Home Blog Page 446

This is why Costco is suing over tariffs.

0

good morning! I’m Daniel de Visé from Daily Money.

If the Supreme Court rules that President Donald Trump’s import tariffs are illegal, U.S. companies will receive refunds for at least some of the money they spend on taxes.

Costco is perhaps the most prominent retailer to sue for tax refunds. However, it can be a dangerous action.

SNAP benefits in jeopardy in some states

Below is an article explaining why some states may reduce food stamp benefits in the coming years due to impending changes to how the program is funded.

kids are buying more stocks

Finally, there is a report on the increase in stock investment by children. What stocks are they buying?

📰 Other stories you can’t miss 📰

Daniel de Visse covers personal finance for USA TODAY. Daily Money breaks down complex consumer and financial news. Subscribe here.

FBI agent fired for kneeling during racial justice protest sues bureau

0


The wrongful termination lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia names FBI Director Kash Patel as one of the defendants.

play

More than a dozen FBI agents are suing leaders at the bureau and the Justice Department, alleging they were wrongfully fired for kneeling during 2020 racial justice protests in connection with the police killing of George Floyd.

The wrongful termination suit, filed Monday, Dec. 8, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, alleges that the former agents, including three unnamed men and nine women, allege the firings were ordered by President Donald Trump’s administration.

It also alleges that FBI Director Kash Patel, who was named as a defendant in the case, pressured him to fire the defendants as soon as they were identified.

In addition to Patel and the department, the lawsuit also names Attorney General Pam Bondi as a defendant.

Floyd, a 46-year-old security guard from Minnesota, was killed in police custody in Minneapolis, sparking sometimes violent protests across the United States after a video surfaced of him pleading for air as a police officer kneeled on his neck. One of the four officers involved was charged and convicted of murder.

The lawsuit comes after a former top FBI official, former Acting Director Brian Driscoll, filed a lawsuit in September over their firings, alleging they were fired without cause in a “retaliatory campaign.”

The Dec. 8 complaint said investigators “made well-considered tactical decisions” on the day of the attack, including kneeling on the ground during protests, to quell tensions among rioters who confronted police and FBI agents.

According to Reuters, an FBI spokesperson declined to comment on pending litigation.

This story has been updated to add new information.

Contributed by: Reuters.

Natalie Neisa Alland is a senior reporter at USA TODAY. Contact her at nalund@usatoday.com and follow her at X @nataliealund.

Golden Globe nomination list led by ‘One Battle After Another’

0


“One Battle After Another” has been nominated for nine Golden Globes and is a frontrunner early this season.

play

  • “One Battle After Another” did well in the Golden Globe nominations announced on December 8th, and is emerging as an Oscar contender.
  • The Golden Globe Awards will be broadcast on January 11th on CBS and streamed on Paramount+ (8pm ET/5pm PT).
  • Leonardo DiCaprio, Emma Stone, and George Clooney were all nominated for the Golden Globe Award for Best Actor.

During Oscar season, “One Battle After Another” was nominated for nine Golden Globes, making it an early favorite.

The critically acclaimed film, directed by Paul Thomas Anderson, has been nominated for Best Comedy/Musical, as well as Best Actor for Leonardo DiCaprio and Best Actress for Chase Infinity at the 83rd Golden Globe Awards, which will announce this year’s nominees on December 8th. The January 11th ceremony, with returning host Nikki Glaser, will be broadcast live on CBS and streamed on Paramount+ (8 p.m. ET/5 p.m. PT). In the TV category, HBO’s The White Lotus topped the list with six nominations (including Best Drama Series), while Netflix’s Adolescence took home five nominations.

Best Motion Pictures and Dramas include “Sentimental Value” (8 total nominations), “Sinners” (7 nominations), “Hamnet,” “It Was an Accident,” “Frankenstein,” and “The Secret Agent.” The other big prize of the night was Best Comedy/Musical, which included “One Battle After Another,” “Marty Supreme,” “Bugonia,” “Blue Moon,” “No Other Choice” and “Nouvelle Vague.”

Michael B. Jordan is nominated for Best Motion Picture Drama Actor, along with Wagner Moura (The Secret Agent), Joel Edgerton (Train Dreams), Dwayne Johnson (Smashing Machines), Jeremy Allen White (Springsteen: Deliver Me From Nowhere), and Oscar Isaac (Frankenstein). Jessie Buckley (“Hamnet”) was nominated for best drama actress, along with Renate Reinsve (“Sentimental Value”), Jennifer Lawrence (“Die My Love”), Tessa Thompson (“Hedda”), Julia Roberts (“After the Hunt”) and Eva Victor (“Sorry Baby”).

Possible Oscar nominees DiCaprio and Timothée Chalamet (“Marty Supreme”) lead the nominations for Best Actor in a Comedy/Musical, with Ethan Hawke (“Blue Moon”), George Clooney (“Jay Kelly”), Jesse Plemons (“Bugonia”) and Lee Byung-hun (“No Other Choice”) also nominated. Cynthia Erivo has been nominated for Best Comedy/Musical Actress for the second year in a row and will be competing against Infinity, Rose Byrne (I Had Legs), Emma Stone (Bugonia), Amanda Seyfried (The Testament of Ang Lee) and Kate Hudson (Song San Bleu).

Erivo’s “Wicked” co-star Ariana Grande returns to the supporting cast, which also includes Emily Blunt (“Smashing Machines”), Teyana Taylor (“One Battle After Another”), Amy Madigan (“Weapons”) and “Sentimental Value” standouts Inga Ebsdotter Lillias and Elle Fanning (“Sentimental Value”). In addition to Benicio Del Toro and Sean Penn from the “One Battle After Another” duo, the race for Best Supporting Actor also includes Jacob Elordi (“Frankenstein”), Stellan Skarsgård (“Sentimental Values”), Paul Mescal (“Hamnet”) and Adam Sandler (“Jay Kelly”).

2026 Golden Globe Awards nominations in all categories:

movie

best drama

“Frankenstein”

“Hamnet”

“It was just an accident.”

“Secret Agent”

“Emotional value”

“Sinners”

best comedy or musical

“Blue Moon”

“Bugonia”

“Marty Supreme”

“There is no other choice.”

“New Wave”

“One battle after another”

Drama Leading Actor Award

Joel Edgerton “Train Dreams”

Oscar Isaac “Frankenstein”

Dwayne Johnson “The Smashing Machine”

Michael B. Jordan “Sinners”

Wagner Moura “The Secret Agent”

Jeremy Allen White “Springsteen: Deliver Me From Nowhere”

Drama Leading Actress Award

Jesse Buckley “Hamnet”

Jennifer Lawrence “Die My Love”

Renate Rheinwe “Sentimental Value”

Julia Roberts “After the Hunt”

Tessa Thompson “Hedda”

Eva Victor: “Sorry, baby”

Best Actor in a Comedy or Musical

Timothée Chalamet “Marty Supreme”

George Clooney “Jay Kelly”

Leonardo DiCaprio “One Battle After Another”

Ethan Hawke “Blue Moon”

Lee By Your

Jesse Plemons “Bugonia”

Best Actress in a Comedy or Musical

Rose Byrne: “If I had legs, I’d kick you.”

Cynthia Erivo “Wicked: For Good”

Kate Hudson “Son San Bleu”

Chase Infinity “One Battle After Another”

Amanda Seyfried “Ang Lee’s Testament”

Emma Stone “Bugonia”

Best Supporting Actor Award

Benicio Del Toro “One Battle After Another”

Jacob Elordi “Frankenstein”

Paul Mescal “Hamnet”

Sean Penn “One Battle After Another”

Adam Sandler “Jay Kelly”

Stellan Skarsgård “One Battle After Another”

Best Supporting Actress Award

Emily Blunt “The Smashing Machine”

Elle Fanning “Sentimental Value”

Ariana Grande “Wicked: For Good”

Inga Ebsdotter Lilias “Sentimental Value”

Amy Madigan “Weapons”

Teyana Taylor “One Battle After Another”

Best Director Award

Paul Thomas Anderson “One Battle After Another”

Ryan Coogler “Sinners”

Guillermo del Toro’s “Frankenstein”

Jafar Panahi: “It was just an accident”

Joachim Trier “Sentimental Value”

Chloe Zhao “Hamnet”

Best Screenplay Award

Chloe Zhao and Maggie O’Farrell, “Hamnet”

Jafar Panahi: “It was just an accident”

Ronald Bronstein and Josh Safdie “Marty Supreme”

Paul Thomas Anderson “One Battle After Another”

Eskil Vogt and Joachim Trier “Sentimental Value”

Ryan Coogler “Sinners”

Best Animated Film Award

“Arco”

“Demon Slayer: Kimetsu No Yaiba Infinity Castle”

“Elio”

“KPop Demon Hunters”

“Little Amelie, or the rain character”

“Zootopia 2”

Best non-English film

“It was just an accident.”

“There is no other choice.”

“Secret Agent”

“Emotional value”

“spirit”

“Voice of Hind Rajab”

Movies and box office results

“Avatar: Fire and Ash”

“F1: The Movie”

“KPop Demon Hunters”

“Mission: Impossible: Final Reckoning”

“Sinners”

“weapons’

“Wicked: For Good”

“Zootopia 2”

Best original song

“Dream As One” from Avatar: Fire and Ash (music and lyrics by Miley Cyrus, Andrew Wyatt, Mark Ronson, and Simon Frangren)

“Golden” from “KPop Demon Hunters” (Music: Joon Gyu Kwak, Yu Han Lee, Hee Dong Nam, Jeong Hoon Seo, Park Hon Jun, Lyrics: Kim Eunjae (EJAE), Mark Sonnenblick)

“I Lied to You” from “Sinners” (music and lyrics by Rafael Saadik and Ludwig Göransson)

“No Place Like Home” from “Wicked: For Good” (music and lyrics by Stephen Schwartz)

“The Girl in the Bubble” from “Wicked: For Good” (music and lyrics by Stephen Schwartz)

“Train Dreams” from “Train Dreams” (music and lyrics by Nick Cave and Bryce Dessner)

best original score

Alexandre Desplat “Frankenstein”

Ludwig Göransson “The Sinner”

Jonny Greenwood “One Battle After Another”

Kangin Ray “Sirat”

Max Richter “Hamnet”

Hans Zimmer “F1: The Movie”

tv set

best drama

“Diplomat”

“The Pit”

“more”

“cut”

“Slow horse”

“White Lotus”

best comedy or musical

“Abbott Elementary School”

“The Bear”

“hack”

“No one wants this.”

“Only murders inside the building.”

“The Studio”

Best Limited/Anthology Series or TV Movie

“puberty”

“It’s all her fault”

“The beast inside me”

“Black Mirror”

“I’ll die for sex”

“Girlfriend”

Drama Leading Actor Award

Sterling K. Brown “Paradise”

Diego Luna “Andor”

Gary Oldman “Slow Horses”

Mark Ruffalo “Tusk”

Adam Scott “Severance”

Noah Wyle “The Pit”

Drama Leading Actress Award

Kathy Bates “Matlock”

Britt Lauer “Severance”

Helen Mirren “Mobland”

Bella Ramsey “The Last of Us”

Keri Russell “The Diplomat”

Rare Seahorn “Pull Rib”

Best Actor in a Comedy Category

Adam Brody: “No one wants this”

Steve Martin “Only Murders in the Building”

Glen Powell “Chad Powers”

Seth Rogen “The Studio”

Martin Short “Murder Inside the Building”

Jeremy Allen White “The Bear”

Best Actress in a Comedy Category

Kristen Bell: “No one wants this”

Ayo Edebiri “The Bear”

Selena Gomez “Only Murders in the Building”

Natasha Lyonne “Poker Face”

Jenna Ortega “Wednesday”

Gene Smart “Hax”

Best Actor in a Limited Series

Jacob Elordi “The Narrow Road to the Deep North”

Paul Giamatti “Black Mirror”

Stephen Graham “Adolescence”

Charlie Hunnam “Monster: The Ed Gain Story”

Jude Law “Black Rabbit”

Matthew Rhys “The Beast Inside Me”

Best Actress in a Limited Series

Claire Danes “The Beast in Me”

Rashida Jones “Black Mirror”

Amanda Seyfried “Long Bright River”

Sarah Snook: “It’s all her fault”

Michelle Williams “Dying for Sex”

Robin Wright “The Girlfriend”

Best Supporting Actor Award

Owen Cooper “Adolescence”

Billy Crudup “The Morning Show”

Walton Goggins “White Lotus”

Jason Isaacs “The White Lotus”

Tramell Tillman “Severance”

Ashley Walters “Adolescence”

Best Supporting Actress Award

Carrie Coon “White Lotus”

Erin Doherty “Adolescence”

Hannah Einbinder “Hux”

Catherine O’Hara “The Studio”

Parker Posey “The White Lotus”

Amy Lou Wood “The White Lotus”

Best stand-up comedy performance

Bill Maher, “Bill Maher: Is anyone else watching this?”

Brett Goldstein “Brett Goldstein: The Second Greatest Night of My Life”

Kevin Hart: “Kevin Hart: Acting in My Time”

Kumail Nanjiani “Kumail Nanjiani, Thoughts of the Night”

Ricky Gervais “Ricky Gervais: Mortality”

Sarah Silverman “Sarah Silverman: Postmortem”

best podcast

“Armchair Expert with Dax Shepard”

“Call her daddy.”

“Be good friends with Amy Poehler.”

“Mel Robbins Podcast”

“Smartless”

“First things first.”

carol burnett award

sarah jessica parker

Cecil B. DeMille Award

helen mirren

Self-checkout theft is on the rise. The reason may be surprising.

0

play

More shoppers are stealing from self-checkouts, and you might be surprised at what they’re stealing.

In a new study by Lending Tree, 27% of respondents admitted to stealing something from a self-checkout without paying for it. Almost half of the more than 2,000 respondents, or 47%, said unaffordable necessities and price increases due to tariffs (46%) were the main motivations for theft.

Self-checkout lanes at grocery and retail stores are convenient for shoppers and help businesses save on labor costs.

However, some self-checkout registers have no employee supervision or only one employee at multiple registers, which can increase the potential for theft.

Key reasons for shoplifting suggest an affordability crisis

The fact that shoppers are admitting to stealing essential items rather than expensive items like electronics is a sign that Americans are suffering from an affordability crisis, Matt Schultz, chief consumer finance analyst at Lending Tree, told USA TODAY.

The percentage of people admitting self-checkout theft has also increased by 12% since Lending Tree last conducted the survey in 2023.

“This is yet another confirmation that many people are still truly suffering from high prices,” Schulz said. “There are definitely a lot of people who are doing well, but there are also a lot of people in this country who are really struggling to make a living.”

Overall retail store theft is on the rise.

In an October 2025 report by the National Retail Federation, retailers reported that overall shoplifting and product theft incidents increased by an average of 26% from 2022 to 2023, and an additional 19% from 2023 to 2024. The report looked at all types of shoplifting, but there was no universal method.

Retailers must weigh the potential loss against the appeal of providing convenience to shoppers.

“While self-checkout can provide consumers with added convenience during their shopping experience, it can also present retailers with the same vulnerabilities as other checkout options, including errors and loss,” David Johnston, vice president of asset protection and retail operations at the National Retail Federation, told USA TODAY. “Retailers are considering this and several other factors to prevent losses and provide consumers with a positive shopping experience.”

Some self-checkout locations will be changed.

As USA TODAY previously reported, some retailers are changing or eliminating self-checkout offerings.

In 2024, Target will begin limiting the number of items in self-checkout areas to 10 items. Dollar General and Five Below executives also said they will reduce the number of self-checkout stations in 2024. Walmart will also remove self-checkout machines from some of its stores in 2024 and dedicate some lanes to Walmart+ or its Spark delivery service. Sam’s Club has installed a Scan & Go system in all warehouse stores. This allows shoppers to scan items with the app and avoid self-checkouts and traditional checkout lanes.

Representatives for Walmart and Sam’s Club confirmed to USA TODAY that there are no new updates to the information reported in the previous article. Representatives for Target, Dollar General and Five Below did not respond to emails seeking comment by USA TODAY’s deadline.

Neil Saunders, a retail analyst at research and analytics firm GlobalData, said self-checkout theft remains a big problem.

“This is one of the reasons why some retailers are moving away from self-checkout and others are putting more restrictions in place, including video surveillance and increased staffing in the area,” Sanders told USA TODAY.

But Sanders said, “It’s unlikely that self-checkout will disappear completely. Retailers like it because it reduces labor costs, and some consumers like it because it’s convenient and efficient.”

In the future, artificial intelligence could be used more to scrutinize self-checkout behavior and purchases to detect criminal activity, he said.

How do people feel about self-checkout?

Other key findings regarding self-checkout from Lending Tree’s research include:

Self-checkout is popular: 55% of respondents said they like self-checkout for speed and convenience, and 69% of those who use self-checkout say they think it makes it easier for theft. Older users are most likely to find the system useful, with 77% of baby boomers and 70% of Gen Xers responding.

Younger shoppers are more likely to steal: 41% of Millennial shoppers and 37% of Gen Z surveyed said they had intentionally stolen from a self-checkout at least once. Additionally, 36% of users said they accidentally left an item behind that wasn’t scanned. While some people may end up going back to the store, 61% of shoppers who said they took something by mistake kept it. Men were also more than twice as likely to steal as women (38% vs. 16%).

◾Why do people steal? In addition to saying the current financial climate is making essential items unaffordable (47%) and tariffs are increasing prices (46%), 39% of shoppers say they feel prices are unfair or too high. Of those who think they will steal again, 60% say they are most likely to steal essential items such as food, water, and health care products.

Only some people regret it: 46% of people who intentionally steal say they’ve been caught, and 31% say they don’t regret it. Of those who stole from a self-checkout, 55% said they would do it again.

Betty Lin-Fisher is a consumer reporter for USA TODAY. Contact her at blinfisher@USATODAY.com or follow her at @blinfisher on X, Facebook or Instagram and @blinfisher.bsky.social on Bluesky.. Sign up for our free The Daily Money newsletter, breaking down complex consumer and financial news. Subscribe here.

Paramount attempts hostile takeover of Warner Bros. Discovery

0

play

Paramount Skydance on Monday launched a hostile bid worth $108.4 billion for Warner Bros. Discovery in a last-ditch effort to create a media powerhouse that would surpass Netflix and challenge the streaming giant’s dominance.

Netflix won a week-long bidding war with Paramount and Comcast on Friday, securing a $72 billion stock deal for Warner Bros. Discovery’s television, film studio and streaming assets. But Paramount’s latest move means that the partnership with Warner Bros. and its prized HBO and DC Comics properties won’t be concluded any time soon.

Netflix’s proposal would have come with a $5.8 billion penalty and potentially faced increased antitrust scrutiny. President Donald Trump questioned the proposal over the weekend. The bid has already drawn harsh criticism from bipartisan lawmakers and Hollywood unions over concerns it could lead to job cuts and higher prices for consumers.

The twists and turns of Warner Bros.’ Discovery story

But Paramount’s bid could also face its own level of scrutiny. The Paramount-Warner Bros. merger would strengthen the company’s dominant position in the studio business, but some fear it could lead to job losses as the industry rapidly consolidates.

Reuters previously reported, citing sources familiar with the matter, that Paramount had raised its offer for the entire company to $30 a share on Thursday, but Warner Bros.’ board had concerns about raising the money.

play

How will Hollywood change if Netflix buys Warner Bros.

Netflix has announced that it will acquire Warner Bros., the legendary Hollywood studio that includes HBO and HBO Max, in a deal worth $72 billion.

“Warner Bros.’ Discovery deal isn’t over yet,” said Ross Venez, senior analyst at eMarketer. “Netflix is ​​in the driver’s seat, but there will be twists and turns to get there. Paramount will likely appeal to shareholders, regulators and politicians to try to block Netflix. It could be a long battle.”

The company sent a letter to Warner Bros. questioning the sale process, claiming that the company had waived a fair bidding process and decided Netflix was the winner.

This was followed by reports that Warner Bros. executives spoke negatively about Paramount’s offer, calling the Netflix deal a “slam dunk.”

Paramount CEO hints at ‘bias against our company’

Paramount CEO David Ellison said in an interview with CNBC on Monday that the bid had “inherent bias” against the company. “We will be the largest investor in this deal, and the reason we are literally sitting here today is because we are fighting for our shareholders, and we are also fighting for the shareholders of Warner Bros. Discovery,” Ellison said in an interview with CNBC.

Some analysts and industry experts believe Paramount is the best candidate to buy Warner Bros. Discovery, given Ellison’s deep pockets and the backing of his father, Oracle co-founder and second-richest man Larry Ellison, who has close ties to the Trump administration.

Paramount has made multiple offers since September, seeking to create an entertainment powerhouse that could compete with tech giants like Netflix and Apple, which has expanded into media but faced rejection.

Although Paramount remains one of Hollywood’s major studios, its box office performance has been spotty, with occasional franchise wins offset by periods in which it trailed Disney, Universal, and Warner Brothers in U.S. market share.

Bloomberg News reported that President Trump met with Netflix co-CEO Ted Sarandos in mid-November and told Warner Bros. executives they should sell to the highest bidder.

Morningstar analysts said the combined company would have significant overlap and combined streaming revenue would decline unless Netflix doubles its price or operates a separate platform.

Sarandos sought to allay antitrust concerns, saying the deal would increase value for consumers, shareholders and talent, and said Netflix was “very confident” in the regulatory process.

Analysts said Netflix’s motivation is to secure exclusive, long-term control over premium IP and reduce its reliance on outside studios as it expands into gaming, live entertainment and the broader consumer ecosystem.

Access to WBD’s vast IP treasure trove would immediately give Netflix credibility, audience reach and merchandising potential for its gaming ambitions, an area where Netflix is ​​still building original content and brand recognition.

Enterprise users can exchange AI pilots for tighter integration

0

According to OpenAI, enterprise AI has graduated from the sandbox and is now used in daily operations with tight workflow integration.

New data from the company shows that companies are now assigning complex, multi-step workflows to models, rather than simply requiring a text summary. These diagrams illustrate a major shift in the way organizations are implementing generative models.

OpenAI’s platform currently serves more than 800 million users each week, with a “flywheel” effect that familiarizes consumers with professional environments. The company’s latest report states that more than 1 million enterprise customers are currently using these tools, and the goal is even tighter integration going forward.

This evolution presents two realities to decision makers. Although productivity gains are tangible, the widening gap between “frontier” adopters and median firms suggests that value is highly dependent on intensity of use.

From chatbots to deep reasoning

The best metric for determining a company’s implementation maturity is task complexity, not seat count

OpenAI reports an 8x year-over-year increase in ChatGPT message volume, but a better indicator for enterprise architects is the consumption of API inference tokens, which suggests deeper integration is taking place. This number has increased nearly 320x per organization. This is evidence that companies are systematically building more intelligent models into their products to handle logic rather than basic queries.

The rise of configurable interfaces supports this view. Weekly users of Custom GPT and Custom Projects (tools that allow employees to direct models with specific organizational knowledge) have increased approximately 19x this year. Approximately 20% of all corporate messages are now processed through these customized environments, making standardization a prerequisite for professional use.

For company leaders auditing the ROI of AI seats, the data provides evidence of time savings. On average, users believe this technology saves them 40 to 60 minutes per active day. Effects vary depending on the type of job. Data science, engineering, and communications professionals report even greater savings (60-80 minutes per day on average).

Beyond efficiency, software is changing the boundaries of roles. There are certain implications for technical capabilities, especially regarding code generation.

OpenAI says enterprise users are seeing an increase in coding-related messages across all business functions. Coding queries for non-engineering, IT, and research roles have increased by an average of 36% over the past six months. Non-technical teams are using this tool to perform analysis that previously required professional developers.

Business improvements spread throughout the department. Survey data shows that 87% of IT professionals report faster problem resolution and 75% of HR professionals see an increase in employee engagement.

The widening enterprise AI capability gap

OpenAI’s data suggests a divide is emerging between organizations that simply provide access to tools and those where integration is deeply embedded in their operating models. The report identifies “frontier” workers, or workers at the 95th percentile of adoption intensity, who generate six times more messages than the median worker.

This disparity is evident at the organizational level. Frontier companies generate approximately twice as many messages per sheet as the median company and seven times as many messages for custom GPT. Larger companies aren’t just using tools more frequently; They are investing in the infrastructure and standardization needed to make AI a permanent part of their operations.

Users who tackle a variety of tasks (approximately seven types) report saving five times more time than those who limit their usage to three or four basic functions. Benefits are directly correlated to intensity of usage, suggesting that a “light touch” implementation plan may not achieve the expected ROI.

Professional services, finance, and technology sectors were early adopters and remain the biggest adopters, but other industries are doing their best to catch up. The technology sector leads with 11x year-over-year growth, followed by healthcare and manufacturing with 8x and 7x growth, respectively.

The global adoption pattern also challenges the notion that this is simply a US-centric phenomenon. International usage is rapidly increasing, with business customer growth exceeding 140% year over year in markets such as Australia, Brazil, the Netherlands, and France. Japan has also emerged as an important market with the largest number of corporate API customers outside the US.

OpenAI: Tight AI integration accelerates enterprise workflows

Case studies highlight how these tools impact key business metrics. Retailer Lowe’s implemented an employee tool in more than 1,700 stores, resulting in a 200 basis point improvement in customer satisfaction scores when employees used the system. Additionally, when online customers utilized the retailer’s AI tools, conversion rates more than doubled.

In the pharmaceutical space, Moderna used enterprise AI to speed up the creation of target product profiles (TPPs), a process that typically takes weeks of cross-functional effort. The company shortened core analysis steps from weeks to hours by automating the extraction of key facts from large packs of evidence.

Financial services company BBVA leveraged this technology to fix bottlenecks in corporate signature authority legal verification. By building a generative AI solution to handle standard legal queries, the bank automated over 9,000 queries per year, effectively freeing up the equivalent of three full-time employees for higher-value tasks.

However, moving to production-grade AI requires more than just software procurement. It requires organizational preparation. The main hurdle for many organizations is no longer the functionality of the model, but its implementation and internal structure.

Leading companies consistently enable tight system integration by turning on connectors that provide models with secure access to corporate data. However, approximately one in four companies do not take this step, limiting their models to general knowledge rather than specific organizational contexts.

Successful implementation requires executive support to set explicit mandates and encourage the codification of organizational knowledge into reusable assets.

As technology continues to evolve, organizations must adjust their approach. According to data from OpenAI, success now depends on delegating complex workflows with deep integrations and treating AI as the primary engine of revenue growth for enterprises, rather than just looking for output.

See also: AWS re:Invent 2025: Frontier AI agents replace chatbots

Banner for AI & Big Data Expo by TechEx event.

Want to learn more about AI and big data from industry leaders? Check out the AI ​​& Big Data Expo in Amsterdam, California, and London. This comprehensive event is part of TechEx and co-located with other major technology events including Cyber ​​Security Expo. Click here for more information.

AI News is brought to you by TechForge Media. Learn about other upcoming enterprise technology events and webinars.

How winter coats pose a danger to children in car seats

0

play

Did you know that winter coats can be harmful to small children in car seats?

Winter coats can pose a safety risk for car seats. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, thick coats can prevent a harness from properly fitting a child.

NHTSA recommends removing the outer layer to reduce the risk of the harness coming loose.

Instead, children should wear a “lightweight fleece layer” under the harness, and parents should “place a blanket or coat around the child after securing the harness snugly for additional warmth,” NHTSA said.

NHTSA says the harness is “sufficiently snug when excess material cannot be tucked into the shoulders.”

Size and position of car seats and booster seats are important

Car seats and booster seats are intended to “protect” children and infants in the event of an accident, but car crashes remain the leading cause of death for children ages 1 to 13, according to NHTSA.

According to NHTSA, 43% of children killed in car crashes in 2023 were not properly restrained.

“Whenever you transport a child in a vehicle, it is important to select the appropriate seat and use it correctly,” NHTSA said.

NHTSA states that rear-facing child seats are “the best seats for use by young children.”

The seat is harness-activated, and in the event of a crash, the rear-facing car seat “cradles and transports” the infant, “reducing stress on the child’s fragile neck and spinal cord,” NHTSA said.

NHTSA recommends keeping children in rear-facing child seats “for as long as possible,” and NHTSA is aimed at children ages 1 to 3.

“This is the best way to protect patient safety,” NHTSA said. “Children should remain in a rear-facing child restraint until they reach the height or weight limits allowed by the child restraint manufacturer.”

Forward-facing child seat recommended

NHTSA recommends moving from rear-facing child seats to forward-facing child seats.

Made with a guard around the headrest similar to an airplane seat, the L-shaped forward-facing child seat works with a tether and harness over the child’s shoulders.

Recommended for children ages 4 to 7, children should remain in a forward-facing car seat until they reach the weight or height limit allowed by the car seat brand.

NHTSA said children ages 8 to 12 should be seated in booster seats.

Booster seats intended to support a child at the height of the seat belt must ensure that the belt fits properly over the upper thighs and lies snugly against the shoulders and chest.

Gov. Tim Walz’s daughter hits back at President Trump over ‘R’ slur on TikTok

0

play

Tim Walz’s daughter fired back on social media in a now-deleted post over the weekend, claiming that her family was thrown into turmoil after President Donald Trump called her father the “R” word.

More than a year after her father became the Democratic Party’s vice presidential nominee, the daughter of a Minnesota governor and her brother, who has a nonverbal learning disability, expressed anger in a since-deleted TikTok post, calling President Trump’s rhetoric disgraceful.

“I’m talking about this because my family and I are always going to be the bigger person, but the president calling my dad what he did has sparked a storm of (expletives) regarding offensive words towards me and my family, especially my brother,” the 24-year-old social media star wrote in a Dec. 6 post, also reported by multiple outlets, including the New York Post and The Hill.

According to the outlet, the TikTok post continued, “Some people send me DMs saying absolutely horrible things.” “When I was home last week, someone drove by and yelled that we were the R-word,” she added. “What kind of (expletive) world do we live in? Shame on you, everyone.”

“You can call me whatever you want. When it’s gas, you can call me daddy or mommy, (expletive) no,” the governor’s daughter said in the video. “I dealt with people who called last August and now they’re calling me again? No.”

USA TODAY has reached out to Tim Walz’s office and his daughter.

Trump and the “R-word”

Late last month, President Trump posted a series of anti-immigrant messages on social media that included the same slur.

A Nov. 27 post on the President’s Truth social account reads, “A very happy Thanksgiving to all of you great Americans and patriots who graciously allowed our country to be divided, confused, dissected, murdered, beaten, robbed, and laughed at for being ‘politically correct’ and for being total idiots when it comes to immigration, and to all the other stupid countries around the world.”

In the post, President Trump, 79, referred to Walz, 61, as the “R-word,” which was once used to describe the medically mentally ill but was later used as a bullying slur.

Contributor: Kinsey Crowley, USA TODAY

Natalie Neisa Alland is a senior reporter at USA TODAY. Contact her at nalund@usatoday.com and follow her at X @nataliealund.

Golden Globe Awards downplays ‘Wicked’ Jennifer Lopez with 2026 nominations

0


Here are the most surprising stars who missed out on nominations and will be absent from this year’s Golden Globes.

play

  • Not everyone was honored to be nominated, with Jennifer Lopez, Sidney Sweeney and Daniel Day-Lewis all being shut out when the 2026 Golden Globe nominations were announced.
  • The Golden Globe Awards will be broadcast live on January 11th on CBS and streamed on Paramount+.
  • Nikki Glazer will return as host of the Golden Globe Awards for the second year in a row.

With such a complete lineup for the Golden Globes, some detractors may raise their eyebrows.

This year, many major awards heavy hitters, including “One Battle After Another,” “Sinners,” and “Sentimental Value,” have cast multiple actors in their bid for gold. Some of these movie stars, such as Regina Hall (One Battle After Another) and Delroy Lindo (Sinners), missed out on well-deserved Globe nominations, as did megastars Sidney Sweeney (The Christie) and Daniel Day-Lewis (Anemone), whose Oscar campaigns fell apart shortly after their laudable film festival debuts. Box office receipts.

These are the most surprising names absent from next month’s show (8 p.m. ET/5 p.m. PT), which airs live on January 11 on CBS and Paramount+.

“Wicked: For Good”

Perhaps the most shocking snub in this year’s lineup was the surprise nominations for Richard Linklater’s Blue Moon and Nouvelle Vague, with the sequel to Wicked left out of the Globes’ Best Musical or Comedy category. The Jon M. Chu-directed fantasy musical received mediocre reviews compared to last year’s blockbuster, but the Oz prequel still continues to cast box office magic. “Wicked” stars Cynthia Erivo and Ariana Grande were also nominated for their roles as Elphaba and Glinda, and the film also won two nominations for best original song (“No Place Like Home” and “The Girl in the Bubble”).

sidney sweeney

The polarizing young star earned a standing ovation and rave reviews from the Toronto Film Festival for his transformation in “Christy,” a sports biopic about real-life boxer Christy Martin. However, the film’s glowing reviews were overshadowed by box office flops and headlines about Sweeney’s controversial American Eagle Jeans campaign, and it ultimately failed to be a starter this year’s awards season.

Will Arnett and Laura Dern appear on ‘Is This Sing On?’

Bradley Cooper directed two film awards heavyweights in 2018’s A Star Is Born and 2023’s The Maestro, both of which earned him multiple Oscar and Globe nominations across categories. But the actor-turned-filmmaker turned his attention to the wittier, lighter drama “Is This Sing On?”, about a man (Arnett) who turns to stand-up comedy after breaking up with his wife (Dern). ‘ Then you might not be so lucky. Neither Arnett nor Dern made it into the drama acting category, and the film was completely canceled.

hugh jackman

The Australian showman is in the Oscar campaign with Song San Bleu, an entertaining but middling biopic about Mike and Claire Sardina who fronted the Neil Diamond tribute band Lightning & Thunder. Hudson was nominated for Best Actress for her portrayal of a singer stricken by tragedy, but Jackman’s dramatic turn was ignored by the Globes.

Shigesaku Bunmi

“Sinners”‘ outstanding work gained awards momentum last week, winning Best Supporting Actor at the Gotham Awards and earning a Critics’ Choice Award nomination. But the Nigerian-British breakout was passed over in the Globe nominations, with Emily Blunt (Smashing Machines) surprising in the supporting actress category.

Rachel Zegler

Say what you like about Disney’s much-maligned “Snow White.” Zegler was absolutely charming in this live-action reimagining, bringing courage and warmth to the two-dimensional character. In a year lacking in true comedies and musicals, voters may have given the Golden Globe-winning “West Side Story” star some room.

daniel craig

Craig has been nominated for the Golden Globe Award for Best Actor three times, including two for the film Knives Out. However, his most recent role as Southern detective Benoît Blanc in “Wake Up Dead Man” was mysteriously omitted from this year’s nominations. If I had to guess, there might have been some category confusion, with Craig’s idiosyncratic detective taking a backseat to Josh O’Connor’s reformed bad boy priest.

jennifer lopez

There’s an alternate universe where Lopez gets her coveted first Oscar nomination for Kiss of the Spider-Woman, and she soars with some of the most spectacular song and dance in years. But the big screen musical was a box office disaster, and her snub at the Globes sadly feels like the nail in the coffin for her chances this season.

gwyneth paltrow

In Marty Supreme, the Oscar winner gives a true movie star performance as a fading icon who can’t shake off Timothée Chalamet’s mean-spirited socialite climber. But even Paltrow couldn’t make it into this year’s most competitive category. Multiple supporting actress candidates were vying for spots in “Sinners,” “Sentimental Value,” and “One Battle After Another.”

dakota johnson

In a less crowded year, Johnson would be a Globe winner for his harrowing work as a New York matchmaker in The Materialist, one of the year’s few box-office phenomenon indie films. However, as there were many flashy performances in the comedy and musical categories, Johnson’s thoughtful performance was not noticed.

Liam Neeson

If you need further proof that the awards engine is broken, look no further than Neeson’s inspiration for the rebooted “The Naked Gun.” Funny parodies were nowhere to be found in this season’s nominations, but dramatic twists from Jesse Plemons (“Bugonia”) and George Clooney (“Jay Kelly”) slipped into the comedy categories.

Roofman starring Channing Tatum and Kirsten Dunst

Perhaps due to poor marketing and a crowded opening weekend, this kind-hearted charmer has largely disappeared from the Oscar conversation, save for a supporting actress nomination for Dunst at the Independent Spirit Awards. It’s a shame, since both Dunst and Tatum are doing the best work of their careers in this modest true story, which was completely blanked at the Globes.

Jeremy Strong

In the afterglow of the fall festivals, Strong seemed poised to curry favor with Jeremy Allen White in the grim biopic “Springsteen: Deliver Me From Nowhere.” Strong was a highlight of the film as Jon Landau, Bruce Springsteen’s attentive manager, but unfortunately the Succession actor dropped out on the morning of the Globe nominations.

Zoran Mamdani moves into Gracie Mansion for New York mayor’s term

0

play

New York City’s next mayor, Zoran Mamdani, shared in a social media post that he and his wife will be moving into the Gracie Mansion, the city’s top leader’s historic residence on the East River.

Mamdani, 34, announced her decision to move there in a Dec. 8 Instagram post alongside a photo of a miniature replica of the mansion on display at the New York Botanical Garden.

“I went to the New York Botanical Garden train show last week and saw our new home!” he wrote. “My wife Rama and I have decided to move to Gracie Mansion in January.”

He said he was making the move for safety reasons and is “committed to enacting the affordability agenda that New Yorkers voted for.”

It’s customary for mayors to live in their Upper East Side homes, but it’s a big change for Mamdani and his wife, Rama Duwaj. The two have lived in a one-bedroom rent-stabilized apartment in Astoria, Queens, for several years. His living situation became a heated topic during the campaign, with rival former Gov. Andrew Cuomo attacking him, arguing that the state lawmaker’s $142,000 salary was too much to live in a rent-stabilized apartment. The New York Times reported that Mr. Cuomo himself once lived in rent-stabilized housing.

Mamdani has put affordability at the center of his successful mayoral campaign, advocating for a rent freeze on the city’s roughly 1 million rent-stabilized housing units.

At 226 years old, Gracie Mansion is one of the oldest surviving wooden structures in the five boroughs. Spanning over 10,000 square feet, it features five bedrooms, a ballroom, and beautiful views of the East River. It also marks a major change for the neighborhood for the mayor-elect, who has lived in Queens for several years, including during a four-year term in the New York State Assembly representing Astoria.

“We miss our home in Astoria. Cooking dinner side by side in the kitchen, riding sleepy elevators in the evenings with our neighbors, listening to the music and laughter vibrating through the walls of our apartment,” Mamdani wrote. “To Astoria: Thank you for showing me the best of New York City.”

Gracie Mansion became the official residence of the Mayor of New York City in 1942, when Mayor Fiorello H. LaGuardia and his family moved there. Billionaire former mayor Michael Bloomberg famously refused to live in a mansion, choosing instead to live in his large apartment on the mountainside and open his home to the public.

Mamdani will be sworn in on New Year’s Day.

Kathryn Palmer is USA TODAY’s political reporter. She can be reached at the following address: kapalmer@usatoday.com And to X@Kathryn Purml. Sign up for her daily politics newsletter here.

Japan warns of 10-foot-high tsunami after major earthquake

0

play

On December 8, a powerful 7.6 magnitude earthquake shook northern Japan, prompting a 10-foot-high tsunami warning and evacuation orders.

The earthquake occurred at 11:15 p.m. local time, and its epicenter was off the coast of Aomori Prefecture, located at the northern tip of Japan’s main island, Honshu.

Tsunami warnings have been issued for multiple prefectures in northern Japan, including Hokkaido, Aomori, and Iwate. According to Japan’s public broadcaster NHK, a tsunami advisory has been issued for Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures.

Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi said at a press conference that authorities were investigating the damage. Chief Cabinet Secretary Minoru Kihara told reporters that the strongest tremor was recorded in Hachinohe City, Aomori Prefecture.

NHK reported that multiple people were injured at a hotel in Aomori Prefecture. The broadcaster also reported that authorities were evaluating the nuclear power plant.

Japan is one of the most earthquake-prone countries on earth, as it is located on the Pacific Rim of Volcano, a region of volcanic arcs and ocean trenches that surrounds part of the Pacific Basin.

This story will be updated.

Contributed by: Reuters

Google, Sony, Okta back Resemble AI deepfake detection plan

0

Resemble AI has raised $13 million in a new strategic investment round for AI deepfake detection. This funding brings the company’s total venture investment to $25 million, with participation from Berkeley CalFund, Berkeley Frontier Fund, Comcast Ventures, Craft Ventures, Gentree, Google’s AI Futures Fund, IAG Capital Partners, and others.

The funding comes as organizations are under pressure to verify the authenticity of digital content. Generative AI has made it easier for criminals to create convincing deepfakes, resulting in over USD 1.56 billion in fraudulent losses in 2025. Analysts estimate that generative AI could lead to US$40 billion in fraud losses in the US by 2027.

Recent incidents highlight how quickly threats can evolve. In Singapore, 13 people collectively lost more than S$360,000 after fraudsters impersonated telecommunications providers and the Monetary Authority of Singapore. Attackers used caller ID spoofing, audio deepfakes, and social engineering techniques to create urgency and capitalize on the public’s trust in governments and telecom brands.

Deepfake detection tools and new AI features

Resemble AI develops real-time verification tools that enable enterprises to detect AI-generated audio, video, images, and text. The company plans to use the new funding to expand global access to its AI deepfake detection platform. This includes two recent releases:

  • DETECT-3B Omnia deepfake detection model designed for enterprise environments. The company reports 98% detection accuracy in over 38 languages.
  • similar to intelligenceis a platform that uses Google’s Gemini 3 model to provide explainability for multimodal AI-generated content.

Resemble AI positions these tools as part of a broader effort to support real-time validation of human users and AI agents interacting with digital content.

The company says the DETECT-3B Omni is already being used in areas such as entertainment, communications and government. Public benchmark results for Hugging Face show that this model performs best in image and audio deepfake detection, with a lower average error rate than competing models.

Industry participants say rapid improvements in generative AI are changing the way companies think about content trust and identity systems. Representatives from Google’s AI Futures Fund, Sony Ventures, and Okta noted that organizations are moving to a verification layer that helps maintain trust in the authentication process.

Alongside the investment announcement, Resemble AI released its outlook on how deepfake-related risks will evolve in 2026. The company anticipates several changes that could shape its corporate plans.

Deepfake verification could become standard for official communications

The company predicts that real-time deepfake detection may eventually be required in official video conferences following incidents involving government officials. Such a move could create new procurement activities and increase adoption in the public sector.

Organizational readiness can determine competitive position

As more jurisdictions adopt AI regulations, companies that integrate training, governance, and compliance processes early may be better able to respond to operational and regulatory demands.

Identity emerges as a central focus for AI security

As many AI-related attacks rely on impersonation, organizations are likely to place greater emphasis on identity-centric security models, such as zero-trust approaches for human and machine identities.

Cyber ​​insurance costs may rise

The rise in corporate deepfake incidents may cause insurance companies to reconsider the insurance policies they offer. Businesses without detection tools may face higher premiums and coverage limitations.

This investment highlights the growing need for companies to understand how generative AI changes their risk exposure. Organizations across all sectors are evaluating how verification, identity protection, and incident response can be incorporated into broader security and compliance strategies.

(Photo courtesy of Pau Casals)

Reference: AWS re:Invent 2025: Frontier AI agents replace chatbots

Want to learn more about AI and big data from industry leaders? Check out the AI ​​& Big Data Expo in Amsterdam, California, and London. This comprehensive event is part of TechEx and co-located with other major technology events. Click here for more information.

AI News is brought to you by TechForge Media. Learn about other upcoming enterprise technology events and webinars.

The next Powerball jackpot drawing is Monday, December 8th

0

play

Cha-ching!

The Powerball prize is now estimated at $875 million after there was no jackpot winner in the drawing on Saturday, December 6th.

The cash value of the upcoming drawing is $403.6 million. The lucky winner can claim the top prize if they match all five numbers with the Powerball.

Here’s what you need to know about the upcoming Powerball drawing.

When is the next Powerball drawing?

The next drawing will take place on Monday, December 8th, just after 11pm ET.

How to play Powerball

To play Powerball, you must purchase a $2 ticket. This can be done at a variety of locations, including local convenience stores, gas stations, and grocery stores. In some states, you can purchase Powerball tickets online.

Once you have your ticket, you have to choose six numbers. Five of them are white balls with numbers from 1 to 69. The red Powerball range is 1-26. You can also add a “Power Play” for $1, which increases your winnings on all non-jackpot prizes.

“Power Play” multipliers allow you to increase your winnings by 2x, 3x, 4x, 5x, or 10x.

If you’re feeling unlucky or just want to let the computer do the work for you, you can take advantage of the “Quick Pick” option, where a computer-generated number is printed on your Powerball ticket. To win the jackpot, players must match all five white balls with the red Powerball in any order.

Powerball drawings are held on Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday nights. The winnings continue to increase even if no one wins the jackpot.

Where to buy lottery tickets

Tickets can be purchased directly at gas stations, convenience stores, and grocery stores. Some airport terminals may also sell lottery tickets.

You can also order tickets online Jackpocket, USA TODAY Network’s official digital lottery delivery companythese states and territories of the United States: Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Idaho, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Puerto Rico, Washington DC, and West Virginia. The Jackpocket app allows you to choose your lottery games and numbers, place your order, check your tickets, and claim your winnings, all using your phone or home computer.

Jackpocket is the official digital lottery carrier of USA TODAY Network. Gannett may earn revenue from viewer referrals to the Jackpocket Service. Must be 18 years or older, 21 years or older in Arizona, 19 years or older in Nebraska. Not affiliated with any state lottery. Gambling problem? Call 1-877-8-HOPE-NY or text HOPENY (467369) (NY). 1-800-327-5050(MA); 1-877-MYLIMIT (OR); 1-800-981-0023 (PR); 1-800-GAMBLER (ALL OTHERS). visit jackpocket.com/tos Over the entire period.

Taylor Eardley is a news reporter for USA TODAY. Contact me at tardrey@gannett.com.

Fernando Cervantes Jr. is a trending news reporter for USA TODAY. Contact us at fernando.cervantes@gannett.com and follow us at X @fern_cerv_.

Are vanity license plates free speech? Supreme Court skirt issue.

0


Lawyers for a Tennessee woman challenging the denial of a 69PWNDU plate argue that the state’s rules have led to “a dizzying array of censorship.”

play

WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court has rejected a Tennessee woman’s appeal challenging her denial of a controversial 69PWNDU personal license plate and will not weigh in on how states regulate vanity license plates.

On December 8, the court refused to hear Leah Gilliam’s appeal. Gilliam argued that each state’s rules about what is and isn’t allowed on personalized plates are often unclear and could amount to “blinding censorship.”

She wants the court to recognize that she is expressing her own views through the veneer, not the government’s, and the decision would limit the state’s ability to control that message.

Justices reached the opposite conclusion in 2015, upholding restrictions on specialty license plate designs that support causes or organizations. States that sell specialty plates can ban images such as the Confederate flag, the Supreme Court ruled in a 5-4 decision.

“For a long time in this country, states have used license plates to convey government messages,” Justice Stephen Breyer wrote for the majority.

But Gilliam’s lawyers argued that the justices were divided on whether the same applies to the combination of letters and numbers on personal license plates.

“Given that car owners’ First Amendment speech rights change as they move from state to state, urgent intervention is needed,” they told the Supreme Court. “The same personalized plates that appear on cars in Maryland, Oregon, Delaware, Rhode Island, Kentucky, California, and Michigan could also be banned in Tennessee, Indiana, and Hawaii.”

Tennessee argued that there was no reason for the Supreme Court to revisit the issue.

“This court does not need another license plate case regarding government speech,” Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Scumetti wrote in response to Gilliam’s appeal. “One is enough.”

Decorative plate mentioning “sexual domination” is revoked

In Gilliam’s case, the state of Tennessee initially approved his application for a personalized license plate that read “69PWNDU.” She said the letter was an online gamer phrase, “pwnd u,” meaning to beat your opponent. She initially said the numbers reflected part of her phone number and were not sexual in nature. Gilliam later said that he was an astronomy buff and that “69” referred to the year of the moon landing.

But the state received a complaint 11 years after authorizing the plate and later told her the plate should be revoked because it references sexual domination. Gilliam filed a lawsuit accusing the state of Tennessee of violating his free speech rights. She said she doesn’t object to a state’s right to refuse plates that are profane, sexual or vulgar, as long as there are parameters for what states can ban.

Tennessee Supreme Court says vanity plate is government speech

The Tennessee Supreme Court said the state’s rules are consistent with the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2015 decision in Walker v. District of Texas, Sons of Confederate Veterans.

“Although personalized alphanumeric combinations differ in some respects from specialty plate designs, a faithful application of Walker’s reasoning forces the conclusion that they are also government speech,” the Tennessee Supreme Court ruled.

The court said most of Gilliam’s arguments were actually attacks on the Supreme Court’s ruling in the 2015 case.

“These claims would be better directed to the United States Supreme Court, the only court with the power to overturn or invalidate precedent,” the court said.

Tennessee AG said plates are not a major national problem

Tennessee’s attorney general argued that the issue is much more complex than Mr. Gilliam acknowledged because license plates at least contain government speech.

“Certainly, the part of the license plate (government ID) that identifies a vehicle, the registration number, constitutes government speech,” Sklemetti asked the high court not to get involved.

The bottom line, he said, is that states’ cosmetic license plate regulations are not a pressing issue of national importance to warrant a judge’s time.

Free speech groups support lawsuit

But several free speech groups, including the Individual Rights and Expression Foundation and the First Amendment Bar Association, had argued that the case had larger implications.

In a short letter supporting Gilliam’s suit, the groups said the protections government speech enjoys “is a red herring for government officials, who have a strong incentive to push the boundaries because it frees them from all First Amendment burdens.”

Regarding the Tennessee Supreme Court’s dismissal of Gilliam’s lawsuit, the group said, “If upheld, this ruling would create a constitutional injury that extends beyond the bumper of a vehicle registered in Tennessee.”

Platform corrects bias in eKYC AI algorithms

0

Digital payments and fintech company Ant International has won the NeurIPS competition for fairness in AI facial detection. The company says it is focused on developing secure and inclusive financial services, especially as deepfake technology becomes more commonplace.

The increasing use of facial recognition in many fields has highlighted the issue of algorithmic bias in AI. A study conducted by NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) found that many widely used facial recognition algorithms have significantly higher error rates when analyzing the faces of women and people of color, and this disparity is due to a lack of diversity in the training data and demographics of the people building and controlling many mainstream AI platforms. The results of biased algorithms can lead to the denial of financial services to large sections of the population and are considered weaknesses in security protocols.

The NeurIPS competition was held in parallel with the acclaimed AI conference, the Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, and challenged participants to create high-performance and fair AI models that cover a variety of demographic factors, including gender, age, and skin color. The Ant International team beat out more than 2,100 entries from 162 teams from around the world. The task given was to accurately detect 1.2 million AI-generated facial images that were selected to be reasonably representative of demographic groups.

The approach taken by Ant’s superior AI models combines a Mixture of Experts (MoE) architecture with bias detection mechanisms. This system trains two competing neural networks. One focuses on identifying deepfakes, while the other is designed to counter the former, forcing them to ignore demographic characteristics. This dynamic process ensures that the system learns how to detect true signs of manipulation, rather than carelessly relying on demographic patterns. The model was trained on globally representative datasets and incorporated real-world payment fraud scenarios to ensure performance at scale.

“Biased AI systems are inherently insecure,” explains Dr. Tianyi Zhang, general manager of risk management and cybersecurity at Ant International. “The fairness of our model is not just an ethical issue; it is fundamental to preventing deepfakes from being exploited and ensuring reliable identity verification for all users.”

The technology behind the winning entry is now being integrated into Ant’s payments and financial services to combat the threat of deepfakes, and the companies say it has achieved a detection rate of over 99.8% across all demographics and the 200 markets in which Ant operates.

Ant’s technology helps customers meet global electronic know-your-customer (eKYC) standards without algorithmic bias, especially during customer onboarding. This is considered to be particularly important in emerging markets where greater financial inclusion may be hindered.

Ant International serves more than 150 million merchants and 1.8 billion user accounts, known for services such as Alipay+, Antom, Bettr, and WorldFirst. The company says AI security is a pillar of its business. AI SHIELD is a risk management framework built on AI Security Docker that reduces the risk of AI service vulnerabilities such as unauthorized access and data leakage.

AI SHIELD powers a suite of risk management solutions that provide broad protection for financial transactions, including protection against deepfake attacks and fraud. The company says that Alipay+ EasySafePay 360 has reduced account takeover incidents in digital wallet payments by 90%.

(Image source: “Beautiful Portrait Abstract Art, Three-dimensional Shapes, Geometric Shapes, Neo-Tokyo Colors, Subdued Colors, Pixar, Art Station, Greg Rutkowski, Samdosart, GE” – Public Domain)

Want to learn more about AI and big data from industry leaders? Check out the AI ​​& Big Data Expo in Amsterdam, California, and London. This comprehensive event is part of TechEx and co-located with other major technology events. Click here for more information.

AI News is brought to you by TechForge Media. Learn about other upcoming enterprise technology events and webinars.

“Freedom” is a big word, but that’s okay

0

“Life,” “freedom,” and “happiness” are big words. It’s so large that it covers a lot more than just a special part of the human experience. A recent North Dakota Supreme Court decision on a challenge to North Dakota’s abortion ban illustrates how that linguistic reality is playing out for both originalist judges and progressive advocates.

last month, Access to Independent Health Services vs. Wrigleythree of North Dakota’s five judges concluded that the state’s ban was unconstitutional and vague. However, the state’s supermajority control was not enough to declare the law unconstitutional. Thus, the two negative votes carried the day.

In addition to rejecting the ambiguity argument, opponents considered an objection based on Article I, Section 1 of the state constitution, the “Rocky-style natural rights guarantee.” The guarantee of natural rights includes broad language that protects nearly every exercise of individual freedom. North Dakota protects, among other things, “certain unalienable rights, such as the enjoyment and defense of life and liberty; the acquisition, possession, and protection of property and reputation; (and) the pursuit and attainment of security and happiness.”

Based on originalism, opponents misunderstood some of these important words, which is not surprising given the way the case was argued. Across the country, judges and lawyers alike are trying to understand the distinction between the “fundamental rights” that some courts claim are protected by the Natural Rights Guarantee and the non-fundamental rights that are generally not protected. The problem is that such distinctions that once existed are no longer there. Most people just don’t realize it yet.

Important words of 1889

In the view of opponents, North Dakota’s natural rights protections cannot extend to as many individual liberties as this sweeping language suggests. That “represents a very broad legal check on legislative authority that is inconsistent with numerous prior precedents,” Justice Jerrod E. Tufte wrote in a dissenting opinion. If all “freedom” and “pursuit of happiness” were guaranteed by the constitution, all It will be protected. But as Mr. Tufte suggested, in 1889, when the Constitution was adopted, the government was doing all sorts of things to restrict individual freedom through police power.

Instead, the opposition went to the opposite extreme, specific Abortion, the very act in question, was protected in 1889. Unfortunately, opponents pointed out that the convention record gave no indication of what the delegates thought about Article 1, Section 1, let alone how it applied to abortion. The 1889 record was uninformative, and opponents simply pointed out that other state courts had enforced their own Rocky guarantees before 1889, citing major treatises on the subject, but without analyzing how those courts applied key words like “liberty” and “happiness.” Opponents also could not discuss conventions in other states where delegates would participate. did Please do not discuss Rockn’s warranty. However, (self-promotion alert) I recently compiled them into a handy summary. Additionally, opponents discussed how courts in other states have applied the Rocky guarantee to abortion restrictions in recent years, with mixed results, but that experience has little application to this case.

rational freedom

At least not as an excuse, opponents failed to engage North Dakota precedent outside of the abortion context, even though they argued that Rocky’s broader view of the guarantee was “inconsistent with much past case law.” One is from 1943. State v. Cromwell. There, the court declared the law requiring a license to work as a photographer unconstitutional. The report said that “freedom” included “the right to buy and sell, the right of citizens to freely choose the merchants they wish to patronize, the right to manufacture, the right to acquire property, the right to live in a community, the right to free and open markets, the right to freedom of speech, the right to self-defense against unlawful violence, and the opportunity to generally do what free men normally do.”

But wait, you might say, that’s an old case that happened at the very end of the world. Loknar During this era, federal and state courts often ruled that restrictions on economic freedom were unconstitutional. In fact, in 1978 the court made the following distinction: Cromwellsignificantly narrowing its use. However, tensions between the broad language of Rocky’s guarantee and the government’s requirement to regulate all areas of economic and personal life remain. of wrigley Dissent may have benefited Cromwellconcluded that that approach was closer to the original meaning of 1889 than later case law.

But wait again. It wasn’t Cromwell (and Lochner vs. New York itself) from a time when laissez-faire economics was essentially law? no! If you believe that, you are falling prey to modern myths that have long been debunked. Loknar And those days — myths that continue to distort our laws today.

like many people Lokner-decisions of the times, Cromwell He said that freedom and happiness symbolize the wide range of human conduct that the Constitution protects. but However, the state can still regulate it. Cromwell He even said Congress should be given “great discretion.” CromwellThe test for determining whether a law is overly restrictive is whether it is reasonable. Although not reasonable under modern rational basis tests, genuine Rationality: Based on actual facts, “its real purpose must be to protect public health, morals, or the general welfare.”

This is a very—dare I say it—reasonable way of reconciling the grand language of Article I, Section 1, with the reality of North Dakota’s acceptance of police power in 1889. Although freedoms are generally protected, governments can still regulate their actions when the facts and reasons justify them.

Under this approach, the question is not whether “abortion” was considered a specifically protected right in 1889. The question is whether, having regard to the facts and the public interest, the restriction of freedom is an unreasonable exercise of police power. Of course, some cases are easier than others. Licensing the profession of taking pictures of people sounds like a stupid idea, and I don’t think it would work. In the case of abortion, of course, the issue is more complex. On the one hand, it’s a woman’s right to her own body, and on the other, it’s a question of life, or potential life.

fundamental changes

To put the dissent in perspective, there is a reason why this view has not arisen in this case, or indeed in other recent abortion cases before the state Supreme Court. There was no political party that supported it. analysis in Cromwell It does not recognize the modern constitutional dichotomy between “fundamental rights” and “non-fundamental rights,” which was born out of footnote 4 of the 1938 U.S. Supreme Court decision. United States vs. Carolen Products. The modern approach is that if a right is “fundamental,” it will be subject to intense scrutiny and the government will almost always lose. If not, rational grounds apply and the government almost always wins. I can see why advocates stack their chips on “fundamental rights.” But that won’t work for long, especially if the judges hold pre-1938 originalist views.

The full impact on state constitutional litigation of the evolution of jurisprudence from carolen products Through today’s originalism, that’s too big a topic to do justice to here. (I talk about this a little bit in the book.) To summarize my opinion, state constitutions, and especially the Rockies Guarantees, were not built on the dichotomy of “fundamental rights.” text protect all Freedom includes not only a few select privacy-based rights that the Supreme Court anointed as fundamental in the years following a 1965 case that prohibited states from blocking married couples’ access to contraception. Griswold vs. Connecticut. Economic freedom is protected in the same way as personal freedom. However, strict monitoring cannot be carried out across the board. Instead, embrace true rationality.

make Loknar your friend

In other words, both judges and Advocates need to be reminded of the following examples: Cromwell And — yes — Loknar. Many modern defenders of fundamental rights have been arguing for decades. Loknar and economic freedom against the anti-canon, with increasingly circumstantial excuses for that distinction. That paradigm is over. The Constitution uses big words. It’s time to force them. There’s a reason.

Anthony Sanders is director of the Center for Judicial Engagement at the Institute for Justice.

Recommended quote: Anthony Sanders “Freedom” is a big word, but that’s okaySᴛᴀᴛᴇ Cᴏᴜʀᴛ Rᴇᴘᴏʀᴛ (December 5, 2025), https://statecourtreport.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/liberty-big-word-and-thats-ok

2026 America’s Best Customer Service. See top rated companies

0

methodology

USA TODAY and Plant-A team up to recognize customer service leaders

America’s Best Customer Service 2026 recognizes service providers, stores and online retailers in the United States that provide the best customer service based on a variety of relevant metrics from the customer’s perspective. The study combines an extensive confidential online survey of U.S. customers with an evaluation of online reviews and public data.

Overall, more than 21,000 service providers, stores and online retailers operating in the United States were included in the initial review. Similar Web, a leading digital data and analytics company, provided information on the top 5,000 e-commerce companies in the U.S. by site traffic from July 2024 to July 2025. From this aggregate list, more than 7,100 companies were selected for detailed evaluation in a national survey.

This national study interviewed more than 32,000 U.S. consumers through multiple online access panels from September 2025 to October 2025. They rated their experiences with service providers and in-store and online retailers they purchased from or contacted in the past three years. Where possible, online reviews were also collected to capture broader customer sentiment.

In addition, more than 1.1 million company reviews from more than 67,000 customers from previous customer service surveys in 2024 and 2023 were considered to evaluate companies’ commitment to consistently outstanding customer service.

Companies that have been involved in consumer data protection cases or publicly reported employment-related allegations in the past two years were excluded from the final rankings using Onclusive’s media monitoring platform Critical Mention.

An overall score was calculated for each company using a proprietary scoring model that takes into account all weights related to target group, survey items, categories, and desk study factors. The best companies in each segment were recognized as America’s Best Customer Service 2026.

Disclaimer

Ranking position

Ranking placement is a positive evaluation based on a review of publicly available data sources and consumer research for the relevant period. Click here for more information on how rankings are compiled.

intellectual property rights

This ranking is based on proprietary market research methodologies, survey questionnaires, and underlying data owned by Plant-A. Ranking lists and published articles are owned by USA TODAY and are subject to copyright protection. Any unauthorized use of these materials, including without limitation publication, reproduction, modification, distribution, transmission, or display, is strictly prohibited without the prior written consent of Plant-A and USA TODAY.

Nature of ranking

Ranking data is generated by Plant-A based on primary and secondary market research, including publicly available data and certain data provided directly to Plant-A. These rankings are published by USA TODAY and are provided for informational purposes only, not as financial or business guidance or professional advice, and should not be relied upon.

Data and periodicity

This ranking is generated from data sources believed to be reliable and is based on a methodological analysis of data over the past 12 months. These essentially reflect historical data and may not include subsequent developments, unanticipated events, or additional data not covered during the study period. Past performance is not indicative of future performance.

No Endorsements or Guarantees: Neither Plant-A nor USA TODAY endorses or verifies the business practices or positions of the companies they rank. The inclusion or exclusion of companies in the rankings should not be used as the basis for making any investment, business, or other decisions. All decisions based on the information presented in the rankings should be taken in conjunction with other available information and independent advice.

Waiver of responsibility

Each of Plant-A and USA TODAY, and their affiliates, and their respective officers, directors, employees, and agents (collectively, the “Released Parties”) assume no liability for any errors or omissions in the rankings or for any actions taken based on the content of the ranking publications. Neither Plant-A nor USA TODAY makes any representations or warranties regarding the information provided in the rankings or their use. Neither Plant-A nor USA TODAY guarantees the completeness or accuracy of the information contained in the rankings. To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, by accessing, using, or relying on the Rankings, you waive all claims and have no recourse against the Released Parties for any alleged or actual breach or infringement of any party’s rights, including any privacy right, proprietary right, intellectual property right, right of publicity, right to credit for materials or ideas, or any other right, including the right to authorize any use, such as copying, that may be considered distortive, derogatory, or offensive. If any part of this disclaimer is held invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this disclaimer shall remain in full force and effect and enforced to the fullest extent permitted by law.

President Trump expected to announce $12 billion farm aid package

0


The American Farm Bureau Federation said in November that aid is “urgently needed” as farm bankruptcies increase.

play

WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump plans to announce a $12 billion aid package for farmers hurt by low crop prices and tariff policies on Dec. 8, according to a White House official familiar with the proposal.

Bloomberg News first reported the proposal on Dec. 7, citing White House officials. The Wall Street Journal also reported on the package.

Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent are scheduled to attend the announcement at 2 p.m. ET. Cattle, soybean, cotton and potato producers are expected to attend.

President Trump has vowed for months to provide aid to farmers because of trade tensions. He reached a trade deal in October with China, the largest customer for U.S. soybeans.

But on Dec. 8, Chicago soybean futures fell below $11 a bushel for the first time since October amid uncertainty about whether China will buy as much supply as the U.S. government hopes.

“Under the direction of the president, there will be a backstop for farmers even if we can’t actually move these goods,” Rollins told reporters on Oct. 16.

The American Farm Bureau Federation said on November 24 that aid is “urgently needed” as farm bankruptcies are on the rise as the cost of growing crops exceeds the income farmers receive.

After President Trump imposed tariffs on foreign imports, farmers lost billions of dollars in exports to their biggest overseas markets, including China.

Soybean farmers have been particularly hard hit this year as China retaliated against U.S. tariffs with its own tax hikes, leading to purchases from Brazil and Argentina instead. China historically purchased half of the U.S. soybeans.

At a Dec. 2 Trump Cabinet meeting, Rollins said one of the administration’s goals through tariffs is to negotiate trade deals that send more products overseas.

“I’m always talking to them, let’s sell more soybeans, let’s sell more corn, let’s get more products out there,” Rollins said. “But if you really think about how to resolve this idea, many of our farmers have been farming for government checks rather than moving their produce around the world.”

Contributed by: Reuters

Notre Dame withdrew from the bowl following CFP’s disdain. Here are the social media reactions

0

play

Notre Dame’s College Football Playoff dreams were shockingly dashed on Sunday, Dec. 7, when the Fighting Irish were removed from the 12-team field.

It wasn’t just the end of the team’s playoff hopes. It was also the end of the season.

Notre Dame withdrew its name from bowl consideration, and the program announced the decision in a statement.

“We would like to thank our families and fans for their support and look forward to bringing South Bend its 12th national title in 2026,” said a statement signed by the 2025 Notre Dame Football Team.

The Fighting Irish finished the season with a 10-2 record and ended the regular season on a 10-game winning streak. One of those two losses, a 27-24 loss to Miami in Week 1, was a disaster for the 10-2 Hurricanes, who clinched the final at-large playoff berth.

The decision to place Notre Dame behind Miami and Alabama was met with no shortage of backlash, with Fighting Irish athletic director Pete Bevacqua telling ESPN’s Jen Rada that the team felt like the rug had been pulled out from under them and calling the playoff selection committee’s weekly rankings ahead of the final selection a “travesty.”

While players have declined to participate in bowl games over the past decade, especially as the playoffs have become less important, it is rare for an entire team to decline the opportunity to play in a bowl game. Notre Dame wasn’t the only school to do this this season; Iowa State and Kansas State also did the same (and were fined the same $500,000 by the Big 12 for their actions).

However, unlike the Fighting Irish, the Cyclones and Wildcats have made coaching changes.

Naturally, Notre Dame’s decision sparked some heated opinions. Here’s a sample of what fans and media members are saying on social media.

Social media reacts to Notre Dame opting out of bowl game

What ByteDance’s launch means for businesses

0

When ByteDance launched a prototype agent-based AI smartphone with ZTE on December 2nd, it quickly sparked consumer enthusiasm, but just as quickly, privacy concerns arose, forcing the company to dial back capabilities. But behind the headline-grabbing sell-out and ensuing controversy lies a more important story. That is the enterprise impact of operating system-level AI agents that can autonomously perform complex multi-step tasks in device ecosystems.

Powered by ByteDance’s Doubao large language model, the ZTE Nubia M153 represents both an experiment in a consumer gadget and a preview of how agentic AI smartphones can reshape workplace productivity, field operations, and enterprise mobility strategies, if the technology can overcome the fundamental trust and governance challenges required for enterprise adoption.

From consumer curiosity to corporate necessity

The appeal for consumers is clear: restaurant reservations by voice, automatic photo editing, cross-platform price comparisons, and more. However, Gartner predicts that by 2028, 33% of enterprise software applications will include agent AI capabilities, up from less than 1% in 2024.

As the most ubiquitous computing device in enterprise workflows, smartphones provide an important testing ground. “Agent AI in industries like manufacturing, construction, healthcare, and energy enhances decision-making, improves safety, and streamlines tasks,” said Nicholas Muy, CISO at Scrut Automation. However, he cautions that early adopters need to avoid real risks around AI errors and security gaps.

According to McKinsey research, 23% of organizations are extending agent AI systems in at least one business function, and an additional 39% are experimenting with AI agents. However, enterprise deployment is different from consumer use. Governance frameworks, audit trails, role-based permissions, and compliance mechanisms are needed, and ByteDance’s consumer prototype was notably lacking.

China’s strategic advantage in software and hardware integration

ByteDance’s approach (partnering with ZTE rather than building its own hardware) reflects a successful enterprise AI strategy. The company is positioning Doubao as a system-level integration that any manufacturer can adopt, similar to what Google did with Android.

With 157 million monthly active users as of August 2025, Doubao already dominates China’s consumer AI market, more than double Tencent’s Yuanbao, which has 73 million users, according to QuestMobile data.

The software over hardware strategy addresses what Morgan Stanley analysts have identified as key weaknesses. The idea is that major smartphone makers, including Apple, Huawei and Xiaomi, have strong enough technological capabilities to develop AI assistants in-house rather than partnering with third-party providers.

ByteDance’s realistic target market appears to be secondary manufacturers seeking differentiated capabilities and potentially enterprise device management platforms. For business buyers, this fragmentation presents both opportunities and challenges.

Organizations can choose device manufacturers based on hardware requirements while standardizing AI capabilities, but only if the governance and security framework proves to be robust enough for the regulated industry.

Privacy panic reveals corporate requirements

Rapid backlash after entrepreneur Taylor Ogan demonstrated the M153’s capabilities on social media and revealed what companies are looking for in hiring it. When users witnessed AI agents with deep system privileges autonomously accessing apps, processing payments, and manipulating data, their immediate concern was control, not convenience.

Trust remains the main barrier to adoption, according to a Forum Ventures survey of 100 senior enterprise IT decision makers. “The trust gap is huge,” says Jonah Midanik, general partner at Forum Ventures. “AI agents can perform tasks with incredible efficiency, but their output is based on statistical probabilities rather than inherent truths.”

The feature rollbacks reported by ByteDance demonstrate an understanding that enterprise-grade agent-based AI smartphones require fine-grained permission systems, comprehensive logging, and the ability to define strict operational boundaries, features that are notably lacking in consumer prototypes.

Enterprise and consumer: different use cases, different requirements

Agent AI The enterprise use case for smartphones is very different from consumer applications. Field service technicians can use AI agents to proactively uncover equipment history, recommend the best route based on real-time conditions, and guide them through complex steps without manual searches. Healthcare providers can access patient context and decision support without having to navigate multiple systems. Financial services professionals receive compliance-checked recommendations and automated workflow orchestration.

According to PwC research, 79% of organizations have deployed AI agents at some level, and 96% of IT leaders plan to expand in 2025. However, a Cloudera survey of 1,484 IT decision makers found that successful enterprise adoption requires a gradual rollout with industry-specific data integration, transparent decision-making processes, and comprehensive testing.

The consumer smartphone market, which IDC predicts will ship 912 million generated AI-enabled units by 2028, is focused on personalization and convenience. Auditability, compliance, and risk mitigation are priorities for enterprise deployments, requirements that are not yet met by consumer-grade agent-based AI smartphones.

Global competitive dynamics and regional strategies

The technology gap between the United States and China adds further complexity. Apple’s slow rollout of Apple Intelligence in mainland China has left ByteDance, Alibaba, Baidu and Tencent racing to fill the void. But Apple’s approach is fundamentally different. Tight hardware and software integration with on-device processing prioritizes user privacy, a stance that resonates with enterprise security requirements.

ByteDance’s licensing strategy could allow Doubao to quickly penetrate the market with Chinese manufacturers and establish the de facto standard before Western competitors can match operating system level integration. For multinational companies operating in the region, this creates device management challenges around data sovereignty, compliance frameworks, and a consistent user experience.

According to Counterpoint Research, Asia Pacific is the fastest growing market for AI agents, with the US currently accounting for 40.1% revenue share. Enterprise buyers may maintain separate device strategies for different regulatory environments and must navigate a bifurcated landscape.

The way forward: Solutions to overcome the hype

For enterprise leaders evaluating agent AI smartphones, ByteDance’s prototype offers valuable lessons on what to ask of vendors.

First, it’s a comprehensive governance framework that defines decision boundaries, records all autonomous actions, and provides role-based access controls. Anthropic’s enterprise solutions feature centralized provisioning, audit logging, and role-based entitlement and may demonstrate these requirements.

The second is a hybrid approach that balances on-device processing for sensitive operations with cloud capabilities for complex inference. Enterprise deployments require flexibility to meet varying data residency and compliance requirements within a jurisdiction.

Third, roll out gradually starting with low-risk use cases. Amazon’s introduction of AI agents to modernize Java applications shows how enterprises can capture value while managing risk.

ByteDance and ZTE’s partnership ultimately heralds an inevitable convergence. In other words, agent AI capabilities will become a standard feature on smartphones rather than a premium differentiator. Enterprise adoption follows a proven pattern of pilot programs in controlled environments, security validation, and gradual expansion as the governance framework matures.

The question facing enterprise technology leaders is not whether agent-based AI smartphones will impact productivity in the workplace, but rather whether to proactively develop an adoption strategy or whether enterprise capabilities will react to improved consumer technology. The privacy panic that followed ByteDance’s launch suggests that organizations that demand enterprise-grade security and governance from the start will determine the trajectory of this technology.

Gartner predicts that by 2028, at least 15% of work decisions will be made autonomously by agent AI, but none by 2024, making the smartphone a communication device and an autonomous enterprise agent. The winners will not be those who adopt first, but those with the most thoughtful implementations that incorporate security and scalable governance from day one.

SEE ALSO: IBM cites agent AI, data policy and quantum as trends for 2026

Want to learn more about AI and big data from industry leaders? Check out the AI ​​& Big Data Expo in Amsterdam, California, and London. This comprehensive event is part of TechEx and co-located with other major technology events. Click here for more information.

AI News is brought to you by TechForge Media. Learn about other upcoming enterprise technology events and webinars.