Home Blog Page 270

Humanity lawsuit seeks to block Department of Defense blacklisting over restrictions on AI use

0

play

NEW YORK – Anthropic filed a lawsuit on Monday, March 9, to block the Pentagon’s national security blacklisting, escalating a high-stakes battle with the U.S. military over limits on the use of the artificial intelligence lab and its technology.

Anthropic said in its lawsuit that the designation is illegal and violates its free speech and due process rights. The filing in federal court in California asked a judge to revoke the designation and block federal agencies from enforcing it.

“These actions are unprecedented and illegal. The Constitution does not allow the government to use vast powers to punish companies for protected speech,” Antropik said.

The Department of Defense granted Anthropic a formal supply chain risk designation on Thursday, March 5, restricting its use of technology that officials say is used in military operations in Iran. Pentagon Secretary Pete Hegseth named Anthropic after the startup refused to remove guardrails on the use of AI for autonomous weapons and domestic surveillance. The two countries have been in increasingly heated debates over these restrictions for months, Reuters first reported.

Antropic officials said the lawsuit does not prevent them from resuming negotiations and reaching a settlement with the U.S. government. The company says it has no intention of fighting the government. The Pentagon said it does not comment on litigation. Last week, Pentagon officials said the two countries were no longer in active talks.

The designation poses a major threat to Anthropic’s business with governments, and the outcome could affect how other AI companies negotiate limits on military uses of their technology. The company’s CEO, Dario Amodei, clarified on Thursday, March 5, that the designation is “narrow scoped” and that companies will still be able to use the tool on projects unrelated to the Department of Defense.

President Donald Trump also told the government to stop working with Anthropic, which financially backs companies such as Alphabet Inc.’s Google and Amazon.com Inc. Mr. Trump and Mr. Hegseth said they planned for a six-month phase-out.

Reuters reported that Anthropic investors are racing to contain the damage from the conflict with the Pentagon.

Mr. Trump and Mr. Hegseth’s Feb. 27 actions came shortly after Mr. Amodei met with Mr. Hegseth in hopes of reaching an agreement after months of discussions with Anthropic over whether the company’s policies could constrain military action.

The Pentagon said U.S. law, not private companies, determines how to protect the country, insisted it would have complete flexibility in using AI for “all lawful uses,” and argued that Anthropic’s restrictions could put American lives at risk.

Anthropic said that even the best AI models are not reliable enough to be fully autonomous weapons and are dangerous to use for that purpose. The company also drew a line under the surveillance of Americans in the country, saying it was a violation of fundamental rights.

After Hegseth’s announcement, Anthropic said in a statement that the designation is legally unsound and sets a dangerous precedent for companies negotiating with the government. The company said it would not waver from “threats and penalties,” and on Thursday, Amodei reiterated that Anthropic will challenge the designation in court.

He also apologized for an internal memo published by tech news site The Information on Wednesday. In a memo written last Friday, Amodei said one reason Pentagon officials don’t like the company is that “we don’t admire Trump like a dictator.”

Last year, the Department of Defense signed contracts worth up to $200 million each with major AI labs, including Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google.

Microsoft-backed OpenAI announced a deal to use its technology on Department of Defense networks shortly after Hegseth was added to Anthropic’s blacklist. CEO Sam Altman said the Pentagon shares OpenAI’s principles of ensuring human oversight of weapons systems and opposing mass surveillance by the United States.

Duke leads Top 25 before March Madness

0

play

As the regular season winds down and the top men’s basketball teams enter conference tournament week, the top spots in USA TODAY’s Sports Coaches Survey largely reflect expectations as Selection Sunday approaches.

Duke enters the ACC Tournament as the top-ranked team in the nation and has a chance to earn the No. 1 overall seed. The Blue Devils once again received 28 of 31 first-place votes. The remaining three wins will once again go to No. 2 Arizona. Arizona is also the top seed in the Big 12 Tournament and is well-positioned to lead the regionals in the Big Dance. Big Ten regular-season champion Michigan State remains No. 3 in the polls, while Surging Florida State continues its upward trajectory, rising to No. 4. Houston returned to the top five while Connecticut, which lost to Marquette, dropped two spots to sixth place.

Top 25: Complete your USA TODAY Sports men’s basketball poll

The rest of the top 10 has changed slightly, with No. 7 Iowa State and No. 2 Iowa State swapping slightly. 8 Michigan State is solid. Texas Tech drops four spots to No. 14, while Illinois moves up to No. 9, just ahead of Nebraska.

With St. Louis and Tennessee eliminated, No. 23 Wisconsin and No. 24 Louisville will return to the voting.

After the hamburger video, the internet wants more CEOs to try their product

0


“Let’s stop at burgers and let the CEO of Ticketmaster buy concert tickets on his website,” one person wrote on TikTok.

play

The internet isn’t ready to trash the CEO just yet.

After McDonald’s CEO Chris Kempczinski’s hamburger video sparked an online uproar that prompted executives from fast-food chains to sample flavors, social media users are calling on more companies to get involved, but in a slightly different way.

From navigating the Trader Joe’s parking lot to searching for email in Microsoft Outlook, people are asking more executives to try their products and services.

“Don’t stop at burgers, let’s get the CEO of Ticketmaster to buy concert tickets on his website,” user @rachel.c220 wrote in a TikTok video on March 7th that has been viewed more than 600,000 times to date.

Commenters jumped in: “Why don’t you just get the CEO of your cell phone company to cancel your account,” one person wrote.

Another user weighed in even more sharply: “Make hospital CEOs pay minimum wage for healthcare.”

The Internet wants more CEOs to try their products

People online are adding suggestions for tasks and products that CEOs should have first-hand experience with, especially those that have been criticized as being particularly difficult.

“I’d love to see the CEO of Intuit file his taxes through TurboTax without screaming at the computer,” one person wrote to X.

Some users targeted travel woes.

Some brought up social media and online platforms.

Some singled out Microsoft specifically when it came to work websites.

Meanwhile, stores that are notorious for being crowded are also catching lost children.

CEO’s hamburger tasting video takes the internet by storm

The CEO’s speech comes after the fast food chain teased a taste test video drama.

It all started when a video of McDonald’s CEO Chris Kempczinski tasting the chain’s new Big Arch Burger began circulating online. The internet quickly began slamming Kempczinski about whether he enjoyed the burger after taking just a few bites of it.

“I love this product,” Kempczinski says in the clip before sampling the burger. “It’s very delicious. I’m going to try it now, but I’m going to have this for lunch, just to be sure.”

Soon, fast-food competitors from Burger King to Wendy’s were jumping in and forcing their executives to sample their food on camera. There are countless memes and parodies circulating online.

Contributor: Mike Snider, USA TODAY

Melina Khan is USA TODAY’s national trends reporter. Contact her at melina.khan@usatoday.com.

Iranian soccer player accepts asylum after President Trump slams Australia

0

play

President Donald Trump walked back his criticism of Australia on Monday, March 9, after the US ally offered asylum to Iranian members of the Iranian women’s soccer team.

Five members of the team have accepted offers of asylum in Australia as they await the resumption of international flights to their war-stricken homeland.

It appears the team members were unaware that they were being offered asylum in Australia, but President Trump warned in a social media post on Monday of serious consequences if they were “forced” to return to Iran. He warned that Australia was making a “terrible humanitarian mistake” and wrote directly to Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese: “Don’t do that, Prime Minister, give them asylum. If you don’t, America will take them in.”

An hour later, President Trump took to social media to congratulate Albanese on a “very good job” and said five team members were “already receiving treatment.” President Trump also said that some members of his team “feel they have to return” due to safety concerns for their families, including “their families being threatened if they don’t return.”

“In any case, the Prime Minister is doing a very good job regarding this rather delicate situation,” Trump wrote.

A person familiar with the matter told USA TODAY that none of the players will return to Iran against their will. The Australian Department of Foreign Affairs announced that it had offered asylum to the entire team, and that five people, including the team captain, had accepted.

World players’ association FIFPRO said early Monday that it was concerned about Iranian hardliners calling the team “wartime traitors” for refusing to sing the national anthem before games. The players’ decision to observe a moment of silence during the Iranian national anthem before their first match against South Korea was branded “the height of disgrace” by commentators on Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting.

The team’s advance into the Australian-hosted Asia Cup tournament began just as the United States and Israel began airstrikes on Iran on February 28. The team was eliminated on Sunday, March 8th.

Reza Pahlavi, the son of Iran’s last shah, wrote in a social media post on Monday, March 9, that the players had “evacuated to Australia” and left the team’s training camp.

“These five courageous athletes, who are now in a safe place, have announced that they have joined the Iranian Nation’s Lion and Sun Revolution,” Pahlavi’s office said in a social media post.

Kathryn Palmer is USA TODAY’s political reporter. She can be reached at the following address: kapalmer@usatoday.com And to X@Kathryn Purml. Sign up for her daily politics newsletter here.

Caroline Leavitt hasn’t ruled out being drafted to Iran. What did Trump say?

0

play

  • White House press secretary Caroline Levitt did not rule out recruitment to the Iran war.
  • President Trump has not commented publicly on the draft, but said he would only send ground troops for “very good reason.”
  • Reinstating conscription would require an act of Congress.

White House press secretary Caroline Levitt did not allay concerns about recruitment to the Iran war in an interview appearance over the weekend.

On March 8, Levitt appeared on Fox News’ “Sunday Morning Futures” with Maria Bartiromo to talk about the Iran war, rising fuel prices, the SAVE Act and more.

“Mothers out there are worried that there will be conscription, that their sons and daughters will be caught up in this. What do you have to say about the president’s ground forces plan?” Bartiromo asked.

“(President Donald Trump) is wise to keep options off the table,” Levitt responded. He also reiterated comments from an earlier briefing, saying that the presence of ground troops is not currently part of the plan, which is primarily an air operation. “As commander in chief, the president wants to continue to evaluate the success of this military operation.”

The war has so far killed seven Americans, at least 1,230 in Iran, about 400 in Lebanon and at least 11 in Israel.

Is Trump talking about the draft?

A review of President Trump’s appearances and interviews over the past week shows that he has not publicly commented on the possibility of returning to the Iranian military draft.

On March 7, President Trump was asked by reporters on Air Force One under what circumstances he would send ground troops.

“I don’t think that’s the right question,” he said. “Is that possible? There’s probably a very good reason.”

In a post on Truth Social in September 2024 during the election period, he stated that the draft would be held if he voted for his opponent, indicating his intention not to hold the draft.

Congressional action would be required to re-enact the draft.

Returning to the draft would require Congress to amend the Selective Service Act.

Current military operations in Iran have not been authorized by Congress as an act of war. Rather, under the War Powers Act of 1973, the president can authorize military action but is restricted from deploying troops for more than 90 days unless war is formally declared. Only Congress has the power to declare war under the Constitution.

The last draft call occurred in 1972, and the president’s authority to make appointments expired the following year.

Was Donald Trump drafted into the Vietnam War?

Although Mr. Trump was old enough to be drafted, he did not serve in the Vietnam War.

He received four deferments for his education and a fifth deferment in 1968 for a medical exemption. In 2018, the daughters of a New York podiatrist told the New York Times that their late father gave them a bone spur diagnosis as a favor to the firm’s landlord, Fred Trump.

Asked repeatedly about his background, he said he did not serve in Vietnam because of his education and lucky draft number.

“I had a good draft number, so you know, frankly, I’m in great spirits. The Vietnam War was a war that was a mistake. Just like Iraq was a mistake, it was a terrible mistake,” Trump said in a 2016 interview on the radio show “Imus in the Morning.”

Contributors: Thao Nguyen, Christopher Cann, Melina Khan, Terry Moseley, James Powel, William Cummings, Crystal Hayes, USA TODAY Network

Kinsey Crowley is a Trump Connect reporter for the USA TODAY Network. Please contact KCrowley@usatodayco.com. follow her X (Twitter), blue sky and TikTok.

Corey Parker dies – ‘Will & Grace’ actor dies after battle with cancer

0

play

Actor Corey Parker, known for his recurring role on the sitcom “Will & Grace,” has died. He was 60 years old.

Parker, who also worked as an acting coach, passed away after a battle with terminal cancer, his agent Chris Ahuja confirmed to People on Saturday, March 7. Parker’s aunt, Emily Parker, told TMZ that Parker passed away on Thursday, March 5th.

According to a GoFundMe set up for the actor in 2025, Parker was previously diagnosed with stage 4 advanced metastatic cancer following hip replacement surgery.

“Corey Parker was an incredible human being,” Ahuja told People. “He was a friend, a mentor, and a deep supporter of many in the acting world.”

USA TODAY has reached out to Parker’s representatives for comment.

Parker, the son of actress Rochelle Natalie “Rocky” Parker, was born in New York City in July 1965. Following in his mother’s footsteps, Parker began his acting career at an early age, appearing in television commercials at the age of four.

As a teenager, Parker further honed his acting talent at New York City’s High School of Performing Arts. He then joined the professional training organizations Actors Studio and Ensemble Studio Theater.

Parker received his first major acting credit in 1983 when he appeared in an episode of the CBS soap opera “As the World Turns.” The following year, he made his silver screen debut in the horror film Scream for Help. Parker also starred in 1985’s Friday the 13th: A New Beginning, a sequel to the iconic slasher horror series.

Parker expanded his showbiz career through the ’80s and ’90s, landing several film and television roles, including the military drama “Biloxi Blues” (1988), the romantic comedy “How I Got to College” (1989), the Tea Leoni-starring sitcom “Flying Blind” (1992-93), and the “Love Boat” spin-off “The Love Boat: The Next.” Wave” (1998-99).

He joined the cast of the show’s second season, “Will & Grace,” in 2000, playing Josh, the sensitive health coach boyfriend of Grace Adler, played by Debra Messing.

Parker appeared in five episodes of NBC’s hit comedy, ending her stint in the season 3 premiere after Grace was torn and conflicted between her relationship with Josh and her new boyfriend Ben (Gregory Hines). However, Josh and Grace’s romance soon comes to an end after Grace discovers that she is dating her friend Jack McFarland (Sean Hayes).

‘Will & Grace’ star Debra Messing calls Corey Parker’s death a ‘tragic loss’

Messing, who played Parker’s girlfriend on “Will & Grace,” paid tribute to the late actor in a post on her Instagram Story on Sunday.

“So sad,” Messing wrote. “Corey was so kind. He was so sweet. What a tragic loss. Love to everyone who loved him.”

Corey Parker becomes acting teacher later in career

In addition to his on-screen acting career, Parker also worked behind the scenes as an acting coach.

The veteran actor has been a guest artist at both Rhodes University in Tennessee and the University of Memphis, as well as guest lecturer at HB Studios in New York City.

In the television world, Parker became the official acting coach for CMT’s drama miniseries Sun Records, which was released in 2017. He also served as a coach on the 2022 Disney+ miniseries Ms. Marvel.

“When I announced that I would have to take a break from teaching, I had no idea what was going to happen,” Parker previously wrote to students on his GoFundMe page. “What’s surprising to me, and perhaps to you as well, is the realization that we are the only group, the only class like us.”

“We have such a strong bond and it was so moving to realize that we are unique,” ​​Parker continued. “Life is certainly full of mysteries, but continuing to explore the unknown and commit to a creative journey no matter what is a form of open-mindedness that forever invites possibilities and further growth.”

Contributor: Taijuan Moorman, USA TODAY

Krispy Kreme is giving away free donuts in time for daylight saving time

0


“Because if you lose an hour, you’ve gained 12 hours,” says Krispy Kreme.

play

Krispy Kreme is offering free donuts to customers to combat daylight saving fatigue.

On Monday, March 9th, customers will receive a free dozen of Original Glazed with the purchase of a dozen at participating stores nationwide.

Krispy Kreme said the offer was “the perfect way to get through spring’s sleepiest Monday.”

“Daylight Savings Time could mean people get an hour less sleep,” Alison Holder, Krispy Kreme’s chief brand and product officer, said in a statement. “We are helping everyone get back on their feet in one of the greatest ways we know how.”

How to get free donuts during summer time

Customers can get a free Original Glazed Dozen when they purchase a dozen in-store or for pickup/delivery via the Krispy Kreme app and website by using promo code SPRING at checkout at participating Krispy Kreme stores in the United States. To find a store near you, visit krispykreme.com/locate/location-search.

“Because if you lose an hour, you’ve gained 12 hours,” says Krispy Kreme.

When did daylight saving time start in 2026?

On Sunday, March 8, millions of people in the United States “jumped forward” as part of Daylight Saving Time, setting their clocks forward an hour to make up for the time lost when clocks were turned back in the fall. Practicing once every two years will reduce your sleep time by one hour.

According to Time and Date, a website about Norwegian time zones, there is more light in the evening and less light in the morning.

Does daylight saving time affect your health?

The time change could make daylight savings difficult for some people and disrupt the sleep patterns of more than 300 million people, according to the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.

Researchers and medical experts say that adjusting our clocks twice a year can increase our chances of mood disorders, hospitalization, and even car accidents.

Contributed by: Amaris Oaks, Saleen Martin / USA TODAY

Saman Shafiq is a trending news reporter for USA TODAY. Contact her at sshafiq@usatodayco.com and follow X and Instagram @saman_shafiq7.

President Trump downplays oil prices in ‘stupid’ post

0

play

With global energy markets in turmoil due to the U.S.-Israel war on Iran, President Donald Trump has said that rising oil prices are “a small price to pay” and suggested that those worried about rising oil prices are “stupid.”

In a social media post on Sunday, March 8, the president criticized the growing concerns and said the price increases were temporary.

“The short-term price of oil, which will fall rapidly once the Iranian nuclear threat is destroyed, is a very small price to pay for America, the world, security and peace,” Trump wrote, adding, “Only a fool would think otherwise!”

On Monday, March 8, oil prices exceeded $110 per barrel, the highest since 2022.

Brent crude, one of the two world crude oil benchmarks, soared to $119.50 a barrel early on Monday, March 9, but has since been trading around $103 a barrel, up about 11%. West Texas Intermediate, a benchmark for crude oil produced in the United States, was around $101 per barrel just before the opening bell of the New York Stock Exchange.

President Trump’s post is the administration’s latest attempt to downplay the growing economic impact of the war against Iran, which is now in its 10th day since the Feb. 28 attack.

Energy Secretary Chris Wright told CNN’s Jake Tapper on Sunday, March 8, that the rise in oil prices won’t last long and that it’s a matter of “weeks, not months.”

President Trump and administration officials have not made clear how long they expect the war to last, adding to market stress.

Iran has effectively halted trade through the Strait of Hormuz, a maritime trade route that transports about 20% of the world’s oil. The president has previously said he is not concerned about rising gas prices and is confident the Strait of Hormuz will remain open.

On March 8, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) called on President Trump to release oil from the nation’s Strategic Reserve, the world’s largest emergency oil reserve, to lower soaring gas prices.

Contributor: Andrea Riquier

Kathryn Palmer is USA TODAY’s political reporter. She can be reached at the following address: kapalmer@usatoday.com And to X@Kathryn Purml. Sign up for her daily politics newsletter here.

Get National Meatball Day deals at Subway, Buca di Beppo, and Sheetz

0

play

Sales are popping up all the time leading up to National Meatball Day, which arrives on March 9th every year.

Serve it on a sub menu, eat it with pizza or spaghetti, or eat it on its own, celebrating the versatile meatball proves that meatballs are a great addition to any main dish.

To commemorate the day, Subway aims to give away 1 million meatballs, according to a press release. The sandwich chain is offering a free upgrade to a foot-long sub to anyone who purchases a 6-inch meatball sub as part of Subway’s “Sub of the Day” or “Meal of the Day.” And this isn’t the only deal.

Here’s what you need to know:

Subway’s National Meatball Day Special

Customers who request a Meatball Subscription upgrade will receive a free upgrade on National Meatball Day.

The meatball sub must be ordered as part of Subway’s “Sub of the Day” ($4.99), which includes only Subway, or the “Meal of the Day” ($6.99), which includes two cookies or a bag of chips and a small fountain drink.

“With National Meatball Day falling on Meatball Monday this year, Subway is rolling out a red sauce for meatball lovers in a historic one-day deal,” Dave Skena, Subway’s chief marketing officer for North America, said in a statement.

This offer is available only at participating stores and prices may vary. California, Alaska, and Hawaii are more expensive. This offer applies only to orders placed in-store.

Meatball Monday at Buca di Beppo

Italian chain restaurant Buca di Beppo’s deal is not limited to National Meatball Day, but rather Meatball Monday. Coincidentally, National Meatball Day 2026 falls on Meatball Monday.

Every Monday, Buca Di Beppo offers 50% off spaghetti and Buca’s world-famous meatballs. Dell is available for dine-in only.

Visit the Buca Di Beppo website to see a list of locations.

Sheetz’s 99 cent meatball subs

Sheetz also offers discounted subscriptions.

The convenience store chain will sell half-sub sandwiches for 99 cents from Monday, March 9 through Wednesday, March 11, according to Herald-Mail Media, part of the USA TODAY Network. Half-size submarines typically cost $4.19.

This offer can be found in the (Offerz) tab of the Sheetz app.

Some purchases are excluded from the transaction. To take advantage of this benefit, customers must be a My Sheetz Rewardz member.

Contributor: Janis Reeser, Herald-Mail Media

Julia Gomez is USA TODAY’s trends reporter, covering popular toys, scientific research, natural disasters, holidays, and trending news. Connect with her on LinkedIn ×Instagram, TikTok: @juliamariegz or email jgomez@gannett.com..

Kentucky soldier identified as victim of Iran war

0

play

The Pentagon has confirmed that the seventh soldier killed in the Iran war was Army Sgt. Benjamin Pennington (26). Pennington died on March 8 from injuries sustained during the March 1 attack on Saudi Arabia’s Prince Sultan Air Base.

Pennington, a resident of Glendale, Kentucky, was assigned to the 1st Space Battalion, 1st Space Brigade, Fort Carson, Colorado, according to a Department of Defense news release.

In a statement published in the X, Gov. Andy Beshear described Pennington as a “hero who sacrificed everything” for his country.

“Please join Briney and me in praying for his family and Kentuckians during this difficult time,” he wrote.

Six other Americans were killed in an Iranian drone strike in Kuwait. Beshear said March 4 that at least four of the soldiers belonged to an Iowa unit under the command group based at Fort Knox.

Wall Street futures fall as inflation concerns rise due to Middle East conflict

0

play

March 9 (Reuters) – U.S. stock index futures fell more than 1% on Monday as fighting in the Middle East entered its 10th day and inflation concerns grew and oil prices soared.

Geopolitical tensions deepened after Iran appointed Mojtaba Khamenei to succeed his father Ali Khamenei as supreme leader. The move is seen as a clear signal that hardliners continue to hold sway in Tehran.

Oil prices soared more than 25% to just under $120 a barrel, but pared gains after reports that Group of Seven (G7) finance ministers and the International Energy Agency would discuss a joint emergency oil stockpile release, and after Saudi Aramco offered to quickly supply oil through a series of unusual bids.

The protracted conflict in the Middle East comes as a broad expansion in economic activity fuels fears of stagflation, while last week’s figures reflect a weakening job market.

“Stock markets are scrambling to catch up on all the news, but we now see the likelihood of a U.S. and global recession increasing significantly as inflation soars,” said Chris Beecham, chief market analyst at IG.

“While the coordinated release of oil reserves may provide temporary relief, it is a limited response and is dwarfed by the loss of oil production due to the closure of Hormuz and regional production disruptions.”

Travel stocks, which bore the brunt of last week’s selloff, were also among the hardest hit on Monday.

In addition to Alaska Airlines ALK.N and United Airlines UAL.O , cruise stocks such as Carnival CCL.N and Norwegian Cruises NCLH.N each fell about 4% in premarket trading.

Big banks, seen as the backbone of the economy, were also hurt, with JPMorgan Chase & Co. JPM.N , Citigroup Inc. CN and Bank of America Inc. BAC.N each falling more than 2%.

Diamondback FANG.O and APA APA.O each rose more than 3% as energy prices rose, while Occidental OXY.N rose 2%.

As of 4:42 a.m. ET, the Dow E-mini YMcv1 was down 758 points, or 1.60%, and the S&P 500 E-mini EScv1 was down 94.5 points, or 1.40%. The NASDAQ 100E Mini NQcv1 fell 385 points (1.56%).

The CBOE volatility index .VIX, Wall Street’s most closely watched measure of investor anxiety, rose 5.16 points to 34.62, its highest level since April 2025.

Prices of traditional safe-haven assets such as precious metals also came under pressure as investors flooded into the US dollar <=USD. Shares of mining companies such as Endeavor Silver EXK.N fell 6%, and Barrick Mining BN fell 3%.

Bucking the trend, defense companies such as RTX RTX.N rose 1% and Aerovironment AVAV.O rose 2.3%.

Rising energy costs are likely to complicate the Federal Reserve’s interest rate outlook amid a focus on strengthening the labor market.

Policymakers have widely expressed the need to assess the economic impact before making monetary policy decisions. However, the two-year US Treasury yield US2YT=RR reflected interest rate expectations and temporarily reached its highest level since late November.

The futures market RTYcv1, which tracks the interest rate-sensitive Russell 2000 index, fell 2.5% and is 10% off its all-time high. A 10% decline is commonly known as correction territory for the index.

Friday’s weak jobs report raised expectations for a 25 basis point rate cut in June. But traders are now pushing those odds to the possibility of September or October, according to data compiled by LSEG.

Last week, the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 0.95%, marking its steepest weekly decline since early April 2025. The S&P 500 index fell 1.33%, its worst week since mid-October, while the Russell 2000 index posted its biggest weekly decline since early August.

Markets face an important week filled with high-stakes economic announcements. This week, job numbers, personal consumption spending data (the Fed’s preferred measure of inflation) and a second estimate of quarterly GDP are expected to be released.

(Reporting by Johan M. Cherian, Pranav Kashyap and Shashwat Chauhan in Bengaluru; Editing by Mrigank Dhaniwala and Maju Samuel)

Participants in the January 6th riot do not want President Trump to pardon them. The Supreme Court will also consider the matter.

0


Brooks, who came to Washington from California to support Trump on January 6, 2021, is one of the few people who didn’t like the pardon from Trump for some reason.

play

WASHINGTON – A presidential pardon?

“No thank you,” said Glenn Brooks, who was convicted in the January 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol. He would rather try to clear his name in court than accept a pardon from President Donald Trump.

The Supreme Court on March 9 denied Mr. Brooks that opportunity.

A lower court had dismissed Brooks’ appeal, saying it no longer had any meaning after vacating his conviction for breaching the Capitol after President Trump last year pardoned about 1,600 people charged in the 2021 riot.

But Brooks, a home remodeling contractor and “a man of great faith,” insisted he had the right to try to prove his complete innocence.

“A forced pardon functions as a forced confession, branding the person guilty and disqualifying him from the appellate court of his choice,” Brooks’ lawyers told the Supreme Court.

His lawyers also said the issue is of “extreme national importance given the increasing use of presidential pardons in politically sensitive cases.”

The Justice Department waived Brooks’ right to appeal to the Supreme Court.

Brooks, who came to Washington from Huntington Beach, California, to support President Trump on January 6, 2021, is one of the few people who didn’t like the pardon from President Trump for some reason.

“The worst day of my life”

Pamela Hemphill, a former Trump supporter who served two months in prison for storming the Capitol, has formally rejected a presidential pardon.

But unlike Brooks, Hemphill pleaded guilty to joining a crowd of angry protesters.

The elderly man said he declined the pardon because he wanted to be honest.

“How can I live my life knowing that I have sinned and received a pardon?” she once said. “It’s like a message that that day was okay, that day was not okay. That day was the worst day of my life.”

Mr. Brooks, by contrast, is fighting four misdemeanor charges in connection with the Capitol breach and is eyeing a chance to have his conviction overturned. He argues that the government lacks sufficient evidence, particularly that Brooks knew his actions were criminal.

Members of his prayer group contacted the FBI

Mr. Brooks was arrested after fellow members of his prayer group told the FBI that Mr. Brooks had been texting photos of himself to church members inside the Capitol. Surveillance cameras showed Brooks, wearing a “Trump” knit cap, climbing through a broken window on the Senate side of the Capitol.

“While he now recognizes that it was not appropriate for him to enter the building, and certainly that it was inappropriate for him to enter through the window, at the time he was following crowds and had worked at many construction sites in the past, so walking through the window was not unusual for him,” Brooks’ attorney said in the filing.

After a jury convicted Brooks in 2024, he was sentenced to six months in prison and ordered to pay $500 in restitution and a $2,000 fine.

Forced out of prison for pardon he didn’t want

Brooks said he was “forcibly woken up and taken out of prison” near the end of his sentence, even though he rejected President Trump’s pardon.

“By forcing a pardon, which has historically been associated with mercy for the guilty, the government is embroiling the defendant in a narrative of guilt and cutting off the very process of correcting the record,” his lawyers told the Supreme Court.

As the Iran war escalates, a barrel of crude oil costs $100, and a gallon of gas costs nearly $3.50.

0

play

Stocks tumbled, bonds sold and Wall Street’s “fear rating” soared as oil prices soared above $110 as the U.S.-Iran war worsened.

Brent crude, the international standard crude, soared to $119.50 per barrel in the early hours of Monday, March 9, before trading around $103 per barrel, up about 11%. West Texas Intermediate, the crude oil produced in the United States, was around $101 per barrel just before the New York opening bell.

The 10-day war reached a new milestone over the weekend when Iran appointed Mojtaba Khamenei to succeed his father Ali Khamenei as supreme leader.

Oil remains unable to pass through the Strait of Hormuz, which Iran has effectively blocked. At the start of the war, many analysts expected prices to rise this high, but most also expected major corridors to reopen relatively quickly and price increases to be relatively contained. But so far, there are no signs that the hostilities will ease.

On Monday morning, the Financial Times reported that a group of major industrialized countries was planning an emergency meeting to discuss joint release of oil reserves.

How high will gas prices rise?

The soaring oil prices are beginning to have an impact across the country. Analysts previously told USA TODAY that gasoline prices have moved roughly in line with oil prices, which have soared nearly 50% in the past few weeks.

“When the price at the pump gets above about $3.50 a gallon, consumers really start to worry,” one oil industry analyst said last week. As of Monday morning, the national average was $3.455 per gallon, according to GasBuddy.

“I think there’s about an 80% chance that the national average price of gasoline will hit $4 a gallon within the next month or sooner,” independent energy analyst Patrick de Haan said on March 8.

“The economic impact is significant,” De Haan added. “For every 1 cent increase in the national average gasoline price, Americans will spend about $3.7 million more per day.”

Stephen A. Smith reveals whether he will run for president in 2028 on Hannity

0


The ESPN personality’s comments on Sean Hannity’s new podcast represent his clearest comments yet on the 2028 presidential race.

play

Stephen A. Smith made a game-changing revelation about his possible 2028 presidential run on Fox News anchor Sean Hannity’s new podcast.

ESPN personality Hannity, 58, told the “Hannity” host on the streaming platform’s debut episode of “Hangouts with Sean Hannity” on Tuesday, March 10, that he has no intention of replacing President Donald Trump in the White House.

Last March, Smith told USA TODAY that he “doesn’t care about public office” and prefers to argue rather than seek office, but he has since said he has debated whether to run multiple times over the past year.

When Hannity asked Smith if he was right, “I don’t think you’re running,” the sports commentator responded, “I don’t think I’d run either, because you’d have to give up the money.”

After a brief exchange, Smith again told Hannity, “I can tell you right now, put your presidential ambitions to rest. If I have to give up money, it’s not going to happen.”

Trump administration officials Stephen A. Smith will vote for

The “First Take” host also said on “Hangout” that the conservative news star won’t like who he plans to vote for in 2028. After Hannity said he was not interested in the choice at hand, Smith said he would vote for Maryland Gov. Wes Moore, Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro or Trump’s Secretary of State Marco Rubio.

Smith said he supports the former Florida senator because “he’s the adult in the room” and “there’s no question he’s qualified to hold the office.” He also said he supports Mr. Rubio over California Governor Gavin Newsom, former Vice President Kamala Harris, or any other Democrat except Mr. Moore and Mr. Shapiro.

“I would vote for Marco Rubio over anyone other than Wes Moore or Josh Shapiro,” Smith told Hannity.

Just last month, the SiriusXM radio host told Robert Costa on “CBS Sunday Morning” that he was considering becoming a politician, despite having “no desire” to become one. “I confess that I am strongly considering appearing on the debate stage in 2027 and running for the Democratic nomination,” Smith told Costa.

Contributor: Terry Collins

Are travel costs too low? The hidden costs of cheap flights and hotels.

0


Industry insiders have warned that minimum rates and hotel deals can have a negative impact on employees, destinations and sustainability.

play

  • Deeply discounted travel often comes with hidden costs, such as overworked staff and poor service.
  • A “race to the bottom” regarding pricing can lead to environmental destruction and cultural degradation.
  • Experts have suggested that some airlines may be cutting costs on safety measures to offer ultra-low fares.

When Robert Gurna found a round-trip ticket from Austin, Texas, to Denver for just $67, he thought he had a deal. But as he sat on a delayed plane, watching overworked agents juggle overbooked flights, he wondered. Too cheap?

“There’s something seriously wrong with that business model,” said Mr. Gruna, an Austin real estate investor. “The flight was three hours behind schedule, the gate agents were tired and exhausted, and the plane was uncomfortably full. That $67 ticket showed that the airline was selling seats to fill the plane and cutting staff and service to dangerous levels.”

check out Elliot Confidentialthe newsletter the travel industry doesn’t want you to read. Each issue is packed with the latest news, deep insights, and unique strategies to help you become a better traveler. But don’t tell anyone!

Welcome to the dark side of the race to the bottom in the travel industry. There, deep discounts come with hidden costs that degrade the experience and harm communities, workers, and the environment.

This is a complex issue that challenges corporate practices, government policies, and the decisions we make as travelers. However, when you think about it this way, you may wonder if the travel money is not enough.

Human damage caused by cheap travel

Conventional wisdom holds that travel has become too expensive, and yes, I’ve written about it, but a growing number of industry insiders are saying the opposite. Travel is sometimes dangerously cheap, and someone else is always paying the real price.

Alexandra Dubakova, chief marketing officer of a travel company based in Zurich, Switzerland, recently visited Egypt, where she got to see it firsthand.

“Low prices mean cheap life,” she explained. “Everyone I met, whether in hotels, restaurants or tourist traps, looked tired and confused. But the moment they made eye contact with a foreigner, they instantly changed. Like a light switch, their smiles came and went.”

The numbers behind Egypt’s tourism industry speak for themselves. Workers’ wages are so low that they rely on begging. Dubakova recalled the most troubling example. In a public toilet, a desperate man stole all the toilet paper, stood at the door and resold it to tourists.

“It was disturbing,” she said.

Cord Thomas, president of a vacation rental management company in Broomfield, Colorado, is observing this movement across the hospitality industry.

“The number of housekeepers who clean 20 rooms on each shift is keeping hotel prices low, while famous tourist destinations have been transformed into overcrowded souvenir images,” he said. “Travellers who are saving money are often unaware of the employee fatigue and environmental damage that bookings cause.”

destruction of the environment and culture

The environmental costs of ultra-cheap travel go far beyond carbon emissions and leisure travel.

“Frequent fliers are responsible for the majority of aviation emissions,” said Rebecca Thompson, founding CEO of Sustainable Travel Technologies.

Ultra-cheap prices are hard to match with the sustainability narrative that many travel companies are trying to weave in.

On the other hand, they offer significant discounts on fares and fees. On the other hand, it claims to be environmentally responsible by using small amounts of sustainable aviation fuel, building a solar power plant behind the hotel, recycling and growing vegetables. I’ve been covering sustainability for years, and I hear this kind of double-talk all too often.

Cultural heritage will pay a similarly high price. Frank Marr, a spokesperson for Nueva Vista, a destination management company in Armenia’s Caucasus Mountains, has seen firsthand how cheap tourism is hollowing out authentic experiences.

“One-day tours can cost less than $25, pushing guides below the local living wage,” he said. “While Instagram-famous areas like Tbilisi’s Old Town are inundated with bargain-basement crowds, quiet UNESCO treasures like Azerbaijan’s Sheki Khan Palace and Armenia’s Akhtara Monastery struggle for preservation funds.”

What to do about the race to the bottom

Travel industry experts increasingly recognize that the obsession with low prices is unsustainable.

“Low prices tend to hurt in any industry when players try to differentiate on price,” said Danish Shah, a marketing professor at Georgia State University. “Airlines have sought to achieve economies of scale by reducing legroom and reducing the quantity and quality of in-flight meals. All of this has been achieved at the expense of service quality and consumer experience.”

The reality of “cheap” travel is often more expensive than advertised.

“Hidden fees can undermine trust and create legal and regulatory issues for airlines and travel companies,” added AirHelp Chief Legal Officer Eric Napoli.

Prices that are too low can also affect safety, said Bill McGee, a senior researcher at the American Economic Liberties Project. His research found that airlines are cutting costs in key areas to maintain extremely low prices.

“The mechanic said the $99 ticket came at a price,” he said. “And those savings came from outsourcing heavy equipment maintenance to El Salvador, China and Singapore, far from the scrutiny of the Federal Aviation Administration.”

So what’s the solution?

The path forward requires fundamental changes in how companies price travel products and how we perceive the value of those products.

AirHelp’s Napoli said one solution is to improve price disclosure.

“Airlines and travel companies should be transparent from the start, especially when passengers choose different baggage options and services and the fees start to add up,” he said.

Rebecca Thompson of Sustainable Travel Technologies believes that better government policy could address the issue.

“There is a proposed tax on frequent flyers where the more flights a traveler takes, the more they pay,” she said. “This could indicate that those who pollute the most are paying the most for the impact they are having on the environment, while keeping annual trips affordable for the majority.”

John William, a travel advisor at Easy Travel and Tours, said prices should reflect the exact cost of providing the service. Also, many people are willing to pay for products that benefit the community.

“I think travelers will be prepared to pay a reasonable price if they understand how it helps sustainable communities, fair treatment of labor and conservation,” he says.

Of course, the solution ultimately rests with the traveler.

“People should avoid short weekend getaways because flight prices are so low,” said vacation rental expert Thomas. “Take less meaningful travel and spend your money on things that benefit your local community.”

You get what you pay for

It wasn’t just cheap flights that Mr. Gurna struggled with unsustainable pricing. He also paid $45 a night for a hotel room that should have cost $180 a night. The experience stayed with him even after he checked out.

“One person manned the front desk, checking in guests, answering phones, and taking maintenance calls all at the same time,” he recalls. “The housekeeping staff were cleaning the rooms too quickly, which compromised the overall cleanliness, and the breakfast bar was out of food by 8am, as the management cut corners whenever possible. The human cost of the low rates was visible and it was disappointing to pay so little.”

This guilt reflects a growing awareness among travelers that value is being extracted from places that claim to celebrate at bargain prices. Ultra-cheap travel does not democratize the experience. It degrades them, turns destinations into theme parks, and turns workers into props for someone else’s Instagram stories.

Bottom line: We probably can’t afford such a cheap price.

christopher elliott I’m an author, consumer advocate, and journalist. he founded Elliot Advocacy, A non-profit organization that helps solve consumer problems. he publishes Elliot Confidentialtravel newsletter, Elliott Reporta news site about customer service. If you need help with a consumer issue, you can: Contact him here Or email chris@elliott.org.

Iran War, Rihanna, Paralympics, Spring Break Travel, Basketball, Baseball: Daily Briefing

0

Welcome to the daily briefing. This morning’s breaking news is:

nicole farato here. Take USA TODAY’s News Quiz. From the latest updates on the Iran war to concerns over safe spring break destinations for Americans, we dig into Monday’s news. Plus: We support the U.S. Paralympic Hockey Team.

More deaths in Iran war

The U.S. military announced Sunday that a seventh American service member has died in the ongoing war with Iran, more than a week after the conflict began. According to the Iranian Red Crescent Society, more than 1,300 people have been killed in Iranian attacks by the US and Israel. In Lebanon, the Lebanese Health Minister announced on Sunday that Israeli airstrikes had killed nearly 400 people.

In an interview broadcast Sunday, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth told “60 Minutes” that “there will be many more casualties” in a war with Iran.

Is the end in sight? President Trump has said he is not interested in negotiations. Rather, it raised the possibility that the war could continue until the Middle Eastern country lost its military and leadership. President Trump said Sunday that high oil prices are a “small price to pay” for Americans. Meanwhile, Iran has named Mojtaba Khamenei as its next supreme leader.

More news you need to know right now

2026 Paralympic Winter Games

Another hockey medal for Team USA?

Team USA’s para ice hockey team defeated Italy 14-1 over the weekend, and the U.S. squad will now take on Germany at the Milan-Cortina Paralympic Winter Games on Monday at 12:05 p.m. ET. If the United States advances to Sunday’s final and wins, it will be the country’s third hockey gold medal this year.

trip

spring break scramble

Rising geopolitical tensions have some U.S. travelers worried about spring break. In one example, recent civil unrest in Mexico has also worried some travelers, with travel insurance platform Squaremas reporting a six-fold spike in customer calls specifically about Mexico. Here are some safe spring break destinations for Americans.

before you go

Have feedback about the daily briefing? Email Nicole at NFallert@usatoday.com.

“Don’t worry.” Swap these destinations for Mexico for spring break.

0


Rising geopolitical tensions are prompting some U.S. travelers to switch their spring break trips abroad to destinations closer to home.

play

For some travelers, spring break may look a little different this year.

Recent geopolitical escalations, including the death of Mexican cartel leader El Mencho and the war with Iran, have disrupted travel for many people, leaving some stranded in closed airspace and others seeking refuge in shelters. InsureMyTrip CEO Suzanne Moreau previously told USA TODAY that destinations not necessarily directly affected or located in conflict zones, such as Egypt and Dubai, are also experiencing “ripple effects” of travel disruptions. On February 28, the State Department issued an alert advising “Americans around the world to exercise increased vigilance.”

With spring break just around the corner, some travelers are reconsidering future trips abroad. They worry about their safety and are anxious about crossing the border. So they’re changing their plans to other destinations that seem safer, even annual spring break destinations like Mexico.

“I’m just saying that a lot of people are upset and if I was going to feel safe going somewhere else for spring break, I would choose that,” said Tyler Hosford, security director at global risk mitigation firm International SOS. “It’s more of the idea of ​​relaxing, drinking a margarita, not having to worry about anything, and going. Yes, it’s safe, but can we go somewhere else?”

Let’s go here for spring break this year.

Where is a safe spring break destination for Americans?

Hosford says it varies. He said travel “remains business as usual” for destinations in Europe, East Asia and Australia.

However, travel to parts of Africa and South Asia, such as Sri Lanka and Thailand, has been more affected by the Iran war. “Many travelers from Europe, the United States and Canada will be traveling through these Middle Eastern hubs,” he said, adding that connecting flights would likely need to be changed and travel times would be longer. “People might say, maybe we’ll postpone it.”

Mexico’s recent social unrest has also worried some travelers, with travel insurance platform Squaremas reporting a six-fold jump in customer calls specifically about Mexico.

Hosford said he’s seeing customers change their spring break trips from Mexico to Hawaii, Florida and other Caribbean locations.

Traveling to Mexico is safe in most cases, especially if you stay in a popular resort area. “The areas of Mexico outside of Jalisco where much of the cartel activity was concentrated are actually returning to normalcy,” Hosford said. “Places like Cabo San Lucas, San Jose del Cabo, Cancun, some of them are now safe to go to.”

Popular Spring Break Destinations in 2026

According to Hopper Technology Solutions, the top destinations for spring break in March and April are:

  1. Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
  2. san juan, puerto rico
  3. Fort Myers, Florida
  4. Sarasota, Florida

Spring break flights to the Caribbean

Interest in the Caribbean is surging among American spring breakers. Here are some of Hopper’s most booked destinations in March and April, along with their average round-trip airfares from the United States.

  • San Juan, Puerto Rico – $300
  • Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic – $329
  • Punta Cana, Dominican Republic – $402
  • Montego Bay, Jamaica – $372
  • Kingston, Jamaica – $403

Social Security checks will be mailed on March 11th. See full payment schedule.

0

play

The first round of Social Security payments for March is scheduled to be distributed this week according to the normal schedule.

The March payments come after an alarming report from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO). The CBO report suggests that the Social Security Trust Fund (formally known as the Old Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund) will be depleted in fiscal year 2032 (by September 2032).

Back in June 2025, program trustees estimated the fund would be depleted in 2033.

After the trust fund that covers the difference between Social Security benefits and payroll tax revenues is depleted, the program must begin reducing benefit payments.

Here’s what you need to know about this week’s Social Security payments.

Who will receive Social Security payments this week?

Beneficiaries born between the 1st and 10th of their birth month are supposed to receive their monthly Social Security benefits on Wednesday, March 11, according to the SSA payment calendar.

When will my Social Security payments be sent?

Social Security benefits, which are paid primarily to elderly or retired beneficiaries, are typically paid on Wednesdays.

According to the SSA calendar, if the recipient’s birthday is between the 1st and 10th of the month, payments will generally be made on the second Wednesday of the payment month. Those born from the 11th to the 20th will receive the allowance on the 3rd Wednesday, and those born after the 20th will receive it on the 4th Wednesday.

People who received Social Security benefits before May 1997 can receive their payments on the third day of the month, excluding weekends and holidays.

Individuals who receive both Social Security and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) can expect Social Security payments on the 3rd of the month and SSI payments on the 1st of the month.

Complete Social Security Payment Calendar for 2026

SSI payment schedule for the end of 2026

Recipients of Supplemental Securities Income (SSI) checks are typically issued payments on the first business day of the month. Because March 1, 2026 is a Sunday, the March payment will now be made on Friday, February 27, 2026.

Here are the SSI payment dates for 2026 according to the SSA calendar:

  • Wednesday, April 1, 2026 (confirmed in April 2026)
  • Friday, May 1, 2026 (Please check May 2026)
  • Monday, June 1, 2026 (confirmed in June 2026)
  • Wednesday, July 1, 2026 (confirmed in July 2026)
  • Friday, July 31, 2026 (Please check for August 2026)
  • Tuesday, September 1, 2026 (confirmed in September 2026)
  • Thursday, October 1, 2026 (confirmed in October 2026)
  • Friday, October 30, 2026 (Please check for November 2026)
  • Tuesday, December 1, 2026 (confirmed in December 2026)
  • Friday, December 31, 2026 (for January 2027)

Fernando Cervantes Jr. is a trending news reporter for USA TODAY. Contact us at fernando.cervantes@gannett.com and follow us at X @fern_cerv_.

President Trump’s ‘Freedom 250’ sparks debate over the origins of American Christianity

0


Historians say the White House prayer book and 250th anniversary celebrations promote a Christian-centered view of American history.

play

The first page of the White House’s new devotional book begins with a myth. It depicts English settlers landing on Cape Henry, near present-day Virginia Beach, hoisting a tall wooden cross and dedicating the land to God in prayer.

The event “reveals the extent to which Christianity, especially Protestantism, has accompanied Britain’s colonial enterprise from its inception,” the booklet says.

However, there is no evidence that the prayers were ever performed, as the document later acknowledged.

Historians and religious experts have warned that the inclusion is a sign of a broader effort by President Donald Trump’s administration to rewrite the country’s origins as explicitly Christian in the year of the nation’s 250th anniversary.

President Trump has announced several faith-focused events that feature almost exclusively Christianity, including his “America Praise” initiative to encourage Americans to join 10 people in prayer each week and a national prayer event in May that will turn the National Mall into a “massive revival.”

The program is sponsored by Freedom 250, a quasi-governmental organization founded by President Trump to realize his vision for the nation’s 250th anniversary. This is separate from America250, a nonpartisan organization created by Congress in 2016 to plan the year’s signature events.

The White House and Freedom 250 say the show is intended to celebrate the protection of religious freedom enshrined in the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Presidents including Ulysses S. Grant, Calvin Coolidge, and Gerald Ford have cited God and religion in speeches marking other milestones.

But some historians argue that Trump’s efforts push the limits of the First Amendment, which prohibits the government from establishing an official state religion.

“We are witnessing this effort to undermine the institutional separation of religion and government,” said Guthrie Graves Fitzsimmons, vice president of programs and strategy at the Interfaith Alliance, a national nonpartisan civil and religious rights organization. “It goes to the core of what it means to be an American: the freedom to worship, the freedom to pray, or the freedom not to pray.”

Freedom 250 Religious Connections

A quarter of the partner organizations listed on the Freedom 250 website are Christian-related, including National Religious Broadcasting Corporation, Angel Studios, the Museum of the Bible, and Pray.com. Another partner is Wall Builders, a nonprofit founded by activist David Barton, who has long advocated that the United States should be run as a Christian nation.

When President Trump launched America Plays in September with a speech at the Museum of the Bible, attended by many of our Christian partners, he also pledged to “defend our nation’s founding Judeo-Christian principles.”

As of March 4, Freedom 250 has no partners representing non-Christian faith groups, according to its website.

Freedom 250 spokeswoman Rachel Reisner told USA TODAY that the partnership mirrors the organization’s offer to work with the 250 President’s Task Force.

“We welcome collaboration with all who share our determination to commemorate our nation’s 250th anniversary in a way that uplifts and unites America,” Reisner said in a statement.

Christine du Mez, an American historian and author of “Jesus and John Wayne,” argued that the lack of equal representation showed that the regime had “no appetite for religious pluralism.” By repeatedly mentioning Christianity, she said, President Trump appears to favor Christianity over other religions in taxpayer-funded programs.

A description of May’s national prayer event on the White House website says it will be streamed to “dioceses” across the country and will include “prominent Christian artists.” Although the document refers generally to “major religious leaders,” it does not specifically mention synagogues, mosques, or other types of worship spaces, nor does it name musicians of other religions.

A White House press secretary told USA TODAY that religions other than Christianity will also participate in the event. Freedom 250 organizers say the organization has not yet decided on the program, but is consulting with religious leaders from a variety of religions, including Christianity, Judaism, Hinduism, Islam and Buddhism.

Other materials produced by the White House and Freedom 250 similarly reference Christianity.

Freedom 250 enlisted PragerU, a conservative media nonprofit, and Hillsdale College, a small Christian school in Michigan, to create exhibits and educational materials for six traveling museums touring the country. Using $10 million in government funding, a mobile museum was built and transported for a year.

“Freedom Trucks” tells the story of the American Revolution and influential American heroes. They also frequently note the role that God played in the founding of the nation. One exhibit on “American Roots” states that “America’s fundamental principles are rooted in Western and Judeo-Christian values.”

Marissa Streit, CEO of PragerU, told USA TODAY that the references to faith in the exhibit are intended to emphasize “the Christian perspective of America’s founding and the love of God and the faith in God that our founders had.”

For example, an exhibit about the Declaration of Independence states that the Founders “believed that God created man for freedom,” and notes that the Continental Congress added references to the “supreme judge of the world” and “divine providence” to the document.

Matthew Spalding, dean of Hillsdale School of Government and advisor to Freedom Tracks, said he felt the depiction of the nation’s founding would be inaccurate without mentioning Christian influences.

He said the reference to Christianity does not imply that people of other faiths do not have religious freedom, but rather focuses on the history of the nation’s founding religion.

“American history has been very much shaped by the Hebrews and Christians who focused on the sense that we have a certain human dignity,” he said. “There’s Christian influence, there’s Jewish influence, there’s also Enlightenment thinker influence, Deist influence. It’s all together.”

Du Mez said the Christian Right has historically overemphasized references to Christianity in the founding of the country.

“For more than half a century, conservative white evangelicals have expressed their own interpretation of America’s past,” Du Mez said. “These alternative histories depict the founding as uniquely Christian.”

Warren Throckmorton, an evangelical Christian and former psychology professor who has spent years studying Christian nationalism, said some of the Christian Right’s historical reinterpretation ultimately found its way into the “Prayers and Proclamations” toolkit released as part of America Prays.

This collection of poems contains 18 references to Christianity, 3 references to Judaism, and no mention of other religions.

A passage in the anthology suggests that prayer helped the Founders overcome their differences at the Constitutional Convention. After the prayer, the collection of poems says, “debate gave way to compromise, which ultimately led to the drafting of the United States Constitution.”

However, a detailed account of the treaty shows that bitter exchanges over slavery, representation, and taxation intensified in the months following the prayer.

Throckmorton said this depiction has been debunked by historians and is “a real problem.”

“The Freedom 250 people would like you to think that prayer saved the country. In reality, it wasn’t. It was more complicated than that,” he said.

Observance of faith at historical junctures

Trump is not the only president to discuss religion during a milestone celebration.

Former President Ulysses S. Grant told Americans that they should “give thanks to Almighty God” for the nation’s blessings on the centennial of 1876. Half a century later, former President Calvin Coolidge implored, “Unless the faith of the American people in these religious beliefs endures, the principles of our Declaration will disappear.”

And on the occasion of the nation’s bicentennial in 1976, former President Gerald Ford asked Americans to reflect on the “deep faith in God that inspired our Founding Fathers.”

But religious historians told USA TODAY that President Trump’s references to religion are different from those of the past.

Throckmorton said presidents typically “talk about God in a very general sense,” so “everyone can find themselves and their religion” in the message. He said the Trump administration has “specifically chosen people to be the faces of Freedom 250…evangelical Christians.”

Recent Republican presidents have sought to appeal to conservative Christians, with President Reagan once telling evangelical leaders, “You can’t support me, but I will support you.” However, there is no record of government-sanctioned and taxpayer-funded events promoting one religion over another.

“The president has the same First Amendment right to freedom of expression as everyone else. He has more influence because of his position,” Throckmorton said. “But none of them are trying to make the Constitution anything other than what it is.”

Graves-Fitzsimmons, who works with the Interfaith Alliance to promote religious freedom, expressed concern that the overt references to Christianity in the 250th document are part of a broader move by the administration to integrate Christianity into the government. In early February, the Interfaith Alliance sued the Trump administration, alleging an illegal lack of religious and ideological diversity in the Justice Department’s Religious Freedom Committee.

The Religious Freedom Commission includes Protestants, Catholics, and Jews, but not Muslims or members of other minority religious groups. The group’s advisory board of lay leaders also includes Muslim representatives. The Interfaith Alliance said the move violates federal law that requires such groups to have “a fair balance in terms of positions represented.”

Andrew Whitehead, executive director of the Association for Religious Data Archives at Indiana University’s Center for the Study of Religion and American Culture, said the debate over religious references in the 250th anniversary of the Confederacy is really about establishing a vision of what America represents.

“Governments are always working on creating national myths,” he says.

“At the end of the day, it comes down to what kind of national myth is upheld today: Does everyone have equal rights under the Constitution, or is this country created by or for white Protestant Christians? Those are contradictory narratives.”

Carissa Wadick covers America’s 250th anniversary on USA TODAY. Contact him at kwaddick@usatoday.com.

Contributor: Breanna Frank, USA TODAY. Liam Adams of The (Nashville) Tennessean

This ridiculously cheap Warren Buffett stock could make you richer

0


Could Warren Buffett’s rare loser become a winner in your portfolio?

Berkshire Hathawaywas led by Warren Buffett from 1965 until his retirement at the end of 2025 and has a number of consumer staples stocks in its stock portfolio. But this is one of Berkshire’s worst-performing investments and may offer the biggest opportunity for new investors.

At the end of 2025, Berkshire Hathaway held 27.5% of the stock. Kraft Heinz (NASDAQ:KHC). At current prices, Berkshire’s stock is worth about $7.8 billion, but its investment cost basis was about $9.8 billion.

The position had a carrying value of $12.2 billion before taking a $3.8 billion impairment charge last year.

There was recent talk that Berkshire, led by Buffett’s successor Greg Abel, was selling its stake in Kraft Heinz as the packaged food company considered splitting into two companies. Kraft Heinz has since put those plans on hold, and Berkshire appears content to own Kraft Heinz stock for now. It’s unclear whether Berkshire sees itself in a good place going forward, but a number of things suggest to me that a comeback may be starting.

Why Kraft Heinz had a rare miss at Oracle of Omaha

Mr. Buffett may have won cleverly. S&P500 However, even legendary investors can lose money on their investments. Berkshire’s relationship with Kraft Heinz dates back to 2013.

That’s when the company partnered with private equity firm 3G Capital to take HJ Heinz private. Two years later, Heinz merged with Kraft Foods. Berkshire Hathaway sold 50% of its Heinz stock and consolidated 27.5% of publicly traded Kraft Heinz stock.

The post-merger stock price initially did well. However, within a few years, stock prices began hitting new lows in about 10 years. Initially, stock prices fell due to radical cost-cutting measures that did more harm than good. These job cuts initially increased profitability, but also led to underinvestment in the company’s brands. Additionally, this affected growth and profitability.

To alleviate this problem, Kraft Heinz pivoted, leading to a partial recovery. But within a few years, inflation became the new headwind. In addition to compressing profit margins, high inflation has caused consumers to shun branded products in favor of lower-priced alternatives. As a result, financial performance deteriorated again and stock prices returned to multi-year lows.

Berkshire and Buffett’s losses could be your gains

Under the Kraft Heinz proposed breakup discussed last fall, one entity would take over the company’s fast-growing seasonings and shelf-stable food businesses, while the other entity would take over the staple foods business.

However, management reportedly backed out after pressure from Berkshire. The move removed an important potential catalyst, but reduced the risk that Berkshire would reduce its position and put pressure on the stock. Additionally, other efforts are underway, including the company’s ongoing $600 million rebranding plan, which could also improve results. Kraft Heinz’s forward P/E ratio is about 12 times, which is in line with its competitors. But if earnings recover and sentiment toward food stocks improves, the stock could rise further. Until now, Kraft Heinz’s price-to-earnings ratio (PER) has hovered in the mid-10s.

That’s not all. The stock’s 6.6% forward dividend yield further increases value potential. Kraft Heinz didn’t work out for Berkshire or Buffett, but for those buying today, this stock could be a long-term golden opportunity.

Thomas Neal has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a position in and recommends Berkshire Hathaway. The Motley Fool recommends Kraft Heinz. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

The Motley Fool is a USA TODAY content partner providing financial news, analysis and commentary designed to help people take control of their financial lives. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY.

Should you buy Kraft Heinz stock now?

Offers from the Motley Fool: Before buying Kraft Heinz stock, consider the following:

of Motley Fool Stock Advisor Our analyst team has identified what they believe Best 10 stocks Investors can buy now…and Kraft Heinz wasn’t among them. These 10 stocks have the potential to generate impressive returns over the next few years.

when to think about it Netflix This list was created on December 17, 2004…if you invested $1,000 at the time of recommendation. you have $534,817!* or when Nvidia This list was created on April 15, 2005…if you invested $1,000 at the time of recommendation. you have $1,123,912!*

Now, the important thing to note is that stock advisor Total average return is 964% — compared to the S&P 500’s 192%, which is a market-beating outperformance. Don’t miss our latest Top 10 list. stock advisorjoin an investing community built by retail investors, for retail investors.

See 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor will return on March 6, 2026.