Home Blog Page 147

When will gas prices fall during the Iran war?

0

play

Gasoline prices may not fall below $3 a gallon until next year, Energy Secretary Chris Wright said in a new interview, as Americans head into the summer travel season due to high energy prices.

Asked by CNN’s Jake Tapper on April 19 on “State of the Union” if it was “realistic” for Americans to expect gas prices to drop below $3, Wright initially answered, “I don’t know.”

“That could happen later this year,” he said. “That may not happen until next year, but prices have probably peaked and will certainly start to fall once this dispute is resolved.”

Wright said later in the interview that the price of less than $3 a gallon is “pretty amazing when you adjust for inflation.”

“We had that during the Trump administration, but we haven’t had that for a long time, adjusted for inflation,” Wright said of the $3 target. “We will definitely go back there.”

The national average gasoline price was $4.04 per gallon as of April 19, according to AAA Fuel Tracker. On February 26, two days before the Iran war began, it was $2.98.

Trump administration officials have promised to lower gas prices since the war began in February, when the United States and Israel launched a joint offensive. In response to the attack, Iran effectively shut down one of the world’s most important oil trade routes in the Strait of Hormuz. The move has blocked hundreds of tankers in the Gulf from entering and exiting the strait, disrupting global markets and sending energy prices soaring.

Wright told CNN on March 8 that the rise in oil prices won’t last long and that it’s a matter of “weeks, not months.”

The war is now in its eighth week, and the strait is a key point of contention in ongoing negotiations between the United States and Iran.

This 160-mile waterway connects the Persian Gulf, the Gulf of Oman, and the Arabian Sea, and is bounded on one side by the Iranian coastline. Before the war, approximately 20% of the world’s oil and natural gas supplies passed through this narrow strait.

Kathryn Palmer is USA TODAY’s political reporter. She can be reached at the following address: kapalmer@usatoday.com And to X@Kathryn Purml. Sign up for her daily politics newsletter here.

8 children killed in shooting in Shreveport, Louisiana, police say

0

play

Eight children were killed in what police believe was a domestic shooting in northwest Louisiana on April 19, according to local authorities.

Shreveport Police Department spokesman Christopher Bordelon said in a news conference that the incident occurred just after 6 a.m. CT in the 300 block of West 79th Street in Shreveport. A total of 10 people were shot and the eight children killed were between the ages of 1 and 14.

Police say the person “responsible” for the shooting carjacked a vehicle after the incident and was followed by police to an area in Bossier Parish, where officers shot and killed the suspect.

Bordelon said police believe the suspect was the only person who fired shots during the incident, which he described as a “domestic disturbance.”

Police have not released the suspect or victim.

Meta layoffs begin May 20, affecting 8,000 employees

0

play

Meta plans to implement the first round of across-the-board job cuts planned for this year on May 20, with more to follow, three people familiar with the plans told Reuters.

The owner of Facebook and Instagram plans to lay off about 10% of its global workforce, or nearly 8,000 people, in the first phase, one of the people said.

The company is planning further job cuts in the second half of this year, three people said, but details of the cuts, including their schedule and scale, have not yet been determined. Executives may adjust plans as they monitor developments in artificial intelligence capabilities, the sources added. Reuters reported last month that the company plans to lay off more than 20% of its global workforce.

Mehta declined to comment on the timing or scope of the planned cuts.

CEO Mark Zuckerberg is pouring hundreds of billions of dollars into AI as he dramatically restructures the company’s internal workings around technology, reflecting a broader pattern this year at major U.S. companies, especially in the technology sector.

Amazon.com Inc. similarly cut 30,000 corporate employees, nearly 10% of its white-collar workforce, in recent months, and the fintech company Bloc cut nearly half its workforce in February.

In both cases, management tied the savings to efficiency gains from artificial intelligence.

Layoffs.fyi, a website that tracks technology layoffs around the world, reported that 73,212 employees have lost their jobs so far this year. For all of 2024, this figure was 153,000. Meta’s job cuts this year are the biggest since the company cut about 21,000 jobs from the end of 2022 to early 2023, which the company has dubbed its “Year of Efficiency.” At the time, Meta’s stock price was plummeting and the company struggled to revise its coronavirus-era growth assumptions, which ultimately proved unsustainable.

While the company is in a more comfortable financial position this time around, executives envision a future with fewer layers of management and AI-assisted workforce efficiency.

Meta stock is up 3.68% since the beginning of the year, but is down from its all-time high hit last summer. Last year, the company generated more than $200 billion in revenue and achieved a profit of $60 billion, despite massive spending on artificial intelligence.

Menlo Park, Calif.-based Meta employed about 79,000 people as of Dec. 31, according to its latest filing.

In recent weeks, Meta has reorganized its Reality Labs team, moving engineers across the company to a new “applied AI” organization tasked with accelerating the development of AI agents that can write code and perform complex tasks autonomously.

Some staff will also be transferred to Meta Small Business, a division created last month as part of the restructuring, one of the people said.

Reporting by Katie Paul in New York and Jeff Horwitz in San Francisco. Additional reporting by Jaspreet Singh in Bengaluru. Editing: Kenneth Lee and Matthew Lewis

Trump approval rating survey on economy and Iran war

0

play

Amid growing dissatisfaction with the economy and the war with Iran, polls show President Donald Trump’s approval ratings for a second term hit a record low, a potentially important warning for Republicans ahead of the midterm elections.

An NBC News Decision Desk poll released April 19 found that 63% of adults disapprove of Trump’s performance as president. This is the lowest rating published by the outlet since Trump was re-elected as president in January 2025. Additionally, 37% of adults said they supported Trump.

The poll was conducted between March 30 and April 13 among a national sample of 32,433 adults aged 18 and older. The margin of error is ± 1.8 percentage points.

According to the newspaper, the decline in approval ratings for the president’s inauguration is mainly due to worsening public opinion regarding the domestic economic situation and the progress of the United States’ joint war against Iran.

Other recent polls measured similar declines, led by negative views about the economy and the ongoing wars that have sparked growing conflict in the Middle East.

The New York Times’ average daily poll shows the president’s total approval rating at 40%, with a majority disapproval at 56%. Recent polls show most Americans disapprove of a war with Iran, while frustrations with the economy and affordability have dogged Trump for months.

As with several polls conducted over the past year, the economy ranked as the top issue for voters. 29% said it was the most important issue, followed by 24% who said it was a threat to democracy.

A new poll finds fewer than one-third of Americans, 32%, approve of President Trump’s actions to address inflation and the cost of living. A further 68% said they did not support it. The poll also found that a majority of Americans (52%) also said they “strongly disapprove” of President Trump’s handling of the issue. This is an increase of 7 points since the last time the NBC News Decision Desk asked questions in August 2025.

Regarding the Iran war, two-thirds (67%) of Americans disapprove of President Trump’s handling of the conflict. Only a third, or 33%, said they agreed. Additionally, 54% said they were “strongly opposed” to the war, compared to 19% who said they “strongly supported” it.

The survey also found a new low in terms of the country’s direction. Just over two-thirds of respondents, 67%, said the United States is on the wrong path. This is a two-point increase from when the pollster asked the same question in its previous survey, which ended in early February. A further 33% (about one-third) said the country was on the right track.

Kathryn Palmer is USA TODAY’s political reporter. She can be reached at the following address: kapalmer@usatoday.com And to X@Kathryn Purml. Sign up for her daily politics newsletter here.

Social Security’s 2027 COLA could cause problems for retirees

0

play

There are still months until the Social Security Administration’s official release of the 2027 cost of living adjustment (COLA), but some experts are already predicting where next year’s adjustment will land.

The Alliance on Aging, a nongovernmental advocacy group, uses inflation data released monthly by the Bureau of Labor Statistics to predict future COLAs. The official release date will be in October, as it is based on third-quarter inflation data. But there is already some tough news for retirees.

Rising inflation is bad news for retirees

The Federation of Senior Citizens projects that the COLA in 2027 will be approximately 2.8%. This number has remained unchanged since January, when the organization predicted a 2027 COLA of 2.5%.

The good news for retirees is that next year’s adjustment is likely to be about the same as or even higher than the 2026 raise. The bad news is that it’s because inflation is surging again.

Consumer price index data released last week showed annual inflation at 3.3%, the highest level in two years, up 0.9% from last month. The main cause is the rise in crude oil prices due to the Iran war.

Rising oil prices do more than just increase the price of gasoline for consumers. Businesses are also being affected by the increased costs of transporting goods and manufacturing plastic products, fertilizers and other items that use petroleum to produce. All of these factors could lead to higher prices, and the longer the war in the Middle East drags on, the more likely it is that inflation will soar.

COLA is calculated based on inflation, so if costs increase, retirees are likely to receive a larger raise in 2027. But if history has shown us anything, it’s that that’s likely not enough.

COLA is consistently lacking

COLAs are designed to maintain the purchasing power of benefits over time, but have historically fallen short of what retirees need to survive.

Between 2010 and 2024, there were only five years in which COLA exceeded that year’s inflation rate, according to data from the National Federation of Senior Citizens. Even at a record high COLA of 5.9% in 2022, it fell short of the same year’s inflation rate of 7%.

Most retirees are also feeling the pinch. According to The Motley Fool’s annual Social Security COLA survey, 68% of beneficiaries say this year’s 2.8% adjustment will do little to cover their daily living expenses. With inflation trending upward again, even a slightly higher COLA may not provide retirees with the reprieve they need.

Retirees are also disproportionately affected by rapid inflation. Most seniors live on a fixed income, and the only wage increase they receive is a COLA. Housing and food also make up a significant portion of most retirees’ budgets, and these costs are especially high compared to many other expenses.

There may not be much retirees can do on their own to combat inflation. However, just by staying informed and keeping realistic expectations about how far your COLA will go, you can plan accordingly.

The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

The Motley Fool is a USA TODAY content partner providing financial news, analysis and commentary designed to help people take control of their financial lives. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY.

The $23,760 Social Security bonus that most retirees completely overlook

Offers from the Motley Fool: If you’re like most Americans, you’re several years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But there are some lesser known ones “Secrets of Social Security” It may help ensure that you increase your retirement income.

One Easy Trick Could Pay You Up to $23,760…Every year! By learning how to make the most of your Social Security benefits, we think you can retire confidently with the peace of mind we all desire. participate stock advisor To learn more about these strategies,

See “Secrets of Social Security” »

Fertilizer prices have skyrocketed due to the Iran war. How will U.S. farmers be affected?

0

Americans worried about food prices may soon feel the effects of the Iran war causing unexpected problems on American farms. Rising fertilizer prices are creating a potential ripple effect that could reach grocery stores.

why? The American Farm Bureau Federation cites the effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz as the main reason why fertilizer prices are rising. According to the United Nations, about a third of the world’s seaborne fertilizer trade passes through the strait.

At least 70% of farmers say they can’t afford all the fertilizer they need because of rising costs associated with the Iran war. The problem can reduce crop yields and, if widespread enough, could drive up food prices.

The federation’s survey, released on April 14, found that nearly three-quarters of farmers said fertilizer prices were becoming too expensive. Approximately 6 in 10 farmers reported an overall worsening of their finances.

If you can’t see the graphic, click here to reload the page.

What is the relationship between the Strait of Hormuz and fertilizers?

The American Farm Bureau Federation says many farmers are reconsidering their fertilizer purchases and when to apply them. Farmers in the South and Northeast are suffering the most, but farms across the country are also being affected.

Persian Gulf countries are important producers of chemical fertilizers, and the Strait of Hormuz is an important trade route. Huge quantities of urea, ammonia, phosphate fertilizers, sulfur, and oil from Gulf countries are transported through the strait each year.

Countries affected by the Iran war account for nearly 49% of global urea exports and about 30% of ammonia exports, according to the federation. Major exporting countries include Iran, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt. Why these chemicals are important:

  • Urea contains approximately 46% nitrogen and is the most widely used solid nitrogen fertilizer in the world.
  • Anhydrous ammonia is a nitrogen fertilizer applied to soil.
  • Nitrogen is essential for plant growth.

Lack of ‘advance booking’ for fertilizer hits farmers

Many farmers “reserve” or purchase fertilizer in advance for the next harvest season. Those unable to book in advance may face higher prices, negatively impacting their budgets and forcing them to readjust production volumes and crop types.

Advance reservation practices vary across the United States because crop production systems, planting schedules, and fertilizer needs vary by region.

Advance reservations are more common in the Midwest, where corn and soybeans are typically grown. About 67% of Midwestern farmers have pre-booked for this season, and about a third are unable to secure all the fertilizer they need.

The lowest percentage was in the south, where about 19% were able to make advance reservations.

Rising diesel prices also impact farmers

The closure of the strait has caused U.S. diesel prices to skyrocket, impacting farmers as well. Agricultural diesel prices have risen 46% since the end of February, the federation said. This increased the cost of the next seed planting and growing season.

  • field work
  • transporting fertilizer
  • irrigation

What happens next?

According to Bloomberg and BrownfieldGnews.com, the USDA said it would investigate “whether fertilizer producers colluded to drive up fertilizer prices” and is asking farmers for help.

The USDA is preparing an online service that allows farmers to confidentially report problems with their produce suppliers. The Department will coordinate with the Federal Trade Commission and the Department of Justice as necessary.

Source USA TODAY reporting and investigation. American Farm Bureau Federation; Reuters; United Nations Conference on Trade and Development

Is it possible that the nickel will be phased out like the penny? The cost outweighs the value.

0

play

Last year, the U.S. Mint put pressure on the last penny.

Penny preservationists have warned that the penny’s death could have dire consequences. Confusion about how to pay bills that don’t end in 0 or 5. And as greedy retailers started cutting up everything, prices went up.

But aside from scattered penny shortages, American society appears to have weathered the loss of its least valuable coin.

Will nickel be next?

This question is logical. President Donald Trump killed the penny because the government lost money every time it pushed a penny. Nickel is also a loser.

In fact, nickel has lost more money. The Mint spent 3.69 cents to create a penny in 2024. The government spent 13.78 cents on every nickel, a loss of nearly 9 cents per coin.

Add this up and the government lost about $18 million in penny minting in 2024. On nickels, the Mint lost $85 million.

“The argument for eliminating nickel is that nickel is expensive to produce and is actually much more expensive than its face value,” said David Smith, an economist at Pepperdine University.

Nickels are larger than pennies and are made from expensive materials, 75% copper and 25% nickel, making them more expensive to manufacture. Although pennies look like copper, they are actually, or were, made mostly of zinc.

Throwing away Penny was ‘easy’

It was “a no-brainer” to eliminate the penny from America, said Robert Whaples, an economist at Wake Forest University who has long advocated abolishing the penny.

“We got rid of the penny, and I think we should, because the value of the penny was so small that it wasn’t worth the time to use it,” he said.

Whales reasoned that America’s growing disdain for the penny was inevitable. Decades ago, Gumball could be bought for a penny. Currently, the average worker earns about a penny per second. If you spend more than a second on a penny, “you’ve wasted your time,” says Whatples.

play

Last penny minted in the US sells for millions of dollars at auction

The last U.S. penny ever minted sold at auction for millions of dollars.

Pennies were in short supply long before the Mint stopped putting pressure on them. One big reason is that Americans stopped picking them up. Pennies fell between couch cushions and on the closet floor, clogging vacuum cleaners and landfills.

Many Americans consider nickels and pennies to be more of a nuisance than currency. According to the Federal Reserve, the typical household holds between $60 and $90 in abandoned coins, the equivalent of one or two pint-sized beer mugs. Americans throw away millions of dollars in coins every year, literally treating them like trash.

Is Nickel living on borrowed time?

But Whaples and other coin experts say the U.S. Treasury has no official plan to phase out nickel.

Americans seem to prefer nickels to pennies. Consumers are likely to keep the nickels in circulation by carrying them around in their pockets and returning them to stores, Mr. Whatples said.

The Treasury only pressed 113 million nickels in 2024, but minted 3.2 billion pennies.

“I don’t see any excitement toward abolishing nickel,” Mr. Whatples said.

Still, the era of nickel may be over.

The death of the penny leaves the nickel as the least valuable coin. Inflation erodes the purchasing power of a coin every year. Stamps have cost less than a nickel since 1968. Calling at a payphone has cost less than a nickel since 1951 (not many people use payphones anymore).

Is the nickel the new penny?

Coin experts reason that once the penny is gone, consumers and store owners will rely more on the nickel. The Mint will probably end up producing more products, and losses will increase even more.

After the death of the penny, one big unknown was how retailers would handle rounding calculations for cash transactions. Will they round up and save the consumer a few cents, or will they round up and make themselves a few cents?

The Common Cent Act, introduced by a bipartisan group of lawmakers in 2025, would round cash transactions to the nearest 5 cents and could be a fairer solution. Although the bill has not progressed, some states are pursuing their own “rounding” laws.

If the nickel is abolished, there is a high possibility that the debate over revaluation will rise again.

“Let’s say you only pay $5 for an item that costs $4.91,” said Ute Wartenberg Kagan, executive director of the American Numismatic Association. “That’s a nine cent difference. It adds up to a lot of money.”

Wartenberg-Kagan said that in the world of coins, the Darwinian struggle for survival favors coins with higher value. America earned 10 cents ($36 million) and a quarter ($166 million) in 2024. She said the Mint could make a sizable profit from dollar coins if more Americans just used them.

“Governments throughout history have had the problem that it’s very cost-effective to make big money. But ordinary people need small amounts of money. That’s the paradox,” she said.

Government researchers have spent years studying ways to reduce the cost of producing nickel, perhaps by using cheaper combinations of ingredients. The goal, of course, is to keep manufacturing costs below 5 cents per coin.

But some observers are predicting the nickel’s eventual demise, given steadily rising inflation and the gradual decline in the purchasing power of the nickel.

“It’s going to be a long time before we get rid of the nickel,” Pepperdine’s Smith said. How long? “It will take 10 to 15 years,” he estimates.

“My sense is that at some point it’s inevitable. But it won’t be right away.”

The truth about book deals: Most authors aren’t wealthy.

0


Many published authors still struggle to find full-time work because of advances, royalties, and contract secrecy.

play

  • Book deal amounts are often kept secret, with vague terms like “great” or “good” used to describe advances that range from $0 to more than $500,000.
  • Most authors receive an advance, but it’s often paid in installments over several years and may be the only money you make from your book.
  • Publishing is a “hit-driven” business, with a small number of best-selling books subsidizing the rest of the market.

From Proposal to Publication is a series that takes readers behind the curtain of modern publishing as a business.

The difference between “good” and “good” can jump as much as $50,000.

Usually, when a book is purchased by a publisher, the transaction is shrouded in mystery. Even when announced on Publishers Marketplace, deals range from $0 to over $500,000 and are categorized as “Excellent,” “Very Good,” “Good,” “Significant,” and “Major.” Unless the author volunteers the exact amount, only those involved in the transaction will know the amount.

For aspiring writers scrolling through contract announcements on industry sites and social media, these vague labels can fuel both dreams and misunderstandings. A “good” deal may sound life-changing. A “big” trade may suggest instant wealth. But for most writers navigating the publishing world of 2026, the economic reality is far more complex.

Let’s take a look at why there are so many secrecy surrounding the publishing industry and how novel writers are coping.

Money that most readers never see

Best-selling novelist Jason June has decided to push back against the industry’s silence around money by continually and publicly sharing his finances and accomplishments through the Ventership newsletter. The goal, he said, was to help other writers understand what a career is really like.

“It’s very private,” June said of the writers not sharing their income. “If we don’t talk about it, no one will know if what they’re getting is industry standard or if it’s very low or very high.”

Confidentiality is not necessarily enforced by the publisher. Instead, many industry insiders say it’s largely due to culture. As an unagented writer who recently announced a “great” deal, I understand that impulse. Given that the industry is largely based on taste and preference, you should consider how a particular amount may affect your interest in ancillary rights to your book.

“The publishing industry doesn’t release sales figures,” publishing industry researcher Jane Friedman told USA TODAY. “People often assume their books are doing better than they actually are, and authors themselves don’t want to talk about it, either because they’re being told to do so by their agents or publishers, or because of shame and embarrassment that their books didn’t do well.”

Friedman said authors often assume they shouldn’t discuss their deals, even when there’s no explicit restriction.

June, who posted last holiday season that 174 copies of the 2024 release were sold, said the lack of transparency leaves writers guessing what success actually looks like. (For comparison, Flopping in a Winter Wonderland, a holiday-themed YA novel, sold 1,277 copies in its first three months of publication.)

“This is a kind of permanent fear for writers as a whole, that because no one talks about their work, we think we shouldn’t or aren’t allowed to do it,” he says.

Advancement: The biggest check, and sometimes the only check

For most traditionally published authors, the largest payment they receive is an advance (an advance paid when a publisher buys a book).

However, advances often arrive in installments, sometimes over several years. Fiction author Kristen Byrd recently posted a total of $6,659 in royalties for 2025.

“I think this is a recent phenomenon, but the biggest frustration for me is that the upfront payment is paid in four installments,” Friedman said. “The final payment actually comes after the book is published, at which point it is no longer an advance payment.”

Books can take years to go from contract to publication, meaning authors can wait a long time to get the money associated with work they’ve already completed.

“It’s probably going to take two years from the time the deal is signed…it could be even longer before the final advance is deposited,” Friedman said.

Even if the advance is paid in full, it is unlikely to equate to a sustainable salary.

“The honest truth about advances in bookselling is that these payments are rarely enough to make a living, especially for first-time authors or those who aren’t New York Times bestsellers,” Friedman added. “Even if you work for a large commercial company, the average raise will be five figures.”

Emily Zips’ Substack analysis of 60 authors with traditionally published debut books in 2025 found that advance amounts varied widely, with about 20% of respondents self-reporting $0 in advance, less than half receiving less than $10,000 per book, and just over a quarter receiving more than $50,000.

Still, Friedman insists that author income testing should be treated with caution. This is because surveys often rely on self-selected respondents, which can lump together very different types of authors and create overly broad authorship ‘crisis’ stories from limited data. Nevertheless, she acknowledges that these studies may help show that book advances and royalties alone do not provide a stable living for most authors.

In many cases, that advance may be the only money the author makes from the book. “In most cases, you don’t get any money up front,” Friedman said.

Why royalties are not always accrued

In theory, if a book’s sales exceed the advance payment, the author can earn additional income through royalties. However, these payments are likely to be small as there are no set standards.

Royalty structures vary depending on factors such as format and contract negotiations, but the amount per book can be surprisingly small. “Even if you sell thousands of books, you only make a dollar or less than a dollar per book sold,” June told USA TODAY. “So if you sell 1,000 books, you might make $1,000.”

Kevin O’Connor, programming director and literary agent at New York University’s Summer Publishing Institute, said most of the writers he works with, both fiction and nonfiction, have other sources of income.

“Most of my clients are part-time writers,” he said. “For most writers, I don’t think it’s possible (to become a full-time writer) until they have a big hit.”

A hit-driven industry

Another economic challenge arises from the uneven distribution of books.

The publishing industry operates as what insiders call a “hit-driven” business, with a small number of titles generating most of the revenue. “Most books don’t sell more than 5,000 copies,” O’Connor said, citing publishing industry data and reporting on the 2022 antitrust trial between Penguin Random House and Simon & Schuster.

As with many entertainment industries, some blockbuster titles subsidize other markets. “There’s an 80-20 rule,” he said. “20% of the title is responsible for 80% of the business.”

Still, editors continue to acquire new books out of passion as well as profit. “They’re excited about a book because they have a personal connection to it,” O’Connor said. “They care and think they can find an audience that cares.”

Sometimes that gamble pays off. In many cases, this is not the case.

Why transparency benefits everyone

For Friedman and other industry observers, increased transparency provides a “better understanding of what others are doing” and puts authors and agents in a “better position to negotiate.”

June agrees. His decision to share finances was intended to provide a data point for writers considering whether to seriously pursue publication.

Industry experts say the economics for authors are unlikely to change dramatically in the near future because the publishing industry remains a hit-driven business, with a small number of titles generating most of the revenue. As a result, advances, rather than royalties, are likely to continue to be the main source of income for many authors, Friedman said.

Very few writers make enough money to write full-time, including blockbuster novelists, prolific genre writers, and original film and television authors. But for most people, publishing looks like part of a portfolio rather than a single career.

Josh Rivera is an author and senior editor at USA TODAY.

Catholics are divided by the feud between President Trump and Pope Leo XIV

0

play

It was a tumultuous April for many Catholic supporters of President Donald Trump.

Two days after Easter Sunday, the president threatened to annihilate Iran. Days later, President Trump belittled Pope Leo

Some have suggested the moment could be a flashpoint for Catholic conservatives torn between political and religious loyalties, as the Trump administration spars with the Vatican over what has become the most contentious relationship between secular leaders and the Holy See since the Middle Ages.

“Conservative Catholics who have supported Trump may feel the need to decide between Trump and the Pope,” said Landon Schnabel, an associate professor of sociology at Cornell University in Ithaca, New York.

The conflict has escalated beyond just the president versus the pope. While some of President Trump’s Catholic allies, most notably Vice President J.D. Vance, entered the fray, the nation’s Catholic bishops rallied around the Pope, and the entire situation spread through social media.

“It’s like we’re watching this debate unfold between two giants in real time,” said Frank Lacopo, an assistant professor of history at Southeast Missouri State University in Cape Girardeau. “This is unprecedented in American history.”

Nearly 60% of Catholics supported President Trump in the 2024 election, but Matthew Schmaltz, founding editor of the Journal of Global Catholicism, said up to a third of that support may have waned since then as the president and pope clashed over U.S. deportation policy and the Iran war. The dispute threatens to collapse key constituencies in the run-up to the 2026 midterm elections.

“It’s clear that American Catholics are an important political constituency, and the president has been careful not to alienate them, whether they are Republicans or Democrats,” he said. “Mr. Trump is truly exploring new political territory.”

Nicholas Hayes Mota, a social ethicist and public theologian at Santa Clara University in California, told Truth Social that the cumulative effect of the past two weeks, limited by AI images of Trump that have since been removed, has already pushed some people to break with the president.

“This is clearly a bridge too far for some people,” Hayes Mota said.

Despite the president’s skeptical attempts to explain, the “Trump as Jesus” image drew fierce criticism from conservative Catholics, including podcaster Michael Knowles, former Fox News host Megyn Kelly, and CatholicVote.org, a group founded by Trump’s ambassador to the Holy See.

For many religious Americans, faith leads and politics follows, said Cornell University’s Schnabel. In other words, their beliefs and values ​​shape their political positions.

But when the president posts images of himself as Christ, he said, he is “asking believers to start with their political allegiances and backfill their theology.” This creates a tension between religious beliefs and political allegiances.

“When people have two conflicting commitments, something has to give,” Schnabel said.

Years of conflict between the Pope and the President

The U.S. government and the Vatican have long exchanged views on policy, but the ongoing exchange is unique in its public and private nature.

“You would have to go back to the Middle Ages or the Protestant Reformation to see this type of controversy between the pope and secular leaders,” said Schmaltz, a professor of religious studies at the College of the Holy Cross in Worcester, Massachusetts.

For example, in 11th In the turn of the century, a dispute arose between Pope Gregory VII and Henry IV over whether the pope or the king had the right to elect bishops. Racopo said a similar dispute erupted in 1303 between Pope Boniface VIII and King Philip IV of France over taxing powers, eventually leading to violence.

“Some of the king’s men went to the pope’s residence and beat him,” he said.

In modern times, the conflict between the Pope and the US president has proved tame and less direct by comparison, largely limited to criticism of US war activities. In 1965, Pope Paul VI famously gave a speech at the United Nations and implored, “No more wars, no more wars!”

“Although he declined to name names, many observers took it to be directed at Lyndon Johnson and the Vietnam War,” Racopo said.

A 2015 article in America magazine recalled Time correspondent Wilton Wynn’s account of a tense meeting between President Johnson and Pope Paul in December 1968 as the war dragged on, with Wynn saying that Pope “slammed his hand on the desk” and “yelled” at the president. However, the meeting ended with the two exchanging Christmas presents.

Hayesmota, who lives in Santa Clara, said the pope has an obligation to speak on behalf of the church and its mission. He noted that Pope John Paul II was an active critic of the 2003 U.S. invasion of Iraq under President George Bush. “So Leo is not acting at risk. But I don’t remember a president attacking the pope in this way.”

Stephen Schneck, former director of the Institute for Policy Studies and Catholic Studies at the Catholic University of America in Washington, D.C., said both Johnson and Bush were “respectful and diplomatic” in their interactions with the pope. “So the conflict between the president and the pope was nothing compared to what we saw last week.”

President Trump has made subtle comments about Pope Leo, a Chicago native who was elected to succeed Pope Francis in May 2025, becoming the first North American pope and who has been vocal in his opposition to the Iran war.

In an April 12 post on Truth Social, President Trump called the pope not only weak on crime but also “terrible in foreign policy,” adding, “Leo should get his act together, use common sense, stop pandering to the radical left, and focus on being a great pope, not a politician.”

In response, the pope said he was “not afraid of the Trump administration” and would continue to preach the Catholic gospel.

The president’s disdain for the leadership of the world’s 1.4 billion Catholics has once again drawn criticism from prominent Catholic conservatives. “President Trump’s post insulting the Pope once again crosses the line of decorum that plays an important role in diplomacy,” said Kelsey Reinhardt, president and CEO of CatholicVote.org.

Hayzmota said such attacks do not support Trump among Catholic voters, nor are they an attempt to politicize the pope’s clear statements about the church’s moral values.

“His attack treated the pope as just a political opponent,” Hayzmota said. “The pope is very popular not only in the United States but among Catholics around the world. If President Trump really wants to make this a contest, I don’t think that would work for him.”

Vance “could be a bridge builder.”

Political observers say the person most likely to be influenced by Imbrorio is J.D. Vance, who has made his faith part of his political persona. Mr. Vance, who converted to Catholicism and describes himself as deeply religious, “will be held accountable” in his upcoming memoir, “Communion: Finding the Path to Faith,” scheduled for publication in June, Mr. Schmaltz said.

“Mr. Vance is in a position where he has to answer questions about religious beliefs and how they relate to policy positions,” Schmaltz said. “Mr. Trump needs to be very careful in how he responds, and he needs to be careful that he doesn’t echo the kind of criticism that he leveled at the pope.”

This week, the vice president joined the fray by publicly rebutting Pope Leo’s April 10 claim on X that followers of Christ “will never be on the side of those who once wielded swords and today drop bombs.”

Speaking to the audience at the Turning Point USA rally in Georgia on April 14, Vance said Leo’s position would mean opposing America’s liberation of France and concentration camps during World War II. He suggested that the pope “be careful when talking about theological issues.”

The next day, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops rushed to Pope Leo’s defense, issuing a statement emphasizing that the Catholic Church’s centuries-old tradition of just war theory teaches that states “can only legitimately take up the sword” in self-defense after peace efforts fail.

“For a just war to be a just war, it must be a defense against others who are actively waging war. This is what the Pope actually said,” the group said in a statement. “When Pope Leo

Some pointed out that Vance’s statement about the church’s doctrine of just war, rooted in the teachings of St. Augustine, was made during a visit by Pope Leo XIV, who for 12 years presided over the worldwide religious order founded by St. Augustine, to the North African site of the ancient Roman city of Hippo, where Augustine once ruled as bishop.

Haysmota said Vance’s comments “sounded arrogant to many people.” “That was not a good thing for the vice president. For many Catholics, war is a pressing moral issue.”

Haysmota said that as the second-highest-ranking Catholic in the administration, Vance could help ease tensions and foster dialogue sought by some Catholic conservatives.

“He may be a bridge builder, but his initial reaction didn’t convey that,” he said.

Will President Trump soften his religious stance?

Schmaltz emphasized that the Catholic right is not monolithic. He said some die-hard MAGA supporters welcome President Trump’s criticism of Pope Leo, “because they perceive him as a liberal…There’s a group of die-hard Catholic MAGA supporters who truly believe that Donald Trump was chosen by God at this historic moment.”

On the other hand, conservative podcasters and influencers may be more cautious about how they frame their support for the administration going forward, he said.

Experts say Trump may have an obligation to soften his religious stance, but the president has proven unpredictable. Days after receiving backlash for posting a controversial AI image, Trump reshared another image of himself being hugged by Jesus and wrote, “God may be playing trumps!”

“If we don’t want a catastrophe, Trump absolutely needs to soften his religious stance,” said Schneck, a former director of the Catholic University Research Institute. “He’s already got the hardcore evangelical right. Why does he continue to antagonize mainstream Catholics and religious moderates?”

Schneck said he believes it’s “political malpractice” for Vance and other Catholics in the Trump administration, including Marco Rubio and Caroline Leavitt, to keep doubling down on these messages, but said the president has shown a knack for wriggling his way out of difficult political positions.

“Mr. Trump’s secret is his uncanny ability to drown out current anger by shifting attention to new spectacles.” “We’re hopeful that this will be his formula to win back a lot of Catholics right before the midterm elections.”

Why age 69 is a critical time for retirement and estate planning.

0

play

People who have neglected retirement planning for most of their lives have one last chance, starting at age 69, that could determine how they spend their later years and whether they leave something to their heirs, some financial advisers said.

Advisers say age 69 is the last stage before mandatory minimum distributions (RMDs) begin at age 73, but is still early enough to take steps to keep taxes low. For example, Americans may find the period between ages 69 and 73 to be the best time to convert to a Roth, the advisers said. Withdrawals from a Roth account are tax- and penalty-free as long as you are age 59 1/2 or older and the funds have been in the account for at least five years.

According to Citizens Bank, taxes are one of the biggest unexpected expenses for retirees. Withdrawals from traditional IRAs and 401(k)s count as taxable income. Depending on how high it is, you could also be taxed on Social Security or end up paying thousands of dollars more each year in Medicare premiums, so planning is important.

Sheena Gray, CEO of the African American Financial Advisors Association, said these years will be the “last window to manage your taxable income and manage your future taxes.” “They can determine whether your wealth is preserved or lost for generations.”

What steps can you take to keep taxes low in retirement?

Experts say a Roth conversion is at the top of the list of smart moves.

If you’re retired from age 69 through the years before your RMD, “you have the opportunity to do a Roth conversion at a lower tax rate,” Gray said. Since the converted amount will be taxed, the conversion will be spread out over several years, starting from age 69. You can avoid competing with higher taxes or being stuck with one huge tax bill, she says.

Since you won’t be receiving a paycheck, you can replace your W-2 income with a Roth conversion, said Jordan Mangaliman, CEO and fiduciary wealth advisor at Goldline Wealth Management. For example, if you earned $150,000 a year before you retired, but now only receive a $50,000 annual pension, you can convert about $100,000 into a Roth and stay in your regular tax bracket, he said.

Roth accounts are also beneficial from a legacy and generational wealth perspective, Mangaliman said. Because Roth accounts are not subject to RMDs, the surviving spouse does not have to continue receiving RMD income, immediately pushing widows and widowers into higher tax brackets when filing a single rather than joint tax return.

Additionally, while most beneficiaries who inherit traditional retirement accounts are required to liquidate the account within 10 years and withdrawals are taxed, Roth withdrawals are not taxable, even to the heir.

Other tips include:

  • Income plan: Identifying your source of income before you have to take RMDs is “very important,” Mangaliman says. “Look at what’s generating income,” he said. “Dividends or bonds? Are you selling stocks? If you sell, is it sustainable? If the market takes a downturn, there’s no time to recover, so a properly allocated portfolio is important.” “Every dollar has a role. It’s not just a bunch of money.”
  • Financial expert: If you haven’t worked with a financial advisor or CPA before, now is a good time to try it out. “A financial advisor is the best person to guide you and help you create a withdrawal plan for your investment income,” Gray said.

How do you find the right financial advisor?

There are many resources available to help you find the right financial professional and create a plan so you don’t run out of money in retirement. Make sure the financial planner is qualified and trustworthy. The fiduciary is legally and ethically bound to work in your best interests.

Lists like USA TODAY’s ranking of the best financial advisory firms exist on many reputable media sites.

You can also find local advisors using our searchable database. For example, the National Association of Professional Advisors’ site includes only fiduciaries. The nonprofit Association Of African American Financial Advisors, of which Gray is CEO, also has a searchable database of financial advisors vetted based on need and location.

“A lot of the mistakes people make include waiting too long to develop a strategy,” Gray says. “Once you’re 73, it’s too late. If you don’t have a plan, the IRS is planning your taxes, which you probably wouldn’t have chosen,” she says.

Medora Lee is USA TODAY’s money, markets and personal finance reporter. Please contact us at mjlee@usatoday.com. Subscribe to our free Daily Money newsletter for personal finance tips and business news every Monday through Friday.

MAGA numbers call into question President Trump’s mental health ‘needs review’

0

play

  • Critics have pointed to Trump’s recent statements, including threats against Iran and social media posts, as evidence of erratic behavior.
  • Recent polls show that a majority of Americans, including many independents and some Republicans, think President Trump has become more erratic as he ages.
  • The White House and President Trump’s remaining allies have dismissed those concerns, contrasting Trump’s energy with that of former President Joe Biden.

President Donald Trump’s actions and comments have long led political opponents to question his mental health, but in recent weeks more people than the usual liberal suspects have accused him of being mentally unstable.

Prominent conservative commentators, from former Fox News hosts Megyn Kelly and Tucker Carlson to conspiracy theorist Alex Jones and podcaster Candace Owens, have suggested the president is in poor health.

“I really think we need to test his mental competency,” Marjorie Taylor Greene said on CNN International on April 15.

The former Republican congressman from Georgia said he was “shocked and horrified” by the president’s recent comments, including warning that “the entire civilization will perish” and Iranians “will live in hell” if his demands are not met.

Jones, the founder of Infowars and a longtime Trump supporter, said on the March 31 episode of his new show, “The Alex Jones Show,” that Republican incumbents seeking re-election need to “cut bait” on the president by the 2026 midterm elections.

“And he babble, but you know, it sounds like his brain isn’t very active,” he said.

Mr. Owens, who has promoted racist and anti-Semitic tropes in recent years, called Mr. Trump a “genocidal maniac” in an April 7 post on X, echoing Democrats who called for the 25th Amendment to be used to remove Mr. Trump from office.

“Our Congress and our military need to intervene,” she said. “We are beyond madness.”

The comments exposed yet another raw nerve in the ongoing civil war over “Make America Great Again” over President Trump’s widespread military attacks on foreign territory.

Some former White House officials from the first Trump administration share this view.

Former White House Counsel Ty Cobb said in a March 31 interview with former CNN reporter Jim Acosta that the president is “obviously insane.”

“These screeds that come out every night highlight the level of insanity and depravity,” Cobb said. “I think he’s gone.”

President Trump slammed these MAGA media figures, accusing them of trying to generate “cheap propaganda.”

“They’re not ‘MAGA’. They’re losers and they’re just trying to hang on to MAGA,” he said in an April 9 social media post.

Most of Trump’s supporters at the Capitol support the president. Others in the online MAGA ecosystem dismissed concerns about his mental health raised by fellow conservatives.

Former FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino, who resigned from the administration in January, blasted right-wing critics on a recent episode of his podcast as “people pretending to be one of us who were fooled” by President Trump. He suggested the president’s actions were more strategic than psychotic.

“No, this is not the scope of the 25th Amendment, losers,” Bongino said. “It could be mental illness. The Baker Act is your time to talk about it, but the president isn’t. I promise you, he’s in a really good position.”

President Trump’s attitude and self-promotion are in focus

Experts say Trump has consistently fueled the MAGA movement with wildly exaggerated rhetoric.

These often long meandering, sometimes “dark” statements by Trump’s own admission, were also prominent during the 2024 campaign, such as when he suggested America needed “a really violent day” to deal with property crime.

“It’s been a tough time,” President Trump said at a rally in Erie, Pennsylvania, on September 29, 2024. “And I mean really rough. Word gets around and it’s over quickly.”

This tendency is becoming more and more obvious in actual governance activities.

For example, during a White House Cabinet meeting in March, the president raised eyebrows when he spent five minutes joking about his love for $5 Sharpie markers. Earlier that month, while updating reporters on the Iran war, he paused mid-sentence to admire the White House curtains.

“Those curtains were my choice in my first term,” Trump said.

He has also long been known to make patently false claims, such as continuing to claim he won the 2020 presidential election and saying in an April 15 interview with Fox Business that “no other president has ever ended a war.”

President Trump said, “No one has ever ended a war.” “Who finished it? Nobody.”

Historians have noted that U.S. presidents have played important roles in ending conflicts and peace agreements, including President Theodore Roosevelt, who won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1906 for ending the war with Russia and Japan.

At one point during the Fox interview, host Maria Bartiromo asked about Republican Sen. Thom Tillis’ opposition to choosing Kevin Warsh to be the next Federal Reserve Chairman. President Trump said the North Carolina lawmaker is no longer in Congress.

President Trump asked, “You know Thom Tillis is no longer a senator.” “He quit.”

When Bartiromo reminded the president that Tillis was still a senator and was only up for re-election in 2026, Trump responded, “No, no, he quit, but he quit.”

But the political right’s criticism of his mental state has more to do with issuing threats in melodramatic language, such as starting an unpopular war in Iran and saying that the US would destroy all of Iran’s bridges and power plants, a potential war crime.

“Remember when I gave Iran 10 days to make a deal or open the Strait of Hormuz,” Trump said in an April 4 Truth Social post. “Time is running out. Forty-eight hours left before hell has them. Glory to God!”

“It’s possible to take over an entire country overnight, and that night could be tomorrow night,” President Trump said at a press conference on April 6. Matthew Dallek, a presidential historian at George Washington University, said this kind of rhetoric has damaged his relationships with conservative media figures who have supported him in the past, despite his small departure from the anti-interventionist “America First” foreign policy ethos of his campaign.

“If Alex Jones calls you crazy, something is wrong,” Dallek said.

Jones was ordered to pay $1.4 billion in 2022 to the families of the victims of the Sandy Hook school shooting, who have long argued that the killings were part of a government conspiracy to steal Americans’ guns.

“I think Trump is still essentially Trump, but he’s more outraged now,” Dallek added. “He’s become a more exaggerated version of himself, which means he’s become more erratic, more confrontational, more belligerent, more extreme.”

Social media explosion fuels speculation

President Trump has touted his mental sharpness for years, calling himself a “very stable genius” in 2019. He also dismissed questions about his physical health, telling reporters on Air Force One last year that the results of an October 2025 MRI scan were “perfect,” adding that his doctor had given them “one of the best reports I’ve ever seen.”

Doctors later confirmed it was a CT scan. The White House has not yet disclosed what type of action took place or detailed consequences.

It comes across quite differently from the frail and halting appearance of former President Joe Biden, but while President Trump has always exuded confidence, he now faces questions about his mental acuity as he approaches his 80th birthday on June 14.

And Mr. Biden, whose re-election bid was scrapped due to similar concerns, is issuing a stark warning.

Mr. Trump has long had a penchant for self-aggrandizement, and this trend has become even more pronounced in his second term, with a banner featuring his portrait hanging in front of the U.S. Department of Justice headquarters in Washington, D.C. His signature was added to U.S. banknotes, starting with the $100 bill. The John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts in Washington will be renamed the Trump Kennedy Center.

Days after he drew backlash for posting an AI-generated image depicting himself as a Christ-like figure, the president once again took to the Truth Social platform to post a photo of himself being hugged by Jesus.

Democrats put pressure on the 25th Amendment

Democrats and their allies have already begun to attack these recent events.

At a House Education and Labor Committee hearing on April 17, Rep. Mark Takano (D-Calif.) slammed Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. about the president’s mental state.

Takano showed a large poster with some of Trump’s online messages and asked whether Kennedy, as the nation’s top health official, would “insist” that the president undergo a mental health and emotional stability test.

“Absolutely not,” Kennedy said.

Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) is working toward passing a long-term bill that would create a commission to assess the president’s fitness to remain in office under the 25th Amendment. In his April 10 letter, he asked the White House physician to evaluate President Trump’s mental health.

“Experts have repeatedly warned that the President is exhibiting signs consistent with dementia and cognitive decline,” Raskin said in the letter. “And in recent days, this country has seen President Trump’s public statements and abuse become increasingly incoherent, erratic, profane, deranged, and threatening.”

White House Press Secretary Davis Engle, asked about the MAGA rift and Democratic pressure, declined to comment on how the administration is responding to former allies. But he criticized the Maryland lawmaker, saying Raskin was “a stupid man’s idea of ​​a smart man.”

“President Trump’s sharpness, unparalleled energy, and historic accessibility stand in stark contrast to the previous administration, when Democrats like Raskin deliberately concealed Joe Biden’s serious physical and mental decline from the American people,” Ingle told USA TODAY in a statement.

Poll shows Americans are also concerned about President Trump’s behavior and age

But polls show Americans are also paying attention to the president’s actions.

A Reuters/Ipsos poll released in February found that about 61% of Americans said President Trump has become more erratic as he ages. Among them: 64% of independents and 30% of Republicans agreed with progressives, who described President Trump’s portrayal as “alarming” and “dangerous” given the enormous power the executive branch holds.

“This president is unfit, unwell, and mentally unstable,” NAACP President and CEO Derrick Johnson said in an April 7 statement. “The statements and actions we are witnessing from President Trump are not only alarming, they are dangerous.”

Civil rights groups are calling for the 25th Amendment to be invoked for the first time in 117 years.

The administration and its allies have dismissed such criticism by focusing on how Trump’s energy contrasts with Biden’s physical problems, which are often attributed to the former president’s slurred speech and slow movements. White House officials regularly point out that earlier this year, President Trump delivered the longest State of the Union address in history to Congress.

However, a Reuters/Ipsos poll found fewer voters believe Trump is “mentally sharp” or “capable of handling challenges” than during the 2024 campaign. In a similar survey in September 2023, 54% of Americans agreed with this statement, compared to 45% in February 2026.

But a Reuters/Ipsos poll found only 23% of voters agreed when asked whether Biden would be mentally sharp and able to meet the challenges in July 2024, when he finally drops out of the race.

Dallek, the presidential historian, said the concerns about Biden are valid, but of a different kind compared to what voters currently have about Trump.

“With Mr. Biden, the concern was mainly about his age. It was whether he could do the job,” he said. “In Mr. Trump’s case, the primary consideration is character. The concern is not that he is old and frail, as has been expressed by critics and the public, but rather that he is energetic and insane.”

Woman killed, plane fire, Casely charger recall updated in a hurry

0

play

The death of a 75-year-old woman has prompted a new recall of more than 400,000 Casely wireless chargers.

On April 16, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission and Kayley re-announced a recall for approximately 429,000 Kayley Power Bank 5000mAh portable MagSafe wireless phone chargers. One woman who was using the charger died and another suffered first-degree burns. The wireless charger was recalled in April 2025.

At the time of the first recall, Casely had received 51 consumer reports of chargers overheating, expanding, or catching fire during use, resulting in six minor burns. Since the recall, 28 new consumer reports have been filed, including a report of a woman’s death.

In August 2024, a 75-year-old New Jersey woman caught fire and exploded while using a wireless charger. She suffered second- and third-degree burns and later died from her injuries, according to a Consumer Product Safety Commission recall. In February of this year, a 47-year-old woman was using a charger on a plane when it caught fire and exploded. She suffered first-degree burns.

Here’s what you need to know about the Casely recall.

What portable chargers are recalled?

The Casely Power Pods 5000mAh Portable MagSafe Wireless Phone Charger has the model number “E33A” printed on the back and “Casely” stamped on the front right side.

Where were the recalled portable chargers sold?

Casely Power Pods 5000mAh Portable MagSafe Wireless Phone Charger was available for $30 to $70 on the Casely website, Amazon, and other online stores from March 22, 2024 to September 2024.

What to do if you own a Casely Wireless Portable Power Bank

Immediately stop using your wireless charger and contact Casely for a free replacement.

To request a free replacement, visit getcasely.com/pages/2025-recall, fill out the online form, and submit two photos of the front and back of the recalled product. Please write “Recall” and permanent market date on the front of the charger before taking a photo.

After submitting the photo, please dispose of the charger according to local and state regulations. Lithium-ion batteries cannot be disposed of in trash cans, general recycling systems, or used battery recycling boxes. Local government household hazardous waste collection centers can accept recalled batteries.

For more information, contact Casely at 888-964-9331 or email recall@getcasely.com Monday through Friday from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Eastern Time.

Greta Cross is USA TODAY’s national trends reporter. Story ideas? Email her at gcross@usatoday.com.

Powerball jackpot $75 million for April 18 drawing

0

play

The Powerball jackpot has risen to $75 million with a $34.2 million cash option ahead of Saturday night’s drawing on April 18th.

According to the Lottery, the jackpot has been won nearly 200 times since Powerball was introduced in 1992.

In 2026 alone, three tickets won the top prize. A $209.3 million prize from a ticket sold in North Carolina on January 21st, a $250.8 million jackpot win in Arkansas on March 2nd, and most recently a $231 million win in Delaware on April 6th ended weeks without a jackpot winner.

The largest lottery jackpot in U.S. history remains the $2.04 billion Powerball prize won by California’s Edwin Castro in 2022.

Here’s what you need to know about tonight’s Powerball drawing.

What are the winning Powerball numbers for April 18th?

USA TODAY will publish the winning numbers at 10:59 p.m. ET after the lottery drawing.

Do I have to be a US citizen or resident to play Powerball?

The short answer is no. You do not need to be a US citizen or resident to play Powerball. Anyone visiting any of the 45 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, or the U.S. Virgin Islands may purchase lottery tickets from authorized and licensed retailers, regardless of nationality, as long as they meet the legal age requirements (usually 18 years old) at the time of purchase.

Top 10 Powerball Jackpots

  • $2.04 billion in California on November 7, 2022
  • December 24, 2025, $1.817 billion in Arkansas.
  • $1.787 billion in Missouri and Texas on September 6, 2025
  • $1.765 billion in California on October 11, 2023
  • January 13, 2016, $1.586 billion in California, Florida, and Tennessee
  • April 6, 2024, $1.326 billion in Oregon.
  • $1.08 billion in California on July 19, 2023
  • $842.4 million in Michigan on January 1, 2024
  • March 27, 2019, $768.4 million in Wisconsin
  • August 23, 2017, $758.7 million in Massachusetts

How to play Powerball

Powerball tickets cost $2 per play and are sold in 45 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. This can be done at a variety of locations, including local convenience stores, gas stations, and grocery stores. In some states, you can purchase Powerball tickets online depending on your local jurisdiction.

Once you have your ticket, you have to choose six numbers. Five of them are white balls numbered from 1 to 69. The red Powerball range is 1-26. You can also add a “Power Play” for $1, which increases your winnings on all non-jackpot prizes. “Power Play” multipliers allow you to increase your winnings by 2x, 3x, 4x, 5x, or 10x.

A “Quick Pick” option is also available if you want the computer to select the numbers for you. To win the jackpot, players must match all five white balls with the red Powerball in any order.

Powerball drawings are held on Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday nights. The winnings continue to increase even if no one wins the jackpot.

Fernando Cervantes Jr. is a trending news reporter for USA TODAY. Contact us at fernando.cervantes@gannett.com and follow us at X @fern_cerv_.

Ice Spice sparks heated debate at McDonald’s

0

play

Ice Spice was the victim of an “unprovoked attack” at a McDonald’s in Los Angeles, his lawyer tells Billboard. However, the singer shared the news with a fast food joke.

On April 17, Bronx-born rapper Isis Gaston posted a video to X of her and a friend being accosted by a woman as they were eating at a McDonald’s booth in Hollywood, California. According to Rolling Stone, Ice Spice, wearing a hoodie, can be seen climbing around the booth to follow the man as he listens to unreleased music.

Along with the video, the rapper wrote on X’s post, “This would never happen at Wendy’s.”

Ice Spice’s lawyer, Bradford Cohen, told TMZ and Billboard that the video documents an “unprovoked attack” that was reported to the Los Angeles Police Department. “We will pursue all criminal and civil avenues to hold the perpetrators accountable for their actions. We are also looking to hold the venue accountable for its apparent lack of adequate security.”

Ice Spice’s references to Wendy’s have some history. She was a cashier at a fast food chain, XXL reported.

USA TODAY has reached out to Ice Spice representatives and attorneys for comment.

Mike Snyder is a national trends news reporter for USA TODAY. You can follow him on Threads, Bluesky, and X, and email him at: mike snyder & @mikegsnider.bsky.social & @mikesnider & msnider@usatoday.com.

The company aims to open six new stores in May. when and where

0

play

Target plans to open six new stores in May as part of the company’s plan to have more than 30 stores by the end of 2026.

The six new stores will be located in Arizona, Missouri, New Jersey and North Carolina and will all open on May 17, according to a Target news release. Target plans to employ approximately 870 people across the six stores.

Five of the new stores are some of Target’s largest stores, exceeding the retailer’s average size of 125,000 square feet, the news release continued. The largest new location will open in St. Louis, Missouri and will be 149,000 square feet. The additional space will allow for an expanded grocery selection and a backroom five times larger than the traditional store.

Take a closer look at where Target will open new stores this spring.

Where will Target open new stores?

Can’t see the map above? Visit infogram.com/1pe2v397j72gyxum2pdkq5vr5qhlg0m1y9l.

  • Arizona: 1355 N. Verrado Way in Buckeye* and 951 N. Promenade Parkway in Casa Grande*
  • Missouri: 8645 Olive Boulevard, St. Louis*
  • New Jersey: 381 Route 440 in Jersey City
  • North Carolina: 5623 Carolina Beach Road* in Wilmington and 551 St. Mark Ave.* in Selma.

*Locations greater than 125,000 square feet

When will new Target stores open?

Six new Target stores will open on May 17th.

Greta Cross is USA TODAY’s national trends reporter. Story ideas? Email her at gcross@usatoday.com.

Typhoon Shinraku, a Category 5 superstorm, hits U.S. territory

0


Typhoon Shinraku hit Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands starting April 11 after rapidly intensifying into a Category 5 storm.

play

The U.S. territory is recovering after a Category 5 super typhoon hit islands in the western Pacific Ocean ahead of peak storm season.

Typhoon Shinraku hit Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands starting April 11 after rapidly intensifying into a Category 5 storm. Territorial and federal authorities declared a state of emergency. The storm caused power outages, flooded homes, and tore off roofs. No deaths have been reported so far.

The powerful storm, with wind speeds reaching at least 175 mph, occurred before most typhoons form between May and October, but NASA said the season is year-round in the Western Pacific.

“We are actively recovering to get our people back to work and live,” Guam Governor Lou Leon Guerrero said in an April 16 video address.

On April 17, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. declared a public health emergency. HHS officials are working with the Federal Emergency Management Agency to assist with public health and medical assistance as needed. Health officials are also seeking to identify Medicare recipients who use medical equipment that relies on electricity, such as dialysis or oxygen, to help people at risk from the storm’s effects.

President Kennedy said in an April 18 statement that “HHS stands by the people of Guam and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands as they cope with the health impacts of Typhoon Shinraku.” “We are working closely with our local and federal partners to deploy teams to assess needs and provide medical and public health assistance as the situation allows.”

President Donald Trump approved a state of emergency for Guam and then the Northern Mariana Islands, allowing FEMA to coordinate disaster relief.

Home to approximately 154,000 people, Guam is an independent territorial island south of the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, an archipelago of 14 islands with approximately 47,300 residents.

Typhoon Shinraku, which formed southeast of Guam, occurred during an El Niño year when waters in the Pacific Ocean naturally warmed. This means that while the Atlantic basin may have a more difficult time developing hurricanes, some areas of the Pacific Ocean may create better conditions for tropical cyclones.

Shinraku is the second Category 5 storm of 2026. Tropical Storm Horacio in the southern Indian Ocean reached speeds of 160 mph in late February.

Forecasters are warning that the dangerous storms could intensify quickly, even though early forecasts predicted a lower-than-normal Atlantic hurricane season. Hurricane season begins in June.

President Trump says cases of missing or dead scientists are under investigation

0


President Donald Trump said the incident may have been a coincidence. The news comes amidst a flurry of reports and speculation about a number of incidents.

play

The White House said it was investigating multiple deaths and disappearances of people associated with the U.S. scientific community over the past few years and asked federal investigators to see if there was a connection between the cases.

“I hope it’s random,” President Donald Trump said when asked by reporters about the claim. “It’s a pretty serious situation…hopefully, I don’t know if it’s a coincidence, whatever you want to call it, but some of them were very important. We’re going to look into that in the next short period of time.”

President Trump said he had just left a conference on the topic.

White House press secretary Caroline Levitt confirmed on April 17 that the administration was working with “relevant” agencies and the FBI, saying “no stone will be left unturned.”

The news from the White House comes after weeks of tabloid reports, internet speculation and inconsistent reporting.

A review of publicly available information by USA TODAY found at least 10 cases of disappearances or deaths that may be related to investigations spanning several years, but the cases reveal inconsistent links to scientific research and widely varying circumstances.

USA TODAY has reached out to the FBI and Department of Energy for more information. CBS News reported that the DOE’s National Nuclear Security Administration, which oversees some of the facilities where some of the scientists worked, is investigating the incident.

Perhaps the most high-profile case concerns retired U.S. Air Force Gen. William “Neil” McCasland, who once managed a science and technology program. He was last seen at his home in Albuquerque in February.

Following the disappearance of McCasland, 68, authorities issued a Silver Alert, an advisory used when elderly people or people with health or cognitive conditions go missing, citing an unspecified “medical issue.”

Authorities said he had previously experienced “mental fog,” but investigators did not believe he was cognitively impaired at the time of his disappearance. There was no evidence of foul play at the time, and a revolver and other items also appeared to be missing from the residence, they said.

McCasland was director of the Air Force Research Laboratory at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base near Dayton, Ohio, where he managed science and technology programs. He joined the base in 2011 and retired in 2013, the Cincinnati Enquirer, part of the USA TODAY Network, reported. The base was home to a project to investigate UFO sightings in the 1950s and ’60s.

Ohio proposal to quarantine the name ‘Trump’ in wildlife refuges causes controversy

0

play

Ohio residents are concerned that the wildlife sanctuary’s name will create an unfair association with President Donald Trump.

In March, the Ohio Department of Wildlife recommended renaming the Charles O. Trump Wildlife Refuge south of Columbus as the Trump Wildlife Refuge. The name was one of more than a dozen proposed as part of a rule review that is required at least every five years, The Columbus Dispatch, part of the USA TODAY Network, reported.

The proposal was met with backlash online, with some believing the name implied a connection to the president or downplayed the importance of the person who donated the land.

“This change sends a clear partisan message. In the current political climate, removing ‘Charles O’ and only elevating ‘Trump’ is not a neutral administrative cleanse,” a Reddit user posted on the Ohio subreddit in March. “Whether the (Ohio Department of Natural Resources) intended it or not, this reads as a political branding decision. Public wildlife lands should not be used to send coded partisan messages.”

Another Reddit user said: “I strongly disagree with this proposal…This is a partisan political act and not a proper use of public land. This is not China, Russia or North Korea.”

Wildlife sanctuaries have nothing to do with the president.

The 128-acre Charles O. Trump Wildlife Refuge is named for Ohio farmer and philanthropist Charles O. Trump, who donated the land in 1996, according to the Ohio Department of Natural Resources. Charles had no relationship with the current president.

Despite the lack of connection, this is not the first time a naming proposal has faced backlash.

In 2020, the Ohio Department of Natural Resources website briefly listed the area as a “Trump Wildlife Habitat Hunting Preserve.” The name and misspelling drew attention, but a spokesperson clarified that the site was named after the person who donated the land, not President Trump.

The state has no plans to retire long-standing names.

Carina Chan, a spokeswoman for the Ohio Department of Natural Resources, told the Columbus Dispatch that the department has no plans to remove “Charles O.” From signs and materials of protected areas. “Charles O. Trump Wildlife Refuge” and “Trump Wildlife Refuge” can be used interchangeably.

When asked about his involvement in the alias, Ohio Governor Mike DeWine said he did not start it.

“As far as I’m concerned, I think all of the original names should and will be retained. All of them will be retained,” DeWine told reporters on April 13. This type of rule change is not something the governor typically involves.

The next step for the alternative name is for the Ohio Wildlife Council to vote on the proposal on April 29. If approved, the rule would go into effect on June 30th.

Greta Cross is USA TODAY’s national trends reporter. Story ideas? Email her at gcross@usatoday.com.

Ohio government reporter Jesse Balmert can be reached at jbalmert@usatodayco.com or @jbalmert on X..

Hundreds of activists attack Ridge Run Farm and try to take away beagles

0


Dane County Sheriff Calvin Barrett said 300 to 400 people were “attempting to violently enter” the Ridge Run Farms facility.

play

On April 18, hundreds of animal activists stormed a beagle breeding facility in Wisconsin, hoping to take the dogs on a “rescue” mission, quickly moving forward with an attack they had planned for the next day.

Dane County Sheriff Calvin Barrett said in a social media update that as of approximately 11:30 a.m. local time, 300 to 400 people were “attempting to violently enter” the Ridge Run Farms facility in Blue Mounds, Wisconsin, and “assault” deputies at the scene.

The action was originally planned for the morning of April 19, as the facility has been embroiled in animal abuse allegations, which the facility adamantly denies. In March, 27 people were arrested in a similar operation and more than 20 dogs were taken from a facility breeding dogs for sale for scientific research.

“This is the right time and we are seizing the moment,” organizers said in a blog post on the morning of April 18.

Barrett said the activists had ladders and entry tools to break through the fence, and Ridge Run Farms had recently beefed up security around the facility with hay bales, a moat and additional fencing, according to photos shared by the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, part of the USA TODAY Network.

Organizers previously said they planned to use any peaceful means necessary to enter the facility and remove an estimated 2,000 or more dogs. Participants were prohibited from bringing any weapons, including pepper spray, and risked arrest and felony charges.

“The concept behind public rescues is that we have a legal and moral obligation to protect these animals when no one else takes action,” Lisa Castagnozzi, a Milwaukee animal advocate who leads the effort’s support team, previously told the Journal Sentinel.

What’s going on at Ridge Run Farms?

Video posted on social media showed a chaotic scene with hundreds of people gathering outside the fenced facility, climbing hay bales and fences, and sheriff’s deputies wearing gas masks firing tear gas as some activists were helped from the ground.

Ridge Run Farms told the Journal that Sentinel activists began storming the property around 9 a.m. Saturday.

Mr Ridgran said he was arrested around 10 a.m. after an activist driving a pickup truck crashed through a gate and sped through the grounds, nearly hitting police, security guards and bystanders.

A Ridge Run spokesperson said no dogs had been removed from the facility as of 2 p.m. April 18. Most of the people who tried to break in had left by about 2 p.m., Rigran said, but some remained on the road and the facility wasn’t sure if any would return.

Mr Barrett said activists were obstructing emergency services on the roads.

“I want to be clear that this is no longer a peaceful protest,” Barrett said.

Organizer Wayne Shun said on his Facebook page that the group tried to contribute to Ridgelan’s April 18 lawsuit alleging violent intimidation by armed security forces.

“At least 12 activists have been arrested,” Shun said in an April 18 social media post. According to updates on his account, he was also taken to jail.

Matt Johnson, spokesman for the Ridge Run Dog Rescue Coalition, said April 18 that organizers are in talks with Ridge Run to purchase the dogs. Johnson said anonymous donors will provide $1 million to release all 2,000 dogs at the facility.

The operation started a day early.

Ridge Run Rescue activists had previously said they wanted at least 2,000 volunteers to storm the facility on the morning of April 19 and remove all beagles from the premises. Barrett warned activists that law enforcement would be present at Ridge Run Farms to support their right to free speech, but that breaking the law would not be tolerated, calling the action a planned and “deliberate intrusion.”

“A critical line must be drawn between peacefully protesting and expressing dissent and violently entering a facility, damaging property or stealing private property,” Barrett said. “We want everyone who comes into our community from the outside to respect our laws and respect our values ​​here in Dane County.”

“Sometimes the only way to make change is to change yourself…If politicians won’t rescue the dogs, we will,” Shun said in a social media post earlier this week in response to the sheriff’s office.

What is Ridge Run Farm? Why is it controversial?

Ridge Run Farms is a state-licensed dog breeding operation located in Blue Mounds, Wisconsin, about 30 miles outside Madison. The company breeds and sells thousands of beagles to research institutes for medical and scientific research and has been in operation for nearly 60 years.

A special prosecutor appointed last year found that Ridgran violated veterinary standards after a former employee testified that he had been subjected to abuse, including performing eye surgeries on dogs without general anesthesia. Prosecutors determined that this act amounted to animal cruelty. Other allegations were not substantiated by prosecutors.

To avoid prosecution, the facility agreed to return its state breeding license by July 1 and end its practice of selling dogs to outside researchers, according to the special counsel’s report. The company can continue breeding dogs for its own internal research.

Ridge Run Farms states on its website that “no credible evidence of animal abuse, cruelty, mistreatment, or neglect at Ridge Run Farms has ever been submitted or substantiated.”

Are there any charges against animal activists?

More than a month after the March break-in, the Dane County Sheriff’s Office announced it has forwarded 70 criminal charges against 63 people to the local district attorney, who will decide whether to investigate. Charges range from theft and trespassing to conspiracy and criminal damage to property.

“When people start trespassing and breaking the law, we have to intervene,” Barrett previously said.

The District Attorney’s Office did not respond to requests for comment.

Trump signs executive order on psychedelics after receiving phone call from Joe Rogan

0

play

President Donald Trump signed an executive order accelerating research into psychedelics to treat veterans after receiving a call from podcast host Joe Rogan.

President Trump said Logan encouraged him to research how drugs can help veterans battling suicide and depression.

President Trump signed the executive order on April 18, telling reporters, “I am pleased to announce historic reforms that will dramatically accelerate access to new medical research and treatments based on psychedelics.”

“A lot of people called me, including the great Joe Rogan, and he said we have to do something about this, and I thought about it,” Trump said in the Oval Office, surrounded by Rogan and other advocates for drug use for veterans, including Robert O’Neill, the former Navy SEAL who claims to have killed Osama bin Laden.

An executive order signed by President Trump sets out to accelerate research into the drug, directing the Food and Drug Administration to expedite research into drugs containing the plant-based hallucinogen ibogaine. Each state would also pay $50 million to research the drug.

Logan said he became convinced of the usefulness of psychedelics when he was interviewed on a podcast by former Texas Gov. Rick Perry and Brian Hubbard, who heads the group Americans Defending Ibogaine.

“They told us how effective this drug was,” he said in a podcast interview, “and millions of people had the opportunity to hear their stories. It gave us the opportunity to hear the stories of different people who had life-changing experiences.”

There is growing scientific evidence that psychedelics have a positive impact on the mental state of military veterans, who face much higher suicide rates than the general population. President Trump referenced a 2024 study from Stanford University that showed ibogaine improved depression and anxiety in veterans with traumatic brain injuries.

Mr. Logan and Mr. O’Neal are also among the podcast personalities who have voiced criticism of President Trump’s war with Iran. After signing the executive order, Trump said hours earlier that Iran would not open the Strait of Hormuz and that “very good dialogue continues” with Iran, even though it has not publicly agreed to return to talks with the Trump administration.

Days before his appearance with President Trump, Mr. Rogan used an expletive to say on his podcast that all wars are “horrible.” “How is this still going on?” he said.

O’Neill also criticized the Iran war earlier this month. “I didn’t think that was a presidential act,” O’Neill said after President Trump threatened to destroy “an entire civilization” if Iran didn’t open the Strait of Hormuz.

O’Neal appeared on Piers Morgan’s Uncensored show on April 7 and said, “I know it’s very difficult to be around President Trump and communicate my disagreements.” “I know the guy and we had dinner together at the White House. But somebody should step up to something like this.”

“It’s far from possible to destroy an entire civilization.”

President Trump’s war with Iran has created a rift with his MAGA movement, which advocates “America first” and anti-interventionism. During his presidential campaign, President Trump said the Iraq war was a mistake and that the United States should not start another war in the Middle East.