Home Blog Page 397

Nicolas Maduro’s outfit in captured photo goes viral on social media

0

play

Hours after the early morning U.S. attack on Venezuela and the capture of Nicolas Maduro, a photo of the Venezuelan leader blindfolded on a boat was posted by President Donald Trump on the social media platform Truth Social.

The photo has since circulated online, not only for Maduro’s modest appearance but also for his outfit, a gray Nike Tex sweatsuit. Nike Tech fleeces, jackets, pants, and sweatsuits have garnered cultural criticism in recent months. Social media trends are prompting young men to ditch their outerwear styles in exchange for quarter zips and the sophistication that comes with clothing.

Maduro’s costume has sparked memes and social media videos, while the detention of the country’s leader and attacks on the country have drawn mixed reactions from Venezuelans and people around the world.

Nike technology is ‘out’ on viral style trends

In November 2025, a viral TikTok video by user Jason Ghimafi declared that young men who want to be respected and feel good about themselves should wear quarter zips instead of Nike Tech sweaters. The Quarter Zip video, in which Zimafi and his friend Richard Miner wear the sweater and pass matcha drinks, has been viewed nearly 30 million times as of December 15th.

“We’re not about Nike technology. We’re not about coffee. Here it’s straight quarter zips and matcha,” says Zimafi. “He (the minor) was talking about wearing Nike technology to go out. I said to him, ‘What are you doing? You upgraded in your life. Now you wear glasses. Now you wear quarter zips.’

The video sparked a movement in which men wearing their best quarter-zips gathered to socialize while drinking matcha and slamming Nike technology. That ethos toward clothing is now reflected in reactions to Maduro’s clothing in photographs of him.

The internet reacts to President Maduro’s outfit

According to Google Trends, searches for the term “Nike Tech” spiked on Google on the morning of Saturday, January 3rd, following President Trump’s post on Truth Social.

On TikTok and Instagram, many posts containing photos of President Maduro during photo shoots are accompanied by comments criticizing the leader’s attire, such as “Why did my brother wear Nike technology?” and “My brother couldn’t get the latest version of the quarter zip.”

Other posts also referenced the leader’s attire, leading some to believe that Mr. Maduro was intentionally dressed in that attire. In one TikTok video, he said the outfit meant “I just want to be a meme.”

“If he was wearing a quarter zip, he would still be OK. He would still be doing his job. But he wasn’t,” TikTok user @brooklyngabby said in a video that had more than 16,000 likes as of Sunday afternoon, Jan. 4. “He was caught slacking off, he was wearing Nike Tech, he wasn’t wearing a quarter zip sweater.”

Kate Perez covers national trends and breaking news for USA TODAY. You can reach her at kperez@usatodayco.com or on Twitter @katecperez_.

Will Greenland be next? President Trump shows interest after attack on Venezuela

0


President Donald Trump has repeatedly mentioned annexing Greenland. He took another such call hours after the United States captured the Venezuelan leader.

play

A day after U.S. forces overthrew Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro, President Donald Trump appeared to have his sights set on Greenland, the next target for U.S. intervention.

Since taking office in 2025, President Trump has repeatedly threatened to buy the ice-covered Arctic island from Denmark, refusing to rule out seizing the resource-rich land by military force. President Trump has argued that annexing Greenland is necessary for national security, pointing to Greenland’s large amounts of important minerals and strategic location.

He made those calls again on Sunday, January 4, when his government won a victory to oust Venezuela’s socialist dictator and vowed to “run” the South American country until a democratic transition occurs.

“We absolutely need Greenland. We need it for our defense,” President Trump said in an interview published on January 4, noting that the island is reportedly “surrounded by Russian and Chinese ships.”

On the same day, Katie Miller, wife of the president’s acting chief of staff, Stephen Miller, posted a photo of Greenland draped in the American flag. Above it, Miller wrote “SOON.”

In response, Denmark’s ambassador to the United States, Jesper Møller Sørensen, said: “We expect full respect for the territorial integrity of the Kingdom of Denmark.”

Greenland’s Prime Minister Jens Frederik Nielsen has repeatedly criticized President Trump’s interest in colonizing Greenland. “The United States will not occupy Greenland,” he said in harsh words in December.

Can President Trump forcefully occupy Greenland?

Greenland is an autonomous territory of Denmark and part of NATO. The population is approximately 57,000. Although the island is heavily dependent on the Danish government, it has the right to hold a referendum on whether to declare independence.

Rufus Gifford, a former U.S. ambassador to Denmark during the Obama administration, said in January 2025 that Denmark’s membership would force the entire alliance to respond to any military action against Greenland.

Are Mexico, Colombia and Cuba on Trump’s radar? regional tensions

0

play

The White House has put the war on drugs at the center of discussions following the detention of Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro. In interviews and news conferences in Florida, President Donald Trump painted a map of pressures that appeared to underline Mexico, Colombia and Cuba, each for different reasons but connected by the same threads of security, drugs and sovereignty.

Political analysts say the message is neither linear nor the same for everyone. He spoke to Mexico in a personal tone. Warning to Colombia. To Cuba with allusions.

High-voltage changes that realign alliances and alert the region while governments and diaspora react in real time.

What did President Trump say about Mexico and drug trafficking?

Trump insisted in an interview with Fox News that “something has to be done” against the cartels in Mexico, before mentioning the Venezuela incident. He said he had a good relationship with President Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo and described her as a “good woman,” but added, “She doesn’t rule Mexico,” a phrase that has strained the dialogue. He claimed that cartels control territory and that America’s overdose crisis kills hundreds of thousands of people a year (by his estimates), but he made clear that this was not a message directed at his government.

The president claimed he asked several times whether Mexico wanted the United States to “handle” the cartels and received a rebuff.

Colombia under pressure: threat or warning?

From Mar-a-Lago, President Trump directly addressed Colombian President Gustavo Petro, telling him to “be careful,” and linking the country to cocaine production and shipments. Petro responded by calling Washington’s actions an attack on regional sovereignty and warning of humanitarian risks, while ordering borders to be fortified against a possible influx of refugees following a reported bombing in Venezuela.

This intersection escalated in networks and public statements. Petro defended Colombia’s efforts against drug trafficking, rejecting any threats and highlighting decades of cooperation and seizures. In parallel, countries such as Brazil, Mexico and Chile condemned the operation in Venezuela, while Argentina and Ecuador celebrated it. The region was divided between support and condemnation.

Will Cuba join the Washington Regional Council?

President Trump has indicated that Cuba could be a topic of discussion within broader regional policy. Secretary of State Marco Rubio was more specific: “If I lived in Havana and was part of the government, I would be at least a little concerned,” calling the country a “disaster” under “incompetent” leadership.

The response from Havana did not take long. President Miguel Diaz-Canel condemned the attack on Venezuela, describing the moment as an attack on Latin America’s “zone of peace” and calling for an urgent response from the international community.

This rhetorical clash has revived historic tensions, affecting Cuban families in the United States whose visas, remittances, and airline tickets are on hold.

What will the Trump administration’s next move be?

The US government guarantees that it will guide Venezuela “until the completion of a safe and orderly transition” without ruling out new operations. Local leaders, on the other hand, value every word and every move. For the U.S. Latino community, this change is important because it could change air travel, police cooperation, trade, and immigration policy.

contribution: Reuters

Boris Q’va is a national Spanish language trends news reporter for Connect/USA TODAY Network. You can follow him on X as @ByBorisQva or write to him at BBalsindesUrquiola@gannett.com.

Pope Leo XIV is ‘deeply concerned’ and calls for independence for Venezuela

0

play

A day after the United States carried out an early morning attack in Venezuela and detained President Nicolás Maduro, Pope Leo XIV called for Venezuela to remain an independent country and supported respect for human rights around the world.

President Maduro and his wife have been indicted on federal drug and weapons charges and are expected to appear at an arraignment in New York City as early as January 5, according to multiple media reports. They arrived in the United States by helicopter through Venezuelan airspace, took a U.S. Navy ship to Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and then flew to New York.

Leo, America’s first pope, spoke in St. Peter’s Square on January 4 and said he was watching developments in Venezuela, adding in particular that the “sovereignty of the country” must be guaranteed.

What did Pope Leo XIV say about Venezuela?

Pope Leo XIV told an audience in St. Peter’s Square that he was watching events in Venezuela with “great concern.”

“The interests of the beloved Venezuelan people must prevail above all considerations and we must work together to overcome violence and begin a journey of justice and peace, guaranteeing the country’s sovereignty, ensuring the rule of law as written in the Constitution, respecting the human and civil rights of all people, and building a peaceful future of cooperation, stability and harmony, with special consideration for the poorest people who suffer due to difficult economic conditions,” Leo said, calling on attendees to join him in prayer.

The Pope later echoed similar sentiments on social media platform X.

The attack on Venezuela and the detention of the country’s leader immediately prompted a variety of reactions from Venezuelans and people around the world. While some, including many Venezuelans living in the United States, welcomed President Maduro’s removal from power, others feared for the future stability of the South American country.

Kate Perez covers national trends and breaking news for USA TODAY. You can reach her at kperez@usatodayco.com or on Twitter @katecperez_.

Leonardo DiCaprio absent from Palm Springs Film Awards due to travel issues

0

play

Leonardo DiCaprio was scheduled to perform at the Palm Springs International Film Awards grand finale on Saturday, January 3rd, but was unable to attend the ceremony due to the chaos at airports across California.

The actor, who won the Desert Palm Lifetime Achievement Award for his role in “One Battle After Another,” was unable to attend due to “unforeseen travel disruptions and airspace restrictions,” a spokesperson for the Palm Springs International Film Festival told USA TODAY Network’s Desert Sun. “While we will miss celebrating with him in person, we are honored to recognize his outstanding work and lasting contribution to the film industry. His talent and dedication to the craft continue to be an inspiration.”

Variety first reported that DiCaprio was unable to leave St. Barts due to Caribbean aviation restrictions due to the Venezuelan conflict.

However, the actor recorded a video message that was played after being introduced by his “One Battle After Another” co-stars Teyana Taylor and Chase Infinity.

“I’m stuck on the East Coast. I wish I could have been there to celebrate with you all. I’m so grateful to be able to join from afar,” he said.

He talked about preserving the concept of going to the cinema to watch a movie.

“My father used to take me to the movies at the Vista Theater in Los Angeles, where I lived four blocks away and is now home to one of the last VistaVision projectors on the planet. It was my neighborhood movie theater and where I first felt the power of film. Sitting in that dark room with my father, seeing something bigger than myself, I realized how deeply movies can affect all of us.”

“Original films are hard to make and hard to protect, but it’s still the movie, not the content, that matters. The stories people create are meant to be shared in dark rooms, in communal experiences. Thank you for believing in this work, and thank you for believing in film.”

Other stars at the ceremony included Timothée Chalamet, who won Spotlight Actor of the Year for his role in the movie Marty Supreme, and Ethan Hawke, who received the Career Achievement Award and gave a speech with a wide range of powerful messages about mental health, AI and more.

“There’s a lot of life to live,” he said. “And I think about my career in art. I had a lot of fun and there was a lot of wildness. That’s my goal, to protect the wild. Protect the wild.”

Contributor: Brendan Morrow, USA TODAY

Will the NFC South winner get a playoff game? NFL needs to change format

0

play

Is your New Year’s glass more than half full? At least we can say the College Football Playoff Selection Committee isn’t involved here. That being said, it’s time for the NFL to adjust the mostly sensible codified rules that determine who advances to the playoffs.

The rules as currently constructed guarantee that teams with losing records will host playoff games this season. Similarly, a divisional “champion” might be just one game above .500. On the other hand, teams that win a dozen or so games can be sent to the wild card game in a big way, a relative sin that is prevalent among some of the same elite teams.

This cannot continue.

If you watched Saturday afternoon’s literally soggy battle between the Tampa Bay Buccaneers and Carolina Panthers (the Bucs won 16-14), you probably didn’t feel like you were witnessing a big-time player who deserves the comfort of home before next week’s postseason opener, just because an 8-9 record is good enough to win the lowly ACC, or NFC South. (OK, maybe we should should Find a way for the Atlanta Falcons and New Orleans Saints, the NFC South who are currently playing much better football than the Panthers and Bucks, to also be in the running, could they be an at-large bid? )

Additionally, it would not be unheard of for the No. 4 seeded team (who would eventually become the NFC South champions) to host the conference championship game if enough upset befalls the higher-seeded team. By comparison, at least five teams could finish with 11 or more wins but no hope of a postseason home game. It’s just one year after the Minnesota Vikings were stuck in the Wild Card despite going 14-3 (the most wins ever for a team that didn’t win a division title).

Not sitting properly. This is similar to Boise State getting a CFP bye week, an oversight that was quickly corrected. The NFL could have addressed its own “problem” in 2025, with the Detroit Lions putting forward a proposal last March encouraging league owners to “amend the current playoff seeding system to allow wild card teams to be seeded higher than division champions if they perform better in the regular season.”

This is more than reasonable and absolutely the right approach for a football system geared towards creating parity. Why not give teams that actually perform well a seed commensurate with their win total?

Old-school purists, and I frequently count myself among them, would argue that a district championship is sacrosanct, an accomplishment worthy of an important home game to begin the postseason. Let’s be honest, it now looks a lot like the empty suits that once championed the sanctity and glitz of college football’s bowl system. Where would we be without the Dukes Mayo Bowl or the pearl-clutching Snoop Dogg Arizona Bowl? Somewhat surprisingly, the Lions’ proposal actually garnered some attention last spring before it was finally tabled, but perhaps the inaction one Saturday in January will give it even more traction in the future.

And of course, 40 years ago, when there were three teams in a 14-team conference, it was easy to defend the argument of paying district winners well. At the time, half of most teams’ schedules consisted of district opponents, essentially making those games more valuable and appealing.

However, the NFL realigned in 2002, splitting into eight four-team divisions across two conferences. In the era of the 17-game regular season, 65% of a given club’s schedule is against non-division opponents. That said, it’s not uncommon for a team to succeed against potentially subpar divisional opponents, struggle mightily against other teams in the league, and still end up taking home the crown. Despite a strike season, the 2025 Bucs or Panthers will be just the fifth sub-.500 team in the Super Bowl era (dating back to 1966) to make the playoffs. This is something that had never happened before the 2010 campaign.

And Sunday night’s winner-take-all AFC North game between the Baltimore Ravens (8-8) and Pittsburgh Steelers (9-7) will see a similar payoff, even though the other six AFC teams in the playoffs have all won at least 11 games.

Divisions make sense in the NFL. They maintain and/or create natural geographic rivalries and have a little extra guaranteed currency when breaking ties for a playoff spot. However, just one win will only qualify them for the playoffs. Even though these Bucks and Panthers compete against each other on a daily basis, there’s no way they deserve a higher seed than the San Francisco 49ers or Los Angeles Rams, the teams that made the NFC West the league’s most dominant division in 2025, along with the top-seeded Seattle Seahawks. Baker Mayfield’s next pick, or Bryce Young’s next 100-yard passing day, will have to take place as a No. 7 seed, struggling in front of hostile fans and being ridiculed accordingly (while reveling in their shortcomings).

And maybe you think this is a problem that will resolve itself. The 2022 Bucs, the last team with a losing record in the playoffs, got smoked at home by Dak Prescott and the Dallas Cowboys in Tom Brady’s final appearance as a player Monday night. However, two of the four teams that won the district championship despite having losing records actually advanced to the district round.

What is the conclusion?Tradition is good. Fairness is better.

All your NFL news on and off the field. Sign up for USA TODAY’s 4th Monday Newsletter.

5 predictions for Black Monday action

0

play

  • “Black Monday” is a term used to refer to the day after the end of the NFL regular season when multiple head coaches are often fired.
  • The Tennessee Titans and New York Giants have already fired their head coaches ahead of the 2026 offseason.

“Black Monday,” figuratively the worst day on the NFL calendar, is less than 24 hours away. On a day when 18 teams are packing up their collective lockers for the offseason that’s weeks away, several head coaches, along with their assistants and even their families, will also be packing up in preparation for a permanent change of address.

Two teams, the Tennessee Titans and New York Giants, decided a few weeks ago to go in a new direction in 2026, pre-emptively pulling the plug on Brian Callahan and Brian Daboll, respectively, rather than needlessly twisting them before the inevitable ax falls. Will their firing portend a larger HC bloodletting?

Here are some Black Monday predictions before it’s official.

Black Monday has a moderate gray hue

Since the 1966 season, the beginning of the Super Bowl era, an average of six to seven head coaching positions have been realized each year. As mentioned earlier, two teams have already started the search. But if I were to set an over/under of, say, 3 1/2 more shots in 2026, I would be inclined to choose the under. While some coaches have certainly fallen short of expectations this season, many have fallen victim to circumstances beyond their control, whether it’s injuries, a weak roster, poor quarterback play or some combination thereof.

It is also notable that very few organizations are waiting for a decision on Black Monday itself. Teams like the Giants and Titans are increasingly cutting the cord when it’s clearly the appropriate course of action. Some teams are making announcements hours after the final regular-season game, rather than forcing coaches to endure a process that doesn’t need to last an additional day. Also, in some cases, a cooling off period may be required before a club or coach decides whether to part ways.

What’s the guess here? Most pink slips will be issued by the end of Sunday – or maybe not until the end of the week… just don’t expect too many.

Coaches who participate in the playoffs will not be on the team in 2026.

It’s not that unusual for a Hedman to leave his post even after reaching the postseason. This is especially true for headmen who are stuck in a rut that is good but not so good. This is not an accusation or suggestion that any of the men below have a problem. But sometimes a franchise ends up deciding to take a step back in order to (theoretically) finally move forward, even if it means parting ways with proven winners like Todd Bowles, Matt LaFleur, or even John Harbaugh. Just to let you know, Black Monday can sometimes arrive a week late.

Mike McDaniel remains in Miami

Widely seen as a rising star after the Dolphins finished a disappointing 8-9 season in 2024, can he somehow survive another 7- or 8-win season? In a break from the typical pattern under coach McDaniel, who is completing his fourth season, the Fins have recovered to nearly break-even after a 1-6 start. That includes losing dynamic wide receiver Tyreek Hill at the end of the season. It’s also worth noting that McDaniel stayed on midway through the season, when owner Stephen Ross and former GM Chris Grier parted ways.

The Dolphins will obviously find a replacement for Grier (thanks, Troy Aikman). They will likely be contractually tied to QB Tua Tagovailoa, who had considerable success under McDaniel, for at least another year before being benched late in the season. But even if the next general manager decides to take it easy financially by firing Tagovailoa, which would cause near nine-figure salary cap pain, it’s unlikely the team will be able to find a replacement with the qualities to be the face of the franchise anytime soon. Given those options, it probably makes sense to keep McDaniel — whether he returns to work under Tua or continues to coach rookie Quinn Ewers, potentially delaying the head coach’s decision for a year. While it’s certainly ideal for a new GM and coach to come on board together and be aligned on philosophy, etc., it’s equally common for new HR executives to spend a year on-site training before deciding whether to continue with the program or completely reset it. Similar reboots have occurred recently in Nashville and Chicago.

Browns keep Kevin Stefanski

This guy was named the league’s coach of the year – twice From 2020. in cleveland. Even if they didn’t say it, it was clear the Browns were thinking long-term, Stefanski and general manager Andrew Berry, the moment they traded away their 2025 No. 2 pick and didn’t acquire a quarterback like Jackson Dart or Tyler Shaw early in the game. What Cleveland did was stack up on young talent – DT Mason Graham, LB Carson Schwezinger, TE Harold Fannin Jr., WR Isaiah Bond, RB Quinshon Judkins, Dylan Sampson, and – maybe? – QBs Shedur Sanders and Dillon Gabriel. This is a very young core, even if the latter two aren’t worth the long-term investment. And don’t forget, the Browns have two first-round picks in this year’s draft and/or the option of finding another veteran stopgap as they continue to look for a long-term answer behind center.

Either way, course owner Jimmy Haslam seems to suggest the coach can and should remain part of the grander plan, not to mention Stefanski has often performed well in recent years, even when he was saddled with quarterback albatross Deshaun Watson.

Mike Tomlin’s future depends on Mike Tomlin

We hear from you, Pittsburgh Steelers fans. you are annoyed. Winning a championship every year is fine, but not winning the Super Bowl every year is a problem. There’s no doubt that Tomlin and this organization want to do more than just advance once the playoffs begin. There’s no doubt that Tomlin and this organization want a long-term answer at quarterback. There’s no doubt that Tomlin and the organization are hoping to complete the construction of the long-awaited “Stairway to the Seven” by dwelling on a league-record six Lombardi Trophies (as a franchise, anyway) since he, Ben Roethlisberger and others won Super Bowl XLIII to close out the 2008 season.

But Tomlin, who had 19 undefeated seasons and 200 wins (including playoffs) (one of three coaches the ever-stable Steelers have hired since 1969), won’t be forced out of Pittsburgh. If that’s what he chooses, he’ll just jump at it and probably get a great job like the Giants. But don’t hold your breath, you ungrateful and spoiled insers.

All your NFL news on and off the field. Sign up for USA TODAY’s 4th Monday Newsletter.

Maduro capture live update. Why did the US attack Venezuela and take away its leader?

0

play

Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, awoke early Saturday morning to U.S. special forces seizing them from their compound in the capital, and by day’s end they were in federal custody in New York.

For several hours on Saturday, U.S. airstrikes targeted air defenses and other facilities in Caracas and three other Venezuelan states, sweeping through both Maduro and Flores states and sending them thousands of miles across sea and air to the United States.

The operation marked a dramatic escalation in President Donald Trump’s stance on Venezuela after months of heightened tensions, threats and the seizure of an oil tanker.

Maduro and his wife have been indicted on federal drug and weapons charges and are scheduled to appear at an arraignment in New York City as soon as Monday, according to multiple media reports.

As global repercussions continue, many questions remain unanswered, including the future of U.S.-Venezuela relations and how the South American nation will move forward.

Gunfire in the streets of Latin America’s capital. US military troops attack by helicopter. A foreign leader accused of drug trafficking has been taken to the United States in handcuffs.

The Trump administration’s January 3 detention of President Nicolas Maduro has echoes of the 1989 U.S. invasion of Panama that ousted military strongman Manuel Noriega and was the most direct U.S. intervention in Latin America since then.

But experts say that despite some similarities, the two key moments in the long and checkered history of U.S. interventions are different in major ways, and could make it more difficult for the U.S. to achieve its goals this time around, following attacks that have reignited unrest in the region.

Hours after his regime attacked Venezuela and forced the president out of office, President Trump said at a press conference on Saturday that the United States plans to run the country until a change in leadership occurs.

“We will continue to run our country until we can have a safe, proper and wise transition of power,” Trump said.

“We have to be smart, because that’s what we’re here for,” Trump said.

The president did not immediately provide additional details about how the United States plans to manage the sovereign nation.

In an interview on Fox News’ “Fox & Friends” on the same day, President Trump declined to say whether he would support Venezuelan opposition leader Maria Colina Machado, the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize winner, in the presidential election.

-Francesca Chambers

Mr. Maduro and Mr. Flores arrived in Brooklyn and headed to the Metropolitan Detention Center on the night of January 3.

By then, they had traveled in multiple types of aircraft and huge warships, spanning at least three countries and two time zones.

According to the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the couple was taken from their home in Caracas and then loaded onto a helicopter, where the raiding force had to struggle to escape from Venezuelan airspace. General Dan “Razin” Cain.

They were then loaded onto the U.S. Navy amphibious assault ship Iwo Jima and headed across the Caribbean to the U.S. military base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

They were then transferred to a plane and flew the final leg to New York, landing just before sunset Eastern Time at Stewart Air National Guard Base, about 80 miles north of Manhattan. Once on board, they were loaded onto a helicopter and taken to Manhattan’s West Side Helipad, and finally to a detention center in Brooklyn.

Pope Leo said Sunday he was watching developments in Venezuela “with deep concern” after the United States overthrew Maduro’s government the day before.

The first US Pope Leo called for Venezuela to remain an independent country and respect human rights.

− Reuters

Clear footage, the first released since the Venezuelan leader arrived on U.S. soil Saturday evening, showed President Maduro walking federal agents down a hallway.

The 12-second clip was posted to X by Fox News contributor Paul Mauro and shared by the White House. In the video, Maduro can be seen clutching a bottle of water and wearing black pants, a black hoodie and a hat.

His hands appeared to be bound and three officers walked him down a carpeted hallway with the word “DEA” written on it. He could be heard saying “good night” and “happy new year” before walking out of the video frame.

Venezuela’s Supreme Court’s Constitutional Council on Saturday ordered Vice President Delcy Rodríguez to assume the role of acting president.

The court’s ruling states that Rodriguez “takes office as President of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela in order to guarantee the continuity of government and the comprehensive defense of the state.”

The judgment further added that the court will consider the matter in order to “determine the legal framework applicable to guarantee the continuity of the state, the operation of the government and the defense of sovereignty in the face of the forced absence of the President of the Republic.”

Difference with income tax

0

play

Do you live in a state with a high sales tax? Are there any states that don’t charge sales tax at all?

Sales tax, the category that includes sales tax, is often listed as a footnote at the end of your receipt, but it can still impact your wallet.

Customs duties are also consumption taxes. And thanks to President Donald Trump’s 2025 Import Tax Campaign, tariffs are becoming much more accessible to American taxpayers.

Lawmakers are making great efforts to expand the consumption tax. The FairTax Act of 2025 was the latest bill to abolish the Internal Revenue Service and replace income taxes and other levies with a national sales tax. The bill has not yet been voted on in the House or Senate.

As tax season approaches, here’s everything you need to know about the country’s sales tax.

What is the national consumption tax?

Consumption tax is a tax on goods and services, that is, on what you spend, not what you earn. In the United States, sales taxes are levied in the form of retail sales taxes and excise taxes (taxes levied on certain products and activities, such as alcohol and fuel), as well as the aforementioned duties.

A national sales tax would create a federal tax on consumer goods and would outweigh (or even replace) income and payroll taxes, which fund Social Security, Medicare, and other government programs.

Does the United States have a national sales tax?

The United States currently does not have a national sales tax. Similar measures are taken in other countries, including Japan, where the standard tax rate is 7.8% and the reduced tax rate is 6.24% on items such as food, beverages, and some newspapers. More than 175 countries, including all of Europe, impose a value-added tax on goods and services at each stage of production.

Sales tax in the United States is determined by state. Almost every state imposes a sales tax, with the exception of Alaska, Delaware, Montana, New Hampshire, and Oregon, which instead allow cities to impose local sales taxes. California has the highest state sales tax rate in the country at 7.25%.

The FairTax Act would eliminate most current federal taxes and introduce a 23% federal sales tax. Tax experts have warned that the bill would primarily benefit the wealthy, who would receive significant tax cuts.

What will happen to the national consumption tax in the future?

According to the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center, the Fair Tax was first introduced in Congress in 1999 and has been reintroduced in each Congress since then. In other words, we can probably expect fairer tax laws in the future.

Could health savings accounts change how Obamacare works?

0

play

Established more than 20 years ago, health savings accounts are a popular way for consumers to save for medical expenses while receiving tax breaks.

But could these accounts play a larger role in how American consumers pay for and receive health care? That’s exactly what Senate Republicans are proposing. They want to give eligible Americans up to $1,500 to fund health savings accounts, rather than extend the pandemic-era subsidies that made Affordable Care Act health insurance cheaper for 22 million Americans.

Health savings accounts are commonly used among workers who obtain health insurance through their employer. As of mid-2025, U.S. consumers had 40 million health savings accounts with $159 billion in savings, a 16% increase in savings compared to the previous year, according to a national survey.

Scott Cutler, CEO of HealthEquity, which provides health savings accounts, said these numbers show that a growing proportion of Americans are relying on health savings accounts to save for unexpected medical expenses.

“Health care affordability is at risk in America,” Cutler said. “Half of Americans can’t afford a $500 medical bill, so having a safety net that expands over time and can be used for medical expenses will help Americans be more prepared.”

What is a Health Savings Account?

Health savings accounts allow consumers to save money before taxes. For workers, this means a certain amount is deducted from their paycheck and deposited into a Health Savings Account (HSA) before taxes are withheld.

This money can be used for eligible expenses such as doctor and hospital bills and prescription drugs. Consumers can roll over their Health Savings Account balances from year to year, invest the funds, and spend the tax-free profits on qualified expenses.

What are the deductibles and contribution limits for HSA plans?

Health savings accounts are paired with high-deductible health insurance plans. Your deductible is the amount you have to pay out-of-pocket before most insurance coverage kicks in.

The minimum deductible for HSA-eligible plans in 2026 is $1,700 for individuals and $3,400 for family insurance plans.

There is also a limit to the amount you can donate each year. Contribution limits are $4,400 for individuals and $8,750 for families. People age 55 and older can contribute an additional $1,000 per year.

How is an HSA different from an FSA?

Flexible spending accounts are also savings vehicles typically offered through the workplace that allow users to withhold pre-tax payroll deductions. A medical insurance FSA can cover medical expenses, while a dependent care FSA is used for child care or elder care costs.

FSA accounts are spend-it-or-lose-it accounts that require consumers to spend their contributions within one year or forfeit their remaining balance. HSA balances accumulate over the years.

Why do some people choose high deductibles and health savings accounts?

Employers offer high-deductible health plans combined with HSAs to cost-conscious workers who want to lower their monthly health insurance premium payments. The tradeoff with these high-deductible plans is that workers must spend more of their own money when visiting doctors and other health care providers.

Employees in high-deductible plans pay an average of $109 per month in premiums, much lower than the average $191 per month for traditional PPO (preferred provider organization) plans, according to benefits consultant Mercer. However, workers must pay deductibles that are more than twice as high as traditional health plans.

One strategy people use is to save enough to cover their out-of-pocket costs, including deductibles, copays, and coinsurance (an insurance plan’s requirement that the consumer pay a percentage of the bill). If consumers save that amount, they can cover basic medical expenses.

Health savings accounts are popular among young people, with 56% of Gen Z workers and 50% of millennials participating in an HSA, according to a HealthEquity survey of more than 600 workers with employer-sponsored health insurance in 2025. These younger workers often have lower rates of chronic disease, and these healthy individuals may see HSAs as a smart way to build savings for potential future medical expenses..

“If HSA holders are better prepared, they are more likely to have emergency savings and be better prepared for medical expenses,” Cutler said. “They are less likely to skip preventive care and can transparently use their money to purchase eligible medical supplies.”

Can Affordable Care Act enrollees use HSA plans?

Health savings accounts are not limited to consumers who have health insurance through their workplace. In 2026, consumers who select a bronze or catastrophic level Affordable Care Act plan will be able to use a health savings account.

Whether Congress chooses to fund health savings accounts for some consumers remains uncertain.

Congress currently does not fund health savings accounts for Affordable Care Act participants. On Dec. 8, Republican Sens. Mike Crapo and Bill Cassidy announced a bill that would deposit $1,000 to $1,500 into eligible consumers’ health savings accounts. This funding would replace the extension of enhanced COVID-19-era tax credits that significantly lower health insurance premiums under the ACA.

On Dec. 11, the Senate rejected the Crapo-Cassidy plan and a Democratic proposal to extend coronavirus-era tax credits for three years. ACA premiums spiked on Jan. 1 for millions of Americans who relied on coronavirus-era subsidies to lower their monthly premiums. The original ACA Advanced Premium Tax Credit, which reduces premiums for people with incomes up to four times the federal poverty level, will remain in place.

When Congress reconvenes in January, Democrats and Republicans will fight over health care affordability.

In a Dec. 18 social media post, Cassidy defended his idea of ​​giving money to consumers rather than funding ACA subsidies paid to health insurance companies. “Republicans support it. Americans support it,” Cassidy said. “Democrats should support it, too.”

But Democrats and some health policy analysts are skeptical about using taxpayer money to support health savings accounts.

“Most Americans don’t have enough savings to pay for medical emergencies, let alone pay high HSA deductibles,” said Representative Lloyd Doggett, D-Texas.

Sabrina Corlett, co-director of Georgetown University’s Center on Health Care Reform, said most Americans don’t have enough cash to pay for anticipated health care costs. Hospital bills alone can cost thousands of dollars, she said.

If Congress funds health savings accounts instead of the ACA’s enhanced subsidies, Corlett said, consumers with chronic health conditions and those who require hospital care “will end up with a very high financial liability.” “Medical debt will increase even more.”

Invasion of Venezuela recreates the invasion of Panama that captured Manuel Noriega

0

play

Gunfire in the streets of Latin America’s capital. US military troops attack by helicopter. A foreign leader accused of drug trafficking has been taken to the United States in handcuffs.

The Trump administration’s January 3 detention of President Nicolas Maduro has echoes of the 1989 U.S. invasion of Panama that ousted military strongman Manuel Noriega and was the most direct U.S. intervention in Latin America since then.

But experts say that despite some similarities, the two key moments in the long and checkered history of U.S. interventions are different in major ways, and could make it more difficult for the U.S. to achieve its goals this time around, following attacks that have reignited unrest in the region.

President Donald Trump said on January 3 that his administration would be “running the country” for some time, apparently referring to nation-building efforts. He said it would be funded by Venezuela’s vast oil reserves, developed by U.S. oil companies, some of which were forced to withdraw in the 2000s.

While many Panamanians see Mr. Noriega’s ouster as a step toward a growing and stable democracy despite the deaths and trauma, experts said the outcome is far less certain in a much larger and more complex country plagued by poverty, crime and deep resistance.

Will Freeman, a Latin America researcher at the Council on Foreign Relations, said it was a much easier task for relatively small Panama to shape its post-invasion future.

Although the details are still unclear, Freeman said he doubts the U.S. would send a full-fledged Iraq-style occupation force.

“In Venezuela this will not be so simple,” he said. “One, it’s unlikely that we’ll even reach democracy. Two, many of the problems that were with President Maduro will remain.”

The leaders try in vain to avoid capture.

President Trump’s announcement of the raid comes 36 years after the United States detained Manuel Noriega.

The military strongman, famous for his pimples, was once an ally of the United States who was scouted by the CIA to stop the spread of communism. But he has increased U.S. anger over actions such as heightened hostility, the annulment of elections, and violent crackdowns on opponents.

In 1989, President George H.W. Bush ordered Operation Just Cause, citing authoritarian rule, concerns about the security of the Panama Canal, and U.S. drug trafficking and money laundering charges. It has mobilized more than 20,000 U.S. troops, many of whom are already stationed in Panama, to seize control of military and infrastructure facilities. A new president took office shortly thereafter.

Maduro’s arrest also stems from his history of conflict with the United States.

Maduro came to power as the successor to President Hugo Chávez, a socialist leader who assumed leadership in the late 1990s. Since then, the country has faced authoritarianism and soaring poverty, crime and inflation.

Like Noriega, Maduro was indicted by U.S. prosecutors in 2020 on drug trafficking charges. But Michael Shifter, an adjunct professor at Georgetown University’s Walsh School of Foreign Service, said he was not as important on the drug issue as Noriega or Juan Orlando Hernandez, the former Honduran presidents recently pardoned by Trump.

Pressure to oust Maduro has increased since Trump’s reelection last year. And in recent months, a U.S. military buildup in the region has included the deployment of an aircraft carrier and deadly military attacks on small vessels suspected of carrying drugs.

Air Force Gen. Dan “Razin” Cain, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said U.S. authorities spent time following Mr. Maduro’s daily life and before the military raid in which he was captured by U.S. special forces at his military base.

When U.S. forces cut off power and descended on Maduro, they encountered resistance, including being hit by helicopters, and counterattacked. Mr. Cain said Mr. Maduro was unable to reach the secure room in the rebar he was trying to reach. Images and video showed explosions, vehicles on fire, smoke billowing over the capital Caracas and swarms of helicopters flying low.

By that night, Mr. Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, were in New York, where Mr. Maduro has been accused of cocaine trafficking during his 25 years in public office.

More than 30 years ago, Noriega also went on the run, driving through the streets to evade arrest and eventually hiding in the Vatican embassy on December 24.

According to the official account, the scene was surrounded by American forces who were unable to storm the scene, and continued to play music by Alice Cooper and Black Sabbath over loudspeakers. He surrendered on January 3, 1990.

Noriega was convicted and spent the rest of his life in prisons in the United States, France and Panama, dying in 2017.

Interventions bring criticism and challenges

Both attacks were part of a century of direct and indirect U.S. intervention in the politics of Latin American countries such as Cuba, the Dominican Republic, and Haiti.

For example, in the 1950s, the United States sought to remove Guatemala’s democratically elected president from office amid land reform that affected the exploitative labor practices of the United Fruit Company, based in the United States.

The United States helped establish a military dictatorship whose policies ultimately led to a civil war and massive human rights violations, during which more than 200,000 Guatemalans were killed or forcibly disappeared.

At least 514 Panamanian soldiers and civilians were killed during the invasion of Panama. However, some local reports put the number at double that. 23 U.S. military personnel were killed. And the event was seen by critics as yet another example of US disregard for sovereignty.

Eduardo Gamarra, a professor of politics and international relations at Florida International University, said that at the time, the United States wanted to intervene relatively quickly as leaders wanted to avoid a quagmire.

In contrast, the Trump administration has turned away from the post-Cold War international order with actions and policies that have been compared to President Theodore Roosevelt’s view of the Monroe Doctrine that the United States should “use international police powers” to end what Roosevelt called “chronic insecurity and malfeasance” in the hemisphere.

And it comes as some countries in Latin America are moving towards right-leaning governments. Gamarra said that during the Panama invasion, more people were trying to break away from the authoritarian leadership.

President Trump has criticized Venezuela for nationalizing its oil industry in the 1970s and making additional expropriations and other changes in the 2000s that forced many major U.S. oil companies to leave the country and led to legal battles over compensation.

According to Reuters, Trump said his administration plans to oversee Venezuela, but that the U.S. military cannot control the country itself, although Trump did not rule out putting some “boots” on the ground.

At a press conference on January 3, President Trump said, “I will continue to run the country until we can have a safe, appropriate and wise transition of power.”

Trump said Venezuelan Vice President Delcy Rodríguez had no choice but to be cooperative, but Rodríguez appeared on Venezuelan television Saturday afternoon with other government officials to denounce what she called a kidnapping.

Such efforts will face complexities that did not exist in Panama decades ago, Schifter said, including the presence of large oil reserves and security challenges from criminal organizations to illegal mining interests.

Uncertainty also stems from mixed reactions, with some celebrating hope for new freedom and others saying a red line has been crossed in a region where the military action has reignited fears about past U.S. interventions.

In Panama, which has attracted the attention of the Trump administration over immigration and canal oversight, the country’s President José Raul Mulino expressed support for “the democratic process and acceptance of the legitimate wishes of the Venezuelan people” on social media.

The invasion of Panama 36 years ago was not seen as much of a precursor to other interventions, but President Trump’s comments on a range of issues, including illegal drugs, targeting Colombia, Mexico and Cuba, have worried some countries.

“U.S. military intervention in the region hasn’t always had a happy track record, so I think that’s creating a lot of anxiety and concern,” Shifter said. “If there are no limits and no rules, why can’t President Trump do the same for them?”

Contributed by Kim Hjelmgaard, USA TODAY, Reuters

Draymond Green ejected from Jazz vs. Warriors

0

play

SAN FRANCISCO — Golden State Warriors forward Draymond Green was ejected during the second quarter of a game against the Utah Jazz on Jan. 3 at Chase Center.

Green, who committed consecutive technical fouls, was sent to the shower room with 2 minutes and 25 seconds left in the second quarter.

After defending Jazz forward Kyle Filipovski in the paint, Green said something to the referee and clapped his hands.

Concerned about a no-call (was he looking for an offensive 3 in the paint?), Green took Filipovski’s pass and ran freely into the lane, allowing Lauri Markkanen to dunk.

Green continued to have a lively discussion with the referee, but received his first technical foul. He continued to argue his point, but received a second technical foul from another referee.

Green finished the game with eight points, three rebounds, two assists, and one block in 12 minutes. The Warriors led 65-58 at the half.

“I don’t know what he said,” Warriors manager Steve Kerr said after his team’s 123-114 victory.

It was Green’s ninth technical foul of the season. If a player receives his 16th technical during the NBA regular season, he will receive an automatic one-game suspension.

“We need Draymond. I want him to go out there,” Kerr said. “We’re not even halfway through the season yet. There’s still a long way to go and we need him.”

Green’s teammates also joined in his defense.

“Believe it or not, Dray was an inspiration to us,” Gary Payton II said. “Everyone had to step up their level. You can’t replace the work he did and what he brought to the team. I think after halftime we had a little more spark, fewer turnovers, getting in transition and allowing our shooters to get open shots.”

President Trump’s arrest of President Maduro will not make life difficult

0


Donald Trump has yet to justify how it will improve our lives as millions of Americans see rising health care costs and persistently high food prices.

play

President Donald Trump did not seek permission from Congress to take military action against Venezuela and bring the South American country’s president to stand trial in the United States.

Also, importantly, he didn’t ask for your permission. There was no effort to garner or evaluate public support for this likely illegal endeavor. You and I and all American citizens have simply been told, as President Trump said on January 3, that the United States is going to govern Venezuela for a while.

In response to the attack, President Trump said, “We will continue to run our country until we can have a safe, proper and wise transition of power.”

Well, that’s really great. I didn’t ask for this. I’ve never heard anyone request this. In fact, I doubt that many, if any, Americans voted for Trump because they wanted regime change in a country that is hard to spot on a map.

People are worried about food and health insurance, not Venezuela

The president just stood up and did it, but he still hasn’t provided a solid justification for how it will improve our lives at a time when millions of Americans are seeing rising health care costs and persistently high food prices.

Looking at Trump’s recent poll numbers, few people are satisfied with the way he is running the country. And now you think he can handle other things a little bit? please.

Sure, no one will shed a tear for Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro – he’s a bad guy. But my understanding of the last US presidential election was that people re-elected Trump because he said on the first day that he would lower food prices. People voted for him because he said he would lead America into a new “Golden Age.”

“My proudest legacy will be as a peacebuilder and unifier,” President Trump said in his inaugural address.

Oops.

Do you think oil can pay for President Trump’s Venezuela debacle? Ha!

The president has not delivered on any of his promises and now appears to be marching America into foreign occupation at great expense while suggesting that Venezuelan oil will help pay for everything.

“There’s so much money coming out of the ground that it’s not costing us anything,” Trump said at the Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach, Florida. There, President Trump oversaw the attack on Venezuela, along with other big-name cabinet members, including Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio.

That echo you’re hearing is from the Iraq war.

I’m trying to think of a time in the past when the administration assured the American people that a country’s oil would cover the costs of occupying that country.

Oh yeah, in 2002, Richard Perle, chairman of the Pentagon’s Defense Policy Board, had this to say about the Iraq war: “The expected economic impact would be relatively small. . . . In any likely scenario, the negative impacts would be significantly smaller than the economic benefits.”

Opinion warning: Get columns from your favorite columnists and expert analysis on key issues delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. If you don’t have the app, download it for free from the app store.

Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld also said of Iraq in 2003: “When it comes to reconstruction, we will first look to the resources of the Iraqi government and the international community before relying on American taxpayers.”

And in 2003, Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz said the following about Iraq: “We’re talking about countries that can actually, and relatively soon, provide funding to rebuild themselves.”

Cool, cool, cool.

President Trump’s attack on Venezuela has nothing to do with drugs

And what about Trump’s explanation that he attacked Venezuela to stop the flow of drugs into the United States? According to the New York Times Editorial Board,

“In this case, this claim is especially absurd given that Venezuela is not a significant producer of fentanyl and other drugs that have dominated the recent overdose epidemic in the United States, and that the cocaine it produces goes primarily to Europe. While Trump has been attacking Venezuelan ships, he has also pardoned Juan Orlando Hernández, who ran a large-scale drug trafficking operation while president of Honduras from 2014 to 2022.” ”

We did not ask for this invasion. No ordinary person asked the United States to intervene in Venezuela. The main concerns people have right now are putting food on the table, ensuring their jobs aren’t lost to artificial intelligence, and paying for their health insurance.

The Trump administration never advocated attacking Venezuela.

So I want Trump administration officials to make sure the American people understand the cost of the quagmire they may have dragged this country into. I want to know who really wanted this pointless military action, what the administration’s plan is going forward, and how this is helping average Americans.

I’m sure I’m not the only one looking for answers, as 2026 is less than a week old and a new imperialist bloody war for oil has already begun.

Follow USA TODAY columnist Rex Huppke on Bluesky at @rexhuppke.bsky.social and on Facebook at facebook.com/RexIsAJerk.

Seahawks vs. 49ers winners and losers, impact on NFC West playoffs

0

play

  • The Seattle Seahawks defeated the San Francisco 49ers 13-3 to win the NFC West.
  • Seattle’s victory clinched the No. 1 seed in the NFC, securing a first-round bye and home-field advantage.
  • The Seahawks’ defense dominated the game, holding the 49ers to just three points and 173 total yards.

It’s already been a good new year for the Seattle Seahawks.

The Seahawks defeated the San Francisco 49ers 13-3 on Saturday night to secure the No. 1 seed in the NFC and win the NFC West title.

Seattle’s stingy defense controlled much of the game, shutting down the 49ers’ hot offense throughout the fourth quarter.

The Seahawks scored the first touchdown of the game and took a 10-3 lead into halftime.

Seattle only made one field goal in the fourth quarter, and that was the only point of the second half.

The 49ers nearly cut Seattle’s lead, but Seahawks linebacker Drake Thomas intercepted a tipped pass from Brock Purdy in the fourth quarter. The Seahawks’ offense took control of the football, and a dominant performance by Seattle’s defense proved they could maintain the advantage.

With this win, Seattle clinched the NFC West title and the No. 1 overall seed in the NFC playoffs.

Here are the winners and losers of the battle for the West.

winner

seahawks defense

The Seahawks held San Francisco to just three first downs and three points in the first half.

Seattle held San Francisco to 105 total yards and five first downs in the fourth quarter.

Seahawks linebacker Boi Maffet ended a promising drive for the 49ers by flipping Brock Purdy’s pass to Christian McCaffrey with his fingertips. The wobbly football floated behind McCaffrey and was picked off by Seahawks linebacker Drake Thomas at Seattle’s 3-yard line with 10:27 left in the fourth quarter.

The turnover gave Seattle a 13-3 lead.

Seattle’s defense held the 49ers to 173 total yards, going 2-for-9 on third down and allowing just three points. The 49ers remained scoreless in the second half.

Brock Purdy was sacked three times and intercepted once.

The Seahawks entered Week 18 ranked in the top 10 in total defense and second in points allowed (18.1).

Jackson Smith-Njiba, Kenneth Walker III

Smith-Njiba and Walker were two of the best players on Seattle’s offensive line.

Smith-Njiba entered Week 18 with an NFL-high 1,709 receiving yards this season. The Seahawks wide receiver had a game-high six catches for 84 yards.

Walker had a productive night for the running back, rushing 16 times for 97 yards.

Seahawks, Seattle

The Seahawks will be a rested team heading into the playoffs. Seattle earned the NFC’s top seed, a first-round bye, and home-field advantage through the NFC playoffs.

The road to Super Bowl 60 goes through Seattle in the NFC.

49ers alternate jersey

The 49ers debuted the Nike X NFL Rivals jersey on Saturday night. It has a sleek all-black look, featuring a midnight black helmet with a red stripe down the middle and a gold-coated face mask.

loser

jason myers

Myers missed a 47-yard field goal to the right in the second quarter and missed a 26-yard field goal into the uprights in the fourth.

The Seahawks’ kicker sometimes missed kickoffs.

It was an off night for Myers, who hadn’t missed a field goal since Week 11.

However, Seattle’s defense was so dominant that Myers’ off night didn’t have much of an impact.

49ers run defense

Seahawks running back Kenneth Walker III helped Seattle maintain possession with a 19-yard run on third-and-17 late in the third quarter.

The Seahawks capped off the drive with a 31-yard field goal by Myers, increasing their lead to 13-3 with 14:15 left in the fourth quarter.

The 49ers defense allowed 180 yards on the ground and one touchdown. The Seahawks averaged 4.6 yards per carry.

49ers injuries

The 49ers have dealt with injuries to key players throughout the season. The team’s ability to overcome injuries to players like linebacker Fred Warner, edge rusher Nick Bosa and wide receiver Brandon Aiyuk is a big reason why Kyle Shanahan is a candidate for Coach of the Year.

Star left tackle Trent Williams was inactive Saturday with a hamstring injury, and wide receiver Ricky Pearsall was out with knee and ankle injuries. San Francisco was unable to overcome injuries against the powerful Seahawks.

Linebacker Dee Winters injured his ankle in the first half, and Purdy was hit late in Saturday’s game.

Los Angeles Rams

The Rams, last year’s NFC West champions, got to watch what would be the NFC West title game.

Follow USA TODAY Sports’ Tyler Dragon on X @TylerDragon.

Saints vs. Falcons, Bucks or Panthers decide NFC South title

0

play

  • The Tampa Bay Buccaneers defeated the Carolina Panthers 16-14 in the final game of the regular season.
  • Both teams’ playoff hopes depend on the outcome of the Atlanta Falcons vs. New Orleans Saints game.
  • The Buccaneers need a win or a tie for the Saints to win the NFC South and advance to the playoffs.

Carolina Panthers head coach Dave Canales wore a hat that read “OPPORTUNITY” during the team’s Week 18 game against the Tampa Bay Buccaneers.

That’s ironic.

Both teams enter the final day of the regular season with no control over their respective playoff fates. Any chance of the Atlanta Falcons defeating the New Orleans Saints on Sunday, Jan. 4 would negate the Buccaneers’ 16-14 victory in poor conditions in Tampa on Jan. 3. However, if the Saints win (or tie), the Bucks will advance as the No. 4 seed in the NFC and their fifth straight NFC South champion.

The Panthers smashed through the sliding door scenario window. A win would automatically clinch Carolina’s division title, and a win for the Falcons would still make the playoffs.

“Hey, we’re all going to be watching the game on the edge of our seats (Sunday), hoping for a result and hoping the Falcons come out on top,” Canales told reporters after the game. “At the same time, at least we have hope to look.”

Baker Mayfield ‘hates’ the Saints, but plans to pull for them on Sunday

It’s a bit of an awkward situation for Buccaneers quarterback Baker Mayfield, who made headlines earlier this season for professing his hatred for the Saints.

“We’re all committed to New Orleans,” Mayfield told reporters.

Buccaneers linebacker Lavonte David began his postgame press conference by thanking everyone who has been there for the last 14 years, but the question arose: “Is this the end of it?”

“No,” he answered. “I’m going to see what the Saints do tomorrow.”

He never thought the day would come when he would have to cheer for the Saints.

“We’ve put together some people we can contact to make sure we take care of business,” he said.

Mayfield was quick to point out that the Bucks could also make the playoffs if the score is tied. He said group texts could be sent for watch parties among teammates.

“We find ourselves in this situation.”

Carolina signal caller Bryce Young said he never thought about the Falcons’ matchup with the Saints. It’s disgusting that we missed the opportunity to take on the division ourselves and now it’s in someone else’s hands.

“To be honest, I might not watch it,” he told reporters.

Tampa Bay head coach Todd Bowles said all both teams can do is wait.

“If we don’t win today, we can’t wait for tomorrow,” Bowles told reporters. “Give yourself a chance. That’s all we can ask for.”

He plans to watch the 1 p.m. ET kickoff from home. Bowles said he could have made “a ton” of plays in the second half as his team saw its season turn around after a 5-1 start. But dwelling on the past won’t change things, he said.

“Today was disappointing. Tomorrow could be jubilant,” Bowles said. “If tomorrow doesn’t happen, we’ll be disappointed. We’ve put ourselves in this situation. We’re grown men about it.”

Mayfield agreed with everything Bowles said. The focus was always on winning against the Panthers and allowing them to let the chips fall.

“Honestly, I thought it was really good to get back in the win column and just focus on the special game and control what we can control. It’s just about ourselves right now. Execute to the highest level we can and find a way to win.”

Mayfield was asked about his thoughts if the Bucks advance.

“I feel good,” he said with a smile that said more than anything that actually came out of Mayfield’s mouth. “It feels good when you enter.”

The “what if” on the final day of the season is an unpleasant reality.

Is President Trump looking at regime change in Cuba after the attack on Venezuela?

0

play

  • President Donald Trump has called Cuba a “failed state” and suggested it could become a focus of future foreign policy.
  • President Trump has repeatedly made offensive remarks about Colombian President Gustavo Petro, saying he is in charge of a country involved in drug trafficking.
  • Secretary of State Marco Rubio described Cuba as a “disaster” with a collapsed economy run by “incompetent, stupid men.”
  • During his first term, President Trump reversed the Obama administration’s Cuba policy, arguing that it only enriched his administration.

PALM BEACH — With Nicolas Maduro in U.S. custody and U.S. authorities running Venezuela, who’s next? Cuba? Columbia? Panama Canal?

President Donald Trump said on January 3 that he was considering the Havana administration.

“Cuba is something we will eventually talk about, because Cuba is a failing state right now, a very badly failed state. We want to help our people,” the president said at a press conference in Mar-a-Lago, the day after a U.S. military operation removed President Maduro from Venezuela. “It’s very similar in the sense that we want to help the Cuban people, but we also want to help the people who have been forced to leave Cuba and are living in this country.”

The president also reiterated his offensive comments against Colombian President Gustavo Petro, who last month denigrated the Trump administration as a “family of pedophiles” citing the investigation into sex abuser and trafficker Jeffrey Epstein.

President Trump said Petro also controls states that are intertwined with the drug trade. The president also said he stands by his assertion late last month that South American leaders needed to “watch their butts.”

The Isthmus of Panama, a strategic global corridor, was not a topic of discussion at the winter White House press conference, but President Trump appeased the Panamanian government over suspicions that China controls the canal. But the Central American country’s president, José Raúl Murino, said on January 2 that the break with Washington was over and the government was actively working with the United States to address grievances.

Therefore, it was mainly Cuba that President Trump was interested in speaking to in Palm Beach when discussing “Operation Absolute Resolve” to remove President Maduro from power in Caracas.

“We want to be surrounded by good neighbors,” President Trump said. “We want to be in a stable environment.”

The communist government in Havana, currently led by Miguel Diaz-Canel, has been in power for 67 years. On New Year’s Day, we celebrated another anniversary of the revolution led by Fidel Castro.

President Trump said, “Cuba is not doing very well right now.” “The system has not been very good for Cuba. The Cuban people have suffered for many years.”

Now that the United States is “running” Venezuela, as President Trump has said, the administration is in a position to completely cut off oil shipments from Venezuela to Cuba. Oil subsidies provided to Havana by the Maduro regime were one of the few sources of foreign aid the Cuban government could rely on.

For this reason, there was great support from supporters who called for an end to communist rule on the island.

“Venezuela’s return to the rule of law and respect for human rights has international implications. The Cuban regime will no longer be able to profit from Venezuelan oil,” said Frank Calzon of the Free Cuba Center. “Iran, Russia, China, Nicaragua and Cuba have lost strategic allies in the Americas. And hopefully, if its vast oil resources are properly managed, Venezuela will be great again.”

President Trump’s harsh speech did not impress West Palm Beach Democratic Rep. Lois Frankel, who represents Florida’s 22nd Congressional District, which includes Trump’s Mar-a-Lago mansion.

“There’s no way to predict what this president will do,” Frankel said. “This kind of rhetoric is dangerous and increases the risk of escalation across the hemisphere. The United States should lead with diplomacy and stability, not threats that undermine the region’s security and ours.”

Rubio: Cuba is in ‘total collapse’

Secretary of State Marco Rubio, asked by President Trump to speak about the situation on the Caribbean island 90 miles from the U.S. coast, added that Cuba was a “disaster.”

“It’s incompetent and run by old people, but incompetent nonetheless,” he said. “There’s no economy. It’s completely collapsed.”

Rubio earlier said his administration would “talk to anyone” but warned his opponents against playing games.

“Don’t play games with this president, because it’s not going to work,” said the former Florida senator and son of Cuban exiles. “I think we learned that lesson last night, and I hope it helps us going forward.”

Trump has long been involved in Cuba’s foreign policy and U.S. domestic politics. He is the only presidential candidate endorsed by the Bay of Pigs veterans organization, Brigade 2506 Association, first in 2016 and then in 2020 and 2024.

During his first term, Mr. Trump visited the Little Havana neighborhood of Miami, Florida, and gave a speech announcing that he would reverse the Obama administration’s engagement policy and resume tourism and trade ties with the Cuban regime, then led by Mr. Fidel’s brother Raul Castro.

President Trump said in a speech at the Manuel Artim Theater on June 16, 2017, “The previous administration’s easing of travel and trade restrictions is not helping the Cuban people; it is only enriching the Cuban regime.” “The result of the previous administration’s administrative actions was nothing more than further repression and a move to crush peaceful democratic movements.”

The then-45th president added: “Therefore, I am immediately revoking the previous administration’s completely unilateral agreement with Cuba.”

Antonio Fins is the politics and business editor for The Palm Beach Post, part of the USA TODAY Florida Network. Please contact us at afins@pbpost.com.

Powerball winning numbers for Saturday, January 3, 2026

0

The jackpot for the first Powerball drawing of 2026 will take place on Saturday. January 3rd was $64 million, with a cash value of $28.9 million.

Saturday’s drawing came after no one won the $1.8 billion Christmas Eve jackpot, the second-largest in the game’s history. The winning ticket was sold in Cabot, Arkansas, about 30 miles from Little Rock.

According to the Arkansas Lottery, winners have 180 days from the drawing date to claim their prize. In this case, Christmas Eve winners must claim their prize by June 22, 2026.

The latest Powerball jackpot is set to take place tonight, so here are the winning numbers.

What are the winning Powerball numbers for January 3rd?

USA TODAY will publish the winning lottery numbers after the drawing at 10:59 p.m. ET.

How to play Powerball

Powerball tickets cost $2 per play and are sold in 45 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. This can be done at a variety of locations, including local convenience stores, gas stations, and grocery stores. In some states, you can purchase Powerball tickets online depending on your local jurisdiction.

Once you have your ticket, you have to choose six numbers. Five of them are white balls numbered from 1 to 69. The red Powerball range is 1-26. You can also add a “Power Play” for $1, which increases your winnings on all non-jackpot prizes. “Power Play” multipliers allow you to increase your winnings by 2x, 3x, 4x, 5x, or 10x.

A “Quick Pick” option is also available if you want the computer to select the numbers for you. To win the jackpot, players must match all five white balls with the red Powerball in any order.

Powerball drawings are held on Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday nights. The winnings continue to increase even if no one wins the jackpot.

The lottery winning numbers sponsors are: Jackpocket, USA TODAY Network’s official digital lottery delivery company.

Top 10 Powerball Jackpots

  • $2.04 billion in California on November 7, 2022
  • December 24, 2025, $1.817 billion in Arkansas.
  • $1.787 billion in Missouri and Texas on September 6, 2025
  • $1.765 billion in California on October 11, 2023
  • January 13, 2016, $1.586 billion in California, Florida, and Tennessee
  • April 6, 2024, $1.326 billion in Oregon.
  • $1.08 billion in California on July 19, 2023
  • $842.4 million in Michigan on January 1, 2024
  • March 27, 2019, $768.4 million in Wisconsin
  • August 23, 2017, $758.7 million in Massachusetts

Can I get Powerball tickets online?

You can also order tickets online Jackpocket, USA TODAY Network’s official digital lottery delivery companythese states and territories of the United States: Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Idaho, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Puerto Rico, Washington DC, and West Virginia.

The Jackpocket app allows you to choose your lottery games and numbers, place your order, check your tickets, and claim your winnings, all using your phone or home computer.

Jackpocket is the official digital lottery carrier of USA TODAY Network. Gannett may earn revenue from viewer referrals to the Jackpocket Service. Must be 18 years or older, 21 years or older in Arizona, 19 years or older in Nebraska. Not affiliated with any state lottery. Gambling problem? Call 1-877-8-HOPE-NY or text HOPENY (467369) (NY). 1-800-327-5050 (MA); 1-877-MYLIMIT (OR); 1-800-981-0023 (PR); 1-800-GAMBLER (ALL OTHERS). visit jackpocket.com/tos Over the entire period.

Fernando Cervantes Jr. is a trending news reporter for USA TODAY. Contact us at fernando.cervantes@gannett.com and follow us at X @fern_cerv_.

President Trump calls Monroe Doctrine ‘Don Roe Doctrine’ after attack on Venezuela

0

play

In an hour-long press conference following the early morning arrest of the Venezuelan leader and his wife, President Donald Trump justified the operation as being in line with the Monroe Doctrine, a foreign policy agenda for more than 200 years.

The doctrine, which the president calls the “Don Roe Doctrine,” has long been relegated to foreign policy history, and recent administrations have sought to distance themselves from it. But more than a decade after then-Secretary of State John Kerry announced under former President Barack Obama that the era of the Monroe Doctrine was over, President Trump has now accepted it.

In his remarks on January 3, the president made this principle a continuing tenet of U.S. foreign policy and said the operation that ousted Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro not only adheres to this principle, but takes it a step further. President Trump has accused Venezuela of seizing and selling U.S. oil assets, claiming that Venezuela is “hosting a foreign enemy” and “obtaining offensive weapons.”

“All of these actions flagrantly violate the core principles of American foreign policy that date back more than two centuries,” Trump said. “It goes all the way back to the Monroe Doctrine. And the Monroe Doctrine is a big deal, but we’ve largely replaced it. Now they call it the Donroe Doctrine.”

What is the Monroe Doctrine? Or is it the “Donro principle”?

The Monroe Doctrine, named after its architect, former President James Monroe, in 1823, was one of the most important agenda items in U.S. foreign policy in the 19th century. The document began as a largely symbolic document expressing American opposition to new or expanding European involvement in the Americas, after centuries of colonial activity in the region. It will be a key element of U.S. foreign policy in the region for decades to come, but it has come under increasing criticism from academics and policymakers for being used to justify intervention in Latin America.

This principle outlined how the U.S. government viewed South and Central America as its strategic “backyard,” an area that should be under U.S. influence rather than Europe.

The spirit of this doctrine continued to evolve through subsequent administrations. In 1904, President Theodore Roosevelt added the so-called Roosevelt Corollary, which states that the United States has the right to intervene in the Americas under certain circumstances. President Roosevelt declared that the U.S. government could “exercise international police powers” to end what he called “chronic insecurity and malfeasance” in the Western Hemisphere.

According to the State Department’s Historical Bureau, this provided the basis for justifying U.S. intervention in Cuba, Nicaragua, Haiti, and the Dominican Republic. According to the National Archives, U.S. Marines were sent to Santo Domingo in 1904, Nicaragua in 1911, and Haiti in 1915, “ostensibly to keep Europeans out.”

In 1934, President Franklin D. Roosevelt abandoned interventionism and established a “good neighbor” policy within the Western Hemisphere. This was seen as the end of the height of Monroe Doctrine foreign policy.

Although U.S. intervention in Latin America occurred long before the Monroe Doctrine, interpretations of this document underpinned several important U.S. projects and actions in the region, from the construction of the Panama Canal to the Cold War era. The document also significantly strained relations with various Latin American countries for decades and remains an important document for understanding historical and contemporary U.S. foreign policy in the region.

President Trump embraces the Monroe Doctrine in second administration

The January 3 remarks were not the first time President Trump expressed a desire to return to foreign policy positions inspired by centuries-old principles. The administration released a new national security strategy in November that explicitly models its stance toward the Western Hemisphere after the Monroe Doctrine, and says it will “reassert and strengthen” that doctrine to “restore American primacy.”

He called it “Trump’s corollary.”

President Trump said of the Monroe Doctrine, “I think we forgot about it.” “It was very important, but we forgot it. We’re not forgetting it anymore. Under our new national security strategy, America’s primacy in the Western Hemisphere will never be questioned again.”

Kathryn Palmer is USA TODAY’s political reporter. She can be reached at the following address: kapalmer@usatoday.com And to X@Kathryn Purml. Sign up for her daily politics newsletter here.

Evangeline Lilly suffers brain damage and cognitive decline after the fall of Hawaii

0

play

Evangeline Lilly said she will be starting the new year with health concerns, an uphill battle and plenty of rest.

‘Ant-Man and the Wasp’ star reveals he has brain damage after an accident in Hawaii where he passed out and landed face-first on a rock.

“The verdict is in…I have brain damage due to (traumatic brain injury). I am relieved to know that my cognitive decline is not just perimenopausal, but uncomfortable knowing how much of an uphill battle it will be to reverse my cognitive decline,” she posted on Instagram on January 2nd.

In a video recorded on Jan. 1, the “Lost” actress said brain scans confirmed “decreased function in almost every area of ​​the brain.”

“But my job now is to work things out with the doctors and start the hard work of fixing it. I’m not looking forward to it, because I think all I’m doing is working hard. But that’s okay,” she added.

Evangeline Lilly has suffered from power outages since childhood

Although the injury in Hawaii was traumatic, “it wasn’t surprising for a Canadian writer who has suffered from ‘absences’ and fainting spells since childhood,” Lilly wrote in a May 30 Substack essay.

Lily said doctors tested her for epilepsy when she was younger and diagnosed her with hypoglycemia without testing.

“For the better part of my life, I have lived with hypoglycemia,” she wrote. “But as I got older and other health issues started to become an issue, my doctor started doing more frequent blood tests. What was interesting was that even after I passed out after a 12-hour fast, my blood sugar never returned to low. Hypoglycemia seemed to be ruled out.”

Lilly said the power outage episode was not fully explained, adding that she had to settle without knowing its cause. Her husband, Norman Cali, said: She appears to die during the episode.

After doctors confirmed she had cognitive decline since suffering a blow to the face, Lily said she was able to slow down and finish 2025 peacefully.

“I think this was the calmest, most restful Christmas vacation I’ve had, probably since I had kids. So 14 years ago. That’s a good thing,” she said. “I feel incredibly grateful and blessed to be able to play another day and another year on this beautiful, living planet. This is the latest update on my concussion. Thank you to everyone for your concern.”

US shocks world with attack on Venezuela and arrest of Nicolas Maduro

0

play

As U.S. forces stormed the compound and the sound of explosions lit up the night sky over Caracas, Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro fled to a safe room inside his home on a military base.

Maduro reached the door but was unable to close it.

Members of the Army’s secret Delta Force captured the Venezuelan leader and his wife, Cilia Flores, removed them from the compound and took them to the amphibious assault ship Iwo Jima, which was waiting off the coast of South America. Both men will be extradited within days to New York, where they will be charged with drug trafficking, U.S. officials said.

The attack, which took place on the Venezuelan capital in the early morning hours of January 3, was a swift and stunning show of military might. Images and video showed explosions, vehicles on fire, smoke billowing over the capital Caracas and swarms of helicopters flying low.

President Donald Trump, who announced the military operation, called it “one of the most amazing, effective and powerful displays of American military power and capability in American history.”

The Jan. 3 military operation was one of the largest foreign invasions since the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, raising questions about the U.S. role in the Caribbean country of more than 28 million people.

With Maduro no longer in power, Trump said the United States would run Venezuela until there is a “safe, appropriate and wise transition of power.” He indicated that Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth would be in charge, along with Venezuelan Vice President Delcy Rodriguez.

Maduro, 63, a former bus driver and union leader, has ruled the county for more than a decade. A handpicked successor to the former leader, he was narrowly elected president following Hugo Chávez’s death in 2013. Maduro was sworn in for a third term in January last year following an election widely condemned as fraudulent by international observers, the Biden administration and opposition groups.

President Maduro’s reign has seriously strained relations with several US presidents, who have accused him of allowing illegal drugs to flow into the United States. Since his first term in the White House, Trump has set his sights on overthrowing Maduro. He said President Maduro is running Venezuela like a “narco-terrorist” drug cartel that is directly responsible for the deaths of Americans.

A federal grand jury in New York, which indicted Mr. Maduro on narco-terrorism conspiracy, cocaine importation conspiracy and two counts of illegal weapons, said Mr. Maduro “sits at the head of a corrupt and illegitimate government that has used government power for decades to protect and facilitate illegal activities, including drug trafficking.”

A “carefully planned” operation

The U.S. attack and capture of President Maduro had been underway for several months.

“This mission was carefully planned, drawing lessons from missions over the past several decades,” Air Force Gen. Dan Cain, Trump’s chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said at a news conference at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida.

The intelligence team monitored Maduro and knew how he moved, where he lived, where he traveled, what he ate, what he wore, and even what pets he had, Cain said.

Meanwhile, starting in early September, the US military launched a series of attacks against drug-trafficking ships in the Caribbean and Pacific Ocean. The campaign escalated, including the seizure of an oil tanker in and out of Venezuelan ports in late December.

Kane said the U.S. military was ready to attack by December, but waited until the appropriate day to minimize the possibility of civilian casualties and maximize the element of surprise. Between Christmas and New Year’s, the military waited for President Trump to issue orders.

Kaine said President Trump issued the order at 10:46 p.m. ET on January 2.

Within hours, aircraft began departing from 20 different bases on land and sea. More than 150 aircraft, bombers, fighters, intelligence, reconnaissance, and law enforcement teams participated. The helicopter began its flight toward Venezuela at 100 feet above water. As they approached Caracas, the military began disabling Venezuela’s air defense systems to allow the helicopters to reach their targets safely, Kane said.

As the helicopter approached its target, it came under fire. One was hit but was still able to fly.

The troops arrived at President Maduro’s compound at 1:01 a.m. ET. Both Maduro and his wife, who were inside, gave up and were taken into custody by the US Department of Justice with military support.

President Trump said that no U.S. troops were killed in the airstrike, and that no U.S. military aircraft were lost.

Trump later posted a photo on social media of Maduro aboard the USS Iwo Jima, wearing a gray sweatsuit and holding a water bottle. His head was covered with something like earmuffs to muffle the noise. A dark blindfold covered his eyes.

Republicans and Democrats disagree over attacks

In Washington, reaction to the military operation was predictably divided along partisan lines, with Republicans supporting the operation and Democrats accusing the Trump administration of waging an illegal war.

Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) said in a post on X that President Maduro was “not just an illegitimate dictator, he also ran a massive drug-trafficking operation, which is why he was indicted in U.S. courts on charges of drug trafficking and narcoterrorism nearly six years ago.”

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana) called the military action “a decisive and legitimate operation to protect American lives.”

“President Nicolas Maduro has trafficked illegal drugs and violent cartel members into our country for years, and is responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Americans,” Johnson said in a statement. “He has been properly charged with this crime in U.S. courts and a warrant for his arrest has been formally issued. And today, he learned what responsibility entails.”

But Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.), an Iraq war veteran, called the attack “the second unjust war of my lifetime” in a social media post.

“This war is illegal,” Gallego said. “It’s embarrassing that in less than a year we’ve gone from being the world’s police officers to being the world’s bullies.”

Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.), who has pushed for consultations between the White House and Congress before military action, expressed concern about the administration’s actions.

“Where are we going next?” Kane asked. “Will the president send troops to protect protesters in Iran? To enforce a fragile cease-fire in Gaza? To fight terrorists in Nigeria? To seize Greenland or the Panama Canal? To repress Americans peacefully gathering to protest his policies? Trump is threatening to do more than this, and he sees no need to seek legal approval from the people’s elected Congress before putting military personnel at risk.”

The Trump administration maintains that it does not require Congressional approval for military operations inside or outside Venezuela.

Criticism from abroad

Other countries were also critical of the operation.

Russia’s Foreign Ministry said the airstrike was “very worrying and condemnable.”

“The pretexts justifying such actions are baseless,” the ministry said in a statement. “Ideological hostility has prevailed over business pragmatism and a desire to build relationships based on trust and predictability.”

In one of the many condemnations by Latin leaders, Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva said that “the bombing of Venezuelan territory and the detention of the president crosses a line into the unacceptable.”

For many, Mr. Maduro’s arrest evoked memories of a similar attack on Panama’s General Manuel Noriega on the same day more than 30 years ago.

On January 3, 1990, the US military captured Noriega and took him to the United States, where he was convicted of drug trafficking, extortion, and money laundering and sentenced to 40 years in prison.

Back in Venezuela, hours after the attack, the streets of Caracas were almost silent. Security forces patrolled the city, and supporters of Maduro’s government gathered later in the day to protest his detention.

But most residents remained confined to their homes as the country, and the world, wondered what would happen next.

Contributors: Francesca Chambers, Cybele Mayes-Osterman, Jeanine Santucci, Davis Winkie.

Michael Collins writes about the intersection of politics and culture. He is a veteran reporter who has covered the White House and Congress. Follow him on X: @mcollinsNEWS