Home Blog Page 346

Pepsi Challenge returns with 2026 Super Bowl commercial

0

play

Polar bears may be considered Coca-Cola’s spirit animal, but Pepsi is playing a furry character in its new Super Bowl commercial.

The ad, titled “The Choice,” premiered online on Thursday, January 29, and features the polar bear long associated with Coca-Cola ads, performing a blindfolded Pepsi challenge and pointing its paw at Pepsi Zero Sugar over Coke Zero Sugar.

After releasing a teaser video for its upcoming Super Bowl commercial on Jan. 26, Pepsi released the entire 45-second ad online on Thursday, Jan. 29. A 30-second version will be aired during the big game on February 8th.

Rate the best and worst Super Bowl commercials!

According to Pepsi’s news release about the ad, the results of the Pepsi Challenge lead the bewildered bear to realize that he is addicted to Pepsi products and embark on a “journey of self-discovery.” He visits a therapist played by commercial director and Academy Award-winning film director Taika Waititi (“Jojo Rabbit”).

As Queen’s classic song “I Want to Break Free” begins, he meets a fellow bear who loves Pepsi Zero Sugar and finds himself being “Coldplayed” with a drink on the jumbotron at a concert.

Mark Kirkham, chief marketing officer at PepsiCo Beverage Co., told USA TODAY that poking the bear, which has partnered with Coke for years, “makes it fun when you have someone who seems to be in sync with someone else.” “It makes it interesting. It makes it interesting, it sparks a conversation. And I think that’s what the Super Bowl is for.”

Pepsi’s revival of the Pepsi Challenge comes 50 years after its creation.

“It gives us the confidence to really reignite the conversation around taste,” Kirkham said.

Pepsi becomes prime-time player with Super Bowl commercial

The new commercial is the latest in a long history of securing Pepsi’s place in pop culture. Over the years, the brand has frequently produced the top Super Bowl commercials based on USA TODAY’s Ad Meter ratings. Perhaps one of the most famous ads, a 1992 ad featuring Cindy Crawford quenching her thirst with Pepsi, actually lost out to a Nike commercial featuring Michael Jordan and Bugs Bunny.

A combination of live-action and computer-generated imagery was used to create the new spot. “I love a good challenge, so I jumped at the chance to participate in what many consider the biggest pop culture contest outside of streaming vs. theaters,” Waititi said in a statement. He also directed Ray’s “The Little Farmer,” which took second place in last year’s USA TODAY Ad Meter, and last year’s Mountain Dew Baja Blast ad starring singer-actress Becky G and singer Seal. “I’m honored to be able to contribute in some small way to Pepsi’s tradition.” – and the iconic Cola War. ”

Kirkham said Pepsi doesn’t automatically rise to the top in Super Bowl advertising. The brand’s creative team is also thinking about “how can we make this more than just an ad during a game? And how can we actually turn it into a cultural moment and not just an ad,” he said. “I think Pepsi’s history of doing that speaks for itself.”

PepsiCo also plans to air a Super Bowl ad for Poppi, the prebiotic soda it acquired in March 2025 for $1.95 billion, and a commercial for Lay’s. Although there are no ads for Gatorade, another brand, Kirkham said it “probably has more in-game exposure than any 30-second ad” because the drink is on the sideline and often tossed out by winning coaches.

But the ads that PepsiCo is running represent the transformation that we’re making as PepsiCo,” he said.

Mike Snyder is a national trends news reporter for USA TODAY. You can follow him on Threads, Bluesky, and X, and email him at: mike snyder & @mikegsnider.bsky.social & @mikesnider & msnider@usatoday.com.

Boyle Heights businesses join ‘national shutdown’ in protest against ICE

0

play

  • Amid planned anti-ICE protests in Southern California, small demonstrations have erupted following reports of federal immigration enforcement in Boyle Heights.
  • One source said it was “beautiful” to see people coming together and agreeing to shut down on January 30 as part of a national call for a strike.

(This story has been updated to change or add photos and videos.)

Stores in Los Angeles’ Boyle Heights neighborhood will temporarily close as part of a nationwide strike scheduled for Friday, January 30, in response to the shooting deaths of Renee Nicole Good and Alex Preti by federal immigration agents in Minnesota, organizers said.

On Wednesday, Jan. 28, about two dozen people gathered at the intersection of East Cesar Chavez Street and North Soto Street in a community that many Latino and Hispanic residents call home. Organizers chanted in Spanish, “Let’s ICE leave LA,” and “Seve, sesiente, el pueblo esta presente,” as passing drivers honked their horns in solidarity.

The measure, known as a “national shutdown,” is supported by various advocacy groups and unions who are calling on people across the country not to go to school, work or shop. The national shutdown calls for defunding U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and an end to their “reign of terror.”

It’s the latest effort to protest ICE and comes as Americans have seen large numbers of Minnesotans dealt with by federal immigration agents in the state throughout January, spurring demonstrations in other areas, including Southern California.

“We see all the violence that is happening in our communities, and we have a lot of support from small and medium-sized businesses for this Friday’s strike. It’s about communities showing up and coming together to show our true strength,” said Gabriela García of the Socialism and Liberation Party, making the announcement at a press conference on January 28.

About 20 businesses in Boyle Heights have already agreed to close, according to two community organizers.

“They understand the importance of worker solidarity and coming together as a working class,” PSL member Daniel Torres told USA TODAY Network. “It’s really great to see that they really want to come together and agree to closure because their businesses have been so affected. One business owner told me today that the community she serves is too scared to come forward.”

Torres said the owners she spoke to aren’t getting any deals, and it’s “the same story for most vendors and business owners here in Boyle Heights.”

“They’ve taken a huge hit to their business and they’re still expected to pay their bills, they’re still expected to pay their rent,” Torres said.

Torres said Cesar Chavez Avenue, First Street and Soto Street are a “mixed mix” of businesses, from places that sell clothing to panaderias and bakeries, and said she has spoken to many businesses and business owners who support the closure.

“They’re like, ‘What else can I do?'” Torres said. “They feel the situation has gotten too bad to go toe-to-toe with ICE on the streets. They need to hold back from work to send a message to Trump and this administration that they will no longer tolerate it.”

The demonstration in Boyle Heights began after several people were reportedly detained by federal immigration agents earlier in the day. LA Taco reported that three people were detained by federal immigration enforcement agents in the area on January 28th.

ICE and Border Patrol did not immediately respond to USA TODAY Network’s emailed questions seeking confirmation of their activities in the community on Jan. 28.

Garcia said the demonstration was “out of love” for the community and to show those detained by federal agents that they have their support and are thinking about their neighbors.

During the demonstration, Torres explained that one way they are fighting back is by withholding work, and that they will continue to stand with the community and protect their neighbors and those who need it.

“We shouldn’t have to suffer like this,” Torres said, visibly and audibly emotional. “It makes me so angry to see our own people suffering. We deserve better…I’m crying because I’m angry. I’m angry and we’re doing everything we can to help our neighbors, because it could happen to any of us.”

“The legal guards who were killed, Renee and Alex, it could have been any of us. So we’re here to say we’re going to keep fighting back,” Torres added. “We’re going to continue to show up on the streets. We’re not going to be harassed by ICE or the LAPD.”

Paris Barraza is a reporter covering Los Angeles and Southern California for the USA TODAY Network. please contact her pbarraza@usatodayco.com.

Bomb cyclone forecast. Snow possible from Florida to New England

0


Let’s call it a bomb cyclone or a nor’easter. This January-to-February storm will be one to remember for some on the East Coast.

play

Whether you call it a bomb cyclone, a nor’easter, or a blizzard, it will be a memorable weekend weather event for some along the East Coast as January turns to February.

“This storm has the potential to bring heavy snow and strong winds to the Southeast this weekend,” AccuWeather senior meteorologist Scott Homan said in a Jan. 29 email to USA TODAY.

There’s even a chance of snow in Florida as bitterly cold air moves south across the Sunshine State.

“People should prepare for the possibility of dangerous snowstorms in some coastal areas from North Carolina to the southern Jersey coast,” Homan said. “Blizzard conditions could extend into parts of Long Island and southern New England.”

This will cause “snow and blowing snow to rapidly reduce visibility, making travel extremely hazardous,” the National Weather Service said in an online forecast.

Snow forecast in Carolina, Virginia

The chance of more than 6 inches of snow is increasing in North Carolina and the Tidewater region of Virginia, according to Weather.com, which says forecast guidance is more consistent with this snowstorm becoming a major snowstorm.

“For cities like Charlotte, Raleigh and Greensboro, North Carolina, this could be the biggest snowstorm in decades,” AccuWeather meteorologist Alex Sosnowski said in an online forecast. “Norfolk, Virginia, could exceed last February’s whopping 11.1 inches.”

The National Weather Service’s official forecast calls for 8.4 inches in Raleigh, 7 inches in Greensboro and 6 inches in Charlotte.

Snow is also possible in parts of eastern Georgia, eastern Tennessee and southern West Virginia, the weather service said.

The Bureau of Meteorology warned that strong winds and the weight of snow on tree branches could snap power lines and cause sporadic power outages. “Large-scale closures and infrastructure disruptions are possible, which could make travel unsafe or impossible.”

Florida snow forecast

Snow falling on the Florida peninsula is sure to be a conversation piece. An even bigger story is the frigid temperatures across the state. The National Weather Service in Tampa said Saturday, Jan. 31, the area could see a mix of light snow and rain, or snow showers or storms.

Snow forecast for Delaware, New Jersey and Maryland

Snow is possible in coastal areas of Delaware, New Jersey and Maryland, but the more significant event will be strong winds. For example, 2 inches of snow is expected in Ocean City, Maryland, and 1 inch is expected in Dover, Delaware, and Atlantic City, New Jersey, according to the National Weather Service.

Strong north-to-northeast winds are becoming more likely, which could lead to major coastal flooding on Sunday 1 February.

“This rapidly deepening storm system will generate strong onshore winds along the Mid-Atlantic coast north from North Carolina’s Outer Banks. Hurricane-force wind gusts, combined with astronomical storm surge, will cause moderate to locally significant coastal flooding,” the weather service said.

Snow forecast for New England

Most of New England’s snow will fall in southeastern Massachusetts, including Cape Cod, Martha’s Vineyard and Nantucket Island.

AccuWeather meteorologists believe the region most likely to see 6 to 12 inches of snow in the Northeast will be in southeastern Massachusetts.

According to Weather.com, one question that remains is regarding snowfall in Boston. “It is not yet clear whether the offshore low, or combination of lows, will windmill far enough offshore to keep the potential for heavy snow on Cape Cod, Nantucket and Martha’s Vineyard, or whether it will move the heavy snow band from far northwest into Boston,” Weather.com meteorologists Rob Shackelford and Jonathan Erdman said in a Jan. 29 online forecast.

Can weight loss drugs cause blindness?

0

good morning! I’m Daniel de Visé from Daily Money.

A Maryland truck driver suffered an “ocular stroke” that left him blind, first in one eye, then the other, Chris Kenning and Austin Fast report.

He filed a lawsuit against a common class of weight loss drugs known as GLP-1 receptor agonists, including Ozempic, Wigovy, and Munjaro. Are they responsible for his condition?

No change to interest rates at January meeting

The Fed chose to keep interest rates unchanged at its January central bank meeting. Can we expect a rate cut in the second half of 2026?

📰 Other stories you can’t miss 📰

📰 great read 📰

Here are some popular stories from 2025 that you may have missed. Please read it! share!

Many Americans believe that $1.5 million is the “magic number” for retirement. The conventional wisdom is that as long as you save this much, you’ll be fine.

Here’s how long that total lasts in each state.

Daniel de Visse covers personal finance for USA TODAY. Daily Money breaks down complex consumer and financial news. Subscribe here.

Israel releases 15 Palestinian bodies; ceasefire agreement moves to new level

0

play

CAIRO – Israel has released the bodies of 15 Palestinians killed during the war in Gaza, three days after recovering the remains of the last hostage, a move that mediators hope will pave the way for implementing the next phase of President Donald Trump’s peace plan.

Police officer Ron Gviri was one of 251 hostages captured by Palestinian Hamas militants and taken to Gaza during the cross-border attack that sparked the war on October 7, 2023.

At the time of the October ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas, there were 48 hostages left in Gaza, 28 of whom were believed to have died, including Gviri.

Handing over all remaining living and dead hostages was a core promise included in the first phase of the ceasefire agreement. Subsequent steps have not yet been achieved, and there is deep disagreement about what comes next, including the disarmament of Hamas.

The International Committee of the Red Cross said in a statement that Israel facilitated the return of the 15 dead Palestinians to Gaza after recovering Ghviri’s body.

Months of body recovery work

“This marks the end of a months-long operation to reunite families and support the implementation of ceasefire agreements,” the ICRC statement added.

The operation began in October with the release of 20 live hostages by Hamas and 1,808 Palestinian prisoners by Israel, according to the ICRC. In subsequent stages, the ICRC facilitated the repatriation of the dead, including 27 of the 28 hostages and 360 Palestinians.

ICRC Regional Director Julian Lelison said: “We are relieved to be able to help reunite families with their loved ones. We hope that for families whose deceased relatives have been returned, this will provide an opportunity for full mourning.”

Gaza’s Health Ministry, run by Hamas, confirmed it had received the bodies of 15 people and said it would work to identify them.

It added that only 99 Palestinian bodies handed over since October have been identified, forcing health authorities to bury unidentified bodies in mass graves.

fragile ceasefire

In the latest violence to undermine the fragile ceasefire, medics said two men were killed by Israeli forces in eastern Khan Yunis, which borders an area of ​​military operations.

The Israeli military said it “carried out precise strikes in accordance with the ceasefire agreement” targeting militants planning attacks on its forces.

“Prior to the attack, measures were taken to reduce the damage to civilians,” the military said in a statement.

Gaza’s health ministry says at least 490 people have been killed in Israeli airstrikes, tank shelling and gunfire since a cease-fire took effect in October after a two-year war that has left widespread destruction in the Palestinian enclave.

Later that day, an Israeli airstrike killed at least one Palestinian and injured others at the Maghazi camp in central Gaza. The trigger for the attack is unclear, and the Israeli military did not respond to requests for comment.

Israel says four soldiers were killed by Palestinian militants in a small coastal territory during the ceasefire.

The two countries have exchanged accusations over ceasefire violations.

By proceeding to the second phase, the United States and mediation partners Egypt and Qatar will have to face the more contentious issue of disarming Hamas, which the group has long rejected. The plan also calls for the dispatch of an international peacekeeping force.

2026 Government Shutdown Update: Congressional Vote Fails

0

A test vote in the Senate on Thursday to avert a partial government shutdown failed, signaling that Democrats, Republicans and the White House remain at odds amid negotiations over funding for the Department of Homeland Security. large spending packages It must pass by the end of Friday.

Just last week, six bills appeared ready to pass Congress. But killing someone Second Minnesotan by federal agents There is chaos on Capitol Hill as Senate Democrats craft DHS reforms while demanding that the DHS spending bill be removed from the broader package.

According to a person familiar with the talks, no agreement had been reached as of that morning. However, talks between the two parties are accelerating. Republican senators have expressed openness in recent days to passing short-term funding for DHS, while lawmakers have offered compromises. Democrats want to keep the funding extension as short as possible, perhaps just a few weeks.

Alex Preti’s death was the second fatal shooting this month by federal agents in the Twin Cities, brought in as part of President Donald Trump’s aggressive anti-immigration efforts. On January 7, Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents killed 37-year-old poet Renee Nicole Good during a protest.

The waiting game began after Thursday’s Senate vote failed.

It’s unclear how long it will take Democrats to finalize a deal with the White House. But the main questions appear to center on exactly how long the short-term funding measures for DHS will last.

“I’ve been talking to administration officials,” said Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Connecticut, adding that he hoped “the better angels will prevail.”

A partial shutdown is likely regardless of whether a Senate deal is reached soon. That’s because the House will almost certainly have to reconsider and approve it.

Fifty-five senators, including all Democrats and seven Republicans, voted against moving forward with the funding plan.

While Democratic concerns were uniformly about ICE and DHS, the Republican vote against the bill was made up of conservatives angered by what they saw as wasteful spending in the six spending bills.

President Donald Trump said he believes the White House and members of Congress are “close” to a deal to avoid a shutdown.

“I hope it doesn’t close,” President Trump said during a cabinet meeting with his secretaries. “We’re working on it right now. I think we’re pretty close. I don’t think Democrats want that either. So we’re going to work on it in a very bipartisan way.”

– Joey Garrison

Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-South Dakota) told reporters that talks between Senate Democrats and the White House are “moving in the right direction” but “we’re not there yet.”

“I think it’s still a gradual process at this point,” he said.

When will the government shutdown begin?

If lawmakers cannot reach an agreement by the end of this week, the government will undergo a partial shutdown starting at 12:01 a.m. Saturday, January 31st.

It’s been less than three months since the government reopened after a record 43-day complete shutdown last fall.

Why is the government nearing a shutdown?

For weeks, Congress has been working toward a Jan. 30 deadline to pass a spending bill to keep the government running.

The U.S. House of Representatives voted on January 22 to send the spending package to the Senate. But Democratic frustrations over DHS funding simmered for weeks in the wake of Goode’s death. Republicans largely supported the DHS funding bill with support from seven Democrats.

But Mr. Preti’s killing has tilted the position of Senate Democrats. Senate Democrats are currently refusing to provide further funding to the agency, which oversees federal immigration enforcement and has played a leading role in President Trump’s aggressive immigration strategy.

There had already been an 11-hour scramble in Congress to pass the final spending bill within a week of the Jan. 30 deadline. Even before news of Mr. Preti’s death broke, weather-related disruptions were straining the schedule, with the Senate vote on Monday, Jan. 26, canceled due to a winter storm.

What do Senate Democrats want?

Senate Democrats on Wednesday, January 28, outlined three major demands for DHS reform, including Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP).

They are calling for greater accountability for ICE and the Border Patrol, including independent investigations and stricter standards for the use of force. Senate Democrats also want to end intensive immigration checks known as “patrol patrols” and require officers to operate without masks and with body cameras on.

Schumer and the president reportedly held talks on Wednesday night, January 28, to reach an agreement to avert a government shutdown, according to reports in the New York Times and Politico.

The remaining five bills are in jeopardy due to conflicts between the two parties. They fund critical government agencies, from the Department of Defense to the Department of Health and Human Services.

Kathryn Palmer is USA TODAY’s political reporter. She can be reached at the following address: kapalmer@usatoday.com And to X@Kathryn Purml. Sign up for her daily politics newsletter here.

Musk shifts focus to commercial focus as Cybertruck sales decline

0

play

  • Tesla CEO Elon Musk said the Cybertruck could transition into a fully autonomous vehicle for commercial cargo delivery.
  • Cybertruck sales fell by nearly half in 2025 compared to the previous year, according to data from Cox Automotive.
  • A Yale University study suggests that CEO Elon Musk’s political stance may have hurt Tesla’s sales.

Tesla’s unconventional electric pickup truck, the Cybertruck, may soon be headed for a self-driving commercial future, CEO Elon Musk told investors during Tesla’s January 28 earnings call.

“We are transitioning the Cybertruck lineup to fully autonomous vehicles,” Musk said in response to a question about the Cybertruck’s weak sales in recent months.

“There’s clearly a market for freight delivery, like localized freight delivery to cities hundreds of miles away, things like that,” Musk said. “There’s a lot of freight that needs to be moved locally within cities, and a self-driving Cybertruck could really help with that.”

The comments come as sales of Tesla’s Cybertruck will fall by nearly half in 2025, according to new data released by Cox Automotive.

How many Cybertrucks has Tesla sold?

The Silicon Valley electric vehicle maker sold 20,237 units of its unconventional electric pickup trucks in 2025, which was 48.1% less than the 38,965 units it sold in 2024. This vehicle was first introduced as a 2024 model.

The Cybertruck’s sales decline comes as overall electric vehicle sales declined in 2025 after President Donald Trump and Congress eliminated a $7,500 tax credit for EV buyers that the Cybertruck and other models were eligible for. According to new data released by Cox Automotive on January 13, automakers sold 1,275,714 electric vehicles in 2025, enough to account for nearly 8% of total U.S. vehicle sales that year. However, industry-wide EV sales also fell 2% from the 1,301,441 electric vehicles automakers sold in 2024.

Travis Axelrod, Tesla’s director of investor relations, defended the Cybertruck’s 2025 sales numbers on a January 28 call.

“In this space, the Cybertruck continues to be the leader, selling more electric trucks than any other,” Alexrod said. “As our competitors continue to retreat.”

How did Tesla’s other cars sell in 2025?

Tesla sold 589,160 cars in the U.S. in 2025, down 7% from 2024’s domestic sales of 633,762 cars.

The company said in an investor presentation from the third quarter of 2025 that the challenges it faces in 2025 are due to “near-term uncertainties due to changes in trade, tariffs and fiscal policy.”

Tesla’s best-selling car in 2025 was the Model Y, which sold 357,528 units in 2025, which was 4% less than the 372,613 Model Y units the company sold in 2024.

Here’s how the rest of Tesla’s lineup fared in 2025 compared to its 2024 performance.

  • Model 3 | 192,440 people in 2025. 189,903 people in 2024
  • Model S | 5,889 people in 2025. 12,426 people in 2024
  • Model X | 13,066 people in 2025. 19,855 people in 2024

On January 28, Musk announced plans to end production of the Model S and Model X in the spring of 2026.

What role do Elon Musk’s politics play in Tesla’s sales slump?

Industry analysts also cited the impact that Musk’s collaboration with Trump and staunchly conservative political stances had on the company’s car sales.

The Cybertruck, in particular, was launched at the height of the 2024 presidential campaign, when Musk was a vocal supporter of Trump, and became a symbol of some shoppers’ alignment with Musk and Trump’s politics.

A November 2025 Yale University study found that Tesla sold between 1 million and 1.26 million fewer vehicles between October 2022 and April 2025 than it would have without what the study authors called the “Musk partisan effect.” The study also found that Musk’s public political stance also helped other automakers increase sales of electric and hybrid vehicles, as drivers who opposed his political stance fled to other EV makers.

A new poll released Jan. 12 by EVs for All America, an advocacy group that works with automakers to push U.S. and state legislatures to adopt EV-friendly policies, found that 44% of people who said they were seriously considering buying an EV had a mostly negative opinion of Musk.

Other findings from the poll include:

  • Among those who said they might consider buying an EV if prices for plug-in models fell, 52% said they had a mostly negative opinion of Musk.
  • Among those who said they were considering buying an EV in the next year, 46% had a negative opinion of Tesla as a brand.
  • Of all respondents to the poll, 58% said they had an unfavorable opinion of Tesla.

Amy Klobuchar announces candidacy for Minnesota governor

0

play

Amy Klobuchar, a four-term Democratic senator and frequent critic of President Donald Trump, officially announced her candidacy for Minnesota governor on January 29, amid heightened tensions in the state due to the administration’s surge in immigration enforcement.

“These times call for leaders who are willing to stand up for themselves and not be a rubber stamp for this administration, but at the same time are willing to find common ground and try to fix things in our state. These times call for grit and resilience,” Klobuchar said in an announcement video posted to social media.

“I believe we must stand up for what’s right and right what’s wrong, which is why today I’m announcing my candidacy for governor of Minnesota,” she said.

Klobuchar’s announcement came after she filed paperwork to form a campaign committee on January 22, after current Gov. Tim Walz announced he would not seek re-election amid a federal investigation into widespread welfare fraud in the state. Minnesota’s precinct caucuses, traditionally the first step in the party endorsement process, begin on February 3rd.

Walz, who ran for vice president alongside former Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris, on January 5 cited mounting pressure over the fraud scandal as one of the reasons for her decision to drop out of the race, but pushed back with claims that the administration had failed to combat fraud.

The alleged scandal involves people, many of them Somali-Americans, accused of stealing hundreds of millions, even billions, of dollars over several years. The Department of Justice indicted 98 defendants in fraud-related cases in Minnesota, resulting in 64 convictions.

Klobuchar said her three goals are to get things done, to bring people together, and to stand up for what’s right and solve what’s wrong.

“I don’t like fraud and waste in government,” Klobuchar said. “I will eradicate fraud by making sure those who steal taxpayer money go to prison and changing the way our state government operates.”

In her announcement, Klobuchar said the Trump administration “revels in division,” referring to the ongoing unrest in Minnesota following the deaths of two Americans, Renee Nicole Good and Alex Preti.

“I’m running for all Minnesotans who want to drive ICE and its abusive tactics out of the state we love,” Klobuchar said.

In a statement, the Republican Governors Association called Klobuchar a “failed presidential candidate” and criticized her record and stance on issues such as the economy and increasing the number of refugees allowed into the country.

“Simply put, Amy Klobuchar has already brought Minnesota into disrepair, and Minnesotans cannot afford any more incompetent governance,” said Courtney Alexander, director of communications for the Republican Governors Association.

Chris Madel, a lawyer running for governor of Minnesota as a Republican, withdrew from the race earlier this week, accusing national Republicans of “retaliation” against the state and criticizing the Trump administration’s response to the immigration crackdown in Minnesota.

“The national Republican Party makes it nearly impossible for Republicans to win elections across Minnesota,” he said.

This story has been updated to add new information.

Contributor: Terry Collins, Katherine Palmer and Christopher Kang

U.S. adult obesity has doubled in the past 30 years

0

play

Adult obesity rates in the United States have increased over the past 30 years and are expected to increase even more over the next decade, according to a new study.

In the study, published Tuesday, Jan. 28 in the journal JAMA, researchers found that 19.3% of U.S. adults were obese in 1990, but this increased to 42.5% by 2022. Researchers also predict that number will increase to 46.9% by 2035.

This study analyzed data from a total of 11,315,421 U.S. participants using two nationally representative cross-sectional surveys.

Ashley Koff, a registered dietitian who was not involved in the study, told USA TODAY that it’s not surprising that these numbers have increased due to a variety of factors.

But she also said the study’s use of BMI, a measurement based on height and weight, to define obesity was problematic. Other health experts have criticized the method as outdated.

“These numbers really don’t tell us anything about the amount of money people invest in losing weight to optimize their personal health, mental health, frustration, and overall well-being,” she says.

The authors note this limitation, saying that the BMI designation “does not directly measure body fat or describe body composition,” adding that these errors “may vary by demographic group.” Other limitations include sparse data and self-reported health information in some locations.

There were large differences in the prevalence of obesity across age, gender, and racial and ethnic groups.

For example, the largest increases were among Hispanic women and men, and the smallest increases were among non-Hispanic black men.

In 2022, non-Hispanic black women had the highest obesity rate at 56.9%, while Hispanic men, non-Hispanic white men and women, and non-Hispanic black men had similar obesity rates ranging from 40.1% to 42.6%.

Results also show that obesity has increased in younger age groups over the past few decades, representing an earlier onset of obesity.

Obesity levels also varied by state. In 2022, numbers of white men and women were similar, and prevalence was lowest in the District of Columbia and highest in West Virginia. The case for the Hispanic population was different, with obesity rates generally highest in the Midwest and South, specifically Oklahoma for women and Indiana for men.

The authors note that these disparities are likely the result of several factors, including race-based discrimination, food insecurity, and differences in access to healthy food and space for physical activity.

“Lack of physical activity and diet do not exist in isolation, often reflect deep socio-economic disparities, and are just some of the many causes of obesity that policy interventions can target to blunt obesity’s worrying trajectory,” the authors write.

Koff added that while it’s great that people are starting to talk more about nutrition, access to support is limited.

“You need access to people who can help you prevent this problem by personalizing your plan and helping you implement it. A qualified nutritionist or coach will do that,” she said. “Currently, this treatment is not available through insurance or for most people, even if they have been diagnosed with obesity or diabetes.”

Starbucks’ new rewards program launches in March

0

play

Starbucks is revamping its loyalty program, and one of the new twists is to ensure that reward stars never expire.

The revamped program will launch on March 10 with three free membership levels: Green, Gold and Reserve. Members in the lowest Green level can prevent their Rewards Stars from expiring due to monthly activities (monthly reward redemptions, purchases, or Starbucks Card reloads). Stars at Gold level (500 Stars earned within 12 months) or Reserve level (2,500 Stars) do not expire.

The coffee house chain announced its new Starbucks Rewards program at its Investor Day event in New York on Thursday, January 29th.

“Starting March 10, our reimagined program will reinvigorate what it means to be a Starbucks Rewards member,” Treci Lieberman, Starbucks Global Chief Brand Officer, said during the event.

Starbucks adds free Mod Monday for Rewards members

“When we talked to customers about what they wanted from the program, it was simple: They didn’t want their points to expire, and they wanted their birthday rewards to have a longer expiration date,” Lieberman told USA TODAY. “So we addressed this issue by extending expiration dates for Gold and Reserve customers and eliminating points expiration, and for Green customers, allowing them to keep their points for as long as they are valid every six months.”

Additionally, the way reward stars are earned will also change. Currently, Starbucks Rewards members earn Stars based on their payment type, with the most Stars earned when paying with a Starbucks Card. The new program allows members to earn Stars based on their purchases, but also rewards them for reloading their Starbucks Card.

Another new perk is Free Mod Mondays, where customers can receive free drink modifications on Mondays throughout the month, such as adding cold foam or protein, “to take your drink to the next level and encourage exploration,” Lieberman said.

Three levels of the new Starbucks Rewards loyalty program

The new Starbucks Rewards program launches on March 10th. You can participate in the free loyalty program on the Starbucks website and the Starbucks mobile app.

Current members will receive an email regarding the changes on Thursday, January 29th. A subsequent email will let you know which membership level you qualify for and keep you updated in the app. Lieberman said each tier “helps you earn income at a different level.”

New tier memberships and benefits include:

  • Green membership level: You can get a free drink or food on your birthday, and on one selected Monday each month, you can receive a free drink change on a free Mod Monday. You earn one Reward Star for every dollar you spend, but you can earn stars faster by reloading your Starbucks Card. Reloads of $30 earn you 10 stars, and reloads of $50 or more earn you 25 stars. Reward Stars are valid for six months, but you can extend your Stars by one month by completing eligible activities each month, such as redeeming rewards, making purchases, or reloading your Starbucks Card. Green Level members also get personalized benefits, games like Starbucks for Life, early access to select drinks and food, and even earn 2 stars when they bring their own personal cup.
  • Gold membership level (500 stars or more): In addition to all the benefits of Green Tier members, Gold members have a 7-day grace period to redeem free birthday benefits and their Reward Stars never expire. Members at this level earn 1.2 stars for every $1 spent, or 12 stars for every $10 spent. Gold members receive at least four additional Double Star Days each year. During these designated days, members will earn 2x Stars on all purchases.
  • Reserve membership level (2,500 stars and above): Members at this level have a 30-day window to redeem free birthday benefits and at least six Double Star Days per year. Reserve members have access to exclusive products and carefully selected events, including all-expense paid trips to coffee-rich destinations like Tokyo, Milan, and Costa Rica. Members at this level earn 1.7 stars for every $1 spent, or 17 stars for every $10 spent, and also earn all Green and Gold benefits. Reserve members also get a physical card.

Starbucks aims to create a ‘more attractive’ rewards program

Starbucks is looking to maintain momentum with its loyalty program, which reached a record 35.5 million customers in the three months ending Dec. 28, 2025, the company announced during its quarterly earnings release on Jan. 28.

According to the company, both fee-based and non-compensated transactions increased for the first time in about four years. “Our top-line results demonstrate that our plan to return to Starbucks is working and that our turnaround is taking hold,” CEO Brian Nicol said on January 28.

Lieberman said Starbucks Rewards members now visit stores on average more than four times a week, 19 times a month and more than 200 times a year. Perks purchases generated nearly 60% of U.S. companies’ revenue in fiscal year 2025, with total spending exceeding $13 billion, he said.

Lieberman said the current compensation program is strong but has a “one-size-fits-all approach.” “We saw a huge opportunity to make the experience more personal and engaging.”

Starbucks also hopes to attract more non-members through advertising. The company recently launched an integration with “Beast Games,” a competition show on Amazon’s Prime Video streaming service hosted by internet personality MrBeast, which includes a new limited-time Cannonball drink. The brand also plans to air commercials during the upcoming Grammy Awards and Winter Olympics.

The goal, Lieberman said, is to “remind our broader audience that Starbucks is the best place to be, while also…building a more personalized and relevant relationship with our rewards community so they know how much they’re valued by the programs we’re creating.”

Mike Snyder is a national trends news reporter for USA TODAY. You can follow him on Threads, Bluesky, and X, and email him at: mike snyder & @mikegsnider.bsky.social & @mikesnider & msnider@usatoday.com.

ICE, Minnesota Border Patrol to “withdraw”. Live updates.

0


Tom Homan said ICE and Border Patrol agents will be “withdrawal” in Minnesota as federal authorities refocus on “targeted” enforcement and increase access to state prisons.

White House Border Security Director Tom Homan on Thursday outlined plans to “reduce” the federal presence in Minnesota as authorities focus on more “targeted” enforcement. This is a major shift in strategy amid backlash following the shooting deaths of two Americans by immigration officials.

“We’re going to see big changes right here in this city,” Homan said, adding that “fewer agents will be on the streets” as federal authorities increase access to local jails and target immigrants with criminal records, a departure from the Minneapolis operation.

Homan, who President Donald Trump sent this week to take over operations in Minnesota, cited “significant progress” with state and local officials that could lead to an agreement to increase cooperation with federal authorities. Homan also acknowledged that changes are needed in Minnesota’s immigration operations.

“I’m not here because the federal government accomplished its mission perfectly,” he said. “What we’ve been working on is making this operation safer and more efficient. The mission will improve because of the changes we’re making internally.”

The announcement is the most significant change in operations since federal agents shot and killed Alex Preti and Renee Good in Minneapolis this month, sparking nationwide protests, a spate of lawsuits, friction within the Republican Party and growing frustration with the Trump administration’s heavy-handed immigration crackdown.

As pressure mounts, President Trump on Monday replaced Border Patrol Commander Gregory Bovino with Homan and promised a “gradual de-escalation” of operations in Minnesota.

On Thursday, Sen. Susan Collins announced that the immigration operation in Maine has ended less than 10 days after it began. Collins, a Republican, said she was informed of the news by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem.

President Trump is Trump, and his Cabinet is scheduled to meet at 11 a.m. ET.

The meeting comes as the Trump administration faces criticism over its handling of an immigration crackdown in Minnesota, where federal agents shot and killed two protesters this month.

Please see the details of the meeting here.

Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey was in Washington, D.C., on Thursday, where he planned to meet with lawmakers and call for an end to federal immigration enforcement operations in the Twin Cities.

Frey was in the nation’s capital for the U.S. Conference of Mayors. He said in a statement that he plans to work with other city leaders to urge lawmakers to take charge of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The meeting comes as Congressional Democrats threaten to partially shut down the government unless Republicans install guardrails for immigration enforcement.

“Minneapolis may have seen one of the largest ICE deployments in the country, but it won’t be the last if we don’t take action,” Frey said in a statement. “I’m going to Washington to advocate for an end to this strategy and replace it with an approach that builds trust, improves safety, and puts residents first.”

Homan said federal immigration agents were working in “difficult circumstances under extraordinary circumstances” and called local protesters “agitators.”

Homan said investigators will conduct “targeted strategic enforcement operations” focused on threats to public safety.

“They’re trying to do it professionally. If they don’t do it, they’re going to be disciplined,” Homan said. “Like other federal agencies, we have standards of conduct.”

Homan said he will not tolerate obstruction, obstruction or assault of police officers.

In announcing cuts to Minnesota’s ICE workforce, Homan insisted the administration was not reversing President Trump’s priority of deporting immigrants who commit violent crimes.

“We are not abandoning the president’s mission on immigration enforcement. Let’s be clear about that,” said Homan, the White House border czar.

Homan said ICE and Border Patrol agents in Minnesota are conducting “targeted enforcement operations,” the same approach he said the federal government has taken for decades.

“That’s traditionally been the case, and that’s what we intend to do,” Homan said. “When we go out into the streets, we know exactly who we’re looking for, and we know exactly where to find them.”

Homan’s comments come as ICE faces criticism for indiscriminately targeting residents.

Speaking to reporters for the first time since arriving in Minnesota three days ago, Homan said he met with Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, Attorney General Keith Ellison and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey. He said his mission is to “bring law and order back” to Minnesota.

“I didn’t come to Minnesota for the photo op or the headlines,” Homan said. “I came here to look for solutions, and that’s what we’re trying to do.”

He reiterated his administration’s opposition to so-called “sanctuary cities” that protect immigrants.

“As I have said many times to this administration over the past few years, jurisdictions that refuse to cooperate with federal immigration authorities are sanctuary cities for criminals. Sanctuary cities are sanctuary cities for criminals, and that poses a danger to local residents.”

Homan said in his opening remarks at the news conference that he did not agree on everything with state and local officials. “I didn’t expect to agree on every point,” he said.

“I’ve heard a lot of people want to know why we’re talking to people who we don’t consider friends of the administration. The bottom line is that we can’t solve problems without talking,” Homan said.

Homan said he came to Minnesota to find a solution. “And that’s what we’re trying to do. We’ve come a long way.”

A federal judge in Minneapolis said Wednesday it was U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement that flouted the law by ignoring dozens of federal court orders during a surge in immigration enforcement this month.

After authorities belatedly complied with an order to release a wrongfully detained man from Ecuador while suspending a contempt of court hearing against Acting ICE Director Todd Lyons, U.S. District Judge Patrick Schiltz cited at least 96 court orders that he said ICE had violated in 74 cases.

A federal judge in Minnesota on Wednesday issued a temporary restraining order against the Department of Homeland Security, prohibiting it from arresting and detaining refugees in the state, and ordering the department to release refugees in its custody.

U.S. District Judge John R. Tanheim issued a restraining order in connection with a class-action lawsuit filed by Minnesota refugees who say they are being detained and detained by the Department of Homeland Security without “warrant or justification,” according to a court filing.

The judge’s order reaffirms the legal status refugees have in the United States and calls into question the legality of Operation Paris, a new homeland security policy that requires authorities to “target and review the legal status” of 5,600 refugees living in Minnesota who are not permanent residents.

A new video reportedly shows Preti having a heated exchange with federal agents about 11 days before the shooting.

A video shared by Trump and major news networks including NBC News and CBS News shows Preti kicking the rear taillight of a car before being tackled by an agent. The video footage does not include the moments leading up to the heated battle.

A representative for Preeti’s family told CBS News that the family was aware of the incident and that Preeti was injured but not receiving medical treatment. The family could not be reached for comment.

In the wake of Preti’s death, Senate Democrats outlined three key demands for homeland security reform ahead of a likely partial government shutdown.

They want President Trump to end intensive immigration checks known as “crunch patrols” and demand more accountability for ICE and Border Patrol, including independent investigations and stricter standards for the use of force. It also requires officers to remove their masks and use body-worn cameras.

If Congressional Republicans and the White House don’t negotiate these demands, a new funding crisis is looming, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer warned. Click here for details.

– Zachary Charmelet

Contributions: Charles Ventura and Tano Nguyen, US TOD. Reuters

What is work-life balance? Reasons why women quit their jobs

0

play

For a while, it seemed almost impossible to have it all.

The COVID-19 pandemic has ushered in a new era of flexible work schedules and remote and hybrid work arrangements. More women, especially mothers with young children, realized that they could combine full-time work with family responsibilities, and fewer women quit their jobs to care for their children and families.

And by 2025, more than 455,000 women will have left the workforce. Now, a national survey has revealed what led many women to make that decision.

According to a survey by women’s advocacy group Catalyst, nearly half of women who left their jobs voluntarily said they did so because of caregiving responsibilities and high and limited childcare costs.

Forced to make an “impossible decision”

Sheila Brussel, research director at Catalyst, said women’s participation in the workforce is starting to lag as workplaces become less flexible.

As more companies scale back flexible work schedules and require employees to return to the office part-time or full-time, women are finding themselves in a tough spot. More than a third of women who left the workplace said they had volunteered to take a less flexible job, according to a Catalyst survey.

Brassell said these women are quitting their jobs not because they lack ambition, but because they don’t have options.

“Our data clearly shows that women are not choosing or taking a step back in their careers. What we’re really seeing is that this is a structural problem. Without support to navigate these caregiving responsibilities and very rigorous and limited work schedules, women are having to make impossible decisions,” she told USA TODAY.

Brassell said that leaving the workforce, even for a short period of time, is a difficult decision that can have long-term implications for a woman’s career trajectory and peak earning years, but that women are torn “between the people they rely on for their care and well-being and their ability to go to work.”

The “sandwich generation” is in crisis

Research shows that although most of the responsibility falls on women, caregiving is not just a women’s problem.

America’s population is rapidly aging, and more and more Americans are joining the “sandwich generation” of caring for children and parents at the same time.

A Harvard Business School study found that three out of four employees have some kind of caregiving responsibility. Almost a third voluntarily quit their job during their career because of it, and the proportion is even higher among senior-level employees.

More companies are offering paid family care leave, which employees can use to care for an elderly parent, a seriously ill family member, or a loved one recovering from surgery or hospitalization, according to leave management company Sparrow. Additionally, 14 states currently offer paid family leave insurance programs that cover family care.

Caregiving increased from 2.4% of all leave requests in 2020 to 6% in 2025, an increase of 150%. The median length of these leaves has nearly quadrupled.

“This suggests that employees are increasingly dealing with long-term care situations, precisely the scenario where, without adequate leave support, talented employees are exposed to chronic stress, burnout, or even leave the workforce altogether,” Sparrow said in a report on employee leave released this week.

But for many organizations, caregiving remains a blind spot. More than half of employers don’t track data on their employees’ caregiving responsibilities, a Harvard Business School study found.

What employers can do now to help caregivers

Brassell said employers should take immediate steps to support their employees, especially women, who make up half of the workforce.

“We are seeing a return to traditional 9-to-5 office work, which will once again increase the burdens women face in navigating caregiving and careers, which is likely to force them to quit their jobs,” she said. Brassell recommends offering flexible schedules so employees don’t have to choose between caregiving and work.

She said other policies that reduce caregiving pressures on employees could increase retention, such as paid emergency care days, financial subsidies and on-site child care.

She also urges regular audits to ensure fair pay and career growth for women. Nearly one in five women who voluntarily quit their jobs reported that pay was a factor in their decision to leave, according to a Catalyst survey.

ICE ends ‘enhanced’ operations in Maine, says Sen. Susan Collins

0

play

Sen. Susan Collins announced on January 29 that Immigration and Customs Enforcement has ended its enhanced enforcement operations in Maine.

More than a week after the Department of Homeland Security launched Operation Catch of the Day, an expansion of its deportation campaign over the objections of local officials, Collins said Secretary Kristi Noem told her that “ICE has ended its enhanced operations in Maine.”

“Currently, there are no large-scale ICE operations underway or planned here,” Collins said in a social media post early Monday morning.

USA TODAY has reached out to DHS and ICE for comment.

Collins said he had “urged” Noem and other Trump administration officials to “reconsider their approach” to ICE in Maine. ICE and Customs and Border Protection will resume normal operations that have existed for years in the state, he said.

DHS said it launched the operation on January 20, targeting “the worst of the worst criminals, illegal aliens, who terrorize our communities.” The department accused Maine Gov. Janet Mills and local officials of a “sanctuary” policy.

The news comes as the Trump administration comes under renewed scrutiny over the weekend shooting of U.S. citizen Alex Preti by federal immigration agents in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Tensions remain high in the state, with President Trump suggesting a “detente” may be on the horizon.

Contributor: Christopher Kang

Taylor Swift, Blake Lively and why their nasty messages matter

0

play

“You don’t have to apologize, please come back🙏”

These are text messages found on the internet.

As Lively and Justin Baldoni’s legal battle continues to unfold in court and in the headlines, Taylor Swift and Blake Lively’s private text conversations have been made public. Among the trove of emails, texts and depositions unsealed in Lively and Baldoni’s lawsuit was an exchange in which Swift allegedly sided with Lively against the Seraph of the End director.

Celeb watchers say the messages have garnered so much attention not because of their relevance to the case, but because they offer a rare, unedited glimpse into A-list friendships and remind us that what we say in private doesn’t always stay private.

Documents obtained by USA TODAY include a text exchange between Lively and Swift that allegedly took place in December 2024, among the hundreds of exhibits that were unsealed on January 20th. In an exhibit filed by Baldoni’s team on Dec. 5, 2024, Swift appears to have sent Lively a screenshot of a People magazine report in which Baldoni talked about the “trauma” of a previous relationship, along with a message that read, “I think this guy knows something is going to happen because he pulled out a little violin.”

Lively apparently responded, “When he says, ‘Did I always listen when they said no?’ and doesn’t finish the conversation, it sounds different.” Like he did to me. But that shouldn’t have tested well in focus groups. ”

The conversation, which took place in the days leading up to Swift’s final show on her Elas tour, appears to have begun with Lively asking Swift, “Are you okay?” Because she “recently felt like a bad friend.” Swift responded that Lively was “not wrong” to feel that things were wrong. Swift’s message said that Lively’s recent interactions “felt like reading a mass corporate email sent to 200 employees,” which made her “feel even more distant from you than geographically.” Swift’s message added, “No need to apologize. Please come back 🙏.”

In another exchange a few weeks later, Swift sent a link to a report that Baldoni had been fired from her agency and told Lively, “You won. You did it. And you… helped so many people who never have to go through this again.”

The message sparked debate online, with some people finding the text offensive. Despite Lively’s team releasing a public statement distancing the pop star from the legal drama, some criticized Swift for standing by Lively in private.

These texts appeal to the public because they are unfiltered.

“We get glimpses into celebrities’ real lives, but only what they want us to see,” says Rob Shuter, host of the podcast “Naughty But Nice with Rob Shuter” and a former celebrity publicist. “This is real. This is just two people. They were never meant to be read. And the fact that they are real is what drives this story.”

The message also touches on experiences that everyone can relate to, famous or not. It’s about venting to your friends about people you both hate.

“You don’t have to be famous to know what it’s like to be really annoyed with someone at work or text a friend after work,” Shooter added. “The fact that Taylor and Blake are doing that is so revealing. It’s so interesting. But that shouldn’t happen, because they’re human beings too. And I think as a society we elevate celebrities to such a high level that we forget that even Queen Elizabeth had to go to the bathroom.”

The real lessons learned from Taylor Swift and Blake Lively’s texting debacle

Lively and Swift aren’t the only celebrities whose texts have been making headlines lately. The internet has also taken notice of reports of private text messages allegedly exchanged between President Donald Trump and European leaders over Greenland.

Shooter said both stories talk about “the power of texting” and serve as stark reminders not to write anything you don’t want anyone to read.

“Now anyone can capture a screen,” he says. “That’s not private.”

And once the text is leaked, there’s no putting the genie back in the bottle.

Melvin Williams, a communications and media studies professor at Pace University, says the mean-spirited nature of Swift and Lively’s writing reflects poorly on neither woman, and they’ve probably both lost some fans as a result.

“The core appeal of Taylor Swift’s brand is her parasocial relationship with her fans,” he says. “Thus, for fans to read Taylor Swift’s deceptive text messages directly contrasts their image of her, revives past questions about Swift’s credibility and behind-the-scenes actions, and raises questions about Taylor Swift’s complicity in the Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni debacle.”

When it comes to texting, Shutter offers the same advice to other people, not just celebrities. “If you don’t want to post it, you shouldn’t send it.”

“I don’t text or email…I can’t take a screenshot and post it on Instagram,” he says. “I think people are being more careful.”

Contributor: Kimi Robinson

Did Trump say “you can’t have a gun”? He has long promoted the Second Amendment.

0

play

  • President Donald Trump’s stance on the Second Amendment has come under scrutiny following the shooting death of Alex Pretty by a Border Patrol agent.
  • President Trump said Preti should not have brought a gun to the protest, a comment that drew criticism from gun rights groups.
  • Despite his history of campaigning on gun rights, Trump’s comments about the Preti incident appear to be a departure from his party’s typical positions.

President Donald Trump’s stance on gun rights and the Second Amendment has come into sharp focus following the shooting death of Alex Pretty in Minnesota.

On January 24, Preti was tackled to the ground and shot to death by Border Patrol agents while participating in an immigration protest in Minneapolis. Federal authorities have defended the shooting of Preti, an ICU nurse who was treating veterans, saying he brought guns to protests to “kill law enforcement.” Witness footage showed Preti holding a cellphone, not a gun, before she was wrestled to the ground.

Minneapolis Police Chief Brian O’Hara said Preti was “exercising his First Amendment right to document law enforcement activities and also exercising his Second Amendment right to be lawfully armed in public places in our city.”

President Trump himself has criticized Pretty for bringing guns to protests, a departure from the Second Amendment rights his party has long supported. Regarding the shooting, he said:

Did Trump say “you can’t have a gun”?

Yes, but that was part of a longer answer.

On January 27, President Trump was asked by reporters whether he believed Preti was acting as an assassin.

“No,” he said. “That being said, you can’t have a gun. You can’t walk in with a gun. That’s just not possible. This is a very unfortunate incident.”

What does Donald Trump say about the Second Amendment?

President Trump and the Republican Party have long supported gun rights. In particular, they publicly supported Kyle Rittenhouse, who went to protests in 2020 with an AR-15 rifle and shot three people, killing two others, saying he was protecting businesses. He claimed self-defense and was innocent of all charges.

The National Rifle Association Political Victory Fund, a powerful gun rights group, endorsed Trump in each of the three elections. In a statement, the group said that in 2024, Trump will be a “strong champion who has always fought for the constitutional right to keep and bear arms.”

Trump frequently expressed support for gun rights during his 2024 presidential campaign.

“I’ve been proud to be the most pro-gun, pro-Second Amendment president ever in the White House, and I think that’s recognized,” Trump said at the 2023 NRA Conference in Indianapolis. “And in 2024, with your support, I will once again be your loyal friend and fearless advocate as the 47th President of the United States.” Trump also frequently said on the campaign trail that former Vice President Kamala Harris was trying to reach for a gun. (That’s not true. Harris was advertising herself as a gun owner.)

Even in his first term as president, Trump’s support for the Second Amendment has come under scrutiny as he has signaled support for gun control legislation, reversed stronger background checks and banned bump stocks, according to ABC News. However, the NRA continued to support President Trump in 2020.

What did President Trump say about Alex Preti?

The video suggests that Preti had a gun on his hip, but was tackled down before the agent was aware of the gun’s presence, and was disarmed before the agent could fire.

President Trump told the Wall Street Journal over the weekend, “I don’t like any kind of shooting. I don’t like it… but I don’t like it when somebody goes to a protest and they have a very powerful, fully loaded gun, and they have two magazines loaded. That’s not good either.”

President Trump also said he wanted to see what the outcome of the federal investigation into Preti’s death would be before passing a verdict, calling the situation in Minneapolis “de-escalating.”

Preeti’s comments that she shouldn’t have been carrying a gun angered gun rights groups.

“The NRA unequivocally believes that all law-abiding citizens have the right to keep and bear arms wherever there is a legal right to do so,” the NRA said on January 27.

“The president is simply wrong,” Dudley Brown, president of the National Gun Rights Association, said in a statement. “While we agree that law enforcement should not be involved, you absolutely have the right to carry tools for self-defense when protesting lawfully. In fact, those are the very places where it is most important to exercise that right.”

Rittenhouse also posted to X, “You can take it anywhere. It’s your right.”

Contributors: Joey Garrison, BrieAnna J. Frank, america today

Kinsey Crowley is a Trump Connect reporter for the USA TODAY Network. Please contact KCrowley@usatodayco.com. follow her X (Twitter), blue sky and TikTok.

Curse of second season? President Trump’s Greenland and immigration issues

0

play

Within a week, President Donald Trump reversed course on Greenland. What is the threat of that invasion? Never mind – and he’s in the middle of a retreat over his pride and joy, immigration enforcement policies.

Is a second season curse looming?

No president in modern times, Republican or Democrat, has been more successful in his second term than his first. Richard Nixon had to resign. Bill Clinton was impeached. Ronald Reagan was embroiled in the Iran-Contra scandal. Lyndon Johnson was embroiled in a divisive war.

And of the seven presidents who served two terms after World War II, six lost their House seats in the second midterm election.

President Trump has scheduled one of those for November.

Of course, it would be foolhardy to forget that Trump’s political signature has accomplished unprecedented things, starting with his unexpected election in 2016 and his reelection eight years later.

So far, Trump 2.0 is going more smoothly than Trump 1.0. His first term was marked by turmoil, a spate of White House chiefs of staff, anonymous dishing from behind the scenes, and a drama that ended with two House impeachments, although the Senate both acquitted him.

Susie Wiles has been Trump’s only chief of staff during his second term, and his cabinet has remained stable despite the presence of controversial figures such as Army Secretary Pete Hegseth and Attorney General Pam Bondi. Tantalizing leaks from his inner circle are rare.

But that relative civility appears to be slipping away in the wake of the uproar over the killing of protester Alex Preti by federal agents in Minneapolis. False claims by government officials that an ICU nurse brandished a gun have been debunked by citizen video showing an entirely different confrontation.

Triggering a blame game: Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, who is facing calls for her resignation or impeachment in Congress, blamed false statements by White House aide Stephen Miller, who blamed guidance from the Border Patrol, where the Border Patrol agent carried out the fatal shooting.

It was a rare display of damage control from Mr. Trump, who usually pushes through controversy without apologizing or compromising. He spoke by phone with Minnesota Governor Tim Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey and said he wanted to “de-escalate” clashes on city streets by sending Border Patrol Secretary Thomas Homan to the scene.

He promised a “very honorable and honest investigation” and belittled his own Border Patrol commander, Greg Bovino, as “a pretty eccentric guy.”

In that and other ways, some of the factors that contributed to the missteps, stumbles and occasional disasters of President Trump’s second-term predecessors may be coming to light in the White House.

Three warning signs of the second trimester curse:

1. A brave president can go too far.

Perhaps it is human nature that many men who have accomplished the extraordinary political feat of winning not just one but two terms in the White House begin to think of themselves as invincible.

In 1937, during the second of his eventual four terms, Franklin D. Roosevelt proposed a plan to fill the Supreme Court with justices more sympathetic to his New Deal legislation. Even Congressional Democrats joined in the pushback against the idea, but to no avail.

Nearly 70 years later, George W. Bush began his second term with a radical proposal to open up Social Security to individual retirement accounts. That didn’t work either.

“President Bush’s approval rating was 58% in January and 38% in September because he gave us a gift,” then-California Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi gleefully recalled in an interview with USA TODAY. “He was going to privatize Social Security. He said, ‘Nancy, I was only partially privatizing.'” And I said, ‘That’s good enough for me.’ ”

President Trump’s second-term policy proposals are bolder and far-reaching than those of his first term, including imposing the toughest tariffs since the 1930s. He faces fewer constraints in ordering military action to bomb Iran’s nuclear facilities and capture Venezuela’s president.

Over the objections of state and local officials, it deployed thousands of ICE and Border Patrol agents to the streets of Minneapolis to arrest and deport illegal immigrants.

As this episode shows, bolder proposals come with greater risks.

The Supreme Court is now poised to rule on whether the president’s tariffs are a constitutional exercise of presidential power. His now-abandoned threat to seize Greenland by force if negotiations fail has fractured the NATO alliance and alarmed traditional allies such as Britain and France.

The impact on world order continues.

2. Campaign priorities and traditional concerns may conflict

Election campaigns are subject to certain discipline. Focus on the issues that matter most to voters or face the consequences.

However, the president, who is prohibited from running for a second term by the constitution, is certain to step down. Their priority may not be voters’ concerns, but a desire for historic achievements and legacies.

President Trump is determined to leave his mark on the nation’s capital during his second term. He added his name to the Kennedy Center and demolished the east wing of the White House to make way for what will surely be known as the Donald J. Trump Ballroom. He has waged a very public (if so far unsuccessful) campaign for the Nobel Peace Prize.

At least in public, the president does not pay much attention to the issues at the table that determine elections and his approval rating. Even trips announced as all about the economy, like his speech in Clive, Iowa, on Tuesday, often end up being dominated by the day’s tumultuous news, like the Minneapolis shooting.

President Trump’s job approval rating has been on the decline in national polls, reaching record lows of 38% approval and 58% disapproval in a January 23-25 ​​Reuters/Ipsos poll. That’s 9 points lower than when he began his second term.

His rating for his handling of the economy fell further, to 35%, lower than at any point during his first term.

3. The political calendar is ticking: Who’s next?

2028 presidential election? It’s already underway.

The race between the Democratic Party and the Republican Party is expected to be very close, with the possibility that Trump’s successor, Vice President J.D. Vance, and Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, as well as other candidates presenting a different path to the Republican Party, will compete. The number of Americans who identify as independent is now at an all-time high, potentially drawing third-party candidates into the race.

But not Trump.

He remains the most powerful and decisive force in American politics of his generation. The Republican Party is shaped by its support for him, and the Democratic Party is shaped by its opposition.

However, attention in the political world has begun to shift to who will be next, and up until now, the calendar reality has been that re-elected presidents will be reduced to authority and become lame ducks sooner than they had hoped.

That’s part of the second season curse.

President Trump pardons white-collar criminals on January 6th. Who could be next?

0

play

  • The U.S. Constitution grants the president almost unlimited “kingly” power to grant pardons and commute sentences.
  • President Donald Trump broke with tradition of being timid about using pardons.
  • Applications for pardons are rapidly increasing. Some call it “false hope.”

President Donald Trump’s overhaul of the federal government has sparked nationwide “Kingless” protests. But in at least one area, the U.S. Constitution gives him near-unlimited king-like powers: clemency.

It wasn’t that long ago that some presidents were slow to grant clemency for crimes through commutations or pardons. Even President Trump only granted one pardon in 2017.

However, even in the first year of his second term, President Trump did not hesitate to take advantage of this policy. President Trump fulfilled a campaign promise, pardoning more than 1,500 people for crimes related to the January 6 Capitol riot on the day he was sworn into office. It granted pardons to high-profile defendants, including former Congressman George Santos, former Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani, and reality TV stars Todd and Julie Chrisley. He mused publicly when asked about pardoning Jeffrey Epstein’s associate Ghislaine Maxwell and rap mogul Sean “Diddy” Combs, neither of whom have received pardons.

“We are proud to help President Trump bring mercy and freedom to more people through the power of pardons,” pardon attorney Ed Martin said in a Jan. 16 X post. But Trump is the only one who can decide who gets mercy. As in his first term, his pardon powers this year reflect his politics, but have been elevated to a new level.

Here’s what you need to know about who was pardoned in President Trump’s first year in office and what it means.

Pardons are part of the president’s constitutional “kinglike” powers

The U.S. Constitution gives the president “the power to grant reprieves and pardons for crimes against the United States, except in cases of impeachment.” The origins of pardon are understood through the Federalist Papers as the need for mercy when the criminal justice system is too harsh. Douglas Berman, a law professor at Ohio State University who testified before Congress as an expert on pardons, said the president’s power to grant pardons is “a truly royal power.”

“The decision to leave it in the hands of the president is a decision that allows it to become highly politicized,” he said. “Certainly, a president’s conceptual definition of what kind of system is cruel is definitely shaped by politics in a variety of ways.”

Nevertheless, most modern presidents have not used their pardon power in the way Trump did. Former President Bill Clinton did not issue any amnesty legislation for three of the four years of his first term. Former President George W. Bush also did not issue pardons in his first few years. By the end of their presidencies, both men had granted 6% and 2%, respectively, of requests submitted, according to Pew Research. Granting pardons carries political risks, and several former pardon attorneys say the Justice Department’s case review and recommendation process is dysfunctional.

There are no restrictions on who the president can pardon for federal crimes, but the Justice Department has guidelines for what cases it reviews for recommendations to the president. In the case of a pardon, petitioners must wait five years after the end of their sentence before applying for a pardon, at which point their continued good behavior will be assessed. The Justice Department calls commutations, or commutations, an “extraordinary remedy,” and traditionally they are considered based on “disparities in punishment, unreasonable severity, serious illness or advanced age, meritorious service to the government, etc.”

In the first year of his second term, President Trump pardoned more than 1,500 people who were indicted in the four years after the January 6, 2021 Capitol riot, 77 people who were indicted and investigated for interfering in the 2020 election, more than 100 individuals, and the virtual currency company HDR Global Trading Limited.

Of the 90 individual cases pardoned as of January 20, 2026, only 12 were more than five years after the end of their prison or probation sentence.

Who did President Trump pardon? Many white collar criminals

The vast majority of those pardoned are not listed in the Justice Department’s petition database, so it is likely that they did not apply at all. A spokesperson said there was no deviation from the long-standing process and that the recommendations given to the president were “consistent, fair and upholds the rule of law.”

In some cases, his pardons send a message. For example, he quickly pardoned 19 people accused of violating the Freedom of Clinic Admissions Act (FACE), a 1994 law that prohibits physical interference with people undergoing abortions or intentional damage to reproductive health care facilities.

“This is a way for him to send a political message where he doesn’t have to divert funds. He doesn’t need cooperation from Congress. He doesn’t face the risk of being sued,” Mark Osler, a former federal prosecutor and current law professor, said in an interview with USA TODAY. “It’s not surprising that he accepted it this way.”

Looking at the other individual cases President Trump granted pardons for this year, about half of them involved white-collar crimes such as fraud, bribery, and tax evasion. CBS News first reported that some people have reported personal or financial ties to Trump, including Paul Walczak, a convicted tax evader whose mother is a longtime Republican donor, and Julio Herrera Bertini, whose daughter has donated millions of dollars to a MAGA PAC.

This is in line with Osler’s review of President Trump’s first round of pardons, published in the William & Mary Bill of Rights magazine, “The Trump Pardons: Celebrities, Confusion, and Missed Opportunities.” If President Trump’s pardons during his first term were an expression of his values, they were a demonstration of his fondness for “tough,” famous, and provocative people. Osler also wrote that his pardon unfairly favored crimes involving fraud.

Rachel Bercow, a law professor at New York University, said personal favoritism in pardons is nothing new, and the “big picture” of what we’re seeing from President Trump’s decision is different. Another key difference, she said, is the new role of Ed Martin, whose nomination as U.S. attorney in Washington, D.C., was withdrawn in the face of backlash over his support for the Jan. 6 rioters. He was appointed to lead the federal government’s Weaponization Task Force, which investigates prosecutors that the Trump administration views as overly politicized.

“It’s a carrot and stick that demands loyalty and punishes dissent,” Bercow said. “And he’s using the pardon power as one of the mechanisms to say, if you pledge allegiance, I’ll support you.”

NBA YoungBoy, Honduran President and Larry Hoover Pardon Raise Eyebrows

Several high-profile cases have been pardoned by President Trump, some of them shocking. Here are some of the most notable pardon cases from President Trump’s first year in office.

  • Rapper NBA YoungBoy (real name: Kentrell Golden) – He was convicted of federal firearms charges and pardoned in May 2025. The lyrics to his 2017 song read, “(expletive) Donald Trump.”
  • Chicago gang leader Larry Hoover – Sentenced to multiple life sentences for murder, extortion, money laundering and other crimes, his federal sentence was commuted in May 2025. But Hoover remains in custody on state charges, and the presidential pardon does not apply.
  • Binance founder Changpeng Zhao – admitted to financial crimes related to the cryptocurrency exchange and was pardoned in October.
  • Democratic Congressman Henry Cuellar – He was indicted on charges of bribery, conspiracy, and money laundering in 2024 and pardoned in December 2025. Some expected the conservative Democrat to switch parties after the pardon, but he did not. President Trump called it a “lack of loyalty.”
  • Former Honduran President Juan Orlando Hernandez – He was sentenced to 45 years in prison for “cocaine importation and related weapons offenses,” according to the Justice Department. President Trump said he received the pardon because “people I greatly respect” told him that Hernandez had been “treated very harshly and unjustly.”

“False hope:” Applications for amnesty increase rapidly

Osler and Bercow, along with Kim Kardashian, visited the White House for a rare opportunity to discuss reforming the pardon process during the Trump administration’s first term. Mr. Trump entered his first term with more than 11,000 pending petitions, a record number for a modern-day president, Mr. Osler said.

That reform never materialized, and the period of unresolved issues grew even longer.

As of data published on January 6, more than 19,600 applications are pending. Nearly 16,000 were filed in 2025 and 2026, but less than 15,000 were received during former President Joe Biden’s entire term.

There may be hope for such applications to move forward this year, when Trump’s pardons regularly make headlines and apply to people who have not been pardoned in the past. Osler called it “false hope.”

“We’ve received thousands of petitions from people who are not famous, not wealthy, not connected, but are down in the road. Their stories are amazing stories of people changing dramatically, throwing away old habits and reinventing themselves,” said Osler, who runs a legal clinic that prepares petitions for free. “And they are completely ignored.”

Contributing: Aisha Bagchi, Hannah Phillips, Kathryn Palmer, Rebecca Morin, USA TODAY Network

Kinsey Crowley is a Trump Connect reporter for the USA TODAY Network. Please contact KCrowley@usatodayco.com. follow her X (Twitter), blue sky and TikTok.

Muffet McGraw calls President Trump a fascist who should be removed from office

0

play

Former Notre Dame coach Muffet McGraw can’t contain his feelings for President Donald Trump, calling him a fascist and saying he needs to be removed from the White House.

In a social media post on Wednesday, Jan. 28, the two-time national champion coach accused the administration of creating an environment where law and justice no longer apply. Her remarks came four days after ICE agents shot and killed Alex Preti in Minneapolis.

Preti was trying to protect a woman who was being assaulted by an ICE officer. The agents knocked the veteran nurse to the ground, punched her, took her licensed gun, and shot her multiple times.

“We no longer believe in the rule of law or the principle that no one is above the law, because under this administration we have found the opposite to be true,” McGraw wrote. “Justice is no longer blind. Justice is bought with money and protected with power.”

“We need real change,” she continued. “…What we need is a reckoning in Washington. Until we get rid of the fascist in the White House, we will continue to see our democracy crumble.”

The Hall of Famer isn’t afraid to speak his mind and has been outspoken on social justice issues for years. In 2019, a year before she retired, McGraw said she stopped hiring male assistants because she wanted to give more opportunities to women. Before a game in December 2014, Notre Dame’s team wore T-shirts that read “I Can’t Breathe,” a reference to Eric Garner’s last words before he died in a police chokehold.

In his post, McGraw linked Preti’s death to the lack of accountability in previous extrajudicial killings.

“Have you ever wondered if things would have been different if Trayvon Martin’s killer had gone to prison, or if Breonna Taylor’s killer had been convicted of murder?” McGraw wrote. “Both incidents sparked nationwide protests. But did anything really change? If accountability had been fulfilled sooner, would George Floyd still be alive? If Renee Goode’s killer had been sitting in prison awaiting murder trial, would Alex Preti have been shot and killed so recklessly?”

“Once again, we protest,” McGraw said. “I’ll ask you the same question again. Has anything changed?”

McGraw compiled an 848-252 record in 33 seasons at Notre Dame. He retired in 2020 and currently works as a television analyst.

February 2026 Social Security Payments. When will I receive my check?

0

play

Social Security payments will be made on the regular schedule in February.

Social Security benefits, which are paid primarily to elderly or retired beneficiaries, are typically paid on Wednesdays. According to the Social Security Administration’s calendar, payments are made on the second Wednesday of each month to beneficiaries whose birthday falls between the 1st and 10th of the month (this month, it’s February 11th).

People born between the 11th and 20th will be paid on the third Wednesday of each month (February 18th). According to the SSA calendar, those born on or after the 20th of the month are paid on the fourth Wednesday of each month (February 25th). Social Security recipients who began receiving benefits before May 1997 will receive payments on January 3.

Social Security payments should increase slightly thanks to the 2.8% cost of living adjustment (COLA) increase that took effect in January. Payments are expected to increase by about $56 a month on average, according to the Social Security Administration.

View the February 2026 Social Security Payment Schedule.

February 2026 Social Security Payment Schedule

The Social Security Administration’s 2026 Benefit Payment Calendar is available online so you can review the schedule for budgeting purposes.

Social Security retirement benefits for February 2026 will be transferred on SSA’s regular schedule.

  • Wednesday, February 11th: The date of birth is from the 1st to the 10th of the month.
  • Wednesday, February 18th: Birthdays are between the 11th and 20th of every month.
  • Wednesday, February 25th: Birthdays from the 21st to the 31st of every month.

SSI payment schedule from February to 2026

Recipients of Supplemental Securities Income (SSI) checks are typically issued payments on the first business day of the month. Because February 1, 2026 is a Sunday, the February payment will now be made on Friday, January 30, 2026.

According to the SSA calendar, SSI checks will be mailed on the following days in 2026:

  • Friday, January 30, 2026 (confirmed for February 2026)
  • Friday, February 2, 2026 (confirm for March 2026)
  • Wednesday, April 1, 2026 (confirmed in April 2026)
  • Friday, May 1, 2026 (Please check May 2026)
  • Monday, June 1, 2026 (confirmed in June 2026)
  • Wednesday, July 1st (confirmed July 2026)
  • Friday, July 31st (confirm for August 2026)
  • Tuesday, September 1st (confirmed for September 2026)
  • Thursday, October 1st (confirmed in October 2026)
  • October 31st (Friday) (confirmed for November 2026)
  • Tuesday, December 1st (confirmed in December 2026)
  • Thursday, December 31st (confirmed for January 2027)

What is Supplemental Securities Income or SSI?

Supplemental Security Income (SSI) is a benefit program for people age 65 and older, with limited income or assets, and who are blind or have a qualifying disability. Children with eligible disabilities are also eligible, according to the SSA website. Adults who qualify for SSI typically earn no more than $2,019 per month.

If you think you may be eligible for SSI, you can begin the application process online, in person at your local Social Security office, or by calling 1-800-772-1213 (TTY 1-800-325-0778) weekdays from 8 a.m. to 7 p.m. local time.

Mike Snyder is a national trends news reporter for USA TODAY. You can follow him on Threads, Bluesky, and X, and email him at: mike snyder & @mikegsnider.bsky.social & @mikesnider & msnider@usatoday.com.

Protesters and immigration authorities engage in battle using social media

0


Social media has become an important tool for documenting the activities of federal employees. In some cases, police filmed activists from directly behind them.

play

The debate over tougher immigration enforcement has been fueled by viral videos following two shootings by federal authorities in Minnesota, part of an ongoing and extraordinary social media battle.

Local officials, including Gov. Tim Walz, called on trained advocates and concerned residents to continue documenting federal agents’ arrests and clashes with protesters. In the murders of Alex Preti and Renee Nicole Good, bystander video that was widely shared online helped contradict elements of testimony released by Trump administration officials.

“This is one of the tools that the public has at their disposal to really hold government officials accountable and to make sure that people who aren’t on the ground understand what’s going on,” said Alexa Koenig, co-director of the Center for Human Rights at the University of California, Berkeley.

Meanwhile, the administration has rolled back Americans’ rights to record law enforcement, while the Department of Homeland Security, which oversees U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and U.S. Customs and Border Protection, has engaged in its own sophisticated social media operations. In some cases, police officers themselves are even quick to record activists’ activities.

The use of social media videos by both sides has sometimes created an unusual dynamic.

Demonstrators film their perspectives. Federal agencies are filming their views. Both posters post videos on social media to make their points.

Efforts to monitor post-murder ICE increase

Jill Garvey, co-director of States at the Core, said the practice of monitoring law enforcement activities and documenting potential abuses dates back to the civil rights movement. The strategy was embraced again during the 2020 racial justice protests and modified for modern times, but Garvey said more people are now exercising their right to record authorities than ever before.

Garvey said that in the days after Goode’s death, attendance at training sessions held by core states on how to securely record ICE activities tripled. After Preeti’s death, the organization held an emergency training exercise that reached its maximum capacity of 5,000 participants.

“What we hear from people who come to these trainings is, ‘Yes, we’re worried. We want to do it as safely as possible, but we’re actually more willing than ever to do it.’ … More and more cities are organizing and preparing to do exactly what Renee and Alex did despite the risks,” Garvey said.

Federal authorities point cameras at protesters

But now there is evidence that federal agencies are taking a cue from the activists’ playbook.

In one video that has been viewed millions of times, a police officer appears to use a cell phone to record information about the person filming him.

When asked why they recorded the information, the officer said, “Because we have a nice little database.” “And now you are considered a domestic terrorist.”

Jonathan Ross, the ICE officer who shot Goode, also appears to have recorded the fatal exchange. Alpha News, a Minnesota-based media outlet, published a 47-second clip on January 9th showing Ross’ perspective.

Vice President J.D. Vance said Ross acted in self-defense and criticized the “media’s dishonesty” about the incident, reposting the video multiple times on X.

The study found that the angle from which something is recorded can be “highly misleading,” and cherry-picking one video out of many to share on social media “could cause serious problems or actually mislead the public,” Koenig said.

“When it comes to U.S. government officials, they have a personal responsibility to provide accurate information to the broad public of this country,” Koenig said.

Best practice for human rights investigators like Koenig is to look at a case from as many different perspectives as possible. Activists have used various bystander footage to challenge federal authorities’ interpretation of events in Minnesota.

Video of the encounter with Good shows multiple officers approaching Good’s SUV, which is parked in the middle of the road. Good briefly retreated before moving forward and beginning to turn to the right. Ross was standing near the front driver’s side of the SUV, and as the vehicle began to move forward, he pulled out a gun and fired multiple shots.

Administration postpones filming

The dueling video accounts emerged as government agencies used immigration enforcement operations as an opportunity to film themselves, according to public records obtained by advocacy groups such as the Immigration Attorneys and the Immigrant Rights Clinic at Stanford Law School. The Washington Post reports that dramatic and sometimes misleading videos of strategic operations and raids on migrants are shared on social media.

For observers, the change in tone from federal officials is notable.

“The tone of DHS’ social media posts is assertive, emphasizing that the agency is doing the right thing, and at times kind of combative,” said Eni Chan, a professor at the University at Buffalo who studies political communication on social media.

ICE and DHS did not respond to USA TODAY’s requests for comment regarding the shooting and social media policies.

And as the regime shoots and shares its own footage, authorities push back against protesters’ right to record law enforcement.

The Trump administration has said the groups that monitor and track ICE are interfering with the agency’s work. Police threatened to arrest people who filmed or followed them.

The New York Times also reported that large Facebook groups and apps used to track the movements of ICE agents were removed at the request of the Justice Department.

But Sophia Cope, senior staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, said Americans have a First Amendment right to record law enforcement while they are performing their official duties, provided they do not interfere.

“It’s pretty clear at this point whether it’s on the right or not,” Cope said.