Home Blog Page 243

U.S. Capitol receives plaque honoring police who responded to riot on January 6th

0


Capitol workers installed the plaque before dawn, more than five years after a mob of President Trump’s supporters tried to overturn the 2020 election.

play

A plaque honoring police who responded to the deadly U.S. Capitol riot on Jan. 6, 2021, has been quietly and provisionally installed after years of delays.

Capitol Hill officials installed the plaque more than five years after a mob of President Trump supporters stormed the Capitol amid the president’s failed effort to overturn the results of the 2020 election.

Rep. Adriano Espaillat (D-N.Y.), the legislative appropriations member, noted that the decorations were installed early in the morning with little fanfare, following years of delays by House Republicans.

“Don’t get me wrong, they did this at 4am so no one could see, so there was no ceremony or real recognition,” Espaillat said in the X post. “Our Capitol Police deserve more recognition and I will continue to push @SpeakerJohnson until they understand.”

The installation of the plaque on the Senate side of the Capitol was first reported by The Washington Post. Congress approved legislation four years ago to install a plaque honoring police officers and directed it to be placed on the West Front of the Capitol.

Five police officers who responded to the riot died in the aftermath. Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick, 42, suffered a stroke during the mob attack and died the next day. Four other police officers died by suicide within months of the attack. A total of 174 police officers were injured.

Additionally, Trump supporter Ashli ​​Babbitt was killed by U.S. Capitol Police Lt. Michael Byrd while attempting to storm the Speaker’s lobby.

The plaque reads, “On behalf of a grateful Congress, this plaque honors the outstanding individuals who bravely defended and defended this symbol of democracy on January 6, 2021. Their heroism will never be forgotten.”

The nameplate lists the various local and federal law enforcement agencies that responded.

House Republicans, who have been in power since 2023, delayed the installation because the law required it to be in place by March 2023. House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana) had not yet installed the plaque. For years, the plaque was kept away from public view in the basement of the Capitol.

A bipartisan Senate resolution passed unanimously in January ordered the Capitol architect to display the plaque until “it can be installed in a permanent location.”

Neither Mr. Johnson’s office nor the architect of the Capitol building responded to emailed requests for comment. The White House did not respond to an emailed request for comment.

Two police officers who responded to the Jan. 6 riot have sued the architect of the Capitol building, seeking a memorial under federal law.

During his second term, President Trump pardoned approximately 1,600 people charged with involvement in the Capitol riot. The White House page says President Trump pardoned the Jan. 6 rioters, saying they were “unjustly targeted, overcharged, and turned into a political spectacle.”

Contributed by Erin Mansfield and Aysha Bagchi, USA TODAY

Rondale Moore’s lifetime attendance celebration draws the ire of Kyle Pitts

0

play

This article discusses suicide and suicidal ideation. If you or someone you know is in trouble or in crisis, help is available. Call or text 988 or chat at 988lifeline.org.

Atlanta Falcons tight end Kyle Pitts attended a celebration of life for former NFL wide receiver Rondale Moore on March 6 in New Albany, Indiana.

Pitts lamented in a social media post that only a handful of Moore’s NFL teammates were in attendance at the event.

“It’s crazy that only 6 or 7 of my NFL teammates showed up today,” Pitts wrote in part on his Instagram Story. “You’re talking about fake emotions and no one’s coming to give you a break. You’re just speechless.”

Moore passed away on Saturday, February 21st, at the age of 25. New Albany Police Chief Todd Bailey told USA TODAY that Moore was found in a garage with a suspected self-inflicted gunshot wound.

Moore’s death sparked conversations about mental health among players, coaches and NFL executives alike. Many paid tribute to Moore on social media, including Pitts, who became close with Moore during the 2024 season they spent together in Atlanta.

“There’s no way this is real,” Pitts wrote in an Instagram post featuring a photo of the two on a merry-go-round. “I’m really just sitting here crying without even thinking about what to say or think.”

“We were literally just on the phone yesterday morning,” he added. “I’m so hurt, Dad, I never thought I’d be posting something like this, let alone about you! Rondale, you’re so at peace watching over us right now, but I wish you’d never deserted us. We love you Dad, and 4 will live on forever.”

Moore’s death was greeted with an outpouring of sympathy at the 2026 NFL Scouting Combine.

“This is an absolutely tragic situation,” Cardinals general manager Monty Ossenfort told reporters. “We just came off a great event at State Farm Stadium and found out the news Saturday night. It was shocking. I had only been with Ron Dale for a year. His competitiveness, how important football was to him, and when he played… It’s really sad. I mean, I’ve seen the intensity of our players, but some of us knew him better than others. I benefited from being with him for a year. So it’s a very, very tragic situation.”

Meanwhile, Cleveland Browns general manager Andrew Berry detailed the challenges athletes face during the “isolation” that comes with “the grueling process of getting back to health” after a major injury.

“Before I got here, I was actually going back and reviewing all the notes I had written with Rondale during the draft process. Rondale was a young man who was incredibly highly regarded by everyone around him and had an incredibly bright future,” Berry said. “And I thought people didn’t realize how difficult the rehabilitation process is for professional athletes, especially when they sustain a major injury.

“And it’s not just the grueling process of getting healthy, but the loneliness that often comes with it. And for people in their early 20s or mid-20s who may be experiencing a career setback for the first time or don’t have the communal aspect that typically comes with college, that can be frustrating.”

“As a league, we think we can do a better job by providing resources to clubs to make sure they have that touchpoint. It’s something we’re very proactive about and we’re very sensitive to. We want as many players as possible to be able to rehab locally or be on site and be part of that team. We’re encouraging our players to stay in the meetings and we’re also planning regular check-ins with the team psychiatrist and team psychologist.”That’s a real factor, but I think it’s an incredible tragedy that we should be more aware of.” ”

Moore missed the final two years of his NFL career due to injury. He suffered a season-ending knee injury before the start of the 2024 season with the Falcons and the 2025 season with the Minnesota Vikings.

After a standout career at Purdue, Moore was a second-round pick in the 2021 NFL Draft and spent his first three seasons with the Arizona Cardinals.

Burger King, Wendy’s and other fast food brands roast McDonald’s

0


After McDonald’s posted a video widely mocking its CEO, competitors posted videos, jokes and unrelated fights on social media.

play

McDonald’s CEO Chris Kempczinski’s Big Arch Burger tasting video has sparked an ongoing social media scrum with fast food brands joining in, some trying to change the narrative.

As the March introduction of McDonald’s biggest burger ever approaches, a video from February of Kempczinski biting into the Big Arch has surfaced. “I love this product,” Kempczinski says in the clip before sampling the burger. “It’s very delicious. I’m going to try it now, but I’m going to have this for lunch, just to be sure.”

Business news site Inc. noted in its account of the incident that “sharp-tongued viewers first zeroed in on the morsels of food that Kempczinski timed to remove from his XXL burger throughout the 81-second video.”

Competitors Burger King and Wendy’s came under fire after they released lewd videos of their executives happily stuffing themselves with hamburgers.

McDonald’s attempted to regain control of the situation with an Instagram post gently poking fun at Kempczinski’s failure. “Take a bite of our new product,” was the same explanation the CEO gave for Big Arch.

Competitors were not ready to stop this move. Jack in the Box posted a video of its Jack mascot saying, “Just a bite? We don’t do that here.”

A&W Canada invited Kempczinski to lunch with taste tester Allen Lulu, who posted a video on TikTok of him munching on a Teen Burger, saying, “We love this product and most people call it a burger.”

Following this, Chris Dull, CEO of Freddy’s Frozen Custard and Steakburgers, posted a video on Instagram of himself “eating burgers as usual,” devouring the chain’s menu throughout the day.

In addition to hamburgers, there are also fast food chains that use chicken and biscuits.

The online food fight has escalated beyond just burgers. When Wendy’s announced on March 5 a new competition to hire a chief tasting officer with a salary of $100,000, Popeyes echoed X, saying, “To be fair, we really need to hire someone to taste our food.”

Wendy’s retort: ​​”It’s a flor pie.” In response, Popeyes suggested, “Your new chief tasting officer might make a better comeback🤡.”

Things got even more heated when Church’s Chicken announced its comeback to Popeyes. “And who taste tested your biscuits?? 👀” Popeyes’ response: “It’s great to have you in the conversation again.”

The discussion turned to the quality of each chain’s biscuits, with nearly 1,000 comments received.

Another chicken player, Kentucky Fried Chicken, also joined the fray on Friday, March 6th. In a video posted on the social media platform, KFC U.S. President Catherine Tan Gillespie said, “I’ve seen a lot of CEOs talking about burgers lately… Good for them. At KFC, we leave the beef to the boys. We don’t use the product. We just have finger-licking delicious chicken.” Tan Gillespie then took a bite of KFC’s chicken. sandwich.

Mike Snyder is a national trends news reporter for USA TODAY. You can follow him on Threads, Bluesky, and X, and email him at: mike snyder & @mikegsnider.bsky.social & @mikesnider & msnider@usatoday.com.

Noem debuts as Trump special envoy at Latin American summit after DHS ouster

0

play

MIAMI — Former Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem will make her debut as special presidential envoy for the Shield of the Americas. President Donald Trump appointed her to the new role after demoting her last week.

Noem will serve as the administration’s liaison to a coalition of like-minded Latin American countries that the Trump administration says it created to combat drug trafficking and solidify U.S. primacy in the Western Hemisphere.

President Trump formally launched the coalition, which includes countries such as El Salvador and Panama, on March 7 at an invitation-only summit at his Doral Golf Club. Leaders from participating countries, including El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, are attending a daylong rally led by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, a former Florida senator and prominent Cuban-American who is fluent in Spanish.

As early aides like Noem declined in stature, Rubio quickly rose to power within the second Trump administration, serving in the dual roles of Trump’s national security adviser and chief diplomat.

President Trump announced in a social media post on March 5 that he would nominate Oklahoma Sen. Markwayne Mullin to lead the Department of Homeland Security.

Last May, he fired his first national security adviser, Michael Walz (currently the U.N. ambassador), and replaced him with Rubio. The temporary arrangements associated with a White House office have effectively become permanent. Mr. Rubio is widely known as the architect of President Trump’s strategy for engagement with the Western Hemisphere and played a leading role in the ouster and arrest of the Venezuelan president.

Noem is in the position of a special envoy, similar to an ambassador.

The role of special envoy is nominally placed in the role of the former Cabinet secretary on the shield of the Americas, but President Trump indicated at the time of the group’s launch that it would operate under Rubio’s supervision.

“I want to thank Secretary of State Marco Rubio for his leadership in putting this really important thing together. He’s been great,” President Trump said in his March 7 speech.

Noem sat in the front row at an event between Ohio state Sen. Bernie Moreno, a Colombian-born Republican, and Treasury Secretary Howard Lutnick. She then did not respond to repeated questions from reporters about what her role would be and how long she intended to serve in it.

President Trump delivered remarks at the Commencement Summit before departing from Florida to attend the dignified transfer of remains of U.S. soldiers killed in combat with Iran.

In his speech, he told leaders that the “epicenter” of cartel violence was Mexico and that President Claudia Sheinbaum was not present. Mexico recently conducted a military operation that killed notorious drug boss Nemesio Rubén Oseguera Cervantes, known as “El Mencho,” temporarily plunging the country into instability.

President Trump said of the cartels on March 7: “We have to root them out. We have to crush them. Because the gang leaders are taking over the country. The cartels are running Mexico. We can’t do that. It’s too close to us. To get to you.”

By naming Noem his special envoy for security initiatives, President Trump has given the embattled former congressman, who left his job as governor of North Dakota to join his administration, a soft landing.

She said in an interview with NBC that Noem, who has come under fire for her spending at DHS and her handling of a clash between protesters and federal agents in Minnesota that left two Americans dead, was a fine person who did a good job.

But he said he was surprised to learn that she had spent $220 million on an ad campaign encouraging immigrants to voluntarily deport, in which she featured prominently. The spending came under scrutiny from Republican Sen. John Kennedy during Noem’s testimony before a congressional committee.

President Trump said, “I wasn’t excited about it. I spent less money than that to become president. I didn’t know about it.”

In a March 5 social media post, Noem expressed gratitude to Trump for appointing him a special envoy.

Duchess Meghan’s ‘As Ever’ brand and Netflix split a year after launch

0

play

Meghan Markle’s lifestyle brand is parting ways with Netflix, representatives of the royal family and the streaming giant confirmed on Friday, March 6th.

The Duchess of Sussex and the streaming giant have teamed up to launch the As Ever brand in 2025, following the release of the Netflix series “With Love, Meghan.”

A spokesperson for As Ever told USA TODAY that the split was made because the brand was ready to stand on its own, and thanked Netflix for its support while hinting at an “exciting year ahead.”

“Meghan’s passion for elevating everyday moments in beautiful and simple ways inspired the creation of the As Ever brand. We are thrilled to play a role in bringing that vision to life,” Netflix said in a statement to USA TODAY. “As always intended, Meghan will continue to grow her brand and move on to the next chapter of her independence. We look forward to celebrating how she continues to bring joy to homes around the world.”

“With Love, Meghan Markle” aired for two seasons in partnership with Netflix and Meghan and Harry.

The couple’s joint media venture, Archewell Productions, announced a multi-year extension of film and television projects with Netflix, including an adaptation of the romance novel “See You at the Lake.”

“I feel inspired by our partners, who work closely with me and the Archewell Productions team to create thoughtful content across genres that resonates around the world and celebrates our shared vision,” Meghan said.

When was As Ever released?

From fruit spreads to sparkling wine, Markle’s As Ever brand promotes the royal couple’s “lifestyle” by offering customers a range of luxury products. As Ever was originally named American Riviera Orchard and launched in April 2024. According to As Ever, the product collection was inspired by “her long-standing love of cooking, entertaining, and being a hostess with ease.” The Duchess of Sussex previously paid homage to her royal husband with her signature candle No. 519. This $64 candle is a subtle reference to the duo’s work. May 19, 2018, wedding, This is her first holiday collection.

Who will and can play in the NCAA Tournament?

0

play

The first three No. 1 seeds for the 2026 NCAA Tournament are all but set.

The intrigue of the final weekend of the regular season leading up to the conference tournament is the battle between No. 4 Connecticut State and No. 5 Florida State for the final No. 1 seed. The Huskies are coming off a head-to-head win against the Gators, but perhaps no team in the SEC is as hot as Florida, which is on a 30-point winning streak.

And of course, there are bubble teams, where most of the plot centers around this time of year. Several other Power 4 conference teams (ACC, Big Ten, Big 12, SEC) enter the final weekend of the regular season with something to prove to get into the Big Dance.

Auburn and Southern California ended up on the wrong side of the bubble near the end of the regular season. Meanwhile, Miami (Ohio) is having a perfect season, but some analysts say it will still be on the bubble if it can’t win the Mid-American Conference tournament.

Below are the latest NCAA Tournament standings predictions, including games played through Wednesday, March 4th.

March Madness bracket predictions

last four in

  • Santa Clara**
  • SMU**
  • Indiana**
  • New Mexico**

first four out

  • auburn
  • san diego state
  • VCU
  • California

No.1 seed

  • Duke (AQ — ACC)
  • Arizona (AQ — Big 12)
  • Michigan State (AQ — Big 10)
  • UConn (AQ — Big East)

With the first three No. 1 seeds almost decided, Florida State is pushing UW for the final No. 1 seed, but the Huskies’ victory in the head-to-head matchup on Dec. 9, 2025 gives them the upper hand. But the Gators winning the SEC might change the equation there.

Type 2

  • Florida (AQ — SEC)
  • illinois
  • houston
  • michigan

Entering the weekend, Florida State had won back-to-back SEC games to reach 30 points, including one against lowly Mississippi State. Michigan State may have a chance to clinch the No. 2 seed if it defeats rival Michigan in the final game of the regular season.

Type 3

  • Purdue
  • nebraska
  • iowa
  • Gonzaga (AQ — West Coast Conference)

Purdue, along with Michigan State, still has a spot at the No. 2 seed depending on how the season goes. The Boilermakers are just 6-6 in their last 12 games, but they have enough talent to cause trouble in the NCAA Tournament regardless of seeding.

Meanwhile, the Cyclones have been on the back foot in the final weeks of the season in the race for not just the No. 1 seed, but the No. 2 seed as well.

Type 4 seeds

  • Texas Tech University
  • Kansas
  • virginia
  • Alabama

Alabama’s recent loss to Georgia certainly hurts a little, but it helps that they’re still ahead of several SEC sixth-seeded teams they’ve beaten so far. Although Texas Tech lost JT Toppin this season, it is a team that could move up in the seeding rankings if it performs well in the conference tournament.

No.5 seeds

  • Vanderbilt
  • tennessee
  • arkansas
  • st john’s

Vanderbilt entered the final weekend in good position with a win over Ole Miss. The Commodores end their season Saturday against rival Tennessee. St. John’s has a chance to beat UConn in the Big East Conference Tournament and earn a seeding spot.

6th type seeds

  • north carolina
  • Louisville
  • wisconsin
  • kentucky

The season-ending game between Kentucky and Florida could give the Wildcats some momentum, or it could keep them on the bubble for some. But while they’ll likely play regardless of that game, it’s hard to gauge how the Wildcats will fare in the postseason.

Louisville’s 15-point win over Syracuse halts its recent drop in seeding.

Type 7

  • miami
  • st mary’s
  • Utah (AQ — Mountain West)
  • St. Louis (AQ — Atlantic 10)

On a three-game winning streak and winning nine of their last 11 games, the Miami Hurricanes are a dangerous team that can get hot at the right time.

Type 8

  • brigham young
  • georgia
  • villanova
  • Clemson

BYU enters the tournament having started the season 16-1, but the Cougars have lost nine of their last 13 games, including three in a row, and are outside of seeding. Don’t sleep on the Villanova Wildcats, who have lost more than half this season to UW and St. John’s University.

9th seed

  • University of California Los Angeles
  • iowa
  • north carolina
  • missouri

The Bruins are gaining momentum at the perfect time of the season. UCLA has won against Nebraska and Illinois in recent weeks, and Mick Cronin’s team has a resume that ranks inside the top 40. The Bruins have gone from being a bubble team to securing a single-digit seed.

No.10 seeds

  • texas
  • Texas A&M
  • central florida
  • ohio

No.11 seeds

  • Miami (Ohio) (AQ — Central America)
  • cincinnati
  • Santa Clara**
  • Southern Methodist**
  • Indiana**
  • New Mexico**

The Lobos are still on the bubble after Wednesday’s loss to Colorado State, but are currently still on track inside for one of the final spots.

Meanwhile, Indiana State took advantage of its chance to advance to the NCAA Tournament with a long-awaited big win over Minnesota.

Cincinnati had a Quad 1 win over BYU in the recent restart and also has wins over Iowa State and Kansas State. In these predictions, the Bearcats will avoid the “best four” and enter the tournament. SMU is another team that continues to struggle despite a strong start to the season.

No.12 seeds

  • South Florida (AQ — America)
  • Belmont (AQ — Missouri Valley)
  • Yale University (AQ — Ivy League)
  • McNeese (AQ — Southland)

No.13 seeds

  • High Point (AQ — Big South)
  • Hawaii (AQ — Big West)
  • UNC Wilmington (AQ — Colonial Athletic Association)
  • Sam Houston State University (AQ — Conference USA)

No.14 Seed

  • East Tennessee (AQ — South)
  • St. Thomas (AQ — Summit League)
  • Austin Peay (AQ — Atlantic Sun)
  • Utah Valley (AQ — Western Athletic)

No.15 seeds

  • Northern Colorado (AQ — Big Sky)
  • Navy (AQ — Patriot League)
  • Merrimack (AQ — Metro Atlantic Athletic)
  • Wright State University (AQ — Horizon)

No.16 Seed

  • Troy (AQ — Sunbelt)
  • LIU (AQ — Northeast)
  • Bethune Cookman (AQ — Southwest Atlantic)**
  • Tennessee (AQ — Ohio Valley)**
  • Howard (AQ — Mid-Eastern Athletic)**
  • UMBC (AQ — America East)**

** indicates played in first 4 games

Thrift store sales and visits increase thanks to social media

0

play

When it comes to creating social media content, thrifting is one of the hottest topics, albeit second-hand.

Videos of people proudly holding up potential purchases in stores, wandering the aisles looking for the best shoes or home goods, or combing through all the items in “Thrifts” (a compilation of everything they find while thrifting) receive hundreds of thousands of views and likes. Additionally, some people turn their recycled items into cash and resell the items online to other antiquarians.

Changes are happening in stores right now. The companies say these videos are contributing to a cultural shift around thrift and consumption, as more people flock to stores to find unique items to complete their wardrobe and home decor collections.

“The thrill of the hunt” for recycled content creators

Influencers on social media platforms are not new, but people are now dedicating their content specifically to saving money. These content creators are now taking their viewers to rummage through racks of clothes and virtually experience their finds.

For Lilianclairee, a 23-year-old social media content creator who posts to more than 2 million followers on TikTok as @lillianclairee, recycling means more than just walking into a thrift store to find something to buy. Her series on TikTok, “Thrifting Tuesdays,” involves her spending a day scouring local stores for the best items, sometimes spending more than four hours inside.

In Lily Claire’s experience, people are drawn to money-saving videos because they have a consistent freshness. The store’s inventory changes and the videos change, sometimes reaching more than 1 million views, she told USA TODAY.

“I think this is one of those series that never gets old because there’s something new in every video,” she said. “Compared to the ‘Get Ready With Me’ (video), which I’m also filming, it can feel stagnant in a way because I’m wearing the same makeup every day. I’m always finding new things by thrifting. I find every video fun to watch because you never know what’s going to show up.”

Lily Claire’s hope is that her videos will not only inspire people to start saving money and find joy in doing so, but also help them shop sustainably while doing so.

“There’s a lot of clothing that ends up in landfills and ruins a lot of things about the environment. So buying secondhand instead of fast fashion brands is a very positive thing… One of my goals is to bring that to people,” she said.

As USA TODAY previously reported, people are turning to second-hand shopping instead of fast fashion and mass-produced materials as a way to save money and the environment. For Marissa Trafton, a 32-year-old thrifting content creator whose TikTok account @marthrifts has 79,000 followers, thrifting allows people to acquire new items while not “exacerbating the environmental crisis that we may be facing,” she told USA TODAY.

Trafton hopes her videos inspire others to buy second-hand, but she recognizes that overspending can also happen while shopping, especially when she sees others constantly saving on great things on social media.

“We want what other people have. For better or worse, we are inspired to go buy something or go look for something that other people have,” Trafton said. “But I think overconsumption is a problem in the world, especially on social media…I think frugality is doing its best to combat that, so we’re not all spending money on new items that end up in landfills.”

Overall, Trafton said a big part of thrifting’s appeal is the character it gives people. Consumers may not want to own the same items as their friends, he added, and thrifting allows them to choose items that stand out.

“It’s the thrill of the hunt. I always have this checklist in my head that I have to find. If I found something like a vintage Coach wallet, I would die,” Trafton said. “It’s an activity… You can go and find anything, and that’s what’s so exciting about it. For example, you can go today and find nothing, or you can go today and find a Cartier plate. And I think that kind of thing is really cool and exciting. It makes it more interesting than just regular shopping.”

Thrift store chains feel the impact of social media

The appeal of frugality isn’t limited to social media. Stores are seeing first-hand a cultural shift around frugality, and it shows in the numbers.

Popular thrift store chain Goodwill is seeing an increase in donations, foot traffic and sales, Oney Crowley, chief marketing officer for Goodwill Industries International, told USA TODAY. More than 150 individual organizations collectively operate more than 3,400 retail stores and outlet centers, and revenue for the entire Goodwill network last year increased by a record $7 billion, or about 7% from the previous year, he said.

Other stores are also affected. At Salvation Army, the regional thrift store’s website saw a 55% year-over-year increase in website visitors on both its search page and monthly loyalty coupon page, and online sales in certain regions were up 50% year-over-year, the company told USA TODAY.

These increases indicate a new attitude toward frugality, Crowley said. Ten years ago, she says, thrifting and buying second-hand had some correlation to necessity. Now it has become a more well-known choice, driven by people’s individuality and values ​​that demonstrate support for sustainability.

“It was like a must-do and a must-do, so I never told anyone that my clothes were second-hand. But now it’s almost a badge of honor,” Crowley said. “It’s a way of thinking that makes you loud and proud that you’re circular and that you’re environmentally conscious.”

Crowley credits the surge in popularity in part to social media, which he said has brought in different demographics to the store, including resellers, customers who buy items from thrift stores and sell them for a profit. Resale is not a new phenomenon, and both resellers and Goodwill’s core shoppers help people choose second-hand items by promoting thrift, she said.

“There are a lot of platforms today where people can easily sell, whether it’s live auctions or other platforms where you can make money from things you don’t need, and from a Goodwill perspective, we think it’s just part of a broader circular economy ecosystem,” Crowley said.

Savings boom changes culture on resale sites

One of those platforms, Depop, an online marketplace for reselling clothing and items, is also feeling the force of cultural change, Steve Doerr, the company’s senior director of brand + creative, wrote in an email to USA TODAY. People are turning to sites like Depop to buy second-hand goods without going to the store, and Dool believes this is also due to customers’ desire to be sustainable.

More than three in five purchases on the site are replaced by new purchases on other sites, he added, and most buyers say they’d rather keep looking for used items or skip the purchase altogether rather than buy new. Additionally, resale allows some people to cover expenses such as bills, and purchasing supports second-hand goods while connecting users directly with consumers, Doerr wrote.

“In-person recycling and online recycling are not competing practices, but complementary practices. Members of our community who own or work in thrift stores say they often receive more used inventory than they can realistically sell,” Doerr wrote. “Therefore, providing more options to bring a second-hand clothes-first mindset to more people is the ultimate victory in our goal of making fashion circular, whether online or in the real world.”

Goodwill’s Crowley acknowledges that some consumers aren’t thrilled about the increased number of people looking for the best used items, but the change remains a positive no matter why people shop.

“The good thing about this is that there’s a general awareness of frugality, right?” Crowley said. “Because when you have resellers and influencers selling online or highlighting thrifty items they find online and talking about how they save money, it kind of normalizes thrifting, but also glorifies it as a new core approach to the way we shop today.”

Kate Perez covers national trends and breaking news for USA TODAY. You can reach her at kperez@usatodayco.com or X @katecperez_.

Despite the health implications, daylight saving time is still here. Here’s why:

0

play

Daylight saving time is here again, and according to some studies, the time change can have negative health effects. Still, the practice of changing clocks twice a year continues.

On Sunday, March 8th, at 2 a.m., clocks will be “advanced” by one hour. This means that most Americans “lose” an hour of sleep.

The idea of ​​daylight saving time goes back more than 100 years and was essentially created to conserve energy by increasing sunlight in the evenings. This adjustment was officially adopted in World War I.

This practice was observed intermittently over the next several years. According to the Department of Transportation, the Uniform Time Act of 1966 established legal requirements for daylight saving time. The current March to November system began in 2007.

Despite attempts by Congress to abolish or adjust daylight saving time, the practice remains in effect throughout the country except for Hawaii, most of Arizona, the Virgin Islands, Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, and American Samoa.

Here’s a look at the health effects of daylight saving time and why it’s still happening.

The negative health effects of daylight saving time

According to John Hopkins University, the transition to changing clocks could lead to an increased risk of heart attack and stroke.

Increased production of inflammatory markers in response to mood disorders, hospitalization, and stress may also be attributable to this change, the university reported.

Additionally, you are more likely to have a car accident. Researchers at the University of Colorado Boulder and the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle, Washington, found a 6% increased risk of fatal accidents after making the switch, according to a 2020 study.

Why is transition associated with so many negative health effects? According to Johns Hopkins, sunlight is the most powerful synchronizer of our circadian rhythms, or body clocks.

Adam P. Spira, a mental health professor at the university, told the Bloomberg School of Public Health in 2023 that exposure to light near bedtime can make it harder to fall asleep at your normal bedtime, resulting in less sleep.

“We function best when our sleep-wake cycles follow the sun. When it gets dark, we get sleepy because of the release of melatonin. In the spring, we switch to daylight saving time, which increases the amount of light we are exposed to in the evening,” he said.

How sleep deprivation affects our health

It has long been known that sleep deprivation has negative effects on health. According to Johns Hopkins University, it can lead to decreased cardiovascular health, increased rates of diabetes and obesity, poor mental health, and decreased cognitive ability.

Children and shift workers heading to school in the dark hours of the morning are most at risk, as are people living on the western edge of the time zone, the university reported.

Why do we still observe daylight saving time? Will it change?

In recent years, politicians have attempted to change daylight saving time laws. In 2018, then-Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) introduced a bill to amend the Uniform Time Act of 1966. This bill would make daylight saving time the new permanent standard time. The bill has since been reintroduced several times without success.

Another more recent bill, the Daylight Saving Time Act of 2026, aims to “permanently adjust American time,” the bill says. The bill, introduced by Rep. Greg Steube (R-Fla.) in early February, would move the U.S. time zones forward by 30 minutes and leave them there permanently.

President Donald Trump has not made any recent statements about an eventual end to the time exchange. However, in March 2025 he said: “When something is a 50-50 issue, it’s hard to get excited about it.

“I think people want more light later on, but some people want more light earlier on because they don’t want to take their kids to school in the dark…That’s something I can do, too, but a lot of people like it in one way and a lot of people like it in another way.”

A month later, President Trump asked X to “push for a brighter day at the end of the day.”

Tips for adjusting to daylight savings time

For now, most Americans have to change their clocks on Sundays. However, the American Academy of Sleep Medicine offers tips for preparing for daylight saving time on its website. They include:

  • Gradually adjust your sleep and wake times by moving your bedtime 15 to 20 minutes earlier each night before making the change.
  • On Saturday, March 7th, I will set my clocks forward one hour and go to bed on time.
  • Get outside early in the morning and soak up some sunshine on Sunday, March 8th. Exposure to sunlight can help set a new morning routine.

Michelle Del Rey is a trending news reporter for USA TODAY. Please contact mdelrey@usatoday.com.

Congress stands between President Trump and emergency funding for Iran war

0


Capitol Hill is largely in the dark about what the influx of emergency funding for the Iran war will look like. But President Trump will have to get through Democrats, who are already divided on how to proceed.

play

WASHINGTON – Capitol Hill is bracing for an imminent request from President Donald Trump for billions of dollars in emergency cash to fund the escalating war with Iran.

A week into the conflict, Congressional leaders, including top Republican appropriators in the Senate and House, have said publicly that a request is almost certain to be filed. But exactly how much money the White House will ask for, when President Trump will ask for it, and what Republicans will do to sweeten the deal are open questions.

But one thing is certain: If Trump wants more money, it will have to go through at least some Democrats.

They already seem to disagree about what they can do. Some, including progressives such as Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), have vowed to vote against such a question before seeing it, arguing that the Pentagon is well-funded thanks to the passage of a “big, beautiful bill” and a defense spending bill that totals more than $830 billion a year.

“Republicans have already given $1 trillion to the military,” Warren told USA TODAY. “Nobody knows how much money is flying around there and where it’s being spent.”

Others, including Rhode Island Sen. Jack Reed, the top Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee, say they need to know more details before making a decision.

“We’ll have to see what they want,” he told USA TODAY.

The extent to which this chasm widens or disappears will be a crucial variable in the coming weeks in determining whether any additional funding bill except Certainty survives the narrow margins in the House and, more importantly, the 60-vote threshold in the Senate (in which Senate Republicans hold 53 of 100 seats).

Infighting among members of Congress could only get worse as regional wars escalate, potentially putting the U.S. military at greater risk and increasing the burden on Congress to ensure the U.S. military has the resources it needs.

At the same time, public opinion polls show that a majority of Americans are dissatisfied with the conflict. As the situation becomes bloodier, public pressure could build in the opposite direction, prompting lawmakers to push harder toward de-escalation rather than digging deeper into government coffers.

All of this is happening in a midterm election year, when voting by members of Congress is always closely monitored.

Although it’s early days, the war could cost taxpayers as much as $1 billion a day, according to some estimates, Rep. Steny Hoyer (D-Md.), the House’s most senior Democrat, told USA TODAY. He did not say in the telegram how he would vote on the additional war spending bill, but said that no matter how much additional funding the Trump administration requests, it would be “a huge amount.”

“I’m not going to prejudge what I’m going to do,” he said.

Promoting agricultural subsidies?

The degree of Democratic (and Republican) support for an influx of war funds may depend on how large the bill becomes. Every time a must-pass bill passes Congress, it can grow as other policy priorities are added.

A senior Republican aide told USA TODAY that Sen. John Boozman (R-Arkansas), the Republican chairman of the Senate committee that oversees agriculture, is considering pushing an agricultural aid measure that could be attached to a supplemental defense spending bill. Producers of staple crops stymied by President Trump’s steep tariffs and widespread market disruption are pleading with agricultural state lawmakers in Congress for help.

However, potential add-ons are not yet decided. House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana) and other Republican Congressional leaders are leaving open their options on how to approach additional defense spending as they await further direction from the Pentagon and White House.

“Of course, further details remain to be determined, such as how long the operation will last and what it will entail,” Prime Minister Boris Johnson told reporters after a briefing on the situation in the Middle East on March 3.

The next day, in the halls of the Capitol, he said a war spending bill would only be passed “if it is appropriate and has the appropriate amount.”

Zachary Schermele is a Congressional reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach me by email at zschermele@usatoday.com. Follow him at @ZachSchermele on X and @zachschermele.bsky.social on Bluesky..

44% of Americans lie about their nationality abroad

0


The Send My Bag survey reveals that many U.S. travelers hide their nationality abroad to avoid politics and stereotypes.

play

“Where are you from?”

This is a common question travelers get, but some Americans prefer not to be asked at all, as they want to keep their nationality a secret while abroad.

In a February 2026 survey by global shipping company Send My Bag, 44% of 1,000 U.S. adult respondents between the ages of 18 and 45 said they had lied about being American while abroad. Of those, 28% said they sometimes lie, and 16% admitted to lying regularly.

“Telling little lies to avoid awkward conversations is not uncommon. What we’re seeing here is that young Americans are choosing to blend in while traveling, choosing to focus on their own experiences rather than being consulted on the administration’s policies,” Adam Ewart, founder and CEO of Send My Bag, told USA TODAY in an email. “Europe is a top destination for Americans. They come for the food, culture and history, not to discuss whether Greenland is about to be annexed.”

They are concerned about how they are viewed as Americans abroad and do not want to face hostility or unwanted attention from others with strong political views. He said, “To reduce tensions and avoid potential conflict, Americans may choose another nationality.”

Do American tourists misbehave?

Some try to avoid standing out as stereotypes of loud, obnoxious Americans. American tourists often get a bad reputation, but it’s not all bad reviews.

Gallup Iceland surveyed 427 tourism professionals from the travel platform Guide to Iceland between December 2025 and January 2026 about their experiences dealing with tourists, including those from the United States, Germany, China, and Canada.

Survey results show that Americans engage in a wide range of travel behaviors. Although they are rated the easiest to communicate with, they are also the second most likely to ignore safety and environmental guidelines and cause “service challenges” such as delays and complaints.

“As one of Iceland’s largest tourist groups,[Americans]have a very wide range of travel styles and expectations,” Guide to Iceland CEO Ingolfur Şahin told USA TODAY. “They have a high level of English proficiency, so communication is easy, but their large numbers and diverse travel habits mean more problems may be reported simply due to higher volume.”

It may be up to the individual traveler to break the stereotype. “Good travelers are curious, respectful and prepared,” he continued. “They follow local guidelines, respect nature and local communities, and take the time to understand the places they visit.”

States cut HIV drug programs due to budget shortfalls

0

Cracks are beginning to show in the finances that are at the heart of the country’s efforts to combat the HIV epidemic.

The Ryan White AIDS Drug Assistance Program has helped more than 250,000 Americans living with HIV obtain lifesaving medications, health insurance, or both. But funding pressures are forcing 18 states to cut costs, putting the care of thousands of Americans living with HIV at risk, according to an analysis by the health policy nonprofit KFF.

Five other states are considering changes to expand limited funding for the Ryan White Assistance Program, known as ADAP, according to KFF.

These states have enacted or are considering changes, and some experts worry more states will follow suit. Program cuts would not only harm some of the 1.2 million Americans living with HIV, but without drugs to suppress the virus, people could become sicker and spread the virus to others.

“We’re concerned about all states,” said Tim Horn, director of drug access for the National Association of State and Territorial AIDS Directors. “Sometimes it seems like budget deficits appear out of thin air.”

What is the Ryan White ADAP Program?

The federally funded Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program provides funding to state-based ADAPs to pay for medication and insurance for people living with HIV. ADAP also received other sources of income, such as state funds and pharmaceutical rebates.

The National Alliance of State and Territorial AIDS Directors and KFF said several factors are putting pressure on state-based ADAP programs.

Rising costs of HIV drugs and health insurance are straining national programs. These programs have also seen a surge in people seeking assistance. Meanwhile, Congressional funding for Ryan White’s program has remained flat in recent years.

In 2024, these state programs will serve more than 257,000 people, a 30% increase from 2022, according to statistics from the National Association of State and Territorial AIDS Directors.

This program primarily targets low-income groups. Almost one in four people living with HIV receives services from the ADAP program.

Horn said the surge in enrollment came as the federal government resumed Medicaid eligibility screening, which had been suspended during the coronavirus pandemic. HIV patients who no longer qualify for Medicaid now rely on their state’s ADAP to pay for their medications, insurance premiums, or both.

Other federal health policy changes placed additional pressure on ADAP. Congress did not extend the Affordable Care Act’s enhanced subsidies that lower consumers’ spending on insurance plans. ACA plans are more expensive this year, with the expiration of enhanced tax credits causing average insurance costs for consumers to jump 114%, according to a KFF analysis.

More pressure is coming. President Donald Trump’s tax cuts and spending bill is expected to cut federal spending on Medicaid by more than $900 billion over the next 10 years. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates that the law could leave millions of Americans uninsured over that period.

These states are tightening qualifications

Florida enacted changes expected to cut aid to an estimated 10,000 to 16,000 residents. Florida has significantly lowered the income limits for the program.

Florida previously expanded eligibility to people earning up to 400% of the federal poverty level, or $63,840 a year. Currently, Florida is reducing residents who earn more than 130% of the federal poverty level, or $20,748 per year.

Florida’s program also excludes Bictarvy, the most widely prescribed HIV drug. A one-month supply of the drug for the uninsured costs an average of $5,132, according to GoodRx.

The Florida Department of Health said changes to the program were needed to prevent a budget gap of more than $120 million.

Florida’s changes are “probably the most severe, but other states have also reduced income eligibility,” said Jennifer Kates, KFF’s senior vice president and director of the Global Public Health Policy Program.

ADAP programs in Pennsylvania, Kansas, Delaware and Rhode Island have changed income eligibility limits, according to the National Bureau of State and Territorial AIDS Directors. Changes enacted by other states include reducing funding for health care services, conducting biannual eligibility tests, and implementing annual or monthly spending caps per enrollee.

No state imposes a waiting list. This is a tactic commonly used in the early 2000s, when too many people with too little money turned to ADAP for help. The administrations of Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama had to approve emergency funding to reduce waiting lists, Cates said.

Thuff KFF said no national program has placed people on a waiting list in the past 10 years. (erase However) states have sometimes used other cost-cutting strategies.

Cates said Florida’s changes represent a “new level of restrictions that we haven’t seen in a while.”

Why advocates are concerned about cuts to HIV services

Experts say cuts to HIV drugs and other aid could put more Americans at risk for the disease.

More than 39,000 U.S. residents will have been diagnosed with HIV as of 2023, although the number of cases remains well below the levels reached in the 1990s, according to statistics from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. According to the CDC, nearly 4,500 deaths in 2023 will be caused by HIV, the virus that weakens the immune system and causes AIDS.

People with HIV who take antiretroviral drugs usually stay healthy, Cates said, and boosting their viral load to undetectable levels can also protect their sexual partners from infection.

But that could change if people no longer have access to HIV drugs.

“If a person’s viral load increases because they don’t have their medication or their access to it is unstable, they could be transmitting HIV to their partner,” Cates said.

Researchers at the University of California, San Diego estimated the potential impact of Florida’s ADAP cuts on people living in Miami-Dade County. Approximately one in three new HIV infections in the county are diagnosed in Florida.

UCSD researchers estimate that of the 7,400 Miami-Dade residents currently receiving ADAP services, 3,700 would no longer qualify under Florida’s enhanced restrictions.

Natasha Martin, a UCSD professor and associate director of global public health, said this lack of coverage could result in 1,000 new HIV cases in Miami-Dade County over the next five years.

The lifetime cost of treating a person with HIV is just over $1 million, so researchers estimate that ADAP eligibility cuts could cost an additional $1 billion to treat an additional 1,000 Miami-Dade County residents with HIV.

“It doesn’t make economic sense,” Martin said. “As a result of these changes, we will be paying billions of dollars to care for people newly infected with HIV.”

Raiders must acquire ace in NFL free agency and draft

0

play

John Spytek probably has a lot of work to do to get the Las Vegas Raiders house in order before the arrival of Fernando Mendoza.

While he didn’t specifically name the Heisman Trophy winner and expected No. 1 pick in this year’s NFL Draft, the general manager spent last week at the NFL Scouting Combine pondering all the fundamentals to have in place before drafting a rookie quarterback.

“You want to limit the amount of pressure on that guy from the beginning,” Spytek said. “…Obviously a great offensive line, run game. All of those things could limit his chances of really getting done. And there’s also a great defense. Because I think it helps if he doesn’t have to feel like he has to score 35 points every week.”

So… about that…

After agreeing to trade five-time Pro Bowl defensive end Maxx Crosby to the Baltimore Ravens on Friday night, the Raiders now have an unparalleled resource to change their long-term fortunes. Not only does Las Vegas now boast 11 picks in the 2026 NFL Draft, but the team’s spending power has increased to a league-high $121.7 million, according to Over the Cap.

But despite all the potential for change that awaits the franchise over the next seven weeks, the move also cemented the Silver and Black as the least entrenched roster in the league entering NFL free agency next week. And after last year’s failed attempt at returning to relevance, Spytek and co-owner Tom Brady will need to prove they can put the right pieces together for a pretty impressive build going forward.

Brady, in particular, needs to make the same second-year leap in the personnel world as he did in the broadcast booth.

It’s too early to judge last year’s draft class, but it’s clear that Spytek and Brady had a disastrous first offseason at the helm of an NFL franchise. According to The Athletic, Brady resisted the idea of ​​signing Sam Darnold, who would go on to win Super Bowl 60 with the Seattle Seahawks. The Raiders’ trade for Geno Smith initially raised hopes that the new system would establish at least some baseline ability, but the veteran signal-caller continued to pace the NFL in interceptions (17) and sacks (55). No. 6 overall pick Ashton Giunty was left with little room after a disappointing rookie season, and the team’s other first-year players also struggled to find their way.

This dynamic resulted in head coach Pete Carroll being fired after just one year, and the organization embarking on another serious reset. The Raiders tore through defenses in releasing Crosby, whose performance and dedication set a bar that no one else in the organization came close to. Spytek and Brady have extra ammunition to shore up Mendoza’s offensive support, but the quarterback may find himself in too many high-scoring situations where his team is ill-suited to keep pace.

And the Raiders have plenty of experience getting burned by flashy offseason moves.

Spending on big names has never been an issue for a team that has whiffed on players like Christian Wilkins, Chandler Jones and Jimmy Garoppolo. But his draft record is even scarier than his run into free agency. Former general manager Mike Mayock’s whiffs in 2020 (Henry Ruggs III, Damon Arnette) and 2021 (Crelin Ferrell, Josh Jacobs, Jonathan Abram) served as a reminder that having multiple first-round picks doesn’t guarantee a difference-maker. And perhaps no other organization has profited less from as many top-100 prospects as Mark Davis’ crew.

So where do Brady and Spytech go from here, and how does the Crosby trade change offseason plans? Let’s take a look:

Raiders’ NFL free agent plans: Which top players should they sign?

Due to the wide range of needs, the Raiders are expected to be linked with just about every big name on the open market. But two players stand out above the rest: center Tyler Linderbaum and wide receiver Alec Pierce.

Linderbaum, the top true free agent on Nate Davis’ Top 100 rankings, should command market-setting compensation after earning his third straight Pro Bowl berth last season with the Baltimore Ravens. While some teams may not be willing to splurge at the position, equipping Mendoza with a savvy pivot could be one of the quickest ways to ease his adjustment to the NFL. There are so many weaknesses on the Raiders’ front that they may need to double-bottom a high-priced veteran.

Meanwhile, Pierce led the NFL in yards per catch for the second year in a row and appears to be on track to earn a significant amount of money. His proven downfield ability will certainly appeal to offenses struggling to get by amidst rampant protection issues. But he’s also thought to be leading a serious bidding war, and the Raiders will have to consider what price range they’re comfortable with. Reuniting first-year coach Clint Kubiak and speedster Rashid Shahid could also be considered. But with another early pick, the Raiders might not need to be so aggressive here.

Now that Crosby is gone, will the Raiders try to sign a big name off the cliff? It won’t be possible to replace him with a free agent, but there are some interesting options in a seriously underpowered front seven. Jaylan Phillips is the most appealing prospect, and Las Vegas could afford to pay a high price for the extremely talented 26-year-old. With the defense switching to a 3-4 format, Odafe Oweh and Boye Mafe could also be catalysts.

With Crosby gone, it could become even more important for the team to bring in a few solid starters, as the Raiders don’t have a position on defense that can shake off additional help.

And while the team’s future will be built through the draft, performing well in free agency will be critical to building the framework for the kind of success that was lacking for last year’s rookies.

Raiders’ NFL Draft Picks: Where could the team potentially go after the Crosby trade?

With the No. 14 overall pick, the Raiders could be in the best position to address the aforementioned challenges at receiver and along the offensive line.

Las Vegas is slated to take USC wide receiver Makai Lemon in USA TODAY Sports’ latest NFL mock draft. He would certainly be a smart weapon to pair with tight end Brock Bowers, as well as Arizona State’s Jordyn Tyson. And the possibility of Mendoza reuniting with Indiana receiver Omar Cooper Jr. is sure to at least be talked about.

But if the Raiders are still frustrated before the draft, they may find a solution early on. The team could be ready to pounce if Miami’s Francis Mauigoa or Utah’s Spencer Fano go down, and either player would be valued at right tackle or guard. On the other hand, Penn State’s Olaiba Vega-Ioane could solidify a shaky interior and could easily end up at No. 14 overall.

However, finding a replacement for Crosby may be difficult. The top three edge rushers in Arbel Reese, David Bailey and Reuben Bayne Jr. will all be gone by the time the Raiders make the No. 2 pick, and there may not be any worthy replacements at that point in the draft. Oklahoma State’s R. Mason Thomas, Missouri’s Zion Young and Illinois’ Gabe Jacus could all draw attention on Day 2.

How long will each state’s $1 million retirement benefit last?

0

play

$1 million is an ambitious goal for retirement savings, celebrated in articles about 401(k) millionaires and threads on Reddit.

But $1 million is not what it used to be. According to a 2025 study by Northwestern Mutual, only 36% of American billionaires currently consider themselves wealthy.

“$1 million sounds like a nice number,” says Rudri Bhatt Patel, a certified financial health counselor and retirement expert at GOBanking Rates. But, she said, “We’re not living in the 1950s.”

A new report from personal finance site GOBankingRates tallies how long $1 million in retirement savings will last in each U.S. state in 2026.

Simply put, it’s not long enough.

The analysis found that the average retiree in each state will spend $1 million within 20 years, based on average annual spending for retirees in each region.

And longevity studies show that many Americans will live at least 20 years after retirement.

How much money do you need to save for retirement to be “wealthy”?

Whatever “wealthy” means today, research shows that it means having assets of $1 million or more. In the latest Charles Schwab Modern Wealth Survey, starting in 2025, consumers set their wealth threshold at a net worth of $2.3 million.

Most retirees don’t have that much savings. The average household between the ages of 65 and 75 has about $200,000 in retirement accounts, according to the 2022 Federal Consumer Finance Survey.

GOBankingRates suggests that if you want your money to last, it’s wise to retire in the Southeast or Great Plains. The most affordable retirement states are Oklahoma and Mississippi, where $1 million lasts about 19 years, followed by Alabama, where it lasts 18.5 years.

“People generally don’t think of Oklahoma or West Virginia or Kansas as places of interest for retirees,” Patel said. However, all three states rank among the five least expensive states for retirement benefits, the study found.

The report uses average annual spending for people 65 and older based on federal survey data and adjusted for each state based on local cost of living. To find out how much $1 million is, the researchers divided that total by each state’s average annual spending.

From an investor’s perspective, this estimate is conservative. That doesn’t take into account the $1 million you could earn in your IRA by investing in stocks and bonds. If your investment return exceeds the rate of inflation, your $1 million will last longer than this report estimates.

It’s also worth noting that many retirees can get by with less than $1 million in the bank. Many households make ends meet solely on Social Security.

Where will Americans retire? According to AARP’s 2025 report, the top five destinations for Americans moving to retire in 2024 are Massachusetts, followed by Florida, Illinois, Kentucky and North Carolina.

Here’s how long $1 million lasts in the top retirement states

If you’re planning on retiring in one of these states, here’s how long $1 million could last you in each state.

  • Massachusetts: 10.8 years. The annual cost of living in Massachusetts is $92,639, making it the second most expensive state for retirees.
  • Florida: 16.4 years. Retirees in Florida face annual costs of $61,125, ranking 31st among the most affordable states.
  • Illinois: 17 years. Illinois ranks 24th in affordability, with an annual cost of living of $58,913.
  • Kentucky: 17.7 years. Kentucky’s annual cost of $56,456 ranks it 16th among states with affordable retirement living costs.
  • North Carolina: 16.7 years. North Carolina ranks 26th in affordability, with annual costs of $59,835.

Here are the 10 states where $1 million in retirement lasts the longest

According to GOBankingRates, here are the 10 states where $1 million lasts the longest in retirement, along with each state’s average cost of overall annual expenses and typically the largest category: housing.

  1. Oklahoma: $1 million lasts 19.3 years. Annual expenses average $51,849. Annual housing costs average $8,824.
  2. Mississippi: $1 million lasts 19 years. Annual expenses average $52,524. Annual housing costs average $9,122.
  3. Alabama: $1 million lasts 18.5 years. Annual expenses average $53,999. Annual housing costs average $9,239.
  4. West Virginia: $1 million lasts 18.5 years. Annual expenses average $54,122. Annual housing costs average $9,200.
  5. Kansas: $1 million lasts 18.3 years. Annual expenses average $54,613. Annual housing costs average $10,071.
  6. Missouri: $1 million lasts 18.3 years. Annual expenses average $54,674. Annual housing costs average $10,110.
  7. Arkansas: $1 million lasts 18.2 years. Annual expenses average $54,859. Annual housing costs average $10,123.
  8. Iowa: $1 million lasts 18 years. Annual expenses average $55,473. Annual housing costs average $10,032.
  9. Tennessee: $1 million lasts 18 years. Annual expenses average $55,473. Annual housing costs average $10,786.
  10. Indiana: $1 million lasts 18 years. Annual expenses average $55,657. Annual housing costs average $9,902.

Here are the 10 states with the highest cost of living for retirees

Here are 10 states with $1 million in retirement benefits for the shortest distance.

  1. Hawaii: $1 million lasts for 9.1 years. Annual expenses average $110,393. Annual housing costs average $38,803.
  2. Massachusetts: $1 million lasts 10.8 years. Annual expenses average $92,639. Annual housing costs average $30,265.
  3. California: $1 million lasts 11.9 years. Annual expenses average $83,978. Annual housing costs average $23,625.
  4. Alaska: $1 million lasts 12.8 years. Annual expenses average $78,449. Annual housing costs average $16,387.
  5. New York: $1 million lasts 12.9 years. Annual expenses average $77,773. Annual housing costs average $23,209.
  6. Maryland: $1 million lasts 13.7 years. Annual expenses average $73,043. Annual housing costs average $19,168.
  7. New Jersey: $1 million lasts 14.2 years. Annual expenses average $70,401. Annual housing costs average $18,141.
  8. Main: $1 million will last 14.3 years. Annual expenses average $70,155. Annual housing costs average $18,141.
  9. Connecticut: $1 million lasts 14.3 years. Annual expenses average $70,094. Annual housing costs average $16,127.
  10. Washington: $1 million lasts 14.3 years. Annual expenses average $69,971. Annual housing costs average $15,607.

Here’s how long $1 million lasts in every other state

And here’s how far a million dollars would reach in the remaining 30 states, from longest to shortest.

Texas: 18 years

North Dakota: 18 years

Nebraska: 17.8 years

Georgia, South Dakota, Kentucky: 17.7 years

New Mexico, South Carolina, Louisiana: 17.6 years

Ohio: 17.5 years

Minnesota: 17.3 years

Michigan: 17.2 years

Wyoming: 17.1 years

Illinois: 17 years

Pennsylvania: 16.8 years

North Carolina and Wisconsin: 16.7 years

Nevada: 16.5 years

Idaho, Utah, Florida: 16.4 years

Virginia: 16.3 years

Colorado: 15.9 years

Delaware: 15.8 years

Arizona: 15 years

New Hampshire: 14.9 years

Montana: 14.8 years

Oregon: 14.6 years

Rhode Island: 14.4 years

Vermont: 14.3 years

Why did Trump attack Iran? He posted that he wanted “unconditional surrender!”

0

play

  • The Trump administration has cited several reasons for its military attack on Iran.
  • Stated goals include eliminating immediate threats, destroying missile and nuclear capabilities, and annihilating naval forces.
  • President Trump expects the war to last several weeks. Casualties in the first week include more than 1,200 Iranians and at least six U.S. troops.

A week into the Iran war, the Trump administration has cited several reasons for its attack alongside Israel.

President Donald Trump, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth said they had moved to eliminate the immediate threat, crush missile capabilities and deter nuclear capabilities. Also, although they did not call it a regime change war, they seemed to support regime change.

President Trump said the United States would continue military operations until all objectives were achieved, which he expected would take several weeks. As of March 6, the death toll includes more than 1,200 Iranians, 10 Israelis, and at least six U.S. military personnel.

Sen. Mark Warner, vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said on March 3, “This is a war that Donald Trump has chosen, and we have four different explanations of what our goals are.” However, after the War Powers Resolution was rejected in both houses of Congress this week, Congress chose not to end U.S. involvement in the war.

Why are we at war with Iran? there are many answers

President Trump and Press Secretary Caroline Levitt have set four goals: 1) destroy Iran’s ballistic missiles; 2) Withdraw the navy. 3) Preventing “terrorist proxies” from destabilizing the region. 4) Ensure that Iran never has nuclear weapons.

However, it took a few days for the messages to integrate around that list of goals, and it appears to be still evolving. Here’s what President Trump and some in his administration have said throughout this week.

  • Feb. 28 video update: “Our purpose is to protect the American people by eliminating the immediate threat from the Iranian regime, which is a very tough, very frightening, and evil group of people,” President Trump said. He also said Iran had worked to rebuild after last summer’s attacks. “For these reasons, the U.S. military has embarked on a large-scale, sustained operation to prevent this deeply evil and radical dictatorship from threatening the core national security interests of the United States and our country. We intend to destroy their missiles and completely destroy their missile industry. It will be completely wiped out again… We will guarantee that Iran will not acquire nuclear weapons. This is a very simple message: They will never have nuclear weapons.” President Trump also called on the Iranian people to take over the government once American rule ends.
  • March 1 video update: “The Iranian regime, armed with long-range missiles and nuclear weapons, would pose a terrifying threat to all Americans. We cannot allow a nation that breeds a terrorist army to possess such weapons, allowing them to usurp the world to their evil will,” President Trump said.
  • In remarks at the Medal of Honor ceremony on March 2, President Trump listed four goals, echoed by Levitt later that week: “An Iranian regime armed with long-range missiles and nuclear weapons would pose an intolerable threat not only to the Middle East, but also to the American people. Our country itself would be threatened, and it was on the verge of being threatened.”
  • “This is not a so-called regime change war, but the regime has certainly changed, and the world is better off because of it,” Hegseth said on March 2.
  • Rubio told reporters on March 2 that Israel was planning to attack Iran first. “We knew there was going to be an Israeli move. We knew it would provoke an attack on U.S. forces. We knew there would be more casualties if we didn’t get ahead of the attack and pursue it,” Rubio said. “And we will all be here answering the question, why did we know that and not act?”
  • On March 3, President Trump refuted Rubio’s statements, saying that the United States thought Iran would strike first, saying, “If we didn’t do it, they were going to attack, they were going to attack first… So, if anything, I’m not going to let Israel get away with it.” (“The bottom line is that the president decided we weren’t going to get hit first, it’s that simple, folks,” Rubio said in a press conference, according to Reuters.)
  • On March 4, Mr. Levitt reiterated the four goals that President Trump outlined on March 2 at a press conference, saying, “Iran has rejected a path to peace because the terrorists in charge of this regime want to build nuclear weapons to use against Americans and our allies.” “President Trump made the courageous determination and determination that there was only one outcome for the United States to pursue with Iran: mass death and destruction at the hands of a nuclear-armed terrorist regime. That death, destruction, and blackmail against Iran.” The American people met their end with Operation Epic Fury. ”
  • On March 6, President Trump posted on Truth Social: “There is no agreement with Iran other than unconditional surrender! Then we will elect a great and acceptable leader, and we and our many wonderful and very brave allies and partners will work tirelessly to bring Iran back from the brink of destruction and make it economically bigger, better, and stronger than ever before.”

According to Reuters, Iran denies seeking nuclear weapons and claims it was an unprovoked attack. National security analysts and experts have previously told USA TODAY that Iran’s nuclear and ballistic missile capabilities are either false or greatly exaggerated.

Contributors: Francesca Chambers, Zachary Schermele, Michael Collins, Michael Loria, america today

Kinsey Crowley is a Trump Connect reporter for the USA TODAY Network. Please contact KCrowley@usatodayco.com. follow her X (Twitter), blue sky and TikTok

Satellite images and videos reveal clues

0

The disturbing images quickly spread on social media, first distributed by Iranian state media and republished by news agencies. USA TODAY is not publishing many of these images due to the graphic nature of the content.

It showed destroyed classrooms, bloody backpacks and colorful school supplies strewn across the grounds. Dust covering every surface. Remains of the playground, including a slide, were scattered among piles of concrete rubble. Some of the children’s bodies were found buried under the rubble.

A video taken by a bystander showed a chaotic scene where fires, believed to have been caused by an airstrike, were burning in an adjoining property. After a while, pan to the right and you’ll see a school filled with smoke.

Iranian authorities said that up to 175 people were killed in the airstrike, most of them elementary school girls. This may be the worst known mass casualty incident involving civilians of the war, but USA TODAY was unable to independently verify many details about the incident, including the exact death toll, the identities of those involved, and who was responsible for the attack.

Farzin Nadhimi, an analyst at the Washington Institute who specializes in security and defense issues in Iran and the Persian Gulf region, said the adjacent facility appears to have been associated at some point with an Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps naval base.

Nadimi said the Shajareh Tayebeh school, which translates into “sacred tree” in English, is part of a network of 32 schools across southern Iran with ties to the Revolutionary Guards. A clinic and cultural center were also located on the premises. Nadimi said the compound appears to have been used at one point as a support base for the Assef Brigade, a naval unit of the Revolutionary Guards, but has since partially or completely changed its purpose.

The New York Times and the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation reported that bystander video and signs on Google Street View link the facility to Iran’s Naval Medical Command. USA TODAY confirmed this using Google Translate.

Historical satellite imagery shows that the school building may have been part of the site in 2013, and the walls were constructed by 2016.

Determining exactly what happened at the school is hampered by the absence of identifiable weapon fragments and the fact that independent journalists have no access to the scene.

However, open source researchers worked quickly to confirm the authenticity of images and videos related to the strike. And a visual investigation by The New York Times, Canadian Broadcasting Corporation and Al Jazeera revealed key details. Satellite images taken by Planet Labs PBC and Vantor confirmed damage to the school, buildings on nearby grounds, and other locations.

Reuters and the Wall Street Journal reported that US military investigators believe it is “likely” that a girls’ school in southern Iran was attacked by US forces. The report cited anonymous US sources.

White House deputy press secretary Anna Kelly said of the report: “This investigation is ongoing. No conclusions have been reached at this time. Reuters’ assertion otherwise is irresponsible and false.” “As we have stated, unlike the terrorist regime in Iran, the United States does not target civilians.” U.S. Central Command declined to comment.

Minab is more than 900 miles from Tehran and close to the strategically important Strait of Hormuz, a key commercial shipping route, especially for oil. U.S. officials suggested in public statements that they were attacking the area on the day the school was attacked. In addition to the Minab site associated with the Revolutionary Guards, satellite images show the destruction of neighboring military sites in Bandar Abbas and Konark.

play

175 people killed in school strike in Iran. doubts remain

Investigators are looking into whether the building’s proximity to other nearby facilities may have played a role in the deadly explosion.

As more information about the attack emerged, Iranian officials blamed the United States and Israel. U.S. defense officials said they were investigating the incident. Israel said it was not aware of any attacks in the area and was also investigating what happened.

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Dan Kaine suggested in a press conference on March 4 that the United States carried out attacks in the neighborhood. Shining a laser pointer on a map showing the regional impact, Kaine explained that U.S. forces are concentrated in Israel in southern Iran and northern Iran.

“Along the southern axis, the USS Abraham Lincoln Strike Group continues to provide pressure from the sea along the southeast side of the coast, draining naval capabilities along the straits to the Arabian Gulf,” Cain said. Satellite images from Planet Labs show damage to other IRGC naval bases in the region.

An analysis by the International Institute for Strategic Studies said U.S. efforts are focused on southern and central Iran, while Israel is focused on the north.

On March 3, funerals for those killed in the attack were held, with hundreds of mourners filling the streets. It was broadcast on Iranian state television. Drone video showed rows of new graves being dug at a nearby cemetery.

Video footage from the funeral showed a coffin draped in the flag of the Islamic Republic of Iran being carried through the crowd. A portion of the video’s narration, which was translated into English, described the grief of the parents as they mourned their daughter.

Iranian state media reported the names of the 57 victims, but did not reveal their ages or their relationship to the school.

  • Hana Deghani
  • Fatemeh Sarali
  • Reza Habeshian
  • aliya bahadri
  • Ali Asghar Zayeri
  • Zahra Bahrami
  • Ahmad Soltani
  • Hamed Palash Nezad
  • Mahdis Nazari
  • Athena Chamani Nezad
  • Amir Kasem Zayeri
  • Fatemeh Deraj
  • Arad Ahmadzadeh
  • saman karimzadeh
  • Fatemeh Shadadi
  • nadia shamiri
  • parham ranjibari
  • Mahmoud Gholamiani
  • Fatemeh Radar
  • Amirhossein Rassouli Soleimani
  • Zahra Belugi
  • Mohammad Khatam Raisi
  • Asuna Raishi
  • Benjamin Jungu
  • Mohammad Sadra Zarei
  • Mariam Pazarak
  • Liana Mohammadi
  • mandana salary
  • Sarah Scheiste
  • Zoha Pasand
  • Asli Zakeri
  • Salma Zakeri
  • Fatemeh Taherifard
  • Zahra Ansari
  • Fatemeh Fadavi
  • mana zaray
  • Atare Zarei
  • Alireza Zaray
  • Mohammadreza Shahasavari
  • Samira Besarde
  • Ethan Salemi Near
  • Fatemeh Zahra Karimi
  • Zeinab Bahrami
  • mohammad shah dosti
  • Reza Barani
  • Athena Ahmadzadeh
  • Khadija Darvisi
  • Rogai Karimi
  • Reza Ranjibar
  • marzi basili fur
  • Mohammad Mahdi Cheghini Nia
  • Muhammad Baharami
  • Ali Akbar Kriyani Pak
  • Hanane Madika
  • Fereshte Sangarzadeh
  • muhammad ali kriyani pak
  • Partha Mokhtari Nasab

This is a developing story and may be updated.

Contributors: Josh Meyer, Camille Fine, Shawn J. Sullivan

Why Americans are cutting trade, cutting spending, and rethinking

0

play

Rising prices are a reality for many Americans, and it’s hitting them hard.

Shoppers are becoming increasingly fatigued by inflation and tariffs, and are changing where and how they spend their money, according to new research.

In Simon-Kucher’s survey, only about one-third of respondents said they understood the impact of tariffs. But “the main benefit for consumers remains simple: prices are rising and households are paying the price,” the study said.

Another study from the Kearney Institute found that shoppers aren’t just shopping less. They are reallocating spend across categories, price points, and channels.

For example, 54% have reduced eating out and 44% have reduced their clothing purchases, with 21% purchasing recycled or resale apparel and 37% substituting cheaper brands.

Shoppers are exhausted by soaring prices

Since the start of the 2020 coronavirus pandemic, U.S. consumers have experienced what Shikha Jain, partner and head of North American consumer at Simon Kuchar, calls a “permanent crisis,” or a state of permanent crisis and constant economic fluctuation. First there’s supply chain uncertainty, then tariffs, and now more geopolitical events that can impact costs, including oil and gas prices, Jain told USA TODAY.

“After years of continued pressure, consumers are not only adapting to high prices, they are becoming exhausted by them,” the commercial strategy consulting firm’s report said. “Even a modest increase can seem heavier than it really is because of the added financial burden that has accrued over the years.”

In the 2025 U.S. Consumer Tariff Market Survey, conducted monthly from February through 2025, 78% of consumers said they had been affected either somewhat or overwhelmingly by inflation over the past three years.

The report, which surveyed 2,000 people, also consistently said women felt price pressure more acutely than men.

The report said consumers will notice further price increases in the second half of 2025, with 60% of shoppers saying electronics cost more. The report said shoppers also noticed increases in prices for food, clothing and household goods throughout the year.

Shoppers are becoming increasingly price-sensitive

Jain said 80% of consumers surveyed by Simon Kuchar were concerned about continued inflation and said they were “starting to feel that prices are too high.”

“People are most accepting of a 5% price increase,” Jain said. “They then begin to evaluate their purchase decision by either reducing the price to a cheaper alternative, waiting for a promotion, or not purchasing at all.”

Jain said retailers tend to hold prices steady for essential items, such as pantry staples, while raising prices on items and categories that are less price-sensitive to shoppers.

Some people may want a particular type of peanut butter or chocolate, and may buy those “favorites” regardless of the price increase, Jain said.

At the same time, some brands and products will become more willing to compromise on brand, price, and quality as consumers reduce prices to private labels and lower-priced versions.

Coronavirus, inflation and tariffs reshaping behavior

Jain said consumer behavior often changes during times of macroeconomic crisis.

The coronavirus pandemic and shutdowns pushed consumers to order and deliver online, first out of necessity and second out of convenience, she said.

Meanwhile, tariffs are increasing prices for products, especially from heavily tariffed countries in East Asia, Jain said. As a result, consumers are starting to embrace the idea of ​​upcycling, recycling and saving more, Jain said.

Only time will tell whether the new shopping behavior sticks, she says.

Consumers may seem “confused” but are dissatisfied

For more than a year, consumers have been told that they are “selective, cautious, and discerning,” and that they splurge selectively, writes Katie Thomas, director of the Carney Consumer Research Institute, in a recent study titled “Consumers in Disarray: Managing a Fragmented Consumer Base.”

Research shows that the fragmented behavior of “shopping as a form of comfort, consistency, and control” while struggling financially can be disruptive.

The study surveyed 24,000 consumers worldwide and 2,000 in the United States for the latest quarterly report.

“While consumers have a variety of views on tariffs and their specific impact, nearly all consumers are dissatisfied with prices that appear to continue to rise. 57% of consumers cited inflation and affordability as their top economic concern,” Thomas told USA TODAY.

Another recent study from the Kearney Institute investigated how consumers in both legs of the K-economy, typically used to represent both economically well-off and needy households, behave erratically.

Low-income consumers are splurging selectively while cutting back on necessities, while high-income consumers are slashing food prices while splurging on experiences.

Betty Lin-Fisher is a consumer reporter for USA TODAY. Contact her at blinfisher@USATODAY.com or follow her at @blinfisher on X, Facebook and Instagram and @blinfisher.bsky.social on Bluesky.. Sign up for our free The Daily Money newsletter, breaking down complex consumer and financial news. Subscribe here.

How much can seniors save with new tax credits?

0


That could make a noticeable difference in your tax refund this year.

If you’re 65 or older, you could potentially get an even bigger tax refund this year thanks to the new senior tax credit. While not everyone is eligible, those who qualify could see their tax bill reduced by $6,000 this year ($12,000 for married couples), which could lead to significant savings.

The exact amount you can save will depend on your income and what other deductions you qualify for, but we already have a rough idea of ​​what a difference this new senior tax credit will make to the average person’s retirement taxes.

How much will the new senior tax credit save you?

According to a June 2025 report from the Council of Economic Advisers, the new $6,000 senior tax credit would add an additional $670 to after-tax income for the average eligible senior. If both spouses qualify for the deduction, the final amount would double to $1,340.

Note that this deduction is in addition to the standard deduction based on your tax filing status and the additional standard deduction for seniors. For the 2025 tax year, the latter is worth $2,000 per single adult and $1,600 per married senior.

Along with other tax credits and credits you qualify for, a significant portion of your annual income can be exempt from taxation. As a result, your tax bill may be reduced or your refund may be larger.

But without filing a return, it’s hard to say exactly how much savings the new deduction will provide. Your accounting or tax preparation software will do the calculations and apply the appropriate deductions.

Not everyone is eligible for the new elderly deduction

The new senior citizen tax credit is only available to people age 65 and older with a valid Social Security number. Married couples must also file jointly to claim the deduction.

There are also income limits. In 2025, single adults may not earn more than $75,000 to claim the full credit. For married couples, this limit is $150,000. For every $1,000 you earn above these amounts, your deduction will be reduced by $60. It will be phased out completely for single adults with incomes of $175,000 or more and married couples with incomes of $250,000 or more.

It’s also worth noting that, at this time, the new senior citizen deduction is only valid through the 2028 tax year. The government may extend it or make it permanent, but it remains to be seen whether that will happen. Otherwise, seniors may need to prepare for tax increases starting in 2029.

The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

The Motley Fool is a USA TODAY content partner providing financial news, analysis and commentary designed to help people take control of their financial lives. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY.

The $23,760 Social Security bonus that most retirees completely overlook

Offers from the Motley Fool: If you’re like most Americans, you’re several years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. However, there are only a few that are not well known. “Secrets of Social Security” It may help ensure that you increase your retirement income.

One Easy Trick Could Pay You Up to $23,760…Every year! By learning how to make the most of your Social Security benefits, we think you can retire confidently with the peace of mind we all desire. participate stock advisor To learn more about these strategies,

View “Social Security Secrets” »

Inside President Trump’s plan to win over Cuba with American oil

0


President Trump’s strategy is different in that it involves coercion and comes at a time when Cuba is struggling to survive.

play

  • The Trump administration has changed its Cuba policy, aiming for economic influence rather than direct regime change.
  • Following the suspension of Venezuelan oil supplies, the United States is now allowing direct sales of petroleum products to Cuba’s private sector.
  • This new strategy uses Cuba’s economic crisis to encourage market reforms and dependence on the US economy.

Aldo Alvarez’s van sat abandoned in the Cuban sun for three weeks.

He couldn’t find fuel to run his delivery company’s 10 trucks and vans in the capital.

The power outage lasted 15 hours a day. The airline canceled the flight because it could not refuel. The hotel shutters were closed. Class has been canceled. Tourism has dried up.

After U.S. special forces dramatically captured Nicolas Maduro in Venezuela on January 3, President Donald Trump cut off oil flows to Cuba. An island with a population of 10 million people is enveloped in darkness.

Cuba appeared to be the next target of the Trump administration’s regime change. It fulfills the dream of Cuban exiles and many Republicans seeking a U.S.-backed blow to end the enduring communist regime.

But despite the White House’s call for Cuba to “make very dramatic changes immediately,” the administration’s aims for the island nation appear to be more subtle.

President Trump, in concert with Secretary of State and longtime pro-Cuba hawk Marco Rubio, is rolling out moves aimed at making Cuba dependent on the U.S. economy. This is a stunning shift from decades of U.S. policy toward Cuba.

On February 25, the Trump administration began allowing U.S. petroleum products, including diesel, to be sold directly to Cuba’s private sector, bypassing a long-standing 1960 U.S. embargo.

And he expects executives like Alvarez to play a key role.

Alvarez was heartened by recent news that U.S. companies will export diesel directly to small and medium-sized businesses in Cuba, something that hasn’t happened in more than 60 years. Fuel was delivered to a nearby gas station.

The van revved up again.

“This is transformational,” Mercatoria founder Alvarez told USA TODAY from Havana. “We can guarantee (fuel) supply in a stable way…that’s definitely good news.”

President Trump has not shied away from using military force in countries such as Venezuela and Iran, but bringing about change in Cuba’s repressive regime may be more like a slow and steady economic dependence on Caribbean-style American products. perestroikaor the gradual allowance of market-like reforms that ultimately led to the collapse of the Soviet Union.

“Friendly Takeover of Cuba”

The change in approach is significant.

“The Trump administration recognizes Cuba’s private sector as both an active sector and an important strategic partner on the ground to help alleviate the humanitarian crisis,” said Rick Herrero, executive director of the Cuba Study Group, a Washington-based nonprofit policy and advocacy group. “I’ve never seen anything like that before.”

Reports also surfaced that Rubio and his aides held behind-the-scenes meetings with the grandson of Cuba’s aging dictator Raul Castro.

President Trump acknowledged on February 27 that Rubio was speaking with Cuban officials at a “very high level” and warned that Cuba was a weakened nation. “Perhaps we will have a friendly occupation of Cuba,” he mused to reporters.

On March 6, the president reiterated his focus on Cuba, telling CNN that the communist island “will soon fall apart.” Federal prosecutors are also considering the possibility of bringing charges against members of the Cuban regime or Communist Party, as they did against President Maduro before his ouster, according to NBC News.

Mr. Trump and Mr. Rubio are scheduled to meet with leaders of like-minded Latin American countries, including Argentina and El Salvador, at a summit on March 7 at the Doral Golf Club, where Cuba will also be included in the discussion.

Then a gunfight on the high seas.

Last week, a murky gunfight between a boat carrying Cuban-Americans and the Cuban Coast Guard near Cuba’s northern coast resulted in four people on the boat (including at least one American) being killed, six others injured and captured. Although the incident has made headlines and sparked conspiracies online about the militants’ motives, it is not expected to change U.S. strategy toward Cuba.

It is unclear how U.S. officials intend to use direct economic contact with Cuba’s private sector as a means to encourage change. At the Feb. 25 summit in St. Kitts and Nevis, Rubio reiterated that U.S. officials do not expect radical changes in Cuba.

“The status quo is unacceptable…Cuba needs to change,” he told reporters. “You don’t have to change everything all at once. You don’t have to change from one day to the next…But Cuba needs to change. It needs to change dramatically.”

Eric Jacobstein, a former assistant secretary of state for Western Hemisphere affairs in the Biden administration, has repeatedly visited the island, meeting with Cuban entrepreneurs and encouraging them to connect with American companies.

For President Trump’s strategy to take hold, he said, more support from U.S. companies from Cuba’s private sector, especially the banking sector, will be needed.

“It’s important to involve the private sector in this independent Cuba,” Jacobstein said. “They are independent and entrepreneurial…a group that has embraced capitalism in a failed communist system.”

President Obama’s opening

Ever since Fidel Castro led a battalion to attack Havana, bearded Since declaring allegiance to communism in 1959, the US president has sought to coerce, detain, and even kill Cuba’s leaders. An embargo imposed by the United States in 1960 prevented most American companies from doing business in Cuba.

Former President Barack Obama began attempting to normalize relations with Cuba in 2014, encouraging U.S.-Cuban business ventures and even reopening the U.S. embassy in Havana. In a historic visit to Cuba, the first by a sitting U.S. president since Calvin Coolidge 90 years ago, President Obama met with activists and entrepreneurs and supported the island’s emerging private sector.

But John Cavulich, president of the U.S.-Cuba Trade and Economic Council, a trade group that has done business with Cuba since 1994, said these efforts were largely cosmetic because no conditions were attached.

Under the Obama administration, several U.S. companies explored operations on the island, and cruise ships and airlines began ferrying tourists to the island. But the Cuban government has largely refused to reform the island’s stagnant economic system or allow foreign direct investment, he said.

Trump’s strategy is different in that it includes coercion and was developed at a time when Cuba was struggling to survive, Cavulich said.

“The Cuban government doesn’t have the resilience to play the game like it did under President Obama,” he said.

“Everyone is scared to death.”

A key question is how Cuban exile communities in Miami and elsewhere would react to such direct U.S. contact with officials and entrepreneurs on the island, something they have long strongly opposed, said Michael Bustamante, a professor of Cuban and Cuban American studies at the University of Miami.

He said a recent exchange between Rubio, who as a U.S. senator had been a strong critic of President Obama’s visit to Cuba, and Raul Castro’s grandson was a shocking turn of events.

“I think this is a surprise to a lot of people,” Bustamante said. “Perhaps it will be a surprise to him.”

As the U.S. strategy for Cuba emerged, Cavulich said members of the Trump administration contacted the council and asked if any executives were willing to publicly support the president’s strategy to deal directly with Cuba’s private sector. They proposed creating a CEO Council for a Free and Democratic Cuba, or something similar.

Mr. Cavulich surveyed members. No one would agree.

“Everyone is scared to death that the regime will be supportive in the morning and then critical by noon,” Cavulich said. “So they’re just taking a ‘wait and see’ attitude.”

He said the strategy the White House has put forth is not that great. perestroika And more bankruptcy filings.

“They’re not liquidating, they’re reorganizing,” Cavulich said of the Cuban government. “The government’s version of Chapter 11 reorganization will continue.”

11,000 Cuban businesses poised to thrive

So far, Cuban officials appear to be paying attention, including images taken aboard a U.S. amphibious assault ship just weeks after President Maduro, handcuffed and blindfolded, boarded the ship after its main oil supply was cut off.

At a meeting of senior officials in Havana this week, Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel stressed the importance of “implementing the most urgent and necessary changes to the economic and social model,” according to the Cuban Communist Party’s official Granma newspaper. This is a stark reversal from the communist island, which has historically shied away from economic reform.

He added that these efforts are “fundamentally related to corporate autonomy, municipal autonomy… leveraging economic partnerships between the state and the private sector, especially at the municipal level, and promoting business with Cubans living abroad.”

Díaz-Canel and other Cuban officials have promised reform in the past but failed to deliver, but Cavulich said President Trump’s belligerent intimidation and the escalating Cuban Missile Crisis may force them to take real action this time.

There are an estimated 11,000 small to medium-sized independent businesses in Cuba, many of which are known as family restaurants, mainly in Havana. palate Go to online delivery service.

“It was easy to see that President Trump intended to prioritize commercial, economic and financial engagement, rather than focusing on eliminating communism from Cuba,” Cavulich said. “I don’t think anyone should be surprised to eventually see (U.S. envoy) Steve Witkoff and (Trump advisor) Jared Kushner negotiating with the Cuban government in Havana.”

Robert Muse, a Washington lawyer who specializes in assisting U.S. companies in Cuba, said most business leaders are still cautiously watching developments.

For years, he said, many people have been waiting for Cuba to evolve into something like Vietnam or China, countries that maintain communist ideology but open up their economies to allow for trade and foreign investment. But that never happened, despite pressure from China and Russia, Cuba’s biggest benefactors.

The dying embers of the revolution

Today, most vestiges of the 1959 Cuban revolution have disappeared or are disappearing. Fidel Castro died in 2016, and his brother Raul Castro, the island’s de facto dictator, and Ramiro Valdez, a former deputy prime minister and close ally of the Castro family, are both in their 90s.

Muse said that in addition to the suffering population and the oil embargo, the Trump administration creates an ideal opportunity to bring meaningful change to the island. Doing it through the private sector is a wise choice, he said.

In Cuba, “there is a growing sense that this is a year of decisions,” Muse said. “This is fundamental economic reform in Cuba.”

Alvarez, a Havana-based entrepreneur, said he recognizes the importance and scarcity of receiving U.S. fuel directly from U.S. companies.

He said the situation in Cuba was dire, with many businesses dormant and people struggling to make ends meet due to the oil crisis.

But he feels Cuba is entering a period of reform, and executives like him are at the forefront of it.

“They gave us a lot of responsibility,” Alvarez said. “And the private sector will take on that responsibility.”

Follow Jarvis on X: @MrRJervis.

Costco has announced that it will refund tariffs to members. Here’s how:

0

play

Tariffs have had a major impact on U.S. businesses since early 2025, and while some executives may have the possibility of refunds in mind, Costco appears to be putting its customers first.

Costco CEO Ron Vacris said in an earnings call on March 5 that the company will return the collected tariffs to members “through lower prices and better value.”

“If, as we have done in the past, fees passed on to our members in any way are recovered through a legal challenge, our approach is to find the best way to return this value to our members,” Vakris added.

Despite this promise, Valkis warned that “the future impact of the tariffs remains very fluid” and that “it is not yet clear what the process will be, what refunds, if any, will be received and when they will be made.”

On the same conference call, Costco executives said the company is not passing on the full amount of the tariffs to consumers through price increases. Instead, it absorbed much of the tariff costs.

Costco’s CEO’s comments came just days after a U.S. Trade Court judge ordered the government to begin paying billions of dollars in refunds to importers who paid tariffs that the Supreme Court last month ruled were illegally levied.

Costco and others sue for refunds

In addition to Costco, other companies such as Walmart, FedEx, Staples, and L’Oréal are suing the federal government for back taxes they have already paid.

Costco’s lawsuit, filed Nov. 28 in the U.S. Court of International Trade in New York and reviewed by USA TODAY, asks the court to find President Trump’s use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose tariffs illegal.

Costco, the largest U.S. warehouse club operator, said it was the “importer of record” for products affected by the tariffs, but did not specify the amount it was seeking in damages.

Costco said in court records that the lawsuit against the federal government was necessary because importers are not guaranteed a refund even if the Supreme Court cancels the tariffs, a move it made last month.

Contributed by: Reuters

Fernando Cervantes Jr. is a trending news reporter for USA TODAY. Contact us at fernando.cervantes@gannett.com and follow us at X @fern_cerv_.

Saks Global will close 15 more stores. See where the shutters are installed.

0

play

Saks Global announced on March 6 that it will close 15 more stores as the luxury retailer continues to seek restructuring after filing for bankruptcy earlier this year.

In a March 6 news release, Saks Global announced that it will close 12 Saks Fifth Avenue stores and three Neiman Marcus stores in 13 states. The latest closure follows the announcement of nine store closures across the United States.

“This strategic optimization is part of our ongoing transformation and is rooted in our long-term view of our business,” Sachs Global CEO Geoffroy van Raemdonck said in a release.

According to the company, the process of closing unprofitable stores is almost complete. However, we are still working with landlords to determine which other stores may close in the future.

What stores are closing?

The following Saks Fifth Avenue and Neiman Marcus stores are scheduled to close, according to a news release Friday.

  • 26100 Cedar Road, Beachwood, OH
  • 5555 Wisconsin Ave., Chevy Chase Village, MD
  • 700 N. Michigan Ave., Chicago, IL
  • 3333 Bristol St., Costa Mesa, California
  • 3200 Las Vegas Boulevard S, Las Vegas, NV
  • 230 Walt Whitman Road, Huntington Station, New York
  • 73555 El Paseo, Palm Desert, California
  • 7700 Old Wake Forest Road, Raleigh, NC
  • 7400 San Pedro Ave., San Antonio, Texas
  • 120 University Town Center Dr., Sarasota, Florida
  • 1 Plaza Frontenac St., St. Louis, Missouri
  • 2051 International Dr., McLean, VA
  • 1450 Ala Moana Blvd Honolulu, HI 3rd Floor – Neiman Marcus
  • 6550 Topanga Canyon Blvd., Canoga Park, California – Neiman Marcus
  • 2 Maple Ave, White Plains, New York – Neiman Marcus

Sachs Global’s recent management crisis

It’s only been two months, but 2026 has been a tough year for Saks Global.

On January 14, the company announced it had filed for bankruptcy, changed management (again), and secured a $1.75 billion financing package that “strengthens the company’s balance sheet and positions it for a strong and stable future.”

Saks Global announced in February that the company was “reviewing our Saks Fifth Avenue and Neiman Marcus store footprint to focus on profitable locations with the greatest growth potential.” The company attributed the closure to factors such as business performance and the “lease economy.”

USA TODAY’s Saleen Martin contributed to this report.

Fernando Cervantes Jr. is a trending news reporter for USA TODAY. Contact us at fernando.cervantes@gannett.com and follow us at X @fern_cerv_.