Home Blog Page 768

Supreme Court’s birthright ruling shocks and scares immigrant groups

0

play

DENVER – The Supreme Court’s apocalypse to stop President Donald Trump from revoking his auto-born citizenship for all born people in the United States has sparked a shockwave among immigrant communities.

The court’s June 27th ruling will not change the status of those subject to birth citizenship, but will give the lower court 30 days to further consider the matter. Supporters quickly filed a class lawsuit to block Trump’s plans. This would terminate automatic citizenship for babies born in the United States, unless the parents are citizens or legal permanent residents.

This measure is not retroactive. This means that if permitted by the court, it only applies to babies born after it has been valid.

Among those pleasing to stop Trump’s plans is Liza, a Texas-based Russian-born graduate student who gave birth after the president announced his executive order. Liza, who was granted anonymity by federal court for recognizing her immigration status, said she was afraid to go to the Russian embassy to register the birth of her child as she applied for asylum in the United States after her husband fled her hometown.

Liza’s baby is currently protected from losing US citizenship due to a temporary injunction issued by a lower court, and is now considering the merits of Trump’s plan. Liza said she was “worried and sick” that the court would control her before the baby was born.

“Thankfully, our babies were born in health and happiness… We are still worried that the government will one day take away our baby’s citizenship,” she told a press conference following the June 27 Supreme Court decision.

“I am saddened to see what today’s decision means for all parents who are not protected by the current preliminary injunction and are now even scared about their child’s future,” she said.

Scotts will quickly change his birthright citizenship ruling

In Denver, the Colorado Immigration Rights Coalition was rushing to reassure pregnant women that the Trump vs. Casa court decision would soon change anything.

“It’s really scary for people who are having children right now… that’s what someone wants to take away this fundamental right,” said spokeswoman Raquel Lane Arellano. “I have not seen the reality that birthright citizenship will be revoked, but to those watching the news, that may not be clear.”

Basement citizenship – expressly granted by the 14th Amendment – ​​says virtually anyone born in the US soil is automatically a citizen. The only exception to this day is the child of a diplomat, a position previously upheld by the Supreme Court.

However, the possibility that Trump would end the rights granted by the 14th Amendment sparked vigilance among groups that the Supreme Court wanted to block his initiative completely. The Supreme Court ruling sets the stage for lower courts to consider the president’s plans for next month.

“Today is a sad day for all people who care about the US Constitution and the constitutional rights of children born every day,” said Conchita Cruz, co-executive director of the Asylum-seeker Advocacy Project. “It’s a confused moment because immigrant families are watching the news and aren’t necessarily sure what it means or how it will affect them.”

What does birthright citizenship mean?

In one of his first actions when he returned to the White House, Trump issued an executive order declaring that children born to tourists, students, or parents visiting workplace visas, or illegally presents are not citizens automatically. His orders do not affect children born to American citizens or to people with legal permanent residency.

The immigration rights group wanted the Supreme Court to reaffirm its previous ruling in favour of birthright citizenship, and was shocked when the court ordered the lower court to consider the legal merits of the president’s plan instead.

According to the Migration Policy Institute, if the policy ends, the policy could affect approximately 255,000 babies born in the United States each year. Experts warn that Trump’s orders could create “stateless” people born in the United States but not related to their parents’ birth country.

New Jersey Attorney General Matt Platkin said the High Court recognized that a national judicial order was appropriate to protect plaintiffs from harm and that it had pledged to continue fighting for birthright citizenship on its merits.

“We welcome the opportunity to file a lawsuit, especially before the district court, as executive orders do not take effect immediately. The president’s approach to innate citizenship shows that it is a recipe for disruption on the ground and a recipe for harm to the state.”

Trump has repeatedly said he will take office on a strict immigration management platform and will attempt to revoke his birthright citizenship. Many countries have terminated their birthright citizenship, including the UK and much of Europe.

Trump has pledged to deport one million people each year, and by ending birthright citizenship, it will make it easier for federal officials to eliminate all their families. Historically, the parents of babies of US citizens have often been allowed to remain in the country, even if they enter illegally themselves.

Immigrant panic and uncertainty

Nivida, a mother of three who came to the United States in 2019, told USA Today that the court ruling created panic among her family and friends in order to escape persecution by criminal gangs in her hometown of Honduras.

“I’m very sad and I’m very anxious at the same time,” said Nivivia, who lives in Louisiana with three young children and was identified solely by the name of the court application.

She said she is protected from the order as she is one of the unidentified asylum seeker plaintiffs in the Asylum-hope Advocacy Project lawsuit that reached the National Supreme Court.

“I may not be affected personally,” she said through the translator. “But a lot of people around me will be affected.”

One of Nivida’s best friends is five months pregnant and is not protected by asylum claims subject to the sentence, she said.

“She’s very worried because she doesn’t know what will happen to the baby when they’re born and what identity they’ll have because of the decision the Supreme Court made today,” Nivida said.

“It’s very sad and very sad. It was something that was in the Constitution, the US Constitution for 150 years,” she said. “And this type of executive order is a law that I’ve only seen in other countries where corruption is present. And I thought this country was different. I thought there was respect for the law and the US Constitution here.”

Nike announces “surgical price hike” to ease Trump’s tariffs

0

play

Nike is taking action to combat the company’s estimated $1 billion blow from President Donald Trump’s tariffs, including the US “surgical price hike” that will begin this fall.

The news came after announcing a series of price increases from June 1st. This includes a $5-$10 increase in some footwear and a $2-$10 increase in adult apparel and equipment.

Other retailers, including Walmart and Adidas, have also warned of increased prices due to tariffs. Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell on June 18 said he expects “meaning inflation will arrive in the coming months” as more businesses increase costs for their customers.

While tariffs represent “new and meaningful cost headwinds,” Nike plans to “completely mitigate” its impact over time, Chief Financial Officer Matthew Friend said in a fourth-quarter revenue call on June 26th.

In addition to rising prices, Nike will assess the company’s cost savings “as needed” and shift its supply chain. According to a friend, around 16% of its footwear is imported from China, but the company plans to cut it to the high single digit range by the end of fiscal year 2026, as it will redistribute it to other countries.

After reporting a 12% decline in quarterly revenue, CEO Elliot Hill said the business is expected to improve outcomes, saying “it’s time to turn the page.”

Nike’s shares had risen more than 15% by noon on June 27th.

Parents can choose their children from LGBTQ+ lessons. What does that mean for school?

0

play

  • On June 27, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a 6-3 decision that allows parents to select their children from the LGBTQ+ theme curriculum, based on religious objections.
  • While religious and conservative parental rights groups are pleased, teachers, authors and civil rights advocates have issued warnings that schools could soon become inclusive.

The nation’s highest courts speak, but the debate over children’s exposure to LGBTQ+ literature and culture in American schools is not over.

While religious and conservative parental rights groups are pleased, teachers, authors and civil rights advocates have issued warnings that schools could soon become inclusive after a U.S. Supreme Court decision to allow parents to separate their children from lessons with material challenged on religious grounds.

Montgomery County Public School parents, including Muslims, Roman Catholics and Ukrainian orthodox followers, advocated district policies that prohibit them from opting out of invading their initial amendment rights to exercise their religious beliefs freely.

On June 27, the Supreme Court agreed with them in a 6-3 decision, saying American parents should be able to remove children from class in order to protect their families’ religious ideology.

The book on LGBTQ+ teaching and characters “doublely conveys certain perspectives on same-sex marriage and gender,” Judge Samuel Alito wrote on behalf of the court majority. He said the courts have long recognized the right for parents to direct their children to religious development.

The American Civil Liberties Union, which supported Maryland school district policies, said the district’s curriculum, which began in 2022, includes elementary school picture books with LGBTQ+ characters, was designed to be secular, age-friendly and inclusive. The ACLU called the decision “very disappointing.”

“This decision complicates our work in creating a welcoming, inclusive and equitable school system,” district spokesman Liliana Lopez said in an email to USA Today on behalf of the district and the Montgomery Board of Education. “It also sends a cold message to many precious members of our diverse community.

Public schools face increased surveillance over what is being taught in the classroom, increased pressure from conservative parents, and additional surveillance over the programs and curriculum they provide to LGBTQ+ youth. The court’s decision represents parental celebrations and panic across the political spectrum.

The Supreme Court decision is pushing the sloppy of President Donald Trump and several conservative custody groups on LGBTQ+ programming in schools. The Trump administration supported his Maryland parents in the incident, saying the school “put a price on the public interest of public education at the expense of advancing your religious beliefs.”

What does it mean for school culture?

The fear of unnecessary environments in public schools for LGBTQ+ students exploded after the decision.

LGBTQ+ students are already more likely to be rejected, bullyed, discriminated and violence in schools. These students are at increased risk for mental health challenges such as depression, anxiety and suicide attempts, according to data from the Child Mind Institute.

An ACLU lawyer said the Supreme Court’s decision “may have widespread consequences on our ability to create an inclusive and welcoming environment that reflects the diversity of the public school community.”

The decision promotes the mission of Trump and his education department to ban programming on schools LGTBQ+ and other social and racial justice issues.

This year, the Trump administration called for public funding programs for public schools that support diversity, equity and inclusion in schools. DEI programming includes programming that provides LGBTQ+ student support.

The U.S. Department of Education cannot directly manage classroom curricula in the hands of states. However, it says it will cut federal funds to violate federal civil rights laws if it fails to comply with the order. (Thousands of schools in more than 12 states are opposed.)

The Supreme Court’s decision will result in “failing chaos in public schools, impairing the ability of students to implement basic curriculum decisions and prepare students to live in our pluralistic society,” said Daniel Mach, director of the ACLU’s Religion and Confession Freedom Program.

Mach called religious freedom “fundamentally important.” However, he said freedom should not “have exempt public schools from secular lessons that do not align with family religious views.”

Parents who say schools shouldn’t teach their children about these issues are looking for a more welcoming place for their families.

“This is a historic victory over parental rights in Maryland and across the United States. Children should not force conversations about drug queens, pride parades or gender transitions without their parents’ permission.” “Today, the courts have restored common sense and made clear that parents, not government, have the final say on how they raise their children.”

Meanwhile, teachers are brave about how the arbitration affects lesson plans, students and classrooms.

“By creating new unnecessary legal rules that burden hardworking educators and disrupt their ability to teach, the courts are effectively inserting daily education decisions about what students can learn and teach,” says Miguel Gonzalez, spokesman for the National Education Association.

What about the school’s religion?

The religious groups praised the Supreme Court’s decision.

Their support comes during a wave of GOPs seeking more religion in schools.

Oklahoma education officials have ordered public schools to teach the Bible. He also wanted state funding for controversial religious charter schools in a deadlocked 4-4 decision earlier this year before the idea was shut down by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Louisiana leaders have directed schools to display 10 commandments, which have been blocked by federal courts. Texas leaders proposed a curriculum that incorporates biblical lessons. Parents and faith leaders filed a lawsuit against it.

Some school administrators and civil rights advocates fought back by saying these duties violated the rights of students. Cecilia Wang, ACLU’s national legal director, said she is concerned about the court’s decision to side with her parents in the case, as it could affect the school’s ability to implement future lessons that could “cause religious opposition.”

“For the first time now, parents who challenge religiously are empowered to choose from a secular public school curriculum that hinders the district’s legitimate educational objectives and the ability to run schools without confusion. Ironically, there are differences when the curriculum is designed to promote politeness and understanding,” Wang wrote in an email.

How about book bans?

Maryland parents who sued the district said they didn’t want to remove the book from school. But Ellie Brinkley, a staff lawyer for the free speech advocacy group Penn America, said a ban on further books across the country’s public schools is likely to be the result of a court decision.

“By allowing parents to pull their children out of the classroom when opposing certain content, justice lays the foundation for a new frontier in attacks on all sorts of books in schools,” Brinkley said. “This will exacerbate that devastating trend.”

The majority of the 16,000 books that have been banned in schools since 2021 are LGBTQ+-themed. According to data from Pen America. Group data states a ban on books that has almost tripled between the 2023-2024 school years, with more than 10,000 books being banned in public schools.

Parents who advocated a national ban on books often say that the content is inappropriate for the school environment. Or they oppose the content of the literature and do not want the child to be exposed to it.

A group of authors and illustrators named in the Maryland case said they disagree with the court’s decision. These include the authors and illustrators of LGBTQ+-themed books: “Uncle Bobby’s Wedding”, “Jacob’s Room of Choice”, “Love, Violet”.

“We believe that young people need to see their own and their families in the books they read. This is especially true for LGBTQ+ children and LGBTQ+ families,” they wrote in an email. “And every child needs to learn how to share their classrooms and communities with people who are different to them.

Contributions: Maureen Groppe, Thao Nguyen; USA TODAY

Please contact Kayla Jimenez (kjimenez@usatoday.com). Follow her on the X on @kaylajjimenez.

Trump is immersed in another peace deal, and this is in Africa

0


The UN has accused Rwanda of supporting rebels who have taken over the massive belt of the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

play

WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump has announced between the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Rwanda that the administration hopes that it will lead to peace in African countries and pave the way for US investment.

Trump said in a social media post on June 20 that he arranged a treaty between the nations and believes Secretary of State Marco Rubio helped unite the nation. He hosted the country’s top diplomats in an oval office on June 27th.

“Only in years they’ll have peace, and that’s a big deal,” Trump said at a previous press conference.

Rubio held a signature ceremony between Foreign Minister Therese Kaikwamba Wagner, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and Rwandan Minister Olivier Ndungere at the State Department just before his meeting with Trump.

The deal was put together as Trump later brokered a ceasefire and his administration began working to end the conflict in Gaza and Ukraine.

The seizure of most of Eastern Congo by the M23 rebel group has killed more than 7,000 people this year alone and expelled over 450,000 people, the DRC government said in February. The area is home to valuable mineral deposits of DRC.

The UN Security Council called on Rwanda to end its support for rebels in a February resolution, urging the two countries to re-engage in diplomatic talks. Rwanda denies supporting rebels.

The Biden administration tried to resolve the conflict, but was unable to secure a deal before one president resigned.

The Trump administration hopes the resolution will put an end to a wider conflict, which has led to the movement of over 7 million people. Within 30 years, conflicts in eastern Congo began occurring after Rwandan genocide caused an estimated 6 million deaths.

More than 18,000 Congolese refugees resettled in the United States in 2023, according to the Department of Homeland Security. It was a major country of refugee nationality that was accepted by the United States that year and in the past decade.

Tommy Piggott, deputy State Department spokesman, said in a June 26th that the signature was a “significant milestone,” but that “paper peace must coincide with implementation on earth.”

A State Department spokesman said the agreement would include territorial integrity, prohibiting hostilities, disarmament, repatriation of refugees, returning internally displaced people and a local economic framework.

This transaction is central to the administration’s approach to conflict reduction around the world. By enabling and promoting economic investment in war-torn countries such as the DRC and Ukraine, the Trump administration hopes to be able to unlock lasting peace deals.

“Durable peace in the Great Lakes region will open the door for greater US and wider Western investment, which will bring economic opportunities and prosperity,” Rubio announced the framework agreement on April 25th. “It’s a win-win for everyone involved, like they call it.”

Businessman Massad Boulos, a senior adviser to the administration in Africa and father-in-law of the president’s young daughter, Tiffany Trump, is working to secure a critical mineral trade with DRC, which could potentially be billions of people in the US.

The Democratic Republic of the Congo has substantial reserves of gold, cobalt and premium copper that are inaccessible due to security risks and undeveloped infrastructure, the International Trade Agency says.

Cobalt is used to make rechargeable lithium-ion batteries used in electric vehicles, laptops, tablets and smartphones.

Walmart opens a “Dark Store” but is not for the public. This is why.

0

play

Walmart is testing several new stores, but you can’t shop there.

These new “dark stores” have been tested as a better way to meet online orders and are not available to the public. Inside, the first store recently opened in Dallas resembles a typical Walmart store. However, there are no signs as customers cannot enter. Those with knowledge of the situation are not permitted to speak publicly.

Although there are no Walmart signs in the store, there are many of the most popular products customers have ordered online as a way to speed up the achievement of online orders.

Another “dark store” works in Bentonville, Arkansas, the home of the retailer’s headquarters, according to Bloomberg. Walmart is experimenting with miniature distribution centers to report KFSM-TV 5 in Springdale, Arkansas, to get more items faster and meet orders from customers paying more.

“We regularly test new tools, features and features to improve our connections with our customers and choose to shop wherever we are,” Walmart said in a statement to USA Today on Friday, June 27th. “No matter what channel, our goal is to remain the same: deliver a fast, seamless and engaging customer experience.”

The retailer launched the Walmart+ subscription service in 2020. This launched with unlimited free shipping (orders over $35) from the store to try Amazon Prime. The subscription price is $12.95 a month or $98 a year. If you’re supported by governments, such as SNAP, WIC, Medicaid, you can get the Walmart+ Assist for $6.47 per year/$49 per year.

Released in 2005, Amazon Prime has gotten a head start with Walmart+, growing from 171 million users in 2022 to an estimated 186.3 million users in the US. According to Emarketer, Walmart+ has an estimated 34.7 million users.

Walmart uses AI, augmented reality, and more drones

In other developments, on June 24th, Walmart deployed a set of artificial intelligence tools to support an enhanced reality tool that allows associates to store with real-time multilingual translation capabilities to communicate with customers and easily find items in the store.

This expansion of AI and augmented reality comes two weeks after Walmart announced plans to expand its drone delivery services beyond Dallas and Bentonville, Arkansas, to five more major cities.

Contributions: Kasey Caminiti, Natalie Neysa Alund, Kathryn Palmer

Jeff Bezos’ Wedding to Lauren Sanchez: Live Update

0

play

Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sanchez Bezos are officially one.

The billionaire Amazon founder and award-winning television journalist tied the knot on Friday, June 27th at a very luxurious Venetian wedding after a star-studded wedding event (which is likely to be a bailout for Italian cities).

The pair raised their eyebrows early on Friday, and as Sanchez Bezos waved and kissed the spectators, she headed out to the wedding on a sleek motorboat from the gorgeous Aman Hotel.

Guests on the A-list were spotted by photographers along the way at the ceremony, including sisters Kim and Khloe Kardashian, their youngest sisters Kendall and Kylie Jenner, and family patriarch Kris Jenner. Oprah Winfrey and Model Brooks Nader. Leonardo DiCaprio and his model girlfriend Vittoria Ceretti. Bezos’ fellow billionaire Bill Gates.

Lauren Sanchez’s wedding gown

Sanchez Bezos wore a high-neck Dolce and Gabbana silhouette dress decorated with priestly buttons covered in 180 silk chiffon combined with tulle and lace veils, inspired by a similar veil worn by iconic Italian actress Sofia Lauren in the 1958 film Horseboat.

“As you get a little older, not many things will surprise you,” 55-year-old Sanchez Bezos told the magazine about the couple’s wedding. “I can’t wait to see him.”

“I’ve come into a lot of therapy and it changed me a lot in a lot of ways. But it’s really Jeff,” she continued. “Jeff hasn’t changed me. Jeff has it. It was revealed myself. I feel safe. I think I saw it. He lets me go. Like I said about Sophia Lauren being apologetic free, he makes me free indifferent. ”

Vogue revealed that out of the 200 guests, around 70 are the duo’s family. “The wedding is very intimate,” Sánchez Bezos said. The traditional dress Sánchez Bezos wore for Fête is a confusion from her usual fashion preferences.

She wore an all-white look inspired by lingerie for President Donald Trump’s second inauguration in January.

“It’s from ‘I’m a simple, sexy modern dress’, ‘I want something that evokes the moment’, and where are you now? I’m not like I was five years ago,” she told Vogue.

Lauren Sanchez Bezos: The subtle way Jeff Bezos’ wife revealed the name change

Before posting photos of the pair’s wedding, the former guest co-host of “The View” scrubbed her Instagram with photos left in her feed (now archives). Eagle Eyed wedding spectators noticed that journalists also made another change. Transfer her display name to “Lauren Sanchezbezos” and the handle to @laurensanchezbezos.

The couple’s controversial, luxurious Venetian weddings do not have legal status under Italian law, suggesting that the couple may already be legally married in the United States, eschewing the bureaucracy associated with Italian marriages.

Bezos’ multi-million dollar events have sparked rage directly online, in an attempt to protest Blue Origin owners to pay more tax amid global dissatisfaction over the division of classes and wealth.

Bezos, 61, and Sánchez were reportedly first linked in 2019, roughly the same as the parties announced a split from their previous partners.

Jeff Bezos began dating Sanchez after Mackenzie Scott split up

Bezos and his ex-wife Mackenzie Scott, who shares four children, formally split in the same year. Sanchez was already in the process of divorce from her husband, Patrick Whitesell, and shared two children. She has former NFL tight end Tony Gonzalez and another child. Tony Gonzalez is scheduled to attend a ceremony with his new wife, “Toby” Gonzalez in October.

Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sanchez engagement

The pair have been in line since then, and Bezos asked Sanchez questions to the yacht during his trip to the Cannes Film Festival in May 2023.

He hid a box containing a $2.5 million pink engagement ring under her pillow, and Sanchez shared it with Vogue.

Who went to Bezos’ wedding?

Attended the wedding festivities included Ivanka Trump and her husband, Jared Kushner, Belgian fashion designers Diane von Foolstenberg, Tom Brady, Orlando Bloom and Gale King. President Donald Trump was reportedly invited, but he was not present, reportedly the New York Times.

Before “I dos,” Sanchez hosted Hollywood and non-profit friends at the Bachelorette Party in Paris in May. There, Kim Kardashian, Kris Jenner, Eva Longoria and Katy Perry were among the attendees.

After the wedding, the newlyweds and their guests are expected to head to the halls of Arsenel, a renovated maritime area on the outer edge of Venice. The vast 14th century complex in the East Castello district, known for hosting the Venice Biennale Art Fair, is surrounded by water and is impossible to reach on the land when the bridge is being raised.

Contributors: Saman Shafik, Anna Kaufman, USA. Reuters

How Ecuadorian Authorities Found Drug Kingpin’s Luxury Rest

0



CNN

The Ecuadorian army revealed how they captured the country’s most wanted man, Dr. Adolfo “Phito” Macia.

After almost 18 months of manhunt for the leader of criminal group Los Ceneros, Ecuadorian security block made a breakthrough on June 25th.

Authorities immediately travelled to the area, began a 10-hour operation, and attempted to find and capture the infamous gang. To prevent the attack from being blocked, the military and police closed access within a 15-block radius, with no one allowed to enter or depart the site.

Special teams from the military eventually entered the property to gather more information and control the House.

It was a well-equipped villa with pool, gym, appliances, games room, marble-like walls and features that show the property is still under construction.

The house was fully equipped, with a pool, gym, appliances, games room, marble-like walls and other features that indicated that the facility was still under construction.
The house was fully equipped, with a pool, gym, appliances, games room, marble-like walls and other features that indicated that the facility was still under construction.

One area of ​​the house included a bunker with fully camouflaged holes in the floor and with hidden access and air conditioning.

“The police and the military on the scene began searching with instruments to see where the alias ‘Fito’ was hiding,” said Ecuadorian Home Minister John Lenberg.

As surveillance flights were identifying irregular crop fields behind the house, authorities requested the use of excavators to find the drug lord.

“They began to excavate. As soon as this happened, if we continued, the roof of his bunker would collapse, causing Fit to panic. At that moment he opened the hatch where the army was already located and climbed up from the hole he had been hiding.

The soldiers pinned Macia to the ground, ordered him to put his weapon in the first place and tossed his full name out loud.

This handout, released by the Ecuadorian army, shows members of the Army looking for a hideout for drug traffickers, aka Adolfo Macias, Alias ​​Fito, after being recaptured in Manta, Manavi, Ecuador on June 25, 2025.

“Adolfo Mathias Villamar,” he said footage from the Army showed him, lying on the floor.

After the surgery, authorities arrested Macia, and four other men were identified as part of his security details.

Macias was immediately relocated to Manta Air Force Base, then to Guayaquil Air Force Base. From there he was taken to the largest security Laroca prison in the Guayaquil Prison complex behind the Rajoul prison where he escaped in January 2024.

A photo released later by the Home Office showed a drug lord trapped inside his phone.

President Daniel Novore said Ecuador is working to hand him over to the US — he faces drug and weapons charges — and is waiting for a response from American officials.

Macias is one of Ecuador’s most notorious gangsters and is the only founding member of Los Ceneros, believed to be still alive. In 2011 he was sentenced to a think tank insight crime “due to a series of crimes, including murder and drug trafficking,” but was recaptured several months after he left prison in February 2013.

Little is known about his life before the crime, but he gained a reputation as a gang money laundering expert during his jail time for over a decade.

Before he escaped prison in 2024, the government had planned to move Macia to a higher security facility. Novoa’s secretary spokesperson told local channels that the news had probably reached Macia and urged him to escape.

Undocumented immigrants face sudden fines under new Trump rules

0


The new rules allow immigration authorities to illegally issue up to $500 across borders, and $1,000 per day to stay in the US on such orders.

play

Millions of people living illegally in the United States face severe new fines from the Trump administration as the White House puts immigrants into self-swagging into the country they are born.

The newly issued rules allow federal immigration authorities to fine people up to $500 for illegally crossing their borders, and if ordered to do so, they can tweak $1,000 per day to not leave the United States. The measure also poses a $10,000 fine for those who voluntarily leave but say they are not.

Whether illegally crossing borders, overstaying visas is considered a civil violation, and the White House said fines reflect the administration’s efforts to reduce illegal immigration.

“The law doesn’t enforce itself; there must be consequences to break it,” Homeland Security Director Tricia McLaughlin said in a statement.

Federal law has long given authorities the power to impose such fines, but they were rarely issued until the first Trump administration, yet still rarely only because officials found the process tedious.

President Joe Biden suspended fines during his term. Previously, by issuing fines, federal agents had to provide notification to individuals via certified mail or to attorneys. The new rules give people to sue for 15 days.

White House officials said it would be effective to mail notifications to people as the law already requires non-citizens to register their addresses with the government.

The fine represents another board on Trump’s strict immigration enforcement campaign platform. This includes famous detention and deportation, and could result in a $1,000 payment to those voluntarily leaving the United States.

Critics say federal authorities have not previously issued such fines. Because it is equivalent to getting “blood from stones,” he says many undocumented immigrants have low-paid jobs.

“Many people who ordered removal because they missed a court hearing could face these fines, even if they didn’t know about the hearing because the government didn’t provide the proper notice (or was a child),” said Aaron Reichlin Melnick of the American Council of Immigration in a social media post. “Regulations may have legal challenges as we skipped the usual ‘notifications and comments’ regulatory process completely. It is clear that there was no emergency here.

Buy now and later loans will immediately affect your FICO score

0

play

  • FICO incorporates purchases now and pays your loan data later.
  • The change is intended to provide lenders with a more complete picture of consumer repayment habits.
  • Responsible use of BNPL can improve your credit score, but excessive or missed payments can hurt them.

FICO has announced that it will pay later loans to people’s credit scores starting in fall 2025 and start factoring them with purchases now.

Credit scores affect the ability of Americans to get loans, buy cars and homes, and rent apartments. FICO, a data analytics company whose credit model is used for most lending decisions, said the scores that account for BNPL loans give lenders a more comprehensive view of consumer repayment behavior.

In a collaborative study simulating the inclusion of BNPL data in AFFIRM, FICO found that the impact of scores was generally consistent with the opening of new accounts.

FICO offers several scoring models. Nerdwallet spokesman Sara Rathner said lenders adopting the new scoring would take time and that most consumers would likely not notice the change this fall.

“A variety of scoring models are designed for different focus,” Lassner said. “It can take years before these are adopted primarily in decision-making and may not be adopted by lenders for any type of borrowing.”

Still, FICO said the introduction of this new kind of scoring represents a major change as lenders keep up with increasing dependence on consumers on BNPL loans.

FICO responds to the growing popularity of BNPL

The younger generation appears to be the most common adopters of digital BNPL loans.

Apps like Klarna, Affirm and Afterpay have easily protected your loans. Often, it can be done on mobile devices without hard credit checks, allowing consumers to undertake many loans at once.

The use of these loans at Gen Z and Millennials appears to have accelerated last year by around 10% of each cohort using them.

This comes after the increasing popularity of the digital BNPL platform, and its use has slowed for three years.

“It’s convenient, but some people probably reach out to it because they’re a bit financially stressed,” said David Tinsley, senior economist at the Bank of America Institute.

Who will change help and hurt

Changes in FICO could actually improve your credit score in order to responsibly use BNPL loans to delay payments for large purchases such as appliances, computers, or wedding dresses.

Russner said credit institutions have already found ways to consider ways to miss or delay paying people’s scores, but the change could be more perceived for the habit of people repaying loans on time.

“We certainly see this recognition that there are many ways for consumers to take financial responsibility,” she said. “Therefore, it is absolutely beneficial for consumers to consider that type of action in their decision-making when evaluating a loan.”

Tinsley also uses them with low-income consumers with high delinquency rates, knowing that some people are drawn to BNPL loans and as a way to spread their payments, they have the cash to make them.

Of course, if a consumer gets several BNPL loans at once and doesn’t pay them back, FICO’s new scoring model is another way for lenders to clearly identify their behavior.

What do you think if you are using a BNPL loan?

Before agreeing to a BNPL loan, Rasner encourages consumers to read the fine print and ensures they know what time they need to pay.

“Look at all other financial obligations, especially if you’re using a buy now, you’ll pay frequently later and have multiple plans at once,” she said.

Tinsley said consumers should remember that BNPL loans are typically on a tighter repayment schedule than credit cards. So, they may have an initial zero selfish grace period, but they are usually less flexible too.

If people can’t make payments on time, they could be hit harder with deferred and assertive fees than they would have faced with a credit card purchase.

“Buy now can be an incredible tool to pay later,” Lassner said.

How does BNPL affect my credit score?

If consumers are concerned about how BNPL loans are affecting their credit scores, Rasner encourages them to check their scores online.

If you check your score, it won’t be dropped. Make sure it’s accurate, says Rathner. If you see an account with a list of them, if you don’t remember opening it, it can be a sign of scams or errors. Please report it to your credit bureau and financial institution.

If you apply for a loan and are denied or dissatisfied with the terms offered, don’t be afraid to speak up.

“It helps you talk to the lender about the factors that led to their decision and understand if there are any actions that will improve your odds later,” she said.

If a consumer believes that the lender’s decision is unfair and based on inaccurate information, he can file a complaint with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

Reach Rachel Barber at rbarber@usatoday.com Follow her at x @rachelbarber_

Trump aims to become a judge after the Supreme Court victory: Summary

0


The Republican president called for a surprise press conference after the Supreme Court limited the extent to which lower courts can block his policies nationwide.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nukeztwvejy

WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump and his top aides have declared a victory over federal judges who blocked Republican administration policies at unprecedented fees after the Supreme Court said national decisions from regional judges are likely to exceed their authority.

“It was a big decision. We are very pleased,” Trump told reporters at a White House press conference, which was repealed before June 27th. He then added that “the Constitution was brought back.”

Earlier in the day, the Supreme Court ordered US District Court judges to temporarily block Trump’s policies in cases of a second-term presidential executive order that restricted the birthright citizenship of children whose parents were in the country without temporary or legal approval.

Trump said he is grateful that the Supreme Court will stop nearly 700 district court judges from impose national injunctions. He especially thanked Judge Amy Coney Barrett and Chief John Roberts for writing the decision.

“These judges tried to determine national laws,” Trump said. “This was a huge abuse of electricity.”

Attorney General Pam Bondy, who appeared with Trump in the White House, set out for what he called an “imperial judge” who tried to block Trump’s administration’s policies. She picked out federal judges who ordered 35 out of 40 blocks across the country for Trump’s policies in Maryland, Massachusetts, California, Washington and the District of Columbia, and noted that the High Court had suspended its practice.

“Americans are finally getting what they voted for,” Bondy said. “Now there are no more fraudulent judges who will strike the country with President Trump’s policies.”

The president’s press conference took place at another whirlwind week tail, beginning with US forces launching air at three Iranian nuclear sites and ending with Senate Republicans struggling to find votes to pass Trump’s major tax, spending and policy-legal packages before the July 4 deadline, when it comes to self-imposed July 4th.

The bill includes Trump’s priorities, including tax cuts and increased spending on border security. The House has approved the 1,100-page bill, but the senator says there are several important provisions, including restrictions on Medicaid healthcare compensation, not enjoying special status at the chamber.

Asked how important it is for Congress to send measures to him by Independence Day after work, Trump replied, “It’s not over, but if possible, I’d like to do it by that time.”

Trump: The 14th Amendment for Slave Baby”

Trump said the Supreme Court ruling allows his administration to return to court and win a lawsuit against birthright citizenship established under 14.th Corrections immediately after the civil war.

“It was for the baby slave,” he said. “It wasn’t meant to people scam the system and trying to come to the country on vacation.”

“This will get us there and ultimately win that case, because hundreds of thousands are poured into our country under birth citizenship,” Trump said. – Erin Mansfield

Bondi: Scotus’ domination solves “bipartisan issues”

Attorney General Pam Bondy has promoted the Supreme Court ruling as a victory for not just Trump but all presidents.

“These injunctions allowed district court judges to become emperor,” she said, “it was a bipartisan issue that continued five presidential terms.

People’s injunctions are plaguing Republican and Democrat presidents. Former President Barack Obama dealt with 12 during his two terms. Former President Joe Biden had 14 in three years.

Trump faces 64 injunctions in his first term, with over 200 cases already underway against his second administration. – Savanna Kucha and Maureen Grop

“I have great respect for her”: Trump praises Amy Connie Barrett

Supreme Court Judge Amy Connie Barrett has been targeted by MAGA activists to monitor President Donald Trump, but the president said he is happy with her.

Barrett wrote a majority opinion on a 6-3 decision restricting the use of a national injunction by federal courts, which the Trump administration opposed.

“I have great respect for her. I have always had it and her decision was written beautifully today,” Trump said at a press conference celebrating the sentencing.

Barrett previously opposed the Trump administration’s efforts to freeze funds for foreign aides, drawing criticism from the right. – Zach Anderson

Trump on tax bills: Senate “It’s a bit difficult for Congressmen.”

During a press conference, Trump admitted an extreme setback to the “big and beautiful” tax and spending bills that approached a key moment before the Senate.

“It was a bit difficult for Congressmen,” Trump said, referring to Elizabeth McDonough, a longtime Senate aide who has served under the Democrats and the GOP majority. “And I’ll say I don’t agree with the councillors about some things and that she was fine in other ways.”

McDonough, an independent official, has struck a variety of provisions from Trump’s marquee legislative package, setting his voluntary timeline on shaky ground.

Trump, in particular, wasn’t going as far as some of his supporters in Congress who called for McDonough to be fired. -Savannah Kuchar and Francesca Chambers

Trump calls the New York Mayor’s Primary winner “a terrible thing for our country.”

Trump targeted New York winner Zoran Mamdani this week in the Democratic primary, and mislabeled “this communist from New York.”

“I can’t believe it’s happening,” Trump told reporters. “He’s a communist. We’re going to go to communism…it’s so bad for New York, but the rest of the country is rebelling against it.”

Democrat socialist and member of the state legislature, Mamdani defeated candidate Andrew Cuomo, the founding candidate, against political expectations, by a seven-point margin in the June 24th Democratic primary. Mamdani is not a communist. –Sarah D. Wire

Trump laughs tariff critics: “They should go back to business school.”

Economists who predicted that the Trump administration’s tariffs could cause a recession should “return to business school,” the president said in defending his second term of taxation.

“We’re taking billions and billions of dollars from China and many other countries,” Trump added.

Trump announced many tariffs that would shake the economic market, but suspended many of them as he negotiated trade deals and later lowered China’s sudden tariffs. The market has since recovered. – Zach Anderson

Trump’s July 4th tax and policy bill deadline: “Not Endoll”

Trump said his voluntary July 4 deadline for Congress to complete his major tax and policy laws is not solid, but Republicans have many concerns about the bill that they have to resolve to lack democratic support.

“That’s not the end, but I would like to get it done by then if possible,” Trump said.

He argued that the bill includes a $4 trillion extension to Trump’s 2017 tax cut, so that failing to approve the law would lead to tax cuts.

“You could have had some ancestors,” Trump said. “I think there’s a lot of pressure to approve that.” – Defeat Janssen

Trump on his threat to life: “I get that throbbing feeling”

Trump appeared to suggest at a press conference that he still had physical effects from a bullet that grazeed his ears during an attempted assassination in Butler, Pennsylvania last year.

Discussing the threat to his life, Trump said he was threatened in the past, “I get that throbbing feeling from time to time. I get that throbbing feeling,” Trump said.

“But what do you know? It’s okay. This is dangerous business,” the president added. -Zac Anderson

Trump appeared to be enjoying himself at a surprise press conference with a reporter, but his White House announced it within 30 minutes it took place.

He laughed at who he chose out of the over 75 reporters during the question and answer session.

When the White House press conference reached the 45-minute mark, Trump asked reporters, “Should I continue doing this?”

The June 27 event was Trump’s second press conference in the briefing room since he returned to the office. At one point, he told journalists he would close the press conference when he gets bored. Ten minutes later he decided he had enough and left the briefing room. – Francesca Chambers

Israeli military denials report that soldiers were told to fire on Palestinians waiting for food after repeated fatal incidents

0



CNN

Israeli forces have denied new reports that soldiers have been ordered to fire on unarmed Palestinians awaiting humanitarian assistance in Gaza after hundreds of people were reported to have been killed in recent weeks while approaching food distribution sites.

On Friday, the Daily Harletts newspaper published an article claiming that Israeli soldiers in Gaza had been instructed by their commanders to shoot a Palestinian crowd approaching the aid site.

One soldier, who spoke anonymously with Haaretz, described the approach route to aid sites as a “sacrificed field” in which Israel will cause fires, even if there is no immediate threat. According to this article, Israeli forces recently began dispersing shells across the crowd, resulting in a sharp increase in casualties.

“We strongly reject the charges raised in the article. The IDF did not instruct the military to intentionally shoot civilians, including those approaching the distribution centre,” the Israeli Defense Force (IDF) said in response to the article. “To be clear, the IDF directive prohibits intentional attacks on civilians.”

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Israel Katz rejected the report as “a malicious lie designed to trust the IDF, the world’s most moral army.”

More than 500 Palestinians have been killed since May 27 and since May 27th, more than 500 Palestinians have been killed as they approached aid sites or trucks carrying trucks. The Palestinians approached the site and fired on a near-base basis when health officials and emergency responders said.

In one such incident earlier this month, more than dozens of witnesses, including those injured in the attack, told CNN that Israeli forces shot crowds with repeated volleys of gunfire. Weapons experts said the shooting rate heard on footage and the images of bullets recovered from the victims matched the machine guns used by Israeli forces.

On multiple occasions, the IDF has allowed to fire what is called a “warning shot” with Palestinians approaching military positions near the aid distribution site. He also said he is investigating victim reports, but the findings so far have not been published.

According to Haaretz, the military advocacy general has directed the IDF’s general staff fact-finding assessment mechanism (thinking cases that include potential violations of war law) to investigate suspected war crimes near the aid site.

“An allegations of deviation from the law or IDF directive will be thoroughly considered and further action will be taken as necessary,” the IDF said Friday.

CNN has contacted the IDF for additional comments.

The Gaza aid site where the death occurred is run by the controversial Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) of Israeli-US Support. The group’s distribution was confusing from the beginning a month ago, with hopeless Palestinian crowds rushing through the site the moment they opened, often within an hour, before making available assistance.

The GHF was established to replace the UN aid distribution mechanism that Israel and the United States accused of looting Hamas. Hamas rejects these claims, and humanitarian groups say that most of the undispersed food aid reaches civilians.

As they returned from the Gaza Strip Aid Distribution Center on June 8, 2025, people will be transporting relief supplies from the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), a private US aid aid group that bypassed a long-standing, unpublished system of the territory.

The GHF coordinated with the Israeli military to designate specific routes for Palestinians traveling to aid sites, and has received acute criticism from aid experts. It acknowledges several episodes of violence occurring outside of immediate aid sites, but it repeatedly described it as “going through without any issues” with food distribution work.

In response to Haaretz’s report, the organization said it was “unaware” of the specific incident described. Nevertheless, “these allegations are too heavy to ignore, so we ask Israel to investigate them and make the results transparent and timely.”

On Thursday, the US State Department announced it would award $30 million to the organization. It says it is an ongoing sign of US support for the GHF, distributing 46 million meals in four weeks of operation.

Four economic indicators suggest that the next Bitcoin rally could approach

0

play

Bitcoin (Cryptography: BTC) Just as bonfires love dry pine needles, thrive with simple cash. Stacks up on the crater and flame. When you keep a pile, the glow fades quickly.

Currently, the set of four macro gauges suggests that central bankers, particularly the Federal Reserve, may be taking steps to create conditions for abrupt execution of crypto prices. Investors tracking these dials before the crowd often catch the next lift in Bitcoin, but everyone else is still discussing the headline.

1. Money Supply

Think of the wide range of US money supply (M2) as one of the many fuel tanks in the economy.

When this particular tank is full, there is a lot of cash in everything from home loans to speculative assets like Bitcoin. When it is shrinking, households and businesses are pulled back, and risky assets are struggling. Furthermore, as a rule of thumb, investors tend to be willing to make risky bets, like cryptocurrency, when money is easily reached.

After shrinking for months, M2 growth tested positive in early April. It is currently about 1% above last year’s level, according to the latest St. Louis Federal Reserve data.

It’s not a big jump, but history shows that the direction switch itself is important. All major 2010 and later Bitcoin rally began only after M2 stopped contracts. So be aware of its trajectory.

2. Bank preparation

Bank reserves are cash deposits that commercial banks keep parked in the federal government.

A high level of reserves means that banks can lend freely to each other and to many customers without worrying about the banks running out of funds. Cheap credits are good news for assets that thrive in liquidity, like Bitcoin.

Most of 2025 exceeded $3 trillion for most of 2025, far above the level that regulators calculate as comfortable. With so much of that cash sitting idle, banks have little reason to put the brakes on lending. Additionally, additional credits tend to flow towards the higher risk corner of the market.

In other words, as long as this situation continues, it will be a tailwind for Bitcoin.

3. Fed Balance Sheet

The Fed is shrinking its balance sheet. I have been selling the Ministry of Finance purchased during the pandemic stimulus. Usually there will be less dollars in circulation, usually strengthening your financial position and reducing your risk preference.

On March 19, the Fed said it would slow its outflow speed and cut the Treasury’s monthly cuts cap from $25 billion to $5 billion.

As the dollar reduces the pace of vacuuming, more liquidity shaking. And if the government continues to take on a strong borrowing, it could potentially revive balance sheet growth before 2026.

Such a change is similar to turning off the money vacuum and then turning on the money printer immediately afterwards. And Bitcoin loves it when the money printer is on.

4. Dollar Financing Costs

International money flows are also an important indicator for watching with Bitcoin, but they are a little more complicated than the other mechanisms discussed so far.

At the moment, large multinationals are able to borrow dollars and change to the euro with a discount of around 2%, trimming interest invoices overnight. If the money is cheap, some of the spare cash often leaks to high-risk assets, and in the second half of 2023 a similar setup helped to promote an 80% Bitcoin rally.

If the discount continues, it becomes another tailwind for the coin.

How to invest based on this information

These four signals rarely flash bright green at once.

Therefore, a savvy investor should slowly build a Bitcoin position while lacking enthusiasm. Dollar – Cost Average (DCAING) Tiny Weekly Buys is probably the best way to go here, as screaming about tariff wars and election dramas can help neutralize the risks of timing.

Alex Carchidi has a Bitcoin position. Motley Fool has a position and recommends Bitcoin. Motley Fools have a disclosure policy.

The Motley Fool is a partner at USA Today, providing financial news, analysis and commentary designed to help people control their financial lives. The content is produced independently of USA Today.

Do I need to invest $1,000 in Bitcoin now?

A miscellaneous fool’s offer: Consider this before purchasing inventory with Bitcoin.

Motley Fool Stock Advisor The analyst team has identified what investors believe to be the 10 best stocks to buy now. And Bitcoin wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that have made the cut could potentially generate monster returns over the next few years.

Consider when this list graces this list on December 17th, 2004… If you invest $1,000 in the recommendations, then $687,731! * Or if you want to make this list nvidiamade on April 15, 2005… If you invested $1,000 at the time of recommendation, you have $945,846.! *

Now it’s worth notingStock AdvisorThe total average return rate of 818% – outperformance that breaks the market compared to175%For the S&P 500. Don’t miss out on the latest Top 10 list that you can use when participatingStock Advisor.

View 10 shares »

How does Donald Trump’s approval rate compare to Obama’s Biden?

0


A recent approval rating poll shows Trump has received worse approval than his own average. His recognition rating is one of the lowest ranges in modern history.

play

  • President Trump’s approval rating is around 41%, slightly below the average of 45% in June.
  • His second term Trump’s approval rate is historically lower compared to other modern presidents.
  • A Reuters/Ipsos poll revealed that 84% of respondents expressed concern over the conflict with Iran.

President Donald Trump’s approval rating has been held almost steadily in recent weeks, but the polls released following his decision to bomb multiple nuclear sites in Iran offer the first glimpse into how the conflict affects Americans’ opinions about his work performance.

Two polls released this week showed the president with a 41% approval rate. This was about 45% below the average for June. The poll count comes from a CNN/SSRS survey released this week. It shows that the majority of Americans have disapproved of the president’s strike in Iran.

Through his return to the White House, Trump issued an onslaught of divisive and legally controversial enforcement actions. In these first months of this semester, his approval rating was historically low due to several measures. Look at how he is ranked compared to his previous president.

What is Trump’s approval rating?

A recent poll average from the New York Times shows Trump’s approval rate was 44% as of June 27th. Pollster Nate Silver’s “Silver Bulletin” newsletter calculated that the president had 45% approval and 52% disapproval on Friday, with the RealClearpolitics average being slightly higher, giving the president a 47% approval and a 51% disapproval rating.

A Quinnipiac University poll released on Thursday, June 26th showed Republican leaders had a 41% approval rate among respondents, with 54% disapproving. This is compared to the Quinnipiac poll released on June 11th, when 38% approved and 54% disapproved.

Respondents gave fewer marks than Trump in handling seven key issues.

What does the polls say about Trump’s decision to bomb Iran?

A Reuters/Ipsos poll released earlier this week gave Trump a similar 41% approval number. This is the lowest the vote found in his second and one term, falling one point from the beginning of the month. The poll began after a US airstrike in Iran on June 21, and ended on June 23 before Iran said it would attack a US air force base in Qatar. A Reuters/Ipsos survey gave him a 57% disapproval rating, with his stance on the economy and foreign policy opinions both falling to four points and 35% approval.

Approximately 84% of respondents said they were worried about the conflict. Thirty-two percent of respondents said they supported airstrikes from the US, while 49 percent said they opposed the idea, Reuters found.

How does Trump’s approval rating compare to his previous president?

Historical analysis by Gallup shows that his approval rating in Trump’s first few years’ office – both the 45th and 47th presidents are lower than other modern presidents at the same time in the administration.

In a Gallup poll conducted June 2-19, 40% approved Trump’s job performance. According to Gallup, here is how it is compared to other presidents in June of the first year of his term:

  • Joe Biden (June 2021) – 56% approval
  • Trump (June 2017) – 38% approval
  • Barack Obama (June 2009) – 61% approval
  • George W. Bush (June 2001) – 54% approval
  • Bill Clinton (June 1993) – 41% approval
  • George HW Bush (June 1989) – 70% approval
  • Ronald Reagan (June 1981) – 59% approval

Kinsey Crowley is a Trump Connect reporter for the USA Today Network. Contact her at kcrowley@gannett.com. Follow her on X and Tiktok @kinseycrowley or Bluesky @kinseycrowley.bsky.social.

Kathryn Palmer is a national trending news reporter for USA Today. You can contact her at kapalmer@usatoday.com and x @kathrynplmr.

RFK Jr. on the prohibition of fluoride: Probably “more cavities”

0


“It’s a balance. You’ll probably see a little more cavity,” Robert F. Kennedy Jr., secretary at Health and Human Service, said in Fox News.

play

Health and Human Services Director Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said Thursday that removing fluoride from public drinking water could result in more cavities.

“It’s balance,” Kennedy said in an interview with Fox News “Falkner Focus” on Thursday, June 26th, “You’ll probably see a little more cavity.

According to the 2018 fact sheet from the American Dental Association (ADA), fluorination is not banned in Europe. However, the BBC reports that adding fluoride to drinking water to drinking water is not widespread in European countries, but some European countries provide fluorescence of water. USA Today has contacted the ADA for more details.

Kennedy’s response came after anchoring Harris Faulkner and asking how removing fluoride from public drinking water would affect dentists and children who have no access to proper oral care.

Kennedy has pushed for banning fluoride in public drinking water. In a meeting with President Donald Trump in April, he said the more children accept fluoride, the more they get “silly.” Kennedy’s comments met with backlash.

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services did not immediately respond to additional comments when contacted by USA Today on Friday, June 27th.

What is fluoride?

Fluoride is a naturally occurring mineral found in many foods and water, and has long been thought to help prevent tooth decay, according to the Cleveland Clinic.

Throughout the day, the protective outer layer of teeth, known as enamel, breaks. Natural minerals within the enamel are broken down by bacteria, plaque and sugar. This is called decalcification. To regain these minerals, people must consume food and water containing chemicals such as fluoride, calcium and phosphates, says a Cleveland clinic. This is known as a re-wrapped item.

The Cleveland clinic says too much demineralisation and the re-5 is not sufficient, which can lead to tooth decay.

When did fluoride introduce water in the US?

(In 1945, Grand Rapids, Michigan, became the first city to freeze the water in its community, adjusting the existing levels of its supply of 1 million copies (ppm) of treatment.

Since then, levels have been adjusted to 0.7 milligrams per liter of water up to 0.7 ppm or 0.7 milligrams of water, which is considered to be the best way to prevent tooth decay.

The health risks of fluoride exposure require much higher concentrations, according to the American Dental Association. According to the Cleveland Clinic, to achieve fluoride toxicity by drinking treated water, you need to consume 5 liters of water per kilogram of body weight.

Where are fluorides prohibited in the US?

Utah and Florida ban fluoride from public drinking water in Utah in March and in May. Kennedy defends these states and is attempting to pass bans in Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Nebraska, South Carolina, North Dakota, Arkansas, Tennessee, Montana and New Hampshire.

The American Dental Association responds to the ban on fluoride

After Utah passed the fluoride ban in March, the ADA issued a statement that dentists “see the direct consequences of fluoride removal on patients.”

“When policymakers’ decisions hurt vulnerable children and adults in the long run, it’s a real tragedy. Those who blindly seek to ban fluorinated water will hurt people, spend money, and ultimately harm our economy.”

The ADA also points to research such as the 2024 study conducted by the University of Queensland.

This story has been updated to add information.

Contributions: Natalie Neisa Aland, Swapna Benugopal Ramaswamy, Mary Walras Holdridge, USA TODAY

Gretacross is a national trend reporter for USA Today. Story ideas? Please email her gcross@usatoday.com.

Are billionaires still gathering social security? Megas are exposed in abundance

0

play

Do billionaires qualify for Social Security benefits? The short answer is yes. Under current law, an individual’s wealth or current income level does not affect his eligibility to receive Social Security retirement benefits. In other words, even if you have $10 billion in assets, you can still qualify for Social Security as long as you meet the requirements.

The only two key factors governing eligibility for Social Security retirement benefits include age and work history. The former is simple. You must be at least 62 years old to begin receiving Social Security retirement benefits. The longer you wait for your profits to assert your age, the higher you will be up to age 70.

When it comes to work history, a short explanation is that you need to work in 40 calendar quarters (10 years) in Social Security employment to qualify for benefits. However, when calculating your profits, the Social Security Administration adjusts all your income for inflation and takes into account your 35 maximum earning years. However, it is important to recognize that even if you have not worked for more than 35 years, you are eligible to earn some kind of benefit based on your work records.

To keep the long story short, if a billionaire paid payroll tax and worked at a job at least 62 years old, he is eligible for Social Security Retirement Benefits.

How much does a billionaire earn from Social Security?

Of course, it is not clear exactly how many billionaires each retirement age billionaire will get from Social Security. There is no requirement to disclose this information.

That being said, I know that the biggest Social Security benefits for those who reach 70 in 2025 are $5,108 a month, or $61,296 a year. Many people mistakenly assume that billionaires will receive large social security benefits, but there is a cap on how much they can get, as only a certain amount of earned income is subject to Social Security Tax. To be clear, the maximum benefits are waiting for recipients to get the maximum Social Security Tax in at least 35 years and apply for retirement benefits until 70.

Certainly, billionaires are far more likely to make the most of Social Security than the average person. Many billionaires have easily met their 35-year revenue requirements and lack of money needs, so many wait as long as possible before insisting on retirement benefits.

Not all billionaires get social security

It is important to point out that eligible individuals are not. I have it To begin collecting social security at the age of 70. It’s the age where you stop getting late retirement credits that increase your profits. To be clear, if you are 70 and have not yet claimed Social Security, your interests will not start automatically. You still need to apply. Therefore, there is a full possibility that billionaires simply choose not to start collecting monthly checks.

It is also worth noting that not all billionaires are making the most of Social Security.

The reason is that it is based on social security. I made money Earnings from jobs and businesses where the person is actively involved. Not all billionaires have a lot of earnings. Many billionaires passively own the company or make most or all of their money from investment income, such as dividends and royalties, which are not considered for social security purposes. There is no Social Security payroll tax on these types of income and is not considered for benefit calculation purposes.

The bottom row means that billionaires who pay the system will collect Social Security benefits. Many people wait for 70 to start collecting, and if wealth is at least partially the result, billionaires may be entitled to the greatest possible benefits I made money money. But this is not necessarily the case. It is also possible that some prominent billionaires are not eligible for Social Security retirement benefits.

Motley Fools have a disclosure policy.

The Motley Fool is a partner at USA Today, providing financial news, analysis and commentary designed to help people control their financial lives. The content is produced independently of USA Today.

Most retirees with the $23,760 Social Security Bonus are completely overlooked

A miscellaneous fool’s offer: If you’re like most Americans, you’re a few years (or even more) behind your retirement savings. However, a few lesser known “social security secrets” can help ensure an increase in your retirement income.

One easy trick allows you to pay over $23,760 each year! Once we learn how to maximize Social Security benefits, we can retire with confidence in the peace of mind we want. participateStock AdvisorFor more information about these strategies, see

See “Social Security Secrets”»

Gov. Gavin Newsom sues Fox News for honor loss

0


California Gov. Gavin Newsom says he’s suing Fox News, which misunderstands viewers and says he’ll edit Trump videos to make Newsom look like a liar.

play

California Gov. Gavin Newsom has denounced Fox News for defamation in a $787 million lawsuit, saying he intentionally misinterpreted viewers during his immigration enforcement protest in his state.

The June 27 application was filed in federal court in Delaware, and Fox News reporters and hosts misrepresented what President Donald Trump said, editing a video of Trump’s comments to make the two men pretend to lie when they spoke during the event.

The case application repeatedly references a $787 million settlement agreed by Fox in 2023 after news networks repeated Trump’s claim that the 2020 election was stolen using equipment.

“If Fox News wants to lie to Americans on behalf of Donald Trump, it should face consequences – just like with Dominion.” “I think Americans should be able to trust the information they receive from major news outlets. I will continue to fight their propaganda machines until Fox is willing to be true.”

In a statement, Fox dismissed the lawsuit as “frivolous.”

“Gov. Newsom’s transparent propaganda stunts are frivolous and designed to cool free speech critical of him,” the statement reads. “We have a fierce defense of this incident and look forward to it being dismissed.”

According to the filing, Newsom brought the incident after Fox host Jesse Watters and reporter John Roberts allegedly lied to him the last time he spoke to Trump on the phone during a June protest in Los Angeles.

Newsom’s submission alleges he spoke with Trump for about 16 minutes on June 7, one day before he deployed 2,000 California National Guard members to Newsom’s objection to the Los Angeles protests.

“On June 7th, President Trump raised a demonstration in Los Angeles, which began that day, and neither discussed the use of the National Guard,” the submission said. And when Governor Newsom tried to discuss the situation in Los Angeles, President Trump steered the topic away.

Trump told reporters on June 10 that he spoke with Newsom, who said “a day ago.”

Newsom refuted Trump’s claims in a post on X, previously known as Twitter, saying that a few minutes later, “There were no phone calls, there were no voicemails. Americans should be wary that the president doesn’t even know who he’s talking to, even about deploying Marines on our streets.”

Newsom’s lawyers claim that Watters’ program will edit Trump’s video to support the president’s claims and make Newsom seem lying about their communications. They also claim that Roberts hedges Trump’s words to make him appear to be talking about the June 7th call, claiming Newsom is lying.

Newsom is appealing as an individual, not as his abilities as governor.

Newsom’s lawyers filed the case meets legal standards for defamation, claiming that it could harm the governor’s position with voters in future elections. Furthermore, they argue that it violates California’s unfair competition law, which prohibits “deceptive and unfair business practices.”

Supreme Court’s side with parents trying to avoid LGBTQ+ books

0

play

WASHINGTON – The split Supreme Court sided with a group of parents who wanted to remove elementary school children from their class when the LGBTQ+ character storybook was read in public schools.

In a 6-3 decision affecting public schools across the country, the court said on June 27 that Maryland public school districts refused to allow opt-outs to bear the right to exercise their religion freely.

The judge said schools must allow opt-out while legal challenges continue.

This case comes as one of the most well-known court terms of office, increasingly demanding comments about what their children are being taught in public schools. The ruling is also amid a wider move to curb the rights of LGBTQ+ people, with Republican-led state legislatures pushing for promoting censorship about LGBTQ+ history and culture in classrooms.

Writing for the majority, Judge Samuel Alito said the courts have long recognized the right of parents to direct religious development of their parents.

The book “doesn’t mind conveying certain perspectives on same-sex marriage and gender,” he said.

“And the (school) board of directors specifically encourages teachers to reinforce this perspective and rebel children for opposition,” he wrote.

In her opposition, Judge Sonia Sotomayor said the decision “threatening the nature of public education.”

“In fact, the courts constitutionalize the democratic process and the parent’s veto over curriculum choices that have long left to local managers,” she wrote. “You’ll feel the reverberation of court error, I’ve been afraid for generations.”

Parents in Maryland, including Muslims, Roman Catholics and Ukrainian orthodox followers, said they were not trying to prevent other students from reading the book.

However, defenders of freedom of speech argued that it would have a practical effect.

And the national organisation representing school administrators is concerned that schools will face religious rights claims of “dismaying diversity.”

Classes across the country teach the idea that children contradict family religious beliefs on a daily basis, a Montgomery County public school lawyer told the court during an oral debate in April.

Advisor Liberty, a religious freedom advocacy group, praised the verdict.

“This U.S. Supreme Court has once again supported the right of parents to direct education and provide the welfare of their children,” said Mat Staver, founder and chairman of the group.

“The initial amendment does not allow public schools to require families to sacrifice their religious beliefs in order for their children to attend school,” Staver said.

However, PFLAG National works to educate the public on LGBTQ+ issues and is called “heartbreaking.”

“This ruling does not erase what PFLAG parents, students and educators have known for a long time. And it is supported by a vast amount of research. All students benefit from the school environment that promotes inclusion, acceptance and respect.”

What is the controversial book?

Maryland school officials said they introduced several books to their reading curriculum, including LGBTQ+ characters at the beginning of the 2022-2023 school year as part of an effort to better reflect the community.

The Washington suburbs’ school system is one of the largest and most ethnic and religiously diverse in the country.

The controversial book includes a book in which a handsome prince falls in love with a knight who helps him defeat a dragon, not a princess. At another “Uncle Bobby’s Wedding,” Chloe’s favorite uncle marries another man.

The book, “The Crossing,” features nine children from various backgrounds, including Alejandra, who use wheelchairs while playing basketball. Adira is wearing a hijab in ballet class. Kate prefers the superhero cape to “skirt and ruffles.”

After various teachers, administrators and parents expressed concerns about the book’s effectiveness and age classification, the school system allowed students to be exempt when read in class.

However, authorities said it had to stop because the number of opt-out requests has been increasing, causing other issues, such as high absenteeism and the difficulty of arranging alternative guidance. They also said that when classmates leave the room when the book is read, the storybook represents them, and that their families could face social stigma and isolation.

Some parents said the book contradicts their beliefs

The parents who later sued said they did not need to send their children to private schools or homeschools to avoid instructions that violate their religion’s doctrine.

“It is immoral to intentionally trace back a young, impressive elementary school son to gender, sexuality, gender activities and curriculum that undermine Islamic teachings on these subjects and will be in conflict with the religious obligation to raise children according to their faith.”

However, a judge in the divided appeals court said that parents had not shown that they or their children were forced to believe or act in their religious views.

The parents asked the Supreme Court to intervene.

The Trump administration supported his parents, saying that schools “put a price on the public interest of public education at the expense of advancing your religious beliefs.”

This story has been updated with comments on the verdict.

Nvidia will regain the title of the most valuable company with AI momentum

0

Nvidia became the world’s most valuable company on Wednesday after its share price rose to $154.10, pushing its market value to $3.76 trillion. Reuters The chipmaker said it overtook Microsoft.

The rise follows a memo from Loop Capital, which increased Nvidia’s price target from $175 to $250. The company maintained its “buy” rating and said demand for generating AI could grow faster than expected.

“We enter the next ‘golden wave’ of Gen Ai Ai adoption, with Nvidia on the front end of another material leg that is stronger than expected demand,” says Loop Capital analyst Ananda Baruah.

Renewed interest in AI has sent investors back to high-tech stocks, particularly companies involved in chips and data infrastructure. Nvidia, which designs high-performance GPUs used in AI models, was a key figure in that trend.

Despite the strong performance of the stock, its valuation does not appear to be over-growing. Nvidia will trade at about 30 times its forecast revenue for next year, below the five-year average of 40 times. This suggests that analysts are increasing their forecasts as the company continues to provide greater profits.

Nvidia, Microsoft and Apple have been spinning in and out of all top spots of market value over the past year. Microsoft has made some recent advances, but Nvidia has regained its lead this week. Apple’s shares rose 0.4% on Wednesday, bringing its valuation to around $3 trillion.

Nvidia’s stock has risen in value by more than 60% since reaching lows in early April. That decline came during a wider sale caused by a tariff announcement from Donald Trump. Since then, the market has been stable and they want trade transactions that can reduce some of the pressure on the company.

The broader tech sector is also moving towards higher ratings. The S&P 500’s technology index rose 0.9% on Wednesday to a new record. In 2025, it has earned nearly 6% so far.

Tesla’s AI push surpasses self-driving cars

Tesla is best known for its electric vehicles, but in addition to building AI capabilities and the Robotaxi project, the company also tackles lesser-known work in robotics.

While many are focusing on the push for Tesla to launch self-driving ride services, CEO Elon Musk also talks about the wider future of AI. As A miscellaneous fool Highlighted, one example is Optimus, a humanoid robot developed by the company for its factory, potentially domestic use.

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang has recently highlighted the potential of this market, calling Humanoid Robotics a “multi-billion dollar industry.” He mentioned Tesla’s Optimus Project as one of the efforts that caught his attention.

Tesla looks at two main uses for Optimus. First, the robots are trained with machine learning and can assist the company’s own production line. Over time, it can take over more tasks, work without breaks, and increase factory power.

Second, Tesla was able to sell Optimus to other industries where labor is physically demanding. The robot can be adapted to more routine settings outside the factory. Musk says Optimus is ultimately more valuable than the company’s automotive business.

Other companies also work in this field. An Nvidia-backed startup, Diagram AI, is developing similar humanoid robots for use in factories. The demo video shows how the machine works with people, increasing the power output and reducing repetitive tasks.

What’s next for Tesla stock?

Tesla’s stock price rose almost 30%, partly due to Robotaxi’s rollout. The company began testing its services in Texas this week.

However, some analysts say its inventory may already be at its peak due to the short-term excitement of Optimus’s announcement. Tesla tends to move based on headings, and the same pattern could be applied to robots and Robotaxi projects.

Optimus could be a key part of Tesla’s future, but that’s too early. There remain important questions about how quickly the robot can scale, how it can compare with other options, and whether the company can turn the project into a real business.

Investors looking at Tesla’s AI plans may want to see more progress before placing a new bet.

(Photo: Mariia Shalabaeva)

See: Fakes No Act: A threat to AI DeepFakes Protection or Internet Freedom?

Want to learn more about AI and big data from industry leaders? Check out the AI ​​& Big Data Expo in Amsterdam, California and London. The comprehensive event will be held in collaboration with other major events, including the Intelligent Automation Conference, Blockx, Digital Transformation Week, and Cyber ​​Security & Cloud Expo.

Check out other upcoming Enterprise Technology events and webinars with TechForge here.

Russia has gathered 110,000 troops near the strategic city of Ukraine, Kiev says

0



CNN

Russia has gathered 110,000 troops near Pokrovsk as part of its efforts to take over the strategic eastern Ukrainian city, the Ukrainian military chief said on Friday.

Oleksandr Syrskyi said on Friday that the area around Pokrovsk is the “hottest place” along the 1,200-kilometer (745 miles) frontline that runs east.

The Russians had been trying to capture Pokrovsk for almost a year, making offensive attacks one after another. However, despite having distinct advantages in terms of the number of troops and weapons available, Moscow failed to take over the city.

Pokrovsk is a strategic target in Moscow. Russian President Vladimir Putin has made it clear that his goal is to partially occupy the eastern Ukraine regions of Donetsk and Luhansk.

Kiev and his allies accused Russian President Vladimir Putin of stagnating peace efforts, allowing his troops to seize more Ukrainian territory.

Although not a major city, Pokrovsk sits on the main supply roads and railways that connect with other military hubs in the region. Along with Kostiantynivka, Kramatorsk and Sloviansk, they will form the backbone of Ukrainian defence in parts of the Donetsk region, still under Kyiv’s control.

About 60,000 people lived in Pokrovsk before the war, but most have left in three years since Russia began its full-scale invasion in February 2022.

Ukraine’s last operating Koh mine was in Pokrovsk, and many of its employees were staying in the area to continue doing so. When they were forced to close early this year, they began to leave too.

The WAR Institute (ISW), a US-based conflict monitor, said Ukrainian defence operations in Pokrovsk late last year forced Russia to abandon its original plan to take over Pokrovsk in a frontal attack.

Residents are walking next to the apartment building that was hit by a Russian military strike at Pokrovsk Onapril 23 in 2025.

ISW said this was because Ukrainian forces began using drones as an integral part of their defensive strategy, consolidating drone operators and ground forces.

At the same time, Russia was unable to significantly increase the number of troops in the region as it was trying to contain the surprising invasion of Ukrainian troops into its own territory in the southern Kursk region.

Silsky told reporters last week that at one point, Kursk’s operations had pulled back nearly 63,000 Russian troops and around 7,000 North Korean troops.

“This has allowed us to reduce pressure on the enemy’s main fronts and reorganize our troops. And the capture of enemy Pokrovsk, announced in September 2024, has not yet happened thanks to Operation Kursk,” he said.

Instead of continuing to attack the cities directly, Russian forces began surrounding the cities from the south and northeast.

In its latest assessment on Friday, ISW said the Russian troops continue to attack with 1-2 soldiers’ small fires, sometimes motorcycles, with all-terrain vehicles and buggies.

In a statement issued Friday, Sirksky said Russia continued to plunge into the administrative borders of the Donetsk region.

“They want to do this not only for achieving some operational outcomes, but primarily for empirical purposes. To achieve psychological effects: to place the infamous “Russian soldier’s feet” there, plant the flag and trumpet another pseudo-‘Victory’,” he said.

Canada died in ice custody at Florida Detention Center

0


Johnny Noviero, 49, was found unresponsive at the Federal Detention Bureau of Prisons in Miami on June 23. Noviello is the eighth person to die in 2025 under ice custody.

play

Canadian officials are “urgently seeking more information” after a Canadian citizen died in detention at a Florida detention center.

Johnny Noviello, 49, said in a statement that he was found unresponsive at the Federal Detention Bureau of Prisons in Miami on June 23. Medical staff administered CPR, an automated external defibrillator shock, and was called 911, Ice said, but Noviello was declared dead by Miami Firefighters about 30 minutes after he was found.

According to Ice, the cause of Noviello’s death is still under investigation.

“Canadian consuls officers are urgently looking for more information from US authorities,” Foreign Minister Anita Anand told social media. “I sincerely sympathy to my family. To respect the privacy of their families, no details will be provided at this time.”

Noviero, who became a legal permanent resident in 1991, was convicted in 2023 of charges including assault and drug trafficking in Borussia County, Florida, Ice said. He was sentenced to 12 months in prison.

On May 15, he was arrested by ICE at the Probation Office and was charged with a notice appearing in “removable” for a controlled substance-related conviction.

Nobiero’s death comes as the Trump administration tightened immigration enforcement and sparked massive protests across the country.

According to agency data, Nobiero is the 10th person to die in 2025 under ice custody. These deaths include Haitian women who spent more than 10 weeks in immigration custody and were detained in inhumane circumstances.

“ICE remains committed to ensuring that all people under its custody exist in a safe, safe and humane environment,” the agency said. “Comprehensive medical care is provided throughout the entire stay when individuals arrive and are provided.”