Home Blog Page 374

Bronco RTR debut shows Ford is seeking younger off-road vehicle buyers

0

play

  • Ford plans to launch the Bronco RTR early next year, offering intermediate off-road capabilities at a price below the Raptor.
  • Ford’s decision to enter off-road was historic for the company in that it filled a blank space that the company is currently trying to occupy.

Ford is currently expanding its off-road packages and offering more affordable models to bring new customers into off-roading.

On January 13th, Ford announced the Bronco RTR at the Detroit Auto Show. This reflects a partnership with RTR Vehicles, known for its Ready To Rock off-road performance package. Founded by Vaughn Gittin Jr., multi-formula drifting champion and off-road racing icon.

What you can expect from a Ready to Rock vehicle

Hendrik Spepen, general manager of Ford’s Ford Blue Portfolio, said the Bronco RTR is capable of high-speed desert thrills and has a bold design. Ford Blue is Ford’s gasoline and hybrid vehicle division.

Speppen told the Detroit Free Press, part of the USA TODAY Network, that the Bronco RTR will attract younger buyers because of its affordability. Additionally, until now, buyers could only have the RTR package installed on their car at a dealership. The new Bronco RTR will be built at Ford’s Flatrock Assembly Plant and will be produced directly from the factory, just as it was when Ford launched the Mustang RTR a year ago.

“The Bronco Raptor is our pinnacle, so if you have a Bronco lineup led by the Raptor, think of (RTR) as a mid-tier value with a performance element,” Spepen said. “It’s a great value for customers, but it doesn’t beat Raptor from a price standpoint, and it’s not intended to outperform Raptor.”

Ford has not yet announced pricing for the RTR. According to Ford’s website, prices for the 2026 Bronco Raptor start at $79,995. Ford plans to open an order bank for the Bronco RTR in the fall of 2026. It will officially go on sale at dealers early next year.

Speppen said the additional features RTR offers the Raptor include a standard high-clearance wide-track suspension, a beefier steering rack and a cooling fan upgraded from the one found on the Bronco Raptor. Fox shocks, 35-inch tires, anti-lag Turbo technology, and “Hyper Lime” accents will be available.

Ford will build the Bronco RTR at its Michigan plant in Wayne, Michigan, and will also produce Broncos there, according to Ford spokesman Mike Levine.

Despite the law, many Section 8 tenants are blocked due to credit history.

0

play

This article was created by Capital & Main. Published with permission.

In 2020, 62-year-old Carrie Rutter is finally ready to move into her home in Orange County, California.

After three years of sleeping in cars and in and out of harsh institutional homeless shelters, Rutter obtained a Section 8 housing voucher to rent an apartment.

But wherever Rutter went, his rental applications were rejected.

“It became clear that my credit history was preventing me from using the voucher,” Rutter told state lawmakers in 2022, pushing for legislation to prevent landlords from using credit reports to deny Section 8 voucher holders.

The following year, the California Legislature approved such a law. Senate Bill 267, which took effect in January 2024, prohibits landlords from denying Section 8 tenants based solely on credit history. Applicants must be given the opportunity to submit pay stubs or other “legally verifiable alternative evidence” that they earn enough to pay their portion of the rent. Colorado has adopted similar measures.

These laws were intended to remove major obstacles to the program’s success. Even though most of their rent is subsidized, many voucher holders are unable to find a landlord who will rent to them. Section 8 tenants pay 30% of their income in rent, and the program covers the rest.

However, a Capital & Main investigation found that some large L.A. landlords ignore the law by continuing to rely solely on credit history to deny Section 8 applicants, failing to consider alternative evidence of ability to pay.

To find out whether some of the Los Angeles area’s largest landlords, including Equity Residential, Essex Property Trust, AvalonBay Communities, Prime Residential, GH Palmer Associates, Greystar and Jamison Properties, are complying with the law, the news organization hired fair housing testers posing as renters to query apartment listings for dozens of properties.

But the nearly two dozen buildings that brokers said will accept Chapter 8 tenants will not consider pay stubs or other evidence of ability to pay in place of the consumer credit checks required by law. None of the companies agreed to Capital & Main’s interview requests or responded to email questions. However, spokespeople for Equity Residential, Essex Property Trust, Prime Residential and Greystar said in an emailed statement that they comply with California’s Fair Housing Act. A Jamison spokesperson said in a statement that the company’s management company welcomes Section 8 voucher holders. GH Palmer Associates and AvalonBay Communities did not respond to emails or phone calls.

“That’s a problem,” San Joaquin County Housing Authority Director Peter Ragsdale said of Capital & Main’s findings.

His agency in Stockton, California, sponsored SB 267 to make it easier for voucher holders in the state to find housing. If they don’t, the community will pay for it, Ragsdale said.

“Homelessness is not free,” he said. “Like Los Angeles County, we cannot meet the need to solve unsheltered homelessness.”

Fewer than half of Section 8 recipients find housing.

A 2021 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development study found that four in 10 Section 8 recipients across the country were unable to find housing after years of waiting for a voucher. In Los Angeles, failure rates have ranged from 30% in 2020 to about 50% in 2022, said Carlos Van Natter, Section 8 director for the Los Angeles Housing Authority.

SB 267 is unpopular with landlords and has drawn criticism from the California Apartment Association (CAA), a powerful industry group.

Spokesman Mike Nemeth said pay stubs, bank records and government benefit statements “do not provide the same insight into an individual’s financial history or reliability in meeting obligations as a credit report. This poses challenges for risk assessment.”

However, CAA informs its members of their obligations under the law in its newsletter and in a fair housing training course for rental staff.

Lawyers who advise landlords are also having to make adjustments.

Dennis Block, a Burbank-based attorney who represents landlords, said in a June 2024 YouTube broadcast that he has long advised clients to use credit checks as a way to screen tenants with Section 8 home deeds.

“All you have to do is run a credit check, and a Section 8 tenant will always end up with a bad credit score,” he said of past guidance. But he lamented that the new law would make this tactic illegal and acknowledged he could no longer recommend it to landlords looking to avoid renting to voucher holders.

Still, Capital & Main’s research shows that credit history remains a barrier to entry for Section 8 participants from the San Fernando Valley to the South Bay. Violations of California’s Fair Housing Credit Reporting Act were common among dozens of building inspectors questioned.

Credit check requirements still remain

Beverly Hills-based GH Palmer Associates showed the strongest compliance with the law. Only one of the seven Palmer Lease Agents insisted that Section 8 applicants must pass a credit check.

Equity Residential, headquartered in Chicago. Essex Property Trust, based in San Mateo, California. Charleston, South Carolina-based Greystar has developed a policy that aligns with California’s 2024 law regarding credit history. However, in responses to Capital & Main’s testers, leasing agents at these companies described various policies that were not compliant with the law and claimed that they would deny Section 8 applicants who did not pass a credit check.

At Equity’s Zia Apartments in Los Angeles’ Chinatown, for example, Capital & Main test staff asked applicants whether they were allowed to show pay stubs to show they had the ability to pay rent.

“There are no pay stubs. In most cases, additional deposits are required or you have to go through a guarantor,” the leasing company said by phone.

Six of the eight equity leasing agencies questioned told testers that you could be denied a rental based on your credit history.

“We are confident that we operate in accordance with applicable Section 8 regulations,” Marty McKenna, first vice president of Equity Residential, said in a statement.

At Essex Property Trust, four of the nine leasing agents Tester contacted said they would reject Section 8 applicants who failed a credit check. But a spokesperson said in an email: “We have reviewed both our written policies and application process to ensure we comply with the law. All Section 8 applicants are approved based on their ability to pay a portion of their rent, not their credit score.”

A Greystar spokesperson said in a statement that all applicants receive a letter “explaining the credit review process and noting that alternative documents may be considered in lieu of a traditional credit check.”

However, leasing staff at six of the eight Greystar properties where testers inquired about credit policies said they would reject applicants who did not pass the credit check.

Avalon Bay Community did not respond to Capital & Main’s request for an interview or written questions.

Four out of six leasing agencies contacted by Tester said they would not consider pay stubs or other proof of ability to pay rent in lieu of a credit report.

“We are committed to complying with all applicable state and federal fair housing laws, including seeking alternative evidence of ability to pay rent and never denying Section 8 voucher holders on the basis of credit,” a spokesperson for San Francisco-based Prime Residential, which owns more than 4,000 Park La Brea Apartments in Los Angeles’ Miracle Mile neighborhood, said in an emailed statement.

However, a representative for Park La Brea said the complex would not accept proof of ability to pay rent in lieu of credit history. Agents at four other Prime facilities told Testers that they cannot determine whether credit history disqualifies Section 8 applicants until credit and background checks are completed.

Los Angeles-based Jamison Properties told Tester that 16 of its 21 properties do not accept Section 8 vouchers, but of the five properties where leasing staff said they accept vouchers, three do not accept credit check alternatives. The two did not respond to Tester’s calls regarding the credit reporting policy.

“The management company that oversees the Jamison portfolio accepts and welcomes tenants with Section 8 vouchers and is taking proactive steps, including partnering with brokers and nonprofit organizations, to assist in identifying individuals and families holding vouchers,” a Jamison spokesperson said in a statement.

The company did not respond to questions about its credit reporting policy, but said in a statement that “all property managers overseeing these buildings have rules and procedures in place to ensure compliance with all applicable laws.”

Chi Chi Wu, director of consumer reporting and data advocacy at the National Consumer Law Center, a nonprofit that advocates for low-income people, said credit history is not a predictor of a tenant’s success.

““Using credit reports and credit scores[to vet Section 8 tenants]is especially illogical because there are programs where literally the government pays a large portion of the rent,” Wu said, “so they have a guaranteed income.” She pointed out that many people have “low credit scores because something bad happened to them.” they lost their jobs. They got sick. ”

unemployment and illness

Callie Rutter said she has always been a responsible tenant. Then she lost the job she loved as an executive assistant. She was late on her bills and her credit was ruined. After losing her apartment, she lived in a shelter in her car. Later, as I was trying to get back on my feet financially, I was diagnosed with cancer and underwent treatment. These circumstances depleted my bank account and made me eligible for Section 8 housing subsidies.

Rutter said her credit score was “terrible” when she started looking for a home. Her house-hunting strategy was to make the best possible impression on potential homeowners and appeal to higher powers. Because the law didn’t protect her at the time.

“Go out on Sunday dressed in your best clothes, grab your documents and pray that you find a place quickly,” she said.

Sasha Morozov, regional director of support services at People Assisting The Homeless, a social services organization in Los Angeles, said her group uses tactics similar to Rutter’s when trying to secure housing for clients using vouchers. She has never seen such acceptance of vouchers since this law was passed.

“It’s like you have to put on your sales hat,” Morozov said, “because the market situation is that the landlord has multiple offers coming in.”

Deborah Slope, deputy director of the National Housing Law Project, said enforcement of the law is key to its effectiveness. But the California Department of Civil Rights has only charged one lawyer and three investigators with enforcing a law that prohibits discrimination against tenants who receive government housing subsidies.

The department investigates and mediates complaints, and sometimes takes legal action against alleged violators, but department director Kevin Kish said sparse staffing places “severe limits on what we can do.”

Enforcement could be further limited because many complaints reach the California Department of Civil Rights through local nonprofit fair housing organizations. Earlier this year, the Trump administration cut funding to dozens of such organizations across the country, causing some to lay off staff and slashing fair housing enforcement.

As for Callie Rutter, she said she used an app to track her on-time rent payments to rebuild her credit. She feels lucky to have found an apartment where she feels safe. She recalled inviting her boyfriend, daughter, and grandchildren over to her home.

Rutter said she burst into tears as they gathered around the pool. “I was thinking about how grateful I was that they knew I was safe and that I had a door that I could lock. I can’t express how grateful I was to be able to take a hot shower.”

This reporting was supported by a grant from the Investigative Journalism Fund.

Annakai Hayakawa Geshlider, Emily Elena Dugdale and Lita Martinez contributed to this story.

Copyright Capital & Main 2026

Congressman Don Bacon says President Trump’s push for Greenland could lead to impeachment

0

play

A Republican lawmaker has gone on record criticizing President Donald Trump for threatening to take Greenland from Denmark, the latest sign of the move’s unpopularity.

Republican Representative Don Bacon, who represents Nebraska, told the Omaha World-Herald on January 14 that President Trump’s approach to Greenland is “absolute nonsense.”

He also told the paper that a U.S. invasion of the Arctic islands was a “disastrous idea” that could lead to Trump’s impeachment.

“So many Republicans are angry about this,” Bacon told the paper. “If he carries out his threat, I think it will be the end of his presidency.”

Asked if he would support a hypothetical impeachment of President Trump over Greenland, Bacon declined to give a yes or no answer, but said, “I would lean toward that.”

Despite strong international opposition and a lack of appetite for invasion among some members of his own party, President Trump has become increasingly vocal about the idea over the past few months. He has turned from speculation about buying Greenland to threats, most recently in a social media post on January 14, saying Greenland should be in “American hands” and that “anything less will not be accepted.”

Speaking to reporters on Air Force One a few days ago, President Trump brushed aside questions about how a potential occupation of the self-governing Arctic island would affect NATO, emphasizing that the United States needs Greenland for national security. Republican leaders first floated the idea of ​​a U.S. takeover of Greenland during their first term in 2019, proposing the idea of ​​purchasing the island.

Danish and Greenlandic officials have made it clear that the resource-rich country is not for sale, with Greenland’s coalition government saying it “cannot accept a takeover in any form” by the United States.

“Greenland does not want to be owned by the United States. Greenland does not want to be ruled by the United States. Greenland does not want to be part of the United States,” Greenland Prime Minister Jens Frederik Nielsen said at a press conference in Copenhagen on January 13.

Mr. Bacon’s recent comments to the Nebraska paper are not the first time he has criticized the president for his foreign policy position on Greenland, nor is he the only Republican to express criticism of Mr. Trump’s approach.

Bacon said in a Jan. 6 CNN interview that he hopes other Republicans will stand up to “totally oppose” the president’s threat to take over the territory.

“This is terrifying,” he said. “Greenland is a NATO ally. We have a base in Greenland.”

Bacon also called Denmark a “proven ally” and said the administration’s stance was humiliating the country and creating mistrust between the United States and its allies.

Bacon, who joined the council in 2017, is not seeking re-election in November. This week, he joined Democrats in introducing legislation that would effectively stop President Trump from invading territory by banning federal funds from being used to invade NATO members or NATO-protected territory.

Sen. Chuck Grassley, a prominent Republican from Iowa, said on January 14 that the president should be able to achieve his goal of strengthening national security through diplomacy, rather than “buying or invading” it. And former longtime Senate Majority Leader Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) recently called the potential capture of Greenland “a particularly devastating act of strategic self-harm against the United States and its global influence.”

Most Americans also oppose the prospect of an armed U.S. occupation of the island, according to a series of polls released in recent days.

A Reuters poll on January 14 found that one in five Americans supported President Trump’s efforts to acquire Greenland, and a CNN poll released the following day found that three-quarters of Americans opposed the United States’ efforts to take control of the Arctic island.

Contributed by Brianne Pfannenstiel, USA Today Network.

Kathryn Palmer is USA TODAY’s political reporter. She can be reached at the following address: kapalmer@usatoday.com And to X@Kathryn Purml. Sign up for her daily politics newsletter here.

Secondary airports or major hub airports: Which is cheaper?

0

play

The secret to getting cheap flights may be to avoid your usual airports.

When booking a trip, travel platform CheapOair’s 2026 trend forecast suggests that while some travelers may automatically assume they should fly from a major airport because they usually have more flight options, they may save more by flying to a secondary airport serving a metropolitan area. Think John Wayne Airport instead of Los Angeles International Airport, and London Gatwick Airport instead of London Heathrow Airport.

Smaller airports typically have lower landing fees and taxes per passenger, so ticket prices may be more affordable, but they offer fewer options than larger airports. As a bonus, airport security checkpoints may be less crowded and have shorter lines.

“These secondary airports offer more options and can offer lower fares compared to larger airports,” Yuvraj Dutta, CheapOAir’s chief supply and revenue officer, told USA TODAY in a statement. “These airlines often offer travelers a more efficient experience because they are often smaller, less crowded, and easier to travel. For many travelers, this means both lower costs and a more enjoyable journey.”

To find the biggest savings, travelers should expand their search to secondary airports, but also keep in mind that low supply can result in higher prices. You should also factor in hidden costs, such as longer drive times to smaller airports or higher parking fees, to determine where the best value is.

Here are some upcoming flights at secondary airports based on January 9 data.

John F. Kennedy International Airport versus Newark Liberty International Airport

Savings: $39.12 or 16.6%

From New York to Puerto Rico’s Luis Muñoz Marín International Airport, a Spirit Airlines flight departing on February 21st and returning on February 28th costs $235.99, and a JetBlue flight from John F. Kennedy International Airport costs $196.87.

Hollywood Burbank Airport versus Los Angeles International Airport

Savings: $51.85 or 40.3%

A round-trip ticket from Los Angeles to Harry Reid International Airport in Las Vegas departing on January 19th and returning from Los Angeles International Airport on January 25th costs $128.84 on Spirit Airlines, but only $76.99 on Frontier Airlines from Hollywood Burbank Airport.

laguardia airport versus John F. Kennedy International Airport

Savings: $115.93 or 31.8%

From New York to Jose Joaquin de Olmedo International Airport in Guayaquil, Ecuador, departing on February 4 and returning on February 11, travelers can book a JetBlue flight from John F. Kennedy International Airport for $364.88 or a Spirit flight from LaGuardia Airport for $248.95.

Baltimore Washington International Airport Thurgood Marshall Airport versus Washington Dulles International Airport

Savings: $79.87 or 50.9%

A United flight from the Washington, D.C., area to Orlando International Airport departing on Feb. 4 and returning from Washington Dulles International Airport on Feb. 11 costs $156.86, while a Frontier flight from Baltimore-Washington International Thurgood Marshall Airport costs $76.99.

Compliant with new ETSI standards for AI security

0

The ETSI EN 304 223 standard introduces baseline security requirements for AI that companies must integrate into their governance frameworks.

As organizations incorporate machine learning into their core operations, this European Standard (EN) establishes specific provisions to protect AI models and systems. It is the first globally applicable European standard for AI cybersecurity and has received formal approval from national standards bodies to strengthen its authority across international markets.

This standard will serve as a necessary benchmark alongside EU AI legislation. This addresses the reality that AI systems have specific risks that are often overlooked by traditional software security measures, such as data poisoning, model obfuscation, and vulnerability to indirect prompt injection. The standard covers everything from deep neural networks and generative AI to basic predictive systems, and explicitly excludes only those used solely for academic research.

ETSI standard clarifies chain of responsibility for AI security

A persistent hurdle in enterprise AI adoption is deciding who takes the risk. The ETSI standard solves this problem by defining three main technical roles: developer, system operator, and data administrator.

For many companies, these lines are blurred. Financial services companies that fine-tune open source models for fraud detection are counted as both developers and system operators. This dual status imposes strict obligations that require companies to secure their deployment infrastructure while documenting the provenance of training data and model design audits.

Including “data controllers” as a distinct stakeholder group has direct implications for chief data analytics officers (CDAOs). These entities control data permissions and integrity. This role currently has explicit security responsibilities. Administrators must ensure that the intended use of the system matches the sensitivity of the training data, effectively placing security gatekeepers within the data management workflow.

ETSI’s AI standards make it clear that security cannot be added as an afterthought during the deployment phase. During the design phase, organizations should conduct threat modeling to address AI-native attacks such as membership inference and model obfuscation.

One clause requires developers to limit functionality to reduce the attack surface. For example, if a system uses a multimodal model but only requires text processing, unused modalities (such as image or audio processing) represent risks that need to be managed. This requirement forces technology leaders to rethink the common practice of deploying large, general-purpose foundation models where smaller, specialized models are sufficient.

The document also calls for stricter asset management. Developers and system operators must maintain a comprehensive inventory of assets, including interdependencies and connectivity. This supports shadow AI detection. IT leaders can’t secure models they don’t know exist. The standard also mandates the creation of specific disaster recovery plans tailored to AI attacks, ensuring that a “known good state” can be restored even if a model is compromised.

Supply chain security is a pressing friction point for companies that rely on third-party vendors and open source repositories. The ETSI standard requires that if a system operator chooses to use an AI model or component that is not well-documented, it must justify that decision and document the associated security risks.

In fact, procurement teams can no longer accept “black box” solutions. Developers must provide cryptographic hashes to verify the authenticity of model components. If training data is publicly obtained (a common practice for large-scale language models), developers must document the source URL and retrieval timestamp. This audit trail is necessary for post-incident investigations, especially when trying to determine whether the model was affected by data poisoning during the training phase.

When companies provide APIs to external customers, they must apply controls designed to mitigate AI-focused attacks, such as rate limiting to prevent overwhelming defenses against attackers reverse engineering models or injecting harmful data.

The lifecycle approach extends to the maintenance phase, where the standard treats major updates, such as retraining with new data, as deploying a new version. In the ETSI AI standard, this triggers new security testing and assessment requirements.

Continuous monitoring has also been formalized. In addition to uptime, system operators must analyze logs to detect “data drift” or gradual changes in behavior that could indicate a security breach. This moves AI monitoring from a performance metric to a security discipline.

The standard also addresses the “end of life” phase. When models are retired or transferred, organizations must engage data custodians to securely dispose of data and configuration details. This provision prevents sensitive intellectual property and training data from being leaked through discarded hardware or forgotten cloud instances.

Management oversight and governance

Compliance with ETSI EN 304 223 requires a review of existing cybersecurity training programs. The standard requires training to be tailored to specific roles, helping developers understand securely coding AI, while also helping general staff recognize threats such as social engineering through AI output.

“ETSI EN 304 223 represents an important step forward in establishing a common, rigorous foundation for protecting AI systems,” said Scott Cadzow, Chair of ETSI’s Artificial Intelligence Protection Technology Committee.

“At a time when AI is increasingly integrated into critical services and infrastructure, the availability of clear, practical guidance that reflects both the complexity of these technologies and the realities of deployment cannot be underestimated. The work that has gone into delivering this framework is the result of extensive collaboration and means that organizations can have full confidence in AI systems that are resilient, reliable and secure by design.”

Implementing these baselines into ETSI’s AI security standards provides a structure for more secure innovation. With documented audit trails, clear role definitions, and enhanced supply chain transparency, companies can reduce the risks associated with AI deployments while establishing a defensible position against future regulatory audits.

An upcoming technical report (ETSI TR 104 159) will apply these principles specifically to generative AI, targeting issues such as deepfakes and disinformation.

See also: Alistair Frost: Addressing employee concerns for successful AI integration

Banner for AI & Big Data Expo by TechEx event.

Want to learn more about AI and big data from industry leaders? Check out the AI ​​& Big Data Expo in Amsterdam, California, and London. This comprehensive event is part of TechEx and co-located with other major technology events. Click here for more information.

AI News is brought to you by TechForge Media. Learn about other upcoming enterprise technology events and webinars.

ICE Deputy Director Madison Sheehan runs for Congress in northwest Ohio

0


Madison Sheehan, 28, is a graduate of Ohio State University. She is seeking to oust longtime incumbent Democratic Rep. Marcy Captur.

play

COLUMBUS, Ohio – A top U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement official is leaving his post after less than a year to run a Republican congressional campaign in northwest Ohio’s most competitive district in the country.

Madison Sheehan, 28, announced her 9th election campaign in Ohio.th In the January 15th House of Representatives election, he will challenge incumbent Democrat Marcy Kaptur, who narrowly won re-election in 2024. The district includes Toledo and parts of northwestern Ohio.

“In less than a year at ICE, I stopped more illegal immigrants than Marcy Kaptur did in 43 years in Washington,” Sheehan said in his campaign launch video.

Sheehan, who described himself in the video as a “Trump conservative,” graduated from Ohio State University in 2019. According to her ICE bio, she was on the women’s rowing team and studied public relations. She served as deputy director of ICE before resigning.

Mr. Sheehan worked for former South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem, now the head of the Department of Homeland Security (the division that includes ICE), and later served as the head of the Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries.

“As Deputy Director of ICE, when President Trump asked me to help clean up this dangerous immigration mess, I accepted,” Sheehan said in the video.

If elected, Mr. Sheehan would also be the youngest member of Congress. Florida Democrat Maxwell Frost, first elected in 2022, is about a month older than Sheehan.

Kaptur is the longest-serving woman in Congress’ history. She was first elected in 1982, but the latest redistricting expected her district to lean more Republican.

Kaptur was one of 75 Democrats to vote alongside Republicans on the June 2025 resolution expressing support for ICE, sparking backlash from other Democrats. Other Ohio Democratic members of Congress also supported the resolution.

Sheehan joins a crowded Republican primary field that includes state Rep. Josh Williams, former state Rep. Derek Merrin and Air Force veteran Aleah Nadeem. The two will face off in the Republican primary election in May.

David Geddert, also known as drag queen Sugar Vermonte, is running as a Libertarian in the district.

Nonpartisan analyst Cook Political Report notes that the race in OH-9 is a toss-up for Democrats.

Anna Lynn Winfrey is a reporter for the Columbus Dispatch. She can be reached at awinfrey@dispatch.com.

NTSB says Boeing knew about defective parts in UPS plane before fatal crash

0

play

The United Parcel Service cargo plane that crashed into an industrial site in Kentucky last year, killing 15 people, had defective parts that aerospace company Boeing reported 14 years ago, according to a new National Transportation Safety Board investigation released this week.

According to the latest NTSB report released on January 14, the parts that broke in this accident had failed four other times.

The Nov. 4 crash in Louisville was the worst disaster in UPS aviation history, USA TODAY previously reported. Nearly 20 bystanders on the ground were also injured in connection with the disaster.

Hawaii-bound Flight 2976 exploded into a fireball shortly after takeoff from Louisville Muhammad Ali International Airport at 5:15 p.m., causing the Boeing MD-11F to crash into an industrial area, killing all three people on board and 12 people on the ground.

In its latest six-page report released on Jan. 14, the NTSB said Boeing knew about flagged parts of the plane involved in the crash.

Research on airplanes with cracks

In a February 2011 letter to airlines, Boeing pointed to four accidents involving three MD-11 aircraft, the same type as UPS Flight 2976, due to failures in parts of the pylons that connect the engines. After takeoff, UPS Flight 2976’s pylon and left engine separated from the wing, causing the plane to crash, according to the report.

The MD-11 aircraft examined by Boeing had fatigue cracks in its pylons similar to those reported by NTSB investigators in their preliminary investigation into the Nov. 4 crash. Following the investigation into the cracked aircraft, Boeing announced it would update its maintenance manuals to include testing to ensure that the cracked spherical bearing races remain functional.

NTSB officials said they are still reviewing the inspection technology Boeing used on the MD-11 plane, how UPS incorporated the information in Boeing’s letter into its operations, and “the history of Boeing’s communications with the FAA leading up to and after the issuance of the service letter.”

The crash and resulting fire disrupted operations at the UPS Worldport facility and delayed delivery service.

The NTSB’s final investigation report into the UPS incident is expected to be released within the next two years.

Natalie Neisa Alland is a senior reporter at USA TODAY. Contact her at nalund@usatoday.com and follow her at X @nataliealund.

Leo Bertucci is a reporter for Courier Journal, part of the USA TODAY Network. Contact lbertucci@usatodayco.com or @leober2chee at X.

Data center and electricity bill

0

Good morning and Happy National Bagel Day! I’m Daniel de Visé from Daily Money.

You’ve probably seen soft-focus TV ads touting the benefits of data centers.

There’s a reason for them. Voter anger over soaring power prices is spreading across the country and across party lines as energy-hungry AI facilities strain the power grid, Jessica Ginn reports. These could be key factors in the 2026 midterm elections.

Verizon users ask, “Can you hear me now?”

If you’ve been affected, you probably already know:

A major wireless outage affected more than 1.5 million Verizon customers Wednesday, disrupting service for several hours. Here’s the full overview:

Advantages and disadvantages of a 10% credit card limit

Finally, Susan Tomper weighs in on President Trump’s call for a 10% cap on credit card interest rates.

At least that sounds great if you’re paying 20% ​​interest on your credit card debt. But the banking industry has no interest in Trump’s proposal.

📰 Other stories you can’t miss 📰

Daniel de Visse covers personal finance for USA TODAY. Daily Money analyzes complex consumer and financial news. Subscribe here.

Activist Mahmoud Khalil may be detained again, appeals court rules

0

play

A federal appeals court has reversed a lower court’s decision to release Palestinian human rights activist Mahmoud Khalil from immigration detention, a major victory for the Trump administration, which had sought to have him deported.

In a Jan. 15 opinion, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit vacated an earlier order that guaranteed Mr. Khalil’s release from custody and temporarily blocked his deportation from the United States.

The ruling effectively means the government is free to detain Mr. Khalil again.

U.S. District Judge Michael Fabiaz of New Jersey had previously ordered his release, ruling that he did not pose a flight risk and that his detention was likely unconstitutional. The federal government argued that the court lacked jurisdiction.

The government called for his removal on rarely used “foreign policy grounds,” with Secretary of State Marco Rubio arguing that defending Mr. Khalil posed a threat to U.S. foreign policy interests.

The decision marks the latest development in Khalil’s case, a lawful permanent resident, since he was detained in March for his pro-Palestinian activities at Columbia University. His detention and the government’s efforts to deport him have sparked a broader debate over free speech protections and the scope of federal power in immigration enforcement.

Check back for more on this developing story.

Verizon offers $20 credit after major outages and service issues

0

play

Verizon confirmed to USA TODAY that it will provide a $20 credit to customers affected by the seven-hour outage.

Verizon’s wireless network outage began around 12:30pm ET on Wednesday, January 14th, and affected more than 1.5 million customers, according to data service outage resource Downdetector. DownDetector reported that the event spread across the United States, with the highest concentrations in New York City, Atlanta, Charlotte, North Carolina, Houston, and Brooklyn, New York.

Verizon customers can access a $20 account credit through the myVerizon mobile app, according to a company statement obtained by USA TODAY. Customers will be notified via text message when credit is ready. On average, the credit should cover several days of service, the company said.

Verizon said in a statement posted to X at 10:20 p.m. and provided to USA TODAY that the outage has been resolved.

Greta Cross is USA TODAY’s national trends reporter. Story ideas? Email her at gcross@usatoday.com.

What does President Trump want in Greenland? Opinion poll shows takeover unpopular

0

play

  • President Donald Trump is pushing ahead with his desire for the United States to acquire Greenland, citing national security concerns.
  • Danish and Greenlandic officials have consistently rejected this idea and emphasized Greenland’s sovereignty.
  • Polls show that a majority of Americans oppose US control of Greenland.

President Donald Trump continues to express his desire for Greenland, an autonomous territory of Denmark.

“With Greenland in American hands, NATO will be much more formidable and effective. Anything less will not be acceptable,” President Trump wrote on Truth Social on January 14.

He has talked about acquiring the Arctic island since his first term, but calls for it have increased in recent weeks since the U.S. military intervention in Venezuela. Diplomatic officials from Denmark and Greenland met with US Vice President J.D. Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio at the White House on January 14, but it appears the two sides were unable to reach an agreement.

“We were unable to change the US position,” Danish Foreign Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen said at a news conference. “It’s clear that the president has a desire to conquer Greenland. We’ve made it very clear that this is not in the kingdom’s interests.”

Polls also show that intervention in Greenland is unpopular. A Quinnipiac University poll released on January 14 found that more than 8 in 10 respondents opposed the U.S. armed occupation of Greenland. A CNN/SSRS poll conducted on January 15 found that 75% of people were completely opposed to any attempt to seize power. A Jan. 13 Economist/YouGov poll found that a majority of Americans believe Greenland and Denmark are allies or friends of the United States.

So why does President Trump want a vast ice island? Here’s what he said:

Why does President Trump want to occupy Greenland?

“We need Greenland for our national security,” President Trump said at a press conference on December 22. “You look out on the coast and there are Russian and Chinese ships all over the place. We need that for national security. We have to have it.”

President Trump has repeatedly returned to national security as a reason for wanting Greenland. The island’s location may also be strategic for the US ballistic missile warning system. In a Jan. 14 post on Truth Social, he said it was “essential to the Golden Dome we are building.”

The island also has important minerals used in industries in which China has near-monopoly power. Greenland has deposits of major minerals such as graphite, copper, nickel, zinc, tungsten, and lithium, all of which are used in the production of modern technology. However, there is currently little mining in Greenland. President Trump also said he has no interest in Greenland, which is rich in mineral resources.

“We have so many mines for minerals, oil and everything else, we have more oil than any other country in the world,” Trump said.

What is Greenland’s response to President Trump’s threat?

Greenlandic and Danish leaders have repeatedly denounced President Trump’s claims that the United States would occupy Greenland.

Greenland’s Prime Minister Jens Frederik Nielsen and Denmark’s Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen issued a joint statement on December 22, saying, “We cannot annex another country. There is no discussion of international security.” “Greenland belongs to the Greenlanders, and the United States must not occupy Greenland.”

The majority of Greenlanders reject the idea of ​​becoming part of the United States, although some support independence from Denmark.

After the White House meeting, Rasmussen told reporters he was trying to address U.S. concerns while maintaining Denmark’s borders. He also said that Danish intelligence refutes President Trump’s claims that Chinese ships dot the coastline.

Is Greenland part of NATO?

Greenland is an autonomous territory of Denmark and part of NATO.

Several major NATO members, including France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain, Denmark and the United Kingdom, signed a joint statement released on January 6 defending the country’s right to sovereignty.

“Greenland belongs to its people. Denmark and Greenland, and they alone, decide matters concerning Denmark and Greenland,” the statement said.

How big is Greenland compared to the United States?

According to the CIA, Greenland is smaller than the United States and more than three times the size of Texas. The population is approximately 57,000.

Still, the island is the largest non-continental island in the world and is approximately 80% covered in ice.

Greenland is located in the north-eastern part of Canada, in the Arctic region.

Where is Denmark?

Denmark is located in Europe between Germany, Sweden, and Norway.

Contributors: Michael Loria, Kim Hjelmgaard, Francesca Chambers, Carly Procell, Dian Zhang, Ramon Padilla, Kathryn Palmer, USA TODAY

Kinsey Crowley is a Trump Connect reporter for the USA TODAY Network. Please contact KCrowley@usatodayco.com. follow her X (Twitter), blue sky and TikTok.

Former Bulls guard Antonio Blakeney charged in point-shaving investigation

0

play

  • Federal prosecutors have charged 20 people in a wide-ranging points-cutting scheme involving college basketball and professional games in China.
  • Former Chicago Bulls player Antonio Blakeney is accused of accepting $200,000 for poor performance in games and then recruiting college players.
  • The operation allegedly involved 39 players from more than 17 Division I teams and involved millions of dollars being bet on at least 29 games.
  • The charges follow another NBA gambling scandal in October that also involved high-stakes gambler Shane Hennen.

Federal prosecutors have secured indictments against 20 people accused of match-fixing Chinese college basketball games and professional games in the wake of the NBA gambling scandal that rocked the sports world in October, according to court documents obtained by USA TODAY Sports.

Sports gamblers operated an extensive point-shaving system in conjunction with players who agreed to underperform in games from 2022 to 2025, according to records released Thursday in Philadelphia.

One of the players named in the indictment is Antonio Blakeney, a former member of the Chicago Bulls who later played for China’s Jiangsu Dragons.

Prosecutors allege that for his involvement in the scheme, Blakeney, 29, received a lump sum of $200,000, and another defendant dropped the cash into a warehouse that Blakeney owned in Florida. Blakeney then continued scouting college players to cut points in NCAA games.

Some of the bets made at Philadelphia’s Rivers Casino were in the hundreds of thousands of dollars, according to the indictment.

Blakeney, a 6-4 shooting guard from LSU, played two seasons in the NBA after signing with the Bulls as a free agent in 2017. He averaged 7.5 points and 1.8 rebounds in 76 career games.

Prosecutors said the operation ultimately involved 39 players from more than 17 Division I teams from 2022 to 2025, with bettors betting millions of dollars on at least 29 different games.

Kennesaw State guard Simeon Cottle, another player named in the indictment, played Wednesday night and scored 21 points in the Owls’ 89-86 win over FIU.

NCAA President Charlie Baker said in a statement that the NCAA continues to work with law enforcement to protect the integrity of college athletics.

“We have and will continue to aggressively pursue sports betting violations in college athletics with a multi-layered integrity monitoring program covering more than 22,000 contests,” Baker said. “However, it is still necessary for remaining states, regulators, and gaming companies to eliminate threats to integrity, such as college prop bets, to better protect players and leagues from integrity risks and predatory bettors.”

Of the 20 people named in the indictment, 15 were college or former college basketball players.

An indictment unsealed Thursday reveals a scheme similar to one announced in October, in which Miami Heat guard Terry Rozier was one of 30 people indicted in a wide-ranging gambling investigation that allegedly involved members of a New York organized crime family.

One of the gamblers indicted Thursday was high-stakes sports bettor Shane Hennen, who had already been indicted along with Rozier and accused of involvement in the scandal.

Contributor: Scooby Axon

Florida Supreme Court refuses to repeal non-unanimous death sentences

0

The Florida Supreme Court has upheld a law that allows a death sentence to be imposed with just eight votes out of 12 jurors.

Florida has a history of allowing non-unanimous juries to recommend the death penalty, but a 2016 state Supreme Court decision ended that practice. But when several new justices joined the court, the court reversed course, and the state Legislature passed the current nonunanimous law in 2023.

The state’s standard, which allows one-third of jurors to vote against the death penalty, is among the lowest in the nation. Alabama is the only other state to allow non-unanimous death recommendations, but recommendations there require the consent of at least 10 jurors.

Lawyers for the defendants have indicated they will ask the U.S. Supreme Court to review the state high court’s ruling. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2020 that a unanimous jury is required to convict a defendant, but it has never considered the constitutionality of non-unanimous verdicts during the penalty phase of capital cases.

“The Origins of Racism”

The Florida Supreme Court’s decision is jackson vs florida The executions come at the end of a year in which Florida was unique in the nation, having executed 19 people in 2025, nearly four times as many as any other state. Florida has about 250 people with death warrants, second only to California, which has not executed anyone in 20 years.

Florida’s large number of prisoners on death row is one reason why only two-thirds of jurors need to approve the death penalty. As of last year, nearly 60 percent of Florida’s death row inmates were sentenced to death by non-unanimous juries. Without the state’s nonunanimous jury law, the case would have continued to be deliberated until the jury reached a unanimous verdict, and some jurors would almost certainly have been sentenced to life in prison.

Even more troubling, non-unanimous death sentences can increase the likelihood that innocent people will be executed. Thirty people on Florida’s death row have been acquitted. This was the largest number of death row inmates to be acquitted in all states. 97 percent of them were sentenced to death by non-unanimous juries.

Historians say the law allowing juries to reach verdicts without unanimity was originally passed to exclude black jurors from meaningfully participating in jury duty. Justice Brett Kavanaugh emphasized this point in his 2020 U.S. Supreme Court concurrence. Ramos vs. LouisianaA decision barring a conviction unless all jurors agree. Nonunanimous jury laws have “racist origins” and have the “potential to silence the voices” of black jurors, Kavanaugh wrote.

The court is Ramos Only the result of a guilty verdict will be considered. If a person is convicted of a crime for which the death penalty may be applicable, the case moves from the guilt phase to the penalty phase. At this stage, the person will only be sentenced to death if the jury returns a death sentence.

Changing legal landscape

in 2016 Hurst vs. Floridathe Florida Supreme Court considered prior law allowing non-unanimous juries to recommend the death penalty. The court ruled that a jury must unanimously find that aggravating circumstances exist to qualify a defendant for the death penalty. If so, the jury must recommend whether to impose the death penalty. The court held that a final death penalty recommendation must also be unanimous because it is “equivalent to a jury verdict at the sentencing stage of a trial.”

But the state Supreme Court reversed course on its second ruling in the 2020s after three justices reached retirement age. State vs. Pool. Nothing in the Sixth Amendment’s right to a jury, the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment, or the Florida Constitution requires a jury rather than a judge to make the final decision on whether to impose the death penalty, much less impose it unanimously, the new court said.

Continue pool After a jury did not recommend the death penalty for the defendant convicted of killing 17 people in the Parkland school shooting, the Legislature changed state law in 2023 to make recommendations nonunanimous again.

Constitutional Arguments for Non-Unanimous Death

Michael James Jackson was convicted in 2007 of murdering an elderly couple, James and Carol Sumner, by burying them alive. His original death sentence was reversed by a state high court ruling. Hurst. But due to various delays, including the coronavirus pandemic, his resentencing could not take place until a month after Congress enacted the 2023 law. After two hours of deliberation, the jury recommended the death penalty by a minimum vote of 8-4.

Jackson and lawyers from the American Civil Liberties Union challenged the non-unanimous 2023 legislation on multiple grounds. Most simply, Jackson argued that the Sixth Amendment’s right to criminal juries, as understood by the Framers, encompassed the right to be unanimous in decisions to carry out the death penalty.

Jackson also argued that the effect of non-unanimity on black jurors violated the Equal Protection Clause. Not seeking the consent of jurors with minority views acts to deny participation to jurors of color and “creates a breeding ground for racism,” he said, highlighting Kavanaugh’s argument. Ramos Agree. A court brief by Black-led groups and lawmakers cites empirical data showing “divergent views on racial bias in the death penalty.” Additionally, the groups argued that the Florida lawmaker’s comments about wanting to target “activist jurors” make it clear that the law is intended to eliminate the perspectives of jurors who are less likely to die.

Jackson continued that the effective exclusion of black jurors violates the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment and affects black defendants who are eligible for capital punishment. The law also violates the Eighth Amendment, he argued. This is because the abandonment of the unanimous death penalty recommendation, compounded by the state’s retreat from other death penalty safeguards, such as the suspension of sentencing reviews that take into account proportionality between cases and co-defendants, and the doubling of the number of aggravating factors that qualify a defendant for the death penalty, has led to the death penalty being applied arbitrarily and unreservedly to the most heinous crimes..

Additionally, Jackson said, “The events of time determined who lived and who died.” Of the approximately 145 defendants received; Mr. Hearst’s Just 85 people were sentenced before Congress returned to non-unanimous power, and 70 received life sentences, according to court briefs from criminal justice groups.

complete refusal

In a unanimous decision, the Florida Supreme Court rejected each of Jackson’s claims. Supreme Court Ramos The court wrote that the decision did not render the law unconstitutional because the case did not address the punishment phase of a death penalty trial. The court also noted precedent that the death penalty can be imposed without a jury recommendation, such as a U.S. Supreme Court case that allowed a judge to override a jury’s recommendation for a lesser sentence.

The court found that Mr. Jackson’s claim that the disparate impact of Florida’s nonunanimous law on black jurors violated equal protection was without merit, and declared that the claim fell “a long way” from proving racially discriminatory intent as required.

Regarding Jackson’s argument about the arbitrariness of the death sentence, the court said only that it had previously rejected claims about the erosion of safeguards against unconstitutional death sentences. They also disagreed that the imposition of death and life influenced the timing of death. Hurst Outrage. The magazine noted that Jackson’s argument was actually about fairness, and that those outraged would likely be sentenced to death after the 2023 law. Framing the issue as equal protection rather than cruel and unusual punishment, the court reasoned as follows: Hurst It did not create a protected legal right, it merely changed the procedure used to determine whether the death penalty applies.

Finally, the opinion states that Jackson’s suggestion that the court “impose a death sentence” “warrants no response other than strict caution on the part of attorneys.”

The only dissent came from Justice Jorge Labarga, who concurred. In court precedent, pool And subsequent events forced him to participate in the outcome, he said. But he lamented Florida’s “absolute outlier” non-unanimous standards and highlighted the state’s high acquittal rate for death row inmates.

Sarah Kessler is an advisor and contributing editor. state court report.

Kathrina Szymborski Wolfkot state court report Senior Counsel, Justice Program, Brennan Center for Justice;

Recommended citation: Sarah Kessler & Kathrina Szymborski Wolfkot, Florida Supreme Court refuses to repeal non-unanimous death sentencesSᴛᴀᴛᴇ Cᴏᴜʀᴛ Rᴇᴘᴏʀᴛ (January 13, 2026), https://statecourtreport.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/florida-supreme-court-raises-end-non-unanimous-death-verdicts

Here’s why Dodge kills the affordable Hornet

0

play

  • Dodge will discontinue production of the Hornet SUV due to a change in policy.
  • The company is offering a $6,250 cash bonus on the new Hornets, which could push the price below $30,000.
  • Dodge sold more than 9,300 Hornets in 2025, according to sales figures from parent company Stellantis.

You can get a new Dodge Hornet SUV for under $30,000 thanks to a deal the brand is running after its parent company decided to discontinue the model.

Dodge is offering a $6,250 cash bonus for all new Hornets that have been discontinued due to tariffs, according to a post on the company’s website.

Dodge says Hornet prices start at $29,995, meaning car buyers can get a new car for less than $30,000.

Why is Dodge trying to kill Hornet?

Dodge said in a statement provided to USA TODAY that “due to a change in the policy environment, production of the Dodge Hornet, manufactured in Italy, has ended.”

Dodge said it is “committed to ensuring that Dodge Hornet owners continue to have access to customer support, service, warranty coverage and continued parts availability.” The company says, “All Dodge Hornet models come with a 3-year/36,000-mile bumper-to-bumper and 5-year/60,000-mile powertrain warranty.” Dodge said the plug-in hybrid version of the Hornet comes with an “8-year/80,000-mile warranty on hybrid components and an 8-year/100,000-mile warranty on the battery.”

Despite the decision to discontinue the Hornet, Dodge said it “remains focused on our core multi-energy muscle lineup.”

How many Hornets did Dodge sell?

According to sales statistics released by Stellantis on January 5, Dodge sold 9,365 Hornets in 2025.

Here’s how many cars Dodge has sold over the past three years.

  • 2025 | 9,365
  • 2024 | 20,559
  • 2023 | 9,336

When did the Hornet first debut?

Dodge first debuted the current version of the Hornet in 2022.

In a press release announcing the new car, the company said it will be a “segment disruptor” that is “poised to disrupt the status quo in the mainstream CUV segment with a host of unique and best-in-class performance features that optimize driving dynamics such as suspension, brakes, steering and handling.”

According to the company, the Dodge Hornet was built at Stellantis’ Giambattista Vico Stellantis plant in Pomigliano d’Arco, Naples, Italy.

The Hornet name dates back to 1958.

What is the Insurrection Act? President Trump threatens to use it in Minneapolis

0


President Donald Trump threatened to invoke the Insurrection Act on Thursday following rising tensions and protests in Minneapolis.

play

President Donald Trump threatened to invoke the Insurrection Act on social media on Thursday, January 15, amid heightened tensions following the second shooting by federal officers in Minneapolis in two weeks. This gives the country the authority to deploy U.S. troops in the country.

“I will enact the Insurrection Act if it will stop the corrupt politicians in Minnesota from attacking the patriots in ICE who don’t abide by the law and are just trying to do their job,” Trump said in a post on Truth Social Thursday morning.

The threat came after a night of clashes between demonstrators and federal agents in Minneapolis, which escalated after federal agents shot and killed a Venezuelan man who fled a traffic stop. Wednesday’s shooting occurred just one week after an immigration officer shot and killed Renee Nicole Good, 37, a mother of three.

Good’s shooting sparked demonstrations across the United States against the Trump administration and federal immigration enforcement.

What is the Insurrection Act?

The Insurrection Act is a law enacted in 1807 that gives the president the power to send the U.S. military to quell civil wars and other situations.

“The Insurrection Act authorizes the president to deploy the military in the United States and use it against American citizens, making it one of the executive branch’s most powerful emergency powers,” according to a 2022 report from the Brennan Center for Justice.

This is one of the oldest emergency powers available to presidents, dating back to 1792, according to the center. This is a constitutional power of Congress that “provides for the raising of the militia to enforce the laws of the Union, suppress insurrection, and repel invasion,” and is a major exception to the Posse Politcocrete Act, which generally prohibits federal troops from participating in civilian law enforcement activities, according to the center’s experts.

What is President Trump saying about invoking the Insurrection Act?

President Trump threatened to invoke the bill in a social media post Thursday, writing that the action “will immediately end the travesty that is unfolding in the once-great state of (Minnesota).”

This is not the first time President Trump has threatened to invoke this law. He made similar threats during protests over ICE actions in Los Angeles in June 2025, deploying the National Guard and saying in a memo that the protests obstructed federal law enforcement and that demonstrations were “a form of insurrection” against the U.S. government.

The action in June marked the first time in decades that a president had moved to deploy the military in such a way without the consent or explicit invitation of governors. A similar threat occurred in Chicago in October 2025, when President Trump was barred from sending the National Guard to the city following demonstrations against heavy-handed ICE enforcement. Invoking a 19th-century law could help President Trump avoid the legal challenges he faced when sending troops to American cities.

President Trump said in a recent post that invoking the Insurrection Act is an action “many presidents have done before.”

Has the Insurrection Act ever been used?

According to a report by the Brennan Center for Justice, the law has been invoked in response to 30 crises in 230 years, but it has not always resulted in the actual deployment of troops.

The Insurrection Act has been used by presidents to deploy troops within the United States in response to crises such as the Whiskey Rebellion of 1794 and the rise of the Ku Klux Klan shortly after the Civil War.

The law was last invoked in 1992 by President George H.W. Bush. Unlike today’s immigration raid protests, California’s governor at the time requested military assistance to quell riots in Los Angeles after four white Los Angeles police officers were acquitted of beating black motorist Rodney King. The Brennan Center said the riot had already been largely quelled by the state-run National Guard before federal troops arrived.

Christopher: Christopher Cann, Thano Nguyen, Jeanine Sancci, US TOD. Reuters

Kate Perez covers national trends and breaking news for USA TODAY. You can reach her at kperez@usatodayco.com or on Twitter @katecperez_.

U.S. visa application processing suspended in 75 countries. See list/map

0

The Trump administration will stop issuing immigrant visas to people from 75 countries, the State Department announced on January 14, saying immigrants are “extracting wealth” from American taxpayer dollars when they enter the United States.

An immigrant visa is a travel document issued to foreign nationals who wish to permanently reside in the United States. Immigrant visas are issued outside of U.S. borders and allow the holder to legally enter the country.

Some of the countries listed include Russia, Iran, Somalia, Haiti, and Cuba. The State Department made the announcement on social media but did not provide a complete list. Inquiries were directed to FOX News.

According to the State Department, the decision is aimed at suspending the number of applicants that could result in “official charges.” This term refers to people who rely on government benefits. Federal officials said increased enforcement could save taxpayers $9 billion a year.

Which 75 countries have visa processing suspended?

If you can’t see the graphic, click here to reload the page.

Since 1882, legal immigrants have been required to meet public charge rules designed to ensure they can support themselves through work, savings and sponsorship, without relying on programs like food stamps or welfare.

Starting in November 2025, the ministry will instruct consular officials to consider applicants’ health, age, English proficiency, financial situation and potential long-term medical needs when considering visas, FOX reported.

The changes for 75 countries are set to officially take effect on January 21, and the department said the freeze “will remain in place until the United States can ensure that new immigrants do not extract wealth from American citizens.”

Contributors: Trevor Hughes and Dinah Voyles Pulver.

Source: USA TODAY Network reporting and research. Migration Policy Research Institute

Progresso launches new soup-flavored candy “Soup Drops”

0

play

progress dropped Two new flavors of limited edition soup drops for those looking to satisfy their soup cravings.

Depending on who you ask, there’s nothing more satisfying than having a hot bowl of soup on a gloomy day or when you’re sick. However, Progresso has released a soup-flavored hard candy again.

In January 2025, the brand, which makes popular canned soups and soups, launched its first Soup Drops flavor: Chicken Noodle.

When USA TODAY producer Cristina Cardona tried the soup-flavored hard candies, she said, “Wow, this tastes like soup.”

The first batch of the candy, marketed as “suckable soup,” sold out within an hour, USA TODAY reported. Following initial success, the company released the candy weekly throughout January.

But on Thursday, January 15, Progresso is launching a new hard candy flavor for soup lovers to enjoy, and the new batch will “warm in your mouth,” according to the packaging.

What will the new flavors be?

Progresso plans to introduce two new flavors, according to a press release emailed to USA TODAY.

  • tomato basil soup drop
  • beef pot roast soup drop

The popular Chicken Noodle Soup Drops will also be back.

When will Progresso Soup Drops be available for purchase?

Progresso Soup Drops will be available for purchase on the Walmart website on Thursday, January 15th at 9am ET.

Anyone who purchases this product will receive a bundle pack that includes a can of Progresso Chicken Noodle Soup and a variety can of Progresso Soup Drops in all three flavors. It retails for $2.97, about the same price as a can of Progresso soup.

After initial release, Soup Drops will be available on Walmart’s website every Thursday throughout January while supplies last.

For more information on Progresso Soup Drop Variety Cans, visit ProgressoSoupDrops.com.

Contributor: Gabe Hauari, USA TODAY

Julia is a trend reporter for USA TODAY, covering scientific research, natural disasters, and trending news. Connect with her on LinkedIn ×Instagram, TikTok: @juliamaigz or email jgomez@hannett.com.

ICE, Minnesota, Verizon suspension, Greenland, ‘Bridgerton’, John Harbaugh: Daily Briefing

0

morning! Welcome to the daily briefing. The problems are:

nicole farato Here, enjoy rapid-fire reading lectures from USA TODAY’s latest Books newsletter. From ongoing anti-ICE protests in Minnesota to the latest on President Trump’s pursuit of Greenland, we’ve got the news for you Thursday. And ‘Ton’ gets a heartrending glimpse in Season 4 of ‘Bridgerton.’

Tear gas, snowballs, arrests

A federal agent in Minneapolis was assaulted and shot in the leg during an arrest Wednesday, the Department of Homeland Security said, sparking further protests in the tense city after the shooting death of Renee Nicole Good by ICE agents earlier this month.

Meanwhile, Good’s family has released new details about the hours leading up to the shooting. Good and his wife quit to “observe and support their neighbors,” according to the family and their attorney.

Another important point is that there are more ICE detention centers than ever before. And since August, immigration officers have shot at least 10 people, a USA TODAY analysis found. In both incidents, agents fired shots at drivers and moving vehicles, an action that has largely been prohibited by law enforcement because of the risk to public safety.

More news you need to know right now

  • Greenland conflict continues: Denmark’s top diplomat, who met with Vice President J.D. Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Wednesday, said allies disagree on Greenland’s future and said President Donald Trump “has a desire to conquer” Greenland.
  • FBI searches Washington Post reporter’s home: The Washington Post reported that Hannah Natanson, who covers the federal government, has not been accused of any wrongdoing and that her office received a subpoena related to an investigation of a government contractor with a top-secret security clearance.
  • Data centers eligible for voting: Voter anger is growing as energy-hungry data centers increasingly strain the power grid and ratepayers’ wallets. Opposition to the giant warehouses driving the artificial intelligence revolution is becoming a key element of the 2026 midterm elections.

what to see

“Bridgerton” is back

Dear Gentle readers, this season’s social events are coming up and there’s a lot of excitement. Rumor has it that Benedict Bridgerton (Luke Thompson), the second son of the Bridgerton family who avoids marriage and is free-spirited, has finally found a partner, Sophie Baek (Yerin Ha).

health

mother and daughter bond

Carol Myers, 72, and her daughter Karly Elyashov, 44, say they don’t look or sound alike and don’t have much in common. Except for one thing: Multiple myeloma is a blood cancer that occurs when plasma cells become abnormal and produce dangerous proteins that can damage bones, kidneys, and other functions.

before you go

Have feedback about the daily briefing? Email Nicole at NFallert@usatoday.com.

Renee Good’s family reveals new details about the morning she was killed by ICE

0


The family released a statement about the 37-year-old mother of three on the same day they announced they would launch a civil investigation aimed at holding ICE accountable.

The family of a woman shot to death by federal agents on January 14 revealed new details about what she was doing in the hours leading up to the shooting that sparked nationwide protests.

Renee Nicole Macklin Goode was shot and killed by Jonathan Ross, a U.S. Customs and Immigration Service agent, on January 7th. The shooting occurred during an ICE operation in Minneapolis, Minnesota, where the 37-year-old mother of three drove her SUV through a Los Angeles neighborhood after being asked to exit her vehicle.

Footage of the deadly encounter was widely seen and deeply divided the country. Homeland Security officials maintain that Mr. Ross acted appropriately and that Mr. Good was involved in “domestic terrorism.” Democratic Party leaders are calling for Mr. Ross’ arrest. A new poll finds that most American voters think the shooting was unjustified.

In a statement calling Good a “beautiful light in our family,” the woman’s four siblings, parents and attorney described the shooting as the result of a chance encounter after dropping her 6-year-old child off at school.

“We would like to thank everyone who supported Renee and our family. The endless care we received during this time is exactly what she gave everyone,” Good’s family said in a letter shared with USA TODAY. “Nae was a beautiful light in our family and brought joy to everyone she met. She had a relentless sense of hope and optimism that was contagious. We already miss her more than words can express.”

“Help your neighbor”

After dropping off their children, Good and his wife, Becca Good, were driving with their dog when they encountered federal agents processing immigration in their neighborhood, according to his family and attorney. Lawyers for the family said the couple stopped to “observe and assist their neighbors.”

Becca Good got out of the SUV moments before the fatal encounter. In Good’s last words, which were caught on camera, the woman can be heard telling the immigration officer: “I’m not mad at you.”

“She was our best friend with a seemingly limitless capacity for love. Naenae gave everything she had to care for her friends, family, and people she had never actually met,” Good’s family said. “She was our protector, our shoulder to cry on, and our sparkling source of joy.”

The new details come after the family announced that a Chicago-based law firm will launch an investigation into Good’s death. The investigation comes as Justice Department officials say there is “no basis” for an investigation into the incident. The firm, Romanucci & Blandin, is the same organization that represented the family of George Floyd, who was killed by a Minneapolis police officer in 2020.

Homeland Security leaders say the controversial national deployment of military operatives is necessary to root out fraudulent agency officials with ties to Somali immigrants.

McKinsey tests AI chatbot during early hiring stages

0

Hiring at large companies has long relied on interviews, tests, and human judgment. That process is starting to change. McKinsey has begun using an AI chatbot as part of its hiring process, marking a shift in the way professional services organizations evaluate early-career candidates.

Chatbots are used in the early stages of recruitment, where applicants are asked to interact with a chatbot as part of their assessment. This tool is not intended to replace interviews or final hiring decisions, but rather to support screening and assessment early in the process. This move reflects a broader trend across large organizations. No longer limited to research or customer-facing tools, AI is increasingly shaping internal workflows.

Why McKinsey uses AI for new graduate recruitment

Recruiting new graduates requires a lot of resources. Every year, large companies receive tens of thousands of applications, many of which must be evaluated in short hiring cycles. Screening candidates for basic aptitude, communication skills, problem-solving abilities, etc. can take a long time even before interviews begin.

Using AI at this stage provides a way to manage volume. Chatbots can interact with all applicants, ask consistent questions, and collect organized responses. Human recruiters will be able to see that data without having their staff manually sift through every application from scratch.

For McKinsey, chatbots are part of a larger evaluation process that includes interviews and human judgment. The company says the tool helps companies gather more information early on, rather than making hiring decisions in isolation.

The changing role of the recruiter

Introducing AI into recruiting will change the way recruiting teams operate. Rather than focusing on initial screening, recruiters can spend more time evaluating prospects who have already passed initial tests. In theory, this allows for more thoughtful interviews and deeper assessments later in the process.

At the same time, questions about the director also arise. Recruiters need to understand how chatbots evaluate responses and which signals to prioritize. Without this visibility, there is a risk that decision-making becomes too biased towards automated output, even if the tool is intended to assist rather than decide.

Professional services firms are typically wary of such adjustments. Their reputations rely heavily on the quality of their people, and any perception of unfair or flawed employment practices carries risks. As a result, recruitment is both a testing ground for AI use and a critical area for management.

Concerns about fairness and bias

The use of AI in recruitment is not without controversy. Critics have expressed concern that automated systems can reflect biases that exist in the training data and how questions are framed. If not carefully monitored, these biases can influence who progresses through the hiring process.

McKinsey said it takes these risks into account and chatbots are used alongside human reviews. Still, the move highlights a broader challenge for organizations implementing AI internally: tools need to be tested, audited, and tuned over time.

Recruitment activities include checking whether certain groups are being disadvantaged by the way questions are asked or the way answers are interpreted. It also means providing candidates with clear information about how AI will be used and how their data will be processed.

How does McKinsey’s AI adoption move fit into broader corporate trends?

The use of AI in new graduate recruitment is not limited to consulting. Leading employers in finance, law, and technology are also testing AI tools for screening, scheduling interviews, and analyzing written responses. What stands out is how quickly these tools move from experimentation to real-world processes.

AI is often introduced into organizations through small, contained use cases. Recruitment is one of them. It exists within the company, affects internal efficiency, and allows adjustments to be made without changing the products and services offered to customers.

This pattern reflects how AI adoption is unfolding more broadly. Rather than making a fundamental transformation, many companies are adding AI to specific workflows where the benefits and risks are easier to manage.

What does this mean for businesses?

McKinsey’s use of AI chatbots in recruitment represents a real shift in corporate thinking. AI is becoming a tool for day-to-day internal decision-making, as well as behind-the-scenes analysis and automation.

For other organizations, there are lessons in the approach rather than copying the tool. Deploying AI in sensitive areas like recruiting requires clear boundaries, human oversight, and a willingness to take the time to review results.

Communication is also necessary. Candidates need to know when they are interacting with AI and how that interaction is integrated into the overall hiring process. Transparency helps build trust, especially as AI becomes more commonplace in decision-making in the workplace.

As professional services firms continue to test AI in their operations, hiring efforts can provide an early indication of how far companies are willing to go. While this technology may help manage scale and consistency, the responsibility for decisions remains with humans. How well a company can balance the two will determine how AI is accepted within the company.

(Photo provided by Resume Genius)

SEE ALSO: Allister Frost: Tackling employee anxiety for successful AI integration

Want to learn more about AI and big data from industry leaders? Check out the AI ​​& Big Data Expo in Amsterdam, California, and London. This comprehensive event is part of TechEx and co-located with other major technology events. Click here for more information.

AI News is brought to you by TechForge Media. Learn about other upcoming enterprise technology events and webinars.