Trump administration asks the Supreme Court to allow a massive federal layoff

Date:


play

WASHINGTON – The Trump administration on June 2 asked the Supreme Court to carry out massive staffing and agency restructuring while the president’s powers to make such drastic changes without Congress are being challenged.

In filing the emergency, the Justice Department said the court should suspend the end of federal jobs for tens of thousands and lift the orders of federal judges closing many agencies and programs.

The DOJ said the judge’s order is based on “irrefutable premises” that require Congressional permission to make decisions on administrative staffing.

San Francisco US District Judge Susan Ilston has determined that unions, nonprofits and municipalities are likely to succeed, challenging the administration’s efforts to reduce and rebuild the federal government.

“After a dramatic staff cut, these agencies will not be able to do what Congress has directed them to,” she wrote in an order that would stop the massive layoffs and reorganizations of 22 federal agencies.

A three-judge panel on the San Francisco-based 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 2-1 on May 30th against the administration’s request to block Ilston’s order.

“The executive order that is questionable here is far greater than the president’s supervisory power under the Constitution,” Judge William Fletcher wrote in the opinion added by Judge Lucy Coe. He was deliberately appointed as the Democratic president.

Judge Consuelo Callahan, appointed by Republican President George W. Bush, opposed the administration’s likely to ultimately win the court battle, saying it was harmed by failing to carry out policies during that time.

The restructuring is at the heart of Elon Musk’s push for government efficiency to reduce the federal government and dramatically reduce spending.

Trump urged agencies to automate routine tasks, close local offices, and reduce the use of external contractors, while eliminating overlapping roles, unnecessary management layers and non-critical work.

Those challenging the change say it will hinder disaster relief programs, public health services, food safety testing and infection prevention.

The Supreme Court has asked challengers to meet Trump’s request by June 9th.



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Share post:

Subscribe

spot_imgspot_img

Popular

More like this
Related

On Father’s Day, this family finally has a reason to celebrate

Kim Humphrey's proudest moment as a father wasn't when...

How to claim a settlement of up to $5,000 from Avis Car Rental.

Eligibility for Dollar General Class Action Settlement ClaimConsumers may...

Most Americans plan to continue working after retirement. Very few people actually do that.

Why American retirees are returning to workA new study...

James Burroughs, co-creator of ‘Cheers’ and director of ‘Friends’, dies at 85

James Burrows, co-creator of "Cheers," has died at the...