Scotus: Mexico cannot sue US gunmen for cartel violence
The Supreme Court unanimously rejected Mexican attempts to retain the American gun company, which caused violence caused by drug cartels.
- During the 2024 campaign, President Donald Trump pledged loyal to gun rights groups and the Second Amendment Group.
- Trump’s Justice Department urged the Supreme Court to break down state laws that prohibit handguns from being brought into someone else’s property without the person’s consent.
- The department also refused to ask the Supreme Court to reverse the lower court’s ruling that federal age restrictions on handgun purchases are unconstitutional.
WASHINGTON – After the Supreme Court made it difficult for them to limit their ability to arm themselves in public places in 2022, some states have taken a different approach.
Five Democrat-led, largely populated states, have passed a law prohibiting handguns from someone else’s property without the person’s express consent.
Now, the Trump administration wants the Supreme Court to declare that rules in Hawaii, California, New York, Maryland and New Jersey are unconstitutional.
“The United States is very interested in preserving the right to maintain and endure weapons and in proper interpretation of the Second Amendment,” wrote Attorney General John Sauer in explaining why the Department of Justice wanted the High Court to put weight on.
That’s not the only example of how administrative changes are affecting lawsuits more than gun regulations.
The Department of Justice has stopped defending federal handgun rules
In a move to wary of groups working to prevent gun violence, the DOJ refused to continue defending federal law 21 as the minimum age to own a handgun after the appeals court ruled the restrictions unconstitutional.
“To say the government is backed down and say, ‘Hey, here’s a major part of the federal firearms law passed by Congress. We’re not going to worry about defending it anymore. That’s really, really important.”
The DOJ also told the Supreme Court that the federal government no longer opposes all aspects of Missouri’s law — blocked by a lower court after the Biden administration and others challenged it — would be punished by state police for enforcing federal gun control laws.
“This is the first time I’ve seen the Justice Department really fight aggressively for the second amendment of all Americans,” said Hannah Hill, vice president of the National Gun Rights Foundation.
Hill said it was going on longer than she wanted her to stand up, and her group was eager to see President Donald Trump abolish federal regulations — including the unwieldy “ghost gun” rules the Supreme Court upheld in March.
“But you’re watching the slow pivot of a huge ship that’s back towards the Constitution,” she said. “And I’m very encouraged by the orbit.”
Trump: “No one will put a finger on your firearm.”
In his 2024 campaign, to deal with thousands of members of Pennsylvania’s National Rifle Association, Trump promised that if voters return him to the White House, “no one will put a finger on your firearm.”
“Your second amendment will always be safe with me as your president,” Trump said.
Soon after taking office, Trump signed an executive order directing a review of the Biden-era firearms policy and the position the government took in gun-related lawsuits.
After the court created a new test of the gun law in its 2022 decision, the legal challenges to firearm regulations have removed New York laws requiring state residents to have “appropriate causes” to carry handguns.
The court said gun rules must be similar to historical regulations on weapons to pass constitutional convened.
Lower Courts have been split beyond the age limit for handguns
The administration changed its hands in January, so it will be based in New Orleans 5.th The U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said that federal law decades ago banning the purchase of handguns between the ages of 18 and 20 failed its test.
“The history of firearm use, particularly in relation to militia service, is contradictory to the premise that children ages 18 to 20 years old are not covered by the obvious text of the Second Amendment,” U.S. Circuit Judge Edith Jones wrote to the court.
In July, the DOJ told a lower court that the government had no intention of appealing the decision to the Supreme Court.
However, the High Court may still take on this issue.
Based in Richmond in June 4th The US Circuit Court of Appeals has concluded that 5 is againstth circuits, dominance over similar challenges.
“From the English common law to the establishment of the United States, our tradition of regulation allows restrictions on the sale of firearms to individuals under the age of 21,” U.S. Circuit J. Harvey Wilkinson III wrote to the court.
Four people, ages 18-20, who challenged the age limit, appealed their decision to the Supreme Court.
DOJ has not submitted its response yet.
Discussions over the right to carry guns in public
With a brief support of a challenge to Hawaiian law, it prohibits banning the carrying of handguns to someone else’s property without consent, the government said the rules “effectively invalidate” the general right to carry public guns that the court upheld in 2022.
“People who have firearms in self-defense cannot carry out errands without fear of criminal sanctions,” Sauer told the court.
Sanchez-Gomez, litigation director at Giffords Law Center, said property owners have the ability to limit weapons at all times. However, Hawaii’s law states the default that handguns are not permitted unless expressly prohibited unless explicitly permitted.
When the court restricted control over who could carry guns publicly, she said, the focus shifted to a place where they could bring them in public.
Alex McCourt, assistant professor at the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Violence Solutions, said the Supreme Court could file such a case to appeal the Trump administration wanted them, but because the court rejected another court of appeal while the court upheld Hawaii’s rules.
“The fact that we have these different opinions across the country is probably even heavier in the minds of the Supreme Court,” he said.
Still, McCourt said it is relatively rare for the High Court to consider gun laws.
“They often say no,” he said.
The Department of Justice supports the challenge to ban AR-15
In June, the judge refused to hear about Maryland’s challenge to ban assault-style weapons, but Judge Brett Kavanaugh said he expected his colleagues to “will soon deal with AR-15 in the next semester.”
A few days later, the Department of Justice urged Chicago-based 7th The U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is a court of appeals that will break similar laws in Illinois.
“This law completely bans the categories of firearms commonly used by law-abiding citizens on legal grounds, so it is completely unconstitutional,” a lawyer for the DOJ wrote in a brief legal brief supporting the challenge.
The Firearms Policy Coalition, one of the groups fighting Illinois law, called the DOJ submitted key steps to fulfill his promise to defend the Second Amendment.
“We hope that General Sawer will stand with us on this issue on the Supreme Court,” Union President Brandon Combs said in a statement that “when this case is inevitably lifting his head.”
