Home Blog Page 215

Who really stands to gain from President Trump’s SAVE Act: Republicans or Democrats? It’s complicated.

0


The president said the election security bill would “guarantee the midterm elections” for Republicans. The available data are less clear. The reason is as follows

play

WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump is urging Congressional Republicans to pass tough new voter registration requirements, arguing the legislation will benefit the party in the upcoming election.

President Trump told Republican lawmakers gathered at a golf resort in Doral, Florida on March 9, “This guarantees we’ll have a midterm election,” urging them to make the midterm election a top priority. “My opinion is that if you don’t understand it, you’ll be in trouble.”

The fact that Republicans are so enthusiastic about the bill, known informally as the SAVE Act, suggests they are confident it will benefit in a year when Republicans expect to lose their House majority.

Meanwhile, Democrats uniformly oppose the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act, and voting and civil rights advocates worry that the bill will disenfranchise many voters who lack access to proof of citizenship. This risk is typically seen as a threat to Democrats, whose supporters are disproportionately young, nonwhite, and low-income.

But does the SAVE Act actually give Republicans a partisan advantage? The evidence is unclear.

The bill would require Americans to present proof of citizenship, such as a birth certificate, passport, or naturalization document, to register to vote in federal elections. The provisions under consideration would also significantly limit or eliminate mail-in voting and require people nationwide to show a government-issued photo ID to vote, which is currently required only in some states.

Democrats overwhelmingly say they support election security and voter ID measures to prevent noncitizens and other ineligible people from registering or voting, but note that such cases are extremely rare. But they argue that the bill’s citizenship proof requirements for registration will deter many voters.

“Under the SAVE Act, you can’t use a driver’s license to register to vote,” Democratic Sen. Tammy Duckworth of Illinois said on the X show on March 19. “Republicans want you to buy a passport instead. If you can afford it. This is a modern-day poll tax.”

Here’s what we know, according to voting rights groups, legal analysis and other data.

“Political implications may vary from state to state.”

One of the most widely cited findings in this debate comes from a study by the Center for Democracy and Civic Engagement at the University of Maryland, which has studied the issue for years.

In its March 2025 report, “Who lacks documentation of citizenship?”, the Center conducted three in-depth studies that included a nationally representative sample of the adult U.S. adult population.

The study states, “Many Americans of all political identities do not have a DPOC, a document proving their citizenship. Further research is needed to understand what impact, if any, the SAVE Act will have on election outcomes.”

National surveys have found that people who don’t have easy access to proof of citizenship are disproportionately young and people of color, two demographic groups that are more likely to vote Democratic than Republican.

But the center also conducted two state-level studies in Georgia and Texas and found that “results suggest that political influences may vary by state.”

In the Texas survey, more Republicans than Democrats said they currently do not have any citizenship documents or do not have easy access to them, the center said. But a study in Georgia “found that roughly equal numbers of Democrats and Republicans were affected,” the authors write.

In recent elections, voters are less polarized by income. Exit polls show that in 2016, voters with annual incomes of less than $30,000 supported Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton over Trump by a 13-point margin, but in 2024, Trump lost low-income voters to former Vice President Kamala Harris by just 4 points.

Millions of Americans lack necessary documents

President Trump has said in recent weeks that he would not sign the bill until the Senate followed the House’s lead and passed the SAVE Act.

The Republican push this week faces fierce opposition not only from Democrats but also from some Republicans who are reluctant to do away with the Senate filibuster and the requirement for a de facto majority in the Senate to pass, as Trump has called for.

But if passed, tens of millions of Americans could be affected.

A 2024 study by New York University’s Brennan Center for Justice found that more than 21 million Americans do not have easy access to the types of citizenship documents required by this bill.

And at least 3.8 million people don’t have these documents at all, many because they’ve been lost, destroyed or stolen, according to a report by the Brennan Center, a collaboration between the Maryland Center for Democracy and Citizenship and two other voting rights groups, VoteRiders and Public Wise.

The Brennan Center report also found evidence of racial disparities, including that 8% of self-identified white Americans do not have ready access to citizenship documents, while nearly 11% of Americans of color are in a similar position.

A new Brennan Center report published last month by the same authors found that 8% of Democrats who said they voted in 2020 do not have easy access to these documents, compared with 7% of Republicans.

Complexity of mail-in registration

Other provisions that may be included in the new bill also further cloud the picture.

For example, the final version of the SAVE America Act will likely also require in-person proof of citizenship for registration and registration renewal, limiting or replacing existing methods such as the Internet, mail, and registration at a local state Department of Motor Vehicles.

A 2023 Brennan Center study found that millions more voters with access to citizenship documents still prefer to register using these common methods.

Key but bipartisan constituency

President Trump has long argued that the 2020 election he lost to Joe Biden cost him widespread voter fraud, especially “millions” of illegal immigrants brought into the country by Democrats to boost their political fortunes.

Mounting empirical evidence shows that President Trump’s claims are not true and that non-referendum and other forms of election fraud are virtually non-existent.

Conservatives disagree. One of them, the Heritage Foundation, maintains a database of 1,546 “substantiated cases of voter fraud.”

“The SAVE Act would prevent noncitizens from voting in American elections,” the think tank said in a Jan. 22 Facebook post. “If you’re against it, you’re probably trying to deceive.”

Could it backfire for Republicans?

On its face, the proposed law targets administrative factors such as access to documents and registration methods, rather than political party affiliation.

But analysts say it could affect voters in both parties differently nationally and state by state, given the parties’ existing election policies and protocols.

A January 2025 analysis by the nonpartisan Government Readiness Institute found that married women, older adults, young people, Hispanics, and low-income registrants will have the most difficulty registering to vote under the SAVE Act.

In a recent analysis, The Washington Post found that rural voters — the group Trump won by 30 points in 2024 — are less likely to have a passport. That unpredictability is compounded by the fact that Republicans attract more male, working-class, first-time voters who “tend to be less educated and have less access to documentation,” the Post said.

Largest Voting Group – Older Americans

Across party lines, older Americans are likely to face the most significant documentation hurdles, including discrepancies and missing records, according to the March 17 SAVE America Act Guide by the nonpartisan AARP (formerly the American Association of Retired Persons).

AARP said in a separate report in October 2024 that it could be important because older people are a major influence in determining U.S. elections.

Turnout among voters 65 and older was the highest of any age group since 1988, with 72% voting in 2020, according to the AARP Guide. According to the report, voters over the age of 50 will account for 55% of voters in the 2024 election.

Older Americans who have moved frequently during their lifetimes or left their homes for nursing homes or assisted living facilities may have particular difficulty gathering the necessary documents to prove their eligibility, such as birth certificates.

Special challenges for women and minorities

The bills under consideration could also pose special challenges for women, especially those who take their husband’s name, which does not match the name on their birth certificate.

“For married women who have changed their names, as long as they are already registered to vote, they are not affected by the SAVE Act,” White House Press Secretary Caroline Leavitt said at a March 10 White House press briefing.

AARP points out that 85% of women over age 50 who married men took their husband’s last name when they married.

Women overall lean toward the Democratic Party, but married women supported President Trump by 5 percentage points in 2024.

Will the Supreme Court listen to the Catholic Church on immigration?

0


‘It’s immoral’ That’s what the Catholic Church told the Supreme Court about President Trump’s attempt to abolish birthright citizenship for some infants born in the United States. Something to watch in the upcoming showdown.

play

WASHINGTON – Several Catholic bishops have taken the “unusual” step of waiving the requirement to attend Sunday Mass for parishioners who fear they will be subject to immigration detention if they leave their homes.

The entire U.S. bishops’ conference issued an unusual public condemnation of the Trump administration’s tactics against illegal immigration.

The church is now hoping its moral strength will persuade the Supreme Court to rule against the administration in two upcoming immigration cases.

Remarkably, the U.S. Catholic bishops have made not only legal but also ethical arguments in their court filings.

The church said in a brief, backed by Bible verses, that the bishops consider President Donald Trump’s attempt to abolish birthright citizenship for some children born in the United States to be “immoral.”

And allowing the federal government to turn away asylum seekers at the border is “not just a legal error, but a moral disaster,” the church wrote in a separate lawsuit scheduled to be argued March 24.

“Catholic bishops are saying that the current administration’s position is not only anti-Constitutional and anti-American, but also anti-Christian,” said Darrell Miller, a professor at the University of Chicago Law School. “This is a remarkable position that the Bishops’ Conference has expressed regarding the current government.”

Most Supreme Court justices are Catholic

This is also a view that may appeal to a uniquely receptive audience. Six of the nine justices are Catholic, and the seventh, Neil Gorsuch, was raised Catholic. (Ketanji Brown Jackson is Protestant, Elena Kagan is Jewish.)

And while religious faith considerations are not formally part of the judicial process, judges’ backgrounds are often scrutinized as indicators of their likely votes.

“Some have suggested that people of faith may have a particularly difficult time obeying the law rather than their moral views,” Judge Amy Coney Barrett wrote in her 2025 book “Hearing the Law,” noting the scrutiny she faced for her Catholic faith when she was first nominated to the federal bench. “I don’t know why.”

An analysis of cases decided by the Catholic court in the nine years since it became a majority found a clear gap between how often Catholic judges sided with the church in cases important to the church and how often non-Catholic judges sided with the church. But according to a 2015 academic paper by Kevin Walsh, a Catholic University law professor who clerked for Justice Antonin Scalia, the difference is “primarily one of ideology rather than ecclesiastical affiliation.”

Dino Christenson, co-author of a 2025 report on the influence of outside groups on courts, said research consistently highlights that judges’ ideology plays the most powerful role in decisions.

“However, reminding the justices that the court is predominantly Catholic and that the church and some parishioners are on one side may resonate with the justices,” Christenson, a political science professor at Washington University in St. Louis, said in an email to USA TODAY.

Bishops take strong stance on immigration

The judges may have known they were working on this series of cases., It shows the strong stance the Catholic Church has taken against immigrants.

In November, the Catholic bishops of the United States issued a “special message” expressing concern about how immigrants are being treated in the United States.

It was the first time in more than a dozen years that the Church had spoken in such a particularly urgent manner. The last time was in 2013, when bishops criticized a provision in President Barack Obama’s health reform that required some Catholic employers to cover contraception in their insurance plans.

The Supreme Court sided with the church in recent cases

In a series of recent victories for the church, a court ruled in 2020 that employers with religious or moral objections do not have to cooperate in covering contraceptives under the Affordable Care Act.

In that case, after siding with the Little Sisters of the Poor, In 2021, a court ruled in favor of a Catholic social services agency that refused to recognize same-sex couples as foster parents.

Last year, the court unanimously sided with Catholic Charities of Wisconsin in a fight over unemployment tax exemptions for religious groups, but deadlocked on whether to allow the church to establish the nation’s first religious charter school in Oklahoma.

Even if the church is not directly involved in the lawsuit, U.S. Catholic bishops will participate in legal battles that “touch important tenets of Catholic teaching.”

In recent years, the church has most often done so in cases involving religious rights, abortion, marriage and sexuality, and immigration.

Church points out that Jesus Christ was a refugee

The immigration case the court will consider on March 24 concerns the government’s ability to limit the number of people seeking asylum at the border by barring them from entering the United States if their request for protection is recognized by law.

Immigrant rights groups and asylum seekers who challenge the “turnback” policy say the government falsely claims migrants are being denied entry because border crossings lack the capacity to process them.

Although this policy is currently not in use, the Department of Justice would like to keep the option open.

Catholic bishops in the United States have pointed out that Christ was a refugee, as his parents fled to Egypt to escape persecution.

“This policy violates nearly 2,000 years of Catholic faith, international humanitarian agreements, and the obligation to care for refugees, a fundamental legal and moral principle that runs through the history of this country,” the church said in a court filing.

The bishops have made similar arguments in the debate over President Trump’s executive order restricting birthright citizenship, and the justices are scheduled to take up the issue on April 1 in one of the most high-profile debates of the term.

The church said in a filing that the effects of the president’s order are “immoral and contrary to the fundamental beliefs and teachings of the Catholic Church regarding human life and dignity, the treatment of vulnerable people, especially migrants and children, and the unity of the family.”

Moral arguments are “historically grounded”

Miller, the University of Chicago law professor, sees the bishops’ faith-based arguments as a wise move.

“They know that this is a Supreme Court that tends to be sympathetic to appeals that have aspects of religious discrimination,” he said. “And to say that this is a form of anti-religious bigotry … is going to be decided differently in this court than it was 20, 25, or 30 years ago.”

Adam Feldman, a lawyer and political scientist who runs a blog called Empirical SCOTUS, said the church’s emphasis on religious teachings appears to be a “major shift” from the more substantive legal arguments the church has raised in other major cases.

A focus on Judeo-Christian tradition could be persuasive for courts, which increasingly use history and tradition to discern the original meaning of the Constitution and subsequent amendments, he said.

“Moral arguments are actually historically based,” Feldman said.

Can judges be swayed by moral arguments?

Douglas Laycock, a law professor at the University of Virginia and a leading expert on religious law, said moral arguments are most important when the law is unclear.

“This is a court that claims to be textualist and often claims it is not interested in policy issues,” Laycock said in an email. “Moral arguments can help judges choose when a law can easily be interpreted in more than one way, but many judges are reluctant to acknowledge that even then.”

Laycock said he doesn’t think there’s any major ambiguity in the law in either immigration case, but the potential for supportive filings, known as amicus briefs, to make a difference is too important to ignore.

“If you care about the issue, you feel obligated to file it just in case,” Laycock said. “However, most of the court briefs turned out to be inconsequential.”

Mega Millions winning numbers for March 20th drawing: $50 million jackpot

0

play

After a lucky player in Ohio won a $60 million jackpot earlier this week, the Mega Millions jackpot has been reset to $50 million, with a $22.6 million cash option for the Friday, March 20th drawing.

The victory ended a months-long drought. There was no Mega Millions jackpot winner from December until early March, until an Illinois player won a massive $536 million prize on March 10th. A week later, on St. Patrick’s Day, the Ohio ticket holder struck gold again.

If someone wins on Friday, you have two options. You can choose a one-time lump sum payment or choose annual payments that start immediately and increase by 5% each year.

Here’s what you need to know about Friday’s Mega Millions drawing.

What are the Mega Millions winning numbers for March 20, 2026?

Friday’s Mega Millions winning numbers: 11-20-51-55-63 and the mega ball 4.

When is the next Mega Millions drawing?

The next Mega Millions drawing is scheduled for Tuesday, March 24th at 11:00 PM ET.

Top 10 Mega Millions Jackpots

  • $1.602 billion in Florida on August 8, 2023
  • $1.537 billion in South Carolina on October 23, 2018
  • $1.348 billion on January 1, 2023 in Maine
  • July 29, 2022, $1.337 billion in Illinois
  • December 27, 2024, $1.269 billion in California
  • $1.128 billion in New Jersey on March 26, 2024
  • $1.05 billion in Michigan on January 22, 2021
  • $983 million in Georgia on November 14, 2025
  • $810 million in Texas on September 10, 2024
  • March 30, 2012, $656 million in Illinois, Kansas, and Maryland

What is Mega Millions?

Mega Millions is a lottery that is played in 45 states, the District of Columbia, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.

Each ticket costs $5 and allows players to choose six numbers from two different number pools: five different numbers from 1 to 70 (white balls) and one number from 1 to 24 (gold mega ball), or choose easy pick/quick pick.

If you match all six winning numbers in the drawing, you win the jackpot. If there are multiple jackpot winners, the jackpot prize will be shared.

How to play Mega Millions

To play Mega Millions, you must purchase a ticket. This can be done at several locations, including local convenience stores, gas stations, and grocery stores. In some states, you can purchase Mega Millions tickets online.

Once you have your ticket, you have to choose six numbers. Five of them are white balls numbered 1-70. The golden mega ball ranges from 1 to 24.

If you’re feeling particularly unlucky or don’t want to go through the hassle of picking, you can request a “quick pick” or “easy pick.” When you use these options, your computer randomly generates numbers.

Mega Millions tickets have built-in multipliers that increase your non-jackpot prize by 2, 3, 4, 5, or 10 times. Previously, players had to pay an extra dollar to add a “Megaplier”.

This story has been updated with new information.

Fernando Cervantes Jr. is a trending news reporter for USA TODAY. Contact us at fernando.cervantes@usatodayco.com and follow us at X @fern_cerv_.

New movies streaming on Netflix, Hulu, HBO Max, and Prime Video

0


Need to see a new movie? Stream these 10 movies for free in your home with Netflix, Hulu, Prime Video, HBO Max, Disney+, and Peacock.

play

  • One of these movies is the one you should watch tonight.
  • Domestic theatrical releases include the musical sequel “Wicked: For Good” and the political thriller “Anniversary.”
  • There are also some original streaming movies, including the Netflix movie Peaky Blinders: The Immortal.

Do you like movies? Live for TV? USA TODAY’s Watch Party newsletter has all of our best recommendations, delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up now and be one of the cool kids.

Another Academy Awards is upon us, and thanks to streaming services, Oscar-level talent continues to emerge.

Remember Cillian Murphy? The actor, who won Best Actor for Oppenheimer, returns to his familiar role in the Netflix film, a sequel to the long-running TV series Peaky Blinders. Cynthia Erivo and Ariana Grande missed out on a repeat Oscar nomination for their Wicked sequel, but big fans of the musical will finally be able to check it out on Peacock. Plus, Hulu, HBO Max, Disney+, Amazon’s Prime Video, and more have plenty of interesting new releases to watch, including a political thriller starring Phoebe Dynevor and Dylan O’Brien, and a psychological drama starring James McAvoy.

Here are 10 hottest new movies you can stream right now.

‘Anniversary’

This political thriller stars Phoebe Dynevor as a young woman who begins dating the son (Dylan O’Brien) of a wealthy couple (Kyle Chandler and Diane Lane). The mother remembers that she was a former student who espoused a radical totalitarian ideology, and the new girlfriend begins to build a powerful following, tearing the family apart from the inside.

Where to watch: Hulu

“Fackham Hall”

“Airplane!” Give the “Downton Abbey” spin you never knew you needed. This hilariously daffy parody is set in England in the 1930s, and tells the story of the aristocratic but often incestuous Davenport family, whose daughter Rose (Thomasin Mackenzie) is torn between marrying her cousin Archibald (Tom Felton) to protect the family or staying with pickpocket-turned-servant Eric (Ben Radcliffe).

Where to watch: HBO Max

“Melania”

Director Brett Ratner’s not-so-revealing documentary focuses on the life of Melania Trump, a former fashion model and wife of President Donald Trump. The film follows the 20 days leading up to the 2025 presidential inauguration, giving behind-the-scenes glimpses into the first lady’s personal and personal life.

Where to watch: prime video

“It’s not like there’s no hope.”

Based on a tragic true story, director Joe Carnahan’s survival thriller stars Zachary Levi as one of four friends on a fishing expedition whose boat capsizes during a severe storm. Josh Duhamel is a Coast Guard captain who leads rescue missions as people face dehydration, hypothermia and other dangers at sea.

Where to watch: paramount+

“Nuremberg”

This crowd-pleasing, realistic and moving historical thriller stars Russell Crowe as Adolf Hitler’s narcissistic right-hand man, Hermann Goering (Russell Crowe). As he and others in the Nazi high command are put on trial for war crimes, Goering plays mind games with military psychiatrist Douglas Kelly (Rami Malek).

Where to watch: Netflix

“1000 Scary Women”

Scary movies aren’t just for men. A great way to jump into International Women’s History Month is to watch this documentary that delves into female pioneers in horror history, celebrates films like Jennifer’s Body and Possession, and talks with filmmakers like Mary Harron (American Psycho).

Where to watch: tremble

“Peaky Blinders: The Immortal Man”

Former gangster Tommy Shelby (Cillian Murphy) made enemies, lost loved ones and did bad things over six seasons of Peaky Blinders. In this new film, Tommy, isolated from the rest of the world, comes face-to-face with the ghosts of his past. It’s time to rescue the estranged son of a criminal (Barry Keoghan), who is caught up in a Nazi plot to destroy Britain’s economy.

Where to watch: Netflix

‘pose’

For the cover of their latest album, pop star Patricia (Aisling Franciosi) and her artist boyfriend Peter (Lucas Bravo) visit the stately mansion where their photography idol Thomas (James McAvoy) took some of his most famous work. They discover that the eccentric Thomas still haunts the place, he needs a new muse, and things get weird with psychological drama.

Where to watch: prime video

“Wicked: For Good”

Cynthia Erivo and Ariana Grande will reprise their roles as the evil witch Elphaba and her popular best friend Glinda with renewed vigor in the musical sequel. While Elphaba confronts a corrupt wizard (Jeff Goldblum), the antagonists develop relationships and stand up for what’s right, all in an unexpectedly relatable fantasy film that sings a lot.

Where to watch: peacock

“Zootopia 2”

Disney’s animated comedy sequel features bunny cop Judy Hopps (voiced by Ginnifer Goodwin) and feral fox Nick Wilde (Jason Bateman). The unlikely friends and partners must once again save the city of Zootopia by helping a fugitive Snake (Ke Huy Quan) and uncovering a long-standing conspiracy against the reptiles.

Where to watch: disney plus

Stocks fall for 4th straight week as NASDAQ and Dow near correction

0

play

U.S. stocks closed sharply lower on March 20, posting losses for the fourth consecutive week, pushing the tech-heavy Nasdaq and blue-chip Dow to near correction levels, or at least 10% below their recent highs.

Stocks have been reeling as the Strait of Hormuz remains effectively closed during the war with Iran. One-fifth of the world’s oil is transported through the narrow waterway, mainly to Asia and Europe, and its blockage has significantly increased the international price of Brent crude. Brent crude oil recently rose 2.84% to $111.74 per barrel.

Because oil is used in nearly every part of our lives, from manufacturing and travel to trucking produce to grocery stores to consumers ordering online to their homes and offices, economists are concerned about how high oil prices will affect inflation and economic growth. According to the Energy Information Administration, oil prices are the main driver of retail gasoline prices, typically accounting for more than half of the total price per gallon.

Economists predicted that the longer the fighting in the Middle East continues, the worse the economy will be. At the moment, there is no easy way out.

The Pentagon is sending thousands of additional Marines to the Middle East, and Reuters reported that Iraq has declared force majeure on all oil fields operated by foreign companies.

“We had expected higher spending due to tax refund season, but sustained gas price increases should more than offset that increase,” Michael Pearce, chief U.S. economist, and Bernard Yaros, lead economist at Oxford Economics, said in a note. They now expect consumption growth to slow to just 1.9% this year from 2.5% in February, the slowest pace since 2013 excluding the pandemic.

The S&P 500 composite index fell 1.51%, or 99.9 points, to close at 6,506.59. The Dow fell 0.97%, or 446.51 points, to 45,574.92. The Nasdaq fell 2.01%, or 443.08 points, to 21,647.611.

How worried should we be about oil prices?

So far, investors and economists are hopeful that the soaring oil prices will not continue. Analysts continue to point to oil futures contracts as a proxy for price expectations. They noted that crude oil delivery prices in recent months were much higher than in upcoming months.

“This divergence suggests that despite the severity of the short-term shock, market participants continue to expect a relatively quick resolution rather than a prolonged supply loss,” Fei Xu, portfolio manager of Vanguard’s Commodity Strategies Fund, said in a research note.

So why are stock prices still falling?

Some analysts said the uncertainty is having a negative impact on the stock market. Even if oil prices don’t continue to rise, no one knows how severe the ripple effects will be, especially from the Federal Reserve’s interest rate cuts, they said.

“When you have no idea what the rate cut environment is going to be, what the inflation environment is going to be, or even what the stock market environment is going to be, more people are going to be reluctant to put their money to work,” said Karen Rogers, portfolio manager at Wedbush Fund Advisors.

“I think at the end of the day, it’s all about the uncertainty of how long this is going to last and what that means for future inflation and any ramifications of future Fed rate cuts,” he added.

The Federal Reserve kept interest rates unchanged at its policy meeting earlier in the week.

“The impact of developments in the Middle East on the U.S. economy is unclear,” the Fed said in a statement explaining the decision, adding that while economic activity is expanding at a “solid pace,” job growth remains low and inflation remains modestly elevated.

Fed Chairman Jerome Powell said in a post-meeting press conference that given the recent inflation shock and weak job market, the Fed is in a “difficult situation” to balance its dual mandate of price stability and maximum employment. However, he added that concerns about “stagflation” were premature.

(Updated with new information.)

Medora Lee is USA TODAY’s money, markets and personal finance reporter. Please contact us at mjlee@usatoday.com. Subscribe to our free Daily Money newsletter for personal finance tips and business news every Monday through Friday.

Buffy the Vampire Slayer’s Nicholas Brendon dies at age 54

0

Nicholas Brendon, best known for playing the beloved Xander Harris on all seven seasons of the WB television series Buffy the Vampire Slayer, passed away on Friday, March 20th. He passed away at the age of 54.

In a statement posted on Brendon’s official Facebook page, Brendon’s family announced that he passed away in his sleep.

“We are saddened to mourn the passing of our brother and son Nicholas Brendon. He passed away in his sleep from natural causes,” the statement said. “As our family grieves his passing and honors the life of a man who lived with strength, imagination, and heart, we ask that you respect our privacy at this time.”

“Buffy” co-star Alyson Hannigan posted a photo of her friend and fellow Dodgers fan Alyson Hannigan on Instagram.

“Dear Nicky, thank you for all the years of laughter, love, and Dodgers,” Hannigan wrote. “I love you. Rest in peace.”

Brendon was nominated for the Saturn Award for Best Genre TV Actor in 1998 and 1999, and was nominated for Best Supporting Actor in 2000 during the run of Buffy (1997-2003). He appeared in several episodes of Criminal Minds as Kevin Lynch, an FBI technical analyst and lover of Penelope Garcia, played by Kirsten Vangsness.

However, much of the actor’s career after “Buffy” was marked by health problems, drug abuse, stints in rehab facilities, and high-profile arrests. Brendon was arrested in October 2014 in Boise, Idaho, after police were alerted to a disturbance involving hotel employees. Four months later, in February 2015, Brendon was arrested again in Fort Lauderdale, Florida for causing extensive damage to a hotel room.

In August 2015, Brendon was scheduled to appear on “The Dr. Phil Show” to talk about his recent arrests and alcoholism. However, the actor removed his microphone during the interview and walked off the show. Brendon later explained on his Facebook page that he had consumed alcohol before the interview and did not feel ready to “reveal the darkest parts of himself on national television.”

Brendon returned to the show in November 2015.

In a statement, the family highlighted many aspects of Brendon’s life beyond his Hollywood career and public image.

“Most people know Nicky for his work as an actor and the characters he has brought to life over the years. In recent years, Nicky has developed a passion for painting and art,” the statement reads.

His family said Brendon was a passionate, sensitive and “endlessly driven” man who loved sharing his talents and artwork with his family.

“Those who truly knew him understood that his art was the purest reflection of who he was as a person. It’s no secret that Nicholas had struggled with illness in the past, but he was on medication and treatment to overcome his diagnosis, and at the time of his death he was optimistic about his future,” the statement continued.

Polymarket opens a pop-up bar in Washington, DC. Click here to learn how to participate.

0

play

Predictive betting market platform Polymarket will open a pop-up bar, the Situation Room, in the capital “specialized in situation monitoring”.

The company announced its latest business initiative in an XPost on Wednesday, March 18th.

“Imagine a sports bar…but with a Live

The bar opens to the public on Friday, March 20th in Washington, DC and will remain open until Sunday, March 22nd. According to Polymarket, the Situation Room will open at 8 p.m. on March 20 and at 11 a.m. on March 21 and 22. The company did not specify when the bar would be open. However, Proper 21 K Street, where the pop-up will be held, closes at 12 a.m. Eastern Time Monday through Sunday, according to the website.

Polymarket opened a free supermarket in New York City last month to promote free markets. Polymarket donated $1 million to Food Bank For NYC as part of that effort.

“Built for free food, free markets, and the people who make New York tick,” the company said in a statement.

What is polymarket?

Polymarket allows users to bet on the outcome of real-world events, from who will win the Academy Award for Best Actress to when the United States will confirm the existence of aliens.

Top trending bets on the platform on Friday, March 20 included whether the U.S. will invade Cuba in 2026 and who the 2028 Republican presidential nominee will be.

Close scrutiny of the name “Situation Room”

Polymarket has come under intense scrutiny since its founding in 2020. In January, the Nevada Gaming Control Board filed a civil enforcement action against the company. In its complaint, the board asked the court for a declaration and injunction to stop Polymarket from offering unauthorized betting in violation of Nevada law.

But Nevada isn’t the only state trying to take the platform to court. Brett Bruen, chief executive of the Global Situation Office, a public relations agency, accused Company X of allegedly using the organization’s trademarked name.

“To track the situation around the world, we are trademarking @GlobalSitRoom and related terms (check notes),” Bruen wrote. “I’m really happy. It’s a great name. But no, you can’t use it. Yes, my lawyer will contact you.”

Global Situation Room has sent a cease-and-desist letter to Polymarket, claiming that the company’s use of the name “Situation Room” creates the false impression that Global Situation Room is “in any way connected to or associated with Polymarket’s services,” CNBC reported, citing a letter from a public relations agency.

“In fact, there is a clear overlap between the uses of GLOBAL SITUATION ROOM and THE SITUATION ROOM, as both marks include ‘SITUATION ROOM’ and enable consumers to monitor and act on global events,” the letter said, written by attorney Shane Delsman of the Milwaukee, Wisconsin-based law firm Godfrey & Kahn. “In fact, the marks are very similar and the Global Situation Room has already witnessed some real disruption in the form of press requests for comment on the opening of the new THE SITUATION ROOM bar.”

USA TODAY reached out to Polymarket for comment on March 20th.

Michelle Del Rey is a trending news reporter for USA TODAY. Please contact mdelrey@usatoday.com.

Tennessee plans to execute a rare woman. She’s fighting back.

0

play

Christa Gail Pike was just 18 years old when she committed a crime that dominated headlines for years. She tortured and killed a romantic rival in Tennessee and then showed part of a 19-year-old woman’s skull to her schoolmates.

The murders in the Knoxville woods displayed a brutality and callousness rarely seen in a woman, much less a woman this young. Now, 30 years later, Pike is back in the headlines as the state of Tennessee prepares to execute her.

Pike, who just turned 50 on March 10, is scheduled to be executed by lethal injection on September 30, about six months later, for the murder of 19-year-old Colleen Slemer. On January 12, 1995, Pike and two others lured Slemmer into the woods and carried out a ritual murder that lasted about an hour.

If the execution goes ahead, Pike will become the first woman to be put to death in Tennessee in more than 200 years, and the 19th woman to be put to death in modern U.S. history.

She is now fighting back, suing the state to halt her execution.

Pike’s lawyers filed suit in Tennessee court in January, arguing that the state’s method of execution violates her religious beliefs and constitutional rights and could cause her undue suffering. In response to Pike’s claims, the state said in a Thursday, March 19, court filing that it has presented no evidence that lethal injection poses an unconstitutional risk to her and that death row inmates are not guaranteed a painless execution.

While Pike was in prison, she took responsibility for the murder and “changed dramatically,” she said in a 2023 letter to The Tennessean, part of the USA TODAY network.

“I feel sick now to think that someone as loving and compassionate as I was was capable of committing such a crime,” she wrote.

USA TODAY examines Pike’s arguments for a stay of execution, the state’s view of them and the feelings of the victim’s mother.

What was Christa Gail Pike convicted of?

Krista Gail Pike and Colleen Slemer were students at the Knoxville Job Corps, a career training program, where Pike began dating a 17-year-old boy. She then became afraid that Slemer was trying to steal from her, prosecutors told jurors at trial.

According to court records, her friend and boyfriend, Pike, lured Slemmer out of the Job Corps Center into the woods before the attack, which was primarily carried out by Pike on January 12, 1995.

Pike later bragged about killing Slemer, telling another student at the center that he slashed the teen’s throat six times with a box cutter, slashed his back with a butcher knife, carved a pentagram on his chest and continued the assault despite Slemer’s “begging” to stop, according to court records.

Pike said he “threw a large piece of asphalt at the victim’s head,” causing what appeared to be the fatal injury, and kept the skull fragments, which he later showed off to other students, according to court records.

Pike was found guilty of first-degree murder and sentenced to death. Pike’s boyfriend, Tadaril Shipp, was convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to life in prison, but was recently denied parole. Pike’s friend Shadra Peterson, who prosecutors say was watching during the attack, testified against Pike and was sentenced to probation.

Who is Christa Gail Pike?

Christa Gail Pike, 50, is the only woman on Tennessee’s death row and has lived there for 30 years since her sentencing in April 1996. Pike and her mother, Carissa Hansen, sobbed uncontrollably in the courtroom during the sentencing, according to archived news reports.

According to archival reporting in the Knoxville News Sentinel, part of the USA TODAY Network, Ms. Pike’s trial attorneys tried to reduce her charges by portraying her as an abandoned child from a dysfunctional family who bounced back and forth between the homes of her divorced parents, depending on who was fed up with her at the time.

Hansen told jurors that she was a bad mother who smoked marijuana with her daughter and even allowed 14-year-old Pike to have a live-in boyfriend. “I should be in her seat. She should be punished for her crimes,” Hansen said.

A University of Tennessee police officer disputed sympathetic testimony, telling jurors that after Slemmer’s body was discovered, Pike returned to the crime scene and “seemed amused.”

“She was giggling,” he testified, according to the newspaper.

Pike’s current lawyers argue that if she were tried today, she should never have been sentenced to death because of her young age at the time of the murder, her mental illness, and her disturbing history of childhood sexual abuse, which began before she could speak. They believe she deserves a life sentence without the possibility of parole.

Pike’s website, created by his supporters, says he does not want to use his childhood trauma as an excuse for killing Slemer.

“There is no excuse for what I did…I take full responsibility for my actions and regret everything that happened that night,” she says. “All I want is for you to look at your current situation with the eyes of logic, not anger, and answer the question: Do I deserve to die for the crimes these three people committed?”

Christa Gail Pike sues Tennessee authorities over execution

In a lawsuit filed against the state in January, Pike’s lawyers argued that Tennessee’s lethal injection method caused her unnecessary suffering, was likely to cause her further fear and suffering, and violated the U.S. Constitution’s protections against cruel and unusual punishment.

Citing a report from an anesthetist, they claim that one of Pike’s conditions, thrombocytosis, causes abnormal bleeding that could cause him to “drown in his own blood and die.” Additionally, Pike cannot request to be executed by electrocution, the only other method allowed by the state. Her lawyers argue that doing so would violate her Buddhist beliefs, which prevent her from “participating in the dying process.”

They also say the state could botch the lethal injection of Mr. Pike, citing concerns about the state’s new execution procedures.

Tennessee began using the new protocol in 2025, three years after the state halted all executions due to a “technical oversight” in injecting death row inmate Oscar Franklin Smith. The new lethal injection protocol uses a single drug, pentobarbital, compared to three drugs in the previous method.

Pike’s lawyers cite a number of “failed” executions that used only pentobarbital, including the 1988 execution of Tennessee’s Byron Black, who killed his ex-girlfriend and her two daughters.

Reporters who witnessed the execution, including a Tennessean, reported that the black man appeared to be in pain and suffering during the lethal injection, which is required under the U.S. Constitution to avoid cruel and unusual punishment.

“It hurts so much,” Black told a psychiatrist at one point during the execution, The Tennessean reported.

Pike’s lawyers charged that the state’s new lethal injection protocol suffers from “the same problems that have characterized failed executions for decades: secrecy, deliberate omissions, inattention to detail, and untrained and unauthorized prison staff attempting to perform medical functions.”

What the state is saying about Pike’s lawsuit

Regarding Pike’s claims of cruel and unusual punishment, established case law states that “the Eighth Amendment does not guarantee a prisoner a painless death,” and that “any method of execution, no matter how humane, involves some degree of risk of pain,” according to the state’s response to Pike’s lawsuit, filed on Thursday, March 19.

The state also defended its lethal injection protocol, citing its “overwhelming history favoring the use of lethal injection in general and pentobarbital in particular.”

In addition, Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Scumetti said that after Pike “lured Colleen Slemmer into the woods to torture and kill her, he carried part of her shattered skull in his pocket and showed it to his friends as a trophy.”

“Ms. Pike has only speculated that the established constitutional lethal injection method poses unique risks in her case,” he said in a statement to USA TODAY. “I wish Pike’s commitment to the sanctity of life had been there in time to save Colleen Slemmer.”

Slemer’s mother, Mae Martinez, is a vocal supporter of the death penalty for Pike. She has been fighting for decades to get the last part of her daughter’s skull so it can be buried with the rest of the teenager’s remains. Investigators are keeping it as evidence in the case.

“My heart breaks every day because I remember it over and over again. I can’t do this anymore. I hope it happens before I die,” Martinez told WBIR-TV in 2021.

“There’s not a day that goes by that I don’t think about Colleen and how she died and how difficult the circumstances were,” Martinez continued. “I just want Krista to calm down, get it over with, and put my daughter at ease so she can finally rest.”

How many women have been executed in America?

According to the Death Penalty Information Center, only 18 women have been executed in the United States since 1976, compared to 1,623 men. That means women account for only 1% of all executions in the United States today.

Pike is not only Tennessee’s only female death row inmate, but also one of only 48 female death row inmates in the nation. By comparison, the male population is just under 2,100, or about 2%.

The last woman executed in the United States was Amber McLaughlin in 2023. McLaughlin, the first transgender person to be executed in the United States, was found guilty of raping and stabbing 45-year-old Beverly Guenther to death on November 20, 2003. Guenther was McLaughlin’s ex-girlfriend.

How many women were executed in Tennessee?

Pike’s lawyers cite information from the Death Penalty Information Center and say only three women have ever been executed in Tennessee.

They list the hangings of three black women in 1807, 1808, and 1819, but their crimes are not specified. The only known woman’s name is Molly Holcomb in 1807. Two of them are listed as slaves by deathpenaltyusa.org, which labels the crime as murder, but many slaves commit suicide due to wrongful charges or for no reason at all.

Pike was the last person to be sentenced to death in Tennessee for a crime she committed when she was 18 years old, and the last woman to be sentenced to death in the state, The Tennessean reported.

Contributors: Evan Mealins and Kelly Puente, The Tennessean

Amanda Lee Myers is a senior crime reporter covering breaking news, cold cases and capital punishment for USA TODAY. Follow her on X at @amandaleeusat.

What are the requirements for tax exemption? Eligibility and options

0

Although “IRS tax relief” is a commonly used term, it does not refer to a single tax relief program. Depending on your financial situation, the IRS may provide relief through an offer in compromise (OIC), penalty reduction, or currently uncollectible status. Each option has its own rules, and eligibility typically depends on your income, assets, expenses, and overall ability to pay.

If you’re dealing with tax debt, understanding these requirements is the first step. This guide details how IRS tax exemptions work, who is eligible, and what the IRS considers when reviewing exemption applications.

What does “IRS tax exemption” mean?

IRS tax relief is not an official IRS program. Instead, it is a broad term used to describe several types of tax relief provided by the IRS to help taxpayers manage or reduce the amount they owe. Official tax relief programs available through the agency include:

  • Compromise (OIC): Allows eligible taxpayers to settle their tax debt for less than the full amount owed if they meet strict financial requirements.
  • Reduced penalties: Certain IRS penalties may be reduced or eliminated for eligible taxpayers, including taxpayers who have a valid reason for being delinquent.
  • Currently Not Collectable (CNC) Status: Suspends IRS collection efforts for taxpayers facing financial hardship
  • installment agreement: Monthly payment plans spread out your tax liability over time and make it easier to manage, but it doesn’t reduce your total balance.

The key difference is that not all options reduce your tax liability. Some things, such as OIC and certain penalty reductions, can reduce the amount owed, but CNC status and installment agreements only change how and when payments are made and do not, by themselves, reduce the balance.

Compromise requirements

According to Jason W. Stanfield, Ph.D., CPA, a member of the American Accounting Association, “An OIC is an offer to settle taxes that are less than the full amount owed. Such offers are generally accepted only when the IRS determines that it is unlikely that the full amount owed will be collected, that paying the full amount owed would create financial hardship for the taxpayer, or that the IRS determines that collection is unlikely.”

To qualify, you typically must meet the following requirements:

  • Keep all required tax returns up to date
  • Keep your estimated tax liability up to date (if applicable)
  • Not in public bankruptcy proceedings
  • Employers must keep payroll tax deposits current

To apply, you need:

  • File IRS Form 656
  • Include Form 433-A (Individual) or Form 433-B (Business)
  • Pay the $205 application fee (exempted for eligible low-income applicants)
  • Include the first payment (usually 20% of the offer or the first installment)

You must also meet the IRS’s financial evaluation standard known as Reasonable Collectability (RCP).

Reasonable recoverability (RCP)

The IRS calculates the reasonable collectability (RCP) using your income, assets, and allowable expenses to estimate the amount you can reasonably collect. An offer in compromise usually needs to be at least this amount or it may be rejected.

IRS penalty reduction requirements

IRS penalty relief is a form of tax relief that can reduce the total amount owed by removing certain penalties. However, the basic tax balance will not be eliminated. When a penalty is removed, the interest associated with that penalty is typically removed as well.

If you have made a good faith effort to comply with tax laws but were unable to do so due to circumstances beyond your control, you may be eligible for reduced penalties. The most common types of relief include initial reduction, reasonable cause, and statutory exceptions.

To request penalty relief, follow the instructions in the IRS notice. Some requests can be fulfilled over the phone, but if not, you can formally request relief by filing Form 843.

First time penalty reduction

First Abatement (FTA) typically applies to penalties for failure to declare, fail to pay, or fail to make a deposit.

To qualify, you must:

  • Have a good tax compliance history
  • You have not been penalized (or your penalty has not been removed for any reason other than initial abatement) in the past three years.

valid reason

If you are not eligible for initial relief, you may request a reduction of the penalty on reasonable grounds.

The IRS evaluates these requests on a case-by-case basis. You must prove that your failure to comply was due to circumstances beyond your control, such as:

  • serious illness
  • natural disaster
  • death in the family

Generally, penalty reductions are not available in the following cases:

  • Rely on a tax expert
  • lack of knowledge of tax law
  • mistakes or oversights
  • Funds alone are not enough

Statutory exemption

Reduction of penalties through statutory exemptions is also available under certain circumstances, such as:

  • Taxpayer relied on incorrect written advice from the IRS
  • Tax return was mailed by the due date
  • The taxpayer lived in a federal disaster area during the period the penalty applied
  • The individual was engaged in military operations in a combat zone

Requirements that cannot currently be collected

Currently Not Collectible (CNC) status is a form of hardship relief that temporarily halts IRS collection efforts. It won’t reduce your tax liability, but it will provide short-term financial relief.

To qualify, you must prove that you cannot cover your essential living expenses by paying taxes. The IRS evaluates your income against the allowable expense standard to determine whether you meet this standard.

To apply, you must submit detailed financial information using one of the following:

  • Form 433-A (individual)
  • Form 433-B (Corporations)
  • Form 433-F (simple case)

Installment contract requirements

Installment agreements are not eligible for tax relief as the amount payable is not reduced. However, you can make your tax debt more manageable because you can pay it over time.

The IRS offers several types of payment plans.

  • Short-term payment plan: Please allow up to 180 days to pay your balance in full. There are no setup fees, and you’ll need to pay less than $100,000 in taxes, penalties, and interest.
  • Long-term installment contract: Monthly payments are typically available over extended periods of up to 72 months. Setup fees apply and typically require a payment of less than $50,000 to qualify for streamlined processing.
  • Streamlined installment agreement: A type of long-term plan with simplified approval requirements. Detailed financial statements are not required and balances from $10,000 to $50,000 are available.

To apply, you can use Form 9465 or apply online through the IRS.

If you owe more than $50,000 or don’t qualify for a streamlined plan, you typically need to provide detailed financial information to the IRS as part of your application.

How to know if you qualify for tax exemption

Tax relief typically comes into play after you receive an IRS notice regarding unpaid taxes. This is different from a tax credit, which is claimed when filing a return, or a tax refund, which is issued as a payment or advance credit.

When reviewing a tax relief application, the IRS evaluates your financial situation, including your income, allowable expenses, assets, and filing compliance. There is no single universally accepted standard. Each case will be reviewed individually.

Although eligibility is not guaranteed, you may be eligible for tax relief if:

  • Files the necessary tax returns
  • Have experienced significant financial hardship, such as job loss, natural disaster, or medical emergency
  • If you pay taxes, you won’t be able to cover your basic living expenses.
  • Not currently bankrupt
  • Keeping the required estimated tax payments up to date

Who generally qualifies for IRS tax relief?

The type and amount of remedies available will vary from case to case and are not guaranteed. However, taxpayers in the following situations are more likely to qualify if they meet IRS requirements:

  • Individuals who are experiencing financial hardship and have a fixed income, such as retirees.
  • People facing or recovering from significant financial hardship
  • people in long-term unemployment
  • Business owners who have gone out of business or experienced large-scale bankruptcy

Who generally does not qualify for IRS tax relief?

Some taxpayers are not eligible for relief, especially those who:

  • Have a large amount of disposable income or accessible assets
  • Failure to meet basic compliance requirements, such as filing returns and paying estimated taxes
  • currently in bankruptcy

In these cases, we recommend that you consult a qualified tax professional.

How to apply for IRS tax exemption

To claim IRS tax relief, you must first receive a tax bill from the IRS. From there, you can choose to work directly with the IRS or hire an agent such as a CPA, tax accountant, or tax relief company.

Work with a tax relief company

Some taxpayers choose to hire a tax relief company to help manage their case and communicate with the IRS. Companies such as Optima Tax Relief, Anthem Tax Services, Alleviate Tax, BC Tax, and Priority Tax Relief offer tax resolution services and may assist you in certain situations.

Legitimate companies exist, but it is important to understand their role and limitations.

Tax relief companies can:

  • provide education and guidance;
  • Prepare and submit documents
  • We will communicate and negotiate with the IRS on your behalf.

However, you cannot:

  • provide false or misleading information;
  • guarantee a particular result or approval

The IRS makes all final decisions regarding tax relief applications.

Apply directly to the IRS

If you apply for infringing offer relief, you must submit the following:

  • Form 656
  • Form 433-A (Individual) or Form 433-B (Corporate)
  • Financial document support

Stanfield said the process could take more than a year. The IRS also offers assistance through its Taxpayer Advocate Service, which can help guide you through the process.

conclusion

The IRS does not offer a single tax relief program. Instead, it offers several forms of tax relief, each with its own requirements and consequences. Eligibility for IRS relief programs is determined on a case-by-case basis and depends on factors such as income, assets, expenses, and overall ability to pay.

Although you can work directly with the IRS, in more complex situations, such as large tax obligations, persistent defaults, or aggressive collection efforts, you may benefit from the guidance of a qualified tax professional to understand your options and avoid errors during the process.

Use the map below to compare your options before seeking help.

Frequently asked questions about IRS tax exemption requirements

How difficult is it to qualify for an offer in compromise?

Qualifying for an offer in compromise is difficult because the IRS will only approve your application if it determines that you cannot reasonably collect the full amount owed. Approval rates are estimated to range from 24% to 40%. However, taxpayers have 30 days to appeal a rejected OIC application.

Can the IRS forgive unpaid taxes?

The IRS may allow some taxpayers to settle for less than they owe through an OIC or reduce certain penalties through abatement. However, it does not offer total forgiveness. Most relief is based on financial hardship or insolvency, and approval is determined on a case-by-case basis.

What income qualifies for IRS hardship status?

There is no fixed income standard for poverty. Instead, the IRS compares your income to the allowable cost of living based on national and local standards. If your income does not cover these required expenses, you may currently be in non-collectible status, which will temporarily halt collection efforts.

Can I apply for an IRS exemption myself?

Yes, you can apply directly to the IRS by submitting the required forms and financial documents. Many taxpayers handle simpler cases themselves. However, in more complex situations, such as large amounts of debt or multiple years of unfiled returns, some people may choose to work with a tax professional or tax relief company.

Publix will open five new stores by the end of April. Find out which state you are in.

0

play

Publix plans to open five new stores in three states by the end of April, bringing its iconic green logo to customers across the Southeast.

According to the company’s New Store Openings page, five new stores are scheduled to open by the end of April, including three in Florida, one in Tennessee and one in North Carolina.

As of March 2026, the chain operates more than 1,400 stores in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Virginia.

Publix was founded in 1930 by George W. Jenkins in Winter Haven, Florida, and currently has more than 260,000 employees, according to its website. The store was also ranked No. 9 in the nation on USA TODAY’s 2025 Best Grocery Stores list.

Here’s what you need to know about the grocery store chain’s upcoming openings.

Where is Publix opening stores?

The following five stores are scheduled to open from March 26th to April 30th.

  • 13123 Kingston Pike, Farragut, TN – March 26
  • 1975 Silverleaf Parkway, Ste 101, St. Augustine, FL – March 26
  • 160 Mariner Blvd., Spring Hill, FL – April 2nd
  • 4628 Guess Road, Durham, NC – April 11th
  • 4267 Dundee Road, Winter Haven, FL – April 30th

Fernando Cervantes Jr. is a trending news reporter for USA TODAY. Contact us at fernando.cervantes@usatodayco.com and follow us at X @fern_cerv_.

Katie Couric, Savannah Guthrie face heartbreak on ‘Today’ show

0

Katie Couric is no stranger to being in the spotlight during difficult times. But even she can’t imagine what current Today host Savannah Guthrie is going through as authorities continue to search for her missing mother, Nancy Guthrie. Guthrie was last seen on January 31st.

“This is a very unique and unique situation for Savannah,” Couric told USA TODAY. “My heart broke into a million pieces for her.”

In 1998, Couric lost her husband, Jay Monahan, to colon cancer. At the time, she was anchoring the “Today” show and had to take care of her two young daughters. Ms. Couric continues to be a leading advocate for early colorectal cancer screening because Ms. Monaghan’s death has had such a profound impact on her and her family.

Couric posted on Instagram on February 3, “I can’t stop thinking and worrying about Nancy Guthrie, Savannah, her siblings, and their children. There is so much sadness and fear in the world and so much cruelty.” “I send my love and support to them and all of you, and I pray for the safety and well-being of this wonderful mother and grandmother. And, frankly, for an entire country that seems lost right now.”

Couric told USA TODAY that she felt her situation was very similar to that experienced by “Today” host Sheinelle Jones when she lost her husband to glioblastoma in May 2025.

“She was trying to take care of her husband and deal with his devastating diagnosis and his illness while also continuing to work on the Today show and taking care of her children,” Couric said. “She and I have talked a lot about it. I’ve been trying to be helpful.”

But what Guthrie is currently experiencing is “very unusual and very heartbreaking,” Couric said.

“I can’t imagine the pain she and her family went through,” Couric said.

Law enforcement is asking anyone with information about Nancy Guthrie’s case to contact them at 1-800-CALL-FBI or the Pima County Sheriff’s Office tips.fbi.gov. (520-351-4900) or 88-CRIME.

Madeline Mitchell’s role covering women and the care economy for USA TODAY is supported by a partnership with Pivotal and Journalism Funding Partners. Funders do not provide editorial input.

Contact Madeline at: memitchell@usatoday.com and @maddiemitch_ At X.

President Trump calls actor ‘great supporter’ and ‘tough cookie’

0

play

This person was one of the supporters President Donald Trump didn’t want to fight with.

The president responded on Friday, March 20, to the death of martial artist and action movie icon Chuck Norris. Norris’ family announced the “Walker, Texas Ranger” star’s death on March 20, but did not specify the cause of death.

The president seemed shocked to hear of Norris’ death, initially saying, “Oh, really.”

Asked about Norris’ death as he was leaving the White House, President Trump said: “He was a great guy. A really good, tough guy.” “You didn’t want to fight him.”

President Trump also paid tribute to Norris’ family, calling him a “great supporter.”

Mr. Norris is a longtime Republican and has been involved in presidential politics throughout his career.

He supported Trump during the 2016 election. In 2016, Norris wrote in an op-ed for the right-wing website WND.com that if “reluctant Republicans and other freedom-loving citizens don’t rally now to support Republican candidate Donald Trump,” then-Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton would win.

During the 2008 election, Norris urged voters to support then-Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee. Additionally, in 1992, he attended an event with President George H.W. Bush at a Houston school aimed at “eliminating drugs from schools,” and awarded him an “Honorary Black Belt.”

Sarah Huckabee Sanders says she was asked to quit her job at an Arkansas restaurant.

0

play

A restaurant in Little Rock, Arkansas has become embroiled in controversy after the state’s Republican governor, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, said she had been asked to leave.

“Last week, I was having lunch at a restaurant with two other mothers when the owner approached a member of the State Police Executive Protection Unit and told me that my presence made the employees feel threatened and I asked them to leave,” Sanders said in a statement to USA TODAY.

The restaurant in question, The Croissant Terry, responded to Sanders’ comments in a statement to local news station THV 11, saying that employees and other customers “question” the governor and his team’s continued presence at the restaurant.

“Leaving her in place risks being seen as lacking support for the community, which makes up a large part of our team, and their families and friends,” it said in a statement. “Ultimately, we made the decision to support the employees and guests who expressed their displeasure.”

The restaurant said in a statement that it “does not recall any comments made to indicate that anyone felt threatened,” adding that on two occasions, employees quietly asked the governor’s security personnel to leave and once offered drinks to the traveling team.

“We regret that we have been put in this position and had to make this difficult decision,” the store said in a statement. “However, we stand by our choice to support our employees and guests.”

USA TODAY contacted The Croissanterie on Friday, March 20, but did not receive a response.

Sanders’ 2019 incident at a Virginia-based restaurant

The incident at The Croissantry was not the only time Mr. Sanders was asked to leave a restaurant.

Back in 2019, when Sanders was White House press secretary during President Donald Trump’s first term, USA TODAY previously reported that the owner of a small restaurant in Virginia kicked him out of the business.

Red Hen co-owner Stephanie Wilkinson said in a Washington Post op-ed that she was harassed by Sanders after she asked him to leave the store.

“We balked when faced with the prospect of providing a fine meal to someone whose actions we felt in service to our country violated basic standards of humanity. We couldn’t do it,” Wilkinson said.

Fernando Cervantes Jr. is a trending news reporter for USA TODAY. Contact us at fernando.cervantes@usatodayco.com and follow us at X @fern_cerv_.

Best flooring installations in 2026, expert reviews

0

The right flooring will make your space warmer, brighter, and more inviting. But even the highest quality materials are useless if they aren’t installed by the right people. That’s where a truly great flooring installer comes into play.

Whether you’re renovating one room or your entire home, knowing who you can trust is half the battle.

The USA TODAY team surveyed 14 of the top flooring installation companies across the country to find out. The flooring contractors on our list are:

Why trust USA TODAY?

The USA TODAY team uses an in-house ranking system to review the best flooring contractors in the United States. We analyze the services and products offered by each provider and read third-party reviews to understand the customer experience. Financing, costs, warranties, and project management are also factored into a company’s final score.

Best Flooring Contractor of 2026

Carpet One Floor & Home: Best Overall

Shop Carpet One Floor & Home

Affordable costs, a seamless installation process, and an extensive catalog of flooring options are just a few of the reasons why Carpet One Floor & Home ranks at the top of our list of best flooring contractors. The company offers everything from virtual visualization tools to professional designs to help you find the perfect flooring for your home.

One of the standout features of Carpet One Floor & Home is our beautiful warranty. Most flooring companies offer workmanship warranties that cover labor costs, but Carpet One goes a step further and covers the cost of replacing your flooring if you’re not satisfied with the installation.

Lowe’s: Great for replacing flooring.

When it comes to flooring, Lowe’s has it all. You can visit a Lowe’s store to browse the selection or browse through hundreds of flooring options online. Lowe’s carries all the major brands like Pergo, COREtec, and Mohawk, but also offers its own brand, STAINMASTER. When you replace your flooring at Lowe’s, you don’t need to do anything. We do everything from moving furniture to cleaning up.

Lowe’s does not install its own flooring; it outsources the work to local flooring contractors. Your project will continue to be managed by Lowe’s every step of the way.

National Floors Direct: Ideal for in-house installations

Shop National Floors Direct Flooring

Need new flooring right away? National Floors Direct is committed to next-day installation on in-stock flooring. This means our in-house design consultant can help you choose your new flooring one day, and our in-house installation team can install it the next.

We also like National Floors Direct’s price match guarantee. If you get a lower quote than a competitor, National Floors Direct will beat it. National Floors Direct offers free furniture relocation with every installation, but that cost can typically add $100 to your flooring estimate.

Floor Coverings International: Ideal for specialty flooring

Flooring Manufacturing International Flooring

Few providers offer the vast number of brands present in Floor Coverings International’s flooring catalog. This list includes dozens of brands, including popular brands like COREtec and Pergo. Additionally, this provider has access to specialty flooring materials such as bamboo, cork, recycled materials, and specialty hardwoods.

Post-installation service is just as important as pre-installation, and Floor Coverings International is your best choice. We always follow up after your floor is installed to make sure you’re happy, and we include a 1-year workmanship guarantee to back up our work.

50th floor: perfect for a comprehensive quote

Shop 50th floor flooring

No one likes surprises in a floor renovation project, especially one that adds hundreds or even thousands of dollars to the total bill. 50Floor provides comprehensive quotes that take everything from subfloor preparation to furniture removal into consideration, so you know what you’re getting in return before you commit.

At 50Floor, we carry all major types of flooring, from laminate and tile to hardwood and carpet, so you can find the right flooring for every room.

The Home Depot: Perfect for a variety of flooring materials

Buy flooring from Home Depot

If your home goal is to master the “Rule of 3,” The Home Depot is your flooring installer. This provider carries every type of flooring imaginable, so you can find the perfect luxury vinyl plank for your living room, fine tile for your bathroom, or luxurious carpet for your bedroom.

Although local contractors will complete the installation, your flooring project will be managed from start to finish by The Home Depot personnel. Home Depot charges a $35 fee to measure new flooring in your home, but that fee is applied to the overall flooring estimate.

Floors and decorations: perfect for professional designs

Store floors and decorative flooring

If you want a professional design, Floor & Decor is your flooring contractor. At Floor & Decor, we offer free professional home design, and our consultants can help you choose the perfect flooring for your home.

Floor & Decor offers flooring options to fit every budget, starting at $1.19 per square foot for quality flooring. With this provider, you can choose to use your own flooring contractor or choose a hand-picked professional from Floor & Decor’s network of contractors.

Empire Today: Lots of coupons and deals

Budget is especially important when it comes to flooring. If you’re not careful, replacing your flooring can cost you thousands of dollars. Empire Today offers discounts and special offers to all customers, often saving you hundreds of dollars on your flooring project.

At Empire Today, we make your on-floor shopping experience as easy as possible. A professional design consultant will visit your home and help you choose the right flooring material. Flooring installation can be scheduled as early as the next day.

How to compare estimates for flooring installation

“When comparing prices for flooring installations, don’t buy based on price alone,” says Carl Murawski, a construction coordinator, electrician, and tradesman with more than 20 years of experience. “Even if the price is lower, the value of the product and installation can be significantly reduced.”

Murawski warns that while a “low-budget” offer can be a strategy for winning business, it can leave out important parts of the job.

“A good estimate should include a breakdown of labor and materials, as well as all flooring requirements, such as subfloor preparation (leveling and lubrication) and removal of old flooring,” he says.

Flooring installation price and schedule structure

The cost and schedule of a flooring project is based on many variables, not just square footage and materials used.

“Installing basic laminate flooring in a relatively square room in good condition is a quick and economical solution,” Murawski says. “However, if subfloor work is required, there are corners that are difficult to negotiate, or extensive precautions need to be taken to address excess moisture, both costs and project duration will inevitably increase.”

The main variables that affect the price and schedule of a flooring installation project are:

  • Type and brand of flooring used
  • Subfloor condition
  • Level of design complexity

Factors influencing flooring installation estimates

Although materials and labor make up the bulk of a flooring estimate, other factors can quickly add up.

“You may be surprised to find out that you need to control humidity and level the floor,” Murawski says.

He says the most common factors that influence flooring installation estimates are:

  • Substrate condition of the flooring
  • Type of flooring installed (hardwood, laminate, tile, etc.)
  • Room configuration
  • Preparatory work that needs to be done on the floor and its surroundings before laying a new floor

Common flooring installation times and causes of delays

Flooring installation time varies depending on the type of flooring chosen, but in most cases it can be completed in a short amount of time.

“Most simple installations can be completed in a few days,” explains Murawski. “The typical installation time for flooring is 1 to 3 days.”

But like any project, delays are bound to occur. For flooring projects, the causes are typically “uneven subfloors, delays in material delivery, and structural damage to the floor and its foundation discovered during removal of old flooring,” Murawski says.

To avoid problems, good installers will “pad” the estimated time or add additional time to account for unexpected delays.

How to prepare your home for flooring installation

To prepare for flooring installation, you need to:

  • move all furniture out of the room
  • Please make sure your pet is safe before installation
  • Disconnect electronic devices and appliances
  • Please remove mirrors, artwork, ceramic/glass fixtures, and other fragile items.

FAQ

What is the best flooring material to install?

It depends on your room and budget. Luxury Vinyl Plank (LVP) and Luxury Vinyl Tile (LVT) are affordable, durable, and easy to clean, making them ideal for high-traffic areas. However, tiles are generally preferred for bathrooms and entryways. Carpets are best for bedrooms.

What are the rules of 3 for flooring?

Rule of 3 refers to floor design. For optimal flow and continuity, limit your flooring to three or fewer types.

What are the latest trends in flooring?

Flooring trends for 2026 include warm tones and textured looks. LVP and LVT are affordable flooring options that are popular due to their luxurious appearance and durability.

Federal judge rules against restrictive Pentagon media policy

0


This policy sought to prohibit news organizations from reporting information that was not officially authorized to be published by the media organization’s head.

play

  • In 2025, the Pentagon introduced a policy that says reporters who “solicit” information not approved for public release could lose access to buildings.
  • First Amendment experts have expressed concerns about the policy but said it is unclear whether it is unconstitutional. They said the matter would likely be resolved in court.
  • The New York Times filed a lawsuit in December claiming the new policy violates the First Amendment and other laws. The judge agreed.

A federal judge on March 20 blocked a Pentagon news policy that would have prohibited news organizations from reporting information not officially authorized to be published by agency heads.

A policy launched by Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth in October 2025 was intended to limit reporters’ coverage of the Pentagon to official statements. According to the policy, journalists seeking information outside of official government channels will be considered a security risk and will have their press privileges revoked. The White House argued that the policy was in the interest of national security.

In his ruling, U.S. District Judge Paul Friedman acknowledged the importance of protecting the U.S. military and war plans, but said in light of President Donald Trump’s recent “invasion” of Venezuela and war with Iran, “it is more important than ever that the public has access to information from a variety of perspectives about government actions.”

Friedman’s ruling Friday came in response to a lawsuit filed by The New York Times. The complaint alleges that Hegseth’s policies violate constitutional free speech and due process protections.

USA TODAY has reached out to the Department of Defense for comment.

A New York Times spokesperson praised Friedman’s decision in a statement.

“The New York Times welcomes today’s ruling, which enforces this country’s constitutionally protected right to a free press,” said Charlie Stadtlander, the newspaper’s executive director of news. “Americans have a right to know how their government is run and what actions our military is taking in their name and with their tax dollars. Today’s ruling reaffirms the right of the Times and other independent media to continue asking questions on behalf of the American people.”

According to CNN, the ruling in federal court in Washington, D.C., came after a March 6 hearing in which Friedman “viewed the policy with skepticism,” especially in light of the U.S. war on Iran.

During the hearing, Friedman acknowledged the need for the Pentagon to “hold certain information closely and securely,” adding, “Openness and transparency allow the public to know what their government is doing.”

“This is what the First Amendment is about,” Friedman said at the hearing, CNN reported.

New guidelines have resulted in most media outlets being banned by the Pentagon.

First Amendment supporters expressed concern when the policy was introduced in 2025.

The Pentagon first issued guidance in September that said reporters could lose access to reporting if they obtain or attempt to publish information they are not authorized to publish. A new version released in October said reporters who “request” information not approved for public release could be disqualified.

The policy states that the receipt and release of unsolicited information, including confidential information, “is generally protected by the First Amendment and generally does not, by itself, result in denial, revocation, or non-renewal of credentials.” But asking for such information from department officials could result in journalists being labeled a “security or safety risk.”

The Pentagon and the majority of media outlets with access refused to sign on to the new policy. That included conservative news websites and networks, as well as nontraditional news organizations that formed a group that attended the first Pentagon news conference under the new guidelines on Dec. 2.

Experts say it’s not clear whether the ostensible policy violates the First Amendment, but they expect the issue to end up in court.

That happened in December, when the New York Times sued the Pentagon for allegedly violating the First and Fifth Amendments and the Administrative Procedure Act.

“This is precisely the type of speech and press restriction system that the Supreme Court and the D.C. Circuit have found to violate the First Amendment,” the complaint states.

Various other news organizations, including the Washington Post, NPR, PBS, and the Associated Press, are suing President Donald Trump’s administration on First Amendment grounds.

Contributed by Reuters.

Breanna Frank is USA TODAY’s First Amendment reporter. please contact her bjfrank@usatoday.com.

USA TODAY’s coverage of First Amendment issues is funded by the Freedom Forum in collaboration with our journalism funding partners. Funders do not provide editorial input.

March Madness food sales offer giveaways and discounts

0

play

March Madness is underway, and to celebrate the fanfare-filled tournament, several food and beverage chains are offering special menus and deals for fans.

The NCAA Division I men’s and women’s basketball tournaments run through April 6, and chains like Wendy’s, Dairy Queen, and Pizza Hut, and even meal delivery platforms like Grubhub, are offering limited-time sales, specials, and March Madness-inspired products.

Are you hungry? Here are some of the food-centric meals and deals available during March Madness.

apple bees

Applebee’s is offering boneless wings for 50 cents each when you order online through Sunday, March 22nd.

checkers and rallies

Checkers and Rally’s are offering $5 meal combos for March Madness. The Spicy Chicken Flatbread Combo and Bacon Burger Flatbread Combo are both $5 and include a sandwich, side, drink and apple pie, according to a news release. The meal sale is available until May 2nd.

Dairy Queen

Dairy Queen has partnered with New Orleans Pelicans center Derrick Queen to launch the DQ Bracket Buster Deal. Available at participating locations until April 12, customers who order a Dairy Queen Chicken Strip Party Platter through the DQ mobile app will receive a free box of Buster Bars, according to a Dairy Queen news release.

dave & busters

On March 20, March 21 and April 7, Dave & Buster’s will offer 20 wings for $20 and all draft beers for $5, according to the Dave & Buster’s website.

domino pizza

Domino’s Pizza will be offering pizzas with any topping for $10 each until the March Madness finale on April 6, according to the pizza chain’s website.

fire department submarine

Through Sunday, March 29th, Firehouse Subs is offering a Full Court Feast meal deal for Firehouse Loyalty members. According to the Firehouse Subs website, the meal includes two medium-sized subs, two bags of potato chips, and two small drinks for $16. The Full Court lineup includes customer favorites Hook & Ladder, Italian, Smoked Turkey and Provolone, and Meatballs.

grab hub

Distribution platform Grubhub is offering several deals from various chains throughout March Madness. This is shown below.

  • Little Caesars: Free ExtraMostBest Pizza on orders over $50 (available through April 30th)
  • Wendy’s: Free Junior Bacon Cheeseburger Biggie Bag with orders over $20 (available through March 23rd), Free Dave’s Single with orders over $20 (available through March 4th-6th)
  • Taco Bell: Free Chalupa Supreme on orders over $30 (available through March 21), Free Chicken or Cheese Quesadilla on orders over $22 (available March 27-29), Free 5-Layer Beef Burrito on orders over $22 (available March 4), Free Regular Nacho Fries with any taco purchase on orders over $20 (available April 6).
  • Kentucky Fried Chicken: $5 off orders of $15 or more (available March 26-31) and $5 off orders of $15 or more (available April 3-7)
  • Buffalo Wild Wings: $15 off orders over $50 (available March 24th – April 6th)

Additionally, Grubhub is waiving shipping and service fees for orders over $50, according to a Grubhub news release.

insomnia cookies

Insomnia Cookies will be hosting a March Madness sweepstakes on April 4th that will send groups of two to Indianapolis for the final weekend of the tournament. As set forth in the Sweepstakes Official Rules, the prize package includes:

  • A $750 travel allowance will be provided in the form of a check or electronic payment.
  • The two fan experience packages include a four-night stay at a downtown Indianapolis hotel, two tickets to the April 4 NCAA Men’s Final Four game, and two tickets to the April 6 NCAA Men’s Championship game.
  • Two Swag Kits from Insomnia Cookies. Includes branded accessories and apparel.
  • Two $100 Insomnia Cookie Gift Cards.

To participate, customers must sign up for Insomnia Rewards and fill out the entry form on the Insomnia Cookies Bracket website by March 20th. Entry forms require a valid email address. Two potential winners will be selected on or about March 30th.

krispy kreme

Krispy Kreme has created two new donuts for March Madness. The players are as follows.

  • basketball donut: Unglazed shell donuts filled with fluffy white cream are dipped in bright orange vanilla-flavored icing and finished with basketball lines of chocolate icing.
  • Basketball net donut: An original glazed donut is dipped in chocolate icing and finished off with vanilla-flavored icing sprinkled along the lines of a basketball net.

pizza hut

To commemorate the tournament, Pizza Hut is collaborating with Space Jam to release the Space Jam x Triple Treat Box. The meal includes two medium-sized one-topping pizzas, breadsticks and cinnamon sticks for $22 and is served in a signature “Space Jam” box. Treat boxes can be ordered through the Pizza Hut website or the Pizza Hut mobile app.

Pizza Hut Rewards members will also have exclusive free access to Space Jam-themed merchandise, including letterman jackets, warm-up jackets and jerseys, according to a Pizza Hut news release.

Through Pizza Hut’s mobile app, Rewards members can also play a Space Jam-inspired digital game and enter to win a year’s worth of pizzas. This time, 10 members will receive a Pizza Hut gift card.

wendy’s

Wendy’s is incorporating the “OG” Dunk combination, a classic Frosty and fries side, into its official Dunk Menu. The menu also includes 6 pieces of nuggets (crispy or spicy) and 3 pieces of tendi, available individually.

According to a Wendy’s news release, the fast food chain is holding a “Dunk Stakes” during March Madness, with one grand prize up for grabs, including $100,000 in cash, as well as other prizes such as custom Dunk-inspired sneakers and Wendy’s gift cards. Customers who make purchases through the Wendy’s mobile app can enter the sweepstakes through April 6, according to a Wendy’s news release.

And on April 7th, participating Wendy’s restaurants will offer free small fries and a small chocolate or vanilla frosty. This benefit is only available on restaurant orders.

Greta Cross is USA TODAY’s national trends reporter. Story ideas? Email her at gcross@usatoday.com.

Chadwick Boseman’s widow says she was diagnosed with cancer ‘suddenly’ but still feels sad

0

play

Simone Ledward Boseman, the widow of actor Chadwick Boseman, has opened up about her battle with colon cancer nearly six years after his death.

In an interview on the Today show that aired on March 20, Boseman told host Craig Melvin that both she and her husband were shocked by the sudden diagnosis. The “Black Panther” actor passed away in 2020 at the age of 43.

“I didn’t know he was going through something until he had already been to the doctor twice. Everything seemed to happen very suddenly. It was a matter of a few weeks when he started feeling unwell,” she said.

“He was so young and he wasn’t even at the point where he was even considering getting a colonoscopy, so it was really troubling in that respect,” Boseman said of the colon cancer.

“We don’t know his family history yet,” she told Melvin, adding that despite his stage 3 diagnosis, they were “very confident” that he would “get through it.”

“For us, it was a difficult moment but he was going to get through it and be fine. And they would do the surgery and then the chemotherapy and he would be okay,” she said. “And the possibility that he might not be OK on the other side was never talked about.”

Exploring the idea that he wasn’t okay “felt like a betrayal of faith,” she said. “When I look back on those days, there are so many things I wish I had found a way to talk about.”

Boseman’s death came as a shock to many fans who had no idea he was ill. His wife told Today that keeping the fight private was intentional.

“Chad was not someone who wanted special treatment because people knew he was sick,” she said. “Work was what drove him, and he didn’t want his illness to interfere with his work. He didn’t want to be treated with kid gloves because people thought he wouldn’t be able to work and would slip under a falling cabinet or run across a field.”

Boseman said that while the passage of time has eased some of the grief, it remains a “painful” process.

“I think the best way to describe it is that the edges become less sharp,” she says. “There are still limits and there are still many painful moments, but I think it will become easier to find love in those moments. You will get used to carrying the weight of sadness, but it won’t go away.”

After starring in TV shows like “Lincoln Heights” and “Parsons Unknown,” Boseman broke out playing Jackie Robinson in 2013’s “42,” and a year later joined R&B superstar James Brown’s colorful wardrobe in “Get on Up.”

But his path to superstardom began in 2016, when he made a cameo appearance as T’Challa, the young prince (later king) and heroic warrior of Wakanda in Marvel’s Captain America: Civil War. Two years later, he headlined the blockbuster film Black Panther, which sparked a global movement in which black men, women, boys and girls locked arms with their hero in the “Wakanda Forever” salute.

Contributions: Andrea Mandel, Brian Truitt, Brian Alexander, USA TODAY

What about food and housing prices?

0

Hello and happy Friday! I’m Betty Lynn Fisher for Friday’s consumer edition of “The Daily Money.”

What do local grocery stores say about your neighborhood?

Whole Foods stores tend to be located in more expensive and affluent areas, while discount stores like Dollar General are located in less affluent areas. But recent analysis suggests that store openings are about much more than that, reports Andrea Riquier.

Student loan transfer responsibilities

The U.S. Treasury Department will soon take over student loan operations and transfer loans from the Department of Education. Medora Lee explains what this means for people with student loan debt.

📰 Consumer stories you can’t miss 📰

🍔Today’s menu🍔

Costco’s hot dog and soda prices haven’t changed in 40 years. Will Costco’s $1.50 hot dogs go up in price?

Betty Lin-Fisher is a consumer reporter for USA TODAY. Contact her at blinfisher@USATODAY.com or follow her at @blinfisher on X, Facebook and Instagram and @blinfisher.bsky.social on Bluesky.. Sign up for our free The Daily Money newsletter, breaking down complex consumer and financial news. Subscribe here.

Marin is conciliatory on immigration policy, but deportation remains on the agenda

0


Marin said ICE agents need a judicial warrant to arrest suspects at their homes or workplaces. He also said he regrets calling Americans killed by police “crazy.”

play

WASHINGTON – Sen. Markwayne Mullin vows to take a number of conciliatory steps on immigration enforcement if confirmed by Homeland Security secretary, but insists the White House is not easing President Donald Trump’s crackdown.

Oklahoma Republican Kristi Noem’s nomination to replace her is an opportunity to reset immigration policy as the department is thrown into turmoil by a surge in enforcement and mass protests over the shooting deaths of two Americans.

Marin pledged to ensure that Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents obtain judicial warrants before entering homes or businesses to arrest suspects. He aims to make ICE more of a transportation service than a front-line suspect hunter. He promised to consult local authorities before opening new detention facilities. He said he regrets calling Alex Preti “crazy” before immigration authorities had completed their investigation into the shooting.

Marin’s arrival comes after the announcement of the retirement of Greg Bovino, the Border Patrol official who oversaw an increased crackdown that sparked protests in Los Angeles, Chicago and Minneapolis. The Trump administration’s border czar, Tom Homan, has taken control of a surge in enforcement in Minneapolis and slashed local staffing. Noem previously agreed to allow immigration agents to wear body cameras while on duty.

But President Trump has made immigration enforcement his top domestic priority, and despite a Wall Street Journal article that reported Trump was rethinking immigration policy, the White House said nothing would change.

“No one is changing the current administration’s immigration enforcement policies,” Press Secretary Abigail Jackson said. “Undocumented immigrants are subject to deportation, and President Trump’s top enforcement priority remains deporting criminal illegal aliens who pose a danger to American society.”

As the Senate prepares to vote on Marin’s confirmation, here’s what you need to know about his approach to immigration enforcement.

Marin says ICE agents need a judicial warrant to enter a home or business.

Mullin said ICE officers will not enter homes or businesses without a judicial warrant unless they pursue a suspect inside, a reversal of Noem’s policy.

Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Connecticut, complained of 28 incidents in which ICE agents “entered” homes without warrants to arrest suspects, “banging on doors and terrorizing children.”

Marin said he clearly communicated his policy decisions to staff.

“We do not enter homes or businesses without a judicial warrant, unless we are pursuing an individual who has taken refuge in a business or residence,” Mullin said.

Marin regrets comments about Pretti, but not Good

Marin said she regrets calling Preeti a “psycho who came to do maximum damage” on social media shortly after she was killed by immigration officials.

“That word probably should have been retracted. I shouldn’t have said that, and I didn’t do that (as secretary),” Mullin said. “The investigation is ongoing.”

Video footage of the shooting showed Preti monitoring immigration enforcement and attempting to help a woman who was pushed to the ground by immigration officers as she was shot repeatedly. Preeti didn’t reach for the gun.

But Mullin stood by his comments, saying Goode’s shooting was “absolutely” justified. “The officer had to make a mixed decision,” he said, adding that Mr Good’s car “was driving towards him.”

“At that point, the car becomes a weapon,” he says.

The Justice Department has refused to open an investigation into the actions of the agent who shot Goode, leading to a wave of resignations at the U.S. attorney’s office in Minneapolis. State investigators say federal authorities are blocking access to evidence and impeding an investigation that could result in the use of force.

Marin aims to restore public trust in DHS

Mullin repeatedly told senators during his March 18 confirmation hearing that he wanted to “restore” confidence in the Department of Homeland Security and said he was trying to avoid controversy.

“I hope in six months I won’t be on the news every day,” he said. “I hope the Department of Homeland Security can focus on its job and avoid any controversy over taking care of our country.”

He added, “I hope people trust our agency again, and I’m going to work every day to get that back.”

Marin reassures senators that immigrants seeking legal residency can stay

Sen. Andy Kim (D-N.J.) asked Mullin about reports of spouses of military personnel and veterans being arrested by immigration officials on their way to interviews for permanent residence documents, known as green cards.

Marin said if immigrants are in the process of legally residing in the United States, “we will continue to work with them.”

Kim also said people were worried about being arrested at hospitals, schools, churches and voting places. He said he instructed his father-in-law what to do if he was detained on his return.

“It’s causing great concern,” Kim said.

Marin said only citizens should be able to vote, but immigration officers would only come near polling stations to track down specific suspects.

“If we’re at the polls, it’s because there’s a specific threat,” Mullin said.

Mullins will lead DHS after Bovino leaves Border Patrol.

Bovino, 55, whose aggressive enforcement of immigration laws has become a lightning rod for protests across the United States, confirmed to Reuters on March 16 that he plans to retire at the end of this month.

Under his leadership, masked immigration officers clashed with residents while searching for immigrants without legal permission to enter the country. There were immigration standoffs in Los Angeles, Chicago and other cities, with mayors and governors fighting him in federal court.

“The greatest honor of my life has been working alongside Border Patrol agents on the U.S. border and in the interior of the United States, in some of the most difficult conditions Border Patrol has ever faced,” Bovino told the conservative news outlet Breitbart.

Homan tries to focus on the ‘worst of the worst’

Homan served as acting ICE director during President Trump’s first term and became border czar during his second term.

Homan came to Minnesota in response to the murders of Alex Preti, an intensive care nurse, and Renee Nicole Good, a poet and mother of three. The death sparked nationwide protests and began intense scrutiny of the tactics of officials carrying out the regime’s deportation plan.

Homan argues that the administration is prioritizing the deportation of “the worst of the worst,” those who have been convicted or charged with serious crimes.

But nearly three-quarters of immigration detainees in February had no convictions, according to the Transaction Records Access Clearinghouse, which tracks government records.

Homan argued that so-called sanctuary cities and states, where local officials resist cooperating with federal immigration authorities, force officers to pursue suspects in communities where other undocumented immigrants are also often arrested.

Marin aims to strengthen cooperation between ICE and local governments

Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.) said “trust has been lost” in ICE after fatal shootings, tear gassing protesters and raids without judicial warrants.

Mr Marin said he would increase cooperation with local authorities and aim to arrest suspects in prison rather than pursuing them through the community.

“We believe there is a better approach, working with local governments,” Marin said.

“I would like to see ICE become a transportation agency and not a front line,” Mullin added. “If we can easily restore relationships with law enforcement, we will go to them and pick up criminals from prison.”

Mr Marin said local authorities would be compensated for the suspect’s incarceration.

“Partnerships are important,” Marin said. “There are viable approaches, but we need partners.”

Supreme Court rules against loud-screaming street preacher

0


The new ruling could make it easier to challenge local laws governing things like hunting and sleeping in public places, as well as restrictions on public demonstrations.

play

WASHINGTON – A street preacher from a group who yelled “whore” and “Jezebel” at concertgoers outside a Mississippi amphitheater won a unanimous Supreme Court case on March 20, with the justices saying the law does not prevent him from challenging local rules about where he can shout his message.

In doing so, the court limited the scope of an earlier ruling that prohibited convicted criminals from filing civil actions to undermine their convictions.

The new ruling could make it easier for people convicted of violating the rules to challenge local laws governing things like hunting and sleeping in public places, as well as restrictions on public demonstrations, if they can later claim they violated civil rights.

Even if such lawsuits fail, groups representing local governments warned that litigation remains costly for cities.

But the court agreed with public evangelist Gabriel Olivier, who had previously been convicted of violating the city’s restrictions on public demonstrations, that the 1994 ruling should not apply to him.

Justice Elena Kagan wrote that Olivier is not challenging the validity of his conviction to seek relief or monetary damages. Instead, they are trying to prevent him from being charged with the same crime again.

“Ultimately, this case is not about what Olivier did in the past and does not rely on any evidence about his criminal record,” Kagan said.

In retrospect, the court’s 1994 ruling was “a little too broad,” she said.

In response to the ruling, Alison Ho, Olivier’s lawyer, said, “It is common sense that citizens who have been arrested under an unconstitutional law can challenge that law.”

“This is not only a victory for the right to share one’s faith in public, but also a victory for the right of all Americans to go to court when their First Amendment rights are violated,” said First Liberty Institute Director Kelly Shackelford.

He yelled insults at concertgoers, including “whore” and “Jezebel.”

Officials in Brandon, Mississippi, said the messages spread by Olivier and his group outside the city’s amphitheater, including shouting insults like “whore” and “Jezebel” over a bullhorn and holding up large placards showing aborted fetuses, were too destructive.

Mr. Olivier’s group preferred to preach at major intersections in the amphitheater, but city officials said it was difficult for traffic police to monitor the radios. Officials said concertgoers walked through the streets to avoid the proselytizers and police had to leave their posts to prevent fights from breaking out.

In 2021, Olivier and other members of his group went to the amphitheater for a country music concert night after the city approved new restrictions on where demonstrations could be held.

Olivier is arrested because he refuses to follow the rules.

He was fined $304 and sentenced to 10 days in jail, suspended for one year.

Rather than contest his conviction, Olivier sued the city using federal civil rights law, alleging that his constitutional rights were violated.

Lower court dismisses preacher’s lawsuit

A federal district judge dismissed the lawsuit. The decision was upheld by the New Orleans-based 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, which cited the Supreme Court’s 1994 Heck v. Humphrey decision, which held that a convicted felon cannot bring a civil action that “necessarily suggests the invalidity” of a conviction or sentence.

During oral arguments in Olivier v. Brandon City in December, the justices seemed to struggle with the case.

Mr. Olivier’s civil rights case appeared to be blocked by a 1994 ruling, but he wondered whether that ruling was intended to cover situations like his.

The city said the preacher had other options.

Brandon’s city attorney noted that Olivier had other ways to fight the restrictions, including challenging them as violations of the state constitution’s free speech protections.

“In this case, the appellants claim that the doors of the courthouse are closed, but that argument ignores the countless doors that the appellants have not tried to enter,” said attorney Todd Butler. “What this lawsuit is about is the petitioner’s priority door.”

The Justice Department issued an opinion on Mr. Olivier’s behalf, as did several religious groups, including the Hare Krishna movement.

The International Society for Krishna Consciousness said groups like it that “must propagate or practice religious beliefs in public” would most likely have to challenge restrictions similar to Brandon’s, but faced a no-win situation because they were most likely already charged with violating the restrictions.