Home Blog Page 221

How a Jewish minority and a small island helped win American freedom

0


There were very few Jews in colonial America. However, when choosing sides, they supported the new nation in its fight for freedom.

play

PHILADELPHIA — Josh Perelman said Jews were a huge minority in colonial America. But they played an extraordinary role in the fight for freedom, he added.

Perelman, senior advisor for content and strategic projects at the Weizmann National Museum of American Jewish History in Philadelphia, recently gave USA TODAY a tour of the museum in advance of the exhibition “The First Salute,” which opens on April 23. The exhibit focuses on the role of a small Jewish community and a small Caribbean island in the War of Independence effort.

Jews first settled in the New World in 1654, coming from Amsterdam and living in New Amsterdam, the Dutch colony that later became New York City. Some came from Brazil, and while they enjoyed some degree of self-determination while under Dutch rule, when the colony came under Portuguese rule, they decided to leave Brazil rather than face forced conversion to Christianity, persecution, or worse.

Many of America’s early Jewish families had surnames such as López, Rodríguez, and Gomez, which had roots in the Iberian Peninsula, but were expelled from the peninsula in 1492 by order of the Catholic King Ferdinand II of Aragon and Queen Isabella I after the horrors of the Spanish Inquisition.

“Just as Isabella and Ferdinand waved goodbye to Christopher Columbus, they waved goodbye to Jews,” Perelman said. “…by driving them out of the country.”

Perelman said Jews, like many before and after them, came to America because they saw it as a land of opportunity, a place to start anew and a place where they could decide their future.

New Amsterdam, old prejudice

“Myths about Jews exist to this day,” Perelman said as he walked up the museum’s steps from Independence Hall and the Liberty Bell. “But Jews are no different from any other minority. No one is monolithic.”

The Jews who landed in New Amsterdam found that they were not immediately welcomed there. Governor Peter Stuyvesant, a strict Calvinist, considered Jews “hateful enemies and blasphemers” and warned that if Jews were allowed to stay, “the Lutherans and Papists cannot be rejected.”

Jewish leaders and those who valued their skills as merchants and merchants successfully advocated for them to remain in New Amsterdam on the condition that they hold no public worship. Jews were also prohibited from owning real estate, joining the militia, opening shops, and holding public office. They should have taken care of themselves, Perelman said, so they did so by forming their own mutual aid groups and community organizations.

“There was this conflict,” Perelman explained. “Will this new world be a monoculture, or an open society with both diversity and homogeneity?”

Soon there will be a Jewish community in Newport, Rhode Island. Savannah, Georgia. Charleston, South Carolina. Philadelphia, and even New York.

Disputes over the economy lead to war

In the Old World, before the Industrial Revolution, wealth meant owning land, and Jews were relegated to “lower” occupations such as finance, mercantilism, and trading. They brought those skills and connections to the New World, settling in cities with busy ports. Philadelphia had a tradition of Quaker religious tolerance, and New York and Newport were particularly hospitable to Jews.

“In many ways, Jews enjoyed more freedom here than in Europe,” Perelman said, noting that while anti-Semitism was real in America, it was not the violent and vicious anti-Semitism of the Old World. Jews here “felt a greater sense of agency and were able to overcome the situation without fear of violent retaliation.”

Perelman pointed out that the American Revolution began as a series of grievances about taxation, representation, and national self-determination that evolved into loftier ideas about freedom.

“One of the more remarkable aspects of this work is the idea of ​​freedom emerging and living,” he says. “It’s a revolution, it’s revolutionary.”

Islands that helped arm the revolution

St. Eustatius is a small island in the Caribbean that, according to the U.S. Naval Research Institute, served as an “Arsenal Depot of the American Revolutionary War,” an eight-square-mile Dutch outpost that provided a means of escaping the British blockade when war broke out, and ships that carried gunpowder and ammunition to the Continental Army with the aid of Jewish merchants and merchants.

Jewish merchant connections “became invaluable in supplying the Continental Army with gunpowder, munitions, and clothing,” Perelman said. “Their families and trade networks placed them in places like Amsterdam, Paris, and the Caribbean,” but it was important that the colonies lacked a military industry and were thus beyond the reach of British troops.

In 1781, British forces led by General John Vaughan and Admiral George Rodney occupied the island, drawing widespread condemnation as Rodney’s first mission was to imprison, strip and deport all Jewish men on the island, stripping them of their property and exhuming their graves for further plunder. However, Rodney, an avid gambler, remained on the island too long, giving the Americans the opening they needed to get much-needed help from the French.

A plea from General Washington: “Send Chaim Salomon.”

Haim Salomon was born in Poland, but arrived in New York in 1775, joined the Sons of Liberty, founded a stockbroker, and worked with Philadelphia merchant Robert Morris to secure and manage funds for the revolutionary cause. However, Salomon was arrested by the British on suspicion of being a spy.

During his captivity, the polyglot Salomon acted as an interpreter between British and Hessian troops, convincing some of his troops to desert or defect to the American side. Arrested again in 1778, Salomon fled to Philadelphia, where he once again collaborated with Morris to secure funding for the Continental Army and donated much of his personal wealth to the cause. At Yorktown, Congress and General George Washington found themselves short of funds to pay for the troops. Washington told Morris to “send Chaim Salomon,” who raised the money and changed the course of the final battle of the war.

But for all his efforts, Salomon is often ignored in historical writing, writes historian James A. Percoco on Battlefields.org. He died penniless in 1785.

a risk worth taking

American Jews considered their efforts to support the American Revolution “worth the risk,” Perelman said, and for many of them, the risk paid off. As the new nation’s first president, Washington reiterated his guarantee of religious freedom. After visiting Newport in 1790 and meeting with one of the Jewish leaders, Moses Seixas, Washington wrote that the new national government “should give no sanction to prejudice, no support to persecution.”

By leveraging their skills and connections, Jews “joined shoulder to shoulder with[the Founding Fathers]” in the revolutionary cause, including the approximately 100 Jews who fought against the Continental Army.

“Like everyone else, they had to choose between maintaining the status quo and risking their lives and livelihoods for ambitious ideals and an uncertain future,” Perelman said. “Most people in the colonies and the Caribbean believed in those ideals.”

Phaedra Torresan is a national correspondent for USA TODAY and writes about history and Americana. Email us at ptrethan@usatoday.com, X @wordsbyphaedra, BlueSky @byphaedra, or Threads @by_phaedra.

ICE delays releasing key immigration data. How to track it.

0

Throughout 2025 and into the first few weeks of this year, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement reported an increasing number of immigrants in its custody. Then the lights went out.

ICE has delayed releasing critical data that allows the public to track many aspects of immigrant detention since the partial government shutdown began more than six weeks ago, violating a Congressional mandate to release this data twice a month.

The agency last updated its numbers on Feb. 12, just days before a partial shutdown began due to funding from its parent agency, the Department of Homeland Security. This has one of the three longest delays between releases.

After previous negotiations broke down, Congressional Republicans on April 1 announced a plan to end the partial shutdown by funding all of DHS except ICE and Border Patrol, but a deal was still not finalized as of April 2.

DHS hasn’t updated some dashboards since President Donald Trump took office in 2025. As such, this data, ICE detention statistics, has become an important tool to see how new immigration enforcement policies are unfolding. This shows how many people are being detained, what kind of facilities they are being held in, and for how long.

“People may be underestimating how useful this ICE detention data is. This is just one part of the larger mystery of how DHS conducts enforcement,” said Ariel Luis Soto, senior policy analyst at the Migration Policy Institute. “But it gives us an important sense of the population of detainees.”

This dataset provides a way to cross-check whether agents are targeting people with no criminal record. It also provides information about detainees to help immigration advocates challenge detention conditions.

USA TODAY combined all of the spreadsheets available on the Wayback Machine going back to 2021 with current data on ICE’s website, as well as several additional datasets, to show how things have changed under the Trump administration and since.

Data reveals ICE is detaining people at record levels. The detention population reached more than 70,000 as of the end of January, an increase of about 80% from a year ago.

But significant changes are occurring, not only in the number of people detained, but also in who is targeted. Illegal border crossing attempts at the U.S.-Mexico border plummeted at the end of the Biden administration and declined further under Trump, but enforcement efforts have shifted domestically.

This means ICE agents are casting a wider net with controversial tactics to meet high arrest quotas, such as arresting people for immigration hearings, workplace raids, and racial profiling.

As a result, the proportion of detainees without criminal records rapidly increased, accounting for approximately 42% of all detainees at the end of the first year of the administration. This number was 6% a year ago. Some of these immigrants are violating only immigration laws, such as overstaying their visas or re-entering the country after being deported, and some are awaiting immigration hearings.

“This used to be our most reliable way to achieve data transparency on ICE detention, but now we have been flying in the dark for a month,” Luis Soto said.

Historically, it has been published approximately every two weeks, with some delays at the end of the year when the final report is produced. Luis Soto said the current delays are significant.

A DHS spokesperson denounced the closure in an emailed statement, saying DHS and ICE “do not have the resources” to release new detention data. The agency did not respond to questions about when it plans to make this dataset or other immigration dashboards it stopped updating before the shutdown. He also did not say whether he would use funding already authorized in President Trump’s signature bill, which gives DHS more than $170 billion.

“When you have a government shutdown, even a partial shutdown like we’re experiencing right now, reporting is delayed,” said Rep. Henry Cuellar (D-Texas), the top Democrat on the House subcommittee that oversees funding for the Department of Homeland Security. “Without a funding agreement, these requirements lapse.” Cuellar was pardoned by President Trump in 2025 for federal corruption charges.

Pressure mounted on the administration following the shooting deaths of two Americans in Minnesota, which ultimately led to turmoil at the department, including the resignation of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem in favor of newly confirmed Markwayne Mullin.

Before going into spring recess, lawmakers were debating a plan to end the government shutdown that began in mid-February, with Democrats demanding reforms to ICE officers before putting money into the parent agency’s annual budget, including requiring masks, banning raids without a judicial warrant and expanding the use of body-worn cameras. Negotiations are continuing in the House and Senate, but no agreement has yet been reached.

Meanwhile, immigration enforcement continues, as President Trump’s signature bill gave ICE about $75 billion in 2025. Much of this funding will likely go towards hiring additional deportees and expanding the detention facility network.

Detaining people’s records requires more facilities to store them. ICE is opening new detention centers across the country. All but five states have one. As of February 5, ICE reported holding immigrants in 220 facilities, roughly double the number at the beginning of 2025. This includes local prisons, which are sometimes used to hold immigrants.

Recently, ICE has been purchasing warehouses around the country and converting them into detention centers, but has yet to actually equip them or detain anyone. The agency has spent more than $1 billion so far, USA TODAY previously reported. Many site plans face community resistance. In one Georgia town, local authorities shut off water and sewage to a warehouse and removed legal barricades. A federal judge has ordered a moratorium on construction at the Maryland site.

Although detention is intended to be non-punitive, advocates and lawyers have criticized conditions in these facilities, including lack of medical care, exposure to extreme heat, and unsanitary conditions.

From January 2025 to March 2026, ICE reported 46 deaths in its custody. Of these, 14 occurred in the first quarter of 2026, which is on track to surpass last year’s death toll. An American Civil Liberties Union report examining deaths over the past few years found that the vast majority could have been prevented with proper medical care.

USA TODAY is tracking all of these numbers as they are released, while also collecting other data. For more information on data such as deaths in custody and deportations, and notes on how it is compiled, check out our new immigration tracker here.

What is W-2? Forms required to declare taxes.

0

play

When your tax filing deadline approaches and you’re in a mad dash to gather all the necessary documents, it’s easy to get overwhelmed by the numbers and letters like W-2, W-9, and 1099.

Some forms are pre-filled and designed to be submitted to the IRS. These may arrive in your mailbox or may be sitting in your website’s “Tax Documents” portal, waiting to be downloaded. In theory, you might not need to do anything other than file it with your tax representative if you have one, or document the appropriate amount on your tax return. Other forms require some action on the user’s part.

Here’s an overview.

What is the W-9 used for?

W-9s are typically used by businesses to collect personal identifying information such as social security numbers and tax identification numbers.

A common reason to fill out a W-9 is that you are an independent contractor, freelancer, or gig worker and your income may exceed $600. You may also be asked to fill out a W-9 when opening an interest-bearing bank account or another financial account that provides extra income.

This form will not be sent to the Internal Revenue Service. However, the information you provide on your W-9 will be used to prepare and fill out other forms. Read more.

Is a W-9 the same as a 1099?

The main difference between a W-9 and a 1099 is that you fill out the W-9, whereas the 1099 is filled out by the company or entity making the payment. In most cases, you should receive your 1099 form by the end of January.

The 1099 form is used to report income that is not earned directly through an employer. There are several types of 1099 forms because there are many ways to make money outside of traditional jobs.

Common 1099s displayed: 1099-G, 1099-K, 1099-R, 1099-Div

Some of the most common 1099s you may receive are:

  • 1099-G: Details any state or local tax refunds that are considered income.
  • 1099-K: Summarize your earnings if you earn at least $20,000 and complete at least 200 transactions on third-party payment networks such as Etsy, Airbnb, and Venmo.
  • 1099-R: Report distributions of $10 or more from various types of retirement plans, pensions, annuities, insurance contracts, and similar accounts.
  • 1099-Division: Used by banks and other financial institutions to report dividends and other distributions to taxpayers and the IRS.

What is a W-4? What is it for?

The W-4 is a form you must complete when you work directly for an employer.

It tells your employer how much federal income tax to withhold from your paycheck, based on factors such as whether you’re married and filing a joint return, whether you have dependents to claim, and whether you work multiple jobs.

You will usually be asked to fill it out when you start your job. However, if you notice that the amount withheld from your paycheck is significantly different from the amount of taxes you ultimately owe at the end of the year, you may want to double-check your forms.

You should also revisit this if your marital status changes, if you have or adopt a child, or if your employment status changes.

The IRS has a withholding estimator that can help you determine whether a W-4 adjustment is appropriate.

What can I learn from my W-2 form?

A W-2 is a form that employers are required to send by the end of January to document how much you earned working for your employer in the previous year and how much tax was withheld from your paycheck. This form also shows how much you earned from tips and the benefits you received during the year.

If you had more than one job last year, expect to receive a separate W-2 from each employer.

You must include each W-2 form on your tax return. Forms are especially important because they provide proof of how much you earned.

What is a 1040 tax return?

The 1040 is a comprehensive form used to fill out an individual’s income tax return. The two-page document records the different types of income you earned last year, indicates whether you take the standard deduction or itemized deductions, and reports any tax credits you qualify for.

Follow the instructions on the form and crunch the numbers to find out how much tax you owe or how much of a refund you need.

Who fills out Form 5695?

Form 5695 is used to declare eligible residential energy credits. For example, if you installed roof tiles that generate solar energy in 2023, you can use the form to claim a residential clean energy credit.

Importantly, this form does not apply to businesses.

Black Caucus scholarships are racially discriminatory, lawsuit claims

0

play

Anti-affirmative action groups are suing the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation, alleging that it illegally discriminates on the basis of race in awarding college scholarships to black students from underfunded schools in majority-black districts.

The lawsuit calls on the Congressional Black Caucus to partner with the foundation as part of a broader effort to overturn affirmative action programs.

“It is neither conscientious nor legal to deny educational opportunities to some young voters and others based on the color of their skin,” the Equal Rights Alliance of America said in a lawsuit filed in federal court in Washington, D.C.

At issue is eligibility for the foundation’s CBC Spouse Education Scholarship. The scholarship is limited to black students in districts represented by members of the Congressional Black Caucus, a powerful voting group that promotes equal rights. This program offers scholarships ranging from $2,500 to $20,000. According to the complaint, the scholarships are awarded to 300 applicants each year.

“The Foundation has operated its programs in such a racist manner every year since 1988, awarding more than $11 million exclusively to Black people,” the Equal Rights Alliance of America said in a press release.

Nicole Austin Hillary, president and CEO of the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation, said the foundation does not comment on pending litigation.

“The Congressional Black Caucus Foundation is proud to reaffirm that we are a nonprofit organization founded 50 years ago by original members of the Congressional Black Caucus. We were founded to help open the doors to educational opportunities and training to the next generation of leaders, provide research, and provide public education on emerging policy issues,” Austin-Hillary said in a statement to USA TODAY. “CBCF remains committed to achieving these goals and providing opportunities for all who benefit from our work and programs.”

The Congressional Black Caucus could not be reached for comment.

The scholarship fund is run by 34 wives and husbands of Congressional Black Caucus members, and its internship and fellowship programs have shaped thousands of leaders in government, business, nonprofit and advocacy roles, according to a February blog post on the foundation’s website.

According to the blog post, the scholarships in question are helping Black students navigate an “inequitable education system” at a time when federal investment in education is shrinking.

The Equal Rights Alliance of America is filing the lawsuit on behalf of two students, one Asian and one Hispanic, who are members of Blum’s organization.

The lawsuit also challenges a second eligibility requirement, which requires applicants to live or attend school in a congressional district represented by a member of the Congressional Black Caucus.

“All qualified students, regardless of race, deserve the same opportunity to compete for this scholarship,” Edward Blum, leader of the Equal Rights Alliance of America, said in a statement to USA TODAY. “It is hoped that this lawsuit will ensure that outcome.”

Blum, who has long worked to end affirmative action and filed numerous legal challenges to race-based preferential treatment, spearheaded the case that led the Supreme Court to rule in 2023 that it is unconstitutional for universities to consider race as a factor in student admissions.

This story has been updated to add new information.

Papa John’s offers carryout specials as gas prices soar

0

play

As gas prices remain high across the U.S. and customers feel financial pressure due to the Iran war, one fast food chain is offering some relief.

Papa John’s is offering customers the opportunity to earn restaurant rewards when ordering carryout that can be applied as a discount on subsequent orders, the pizza chain announced April 2. The program, dubbed “Pizza Miles,” aims to help customers get takeout gas reimbursed through a rewards system.

The program is set to run through the end of this week, so here’s what you need to know about refunds from Papa John’s.

What is Papa John’s new gas program?

Members of the chain’s rewards program, Papa Rewards, can opt-in to Pizza Miles from Friday, April 3 through Sunday, April 5. Once opted in, members will receive $4 in Papa Dough, Papa John’s redeemable reward currency, when they place a to-go order of $10 or more through the chain’s app or website.

“If you choose takeout, we are choosing to reward you for it,” Lindsey Adams, Papa John’s vice president of customer marketing and media, said in a news release. “Pizza Miles offers our most loyal Papa Rewards members the true value of Papa Dough by simply getting the pizza they already love.”

Customers can join Papa John’s Rewards Program for free by signing up through the Papa John’s app or website. Typically, for every $10 spent, customers earn a $1 Papadeau that can be used toward future orders.

“Papa Daws are valid for 14 days and can be redeemed on future orders through the Papa John’s app, giving fans an easy way to turn today’s ambition into tomorrow’s value,” the news release states.

As gasoline prices soar, other companies also offer discounts

DoorDash also launched a financial relief program in response to soaring gas prices across the United States.

The delivery service’s new program will offer 10% cash back to DoorDashers who fill up on gas, including those with DoorDash cards. Dashers who drive more than 125 miles during their dash will also receive weekly relief payments, the company said in a release.

Dashers eligible for both cashback and relief payments can save between $1.40 and $1.90 per gallon based on mileage while actively completing deliveries within a week, according to the release.

Gasoline prices soar as Iran war continues

The US and Israel’s war against Iran has put pressure on gas stations since attacks began in late February. Consumers have seen prices rise by $1 over the past month as the US, Israel and Iran enter a new phase in their ongoing war, with oil and gas becoming a key target for both sides.

Much of the pressure stems from Iran’s blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, a 160-mile waterway that connects the Persian Gulf with the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea. The Strait of Hormuz transports 20% of the world’s oil traffic and approximately 20% of the world’s seaborne liquefied natural gas.

Negotiations continue between Iranian and U.S. officials, with President Donald Trump saying on March 26 that Iranian authorities had allowed 10 “large oil vessels” to pass through the Strait of Hormuz as a show of good faith during back-channel negotiations with the United States. But consumers still find prices high, with the national gas average at $4.081 as of April 2, AAA reports.

Kate Perez covers national trends and breaking news for USA TODAY. You can reach her at kperez@usatodayco.com or X @katecperez_.

California hospice operator defrauded taxpayers of millions of dollars with false claims

0

play

Prosecutors announced April 2 the arrest of eight people suspected of running a series of health care fraud schemes that defrauded Medicare and other insurance companies of tens of millions of dollars across Southern California.

First Assistant U.S. Attorney Bill Esseri said eight defendants, including three nurses, a chiropractor and a psychologist, were charged in separate cases with defrauding the health care system of more than $50 million. The U.S. Attorney’s Office said the arrests were made in conjunction with a federal task force created as part of President Donald Trump’s “war on fraud.”

Prosecutors alleged that the defendants engaged in various schemes to exploit union health benefits and hospice care programs through fraudulent billing and illegal kickbacks. Prosecutors said five of the cases involved hospice care facilities in multiple cities in Los Angeles County that made false claims to Medicare for patients who were terminally ill and ineligible for services.

One person was arrested in Idaho and one in the Los Angeles area on suspicion of defrauding union health insurance by offering chiropractic services, prosecutors said. Another person in the Los Angeles area was also accused of posing as a nurse and completing fraudulent immigration documents.

In a press conference, Essayri, a Trump appointee, accused California of failing to vet hospice permits when issuing them, calling the state a “kingdom of fraud.” In a statement regarding

“The Trump administration, home to the biggest fraudsters on the planet, is trying to blame California for problems with federal programs,” Newsom said on X. “I’m pleased that just 15 months into President Trump’s presidency, the Federal Reserve is finally getting serious about addressing fraud in the programs it administers.”

In March, President Trump signed an executive order creating a task force led by Vice President J.D. Vance with the goal of proving his claims that federal funds intended for social welfare programs were being stolen in some states. The signed order specifies that the task force will investigate suspected fraud across the country.

At the time, President Trump specifically singled out California in his remarks, saying that there were more fraud allegations in Democratic-led states than in Republican-led states, although he offered no evidence. Fraud experts previously told USA TODAY that these cases are not a question of whether a state is red or blue, but a question of how well states and the federal government can work together.

Suspected Hospice Care Fraud Scheme

Prosecutors argued that the defendants in the hospice care plan operated a facility that “defrauded Medicare by using people who were not terminally ill as beneficiaries.”

“The defendants indicted today allegedly turned hospice care into a cash cow business, costing taxpayers more than $50 million,” U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Inspector General T. March Bell said in a statement. “The scale of the losses highlights the deliberate abuse of power and trust vested in health care providers.”

The largest case, announced April 2, involved a hospice care company based in Artesia, California, a city in southeast Los Angeles County. Prosecutors accused the owner, a licensed vocational nurse, of using the company to submit more than $9 million in fraudulent hospice claims to Medicare from July 2020 to April 2025. She received more than $8.5 million for these applications.

Prosecutors say the owners billed Medicare for hospice services for patients who were not terminally ill and paid kickbacks for patient referrals. One couple told authorities they were promised $300 a month to enroll in hospice care and received unnecessary items such as energy drinks, non-prescription vitamins and a wheelchair, even though they were not terminally ill.

Other defendants include:

  • A psychologist and his wife, a registered nurse, were arrested on suspicion of defrauding Medicare by paying illegal kickbacks for referrals of patients who did not die. Prosecutors said the couple submitted more than $5.2 million in fraudulent claims to Medicare, and more than $4 million was paid on those claims.
  • Another person indicted is already serving time in a federal prison in Seattle for a previous hospice fraud case, prosecutors said. The husband was arrested as a co-defendant on the morning of April 2nd.
  • A Los Angeles-area certified vocational nurse is accused of using a hospice center to bill more than $3.8 million between January 2022 and September 2025, prosecutors said. She was paid approximately $3.4 million.
  • The CEO and CFO of another Los Angeles-area hospice center, whose enrollment in Medicare was revoked in August 2024, accused them of stealing hundreds of thousands of dollars from Medicare by forging at least one doctor’s signature on Medicare documents.

Contributor: Sarah D. Wire, USA TODAY. Reuters

Which is best for your next project: Empire Today or Lowe’s flooring?

0

If you’re looking to purchase new flooring for your home, you’ve probably considered a national flooring company with competitive pricing, a wide range of products, and an open, ready-to-install inventory. However, many major companies feel the same way, and finding reliable information and reading customer reviews takes time.

That’s why the USA TODAY team did the research on your behalf and compared Empire Today and Lowe’s flooring to help you decide which is the better option for your flooring project.

Empire Today vs. Lowe’s Flooring: Which is Right for You?

Overall, we recommend Lowe’s Flooring as it ranks second on our list of the best flooring contractors. Lowe’s has a much larger service area across the country and offers a wide range of flooring brands as well as its own brands. Empire Today’s service area is about half that size, and no information is provided about the specific brands it serves.

However, one thing to consider is whether you know the type, style, and color of the flooring you want. If so, I recommend Lowe’s. If not, Empire Today might be a better choice. Because one of our representatives will come in for a free consultation and provide you with hundreds of samples to help you choose the best flooring for your space.

Empire Today vs. Lowe’s Flooring Overview

Empire Today and Lowe’s Flooring are both national flooring companies that offer free measurements and free estimates for complete flooring. Because both companies outsource installation work to third-party flooring contractors, both installation quality and customer service can vary.

Empire Today was founded in 1959. After a short period of selling protective plastic covers for floors and furniture, the company shifted its focus exclusively to coordinating flooring and equipment. Lowe’s was founded in 1921, but its primary focus is as a home improvement retailer and only recently began connecting homeowners with flooring service providers.

Empire Today and Lowe’s Flooring: Flooring Types and Costs

Both Empire Today and Lowe’s Flooring offer all the most popular types of flooring, including vinyl, laminate, hardwood/engineered wood, carpet, and tile.

Lowe’s provides the average cost per square foot for each flooring type. This is shown in the table below. Empire Today does not provide pricing information online and must obtain a free quote to confirm pricing.

We looked at customer reviews and homeowner forums to see how much homeowners are paying for Empire flooring so you can compare costs. However, you should obtain an in-house quote for the most accurate price.

Types of flooring Average cost per square foot Estimated cost per square foot
carpet $3.88–$6.62 $2.50–$6.00
Hardwood/artificial wood $2.99–$6.89 $5.50–$12.00+
laminate $1.44–$3.99 $2.50 – $4.50
Luxury vinyl board (LVP) $2.29–$4.29 $3.50 – $6.50
tile $0.99–$3.49 $6.50–$15.00+

Although Lowe’s lists some flooring costs online, keep in mind that these are just averages and do not include installation costs. Actual prices from either company will vary depending on:

  • room size and complexity
  • Unexpected problems with the subfloor
  • Your location and local living costs
  • Additional services you would like (trim, underfloor heating, etc.)
  • The quality and brand of the floor you choose
  • Flooring removal

Empire Today vs. Lowe’s Flooring Installation

The installation process you will experience will be similar, as both are national companies that outsource their installation work to third-party companies. However, there are some subtle differences.

How the estimation process works

Empire Today is known for its door-to-door consulting. During this consultation, a representative will bring hundreds of flooring samples to your home to see how different styles, colors, and materials will look in your space. They will help you choose your flooring, take measurements, and begin creating a quote.

Lowe’s requires you to view flooring samples online before scheduling a measurement. Since this process is less manual, you may not be as confident in the product you choose. Once you have decided on a specific product, schedule a measurement. To learn more about this process, check out our Lowe’s flooring review.

Both companies require materials to be purchased as part of the installation package. You cannot purchase materials in advance and then go to Empire or Lowe’s to install. However, you can also purchase Lowe’s flooring without scheduling installation.

How the installation works

The installation process for both companies works similarly.

  1. Your Empire or Lowe’s representative will use your measurements to provide you with a formal quote.
  2. You approve the quote and make the required down payment.
  3. The company will assign a third-party installer to your project.
  4. That third party will install the flooring.
  5. Sign off when the installation is complete.
  6. Either Empire or Lowe’s will respond to future customer service inquiries and warranty claims.

Who installs the flooring

Neither Empire Today nor Lowe’s Flooring installs the flooring themselves; they work with local contractors.

Empire Today vs. Lowe’s Flooring: Availability

Lowe’s has a much broader reach than Empire, with operations in all 50 states, and Washington, DC Empire Today offers flooring services in 27 states, including:

  • arizona
  • California
  • colorado
  • connecticut
  • florida
  • georgia
  • illinois
  • Indiana
  • kentucky
  • maryland
  • Massachusetts
  • Michigan
  • minnesota
  • missouri
  • nevada
  • new jersey
  • new york
  • north carolina
  • ohio
  • Oregon
  • pennsylvania
  • south carolina
  • tennessee
  • texas
  • virginia
  • washington
  • wisconsin

The service area alone may be the deciding factor. If Empire Today doesn’t serve your area, but you still want to compare national companies, you can read our guide comparing Lowe’s flooring vs. Home Depot flooring for a more direct comparison.

Empire Today vs. Lowe’s Flooring Review

Reviews for Empire Today are generally positive on sites like the Better Business Bureau (BBB) ​​and Trustpilot, with scores of 3.2 stars and 4.3 stars, respectively. The Yelp score is much lower, at just 1.4 stars.

Even more important than the total score is customer sentiment. Many customers seem satisfied with the customer service, quality of installation, and professionalism of the staff assigned to the project. However, some customers have encountered poor installation and customer service issues. Some reviews mention gaps around the flooring, wrong colored products, and issues with the contractor not doing everything that was quoted in the initial quote.

Lowe’s has thousands of reviews on similar sites, but most of them are about the retail side of the business and not specifically related to flooring services. However, a report on Reddit paints a similar picture. While some customers are satisfied with the affordability, professionalism, and quick installation, others encounter customer service issues and installation mistakes that end up costing them more to fix.

Both companies outsource their installation work to third parties, which can lead to differences in service and quality, which is why we review both companies.

How does USA TODAY rate flooring companies?

We evaluate flooring companies based on four main categories:

  • Installation quality and workmanship
  • Costs and financing
  • company credibility
  • product quality

Within these categories, we evaluate the 26 quantitative metrics that we believe have the most impact on your customer experience. These include the types of flooring available, the consultation and measurement process, the usual accuracy of quotations, etc.

FAQ

What are the most rated LVP flooring brands?

Shaw, Armstrong, SMARTCORE, and COREtec are all among the top-rated LVP flooring brands, and karanda also ranks highly, but at a higher price point. Brands like LifeProof and STAINMASTER, sold exclusively at The Home Depot and Lowe’s respectively, rank high in terms of quality but are more affordable.

When is the best time to buy flooring?

Since most homeowners purchase and install new flooring in the spring or summer, the best time to purchase flooring at a discount is late fall or early winter. If you don’t want to keep your flooring in your home for long periods of time before installation, aim to purchase it in early spring and install it in mid-to-late spring.

Who are Empire Today’s competitors?

Empire Today’s competitors include Lowe’s Flooring, The Home Depot, Carpet One Floor & Home, 50Floor, and Floor & Decor. It also competes with national companies such as Floor Coverings International and National Floors Direct, which perform installations in-house.

Most of Blake Lively’s claims against Justin Baldoni are dismissed by judge

0

play

A federal judge in New York has dismissed most of Blake Lively’s sexual harassment and retaliation claims against Justin Baldoni.

Judge Louis Lehman issued a 152-page opinion and order on Thursday, April 2nd. The ruling, obtained by USA TODAY, granted in large part and denied in part a motion for summary judgment by Mr. Baldoni and his co-defendants to avoid a trial scheduled to begin May 18.

The virtual court hearing will take place on the evening of April 2nd.

In a 2024 California complaint that followed a lawsuit later filed in New York federal court, Lively alleged that Baldoni and Wayfarer Studios CEO and “It Ends With Us” producer Jamie Heath engaged in inappropriate conduct in the workplace and then engaged in a retaliatory “social manipulation” smear campaign against the actress.

Lehman admitted three of the 13 legal claims Lively filed against director and co-star Baldoni, including breach of contract, retaliation, and aiding and abetting retaliation, and allowed the film to proceed to trial. The remaining claims involve It Ends With Us Movie LLC (breach of contract and retaliation), Baldoni’s production company Wayfarer Studios (retaliation), and The Agency Group PR LLC (aiding and abetting retaliation), which accused Lively of organizing an online campaign to cast Lively in a negative light.

Ten claims were dismissed, including claims related to sexual harassment and defamation.

The sexual harassment claim was dismissed due to jurisdictional issues. Lehman wrote that although Lively filed the lawsuit under California law, the alleged misconduct did not take place in that state.

The legal battle began in late 2024, when Lively filed a California complaint alleging sexual harassment and retaliation by Baldoni and producer Jamie Heath, followed by a lawsuit in New York federal court.

What did the judge say in his dismissal?

Lehman said in the filing that “the relevant considerations overwhelmingly point out” that Lively’s “degree of financial independence” classifies her as an independent contractor rather than an employee. Therefore, he ruled that the actress could not bring a sexual harassment suit under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Lehman also stressed that the “social context” of sexual harassment allegations must be assessed based on the context in which the sexual harassment occurred, noting that the two had filmed several romantic scenes together. She confirmed Lively’s claims that Baldoni made kissing gestures to her during filming, kissed her forehead, rubbed his mouth against her neck, put his thumb over her mouth, leaned into her neck and said, “You smell good.”

“Under this framework, it would be difficult to see Mr. Baldoni’s conduct as reflecting gender-based hostility or prejudice,” Liman wrote. “He was acting in the scene. Assuming he was improvising, his conduct did not go far beyond what could reasonably be expected to occur between the two characters during the slow dance scene, giving rise to an inference of hostile treatment based on sex.”

He added: “While these incidents alone cannot support a hostile work environment claim, sexual harassment claims must be evaluated in the totality of the circumstances.”

Justin Baldoni, co-defendant, “grateful” that “case has been narrowed down significantly”

Mr. Baldoni’s co-defendants include producer Mr. Heath, his company Wayfarer Studios, its co-founder Steve Sarowitz, crisis public relations expert Melissa Nathan, and publicist Jennifer Abel.

“We are very pleased that the court dismissed all sexual harassment claims and all claims brought against the individual defendants, including Justin Baldoni, Jamie Heath, Steve Sarowitz, Melissa Nathan, and Jennifer Abel,” defendants’ attorneys Alexandra Shapiro and Jonathan Buck told USA TODAY in a statement.

“These are very serious allegations, and we appreciate the court’s careful consideration of the facts, the law, and the extensive evidence provided,” the statement added. “What remains is a fairly narrowed case, and we look forward to defending the remaining claims in court.”

The defendants previously denied Lively’s claims that they waged a “defamatory ‘smear campaign'” against her.

Rather, the lawyers argued in a Nov. 12 filing that Mr. Baldoni “sought the advice of a crisis public relations firm” simply to “minimize the impact of media reports of increasing efforts to distance Mr. Lively from the film.”

In October, Mr. Lehman entered a final judgment in a $400 million counterclaim from Mr. Baldoni and co-defendants, effectively ending the January 2025 lawsuit against Ms. Lively, her husband Ryan Reynolds, and the New York Times. Parties have the right to appeal.

Blake Lively says she’s looking forward to testifying at trial

One of Lively’s attorneys, Sigrid McCauley, said in a statement that the sexual harassment charges “cannot proceed not because the defendant has done nothing wrong, but because the court has determined that Blake Lively is an independent contractor and not an employee.”

“This case has been, and continues to be, focused on the devastating retaliation and extraordinary steps the defendants took to destroy the reputation of Blake Lively, who stood up for safety on set,” the statement continued. “For Blake Lively, the greatest measure of justice is that the people and schemes behind these coordinated digital attacks are exposed and are already being held accountable by the other women who were targeted.”

“Lively looks forward to testifying at trial and continuing to shine a light on this vicious online retaliation, making it easier to detect and fight,” McCauley said.

This high-profile controversy has involved several other celebrities over the past year and a half, as the stars’ private communications were exposed during the discovery process of Lively and Baldoni’s affair.

The hundreds of exhibits unsealed in January included messages from Taylor Swift, Matt Damon, Ben Affleck and Seraph of the End star Jenny Slate.

Contributor: Anthony Robredo, USA TODAY

Reese’s founder’s grandson slams Hershey’s ‘classic’ recipe changes

0

play

Nearly two months after Mr. H.B. Reese’s grandson accused Mr. Hershey of secretly changing the formulations of various Reese’s products, the company announced it would bring back “a small portion” of the brand’s candies with classic milk chocolate and dark chocolate recipes.

The Hershey Company confirmed the change during its 2026 Investor Day event on March 31st and in a statement to USA TODAY on April 2nd.

The Hershey Company’s chief growth officer, Stacey Taffet, said at a March 31 event that the company is enhancing KitKat recipes to offer customers “creamier chocolate,” and “transitioning our sweets portfolio to colors derived from natural sources to ensure all Hershey and Reese’s products match the brand’s classic milk and dark chocolate recipes.”

The company said in a statement to USA TODAY that these changes should take effect in 2027, adding that the core recipe and Reese’s Peanut Butter Cups remain unchanged.

The move comes after Brad Reese, the grandson of Reese’s Candy founder H.B. Reese, wrote an open letter to Hershey in a LinkedIn post on February 14, saying his grandfather created the brand using real milk chocolate and peanut butter and claiming that the chocolate company changed at some point after acquiring the Reese’s brand in the 1960s.

Reese’s brand and identity “has been rewritten not by the storyteller, but by the formulation decision that replaces milk chocolate with a composite coating and peanut butter with peanut butter-like cream,” Reese wrote in a LinkedIn post.

Hershey made some changes to the recipe after hiring CEO Kirk Tanner in August, which the company said were announced publicly through marketing materials and investor events. The chocolate company said it decided to return to classic recipes following a 25% increase in research and development to fund talent, technology and nutritional science.

Below are comments from Hershey Co., Reese’s grandson, and other members of his family.

The Hershey Company says most of its products are already made with classic recipes

Hershey said April 2 that most of its Reese’s products, including Reese’s Peanut Butter Cups and classic shapes, are made using classic recipes. Products returned to this recipe represent approximately 3% of the Reese selection.

The company’s popular Reese’s Peanut Butter Cups are listed on the package as “milk chocolate and peanut butter,” while other products are listed as containing “peanut butter cream.”

Reese, who has publicly accused Hershey of quietly changing recipes for certain Reese’s products, told USA TODAY on April 2 that he has been a lifelong fan of the candy made by his grandfather. It wasn’t until I tried Reese’s Unwrapped Chocolate Peanut Butter Cream Mini Hearts on Valentine’s Day 2026 that I noticed a difference in the taste of the candy.

“I opened it and there were about two of them in there so I had to spit them out,” he said. “I threw everything inside in the kitchen trash can and kept the pouch. I looked it up and it wasn’t milk chocolate or real peanut butter. This is the first time I’ve ever thrown up a Reese’s product.”

After trying the candy, he was shocked because he couldn’t find an announcement that Hershey would change the chocolate and peanut butter it uses to make Reese’s products. He said customers need to look carefully and try the treats for themselves to find out, adding that instead of describing products as “milk chocolate,” Hershey often uses words and phrases like “chocolatey,” “chocolate covered,” and “made with chocolate.”

Mr. Rees claimed that other products Mr. Hershey had changed include Reese’s Unwrapped Chocolate Peanut Butter Cream Mini Eggs and Cadbury Creme Eggs and Milk Chocolate Eggs.

“If it doesn’t say milk chocolate, that means it’s vegetable oil,” Reese told USA TODAY.

According to Hershey’s ingredient documents, some of the company’s products use vegetable oils. Reese said the change in chocolate formulation caused a chain reaction because the vegetable oil Hershey uses to make its chocolate coating was incompatible with peanut butter. To solve this problem, Reese claims Hershey stopped using real peanut butter and instead used an ingredient called “peanut butter cream.”

The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) guidelines include two grades of peanut butter: A and B. The agency requires companies to use peanut butter that is “of good color, good consistency, few defects, and good taste and aroma,” with peanut butter scoring at least 90 points for Grade A peanut butter and 80 points for Grade B peanut butter. Products that do not meet these requirements must be labeled differently, according to California’s Riverside County Law Library.

Hershey used “cream” instead of “peanut butter” to avoid using the exact term “peanut butter” as defined by the USDA, the library said.

Brad Reese says Hershey’s return to classic recipes is a ‘PR stunt’

Reese said Hershey’s reputation has been tarnished, even though Hershey has vowed to return to its classic milk chocolate and peanut butter ingredients.

“This is much bigger than people realize,” he said, later adding that the company’s estimated timeline for reversing this change in 2027 “makes no sense at all.”

He said the schedule allows the company to cut corners on materials while still making more profit. Reese said he just wants people to know that they need to pay attention to ingredients when consuming products like Reese’s Cream Candies and other snacks, and that changes may be happening behind the scenes.

“Everyone would think, ‘Oh, my tastes have changed,'” he told USA TODAY. “They think they have a defective product.”

Reese called the recipe reversal, scheduled for 2027, a “PR stunt” and said the company hopes people will forget all about it.

“If it’s true, we’ll deal with it right away because damage is happening every day,” he says.

Reese family says grandson’s comments do not represent them

The Hershey Company sent a statement to USA TODAY on April 2 from the Reese family saying they do not support Brad Reese’s claims.

“His statements and opinions are entirely his own and do not reflect the views or positions of our family,” the family wrote. “We continue to respect the Hershey Company, its leadership, and its long-standing role in our community. We believe that Mr. HB Reese takes great pride in the products produced under his name today and the integrity with which the brand continues to be stewarded.”

Rees’ brother, Andrew Rees, has the right to publish his grandfather’s name, image and likeness. Since Brad Reese began airing his criticisms of Hershey via LinkedIn, Andrew has also reposted them and appears to agree that Hershey changed recipes without notifying customers.

Brad Reese said in an April 2 LinkedIn post that the family’s statement was nothing more than an attempt to “discredit Hershey’s Messenger.”

“Hershey can make all the statements it wants, but until Reese’s ingredients align with Reese’s brand story, it remains public record,” he wrote. “They changed the product on the lease. They got caught. And now they’re trying to manage the perception rather than solve the problem. The chain of evidence doesn’t go away.”

Saleen Martin is a reporter on USA TODAY’s Trends team. She is from Norfolk, Virginia – 757. Please send your email to: sdmartin@usatoday.com.

Tiger Woods says he’s ‘talking to the president’ in body camera footage

0

play

Body camera footage released Thursday by the Martin County (Fla.) Sheriff’s Office shows Tiger Woods talking on the phone as he is approached by police following the rollover crash that led to his arrest last week.

After hanging up, he told the official, “I’m just talking to the president.”

Woods was arrested on suspicion of driving under the influence after he crawled out of his overturned vehicle following a two-vehicle crash on Jupiter Island just after 2 p.m. ET on March 27.

The golfer was driving his Land Rover northbound at high speed when he overtook a truck towing a trailer containing a pressure washer and ripped out the truck. The speed limit was 30 miles per hour.

It’s not clear whether Woods just got off the phone with President Donald Trump, but Trump sent a message of congratulations to Woods in the hours after the accident.

Asked about Woods, President Trump said: “He’s had some difficulties. There was an accident, that’s all I know.” “He’s a very close friend of mine. He’s a great guy. A great guy. But there are some things that are a little difficult. I don’t want to talk about it.”

A White House representative did not respond to USA TODAY’s questions about Woods’ video released on April 2.

The 50-year-old golfer is dating Vanessa Trump, 48, the ex-wife of President Trump’s son Donald Trump Jr. President Trump awarded Woods the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the highest civilian honor, in 2019.

Woods was released from the Martin County Jail in Stuart, Florida late on March 27th. He was seen leaving the prison through a side entrance in the passenger seat of an SUV.

CVS opens 60 stores in U.S., including ‘pharmacy-style’ stores

0

play

CVS will open the first of its new “pharmacy-style” pharmacy-only stores in 2026 and plans to open more.

The drugstore chain announced its new store format on March 30th, and announced that it plans to open 20 similar stores nationwide in 2026. These pharmacy-only stores, the first of which opened last year in Birmingham, Alabama, will consist of full-service pharmacies that offer both prescription filling and over-the-counter product selection, minus the rest of the corner stores typically found in CVS stores.

Images of a newly released store in Chicago’s West End show a stripped-down version of the CVS Pharmacy counter you often see in the back of local CVS stores. Rather than occupying a small portion of the approximately 3,000 square foot space, the center is centered around a counter and accompanying waiting room, not dissimilar to a doctor’s office waiting room.

The purpose of these “pharmacy-style” stores is to give pharmacists more face-to-face interaction and consultation with customers, the company said in a press release.

“Our new dedicated pharmacy locations will allow our pharmacy teams to continue to build relationships with patients, their friends and neighbors, and provide on-site pharmacy care in the communities that need us,” Len Shankman, CVS Health executive vice president and president of Pharmacy and Consumer Wellness, said in a statement.

Where will new CVS locations open?

CVS plans to open a total of 20 pharmacy-only stores by the end of the year. Although the exact list of addresses was not shared, the format will expand to Houston, Detroit, Brooklyn, New York, and Roxbury, Massachusetts, according to a press release.

The company also plans to open more than 40 new CVS pharmacies nationwide in 2026, including traditional stores and Target pharmacies. Exact location details were not available as of April 2nd.

CVS closes thousands of stores and opens hundreds

Like other drugstore chains, including the now-defunct Rite Aid, CVS has struggled in recent years to maintain store numbers amid competition, leading to significant downsizing efforts.

The company announced plans to close 270 stores in 2025, adding to the roughly 800 net closures over the past three years as reported by the Wall Street Journal, for a total of more than 1,000 store closures.

Part of the chain’s strategy is to open more pharmacy counters inside Target stores and smaller in-store MinuteClinics for minor illnesses and injuries, vaccines and other simple care.

The company has also agreed to pay up to $4.9 billion over 10 years to settle a series of high-profile lawsuits alleging Medicare fraud, improper pricing and contributing to the opioid epidemic.

Army’s top officer, General Randy George, resigns at Hegseth’s request

0

play

Pentagon Secretary Pete Hegseth has asked the U.S. Army’s top official, General Randy George, to resign from his post and retire immediately, according to Pentagon officials.

According to CBS News, George has been the Army Chief of Staff since 2023. According to CBS News, Hegseth wanted someone in the Army who could better implement his and President Donald Trump’s vision. George’s retirement was also reported by Reuters. The official confirmed to USA TODAY that the CBS report was accurate.

The official spoke on condition of anonymity. The Army referred USA TODAY to Hegseth’s office.

Top Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell confirmed that General George will be retiring with immediate effect. “We are grateful for General George’s decades of service to our country and we wish him well in his retirement,” the Pentagon wrote.

Mr. George’s dismissal comes as the U.S. military engages in a war with Iran and increases its military presence, including parts of the Army, in the Middle East.

It also comes after Hegseth said in a social media post that a military investigation into the helicopter pilot who flew near the home of pro-Trump musician Kid Rock would be closed.

He wrote on March 31: “Thank you @KidRock. The @USAarmy pilot’s suspension has been lifted. No penalties or investigations. Carry on, patriots.”

Mr. Hegseth has fired a number of senior military personnel and generals, many of them women or black people, and some critics have questioned whether their race or gender contributed to their dismissal. The New York Times reported in late March that he blocked the promotion of two Black and two female Army officers to the rank of one-star general.

Mr. Hegseth fired several of his senior advisers last year for leaking information to the media.

George has over 40 years of military service. He was commissioned as an infantry officer from the U.S. Military Academy at West Point in 1988 and completed multiple deployments in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Who fired President Trump? Latest updates on Pam Bondi and Kristi Noem

0

play

President Donald Trump fired Attorney General Pam Bondi on Thursday, April 2, marking the second time in his second term that he has fired a Cabinet member.

Mr. Bondi’s firing is the latest example of Mr. Trump’s leadership style as president, which has been characterized by frequent changes at the top of his administration. Lawmakers from both parties accused Mr. Bondi of failing to release the Jeffrey Epstein files as ordered by Congress in December.

From Bondi to Kristi Noem, here are some notable examples of Trump’s use of his signature catchphrase as president over the years: “You’re fired.”

Bondi becomes the latest member of the Trump administration to be shown the door, with the president announcing the move in a post on Truth Social. He praised Bondi as a “great American patriot and a loyal friend,” adding that he plans to move into the private sector.

Following his firing, Mr. Bondi said he would hand over his duties at the Justice Department to Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche and continue to support Mr. Trump and his administration.

“President Trump’s historic and highly successful efforts to make America safer and more secure is the honor of a lifetime,” Bondi wrote on social media, calling his tenure “the most important first year of the Department of Justice in American history.”

Kristi Noem

Noem, who served as Homeland Security secretary and oversaw President Trump’s promise of mass deportations, was fired on March 5, shortly after being questioned by lawmakers over the department’s massive spending.

Her exit came after controversy surrounding a $220 million Department of Homeland Security ad campaign that featured Nomu prominently. She said President Trump approved the ad, but the president denied this claim.

During her time in office, Noem was a frequent target of criticism as her administration ramped up immigration enforcement. Her leadership at the department has come under increased scrutiny as public outcry over violence in Minneapolis, including the shooting deaths of two Americans, has garnered national attention.

Rex Tillerson

Rex Tillerson, who served as Secretary of State during the Trump administration’s first term, was fired by the president in March 2018 after returning from a trip to Africa.

During his time in office, Tillerson was often seen as operating outside of Trump’s inner circle and sometimes publicly diverged from the president’s views. President Trump said his decision to dismiss Tillerson was based on differences of opinion on North Korea diplomacy, steel and aluminum tariffs, and the Iran nuclear deal.

Mike Pompeo replaced Tillerson as Secretary of State.

jeff sessions

Jeff Sessions, who served as U.S. attorney general, was fired by President Trump after a year of intense scrutiny from the White House.

His resignation was forced by President Trump and came after the president criticized Sessions over his decision to recuse himself from the Justice Department’s investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election.

The President has named Matthew Whitaker, Chief of Staff to the Attorney General, as interim Attorney General.

john bolton

Bolton served as President Trump’s national security adviser until he was fired by the president in September 2019 following sharp disagreements over foreign policy.

President Trump announced the move in a social media post, writing that he and Bolton “strongly disagree” on several issues and that Bolton’s service in the White House is no longer needed.

Mr. Bolton publicly disputed Mr. Trump’s explanation, saying that Mr. Trump was not fired but offered to resign.

“I tendered my resignation last night, and President Trump said, ‘Let’s talk about it tomorrow,'” Bolton said at the time.

anthony scaramucci

Anthony Scaramucci served as White House communications director for just 11 days during President Trump’s first term, making him one of the shortest-serving senior officials in the Trump administration.

His short tenure drew scrutiny for his lack of communications experience and confrontational style, which caused tension within the West Wing. Scaramucci also publicly vowed to root out leaks from within his administration and said he would fire any staffer found speaking to the media without permission.

james comey

President Trump surprised the political world in May 2017 by firing FBI Director James Comey, an abrupt end to a term fraught with political controversy, from the Trump campaign’s ties to Russia to the handling of Hillary Clinton’s classified emails.

In recommending that Mr. Comey be fired, Justice Department leaders criticized Mr. Clinton’s handling of the investigation into his use of a private email server while secretary of state. In a letter to Comey released by the White House, Trump agreed that he was “unable to effectively lead the department.”

Democrats, including some who had previously attacked Comey for his handling of the Clinton investigation, viewed Trump’s firing as a blatant attempt to obstruct the Russia investigation.

contribution: Bert Jansen, Terry Collins, Sarah Wyer, Ryan W. Miller, Gregory Cote, Michael Loria, USA TODAY

Fernando Cervantes Jr. is a trending news reporter for USA TODAY. Contact us at fernando.cervantes@usatodayco.com and follow us at X @fern_cerv_.

Starbucks pays baristas bonuses for friendly, fast service

0

play

Does your Starbucks barista have a big smile on his face? It might have something to do with Starbucks investing in lattes.

The world’s largest coffee company is dangling hefty bonuses for friendly and fast service at its cafes.

Hourly workers, from baristas to shift supervisors, can earn an additional $1,200 a year if their stores meet or exceed customer service and other goals.

Starbucks rolled out the initiative in July, with the first payments expected to begin in the fall. It’s part of an attractive attack to boost sales by reconnecting with customers turned away by long wait times and high prices.

Brian Nicol, who was hired by Chipotle as CEO in 2024, wants baristas to resume serving the company. His turnaround strategy calls for warmer interactions, faster ordering and more inviting cafes.

The “return to Starbucks” effect seems to be taking place. Global sales at current locations increased 4% last quarter. Starbucks also announced a more bullish outlook for 2026 than expected.

Starbucks is also expanding its tipping offering by adding the option for customers to tip with a credit or debit card when ordering online using the app or paying at the register. From August, employees will be paid weekly instead of twice a month. The company said the changes could increase wages by an average of 5-8%.

Currently, baristas earn an average hourly wage of $30 with benefits, according to Starbucks. Baristas at hundreds of cafes (about 5% of stores) represented by the Starbucks Workers United union will have to negotiate individually for increased bonuses and tips, the company said.

Contract negotiations between Starbucks and the union have stalled.

The cover of J.D. Vance’s new book ‘Communion’ raises eyebrows.

0

play

Vice President J.D. Vance’s upcoming book is attracting attention not for its content but for its newly released cover.

Vance and publisher Harper (an imprint of HarperCollins Publishers) announced on March 31 that they will introduce a faith-centered memoir, Communion: Finding Your Way Home to Faith, to be released in June.

Vance described the book as a reflection on his “personal journey and how he found his way back to the faith,” specifically his upbringing as a Protestant and his conversion to Catholicism after spending time as an atheist.

The logline for Harper’s memoir reads: “Vance reflects on how he came to his faith and details his conversion to Catholicism. In doing so, he reveals how his faith guides his public work and how it influences his vision for the future.”

But eagle-eyed social media sleuths are pointing out a possible problem. The picturesque place of worship on the cover, nestled in the green hills of Virginia, appears to refer to the United Methodist Church, not the Catholic Church.

What is the cover photo for “Communion: Finding My Way Back to Faith”?

The cover image depicts the United Methodist Mount Zion Church in Elk Creek, Virginia, USA, and was confirmed today by metadata from Google Maps and a matching church image by the same photographer. Vance cited his family’s Appalachian roots in his previous memoir, Hillbilly Elegy, which debuted on the New York Times bestseller list when it was published in 2016, but it is unclear whether the book’s cover was intended to mimic a similar setting.

This discrepancy was first pointed out by Bulwark contributor Joe Particone.

Particone wrote on March 31: “While Mr. Vance has become particularly Catholic during his return to faith, the church featured in his book is not the Catholic Church. Given the vice president’s outspokenness about his Catholic faith, the choice of photo of Vance struck me as odd.”

Perticone similarly noted that idealistic images of “photogenic” churches taken by local photographer Tim Pennington are popular subjects for stock images. You can find several similar photos of the same church on the stock photo site Getty Images.

In a Dec. 26, 2020 comment posted on Instagram, Pennington confirmed the name and location of a similar image of a church, identifying it as Mount Zion United Methodist Church in Comers Rock, an Elk Creek recreation area.

Representatives for Mr. Vance and Mr. Harper did not immediately respond to USA TODAY’s requests for comment. USA TODAY also reached out to Tim Pennington.

JD Vance and the Catholic Church

Vance’s Catholic faith was often talked about during his time as vice president.

Vance told the American Conservative in 2019 that he grew up a Christian without any strong religious affiliation, and went through a period of identifying with evangelicalism and his father’s Pentecostal church before calling himself an atheist in college.

Vance officially converted to Catholicism in 2019, but has faced repeated criticism from both Pope Francis and Pope Leo XIV since the start of the Trump administration. Pope Francis directly contradicted Vance’s interpretation of Catholic principles, condemning his administration’s immigration policies as “shameful.” Pope Leo has been vocal about his anti-war views since the Iran war began in February.

Vance also spoke about his wife’s religion at a Turning Point USA event in October 2025, during which he said he hoped Usha Vance would abandon her Hindu faith and convert to Christianity.

“Ultimately, do I hope that she is moved in some way by the same things that moved me in church? Well, honestly, I hope so, because I believe in the Christian gospel, and I hope that eventually my wife will see that as well,” he said. “But even if she didn’t, that doesn’t matter to me because God says everyone has free will.”

“Communion: Finding My Way Back to Faith” is scheduled to be released on June 16, 2026.

Gasoline prices vary by state. What’s behind it?

0

play

  • Gas prices vary by state, depending on factors such as local taxes, distance from the source, and environmental programs.
  • In addition to state taxes, a federal tax of 18.4 cents per gallon has been applied to all gas purchases since 1993.
  • California has the highest state gas tax at 71 cents per gallon.

With gas prices averaging more than $4 per gallon, motorists are wondering what causes the differences in gas station prices from state to state.

These questions arise after the national average gasoline price rose to $4.08 per gallon on Thursday, April 2, according to the AAA Auto Club. This figure is up from the national average price of $3.98 a week ago on March 26th and the average price of $3.00 on March 5th.

The state with the highest gas prices on April 2 was California, where drivers paid an average of $5.89 per gallon, up from $4.65 a month earlier on March 5. The state with the lowest gas prices on April 2 was Oklahoma, where drivers paid an average of $3.27 per gallon, still up from Oklahoma’s average gas price of $2.47 a month earlier on March 5.

The USA TODAY Cars team investigated what causes gas price fluctuations in states and which states have the highest gas taxes.

What causes the variation in gas prices across states?

According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, regional differences in gas prices can be explained by several factors.

The agency cites the following reasons for regional differences in gas prices.

  • Differences between state and local gas taxes
  • Distance from source
  • interruption of supply
  • Retail competition and operating costs
  • environmental program

“The more gasoline has to be transported to the point of sale, the higher the transportation costs, so the retail price of gasoline tends to be higher,” the agency said.

“Slowing or halting gasoline production could result in increased bidding for available gasoline supplies,” the agency added. “Gas station prices are often highest in locations with the fewest gas stations.”

The agency added: “Some regions of the country require the use of special reformulated gasoline that contains additives to reduce the production of carbon monoxide, smog, and toxic air pollutants from gasoline evaporation and combustion.”

Which state has the highest gas tax?

The federal government has collected taxes on all gasoline purchases made at U.S. gas stations since the 1930s. The current tax rate of 18.4 cents per gallon was established by law passed by Congress in 1993. Transportation funding advocates lament that Congress has not acted to raise gas taxes in more than 30 years.

In addition to the federal gas tax paid by all drivers, each state imposes its own local gas tax.

Here are the states with the highest gas taxes and current average gas prices.

1. California

  • gasoline tax: 71 cents per gallon
  • Average gasoline price on April 2nd: $5.89

2. Illinois

  • gasoline tax: 66 cents per gallon
  • Average gasoline price on April 2nd: $4.27

3. Washington

  • gasoline tax: 59 cents per gallon
  • Average gasoline price on April 2nd: $5.37

4. Pennsylvania

  • gasoline tax: 59 cents per gallon
  • Average gasoline price on April 2nd: $4.08

5. Indiana

  • gasoline tax: 55 cents per gallon
  • Average gasoline price on April 2nd: $3.95

6.Michigan

  • gasoline tax: 48 cents per gallon
  • Average gasoline price on April 2nd: $3.89

7. Maryland

  • gasoline tax: 46 cents per gallon
  • Average gasoline price on April 2nd: $4.06

8. New Jersey

  • gasoline tax: 45 cents per gallon
  • Average gasoline price on April 2nd: $4.05

9. Virginia

  • gasoline tax: 42 cents per gallon
  • Average gasoline price on April 2nd: $4.01

10. Rhode Island

  • gasoline tax: 41 cents per gallon
  • Average gasoline price on April 2nd: $3.91

11. North Carolina

  • gasoline tax: 41 cents per gallon
  • Average gasoline price on April 2nd: $3.91

12. Oregon

  • gasoline tax: 40 cents per gallon
  • Average gasoline price on April 2nd: $4.97

13. Florida

  • gasoline tax: 39 cents per gallon
  • Average gasoline price on April 2nd: $4.23

14. Utah

  • gasoline tax: 39 cents per gallon
  • Average gasoline price on April 2nd: $4.19

15. Ohio

  • gasoline tax: 39 cents per gallon
  • Average gasoline price on April 2nd: $3.76

16. West Virginia

  • gasoline tax: 36 cents per gallon
  • Average gasoline price on April 2nd: $3.91

17. Washington DC

  • gasoline tax: 35 cents per gallon
  • Average gasoline price on April 2nd: $4.20

18. Georgia

  • gasoline tax: 34 cents per gallon
  • Average gasoline price on April 2nd: $3.70

19. Montana

  • gasoline tax: 34 cents per gallon
  • Average gasoline price on April 2nd: $3.75

20. Idaho

  • gasoline tax: 33 cents per gallon
  • Average gasoline price on April 2nd: $4.27

21. Wisconsin

  • gasoline tax: 33 cents per gallon
  • Average gasoline price on April 2nd: $3.79

22. Nebraska

  • gasoline tax: 33 cents per gallon
  • Average gasoline price on April 2nd: $3.43

23. Minnesota

  • gasoline tax: 32 cents per gallon
  • Average gasoline price on April 2nd: $3.55

24. Maine

  • gasoline tax: 31 cents per gallon
  • Average gasoline price on April 2nd: $3.91

25. Vermont

  • gasoline tax: 31 cents per gallon
  • Average gasoline price on April 2nd: $3.99

26. Alabama

  • gasoline tax: 31 cents per gallon
  • Average gasoline price on April 2nd: $3.80

27. Iowa

  • gasoline tax: 30 cents per gallon
  • Average gasoline price on April 2nd: $3.48

28. South Dakota

  • gasoline tax: 30 cents per gallon
  • Average gasoline price on April 2nd: $3.52

29. Missouri

  • gasoline tax: 30 cents per gallon
  • Average gasoline price on April 2nd: $3.49

30. Colorado

  • gasoline tax: 29 cents per gallon
  • Average gasoline price on April 2nd: $3.83

31. South Carolina

  • gasoline tax: 59 cents per gallon
  • Average gasoline price on April 2nd: $3.83

32. Massachusetts

  • gasoline tax: 27 cents per gallon
  • Average gasoline price on April 2nd: $3.86

33. Tennessee

  • gasoline tax: 27 cents per gallon
  • Average gasoline price on April 2nd: $3.84

34. Kentucky

  • gasoline tax: 26 cents per gallon
  • Average gasoline price on April 2nd: $3.90

35. Kansas

  • gasoline tax: 25 cents per gallon
  • Average gasoline price on April 2nd: $3.33

36. Arkansas

  • gasoline tax: 25 cents per gallon
  • Average gasoline price on April 2nd: $3.53

37.Connecticut

  • gasoline tax: 25 cents per gallon
  • Average gasoline price on April 2nd: $4.02

38. New York

  • gasoline tax: 25 cents per gallon
  • Average gasoline price on April 2nd: $4.01

39. Wyoming

  • gasoline tax: 24 cents per gallon
  • Average gasoline price on April 2nd: $3.84

40. New Hampshire

  • gasoline tax: 24 cents per gallon
  • Average gasoline price on April 2nd: $3.87

41. Nevada

  • gasoline tax: 24 cents per gallon
  • Average gasoline price on April 2nd: $4.94

42. North Dakota

  • gasoline tax: 23 cents per gallon
  • Average gasoline price on April 2nd: $3.43

43. Delaware

  • gasoline tax: 23 cents per gallon
  • Average gasoline price on April 2nd: $3.88

44. Mississippi

  • gasoline tax: 21 cents per gallon
  • Average gasoline price on April 2nd: $3.71

45. Louisiana

  • gasoline tax: 21 cents per gallon
  • Average gasoline price on April 2nd: $3.75

46. ​​Oklahoma

  • gasoline tax: 20 cents per gallon
  • Average gasoline price on April 2nd: $3.27

47. Texas

  • gasoline tax: 20 cents per gallon
  • Average gasoline price on April 2nd: $3.80

48. Arizona

  • gasoline tax: 18 cents per gallon
  • Average gasoline price on April 2nd: $4.69

49. New Mexico

  • gasoline tax: 19 cents per gallon
  • Average gasoline price on April 2nd: $3.83

50. Hawaii

  • gasoline tax: 19 cents per gallon
  • Average gasoline price on April 2nd: $5.50

51. Alaska

  • gasoline tax: 9 cents per gallon
  • Average gasoline price on April 2nd: $4.60

Pam Bondi’s biggest controversies as AG, starting with the Epstein file

0

play

After just over a year on the job, Pam Bondi is no longer the nation’s top law enforcement officer.

The former Florida attorney general and ally of President Donald Trump served as U.S. attorney general for 14 months, during which time he sparked controversy and significant criticism.

Bondi’s tenure has been eventful, from launching investigations into people considered the president’s enemies to overseeing the botched release of millions of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein.

Here’s what you need to know about her biggest controversies.

Pam Bondi fired from Justice Department amid reports of rift with President Trump

In an April 2 social media post, President Trump praised Bondi as a “great American patriot and loyal friend” and said he would move to the private sector.

But in recent days, multiple media outlets have reported that the president is unhappy with the attorney general, particularly over the department’s response to the release of documents related to the sex trafficking investigation into the late convicted financier Epstein.

Bondi’s firing marks the second time in President Trump’s second term that he has fired a Cabinet member. He fired Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem in March and replaced her with former Oklahoma Sen. Markwayne Mullin.

In the interim, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, the president’s former personal lawyer, will lead the Justice Department.

Bondi’s tenure in office jeopardized by Epstein file controversy

Mr. Bondi’s tenure was marred by accusations of mismanagement over his handling of the Epstein file. In recent months, several prominent members of Congress have alleged that she was involved in a cover-up regarding the investigation, further fueling what has proven to be a stubborn thorn in the Trump administration’s side.

The outgoing attorney general was one of the most vocal advocates for transparency in the Epstein case before and shortly after becoming the country’s top law enforcement official, pledging to release Justice Department information about the accused sex trafficker. But within months, Bondi became the subject of federal misconduct charges related to the Epstein investigation and a frequent target of conspiracy theories.

Congress almost unanimously passed an unusual bipartisan agreement to force the Justice Department to release the files to the public after Mr. Bondi refused to release them in July 2025, breaking an earlier promise. The department missed the deadline and released about 60% of Epstein-related documents. Blanche said the records left behind include the names of women who have accused Epstein of abuse, who could harm potential prosecutions, or who are protected under legal privilege.

The Justice Department under Bondi also came under fire for failing to prosecute the alleged accomplices of sex traffickers. Epstein’s associate, Ghislaine Maxwell, is the only person indicted so far and is currently serving a 20-year sentence. Epstein died in prison in 2019 while awaiting trial on child sex trafficking charges. The Justice Department estimates that the deceased fund manager victimized more than 1,000 women and children.

Anger over the release culminated in a raucous oversight hearing before the House Judiciary Committee on February 11, which featured heated exchanges and open yelling between Bondi and House Democrats. Lawmakers accused Mr. Bondi of abandoning victims of sex offenders to protect the president, who once befriended Mr. Epstein, and other powerful friends and allies of President Trump. Bondi strongly denied allegations of a cover-up, telling lawmakers at a hearing in February that an investigation into possible co-conspirators was underway.

Republicans on the committee rushed to Bondi’s defense, but the cracks in support have widened, with some Republicans also expressing displeasure with his response to the release of the files. The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee subpoenaed Bondi on April 14 to testify about the Epstein file.

Investigations into people considered President Trump’s Democratic opponents have failed.

Mr. Bondi has also come under fire for firing dozens of career prosecutors who worked on investigations criticized by Mr. Trump, with critics accusing him of abandoning the Justice Department’s traditional emphasis on impartial justice.

Her handling of the investigation into President Trump’s political rivals has also been controversial, and the president has made an unusual public request to speed up the investigation.

President Trump publicly pressured Bondi on social media in September 2025 to take legal action against New York Attorney General Letitia James, former FBI Director James Comey, and Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif. But judges dismissed the charges against James and Comey, and a grand jury declined to bring new charges. Mr. Schiff has not been charged.

The grand jury also declined to indict any suspects in the investigation by U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro for the District of Columbia. One investigation targeted six Democratic members of Congress for encouraging the military to disobey illegal orders.

Contributed by: Reuters; Bert Jansen, USA TODAY.

Kathryn Palmer is USA TODAY’s political reporter. She can be reached at the following address: kapalmer@usatoday.com And to X@Kathryn Purml. Sign up for her daily politics newsletter here.

President Trump imposes 100% tariff on branded drugs and changes to steel tariffs

0


Pharmaceutical companies that promise to shift production to the United States will be subject to a 20% tariff, but if they also agree to lower prices, the tariff will be reduced to zero.

play

President Donald Trump has ordered a 100% tariff on branded drugs made overseas as his administration ramps up efforts to encourage drug companies to manufacture in the United States.

President Trump threatened to impose tariffs last year, but has since worked to negotiate deals with drug companies to lower prices and force the U.S. to produce medicines.

Several companies have agreed to such deals. According to the order, drug companies that commit to shifting production to the U.S. will be subject to a 20% tariff during the transition, but will be exempted if they also agree to reduce prices to the so-called “most-favored-nation” level paid by other countries. If the drug is not produced in the U.S. within four years, full tariffs will be imposed.

The European Union, Japan, South Korea, Switzerland and the United Kingdom are exempt from tariffs due to existing trade agreements with the United States.

A White House official said the tariffs would help ensure the United States does not benefit from other countries for life-saving drugs. The tariffs will take effect on July 31st for some companies and September 29th for others, depending on the size of the company.

“The United States is highly dependent on imports, and disruptions to global supply chains due to geopolitical or economic turmoil could limit America’s access to life-saving medicines,” the executive order signed by President Trump on April 2 said, adding that approximately 53% of patented medicines distributed in the United States are manufactured overseas.

However, experts say higher tariffs could lead to higher drug prices.

Approximately 90% of drug prescriptions in the United States are generic drugs. The 100% tariff applies to branded drugs that still have patents, not generic drugs.

In enacting the drug tax, President Trump is using tariff authority that was unaffected by the Supreme Court’s decision that invalidated the use of emergency powers to enact blanket tariffs.

The new tax on pharmaceuticals was introduced on the anniversary of President Trump launching an aggressive tariff program last year. Since then, it has suffered setbacks in the courts and faced strong criticism from Democrats and some Republicans concerned about soaring prices.

The Democratic National Committee said on April 2 that President Trump is damaging the economy with a “reckless trade war.”

The Trump administration was undaunted by polls showing tariffs are unpopular. In an April 2 press release, the White House praised President Trump’s trade policies, saying they will “make our country rich, strong, and respected again.”

“This is just the beginning of the President’s transformation of global trade…Americans can look forward to the best yet,” White House Press Secretary Khush Desai said in a statement.

On April 2, President Trump also ordered changes to tariffs on foreign steel, aluminum and copper, which White House officials say are aimed at preventing steel exporters from other countries from undervaluing the steel they export to the United States, thereby lowering their tariff costs. The President also revised tariffs on metals in finished products, eliminating tariffs on products with less than 15% metal content and changing the way tariffs are calculated on products with high metal content.

President Trump has been pressuring drug companies to lower prices and invest in U.S. production.

The president held a White House event in December to announce that nine companies had agreed to lower prices: Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genentech, Gilead, GSK, Merck, Novartis, and Sanofi. In February, the administration launched TrumpRx, a new website aimed at helping Americans buy medicines at lower prices.

White House officials said pharmaceutical companies are also committed to investing hundreds of billions of dollars in the United States.

This story has been updated to add new information.

Contributor: Ken Alltucker

FSIS says dinosaur chicken nuggets may contain dangerous levels of lead

0

A public health warning has been issued for frozen dinosaur-shaped chicken nuggets that may be contaminated with dangerous levels of lead, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service.

The agency said the issue was discovered during “routine surveillance sampling” and is continuing to investigate.

FSIS said no recall has been requested because the product is no longer available for purchase. However, the product may still be in the consumer’s freezer.

Here’s what you need to know:

Which Frozen Dinosaur Chicken Nuggets are affected?

The product subject to the public health warning is a 29-ounce plastic bag of great value fully cooked dinosaur-shaped chicken breast nuggets. Each bag contains approximately 36 nuggets, has a “best before” date of February 10, 2027, and a lot code of “0416DPO1215.” The establishment number “P44164” is printed on the back of the bag.

Where were the chicken nuggets shipped?

FSIS said the nuggets were shipped to Walmart stores across the United States.

Why are chicken nuggets unsafe?

Chicken nuggets can be contaminated with dangerous levels of lead.

According to FSIS, lead is especially dangerous for pregnant women, infants, and young children because it can harm the developing brain and nervous system, potentially causing permanent problems.

“There is no safe amount of lead exposure. Food and Drug Administration guidelines establish an Interim Reference Level (IRL) of 2.2 micrograms,” FSIS said in a public health alert. “The amount of lead in these nuggets can be up to five times higher than this IRL for children.”

Consumers who have purchased these products and still have them in their freezers are advised not to consume them and to throw them away or return them to the place of purchase.

Gabe Hauari is USA TODAY’s national trends news reporter. You can follow him at X @gabehauari Or email Gdhauari@gannett.com.

Why was Pam Bondi fired? President Trump fires attorney general

0


“(President Trump) wants to prosecute his opponents and doesn’t understand why he can’t press the button and do it,” Dave Aronberg, a former Florida prosecutor who worked with Bondi, told USA TODAY.

play

WASHINGTON – “We love Pam.” “A great American patriot.” “My faithful friend.”

Judging by President Donald Trump’s effusive praise of former Attorney General Pam Bondi on social media on April 2, you might think he was nominating her for the award rather than firing her.

But this was the president’s way of saying that Bondi would no longer work at the Justice Department after only a year on the job.

President Trump praised Bondi for doing a “great job” targeting crimes and homicides across the country, and said he “faithfully fulfilled” his role. So why would he oust the woman he had chosen to serve as the nation’s highest law enforcement officer?

Asked for comment on Trump’s reasoning, the White House referred USA TODAY to Trump’s social media posts, which not only praised Bondi but also said, “She will be moving to an important new job that is desperately needed in the private sector and will be announced in the near future.”

The Justice Department did not immediately respond to USA TODAY’s request for comment, but Bondi posted on social media that he would “continue to fight” for the president, where he would help transition the department “before moving on to a key role in the private sector, which I am excited about.”

President Trump has so far chosen to keep the reasons opaque in his public statements, but Bondi has been immune to criticism for about a year in office. She is accused of politicizing the Justice Department and ignoring the victims of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, and is facing multiple impeachment efforts.

And despite being accused of weaponizing the Justice Department, she has had little success prosecuting political opponents and critics, reportedly drawing the president’s ire.

“(President Trump) wants to prosecute his opponents, but he doesn’t understand why he can’t just push a button and do it,” Dave Aronberg, a former state attorney in Palm Beach County, Florida, who worked in the Florida attorney general’s office in Bondi, told USA TODAY. Aronberg, a Democrat, testified in support of his nomination for U.S. attorney general.

“Attorney General Bondi is an experienced prosecutor, and she will never be the Roy Cohn that (Trump) wants her to be,” Aronberg added, referring to the lawyer who helped Sen. Joseph McCarthy investigate suspected communists in the 1950s and later mentored and represented Trump.

Targeting Trump’s opponents but failing to capture them

In September, Bondi agreed to Trump’s request to appoint Lindsey Harrigan, a lawyer with no experience as a prosecutor, as Virginia’s top prosecutor, but Trump wanted to indict his critics, former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James. Harrigan then heeded President Trump’s call for grand jury indictments against each.

But those prosecutions went nowhere.

The judge ruled that Harrigan was illegally appointed and dismissed the charges in both cases. The Justice Department has since tried at least twice unsuccessfully to obtain new indictments against James from a grand jury. As for Comey, the department faces questions about whether the legal deadline to seek new charges has passed.

The Justice Department has appealed an initial ruling that threw out the cases against Comey and James.

The Justice Department under Bondy is also investigating others who have been hostile to President Trump, including Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell, and six members of Congress who urged military personnel to disobey potentially illegal orders. However, the department has not secured charges against these people.

Epstein file controversy

Bondi has also come under fire for his handling of the Epstein file, as Republicans in Congress join Democrats in calling for greater transparency at the Justice Department.

In March 2025, Mr. Bondi fueled expectations that the Justice Department would release incriminating information against associates of Mr. Epstein, who died in a Manhattan jail awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges.

But in May, Bondi reportedly told Trump that his name appeared multiple times in the file. The Justice Department then released a memo in July saying that a systematic internal review of the files had not uncovered a list of criminal Epstein clients and that “further disclosure is not appropriate or warranted.”

Since then, Mr. Bondi has had to face accusations of involvement in a cover-up from some Republicans and many members of the public who sympathize with Mr. Trump’s MAGA movement.

After Congress passed a transparency law forcing the Justice Department to release the Epstein documents, the department missed its legal release deadline by weeks. He released an image of the alleged victim, but admitted it was a mistake. And he has since been accused of withholding and editing documents in violation of the law.

“Sadly, the Department of Justice has failed to adequately redact victim information and, at the same time, has failed to avoid exposing individuals who are criminals,” Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), the transparency law’s lead sponsor, told USA TODAY in a statement in February.

Bondi’s troubles with Epstein didn’t seem to end when she was fired. The Republican-led House Oversight Committee subpoenaed Mr. Bondi to testify under oath in an April 14 deposition about how the Justice Department handled the Epstein file.

The committee’s top Democrat, Rep. Robert Garcia of California, posted on social media on April 2 that those plans remain unchanged.

“Pam Bondi and Donald Trump may think that if she is fired, she will not be able to testify before the Oversight Committee. They are wrong. We look forward to hearing from her under oath.”