Home Blog Page 84

Cycle Sync Drink? This company claims it helps with menstruation and menopause.

0

play

In September 2025, a California startup launched a line of beverages for menstrual cycles and menopause that is now rolling out to stores across the United States.

The Cycle is the world’s first ready-to-drink brand created for periods, menopause and menopause, the company claims in a news release.

The brand’s drink lineup includes four phased beverages: Pre-Period Comfort and Period Comfort. Drinks for menopause are “Peri Comfort” and “Meno Comfort”.

It will be sold at 410 Sprouts Farmers Market stores nationwide.

The drink is also sold at small chain and independent stores such as Lazy Acres, Rainbow Acres, and Happy Grocery in New York City.

Additionally, consumers can purchase drinks directly on the company’s website. Prices range from $4.99 to $5.99 per 12-ounce can.

Here’s what you need to know about the beverage line and what experts say about cycle-synchronized beverages.

What does the drink consist of?

The company says each drink is based on sea buckthorn, a natural source of omega-7. Sea buckthorn, a large, prickly shrub or small tree, is also known for its bright orange edible fruit and silvery-green leaves, according to Montana Fruit Tree Company, a Montana-based fruit growing and marketing company.

According to a 2019 study by Spanish researchers, this plant is famous for having the highest concentration of natural omega-7s.

The drink is non-sparkling, decaffeinated, zero sugar and contains no artificial colors, sweeteners or preservatives.

Breakdown of each drink

Introducing the drink lineup and company information.

  • Comfort before menstruation. A subtly sweet, fruit-forward blend to drink during your luteal phase (the two weeks before your period). Features chasteberry, clamp bark, shatavari root, dandelion root, and ginger.
  • period comfort. A bright, tropical blend designed to feel grounding and nourishing during menstruation. Features nettle leaf (contains natural iron), raspberry leaf, lemon balm, and motherwort.
  • Peri Comfort. Daily support for perimenopausal changes. Features black cohosh, maca root, motherwort, inositol, and nettle leaf.
  • Meno Comfort. Daily rituals for menopause. Features sage, hop blossom, lemon balm, turmeric, and glycine.

Research results about drinks

Dr. Cassandra Simmons, director of general obstetrics and gynecology at NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, said in an emailed statement that there is new data supporting safe supplement use during premenstrual periods, pregnancy, postpartum, and perimenopause.

Omega-7 is very beneficial and helps balance hormones, and vitamin C has a similar effect, she said.

Additionally, she said that the shatavari root and dandelion root in the brand’s premenstrual comfort drink have beneficial properties.

You can use about 600-800 milligrams of shatavari root per day to improve hormonal balance. A similar dose can also help manage menopausal symptoms such as hot flashes and night sweats. Simmons says dandelion root can help patients experiencing constipation and bloating during hormonal changes.

“We don’t drink for fun anymore,” Anastasia Salta, founder of The Cycle, told USA TODAY. “I’m hoping for some kind of functionality.”

Michelle Del Rey is a trending news reporter for USA TODAY. Please contact mdelrey@usatoday.com.

Jack Schlossberg’s 5 ‘Fun and Inspiring’ Social Media Posts

0

play

Jack Schlossberg, a member of the Kennedy family, has become a social media celebrity over the past few years.

Schlossberg said he has no regrets about any of his posts, even though he trolled Trump administration officials and made off-the-cuff comments.

But his digital footprint came under the microscope after he announced his campaign for a seat on the New York City Council.

Here are some of his quirkiest posts from the past year.

Comparing the Vice President’s Wife and His Grandmother

In one of the most controversial posts, Schlossberg tweeted, “True or false: Usha Vance is way hotter than Jackie O.”

Schlossberg, 33, is the son of John F. Kennedy and Caroline Kennedy, daughter of Jackie Kennedy. Many were confused as to why Schlossberg posted about his grandmother, but Schlossberg defended it.

“People say, ‘How can you say that about grandma?'” And it’s like, of course, it’s not me saying that. I’m trying to hold up a mirror to how we treat and objectify politicians, families, politicians,” Schlossberg said in a recent interview with Vanity Fair.

Posts after Pope Francis’ death

On April 21, 2025, the day of Pope Francis’ death, Schlossberg tweeted, “Okay, JD killed the Pope.”

One of the last meetings the Pope had before his death was with the Vice President.

Calls President Trump a “fat cat”

Schlossberg accused the president of “killing America” ​​in a post last April.

“Trump is funny and great on camera, but he’s very bad at this job.”

Trump policies will destroy America

Stupid fat cat,” he tweeted.

Asks conservative politician to be father

Last March, Vivek Ramaswamy, currently running for governor of Ohio, tweeted, “Remove cell phones from schools.”

Schlossberg quoted the post and wrote, “If you agree to be a father, I’ll do whatever you want!!”

Calling the family an asset of Russia

“RFKjr only makes sense as a Russian asset,” Schlossberg wrote last May.

He ended his tweet with a simple “:)”. (US Secretary of Health Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is a member of his family.)

In another post last year, Schlossberg said he had never met Cheryl Hines, RFK Jr.’s wife, but if he did, “I would tell her he looks extremely dehydrated.”

Jack Schlossberg’s defense of the post

Schlossberg said his chaotic posts were intentional.

“You don’t have to be boring all the time. You can show that you can be a politician, you can be a Democrat. It’s fun and it’s exciting and it resonates with people and you can talk about policy,” he said in an interview with Vanity Fair.

“If I tweet something that someone finds offensive or vulgar, I hold a mirror up to them and say, ‘Look what the president tweets every day.'”

Elsie Hewitt speaks out amid rumors of Pete Davidson split

0

play

Model Elsie Hewitt has opened up about life with her five-month-old baby amid reports that she has split from comedian Pete Davidson.

Hewitt, 30, posted a May 16 TikTok video in response to a paparazzi photo of her taking a walk with her daughter, Scottie Rose Hewitt Davidson.

“Yes, yes, I know. I’m tired, okay? I should have left the house dressed better yesterday. I should have known this was going to happen,” she said. “But I don’t think about that right now, because I have to take care of my kids. And I have to work and earn money, and I’m doing it myself, which is hard.”

She ended the video by sarcastically telling viewers, “Next time I get paparazzi while walking with my daughter, I’ll try to look better.”

Hewitt’s video was released shortly after The Sun reported on May 14 that Hewitt and the 32-year-old “Saturday Night Live” alum had broken up.

A source close to Davidson told USA TODAY on May 17 that “Davidson pays for everything” related to Scottie, including health insurance and Hewitt’s rent.

USA TODAY has reached out to Davidson’s representatives for comment.

Davidson and Hewitt confirmed their romance in March 2025 and announced they were expecting their first child in July.

In an interview with USA TODAY shortly before Scotty was born, Davidson said he believed his father, who died in the line of duty at age 33 as a firefighter responding to the 9/11 terrorist attacks, was “close by, watching over me.” “I think he’s proud and I think he’s excited to meet this baby,” Davidson said.

“It’s easy to feel sad,” Davidson said. “That would be great. If anything, he might come back through the baby.”

Contributor: Anthony Robredo, USA TODAY

As inflation spikes, the probability of the Fed raising interest rates increases. what it means to you

0

play

In a reversal, traders now believe the Fed’s next move will be to raise interest rates, even as new Chairman Kevin Warsh and President Donald Trump have signaled support for lower borrowing costs.

The Fed typically lowers interest rates to stimulate the economy and encourage employment, and raises them to control inflation. Forecasters’ current expectations for rate hikes appear to be a response to continued traffic disruption in the Strait of Hormuz, which has pushed up prices for oil, gas and related products, and positive employment growth in March and April.

Although policymakers are somewhat divided on the optimal path for interest rates, there has been no indication yet that a rate hike will occur in the near future. The median forecast for the federal funds rate, a benchmark for national interest rates, announced by the Interest Rate Setting Committee on March 18, suggested that the rate would be cut by a quarter of a percentage point by the end of the year. Three members opposed the April decision because they felt the committee’s accompanying statement was biased toward future interest rate cuts.

“The bar to raise rates is pretty high, not impossible, but pretty high,” said Mike Scordeles, head of U.S. economics at Trust. “We have to see a lot of things break down before it becomes a realistic base case for rate hikes.”

Why are forecasters predicting rate hikes?

Futures markets still largely expect policymakers to keep rates unchanged at their upcoming meetings, but now believe the odds of a rate hike are higher than the odds of a cut, according to CME Group’s FedWatch tool. As of the afternoon of the 18th, the probability of an interest rate hike in December is approximately 49%, and the probability of an interest rate hike in January next year is 58%.

“All of this is a recognition of the reality that formal resolution of the Middle East conflict will take much longer than expected, and the inflationary effects that were expected to be temporary are likely to be far more lasting,” said Jordan Rizzuto, chief investment officer at Gammalord Capital Partners.

Some of this shift in expectations also appears to be driven by the global nature of futures markets, Skorderes said. He said European investors grappling with soaring prices for natural gas and electricity are likely contributing to higher expectations for rate hikes, but added that these price pressures have not been as pronounced in the U.S. as in Europe.

Skorderes said that for rate hikes to be a realistic expectation, Fed policymakers would need to ensure that oil prices remain close to the levels seen after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022, and that higher oil prices lead to higher prices for more consumer goods. In other words, the Fed is still waiting for more data before taking next action.

Will Mr. Warsh try to lower interest rates?

Mr. Warsh will serve as chairman for the first time at the Federal Open Market Committee’s next meeting in June. As President Trump’s nominee, Warsh suggested he would consider temporary price increases and said he believed productivity gains from AI could act as a drag on inflation.

“Theoretically, that framework leans dovish,” Christian Floro, market strategist at Principal Asset Management, said in a note to USA Today, meaning he could support lower interest rates. “In fact, rising inflation associated with a booming economy may limit his ability to persuade other committee members.”

Even if Mr. Warsh thinks lowering borrowing costs is the right move, he still needs to convince a majority of the FOMC to vote in his favor. The committee consists of 12 voting members. Mr. Warsh has only one vote.

“There’s nothing in economic theory that says now is a good time to cut rates,” said Jacob Robbins, an assistant professor of economics at the University of Illinois. “We need to better understand how AI will impact the economy before calling for interest rate cuts at this point.”

What do changes in interest rates mean for consumers?

In general, when the Fed lowers its benchmark interest rate, it can lead to lower interest rates for consumers on things like credit cards, auto loans, and mortgages. Raising interest rates would be counterproductive, but would benefit savers by increasing returns on high-yield savings accounts and certificates of deposit.

“A common response is, ‘Raising interest rates is a net negative for consumers because it increases borrowing costs.’ What we’ve seen is that over time, raising policy rates can certainly raise borrowing costs, but the effects are rarely immediate,” Rizzuto said.

In theory, higher borrowing costs are designed to curb inflation by making it harder to shop on credit and take out loans, but they don’t automatically make petrol at the pump cheaper.

“Changing interest rates will not necessarily change whether the Strait of Hormuz is open or not,” Skorderes said.

(This article has been updated with new information.)

Contact Rachel Barber rbarber@usatoday.comFollow her on X @rachelbarber_and subscribe to her newsletter Making More of Your Money here.

Elections will be held in six states on May 19th. Things to note are:

0

play

May 19th will be one of the busiest days of the 2026 election cycle, and a day with potentially significant results.

Across six states, Americans will vote in the House, Senate and gubernatorial primaries, among other local races. The election comes at the head of a crowded month-long campaign to select candidates for Washington and state government positions during the November midterm elections. These elections come as Republicans aim to maintain slim majorities in both chambers of Congress and as President Donald Trump takes steps to purge Republican opposition.

John McGlennon, a government professor at the College of William and Mary, said the redistricting and massive campaign spending shows how high the stakes are on May 19.

“The next few weeks of primaries will tell us whether these tactics will work,” he said of efforts to raise large sums of money by changing congressional maps in races such as Georgia’s Senate race and Pennsylvania’s House primary.

Here are some of the races to be held on May 19th, as well as some of the notable contests to watch.

Which states will have races on May 19th?

Six states will hold primaries on May 19th.

  • Alabama: U.S. House of Representatives, Governor
  • Georgia: U.S. House of Representatives, Governor
  • Idaho: U.S. House of Representatives, Governor
  • Kentucky: US House of Representatives and Senate
  • Oregon: U.S. House of Representatives, Governor
  • Pennsylvania: US House of Representatives, Governor

Main things to note

1. Georgia gubernatorial and Senate primaries

Democratic Sen. Jon Ossoff ran unopposed in Georgia’s Senate primary. But five Republicans, including Buddy Carter, Mike Collins, John Coyne, Derek Dooley and Jonathan McCollum, will be on the Republican side of the ballot, with the winner aiming to face Ossoff in a key race this November.

“Georgia is the only state with a Democratic incumbent that Trump actually won in 2024, so Ossoff is a top Republican target,” University of Alabama political science assistant professor Enrijeta Sino previously told USA TODAY. “Georgia remains the most flippable incumbent Democratic-held seat.”

The state will also vote on a candidate for the state’s top job, as current Gov. Brian Kemp is term-limited. Atlanta Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms is one of seven Democrats competing in a crowded primary. On the Republican side, potential candidates include Rick Jackson, Lt. Gov. Bert Jones, Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, and Attorney General Chris Carr.

Mr. Trump has endorsed Mr. Jones as Mr. Raffensberger has drawn the president’s ire. Raffensberger is seeking governor, rejecting Trump’s request to “find” enough votes to win the state he lost to President Joe Biden in 2020.

The Georgia campaign has raised a lot of money, McGlennon said. According to OpenSecret, a political funding research group, this is particularly due to the role of “dark money”, a term for funds that do not have to reveal their sources and are intended to influence political outcomes.

All 14 of Georgia’s congressional districts will hold elections. There are currently nine Republicans and four Democrats in office in Georgia, with one vacant seat in the 14th Congressional District.

He said Georgia will likely have at least one runoff election as the race continues to be close, meaning no candidate will pass the 50% vote threshold.

2. Kentucky’s Trump opponents in the spotlight

In Kentucky, all eyes are on the race in the 4th Congressional District, where the political lifeline of Representative Thomas Massie, another Republican opponent of Trump, will be tested.

Massey has repeatedly opposed President Trump on a series of high-profile issues. Massey voted against the president’s tax cuts last year. He led the legislative fight to force the release of Justice Department documents related to the investigation into sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. And Massi voted to halt the war against Iran.

The president is supporting Ed Gallein in Hebron, Kentucky, but polls ahead of the primary show Massie leading Gallein.

All eyes will also be on the Kentucky Senate Republican primary to choose a candidate to replace Sen. Mitch McConnell, who is retiring after 40 years in office.

3. Alabama voters keep track of new maps

Alabama’s May 19 primary election comes after the Supreme Court upheld the state’s new congressional map, handing a victory to Republicans. The court has reversed a ruling that blocked the state’s Republican Party preference maps as racist and illegally diluting the voting power of black Alabamians.

But McGlennon says voters now face a confusing landscape with potentially different House districts compared to past elections. The primaries for Alabama’s 1st, 2nd, 6th, and 7th Congressional Districts will now be held on August 11th instead of May 19th, after Governor Kay Ivey changed the election dates following court redistricting.

“If you live in four of Alabama’s seven congressional districts, you will have to wait until August 11th to vote in those districts,” he says. “If you live there and already voted before the redistricting, your vote won’t be counted. You’ll have to do it all over again, and maybe this time with a different candidate in a different district. Confused? Consider yourself lucky if you’re not an Alabama voter.”

Contributor: Bert Jansen

Severe weather warning warns of tornadoes in Midwest Plains region

0

play

More than 40 million people from Texas to Michigan face an increased threat of severe weather that could bring severe storms, hail, and tornadoes into the afternoon and evening of May 18.

Severe thunderstorms, heavy rain and flooding are expected in parts of the south-central Plains and mid-Missouri Valley during the afternoon and evening hours, according to the National Weather Service’s Storm Prediction Center.

The threat continues into May 19, with preliminary forecasts saying more than 60 million people could be at risk of severe weather from Texas to parts of New England.

The storm followed active weather on May 17, and National Weather Service officials were called out on Monday to conduct an investigation into a possible tornado. Kansas, Nebraska, Iowa, and Minnesota all experienced varying degrees of hail, damaging winds, and tornadoes, and the threat of severe thunderstorms was rated 3 out of 5 across much of the central United States. The National Weather Service received more than a dozen reports of hail and 180 reports of strong winds, as well as more than a dozen reports of tornadoes, according to preliminary information available from the agency.

Which states have the highest risk of severe weather on Monday?

The Storm Prediction Center said parts of Iowa, central and eastern Kansas, northwestern Missouri, southeastern Nebraska and northern Oklahoma could see damaging winds, widespread baseball-sized hail and the potential for severe tornadoes in some areas on May 18.

“A supercell capable of producing very large to large hail and multiple strong to intense tornadoes is most likely to develop from central Kansas and southeastern Nebraska to Iowa and northwestern Missouri,” the center said.

The area roughly between Wichita, Kansas, and the borders of southeastern Nebraska and northwest Missouri is most at risk, with a severe weather threat level of 4 out of 5. The threat level, called “moderate,” is unusual and is designated by the Storm Prediction Center only about 14 times a year, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. This means that “widespread severe weather, including several tornadoes and numerous severe thunderstorms, some of which will be severe,” is likely.

Other locations, stretching roughly from Enid, Oklahoma, to Fort Dodge, Kansas, face a threat of 3 out of 5.

“Major cities at risk for dangerous and severe thunderstorms include Oklahoma City, Kansas City, Missouri, Omaha, Nebraska, Des Moines, Iowa, and Minneapolis,” AccuWeather reported.

What to do if a tornado is imminent

According to the SPC, residents in these areas should always be aware of the weather and pay attention to watches and warnings.

A tornado watch means conditions are likely for tornadoes to form in the next few hours. According to the SPC, if a tornado warning is issued for your area, move to a safe location, ideally a basement or indoors on the bottom floor of a research building.

This story has been updated to add new information.

Gabe Hauari is USA TODAY’s national trends news reporter. You can follow him at X @gabehauari Or email Gdhauari@gannett.com.

Jack Schlossberg said online trolls are helping his campaign. is that so?

0

play

Kennedy’s successor, Jack Schlossberg, became known for his sometimes outlandish social media posts.

That’s why so many people were shocked when the 33-year-old announced he was running for NY-12, one of New York City’s most high-profile races. But the social media personality defended his online presence and persona, saying it was actually helping his campaign.

Who is Jack Schlossberg?

Schlossberg is the son of John F. Kennedy and Caroline Kennedy, daughter of Jackie Kennedy.

He is currently running for Manhattan’s 12th Ward, which includes some of the city’s most important sites, including the Empire State Building and the United Nations.

The Democratic primary election will be held in June of this year.

Jack Schlossberg’s Social Posts

Schlossberg has a notable digital footprint. He sometimes makes fun of politicians, including his own family members, U.S. Secretary of Health Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Or maybe he’s just expressing his passionate views on topics like whether fruit belongs to meat or not. In any case, those with political aspirations say it’s all intentional.

“You don’t have to be boring all the time. You can show that you can be a politician, you can be a Democrat. It’s fun and it’s exciting and it resonates with people and you can talk about policy,” he said in an interview with Vanity Fair.

“If I tweet something that someone finds offensive or vulgar, I hold a mirror up to them and say, ‘Look what the president tweets every day.'”

Schlossberg said he has no regrets about his post and is using it as a tool to challenge the status quo.

“‘The medium is the message’ is a famous saying, and I know how to breathe that air, and breathing that air means shock value. It means using every tool at your disposal, your sense of humor.”

On Thursday, May 14, the Times published “Inside Jack Schlossberg’s Chaotic Campaign to Restore Camelot.” The report includes multiple allegations of Schlossberg’s dysfunctional campaign, including high turnover, regular absences from strategy meetings, and long periods of disappearances with little explanation. According to the newspaper, Schlossberg had to leave for a nap during his campaign launch, something the up-and-coming congressman later joked about.

“I needed a little nap!! Even though I just woke up. For the rest of the day/the rest of the month, go full throttle LMK if you want to hang,” he wrote to X.

“Wait, I’m really busy so I can’t go so I changed my mind.”

Other posts said Vice President J.D. Vance “killed the Pope,” said RFK Jr. “is only worth a Russian asset :),” and told supporters that “we’ll lose an hour of sleep, but we’ll be okay” when the clocks change.

Schlossberg’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment about his social media presence.

But despite the posts, Patch said, a March poll showed Schlossberg holding an early lead in the NY-12 seat with 25% support. He also has the support of Nancy Pelosi.

“I was born with a platform, and I was born into a family where what I inherited was public service, not some kind of celebrity now, and that’s what I want to continue to do,” he said in an interview with VF.

“We need to do everything we can to make sure corporate interests don’t buy our legislators, because I think AI, big tech, and billionaires control enough legislators right now. I don’t think they need new ones.”

Elon Musk loses lawsuit against OpenAI

0

play

A jury on May 18 ruled against Elon Musk in a lawsuit against OpenAI, ruling that the artificial intelligence company cannot be held liable to the world’s richest man for allegedly straying from its original mission of benefiting humanity.

In a unanimous verdict, a jury in federal court in Oakland, California, said Musk filed his lawsuit too late. The jury deliberated for less than two hours.

The trial was widely seen as a seminal moment for the future of OpenAI and artificial intelligence in general, in terms of how it should be used and who should benefit from it.

After the ruling, Musk’s lawyers said they were reserving the right to appeal, but the judge suggested they could face an uphill battle because it is a question of fact whether the statute of limitations ran out before Musk filed his lawsuit.

“There is a substantial amount of evidence supporting the jury’s verdict, which is why I was prepared to dismiss it on the spot,” said U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers.

Musk’s 2024 lawsuit accused him of manipulating OpenAI, its CEO Sam Altman, and president Greg Brockman into donating $38 million, then adding a for-profit business to the original nonprofit behind his back and receiving tens of billions of dollars from Microsoft and other investors.

Musk called the OpenAI defendants’ actions “theft of charity.”

OpenAI was founded in 2015 by Altman, Musk, and several others. Musk stepped down from the board in 2018, and OpenAI formed a for-profit business the following year.

People are using AI for a variety of purposes, including education, facial recognition, financial advice, journalism, legal research, medical diagnosis, and harmful deepfakes. Many have expressed distrust of the technology and fear that it will put people out of work.

The verdict came after 11 days of testimony and arguments in which Musk and Altman’s credibility came under repeated attack.

Both sides accused the other of being more interested in money than serving the people.

In closing arguments, Musk’s lawyer, Stephen Moro, reminded jurors that several witnesses had questioned Altman’s candor or branded him a liar, and that Musk did not give an unconditional “yes” when asked during the trial if he could be completely trusted.

“Sam Altman’s credibility is in direct question,” Moro said. “If they don’t believe in him, they can’t win.”

Musk accused OpenAI of seeking to unjustly enrich investors and insiders at the expense of nonprofits, and of not prioritizing the safety of its AI. He also claimed that Microsoft knew all along that OpenAI was more about money than being altruistic.

OpenAI countered that it was Mr. Musk who saw the dollar signs and took too long to argue that OpenAI violated its founding agreement to build secure artificial intelligence that benefits humanity.

“Mr. Musk may have a Midas-like touch in some areas, but not when it comes to AI,” William Savitt, an attorney for OpenAI, said in closing arguments.

OpenAI competes with AI companies such as Anthropic and xAI, and is preparing for an initial public offering that could value the business at $1 trillion.

A Microsoft executive testified that Microsoft has spent more than $100 billion in partnership with OpenAI.

Musk’s xAI is now part of his space and rocket company SpaceX, which is preparing for an IPO that could surpass OpenAI’s size.

Recall of popular Parmesan ranch seasoning. See affected products

0

play

A popular seasoning product has been recalled due to a potential salmonella health risk.

Blackstone Products has recalled Parmesan Cheese Ranch Seasoning, according to a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) notice released May 15.

This action stems from a separate recall of infant formula from California Dairies, Inc.

The notice states that the milk powder ingredients are supplied to a third-party manufacturer and used in seasoning products. No illnesses related to the recall have been reported.

The products were sold at Walmart stores and on the Blackstone Products website.

What is salmonella?

Salmonella is a group of bacteria found in food and water that can cause serious and fatal infections in children, the elderly, and people with weakened immune systems, according to the Cleveland Clinic. Symptoms include fever, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain.

If severe infections enter the bloodstream, they can cause more serious illnesses such as arterial infections, endocarditis, and arthritis, the FDA notice says.

Which products are affected?

Blackstone Parmesan Ranch 7.3 oz seasoning powder units are being recalled with expiration dates of July 2, 2027, August 5, 2027, and August 12, 2027. The units also have the following lot numbers: 2025-43282, 2025-46172, and 2026-54751.

The number is located on the bottom of the product packaging.

What should consumers do next?

According to Blackstone Products, consumers should not use the product and should immediately discard it.

Purchasers may contact Blackstone Products at 1-888-879-4610 to obtain a replacement product from 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM Eastern Time, Monday through Friday.

Michelle Del Rey is a trending news reporter for USA TODAY. Please contact mdelrey@usatoday.com.

Department of Justice says $1.8 billion deal in Trump IRS case raises ethical concerns

0


The attorney general will select the person to spend money from the fund, and the president can remove that person, according to the Justice Department.

play

The Justice Department announced it will provide $1.776 billion to “victims of legal battles and weapons charges” as part of a $10 billion settlement of a lawsuit brought by President Donald Trump and his family against the Internal Revenue Service.

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, Trump’s former personal lawyer, said in announcing the fund, which appears to be aimed at benefiting Trump’s political allies with taxpayer dollars, that the government “should never be weaponized” and that the Justice Department aims to “right the wrongs that have been done in the past.”

News of the agreement immediately sparked fierce ethical objections from Congressional Democrats.

Sen. Mark Warren (D-Va.) posted on social media: “It’s official. Mr. Trump has dropped his lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service to obtain a $1.8 billion slush fund to pay his political allies. Your tax dollars will be a gift to his friends.”

“If my Republican colleagues respect the Constitution and the authority of Congress, they will join us in stopping this class corruption,” Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Maryland, posted on social media.

Mr. Raskin is one of several leaders supporting legislation that would impose limits on presidents and vice presidents who seek to collect damages from the governments they run.

Why did Trump file a lawsuit against the IRS?

The lawsuit against the IRS was filed in January by Trump, his two oldest sons, Don Jr. and Eric, and the Trump Organization, which includes many of Trump’s businesses. Contractor Charles Littlejohn was sentenced to five years in prison in 2024 for disclosing thousands of tax returns, including those of Trump and many other wealthy individuals.

Trump and the other plaintiffs argued in their lawsuit that the IRS embarrassed them and “unreasonably harmed” the companies’ reputations by failing to establish adequate review and oversight systems to prevent the information from being released.

Trump and his family said in a May 18 court filing that they do not need court permission to drop the case because the IRS has not yet taken any major action. They made no mention of reconciliation.

However, 93 members of Congress filed a motion on the matter on May 18, prior to the formal announcement of the $1.776 billion fund, citing legal limitations on the Justice Department’s ability to settle. They argued that the court should consider the risk that President Trump could use the lawsuit to “siphon billions of taxpayer dollars into the pockets of the president, his family, and his allies.”

Who will receive money from the fund?

The Justice Department’s announcement said there were no partisan requirements for filing a claim, but did not specify who specifically would receive money from the fund.

But the Justice Department has made clear that the fund will be strictly controlled by the president and attorney general.

The attorney general will select five members to administer the fund, one of whom will be chosen “in consultation with Congressional leadership.” The president may dismiss any member of the committee he wishes, and a successor will be selected in the same manner as the person who was dismissed.

President Trump has repeatedly offered insight into what types of cases he believes will involve “laws” and “use of arms” under the Biden administration.

These include two federal lawsuits filed against Trump and others for allegedly mishandling classified documents and illegally trying to overturn the 2020 election results. These cases were brought by a special prosecutor appointed with greater than usual independence from Justice Department leadership. A separate special counsel also filed a criminal case against Hunter, the son of former President Joe Biden.

President Trump also described the more than 1,500 lawsuits filed against his supporters for allegedly committing crimes during the storming of the Capitol on January 6, 2021 as “an act of law.” Trump pardoned all of these people on his first day back in office in 2025. Most of them already had criminal convictions.

It is not clear whether the identities of the recipients of the funds will be made public.

The attorney general will receive quarterly reports on who received the funds, and the fund must “take steps to protect personal information and avoid fraud,” the announcement said. The Attorney General may order an audit of the Fund.

The fund is scheduled to stop processing claims about a month after the end of Trump’s current presidential term.

Trump, his two oldest sons, and the Trump Organization will not receive any money as part of the settlement, the Justice Department said.

Trump has been accused of weaponizing the current Justice Department. On social media, he called for criminal charges against specific targets, including former FBI Director James Comey, New York Attorney General Letitia James, and California Democratic Sen. Adam Schiff. The Justice Department has repeatedly tried to bring charges against Comey and James and has investigated Schiff.

(This story has been updated to add new information.)

Is it time for a rebalance?

0

good morning! I’m Daniel de Visé from Daily Money.

If you’re someone who saves for retirement on their own, you may have seen the value of your portfolio triple over the past 10 years. That’s great, but maybe it’s time to rebalance.

New cars are increasingly becoming luxury items.

New cars are starting to look like luxury items, even if they aren’t luxury cars. Today, Betty Lin-Fisher reports on research tracking the decline in new car affordability.

Can AI financial advice help?

Half of Americans now turn to AI for financial advice. Two academic studies have been launched to determine whether the advice provided by AI is beneficial.

📰 Other stories you can’t miss 📰

Daniel de Visse covers personal finance for USA TODAY. Daily Money breaks down complex consumer and financial news. Subscribe here.

Will there be a run-off vote in the GA preliminary race? Candidates hope to win a majority

0

play

Election day is fast approaching, and candidates from the top to the bottom of the poll are delivering their final messages to voters in hopes of getting a chance to run in November.

Georgia’s midterm primary elections are Tuesday, May 19th, with voting taking place across the state from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m.

The primaries for Georgia’s top seats are crowded, with as many as 15 names on both sides of the aisle for governor and multiple Republicans vying to run against Jon Ossoff in the Senate race.

Will a candidate be able to reach a 50% majority in the primary? Or should Georgia prepare to head to the polls again next month?

Latest polls show Republican race to be close

Perhaps the most contentious race in Georgia is the Republican primary for governor, with Trump supporter Bert Jones hoping to face off against Trump-hating Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger and health care CEO and political outsider Rick Jackson.

Mr. Jones and Mr. Jackson have been topping the polls back and forth, followed by Mr. Raffensperger by a wide margin.

According to Insider Advantage’s latest poll of Georgia voters conducted over the weekend (released May 17), Mr. Jackson led with 31% of the vote, followed by Mr. Jones with 27% and Mr. Raffensperger with 16%.

Five other gubernatorial candidates, Chris Carr, Greg Kirkpatrick, Clark Dean, Leland Olinger II and Kenneth Yasgur, failed to reach double-digit approval ratings. A significant 12% of voters are still undecided, meaning they may still be undecided by the time they vote the next day.

The poll mimics other polls released in the early spring and confirms the assumption of many political analysts that the primary will advance to a runoff.

The same can be said about the Republican primary for a U.S. Senate seat. According to the latest InsiderAdvantage poll, Mike Collins leads with 32% support, but Kemp’s supporter Derek Dooley is not far behind at 26%, followed by Buddy Carter with 21% support. As of this weekend, 18% of voters said they were still unsure.

Mr. Dooley had improved significantly in recent weeks and was hoping for a second-place finish that could lead him to a runoff and pull away from Mr. Carter just days before the election.

If one candidate does not reach 50% support, a runoff election will be held. This means that even if one candidate has a large lead over the other, if the final vote count is less than 50%, the top two candidates will enter the runoff on June 16th.

Mr. Bottoms has a big lead over the Democrats, but is that enough?

On the Democratic side, former Atlanta Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms has been leading the polls for months, and her name recognition in the state could be enough for Democrats to ignore her one-term Atlanta residency.

But rather than fighting her primary opponent, she may be fighting to woo undecided voters.

A poll conducted by the Atlanta Journal-Constitution earlier this month found that 35% of Democratic primary voters were still undecided in the seven-person race. That’s just behind Bottoms’ lead of 39%, followed by Michael Thurmond, Jason Estevez, Jeff Duncan, Amanda Duffy, Ol Brown and Derrick Jackson.

Since leaving the mayor’s office, Bottoms has been endorsed by former President Joe Biden, who praised her work in the Biden administration.

His campaign is sticking to its message that Bottoms, Georgia’s first black governor and first female governor, is Georgia’s best hope for turning the state over in the midterm elections.

“Our campaign is gaining momentum at the right time because voters know Keisha will win no matter which Trump Republican emerges in the Republican primary and is the strongest candidate to win the Democratic gubernatorial race this November,” Bottoms campaign manager Rashad Taylor said in a statement after the release of the Insider Advantage poll.

While Bottoms may have a commanding lead when voting closes on Tuesday, he is still unlikely to reach the 50% majority needed to win, and either candidate who finishes second will advance to a runoff.

When are Georgia’s midterm elections?

Election Day in Georgia is Tuesday, May 19th. If the race requires a runoff, it will take place on June 16th.

To find out if you’re registered to vote, where to vote, and more, visit the Georgia Secretary of State’s My Voter Page.

Eileen Wright is an Atlanta Connect reporter for USA Today’s Deep South Connect team, covering midterm races in Georgia. X Find her at @IreneEWright or email her at ismith@usatodayco.com.

Texas AG Ken Paxton launches investigation into beef industry amid rising prices

0

play

As consumers face rising beef prices, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is working with the Justice Department to investigate the nation’s largest meat processors.

Paxton announced in a May 15 news release that it would launch an “antitrust investigation to protect the nation’s beef supply chain.” Paxton said the beef processing industry is highly concentrated, with four companies – JBS SA, Tyson Fresh Meats, Cargill and National Beef Packing Company – controlling more than 85% of the domestic beef processing market.

“This level of consolidation has given these companies significant market power with both cattle producers and consumers,” the news release states. “According to reports, these companies may have used their advantage to lower prices paid to ranchers while simultaneously raising beef prices for consumers. These four companies are making huge profits at the expense of Texas ranchers and consumers nationwide.”

Beef prices are projected to rise 12.1% in March 2026 from March 2025, and an additional 6.3% in 2026, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

“Texans deserve a fair price for their beef, and our state’s ranchers deserve fair compensation for their hard work,” Paxton said in the release. “When major meat processors manipulate markets to pay ranchers lower wages and families pay higher prices at grocery stores, we will hold them accountable. My office will aggressively investigate antitrust violations to protect fair competition, ranchers, and Texas consumers.”

Paxton encourages industry participants with concerns about potential antitrust violations, including price fixing and market manipulation, to contact the Attorney General’s Antitrust Division with relevant information at antitrust@oag.texas.gov, according to a news release.

beef price per pound

The average price per pound of ground beef in the United States was $6.899 in April 2026, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.

Prices are up more than $1 from a year ago, with the average price of a pound of ground beef being $5.801 in April 2025.

Natassia Paloma can be reached at npaloma@gannett.com, @NatassiaPaloma at x. natassia_paloma on Instagram and Natassia Paloma Thompson on Facebook.

What you need to know about the causes, symptoms, and risks of Ebola hemorrhagic fever

0

play

A rare Ebola outbreak in central Africa has killed at least 80 people and the World Health Organization has declared a public health emergency of international concern.

On May 17, WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus announced the outbreak of Bundibugyo virus, a type of Ebola, after at least 80 people were killed and nearly 250 suspected cases were reported in the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo. Meanwhile, the actual number of suspected infections is expected to be much higher, Reuters reported.

Officials in neighboring Uganda said two cases (including one death) were confirmed among travelers from Congo in the capital Kampala, but test results showed no clear link. Congo’s capital, Kinshasa, also reported another laboratory-confirmed case of the virus in a person who had returned from Ituri province in eastern Congo, which is the epicenter of the outbreak.

The WHO said the outbreak had not yet reached pandemic level under international health regulations. Health experts told USA TODAY the risk to Americans is low at this time. The last Ebola outbreak was recorded from 2013 to 2016, with 28,652 cases and 11,325 deaths reported in 10 countries worldwide, according to the Cleveland Clinic.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention announced at a press conference on May 17 that it had activated its emergency response center. The agency said it is also working with interagency partners to provide in-country support for surveillance, contact tracing and other preventive measures.

Here’s what else you need to know about infectious diseases:

What is Ebola?

Ebola is a “serious and life-threatening” type of viral infection that damages blood vessels, according to the Cleveland Clinic. It is caused by a group of viruses known as ortho-Ebola viruses and can cause serious illness that can be fatal if untreated.

According to the CDC, the ortho-Ebola virus is primarily found in sub-Saharan Africa.

How does Ebola spread?

Ebola virus is transmitted to people from wild animals such as fruit bats, porcupines, and non-human primates, and fruit bats are thought to be the natural host of ortho-Ebola virus. According to the WHO, humans can become infected with the virus through “close contact with the blood, secretions, organs, or other bodily fluids of infected animals that are sick, dead, or found in the rainforest,” but the CDC says this is rare.

According to the WHO, human-to-human transmission occurs “through direct contact with the blood, secretions, organs, and other body fluids of an infected person, and through direct contact with surfaces and materials (e.g., bedding, clothing) contaminated with these body fluids.”

“People cannot transmit the disease before they develop symptoms, and they remain infectious as long as they have the virus in their blood,” the WHO said.

Ebola hemorrhagic fever symptoms

Symptoms of Ebola typically appear two to 21 days after exposure to the virus, and often begin with “dry” and “general” symptoms, such as fever, aches, aches, and fatigue, according to the CDC.

As symptoms worsen, “wet” symptoms usually develop, such as diarrhea, vomiting, abdominal pain, rash, and unexplained bleeding.

Other symptoms may include chest pain, shortness of breath, confusion, red eyes, rash, hiccups, and seizures.

Ebola is difficult to diagnose clinically because the symptoms of the early stages of the disease are similar to other infectious diseases such as malaria, typhoid fever, bacteriosis, meningitis, and other viral hemorrhagic fevers.

Is there a vaccine for Ebola hemorrhagic fever?

yes. According to the CDC, Ervevo is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration only for the prevention of Ebola hemorrhagic fever of the ortho-Ebola virus xilense species. This vaccine is recommended for adults 18 years and older who are at potential risk of contracting the Ebola virus. However, the CDC said it can only be administered to patients who meet certain criteria, adding that at-risk patients are encouraged to contact their health care provider immediately for the best course of action.

Meanwhile, the WHO lists two approved vaccines on its website, including Ervevo (Merck & Co.) and Zabdeno & Mbavea (Janssen Pharmaceutica), adding that the Ervevo vaccine is recommended as part of the outbreak response.

Contributor: Eduardo Cuevas

Saman Shafiq is a trending news reporter for USA TODAY. Contact her at sshafiq@usatodayco.com and follow X and Instagram @saman_shafiq7.

I’m glad Donna Kelce, Travis Kelce, and Jason Kelce weren’t in the NIL era.

0

play

NEW YORK — Jason Kelce and Travis Kelce used their NFL careers to raise their profile and build strong brands that set them up for enough success in their post-playing days.

Donna Kelsey is happy with how her sons are doing, but she’s also glad they made it through college and the professional ranks.

Speaking with USA TODAY in partnership with the app GameChanger, Kelsey was asked if she could imagine what it would have been like if her sons had attended college during the NIL era. What was her reaction?

“That would be a nightmare,” Kelce said with a laugh. “I’m glad I don’t have to worry.”

Kelsey explained what she meant, highlighting her concern that young athletes lack resources to manage their money.

“If you think about it, it’s never a good thing that a lot of kids have a lot of money,” Kelce said. “And they don’t have any help. Usually in professional sports, there’s someone to help you, like a financial planner or something. And I feel so bad because these guys have money that could probably last them the rest of their lives if invested properly.”

Kelce wanted to make it clear that he is a supporter of NIL. He said the program is a “good idea” and that athletes are entitled to a portion of the revenue from college athletic departments.

“I’m not saying we shouldn’t have to pay them because the university makes so much money off of it,” Kelce said. “In my personal opinion, I think it could have been considered a little more in their favor.”

Kelsey points out that NIL has quickly grown into a billion-dollar industry, but the NCAA has largely failed to enforce universal regulations regarding it. As such, players have had to adapt to an ever-changing set of rules while learning how to manage their money, which can be life-changing in some cases.

When the NIL was first introduced in 2021, both Kelce brothers were well into their NFL careers. Despite this, the two have done well for themselves.

According to Spotrac.com, Jason finished his 12-season career earning $81.7 million from the Philadelphia Eagles. Meanwhile, Travis Kelce has earned just under $111.9 million in 13 seasons with the Kansas City Chiefs and is set to make another $12 million in 2026.

Add in the popularity of the brothers’ New Heights podcast, Jason’s deal with ESPN, countless sponsorship deals, and Travis’ impending wedding to Taylor Swift, and it looks like Kelce is poised for sustained personal and financial success as his playing career winds down.

As for the Kelsey family matriarch, Donna Kelsey, like her sons, is no stranger to support. Mothers and Grandmothers has partnered with GameChanger, an app that streams youth sports to friends and family, and will award one winner a “Gran Cave” (think Grandparents’ “man cave” for live streaming youth sports) and a premium subscription to the platform. Owned and operated by Dick’s Sporting Goods, GameChanger says “Grand Cave” is “a modern take on the classic ‘man cave.'”

Trump trades millions of stocks while promoting companies

0


The Trump Organization said the transaction was handled by a third-party financial institution and that the president and his family were not involved in the transaction.

play

WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump has bought and sold at least $220 million worth of stocks involving companies such as Nvidia, Apple, Microsoft and Tesla. Executives from these companies were hosted at the White House and during a visit to China last week.

The high-priced deal raised alarm among Democratic lawmakers and ethics advocates, who argued that the deal represented a conflict of interest for the president. Many of the companies are federally regulated or could benefit from President Trump including them in his official meetings.

But the president’s company, the Trump Organization, said his accounts were being managed by a third-party financial institution without input from Trump or his family.

“Neither President Trump, his family, nor the Trump Organization plays any role in selecting, directing or approving any specific investments,” the Trump Organization said in a statement. “They receive no advance notice of trading activity and do not provide input on investment decisions or portfolio management of any kind.”

The stock purchases and sales were extensively reported to the U.S. Office of Government Ethics. Total transaction volume in the first three months of this year ranged from $220 million to about $750 million. However, this report provides a snapshot of your investments, rather than aggregating your overall holdings or the gains and losses from specific trades.

The deal reflects the broad overlap in companies Trump touted at the White House and in meetings with Chinese President Xi Jinping. President Trump has made no secret of the fact that he brought top executives such as Nvidia’s Jensen Huang, Apple’s Tim Cook, and Tesla’s Elon Musk on Air Force One to visit China.

Trump said on social media that he asked Xi to “open up” China to foreign companies such as Boeing Co. and GE Aerospace, as well as financial services companies such as Citigroup, Mastercard and Visa.

On his first flight, President Trump announced that China had agreed to buy hundreds of new Boeing jets and GE engines. His account had him buying at least $1 million in Boeing stock and selling at least $500,000 during the first quarter. He also purchased GE Aerospace for at least $80,000.

During the trip, reporters yelled at executives and asked questions about how the trip went.

“The meeting went well,” Huang said. “Mr. Xi and President Trump were great.”

Asked what had been accomplished, Musk said: “A lot of good things.”

Mr. Trump’s account purchased at least $2 million and as much as $7 million in Nvidia stock in the first quarter, according to the ethics report. The account also sold at least $1.8 million in Nvidia stock during that period.

One of the acquisitions (for at least $1 million on February 10) came a week before Nvidia announced a strategic partnership with Facebook’s parent company, Meta, across cloud storage and artificial intelligence infrastructure.

During his State of the Union address in February, President Trump urged lawmakers to approve legislation that would ban trading in individual stocks. He argued that lawmakers should not be allowed to “use insider information to gain unfair advantage.”

Rep. Mark Takano (D-Calif.) agreed. But he said the president and vice president should also be prohibited from trading individual stocks.

“He was the last person in office to lecture Americans and others about transparency,” Takano said.

“The president should not be a day trader,” the Washington nonprofit advocacy group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics said on social media.

Supreme Court denies opportunity to reconsider social media liability

0


The judges refused to decide whether X could be sued for distributing sexually explicit videos of minors.

WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court on May 18 abandoned an opportunity to consider liability protections for social media sites, refusing to take up a case on whether Company X could be sued for distributing sexually explicit videos of minors.

The controversial law at the center of this case, known as Section 230, is widely interpreted to protect websites from lawsuits over user-generated content.

Critics say lower courts are reading too much into the law’s text to protect internet platforms.

“Social media platforms are increasingly using Section 230 as a get-out-of-jail-free card,” Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in 2024 when he dissented from the court’s decision not to take the case over Snapchat.

A recently rejected appeal involved two teenage boys who thought they were communicating on Snapchat with a female student at their school. In reality, they were tricked by sex traffickers into blackmailing them into recording sexually graphic videos of themselves.

Three years later, the video started going viral on Twitter (now known as X). The company denied the minors’ requests to remove the posts and only removed them after the Department of Homeland Security got involved, according to the filing.

When the teens filed suit, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals said Section 230 prohibits pursuing X for distributing child pornography or profiting from sex trafficking. The court allowed other aspects of the case to move forward. But the victims, identified under pseudonyms in the lawsuit, asked the Supreme Court to reconsider the rejected claims.

“What makes this case different from others is that Twitter knew that criminal content involving John Doe 1 and John Doe 2 was proliferating on its platform,” the lawyers wrote in the appeal. “This case does not require courts to cover all cases to which Section 230 applies.”

In response, X’s lawyers said the case was the latest attempt to disrupt the interpretation of established law.

“Like others who have raised variations on the same argument, the petitioners fall short of justifying destabilizing measures,” they said.

Virginia’s Redistricting Efforts and the Painstaking Process of Constitutional Amendments

0

The Virginia Supreme Court ruled last week that Virginia’s constitutional amendment process that allows the state legislature to redraw congressional districts for November’s midterm elections is unconstitutional. The ruling effectively invalidated the April election in which more than 3 million Virginians voted and a majority approved the measure.

The amendment would pave the way for the state Legislature to hold the 2026 midterm elections using a gerrymandered U.S. House map in which 10 of the state’s 11 districts favor Democratic candidates. The map replaces the 2021 map drawn by a court-appointed task force, with six seats leaning Democratic, four seats leaning Republican, and one seat in the mix. The high court’s ruling ruled that the Special Masters’ 2021 map will remain valid for the upcoming midterm elections.

The Virginia Supreme Court’s decision comes as states battle for partisan redistricting ahead of the midterm elections. McDougle vs. Scott It drew sharp criticism, with some even suggesting that members of the court should be removed. But the issue before the court was actually a procedural question: whether the Legislature followed Virginia’s strict process for amending the state constitution. The court answered that question in the negative, holding that the state legislature did not follow the process set forth in the state constitution and therefore lacked the authority to redraw congressional districts.

Complex correction process

Virginia’s current redistricting battle stems from a constitutional amendment approved in 2020 that delegates the task of redrawing federal and state legislative districts to an advisory redistricting commission made up of eight state representatives and eight Virginians. The amendment would transfer redistricting authority to the Virginia Supreme Court if the commission could not agree on a map. This impasse occurred in 2021, when the Virginia Supreme Court drew the current map with the help of two special justices.

Because of this constitutional amendment, when unprecedented redistricting battles began in several states last year, the Virginia General Assembly had to seek an amendment to the Virginia Constitution that would give it the power to not only redraw maps on its own with a majority vote of the legislature. The process used to pass the amendment at issue mcdougle.

The procedure for amending the Virginia Constitution is governed by Article XII, Section 1. This provision provides for a four-step process. First, both houses of Congress, the House of Delegates and the Senate, must vote to pass constitutional amendments during Congress. Second, elections for Virginia’s House of Representatives, the House of Delegates, must intervene. Third, both houses of Congress Also Vote to pass the constitutional amendment bill at the next regular session of Congress. Fourth, twice-approved amendments go to voters, who must pass them by popular vote.

Virginia Supreme Court Justice D. Arthur Kelsey said in the majority opinion that this is necessarily an arduous process and that the Constitution should not be amended lightly.

This process gives voters two chances to kill the amendment. First, they can vote to replace the member who originally passed the amendment with a member who does not support the amendment in question. Second, if the amendment reaches a vote, the amendment itself can be rejected.

Virginia’s 2025-26 Redistricting Efforts

In contrast to federal elections, which are held in even-numbered years, Virginia’s state elections are held in odd-numbered years. Therefore, the general election of delegates will be held on November 4, 2025, and early voting began on September 19. During this time, Virginia voters had the opportunity to vote early (or on Election Day) for their preferred candidates for delegates, governor, and other statewide offices.

Since Congress is not in session throughout the year, this period was a special session. The special session was initially limited primarily to deliberating budget proposals, but later lawmakers, along party lines, voted to expand the scope of the session to include constitutional amendments.

Then, on October 29 and 31, 2025, more than a month after early voting began, both chambers of Congress voted in favor of amending the Virginia Constitution for the first time. By this date, 1.3 million votes had already been cast in the House of Representatives election. Four days later, Election Day was November 4, 2025.

On January 14 and 16, 2026, Congress reapproved the amendment. The amendment was then sent to the people of Virginia for a public vote on the issue. A majority of Virginians approved the amendment.

Previous opportunities to consider

Throughout this process, litigation was pending in Virginia courts over whether the Legislature took the proper steps to amend the Virginia Constitution. In March, the dispute reached the Virginia Supreme Court, which ruled that it could not intervene in the process until after the election. This decision, also controversial, is based on a 1912 Virginia Supreme Court case. scott vs jamesheld that courts cannot address procedural issues related to the constitutional amendment process until after a popular vote.

Just one day after the April 21, 2026, election, a lower court ruled that the process was improper and invalidated the amendment. The court explained, among other reasons, that the first Congressional vote on the amendment on October 31, 2025 is outside the scope of the special session. The general election of the House of Delegates did not intervene before the second vote, as required by the state constitution. The proposed amendments were not posted and published in court at least three months before the general election, a statutory requirement. And the language on the ballot was “grossly misleading” and “did not accurately describe the proposed amendment.” The court did not elaborate on why this measure was misleading.

last week’s decision

The Virginia Supreme Court majority addressed one issue on appeal: whether a general election of delegates intervened between Congress’s two votes on the amendment.

The state defended the validity of the procedure, arguing that because the Nov. 4, 2025 election date came four days after the first Congress’s approval, the constitutional requirement for a “general election of representatives” to take place between two Congressional votes was met. The state argued that the term “general election” referred only to Election Day, not the entire voting period.

In a 4-3 decision, the court disagreed, saying the “general election” meant the entire election from Sept. 19 to Nov. 4. The court said Election Day was the very last day of the general election. Citing the more than 100-year history of general elections being held over several days, the majority argued that the correct reading of “general election” requires consideration of historical context and the public’s understanding of the term. According to the majority, the public would define a “general election” to include mass early voting in which more than 1 million Virginians voted. The majority emphasized that this interpretation would preserve Virginia’s “constitutionally protected opportunity for delegates to vote for or against constitutional amendments.” Therefore, according to the majority’s interpretation, Congress failed to vote on the constitutional amendment bill. before Under the state constitution, representative elections will be held in the interim.

Thus, just 16 days after the people of Virginia approved the constitutional amendment by popular vote, the court invalidated it as improperly codified.

Opponents were persuaded by the state’s definition of a “general election,” pointing to Article 2, Section 4 of the Virginia Constitution, which gives the legislature the power to determine when and how elections are held, and which requires delegates to be “elected” on “the Tuesday following the first Monday in November.” Opponents said Congress invoked these powers by defining a “general election” in the statute as “an election held in the Commonwealth.” above The Tuesday following the first Monday in November. ” Opponents also highlighted that the law states that early voting begins “before the election.” Opponents cited other provisions in the state constitution that also say elections “must be held.” be held back Tuesday, it’s not about the election. end on that Tuesday. Any objections would have allowed the state to make the decision and allow Congress to redraw the map.

National gerrymandering

The battle for Virginia is being fought in the context of increasingly intense redistricting wars across the United States.

From 2025 to 2026, a number of states, including California, Florida, Louisiana, Missouri, North Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, and Virginia, are redrawing U.S. House districts to favor partisanship in the November 2026 general election. These efforts have accelerated since the U.S. Supreme Court ruled last month. louisiana vs curry Louisiana’s congressional map, which includes two majority-black districts, is an unconstitutional racial gerrymander that violates the 14th Amendment. chalice This would allow states to prioritize partisan goals over racial balance when drawing congressional districts, making it difficult for states to challenge the maps as racial gerrymandering if they claimed partisan intentions.

Each of these states has its own process for redistricting. Some states, like Virginia, had to submit redistricting to a popular vote. Californians passed a ballot initiative in November 2025 that temporarily overrode the state’s independent redistricting commission and adopted Democratic-leaning maps drawn by the state Legislature. Other states do not require voters to redistrict. Texas, North Carolina, Utah, Florida, and Tennessee were all able to redistrict their congressional districts without a ballot initiative.

In this context, the Virginia Supreme Court’s decision to invalidate the constitutional amendment was, in part, the result of the state’s redistricting process. Due to the 2020 Redistricting Commission’s constitutional changes, Virginia cannot currently redistrict without passing another constitutional amendment. In attempting to pass that amendment, the Legislature did not properly follow the amendment process set forth in the state constitution, as interpreted by the court.

The Virginia Supreme Court’s decision does not prevent the case from being retried in 2028, subject to proper procedures.

Laura Nyday is an associate in Steptoe’s Washington, DC office where she focuses on pro bono work, including voting rights litigation.

Recommended citation: Laura Niday, Virginia’s Redistricting Efforts and the Painstaking Process of Constitutional AmendmentsSᴛᴀᴛᴇ Cᴏᴜʀᴛ Rᴇᴘᴏʀᴛ (May 15, 2026), https://statecourtreport.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/virginias-redistricting-effort-and-laborious-process-amend-its

Silver Price Today May 18, 2026

0

How much is silver worth per ounce today?

As of 8:05 AM ET on May 18, 2026, the spot price of silver is $76.31 per oz., according to the latest market data. The stock rose 0.44%, or $0.33 from its previous closing price of $75.97.

One year ago, silver was trading at $32.29 per ounce. This means that the price has increased by 136.32% in the last 12 months.

Key levels to look out for this week:

52 week low: $32.36

52 week high: $117.39

Silver is trading 35.00% below its 52-week high. The stock is trading at a level 135.80% higher than its 52-week low.

What is the historical price of silver?

today 1 week ago 1 month ago 1 year ago
$76.31 $79.91 $80.81 $32.29

A week ago, silver was trading at $79.91 per ounce. Since then, the price has fallen by 4.51%.

One month ago, silver was trading at $80.81 per ounce. Since then, the price has fallen by 5.58%.

USA TODAY is an independent publisher and not an investment advisor. The information provided is for educational purposes only and should not be construed as financial, investment, or trading advice. We recommend that you seek independent advice from a qualified professional regarding any specific financial decisions you may make. Trading commodities, futures, and options involves significant risk of loss. Individual investment results may vary. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Prices can change rapidly and unpredictably due to factors such as supply/demand, weather, and geopolitical events. Our company assumes no responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of the information.

What is driving the price of silver today?

The price of silver is driven by inflation expectations, central bank policy, global economic conditions, and investor demand. The strength of currencies, especially the US dollar, can influence daily prices, as well as physical and industrial demand. For more on the market, read the latest investment news on USA TODAY Money.

What does XAG/USD mean?

XAG/USD is the ticker symbol used to track the spot price of silver in US dollars.

XAG stands for 1 troy ounce of silver and USD stands for US dollar. The estimated price tells you how many dollars it costs to purchase one ounce.

Prices are usually quoted per troy ounce, which is slightly heavier than a standard ounce.

Spot prices reflect real-time market transactions and serve as a benchmark for futures contracts, ETFs, and retail bullion prices.

how to invest in silver

Investing in silver can be done by buying physical coins or bars, buying ETFs that track its price, or investing in mining stocks. Be sure to weigh costs, storage needs, and risk tolerance before making a decision. The retail price of a coin or bar typically includes a premium over the spot price.

Disclaimer: This USA TODAY Money article was automatically generated using live market data from Alpha Vantage. If you think we made a mistake or have feedback, please use this form.

USPS has built a powerful network. Then things changed.

0


The United States Postal Service has endured many changes since America’s founding and has remained the lifeblood of rural America. We are now facing a major crisis.

play

Newman, his nemesis on Jerry Seinfeld’s sitcom of the same name, made the famous (and creepy) statement. “When you control your email, you control yourself.” information. ”

It was something Renaissance man and Founding Father Benjamin Franklin knew all too well. He oversaw the postal service from 1753 to 1774, improving the rough system that connected Britain’s 13 colonies. However, Smithsonian Magazine writes that when it became clear that war between the United States and Great Britain was inevitable, Franklin and his fellow rebels relied on underground communication networks to share information that would prove critical to the revolutionaries’ success.

In 1775, the Continental Congress created what would become the United States Postal Service, with Franklin as its first postmaster general. According to the agency’s website, this was “the new government’s first and, for many, most important role.”

Now, 251 years after its founding, the USPS remains an important government function for many Americans, but the service is facing a financial crisis that has forced it to suspend pension plan payments and raise prices on parcels, priority mail and stamps.

According to Steve Kochelsperger, USPS historian and manager of corporate information services, mail is delivered to Americans no matter how far away they are. And they deliver letters, luggage, and parcels by any means necessary: ​​by car, boat, plane, or even mule.

Let’s take a look back at this iconic American institution, which has faced unprecedented challenges in recent years.

Did you hear the news? Read the shortlist and find what’s missing

War and commerce drive postal innovation

Kochelsperger explains that before the Civil War, Americans had to go to their local post office, and in many small communities that meant going to a general store or another store downtown.

Newspapers, an important source of information from colonial times into the 20th century, were given subsidies to send by mail as a means of communicating information to people. But Lynn Heidelbaugh, curator at the Smithsonian’s National Postal Museum, said mailing letters and correspondence can be expensive. Postage rates were lowered in 1845, making it more affordable, and stamps were introduced in 1847, making it more convenient. Mail was delivered to the post office by horse, stagecoach, and later by train.

According to Heidelbaugh, when the Civil War broke out, it was not uncommon to see women with children waiting in line at urban post offices for letters from sons and husbands who had been estranged by the war. Free home delivery began in urban areas in 1863, but it took “decades of debate in Congress” for it to spread to small towns and villages, he said. By 1902, free rural delivery became the norm across the United States

John Wanamaker, a Philadelphia department store owner, was appointed postmaster general by President Benjamin Harrison in 1889 and promoted free rural delivery (RFD), commemorative stamps, and pneumatic tubes, innovations that were introduced after his term ended in 1893, Kochelsperger said.

“Sears & Roebuck and Montgomery Ward, they were the Amazons of their time,” Kochelsperger said. “Business grew because catalogs could be sent directly to people.” Starting in 1913, Americans could receive parcels no matter how far away they were.

Infrastructure equals access

Heidelbaugh said the USPS’ universal service mission means it must be able to reach sometimes hard-to-reach areas, which has helped strengthen physical connections in many communities.

“Rural delivery helped advocate for better roads,” she said. “Rural areas were already working to improve their roads, and rural truckers could use those roads to make a case for better roads that are graded, paved, and maintained.”

The Constitution gives Congress the power to establish post offices and post roads, and Heidelbaugh said this clause has “great latitude” and has been interpreted to include not only paved roads, but also waterways, canals, railroads and air mail services. This is also affecting rural areas and commercial organizations. “When funds are routed to other (postal) routes, the companies that transport the mail receive a steady stream of income, allowing the railroad companies that transport the mail, for example, to invest more in passenger service.”

Reach hard-to-reach places

The Postal Service can be a figurative and literal lifeline for many Americans living in remote and remote areas, from rural parts of the continental United States to hard-to-reach areas of Alaska to far-flung territories like Guam and military bases around the world.

Kochelsperger said newspapers and letters “help keep families informed and connected, especially in times of crisis, such as during wars, when loved ones are far away.”

The mail is the means by which the federal government serves and communicates with people (for example, the Internal Revenue Service communicates with taxpayers by mail). During the coronavirus pandemic lockdown, post offices were “crucial in delivering life-saving medicine and much more” to people unable to leave their homes.

“If your nearest pharmacy is a day’s drive away, you may be able to rely on the post office for life-saving medicines,” he said.

The American Samoa Post Office is the only U.S. post office in the Southern Hemisphere. Kochelsperger said there are post offices in Antarctica and Greenland, and there are also post offices on ships around the world. USPS only delivers during certain times of the year to remote villages in Alaska that are only accessible by air. The Detroit River Service delivers mail to boats navigating the waterway, and the Spy Post Office delivers mail to the Havasupai Tribe people in the Grand Canyon. Mule trains are the “best and most cost-effective way” to access areas that are inaccessible by car and too dangerous for helicopters and small planes, he said.

Across the country, “when you drop something in a mailbox, it’s a given that it’s going to arrive in the mailbox,” he said.

“The calculation is very easy.”

The 21st century has brought tough challenges to the postal service. The Postal Service has struggled for decades to maintain costs while delivering to areas across the United States and around the world.

The USPS has lost money every year since 2007, totaling about $109 billion by fiscal year 2024, according to the U.S. General Accounting Office. Americans’ habits are changing, and they can now communicate, pay bills, and even sign documents all online. According to the Postal Regulatory Commission, the USPS delivered 112 billion pieces of mail in fiscal year 2024. While this may sound like a huge amount, it’s actually down nearly 50% from its 2006 peak.

Postmaster General David Steiner said in comments May 8 that the Postal Service’s financial outlook is “unsustainable” under its current business model.

“The math is very simple,” he said. “Revenues and services cannot offset the costs associated with universal service obligations.”

He said Congress sees allocating more money to the Postal Service as “public service reimbursement for the universal service that the Postal Service provides to the public, a service that no other private company has the desire or ability to perform.”

But Steiner admitted to Congress in March that 71% of mail routes cost the Postal Service money. Meanwhile, postage rates remain among the lowest in the developed world, despite frequent increases.

Critics say the Postal Service needs a fundamental overhaul. The Wall Street Journal wrote in a May 11 editorial that another “bailout” for the Postal Service by Congress is not the answer. “That business model is anachronistic in a digital world,” as the number of addresses that need to be reached continues to grow and so do costs.

“Something has to give,” the paper said, calling on Congress to let go of postage and nationwide shipping obligations and “let Mr. Steiner run it like a business.”

Meanwhile, Steiner proposed updating Congressional reimbursement amounts to better reflect today’s fiscal realities, including changes to USPS’ borrowing capacity and reform of the retirement system. The need for a strong postal service shouldn’t be partisan, Steiner added.

“The Postal Service was established to serve the nation,” Steiner said.

Phaedra Torresan is a national correspondent for USA TODAY and writes about history and Americana. Contact her via email at ptrethan@usatoday.com, X @wordsbyphaedra, BlueSky @byphaedra, or Threads @by_phaedra..