houses more than 5,600 military personnel, received an order banning soldiers from wearing their uniforms outside the base “to ensure that military protection efforts are consistent with current global conditions,” according to a copy of the order obtained by USA TODAY.

“This prohibition applies to all off-post activities, including but not limited to eating, shopping, and appointments,” the order says.

Army Combined Command issued a similar order to its members on the same day, according to spokesman Lt. Col. Brien Freigo. The order is “a prudent, proactive step aimed at reducing visibility and is not in response to an identified or credible threat,” he told USA TODAY in an email.

The Pentagon referred questions about these bans to U.S. Northern Command, which said there are no blanket bans on U.S. military bases.

A temporary ban was also issued on February 28 at Shaw Air Force Base, east of Columbia, South Carolina, stating that military personnel are “no longer permitted” to wear their uniforms off base. The base rescinded this policy on March 15.

In an emailed statement, the Navy did not say whether it had banned the use of the uniform off-base, but said it was “implementing additional force protection measures” to “reduce the vulnerability of our service members,” including changes to uniform policy in certain situations. On the day the war began, Naval Support Activity Facility Annapolis, located across the river from the Naval Academy in Maryland, announced increased security at its entrance gates and canceled all public visitation “as a result of the current world situation,” according to a Facebook post.

Recent attacks on US bases related to the Middle East conflict

At least two other attacks in recent weeks are reportedly linked to the ongoing war in the Middle East.

Police say the gunman who killed two people and injured more than a dozen others at an Austin bar on March 1 was wearing an Iranian flag shirt, according to videos and photos shared online.

Less than two weeks later, police said Ayman Mohammad Ghazali, 41, was killed after driving a truck into a Michigan synagogue and exchanging gunfire with police. Local leaders in Dearborn Heights said Ghazali’s family in Lebanon had been killed days earlier in an Israeli attack that swept the country and killed hundreds on another front in the Iran war.

across-the-board prohibitions common in recent U.S. wars

Steve Gabavics, a retired Army colonel who served in the military police for decades, estimates that threats to bases have increased by 10 to 15 percent as a result of the Iran war.

Gabavics said it’s not new for the military to tighten security on bases and facilities in response to U.S. wars overseas, such as restricting service members from wearing uniforms off base. “I’ve seen it every time there’s been a major international conflict,” he said.

Gabaviks, who commanded military police across the Military District of Washington, said there may have been dozens of Iranian-linked sleeper cells in the Washington, D.C., area and about 100 scattered across the country during his service.

But the greater threat to military personnel likely comes from ideologically inspired “lone wolf” attackers, he said.

Last November, two uniformed National Guard soldiers on patrol were gunned down a few blocks from the White House. Sarah Beckstrom, 20, of Summersville, West Virginia, was killed and another soldier was seriously injured. Rahmanullah Rakanwar, a 29-year-old Afghan man arrested and charged in the shooting, worked with the violent CIA-backed Zero Squad during the U.S. occupation of the country.

Soldiers in uniform do indeed “make a target,” Gabaviks said. “We’re trying to make sure that people who want to do things like this aren’t easy targets.”

Whole foods? Walmart? Grocery stores hold clues to home prices

0

play

What do local grocery stores say about your neighborhood?

It may seem like a no-brainer. Whole Foods stores tend to be located in more expensive and affluent areas, while discount stores like Dollar General are located in less affluent areas. However, a recent analysis found that store openings are highly related to how grocery chains anticipate neighborhood demographics and housing price trends.

The report is written by Aziz Sunderj, who worked for many years at an investment bank before starting a newsletter called Home Economics. For his analysis, he collated more than 32,000 store openings and home price data over nearly 50 years and added census demographics.

Sundarj found that home prices not only rose in ZIP codes where Trader Joe’s opened, but rose 6% faster than the national average over the next three years. But in ZIP codes where Walmart opened, home prices were 4% below the national average.

Will the rich get richer and the poor get poorer?

“I think people who are looking for a location for a Trader Joe’s or a Walmart are looking for an area that is changing in a way that is beneficial to them,” Sundarj told USA TODAY.

For example, Trader Joe’s may select “well-educated, relatively high-income people, (but) not necessarily in the most expensive areas,” he said.

Residents in areas where Trader Joe’s stores open are more likely to be college-educated, with 52% holding a bachelor’s degree, tied with Whole Foods for the highest percentage of any chain and well above the national average, Sundarj said in his analysis. The median household income in these areas was $82,000, also the highest of any chain, and the median home price before the stores opened was $425,000.

In contrast, Wal-Mart’s customers are “slightly lower income and probably live in areas where home price growth is slower. They live in areas that are somewhat economically stagnant,” he said.

A typical Walmart store is located in an area where the median household income is $49,000, 23% of adults have a college degree, and home prices are $144,000, one-third of the home prices in Trader Joe’s ZIP codes.

Sundarj believes the disparate fortunes between the Wal-Mart and Trader Joe’s districts tell a larger story. “The grocery store story is kind of a window into the broader story of what’s going on in America about affordability and inequality,” he says. These retailers are taking advantage of an unfortunate reality about the American economy in recent years. In other words, companies at the top of the income and wealth divide are doing better, while those at the bottom are faring less well.

“The K-shaped economy is running down the aisles of grocery stores,” Sundarj wrote in the report.

James Comey subpoenaed in 2016 election, Russia investigation

0

play

Former FBI Director James Comey has been subpoenaed as part of a Justice Department investigation into whether Obama administration officials violated laws during an initial investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election, according to multiple media reports.

Comey had previously been indicted by the Trump administration on charges of lying to Congress, but the case was dismissed after a judge ruled that the prosecutor who prosecuted him was illegally appointed. The Department of Justice appealed this decision.

The development follows Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard’s assertion in a July 23 press conference that the Obama administration pushed a “contrived narrative” that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to support President Donald Trump. The same day, the Justice Department announced it was creating a “strike force” to evaluate the evidence and “explore potential next legal steps.”

Axios, citing unnamed sources, was the first of several media outlets to report on Comey’s subpoena. The investigation is reportedly being led by U.S. Attorney Jason A. Redding Quiñones, a Florida federal prosecutor appointed by President Trump.

The Justice Department has launched multiple prosecutions within the past year after President Trump publicly called for prosecutions of specific targets. This includes the so far unsuccessful prosecution of Comey, who was fired from the FBI by President Trump in 2017.

This includes a separate complaint against New York Attorney General Letitia James, who filed a civil suit against Trump in 2022. The case against her was dismissed in the same ruling that dismissed Mr. Comey’s case after a judge ruled that the prosecutor who secured the indictment was wrongfully imprisoned.

This story has been updated with additional information.

Is “The Bachelorette” canceled? Taylor Frankie Paul speaks

0

play

ABC has canceled Taylor Frankie Paul’s upcoming season of The Bachelorette following backlash as the police investigation into the reality TV star and her ex-partner Dakota Mortensen continues.

“In light of the new video that was just released today, we have made the decision not to move forward with a new season of The Bachelorette at this time. We are focused on supporting our families,” a Disney Entertainment Television spokesperson told USA TODAY on Thursday, March 19.

The revocation comes after police in the northern Utah city of Draper disclosed an ongoing “domestic assault investigation” involving Paul and Mortensen, both of whom reportedly denied the allegations.

Authorities contacted both parties on February 24 and 25, a spokesperson told the outlet. The “Secrets of a Mormon Wife” star is set to star on season 22 of “The Bachelorette,” making her the first star to direct a season despite dating 22 men and not appearing on “The Bachelor.”

Paul recently told People in a statement on Tuesday, March 17, that it was “heartbreaking to see that, to go through that, especially during this time.”

“It’s just difficult timing and that’s a big problem,” Paul told the magazine. “I feel like all the premieres I’ve been to, I’ve never fully enjoyed them. So this is another premiere…It’s been really hard and it took everything to get here today.”

Paul is the unofficial star of “Secrets of Mormon Wives,” which has exploded in popularity since its premiere in 2024, following several women who have dubbed themselves “MomTok.” She drew a large audience on social media when she acknowledged that another couple in the LDS Church was “gently rocking.”

USA TODAY has reached out to a representative for Mormon Wives for comment.

‘Mormon Wives’ season 5 production paused over Taylor Frankie Paul’s domestic violence allegations

The investigation led to the suspension of production on Season 5 of The Mormons, Paul confirmed in an interview on Good Morning America on March 18th. Reality star Paul added that he doesn’t know how long the suspension will last.

“When your life is covered in these headlines, it feels like the end of the world. That’s how it feels. I’m not going to lie,” she said. “But I want to say, I’ve been here before, I’ve overcome it and shared my story… so I hope I can do it again.”

Co-star Mikayla Matthews addressed the pause in an Instagram Q&A on Thursday, March 19, saying, “This was a decision that all of us girls came up with and agreed upon,” adding, “We were nervous about filming everything that was going on.”

2023 video shows altercation allegedly involving Taylor Frankie Paul

TMZ leaked a 2023 video of an alleged argument between the former couple, which the outlet reported was being used as evidence in a domestic violence case. The video shows Paul screaming, punching and kicking Mortensen while he was recording, before pulling his hair and locking him in a headlock.

“Look, Taylor, this is all you have to do,” Mortensen says in the video. “This is no good.”

In the video, Paul can be heard throwing a metal bar stool at Mortensen, followed by the sound of a child, allegedly Paul’s daughter, crying. Then I heard Paul yell, “You did it!”

The rest of the video is hidden, but further movement and cries can be heard, including Paul’s daughter crying for her mother. At one point a doorbell is heard ringing, and then Mortensen speaks to someone who says, “What’s going on?” Paul replies, “Nothing,” but Mortensen says, “She’s been beaten.”

Contributed by: Taijuan Moorman, Edward Segarra, KiMi Robinson, USA TODAY