Home Blog Page 197

Peter Alexander leaves ‘Today’ show, shares news in emotional segment

0

play

Peter Alexander gets approval.

The 49-year-old NBC News chief White House correspondent and co-host of Saturday’s “Today” show is leaving the network after 22 years.

Alexander shared the news in an emotional segment on “Today” on Saturday, March 28th. He said he made the decision to spend more time with his family, noting that he lives in Washington, D.C., a “trek” from the “Today” show studios in New York City.

“I’ve been away from home more than 80 nights in the last seven months, and I’ve been away from my family more than 220 Friday nights in the last seven years,” Alexander said. “So, in this limited time, I would like to create a better balance between my personal and professional life and try something new before my daughters lose interest in playing with me.”

He continued, “I’m excited. Just like I was taught, my family comes first and the rest is the details.”

Alexander joined NBC News in 2004 and was selected to anchor the Saturday edition of the “Today” show in 2018.

As a White House correspondent for NBC News, Alexander has covered the presidencies of Barack Obama, Joe Biden and Donald Trump. At a White House press conference in March 2020, Trump called Alexander a “terrible reporter” after a reporter asked whether the president was giving Americans a “false sense of hope” by trying to “put a positive spin on things” during the coronavirus pandemic.

In the March 28 segment announcing the news, Alexander’s Today colleagues became emotional over his resignation. Anchor Laura Jarrett praised Alexander as an “excellent journalist,” “a good, decent human being” and “an extraordinary father,” and said she supported his decision to prioritize his family. “You only get one chance to be a father to Eva and Emma,” she says.

Alexander also said he spoke about his decision with Savannah Guthrie, who recently announced she would return to “Today” on April 6 after a two-month absence due to the disappearance of her 84-year-old mother, Nancy Guthrie.

“I also had the opportunity to exchange messages with my dear friend Savannah. I’m excited to have her back here. We will continue to pray for her,” he said.

Alexander is the latest TV anchor to announce major changes to his on-air duties, citing a desire to spend more time with his children. Anderson Cooper announced in February that he was leaving CBS News’ “60 Minutes,” where he was a correspondent in addition to his work at CNN.

“For nearly 20 years, I’ve been juggling my jobs at CNN and CBS, but now that I have young children, I want to spend as much time as possible with them while they still want to spend time with me,” Cooper said.

Cory Booker slams Democrats for “meeting with press” negotiations for 2028 presidential election

0

play

Sen. Cory Booker said in a new interview that Democrats have “failed at this point” and appealed to the left to support new leadership to ease the nation’s deep divisions.

Appearing on NBC News’ “Meet the Press” on Sunday, March 29, the New Jersey Democratic congressman promoted his new book, “The Stand,” in which he writes that the Democratic Party has stumbled on administering “purity tests” to its members. Mr Booker argued that these formed a coalition “too small to effect major change”.

“I’m proud of a lot of the things my Democratic colleagues are doing, but collectively, our party is failing at this point,” Booker said.

Expanding on that passage from his book, the congressman told host Kristen Welker that Democrats must make a “generational shift” to bridge the bitter partisan divide.

“This is one of our greatest crises, and it’s time to envision a new vision for this country that is far more united, brings people together, and is less divided,” Booker said. “I truly believe that this is a time when we need new leadership, a new moral imagination, to unite our country.”

Booker added that the Democratic challenge is bigger than President Donald Trump and his administration, something the party and Booker passionately oppose. Last year, Booker protested the president on the Senate floor, delivering a 25-hour marathon speech airing Democrats’ dissatisfaction with the administration’s policies.

“He shouldn’t be the hero of our story at this point,” Booker said in an interview. “We have real challenges with new technologies such as AI and robotics, and we have new challenges that require greater national unity. And they remind us that we are not each other’s enemies. In fact, our ability to fund common ground has always been our greatest hope.”

Democrats did not rule out running for president in 2028 when asked directly. He ran unsuccessfully for the party’s nomination in 2020.

“I’m running for re-election,” Booker said. “I hope the state of New Jersey supports me for another six years.”

Kathryn Palmer is USA TODAY’s political reporter. She can be reached at the following address: kapalmer@usatoday.com And to X@Kathryn Purml. Sign up for her daily politics newsletter here.

Caster Semenya criticizes IOC and Kirsty Coventry over transgender ban

0

play

Olympic champion runner Caster Semenya on Sunday expressed disappointment with the International Olympic Committee and criticized IOC President Kirsty Coventry following the IOC’s recent decision to ban transgender athletes from competing in the Olympics.

The decision also limits female athletes like Semenya who have differences in sexual development, or medical conditions known as disorders of sexual development.

South Africa’s Semenya said she expected more from Zimbabwean Coventry after the women’s race, which was encouraged to celebrate female strength, unity and community support.

“Personally, I think she understands that as a leader she is African and we Africans are from the Global South and we cannot control our genes,” Semenya said at a March 29 press conference in Cape Town.

The IOC issued the ban on March 26, reversing a 2004 decision to allow transgender female athletes to participate.

To date, only one openly transgender woman has competed in the Olympics, a weightlifter from New Zealand, but she failed to make it past the opening round at the 2021 Tokyo Summer Games.

“When the science is clear, show us who made the decision. Don’t pretend it’s a lie, because it’s a lie and we know it because we saw it,” Semenya said. “So if we’re going to answer or confront Kirsty, that’s how we’re going to respond. And this is something that affects women, so we’re going to respond with raw strength.”

Semenya is a two-time Olympic gold medalist in the 800-meter race. Although she was assigned female at birth, she has testosterone levels higher than the typical female range. She has been banned from competing in major international competitions because she refused to take drugs that artificially lower her testosterone levels.

The new eligibility rules, which the IOC says will “protect the fairness, safety and integrity of the women’s category,” will begin at the Los Angeles Olympics in July 2028.

Nevada desert land near Burning Man heads for auction in April

0


More than 600 acres of land near Burning Man in the Black Rock Desert will be auctioned off in April.

play

A large parcel encompassing hundreds of acres near the Burning Man venue is on the market.

Three parcels totaling more than 615 acres on the edge of the Black Rock Desert will be auctioned in April through online marketplace Concierge Auctions.

This collection of properties is said to be one of the last privately owned parcels near the annual location of Burning Man, and auction officials have called it “one of the most important privately owned properties” in Gerlach, Nevada for some time.

“This is one of the most attractive properties to emerge in northern Nevada in recent decades,” said Carl DiGennaro of Key Realty Las Vegas. “With its geothermal features and significant water rights, as well as its rich history and proximity to Burning Man, it offers exceptional scale and flexibility.”

The three parcels, which are said to have potential for geothermal development, can be acquired individually or as part of a package. The parcel is:

  • Camp David: The 144-acre property is located in one of the “most geothermally active” locations in Nevada, according to the listing.
  • Sandy J: 70 acres surrounded by 2 natural hot springs.
  • fredsfield: The largest parcel is located in the valley adjacent to Black Rock Preserve and is nearly 400 acres in size.

These properties are touted not only for the large water rights they hold, but also for a variety of potential uses.

Camp David is home to the Great Boiling Spring and dozens of natural hot spring pools that hold 201 acre-feet of water. It also features several structures, including primary residences, shops, storage facilities, maintenance outbuildings, and a dedicated power storage facility.

Located just one mile from downtown Gerlach, Sandy J holds just under 145 acre-feet of deeded water rights. City water also flows beneath the property, and the parcel is being touted as an opportunity for “thoughtful development.”

Fred’s Field has 447 acre-feet of spring water and offers outdoor activities such as fishing, paddleboarding, and kayaking. The landscape includes views of mountains such as Granite Peak.

Bidding will open on April 1st at 6:30pm and close on April 15th at 4pm. Interested parties can register through the auction listing page on the Concierge Auctions website. The parcel package is listed for $20 million, and the starting price is expected to be more than $10 million.

“These properties represent years of careful management of the land,” seller David Hardy Jamieson said in a statement. “Each parcel has its own character and significance, and we look forward to watching the next owner shape a vision that honors both the landscape and its incredible potential.”

President Trump says “Cuba is next”, US continues talks

0

play

President Donald Trump hinted again that action could be taken against Cuba as months of sanctions put pressure on the country and sparked talks between the United States and the island, located about 90 miles from Florida.

During his remarks at the Future Investment Initiative Summit in Miami on March 27, President Trump uttered the phrase “Cuba is next” while talking about the U.S. presence in Venezuela. The United States launched a military operation in January, detaining former Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, and immediately imposed sanctions and tariffs on Cuba.

“We’ve been very successful. You know, when I went to Venezuela…I said we’ve built this great military, and we never have to use it, but sometimes we have to use it,” Trump said, before adding, “By the way, next up is Cuba. But I hope I never said that.”

President Trump went on to plead with the media to “please ignore that statement, thank you,” before adding again, “Cuba is next.” He did not elaborate on the statement.

President Trump’s past statements about Cuba have similar themes.

The comments are the latest in a series of harsh remarks the Trump administration has made against Cuba in recent months in the wake of U.S. sanctions, including an oil blockade that has put pressure on Cuba’s aging power system, which has recently suffered nationwide power outages.

Those comments included President Trump describing Cuba as a “terrible state” and a “weakened country,” as well as saying he believed it would be an “honor to occupy Cuba” and that he could “do whatever he wanted” to the country, including the possibility of a “friendly takeover.” It is unclear what “occupying Cuba” means or what it looks like.

Additionally, President Trump previously indicated that the U.S. government would soon do “something with Cuba,” Reuters reported.

The United States and Cuba have both confirmed that they are negotiating, with Cuba’s top diplomat in Washington telling USA TODAY in an exclusive interview on March 13 that Havana is engaged in “serious” and “delicate” negotiations with the U.S. government. Neither side has disclosed details of the ongoing negotiations, but President Trump has portrayed Cuba as eager to reach an agreement.

Kate Perez covers national trends and breaking news for USA TODAY. You can reach her at kperez@usatodayco.com or X @katecperez_.

Men’s NCAA Tournament Time, Sunday TV

0

By the end of the night, the final two spots in the Men’s NCAA Tournament Final Four will be determined.

Sunday’s Elite Eight games begin with the day’s appetizer, No. 1 Michigan vs. No. 6 Tennessee, at 2:15 p.m. ET at Chicago’s United Center. The Wolverines, led by Impact transfer Jaxel Lendeborg, are looking to return to the Final Four for the first time since 2018, while the Vols, led by their red-hot offense and frontcourt, are chasing the program’s first Final Four appearance.

The main course will take place in Washington, D.C., between No. 1 Duke University and No. 2 University College. In the Sweet 16 against St. John’s, the Blue Devils’ offense looked better than it did the first weekend, which could be attributed to the return of point guard Caleb Foster, who had 11 points and two assists off the bench. Seeking their third title in the past four years, the Huskies are closing in on 2024 national championship form thanks to their big three of Taris Reed Jr., Cyrus Demaree Jr. and Alex Karaban.

Here’s what you need to know about Sunday’s Elite Eight game.

Stream Sunday’s Elite Eight Game on Fubo (Free Trial)

March Madness Elite 8 Schedule: Sunday Game Times

always east

Where can I watch March Madness Elite 8 today?

Both of Sunday’s Elite Eight games will be broadcast on CBS. Streaming options include the March Madness Live app (with TV login) and Fubo, which carries CBS and offers free trials to new subscribers.

Announcer for Sunday’s March Madness Elite 8 game

Michigan vs. Tennessee

  • Andrew Catalon (commentary), Steve Rapace (color commentator), Evan Washburn (sideline reporter)

Duke vs. UW

  • Ian Eagle (commentary), Bill Raftery (color commentator), Grant Hill (color commentator), Tracy Wolfson (sideline reporter)

Get to the heart of the news quickly with the USA TODAY app. Download award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, e-newspapers, and more.

Iranian leaders prepare for ground attack

0

play

Regional powers in the Middle East are rallying behind Pakistan in a bid to deescalate the escalating US-Israel war after Pakistan rejected President Donald Trump’s 15-point peace plan and thousands of US troops arrived in the region.

As negotiations stall, Iranian parliamentary leaders say the country is preparing for a possible U.S.-led ground attack. His comments came hours after The Washington Post reported that the Pentagon was preparing for weeks of ground operations in Iran.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio told reporters on March 27 that the United States does not need ground forces to win the war, but added that the military must also give the president “the maximum opportunity” if the situation changes.

Mr. Rubio echoed the stance of many administration officials over the past few weeks who have pledged a quick end to the war, adding that the war will not last long. The war between the United States and Israel on Iran, which began on February 28, is now in its fifth week.

Here’s what you need to know:

Iran says US is preparing ground attack during peace talks

Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Berger Ghalibaf claimed in remarks published by Iranian state media on March 29 that the United States was secretly planning a “ground attack” despite US officials pressing for negotiations.

“As long as the United States demands Iran’s surrender, our response will be to never accept humiliation,” he said in a message to the nation.

The foreign ministers of Egypt, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Turkey are scheduled to meet in Islamabad on March 29 to discuss ways to stop the war, but it is unclear whether representatives from the United States or Iran will attend.

Last week, the United States announced it had proposed a 15-point ceasefire plan to Iran, which includes reopening waterways and limiting Iran’s nuclear program. However, the Iranian government rejected this list and submitted its own proposal.

President Trump has also threatened in recent days to damage Iran’s power plants and other energy infrastructure unless the country opens the Strait of Hormuz, a critical corridor for global energy supplies. After March 27, when the stock market suffered its worst day of the war, President Trump announced an extension of the deadline for reopening the Straits, giving Iran an additional 10 days.

In a March 28 post on X, US Central Command announced that 3,500 soldiers and the amphibious assault ship Tripoli had arrived in the Middle East. The contingent includes sailors, Marines and attack fighters.

Iran, Israel trade strike, Houthis enter conflict

Yemen’s Iranian-allied Houthis entered the conflict after launching missile and drone attacks into southern Israel on March 27 and 28. The group’s attacks have opened a new front in the war and raised concerns of further escalation and chaos in the Gulf region.

Israel and Iran carried out consistent attacks over the weekend as efforts to seek a negotiated end to the war inched forward. The Israeli military announced on March 29 that the previous day, Israeli forces had targeted Tehran’s weapons manufacturing infrastructure, including dozens of storage and production facilities.

US-based human rights group HRANA said on March 28 that it recorded more than 700 attacks across Iran throughout the day, making it one of the deadliest 24-hour periods since the war began. The group, which collects open source data, tracked most of the attacks in Tehran and reported that 24 civilians were killed and 88 injured.

Hundreds of people gathered in Beirut to mourn the three Lebanese journalists killed in an Israeli airstrike on March 28. Lebanon’s Al-Manar television reported that three people, one of its correspondents and two of broadcaster Al-Mayadeen, were killed while riding in a media vehicle. A Lebanese soldier was also killed.

The Israeli military accused one of the journalists of being part of a Hezbollah intelligence unit and reporting on the whereabouts of Israeli soldiers.

How many people died in the war?

As of March 27, at least 1,900 people have been killed and 20,000 injured in Iran, according to a tally by the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, Reuters reported. HRANA estimates the death toll at 3,461, including 1,208 military deaths and at least 1,551 civilians. The remaining 702 people are unclassified between civilian and military.

Lebanese public health authorities announced that as of March 27, Israeli airstrikes had killed 1,142 people and injured 3,315. It is unclear whether Hezbollah fighters are included in the death toll announced by Lebanese authorities.

According to Reuters, Iraqi health authorities have announced that at least 100 people have died since the crisis began. Missiles fired at Israel from Iran and Lebanon have killed 19 people in Israel, according to Israeli emergency services. The Israeli army also announced that four soldiers were killed in southern Lebanon.

According to the Pentagon, more than 300 U.S. military personnel have been injured in the Iran war. The death toll remains at 13 military personnel.

More than 20 people were also killed in other countries and territories embroiled in regional crises, including Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, the West Bank and the United Arab Emirates.

Contributed by: Reuters.

Kathryn Palmer is USA TODAY’s political reporter. She can be reached at the following address: kapalmer@usatoday.com And to X@Kathryn Purml. Sign up for her daily politics newsletter here.

Pope Leo says God rejects the prayers of leaders who wage war

0

play

Pope Leo, in an unusually powerful statement as the Iran war enters its second month, said God rejects the prayers of leaders whose “hands are covered in blood” after starting the war.

Addressing tens of thousands of people in St. Peter’s Square on Palm Sunday, the celebration marking the start of Holy Week leading up to Easter for the world’s 1.4 billion Catholics, the Pope called the conflict “terrible” and said Jesus cannot be used to justify any war.

“This is our God, Jesus, the King of Peace, who rejects war. No one can use him to justify war,” Leo, the first U.S. pope, told a crowd in bright sunlight on March 29.

Quoting a Bible verse, he said, “(Jesus) does not listen to the prayers of those who make war, but rejects them, saying, “No matter how many times you pray, I will not listen. Your hands are covered in blood.”

Although Leo did not specifically name any world leaders, he has stepped up his criticism of the Iran war in recent weeks.

In an appeal after Sunday’s celebrations, the pope lamented that Christians in the Middle East are “suffering from the effects of brutal conflicts” and may not be able to celebrate Easter.

The pope, known for choosing his words carefully, has repeatedly called for an immediate ceasefire in the conflict and last week said military airstrikes are indiscriminate and should be banned.

Some U.S. officials have invoked Christianity to justify the Feb. 28 joint U.S.-Israeli attack on Iran that sparked the escalation of the war.

play

Pope Leo calls for ceasefire and condemns violence in Middle East

Pope Leo made an impassioned appeal for an immediate ceasefire in the growing war in Iran, criticizing the “brutal violence” across the region.

Secretary Pete Hegseth, who began leading Christian prayer services at the Pentagon, recently prayed in a service against “overwhelming acts of violence against people who don’t deserve mercy.”

In his Sunday sermon, Leo referred to a Bible passage in which Jesus, about to be arrested before his crucifixion, rebukes one of his followers for striking his arrester with a sword.

“(Jesus) didn’t take up arms, defend himself, or wage war,” Leo said. “He revealed the gentle face of God, who always rejects violence. Rather than save himself, he allowed himself to be nailed to the cross.”

Two rescued black lab mixes join former President Joe Biden’s family

0

play

Former President Joe Biden has added two new furry friends to his family.

The Biden family adopted two black lab mixes from Tennessee’s Rescue Dog & End of Life Sanctuary on March 24, the organization said in a social media post along with a photo of the former president and former first lady Jill Biden and the new pets.

“These two Johnson County pups were adopted together by the Biden family yesterday. As you can see, the pup on the right is true to his Johnson County, Tennessee personality and does not sit still during the photo shoot…ready to run and play,” the post reads.

The organization said it is excited about the adoptions to Biden’s post and enjoys having animals adopted by local Tennessee residents.

“For us, a great home is a great home! We are thrilled for these two puppies who were once abandoned in the mountains,” the post reads. “We always say to each person, ‘Make yourself proud,’ and these two certainly did that.”

This mix of the two is the latest addition to Biden’s pet family, which also includes his cat Willow. The Biden family also adopted dogs Major and Commander over the past decade, but both were reportedly rehomed after a number of biting incidents.

As of the morning of March 29, the former president and first lady had not yet announced the name of their new dog.

‘SNL UK’ cruelly mocks former Prince Andrew and Prince William

0

play

What if former Prince Andrew befriended Jeffrey Epstein as part of an elaborate plan to make the King look better compared to Charles III?

That was the premise of the cold open of the latest episode of “Saturday Night Live UK,” the new British spinoff of the American sketch comedy show. The sketch, which aired on March 28, depicts a fictional secret meeting of MI5 agents in 1997 and stars Jack Shepp as Andrew, who is briefed on plans to improve Prince Charles’ image in the aftermath of Princess Diana’s death.

“We deduced that the only way to make the future king more likable was to make him less likable to those around him,” one of the agents told Andrew. He was presented with a “29-year plan to slowly but surely make the entire country think you are king.”

Shep’s Andrew flipped through a document outlining the plan and asked, “Do you actually want me to do all of this? The part about befriending a notorious pedophile, before and after I’m convicted?”

The sketch spoofed Andrew’s controversial relationship with the late convicted sex offender, but Epstein’s name was never mentioned. Mr Andrew, who was arrested in February on suspicion of misconduct in public life, said he regretted his friendship with Mr Epstein and denied wrongdoing.

“This all seems very risky. God, I’m sweating,” said Shep, who plays Andrew, a reference to the real Andrew, who claimed he was medically unable to sweat during an infamous 2019 BBC interview.

But the plan didn’t stop with Epstein. In the sketch, when Andrew, who plays Shep, points out that Prince William would be hard to dislike because he’s “very handsome,” one of his agents said, “We’re taking that into account.” Meanwhile, another agent revealed that Prince Harry is “marrying a woman who 98% of the British public would find impossible to have a normal conversation with.”

This was the second episode of Saturday Night Live UK, which first aired on March 21st. The series’ first cold open showed Prime Minister Keir Starmer (George Fouracres) nervous about calling President Donald Trump and wanting to avoid conflict with the US president. Trump shared part of the sketch with Truth Social magazine, but did not include the second half, in which Fouracres, who plays Starmer, says Trump wants to “start World War III.”

Jamie Dornan will host the March 28 episode of ‘SNL UK’, which will be available to watch on Peacock in the US. Riz Ahmed will next host the show on April 4, the same day Jack Black hosts the American version of Saturday Night Live.

How to reduce your tax bill or increase your refund

0

Tax day is fast approaching, with April 15th just around the corner.

If all goes well, you’ll have paid your taxes and may already be able to enjoy a larger refund than usual. If not, there’s still time.

Below are some tips to keep in mind to minimize the amount of tax you owe or get the most refund possible.

📰 More stories you won’t want to miss 📰

Every week, The Daily Money brings you the best consumer news from USA TODAY. We analyze financial news and provide the TLDR version of how the Federal Reserve, government, and corporate decisions affect you.

Birth tourism. Birthright citizenship and major Supreme Court cases

0


What is maternity tourism? President Trump is asking the Supreme Court to uphold his order denying U.S. citizenship to babies born to visiting-only foreign nationals.

play

WASHINGTON – The practice is called “birth tourism.”

Companies with names like USA Happy Baby and Star Baby Care offered to bring pregnant women from China or other countries to the United States and give birth to children who would be recognized as U.S. citizens before returning home.

According to a federal criminal indictment against the companies, women were taught to wear baggy clothing to hide their pregnancies and mislead customs officials about the length of their stay. Star Baby Care said on its website that it has “served 8,000 pregnant women” for 20 years. USA Happy Baby said it charged VIP customers up to $100,000.

However, the scope of birth tourism and its threat to national security is hotly debated. Estimates range from just 2,000 babies per year to a suspected 1.5 million over 15 years. This higher number is reflected in Congressional testimony and arguments that the Supreme Court will hear the case on April 1st.

The justices will decide whether President Donald Trump can restrict birthright citizenship by executive order, despite courts’ past interpretations of the 14th Amendment, which was ratified more than 150 years ago. For more than 125 years, the high court has interpreted the amendment to grant citizenship to nearly everyone born in the United States.

Mr. Trump and his allies argue that citizenship does not cover people who give birth to children while on vacation. But opponents of the move, including Congressional Democrats and 140 university professors, argue that the problem is overblown and that laws to combat birth tourism are already in place.

What is the controversy surrounding the 14th Amendment?

The Fourteenth Amendment states, “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and who are subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, are nationals of the United States and of the state in which they reside.”

The expression “subject to jurisdiction” has traditionally been understood to mean children of diplomats. Native Americans were initially excluded because of their tribal loyalty, but were granted birthright citizenship under a 1924 law.

Federal judges have repeatedly rejected executive orders signed on the first day of President Trump’s second term that aimed to limit birthright citizenship.

“A lot of the government’s policy arguments are beside the point, because this is a constitutional provision that is not a subject of policy discussion at this point,” said Cody Wofsy, an attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union, which is participating in the lawsuit. “The reality is that[birth tourism]is a marginal problem that is already being addressed by federal regulations that make it illegal.”

President Trump’s order denied birthright citizenship to children if their mothers entered the country without legal authorization or if they were in the country temporarily as students, workers, or tourists.

“Birthright citizenship is not meant for people who can take a vacation and become permanent residents of the United States of America, bring their families, and spend all their time laughing at ‘football guys’ like us,” President Trump said on social media on May 15, 2025.

“Amazing numbers” vs. “infinite decimals”: It’s hard to count babies born to tourists

The figures from birth tourism are highly controversial, as the government does not count the number of births resulting from birth tourism.

Peter Schweitzer, president of the Government Accountability Institute, a conservative think tank in Tallahassee, Florida, testified at a March 10 Senate hearing that an estimated 1.5 million people living in China have been U.S. citizens by birth over the past 15 years.

Schweizer argued that these people are educated in Chinese Communist Party schools with a distorted view of American values ​​and culture, but that they can vote in elections and bring their parents in as permanent residents when they turn 21.

“The scale of exploitation is staggering, but the U.S. federal government is not systematically tracking it,” Schweitzer said.

However, Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) found Mr. Schweitzer’s estimate lacking in legitimacy.

“He didn’t have anything to back it up,” Durbin told USA TODAY. “When I asked for specifics, he gave me generalities.”

The Center for Immigration Studies estimated in 2020 that tourist births result in more than 20,000 to 39,000 babies each year, based on federal statistics on how many foreign-born mothers give birth and how many show up on the census as having stayed longer than tourists.

But Jeremy Neufeld, a researcher at the Niskanen Center think tank in Washington, D.C., sharpened his pencil and said the center’s numbers were a “gross overestimation.” Neufeld argued that a fairer estimate would be that fewer than 2,000 babies are born to tourists each year.

In written arguments before the Supreme Court, a group of 140 university professors said that of the 3.6 million births each year, birth tourism “accounts for a tiny fraction of the children who attain birthright citizenship each year.”

Stephen Camarota, a researcher at the Center for Immigration Studies, told USA TODAY that the government could end the conflict by charting the number of women who entered the country with foreign passports, stayed less than three months, and left the country with their infants using U.S. passports.

Lawmakers disagree on whether birth tourism is a ‘big problem’ or a ‘minor problem’

Republicans and Democrats disagree on the seriousness of the threat posed by birth tourism.

“This is a big problem,” Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) told USA TODAY. “We’re being played, so we’re looking forward to seeing what the Supreme Court does.”

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) told USA TODAY that birth tourism is a “persistent concern.”

“This is a blatant abuse of immigration law,” said Cruz, who took part in written arguments in the Supreme Court case.

Sen. Peter Welch (D-Vermont) told USA TODAY there is an agreement not to allow birth tourism. But he said the impact would be “minor.”

“We don’t want that. It’s illegal. As long as there are steps that can be taken to curb it, there’s a consensus that we should do it,” Welch said. “Fortunately, the facts show that it’s a fairly minor issue, but it’s clearly one of significant concern.”

President Trump changes visa policy to discourage birth travel

Opponents of Trump’s executive order argued that laws already in place could discourage birth tourism.

The State Department changed its visa policy in 2020 during the Trump administration to discourage women from giving birth while visiting.

The change specifically allows the department to deny a visa applicant if consular officials have “reason to believe” that the tourist gave birth while in the country and the primary purpose of the visit was to obtain U.S. citizenship for the child.

“If there is a problem with birth tourism, and I don’t think there is evidence that there is a problem, then the solution is to enforce the law and not strip American families of their citizenship for children born on U.S. soil or force them to prove their parentage or strip their citizenship,” Amanda Frost, a law professor at the University of Virginia, said at a March 10 Senate hearing.

“The American way of life is not for sale,” says an investigator.

A 2019 federal indictment accused 19 people in Southern California of conspiring to help tourists give birth in the United States. At the time, there was no dispute that the children were citizens, so the charges focused on the travel agency educating the parents on how to lie to obtain visas, money laundering, and filing false tax returns.

Dongyuan Lee, then 41, of Irvine, California, was charged with operating Orange County-based You Win USA. The company advertised that it served 500 Chinese women. According to the indictment, she used 20 apartments to house pregnant women and charged each client between $40,000 and $80,000.

Mr. Lee pleaded guilty to visa fraud and conspiracy to commit visa fraud. In December 2019, U.S. District Judge James Serna sentenced her to 10 months in prison, which she had already served while the indictment was pending.

Ms. Lee’s attorney, Thomas O’Brien, said her case is not about birth tourism because the government has confirmed that the State Department issues visas to foreign nationals who give birth in the United States. Mr. O’Brien argued that the lawsuit was in support of his client who lied on his visa application. He also said that You Win USA’s number of fraudulent visas was not “as extensive as the government had publicly advertised.”

Michael Wei Yue Liu, then 53 years old, of Rancho Cucamonga, California, and Jing Dong, then 42 years old, of Fontana, which operated USA Happy Baby, were found guilty of conspiracy and 10 counts of international money laundering. In December 2024, U.S. District Judge Gary Klausner sentenced both men to 41 months in prison.

Prosecutors say Liu and Dong charged clients $20,000 to $40,000 and VIPs up to $100,000 to have their children delivered in the United States. Prosecutors say the company received $3.4 million in international wire transfers over a two-year period.

Prosecutors said Mr. Liu and Mr. Dong helped the Chinese woman submit a false visa application to the State Department by lying about the purpose of her visit and the length of her planned stay. Prosecutors say Liu and Dong taught the women how to pass interviews at the U.S. consulate in China, how to deceive U.S. customs officials, and how to enter the country through ports that are considered less stringent, such as Hawaii instead of Los Angeles.

Prosecutors told the judge in their sentencing memo that Mr. Liu and Mr. Dong “ran a lucrative business that violated American law.” “The defendants assisted numerous clients in defrauding U.S. authorities and purchasing U.S. citizenship for their children for tens of thousands of dollars each.”

How much should I walk to lose weight?

0

play

These days, almost everyone recommends another way to lose weight. The options and advice seem endless, from the latest ultra-low-fat diets to high-intensity exercise regimens like CrossFit to weekly injections to suppress appetite.

But sometimes the most proven strategy is also the simplest. Start walking, a weight loss method that has stood the test of time. After all, walking doesn’t require a gym membership, expensive equipment, or specialized training, is easy for just about anyone, and can be done almost anywhere.

It may not seem as dramatic as more intense training, but walking is surprisingly good for you and is one of the most effective and sustainable ways to burn fat and lose weight. Here’s what you need to know:

How does walking help lose fat?

Essentially, “weight loss occurs when your body burns more calories than it expends,” says Austin “Ozzy” Gontan, a licensed psychologist at Pacific Pearl of La Jolla and director of the San Diego Marathon Clinic. He explains that walking, even at a moderate pace, requires energy, so it contributes to this process by increasing your daily calorie expenditure. This means your body needs to tap into stored fuel to power your movements.

But walking does more than just burn calories, says Dr. Michael Frederickson, director of physical medicine and rehabilitation at Stanford University. He explains that it also improves how the body processes blood sugar and insulin. Typically, if you are sedentary, your blood sugar levels will remain elevated for a longer period of time, making it more likely that excess energy will be stored as fat. “But walking regularly allows your muscles to use circulating sugars more efficiently, improving insulin sensitivity and thereby making you less likely to store fat,” he says.

Another benefit Gontan points out is that walking can help maintain muscle mass during weight loss. This is important because if you lose weight through diet alone, some of that weight may come from muscle. However, adding regular walking can signal your body to maintain lean tissue while losing fat. “This is helpful because muscle helps keep your metabolism high over the long term,” he says. In fact, maintaining lean muscle mass causes your body to burn more calories and rely on more fat for fuel, even at rest.

How much should I walk to lose weight?

The amount of walking needed to lose weight varies from person to person, but “most adults need about 45 to 90 minutes of consistent walking each day to see visible weight loss results,” Gontin says. This is consistent with meta-analysis studies showing that it takes at least 45 minutes of walking per day to see weight loss effects.

If people stay consistent, “walking alone typically results in a moderate weight loss of 4 to 6 pounds over 12 weeks to 6 months,” Frederickson says. However, factors such as age, gender, starting weight, and lifestyle can greatly influence your results.

There are also several variables that can affect how much weight you lose from walking. Gontin points out that walking uphill can make a big difference because walking uphill requires more muscle activation and more energy expenditure than walking on a flat surface. Topography is also important. For example, “walking a woodchip trail requires about 27% more metabolic energy than walking on a sidewalk, and energy costs increase gradually from sidewalk to dirt, gravel, grass, and woodchips,” Frederickson says.

“Walking pace also has a complex effect on fat loss,” he added. For example, walking briskly generally increases total energy expenditure and burns more calories per minute. However, research also suggests that slow walking performed over a longer period of time may result in greater total fat loss in people who are initially overweight than faster walking performed over a shorter period of time. “But both speeds, given enough time, will eventually lead to fat loss,” Frederickson says.

But again, consistency is key. “Weight loss requires consistent daily walking,” says Gontan.

What else helps with weight loss?

Walking plays a powerful role in fat loss, but is most effective as part of a broader lifestyle approach. “Walking is not a standalone obesity treatment,” Frederickson says.

In fact, one of the most important complementary factors is nutrition. If your daily calorie intake consistently exceeds the calories your body burns, it will be difficult to lose weight, even with regular exercise. In other words, “walking alone won’t overcome a consistently poor diet,” Gontan says. Conversely, eating patterns that emphasize whole foods such as vegetables, fruits, lean proteins, whole grains, and healthy fats make it easier to maintain a moderate calorie deficit.

Gontin says sleep and stress management also play a surprisingly important role in weight regulation, with sleep deprivation disrupting the hormones that control hunger and satiety, and chronic stress can affect weight by increasing cortisol levels, increasing appetite and encouraging the body to store more fat.

However, when combined with balanced nutrition, adequate sleep, and effective stress management, Gontan says, “a consistent daily walk can be one of the most sustainable, scientifically-backed tools for achieving long-term weight loss and overall health.”

This mother is in the top 1% of earners. Why are there so few women in the top 1%?

0

play

Nancy Marzouk, who works in the technology industry, was used to being the only woman in the room. But that doesn’t mean she liked it.

“I always felt like I was over-performing, and I was potentially under more scrutiny than other people, if that makes sense,” said Marzouk, 52.

She attended art school, but after graduating from undergrad, she became interested in the advertising industry and fell in love with it. As she rose through the ranks at various marketing and technology agencies, she felt like she was always working harder than everyone around her but not moving up the ladder at the same pace.

“The company wasn’t going to change. Basically, I had to leave for it to change. That’s how I felt,” she said. “I felt like I got to a point in my career where it didn’t matter what I did. There were too many politics involved. So if you’re not part of the boys’ club… it didn’t matter what I did.”

Marzouk took a risk. She quit a stable corporate job and started her own startup called Mediawala, a data management company, in 2013. Marzouk currently earns between $600,000 and $800,000 annually, ranking her in the top 1% of earners in the country, according to SmartAsset.

According to a 2019 American Sociological Review study, only 5% of the top 1% of earners in the United States are women. Fellow top 1% woman and researcher Emily Riley recently surveyed 145 of these women to find out what it takes to become a top 1% woman. Another 180 women surveyed in the report had incomes of $300,000 or more, and about 170 other women surveyed had incomes between $100,000 and $300,000. The ranges vary slightly, but in Riley’s study, the top 1% of earners earn more than $775,000. The researchers found that in the top 1% of households, women are more likely to be the wives or partners of high-income men, but in the top 1% of households, women themselves are rarely the sole breadwinners.

“What I realized mid-career when I started having kids and wanted more flexibility was that I didn’t really have the tools to negotiate in a way that made me feel in control,” said Riley, 48. “I always felt like I was a step behind and was missing out on something, and even though I continued to have some success, it became clear that there weren’t that many women above me who were paving the way for me.”

Riley also took a risk after deciding to have her third child. She wanted more flexibility as a working mother, so she became a technology consultant. Like Marzouk, she realized that being her own boss actually increased her and her family’s income. Her annual income is said to be just under $1 million.

Most conversations about women in the workforce focus on challenges and hurdles, Riley said. She thought about how, as a young working woman, she always wanted a roadmap to success. So she gathered together successful women in her network, women’s groups, and across LinkedIn to conduct her own research.

“I was overwhelmed by the positive feedback,” she said. “It really hit a nerve that other career women agreed with me. You know, this is something we can all enjoy. Instead of just feeling frustrated, frustrated, challenged, we can actually do something about it and I’m really excited to listen to each other and learn from each other.”

Women in the top 1% of income earners are more likely to be married and have at least two children.

Riley’s research found that the top 1% of women share three traits: drive, career management, and a desire to learn and grow.

She predicted that women in the top 1% would be fiercely competitive, and that’s true, with 44% of women in the 1% saying they’re competitive, compared to 25% of women in the $100,000 to $300,000 bracket. But she also found that the 1% of women were less submissive and more “in their own way.” One in five women in the 1% are more likely to “go with the flow,” compared to one in three women in low-income households.

Research shows that most women in the top 1% of income earners are married and have children. These women are typically the main breadwinners in their households, but 89% are married and 71% have two or more children.

Marzouk has two boys. Although her husband works, she has been the family’s main breadwinner for some time now. Marzouk said that early in her career, she felt she had to go “above and beyond” at work and that “otherwise it would prevent me from climbing the career ladder.” She credited her success to her partner who supported and encouraged her to pursue her dreams and goals.

Marzouk said that although things have improved for working mothers in recent years, she still feels she missed out on a lot when her children were young. Riley said she heard a lot about guilt from the women she interviewed for this study.

“You can’t really have it all, but you can live a fulfilling life,” Riley said. “That’s when you have a lot to do. Of course, you can’t be everywhere at the same time. You’ll be missing the weekday holiday party at your child’s school, but you’ll be attending the recital on Saturday night, right?”

“What would you do if you were a man?”

There aren’t many women who are CEOs in the technology industry, and even fewer founders, Marzouk said. She gets excited when she hears about women starting their own companies in advertising and technology and wants to help them. As a woman, it’s difficult to raise capital funding, she says.

“Women are very practical. They think about things realistically,” she says. But making financial projections realistic doesn’t excite potential funders, who are mostly men. “People only want to invest in pipe dreams.”

Her advice? Think like a man, Marzouk says.

“What would a man do? What would my husband do if he found himself in this situation?” she said. “And I actually do the opposite of my instincts because I know who my audience is.”

Marzouk said many women are stuck in “mid-career” roles. Women sometimes need to think about what they want to achieve and the best way to get there, she said, and that might mean stepping out of their comfort zone.

Once you break through the glass ceiling, “you can do anything you want,” Marzouk said.

Madeline Mitchell’s role covering women and the care economy for USA TODAY is supported by a partnership with Pivotal and Journalism Funding Partners. Funders do not provide editorial input.

Contact Madeline at: memitchell@usatoday.com and @maddiemitch_ With X.

WHOOP bracelet saves 24-year-old with rare heart disease

0

play

Mia Beam was used to going to the gym. The 24-year-old former Division I basketball player dribbled and jumped better than most people in the country. Then one day last November, she struggled to take a deep breath.

Emergency room doctors diagnosed her with pleurisy, an inflammation of the tissue that separates the lungs from the chest wall. After taking anti-inflammatory drugs, she began to feel better. But after a few days, her symptoms worsened. Sweat soaked her sheets. It wasn’t the coronavirus. Is it possible that it was a virus infection?

“I had to take a bath every morning because I was freezing,” the Louisville, Kentucky, student said on a video call. “I couldn’t lie down and had to sleep in a certain elevated position because I couldn’t breathe properly when I lay down.” Her heart rate rose to 130 to 140 seconds just by sitting on the couch. Her WHOOP bracelet, a wearable device that tracks vital signs, sleep patterns, and athletic performance metrics, alerted her to how hard her body was being worked without exercise.

Medical providers had a hard time diagnosing her. Blood tests, a CT scan, and an echocardiogram ultimately revealed that she had pericarditis, which progressed to cardiac tamponade. Cardiac tamponade is a condition in which swelling and irritation around the heart cause fluid to build up and stop normal blood flow.

Doctors removed 871 milliliters of fluid from her heart during surgery and said she would have died within 24 to 48 hours. Her mother, Jamie Beam, said: “Her left lung had collapsed, her left ventricle had collapsed, and it had entered the right side of her heart.”

Mia Beam believes a WHOOP bracelet saved her life.

WHOOP tracks traditional metrics like heart rate, blood oxygen, and skin temperature and sends that information to an app on your phone. It also monitors your health across categories such as sleep.

Another such category is “tension.” It looks at both cardiovascular and muscular loads and how exercise, anxiety and other factors affect health. Over the past two weeks, Beam’s heart rate has increased to between 15 and 16 out of 21 on the resting stress scale. That 15-16 previously appeared on her only after training, such as basketball games.

It’s great that new technology saves lives, but it’s not the be-all and end-all when it comes to health and medicine. Medical experts say regular visits to your primary care physician remain the standard recommendation for staying healthy. But wearable technology devices like WHOOP, Oura Ring, and even the Apple Watch can be additional tools in your toolbox.

“Medical Miracle”

Beam received WHOOP as a gift about a year ago. She was aiming for high tension numbers during her workouts, but when it showed her resting tension was very high, she thought the bracelet might have malfunctioned.

Doctors are now monitoring Beam closely and he is taking medication to prevent this from happening again. Taking it easy was tough for the self-proclaimed “gym rat.”

“I try to be really intentional about play activities and what I’m doing and listen to my body,” she says. “But I’m at a stage in my life where I never thought I’d be in this situation.” She retired from basketball in the spring of 2025, but worried she would have pushed herself too hard had she still played. She played last year despite suffering facial fractures.

Beam tries not to focus too much on the WHOOP numbers, although they are fascinating.

“At first I was obsessed with it, and if I thought something was wrong I would panic,” she says. “But right now, I think it’s more of a monitoring thing.”

“It’s important in no case to look at your data as a report card or a referendum on whether or not you’re doing well,” says John Sullivan, chief marketing officer at WHOOP. “Instead of just being growth-oriented and trying to say whatever the data tells us today, we’re going to use the data to inform decisions about how to bend the curve tomorrow.”

He said the company hears from users every week who say the product helped them discover symptoms they otherwise wouldn’t have noticed, so they built an acceptance system for people to share their stories and give the company permission to talk about it. He discovered his own risk for heart disease through the company’s advanced research efforts.

It’s easy to see why the entire Beam family has started tracking their health through wearables since Mia’s ordeal. We’re seeing testimonials on social media about many other early detection companies, including full-body MRI and extensive blood testing from Prenuvo and Function. While it’s best to see the whole story as just one story, there’s no denying the benefits that technology like this can offer.

“It’s kind of a medical miracle that she’s walking around so healthy,” Jamie Beam says. “I really appreciate it.”

John Fetterman faces pushback from Democrats on Senate vote

0

play

  • Pennsylvania Sen. John Fetterman is facing criticism from Democratic voters for breaking with his party on several key issues.
  • Fetterman, who once campaigned against centrist Democrats, has seen his popularity rise among Republicans and decline along with Democrats.
  • Some political analysts and party members are questioning whether Fetterman can be re-elected in 2028 or if he will choose to run again.

Throughout his 2022 U.S. Senate campaign, John Fetterman frequently attacked on social media one of the few centrist Senate Democrats with a history of defeating the party’s ranks.

Fetterman, Pennsylvania’s lieutenant governor, then announced himself as the anti-Joe Manchin, anti-Kyrsten Sinema candidate, giving Democrats a guaranteed 51st vote in the Senate.

Mr. Fetterman, oversized and tattooed and wearing a hoodie and shorts, overcame Dr. Mehmet Oz’s celebrity status and a near-fatal stroke to become the only Democrat to flip a Republican Senate seat during that cycle.

Four years later, the former Braddock mayor finds himself filling the role he once lamented.

And a lot of people who voted for him are paying attention.

“Overall, we feel abandoned,” said Frieda Toepfer, D-Erie, Pennsylvania. “Most of us feel that way. We feel unrepresented.

“We are extremely disappointed in Mr. Fetterman,” she said. “He certainly hasn’t made himself known to the people in the district. I think the people who expected him to be a progressive had too many expectations of who he was.”

Various voter groups plan to gather at five of Mr. Fetterman’s offices in Pennsylvania on March 30th to air their grievances. Events are planned in Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Harrisburg, Wilkes-Barre and Erie.

Toepfer organized Ellie’s event through the local chapter of 50501, which has been organizing “No Kings” protests across the country.

“We’re going to be there with signs, and people are going to come in and talk to the officials and tell them how they feel,” Toepfer said of the Erie event, which begins at noon outside the Erie County Courthouse.

Fetterman’s office did not respond to requests for comment for this article.

Pennsylvania Democratic Party slams Fetterman

Mr. Fetterman, 56, has roiled his party over votes to reopen the federal government, including when he supported a continuing resolution in November and in February when he supported funding for the Department of Homeland Security, which remains shut down amid budget battles.

He is an ardent supporter of Israel in its attack on Palestine in the Gaza Strip, and has recently supported Israel and the Trump administration’s war with Iran.

He also supported Trump’s crackdown on deportations, and in March was the vote on the committee that advanced the nomination of fellow Sen. Markwayne Mullin to head the Department of Homeland Security.

U.S. Representative Brendan Boyle, who has become one of Fetterman’s biggest critics, called for his removal.

After the committee’s vote against Mullin, Boyle wrote to X that “Sen Fetterman once again shows why he is Trump’s favorite Democrat.” “He has to go.”

Hours later, at a town hall meeting in Carlisle, U.S. Rep. Christine Houlahan again sharply criticized her fellow Democrats.

“We have these senators. There are actually two of them,” Houlahan said, as reported by Keystone. “And I have to be really honest: Of the two, I have more success working on the ‘R side of the aisle’ than I have on the ‘D side of the aisle.'”

“I’ll be punished for being a Democrat.”

Mr. Fetterman has been as vocal about his position within the party as his critics. On a recent episode of the podcast “All In,” he said Democratic leaders are plagued by “Trump Derangement Syndrome,” a disease that President Trump invented to deflect criticism.

“Our party is governed by TDS,” Fetterman said. “This made it virtually impossible for you to agree that something is good or agree with the other side without being punished as a Democrat.”

Appearing on “Real Time with Bill Maher,” Fetterman discussed his fitness for office and accused Maher of, in his words, “crazy.”

“Part of the party just wants to turn me into Colonel Kurtz,” Mr. Fetterman told Mr. Maher, referring to the main antagonist in the 1979 film “Apocalypse Now,” played by Marlon Brando.

“People are really upset about some of the positions he’s taken.”

Questions about Fetterman’s political loyalties arose after he visited President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach, Florida, ahead of Trump’s 2025 inauguration. This foreshadowed a much more cozy relationship between Mr. Fetterman, Mr. Trump, and his MAGA base than most Democrats expected.

In Erie County, where Fetterman chose to resume his 2022 campaign after suffering a stroke, Democratic Party Chairman Sam Talarico said he has filed numerous complaints.

“It’s definitely been an upturn, but it’s hard to explain,” Talarico said, noting that he couldn’t recall whether Fetterman had appeared on Erie since taking over. “And it’s hard to explain because he can barely get a job anymore. Being a civil servant is not a good thing.”

A Quinnipiac University poll of 836 self-identified registered voters conducted between February 19 and 23 found that Fetterman’s approval rating remained at 46%, but only with 73% of Republicans, 48% of independents, and 22% of Democrats.

Fetterman told News Nation’s Chris Cuomo on March 25 that he was “perplexed” by the Republican’s support, given that he has voted against some of Trump’s key priorities, including his spending plan known as the “Big Beautiful Act” and the SAVE Act.

Fetterman, who voted to confirm former Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, also noted that he also called for her removal.

Talarico said he’s trying to stay positive.

“I remind people that there’s still good in there, that he’s still in talks with the Democrats and voting our way the majority of the time, but we’d like to see a little more of that,” Talarico said. “That’s a good thing. People are really angry about some of the positions he’s taken, especially on the war. It’s hard to find people in the Democratic Party who really support a war on Iran, but Fetterman supports it.”

Toepfer also said Fetterman is better than Republican Sen. Dave McCormick and Oz, whom President Trump nominated to run the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. In 2022, he supported state Rep. Malcolm Kenyatta in the Democratic primary.

She said she can’t imagine Fetterman being able to win the party’s support when he’s re-elected in 2028.

“If he has to finish his term, it would be in his best interest to leave gracefully,” she said. “I don’t know how he could think of running again.”

Will Fetterman choose to run again?

Robert Spiel, a political science professor at Penn State’s Behrend campus in Erie County, blamed Fetterman’s departure from the party on health.

“A lot of people don’t seem to want to say anything about this, but he’s had two health crises in the last five years that can change people,” Fetterman said of his 2022 stroke and fall from atrial fibrillation.

Unless Fetterman makes a major change of direction or Pennsylvania expands its closed primary system, Mr. Fetterman is unlikely to be elected again, including as an independent or Republican, Spiel said.

Spiel recalled that Pennsylvania Republican Sen. Arlen Specter switched from the Republican Party to the Democratic Party in 2009. Polls showed Mr. Specter trailing his eventual successor, Pat Toomey, in the 2010 Republican primary. But he also failed to convince Democrats to choose him over then-U.S. Rep. Joe Sestak.

“I think he can try as an independent,” Spiel said. “However, in recent decades, those who have abandoned their parties and run for parliamentary elections as independents have had little success.”

A rare exception is Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, who, like Specter, faced a revolt from her party in 2010. The Republican incumbent lost to Tea Party candidate Joe Miller in the Republican primary that year, but made history as a write-in candidate in the general election, defeating both Miller and Democratic candidate Scott McAdams. This is the first time since 1954 that a write-in candidate won a Senate seat.

The names of potential primary challengers to Fetterman in 2028 have surfaced in recent months. According to various reports, these include Boyle and former U.S. Rep. Conor Lamb, the runner-up in the 2022 Democratic primary.

Spiel noted that Fetterman hasn’t had many friends within the party throughout his political career, so it’s not surprising that Democratic leaders would speak out against him.

But Talarico wonders if Fetterman wants another term.

“I don’t even know if he’s going to run for another term,” he said. “He doesn’t seem to like the job very much, which is understandable, because it’s hard to get anything done.”

Matthew Link is a Pennsylvania investigative journalist for the USA TODAY Network.

Women’s NCAA Tournament elite eight games move closer to Final Four in March Madness

0

play

Eight teams remain in the women’s NCAA Tournament.

The first and second rounds of women’s tournaments usually don’t produce as many upsets as the men’s, but things could get spicy and interesting during the second weekend of March Madness. This year’s tournament did not disappoint.

No. 3 Duke upset No. 2 LSU with Ashron Jackson’s buzzer-beating 3-pointer, and Hannah Hidalgo’s triple-double led No. 6 Notre Dame to a victory over No. 2 Vanderbilt. The Fighting Irish and Blue Devils are the only teams left in the field from the ACC, along with the Big Ten and SEC on the far left.

Last year’s Final Four teams (UConn, UCLA, Texas, and South Carolina) were all No. 1 seeds this season and are still alive after winning Sweet 16 matchups in Fort Worth, Texas, and Sacramento, California.

Can Hidalgo and Neele Ivey create more March Madness magic? Will Duke continue to avenge its non-conference losses? Can Raven Johnson lead South Carolina to its sixth straight Final Four?

Four of the eight teams still dancing have won national championships, but Texas hasn’t won it all since 1986 and will be looking to end a long drought. TCU and Michigan State are looking to advance to the Final Four for the first time, while Duke has not reached the national semifinals since losing to Maryland in the national title game in 2006.

Here are all the Elite Eight games airing on Sunday and Monday, ranked by ease of viewing.

1. UCLA vs. Duke

Time/TV: Sunday, 3pm ET (ABC)

Duke has been pretty good in the run-it-back game this season. They won both games against Notre Dame and Louisville, lost to the Tigers in February, beat Clemson in the ACC Tournament, lost to the Bears in Paris, beat Baylor in the second round of the NCAA Tournament by double digits, and beat LSU in the Sweet 16 after losing at home to Kim Mulkey’s team in December. Carla Lawson’s Blue Devils will have a chance to break the record against UCLA after the Bruins won by 30 points in Las Vegas in November. UCLA is on a 28-game winning streak, but hasn’t had a winning percentage below double digits since Feb. 8. The Bruins are like Goliath. Could Duke be David?

2. South Carolina vs. TCU

Time/TV: Monday, 9pm ET (ESPN)

The Shamcocks had a wire win over Oklahoma State on Saturday, winning 94-68. Aaliyah Chavez scored 21 points, but South Carolina pretty much neutralized the rest of the Sooners. The Gamecocks, whose sixth straight Final Four appearance is on the line, will face another team with an extremely talented point guard in Olivia Miles, the nation’s triple-double leader this season. Marta Suarez replaced Miles’ Batman as Robin, dropping 33 points in the Horned Frogs’ win over Virginia. SEC Defensive Player of the Year Raven Johnson is expected to track Miles.

3. UW vs. Notre Dame

Time/TV: Sunday, 1pm ET (ABC)

No team in the history of women’s college basketball has played more in the NCAA Tournament than Notre Dame and UW, who will meet for the ninth time in the Big Dance on Sunday. The former Big East rivals met earlier this season, with the Huskies winning 85-47. Can Hannah Hidalgo pull off the biggest upset in tournament history, or will undefeated UConn continue its run to repeat as champions?

4. Texas vs. Michigan

Time/TV: Monday, 7pm ET (ESPN)

Michigan was the closest team to Yukon this season, losing by just three points in a game played on neutral ground in November. Texas has lost three games all season and is the only team to beat UCLA. Both teams are led by a talented trio, with Madison Booker, Lori Harmon and Jordan Lee leading the Longhorns, and sophomores Saira Swords, Olivia Olson and Mila Holloway anchoring the Wolverines.

When will my April SSI check be mailed? See the 2026 payment schedule.

0

play

April Supplemental Security Income checks are scheduled to be issued on April 1st.

Supplemental Security Income (SSI) payments are typically issued on the first day of the month, but payments may be issued earlier if the first calendar day of the month is a weekend or holiday. According to the Social Security Administration’s calendar, the first day of April falls on a Wednesday and payments will be made on April 1st.

This begins a four-month period in which SSI checks are issued on the first of the month. Then, in July, August 1st is a Saturday, so August’s check will be paid early, on Friday, July 31st.

When will my SSI payment be sent? See the full 2026 payment schedule.

Here are the SSI payment dates for 2026 according to the SSA calendar:

  • Wednesday, April 1, 2026 (confirmed in April 2026)
  • Friday, May 1, 2026 (Please check May 2026)
  • Monday, June 1, 2026 (confirmed in June 2026)
  • Wednesday, July 1, 2026 (confirmed in July 2026)
  • Friday, July 31, 2026 (Please check for August 2026)
  • Tuesday, September 1, 2026 (confirmed in September 2026)
  • Thursday, October 1, 2026 (confirmed in October 2026)
  • Friday, October 30, 2026 (confirmed in November 2026)
  • Tuesday, December 1, 2026 (confirmed in December 2026)
  • Thursday, December 31, 2026 (confirmed for January 2027)

What is Supplemental Security Income (SSI)?

Supplemental Security Income is a program administered by the Social Security Administration that provides benefits to people with limited or no income or assets, people age 65 and older, and people who are blind or have a qualifying disability. According to the SSA website, eligible children with disabilities are also eligible for SSI.

Adults who earn more than $2,073 per month from work are generally not eligible for benefits. About 7.4 million Americans currently receive monthly SSI payments, and about one-third of SSI recipients also receive Social Security benefits, the agency said.

To see if you qualify for SSI, visit the Social Security website. You can also visit your local Social Security office in person or call 1-800-772-1213 (TTY 1-800-325-0778) between 8 a.m. and 7 p.m. local time on weekdays.

Mike Snyder is a national trends news reporter for USA TODAY. You can follow him on Threads, Bluesky, and X, and email him at: mike snyder & @mikegsnider.bsky.social & @mikesnider & msnider@usatoday.com.

‘No Kings’ rallies massive show of political power against Trump

0

play

The demonstration outside the Minnesota State Capitol building for the famous “No Kings” rally, in which Bruce Springsteen and Jane Fonda joined the bill, was the least notable development on the day of the March 28 protests.

Even more notable was the “No Kings” march in Staunton, Virginia. and Salisbury, Maryland. Rockford, Illinois. Beaver, Pennsylvania. Eugene, Oregon. Chillicothe, Ohio. Port Huron, Michigan. Flatwoods, West Virginia. In addition to over 3,000 locations nationwide, we also have locations around the world.

Sarah Elizabeth Greer, 56, called it “the sacred intertwining of democracy” as she marched through Manhattan pushing her two small dogs in a cart emblazoned with handwritten signs that read “No Barking” and “Chew Power!”

The left-wing protests calling for opposition to the revolutionary-era monarchist and authoritarian President Donald Trump had the widest geographic reach of any one-day protest in the United States in more than half a century. They included not only the familiar districts of New York, Los Angeles, and Austin, but also communities in all 50 states and every congressional district, including rural and Republican territory.

Although the atmosphere was generally positive and the marches were mostly peaceful, the third No King protest was definitely a show of political power that could have repercussions beyond the 2026 midterm elections.

The record-breaking protests foreshadow further upheaval in the run-up to November’s midterm elections, following a series of Republican losses in special elections, including a Democratic victory in the Florida House of Representatives representing the president’s home district.

Incidentally, the evening rally in West Palm Beach included a march down President Donald Trump Boulevard toward the president’s weekend mansion in Mar-a-Lago, but police turned the demonstrators back before they could get close enough to be seen or heard at the scene.

The White House had already dismissed the protests as pointless.

Press Secretary Abigail Jackson had previously called it a “Trump confusion therapy session,” and said only “reporters who are paid to cover it” were interested. Mike Marinella, a spokesman for the National Republican Congressional Committee, called them the “Hate America Rally.”

Here are some takeaways from the latest and largest protest organized by a loosely organized group called No Kings.

1. Historic turnout

It was one of the largest protests in American history.

Although not yet verified by independent analysts, organizers estimated a total audience of 8 million people, higher than the 7 million estimated for the previous “No Kings” Day in October 2025. More events were planned this time around (3,300 vs. 2,700), with even larger crowds reported in some locations due in part to opposition to the Iran war.

The previous large-scale one-day protest in the United States was the first Earth Day in 1970, when an estimated 20 million people participated in environmental rallies and teach-ins.

Think about it. In a country of nearly 349 million people, 8 million people in attendance means more than 1 in 50 U.S. residents attended a No Kings rally.

Organizers say two-thirds of registered participants live outside of major cities, with a 40% increase in participants from suburban, small town and rural addresses from last time.

The first “No Kings” rally was held on June 14, 2025, the day President Trump presided over a military parade in Washington commemorating the 250th anniversary of the founding of the U.S. military, which also happened to be Trump’s 79th birthday. These protests have drawn approximately 5 million people, a figure confirmed by the Crowd Counting Consortium sponsored by Harvard University and the University of Connecticut.

Four months later, an estimated 7 million people participated in the second “No Kings” march.

The large number of locations for the third event means that the march may have received less national news coverage than other iconic protests centered in Washington, D.C., such as the 1963 Washington Civil Rights March and the 1969 anti-war Vietnam Moratorium demonstrations.

But the fact that the rally took place in a local square and marchers headed to the streets of their hometowns also perhaps makes it harder for critics to dismiss the protests as the province of radical liberals on the East and West Coasts.

2. The messages were mixed

The demonstrators were united by their opposition to Trump and their support for the democratic institutions they accuse him of endangering.

In Columbus, Ohio, Beverly Vogely, 86, waved at passing cars with a red, white and blue sign that read “Stop Trump, Save Democracy.” In Wilmington, Delaware, a man held up a handwritten message on brown cardboard: “When the people rise, kings fall.”

The choice of Minnesota for the flagship rally also reflects widespread opposition to sweeping immigration raids by ICE agents in Minneapolis and elsewhere that have trapped some Americans, imprisoned thousands of illegal immigrants, separated immigrant families and led to mass deportations.

However, the No Kings movement lacked the point-by-point platform of a political party, with mixed priorities and potential conflicts over tactics and priorities.

The billboards opposed the Iran war, decried housing and health care costs, supported Ukraine in its war with Russia, and raised the Jeffrey Epstein scandal. Some of them called for Trump’s impeachment. “Arrest them!” one protester marched in Washington, D.C., demanding the display of a banner with the names of Vice President J.D. Vance, Secretary of the Army Pete Hegseth, Presidential Press Secretary Caroline Leavitt and others.

Some rallies also had “Abolish ICE” placards. At one of the marches in Washington, D.C., a Palestinian flag waved among the crowd.

3. The protesters were anti-Trump, but not necessarily Democrats.

Uniting against Trump doesn’t automatically mean the entire crowd supports Democrats.

The No Kings movement does not rely on the Democratic Party to organize its protests. We are building our own infrastructure using social media and digital resources. The coalition of labor unions, progressive activists, civil rights groups and others behind the group includes established organizations such as Public Citizen, Move On, and the Human Rights Campaign, as well as emerging groups such as Indivisible and 50501.

They are appealing not only to progressives who think Democrats are too moderate, but also to a growing number of independent voters, including centrists, who are disillusioned with both major parties. That could complicate efforts to deliver votes.

A woman’s sign in Rehoboth Beach, Delaware, read, “Eggs are expensive in BC, all the chickens are in Congress.”

4. Protests could be important on Election Day

History shows that large-scale protests can be important in midterm elections, unleashing political energy and galvanizing voter enthusiasm.

The Tea Party movement, which began erupting in 2009 among conservatives opposed to President Barack Obama, is believed to have boosted Republican turnout in the 2010 midterm elections, giving Republicans 63 seats and a red wave majority in the House.

The 2017 Women’s March, which began with Trump’s first inauguration, contributed to the blue wave that saw Democrats flip 41 seats and take back the House in 2018.

Democrats are now increasingly confident they will flip the three or more seats needed to regain the House majority in November. While the 2026 map now suggests that Republicans could win a Senate majority in their favor, that possibility remains remote.

5. But sometimes blowbacks occur.

However, large-scale protests also carry electoral risks.

Protests against the Vietnam War energized young voters and liberal Democrats. But a backlash from older, more conservative voters led Republican Richard Nixon to campaign for law and order in 1968, narrowly defeating Democrat Hubert Humphrey in the race.

More recently, the conservative Tea Party’s takeover of some Republican organizations led to the nomination of untested and unvetted candidates in states such as Delaware and Nevada, which subsequently struggled to win statewide elections. Most analysts believe this cost Republicans any chance of regaining the US Senate majority in 2010.

Some Republicans now portray the No Kings movement as a group of radicals out of touch with mainstream political opinion. House Speaker Mike Johnson said it brought together “Marxists, socialists, Antifa supporters, anarchists, and pro-Hamas factions of the far-left Democratic Party.”

Marinella said the rally is “where the most violent and wildest fantasies of the far left take the microphone and House Democrats receive their marching orders.”

Despite the harsh rhetoric against President Trump and his policies, the march had a light-hearted tone and featured quite a few costumes, including various inflatable versions of the president. A giant inflatable frog danced at the front of the crowd at City Hall in Morristown, New Jersey.

In Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, a group of women wore fake Statue of Liberty crowns and carried lighted plastic torches.

Posted by: Eduardo Cuevas in New York.

Arizona Basketball defeats Purdue in Elite 8 to advance to 2026 Final Four

0

play

SAN JOSE, Calif. — Arizona’s drought is over.

The top-seeded Wildcats continued their March Madness run with a come-from-behind 79-64 victory over second-seeded Purdue in the Elite Eight, advancing to the Final Four for the first time in 25 years.

The game was a back-and-forth affair in the early going, but a run just before halftime gave Purdue a seven-point lead and put the Wildcats on the back foot for the first time in the NCAA Tournament.

Although it alarmed Arizona’s heavy presence and evoked March’s past trauma, it was in no position to scare these “Cats.” This season, they led 5-0 at halftime.

Make it 6-0.

Arizona came out of the locker room nervous, but Purdue couldn’t sustain its hot shooting. A 16-3 run gave the Wildcats the lead and they held that lead the rest of the way, outscoring Purdue in the closing stages.

The Wildcats outscored the Boilermakers 48-26 with 20 minutes remaining, shooting 51.6 percent from the field during that time, while Purdue shot 32.1 percent on just one 3-pointer in the final minute after making seven 3-pointers in the first half.

Four Arizona starters scored in double figures, led by Koa Peat, who was named the West’s most outstanding player, with 20 points.

In the end, Arizona had its most impressive performance of the tournament thus far, winning all four games by 10 points or more, breaking the March curse that has hung over the program for most of the 21st century.

The Wildcats last made it to the Final Four in 2001 under coach great Lute Olsen, but since then, the Wildcats have failed to reach the stage each time despite being one of the winningest programs in the country. Arizona has lost six straight Elite Eight appearances, two of which were as a No. 1 seed.

The Wildcats have had several NBA stars with championship potential over the years, but this well-rounded unit ends that spell. All they needed to do that was win a program-record 36 games.

Purdue will return home to Indiana, except it won’t play in nearby Indianapolis, denying it a spot in the Final Four for the second time in three years after starting the season as the No. 1 team in the country.

The Boilermakers’ failure to win their first national championship, leaving Indiana as the last team remaining, guarantees a team will not win its home state title, the first since UCLA won in San Diego in 1975.

The loss also preserved an unlucky March winning streak, and Purdue fell to 0-10 overall against No. 1 seeds in the NCAA Tournament.

Boilermakers guard Braden Smith finishes his career as the NCAA’s all-time assist leader with 1,103 career dimes.

Instead, Arizona State will head to Indianapolis, a city synonymous with its history, where it won its only national championship in 1997. The Wildcats will face the winner of Michigan and Tennessee in the national semifinals for a second chance to win the championship.