The US Supreme Court raises restrictions on deportation to “third countries”
The U.S. Supreme Court cleared the road on Monday to resume deporting immigrants to their country without providing the opportunity to show the harm they may face, giving him another victory in his aggressive, massive deportation.
This article was written by the non-profit journalism publisher Capital & Main. It has been reissued here with permission.
Adam Christian, 51, has been fighting for a union contract at Red Rock Resort in Las Vegas since his late 30s. Meanwhile, Redlock resisted the Cooking Workers’ Union every turn, earning dozens of unfair labor violations, injunctions, and numerous orders to correct their actions. At one point, the worker arrived at work and found a complimentary steak served for dinner. Each person will receive a “voting number!” message.
“They showed they would fight to a bitter end,” said Christian, who has been a Red Rock server since 2006. But the fight had an independent institution similar to a court for union election, where workers like Christians could rely on the National Labor Relations Commission.
But the May 22nd move by the Supreme Court could signal the end of the NLRB’s independence, Labour leaders will turn the institution into an extension of the White House. They warn that President Donald Trump can use the board to reward his friends and punish his enemies.
“It’s time to go beyond the labor movement and ring the alarm bell,” said Jody Karemin, director of advocacy for the AFL-CIO of the National Federation of Unions, representing nearly 15 million workers across the country.
The Supreme Court paves the way of dismissal
On May 22, the Supreme Court suggested that it overturned decades of precedent and gave the president the power to fire members of the Labor Commission without any reason.
Members of agents’ bipartisan committees have traditionally pride themselves on making decisions based on interpretations of the law, without interference from the president. “It’s difficult for five members of the board to be enthusiastically defending our decision-making independence,” said Lauren McPherran, a member of the NLRB under Presidents Obama, Trump and Biden. “We didn’t talk about pending cases with the White House, and we never made a decision at anyone’s request from the administration.”
The first indication that agency independence was at stake came in January. On the 27th of that month, Trump fired Biden’s appointee, Gwyn Wilcox, who was not due to expire until 2028. Wilcox filed a lawsuit challenging the shooting and cycled between courts throughout the spring. The firing required three quorums to issue decisions and freezing all lawsuits sued by the agency’s top decision making body.
Trump follows Wilcox’s firing in a February executive order that combined executive control over independent institutions such as the National Labor Relations Commission. The order gives the President the power to decide how the NLRB interprets the law.
Also, all agent managers (probably members of the Labor Commission) should employ White House communications within the office and coordinate with the White House regularly. It also provides the Director of Management with new authority to manage the agency’s funds, allowing political appointees to decide which NLRB cases will receive full support and to which bureaucratic spheres they are struggling.
Then, on May 22, the Supreme Court maintained a lower court’s decision to restore Wilcox, explaining that they are likely to be on their side with Trump, but will not make a final decision until a full hearing occurs.
William Gould, professor emeritus at Stanford University who chaired the NLRB in the 1990s, said the agency’s calculations have changed as the president can directly influence decisions. “It means that whenever a decision the president dislikes, we can get rid of the man who gives them bad news,” he said. “That’s the opposite of independence.”
As NLRB independence decreases, employers like Red Rock can benefit. Station Casino, the parent company of Red Rock, is run by billionaire brothers Frank and Lorenzo Fertita near Trump, and has donated $1.85 million to the reelection campaign. (Christian from Red Rock Server said Trump shifted while he was eating at Red Rock.)
In fact, last October, Redlock filed his own case in U.S. District Court, attempting to give the president more power than the agency. The lawsuit targets the NLRB itself, and the board argued that it was unconstitutional because the president did not allow the free fire of board members and administrative law judges, as the company engaged in “proliferation and terrible misconduct.” The lawsuit reflects legal arguments made by companies including Amazon and SpaceX that face worker complaints.
Red Rock, Station Casino and NLRB declined to comment.
If the Supreme Court grants the NLRB control over Trump, AFL-CIO Kalemine said workers would be suffering. “This is an agency that workers have to go to and now it’s in full control of the president,” he said.
Copyright 2025 Capital & Main
