Home Blog Page 189

President Trump’s banquet hall prepares for vote as judge orders construction halt

0

play

Two days after a federal judge ordered a halt to President Donald Trump’s $400 million ballroom project, which must first be approved by Congress, the Federal Planning Agency is scheduled to take a final vote on the project’s site and construction plans.

The vote by the 12-member National Capital Planning Commission on April 2nd, chaired by Will Schaaf, White House chief of staff and former personal lawyer to President Trump, will be conducted in person and the public will be allowed to attend. This is in contrast to the March 5 public hearing, which was held online after the project received more than 35,000 written comments and 104 applicants to testify. Most comments were negative.

Even if the commission votes in favor of the ballroom, it cannot override the judge’s decision to halt construction on the project.

Still, Planning Commission spokesman Steven Staudigl said the vote advances the final stage of the review process.

A White House official, who can speak freely on condition of anonymity, told USA TODAY, “There is nothing in the injunction that prevents the Planning Commission from considering the aesthetic and architectural merits of the project.”

President Trump, who has long lamented the lack of a spacious banquet hall on the White House grounds to eliminate reliance on temporary tents during events such as state dinners, called the judge’s decision “wrong” in a post on Truth Social.

The project was announced by the White House in July, but became a highly controversial undertaking as the east wing was suddenly demolished to accommodate a 90,000 square foot ballroom.

Financing the project through private donations also caused controversy. The White House announced a list of 37 donors, including companies such as Amazon, Apple, Caterpillar, Coinbase, Google, Comcast, HP, Lockheed Martin, Meta, Microsoft, T-Mobile and Union Pacific Railroad, but did not disclose the amount donated. Some companies do business with the federal government.

The National Trust for Historic Preservation filed a lawsuit Dec. 12 asking the court to halt further construction until the plans pass Congressional approval and a legally required review process. The scale of the project would “dwarf the White House itself,” the preservation group said.

A March 31 ruling by U.S. District Judge Richard J. Leon questioned the “complex financing plan” and noted that Congressional approval could maintain “power over state property and oversight over government spending.”

“The President of the United States is the custodian of the White House for the next generation of the First Family. But he is not the owner!” Leon wrote in a 35-page opinion.

The ruling halts all actions “including, but not limited to, further demolition, site preparation, landscaping, excavation, foundation work, and other construction and related works,” except those that are “absolutely necessary” to ensure the safety of the area.

The Trump administration immediately appealed.

Leon’s order will go into effect on April 14, two weeks after its issuance date. The White House team must file a compliance report with the court within 21 days of the order taking effect.

The ballroom plan is in the final stages of the design approval process, with the Fine Arts Commission expected to approve the design on February 27th and the National Capital Planning Commission on April 2nd. But even if NCPC approves the plan, Leon’s ruling prevents the project from moving forward.

When the White House first announced plans for the ballroom, President Trump told reporters that the addition “will be built on the east side and it’s going to be beautiful.”

“You’ll have a view of the Washington Monument. It won’t be in the way of the current building,” he says. “It’s close, but it doesn’t touch it, and it has complete respect for the existing building. I’m the biggest fan of that.”

But plans have changed.

The loss of the historic building drew criticism from former residents and the public, including former first ladies Hillary Clinton and Michelle Obama.

Clinton posted a photo of the demolished east wing facade with an X caption that read, “It’s not his house. It’s your house. And he’s destroying it.”

Swapna Venugopal Ramaswamy is USA TODAY’s White House correspondent. You can follow her at X @SwapnaVenugopal.

Big Bend border wall faces bipartisan opposition in Texas

0


Call it Texas Independence: Republicans and Democrats in the Big Bend say outsiders shouldn’t decide their future. They argue that a border wall would separate them from the rivers and land that define the region.

PRESIDIO, Texas – It’s a dark, starry night for Dennis Carrera. Mike Davidson has been rowing the Rio Grande for 49 years. For Bill Ivey, it’s the ghost town business he built with his father and now his son.

In a historically rebellious state, an unlikely coalition of Texans of diverse backgrounds and political opponents are banding together to fight President Donald Trump’s plan to spend billions on a border wall here in the state’s rugged Big Bend region.

River contractors have bombarded the state’s Republican Congressional delegation and Republican Gov. Greg Abbott with anti-wall postcards. A local photographer started a petition that gathered over 106,000 signatures. Protests are planned for April 4 at the Texas State Capitol and Big Bend National Park.

There are now significant signs that their efforts may be paying off.

The Department of Homeland Security has updated its online “smart wall” map to replace plans for physical barriers with “deterrent technology” at national and state parks in the region. Local officials, including the governor, said they had been informally assured that no wall would be built inside the park.

play

Big Bend residents oppose border wall proposal

Residents oppose a proposed border wall near Big Bend, citing environmental and economic concerns.

Texans in the Big Bend say the region’s border wall threatens their land, lives and livelihoods. They don’t want distant government officials making decisions without their input. Physical barriers could put at risk the landscape, which attracts more than 500,000 tourists a year and drives the local economy.

“It doesn’t take much to destroy a community, and if you put a wall in the Big Bend region… it would destroy the economy here,” said Ivey, a Republican and longtime Trump supporter.

“I think someone drew a line on a map of Washington, and they’ve never been here,” Ivey said. “All you have to do is come here and see it.”

The dark nights of Big Bend reveal distant galaxies. The green Rio Grande floats like a ribbon in the jaws of jagged canyons. Once a quaint ghost town, Terlingua serves as a springboard to the vast desert vistas of Big Bend National Park. The Presidio, with a population of 3,246, has historic Mexican, Spanish, and indigenous roots in the area.

“The fact that they’re trying to disrupt our peace, the fact that they’re trying to take away the only thing we have, which is the night sky, really makes me angry,” said Carrera, who lives in Presidio. The government already has a contract to build 272 miles of border wall in the Presidio.

In an emailed response to questions, U.S. Customs and Border Protection told USA TODAY that the combination of barriers, roads and technology adjacent to Big Bend National Park and Big Bend Ranch State Park is “still in the planning stages.”

CBP said it coordinates with federal and state agencies “throughout border security and technology implementation planning to achieve the Border Patrol’s operational priorities.”

The Big Bend region of Texas is one of the last areas along the border without some kind of fence or barrier. Locals say the mountains, remote desert and extreme weather are enough deterrents to prevent illegal crossings.

The Border Patrol’s own numbers bear that out. At 500 miles, the Big Bend sector is the largest of nine sectors on the Southwest border. Although it is almost a quarter of the distance between the United States and Mexico, the number of illegal border crossings is at an all-time low.

In late 2023, during President Joe Biden’s presidency, the El Paso area was recording more than 50,000 migrants per month, while the Big Bend area had about 1,500 migrant encounters. According to U.S. Customs and Border Protection data, there were 3,096 immigration arrests in the Big Bend region in fiscal year 2025, or 1% of the 237,538 border arrests overall.

CBP said a contract has been awarded for a “major border wall system” in the eastern and western border areas of the Presidio that will run through farms and ranches to the edge of Big Bend Ranch State Park. CBP confirmed to USA TODAY that construction of a three-mile border barrier originally planned within the state park has been canceled.

“The Wonders of the Rio Grande”

In late March, the bilingual slogans “No Walls” and “No Al Muro” were plastered all over the Big Bend area, on trucker hats, road signs, bumper stickers and hand-embroidered beer koozies.

During his 2015 election campaign, Trump promised to build a “big, beautiful wall” along the nearly 2,000-mile U.S.-Mexico border. His first administration built 482 miles of physical barriers, but installed only 137 miles of new fencing, according to an analysis by border security researcher Adam Isakson.

Biden halted construction of the border wall. Trump restarted it. In the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, signed into law by President Trump last summer, Congress gave the Department of Homeland Security $46.5 billion to expedite border wall construction.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection announced by January that it intended to issue $11.4 billion in contracts in President Trump’s first year and award the remaining contracts by June 30. The goal is to construct 250 miles of new border barrier by September 30th.

Local alarm began to spread after the Big Bend Sentinel newspaper published a story about the president’s plans.

Terlingua outfitters handed out addressed postcards to tourists after canoe trips. At Benga, a restaurant and tourist hub, every table had a barrier postcard and a pen. Activists erected a makeshift iron fence in the restaurant’s parking lot and posted another slogan, “Stop the Steal,” on top of it. This is a play on the MAGA effort to overturn the 2020 election.

Erin Little, co-owner of Big Bend Boat and Hike, said she and other tour companies have mailed thousands of postcards to Abbott, Sens. John Cornyn and Ted Cruz, and Rep. Tony Gonzalez, whose district includes Big Bend.

Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Cruz and Mr. Gonzalez did not respond to USA TODAY’s requests for comment. Abbott spokesman Andrew Maharelis told USA TODAY that the governor “fully supports the use of all tools and strategies necessary to assist the Trump administration in deterring illegal immigrants who attempt to make the dangerous journey across our southern border.”

“Rugged and isolated areas like the Big Bend present a unique opportunity to deploy technology to assist border security,” Mahalelis said in an email, adding that U.S. Border Patrol Chief Mike Banks assured governors there are no physical barriers in state or national parks.

Still, tourists are pitching in to continue the fight alongside locals, Little said as he carried a plastic box of postcards.

“Great support,” she said.

One Texas mother who was near the top of the mountain said a wall won’t stop crime. It always finds a way. She wrote in cursive: “What the wall prevents is our daughters’ access to the wonders of the Rio Grande and the curiosity of future Texans to learn and grow from experiences on protected public lands.”

Wall by the river: “The final insult”

During the day, the road between Presidio and Terlingua through Big Bend Ranch State Park curves along the river and up and over steep hills.

A violent volcanic eruption approximately 30 million years ago (after the extinction of the dinosaurs) created the sheer rock faces and boulder fields that make the area’s topography so unique. The Rio Grande is a relatively recent arrival geologically, flowing into the Big Bend about 2 million years ago.

In late March, turtles sunbathe on the river’s edge. Gambel’s quail runs among the rocks. The scorching 100 degree sun in the afternoon keeps other wildlife away.

But at night, desert animals come down to the Rio Grande in search of water. The mule deer, with their keen ears, dart across the two-lane state highway. A company of pig-like javelina roams around. A black-tailed jackrabbit threads its way through a field of mesquite and flowering nopal cacti.

Davidson, a longtime river guide and born-and-raised Texan, began guiding tourists on the Rio Grande in the 1980s, when the river was swollen and flooded frequently.

“When I first came here, we had summer rains and bad flooding,” he said. “We like rivers. We like floods. The higher, the better.”

Over the years, he said, the river has been subjected to “small insults” that have added up to dramatically change its nature and ecosystem. He points to a warming climate and increased growing of expensive, water-intensive agricultural products in Mexico since the North American Free Trade Agreement in the 1990s.

The lanky 73-year-old paddled the river for five straight days in late March, guiding vacationing couples, families and college students, many on their first run on the Rio Grande.

“It would feel like the final insult to build a wall separating me from the river, which is part of my existence,” he said.

“Why do they want to make it?”

The world’s eighth-largest economy, a lone star state and former Republic of Texas with a history of fighting for independence, has a track record of overseeing the federal government. It is the largest state in the Lower 48 and the second most populous.

Asked if Big Bend residents could stop the wall from being built, Ivey said, “I’m old enough to remember when a group of Texans tried to secede from the Union.”

Border wall opponents plan to hold rallies at the Texas State Capitol in Austin on April 4th and in the Santa Elena Valley in Big Bend National Park the same day. They want Mr. Abbott and the state’s congressional delegation to take a stand.

In the Presidio, Luis Armendariz Spencer keeps a dusty copy of Texas Monthly in the back seat of his Chevrolet, which includes a cover story about a Texas gunman called “The Hell We Raised.” He owns farmland on the U.S.-Mexico border and believes there is no need for a border wall in the area.

“Why do they want to build it?” he asked. “To prevent Mexicans from coming to the United States to work? But they’re not coming anymore.”

Grassroots efforts to oppose border wall construction have had little success. But as opposition to Big Bend grows among Republicans, President Trump’s Department of Homeland Security is signaling it may be listening.

On March 5, the same day that President Trump fired former DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, the official color-coded “smart wall” map was updated online to show that Big Bend National Park would be equipped with unspecified “detection technology” rather than a 30-foot steel barrier.

On March 22, Big Bend Border Patrol Chief Lloyd Easterling told Presidio County Commissioner Deirdre Hissler that DHS has also decided to remove physical barriers at Big Bend Ranch State Park. Local residents are concerned about the departure of officials. A few days later, Easterling announced he was retiring from the Border Patrol.

On March 30th, the “Smart Wall” map was updated again to reflect that new stance. But residents say the new colors on the digital map are not enough to allay fears.

“When the map changed, did we celebrate? We celebrated,” she said. “But we remain on high alert.”

Landowners received notices threatening eminent land, which is the federal government’s right to expropriate property for a fair payment for its own purposes. Hissler said the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and others will review the property ownership in Presidio County Court on April 20. Local residents have been sharing photos of survey markers appearing on state park grounds.

Contractors are surveying the area.

In Valentine, 95 miles north of the Presidio, the mayor received a request from a company called Frontier Development to set up a camp with 200 trailers to house out-of-town construction workers, city clerk Albert Miller said. The total population of the town is 73 people.

Before the committee could discuss it, the company withdrew its proposal after encountering opposition.

Carrera, who has returned to his hometown of Presidio after a decade in Dallas, worries about how the men’s camps, construction teams and floodlights will affect the quiet, dark night skies of the countryside he has drawn into.

In Dallas, “we had to plan for times when the moon would be visible,” she said. “I took a photo with my iPhone today, and you can see the Milky Way.”

“Being four minutes away from a sign that says ‘Night Sky Preserve’ feels very special,” she said. “If you do that, everything will be ruined, right?”

Lauren Villagran covers borders and immigration for USA TODAY. Contact her at lvillagran@usatoday.com or laurenvillagran.57 on Signal.

10 energy and shipping stocks to watch as Hormuz turmoil grows

0


Downside risk for stocks in the current market environment can be mitigated by buying stocks that will do well due to the continued closure of the Channel and potential damage to energy infrastructure.

play

With the conflict in the Persian Gulf still ongoing, it’s a good idea to purchase some protection in your portfolio in case the conflict becomes prolonged, or even relatively short-lived, causes lasting structural damage to pre-conflict economic activity.

With that in mind, here’s a whistleblower tour of 10 stocks that can help investors in the current environment.

3 oil stocks that could benefit if oil prices rise further

It’s hard not to think of Captain Obvious here, but a good place to start is with oil and gas exploration and production companies, especially those operating in the United States such as Devon Energy, which focuses on the Permian Basin. (NYSE:DVN) and Diamondback Energy (NASDAQ: FANG). These two companies are not only attractive as tactical tools to manage the risk of high oil prices. They also look very valuable based on pre-conflict oil prices.

The third is Chevron, a major integrated company. (NYSE:CVX). Upstream operations (exploration and production) have benefited from higher oil prices, while downstream operations (refining) have also benefited from widening crack spreads (the difference between crude oil prices and refined product prices) due to poor access to crude oil and refined product shortages for Asian refiners.

DVN Chart

petroleum product refiner

Speaking of crack spreads, the most widely followed is the 3-2-1 spread (the spread between the prices of three barrels of oil, two barrels of gasoline, and one barrel of diesel), which has grown from less than $20 at the beginning of the year to just over $54 today.

That’s good news for refiners like Valero Energy. (NYSE:VLO) and PBF energy (NYSE:PBF), They get their oil from the US regardless of price. The latter is more of a pure refiner (Valero also has renewable diesel and ethanol businesses), and PBF is outperforming the market. As long as crack spreads remain wide and high prices do not destroy demand for transportation products (such as gasoline), these stocks are likely to outperform.

Don’t forget liquefied natural gas (LNG)

According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), 34% of the world’s crude oil trade passes through the Strait of Hormuz, and 20% of the world’s LNG trade also passes through the Strait of Hormuz. Almost 90% of the LNG volume that passes through the strait goes to Asia, with the remainder going to Europe. And even if the strait opens, LNG may take longer to recover than oil, especially if Qatar’s Ras Laffan, the world’s largest LNG export facility, continues to suffer damage.

Three companies that can help fill the LNG supply shortage caused by the strait blockade. woodside energy group (New York Stock Exchange:WDS) is an Australian LNG producer (4.5% dividend yield, US listed) ideally placed to supply LNG to Asian markets.

cheniere energy (NYSE:LNG) Already the largest exporter of LNG in the United States, it is currently operating at maximum capacity and is in the process of expanding its export capacity over the next few years with new LNG trains expected to ramp up production soon.

The third LNG (and crude oil) operation is Norway’s Equinor (New York Stock Exchange: EQNR)is a major LNG exporter with assets offshore Norway. This will help fill the gap for European countries that previously supplied LNG through the Strait.

transport and fertilizer

Speaking of Norway and LNG, shipping company Flex LNG (NYSE: FLNG) The company is also well-positioned to benefit from rising LNG shipping rates and demand for a modern, fuel-efficient fleet. If LNG cannot reach Asia through the Straits, it will likely be transported much longer distances, which is good news for shipping companies, daily rates and fleet utilization.

Finally, it’s not just crude oil, LNG, and refined petroleum products that pass through the Strait. According to the United Nations, about a third of the world’s ocean fertilizer flows through the straits. Gas is the main ingredient in fertilizer, and the lack of gas and fertilizer passing through the Strait has forced U.S.-focused fertilizer producers like CF Industries to (NYSE:CF) Will benefit from Western manufacturing facilities and gas supplies from the US

Lee Samaha has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a position in and recommends Cheniere Energy and Chevron. The Motley Fool recommends Equinor Asa. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

The Motley Fool is a USA TODAY content partner providing financial news, analysis and commentary designed to help people take control of their financial lives. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY.

Should you buy Chevron stock now?

Offers from the Motley Fool: Before buying Chevron stock, consider the following:

of Motley Fool Stock Advisor Our analyst team has identified what they believe Best 10 stocks Investors can buy now…and Chevron wasn’t among them. These 10 stocks have the potential to generate impressive returns over the next few years.

when to think about it Netflix This list was created on December 17, 2004…if you invested $1,000 at the time of recommendation. you have $501,381!* or when Nvidia This list was created on April 15, 2005…if you invested $1,000 at the time of recommendation. you have $1,012,581!*

Now, the important thing to note is that stock advisor Total average return is 880% — compared to the S&P 500’s 178%, an overwhelming market outperformance. Don’t miss our latest Top 10 list. stock advisorjoin an investing community built by retail investors, for retail investors.

See 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor will return on March 31, 2026.

President Trump’s war: quick start and messy Iran withdrawal

0

play

Thirty-three days into the war with Iran, President Donald Trump declared victory at hand. largely.

In a prime-time address from the White House, President Trump praised what he called a “swift, decisive and overwhelming victory on the battlefield.” The victory was so decisive that he suggested that a few more weeks of military offensives could end the war and “return them to their proper Stone Age.”

“We are on track to achieve all of America’s military goals very soon,” he said.

But he made it clear that he was prepared to leave the messy and problematic situation alone.

The 19-minute speech included no new details about the course of the war and only briefly mentioned the possibility of a negotiated settlement.

But he also did not mention the possibility of escalating the war by deploying the thousands of U.S. ground troops currently massed in the region. And he revised what he had described as the fundamental goal of gaining control of the highly enriched uranium currently buried on Iranian territory as a step he no longer considered necessary.

He said the sites are under “intensive satellite monitoring and control” and that any attempt by Iran to retake them could result in U.S. forces returning to the area. (Of course, that surveillance has been going on for years, long before the war began.)

The president is anxious to end the war and soon

He also said he would leave it to other countries to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, which is currently under Iranian control and is pushing up energy prices. Countries that are more dependent than the United States on oil shipped through this route should “belatedly muster up the courage” and “just take it, protect it, and use it for themselves,” he urged.

Moreover, he predicted that the strait would “open up on its own” once the war ended.

All of this shows that the president is anxious to end this war soon.

There was speculation before the speech that Trump would announce an end to the war or an escalation of the war. Both theories are based on contradictory comments he made about what the essential goal was.

In a social media post on Wednesday, the president said the United States would not consider a ceasefire until the Strait of Hormuz is open and free, vowing to “blast Iran into oblivion” until that happens.

But in an interview with Reuters also on Wednesday, he said the United States believed the war would end “quite quickly” and could return for “spot strikes” if necessary.

As it turns out, this speech was more like a Reuters interview than an X post.

Skeptical audiences and unpopular wars

Trump was addressing a skeptical American public.

A CNN poll conducted March 26-30 found that only a third of those surveyed supported the decision to launch an attack on Iran, and that support has eroded since the war began. Two-thirds of respondents in the Reuters/Ipsos poll said the United States should end the conflict quickly, even if all goals are not achieved. That included four out of 10 Republicans.

President Trump’s overall job approval rating has fallen to 36% in an Ipsos poll and 35% in a CNN poll, as Republicans worry that the Iran war is upsetting an already difficult political landscape ahead of November’s midterm congressional elections.

Meanwhile, the war continues.

Bombs were dropped on Tehran on Wednesday, sending plumes of smoke over the capital. Iranian missiles hit some locations in Israel where many Jews were celebrating the first night of Passover. Israel launched an attack on Lebanon and Iran launched a missile at the United Arab Emirates.

U.S. Central Command has updated the number of targets struck by U.S. forces in Iran during the war to 12,300. so far.

Here’s how to track Artemis II astronauts during their trip around the moon

0


NASA offers an online Artemis II tracker for those who want to follow the four astronauts as they adventure around the moon in the Orion capsule.

Four astronauts are about to go farther from Earth than humans have ever gone before. Follow them as they travel 250,000 miles on NASA’s pioneering Artemis II moon mission.

Luckily, the U.S. Space Agency has an app for that. And a desktop website too.

After a potential launch from Kennedy Space Center in Florida on April 1, astronauts will pilot the Orion crew capsule on a 10-day journey around the moon and back. The mission, the second in NASA’s multibillion-dollar Artemis program, will pave the way for a moon landing as early as 2028.

Here’s what you need to know about NASA’s Artemis II tracker.

Artemis II Tracker. Track moon missions in real time

NASA’s online tracker, available on both desktop and mobile apps, lets you follow Artemis II astronauts as they adventure to and around the moon aboard the Orion crew capsule.

Officially called the Artemis Real-time Orbit Website (AROW), the tracker allows users to see where the Orion spacecraft is and how fast it’s traveling, as well as its distance from both Earth and the moon in miles, NASA said.

The desktop website version’s interface includes major mission milestones and features for the Moon, including information about Apollo-era landing sites. The mobile version of NASA’s app for smartphones is similar, but adds an augmented reality feature that allows users to move their phone to see where Orion is currently positioned relative to Earth.

Data is collected in real time by Orion’s sensors and transmitted to the Mission Control Center at NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston. This information will be constantly updated starting about one minute after liftoff until Orion begins its re-entry into Earth’s atmosphere about 10 days later.

What time is the Artemis II rocket launching today?

NASA is working towards the launch of the Artemis II mission from Kennedy Space Center in Florida on Wednesday, April 1st. The Orion capsule, which will carry astronauts atop NASA’s 322-foot Space Launch System rocket toward the moon, is scheduled to touch the ground during a two-hour launch window that opens at 6:24 p.m. ET.

NASA says there is an 80% chance that weather conditions will be favorable for launch. However, if the launch fails due to bad weather or other factors (such as unforeseen problems with the spacecraft), NASA has other backup dates available, from April 2 to 6, in addition to April 30.

Artemis II launch countdown

visualization

Four astronauts orbit the moon on Artemis rocket launch

Under the Artemis program, NASA aims to return astronauts to the moon for the first time since the Apollo program ended in 1972.

NASA aims to use a series of manned and unmanned missions over the next few years to build a lunar base and establish a permanent foothold at the moon’s south pole. From there, the first humans could head to Mars.

As a 10-day lunar orbit mission, Artemis II will primarily serve as a test flight, with a crew of four testing systems and hardware ahead of a future landing.

In 2027, another astronaut will reach Earth orbit aboard Orion to test docking capabilities with one or both of the commercial lunar landers being developed by Elon Musk’s SpaceX and Jeff Bezos’ Blue Origin. The moon landing will then take place in 2028 under Artemis IV.

Introducing the Artemis II crew

The Artemis II crew of four arrived in Florida on March 27 after entering standard preflight quarantine to avoid illness. This is shown below.

  • NASA astronaut Reed WisemanThe mission commander, a Baltimore native, last flew to the International Space Station in 2014 on a Russian Soyuz rocket.
  • NASA astronaut Victor Glovera pilot from Pomona, California, who flew into space in 2020 on a SpaceX mission to the space station.
  • NASA astronaut Christina Kocha mission specialist from Grand Rapids, Michigan, holds several space agency records and flew on the Soyuz ISS mission in 2019.
  • Canadian Space Agency astronaut Jeremy HansenAnother mission specialist flying into space for the first time.

Eric Lagatta is a Space Connect reporter for the USA TODAY Network. Please contact elagatta@usatodayco.com.

When will Artemis II reach the moon? NASA mission timeline

0

play

After two long delays, NASA made history on April 1, launching a crew of four astronauts on a 10-day expedition around the moon and back.

The Artemis II mission, the second in NASA’s multibillion-dollar lunar program, is a major milestone for the agency, marking the first human deep space flight in more than 50 years. NASA said Artemis II’s crew is expected to travel “further from Earth than any previous human mission.”

USA TODAY previously reported that the expedition will send its crew about 42,000 miles into space, potentially breaking the record set by the 1970 Apollo 13 mission at a distance of about 248,000 miles from Earth.

“This milestone will occur during the lunar flyby phase, during which the crew will fly in a free orbit around the Moon, allowing the spacecraft to orbit the Moon and return to Earth without entering orbit around the Moon,” NASA said.

NASA said that although the crew will not land on the moon’s surface, the lunar flyby mission is intended to test life support systems and critical operations, paving the way for future moon landings and Mars exploration. The mission is expected to last about 10 days, with the crew arriving near the moon around the fifth or sixth day before returning to Earth for a splashdown in the Pacific Ocean.

Here is the timeline of Artemis II’s journey:

launch date

Four astronauts, including the first black man, first woman and first Canadian, lifted off from NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida aboard the Space Launch System (SLS) rocket, one of the largest and most powerful rockets NASA has ever flown.

After liftoff, the Orion crew capsule separates from the rocket’s upper stage and enters a highly elliptical orbit around Earth.

earth orbit

During the first day or two of the mission, the crew will perform system checks in high Earth orbit, including tests of the Orion capsule’s life support, propulsion, navigation, and communications systems to ensure the spacecraft is ready for flight into deep space.

menstrual ejaculation

After completing system checks, Orion will conduct a “lunar surface burn” on its second day, according to Scientific American. The menstrual ejection involves the ignition of Orion’s main engine, which increases the spacecraft’s speed and propels it out of Earth’s orbit and toward the Moon.

During the third and fourth days, the crew will continue to monitor spacecraft systems as they approach the moon. The mission controller tracks communications and navigation performance.

moon flight

On the fifth day, Orion enters the moon’s sphere of influence, “marking the point at which the moon’s gravity becomes stronger than Earth’s,” according to NASA.

“The crew will spend an entire day entering the lunar vicinity, with almost all of the morning devoted to spacesuit testing,” the agency said. “As the first astronauts to wear the new suit in space, the Artemis II crew will test its ability to quickly don and pressurize the suit, attach a seat and board while wearing the suit, eat and drink through a port in the suit’s helmet, and other features.”

NASA said the crew will be closest to the moon on day six, and the furthest from Earth during this phase.

Return to Earth and splashdown

After the lunar flight, the crew will return to Earth over several days to continue deep space testing, including evaluating power systems, thermal controls, and crew operations far beyond low-Earth orbit.

As Orion approaches Earth, it separates its major components before entering the atmosphere at a speed of about 25,000 miles per hour. One of the mission’s main objectives is to test the capsule’s heat shield, which was partially cracked and scorched during the 2022 Artemis I mission, during atmospheric reentry, reported Florida Today, part of the USA TODAY Network.

The spacecraft is expected to splash down in the Pacific Ocean, where a recovery team will retrieve the crew.

Contributor: Doyle Rice, USA TODAY. Reuters

Powerball jackpot rises to $194 million for April 1 drawing

0

play

The Powerball jackpot has risen to $194 million with a cash value of $87.1 million ahead of the drawing on Wednesday, April 1st.

According to Powerball, the jackpot has been won nearly 200 times since the lottery’s inception in 1992. Currently, 48 lotteries in the United States participate in Powerball games, but five states do not offer Powerball games: Alabama, Alaska, Hawaii, Nevada, and Utah.

The odds of winning the jackpot are approximately 1 in 292 million, but smaller prizes are much more common, and the overall odds of winning the prize are approximately 1 in 25. The five states with the most Powerball winners include Indiana, Missouri, Minnesota, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.

Wednesday’s Powerball drawing falls on April Fool’s Day, but the jackpot prize is very real. Here’s what you need to know:

What are the winning Powerball numbers for April 1st?

USA TODAY will publish the winning numbers at 11pm ET after the lottery drawing.

Do I have to be a US citizen or resident to play Powerball?

The short answer is “no.”

You do not need to be a U.S. citizen or resident to play Powerball. Anyone visiting any of the 45 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, or the U.S. Virgin Islands may purchase lottery tickets from authorized and licensed retailers, regardless of nationality, as long as they meet the legal age requirements (usually 18 years old) at the time of purchase.

Top 10 Powerball Jackpots

  • $2.04 billion in California on November 7, 2022
  • December 24, 2025, $1.817 billion in Arkansas.
  • $1.787 billion in Missouri and Texas on September 6, 2025
  • $1.765 billion in California on October 11, 2023
  • January 13, 2016, $1.586 billion in California, Florida, and Tennessee
  • April 6, 2024, $1.326 billion in Oregon.
  • $1.08 billion in California on July 19, 2023
  • January 1, 2024, $842.4 million in Michigan.
  • March 27, 2019, $768.4 million in Wisconsin
  • August 23, 2017, $758.7 million in Massachusetts

How to play Powerball

Powerball tickets cost $2 per play and are sold in 45 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. This can be done at a variety of locations, including local convenience stores, gas stations, and grocery stores.

In some states, you can purchase Powerball tickets online depending on your local jurisdiction.

Once you have your ticket, you have to choose six numbers. Five of them are white balls numbered from 1 to 69. The red Powerball range is 1-26. You can also add a “Power Play” for $1, which increases your winnings on all non-jackpot prizes.

“Power Play” multipliers can increase your winnings by 2x, 3x, 4x, 5x, or 10x.

A “Quick Pick” option is also available if you want the computer to select the numbers for you. To win the jackpot, players must match all five white balls with the red Powerball in any order.

Powerball drawings are held on Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday nights. The winnings continue to increase even if no one wins the jackpot.

Fernando Cervantes Jr. is a trending news reporter for USA TODAY. Contact us at fernando.cervantes@gannett.com and follow us at X @fern_cerv_.

President Trump’s rosy picture of Iran offers no hint of closure: Bottom line

0


In his 19-minute speech, the president said little about ending the Iran war but promised that rising gas prices would be a “short-term” problem.

play

  • The president did not give an exact date for ending the conflict, but promised to escalate bombing.
  • President Trump acknowledged the “short-term” spike in gasoline prices and blamed it on Iran’s actions.
  • Most Americans, including many Republicans, want the war to end, even if its goals are not achieved.

President Donald Trump painted a rosy picture of the U.S.-Israel war against Iran in a prime-time address on April 1 to address the conflict’s unpopularity.

To that end, he reiterated previous indications that the war would be over in two to three weeks and that gasoline prices, which had skyrocketed during the war, would soon come down.

The war has divided public opinion among Trump supporters since the United States and Israel began shelling Iran on February 28th.

According to a March 24 Reuters poll, 35% of Americans support attacking Iran, while 61% oppose it. In the same poll, President Trump’s approval rating dropped to 36%, the lowest since returning to the White House.

Although the Iranian regime is still in place, President Trump praised America’s battlefield successes.

President Trump said, “Iran’s navy is gone. Its air force is devastated.” “Most of their leaders – most of the leaders of the terrorist regime they led – are now dead.”

A March 31 Reuters poll found that 66% of Americans want the war to end quickly, and 27% said the United States should strive to achieve all of its goals in Iran, even if the conflict is prolonged.

Three key aspects of President Trump’s speech are:

There is no exact timetable for ending the Iran war.

President Trump’s 19-minute speech began by praising military strength, saying it had resulted in “swift, decisive (and) overwhelming victories on the battlefield.”

Although the U.S. and Israeli forces have destroyed many of Iran’s ballistic missile systems, the Islamic-based regime continues to fire missiles in the region at other Persian Gulf states and U.S. forces, including one that injured 12 people at a base in Saudi Arabia. March 27th.

But much of the interest in the president’s April 1 comments stemmed from the destruction being achieved and diplomatic goals about when the conflict would end. In this regard, the president said that the United States is “very close” to completing the “job” but that the pace of bombing will continue to increase until Iran relents.

“We’re going to launch a very tough attack over the next two to three weeks,” Trump said. “We’ll take them back to the Stone Age.”

President Trump admits gas prices will rise ‘in the short term’

The speech comes at a politically dangerous time for President Trump and Congressional Republicans, with the 2026 midterm elections on the horizon and the rising cost of living a political albatross for the ruling party.

Gasoline prices averaged more than $4 a gallon across the country this week, and only 24% of Americans approve of President Trump’s handling of the issue, according to a new CNN/SSRS poll released March 31. That’s $1 a gallon more expensive than a month ago when the airstrikes began, and Americans say it’s hurting their wallets.

When President Trump finally focused on the economic impact of the war, he reiterated his earlier assertion that it was a “short-term” situation and blamed the Iranian regime’s “extraordinary terrorist attacks on commercial oil tankers and neighboring countries” in the Persian Gulf region.

The president has said the end of the war will reopen the Strait of Hormuz, a key waterway for global oil markets, but some experts are skeptical.

“They’re going to want to be able to sell oil, because that’s all they have to try to rebuild,” Trump said. “As supplies resume, gas prices will fall quickly. Stock prices will rise quickly.”

It’s too early to tell whether the president’s comments will ease domestic heartburn.

According to a CNN survey, about 63% of respondents said that rising pump prices are causing financial hardship for their households, including about 15% who said the situation was difficult.

Not much different from Truth Social’s post

Much of the speech was a rehash of Trump’s comments online and in various chats with reporters over the past month, including repeated calls to negotiate with Iran or risk annihilation.

The president spoke of the need to fight Iran to prevent it from becoming a nuclear power, and renewed his condemnation of former President Barack Obama’s agreements with foreign adversaries that Trump withdrew from during his first administration in 2018.

In the previous agreement, Iran agreed to give up 97% of its nuclear stockpile and 70% of its centrifuges (machines used to enrich uranium). But many argue that the war has given Iranians a better position than originally expected, especially given the global economic impact.

“Thanks to the actions we have taken, we are ending Iran’s evil threat to America and the world,” President Trump said.

However, by the end of the president’s remarks, there were no new announcements regarding the conflict.

Contributed by: Reuters

Rams wide receiver Puka Nacua is undergoing rehabilitation after filing lawsuit, lawyer says

0

play

Los Angeles Rams wide receiver Puka Nacua has entered a rehab facility, his attorney Levi McCassan told the California Post on April 1.

McCassan said Nacua is receiving treatment at a high-end treatment center in Malibu. He explained that the 24-year-old recipient’s stay was to “improve his overall behavior as much as possible in all aspects of his life.”

The lawyer also clarified that a lawsuit filed by a woman against Nacua in March — accusing him of biting her, causing injury, pain and suffering, and making anti-Semitic comments on Dec. 31, 2025 — was a “factor” in Nacua’s admission to rehab, but his decision was not directly tied to the civil lawsuit.

“He was there for quite some time before these allegations came to light, and he plans to be there for a while longer,” Macassan told the California Post.

Nacua, through McCassan, denied these allegations “in the strongest terms.” And Macassan told USA TODAY Sports in March that he planned to file a defamation lawsuit against the woman.

Ivor Pyne, deputy director of communications, said the matter is also under review by the city attorney’s office. Los Angeles City Attorney Heidi Feldstein Soto will decide whether to file criminal charges.

Macassan also spoke with NFL Network reporter Steve Wyche and posted the lawyer’s words on social media.

“He will complete the program in time to fully participate in all OTAs for the Rams,” McCassan said. “Puka also deeply appreciates the support he has received from his family, friends, coach (Sean) McVay, and teammates.”

The Rams have not yet commented on reports that Nacua has entered a rehab facility. McVay first addressed the allegations against the receiver in an interview at the NFL’s annual meeting on March 30.

“You know, I trust this kid’s heart,” McVay said, according to ProFootballTalk. “I want to continue to love him and keep my arms around him and help him grow. And really, get all the right facts before you rush to judgment about that particular situation. But I’ve known this guy for three years, so I’ll say I trust his heart. I trust humans. And I want to put my arms around him.”

Brian Noem, Kristi Noem and the Tabloid Investigation

0

play

Brian Noem, former Secretary of Homeland Security and husband of South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem, has become a hot topic online after a tabloid published an investigation that found him leading a “secret double life.”

The Daily Mail reports that Bryon Noem is cross-dressing. This report has not been independently verified by USA TODAY.

Here’s what we know:

Who is Brian Noem?

Brian Noem, who is married to former South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem, was fired as DHS secretary on March 5 and later appointed special envoy for the new Shield of the Americas initiative to advance the Trump administration’s national security policy in the Western Hemisphere.

The couple married in 1992 in Watertown, South Dakota, and have three children, Cassidy, Kennedy and Booker, according to the National Governors Association.

Outside of family life, Bryon Noem works in the insurance industry and holds a degree in business finance from Northern State University. He coached basketball and after graduation worked on the Noem family farm before becoming an insurance agent.

What did the Daily Mail report about Bryon Noem?

The Daily Mail reported on March 31 that Bryon Noem paid adult entertainers to cross-dress while role-playing.

The media’s report included messages, audio and photos purporting to show Brian Noem wearing women’s clothing and using props.

USA TODAY has not independently verified the authenticity of images published by the Daily Mail.

How did Noems react?

The New York Post reported that Kristi Noem’s publicist said she was “devastated” by the allegations.

“The family has been blindsided by this and is asking for privacy and prayers at this time,” a spokesperson told the Post.

The Daily Mail reported that when contacted by phone, Bryon Noem did not deny sending the photos or having explicit conversations.

USA TODAY reached out to Kristi Noem for comment, but did not immediately receive a response.

Why has this become a political issue?

The Daily Mail cited national security experts as saying that Brian Noem’s involvement in the adult entertainment community could potentially be used as leverage against Kristi Noem, which it described as “damaging information.”

The Daily Mail reported that Bryon Noem responded to questions about the allegations, denying that he jeopardized national security or exposed his wife to threats.

Kate Perez covers national trends and breaking news for USA TODAY. You can reach her at kperez@usatodayco.com or X @katecperez_.

3 things President Trump’s Iran war speech means for investors

0


President Donald Trump will give a televised address on the Iran war tonight at 9pm ET.

play

President Donald Trump will address the country in a televised address tonight at 9pm ET and provide an “important update” on the Iran war, which has been the biggest factor impacting markets since the conflict began in late February.

President Trump has said multiple times in recent days that the United States will end its involvement in the incident soon, possibly within weeks, but investors still don’t know much and will likely want more information.

These include when and how the United States will actually leave the conflict, how it will leave Iran in charge, and what will happen to the Strait of Hormuz, which has a huge impact on oil prices.

Here are three things investors should pay attention to in Trump’s speech tonight.

The devil is always in the details

Mr. Trump is a very unpredictable person, so it’s hard to know exactly what he’ll say tonight. Obviously it’s about the Iran war, but the devil is always in the details.

The first thing investors want information about is what will happen in the Strait of Hormuz. In recent weeks, President Trump and members of his administration have hinted at taking control of the narrow waterway through which one-fifth of the world’s oil flows every day in peacetime.

But more recently, reports have suggested that President Trump may be prepared to withdraw from the war without reopening the Strait. As of this writing, oil futures prices are hovering above $99 per barrel. Clarity on President Trump’s approach to what happens in the Strait of Hormuz will be a big issue.

The second thing that investors should pay attention to, which is becoming increasingly unclear, is who President Trump and the United States are actually negotiating with on the Iran issue, and what the country’s post-war leadership looks like.

A number of Iranian officials have been killed in recent weeks. President Trump and U.S. officials have often touted progress toward a deal, which was quickly rejected by Iranian state media and some Iranian officials.

“We have the necessary will to end this conflict as long as the essential conditions are met,” Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian told the European Council.

However, the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) has adopted a very different rhetoric, and tensions appear to be growing between the two. Further insight into who currently has real power could tell us a great deal about how negotiations between the United States and Iran are actually progressing.

Finally, given President Trump’s recent public comments on social media, it would not be surprising to see the 47th president discuss the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO).

Several members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) have opposed the war by effectively refusing to join or assist the United States, infuriating President Trump, who has said he is considering withdrawing from the military alliance.

Although the impact on markets is likely to be small in the short term, if President Trump follows through on this threat, it could have a significant long-term impact as it would likely change the way countries approach their defense strategies and affect various currencies and government bonds.

The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

The Motley Fool is a USA TODAY content partner providing financial news, analysis and commentary designed to help people take control of their financial lives. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY.

Where you can invest $1,000 now

Offers from the Motley Fool: When our analyst team has a stock tip, it’s worth listening. in the end, stock advisor The total average return was 915%*, a market-beating performance compared to the S&P 500’s 183%.

they just made it clear what they believe Best 10 stocks so that investors can buy now. Available after joining Stock advisor.

View stocks »

*Stock Advisor will return on April 1, 2026.

Republican leaders say they have reached a deal to end DHS shutdown

0


Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said, “House Republicans have given up.”

play

WASHINGTON – The Department of Homeland Security funding crisis that has plagued Washington and the nation for nearly seven weeks, disrupting airports, endangering the safety of Americans and ultimately resulting in the longest partial government shutdown in history, is finally coming to an end.

Congressional Republicans announced a new deal on April 1, announcing that the House would agree to pass a previously approved bipartisan Senate bill that would fully fund DHS, except for Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Border Security.

At the same time, he said he would expedite separate legislation to secure more long-term funding for the same agencies.

“In the coming days, Senate and House Republicans will follow the President’s direction to fully fund the entire Department of Homeland Security on two parallel tracks: the appropriations process and the reconciliation process,” House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana) and Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-South Dakota) said in a joint statement.

It was a sudden about-face for House Republicans, who had revolted on March 27 against the Senate’s compromise bill, which passed unanimously in the middle of the night. Just days ago, Prime Minister Boris Johnson, who is facing pressure from conservative hardliners, called the Senate deal a “joke”. The high-profile split among lawmakers highlighted dramatic divisions within the Republican Party until President Donald Trump intervened on April 1 to functionally support the Senate’s approach.

It wasn’t immediately entirely clear what the timeline for ending the shutdown would look like, given that the House and Senate are in a two-week recess scheduled through April 13. Multiple congressional aides told USA TODAY the Senate needs to pass the DHS bill again. It will probably be agreed unanimously during a brief “preliminary” session on April 2, followed by a second vote in the House.

Importantly, neither of the top two Democrats in Congress indicated they intended to derail the proposed path forward. “House Republicans have relented,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said after the deal was announced.

“Republican divisions have derailed bipartisan consensus for days, and American families have been made to pay the price for the dysfunction,” he said in a statement. “Throughout this fight, Senate Democrats have never wavered. We have been clear from the beginning: We will fund critical security, protect the American people, and not issue blank checks to reckless ICE and Border Patrol enforcement.”

In a separate statement, House Majority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) said, “Now is the time to pay TSA workers, end the chaos at our airports, and fully fund every department of Homeland Security not connected to Donald Trump’s violent mass deportation apparatus.”

The political shift on Capitol Hill finally revealed a plausible exit to the government shutdown, marking the culmination of a protracted showdown in Washington, D.C., and testing Democrats’ resolve to visibly push back against the Trump administration’s immigration enforcement policies in a high-stakes midterm election year.

As is common with (increasingly frequent) government shutdowns, the results were mixed.

For a party struggling to hold on to power, the maneuver shined an embarrassingly bright spotlight on a controversial and politically complex issue for Republicans for more than a month. And it brought about some important changes. Federal agents were called in from Minnesota after the killings of Renee Good and Alex Preti came under intense scrutiny.

President Trump fired Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, largely in connection with a separate controversy over expensive TV ads she oversaw. Her successor has publicly promised greater transparency and at least some new immigration guardrails.

But even weeks of chaos at the airport weren’t enough to pressure Republicans and the White House to agree to some of the more significant reforms Democrats had sought. Banning police officers from wearing masks and requiring judicial warrants for immigration searches were among the demands left out of the final agreement, but accountability measures for DHS were also included.

Although Congress won’t immediately fund ICE and the Border Patrol, both divisions of DHS have already received a large funding injection as part of the so-called “One Big, Beautiful Bill Act” passed last year. This tax and spending law was approved through a special budget process called reconciliation. The process requires support from only a simple majority among senators, rather than the usual 60 votes in the Senate.

Just before the latest shutdown deal was signed, President Trump ordered Republicans to pass a new reconciliation bill, this time with more funding for immigration enforcement and more cash for the Iran war. He hopes to have the bill on the table by June 1.

Zachary Schermele is a Congressional reporter for USA TODAY. You can email us at zschermele@usatoday.com. Follow him on X at @ZachSchermele and on Bluesky at @zachschermele.bsky.social..

Foundayo receives FDA approval as a new GLP-1 weight loss drug

0

play

The Food and Drug Administration approved Eli Lilly’s new weight loss drug on April 1, giving consumers a second option in the growing non-injectable GLP-1 weight loss drug market.

Lilly has announced that it will sell a weight loss drug under the brand name “Foundayo.” The FDA has approved a once-daily prescription drug for overweight adults who are obese or have weight-related medical problems.

The introduction of Foundayo gives consumers a new option for GLP-1 weight loss drugs. Novo Nordisk’s Wigoby was the only FDA-approved GLP-1 pill available after December 2025.

Both Lilly and Novo Nordisk are betting that their daily weight-loss drugs will become a popular option for consumers who want to avoid injections or who have been reluctant to take weight-loss drugs.

Consumers whose insurance does not cover weight loss drugs can purchase Foundayo for $149 for a minimum one-month dose and up to $349 for additional monthly doses. Foundayo’s co-pay program starts at $299 for a one-month prescription for higher doses.

Lilly said people with insurance that covers weight loss drugs could pay as little as $25 a month with a Foundayo savings card.

In clinical trials, people who started and continued on the highest dose of Foundayo lost an average of about 27 pounds, compared to about 2 pounds for those taking a placebo.

According to the FDA, this drug can cause side effects such as nausea, constipation, diarrhea, vomiting, indigestion, abdominal pain, headache, fatigue, belching, reflux, gas, and hair loss.

David Ricks, CEO of Eli Lilly, said that fewer than 1 in 10 people who could benefit from GLP-1 are taking it.

“We believe Foundayo can help level the playing field for people who are obese, overweight and have weight-related complications,” Ricks said in a statement.

Dan Skovronsky, Lilly’s chief scientific and product officer, told USA TODAY that the weight-loss drug should also help overcome barriers such as obesity stigma and reluctance to receive injections.

Because so many adults already take oral medications to manage blood pressure and cholesterol, people may be more willing to take pills to treat obesity.

The option of taking a pill “would turn weight maintenance into something very similar to (controlling) cholesterol or blood pressure,” Skovronsky said.

Will this start a new round of GLP-1 wars?

The launch of Foundayo puts Lilly in the crosshairs of rival Novo Nordisk’s popular weight-loss drug Wigoby.

Since Novo Nordisk launched Wigovy tablets following approval in December, demand for the oral drug has skyrocketed, with more than 600,000 prescriptions filled.

This is similar to when rivals sparred over anti-obesity drugs. Lilly’s Zepbound and Novo’s Wegovy are injectable weight loss drugs that are fueling global demand for weight loss drugs. Goldman Sachs predicts global anti-obesity drug sales will reach $105 billion by 2030.

However, health insurance companies have been slow to cover these popular weight loss drugs to consumers. A study by benefits consultant Mercer found that 49% of large employers will pay for GLP-1 drugs for obesity in 2025. Another study by the health policy nonprofit KFF found that 43% of large employers will be paying for anti-obesity drugs in 2025.

Both Lilly and Novo offer drug discounts to customers whose insurance does not cover anti-obesity drugs.

On March 31, Novo launched Wegovy’s subscription plan for self-pay patients. Customers receive nearly 30% off when they subscribe to medications through our telemedicine partners Ro, Weight Watchers, and LifeMD.

Wegovy’s subscription plans have monthly costs of $289 for a 3-month subscription, $269 for a 6-month subscription, and $249 for a 12-month subscription. These discounts range from 3% to 17% of Wegovy pills’ monthly price of $299.

Supreme Court considers birthright citizenship, increasing pressure on Trump

0

play

  • President Donald Trump made a historic appearance at the Supreme Court for oral arguments on birthright citizenship.
  • The lawsuit challenges the long-held interpretation of the 14th Amendment, which grants citizenship to nearly everyone born on U.S. soil.
  • President Trump’s appearance comes amid declining approval ratings, rising gas prices and the Iran war.

WASHINGTON – Muffled gasps echoed through the packed Supreme Court chamber as President Donald Trump entered the hall at 9:51 a.m. and took a seat in the front row of the auditorium.

No other sitting president has attended oral arguments before the nation’s highest court.

But for Trump, this was more than just a thing. This included birthright citizenship, a constitutional principle that has been in effect since the ratification of Article 14.th Amendment of 1868. It has been used to automatically grant U.S. citizenship to babies born on this land.

Ending birthright citizenship was a slogan and campaign promise that Trump used to win a second term. Mr. Trump, who has returned to office as president, has made this a central part of his immigration policy, aiming to stop immigrants from entering the United States illegally to give birth and granting American citizenship to their children.

So on Wednesday, April 1, the day President Trump was scheduled to address the nation about the Iran war as gas prices rose and his approval ratings plummeted, he sat silently for more than an hour, listening to his 14 lawyers argue the merits of the legal battle.th This amendment was intended to grant citizenship temporarily or without documentation to children of people in the country.

The court remained silent throughout most of the arguments by the nine justices, including three appointed by Mr. Trump. The judge, lawyers, and others in the chamber did not acknowledge his presence. But there were several laughs when the justices pointed out the constitutional tensions in the case.

“Yes, yes, but what about the Constitution?” Judge Amy Coney Barrett asked the government’s lawyer, Attorney General John Sauer, as President Trump looked on.

President Trump sits in the front row of the Supreme Court

Seated next to Presidential Counsel David Warrington, wearing a standard red tie and black suit, the president listened attentively throughout much of the proceedings, occasionally shifting his weight or scratching his head.

To his right, a security guard sat impassively, sunlight streaming in through the closed blinds.

Mr. Sauer, the government lawyer, argued in court that the 14th Amendment’s citizenship clause was adopted after the Civil War to grant citizenship to newly freed slaves and their children. He said he did not grant citizenship to the children of temporary or undocumented people in the country because the country’s parents lacked “direct and immediate allegiance” to the United States.

Justice Elena Kagan asked Sauer to explain his rationale for changing the Supreme Court’s more than 125-year-old interpretation of birthright citizenship, which applies to nearly all children born in the United States. She said the 14th Amendment comes from the English common law tradition, which the high court interpreted in 1898 to apply without restriction.

“It was a clear rationale, a clear rationale that was very different from your rationale,” Kagan said. “Everyone has believed that for a long time.”

The birthright citizenship case, one of the largest brought before the court during the current term, was sparked by an executive order signed by President Trump on his first day in office last year. This order calls into question the long-standing interpretation of Article 14.th An amendment that would guarantee birthright citizenship to almost everyone.

The American Civil Liberties Union and other groups challenged President Trump’s order in court, and every lower court that has considered the order has ruled it invalid.

Throughout his political career, Trump has relied on immigration and other populist issues to win the support of MAGA supporters and maintain their goodwill.

But the Iran war has caused a rift among his supporters, who are calling for a return to the “America First” policy he advocated during the campaign.

Many are now openly questioning how the Iran war fits into that objective, given that it is driving up the cost of living for many Americans. The average price of gasoline in the United States rose to $4 a gallon this week for the first time in four years, as fuel prices soared due to the Iran war.

Support for immigration enforcement and President Trump’s handling of immigration has declined even among Republicans after the deployment of Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents to several Democratic-led cities.

A poll released last week by the Public Religion Research Institute in Washington found that Republican approval for President Trump’s handling of the immigration crisis was at 78%, down from 90% a year ago.

A Supreme Court victory in the birthright citizenship case could help restore the trust of Trump’s supporters who fear he has lost his way.

Relationship between President Trump and Supreme Court Justices

Trump’s attendance at the Supreme Court argument was historic. The court said it was not aware of any president in modern times (since the court building opened in 1935) to have attended oral arguments, but that several future and former presidents have argued before the justices.

This was not Trump’s first appearance at the Supreme Court. He has previously appeared on the court twice, with his formal appointment taking place at Justice Neil Gorsuch’s appointment in 2017 and Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s appointment in 2018. First Lady Melania Trump was present in both cases.

As is customary for these symbolic ceremonies, neither ceremony was scheduled on the day the court was in session, so President Trump did not observe arguments in the case. According to the Supreme Court Historical Society, presidents have historically attended the oath of office on the day of the court, but left before the presiding judge began the trial.

At least eight former or future presidents have argued cases in court in their capacity as attorneys: John Quincy Adams, James K. Polk, Abraham Lincoln, James Garfield, Grover Cleveland, Benjamin Harrison, William Howard Taft, and Nixon. However, no one held the office of president at the time.

President Trump has appointed three of the court’s current nine judges, but there have been concerns about his relationship with the court.

President Trump launched an attack on the justices in February after they issued a landmark ruling that said he did not have the authority to impose sweeping tariffs, a central part of his economic policy and a key tool in his foreign policy. The 6-3 ruling dealt a major blow to President Trump’s economic policies, slamming the justices as “not having the courage to do the right thing.”

He specifically singled out two appointees, Gorsuch and Barrett. He called them a “disgrace to the family” and derided them as “idiots and dogs” and “RINOs” (Republicans in name only).

“They make me feel bad because they’re bad for the country,” he said later.

Robert Rowland, an expert on presidential rhetoric at the University of Kansas, said that by attending the Supreme Court arguments on birthright citizenship, Trump was sending a message to the justices and the public about the importance his administration attaches to the case.

“My purpose in attending the hearing is to suggest to the Supreme Court that there will be a public backlash if we do not support the Trump administration’s position,” Rowland said. “The purpose is blackmail.”

The justices were still debating the pros and cons of birthright citizenship when Trump rose from his seat and left the courtroom. President Trump’s resignation means he did not listen to the arguments of Cecilia Wang, the American Civil Liberties Union’s national legal director, who filed a lawsuit against the executive order.

Trump returned to the White House minutes later. He did not comment to reporters. But then he posted a message on his social media site, Truth Social. “We are the only stupid country in the world that recognizes ‘natural-born’ citizenship!” he wrote.

A court ruling on the case is expected by this summer.

After arguing before the Supreme Court, Trump turned his attention to the next pressing issue on the day’s agenda: a national address on the Iran war.

Michael Collins writes about the intersection of politics and culture. He is a veteran reporter who has covered the White House and Congress. Follow him on X: @mcollinsNEWS

Carissa Wadick is a national reporter for USA TODAY. Follow her on X: @KarissaWaddick

Contributor: Maureen Grope

Is Social Security enough to retire? Here are the average payments

0


This number may surprise you.

play

Many retirees end up living solely on Social Security. For some, it’s not intentional. That means there is no way to save money in a meaningful way. But for others, it can lead to misunderstandings.

One of the biggest misconceptions about Social Security that you often hear is that these monthly benefits are enough to replace your entire pre-retirement paycheck. In reality, you probably won’t get close. And if you look at what the average retirement savings look like today, you’ll understand why it’s so important to save for retirement if possible.

What does today’s average Social Security check look like?

Social Security pays different types of benefits. However, today’s average retirement benefit is approximately $2,076.41.

If you do the math, you’ll find that it equates to about $25,000 a year. You will also find that the typical Social Security benefit is not enough to live on.

Of course, there are steps you can take to receive larger Social Security benefits in retirement. First, the more you earn (up to a certain point), the more money you may receive from Social Security. Therefore, it helps to improve your skills to earn higher wages.

You should also know that your Social Security benefits are calculated based on your 35 most profitable years of income. So if you commit to working for at least 35 years, that’s another way to potentially get more money in retirement.

Finally, once you reach full retirement age (age 67 if you were born after 1960), you are eligible to receive Social Security benefits without reduction. However, each time you delay filing a claim, your benefits will permanently increase by 8% until you reach age 70.

Don’t plan to retire on Social Security alone, even if your benefits are larger than average.

Once you are able to claim benefits, you could end up receiving much more than $2,076.41 from Social Security. However, that doesn’t mean it’s a good idea to rely solely on Social Security when you retire.

First, people who qualify for more benefits tend to be higher income earners. Therefore, retiring with only Social Security benefits could mean having to scale back your lifestyle significantly. And even if you wanted to, without any income other than these benefits, you could end up at risk of financial hardship.

This isn’t to say you need a $2.5 million nest egg to retire comfortably. But what we aim for is some savings. A small monthly contribution to an IRA or 401(k) can have a big impact over time. And in the end, it can be a great supplement to the monthly Social Security checks you’ll eventually receive.

The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

The Motley Fool is a USA TODAY content partner providing financial news, analysis and commentary designed to help people take control of their financial lives. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY.

The $23,760 Social Security bonus that most retirees completely overlook

Offers from the Motley Fool: If you’re like most Americans, you’re several years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But there are some lesser known ones “Secrets of Social Security” It may help ensure that you increase your retirement income.

One Easy Trick Could Pay You Up to $23,760…Every year! By learning how to make the most of your Social Security benefits, we think you can retire confidently with the peace of mind we all desire. participate stock advisor To learn more about these strategies,

View “Social Security Secrets” »

People caught in FBI raid enjoying March Madness during 2017 college basketball games

0


“Some people received short-term banishments or punishments, but if you win, you always get a spot.”

On September 26, 2017, the FBI and federal law enforcement officials unleashed a major explosion in the college basketball world, leading to the arrest of several coaches and ultimately the suspension or firing of several others.

The list also included then-USC assistant coach Tony Bland, who was arrested on bribery-related charges the same day. The aftermath also involved Louisville head coach Rick Pitino (fired in 2017), Arizona head coach Sean Miller (fired in 2021), Kansas head coach Bill Self (suspended in 2022) and LSU head coach Will Wade (fired in 2022).

But those coaches and several others have since been pardoned and even had something of a comeback party this month as active coaches in the NCAA Tournament. Wade was also just rehired as LSU’s head coach as if nothing had happened, serving as a reminder of what’s really important in college sports after all the FBI issues settled down.

“Some players have had short-term bans or punishments, but if they win, there’s always a spot,” said David Ridpath, a sports business professor at Ohio University.

Those March Madness comeback stories (see list below) also raise another big concern on the eve of the Final Four in Indianapolis, observers say.

One question is whether this repression had a lasting purpose or whether it should have been carried out from the beginning. The other concerns former Arizona State assistant coach Emanuel “Book” Richardson, who is still paying the price after serving 90 days in federal prison.

“This is a serious injustice that continues,” one of his supporters said recently.

What was illegal at the time is now generally legal.

The FBI investigation and subsequent NCAA rules enforcement case, aimed at cracking down on allegations of bribes and illegal payments to recruits and their families, seems strange now. NCAA rules have since been changed to legalize certain payments for player name, image and likeness (NIL) starting in 2021.

Sports apparel companies like Adidas can now legally pay NIL directly to athletes. Unlike then, an Adidas consultant testified in a 2018 trial that he made illegal payments to families of freshmen, including those at two Adidas-sponsored schools in Kansas State and Louisville. Both Louisville and Kansas cities were punished for their lack of knowledge.

Kansas spent $10 million over six years fighting a lawsuit alleging that Kansas used Adidas to lure recruits with money. Adidas employees and consultants were also jailed for the crime.

With the current rule structure, this would never have happened.

Richardson told USA TODAY Sports on March 25: “Everything that’s going on (legally now with NIL) is just a microcosm of what’s always going on. Now we can put a name to it (NIL).”

Meanwhile, not everyone will be able to restart their careers like Brand and Pitino, who participated in March Madness this month. Even after serving time in prison and being held accountable for $20,000 in bribes, Richardson was effectively barred from college basketball by a 10-year show-cause penalty from the NCAA, which prosecutors allege used to steer players to specific agents and financial advisors after they entered the NBA.

Some think this prolonged punishment is clearly wrong.

Book Richardson case

Richardson, 53, is seeking federal clemency even though he has already served his sentence. A federal pardon does not erase the NCAA’s 10-year penalty for paying $40,000 to fraudulently obtain a recruit’s high school transcript. However, a pardon would be a meaningful sign of forgiveness. The application was led by a group at New York University that included clinical professor David Hollander.

Hollander told USA TODAY Sports on March 25: “This is an ongoing and serious act of misconduct, and no matter what else the FBI investigation yields, Book Richardson remains under the professional restraints of a 10-year cause. Overreach is not enough because words are not worth a human life. That’s the problem: One person’s entire life has been unilaterally hammered away.”

In 2019, four coaches pleaded guilty to similar bribery charges: Richardson, Brand, former Auburn assistant Chuck Person and former Oklahoma State assistant Lamont Evans. Richardson, Person and Evans will retire from college basketball after serving 10-year show cause penalties. Richardson and Evans have both served time in prison, not Parson or Brand. Brand only received a three-year show-cause penalty from the NCAA and is back in college basketball on the staff at the University of Kansas.

Since then, the under-the-table bribery of those days has been discouraged and replaced by over-the-table business dealings. In addition to allowing athletes to earn money for their NIL, the NCAA also allows them to hire agents to manage their NIL income while in college.

Richardson didn’t miss his timing. He regrets taking the money and now works at St. James Performance Academy in Virginia.

“I spent 90 days in prison and was released in October 2020,” Richardson said. “(Legalized) NIL happened in 2021.”

The NCAA punishment was imposed after he leaves prison in 2022, saying he cannot afford legal defense in another proceeding. “I was incarcerated,” Richardson said. “I thought the worst part was over.”

Most recently, he noticed all the familiar names involved in this month’s March Madness.

List of March Madness coaches suspended for scandal

These coaches coached in the NCAA Tournament this month after being mired in a quagmire stemming from a 2017 FBI investigation.

∎ Tony Brand, now at the University of Kansas, played in his first NCAA Tournament since his arrest.

■ Rick Pitino, currently the head coach at St. John’s, is playing in the Sweet 16 for the first time since being fired by Louisville.

∎ LSU’s Will Wade was caught on an FBI wiretap discussing an “offer” and “deal” for Javonte Smart, a top recruit who later signed with LSU before NIL was legalized. LSU waived Wade for cause in 2022 after the NCAA accused him of serious recruiting violations. The NCAA’s enforcement division also handed him a 10-game suspension and a two-year show-cause penalty. He bounced back as a coach at McNeese State and then North Carolina State, leading them to this month’s NCAA Tournament. He is now all forgiven and returning to LSU. “We’re trying to follow more rules this time,” he recently told reporters. He also received a hero’s welcome at his re-inauguration press conference in Baton Rouge on March 30.

“You don’t get second chances in life, but here you are,” Wade said on March 30.

∎ Kansas coach Bill Self was suspended for four games in 2022 after years of battling allegations related to Adidas. They lost to Pitino vs. St. John’s in the second round on March 22nd.

∎ Head coach Sean Miller took Texas to the NCAA Tournament this month after being fired by Arizona in 2021 and then bouncing back at Xavier. Shortly before firing him, the NCAA accused Arizona State of serious recruiting allegations stemming from the FBI incident. An FBI wiretap caught Book Richardson telling an ambitious agent that Miller “bought” star player Deandre Ayton. Mr. Miller denied that.

∎ Kansas assistant coach Curtis Townsend, who was suspended for four games along with Self in 2022, sat next to Self during the game against St. John’s.

∎ Former Creighton assistant coach Preston Murphy returned to the NCAA Tournament with Alabama this month after being handed a two-year show-cause penalty following an FBI investigation. Although he was not charged with a crime, he allegedly accepted money from a businessman who tried to recruit college athletes to sign with his company.

Richardson said he is happy with these coaches.

“If they have the opportunity to come back and be active, I want the same opportunity,” Richardson said. “I think I have a lot to give.”

Rick Pitino, Bill Self, Adidas March Madness Game

The second round match, which took place in San Diego on March 22nd, particularly stands out against the backdrop of the 2017 FBI scandal.

It was a matchup between two Hall of Fame coaches that was nationally televised on CBS, Self and Kansas at St. John’s vs. Pitino. Before the game, Self sat to the right of assistant coach Townsend, and Brand was seated in the row to his left.

All wore the Adidas “Three Stripes” logo on their sleeves. Their star freshman guard Darrin Peterson is also paid by Adidas, and unlike his pre-2021 players, he is now openly allowed to do so.

On the other side of the court, Pitino’s team also wore Adidas uniforms after signing a sponsorship deal with the company last year.

Adidas-sponsored Peterson scored 21 points, but Adidas-sponsored St. John’s won 67-65 on a buzzer-beating layup.

Considering all this, what was the real impact of this FBI case?

The match took place just a few years after Adidas representatives went to prison and some coaches were punished in a lawsuit involving alleged recruiting by Adidas.

“The time has come to free this man.”

At least Richardson still feels the effects.

“I’ve been to hell and back,” he said. And he never snitched on anyone, which may have helped reduce his sentence.

“It all could have been avoided if everyone had just told me what they thought I knew,” Richardson said.

The NCAA and the U.S. Department of Justice did not respond to messages seeking comment. Meanwhile, the contrast between Richardson and other active coaches hasn’t gone unnoticed in the college basketball world.

“I’m so happy for my friends Will Wade and Sean Miller,” ESPN analyst Fran Frascilla recently said on social media. “I’m not being sarcastic. But I talked to the NCAA about Book Richardson, and it’s really time to let this guy go. His penalty is very, very, very unfair.”

Follow reporter Brent Schrotenboer @Schrotenboer. Email: bschrotenb@usatoday.com

(This story has been updated to add new information.)

DHS, Marine suspends purchase of warehouses for detention centers

0

play

The Department of Homeland Security is temporarily halting plans to purchase warehouses to house undocumented immigrants less than two weeks into the term of recently confirmed Secretary Markwayne Mullins, according to multiple reports.

In a statement emailed to USA TODAY, DHS said, “As with any transition, we are reviewing agency policies and recommendations.” It is unclear whether Mr. Marin intends to move forward with authorities’ plans to convert the warehouses he has already acquired into detention centers.

The former Oklahoma state senator had previously expressed some hesitation during his confirmation hearing last month, saying it was “important to talk to the communities” in which such centers would be built and maintained.

DHS’ estimated $38.3 billion plan to buy 24 commercial warehouses and increase capacity to more than 92,000 beds in the coming months has drawn criticism from some local officials and residents of the proposed sites, USA TODAY previously reported. Local officials have expressed concern that these facilities could overwhelm public sewer and water systems.

The backlash led to the collapse of at least 11 deals, but as of early March, the federal government had purchased at least 10 warehouses.

Some of the proposed warehouses could accommodate more than 8,000 people at a time. President Donald Trump’s deportation crackdown was a cornerstone of his 2024 re-election bid and the first year of his second term.

DHS is currently closed as Congress is embroiled in a battle over the department’s funding, particularly immigration enforcement, following the shooting deaths of two Americans by federal agents in Minnesota. But Republican lawmakers announced April 1 that the House plans to pass a bill to the Senate that would fund most of the departments except Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Border Protection.

How the US is waging an AI-assisted war against Iran

0


Hundreds of civilians died in the Iran war. Is the US military’s AI making a fatal mistake?

play

  • Experts and former officials say military artificial intelligence systems are at the heart of Operation Epic Fury
  • As the war drags on, the role of AI could increase
  • In mid-March, more than 100 members of the House and Senate signed a letter to Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth asking whether Maven Smart Systems was involved in the school walkout.

The deaths of hundreds of Iranian civilians in the war have put the U.S. military’s new AI systems in the spotlight, with lawmakers raising concerns that the systems are making fatal mistakes.

Experts and former officials say the military’s artificial intelligence systems are at the heart of Operation Epic Fury, a new phase in the deployment of AI on the battlefield.

“After years of saying we were moving too slowly, I am now concerned about how fast we are moving,” said retired Lt. Gen. Jack Shanahan, who led efforts to develop and integrate AI into the military.

“At some point, it may become increasingly difficult to define what advanced AI systems should not do, as opposed to defining what humans want them to do.”

During a closed session of the House Armed Services Committee on March 25, Pentagon officials told lawmakers that AI is being used for data management, but not for final target selection, according to people familiar with the briefing.

Gen. Brad Cooper, commander of U.S. Central Command, said in his latest video on the war on March 11 that U.S. soldiers are “utilizing a variety of advanced AI tools.” “While humans will always make the final decisions about what to photograph, what not to photograph, and when to photograph it, advanced AI tools can reduce processes that previously took hours or even days to seconds.”

The military has attacked more than 12,000 targets in the month-long Iran war, including more than 1,000 in the first 24 hours after the war began on February 28. One of the locations bombed that day was a school in Iran, killing at least 175 people, most of them children.

Earlier in the war, the U.S. military launched longer-range, more expensive missiles to attack Iran from afar, but now that Iran’s air defenses have weakened, it has switched to shorter-range gravity bombs that can be dropped from aircraft, according to Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Dan Cain and others.

Emelia Probasco, a senior researcher at Georgetown University’s Center for Security and Emerging Technologies who studies military uses of AI, said the first target likely came from the Pentagon’s long-standing plan to attack Iran.

But as wars drag on, Probasco said AI could play an increasing role, including “prioritizing” targets, or telling soldiers where to attack first.

“We are now entering a phase where these targets are being attacked and we may see an even greater impact of AI,” she said. “What you’re looking for are time-critical targets, moving targets, and targets we didn’t know about before.”

20 soldiers with AI equals 2,000 jobs

For nearly a decade, the military has been integrating an AI tool known as the Maven Smart System into its computer systems. Often shortened to “Maven,” the system fuses the military’s many disparate channels of data, information, satellite imagery, and asset movement into a single software platform. Military leaders say the system will enable faster and more effective decision-making in the heat of battle.

This system has already significantly increased the number of targets that can be attacked by a given number of operators. According to Probasco’s 2024 study of Army exercises using the system, the roughly 20 personnel using the system could rival the work of more than 2,000 soldiers during the Iraq War targeting cells, which at the time was considered the most efficient in U.S. military history.

And, she added, its development in the two years since her research has been “dramatic.”

In a demonstration of the Maven Smart System at a March 12 conference, Cameron Stanley, the Pentagon’s chief digital and artificial intelligence officer, showed how users can easily turn structures into fireballs by simply “left-clicking, right-clicking, left-clicking.”

On a screen behind Cameron, a cursor hovered over an overhead image of a row of cars, displaying numbers representing their dimensions, location coordinates and other data. Cameron says that with just a few clicks, object “detection” can be moved into a “targeting workflow.”

The system offered options for which metrics the AI ​​should prioritize, including time to target, distance, and ammunition. Sleek graphics appeared to show on a map the circular blast radius that attacks created and the arc that weapons traveled. After a few clicks on the blue “Approve” and green “Task Execution” bars, a dark cloud of explosions filled the screen.

“When we started this, it literally took hours to implement what we saw there,” Cameron said.

Iran school strike raises questions about AI

Despite official claims that AI improves military accuracy, Iran’s civilian death toll has raised concerns that AI is contributing to false targeting.

Lawmakers asked whether AI played a role in school strikes. An investigation by The New York Times and other sources has found that the United States was likely behind the attack, which used American-made Tomahawk missiles. Those reports said the school may have been on an old target list that the military was unable to review. The Pentagon said its own investigation into the attack was ongoing.

In mid-March, more than 100 members of the House and Senate signed a letter to Pentagon Secretary Pete Hegseth asking for details on whether the Maven Smart System was involved in the school attack and how the military is checking the workings of AI.

Shanahan said there was “no indication” that AI was involved in the attack, “but we need to recognize that while future AI will be able to discover more targets than ever before, humans must remain responsible for the decisions to attack those targets.”

Past military exercises have demonstrated that AI is far less accurate than humans. In the Army exercises studied by Probasco, the Maven smart system was able to accurately identify tanks about 60% of the time, compared to 84% accuracy for human soldiers, but that number dropped to just 30% in snowy weather. An AI targeting system tested by the Air Force in 2021 reached only 25% accuracy when tested in imperfect conditions.

In 2023, the Department of Defense issued a directive stating that soldiers and commanders using AI systems must be able to use “an appropriate level of human judgment regarding the use of force.”

“Our military operates in full compliance with all laws and established policies of the United States, including ensuring human participation in critical operational decisions at all times,” the Pentagon said in a statement to USA TODAY.

“The responsibility for the lawful use of any AI tool lies with the human operator and chain of command, not with the software itself.”

Department of Defense pursues companies behind AI chatbots

The Trump administration has generally moved to remove regulations on AI in the name of innovation and reducing bureaucracy, and the Pentagon has followed suit. In a Jan. 9 memo outlining the military’s AI strategy, Hegseth directed the Pentagon to “unleash experimentation” with AI models and work to “actively identify and eliminate bureaucratic barriers to deeper integration” of AI.

“We must accept that the risks of not moving fast enough outweigh the risks of incomplete coordination,” the memo said.

In recent months, this approach has put the Department of Defense at odds with Anthropic, the Silicon Valley company behind Claude, the only AI chatbot currently configured to run on Maven smart systems.

Anthropic sought an agreement from the Department of Defense that its technology would not be used to attack targets without mass surveillance or human approval. After Pentagon officials publicly criticized the company on social media, the Pentagon refused to accept those terms, saying Claude must be available to the military for “all lawful uses.” The Pentagon had moved to designate the company as a “supply chain risk,” a designation meant to limit companies vulnerable to sabotage or sabotage by U.S. adversaries, but that move was blocked by a March 26 ruling by a federal judge.

“The military will not allow vendors to enter the chain of command by restricting the lawful use of critical capabilities,” the Pentagon said in a statement. “It is the military’s sole responsibility to ensure that our warfighters have the tools they need to prevail in crises, without interference from corporate policy.”

Antropic said in a statement that it believes the Pentagon has not yet used Claude in violation of its terms. However, the controversy reportedly arose after Anthropic learned that the military had used Claude in an operation to capture Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro. “Anthropic currently has no confidence that Claude will function reliably or safely when used in support of lethal autonomous warfare,” the company argued in court documents.

Heidi Klaaf, chief AI scientist at the AI ​​Now Institute, said that while AI built for military purposes “already has a lot of accuracy issues,” language learning models like Claude “are actually even more inaccurate.”

“They’re not very good at solving tasks outside of what they’re trained for. That’s fine when used in non-critical environments, like writing emails, but it’s very different when dealing with new scenarios like fog of war.”

The Claude controversy is not the first time that Silicon Valley’s growing business partnership with the Pentagon to produce high-tech weapons and military tools has come under fire from the companies that make them. Google was originally contracted to work on the Maven Smart System, which was in its early stages of development, but canceled the contract in 2018 after employee protests. Google and Amazon employees have also protested the companies’ AI contracts with the Israeli military in recent years, as well as Google’s work with immigration and border security authorities.

“If any technology company yields to the Department of Defense’s demands, Mr. Hegseth will have the power to build and deploy AI-powered drones that kill people without human approval,” a group representing workers at Amazon, Google and Microsoft said in a statement about the humanity debate.

Shanahan said human control of AI in military applications is a “non-negotiable starting point” but could ultimately be limited to designing and developing systems that increasingly operate on their own.

“At some point, we’re going to operate under the assumption that autonomous weapons will be released and humans won’t be able to take them away.”

Spring Pest Season Begins—Save $50 on Orkin Pest Control

0

In spring, budding flowers bloom, warm breezes blow, and endless lines of tiny black ants love to invade your home and scavenge for crusty trash you didn’t even know was hiding behind the trash can.

wonderful.

But you don’t have to live surrounded by ants, cockroaches and the dreaded mosquitoes. Investing in pest control services can help keep your home free of critters all year long, but especially in the spring when everyone in your family seems to have decided that your house is their home.

And Orkin, one of our favorite pest control services, is taking $50 off their services with this limited time deal.

$50 off Orkin

Use code 50OFF to save on your first scheduled service at Orkin.

$50 off at Orkin

Save $50 on Orkin with this code

If you are considering signing up for a pest control service, spring is the perfect time to consider your options. Orkin is currently offering free estimates for services, as well as $50 off your first recurring service when you use the code. 50 off.

As a homeowner who has had pest control on and off for the past 6 years, I can confidently say that this is one of the best investments my husband and I have made in our home. Our technicians come regularly (once a quarter) and spray the outside of your home. When we tell them we have a particular problem (like cockroaches that love to nest under the sink), they come in and take care of them too.

Orkin offers pest control services that target specific critters and seasons (by the way, it’s “swarming season”, which is great).

What does the Orkin service include?

When you sign up for regular Orkin services, you’ll not only get a $50 discount, but you’ll also have the peace of mind that someone is always thinking of ways to keep bugs out of your home. Orkin divides pest seasons into six zones.

  • Shelter season (mid-winter): Pest activity slows down when these insects begin to hide in walls, attics and basements, patiently waiting to disturb them again in the spring. Orkin focuses on reducing their activity during this time and protecting the home from the impending emergence of spring.
  • Flock season (spring): This is the season when pests happily crawl out of their hiding places and start looking for food (more specifically, your food). During this period, Orkin focuses on preventive measures to make your home inhospitable to pests.
  • Breeding season (late spring to early summer): The three worst pests breed during this time: mosquitoes, flies, and cockroaches. Orkin targets all three of these and either keeps them away from your home or targets any infestations that may currently be infected.
  • High season (midsummer to late summer): Welcome to peak pest season. At this time of year, bugs are everywhere, both indoors and outdoors. Orkin strengthens the protection of the house, targets the weasels that have invaded the house, and begins to prepare for the cold season when all insects want to return to the warm and cozy walls.
  • Preparation season (early autumn): As the temperature begins to drop, insects begin to think about hibernation. During this period, Orkin focuses on reinforcing the walls to seal off the doors to the tiny little insect homes they have built for themselves.
  • Invader season (late autumn to early winter): At this time of year, in my house, we begin to see mice and cockroaches actively seeking shelter from the cold. Orkin specifically targets entry points and common areas of refuge to prevent them from invading your home completely.

Which pests are most common in spring?

During swarming season (spring), insects begin to emerge from their winter hiding places. You can expect to see an increase in the following activities:

  • Wasp
  • Ali
  • termites
  • mosquito
  • tick
  • stink bug
  • mouse

Do I need this deal?

If you don’t yet have pest control (or are unhappy with your current provider), please consider getting a free quote from Orkin. You don’t have to move on after the evaluation, but if you do, that $50 off code is a great way to start your spring.

$50 off Orkin

Use code 50OFF to save on your first scheduled service at Orkin.

$50 off at Orkin

Six lessons as President Trump’s citizenship order heats up at the Supreme Court

0


The 14th Amendment has granted citizenship to nearly all infants born in the United States since 1868, but President Trump is seeking to block citizenship for the children of undocumented immigrants and temporary residents.

play

WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump’s effort to redefine who is an American did not result in the swift rejection from the Supreme Court that many had expected heading into oral arguments April 1, but leading conservative justices appeared skeptical of the administration’s claims about its legality.

Every other court that has considered President Trump’s executive order severely restricting birthright citizenship has ruled against it.

But the conservative justices in the 6-3 majority asked the other side pointed questions, particularly about how to understand the court’s landmark 1898 decision that upheld citizenship for a San Francisco-born man whose Chinese parents were barred from citizenship by law at the time.

Still, the court could rule against Trump without agreeing to the meaning of the ruling. This will be a major blow to the president, who is historically the first sitting president to attend part of the debate.

Here are six takeaways from the discussion:

Judges have multiple ways to rule against Trump

14th The proposed amendment would automatically grant citizenship to “all persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.”

President Trump has argued that this provision does not apply to the children of people who are in the country illegally or temporarily.

Although the justices spent much of their time debating the original meaning of that clause and how to interpret the court’s landmark 1898 decision on it, there is another potential way the court could decide this case.

Similar language was used in the Civil Rights Act of 1952, but it was widely understood at the time to differ from President Trump’s interpretation of Section 14.th The amendment means the court could reject President Trump’s order without resolving any questions about the amendment’s intent or the 19th-century ruling.

Justice Brett Kavanaugh, a Trump appointee, noted that the court’s standard practice is to resolve issues based on law rather than constitutionality whenever possible.

But ACLU attorney Cecilia Wang, who is representing the challengers, said it’s important the court upholds the landmark 1898 decision on birthright citizenship.

“I just think it would be wise for the court to revisit that,” Wang said. “But of course we are willing to win in any position.”

Attorney General John Sauer argued that the lawmakers who drafted the 1952 law had misunderstood the 2014 law.th amendment, the Supreme Court could amend it at the same time by upholding President Trump’s order.

But if the court were to rule against Trump, Sauer added, the administration would prefer to lose based on the 1952 law rather than the Constitution. If that were to happen, Congress could change the law to strip people of their birthright citizenship, but that would be highly unlikely without a Republican majority in both chambers. That would certainly lead to new legal challenges and likely send the constitutional issue back to the high court.

What does “domicile” mean?

A hotly contested issue is whether the parents must be “resident” in the United States, meaning they must be legally present and intend to remain in the United States, in order for the children to be considered citizens. The word “settlement” appeared multiple times in the landmark 1898 ruling upholding birthright citizenship, but lawyers challenging Trump’s order argue that citizenship does not require it.

Sauer argued that domicile refers to people who are legally present in the country and intend to permanently reside there. His position excluded children of illegal immigrants and people visiting the country temporarily, who are not automatically granted citizenship.

But Judge Amy Coney Barrett, a Trump appointee, suggested that applying the definition of birthright citizenship could be difficult.

“Some people don’t know at birth whether they want to stay or not,” Barrett said.

Chief Justice John Roberts noted that the word “residence” appeared 20 times in the court’s 1898 decision, which affirmed birthright citizenship for nearly everyone born in this country.

“Isn’t it at least concerning that something has been discussed 20 times and plays such an important role in the opinion that it can be dismissed as irrelevant?” Roberts asked Wang, the ACLU attorney.

Mr Wang said birthright citizenship derives from British common law, which does not require parents’ domicile.

Justice Neil Gorsuch, a Trump appointee, suggested that the purpose of the word “residence” in the 1898 decision was unclear.

“It seems confusing to me,” he said. “Maybe you can convince me otherwise.”

Birth tourism: Judges say Trump’s policy concerns are irrelevant

President Trump has blamed “birth tourism” — the practice of pregnant women coming to the United States to give birth and making their babies citizens — as the main justification for cutting back on birthright citizenship.

“In recent decades, countless foreign nationals from potentially hostile countries have flocked to give birth in the United States, creating an entire generation of Americans abroad with no meaningful connection to the United States, creating a sprawling industry of birth tourism,” Sauer said in court.

However, the scope of birth tourism and its threat to national security is hotly debated. Estimates range from a “mere” 2,000 babies per year to a debatable 100,000 babies per year over 15 years.

Asked about the statistics by Roberts, Sauer acknowledged it was unclear how common the practice was.

“No one knows for sure,” Sauer said.

Regardless of their impact, Roberts argued that policy considerations “have no bearing on the legal analysis before us.”

Kavanaugh, another conservative justice whose votes are often key to decisions, made a similar point about the administration’s argument that most countries do not have birthright citizenship.

“You have mentioned several times the practices of other countries, which clearly support what you are saying here as a matter of policy,” Kavanaugh told Sauer. “But obviously we’re trying to interpret American law based on American history, based on American precedent.”

Some conservatives insist on the Trump administration’s claims

Some of the court’s conservative justices appeared concerned about the breadth of the Trump administration’s claims or the practicality of how they would be applied.

Roberts, an appointee of President George W. Bush, said he found it “very strange,” citing the Trump administration’s assertion that children born in the United States to illegal immigrants are not automatically citizens.

The administration pointed to the children of ambassadors and the children of enemies who have entered the country, suggesting that children of undocumented immigrants may not have citizenship either, since these children were not historically understood to have a right to citizenship.

“I don’t really understand how you can go from such a small, kind of idiosyncratic example to that large group,” Roberts said.

Sauer said there is historical evidence to support the understanding that birthright citizenship is granted to people who do not owe allegiance to another country.

Barrett suggested it would be difficult to apply the Trump administration’s definition of birthright citizenship – whether the parents of a child born in the United States are “resident” in the United States, meaning whether they intend to remain in the United States permanently.

As a practical matter, Sauer said, because the president’s executive order takes into account the legal immigration status of a child’s parents, there is no need for courts to evaluate parental intent.

Liberals doubt Trump’s stance on birthright citizenship

It was clear even before the arguments were heard that the court’s three liberal justices were deeply skeptical of the Trump administration’s stance on birthright citizenship.

In a June dissent in a case challenging a lower court judge’s authority to block President Trump’s citizenship order nationwide, Justice Sonia Sotomayor said the order was “clearly unconstitutional under settled law.” Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson and Elena Kagan joined the opinion.

Judging by the April 1 debate, none of the three Democratic-appointed justices have changed her mind.

Kagan, who was appointed by President Barack Obama, said “everybody” has believed in the rationale for birthright citizenship “for a long time.”

Jackson suggested that a Trump administration victory could fundamentally destabilize civil rights. That’s because Congress could continue to overturn birthright citizenship simply by redefining what it means to be “domiciled” in the United States (the Trump administration says a parent’s “domiciled status” is key to whether a child has birthright citizenship).

Sotomayor argued that if the Trump administration wins, it could begin stripping people of their citizenship rights through new executive orders, even if the executive orders in question apply only to future children born in the United States.

“The government could move to denaturalize people who were born here illegally,” she says.

Sauer argued that there has long been controversy over who has birthright citizenship, and that the Trump administration is not seeking to retroactively revoke birthright citizenship.

In an unprecedented move, President Trump attends Supreme Court arguments

President Trump demonstrated the importance of the case to him by attending the April 1 argument in person, an unprecedented step for a sitting president.

President Trump’s motorcade arrived at the courthouse around 9:40 a.m. on its way from the White House to the courtroom across from the Capitol, passing a school group touring the National Mall. He entered through the back door.

The judge and his lawyers did not acknowledge Mr. Trump’s presence, but a quiet gasp echoed throughout the room when Mr. Trump entered the room. He was seated in the front row of public seating behind the lawyers’ table.

Trump left the debate more than an hour after Sauer’s main presentation ended.

“We are the only stupid country in the world that recognizes ‘natural-born’ citizenship!” Trump said on social media after the argument.

According to the Pew Research Center, 32 other countries, including Canada, Mexico and Brazil, offer birthright citizenship under similar terms to those in the United States.

Contributor: Carissa Wadick