play

A judge in the sex crimes trial for Sean “Diddy” Combs officially kicked out controversial ju Assembly No. 6.

Judge Arun Subramanian dismissed the ju judge on Monday, June 16th for what the prosecutor described as the man’s “lack of candidity” about his living situation.

Subramanian previously said there were “some contradictions” surrounding details about where the ju apprentice lives and where he lives. The judge explained that the reason for his removal was based on multiple interviews with ju judges.

The judge told the court that, in one instance, the ju apprentice had an off-hand conversation with members of the ju apprentice department. A few weeks ago, in an interview with Ju-Actor, the Ju-Actor said he lived in the Bronx with his fiancé and young daughter. However, when asked in another interview where he lived, the ju umpire said he had an apartment in New York and stayed 4-5 nights a week when he worked and was on the ju umpire duties. And in yet another interview, “He showed that he lived in New York with his aunt.”

“The ju umpire cannot answer simple questions,” Subramanian said on June 13, adding that “there are serious questions about the ju umpire’s candidness and ability to follow instructions.”

Subramanian added that “it looks like a trivial issue,” but he added that “serves the basic standards of the ju apprentice.” Due to the “change in answers and contradictions” of the ju judge, Subramanian said he would raise questions as to whether the ju judge is true in other questions directly related to the case.

Combs’ lawyers opposed the fire and argued for the prosecution’s promotion that a black man who was a ju judge had demonstrated racial bias.

In an opposition letter dated June 15, his lawyer said there was “de facto no basis” to remove the man, and that combs would be “substantially biased” by the firing of Ju Judge No. 6. They pointed out that if the ju apprentice is removed, they will again move for tort.

After the ju apprentice is fired, alternative ju apprentices usually take their place. Six alternatives have been on the sidelines at the trial, but it is now in its seventh week, but the alternative has not been formally announced by the judge.

Contributions: Kimmi Robinson, Jay Sharl, Taiwan Muan



Source link

By US-NEA

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *