Home Blog Page 21

President Trump calls for network license revocation as air speech declines

0


Legal experts say the FCC cannot revoke a broadcast license just because a network refuses to broadcast a presidential speech, citing First Amendment protections.

play

President Donald Trump has called for ABC and NBC to have their licenses revoked for not airing a July 16 prime-time address focused on election security.

Towards the end of his roughly 26-minute speech at the White House, President Trump criticized the networks for not broadcasting it live, claiming that the decision was made “due to the fact that they don’t like this subject matter.”

“Such fraud should mean revocation of license,” he says. “They’re using our public airways, which are worth billions of dollars, for absolutely nothing. They’re not paying anything. All we want is integrity in our elections and integrity in our reporting.”

Each network aired his speech on their respective streaming platforms and covered his subsequent remarks.

NBC declined to comment. USA TODAY has reached out to ABC.

Experts told USA TODAY that while the Federal Communications Commission has limited authority to revoke broadcast licenses, doing so based on a network’s editorial decisions would be unconstitutional.

“The First Amendment does not allow the president to require reporting by royal order,” said Robert Cohn Revere, principal counsel at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression. “This is Section 101 of the First Amendment.”

Here’s what you need to know:

How did the FCC react to President Trump’s comments?

The FCC did not respond to USA TODAY’s request for comment on July 17. FCC Chairman Brendan Carr had previously threatened the network’s broadcast license over its coverage of the Iran war, but had not issued a public statement on the matter as of early afternoon.

Commissioner Anna Gomez, appointed by former President Joe Biden in 2023, called President Trump’s call to revoke the license “ridiculous” in a statement provided to USA TODAY.

She said the FCC “does not have the authority to punish stations that refuse to air overtly political speech.”

She echoed those sentiments in a July 17 X post that included a screenshot of a news headline reporting the network’s previous decision not to air speeches by Biden or former President Barack Obama during their respective terms.

“This is a blatant attempt to bully a broadcaster, and the FCC should not be involved,” Gomez said.

Her response reiterated an earlier statement in which she accused the FCC of engaging in partisan politics to support President Trump’s objectives.

Could the FCC revoke President Trump’s license for not broadcasting his speech?

Not so, according to First Amendment experts.

“Governments are not responsible for deciding what is and isn’t newsworthy, what needs to be broadcast live and what doesn’t,” said David Keating, director of the Free Speech Institute.

But given Carr’s past statements and the FCC’s past actions against the station under the Trump administration, Keating and Cohnrevere said they could try to revoke the license over editorial decisions.

“I wouldn’t be surprised if he (Kerr) tried it, but I don’t think he would ultimately be successful,” Keating said.

But the process would still be time-consuming and costly for the network, he said.

What actions has the FCC already taken against ABC?

President Trump’s comments further accelerate debate over the future of ABC’s broadcast license.

In February, the FCC began an enforcement action against Disney-owned ABC after state Rep. James Talarico (D-Texas) appeared on “The View” while running in the state’s Democratic Senate primary.

Carr characterized the issue as a procedural issue, saying ABC had not filed the proper paperwork to declare a political candidate’s appearance, giving opponents leeway to request “equal time and placement.”

In May, the FCC began accepting public comments on whether The View should be exempted from requirements to provide equal broadcasting opportunities to political candidates. By late June, when the ABC launched a broadcast campaign to encourage public engagement on the issue, more than 50,000 comments had been received.

In a July 6 legal filing, the network accused the FCC of engaging in “callous rhetoric ahead of the fast-approaching 2026 general election.”

In a separate matter, the FCC in April ordered Disney-owned ABC to submit license renewals for eight of its television stations by late May, years ahead of schedule. The order said the commission was investigating the stations for “possible violations of the Communications Act of 1934 and FCC rules, including the FCC’s prohibition on unlawful discrimination.”

In response, Disney said it is “confident” that “this record demonstrates our continued eligibility as a licensee under the Communications Act and the First Amendment, and we are prepared to demonstrate that through appropriate legal channels.”

Contributor: Brian Alexander, USA TODAY

Breanna Frank is USA TODAY’s First Amendment reporter. please contact her bjfrank@usatoday.com.

USA TODAY’s coverage of First Amendment issues is funded by the Freedom Forum in collaboration with our journalism funding partners. Funders do not provide editorial input.

Craig Melvin and Al Roker granted order of protection from ‘Today’ intruder

0

play

Craig Melvin and Al Roker were granted a restraining order against an intruder who broke into the “Today” show studio on Thursday, July 16th.

Andrew Truelove, 41, was arraigned in New York Criminal Court on Friday, July 17, and was formally charged with third-degree robbery as a hate crime and third-degree menacing as a hate crime, both felonies, according to records reviewed by USA TODAY. He remains in custody on $10,000 bail.

According to the Manhattan district attorney’s complaint obtained by USA TODAY, Truelove sneaked into the building at 30 Rockefeller Center by following an employee who entered a restricted area with an ID badge. Truelove was said to have been looking for Roker, 71, when she encountered Melvin, 47, in the stairwell.

Truelove then allegedly walked up to Melvin and said a racial slur, to which Melvin asked, “Did you want to get arrested for that?” Truelove allegedly responded by saying, “I’ve always wanted to call a black celebrity.”

At their July 17 arraignment, a judge issued a full temporary protective order for Mr. Roker and Mr. Melvin.

How did the “Today” show cover this incident?

USA TODAY previously reported that New York police received a report of a “disabled person” inside the Today show building around 9 a.m. local time on July 16. Truelove was arrested shortly thereafter.

Later that day, Melvin addressed the incident in an Instagram post, assuring the public that he was “doing fine.” He also shared a statement from a spokesperson for the NBC show, acknowledging a “security incident” in which “an individual entered an unauthorized area of ​​the vestibule near Studio 1A” and was confronted by a co-anchor.

“The individual was taken into custody by law enforcement without incident and was taken into custody. There was no altercation and no one was injured,” the statement said, adding that the program is “fully cooperating with law enforcement as they investigate this matter.”

“NBC and TODAY take the safety and security of our employees, talent, staff and guests very seriously. We are reviewing this incident and our security protocols and remain committed to providing a safe and secure environment for everyone who works at or visits our studios.”

On July 17, Roker posted a photo of himself and Melvin on Instagram with the caption, “Thank you @craigmelvinnbc to everyone who has reached out to check on my brother over the last 24 hours. We’re both okay. Moments like this help bring us together.”

“Like Craig said, ‘You can go after one of us, you can go after all of us.’ We’ll talk about that this morning on @todayshow,” the weathercaster added.

The situation was also brought up on NBC’s morning show on July 17, when Laura Jarrett, filling in for Savannah Guthrie, told Melvin, “We want to make sure you’re safe.” He replied, “Safe and sound.”

Prior to his arrest, Truelove had an extensive criminal history, including multiple ongoing criminal mischief, assault, trespassing and reckless endangerment cases in New York, according to records reviewed by USA TODAY.

Contributor: Taijuan Moorman, USA TODAY

Silver fell 3.02% on July 17, 2026

0

How much is silver worth per ounce today?

As of 12:05 PM ET on July 17, 2026, the spot price of silver is $55.97 per oz., according to the latest market data. The stock fell 3.02%, or $1.74 from the previous closing price of $57.72.

One year ago, silver was trading at $37.87 per ounce. This means that the price has increased by 47.79% in the last 12 months.

Key levels to look out for this week:

52 week low: $36.68

52 week high: $117.39

Silver is trading 52.32% below its 52-week high. It is 52.60% higher than its 52-week low.

What is the historical price of silver?

today 1 week ago 1 month ago 1 year ago
$55.97 $59.89 $70.24 $37.87

A week ago, silver was trading at $59.89 per ounce. Since then, the price has fallen by 6.54%.

One month ago, silver was trading at $70.24 per ounce. Since then, the price has fallen by 20.31%.

USA TODAY is an independent publisher and not an investment advisor. The information provided is for educational purposes only and should not be construed as financial, investment, or trading advice. We recommend that you seek independent advice from a qualified professional regarding any specific financial decisions you may make. Trading commodities, futures, and options involves significant risk of loss. Individual investment results may vary. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Prices change rapidly and unpredictably due to factors such as supply/demand, weather, and geopolitical events. Our company assumes no responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of the information.

What is driving the price of silver today?

The price of silver is driven by inflation expectations, central bank policy, global economic conditions, and investor demand. The strength of currencies, especially the US dollar, can influence daily prices, as well as physical and industrial demand. For more on the market, read the latest investment news on USA TODAY Money.

What does XAG/USD mean?

XAG/USD is the ticker symbol used to track the spot price of silver in US dollars.

XAG stands for 1 troy ounce of silver and USD stands for US dollar. The estimated price tells you how many dollars it costs to purchase one ounce.

Prices are usually quoted per troy ounce, which is slightly heavier than a standard ounce.

Spot prices reflect real-time market transactions and serve as a benchmark for futures contracts, ETFs, and retail bullion prices.

how to invest in silver

Investing in silver can be done by buying physical coins or bars, buying ETFs that track its price, or investing in mining stocks. Be sure to weigh costs, storage needs, and risk tolerance before making a decision. The retail price of a coin or bar typically includes a premium over the spot price.

Disclaimer: This USA TODAY Money article was automatically generated using live market data from Alpha Vantage. If you think we made a mistake or have feedback, please use this form.

Georgia leaders respond to President Trump’s election interference claims

0

play

update: This article has been updated to include a statement from Keisha Lance Bottoms.

On Thursday night, President Donald Trump addressed the nation in the East Room of the White House.

From allegations that the Chinese government tried to interfere in the 2020 election to a Department of Homeland Security report suggesting that hundreds of thousands of noncitizens across multiple states are registered to vote, President Trump’s speech focused on what he called the U.S. election system “broken” and “fragile.”

“Our goal in releasing this information is not to undermine confidence in our elections, but to gain confidence by confronting the vulnerabilities and remediating them very quickly,” Trump said in a speech.

Although a trove of documents was released with this speech suggesting that foreign governments considered ways to interfere in the electoral system, there appears to be no evidence that any attempts were actually successful or influenced the outcome of the 2020 election.

Leaders on both sides of the aisle disagree on what to make of the presumed findings, with many saying it is more important to set the stage for renewed claims of election fraud in November’s midterm elections than the outcome of the election six years ago.

Here’s how some Georgia politicians reacted to the speech.

Ossoff, Warnock avoid direct attacks

Days before the speech, rumors circulated that President Trump might summon Georgia Sens. Jon Ossoff and Raphael Warnock to claim their victory was illegitimate, forcing both politicians to get ahead of their messages.

However, President Trump did not mention the recent FBI raids on election sites in Georgia or Fulton County in his remarks, nor did he name any senators.

“Tonight, as the war spirals and prices rise, we hear from a failed and desperate president who, as always, is focused on his own frustration, shame, and, most of all, the fear of responsibility that comes with defeat,” Ossoff wrote in a post on X after his speech. “We also heard a president demonstrate clear intent to attack this election and our right to vote, just as he is trying to throw away our votes and seize the presidency in 2020.”

Ossoff went on to say that there is a “wave of rebellion” growing, especially in Georgia, where Ossoff is seeking re-election this term, and that Trump is “nothing compared to the power of the people.”

Earlier in the day, Ossoff called Trump “the most famous loser in the world” during an appearance on CNN.

This message was shared by Senate Reverend Raphael Warnock, a longtime leader of the modern civil rights movement and a passionate advocate for voting rights. Mr. Warnock will not be up for re-election this year.

In a video posted after his speech at X, Warnock said President Trump’s remarks were not actually about 2020, but rather 2026.

“Donald Trump knows this. He knows he’s a failed president. He knows his popularity is on the decline. He knows he’s on track to lose in 2026, and instead of doing something for the people, he’s trying to interfere in the election. Don’t let him believe he’s already won,” Warnock said.

Collins says Americans should be ‘alarmed’

Rep. Mike Collins, a pro-Trump candidate running against Ossoff in Georgia’s Senate race, called the speech alarming and doubled down on his support for the SAVE America Act.

“The only reason we won’t[pass the SAVE America Act]is because the policies are so bad and the candidates are so pathetic that they can’t get away with it or get elected any other way, so they want to cheat,” Trump said in his speech.

The SAVE America Act would require a photo ID and proof of citizenship to vote. Supporters say the change will prevent voter fraud, while opponents say it acts as a form of voter suppression.

“Our right to free and secure elections must be ruthlessly protected, and all Americans should be wary of our adversaries’ ability to interfere with elections and jeopardize the right to vote,” Collins said in a post on X. “With 83% of Americans supporting voter ID, there has never been a more important time to pass the SAVE America Act and protect our democracy.”

“Legacy media is a real threat,” Fuller says.

Georgia’s newest congressman, Clay Fuller, won the seat to replace Marjorie Taylor Greene in a special election earlier this year.

After the speech, Mr. Fuller attacked traditional media and news outlets that chose not to broadcast the speech.

“ABC, NBC, and CNN just refused to air President Trump’s prime-time speech exposing election interference. This is blatant censorship to hide the truth from American voters,” Fuller said in a post on X. “They don’t want you to know. They want to control. Legacy media is a real threat to democracy.”

Historically, major news organizations have also refused to print speeches by other presidents. In 2014, ABC, CBS, FOX, and NBC all refused to air President Obama’s speech outlining his immigration reform plan and instead aired their highly rated Thursday night shows. In 2022, many of those same stations refused to air President Biden’s “Battle for the Soul of the Nation” speech.

In a second post, Fuller shared figures that DHS claims there are 278,000 noncitizens registered to vote in the United States and reiterated his support for the SAVE America Act.

“That’s why Democrats are so afraid of the SAVE America Act,” Fuller said.

Although Greene no longer holds political office, that hasn’t stopped her from remaining in the political spotlight and speaking out.

“Everyone agrees that voting machines can be hacked and votes swapped. After the president’s speech last night, when will we take down the voting machines?” she asked in the X post.

The speech was aimed at “instilling a sense of distrust,” Bottoms said.

Keisha Lance Bottoms, who served as Atlanta’s mayor in the 2020 election and is now a Democratic gubernatorial candidate, said the speech was part of an ongoing effort to “instill distrust” in Georgia elections.

Bottoms spoke out after the FBI raided a Fulton County election site, part of the Atlanta metropolitan area, earlier this year. She also opposed a Department of Justice subpoena requesting personal information from Fulton County poll workers and volunteers.

“Donald Trump continues to sow distrust in our elections. He orchestrated an attack on a polling site in Fulton County and is targeting the privacy of Georgia election workers. This is just his latest desperate attempt to intimidate voters,” Bottoms said in a statement Friday morning. Regarding her Republican opponent, she said, “Rick Jackson has said he agrees with all of Mr. Trump’s policies. As governor, I will defend the fundamental rights of Georgians as Mr. Trump continues to spread conspiracy theories.”

Jackson did not directly address the speech on social media, but he has repeatedly said at campaign events that he would be “Trump’s favorite governor” and that he “looks like Trump, but with a Southern tongue.”

Eileen Wright covers Georgia politics and elections as an Atlanta Connect reporter for USA TODAY’s Deep South Connect team. X Find her at @IreneEWright or email her at ismith@usatodayco.com.

“Today” Show Intruder – Craig Melvin, anchor talks about the incident

0

play

The “Today” show anchor talks about the arrest of the intruder.

On the Friday, July 17 broadcast, Craig Melvin mentioned an incident the previous day involving someone who snuck into the studio and confronted him.

“Thankfully, he was arrested quickly. He was arrested,” the anchor said, adding that the show is “cooperating fully with the NYPD investigation. We’re just glad everyone is safe.”

Co-anchor Laura Jarrett, who was filling in for Savannah Guthrie, told Melvin, “We want to make sure you’re safe,” adding that he was “safe and sound.”

The New York City Police Department previously confirmed that a suspect was in custody after officers responded to a “disabled person” inside a building at 30 Rockefeller Center around 9 a.m. on July 16.

USA TODAY later learned that the suspect entered the building through the lobby and encountered Melvin, 47, on the stairs. They allegedly engaged in a verbal exchange that lasted less than 10 seconds before security officers restrained the suspect. Police arrested him shortly after.

People and TMZ further reported that the suspect was looking for weather anchor Al Roker when he started yelling racial slurs at Melvin.

Melvin addressed the situation in a statement posted on his official Instagram page on the same day, writing, “Hey everyone. So many of you have reached out to me in the last few hours. I’m fine. Thank you for reaching out to me. I look forward to seeing you tomorrow morning on @todayshow.”

Melvin also shared a statement from a spokesperson for the NBC program, confirming a “security incident” that said, “An individual entered an unauthorized area of ​​the vestibule near Studio 1A. The individual approached anchor Craig Melvin and alerted security. The individual was taken into custody by law enforcement without further incident and was taken into custody. There was no altercation and no one was injured.”

“We are cooperating fully with law enforcement in their investigation,” the program continued. Today and NBC said in a statement: “We take the safety and security of our employees, talent, staff and guests very seriously. We are reviewing this incident and our security protocols and remain committed to providing a safe and secure environment for everyone who works at or visits our studios.”

As of July 16, the NYPD announced that the investigation was ongoing and charges were pending.

The suspect, identified by NBC News as Andrew Truelove, has an extensive criminal history, including multiple ongoing cases in New York for criminal mischief, assault, trespassing and reckless endangerment, according to records reviewed by USA TODAY.

Contributor: Taijuan Moorman, USA TODAY

Today’s gold price for July 17, 2026

0

How much is gold worth per ounce today?

As of 12:05 PM ET on July 17, 2026, the spot price of gold is: $4,015.75 per oz., according to the latest market data. This was down 0.99% and $40.09 from the previous close of $4,055.84.

One year ago, Gold was trading at $3,344.70 per ounce, representing an increase of 20.06% in price over the past 12 months.

Key levels to look out for this week:

52 week low: $3,284.65

52 week high: $5,477.79

Gold is trading 26.69% below its 52-week high. It is 22.26% above its 52-week low.

What is the historical price of gold?

today 1 week ago 1 month ago 1 year ago
$4,015.75 $4,121.92 $4,338.54 $3,344.70

A week ago, gold was trading at $4,121.92 per ounce. Since then, the price has fallen by 2.58%.

A month ago, gold was trading at $4,338.54 per ounce. Since then, the price has fallen by 7.44%.

USA TODAY is an independent publisher and not an investment advisor. The information provided is for educational purposes only and should not be construed as financial, investment, or trading advice. We recommend that you seek independent advice from a qualified professional regarding any specific financial decisions you may make. Trading commodities, futures, and options involves significant risk of loss. Individual investment results may vary. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Prices change rapidly and unpredictably due to factors such as supply/demand, weather, and geopolitical events. Our company assumes no responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of the information.

What is driving the price of gold today?

The price of gold is driven by inflation expectations, central bank policies, global economic conditions, and investor demand. The strength of currencies, especially the US dollar, can influence daily prices, as well as physical and industrial demand. For more on the market, read the latest investment news on USA TODAY Money.

What is XAU/USD?

XAU/USD is the ticker symbol used to track the spot price of gold in US dollars.

XAU stands for 1 troy ounce of gold and USD stands for US dollar. The estimated price tells you how many dollars it costs to purchase one ounce.

Prices are usually quoted per troy ounce, which is slightly heavier than a standard ounce.

Spot prices reflect real-time market transactions and serve as a benchmark for futures contracts, ETFs, and retail bullion prices.

how to invest in gold

Investing in gold can be done by buying physical coins and bars, buying ETFs that track the price of gold, or investing in mining stocks. Be sure to weigh costs, storage needs, and risk tolerance before making a decision. The retail price of a coin or bar typically includes a premium over the spot price.

Disclaimer: This USA TODAY Money article was automatically generated using live market data from Alpha Vantage. If you think we made a mistake or have feedback, please use this form.

Reactions to President Trump’s sincere campaign speech are quite divided.

0

Less than four months after the pivotal midterm elections, reactions were swift and varied, largely along party lines, after President Donald Trump released a trove of declassified documents casting doubt on the integrity of the U.S. election in a July 16 prime-time address.

President Donald Trump said America’s adversaries, including Russia, China, Iran and North Korea, could compromise the country’s election infrastructure, and said the so-called “deep state” within the government withheld information showing Chinese interference in the 2018 midterm elections during his first term and the 2020 presidential election.

The president used a list of election allegations that could not be immediately verified to push Republicans in Congress to pass the Save America Act, which has not advanced in the Senate and would overhaul voting in federal elections.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said in a series of social media posts that the “SAVE Act is dead on arrival” in the Senate and that Trump’s speech was a “pathetic attempt” to deny his loss in the 2020 election.

“Sadly, while this president wallows in frustration, revenge, and intrigue, the American people expect their leaders to take bold action against persistent inflation, expensive food, rising gas prices, and crippling cuts to affordable health care,” Schumer said, adding that Democrats will not allow President Trump to use “delusional bigotry” to undermine Americans’ right to vote.

Meanwhile, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin supported the president’s opinion, noting that the department has identified more than 250,000 potential noncitizens who are illegally registered to vote in just four U.S. states.

“Election security is national security,” Marin said in a post on X, adding, “Only Americans should elect America’s leaders.”

Party policy reaction to President Trump’s speech

In a post on X, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries criticized President Trump, calling him “pathetic” and “an 80-year-old failed president spreading weak conspiracies.”

“The economy is a disaster under this man’s administration, and the American people know it,” the Democratic caucus leaders concluded.

Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.), vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, called President Trump’s speech an attempt to undermine the integrity of the nation’s elections and said the nation was embarrassed.

Warner told MS NOW talk show host Jen Psaki that he was “embarrassed that the president of the United States has tried to address all Americans with a series of falsehoods and accusations, but I think his purpose is to undermine confidence in our system.” He said he and his allies would suffer a dramatic midterm election defeat if the U.S. held “free and fair elections in 2026.”

“If we blow this off as just another Donald Trump rant, we do so at our own peril,” Warner said.

Warner said that for the past 10 years, his committee has reviewed and investigated all allegations raised by the president on a bipartisan basis.

“The irony of all this is that most of the accusations he’s making about 2018 and 2020 were people that Donald Trump appointed were in charge of intelligence agencies,” Warner said. “Why didn’t they find any of these so-called allegations?”

Warner called on his Republican colleagues, if they have any decency, to speak up and “tell the truth.”

But Rep. Mike Collins, a Georgia Republican Senate candidate who has been endorsed by President Trump, echoed the president’s comments on social media, saying Americans should be “alarmed” by attempts by his opponents to thwart a secure election.

“Our right to free and secure elections must be ruthlessly protected, and all Americans should be wary of our adversaries’ ability to interfere with elections and jeopardize the right to vote,” Collins said in a post on X. “With 83% of Americans supporting voter ID, there has never been a more important time to pass the SAVE America Act and protect our democracy.”

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent appears to agree in his own X post. “Thank you, @POTUS, for standing up for free and fair elections. Americans deserve to trust the integrity of our elections, which is critical to our country.”

But Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) said President Trump’s actions appear to be a “ceremonial kickoff” campaign to interfere in the crucial midterm elections in November.

The White House says President Trump is losing independent voters two years after he performed well with groups and won reelection.

“Even MAGA is disappointed,” the White House said in a written statement. “[Trump]is a failure, an unpopular president, and a drag on the party in the midterm elections.”

The congressman said Trump is trying to use his presidential powers to “taint American elections with the help of creepy billionaires.”

The White House said the U.S. has the systems and legal counsel to protect voting, and its colleagues are “ready” to protect Americans’ right to vote.

“What is important now is for the nation to see and understand what this lawless and increasingly unfree president is up to,” the White House said.

Taco Bell Lettuce, Tested, and Foods to Avoid

0

play

Lettuce served at Taco Bell restaurants has been linked to an outbreak of the stomach-wrenching parasitic infection, federal health officials say, as thousands of people across the country contract cysticercosis.

This gastrointestinal disease, which can cause frequent watery diarrhea or explosive bowel movements, nausea, cramping, bloating and low-grade fever, affects people in 34 states.

At least 102 people have been hospitalized in Michigan since June 22, with 4,312 cases reported statewide, the state health department announced Thursday.

White House press secretary Caroline Levitt said Thursday that “the White House is closely monitoring the situation.”

Asked whether public health cuts had slowed the response to the outbreak in any way, Levitt said, “Absolutely not,” adding that the FDA and CDC have “the resources necessary to ensure that the American public is well-informed and protected from this disease during this time.” Experts say otherwise.

Is iceberg lettuce linked to the spread of infection?

An investigation by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Food and Drug Administration and state health officials found that shredded iceberg lettuce served at Taco Bell stores in Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio and West Virginia was linked to the outbreak.

The FDA’s follow-up investigation has identified a single supplier of the Mexican iceberg lettuce used in these Taco Bell locations, the agency announced late Thursday, July 16.

Health officials have not disclosed Taco Bell’s suppliers. USA TODAY has reached out to HHS, CDC, and FDA for comment.

Is a stool test required for diagnosis?

The CDC advises anyone who believes they may be infected to see a doctor for testing and treatment.

“Doctors won’t know how to treat it unless you get a positive stool test, especially a gastrointestinal pathogen test. Without a test, it could be considered bacterial or viral diarrhea,” Dr. Anil Sharma, an associate professor in the Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition at the University of Florida College of Medicine, previously told USA TODAY.

Craig Hedberg, a professor in the University of Minnesota’s Department of Environmental Health Sciences, explained in a media briefing Thursday that most Cyclospora cases are diagnosed through culture-independent diagnostic tests. The test is a PCR-based panel that can screen for approximately 20 different pathogens simultaneously.

“These panels are much more widely used today than they were 10 years ago, so our ability to detect these infections at the clinical level is much better than before,” he added.

Contributed by Mike Snider and Thao Nguyen, USA TODAY

Coca-Cola’s Fairlife suspends U.S. milk production after cyber attack

0

Fairlife Co. announced that it has temporarily halted milk production in the United States following a cyber attack.

Parent company Coca-Cola said in a statement on July 16 that some of Fairlife’s systems were accessed by an unauthorized third party in a “ransomware event.”

The milk brand said it has notified law enforcement and temporarily halted production in the United States while it continues to investigate the incident.

Fairlife also stated that the quality and safety of its products will not be affected.

“The full extent, nature and impact of the incident is not yet known,” the company said in a statement.

It is unclear whether the production disruption will affect milk supplies in stores. Coca-Cola did not provide additional information when contacted by USA TODAY.

Here’s what we know so far:

Fairlife suspends U.S. milk production following ransomware cyberattack

In light of the attack, Fairlife, which also operates in Canada, said only its production in the United States was affected.

“The company has completed its investigation and is working diligently to restore its systems and affected operations,” the company said in a statement.

According to the FBI, ransomware is a type of malicious software that restricts access to your computer’s files, systems, and networks.

Perpetrators of ransomware attacks also demand a ransom payment to regain access to your computer.

Melina Khan is USA TODAY’s national trends reporter. X Keep up with her at @melinakh and on Instagram @bymelinakhan.

Trump administration asks Supreme Court to uphold ban on transgender soldiers

0


The Justice Department is appealing a ruling that says the policy was likely fueled by unconstitutional hostility and wants to keep the ban in place.

play

WASHINGTON – The Trump administration will once again ask the Supreme Court to uphold the president’s ban on transgender people serving in the military.

In a July 16 filing, the Justice Department asked lower courts not to confirm a ruling that said the ban likely violated the military’s constitutional rights and could not be enforced against current service members who objected to the policy.

Government lawyers said they would appeal the June ruling to the Supreme Court by the end of August. They highlighted that a judge had already intervened in another challenge to the policy last year, when the majority said the ban could be enforced because it was in litigation.

If the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit does not agree to put the ruling on hold while the administration appeals, the government could ask the Supreme Court for an interim ruling suspending enforcement.

When a federal judge in Washington state intervened last year after suspending the ban, the court did not explain its decision.

The D.C. Court of Appeals said it was not bound by its ruling, which was more limited because the justices may have thought the suspension should apply only to service members who objected to the policy.

“The court’s reasoning is unexplained and may be based on the unconscionability of the universal nature of the injunction,” Judge Robert Wilkins wrote for a three-judge panel on the D.C. Court of Appeals.

The Justice Department argued that that reasoning was incorrect.

“The Supreme Court has blocked the injunction in its entirety, including the one applied to the named plaintiffs,” government lawyers wrote. “Thus, the injunction cannot be construed as relating solely to the universal scope of the injunction.”

The Justice Department also argues that the Supreme Court’s recent ruling that states can ban transgender girls from participating in women’s sports teams supports its argument. That’s because the court rejected arguments that transgender students undergoing puberty blockers and hormone therapy should be given a chance to prove they no longer have an athletic advantage.

Similarly, the government wrote in its filing that the appropriateness of a Department of Defense policy depends on whether it has a reasonable relationship “to prevailing issues.”

“Adopting a gender identity that is inconsistent with an individual’s gender is inconsistent with the soldier’s commitment to an honorable, honest, and disciplined lifestyle,” reads an executive order signed by President Trump shortly after taking office.

Wilkins, who was appointed by former President Barack Obama, wrote that the policy was arbitrary and “appears to be driven by a naked desire to harm a politically unpopular group: people who identify as transgender.”

Justice Justin Walker, an appointee of President Donald Trump, dissented, writing in the minority opinion that striking down Pentagon policy would amount to an “unprecedented intrusion into internal military operations.”

Pentagon Secretary Pete Hegseth officially issued a ban on transgender people from military service in February 2025, effectively reinstating an order enacted by President Trump during his first term. Meanwhile, former President Joe Biden abolished the program days after taking office in 2021.

In a memo released last year, Hegseth said people experiencing symptoms of gender dysphoria “are unable to meet the rigorous standards required for military service.” He links the ban on transgender service members to a sweeping push to stamp out what he calls “woke” policies throughout the military.

According to data from the Department of the Army (formerly the Department of Defense), there are approximately 1.3 million active-duty members in the military. Transgender rights groups say as many as 15,000 transgender people serve in the military, but officials say the number is in the low thousands.

Another devastating flood hits Texas Hill Country, killing two people

0

play

Catastrophic flooding has struck the Texas Hill Country, killing at least two people, more than a year after rain caused the Guadalupe River to overflow and cause flooding that killed more than 130 people.

“Extreme rainfall” over the past few days has totaled nearly 2 feet in some parts of the Texas Hill Country, according to a National Weather Prediction Center tally. Leakey, Texas has lost 23.37 inches since Monday afternoon. One recording station in Kerrville that was hit by a storm in July 2025 received 20.71 inches of rain.

Gov. Greg Abbott said on July 16 that most of the rain was concentrated in Uvalde, Kinney, Bandera, Kerr and Gillespie counties, with widespread rainfall ranging from 6 to 13 inches. More heavy rain is expected on July 17 as the weather pattern moves slowly, the National Weather Service announced.

The rain caused rivers like the Guadalupe, Nueces, and Frio rivers to once again swell near or above record levels. The Nueces River near Uvalde reached a record level of 28.01 feet on July 16, breaking the previous record of 24.88 feet set in 1996, according to preliminary data. Abbott said the Nueces River is expected to reach twice the flow rate of Niagara Falls.

Photos from Kerrville show water from the Guadalupe River covering roads and fallen trees. Video shared by a Texas game warden showed the vehicle submerged and swept away by water. Abbott said hundreds of water rescues have been carried out so far.

“We are facing record rainfall, leading to extremely dangerous flooding. We want to do everything we can to protect all lives,” Abbott said.

Abbott said on July 16 that 59 counties in Texas were under flood watches.

2 people killed in Texas floods

Mr Abbott confirmed on July 16 that at least two people were reported killed in the flooding.

He said a man near Comfort died after being swept away by an RV. Abbott said the Uvalde woman was swept away by floodwaters while driving on the road. The governor did not reveal the identity or age of the victim.

Jenny Steward told The Associated Press that one of the victims was her husband, 65-year-old John Mark Steward of Kerrville. She was out visiting her parents when she heard from a neighbor that her mobile home had been washed away.

“I’m really disappointed that I wasn’t with him,” she told The Associated Press, adding that they had just celebrated their third anniversary.

Mr Abbott said more than 230 water rescues had been carried out since the flooding began. He said 2,350 emergency responders were responding to the floods and about 1,400 vehicles, including helicopters, rescue boats and large vehicles, were deployed.

Game wardens in Texas said they have been involved in rescues from homes, submerged vehicles and vehicles swept off roads. They shared video of responders carrying a small child wearing a life jacket and snorkel goggles through floodwaters and onto a waiting boat. Another video showed a helicopter rescue.

Authorities urged residents not to drive on roads covered in water.

Floods occur one year after Texas tragedy

Exactly one year ago, flooding during the night and early morning hours of July 4, 2025, caused the Guadalupe River to flow into surrounding areas, killing more than 130 people, including 28 at Camp Mystic, a Christian girls’ summer camp.

Mr Abbott said that although the water behaved differently along the riverside campground, lessons learned from that flooding incident helped prevent further catastrophe this time. Mr Abbott said more than 80 people were removed from the campsite early on.

He said a flood warning system installed after the 2025 floods had been activated.

Bearista Cup opens a new chapter for Starbucks products

0

play

Starbucks introduced the original Glass Bearista Cold Cup in November 2025 as part of its holiday product line. The release of this cup was a defining moment in Starbucks’ product strategy.

In a blog post shared exclusively with USA TODAY ahead of its release, Treci Lieberman, Starbucks’ global chief brand officer, said the launch of the Bearista Cup was “more than just a successful product launch; it was a turning point.”

The Glass Bearista Cold Cup with Straw is shaped like a teddy bear with a green Starbucks stocking cap on its head and is designed to hold 20 ounces of cold beer or your other favorite beverage. Starbucks said the cup, which retails for $29.95, sold out in less than a day, prompting some disappointed customers to flood Starbucks’ social media accounts about the out-of-stock cup.

“Excitement about our product has exceeded even our highest expectations, and even though we shipped more Bearista Cups to coffeehouses than almost any other product this holiday season, the Bearista Cup and some other products quickly sold out,” Starbucks said in a statement last November.

Lieberman said in a blog post that today’s customers are looking for products and experiences that “reflect who they are and what they love,” and that customers didn’t just buy the Bearista Cup, they “shared it, celebrated it, and made it part of a broader cultural conversation.”

According to Lieberman’s blog post, Starbucks is expanding the ways customers can access its products, with an online merchandise shop currently available only to Starbucks Rewards members becoming available to all customers ahead of the holiday season later this year.

Lieberman said the merchandise plays a key role in the company’s “Back to Starbucks” plan, which allows it to extend the “Starbucks experience beyond the coffeehouse” and create new ways for customers to engage with the brand.

The Bearista Cold Cup was so popular among fans that Starbucks subsequently launched two additional versions: a soccer-themed cup ahead of the World Cup in June, and a pink Bearista Cup earlier this month. Most of the North American inventory of pink cups had been sold out by 7 a.m. local time, Lieberman said. It’s unclear whether the fan-favorite cup will be released again.

The coffee chain also cites other recent collaborations, including a special “Peanuts” cup and a special line of “Hello Kitty” merchandise, to highlight “the power of culturally relevant design that travels the world.”

Other food and beverage companies are focusing on products to connect with customers

The movement to utilize goods and collaborate with popular pop culture brands seems to be spreading to the food and beverage industry.

Ahead of the 2026 Men’s World Cup, beer brands such as Miller Lite and Coors Light have announced unique items that will be sold exclusively through online shops to attract customers.

Last month, Coors Light introduced its new Tallboy canister. This is a limited edition taller than Tallboy designed to hold and cool three full Coors Light cans at once. This canister was available on Shop.Coorslight.com on June 11th and June 18th. Miller Lite also joined in on the World Cup fun, introducing the Miller Time MVP Match Ball in May. This ball is approximately 50% larger than a standard soccer ball, holds up to 12 Miller Lite cans, comes with a display stand, and is refillable (beer not included). The ball was available for purchase on May 20th and again on June 3rd exclusively on the Miller Lite website.

Trader Joe’s tote bag lineup has become a social phenomenon, with Black Friday-style lines forming in stores when new bags go on sale and videos of people going through the process of securing bags going viral on social media.

Many popular fast food companies have created online shops where fans can purchase branded products. McDonald’s has Golden Arches Unlimited, Chick-fil-A has Chick-fil-A Shop, Panera Bread has The Panera Shop, Whataburger has Whatastore, and many other examples.

Gabe Hauari is USA TODAY’s national trends news reporter. You can follow him at X @gabehauari Or email Gdhauari@usatoday.com.

Finding public policy in the text of the constitution

0

The Constitution is not just for the sake of the Constitution. Their language itself influences broader legal and even cultural principles. For example, America’s culture of “free speech” refers not only to the First Amendment, but also to broader values ​​such as academic freedom. Although the Constitution does not directly regulate these values, it nevertheless inspires them.

A Colorado Supreme Court decision last month illustrates this dynamic in the context of private employment law, but it also raises serious concerns that the state high court misplaces its priorities when it comes to Colorado’s Constitution.

Moreno vs. Circle K Store The main concern is when any employee can bring an unfair dismissal claim against a private employer. The facts are simple but debatable. The plaintiff, Mary Ann Moreno, is a 72-year-old woman who works at a Circle K convenience store. The man threatened her with a knife and demanded a cigarette. The parties’ accounts then differ. What is clear, however, is that not only did she not fully comply with her assailant’s demands, but she also did not physically fight back. Eventually he picked up a pack of cigarettes and drove off. Circle K then fired her because she violated its passive confrontation policy. She filed a lawsuit for wrongful dismissal.

The federal district court in this case certified the following question for the state Supreme Court: Does Colorado recognize a public policy exception to at-will employment when an employee is fired in self-defense?

“Public policy” is a magic word that often appears in private law. Whether it’s good for courts to wave the public policy wand is a question of jurisprudence that I’ll leave for another forum (and where my sympathies lie with the critics). In any case, American courts routinely rely on public policy to shape common law decisions. As an example, contract provisions such as liability waivers are not enforced not because Congress passed a law making them unenforceable, but simply because there are broader and perhaps obscure public policy reasons.

Another example is unfair dismissal. The Colorado Legislature has not passed a law that would prohibit private employers from firing employees for confronting shoplifters. But it was still not far-fetched for Mr. Moreno to argue that there were public policy reasons to allow the lawsuit.

What was surprising was how the court used the Colorado Constitution to justify the creation of the public policy exception.

As I have written before, Article 2, Section 3 of the state constitution is a classic Lockean guarantee of natural rights. These provisions, typically in the tradition of the philosopher John Locke, protect pre-political natural rights, rights that we have simply by virtue of being human, rather than those acquired through the formation of an ordered society. Colorado states:

Every person has certain natural, essential and inalienable rights, including the right to the enjoyment and protection of his or her life and liberty. Acquisition, possession, and protection of property. and to pursue and obtain their safety and happiness.

Two-thirds of all state constitutions contain similar language, and most state courts interpret the constitution as providing substantial protections for the government. Judging from the text, Colorado offers the following: many of protection. Simply “getting happiness” or “owning property” can threaten all kinds of laws, from drug prohibition to zoning and licensing.

Early in Colorado’s history, courts used this provision to some degree in this way. For example, in a 1914 case, the court invoked the law to thwart a medical board’s attempt to punish a physician who placed a newspaper advertisement offering services “connected with disease or genital ailments.” (Unfortunately, the opinion did not include the text of the advertisement itself.) The discipline found that it violated physicians’ right to pursue happiness, specifically their right to “follow personal preferences in career choice.”

But in recent decades, courts have remained largely silent on Rocky’s rights, issuing only occasional rulings. With respect to liberty and property rights (rights explicitly mentioned in the Clause), courts have generally relied on state due process clauses. And there, most rights meet a cruel fate because courts have applied the rational basis test, a type of judicial scrutiny that almost all laws endure. Additionally, the court has not said much, if any, about the specific language at issue in the case. Moreno: Coloradans’ right to “defend their lives.”

Given that the defendant in this case is a private entity, you may ask why this constitutional provision is relevant. The majority agreed, and Chief Justice Monica Marquez’s dissenting opinion emphasized that the Constitution generally does not apply to private political parties. Indeed, as explained by Carlos Chevere Lugo, while some provisions of state constitutions can be binding on private entities, it is widely understood that the Rocky Guarantee is not, with certain express exceptions that are not relevant here.

To be clear, Ms. Moreno does not claim that Circle K violates her natural rights guaranteed by Article 3. If so, she has no rights. Instead, her argument was that Section 3 triggered a public policy exception to her status as an at-will employee.

As the court explained, state courts often derive their public policy standards from statutes that do not directly regulate what is at hand, but that inform broader values. A classic example is an earlier Colorado case in which an employee was fired for refusing to perform an illegal act. Although the Criminal Code does not address employment law, the court recognized a broader public policy that employers do not want to encourage crime.

in Morenothe court invoked Colorado law codifying justifiable homicide. In other wordsmurder in self-defense – to justify public policy supporting the employment-at-will exception. If they hadn’t looked at the state constitution, it might have ended there. But the court also cited Article 3’s “protect life” language, which it said “represents a clear public policy favoring self-defense.” It remained unclear why this case would vindicate natural rights, given that courts have repeatedly refused to invoke the provision.

This decision changes Colorado’s employment law and eliminates one area of ​​at-will employment. But given the facts at issue, that doesn’t mean Moreno will win. The court determined that Mr. Moreno could proceed with the case and remanded the case to federal court for further proceedings on the merits.

As the dissenters pointed out, the majority’s reliance on Colorado’s natural rights guarantees goes too far and could have far-reaching unintended consequences. The same can be done for all types of rights in the Colorado Constitution. Like most state constitutions, free speech is protected. What happens if she gets fired for abusing a customer? Colorado also has a contract clause. Could this have any impact on at-will employment? The list is long and uncertain.

Now consider the following hypothesis. Imagine Moreno brandishing an illegal switchblade at an assailant and being indicted. Colorado’s Second Amendment analog protects the “defense” of “person or property.” But six years ago, the Colorado Supreme Court ruled that it was not as protective as the Second Amendment. That means Moreno would likely lose her hypothetical claim that her hypothetical prosecution violates the Second Amendment to the Colorado Constitution. In other words, the court’s precedent suggests that she should lose the case. to the government Invokes state constitutional self-defense protections, but may prevail in dispute private employer Congress has not even passed a law affecting her at-will employment. That’s outrageous.

While some labor lawyers may be satisfied with this outcome, Morenothe rest should be careful. The court used the constitutional language carelessly, without understanding the contradictory meanings outlined in my hypothesis. A majority of Colorado judges appear to have lost sight of the Constitution’s primary purpose. It is not about forming laws between private parties, but about protecting oneself from guardians.

Anthony Sanders is director of the Center for Judicial Engagement at the Institute for Justice.

Recommended quote: Anthony Sanders Finding public policy in the text of the constitutionSᴛᴀᴛᴇ Cᴏᴜʀᴛ Rᴇᴘᴏʀᴛ (July 14, 2026), https://statecourtreport.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/finding-public-policy-constitutional-text

Trump revives 2020 election claims as experts dispute his evidence

0


President Donald Trump made a number of claims about election integrity in a prime-time address. Experts, including former U.S. intelligence officials, are skeptical.

play

WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump touched on a wide range of issues in his July 16 address to the nation, from accusing China of interfering in the U.S. election to defeat him to grave weaknesses in the nation’s elections.

In his comments and previously classified documents that he ordered declassified to strengthen his case, President Trump made extensive claims about the vulnerability of U.S. elections to both foreign interference and cyber and technological vulnerabilities.

Some experts who have reviewed Trump’s claims and newly released documents say the president is making false claims. That includes Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.), the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee.

This document contains genuine cyber threats and vulnerabilities. But they say there is little to show that U.S. elections are as fragile as the president claims. Alternatively, it said there is little indication that China interfered in the U.S. election in any meaningful way that would change the outcome of his 2020 loss to Democrat Joe Biden in order to undermine President Trump.

Below is a list of key points of President Trump’s claims, based on previously classified U.S. intelligence documents, and possible responses.

China’s election interference and cover-up

Trump’s claims: China sought to undermine the 2020 election in a myriad of ways, including compromising U.S. voter data, stealing 220 million voter files, and secretly influencing U.S. business leaders and journalists. Trump also said raw intelligence obtained by the FBI in 2020 shows China is trying to manufacture illegal ballots for Biden.

response: Warner told USA TODAY in a recent interview that he has already seen the classified documents cited by Trump and that U.S. intelligence assessments have long acknowledged interference by China, Russia and other countries. Those reports, including a key March 2021 intelligence assessment of the 2020 election, concluded that none of these countries attempted to tamper with voter registration, ballot mailing, counting, or reporting results. But the assessment also specifically stated that it did not assess how foreign influence activities affected voters or election results.

The majority view of the intelligence community, expressed with high confidence in 2021, was that China considered but did not carry out influence operations aimed at changing the outcome of the presidential election, according to a declassified version released at the time. On July 16, Chinese government spokesperson Liu Zhang told USA TODAY, “The U.S. presidential election is an internal matter of the United States, and its outcome will be determined by the votes of the American people. China has never interfered in the U.S. presidential election and will never interfere in the future.”

Even White House adviser John Solomon, who helped review the documents, said after Trump’s July 16 speech that the intelligence community had “no evidence” that a foreign power “flipped votes in the 2020, 2022, or 2024 elections.”

As for President Trump’s explanation for the 220 million files stolen or hacked by China, it appears to go beyond the White House’s own explanation that the records may have also been “bought.” Election experts, including former Justice Department attorney David Becker, told USA TODAY that some of the records in question were available for purchase by campaigns, researchers and other qualified purchasers and could easily have been obtained by a hostile government.

US intelligence cover-up

Trump’s claims: U.S. intelligence agencies, including the CIA, FBI, and National Security Agency, withheld information about China’s efforts and intentions to undermine President Trump’s political fortunes, including curbing or downplaying China’s reach. Internal documents revealed that information about China’s election targets was “deliberately massaged” and left out of the president’s briefing.

response: There is constant debate within and among the 18 U.S. intelligence agencies over how much weight to give to certain information, especially opaque information such as China and Russia’s intentions to influence U.S. elections.

The intelligence community publicly disclosed some of these disagreements in its 2021 assessment, including a “minority view” by the national intelligence and cyber director that China has taken some steps to undermine President Trump’s re-election chances, primarily through social media and public statements. But its overall conclusion was that China “did not conduct interference activities and did not consider but conduct influence operations intended to change the outcome of the U.S. presidential election.”

As for the cover-up claims, Sue Gordon, who served as director of national intelligence in the Trump administration from 2017 to 2019, told CNN on July 16 that intelligence agencies repeatedly warned President Trump about efforts by foreign governments to interfere in U.S. elections, primarily aimed at undermining voter confidence in the election system. But she said, “Intention is not action. Action is not impact. And impact is not result.”

Vulnerabilities in election infrastructure

Trump’s claims: U.S. election infrastructure, including electronic voting machines, can and has been easily compromised. Centralized election-related data repositories are the most vulnerable to abuse. Intelligence community assessments indicate that adversaries such as Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea have the potential to compromise U.S. election infrastructure.

response: U.S. intelligence and cybersecurity officials have acknowledged and warned about these vulnerabilities for more than a decade. The intelligence community established a special Foreign Influence Center in 2022 to combat these activities in real time. But after retaking the White House in January 2025, President Trump dismantled FMIC and other major efforts within the U.S. government to detect and respond to vulnerabilities and intrusions in election infrastructure.

Venezuela election interference

Trump’s claims: The CIA has obtained reports of a specific conspiracy to digitally rig elections in favor of the Maduro regime in Venezuela.

response: This claim falls far short of past claims by Trump supporters that Venezuela played a role in meddling in the US election through access to voting machines. “The intelligence is very clear. They did it with their own machines,” Solomon told reporters on July 16 when asked about Venezuela’s claims.

Fraud and concealment of non-citizen voters at the state level

Trump’s claims: The Department of Homeland Security has found that approximately 278,000 noncitizens are registered to vote in federal elections. Election officials suppressed significant evidence of fraud, including a massive voter registration drive in Michigan. And while the FBI discovered that agents had signed voter registration forms in other people’s names and submitted fraudulent registration forms, the Biden Justice Department made slow progress and closed the investigation.

response: As President Trump acknowledged, the details are expected to be revealed by Homeland Security officials on July 17th. It is difficult to evaluate President Trump’s claims without details of what he is claiming, including his methodology. However, according to FactCheck.org, DHS’ SAVE database is notorious for producing false positives, particularly those involving people who naturalized after older immigration records were created.

The Muskegon, Michigan, incident cited by Trump involved documented fraud, including fraudulent or questionable registration applications. But authorities discovered and invalidated the suspicious applications before election day, resulting in no votes being cast.

Attack on TV networks for not broadcasting President Trump’s speech live

Trump’s claims: In an unprecedented move, President Trump asked the Federal Communications Commission to revoke the broadcast licenses of ABC and NBC, which chose not to broadcast prime-time speeches. He accused the networks of not wanting to “expose” the election fraud he claimed in his speech, saying, “They and members of the media are part of a conspiracy… They want to protect the radical left.”

response: ABC and NBC may not have pre-empted major broadcast channels from broadcasting President Trump’s speech, but they covered President Trump’s speech. Both companies streamed the speeches live on their websites, and NBC aired a special report afterwards. CNN provides ongoing discussion and analysis on audio and has made the feed available digitally.

49ers legend chases heckler at celebrity golf tournament

0

play

NFL legend Jerry Rice wasn’t happy about being heckled after hitting a golf shot during the recent American Century Championship.

Rice was hitting a ball off a tee at an undesignated hole on the course at Edgewood Tahoe Golf Course in Stateline, Nevada, when the incident occurred. He hit the ball with a jerky swing, and immediately after making contact, the audience shouted, “Four!” It shows that Rice hit a bad shot.

The former San Francisco 49ers receiver immediately turned to the crowd and quietly yelled, “Hey!” Then he asked, “Which one? Which one?” as he tried to catch up to the heckler.

In the end, Rice seemed to have caught up with the group of hecklers. It’s not clear what he said to the fan in question, as the video of the incident was shot from a distance.

After a brief faceoff, Rice returned to the tee box with a smile on his face. Fans nearby cheered him on and he continued his round.

Rice finished 42nd in the 90-player celebrity golf tournament, which included many former NFL players. Among them were Marcus Allen, Jerome Bettis, Drew Brees, Derek Carr, Larry Fitzgerald, Ryan Fitzpatrick, Dwight Freeney, AJ Hawk, Jason Kelce, Jim McMahon, Patrick Peterson, Tony Romo, Joe Theisman, Adam Thielen, Brian Urlacher, DeMarcus Ware, Andrew Whitworth and Steve Young.

Several current NFL players also participated in the American Century Championship. Davante Adams, Kyle Hamilton, Kyle Juschuk, Trevor Lawrence and Baker Mayfield were all on the field along with Minnesota Vikings coach Kevin O’Connell and Tennessee Titans coach Robert Saleh.

Dunkin’ offers a free Perk Tumbler with the purchase of this drink

0

play

Dunkin lovers may want to wake up early to buy the coffee chain’s latest goodies.

Dunkin, in conjunction with the lifestyle brand, will launch the Park Perfect Ships collection on Friday, July 17th. To celebrate the release date, customers who purchase a Park Daydream Refresher will receive a limited edition Park Tumbler while supplies last.

Parke Daydream Refresher is made with strawberry flavored shots with strawberry dragon fruit and oat milk, topped with a layer of pink strawberry cold foam.

Here’s how to get your hands on Dunkin’s limited edition Park Tumbler.

When will Dunkin’ Park Collection be available?

The Dunkins Park Collection will be available starting Friday, July 17th.

How to order Dunkins Park Collection drinks

Parke Daydream Refresher is on the menu at all Dunkin’ stores and in the app, while the Parke Perfect Sips Collection is only available via the Dunkin’ app.

How to receive a free Dunkin Park tumbler

Customers who purchase a Parke Daydream Refresher on July 17 will also receive a limited edition Parke tumbler while supplies last at participating Dunkin’ locations. Offer limited to one Parke tumbler per order.

What drinks are available in Dunkin Park Collection?

Dunkin’ Park Perfect Ships Collection features:

  • Blueberry vanilla protein latte: A smooth latte made with espresso and protein milk, layered with a sweet French vanilla swirl and a blueberry flavor shot.
  • Strawberry cloud matcha: Earthy matcha, creamy whole milk, and sweet vanilla flavors topped with pink strawberry cold foam.
  • Splash Berry Dunkin’ Zero: Watermelon with lime and blackberry flavors mixed with sparkling water for a sugar-free energy boost.
  • Pink Pineapple Sparkling Refresher: Tropical pink pineapple flavor mixed with carbonated water.
  • Strawberry Sparkling Limeade: A tangy-sweet blend of classic limeade and strawberry flavors topped with sparkling water.
  • Pink Mango Daydream Refresher: A tropical blend of mango and pineapple mixed with creamy oat milk and finished with pink strawberry cold foam.
  • Coconut cloud limeade: Bright limeade and coconut flavors come together and are topped with sweet, cool foam.

See the entire Parke x Dunkin’ collection

The Parke x Dunkin’ collection includes a limited edition line of mock neck sweatshirts and accessories inspired by Dunkin’s pink and orange color palette. Full lineup includes:

  • Latte Varsity Mock Neck ($135): A latte-inspired staple featuring a bold Dunkin’ Orange park signature logo, subtle donut embroidery on the sleeve and a custom co-branded patch.
  • espresso varsity mock neck ($135): A deeper espresso-toned item featuring a bold Dunkin’ pink park varsity logo. Finished with premium details like donut embroidery and custom co-branded patches.
  • Parke x Dunkin Claw Clip ($17): Pink everyday hair accessory featuring orange Parke and Dunkin’ branding.

The collection will be available on Park’s website starting July 17th at 10am ET.

Dunkin’ will also launch a limited edition collection of Park x Dunkin stainless steel tumblers. It comes in three colors: latte, espresso, and pink, and costs $24.99. The tumbler will be on sale at DunkinRunsonMerch.com starting July 20th at 10am.

Greta Cross is USA TODAY’s national trends reporter. Story ideas? Email her at gcross@usatoday.com.

Saman Shafiq is a trending news reporter for USA TODAY. Contact her at sshafiq@usatodayco.com and follow X and Instagram @saman_shafiq7.

Parking your car can be dangerous. So why does ICE rely on them?

0

play

Traffic stops, one of the Trump administration’s increasingly common immigration tactics, have come under intense scrutiny following two fatal shootings by federal agents in less than a week.

Over a six-day period, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents shot and killed two people during encounters at vehicle stops. That sparked widespread protests and led agency leaders to suspend most stops across the country, a decision that was quickly reversed by President Donald Trump.

“We cannot let go of traffic stops, one of ICE’s most important and effective crime-fighting tools,” the president said in a social media post.

The shootings and rapid policy shifts have prompted calls for a review of ICE’s tactics and raised broader questions about how the administration’s push for mass deportations is changing the way immigration agents operate in American society.

Former ICE leaders said traffic stops were never a primary enforcement tool. When investigators make arrests in the community, they typically rely on surveillance and careful planning to detain people in their homes, workplaces, or other locations. Those operations were typically limited to immigrants deemed to pose a threat to public safety or those with serious criminal convictions, former officials said.

But that has changed as the Trump administration seeks to carry out what it calls the largest deportation campaign in U.S. history. ICE agents, Border Patrol agents, and other Department of Homeland Security employees increasingly rely on street operationsIncluding car stops Find and arrest illegal immigrants, many of whom have no criminal records.

As street activity increases, police-involved shootings also increase. Since early last year, immigration agents have shot and killed more than 20 people, most of whom were in their cars at the time of the attacks, according to a USA TODAY analysis of public statements, lawsuits and court records.

Police and use-of-force experts say this worrying trend suggests a lack of training and experience on how to safely conduct traffic stops, which are widely known among law enforcement officials as one of the most dangerous types of encounters an officer can face.

“Traffic stops are tricky, sometimes dangerous, and require thorough scenario-based training to learn how to stop properly,” said David Harris, a law professor at the University of Pittsburgh who specializes in police procedurals. “ICE agents don’t seem to understand that.”

“Our first goal is to keep our officers safe and keep criminals off our streets. Illegal aliens will be arrested and deported wherever they are,” Homeland Security Secretary Mark Wayne Mullin said in a statement to USA TODAY.

2 vehicle stops 6 days apart

On July 13, ICE agents shot and killed a Colombian man in a residential neighborhood in Biddeford, Maine. The Department of Homeland Security said officers opened fire “out of fear for public safety” as the man tried to flee the scene.

Six days earlier, ICE agents shot and killed a Mexican national during a traffic stop in Houston, Texas. Federal officials said the man tried to hit them with his car, but witnesses disputed that.

Amid outrage over the killings, top officials at ICE and the Department of Homeland Security ordered officers to halt most traffic stops and prioritize other immigration enforcement tactics.

In an interview with Fox News, White House Border Security Director Tom Homan described the suspension as a “short-term review to ensure the safety and correct behavior of ICE agents.”

Homan also disputed claims by some conservative commentators that the moratorium would hinder the administration’s immigration enforcement efforts, saying agents could make arrests before they get into their homes or cars.

Nevertheless, President Trump slammed the decision on social media the next morning, calling it a victory for Democrats and criminals.

Within hours, the White House confirmed that it had overturned President Trump’s order suspending traffic stops to allow authorities to evaluate training policies, to the frustration of law enforcement experts, former ICE agents, members of Congress and others who thought the suspension was a logical response to recent deadly incidents.

“I don’t understand why anyone would oppose a pause when there are so many shootings and so many deaths,” said John Sandweg, who served as acting ICE director under former President Barack Obama.

‘It wasn’t necessary’: Former ICE agents say traffic stops are rare

For most of its existence, ICE has taken illegal immigrants into custody from local or state law enforcement and relied heavily on local jails for arrests.

This comes after the Obama administration expanded a program that connects people incarcerated in local jails with federal immigration officials. President Obama later repealed the program, but President Trump reinstated it during his first term as president.

Sandweg said when ICE agents made arrests in the community, the operations targeted people convicted of serious or violent crimes. Of all the arrests ICE made on the streets, most occurred in residential homes.

“Traffic stops will occur. They are not prohibited, but they were not the focus of the operation,” he said. “We didn’t need them.”

Deborah Fleischaker, a former ICE official who worked under the Biden administration and the first Trump administration, said she spent a significant amount of time investigating each street action during her time at the agency.

“We knew where we were picking them up and why we were picking them up. We observed them over several days or weeks to establish their patterns,” she said. “You did that so that you could get them in the safest way for the officer and the target.”

Agents flood into community amid deportation campaign

Since President Trump returned to office, immigration officials have increasingly engaged in street operations, including vehicle stops, to carry out the president’s deportation plans. This has been made possible in part because of the closure of the southern border, which experts say has allowed the agency to operate within the country. Illegal border crossings have plummeted under the Trump administration.

The number of street arrests by ICE has increased 11 times compared to the monthly average in the final months of the Biden administration, according to a report from the Deportation Data Project.

During the same period, transfers from state prisons and local jails to ICE custody nearly doubled, and the number of people arrested without conviction was seven times higher than under President Joe Biden, according to the report.

The increase in street arrests comes as the agency more than doubles its staff and pushes to expand the number of illegal immigrants it apprehends for deportation. White House Chief of Staff Stephen Miller has previously said ICE’s minimum goal is to arrest 3,000 people per day.

At the same time, the number of shootings by federal officers has skyrocketed, with more than 20 similar incidents since August, most involving vehicles and traffic stops, Department of Homeland Security and court records show.

Former ICE agents and law enforcement experts blamed, in part, a pressure campaign to increase arrests and a lack of vigilance by agents on the ground. They pointed to two recent shootings in Texas and Maine in which ICE agents shot and killed men who were not the target of immigration enforcement.

“Part of what has been forgotten along the way under this mass deportation program is the careful planning that took a lot of time and thought,” Fleischaker said. “We’re seeing tragic mistakes like this because there’s less planning and they’re flying by the seat of their pants more often.”

Homeland Security and administration officials have largely defended their employees, linking the shootings to an increase in vehicular assaults and noncooperation fueled by rhetoric from Democratic officials.

Trump officials argue that the increase in street activity is also the result of local authorities implementing sanctuary policies that limit cooperation with police and federal immigration authorities.

“Our law enforcement officers are facing a more than 1,300% increase in vehicle attacks as they work to enforce our nation’s laws,” Mullin said in a statement. “We urge caution against illegal aliens, but trying to evade arrest is dangerous. This reckless illegal alien activity came after sanctuary politicians held a webinar and shared resources on how to openly defy ICE.”

Riskier tactics

Jeffrey Alpert, a criminology professor at the University of South Carolina who studies the use of deadly force by police, said vehicle stops are among the most dangerous encounters law enforcement officers face on a daily basis.

To manage these risks, officers receive extensive training in everything from approaching vehicles to assessing threats and de-escalating conflicts. Former ICE officials said immigration officers received similar guidance under the Obama, Biden and first Trump administrations.

Homan said the agency’s current vehicle stop training is “pretty extensive” and comparable to what other federal, state and local law enforcement agencies offer.

But former ICE officers and law enforcement experts said training alone is not enough. Unlike local police officers who regularly conduct traffic stops throughout their careers, immigration officers have historically relied on other enforcement methods and have had little opportunity to gain experience responding to roadside encounters.

“Even in the best of circumstances, when you lack experience and are doing something difficult and dangerous, things can easily go wrong,” said David Harris, a law professor at the University of Pittsburgh who studies police procedurals.

Several experts also questioned whether vehicle stops are necessary at many immigration points. They noted that investigators can often make arrests at residences or other locations where the situation is more controlled and the risk of conflict is lower.

Homan, who previously led ICE under the Obama administration and during the first term of the Trump administration, has made similar points publicly.

“We’re hearing a lot right now that this is going to impact ICE arrests, but I don’t think that will happen,” Homan told Fox News. “I’ve been doing this for a long time. Once the foreigner leaves the house, you can arrest him before he gets into the car. You can just wait until the car reaches its destination.”

White House announces vehicle stops have resumed

The brief suspension of vehicle stops across the country highlighted how seriously immigration authorities were responding to the outrage over the spate of shootings. But once the president intervened, administration officials who had defended the moratorium quickly reaffirmed their support for the tactic.

“President Trump and I are on the same page,” Marin said on X. “We want @ICEgov officers to have every option available to them to keep them safe while carrying out their mission to deport as many criminal illegal aliens from our country as possible.”

Homan later echoed that sentiment, saying vehicle stops are essential to immigration enforcement, but he had previously said the stops would not affect the administration’s deportation goals.

“Vehicle stops are a primary tool for doing our job, and we must continue to do so,” he told Fox News.

On July 16, White House press secretary Caroline Leavitt confirmed that “vehicle stops continue” and said the Department of Homeland Security was providing “verbal guidance” to all field offices.

As the administration moves forward with its immigration crackdown campaign, former ICE agents and law enforcement experts have warned that resuming vehicle stops without overhauling training and tactics could lead to more violence.

“This is an immigration policy that gets in the way of common sense,” Sandweg said of Trump’s decision to overturn the order. “These stops are not good for anyone, not the authorities, not the officers involved, not the suspects.”

She moved in with her father, who has Alzheimer’s disease. But something amazing happened

0

Natalie Bryan, 49, knows how devastating dementia can be. Her grandmother has Alzheimer’s disease, and Brian has watched friends care for their parents in recent years.

That’s one reason she and her husband decided to return to their hometown of Oklahoma City in 2021 after spending the first half of their careers moving around the country.

“My husband also has older parents,” she said. “My parents are aging and I decided they would need help at some point.”

When Brian’s father, James Nelson, started showing mild signs of memory loss in 2024, his family urged him to get tested immediately. As a result, it was confirmed that he had mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease.

“We knew what the diagnosis meant,” Brian said. “And for us, that diagnosis meant a long journey into decline and, ultimately, death.”

For decades, that’s been true. However, new treatments for Alzheimer’s patients that have become available in recent years have significantly improved patient outcomes, lengthened plateaus, and ultimately reduced caregiving responsibilities for patients’ families.

Early detection is key, said Dr. Anna Chodos, executive director of Dementia Care Aware, an organization dedicated to improving dementia detection and care. For eligible patients in the early stages of Alzheimer’s disease, treatment can slow symptoms and disability. But Chodos said most people are still diagnosed too late to qualify, and some have already received treatment, making them ineligible.

Most Alzheimer’s patients still require a lot of care, Chodos said. Of the 63 million caregivers in the United States, 27% report that the person they care for has Alzheimer’s disease, dementia, or other memory-related disorders, according to the AARP and National Alliance for Caregiving report “Caregiving in the US 2025.”

“Caregivers need to connect with all the resources and great community organizations that can support them,” Chodos said. “They need to know they are not alone.”

“We were surprised too.”

After Brian’s father was diagnosed, his doctors considered treatment options. She said her father was a good candidate because he was diagnosed early and drove himself to receive IV fluids every other week for 18 months. Brian’s father uses Requembi, but the Alzheimer’s Association says drugs like Kisunra also target the underlying biology of the disease. Not all treatments work for all patients, and some patients respond better to certain drugs while others do not respond at all. Although there are other drugs that can relieve the symptoms of dementia, there is currently no drug that can cure Alzheimer’s disease.

“I would say we were hopeful, but we did not expect the results we received,” Brian said.

Brian said his 79-year-old father showed little signs of decline over the past 18 months. Her family still notices short-term memory problems in him, but the disease doesn’t seem to be progressing and his father hasn’t noticed any side effects from the IV fluid, she said. He helps take care of the children, drives his own car, works with the elderly helping the elderly, and continues to go to church. Recently, I have reduced my infusion to once a month.

“Other people, like my grandmother and my friend’s parents, have also seen significant declines over 18 months,” she says. “We were really surprised.”

Chodos said patients taking these drugs typically still regress, but at a slower pace.

“The real goal would be to keep people permanently in a very early stage, where there is very little progression of the disease,” Chodos said. “What we’re really hoping is that we can lock in some of their time and maybe even help them improve some of the things that will get them back to better function, like exercising more or eating better or sleeping better.”

For Brian, it was a huge relief. As a working mother of two children, she worried that her father’s diagnosis would add another stressor to her already busy life. But so far, life continues as normal. She sometimes attends doctor’s appointments to take notes for her siblings, but otherwise her father remains independent.

“I thought I was going to make all the doctor’s appointments and go with him, but he just went on his own,” she said. “He comes right after he gets the IV and walks my dog.”

Brian knows his father won’t be independent forever. But the treatment gave them time to start thinking about what their lives would be like if their parents needed more caregiving support. For many family caregivers, the diagnosis is sudden and all-consuming. Brian said he is grateful for this preparation period.

“You have to think about finances, but you also have to think about physical care and the time you want to spend with them,” she says. “We realize that time is limited, and we want our children to make the most of their time with their grandparents.”

Madeline Mitchell’s role covering women and the care economy for USA TODAY is supported by a partnership with Pivotal and Journalism Funding Partners. Funders do not provide editorial input.

Contact Madeline at: memitchell@usatoday.com and @maddiemitch_ With X.

Greystar Real Estate Partners accused of refusing Section 8 tenants

0

play

The Housing Rights Initiative, a nonprofit watchdog group, has filed multiple complaints with the New Jersey Department of Civil Rights alleging fair housing violations by Greystar, the nation’s largest apartment manager and owner.

The filing is part of a multi-state lawsuit, totaling 114 complaints filed in six states and Washington, D.C., that accuses the company of systematically refusing to rent to prospective tenants with Section 8 housing vouchers.

“Greystar is committing massive civil rights violations on a scale our organization has never seen before,” said Housing Rights Initiative Founder and Executive Director Aaron Carr. “We have never encountered a landowner like Greystar who operates with such brazen contempt and hostility to the rule of law. America’s largest landowner is America’s most discriminatory landowner.”

In response to the allegations, Greystar said in a statement that it “remains committed to fair housing practices.” The company also said it “provides training and expects our team members to comply with all applicable laws.”

The charges were filed after a series of sting operations that began in October 2025. Testers from the Housing Rights Initiative would call Greystar properties posing as prospective tenants.

These testers asked the property’s lease agent if they could use Section 8 housing vouchers to pay rent. The complaint alleges that Greystar’s leasing agents repeatedly refused to accept vouchers, imposed illegal conditions, such as requiring vouchers to cover 100% of rent, and refused to count voucher assistance toward minimum income requirements.

The Housing Rights Initiative said this is a direct violation of fair housing laws in all seven jurisdictions and highlights the need for strong enforcement by state civil rights and housing authorities.

According to Greystar’s website, Greystar manages more than 1.1 million units nationwide.

The Housing Rights Initiative said its investigation into Greystar is ongoing and additional fair housing violations may be added to the public record as inspections continue.

“Our investigation into Greystar reveals that Greystar’s discriminatory practices are part of a much larger pattern underlying income discrimination across housing markets across the country,” said Akash Patel, director of program development at the Housing Rights Initiative. “Fair and equitable housing practices are critical to social stability, and allowing discrimination to continue will further disadvantage our most vulnerable neighbors.”

Maddie McGay is a real estate reporter for NorthJersey.com and The Record, covering everything that’s worth celebrating about living in North Jersey. Find her on Instagram @maddiemcgay or X @maddiemcgayy and sign up for the North Jersey Living newsletter. Have a tip, trend, or great home she should know about? Email MMcGay@gannett.com.

Andy Burnham becomes leader of the UK Labor Party

0

play

LONDON, July 17 (Reuters) – Andy Burnham, nicknamed the “King of the North,” will be sworn in as leader of Britain’s ruling Labor Party on Friday, the final step in his bid to become the seventh prime minister in a decade on a pledge to halt the rise of populist Reform Britain.

Mr Burnham, who earned his nickname as Mayor of Greater Manchester for his determination to protect local interests, will be elected with overwhelming support from Labor MPs at Friday’s special meeting.

The event is just a formality before Keir Starmer is sworn in as Britain’s leader on Monday, when the party will look into his ministerial team and want to know more about his approach to government.

Burnham’s massive “rebalance of power”

Mr Burnham, 56, will deliver a message in his speech that his government will be a “genuine Labor Party” overseeing economic recovery, strengthening public control, reindustrialization and putting power back in the hands of local communities.

According to excerpts from the speech, the prime minister promises to give Britain “a new path to the path we have been on for the past 40 years” and that the government will be “unabashedly Labor in our priorities and decisions, putting people and places at the heart of everything we do.”

But there’s still much to learn about how Burnham will govern.

He has spoken once since returning to parliament last month after winning the seat in Makerfield. It marked the beginning of a four-week process to remove Starmer, who installed him as prime minister and is unpopular across Britain and whose MPs are hostile to him.

In it, he outlined some of his domestic agenda and said he wanted to oversee the “biggest rebalancing of power” from London to England’s regions. He said he believed this would reduce inequality and the anger felt by “marginalized communities” who are increasingly flocking to reform.

The message that there was a plan to halt the rise of reformists appealed to Labor MPs who feared losing their seats to veteran Brexiteer Nigel Farage’s populist party at the next national election, due by 2029. Reformers have been leading the polls for months.

Some of that shine has been tarnished in recent weeks by Mr Farage’s acceptance of money from wealthy donors, perhaps giving Mr Burnham a chance to revive Labour’s fortunes.

But he doesn’t have much time.

With a general election less than three years away, Mr Burnham needs to start delivering on some of his promises as soon as possible, many of which are based on long-term thinking.

Nigel Wilcock, executive director of the Economic Development Institute, an independent body representing economic development professionals, said Mr Burnham had spent years making the case for a different approach to economic growth.

“The challenge is to make that vision a reality.”

(Reporting by Elizabeth Piper; Editing by Kevin Liffey)