Home Blog Page 106

Is a heat pump right for your home? Experts explain

0

Heat pumps are becoming more popular due to their increased efficiency and dual purpose. According to Rocky Mountain Institute (RMI), heat pumps will account for 47% of refrigeration equipment sales in 2025, and from October 2025 to March 2026, heat pump sales even exceeded traditional air conditioning units for the first time.

Thinking about jumping on the bandwagon but aren’t sure if your home is a good candidate for a heat pump? The USA TODAY team asked the HVAC experts at ARS, a national HVAC installer, to help you decide.

Here, we’ll take a closer look at which regions are best suited for heat pumps and why.

What is a heat pump and how does it work?

The name “heat pump” is misleading, as this machine has the ability to both heat and cool your home. However, this name perfectly describes how a heat pump works. Unlike furnaces, heat pumps do not produce heat. They move it from one place to another.

  • In the winter, heat pumps heat your home by extracting heat from the outside air and moving it indoors. This works even in cold climates.
  • During the hot summer months, the heat pump works in reverse. A heat pump takes hot air from inside your home and pumps it outside.

Key factors determining heat pump performance

Heat pump performance is about more than just the model and efficiency rating. The factors that affect the operation of heat pumps are:

  • climate: Heat pumps work in any climate, but they perform better in milder climates. As temperatures drop, so does the efficiency of heat pumps (although heat pumps still operate at higher efficiency than other types of HVAC systems).
  • insulation: Even the most modern and efficient heat pump systems won’t keep your home cool if your walls aren’t properly insulated. Insulation is the main defense against heat entering and leaving your home, so poor insulation means your heat pump has to work much harder to maintain the temperature inside your home.
  • Heat pump model: Newer heat pump models have superior technology to help keep your home cooler. “The technology in these systems is really amazing right now,” says Joey Dooley, general manager of ARS in Texas. “Before, you were basically limited to one or two stages, either low or high. Now we have systems available that have more precise capacity control, such as communication systems, variable speed systems, and variable speed compressors,” he says.
  • Correct installation: A heat pump will not work properly if it is not set up properly first. Even if you buy the best and most efficient heat pump, “it still needs to be installed correctly,” says Scott Urquhart, ARS HVAC sales and customer experience specialist. “If we don’t, there will be problems.”
  • Thermostat settings: Modern thermostats do more than just set the temperature in your home. You can also set timers, adjust your home’s temperature on the go, and recommend the right temperature to achieve your preferred energy usage. These settings help improve the operation of your heat pump.
  • Your personal preference: If you prefer your home to be 65 degrees when the thermometer outside is reading 95 degrees, you can expect your heat pump to work harder and use more energy. While not uncomfortable, keeping your home’s temperature between 72 and 75 degrees when it’s unbearably hot outside can help your heat pump perform better and extend its lifespan.

Heat pumps in cold regions

Homeowners in northern climates have traditionally avoided heat pumps, believing they wouldn’t survive the cold.

But Steve Wade, senior director of operations and procurement at ARS, debunks that myth. Heat pump technology has advanced to become a viable, if not more efficient, option than traditional air conditioning and heating. Older heat pump models may not have been sufficient, but now the use of dual fuel (both electricity and natural gas) makes them suitable for all climates.

In cold climates, high-efficiency heat pumps can rely on supplemental heating (i.e., gas) even under extreme temperatures.

“Dual fuel is great,” Wade said. “They use electricity when it’s warm, but when they need more energy they switch to gas,” Wade said. This dual fuel capability makes heat pumps possible in colder climates like Chicago and Milwaukee.

Many homeowners think that simply installing a high-end or “premium” heat pump will lower their electricity bills. In reality, performance in cold climates is highly dependent on appropriate system size, installation quality, and equipment usage. Even the most expensive system can perform poorly if it doesn’t match your home’s insulation level or is too large.

Heat pumps in warm climates

For homeowners living in warmer climates like Florida, Texas, and Arizona, heat pumps are an obvious choice.

“It will be similar to a traditional air conditioning system,” Wade says. Heat pumps keep indoor temperatures low, but provide heat for several months of the year when needed.

Although heat pumps operate more efficiently in warmer climates, many of the same myths persist.

Homeowners often believe that paying more upfront will guarantee better energy savings. Wade points out that a higher-priced system doesn’t necessarily offer a meaningful improvement over a mid-range model if the efficiency gains are small. The real differentiator is how well the system matches your home’s cooling load and how consistently it maintains it.

Incentives and rebates by state

The Federal Energy Efficient Home Improvement Credit, which allows you to claim a tax credit of up to $3,200, expired on December 31, 2025. This means that the financial incentives for heat pumps are reduced.

Even in 2026, some states still offer tax incentives for installing energy-efficient systems like heat pumps. They include:

  • new york: Up to $8,000 for heat pumps with EmPower+
  • Maryland: Up to $15,000 for projects through EmPower Maryland and the state’s top energy providers
  • Rhode Island: Up to $11,500 available to eligible homeowners through Clean Heat RI
  • Colorado: Funding for select Colorado counties through the HEAR program
  • Wisconsin: HOMES Projects can save you up to $5,000 on energy efficiency projects

This is by no means a complete list, so check with your state and local utility company for rebates, credits and other savings opportunities.

When not to switch to a heat pump

Heat pumps can be used in any region, but the costs may outweigh the benefits. When refurbishing a new heat pump, you can expect to incur high bills at the end of the project. So if cost is your main reason for not installing a heat pump, your reasoning may be spot on.

  • Higher initial costs: Even if you don’t need new ductwork or other upgrades, the average price for a new heat pump is $13,000. New air conditioners cost between $3,000 and $15,000, but most are more affordable than heat pumps.
  • Electrical upgrade: If you have an older home, ductwork and heat pumps are only part of the overall installation. Outdated electrical systems may need to be updated from 100 amp electrical panels to 200 amp panels, further increasing the cost of the project.
  • Duct work: While not all types of heat pumps require ductwork (think ductless mini-splits), if you need whole-house heating and cooling, ductwork is required. This can easily cost thousands of dollars, making installation costs too high.

Other reasons for not installing a heat pump depend on your home and where you live.

  • If you live in an area where gas prices are low, you may not save money by switching to a heat pump. If your electricity bill is high, you may end up spending even more energy.
  • Areas that experience extreme cold may still require a gas-powered system to combat the temperatures. Heat pumps are more efficient, but may not be suitable for your home.
  • An uninsulated home loses heat more easily, so the heat pump has to work harder to maintain the temperature inside the home. Upgrading your home’s insulation can solve this problem, but it can be expensive.

If you don’t plan on living in your home for a long time, you may want to reconsider purchasing a heat pump.

The bottom line is that they are expensive and you may not stay long enough to recoup your costs. However, even if it doesn’t directly impact your home’s value, a new heat pump may attract buyers.

“If one home has a newer, more efficient air conditioning system and another home has a system that appears to be at the end of its lifespan, the home with the better system is more attractive,” Dooley says. “I don’t know if that will increase the price of the domestic dollar against the dollar, but it will definitely increase favorability.”

Why are heat pumps expensive?

Using a heat pump may offer further energy cost savings, but requires a higher initial cost.

“We have added components that don’t exist in traditional air conditioners,” Wade says. This product is manufactured differently and uses more expensive copper components, increasing costs.

Installation costs may also add up to a higher total cost. Heat pumps often require careful sizing, potential electrical upgrades, and, in some cases, ductwork modifications and auxiliary systems to accommodate extreme temperatures. If you don’t already have one installed, you may also need a compatible indoor unit and thermostat.

Heat pump decision checklist

Not sure if a heat pump is right for you? Use this heat pump decision checklist to decide:

We recommend using a heat pump in the following cases:
Live in a mild climate that does not experience extreme heat or cold
your home is moderately insulated
electricity bill is low
I want to combine heating and cooling into one system.
You may benefit from a heat pump if:
Although insulation is in place, the house is still drafty.
There are only a limited number of installers in your area, so you won’t be able to get multiple quotes.
Electricity bill is average
you don’t live in a frigid climate
A heat pump may not be ideal if:
There is cheap natural gas
electricity bill is high
Installation costs are too high to save money
Air conditioning and heating equipment are already installed

Val Kilmer criticized by ‘Conspiracy’ director Adam Marcus

0


Adam Marcus condemned Val Kilmer’s behavior during the filming of the 2008 direct-to-DVD film Conspiracy, calling the actor “the worst human being I’ve ever known.”

play

One director doesn’t look back fondly on his time working with Val Kilmer.

In a now-deleted thread, director and screenwriter Adam Marcus, known for his work in horror films, appeared to suggest that the late actor behaved badly on the set of the 2008 thriller Conspiracy.

According to Entertainment Weekly, Marcus wrote on Sunday, May 31, alongside a photo of the director and actor together, “#MicroIntellectMonday To the day I directed that guy. The guy that played Iceman and Doc Holliday (sic).” “You know, this is me and Putz working on the set of Conspiracy.”

Marcus also pre-emptively addressed the backlash against “mouthing the dead”, adding that if Kilmer “had only done a tenth of what I did on my set today, it would have been canceled immediately.”

“He’s the worst human being I’ve ever known…and that’s really saying something,” the “Jason Goes to Hell” director continued, according to the outlet.

The post doesn’t seem to appear on his thread page anymore. USA TODAY has reached out to Marcus and Kilmer’s representatives for comment.

Kilmer starred as disabled Special Forces veteran William “Spooky” McPherson in the critically acclaimed direct-to-DVD film, opposite Jennifer Esposito and Gary Cole. The film has a 19% rating on Rotten Tomatoes’ Popcornmeter, while Richard Roeper of Ebert & Roeper called it “beyond scary” and “shockingly bad.”

Six years after the film’s release, Kilmer was diagnosed with throat cancer. He later recovered. The actor has spent much of the past decade publicly battling the disease, permanently losing his voice after a tracheotomy, but continued to act and write.

Mr. Kilmer passed away in April 2025 at the age of 65 from pneumonia.

Val Kilmer admits to ‘misbehaving’ and ‘strange’ behavior

In the intimate 2021 documentary Val, Kilmer culled from hundreds of hours of personal home footage to reflect on his ups and downs. The documentary was narrated by the actor’s son Jack.

Towards the end of “Val,” Kilmer reflected on his accomplishments and ultimately said he felt “blessed.”

“I misbehaved,” Kilmer said in the documentary. “I’ve acted bravely. I’ve acted strangely to some people. I don’t deny any of that, and I don’t regret any of it, because I’ve lost and discovered parts of myself that I didn’t know existed.”

Contributed by Brian Alexander and Patrick Ryan, USA TODAY

Starbucks Unicorn Frappuccino is coming back this summer

0

play

The Unicorn Frappuccino is coming back to Starbucks.

Starbucks says the popular, colorful drink first debuted as a limited-time product in 2017, and most recently appeared at this year’s Coachella music festival. The drink made waves in 2017 with its pink and blue swirls, color changes, and “unicorn dust” topping.

The Unicorn Frappuccino will return to Starbucks Coffeehouses later this summer for one weekend only, but the company has not yet announced a date.

Starbucks recently discontinued its summer menu

Starbucks’ summer menu will go on sale May 12 and will be available for a limited time, according to the coffee chain. The menu welcomes the return of the new Tropical Butterfly Refresher, the new Horchata Frappuccino Blend Beverage, and the Iced Horchata Shake Espresso.

According to Starbucks, Tropical Butterfly Refresher features guava and passionfruit flavors, as well as bursts of mango-pineapple-flavored pearls. To finish off the drink, a splash of butterfly pea flower infusion is added to effectively create the color of the drink.

Starbucks says the drink can be customized with lemonade or coconut milk, as well as customers’ preferred levels of caffeine and B vitamins.

Iced Horchata Shake Espresso features Starbucks Blonde espresso and horchata syrup, blended with the nuttiness of cinnamon, vanilla and toasted rice, shaken with ice and finished with oat milk.

The summer menu also features new unicorn cake pops, which are vanilla cake mixed with confetti sprinkles, drizzled with white chocolate icing and decorated with unicorn faces.

Gabe Hauari is USA TODAY’s national trends news reporter. You can follow him at X @gabehauari Or email Gdhauari@gannett.com.

Will Aaron Donald return to the Rams? Erica Donald speaks out

0

play

The Los Angeles Rams acquired a defensive star in the Myles Garrett trade. Also, you may have accidentally landed briefly.

Former Rams defensive tackle Aaron Donald told ESPN’s Pat McAfee that he is considering retirement after Los Angeles acquired Garrett in a June 1 trade with the Cleveland Browns. McAfee shared a text message he received from Donald on the June 2 episode of “The Pat McAfee Show.”

“(The Myles Garrett trade) certainly made me think,” Donald said in a text message, according to McAfee.

Donald went on to say that a return to the Rams is not yet certain. He told McAfee that he is 35 years old and has been two years since his last football action (the 2023 season, which included his 10th Pro Bowl appearance and his eighth First Team All-Pro honor).

“We’ll have to see if that fire rekindles,” Donald said.

Rumors of Donald’s return were circulating as early as the 2024 offseason, months after he first announced his retirement. Despite saying in interviews that he no longer had the desire to train persistently, Donald has been posting videos on social media of himself lifting heavy weights throughout his retirement.

A video posted to Instagram three weeks ago shows the three-time NFL Defensive Player of the Year bench pressing 160-pound dumbbells, a total of 320 pounds.

During his 10-year career with the Rams, Donald had 543 tackles, 176 tackles for loss, and 111 sacks. He also recorded 24 forced fumbles and 21 passes defensed in his career. Donald’s six-year, $135 million contract extension he signed with the Rams in 2018 expires after the 2024 season, one year after retiring.

Garrett will join the Rams defense in 2026 after a stellar career in Cleveland. The No. 1 overall pick in the 2017 NFL Draft has 412 tackles and 125.5 sacks over the first nine years of his career. His 23 sacks last season set a single-season NFL record previously set by Michael Strahan and TJ Watt, and he was on his way to winning his second NFL Defensive Player of the Year award.

Garrett, 30, is under contract with the Browns through 2030 after signing a four-year, $160 million extension that begins after the 2026 season.

Erica Donald responds to rumors of Aaron Donald not retiring

If anyone knows about Donald’s plans, or lack thereof, to get back on the field, it might be from someone inside the former Lamb’s house.

Aaron’s wife, Erica Donald, posted the perfect three-word message for fans hoping to see No. 99 return to the team following the Myles Garrett trade.

“Everyone is hilarious,” she posted to X.

What is a doom job? Definition, examples, and why it’s important at work

0

Today’s job seekers find themselves stuck in an endless loop of scrolling through job posting sites for hours and saving the ones that interest them. largely Yes, they keep exploring long after their motivation has waned.

Often, what starts out as a focused effort to find a better role, or to get out of a tough job market, quickly becomes repetitive and unfocused, with candidates applying for jobs that don’t quite align with their goals, but that they still feel are worth a shot in the moment.

The experience has a name: “destructive work.” This reflects expanding workplace behaviors shaped by job market uncertainty and the pressure to constantly be on the move.

What is Doomjob?

Doomjobs are a recent workplace phenomenon that reflects the compulsive temptation of doomscrolling. The article describes how job seekers cycle through lists that don’t exactly match what they’re looking for, but apply anyway out of urgency or uncertainty.

Sometimes it feels effective, but often it becomes a cycle of application without a clear direction.

“It’s like you’re just looking at things without thinking, and you’re not necessarily doing anything productive,” says organizational psychologist Dr. Jamie Shapiro.

As you scroll through endless job listings, something triggers in your brain. “Every time you scroll, you get a hit of dopamine,” she says.

This often happens when people are “burned out or in an organization where they don’t feel appreciated,” she added. This leaves job seekers daydreaming about other options. This behavior, along with a short-term release of dopamine, can create an illusion of control.

One of the downsides to crushing jobs is that they can keep job seekers busy without truly getting them closer to the role they actually want. Over time, that cycle can take a toll on your self-confidence, networking efforts, and long-term career direction.

For many workers, especially recent graduates, the constant stream of low-ball applications and rejections can be emotionally draining.

Mindy Cox, chief human resources and marketing officer at OC Tanner, said the process often results in a “real sense of frustration” for job seekers who apply extensively but see little success.

“If you apply for 500 jobs, even if you receive one acceptance letter, there could be 499 rejections. That can’t help but affect us,” she says. “I feel frustrated because my efforts are not proportional to the results.”

This rapid application approach can also steer people away from more intentional networking and relationship building. “It’s easier to sign up for a pre-populated application with one set of credentials than it is to reach out and build connections directly,” Cox says.

Over time, the pattern can also make it difficult for employees to maintain long-term direction.

“Life is expensive these days, and of course sometimes you need something in between,” Cox said. “But if you want long-term success, you have to get into a role where you feel that purpose.”

How the job of destiny became established in the job market

Doomjobs began to gain traction as AI, “easy-to-apply” job sites, and a tough job market changed the way people searched for jobs.

Increased layoffs across major industries and new graduates struggling to stay in the workforce are adding to the pressure, creating a sense of urgency in job searches.

But Dr. Shapiro says there are several additional factors that exacerbate this trend. The first is the way AI is discussed in the workplace and in the media. Often, as she puts it, it is discussed through a fear-based lens.

That constant sense of threat puts people into “survival mode,” making them more susceptible to burnout and leaving people with “fear of work,” she added.

In situations like this, job seekers and dissatisfied employees often turn to short-term relief, something that gives them a sense of progress or potential even if it isn’t long-term.

This trend is also accelerating due to changes in the recruitment system itself. Easy application features and algorithm-driven job sites allow you to submit applications faster than ever before, often with little friction or consideration.

“We have a lot of technology that allows us to recognize apertures,” Cox says. “LinkedIn sends me jobs that match my profile every day, multiple times a day. Jobs come directly to my email, so they’re available even when I’m not looking.”

For job seekers, constant visibility can create fear of missing out. Doing destructive work can give you a fleeting sense of control. So even if the extensive job search feels daunting, it’s a reminder that options still exist.

Why it’s important to apply with a purpose

“Destructive work is a coping mechanism,” Cox says. “The strategy is to apply with a purpose.”

Rather than responding to every job opening, job seekers should focus their time on opportunities that better fit what they’re looking for, making each application more intentional and informed.

Peter Duris, CEO and co-founder of Kickresume, says this approach also increases a candidate’s chances of being noticed. Job seekers “are much more likely to be invited for an interview if they carefully consider whether they are a good fit for the job and tailor their applications to make that clear,” he says.

In a competitive hiring environment, a shift from mass to focus can help candidates stand out not just by how many roles they apply to, but also by how clearly they match the role they pursue.

How to end the cycle of misery

The first step to ending destructive cycles is self-awareness, says Dr. Shapiro. If job seekers find themselves in a disastrous job, she suggests pausing and resetting their search.

She likens it to using social media, where time passes before you know it. “You can be on social media for 15 minutes and suddenly it feels like 60 seconds,” she says. “It can also happen in disastrous jobs.”

From there, structure becomes important. Setting clear goals and deadlines will help you stay intentional with your job search, rather than doing it reactively or endlessly.

“It’s often quality over quantity,” Duris says. “Remember, by being a little more selective about the jobs you apply for, you actually increase your chances of getting an interview.”

That selectivity extends to how you build your applications. “Tailoring your resume for every role may seem like a daunting task, but in most cases, your existing resume is already pretty much it,” he says. “Read each job description carefully, make sure the relevant skills are clearly listed, and make sure you have the right keywords in the right places.”

He added that long-term progress is not just about applications. “To develop a truly intentional approach to career advancement, it’s important to focus on skill development,” Duris says.

Overall, the goal is to move away from destructive work and toward a more intentional approach. Getting a job isn’t about completing most applications, it’s about applying with direction.

New Mexico gubernatorial election results: Deb Haaland advances

0


The former congressman and secretary of the interior is one step closer to becoming the first Native American female governor in U.S. history.

play

Former Secretary of the Interior Deb Haaland won the New Mexico Democratic gubernatorial primary on June 2, moving one step closer to becoming the first Native American female governor in U.S. history.

Immediately after the polls concluded, NBC News Decision Desk Headquarters predicted that Haaland would win the nomination to replace outgoing Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham over Sam Bregman, the district attorney in the state’s 2nd Judicial District.

Haaland made history as the first Native American cabinet member when Biden appointed her to lead the Interior Department, which manages federal lands. Before that, she was a member of parliament.

She is the second Native American woman to be a major political party’s candidate for governor. Paulette Jordan ran in Idaho as a Democrat in 2018, but lost to Republican Brad Little in the ruby ​​red state.

By contrast, Haaland is running in a blue state and has a strong shot at becoming governor there. Both Cook Political Report and Sabato’s Crystal Ball believe the general election is “likely for a Democratic victory.”

Haaland is the second Biden Cabinet member to run for California governor, with former Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra running for governor.

The former interior minister ran a liberal-leaning campaign against the moderate Bregman, including defending the Democratic Party in a profile in Vogue magazine.

“I know people are frustrated with the Democratic Party. I’m not saying the Democratic Party is perfect,” Haaland told the magazine. “But I still feel that our values ​​will lead to a win for the most vulnerable people in this country, the people politicians should be thinking about first.”

Haaland told the Albuquerque Journal that she will make resistance to the Trump administration a key part of her campaign, calling for more funding for state attorneys general to sue the Trump administration.

“We will continue to sue the administration,” she said. “If it’s going to work, we should fight him in court every chance we get.”

Sen. Ben Ray Luján is expected to win renomination

Luján easily defeated Matt Dodson in New Mexico, becoming the Democratic candidate for re-election. The Associated Press and Decision Desk headquarters called the incumbent race immediately after voting closed.

According to the Associated Press and NBC News, Marker has received enough votes in the primary to be on the November ballot, so he will face Republican write-in candidate Larry Marker in November.

The Cook Political Report and Sabato’s Crystal Ball both say Democrats are likely to hold the Senate seat.

In the remaining state House races, Democrat Melanie Ann Stansbury will face Republican Didi Okpaleke for the 1st District seat, while incumbent Democrat Teresa Leger Fernandez will face Republican Martin Zamora in the 3rd District.

In the primary for the state’s only contested House seat, Gregory Cunningham defeated Jose Orozco to take the Republican ticket and face incumbent Democrat Gabriel Vazquez in the state’s 2nd District, according to the Associated Press and DDHQ.

Peabo Bryson dies – Disney singer dies at age 75 due to stroke

0

play

Peabo Bryson, the Grammy Award-winning singer who created numerous R&B and Disney hits, has died. He was 75 years old.

Bryson passed away “peacefully” at 5 p.m. on June 2, “surrounded by the love of his family and loved ones,” according to a statement from Bryson’s family provided to USA TODAY.

“We are so touched by the outpouring of love, prayers and support from our fans, friends and colleagues around the world,” the statement said. “While our hearts are broken, we take solace in knowing how deeply loved Peabo was and how many lives were touched by his voice and generous spirit. His legacy and music will live on for generations to come.”

The news comes two days after Variety reported that Bryson had suffered a stroke and was receiving treatment. A representative for Bryson confirmed to USA TODAY on June 1 that he is “currently receiving treatment” following a medical emergency.

The South Carolina-born musician is known for his work on the Disney hit “Beauty and the Beast” and Celine Dion’s duet “Beauty and the Beast” with singer-songwriter Regina Belle, which was featured on the “Aladdin” soundtrack. Best known for their song “A Whole New World,” they won back-to-back Grammy Awards for Best Pop Performance by a Duo or Group with Vocals in 1993 and 1994, respectively. Both tracks were also nominated for Record of the Year.

Bryson also released a string of hit singles with the late Roberta Flack, including “Tonight I Celebrate My Love,” “You’re Looking Like Love to Me,” and “As Long as There’s Christmas” from their 1983 duet album Born to Love.

He was also known for several hit solo ballads, including “If Ever You’re in My Arms Again” and “Can You Stop the Rain.” “Can You Stop the Rain” was nominated for Best R&B Vocal Performance in 1992. Other Grammy-nominated songs include “Lost in the Night” and “Did You Ever Know.”

Bryson had suffered a “mild” heart attack in 2019.

The singer’s music was nominated for a Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Original Song along with Earl Rose for the 1993 song “I Found Love” from “All My Children.”

The singer has been active for many years and released her latest album “Stand for Love” in 2018.

Outback sues for $1.5 million after woman slips on mashed potatoes

0

play

A Virginia woman is seeking $1.5 million from Outback Steakhouse, an Australian-themed casual dining restaurant chain, after she claims she slipped on mashed potatoes inside the restaurant and fell face-first onto the floor, sustaining serious and permanent injuries.

Tracy J. Renshaw, 56, claims the incident occurred on May 14, 2023, while she was dining with her family at Outback Steakhouse in Sterling, Virginia. The lawsuit, first filed in Loudoun County Circuit Court in May 2025 and later transferred to federal court on May 27, 2026, accuses the restaurant of failing to maintain a safe environment for its customers.

Renshaw was walking to the bathroom when she stepped on a slippery object on the floor that looked like mashed potatoes, according to the complaint. The fall caused her to land face-first on the hard floor, according to the complaint.

Her application claims the chain had a legal obligation to maintain a safe environment and warn customers of the dangers. The paper alleges that no warnings about the substance were posted and that the restaurant left the spill on the floor for an unreasonable amount of time.

Lawsuit alleges negligence and permanent damages

Renshaw’s complaint says the situation created an “unreasonably dangerous” situation for patrons and alleges negligence for failing to address or clean up the spill. The lawsuit also alleges that the fall caused her to experience significant pain, impaired her ability to work, and incurred ongoing medical expenses.

The lawsuit does not provide a detailed medical explanation of her injuries, and her attorney has not publicly detailed her condition.

Although the lawsuit is ongoing, Outback Steakhouse has denied the charges. The company claimed it had not notified it of any hazardous conditions and had no obligation to post a warning about the alleged leak. He also disputed claims about the extent of Renshaw’s injuries.

USA TODAY has reached out to attorneys for Outback Steakhouse and Renshaw for additional comment on the allegations.

Past injury lawsuits related to chains

The Independent previously reported on several lawsuits involving Outback Steakhouse locations in various states, centering on allegations of injury to customers. In one case, a Florida man filed a lawsuit alleging he was seriously injured when a toilet at Outback in Ocala allegedly “cracked” while he was using it.

In another case, a South Carolina woman was awarded $315,000 in damages after she claimed she ingested a metal hair embedded in a chicken dish, requiring emergency surgery to remove the hair from her esophagus. The incident involved allegations that hair grew from a wire brush used to clean grills at the Outback store she visited.

Other lawsuits cited in previous reports include one in South Carolina involving a customer who allegedly swallowed broken glass in a plate of sweet potatoes, and one in Oregon in which a diner claimed he broke two of his molars by biting into a piece of plate that had gotten into his food.

Reporter Anthony Thompson can be reached at ajthompson@usatodayco.com or X @athompsonUSAT..

Supreme Court allows Alabama to use maps that weaken black voting power

0

play

WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court said June 2 that Alabama may use a congressional map that was previously deemed to have intentionally discriminated against Black voters. The conservative court’s latest redistricting will help Republicans in their efforts to maintain a narrow majority in the U.S. House of Representatives in the midterm elections.

The ruling confirms how difficult, if not impossible, it is for racial minorities to challenge electoral maps after the court significantly relaxed the Voting Rights Act in April.

In an unsigned opinion dissented by the court’s three liberal justices, the majority suspended a lower court’s ruling that blocked Alabama from using the disputed map.

The map, passed by the Republican-led Legislature in 2023, includes only one district with a large black population, instead of the two districts included in the map that lower courts said the state must use.

The three-judge panel said the Republican-favored map was “tainted with intentional racism.”

“We conducted a thorough review of extensive and incontrovertible evidence from members and Congress, and the 2023 Plan could not be understood as anything other than a deliberate effort to dilute votes based on race,” the committee wrote. “We have concluded that if this record does not rebut a strong presumption of legislative integrity, we doubt that the presumption is rebuttable.”

But the Supreme Court said the panel incorrectly interpreted Alabama’s consent to the lower court’s original ruling on the map as evidence of discriminatory intent.

The majority also said the commission should not have blocked the map right before the election because states “are free to decide for themselves whether last-minute electoral changes are in their own interest.”

In a dissenting opinion joined by two liberal colleagues, Justice Sonia Sotomayor said the majority’s decision “upends an entire election in Alabama and undermines our democratic process in the name of recognizing discrimination against black Alabamians in Alabama.”

Intentional discrimination is a new standard set by the Supreme Court in its April decision in Louisiana v. Calais to assess whether racial minorities’ voting rights are being unfairly restricted.

The Trump administration supported Alabama’s argument that the Supreme Court should intervene because the lower court’s decision contradicts Louisiana v. Calais.

Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall said the three-judge panel was nervous about finding racial bias while ignoring “many legal explanations” for district lines, including keeping similar communities together in the same district and not requiring two incumbents to run against each other.

“Mr. Curry justified Alabama’s position,” Marshall wrote in the state’s emergency appeal, “yet in one week the district court ruled that Mr. Curry did not change anything.”

Voting Rights Act ruling sets off battle

The Voting Rights Act “requires strong evidence of intentional discrimination,” Justice Samuel Alito wrote in a majority opinion that held up Louisiana’s map for relying too much on race to classify voters. He said it was not enough that maps “failed to provide a sufficient number of majority and minority areas.”

A new interpretation of the Voting Rights Act forced several Southern states to redraw their congressional maps to eliminate minority-heavy districts, even though voting for this year’s candidates had already begun.

After issuing its decision, the court rushed to finalize the decision so that Louisiana could quickly impose new maps.

The justices then directed Alabama’s three-judge panel to reconsider its 2025 rejection of the Republican-preferred map, resulting in a new rejection in May and the state immediately appealing to the high court.

Kristen Clark, general counsel for the NAACP, said in a statement that the Supreme Court “is stripping black voters of their power and voice at a rate that would put even Jim Crow jurists to shame.”

Alabama’s map has been controversial for years.

Alabama’s maps have been in dispute since the 2020 Census, when the Alabama Legislature drew new boundaries that included one of seven districts with a majority of Black voters. African Americans make up more than a quarter of the state’s total population.

In 2023, the Supreme Court unexpectedly ruled against the state, striking down the map as a violation of the Voting Rights Act. The maps passed by the Republican-controlled Congress in response to that decision are the subject of the latest ruling.

Other Supreme Court redistricting decisions

In other redistricting decisions this year unrelated to the Voting Rights Act, the court allowed Texas to use a map drawn to give Republicans up to five additional seats in the U.S. House of Representatives.

The justices also allowed California to use a map that could send five more Democrats to Congress.

The court declined to intervene after the Virginia Supreme Court blocked the creation of new maps aimed at electing four more Democrats from the state.

Mega Millions jackpot reaches $346 million on Tuesday, June 2

0

play

The Mega Millions jackpot continues to grow ahead of the drawing on Tuesday, June 2, and now stands at $346 million, with a cash value of $153.8 million.

If someone is lucky enough to win the jackpot on Tuesday, they have two options. Take home one-time cash or get paid instantly, then receive an annual check that’s 5% larger than the previous year.

It’s been over two months since I won the Mega Millions jackpot. The last time it happened was on March 17th when the Ohio State player won $60 million.

With Tuesday’s Mega Millions drawing just hours away, here’s what you need to know.

What are the winning Mega Millions numbers for June 2, 2026?

USA TODAY will publish the winning numbers for Tuesday’s Mega Millions lottery after the drawing at 11pm ET.

When is the next Mega Millions drawing?

The next Mega Millions drawing is scheduled for Friday, June 5th at 11:00 PM ET.

Top 10 Mega Millions Jackpots

  • $1.602 billion in Florida on August 8, 2023
  • $1.537 billion in South Carolina on October 23, 2018
  • $1.348 billion on January 1, 2023 in Maine
  • July 29, 2022, $1.337 billion in Illinois
  • December 27, 2024, $1.269 billion in California
  • $1.128 billion in New Jersey on March 26, 2024
  • $1.05 billion in Michigan on January 22, 2021
  • $983 million in Georgia on November 14, 2025
  • $810 million in Texas on September 10, 2024
  • March 30, 2012, $656 million in Illinois, Kansas, and Maryland

What is Mega Millions?

Mega Millions is a lottery that is played in 45 states, the District of Columbia, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.

Each ticket costs $5, and players can choose six numbers from two different number pools: five different numbers from 1 to 70 (white balls) and one number from 1 to 24 (gold mega ball), or choose Easy Pick/Quick Pick.

If you match all six winning numbers in the drawing, you win the jackpot. If there are multiple jackpot winners, the jackpot prize will be shared.

How to play Mega Millions

To play Mega Millions, you must purchase a ticket. This can be done at several locations, including local convenience stores, gas stations, and grocery stores. In some states, you can purchase Mega Millions tickets online.

Once you have your ticket, you have to choose six numbers. Five of them are white balls numbered 1-70. The golden mega ball ranges from 1 to 24.

If you’re feeling particularly unlucky or don’t want to go through the hassle of picking, you can request a “quick pick” or “easy pick.” When you use these options, your computer randomly generates numbers.

Mega Millions tickets have built-in multipliers that increase your non-jackpot prize by 2, 3, 4, 5, or 10 times. Previously, players had to pay an extra dollar to add a “Megaplier”.

Fernando Cervantes Jr. is a trending news reporter for USA TODAY. Contact us at fernando.cervantes@usatodayco.com and follow us at X @fern_cerv_.

No aides warned about Joe Biden’s health before 2024 debate

0

play

Former first lady Jill Biden told ABC’s “The View” on June 2 that no one approached her because of concerns about former President Joe Biden’s health amid his dismal performance in the 2024 presidential debate.

Biden’s comments came during his media appearances as the former first lady’s new memoir, “A View from the East Wing,” hit stores.

Asked if she still believes her husband could have served four more years in the White House, Biden said he doubted it, especially given that his husband was diagnosed with prostate cancer in 2025.

“Well, based on what I know now, that’s not the case,” she said. “God, who knew? I mean, being diagnosed with cancer was such a shock.”

During an appearance on “The View,” Biden was asked whether anyone in her husband’s inner circle had consulted her about her husband’s health before his debate appearance with then-Republican candidate Donald Trump, especially as Americans were increasingly concerned about the former president’s health.

“A lot of aides say they saw this. Not one person came up to me and said, ‘Jill, look, Joe has aged or something is wrong,'” she said. “When I saw that, when all of America saw that moment on TV at the debate, I mean, I was scared out of my mind because I thought, ‘Oh my God, he’s having a stroke.’

Book publication and cancer diagnosis

The release of Biden’s book comes a year after the former president announced he had been diagnosed with prostate cancer and just days after she gave an update on her husband’s health.

In an interview on NBC’s “Today” on June 1 to promote her new memoir, she said that she is “doing well” despite her husband’s continued battle with prostate cancer.

“If he had just been diagnosed with prostate cancer, I think that would be a different matter, because it is curable,” the former first lady said. “But the fact that it metastasized to his bones makes it a completely different story.”

She added: “So I think Joe will be living with cancer ‘for the rest of his life.'”

USA TODAY’s Melina Khan contributed to this report.

Fernando Cervantes Jr. is a trending news reporter for USA TODAY. Contact us at fernando.cervantes@usatodayco.com and follow us at X @fern_cerv_.

Ford’s no-drive warning recall also includes Bronco Sport and Maverick

0

play

Ford Motor Co. has issued a recall that includes do-not-drive warnings for certain vehicles due to defects that may increase the risk of collisions.

More than 4,600 vehicles are included in the recall warning issued by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. The alert said affected vehicles may experience installation-related issues.

“The front lower control arm ball joint may have been incorrectly installed or incorrectly repaired at the vehicle assembly plant, which could result in the control arm becoming separated from the front wheel knuckle,” the recall states.

Here’s what you need to know about which models are subject to the recall and what car owners should do.

Which vehicles are subject to the recall?

According to NHTSA, 4,653 vehicles may be affected. The recall number is 26S36.

The models listed are:

  • 2021-2026 Ford Bronco Sport
  • 2022-2026 Ford Maverick

What should car owners do if they own a Ford vehicle that is subject to a recall?

NHTSA is asking owners not to drive their vehicles. Your auto dealer will repair the front lower control arm ball joint free of charge if necessary.

Notifications will be sent out by June 5th. Ford customer service can be reached at t 1-866-436-7332.

Taylor Eardley is a news reporter for USA TODAY. Contact us at tardrey@usatodayco.com.

GLP-1 drugs are associated with lower breast cancer risk

0

play

Obesity is a known risk factor for breast cancer, but could some women reduce their chances of this common type of cancer by taking weight loss drugs like Wegovy or Zepbound?

A study of more than 111,000 women published June 2 in a peer-reviewed journal found that women who took the popular GLP-1 drug prescribed for obesity and diabetes had a more than 30% lower risk of breast cancer. However, the researchers cautioned that this observational study does not prove that the popular weight loss drug reduces cancer risk.

University of Pennsylvania researcher Elizabeth MacDonald said that studies linking GLP-1 drugs to breast cancer prevention, along with a study published in May that found GLP-1 users were less likely to see metastasis of some obesity-related cancers, “only raises the possibility that there are real biological signals” that should be studied in robust clinical trials.

Other than skin cancer, breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in the United States, accounting for an estimated 380,000 cases annually. Approximately 1 in 8 women will be diagnosed with breast cancer during their lifetime.

McDonald, a professor of radiology at the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, said that if GLP-1 drugs help lower the risk of breast cancer, “the benefits will be transformative for women’s health.”

What researchers know about GLP-1 and breast cancer

McDonald presented the findings at a meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, and the study was published June 2 in the medical journal JCO Oncology Practice. The study examined the health records of more than 111,000 overweight women between the ages of 45 and 80 who underwent breast imaging at health care facilities in Pennsylvania.

Health records from 2022 to mid-2025 show that more than 15,000 women had a prescription for a GLP-1 drug, while more than 96,000 had no record of a GLP-1 prescription. Researchers compared the two groups and found that women prescribed GLP-1 drugs had a 35.1% lower risk of developing breast cancer.

The researchers also analyzed the records to match more than 15,000 GLP-1 users with a control group of non-GLP-1 users. Groups were matched across age, race, ethnicity, BMI, breast density, and diabetes status. When researchers compared the two groups, those prescribed GLP-1 drugs were 30.5% less likely to be diagnosed with breast cancer.

The study did not say what type of GLP-1 drug was used or how long the women took weight loss or diabetes drugs. The study also did not take into account genetic risk factors or whether the cancer was at an advanced stage at the time of diagnosis.

And because the study relied on the health records of women who visited the Pennsylvania facility, it does not address whether the patients received GLP-1 drugs elsewhere, such as through telemedicine companies or compounding pharmacies. During the study period, consumers flocked to telemedicine providers and compounders selling cheap knockoffs of GLP-1 weight loss drugs.

If study participants had secured GLP-1 drugs through a telemedicine provider or compounder, “we would never have known they were taking the drug,” MacDonald said. “There would be people in the control group taking GLP-1, so this would make it less effective.”

McDonald and other researchers are seeking funding to start a clinical trial to evaluate whether GLP-1 drugs can reduce breast cancer cases in high-risk women. The study was designed to follow participants over five years and also seeks to answer whether GLP-1 drugs can reduce the risk of tumor recurrence in women who previously had breast cancer.

Researchers at the University of Pennsylvania who were not involved in the study said the study contributes to growing research into GLP-1 drugs, which are commonly prescribed for weight loss and the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Some GLP-1s have been approved to reduce the risk of sleep apnea and heart disease. And researchers are studying its potential in treating addiction and cancer.

“With some of these new (weight loss) drugs coming to market, I think we’re going to see potential utility in cancer survival and perhaps cancer prevention,” said Bernard Fumeler, associate director of population sciences at the Massey Comprehensive Cancer Center at Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU).

In May, VCU researchers published a study in JAMA Network Open suggesting that breast cancer patients treated with GLP-1 had better outcomes than those who did not take the drug.

The VCU study of more than 840,000 patients matched similar groups of breast cancer patients with obesity or type 2 diabetes. Patients who took GLP-1 had better survival rates and were less likely to have their tumors come back after 10 years than those who did not take GLP-1.

Previous studies have shown that breast cancer patients who lost weight through treatment or surgery had improved heart health and longevity. Therefore, it makes sense that weight loss through the use of GLP-1 could lead to better outcomes for breast cancer patients, the researchers said.

“If we can find ways to reduce the risk of cancer in people who have (greater) risk factors, that’s key to what we want to do in cancer prevention,” Fumeler said.

Vanilla Ice defends Freedom 250 show, plans to play for Iranian President Vladimir Putin

0


The “Ice Ice Baby” rapper has no qualms about performing at the Great American State Fair, a Freedom 250 event created by President Trump. “I’d like to play for anyone, even President Putin.”

play

If you don’t mind paying for it, I recommend vanilla ice cream.

The rapper, who was one of the remaining artists scheduled to perform at the Great American State Fair, said he was scheduled to perform at the event for President Donald Trump’s nonprofit Freedom 250 and had no hesitations about it.

For me it’s as simple as a pimple. It’s nothing. “Today is America’s birthday,” he told CBS News in an interview published on Monday, June 1. “It has nothing to do with politics. I don’t understand why they would bring it into politics.”

The “Ice Ice Baby” rapper, whose real name is Robert Van Winkle, said he would “go and play for anyone,” including Russian President Vladimir, “President Putin. Anyone. If you want, I’ll go to Iran. It doesn’t matter.”

The comments come after most of the artists scheduled for the June 25-July 10 event withdrew, including The Commodores and Martina McBride, who suggested they were led to believe the event was “nonpartisan,” and Bret Michaels, who said he had received “completely unfounded and inexcusable” threats about appearing on the lineup.

Freedom 250 is “dedicated to uniting Americans in commemoration of our nation’s 250th anniversary.”

Vanilla Ice and Flo Rida were among the artists who remained. White House officials said President Trump indicated he would give a speech at the trade show instead, following his resignation. His headline speech is scheduled for June 24th.

Vanilla Ice said he understands artists pulling back “for fear” of backlash or the event being too political, but he doesn’t care whether the event is partisan or not. “When we do an event, we never ask about the event,” he said.

The rapper, who admitted he’s “never voted in my life,” said art “should never get involved” in politics, adding, “You should do whatever you want to do.

“You can’t choose your fans. They choose you,” the rapper continued. “You’re just an entertainer. Never think you’re anything more than that.”

According to the official Freedom 250 website, the Great American State Fair will transform the National Mall in Washington, D.C., into “the nation’s largest and most daring state fair” in celebration of the United States’ 500th anniversary, or 250th anniversary. In addition to a Ferris wheel and carousel, attractions include a rodeo and livestock competitions.

Contributors: Zachary Schermele and Edward Segarra, USA TODAY

Gold vs Bitcoin? Key differences, risks and benefits

0

Gold and Bitcoin are two of the most popular alternative investments, but they are attractive to investors for very different reasons. While gold has a centuries-old history as a store of value, Bitcoin offers a newer, technology-driven approach to preserving and growing wealth.

When choosing between the two, it’s important to understand how they differ in areas such as volatility, scarcity, inflation protection, liquidity, and long-term performance. Here’s how to compare gold and Bitcoin and decide which one is right for your portfolio.

Gold is a physical asset. Bitcoin is digital

“Gold is a tangible, rare metal with 5,000 years of financial reliability,” explains Henry Yoshida, a certified financial planner and co-founder of Dallas-based fintech company Rocket Dollar. Its value is independent of whether governments, banks, and companies fulfill their promises.

In contrast, Bitcoin exists entirely in digital form. It runs on a decentralized blockchain network, and its value depends primarily on investor demand, adoption, and trust in the technology. Bitcoin’s supply is limited by design, but its short track record means investors need to have more faith in the network’s continued growth and acceptance.

Gold has a long track record. Bitcoin is relatively new

Gold has served as a store of value for thousands of years, giving investors a long history of assessing how it performs during times of inflation, market turmoil, and economic uncertainty. “Gold’s thousands of years of track record means we know how it behaves through wars, currency collapses, and inflation cycles,” Yoshida says. “Bitcoin has only experienced one Fed tightening cycle and zero true global recessions.”

This difference in history creates trade-offs for investors. While gold’s long history may make it easier to evaluate it as a defensive asset, Bitcoin’s short history leaves more uncertainty about how it will perform in the broader economic environment.

At the same time, new assets offer greater growth potential if adoption continues to expand. Alexander S. Bloom, CEO of Two Prime, an SEC-registered investment advisory firm, said investments like Bitcoin “may be difficult to attract large-scale adoption, but they also offer even greater benefits if successful.”

Bitcoin is generally more volatile than gold

Bitcoin has historically experienced much greater price fluctuations than gold. “Bitcoin’s annual volatility is about 70% to 80%, which is about four times gold’s 15% to 20%,” Yoshida points out.

This volatility creates both opportunity and risk. Large price movements can lead to large profits in a bull market, but they can also lead to large losses in a short period of time. Gold tends to move more slowly, and many investors find it easier to hold onto gold during times of market stress.

Volatility is not automatically negative, Blume said. Investors can manage risk by keeping volatile assets a small portion of their portfolio, and investors with a long-term horizon may be able to weather market fluctuations. However, retirees and investors who may need to access their money in the near future should be wary of investing too much in Bitcoin.

Gold is widely accepted as a safe-haven asset

Gold has long been considered a safe investment, with investors often turning to it during times of economic uncertainty, geopolitical instability, and inflation concerns. “Gold has achieved its status as a safe-haven asset because central banks hold it in reserves, there are no issuers that can default, and historically gold appreciates when confidence in paper money declines,” Yoshida says. He cited the recent rise in gold prices to more than $5,400 this year amid tensions in the Middle East as a recent example.

Unlike stocks and bonds, gold is not tied to a company’s profits or a government’s ability to service its debt. Its independence has allowed it to maintain its reputation as a store of value during times of market downturn and financial stress.

Blume describes gold as “hard money.” This means that its supply is naturally limited. “Hard money assets tend to do well in times of inflation and uncertainty because people trust them and seek security,” he said.

Bitcoin offers potential for growth as it gains adoption

Like gold, Bitcoin is in limited supply and is often seen as a hedge against currency depreciation. In fact, some investors refer to Bitcoin as “digital gold” because there are only 21 million Bitcoins in existence. The key difference is that Bitcoin’s value is highly dependent on its continued adoption by investors, institutions, and governments.

Every time a new exchange-traded fund (ETF), government, or company buys Bitcoin, it adds demand to a supply that cannot grow. At its best, this dynamic helped drive triple-digit profits. As Yoshida says, “Gold won’t go 10x from here, but it won’t go to zero even if hiring stagnates.”

The potential for huge profits is one of Bitcoin’s biggest attractions, but it also brings additional risks. Unlike gold, which derives some of its value from its long history as a store of value, the investment case for Bitcoin relies heavily on continued trust and adoption in the network.

Brian Kuderna, a certified financial planner and founder of the Kuderna Financial Team, warns that the price of Bitcoin can also be influenced by factors that have little to do with fundamentals. Social media trends, investor sentiment, and politicians publicly supporting or criticizing cryptocurrencies can all contribute to sharp price swings, making Bitcoin’s path to widespread adoption more bumpy than it appears on paper.

Gold and Bitcoin supply dynamics are different

Scarcity helps support the value of both gold and Bitcoin, but their supply mechanisms are very different.

“The supply of gold increases by about 1.5% to 2% every year due to mining,” Yoshida says. This growth is slow enough to maintain gold’s purchasing power over time while meeting demand from investors, central banks, jewelers, and industrial users.

In contrast, Bitcoin’s supply is fixed. The network is programmed to never exceed 21 million Bitcoins. Unlike gold, whose supply can gradually increase as more metal is mined, Bitcoin’s supply cannot expand in response to increased demand.

For supporters, its fixed cap is one of Bitcoin’s most attractive features. They argue that Bitcoin’s limited supply makes it resistant to currency depreciation, making it potentially valuable as a long-term inflation hedge. Critics counter that scarcity alone does not guarantee value if investor demand weakens.

Inflation hedging: Gold is proven. Bitcoin is being discussed

Many investors buy both gold and Bitcoin because they believe that assets with limited supply can help protect purchasing power when inflation erodes the value of cash. The difference is that gold has a much longer track record.

“Gold has maintained its purchasing power through major inflation episodes of the last century, but Bitcoin’s inflation hedging theory is still under stress testing,” Yoshida observes. “Bitcoin was sold off during a spike in inflation in 2022, and has fallen in 2026 even as the CPI (Consumer Price Index, a key inflation indicator) is soaring.”

That doesn’t necessarily invalidate Bitcoin’s inflation hedge argument. Proponents argue that Bitcoin should be valued over the long term and that its fixed supply may be more important than short-term market sentiment.

Bloom takes that view, noting that Bitcoin has outperformed inflation for several years. The challenge is that investors need to tolerate significant volatility along the way. Those with shorter time horizons or lower risk tolerance may feel uncomfortable holding onto Bitcoin through the sharp drawdowns that often accompany long-term gains.

Liquidity and accessibility

Gold and Bitcoin are both relatively liquid assets, so they can usually be bought and sold without much difficulty. However, the ownership experience is very different.

Gold is traded through dealers, banks and exchanges around the world, primarily during market hours. Bitcoin trades 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, so investors can buy, sell, and transfer their Bitcoin virtually any time. As Yoshida points out, Bitcoin can be sent around the world in minutes from your smartphone.

The trade-off occurs after the purchase. Physical gold requires safe storage and often requires insurance to protect against theft or loss. Bitcoin eliminates those costs, but it also introduces risks of its own. Investors who store their own cryptocurrencies must protect their private keys and account credentials, as forgetting a password or losing a key can permanently cut off access to your holdings.

For some investors, Bitcoin’s 24-hour accessibility is a big advantage. Others prefer the simplicity and tangibility of owning a physical asset they can hold in their hands.

Which is better: gold or Bitcoin?

There’s no winner between the two, and most financial planners will tell you that the better question is how much of each to own. Yoshida recommends placing 5% to 10% of your portfolio in gold, and says that when it comes to Bitcoin, “a 1% to 3% allocation can make a big difference in portfolio returns.”

Consider Gold if… Consider Bitcoin if… Consider both if…
Prioritizing capital preservation over growth Have a long-term perspective and don’t need money right away You need a portfolio anchor with a bet on growth
Are you near or near retirement? More than 50% stomach drop possible without selling Diversified across different investment types
You want to hedge around economic factors, not headlines. Want exposure to mature investments with greater upside potential I would like to have a basic allocation in gold and a small speculative position in Bitcoin.

conclusion

Gold and Bitcoin can both play a role in a diversified portfolio, but for different purposes. Gold has a long history as a store of value, has a reputation as a safe asset, and generally has low volatility. Bitcoin has greater growth potential, but is riskier and has a shorter track record.

For many investors, the choice is not necessarily one or the other. Gold and Bitcoin often react differently to economic and market conditions, so owning both can help diversify your portfolio. Investors can gain exposure through the purchase of physical gold (such as coins and bars), cryptocurrencies, or through ETFs that provide access to one or both assets.

Consider your time horizon, risk tolerance, and overall financial goals before investing. If you’re not sure how either asset fits into your portfolio, start with a small position and reconsider with your financial advisor as your goals change.

About the editor

Roxanne Downer is an editor and writer with nearly 20 years of experience covering personal finance, consumer services, and investing. She specializes in translating complex topics and thoroughly dissecting industry terminology and sales tactics to provide readers with clear, trustworthy guidance they can use, whether it’s comparing providers, managing debt, or considering new investment strategies.

Read full biography

FAQ

Is Bitcoin better than gold?

it depends. If you want stable, long-term protection for your money, gold makes more sense. Bitcoin has the potential for greater profits, but larger price fluctuations are expected.

Is gold safer than Bitcoin?

For most investors, gold is safer. It has a centuries-old history as a store of value and does not rely on technology to maintain its value. Although Bitcoin has become increasingly mainstream in recent years, it has yet to survive every economic cycle.

Can Bitcoin replace gold?

So far, most investors and analysts are saying no. Gold’s 5,000-year history and central bank support give it a kind of staying power that Bitcoin has not yet built.

Which is a better hedge against inflation?

Gold has long been valued as a reliable inflation hedge. Although Bitcoin has survived most major periods of inflation in the last century, Bitcoin has only survived one.

Should I invest in gold or Bitcoin?

It depends on the type of investor. Many hold both gold as a source of stability and Bitcoin as a smaller growth position.

Can I invest in both gold and Bitcoin?

yes. Many investors use gold as a more stable store of value and Bitcoin as a riskier growth asset. The two assets often react differently to market conditions, so owning both can provide diversification benefits.

Justice Department’s Todd Blanche says President Trump’s ‘anti-weaponization’ fund has ended

0

play

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche said at a June 2 Congressional hearing that the Justice Department will not move forward with President Donald Trump’s “anti-weaponization fund” that could provide funding to people convicted of assaulting police during the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol.

The Justice Department said in a June 1 statement that it would comply with a judge’s ruling that ordered the funds to be suspended ahead of a June 12 court hearing. But he did not respond to follow-up questions ahead of Mr. Blanche’s testimony about whether he was permanently abandoning the $1.776 billion effort.

The fund has sparked widespread anger and a standoff between the White House and Congress, as Senate Republicans have refused in recent days to move forward with an immigration enforcement spending bill until the fund is limited or eliminated.

Following the Justice Department’s June 1 statement on suspending the fund, some Republican senators said they wanted a clearer message that the Trump administration was done pursuing the fund.

“We are not moving forward with plans for the fund,” Blanche said in testimony to Congress.

Rep. Grace Meng (D-N.Y.) told Mr. Branch that she expected a written statement from the Justice Department that it would not proceed with administering the fund, even after the June 12 court hearing.

“So I think what I say here will be recorded, so it will be in writing,” Blanche said.

Nevertheless, the acting attorney general left open the possibility that the Justice Department will fight any legal challenges brought in court against the fund.

“Despite what we’re doing in these cases, defending our rights and making sure our rights are protected, we’re not going to proceed with the operation of the fund,” he said.

How was the Anti-Weaponization Fund born?

The Department of Justice announced the creation of the fund as part of a settlement of a $10 billion lawsuit brought by President Trump and his two eldest sons against the IRS for failing to protect their tax returns. The contractor leaked tax return information from 2019 to 2020, along with that of hundreds of thousands of other taxpayers.

Later, Justice Department lawyers and lawyers for Trump and his two sons settled the case, agreeing for the government to establish a fund and relieve the family of any previous tax liability.

The New York Times reported in 2020 that President Trump is engaged in a decade-long audit battle with the IRS over his $72.9 million tax refund claim. Losing the battle could cost the company more than $100 million, according to the Times.

Blanche said in a subsequent hearing that the Justice Department was not waiving the tax portion of the settlement.

“Nothing has changed since then,” Blanche said.

“As with all IRS settlements with individual taxpayers and other businesses, it is standard and typical to exclude past ongoing audits as part of the settlement,” he added.

The agreement raised widespread ethical concerns. Government watchdogs argued that it was inappropriate for a Justice Department lawyer, presumably under the president’s control, to enter into such a contract with the president’s personal lawyer without judicial oversight.

Dozens of former federal judges have asked the Miami federal judge who closed Trump’s case against the IRS to reopen the case. They said the government had been fighting “nearly identical claims” filed against the IRS by others and said the disparate treatment of Trump showed the settlement was unethical.

While the justices consider what to do next, he asked Trump to respond by June 12 to allegations that he improperly colluded with the Justice Department.

(This article has been updated with additional information.)

UN meteorological agency warns of impending El Nino phenomenon

0


World leaders are particularly concerned about the prospect of droughts, heavy rains and heat waves that are expected to occur unevenly around the world.

play

On June 2nd, a new warning was issued regarding the impending El Niño weather pattern.

The World Meteorological Organization (WMO), the United Nations’ meteorological agency, has announced that there is an 80% chance of an El Niño phenomenon starting this summer.

The prospect of a strong El Niño event is raising concerns that long-term climate warming will be compounded by even more heat, including ocean heatwaves. Forecasts are on high alert around the world as this pattern has a major impact on global weather, and a strong event could have ripple effects for months to come.

The WMO said the El Niño phenomenon, driven by unusually warm waters in the tropical Pacific Ocean, is beginning to affect global temperatures and rainfall patterns.

After this summer, there is a nearly 90% chance that El Niño will continue through at least November. WMO said in a statement that while uncertainty remains about the strength and timing of El Niño’s peak, most forecast models suggest that El Niño will be at least moderate and possibly strong.

El Niño occurs when sea surface temperatures in the central Pacific Ocean are above average. Natural climate patterns influence weather around the world.

“The science is clear: El Niño has a 90% chance of arriving on our doorstep in the coming months,” UN Secretary-General António Guterres said in a video statement. “The world must treat this as an urgent climate warning: El Niño will add fuel to the fire of a warming world.

“The impact will be even more intense, it will travel further and it will cross borders with devastating speed,” he said.

Prepare for a “strong” El Niño

Scientists say this could be a very strong El Niño, potentially a “super” El Niño, but this is not the official term used by the WMO or the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).

“We need to prepare for a potentially strong El Niño event, which will exacerbate droughts and heavy rainfall and increase the risk of heat waves both on land and in the oceans,” WMO Secretary-General Celeste Sauro said in a statement. “The recent El Niño event of 2023-2024 was one of the fifth strongest on record and contributed to record global temperatures observed in 2024.”

WMO says El Niño is typically associated with increased rainfall in southern South America, the southern United States, the Horn of Africa and parts of central Asia, and drought in Australia, Indonesia and parts of South Asia.

What is El Niño?

El Niño is a natural climate pattern in which surface ocean temperatures in the central and eastern tropical Pacific Ocean are warmer than average.

The name means little boy or Christ child in Spanish. El Niño was originally recognized by fishermen off the coast of South America in the 1600s when unusually warm water appeared in the Pacific Ocean around Christmas.

The entire natural climate cycle is officially known as El Niño (Southern Oscillation), and scientists refer to it as ENSO. This cycle moves back and forth between warm and cold ocean water in areas along the equator of the tropical Pacific Ocean. La Niña is characterized by lower than average seawater levels in the region.

How warm is the water temperature?

In the El Niño region along the equator in western South America, sea surface temperatures have recently been rising rapidly. In the El Niño region, sea surface temperatures are moving westward at near-record levels, a clear sign that El Niño is beginning.

El Niño outbreak ‘progressing smoothly’

Daniel Swain, a climate scientist at the University of California’s College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, said the formation of circulation patterns is already “clearly well underway.” The atmosphere and ocean are working together and appear to be consistent with model predictions of “a significant El Niño by midsummer,” Swain said in a recent update on WeatherWest’s website.

NOAA’s latest forecast predicts that El Niño will likely occur in June or July. The agency’s next update on weather patterns is expected to be released on June 11.

Seasonal Forecast Outlook predicts that El Niño could lead to a busier-than-normal hurricane season in the Pacific Ocean and a slightly less-than-normal season in the Atlantic Basin.

Are you disappointed? Travelers have probably eaten some.

0

good morning! I’m Daniel de Visé from Daily Money.

Have you ever gone on a trip and wished you could do it all over again later? Maybe you crammed too much into one week, or you took so much on the trip that you almost slept on the bus. (We did it once.)

Are you disappointed? As Kathleen Wong reports, travelers are experiencing a few things.

When food is too delicious to eat

Betty Lin-Fisher tells a story about an app called Too Good to Go. It started in Europe and is available in 62 cities in the United States. Through the service, supermarkets and restaurants can offer “surprise bags” filled with food at more than 50% off the retail price.

Prepare for new student loan rules

Medora Lee reports that federal student loans are undergoing an overhaul. The changes will take effect on July 1st, so borrowers should start preparing now.

📰 Other stories you can’t miss 📰

Daniel de Visse covers personal finance for USA TODAY. Daily Money breaks down complex consumer and financial news. Subscribe here.

Minnesota Republican Party faces discord over Derek Chauvin’s moment of silence

0

play

The Minnesota Republican Party distanced itself from observing a moment of silence for Derek Chauvin during its state convention, saying the act was not part of its leadership plan, was not part of its official program and should not be construed as a party position.

Republican officials said in a Facebook post on Monday, June 1, that the recognition of the former Minneapolis police officer convicted of killing George Floyd in 2020 came from a spontaneous delegate motion at the convention floor and was not initiated or approved by leadership.

The controversy quickly escalated after state leaders, civil rights lawyers and Democratic lawmakers condemned the action, saying it was deeply harmful to Floyd’s family and inconsistent with accountability under the law.

The moment of silence was held May 30 at the party’s annual convention in Duluth, days after the sixth anniversary of Floyd’s killing in Minneapolis, which reshaped the national conversation about police and racial justice.

Minnesota Republican says gesture is not leadership behavior

The Minnesota Republican Party said in a statement that Derek Chauvin’s confirmation stemmed from a delegate request during floor proceedings at the Duluth convention and was handled according to standard rules of order.

Party officials stressed that the convention leadership, including Speaker Danny Nadeau, had not proposed the motion. The statement said the leadership’s role was only procedural and presiding over a motion does not reflect agreement or support for its subject matter.

Officials reiterated that the convention agenda itself did not include Chauvin’s planned confirmation and said the episode should not be interpreted as a leadership-driven decision or policy stance.

Minnesota Attorney General denounces attack as ‘grave brutality’

Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison, who led the prosecution of Chauvin, harshly criticized the action, calling it a “profound brutality” against the Floyd family.

Ellison said the timing of the attack so close to the anniversary of Floyd’s death made it even more damaging.

He said honoring Chauvin “sullies the memory of George Floyd and re-harms his loved ones,” and called it “disturbing” to recognize someone who was convicted of violating his oath as a police officer.

Ellison also called the action “disrespectful” to law enforcement officers who honorably perform their duties, and reiterated that courts have already upheld Chauvin’s conviction through multiple appeals.

Widespread backlash and political fallout

Democratic state Rep. Jamie Long called the moment of silence “disgusting” and argued that Republicans chose to honor a convicted murderer rather than a victim of violence or a military member.

The gesture also drew criticism from civil rights attorneys Ben Crump and Antonio Romanucci, who represented George Floyd’s family in civil litigation following his death. Lawyers called the moment of silence immoral and disrespected both Floyd’s family and the extensive public record surrounding Chauvin’s conviction, and called for a retraction and apology.

Floyd was killed on May 25, 2020, after Chauvin, a white former Minneapolis police officer, knelt on his neck for more than nine minutes. Chauvin was later convicted of second-degree murder, third-degree murder, and second-degree manslaughter and sentenced to 22 and a half years in state prison.

The killing sparked global protests and was a defining moment in the Black Lives Matter movement and debate over police enforcement in the United States.

Chauvin’s conviction has been upheld by multiple appeals, including a 2023 dismissal by the U.S. Supreme Court, and he is currently serving his sentence in federal custody.

Despite the controversy, party officials said they were focused on supporting candidates and the upcoming election, rather than the actions on the floor that sparked the backlash.

Reporter Anthony Thompson can be reached at ajthompson@usatodayco.com or X @athompsonUSAT..

Raising Cane will open 12 new restaurants in these states in June

0

play

In June, the company confirmed that Raising Cane’s would add 12 stores to its group of chicken finger restaurants, including a flagship location in Southern California.

Locations will be located in Illinois, Maryland, and Texas, as well as new markets such as Pensacola, Florida, and Lynnwood, Washington.

“A standout opening in June is the unveiling of our flagship restaurant in Inglewood,” the company said in an email to USA TODAY on Monday, June 1.

The Inglewood store is located about six minutes from SoFi Stadium, which will host World Cup games starting June 11. The Intuit Dome, the home arena of the Los Angeles Clippers, is also nearby, according to the Raising Canes.

“Designed to attract attention, the restaurant draws inspiration from the innovations of the surrounding landmarks and features a striking multi-level layout, glass exterior, distinctive aluminum halo and LED screens that will captivate locals and visitors alike,” the company said.

The company currently has more than 950 stores across the United States, with most stores concentrated in Texas and California.

Here’s what you need to know about Raising Cane’s new location.

Where will the new restaurant open?

In addition to opening 12 new Raising Cane locations, the restaurant chain is also hosting two reopenings. One will be held June 15th in St. Norman, Oklahoma, and the other will be held June 29th in Lexington, Kentucky.

Raising Cane’s said the restaurant, which is set to reopen, has been “completely renovated” with “updated signage and bright colors and design elements inspired by local schools and universities.”

“The indoor dining area features new tables, chairs and lighting, as well as community-focused décor that reflects the spirit of the area,” the company said in a June 2 statement.

Raising Cane’s is still working out the details As for opening dates for the Inglewood and Santa Monica locations, the fast food chain said it plans to open other locations as well. From June 2nd to June 29th.

A complete list of June Raising Cane jobs can be found below.

  • Illinois – 151 E. Townline Road, Vernon Hills (opens June 2)
  • Maryland – 10231 Reisterstown Road, Owings Mills (opens June 3)
  • California – 7595 Broadway, Lemon Grove (opening June 8th)
  • California – 4246 E. Ontario Ranch Road, Ontario (opens June 15)
  • Florida – 5110 N. 9th Ave., Pensacola (opening June 16)
  • California – 146 S. Palm Ave., Alhambra (opening June 22)
  • Washington – 1232 164th St. SW, Lynnwood (opens June 23)
  • California – 1008 Broxton Avenue, Los Angeles (opens June 29)
  • Florida – 1200 W. Osceola Parkway, Kissimmee (opening June 29)
  • Texas – 12901 N. Interstate Highway 35, Bldg. Austin 21 (opens June 29)
  • California – 3895 W. Century Blvd., Inglewood (date TBA)
  • California – 1401 3rd St., Santa Monica (date TBA)

Saleen Martin is a reporter on USA TODAY’s Trends team. She is from Norfolk, Virginia (757). Email sdmartin@usatoday.com.